Selected papers~ SPECIAL EDITION - Index of
Selected papers~ SPECIAL EDITION - Index of
Selected papers~ SPECIAL EDITION - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH,<br />
YOUTH AND SPORTS<br />
THE ANNALS OF THE<br />
UNIVERSITY OF ORADEA<br />
ECONOMIC SCIENCES<br />
TOM XX<br />
1 st ISSUE / JULY 2011<br />
~<strong>Selected</strong> <strong>papers~</strong><br />
<strong>SPECIAL</strong> <strong>EDITION</strong> - “20 YEARS OF ACADEMIC<br />
ECONOMIC EDUCATION IN ORADEA”<br />
ISSN 1222-569X (printed format)<br />
ISSN 1582-5450 (electronic format)
The publication <strong>of</strong> the papers in the Journal - THE ANNALS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ORADEA.<br />
ECONOMIC SCIENCES - Tom XX, 2011, ISSN 1582-5450 (electronic format), ISSN 1222-569X<br />
(printed format), a journal couted by the National Authority as B+ CNCSIS - Romania, RePEc, EBSCO,<br />
DOAJ, CABELL’S DIRECTORY OF PUBLISHING OPPORTUNITIES indexed and respectively on the<br />
site <strong>of</strong> the journal: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro, with open access, is a result <strong>of</strong> a peer review<br />
evaluation process. The papers published in this volume are exclusivily engaging authors.<br />
Editorial Board<br />
Chief Editor:<br />
Dr. Anca DODESCU, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Associate Editors:<br />
Dr. Ioana POP-COHUŢ, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Dr. Adriana GIURGIU, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Members:<br />
Academician, Mircea Maliţa, Member <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy, Romania, Dr. H.C. <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />
Dr. Gheorghe Zaman, Corresponding Member <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy, Romania, Dr. H.C. <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong><br />
Oradea;<br />
Dr.Ahmet Aktas, University <strong>of</strong> Akdeniz, Alanya, Turkey;<br />
Dr.Mihaela Belu, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />
Dr. Gordon Biggs, Moray College UHI Millennium Institute, Scotland, Great Britain;<br />
Dr. Luminita Chivu, The Romanian Academy, Romania;<br />
Dr. José Cifuentes – Honrubia, University <strong>of</strong> Alicante, Spain;<br />
Dr.Mircea Ciumara, The Romanian Academy, Romania;<br />
Dr.Constantin Ciutacu, The Romanian Academy, Romania;<br />
Dr. Marin Dinu, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />
Dr.Xavier Galiegue, University <strong>of</strong> Orleans, France;<br />
Dr. Valeriu Ioan-Franc, The Romanian Academy, Romania;<br />
Dr. Zoran Ivanović, University <strong>of</strong> Rijeka, Croatia;<br />
Dr.Kormos Janos, University <strong>of</strong> Debrecen, Hungary;<br />
Dr.Eszter Lang, University <strong>of</strong> Debrecen, Hungary;<br />
Dr. Nicola Mattoscio, “G. D’Annunzio” University <strong>of</strong> Chieti, Pescara, Italy;<br />
Dr. Piero Mella, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, Italy;<br />
Miguel Angel Moreno San Juan, The Leadership Institute, Arlington, USA;<br />
Dr. Guido Montani, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, Italy;<br />
Dr. András Nábrádi, University <strong>of</strong> Debrecen, Hungary;<br />
Dr. Giuseppe Paolone, “G. D’Annunzio” University <strong>of</strong> Chieti, Pescara, Italy;<br />
Dr. Nicolae Pop, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania, Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />
Dr. Ioan Popa, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania ;<br />
Dr. Wiktor Pozniak, College <strong>of</strong> Europe, Poland;<br />
Egidio Rangone, ”G. D’Annunzio” University <strong>of</strong> Chieti, Pescara, Italy;<br />
Dr. Jean-Emmanuel Tyvaert, University <strong>of</strong> Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France;<br />
Dr. Adriana Tomescu, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Dr. Valentina Vasile, The Romanian Academy, Romania.<br />
Responsible for the English version: Dr. Mirabela Pop, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania.<br />
Honorary Committee:<br />
Academician, Mircea Maliţa, Member <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy, Romania – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />
His Excellency, Jonathan Scheele – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />
Dr. Aurel Negucioiu – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />
Dr. Gheorghe Gh. Ionescu – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />
Aldo Poli – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />
Franco Antiga - Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />
Dr. Constantin Roşca – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />
Dr. Gheorghe Olah – University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />
Dr. Gheorghe Zaman, Coresponding Member <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy, Romania – Dr. H.C. <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong><br />
Oradea.
Scientific Committee:<br />
Dr. Băbăiţă Carmen, West University, Timişoara, Romania;<br />
Dr. Bătrâncea Ioan, “Babeş – Bolyai” University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;<br />
Dr. Liviu Begu, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />
Dr. Nicolae Bibu, West University, Timişoara, Romania;<br />
Dr. Rodica Boier, “Gh. Asachi” Technical University, Iaşi, Romania;<br />
Dr. Sorin Briciu, “1 Decembrie 1918″ University, Alba Iulia, Romania;<br />
Dr. Cristiana Cristureanu, “Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian University, Bucharest, Romania;<br />
Dr. Marin Dinu, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />
Dr. Liliana Feleaga, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />
Dr. Niculae Feleaga, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />
Dr. Emilian M. Dobrescu, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania;<br />
Dr. Nicoleta Farcane, West University, Timişoara, Romania;<br />
Dr. Xavier Galiegue, University <strong>of</strong> Orleans, France;<br />
Dr. Elena Hlaciuc, “Ştefan cel Mare” University, Suceava, Romania;<br />
Dr. Tatiana Moşteanu, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania - Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />
Dr. Marin Opriţescu, University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Romania;<br />
Dr. Nicolae Al. Pop , The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />
Dr. Ion Popa, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />
Dr. Gheorghe Popescu, “Babes-Bolyai” University, Cluj Napoca, Romania;<br />
Dr. Gabriela Prelipcean, “Ştefan cel Mare” University, Suceava;<br />
Dr. Petru Prunea, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Dr. Gabriela Stănciulescu, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />
Dr. Ovidiu Rujan, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />
Dr. Ioan Talpos, West University, Timişoara, Romania;<br />
Dr. Adriana Tiron Tudor, “Babeş – Bolyai” University, Cluj Napoca, Romania<br />
Dr. Jean-Emmanuel Tyvaert, University <strong>of</strong> Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France;<br />
Dr. Constantin Tulai, “Babeş-Bolyai” University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;<br />
Dr. Ioan Trenca, “Babeş-Bolyai” University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;<br />
Dr. Gordon T. Biggs, Moray College, Scotland, Great Britain;<br />
Dr. Maria Madela Abrudan, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Dr. Olimpia Ban, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Dr. Alina Bădulescu, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Dr. Mihai Berinde, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Dr. Elena Botezat, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Dr. Nicoleta Bugnar, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Dr. Gheorghe Ţară, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Dr. Naiana Ţarcă, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />
Dr. Daniela Zăpodeanu, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania.<br />
Edition prepared by:<br />
Associate editor – Dr. Ioana POP COHUŢ<br />
Ec. Cătălin ZMOLE
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
DISERTATION AT ACADEMIC CEREMONY OF AWARDING THE UNIVERSITY<br />
OF ORADEA HONOR DEGREE OF DOCTOR HONORIS CAUSA TO PROFESSOR<br />
DR. GHEORGHE ZAMAN, CORRESPONDENT MEMBER OF THE ROMANIAN<br />
ACADEMY, ON MAY 27, 2011 ................................................................................................ 9<br />
CHALLENGES, VULNERABILITIES AND WAYS OF APPROACH IN<br />
ROMANIA'S EXTERNAL DEBT SUSTAINABILITY ............................................... 11<br />
Zaman Gheorghe .......................................................................................................... 11<br />
PLENARY SESSION ............................................................................................................... 45<br />
EXPERIENCES AND TENDENCIES OF DECENTRALIZATION AT REGIONAL<br />
LEVEL IN THE EUROPEAN UNION ........................................................................... 47<br />
Dodescu Anca ............................................................................................................... 47<br />
A NEW THINKING FOR A NEW WORLD. REPRESENTATIONS FROM<br />
ECONOMY ....................................................................................................................... 63<br />
Negucioiu Aurel ............................................................................................................ 63<br />
CONTINUING INTERNATIONAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION IN THE<br />
FINANCIAL CRISIS CONTEXT ................................................................................... 85<br />
Berinde Mihai ............................................................................................................... 85<br />
EUROPEAN AUSTERITY WITHOUT GROWTH? EUROPEAN GROWTH<br />
WITHOUT EUROPEAN DEMOCRACY?HOW EUROPEAN CITIZENS CAN<br />
REVIVE THE EUROPEAN PROJECT AND DEFEAT EUROSCEPTICISM ......... 91<br />
Montani Guido .............................................................................................................. 91<br />
ACCOUNTING FOR SUSTAINABILITY: WHAT NEXT? A RESEARCH<br />
AGENDA ........................................................................................................................... 97<br />
Cunningham M. Gary ................................................................................................... 97<br />
Arne Fagerström ........................................................................................................... 97<br />
Lars G. Hassel .............................................................................................................. 97<br />
LE DYNAMISME DES TPE ET PME ET L'ÉVOLUTION DE L'ÉCONOMIE<br />
ROUMAINE .................................................................................................................... 113<br />
Jubénot Marie-Noëlle ................................................................................................. 113<br />
A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH REGARDING THE MARKETING<br />
COMMUNICATION TOOLS USED IN THE ONLINE ENVIRONMENT ............ 119<br />
Pop Nicolae Alexandru ............................................................................................... 119<br />
Acatrinei Carmen........................................................................................................ 119<br />
SECTION INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION: ......... 127<br />
SUB-SECTION: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS............................................................... 127<br />
THE IMPACT OF THE CRISIS ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE AND SOLUTIONS<br />
TO REDUCE THE CRISIS EFFECTS. CASE STUDY: ROMANIA ....................... 129<br />
Meşter Liana ............................................................................................................... 129<br />
Bugnar Nicoleta .......................................................................................................... 129<br />
Fora Andreea .............................................................................................................. 129<br />
5
SECTION: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION ......... 135<br />
SUB-SECTION: EU SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND<br />
COMPETITIVENESS ........................................................................................................... 135<br />
POVERTY AND LIVING. ROMA POOR NEIGHBORHOODS IN ROMANIA AND<br />
HUNGARY ...................................................................................................................... 137<br />
Olah Gheorghe ........................................................................................................... 137<br />
Olah Șerban ................................................................................................................ 137<br />
Flora Gavril ................................................................................................................ 137<br />
Szekedi Levente ........................................................................................................... 137<br />
UTILISATION OF BENCHMARKING TECHNIQUES FOR FUNDAMENTING<br />
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES IN THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN<br />
ROMANIA ....................................................................................................................... 185<br />
Rujan Ovidiu ............................................................................................................... 185<br />
Ţarţavulea Ramona Iulia ............................................................................................ 185<br />
Vasilescu Felician ....................................................................................................... 185<br />
