Oct 26, 2008 · Subversion makes no effort to be a good tool. It maintains a central history; that's it. It's slow, it uses a lot of disk space, the UI is ...
Oct 7, 2022 · I see SVN as uninteresting, and very limited. It's just a bucket to dump things into. It's capabilities are a subset of git's.
People also ask
Why is SVN so bad?
Does anybody still use SVN?
What are the disadvantages of SVN?
Why is GitHub better than SVN?
Therefore, committing code in Subversion effectively means one thing: you risk to introduce bugs and/or conflicts into your team's common codebase. This should ...
Oct 26, 2012 · It's because svn lacked the proper data structures to accurately determine the latest common ancestor of the two branches.
Dec 11, 2008 · Subversion isn't even better than CVS across the board: it's slower, wastes a lot of space, is way less stable, and doesn't have independent ...
Aug 3, 2008 · I think Subversion is better than Git (at least for the projects I work on), mainly due to its usability, and simpler workflow.
Subversion does not support atomic checkout. You can get errors during a commit or update and wind up with a database or local machine in an inconsistent state.
SVN has been around for longer, some companies are used to it and don't want to switch when SVN already works. Migration would usually require a lot of ...
Mar 15, 2011 · It feels a whole lot like SVN, except that basic stuff like checkin and checkout are more complicated (requires two steps instead of one). In ...
Oct 26, 2008 · The primary problem with Subversion is the centralized repository. This manifests itself in several ways. Firstly, you must have operations ...