Geambaşu Cristina Venera ......................................................................................... 185<br />
SECTION ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION ................................... 191<br />
SUB-SECTION: BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION ............................................................ 191<br />
THE BRAND EQUITY OF TOURISTIC DESTINATIONS – THE MEANING OF<br />
THE VALUE ................................................................................................................... 193<br />
Ban Olimpia ................................................................................................................ 193<br />
Popa Luminiţa ............................................................................................................ 193<br />
Silaghi Simona ............................................................................................................ 193<br />
THE TOURISM BARRIERS OF THE DISABLED IN ROMANIA ......................... 201<br />
Băbăiță Carmen Mihaela ........................................................................................... 201<br />
Nagy Andrea ............................................................................................................... 201<br />
Filep Adrian Viorel ..................................................................................................... 201<br />
START-UP FINANCING SOURCES: DOES GENDER MATTER? SOME<br />
EVIDENCE FOR EU AND ROMANIA ....................................................................... 207<br />
Bădulescu Alina .......................................................................................................... 207<br />
SUB-SECTION: ECONOMICS ............................................................................................ 215<br />
COMPETITIVENESS - GROWTH FACTOR. POINT OF VIEW ON THE<br />
SITUATION IN ROMANIA .......................................................................................... 217<br />
Cismaș Laura.............................................................................................................. 217<br />
Bucur Oana Nicoleta .................................................................................................. 217<br />
Pitorac Ruxandra Ioana ............................................................................................. 217<br />
DYNAMICS ECONOMIC DISPARITIES IN NORTH-WEST REGION OF<br />
ROMANIA ....................................................................................................................... 223<br />
Florea Adrian ............................................................................................................. 223<br />
ABOUT OTHER KIND OF PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH (HOMO-SAPIENS<br />
TO HOMO-OECONOMICUS) ..................................................................................... 229<br />
Jivan Alexandru .......................................................................................................... 229<br />
THE POTENTIAL OF FEMALE ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS A REGIONAL<br />
GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT ENGINE IN THE WESTERN ROMANIA ..... 237<br />
Pop Cohuț Ioana ......................................................................................................... 237
TOURISM'S CHANGING FACE: NEW AGE TOURISM VERSUS OLD<br />
TOURISM ........................................................................................................................ 245<br />
Stănciulescu Gabriela Cecilia .................................................................................... 245<br />
Molnar Elisabeta ........................................................................................................ 245<br />
Bunghez Magdalena ................................................................................................... 245<br />
YOUTH LABOUR MARKET. MOBILITY, CAREER DEVELOPMENT,<br />
INCOMES. CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES .............................................. 251<br />
Vasile Valentina .......................................................................................................... 251<br />
Vasile Liviu ................................................................................................................. 251<br />
SECTION FINANCE, BANKING AND ACCOUNTING .................................................. 265<br />
SUB-SECTION: FINANCES ................................................................................................ 265<br />
THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE PUBLIC DEFICIT<br />
OF THE EU COUNTRIES ............................................................................................ 267<br />
Bǎtrâncea Ioan ........................................................................................................... 267<br />
Bǎtrâncea Maria ......................................................................................................... 267<br />
Nichita Ramona-Anca ................................................................................................. 267<br />
SUBSECTION: ACCOUNTING .......................................................................................... 273<br />
INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE IN THE ANNUAL<br />
REPORTS OF ROMANIAN MANUFACTURING LISTED COMPANIES –<br />
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................ 275<br />
Bogdan Victoria .......................................................................................................... 275<br />
Balint Platon Judit ...................................................................................................... 275<br />
Farcaş Mariana .......................................................................................................... 275<br />
PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES ON FISCAL ...................................................... 285<br />
Morar Ioan – Dan ....................................................................................................... 285<br />
IFRS COMPLIANCE REGARDING INFORMATION DISCLOSED BY<br />
COMPANIES IN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CASE STUDY<br />
ON IAS 23 BORROWING COSTS APPLICABILITY .............................................. 289<br />
Tiron-Tudor Adriana .................................................................................................. 289<br />
Fekete-Pali-Pista Szilveszter ...................................................................................... 289<br />
Dragu Ioana-Maria .................................................................................................... 289<br />
SUBSECTION: BANKING ................................................................................................... 297<br />
MODELING ROMANIAN EXCHANGE RATE EVOLUTION WITH GARCH,<br />
TGARCH, GARCH- IN MEAN MODELS .................................................................. 299<br />
Trenca Ioan ................................................................................................................. 299<br />
Cociuba Mihail Ioan ................................................................................................... 299<br />
MONEY: FROM STATISTICAL DEFINITION TO MONETARY POLICY FOR<br />
ADOPTING EURO. ........................................................................................................ 307<br />
Zăpodeanu Daniela .................................................................................................... 307<br />
SECTION MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING ............................................................. 313<br />
SUB-SECTION: ECONOMIC INFORMATICS ................................................................ 313<br />
TOOLS USED IN DECISION MAKING ..................................................................... 315<br />
Demian Horia ............................................................................................................. 315<br />
Bernabeu Elena Perez ................................................................................................ 315<br />
Abrudan Maria Madela .............................................................................................. 315
SUB-SECTION: MARKETING ........................................................................................... 321<br />
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THE<br />
CASE OF ROMANIA. CONCEPT AND MANAGEMENT. ..................................... 323<br />
Bibu Nicolae ............................................................................................................... 323<br />
Lisetchi Mihai ............................................................................................................. 323<br />
SUB-SECTION: MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................... 331<br />
ORGANIZATIONAL STRESS AND ITS IMPACT ON WORK PERFORMANCE333<br />
Bucurean Mirela ......................................................................................................... 333<br />
Costin Mădălina-Adriana ........................................................................................... 333<br />
ELEMENTS FOR A MODEL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL SCHOOL FOR WOMEN<br />
IN RURAL AREAS OF ROMANIA ............................................................................. 339<br />
Botezat Elena .............................................................................................................. 339<br />
Tarcza Teodora ........................................................................................................... 339<br />
HOW FUTURE MANAGERS VIEW SOCIETAL CULTURE: A CROSS-<br />
COUNTRY COMPARISON .......................................................................................... 347<br />
Catana Gheorghe Alexandru ...................................................................................... 347<br />
Catana Doina ............................................................................................................. 347<br />
EXPLANATORY ECONOMETRIC METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THE<br />
BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA - GUIDE<br />
FOR DEVELOPING THE PILOT STUDY ................................................................. 353<br />
Roşca Constantin ........................................................................................................ 353<br />
THE NEED FOR PUBLIC DEBT MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF<br />
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION ............... 365<br />
Marcu Nicu ................................................................................................................. 365<br />
Meghișan Mădălina Georgeta .................................................................................... 365<br />
IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES IN THE LESS FAVOURED<br />
AREAS OF ROMANIA .................................................................................................. 375<br />
Tileagă Cosmin ........................................................................................................... 375<br />
Cosmescu Ioan ............................................................................................................ 375
Disertation at Academic Ceremony <strong>of</strong> Awarding<br />
the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Honor Degree <strong>of</strong> Doctor Honoris<br />
Causa to Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Dr. Gheorghe Zaman,<br />
Correspondent Member <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy,<br />
on May 27, 2011
CHALLENGES, VULNERABILITIES AND WAYS OF APPROACH IN<br />
ROMANIA'S EXTERNAL DEBT SUSTAINABILITY<br />
Zaman Gheorghe<br />
Correspondent Member <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy<br />
Introduction<br />
The notion <strong>of</strong> a country's external debt, measured by a complex system <strong>of</strong> static and dynamic indicators,<br />
knows a lot <strong>of</strong> approaches and opinions in the literature, more or less convergent, complementary and<br />
advanced in terms <strong>of</strong> factors.<br />
Indicators <strong>of</strong> the external public and private debt on short, medium and long term provide a snapshot <strong>of</strong><br />
indebtedness <strong>of</strong> the country and are the most researched domain in the literature, including national and<br />
international financial bodies, which adopt a series <strong>of</strong> classification criteria <strong>of</strong> countries in terms <strong>of</strong> size<br />
and dynamics <strong>of</strong> external debt.<br />
In this study, we intend to make an analysis <strong>of</strong> the volume, dynamics and structure <strong>of</strong> the current<br />
Romania's foreign debt, showing the challenges for national economic policies, present and perspective,<br />
the internal and external vulnerabilities and ways <strong>of</strong> approaching the external debt sustainability.<br />
According to the definition given by UNCTAD, a sustainable foreign debt is that level <strong>of</strong> debt which:<br />
� allows the indebted country to pay all current and future debt service without resorting to<br />
restructuring or rescheduling;<br />
� prevents accumulation <strong>of</strong> arrears and defaults;<br />
� in parallel provides an acceptable level <strong>of</strong> growth in the lending country.<br />
Until recently, Romania was considered a country with a low external debt. Currently, the situation has<br />
changed, meaning that this debt, somewhat neglected in the early transition period 1 has become a serious<br />
threat to present and future sustainability <strong>of</strong> economic development in Romania.<br />
In general, external debt concerns financial and economic interests <strong>of</strong> all parties especially creditors and<br />
debtors, by the formula "win-win", so that, currently, some countries have surplus <strong>of</strong> balance <strong>of</strong><br />
payments, usually the most developed and economically healthy, while others have deficits that, in<br />
extreme situations, can lead to inability to pay the debt, which means tough measures and policies,<br />
especially for the living standards <strong>of</strong> many generations <strong>of</strong> taxpayers.<br />
Chapter 1. Features <strong>of</strong> the volume, structure and dynamics <strong>of</strong> Romania's foreign debt<br />
Romanian cooperation with international financial institutions is not recent. If we don’t<br />
consider the period before 1990, we can say that the period from 1991 to 2011 saw some standby<br />
arrangement with the IMF which Romania has made for various reasons, the latter regarding<br />
the impact <strong>of</strong> international economic and financial crisis which manifested itself in Romania<br />
stronger and longer than in most <strong>of</strong> the developed EU countries and in some new EU member<br />
states.<br />
During 2005-2010, total external debt <strong>of</strong> Romania increased from 38.511 billion USD to<br />
120,436 billion, representing a proportion <strong>of</strong> 75%. In other words, there was an increase <strong>of</strong><br />
about 3.12 times, this representing the macroeconomic indicator with the highest dynamic the<br />
result <strong>of</strong> which was to record an absolute record, unprecedented in the economic history <strong>of</strong> the<br />
country, in terms <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the indicator, and its dynamics under the circumstances in<br />
which the level <strong>of</strong> the country’s economic and social development <strong>of</strong> 1989 was reached in<br />
2003-2004, while the GDP growth was only 138.1% during 2002-2009, which leads us to<br />
believe that the elasticity <strong>of</strong> GDP to external debt was very low.<br />
1 Several studies have shown the need to pay attention to Romania's foreign debt even since the early years <strong>of</strong><br />
transition (see Gh.Zaman, 1993, Datoria externă obsesia de care nu scăpăm (External debt- the obsession we<br />
cannot escape from), Capitalul (The Capital), June 26, pg.3).<br />
11
Table no.1.1 Total external debt <strong>of</strong> Romania in 2005-2010 1<br />
12<br />
billion U.S.D.<br />
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2010/<br />
2005 %<br />
In billions <strong>of</strong> U.S. dollars<br />
Total external debt <strong>of</strong> which: 38,5 51,7 80,2 105,7 111,8 120,4 313<br />
Public 14,1 13,4 14,4 16,4 27,8 37,3 265<br />
Loans 6,2 6,0 6,4 7,9 19,7 28,7 462<br />
Multilateral 6,1 5,9 6,3 7,8 19,6 28,7 470<br />
Bilateral 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,07 0,08 80<br />
Bonds 3,3 3,2 3,3 3,9 3,9 3,8 115<br />
Others 2<br />
4,5 4,2 4,6 4,5 4,2 4,7 104<br />
Private 23,3 37,0 64,8 88,95 83,8 82,9 356<br />
Short term 7,8 15,8 26,8 29,9 19,3 22,9 294<br />
Long term 15,6 21,3 38 59,2 64,5 60,1 385<br />
as a percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
Total external debt <strong>of</strong> which: 38,8 42,1 47,0 51,4 68,3 74,9 193<br />
Public 14,2 10,9 8,4 8,0 17,0 23,2 163<br />
Loans 6,2 4,9 3,7 3,9 12,0 17,9 289<br />
Multilateral 6,1 4,8 3,7 3,8 12,0 17,8 292<br />
Bilateral 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,0 0,1 100<br />
Bonds 3,3 2,6 2,0 1,9 2,4 2,4 73<br />
Others 2<br />
4,6 3,4 2,7 2,2 2,6 2,9 63<br />
Private 23,5 30,1 38,0 49,3 51,2 51,6 219<br />
Short term 7,8 12,8 15,7 14,5 11,8 14,2 182<br />
Long term 15,7 17,3 22,3 28,8 39,4 37,4 238<br />
1) End <strong>of</strong> year unless otherwise specified, 2) Include private bank debt and other public debt.<br />
Source: NBR, IMF data and own calculations.<br />
Figure no. 1. Institutional structure <strong>of</strong> the total external debt by type <strong>of</strong> institutions in 2010
Data in Table no. 1.1 and Figure no.1<br />
suggest some features <strong>of</strong> Romania's foreign<br />
debt, which can lead to some real challenges<br />
for present and future national economy,<br />
namely:<br />
- the highest dynamics <strong>of</strong> external debt over<br />
the period 2005-2010 beyond the average <strong>of</strong><br />
313% for total foreign debt, there have been<br />
public multilateral loans, mainly due to big<br />
increases in 2008-2010, because <strong>of</strong> the crisis,<br />
followed by long-term private debt, which,<br />
unlike the public debt, after especially large<br />
increases in 2005-2008, decreased in 2010,<br />
when private sector lending became more<br />
expensive and more restrictive;<br />
-in terms <strong>of</strong> weight in the total external debt it<br />
is by far due to private external debt <strong>of</strong> 68.8%<br />
<strong>of</strong> which 18.3% on short term and 49.9% on<br />
long term.<br />
As for the fact that private sector is the one<br />
with the highest level <strong>of</strong> external<br />
indebtedness we shall note that there have<br />
been opinions stating that the private<br />
economic agents are free to contract external<br />
debt, as much as they can or will. This view,<br />
for the whole <strong>of</strong> sustainable economic growth<br />
in Romania, is totally wrong because:<br />
- a part <strong>of</strong> public and private debt is<br />
guaranteed publicly so the state is to pay if<br />
the private firm enters into default, a situation<br />
that reflects unfavourably on all taxpayers;<br />
- even the private external debt, without<br />
public guarantee, is relevant for the state<br />
because private economic collapse in case <strong>of</strong><br />
default <strong>of</strong> debt payment, by the effects<br />
propagated (negative externalities), entails,<br />
directly or indirectly, negative repercussions<br />
on the national economy as a whole and not<br />
seldom does the state have to intervene, as<br />
was the case <strong>of</strong> the banks in difficulty in<br />
developed countries during the present crisis,<br />
when they received financial support from the<br />
state, investment injections, or were taken by<br />
the state on the ground that they were too<br />
large (important) to crack under the slogan<br />
“too big to fail”(!).<br />
This is therefore the first challenge in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> the relation between<br />
13<br />
public and private external debt that<br />
requires further examining, taking into<br />
account the quasi-symbiotic coexistence <strong>of</strong><br />
the two types <strong>of</strong> debt, and that neither the<br />
state nor the private firms can be indifferent<br />
to bankruptcy or insolvency, both <strong>of</strong> one<br />
and <strong>of</strong> the others, due to the acknowledged or<br />
disregarded, assumed or denied, relational<br />
context <strong>of</strong> the public-private, public-public<br />
and private-private partnerships. This<br />
challenge forces us to rather a rejection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
destructive competition, the market<br />
individualism, autarchy and selfishness<br />
promoted by some experts and to better<br />
cooperation and solidarity.<br />
Another conclusion that can be drawn from<br />
the effects <strong>of</strong> crisis and not only is that<br />
neither the private sector nor the public one<br />
are exempt from the developments <strong>of</strong> the<br />
"business cycle", <strong>of</strong> recessions and crises, no<br />
matter how much they would advocate one or<br />
the other. For this reason, the use <strong>of</strong> strategic<br />
positive sum games formula such as "winwin"<br />
seems to be the wisest solution.<br />
- The ratio <strong>of</strong> the total external debt to<br />
GDP gives us clues about the efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />
the use <strong>of</strong> potential resource representing<br />
external borrowing - expressed as magnitude<br />
<strong>of</strong> GDP (effect) <strong>of</strong> production that reflects<br />
one unit <strong>of</strong> effort, which in this case is<br />
foreign debt. In other words, a medium and<br />
long term growth <strong>of</strong> external debt, faster than<br />
<strong>of</strong> GDP, generates doubts about the efficiency<br />
<strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> the borrowed money. Not vainly<br />
does the phrase "live a life on debt" have<br />
negative connotations. If in isolated cases it<br />
may be a way to "get through", even to be<br />
able to live, at the societal level such a<br />
generalization can only have negative effects,<br />
which, whether we admit it or not, practice,<br />
reality induce into us sooner or later.<br />
In connection with this aspect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
correlation <strong>of</strong> GDP and external debt, we<br />
want to mention that there are experts who<br />
believe that having a large foreign debt is as a<br />
sign <strong>of</strong> credibility, internally or externally,<br />
and to make efforts to pay foreign debt would<br />
be a "big mistake". In support <strong>of</strong> such
easoning is brought, in my opinion totally<br />
unconvincingly, the case <strong>of</strong> periodic<br />
exemptions from external debt <strong>of</strong> heavily<br />
indebted developing or underdeveloped<br />
countries that enter default as well as deleting<br />
the external debt <strong>of</strong> the central European<br />
countries that have turned from a controlled,<br />
centralized economy to a competitive market<br />
economy. These examples cannot be<br />
considered other than exceptions, rare cases,<br />
which strengthen the rule <strong>of</strong> preserving the<br />
ability to pay, <strong>of</strong> solvency, based on loans<br />
designed, managed and reimbursed<br />
efficiently.<br />
Therefore, I think that depending on the level<br />
and characteristics <strong>of</strong> the economic and social<br />
development <strong>of</strong> each country, there are<br />
optimal or sustainable external and<br />
domestic debt levels, on different time<br />
horizons, which only the complex,<br />
multidisciplinary approaches <strong>of</strong> teams <strong>of</strong><br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals can quantify and substantiate.<br />
In conclusion, it can be said that the weight <strong>of</strong><br />
the total external debt or <strong>of</strong> its individual<br />
components in GDP, is rather determined by<br />
taking into account the complex internal and<br />
external factors acting in a national economy<br />
and not necessarily the systems <strong>of</strong> standard<br />
indicators or criteria, more or less stable over<br />
time and established by various bodies and<br />
specialists. This does not mean one should<br />
neglect the standard criteria and benchmarks,<br />
but on the contrary, to see how adequate they<br />
are in each peculiar case. Even the<br />
14<br />
applicability, the operational character, the<br />
convergence and adherence criteria <strong>of</strong> EMU<br />
have raised numerous objections not only <strong>of</strong><br />
theoretical and methodological nature but<br />
mainly practical.<br />
The evolution <strong>of</strong> external debt <strong>of</strong> Romania<br />
on quarters 1-4 2010 and quarter 1, 2011<br />
In the last five quarters, the year 2010 and<br />
quarter 1-2011, Romania's total gross external<br />
debt increased continuously (Table no.1.2),<br />
which is more a cause for concern than a<br />
safety mark because such dynamics show that<br />
the effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis and the policies<br />
adopted to counter them so far have not<br />
proven to stop the urgent need to increase, at<br />
an unsustainable pace on the medium and<br />
long term, the indebtedness <strong>of</strong> the country,<br />
through new loans <strong>of</strong> considerable sizes, even<br />
if they are called "preventive"<br />
(precautionary).<br />
The largest increases were reported for longterm<br />
debt <strong>of</strong> the government and the banks,<br />
respectively 1.6 billion euro and 1.2 billion<br />
euro, amounts beyond the possibilities <strong>of</strong><br />
reimbursement, as long as its maturities make<br />
short-term debt reach more and more<br />
overburdening levels, relatively difficult to<br />
honour.<br />
So, another challenge for the Romanian<br />
foreign debt sustainability would be the very<br />
taking <strong>of</strong> actions to stop / slow down this<br />
rapid dynamic <strong>of</strong> the burden <strong>of</strong> its external<br />
debt.<br />
Table no.1.2. Structure on institutional sectors, maturities and financial instruments<br />
T1/2010 T2/2010 T3/2010 T4/2010 T1/2011<br />
Mil. euro - end <strong>of</strong><br />
period<br />
Total gross external debt 86 527,9 87 785,0 89 184,0 90 908,4 93 386,2<br />
I. GROSS EXTERNAL DEBT 71 484,0 72 244,8 73 209,2 74 918,8 77 179,7<br />
1. Government 17414,3 17 304,8 17712,8 18 394,6 20 193,7<br />
Short-term 1 096,0 967,0 1 232,0 1 491,0 2 217,0<br />
Money market instruments 1 061,0 929,0 1 132,0 1 376,0 2 141,0<br />
Loans 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0<br />
Cash and deposits 35,0 38,0 100,0 115,0 76,0<br />
Long-term 16 318,3 16 337,8 16 480,8 16 903,6 17 976,7
T1/2010 T2/2010 T3/2010 T4/2010 T1/2011<br />
Mil. euro - end <strong>of</strong><br />
period<br />
Bonds 3 790,2 3 544,2 2 848,3 2 863,0 3 010,8<br />
Loans 12 527,0 12 792,4 13 631,5 14 039,3 14 964,6<br />
Trade credits 1,1 1,2 1,0 1,3 1,3<br />
2. Monetary Authority 7 178,5 7 717,7 9 004,5 9 104,6 9 673,1<br />
Short-term 57,0 79,0 48,0 22,0 6,0<br />
Loans 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0<br />
Cash and deposits 57,0 79,0 48,0 22,0 6,0<br />
Long-term 7 121,5 7 638,7 8 956,5 9 082,6 9 667,1<br />
Bonds 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0<br />
Loans 7 121,5 7 638,7 8 956,5 9 082,6 9 667,1<br />
3. Banks 21 629,2 21 107,3 21 337,0 22 688,6 22 952,9<br />
Short-term 6 590,0 6 242,0 6 277,0 7 025,0 6 751,0<br />
Loans 327,0 555,0 574,0 1 611,0 1 798,0<br />
Cash and deposits 6 106,0 5 587,0 5 673,0 5 367,0 4 909,0<br />
Other liabilities 157,0 100,0 30,0 47,0 44,0<br />
Long-term 15 039,2 14 865,3 15 060,0 15 663,6 16201,9<br />
Bonds 183,7 120,2 146,3 125,8 130,0<br />
Loans 7411,9 7 460,9 7 243,7 7 310,1 7 555,8<br />
Other liabilities 7 443,6 7 284,2 7 670,0 8 227,7 8 516,1<br />
4. Other sectors 25 262,0 26 115,0 25 154,9 24 731,0 24 360,0<br />
Short-term 4 457,0 5 115,0 4 751,0 4 630,0 4 620,0<br />
Money market instruments 2,0 2,0 15,0 41,0 164,0<br />
Loans 3 116,0 3 264,0 3 097,0 2 956,0 3 079,0<br />
Trade credits 1 339,0 1 845,0 1 637,0 1 633,0 1 377,0<br />
Other liabilities 0,0 4,0 2,0 0,0 0,0<br />
Long-term 20 805,0 21 000,0 20 403,9 20 101,0 19 740,0<br />
Loans 20 642,5 20 841,3 20 259,9 19 989,6 19 665,1<br />
Trade credits 162,5 158,7 144,0 111,4 74,9<br />
II. INTER-COMPANY DIRECT<br />
INVESTMENT<br />
15 043,9 15 540,2 15 974,8 15 989,6 16 206,5<br />
- liabilities to affiliated enterprises 18,2 0,5 3,4 9,7 10,0<br />
- liabilities to investors ( series 15 025,7 15 539,7<br />
available from December 2001)<br />
15 971,4 15 979,9 16 196,5<br />
Source: NBR Data.<br />
The balance <strong>of</strong> chronic deficit <strong>of</strong> the<br />
balance <strong>of</strong> payments <strong>of</strong> Romania is another<br />
synthetic indicator relevant to the health <strong>of</strong><br />
the economy and hence <strong>of</strong> the sustainability<br />
<strong>of</strong> external debt (see Table no.1.3.). The<br />
higher the current account deficit, the more<br />
difficult the financing problems.<br />
15<br />
It is noted that compared to the first quarter <strong>of</strong><br />
2010, in the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2011 Romania<br />
saw a favourable trend to reduce the size <strong>of</strong><br />
the current account deficit. What is important<br />
to note is that, except for component C -<br />
Current transfers - that has a growing surplus<br />
in quarter I.2011 compared to quarter I.2010,
all other components <strong>of</strong> the current account<br />
balance – the trade balance, the services and<br />
the income – recorded negative values.<br />
In the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2011 the current<br />
account <strong>of</strong> the balance <strong>of</strong> payments showed a<br />
deficit <strong>of</strong> 634 million euros, down by 58.9<br />
16<br />
percent compared with the same period <strong>of</strong> the<br />
previous year, due to a trade deficit reduced<br />
by 64.6 percent and current transfers surplus<br />
increase by 68.0 percent (due to net transfers<br />
<strong>of</strong> public administration).<br />
Table no.1.3. Romania’s balance <strong>of</strong> payments and foreign debt – quarter I 2011<br />
- million euro -<br />
Quarter 1 <strong>of</strong> 2010 r<br />
Quarter 1 <strong>of</strong> 2011 p<br />
CREDIT DEBIT NET CREDIT DEBIT NET<br />
CURRENT ACCOUNT (A +<br />
B + C)<br />
10 725 12 269 -1 544 14 164 14 798 -634<br />
A. Goods and services 9 273 10 839 -1 566 12 482 13 242 -760<br />
a. Goods (export FOB -<br />
import FOB)<br />
7 902 9 189 -1 287 11 016 11 471 -455<br />
b. Services 1 371 1 650 -279 1 466 1 771 -305<br />
- transport 396 447 -51 451 560 -109<br />
- tourism - travel 162 244 -82 210 283 -73<br />
- other services 813 959 -146 805 928 -123<br />
B. Income 210 622 -412 251 854 -603<br />
C. Current transfers<br />
r p<br />
Revised data; Provisional data;<br />
1 242 808 434 1 431 702 729<br />
Source: National Statistics Institute (INS). FOB imports are calculated based on conversion factor<br />
CIF / FOB <strong>of</strong> 1.0834 determined by the INS.<br />
The financing <strong>of</strong> the current account<br />
deficit in the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2011, was made<br />
at a rate <strong>of</strong> 59.8 percent by non-residents'<br />
direct investment in Romania, which<br />
recorded 379 million euros 2 (compared with<br />
486 million euros in the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2010),<br />
<strong>of</strong> which intra-group loans 3 totalled 290<br />
million euros and capital equity consolidated<br />
with the estimated net loss 89 million euros.<br />
Naturally, the question arises as what sources<br />
the current account deficit will be financed<br />
from, if in the foreseeable future, the balance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the trade balance, <strong>of</strong> services and revenues<br />
continues to be negative, and current transfers<br />
diminish. In addition, privatizable state assets<br />
will be increasingly less a source <strong>of</strong> free<br />
currency given that most <strong>of</strong> them are already<br />
2 Estimative data.<br />
3 Credits <strong>of</strong> the foreign investor to the resident firm.<br />
privatized without noticeable materialisation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the foreign currency brought about in<br />
public investments or other goods and<br />
services.<br />
Medium and long term external debt was<br />
on March 31, 2011, <strong>of</strong> 74,278 million euro<br />
(79.5 percent <strong>of</strong> total external debt), up by 2.5<br />
percent as compared with December 31,<br />
2010.<br />
Short-term external debt recorded on<br />
March 31, 2011, a level <strong>of</strong> 19,126 million<br />
euro (20.5 percent <strong>of</strong> total external debt), up<br />
by 3.7 percent as compared with December<br />
31, 2010, representing a fairly threatening<br />
level for Romania's capacity to pay.
Table no.1.4. Romania's foreign debt on March 31, 2011 *<br />
and external debt service in the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2011<br />
17<br />
- million euro-<br />
External debt External debt<br />
service<br />
quarter I 2011 p<br />
Balance on<br />
31.12.2010 r<br />
Balance on<br />
31.03.2011 p<br />
I. External debt on medium and long-term 72 471 74 278 2 238<br />
1.1. Direct public debt a)<br />
16 022 17 129 366<br />
1.2. Publicly guaranteed debt b)<br />
1 708 1 637 61<br />
1.3. Publicly non-guaranteed debt 37 431 37 329 1 581<br />
1.4. Medium and long term deposits <strong>of</strong><br />
non-residents<br />
8 227 8 516 167 e<br />
1.5. IMF loans c)<br />
9 083 9 667 63<br />
II. Short-term external debt 18 437 19 126 8685 e<br />
Total external debt (I + II) 90 908 93 404 10 923<br />
*) External debt balance is cash-based (not including accrued interest and not matured), also not<br />
including allocations <strong>of</strong> SDRs by the IMF.<br />
a)<br />
external loans contracted directly by PFM (Public Finance Ministry) and by local authorities<br />
under the legislation on public debt, including the ones under GEO no.99/2009 on ratification <strong>of</strong><br />
Stand-By Agreement between Romania and IMF; b) external loans guaranteed by the PFM and the<br />
local authorities under the legislation on public debt; c) loans from the IMF under the Stand-By<br />
Arrangement with Romania, excluding the amount received from the IMF under the PFM<br />
Ordinance no.99/2009; e- estimated data; p - provisional data; r - revised data.<br />
The ratio <strong>of</strong> external debt service on medium<br />
and long term 4 was 17.9 percent in first<br />
quarter 2011, versus 33.3 percent in 2010.<br />
The degree <strong>of</strong> coverage 5 was 8.2 months <strong>of</strong><br />
imports <strong>of</strong> goods and services on March 31,<br />
2011, as compared with 8.6 months on<br />
December 31, 2010, which shows a<br />
downward trend. These external debt<br />
sustainability indicators were not considered<br />
to be "warning" indicators for Romania’s case<br />
even though by some standards they still have<br />
4 External debt service ratio on medium and long<br />
term is calculated as the ratio between the debt<br />
service on medium and long term and the exports <strong>of</strong><br />
goods and services.<br />
5 Coverage <strong>of</strong> reserves in months <strong>of</strong> imports is<br />
calculated as the ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial reserves <strong>of</strong> the NBR<br />
(foreign exchange + gold) at end <strong>of</strong> period to average<br />
monthly imports <strong>of</strong> goods and services in that period.<br />
degrees <strong>of</strong> "freedom" and "monetary" in the<br />
sense <strong>of</strong> deterioration.<br />
Over-consumption and loss <strong>of</strong><br />
competitiveness <strong>of</strong> Romanian economy, have<br />
contributed in the last two decades to<br />
relatively large and persistent current account<br />
deficits and, consequently, a rapid<br />
accumulation <strong>of</strong> gross foreign debt. Factors<br />
that contributed mainly to this situation were:<br />
- relatively low structural competitiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
the Romanian economy as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
obsolete, less efficient technology and quality<br />
competitiveness <strong>of</strong> Romanian exports,<br />
- increase <strong>of</strong> unit labour costs in Romania<br />
compared to its growth in partner countries,<br />
even if it is still relatively low,<br />
- the appreciation <strong>of</strong> national currency even<br />
after Romania's EU accession in 2007,
- allocation <strong>of</strong> resources predominantly<br />
between the "tradable" sector, exporter <strong>of</strong><br />
goods and services, and the "non-tradable"<br />
sector mainly oriented towards domestic<br />
consumption.<br />
At the same time, during this period, an<br />
adverse impact was brought by the increase in<br />
wages and relative prices in the sectors <strong>of</strong><br />
"non-tradable" goods and public services<br />
(public services, services for domestic<br />
consumption, construction) as compared to<br />
the wages and prices <strong>of</strong> branches producing<br />
exportable goods and services (industry,<br />
tourism, transportation etc.). Only a small<br />
portion <strong>of</strong> the loss <strong>of</strong> competitiveness was<br />
due to higher prices and wages in the<br />
"tradable" sector, as compared to increases in<br />
Romania’s partner countries as well as to the<br />
nominal appreciation <strong>of</strong> the euro.<br />
We know that improving competitiveness is a<br />
necessary precondition for the export targeted<br />
sectors, enabling the creation <strong>of</strong> new jobs and<br />
the recovery <strong>of</strong> lost positions in order to<br />
maintain external debt to a sustainable level<br />
and stop the increase in the external deficits.<br />
In the future, trade surpluses are needed so<br />
that negative structural developments in the<br />
field <strong>of</strong> income and transfers can be<br />
compensated.<br />
The effort to recover lost competitiveness<br />
involves three main, interrelated directions:<br />
- reduction <strong>of</strong> production costs by lowering<br />
certain categories <strong>of</strong> wages and underserved<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>its;<br />
- increase <strong>of</strong> productivity and promotion <strong>of</strong><br />
tradable sectors with high added value,<br />
intended for export which require investments<br />
in new technologies and equipments;<br />
- reduction <strong>of</strong> prices and wages in the<br />
country, in the "nontradable" goods and<br />
services sector, as compared to the "tradable",<br />
to motivate firms to invest and produce in this<br />
sector.<br />
18<br />
Chapter 2. Scenarios <strong>of</strong> the general<br />
framework <strong>of</strong> the sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania’s public and external debt<br />
Although there is a whole literature dedicated<br />
to models and techniques <strong>of</strong> analysis and<br />
forecast <strong>of</strong> external debt sustainability 6 , in<br />
this chapter we shall present and analyze<br />
scenarios made by IMF experts, in<br />
collaboration with Romanian specialists,<br />
regarding: the macroeconomic frame and the<br />
current policies in 2008-2016 in Romania<br />
(Table no.2.1); the sustainability <strong>of</strong> public<br />
sector debt (Table no.2.2); the sustainability<br />
<strong>of</strong> external debt from 2008 to 2010.<br />
An analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the financial and<br />
economic crisis in Romania compared to<br />
other countries (see Table 2.1 and Annexes 1<br />
- 7) highlights several features <strong>of</strong> the<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> Romanian economy during the<br />
crisis among which:<br />
- the stronger and longer-term impact <strong>of</strong> crisis<br />
in our country compared to other countries;<br />
- relatively modest economic, financial and<br />
social performances, poorer in Romania,<br />
compared to developed countries and to some<br />
new EU member states;<br />
- a more disadvantaged external position <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania, compared to other countries, for<br />
most <strong>of</strong> the specific indicators.<br />
6 Established criteria <strong>of</strong> debt sustainability (Paris<br />
Club on Naples terms), for developing countries,<br />
based for example on the following limits:<br />
- rate <strong>of</strong> present value debt / exports (200-250%);<br />
- rate <strong>of</strong> debt service ratio / exports (20-25%);<br />
- rate <strong>of</strong> present value debt / tax revenue (28%);<br />
- the share <strong>of</strong> exports in GDP (at least 40%);• tax<br />
revenue / GDP (20%).
Table no.2.1. Romania: Macroeconomic framework, current policies, 2008/2016<br />
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />
Est. Project. Project Project. Project. Project. Project.<br />
GDP and prices (annual percentage change<br />
Real GDP 7.3 -7.1 -1.3 1.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0<br />
Real domestic<br />
demand<br />
7.3 -12.9 -1.0 1.2 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.2 4.1<br />
GDP deflator 15.2 4.1 4.5 4.7 4.3 4.6 4.9 5.1 5.2<br />
Domestic<br />
demand deflator<br />
14.4 4.2 3.5 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.7<br />
Consumer price<br />
index (average<br />
CPI)<br />
7.9 5.6 6.1 5.4 3.4 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0<br />
Consumer price<br />
index (CPI, end<br />
<strong>of</strong> period)<br />
6.3 4.7 8.0 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0<br />
Nominal wages 23.6 8.4 2.6 4.7 6.7 6.9 7.0 8.0 8.0<br />
Real exchange<br />
rate<br />
based on CPI<br />
-5.0 -7.5 1.9 -0.2 3.3 3.0 3.2 2.5 2.6<br />
Real exchange<br />
rate<br />
based on GDP<br />
deflator<br />
Monetary<br />
Aggregates<br />
(Annual<br />
percentage<br />
change)<br />
1.5 -8.8 0.4 -0.9 4.1 4.5 5.1 4.8 4.9<br />
Broad money 17.5 9.0 6.9 10.3 14.1 14.5 14.9 16.0 16.0<br />
Domestic credit<br />
Savings and<br />
investments<br />
(in%<br />
<strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />
33.7 0.9 4.7 7.7 8.7 10.4 10.9 11.4 11.8<br />
Foreign savings 11.6 4.2 4.2 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.0<br />
Gross National<br />
Saving<br />
19.7 21.1 22.2 19.5 20.1 20.8 21.5 22.0 22.7<br />
Government 1.5 -0.8 0.8 2.7 4.5 5.4 6.0 5.6 5.2<br />
Private 18.2 21.9 21.4 16.8 15.6 15.4 15.5 16.4 17.5<br />
Gross domestic<br />
investments<br />
31.3 25.3 26.4 24.6 25.2 26.0 26.7 27.1 27.6<br />
Government 6.3 6.5 7.3 7.1 7.5 8.3 8.5 7.8 7.3<br />
Private<br />
Central<br />
Government (in<br />
% <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />
25.0 18.8 19.1 17.4 17.7 17.8 18.2 19.3 20.4<br />
Income 32.2 31.4 32.8 33.3 33.7 33.5 33.2 32.4 31.7<br />
19
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />
Est. Project. Project Project. Project. Project. Project.<br />
Tax revenues 18.4 17.8 18.1 18.9 18.9 18.7 18.6 18.5 18.5<br />
Non-fiscal<br />
income<br />
3.1 2.9 3.9 3.5 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4<br />
Grants 0.9 1.0 1.8 1.6 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.2 1.8<br />
Expenditures 37.0 38.7 39.4 37.7 36.7 36.4 35.7 34.7 33.9<br />
Fiscal balance -4.8 -7.3 -6.5 -4.4 -3.0 -2.9 -2.5 -2.3 -2.1<br />
Structural fiscal -8.5 -7.0 -4.9 -2.4 -1.6 -2.0 -2.0 -2.1 -2.1<br />
balance 1/<br />
Gross public<br />
debt (direct)<br />
19.5 27.4 33.2 36.1 36.2 36.0 35.5 34.7 33.8<br />
Balance <strong>of</strong> payments (in % <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />
Current Account -11.6 -4.2 -4.2 -5.0 -5.1 -5.2 -5.2 -5.1 -5.0<br />
Trade balance -13.8 -5.8 -4.8 -5.0 -4.7 -4.6 -4.2 -3.7 -3.2<br />
Balance <strong>of</strong><br />
services<br />
0.5 -0.6 -0.6 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2<br />
Income balance -2.7 -1.3 -1.6 -2.2 -2.3 -2.3 -2.4 -2.5 -2.6<br />
Balance <strong>of</strong><br />
transfers<br />
4.3 3.5 2.8 2.8 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.7<br />
Capital and<br />
financial<br />
account balance<br />
12.8 -1.9 1.1 5.3 8.4 8.6 8.3 5.6 6.1<br />
Balance <strong>of</strong> direct<br />
foreign<br />
investments<br />
6.7 3.0 2.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0<br />
Gross<br />
international<br />
reserves (bill.<br />
euro)<br />
28.3 30.9 36.0 40.4 43.4 44.3 45.1 44.6 47.3<br />
Gross<br />
international<br />
reserves (months<br />
<strong>of</strong> imports next<br />
year)<br />
7.8 7.4 7.8 8.0 7.8 7.2 6.7 6.1 6.1<br />
International<br />
investment<br />
position<br />
(in % <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />
-49.4 -62.7 -70.8 -75.3 -72.6 -73.0 -74.2 -72.6 -69.5<br />
External debt<br />
(in% <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />
51.4 68.3 74.5 78.9 75.4 70.4 65.5 61.1 58.4<br />
Short-term<br />
external debt<br />
(as% <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />
14.7 12.4 15.4 15.9 15.3 14.8 14.2 13.7 13.3<br />
Export volume<br />
(percentage<br />
change)<br />
8.3 -5.3 24.5 7.2 7.6 8.1 8.3 8.3 8.3<br />
Import volume<br />
(percentage<br />
7.9 -20.9 9.0 6.7 7.5 8.5 8.4 8.3 8.3<br />
20
change)<br />
Terms <strong>of</strong> trade<br />
(percentage<br />
change)<br />
Nominal GDP<br />
(in mil. lei)<br />
Nominal GDP<br />
(in mil. Euro)<br />
2008 2009 2010<br />
Est.<br />
2011<br />
Project.<br />
21<br />
2012<br />
Project<br />
2013<br />
Project.<br />
2014<br />
Project.<br />
2015<br />
Project.<br />
2016<br />
Project.<br />
2.8 -0.4 -1.8 -0.7 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.1<br />
514,700 498,008 513,641 542,035 590,247 643,816 703,827 770,546 843,680<br />
139,666 117,558 122,062 127,237 140,658 156,307 174.317 194.107 216.339<br />
Source: Estimates and projects <strong>of</strong> the Romanian authorities and the IMF staff.<br />
1/ Real fiscal balance adjusted for the automatic effects <strong>of</strong> the internal imbalances (output gap) and external<br />
imbalances (absorption gap) in the fiscal position.<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> data on the economic and financial indicators in Table 2.1 highlights some<br />
challenging issues <strong>of</strong> major significance.<br />
It is that economic growth in Romania has gone from relatively high values in 2008, to sudden<br />
and major slumps in 2009 and 2010, the real GDP moving from a growth <strong>of</strong> 7.3% to decreases<br />
<strong>of</strong> -7.1% and, respectively,-1.3% for 2011, the forecast having been 1.5%.<br />
These large and sudden changes in amplitude indicators show a case <strong>of</strong> strong shock that<br />
Romania went through, with severe enough consequences on short, medium and long term.<br />
From these shock cases we should draw lessons in the sense that the way economic decline<br />
occurs is important as well and one must always be prepared. Statements <strong>of</strong> decision makers in<br />
Romania in September 2008, that the international financial crisis "will not have direct<br />
effects" on the Romanian economy, showed how far they were from the truth:<br />
- Projections for the years 2012-2016 show rather relatively equal annual developments, which<br />
<strong>of</strong> course is only a desirable perception <strong>of</strong> quite variable future developments;<br />
- External debt as weight in GDP increased from 51.4% in 2008 to 78.9% in 2011, and in the<br />
next four years until 2016 it should stay at a high level, although with a downward trend,<br />
without reaching the level <strong>of</strong> 2008, which means that the decline triggered by the crisis, in<br />
some cases, will not have been recovered even by 2016;<br />
- Inflation is at relatively high rates in 2008-2010 and then stays quasi-constant at an annual<br />
level <strong>of</strong> 3% which by far cannot be considered as a convenient (comfortable) one;<br />
- The ICOR (incremental capital - output ratio) shows a decrease <strong>of</strong> expected economic<br />
performance and efficiency which is contrary to the sustainability <strong>of</strong> external debt and the<br />
ability to meet external debt service. Added to this is the continuation <strong>of</strong> chronicization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
deficits <strong>of</strong> the trade, services and income balances, during 2011-2016;<br />
- The gross international reserves are expected to increase to 47.3 billion euros as compared to<br />
36 billion euros in 2010. The sources <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> such reserves if they consist <strong>of</strong> new<br />
borrowings are not a factor <strong>of</strong> the strengthening <strong>of</strong> sustainability.
Table no.2.2 Romania: The sustainability <strong>of</strong> public sector debt (in % <strong>of</strong> GDP, unless otherwise specified)<br />
Current Projections Primary balance<br />
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />
that stabilizes<br />
the debt<br />
Public sector debt 15.4 17.5 19.5 27.4 33.2 36.1 36.2 36.0 35.5 34.7 33.8 -1.4<br />
o / w foreign currency denominated 7.1 6.6 6.4 15.0 20.4 24.0 21.9 18.4 15.0 11.7 10.0<br />
Percentage change <strong>of</strong> public sector debt -0.3 2.1 2.0 7.9 5.7 2.9 0.0 -0.1 -0.6 -0.8 -0.9<br />
Flows identified as debt generators (4 +7 +12) -3.0 -0.1 2.7 7.9 7.8 2.4 0.0 -0.1 -0.6 -0.8 -0.9<br />
Primary deficit 0.6 2.4 4.1 6.1 5.1 2.7 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4<br />
Revenues and grants 32.3 32.3 32.2 31.4 32.8 33.3 33.7 33.5 33.2 32.4 31.7<br />
Primary expenditure 32.9 34.6 36.3 37.5 38.0 35.9 35.0 34.7 34.0 33.0 32.2<br />
Automatic debt dynamics -3.1 -2.3 -1.3 1.8 2.7 -0.2 -1.3 -1.3 -1.4 -1.4 -1.3<br />
Rate debt / income in public sector 47.6 54.2 60.7 87.4 101.0 108.6 107.3 107.7 106.9 107.0 106.4<br />
Gross financing need(in%) 1.8 3.9 6.3 8.4 7.2 5.4 4.7 9.1 8.1 5.6 5.0<br />
in bill. U.S.D. 2.2 6.7 12.8 13.8 11.6 9.0 8.7 18.5 18.2 14.0 13.6<br />
Scenario with key variables at their historical averages 36.1 34.2 32.5 31.0 29.6 28.4<br />
No policy change scenario (constant primary balance) in 2011-2016<br />
Key macroeconomic and fiscal assumptions<br />
36.1 37.5 38.8 39.9 41.0 42.1<br />
Real GDP growth (in percents) 7.9 6.3 7.3 -7.1 -1.3 1.5 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.0<br />
The nominal interest average rate for public debt (in percents) 6.1 5.8 5.2 6.0 5.3 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.0 5.2 5.3<br />
The real interest average rate (nominal rate minus the change in the GDP -4.5 -7.7 -10.1 1.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0<br />
deflator, in percents)<br />
Nominal appreciation (increase in U.S.D. value <strong>of</strong> local currency in percents) 19.4 6.5 -16.5 0.3 -10.7<br />
Inflation rate (GDP deflator, in percents) 10.6 13.5 15.2 4.1 4.5 4.8 4.3 4.6 4.9 5.2 5.2<br />
Growth <strong>of</strong> real primary expenditures (deflated by GDP deflator, in percents) 14.8 12.0 12.4 -3.9 -0.1 -4.5 1.8 3.3 2.2 1.0 1.5<br />
Primary deficit 0.6 2.4 4.1 6.1 5.1 2.7 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4<br />
Source: IMF<br />
22
Table 2.2 shows that the weight <strong>of</strong> public<br />
debt in GDP that increased from 15.4%<br />
in 2006 to 33.2% in 2011, will increase up<br />
to 36.2% in 2013, then coming back to<br />
33,8% in 2016. Similarly will the need <strong>of</strong><br />
gross financing increase which also is not<br />
a favourable tendency either.<br />
The nominal interest average rate on<br />
public debt will stay at over 5%, which<br />
23<br />
will strike the debt burden and the<br />
possibilities <strong>of</strong> reducing it.<br />
The inflation rate is not closer to its level<br />
in other EU countries either, which means<br />
slow evolution <strong>of</strong> nominal convergence.<br />
But what draws particular attention is the<br />
rate debt/income that shows an increasing<br />
trend during 2010-2013, which means<br />
poor performance <strong>of</strong> the economic policy<br />
mix.<br />
Table no.2.3. Romania: the framework <strong>of</strong> the sustainability <strong>of</strong> external debt, 2006-<br />
2016 (in percents <strong>of</strong> GDP, unless otherwise specified)<br />
Current Projections Current<br />
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 account<br />
without<br />
interests<br />
that<br />
stabilize<br />
the debt<br />
External debt 42.1 47.0 51.4 68.3 74.5 78.9 75.4 70.4 65.5 61.1 68.3 -7,2<br />
Changes in external debt 3.3 4.9 4.4 16.9 6.2 4.4 -3.5 -5.0 -4.9 -4.4 -2.7<br />
Identified external debt generating flows -5.4 -1.4 0.5 10.4 -0.4 -0.5 -2.2 -2.3 -1.9 0.2 0.2<br />
Current account deficit, excl. Interest 9.2<br />
payments<br />
12.2 10.1 2.4 1.8 2.7 . 3.0 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.6<br />
Deficit in goods and services balance 12.0 14.0 13.2 6.1 5.5 5.7 5.3 5.2 4.8 4.2 3.7<br />
Export 32.1 29.2 30.4 30.7 36.0 37.8 37.7 37.6 37.4 37.2 37.0<br />
Import 44.2 43.2 43.6 36.8 41.4 43.5 43.0 42.7 42.1 41,4 40.7<br />
Capital inflows that do not generate debt -8.6<br />
(negative)<br />
-5.B -6.1 -3.4 -2.6 -4.4 -4.2 -4.7 -4.4 -2.5 -2.6<br />
Automatic debt dynamics -6.0 -7.6 -3.6 11.4 0.4 1.2 -1.0 -0.9 -0.9 -0.9 -0.8<br />
The contribution <strong>of</strong> nominal interest rate 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.4<br />
Contribution <strong>of</strong> real GDP growth -2.5 -2.1 -3.1 4.3 0.8 -1.1 -3.1 -2.9 -2.7 -2.4 -2.2<br />
Contribution <strong>of</strong> price and exchange rate -4.7<br />
changes<br />
-7.0 -2.0 5.3 -2.9<br />
Residues, including gross foreign assets 8.8<br />
change<br />
6.3 4.0 6.5 6.5 4.5 -1.4 -2.6 -2.9 -4.6 -2.9<br />
External debt ratio <strong>of</strong> exports (in percents) 131.0 160.7 169.0 222.2 207.1 208.6 199.6 187.3 175.3 164.1 157.5<br />
Gross external financing need (bill.euro) 21.7 35.9 46.2 34.9 32.5 34.4 40.2 49,8 52.1 51.8 53.9<br />
In percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP 22.2 28.8 33.1 29.7 26.6 26.9 28.4 31.6 29.7 26.5 24.8<br />
Scenario with key variables at their<br />
historical averages<br />
Key macroeconomic assumptions<br />
78.9 77.0 74.1 71.2 66.4 63.4<br />
Real GDP growth (in percents) 7.9 6.3 7.3 -7.1 -1.2 1.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0<br />
GDP deflator in euros (percentage 13.8 19.8 4.4 -9.4 4.4 3.4 5.9 6.6 7.0 6.9 7.1<br />
changes)<br />
Nominal interest rate (in percents) 3.8 3.7 3.6 2.9 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.5<br />
Export growth (euro in percents) 19.3 15.9 16.6 -14.9 20.6 10.3 10.4 10.6 10.9 10.9 10.9<br />
Imports growth (euro in percents) 25.2 24.7 13.2 -28.9 15.9 10.2 9.4 10.4 10.0 9.5 9.5<br />
Current account balance, excluding interest -9.2<br />
payments<br />
-12.2 -10.1 -2.4 -1.8 -2.7 -3.0 -3.3 -3.4 -3.6 -3.6<br />
Net capital inflows that do not generate 8.6<br />
debt<br />
5.8 6.1 3.4 2.6 4.4 4.2 4,7 4.4 2.5 2.6<br />
Source: IMF
The analysis <strong>of</strong> external debt indicators<br />
(Table no.2.3) highlights several issues<br />
challenging the level <strong>of</strong> sustainability and its<br />
impact factors, namely:<br />
- ratio <strong>of</strong> external debt to GDP has increased<br />
by 2011 then following decreases, weaker at<br />
first, then more consistent, stabilising at<br />
relatively high levels, especially if we<br />
consider Romania's ability to pay;<br />
- the rate external debt / exports increases,<br />
resulting in a relatively weak capacity <strong>of</strong><br />
export to be a source <strong>of</strong> external debt<br />
disbursement.<br />
24<br />
Chapter 3. External debt vulnerabilities<br />
As previously mentioned, a country's external<br />
debt is not only a chance for potential<br />
beneficial effects, favourable and<br />
unfavourable as well, if the management and<br />
the administration are not effective and do<br />
not take into account risks, vulnerabilities,<br />
weaknesses, especially regarding medium<br />
and long terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> repayment<br />
and provision <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> funding.<br />
According to our calculations (G. Georgescu<br />
and Gheorghe Zaman) in 2009, Romania's<br />
external debt sustainability indicators, on<br />
medium and long term, showed a trend <strong>of</strong><br />
deterioration compared to previous years<br />
(Table no.3.1.) versus limit criteria<br />
conventionally stipulated in the literature and<br />
international financial practice.<br />
Table no.3.1. Romania's external debt sustainability indicators, on medium and long<br />
term, between 2000 and 2009<br />
Indicators 2000 2006 2007 2008 2009 Maximum<br />
limit<br />
External debt / GDP 23,9 29,2 31,1 37,9 56,0 50,0<br />
External debt / Export 72,7 91,2 105,5 122,0 181,9 150,0<br />
External debt / Foreign 65,3 73,9 83,5 97,0 149,5 100,0<br />
exchange incomes<br />
Foreign exchange reserves /<br />
External debt<br />
54,2 80,0 70,6 54,6 47,2 50,0 *<br />
External debt service / Foreign<br />
exchange incomes<br />
15,0 15,8 16,3 22,7 26,0 20,0<br />
External debt service / Exports 16,7 19,4 20,5 28,5 31,7 30,0<br />
External debt service / Foreign<br />
exchange reserves<br />
42,3 26,6 27,6 42,8 36,9 40,0<br />
Foreign exchange reserves / 12,9 23,4 22,0 20,7 26,4 25,0 *<br />
GDP<br />
* minimum threshold<br />
Source: Own calculations based on data from NBR and from the National Commission for Prognosis.<br />
Moreover, for a series <strong>of</strong> indicators <strong>of</strong><br />
external debt sustainability, Romania<br />
exceeded "fault rates" in 2009, which lowers<br />
its country rating and hinders its access to<br />
international capital markets.<br />
%<br />
Although the IMF, by the recipes it<br />
recommends to countries that resort to<br />
foreign loans, focuses highly on fiscal and<br />
monetary policies, the specialists, for<br />
example pr<strong>of</strong>. Calvo G., emphasize that these
policies have not proved effective, requiring<br />
complementary actions <strong>of</strong> structural policies<br />
that should help reducing the external<br />
financial vulnerabilities, especially in<br />
economies suffering from high incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
bank loans in freely convertible currencies.<br />
For this reason, and also because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis, proposals have been<br />
made to create an emerging markets fund,<br />
as the IMF is the "lender <strong>of</strong> last resort",<br />
which ought to have lent to emerging<br />
economies under specific conditions and<br />
more conveniently so they can cope with<br />
external shocks, with the probability <strong>of</strong><br />
sudden stop <strong>of</strong> loans and with the price<br />
volatility <strong>of</strong> the capital inflows.<br />
IMF believes that the emerging European<br />
economies during crisis saw large external<br />
imbalances, the causes varying from one<br />
country to another. However, some<br />
similarities can be specified, namely: strong<br />
capital flows in the non-tradable sector 7 that<br />
registered a huge increase in price and wage,<br />
which eroded competitiveness as capital<br />
flows boosted mostly the <strong>of</strong>fer (supply) and<br />
the imports rather than the exports, and these<br />
contributed to major changes and, ultimately,<br />
non-sustainability <strong>of</strong> the positions <strong>of</strong> net<br />
foreign assets.<br />
Financial integration has played a critical role<br />
allowing the funding <strong>of</strong> the imbalances while<br />
the lack <strong>of</strong> institutions and the lack <strong>of</strong> the<br />
"national" approaches to resolve the crisis<br />
have prevented the private sector and the<br />
markets from playing a bigger role.<br />
With the banking problems being tackled and<br />
solved at national level, the problems <strong>of</strong><br />
banks and <strong>of</strong> sovereign debt in the euro area<br />
peripheral countries amplified each other. As<br />
the financial costs in the private sector<br />
depended to a growing extent on the national<br />
origin <strong>of</strong> the borrower, the financial<br />
integration was "disintegrated" acting in<br />
directions opposite from its objectives.<br />
7 Sector "nontradable" means those goods and<br />
services produced and consumed in the country.<br />
25<br />
The re-launching <strong>of</strong> long-term economic<br />
growth is the key issue in Romania. The<br />
growth and the convergence cannot be<br />
restored to their normal trajectories unless by<br />
increasing productivity, with which Romania<br />
fought hard but unsuccessfully, in the past<br />
two decades, even if it had a relatively large<br />
access to foreign capital. To enhance<br />
efficiency, we need better policies at national<br />
level, along with more effective governance<br />
at EU level that could strengthen these<br />
policies. Special attention should be given to<br />
the supervising <strong>of</strong> the financial system and to<br />
the economic integration due to their<br />
vulnerability.<br />
Multi-speed post-crisis reconstruction is<br />
underway with some emerging economies<br />
going at a higher tempo, and others, on the<br />
contrary, still fighting out <strong>of</strong> the crisis.<br />
The economic science and practices,<br />
following the recent crisis, were again alerted<br />
to the possibility to predict and take<br />
preventive measures against the crisis effects<br />
by means <strong>of</strong> early warning that could<br />
prevent or determine better training to cope<br />
with the crises and maintain the external debt<br />
sustainability and the economic development.<br />
This, especially since the economic science<br />
is accused to have been unable to predict<br />
precisely in "space and time" the economic<br />
crisis occurrence. The charges could be also<br />
brought to seismology and other sciences <strong>of</strong><br />
earth physics which do not foresee the time<br />
and place <strong>of</strong> natural disasters.<br />
Overview <strong>of</strong> literature on indicators for early<br />
warning, sudden stops and changes <strong>of</strong> current<br />
account:
Authors Main messages<br />
Milesi Ferretti and Razin<br />
(1998)<br />
Kaminsky, Lizondo and<br />
Reinhart<br />
(1998)<br />
Berg, Borensztein, Milesi-<br />
Ferretti, Pattillo<br />
(1999)<br />
Frenkel and Calvo<br />
(2004)<br />
The weak reserves and the trade ratio (terms <strong>of</strong> trade),<br />
unfavourable, may trigger changes in the current account<br />
and currency crises<br />
Some indicators can announce the possibilities <strong>of</strong> currency<br />
crises. Early warning indicators include current account<br />
deficit, over-evaluation, weak growth in exports, reserves to<br />
the "broad money"<br />
Reserves / short-term debt are also early warning indicators<br />
<strong>of</strong> currency crises. Added to these we find the current<br />
account deficit, loss <strong>of</strong> reserves, weak exports and other<br />
early warning indicators.<br />
The probability <strong>of</strong> sudden stop <strong>of</strong> foreign capital increases<br />
the size <strong>of</strong> the current account initial deficit as a percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> GDP and decreases with country’s openness.<br />
The current account deficit is the key indicator for the crisis.<br />
Edwards<br />
(2005)<br />
Mendoza and Terrones All crises in emerging economies have been associated with<br />
the "boom" <strong>of</strong> loans, although not all credit booms end in<br />
crisis.<br />
The vulnerabilities generated by the underperformant<br />
management <strong>of</strong> external debt, in<br />
the countries most affected by the current<br />
crisis in the EU (Greece, Ireland, Portugal,<br />
Spain, Romania), can be analyzed in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
fiscal, financial and structural measures,<br />
which, in various proportions present<br />
similarities, due to the unique source <strong>of</strong><br />
recipes and advice which is the International<br />
Monetary Fund.<br />
We will refer to some <strong>of</strong> the possible<br />
vulnerabilities <strong>of</strong> the measures taken in<br />
Romania for getting over the economic crisis,<br />
especially in terms <strong>of</strong> long-term effects.<br />
- The fiscal policies in Romania, to increase<br />
VAT from 19 to 24% and increase other<br />
taxes, could un-stimulate, on long term, by<br />
increasing prices, the demand and hence the<br />
supply, especially in the tradable sector<br />
which represents the overwhelming part <strong>of</strong><br />
private economic agents. On the other hand,<br />
taxation <strong>of</strong> prizes and vouchers can act in the<br />
same direction, so additional budget revenues<br />
expected might be far outweighed by the<br />
negative externalities they generate into the<br />
real economy,<br />
- The financial-monetary policies <strong>of</strong> growth<br />
<strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> prudentiality, supervision,<br />
26<br />
transparency and improvement <strong>of</strong> the way <strong>of</strong><br />
reporting, while, maintaining high interest<br />
rates for credits on short, medium and long<br />
term, they cannot achieve the expected goals<br />
<strong>of</strong> recovery and economic efficiency,<br />
- The structural policies related to reducing<br />
employment and wages in public<br />
administration, education, research, health<br />
etc. also have an adverse effect on the<br />
sustainable economic growth and on the<br />
opportunities to create funds necessary to<br />
finance maturing debt.<br />
Chapter 4. Strategic ways <strong>of</strong> approaching<br />
the external debt sustainability<br />
Public and private external debt is one <strong>of</strong><br />
the most powerful economic policy tools that<br />
can be used effectively to stimulate economic<br />
growth but which, if inefficiently used, can<br />
cause serious damage to national economies<br />
on short, medium and long term.<br />
Governments can contract debts to finance<br />
new investments in human or material<br />
capital, to outline the country's resources to<br />
counteract recessions or to meet the financing<br />
needs resulting from exceptional<br />
circumstances such as natural disasters or<br />
financial crises.
The external debt can create a burden for<br />
future generations, as well as a number <strong>of</strong><br />
vulnerabilities for the investment process and<br />
inflation, the resistance to crisis and recession<br />
<strong>of</strong> a country.<br />
Even before the classics <strong>of</strong> political<br />
economy, A. Smith and D. Ricardo, the<br />
problem <strong>of</strong> external debt was a concern <strong>of</strong><br />
primary importance for economic science,<br />
given the potentials that it has, both positive<br />
and negative, for countries that receive and<br />
grant loans.<br />
Usually, governments borrow on domestic or<br />
external market to finance projects <strong>of</strong> long<br />
term development that are targeted to<br />
physical infrastructure (roads, bridges,<br />
hydroelectric plants etc.). or investment<br />
inclusively in the human capital.<br />
Governments may decide to borrow in order<br />
to maintain the level <strong>of</strong> current expenditures<br />
without increasing taxes in times <strong>of</strong> crisis and<br />
recession or to finance the costs caused by<br />
natural disasters (earthquakes, floods,<br />
droughts), wars etc.<br />
On the other hand, states resort to loans to<br />
help the start <strong>of</strong> the economic growth at<br />
higher rates so as to ensure a higher<br />
consumption for the population,<br />
redistributing resources from future<br />
generations to the present ones.<br />
According to the opinions in the literature,<br />
the behaviour <strong>of</strong> policy makers has a strong<br />
penchant for short and medium term, i.e.<br />
for how long a term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice usually lasts.<br />
Regarding indebtedness, issues concerning<br />
debt repayment, after this period, interest<br />
them less or not at all. Not to say it publicly,<br />
many probably think in the sense <strong>of</strong> “aprés<br />
moi le déluge!”<br />
The external indebtedness <strong>of</strong> countries with<br />
economies in transition has shown in over<br />
two decades <strong>of</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> competitive<br />
market economy, that high levels <strong>of</strong> debt can<br />
bring a series <strong>of</strong> serious constraints on the<br />
behaviour <strong>of</strong> an independent monetary<br />
policy, especially when the debt is in hard<br />
currency and a monetary policy <strong>of</strong><br />
accommodation can lead to devaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
national currency and substantial negative<br />
effects (Calvo and Reinhat, 2002).<br />
27<br />
The set <strong>of</strong> recommendations (conditionalities<br />
accepted by governments) on the monetary<br />
and fiscal policies <strong>of</strong> different IMF stand-by<br />
arrangements and other international<br />
financial institutions also comprises a<br />
component aimed, more or less relevantly, at<br />
the need to promote real economy<br />
restructuring policies supporting sustainable<br />
development <strong>of</strong> the country borrowing. In<br />
this respect, we wish to present a viewpoint<br />
about the need for new approaches <strong>of</strong> the<br />
relationship between the sectors <strong>of</strong> industry<br />
and services in Romania, considering their<br />
role in the process <strong>of</strong> economic growth and<br />
the features <strong>of</strong> "tradable" / "exportable" and<br />
"non-tradable" goods and services.<br />
The problems <strong>of</strong> specialization and <strong>of</strong><br />
domestic and international economic<br />
cooperation, <strong>of</strong> the value chains revolve<br />
around the strategic approach <strong>of</strong> crossconditioning<br />
and inter-empowering <strong>of</strong> the<br />
relations between economic sectors<br />
(primary, secondary, tertiary, and<br />
quaternary), avoiding, for example, trap<br />
pseudo-tertialization that many transitional<br />
economies entered into, exaggerating the role<br />
<strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> services predominantly<br />
speculative, particularly financial ones.<br />
More and more experts in developing<br />
countries consider that reducing the weight <strong>of</strong><br />
manufacturing industry in GDP is a<br />
"worrying" phenomenon. In a report 8 by<br />
Michael Spence and Sandile Hatshwayo,<br />
submitted to the Council on Foreign<br />
Relations in New York, it is argued, based on<br />
advanced statistical and economic analyses,<br />
that "the American economy must find ways<br />
to develop employment in the "tradable"<br />
sector containing industries whose products<br />
are sold abroad." This sector, although<br />
comprises services, including financial ones<br />
is dominated by manufacturing industries,<br />
which in literature is called "secondary"<br />
sector. Getting over the recession and the<br />
current economic and financial crisis in most<br />
8 "The Evolving Structure <strong>of</strong> the American Economy<br />
and the Employment Challenge" by Michael Spence<br />
and Sandile Hatshwayo, Council <strong>of</strong> Foreign<br />
Relations, Working Paper, March 2011.
countries, including Romania, takes place,<br />
according to the opinion <strong>of</strong> several<br />
specialists, at the expense <strong>of</strong> the<br />
manufacturing sector, which show greater<br />
resistance to the shocks <strong>of</strong> the business cycles<br />
and the crises, compared with other sectors <strong>of</strong><br />
the national economy, more volatile and<br />
vulnerable.<br />
Both in absolute and relative terms (as weight<br />
in employment) the "tradable" sector in<br />
Romania has declined dramatically in the two<br />
decades. The creation <strong>of</strong> new jobs has been<br />
promoted especially in the services sector so<br />
as we could follow the increasing trend <strong>of</strong><br />
this weight manifested in developed<br />
economies, notwithstanding that in these<br />
countries the process was lengthy, without<br />
forcing, but with sectorial complementarities<br />
<strong>of</strong> efficiencies at the macroeconomic level.<br />
In developed countries, in absolute terms,<br />
manufacturing industry grew more slowly<br />
than services in the last two decades, which<br />
meant a reduction in relative weight. A major<br />
strategic management error in Romania was<br />
discouraging Romanian manufacturing<br />
industry, considered the result <strong>of</strong> inefficient<br />
socialist industrialization by decision makers,<br />
less or not at all savvy, who relied on the<br />
advantages <strong>of</strong> producing companies from<br />
abroad who also had the interest to expand<br />
their markets in the emerging Europe<br />
countries. Giving up the vast majority <strong>of</strong><br />
manufacturing industries in Romania and<br />
28<br />
replacing them with imported products, under<br />
the pretext that they are better, more<br />
functional, better presented and packed and at<br />
a lower cost is, at first sight, a "beneficial"<br />
measure <strong>of</strong> rinsing the national economic <strong>of</strong><br />
ineffective activities. Finally, it turned out to<br />
be counterproductive, because the most<br />
important branches generating and<br />
propagating technologic progress are in<br />
this sector as the most fertile and strong<br />
domain for R&D and technology transfer. As<br />
for the advantages the imported products<br />
have compared to local products, perhaps<br />
only partially (!) they were valid, but the<br />
negative costs are neglected (negative<br />
externalities), costs that they have produced<br />
in the entire national economy by increasing<br />
underemployment, destruction <strong>of</strong> man-made<br />
capital, export <strong>of</strong> scrap iron and negative<br />
impact on natural capital. If all these negative<br />
effects, at the macroeconomic societal level,<br />
are added with a minus to the benefits and the<br />
superiority <strong>of</strong> imported products in Romania,<br />
we shall conclude, not very favourably, that<br />
there is a "destruction" <strong>of</strong> manufacturing<br />
industry (deindustrialization), in favour <strong>of</strong><br />
services industry which, if not strictly<br />
regulated by clear legal institutional basis,<br />
may largely encourage speculation, polluting<br />
consumerism, inflation, weak, unsustainable<br />
economic development, as happened in 2009-<br />
2010.<br />
Table no.4.1 Structure in percents <strong>of</strong> employed population,<br />
on the main activities <strong>of</strong> national economy in the period 1993-2009<br />
1993 2003 2005 2008<br />
-% -<br />
2009<br />
Agriculture, hunting and<br />
forestry<br />
35,2 34,7 31,9 27,5 28,7<br />
Fishing and pisciculture 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1<br />
Industry 30,1 24,8 23,2 29,1 21,1<br />
Constructions 4,8 4,8 6,1 7,8 7,4<br />
Services 10,9 35,7 41,0 42,7 42,8<br />
Source: Romania’s Statistical Yearbook 1999, p.81 and 2010, p.91<br />
Data in the table no.4.1 show an overly large increase <strong>of</strong> the weight <strong>of</strong> services in total<br />
employment (about +31 percentage points) at the expense <strong>of</strong> industry (-9 pp) and agriculture (-<br />
6.5 pp) where a significant growth potential remains unvalued.
Table no.4.2. Contributions (%) to GDP growth on categories <strong>of</strong> resources in 2004 and 2009<br />
2004 2009<br />
Total GDP 8,5 -7,1<br />
Agriculture 2,2 -1,0<br />
Industry 1,9 -0,3<br />
Constructions 0,5 -1,4<br />
Services 3,0 -3,0<br />
Net taxes 0,9 -1,4<br />
Source: Romania’s Statistical Yearbook 2010, p.322<br />
The structure <strong>of</strong> GDP growth contribution on categories <strong>of</strong> resources (Table no.4.2) shows, for<br />
example, that in the first year <strong>of</strong> financial crisis in Romania, the services sector had the largest<br />
contribution (42.2%) to the GDP’s decline, which outlines their sensitivity and vulnerability,<br />
followed by construction sector whose unhealthy and unsustainable growth in 2008 reached<br />
exaggerated levels (+33% compared to 2007). Following a policy <strong>of</strong> promoting the services,<br />
especially those <strong>of</strong> speculative inflationist brokerage, the investment policy saw a structure that<br />
clearly disadvantaged the industry and the agriculture (Table no.4.3). Thus, the volume <strong>of</strong><br />
investment in industry as a percentage <strong>of</strong> total investments decreased by -15.6 percentage<br />
points in the period 1993-2009, and in agriculture by -3 pp.<br />
Table no.4.3. Structure in percents <strong>of</strong> net investments, on main activities <strong>of</strong> the national<br />
economy during 1993-2009<br />
1993 2003 2005 2008 2009<br />
Agriculture 6,9 5,9 2,8 3,4 3,9<br />
Industry 49,9 37,6 33,0 31,8 34,3<br />
Constructions 0,2 9,6 9,6 10,9 12,2<br />
Services 46,9 50,3 53,9 49,6<br />
Source: Romania’s Statistical Yearbook 1999, 2010, p.357.<br />
It is noted that in 2009, it is the very investment in services that showed the largest percentage<br />
decline (- 4.3 pp), which highlights the sector's vulnerability to the crisis shocks and its<br />
inability to redress without the real support <strong>of</strong> manufacturing industries, mining and<br />
agriculture.<br />
Table no.4.4 Structure in percents <strong>of</strong> the sources <strong>of</strong> investment financing<br />
2003 2008 2009<br />
Own sources 68,7 73,0 68,1<br />
Domestic credit 9,2 9,7 7,4<br />
Foreign loans 8,4 3,6 5,3<br />
State and local budget 6,9 8,2 8,8<br />
Foreign capital 0,4 0,6 1,8<br />
Other sources 6,4 4,9 8,6<br />
Source: Romania’s Statistical Yearbook, p.357<br />
29<br />
-% -
One <strong>of</strong> the most important problems <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania's getting over the crisis and entering<br />
the way to sustainable development is<br />
represented by the sources <strong>of</strong> financing the<br />
investments.<br />
The data in the table no.4.4 reveal the<br />
following:<br />
- the largest share is held by the own sources<br />
<strong>of</strong> the economic agents, weighing more than<br />
68%, which actually highlights the<br />
fundamental role <strong>of</strong> the own effort <strong>of</strong> the<br />
economy to get out <strong>of</strong> the crisis, and to which<br />
the other sources <strong>of</strong> funding can<br />
complementarily be added more or less;<br />
- internal loans have between 7 and 9% <strong>of</strong><br />
total investment funding, which is a very<br />
modest weight, showing that the banks' role<br />
30<br />
in stimulating investments is still weak,<br />
among others due to the high interest rates<br />
and the reluctance that they have for medium<br />
and long term loans in times <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
turbulence;<br />
- investment financing from public sources<br />
has increased in weight in the crisis year<br />
2009 which shows exactly the role that state<br />
can have in stimulating investments as a<br />
factor <strong>of</strong> growth;<br />
- foreign capital in the period 2003-2009 had<br />
a very small weight in investment financing,<br />
which is why an exaggeration <strong>of</strong> their role in<br />
the sustainable growth is not very beneficial;<br />
- other sources <strong>of</strong> investment financing refer<br />
to foreign loans and grants from EU<br />
structural and cohesion funds that are still<br />
insufficiently accessed.<br />
Table no.4.5 Structure in percents <strong>of</strong> GDP, on categories <strong>of</strong> resources, in the years 1999,<br />
2004, 2005 and 2009<br />
- % -<br />
1999 2004 2005 2009<br />
Agriculture, forestry and 11,1 12,5 8,4 7,1<br />
fishing<br />
Industry 27,3 24,9 24,8 27,8<br />
Constructions 4,9 5,9 6,5 11,0<br />
Services 56,7 56,7 60,3 54,1<br />
Source: Data <strong>of</strong> the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Statistics. Own calculations, Romania’s Statistical Yearbook<br />
2005, p.415<br />
In the crisis year 2009, the weight <strong>of</strong> services and constructions in total GDP on categories <strong>of</strong><br />
resources decreased by -6.2 pp and, respectively, -4.5 pp, as compared to 2005, highlighting<br />
their weak resistance and sustainability to the crisis shocks.<br />
Table no.4.6 Contribution (%) to GDP growth on categories <strong>of</strong> usages in 2004, 2005 and<br />
2009<br />
2004 2005 2009<br />
GDP 8,5 4,2 -7,1<br />
Household final consumption 9,8 7,4 -6,5<br />
Government's final consumption -1,0 0,2 0,1<br />
Fixed capital gross formation +2,4 3,4 -8,1<br />
Net Export -4,4 -4,5 7,5<br />
Changes in inventories 1,7 -2,3 -0,1<br />
Source: Data <strong>of</strong> the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Statistics. Own calculations, Romania’s Statistical Yearbook<br />
2005.
The data in Table no.4.6 emphasize that in<br />
the crisis year 2009, the net export, created<br />
in the "tradable" sector (Manufacturing)<br />
was the only one who contributed<br />
positively to GDP growth, the fixed capital<br />
gross formation and the individual<br />
consumption having a negative impact.<br />
The dramatic decrease in the number <strong>of</strong><br />
employees in the manufacturing industry in<br />
Romania is a negative phenomenon which<br />
did not contribute at all to the development <strong>of</strong><br />
the country but it rather increased its<br />
vulnerability and dependence, internally and<br />
externally. We need a radical change in the<br />
strategic management <strong>of</strong> sustainable growth<br />
<strong>of</strong> manufacturing industries, especially with<br />
when a new reindustrialization <strong>of</strong><br />
Romanian economy is more <strong>of</strong>ten discussed.<br />
The increase in the weight <strong>of</strong> financial and<br />
business insurance services is only a<br />
"favourable" appearance that could not<br />
compensate for the long-term effects and the<br />
job losses in manufacturing industry.<br />
These changes on the labour market, keeping<br />
their proportions and features, are found in<br />
developed countries as well and suggest the<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> several common factors<br />
including, in the top, the technological<br />
change and globalization that allow<br />
specialization on certain goods and products<br />
but on different stages <strong>of</strong> production process.<br />
The links <strong>of</strong> the chain with the lowest added<br />
value are transferred in less developed<br />
countries or in the developing countries,<br />
where labour force is cheaper and the better<br />
paid jobs remain in the developed countries.<br />
If in America manufacturing industry<br />
declined and wages were lower, in<br />
commercial services, where America has a<br />
comparative advantage, both value added and<br />
employment increased. The same happened<br />
to non-tradable services which, by<br />
definition, remain where consumption occurs.<br />
The demand for non-tradable goods in the<br />
future may not continue to grow at the same<br />
pace as so far, considering the effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
economic and financial crisis. Health,<br />
commerce and government services<br />
decreased. Therefore, government will have<br />
to focus on technologies that could serve to<br />
31<br />
develop the "tradable" sector (<strong>of</strong> goods and<br />
services exported).<br />
The economic structural evolution has its<br />
own strategic importance and may be<br />
affected in different effective ways, so that<br />
nowadays there appears as increasingly<br />
necessary strategy <strong>of</strong> reindustrialization <strong>of</strong><br />
transitional economies, after the shock<br />
deindustrialization produced during 1990-<br />
2010. In this context, we can mention that<br />
Romania follows an unfavourable trend, as<br />
compared to the global trends, in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />
drastic reduction <strong>of</strong> CDI staff and <strong>of</strong> the<br />
investment and expenditure in the sector<br />
considered, along with industry and<br />
agriculture as factors <strong>of</strong> sustainable, smart<br />
and inclusive development (UE Strategy<br />
2020).<br />
There still are many uncertainties about how<br />
to implement such a strategy which does not<br />
mean that we will not have to deal with both<br />
theoretical and pragmatic terms. Many<br />
specialists would question an industrial<br />
policy that promotes manufacturing industry<br />
as a first priority.<br />
As long as a low demand keeps the interest<br />
rates and the dollar at a low level, the<br />
tradable sector is likely to grow without the<br />
need for action (impulse) from the state.<br />
America remains the world's largest<br />
manufacturing producer. Japan and America<br />
have doubled the manufacturing production<br />
output in the period 1980-2009, and, in<br />
absolute terms, the manufacturing production<br />
output did not decline in any <strong>of</strong> the G7<br />
country in this period.<br />
The manufacturing industry with low added<br />
value focused in China, where labour is<br />
cheap, but it is not clear whether this<br />
structure <strong>of</strong> comparative advantage will last<br />
long. However, China has not neglected the<br />
sustainable growth <strong>of</strong> manufacturing industry<br />
especially <strong>of</strong> branches with high added value,<br />
science-intensive, using in a first phase the<br />
massive promotion <strong>of</strong> technological transfer<br />
and assimilation <strong>of</strong> the mass <strong>of</strong> products and<br />
equipment, followed by a phase <strong>of</strong><br />
improvement in products and services<br />
acquired and, more importantly, a phase <strong>of</strong><br />
business creativity and innovation.
Jagdish Bhagwati, pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Columbia<br />
University, believes that those who favour<br />
stimulation <strong>of</strong> the manufacturing industry in<br />
the rich world suffer from the so-called<br />
"fetish" <strong>of</strong> processors (manufacturing fetish).<br />
According to Bhagwati, the fascination for<br />
manufacturing industry is based on the<br />
erroneous belief that it is more dynamic in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> technology than the services. In the<br />
services there take place sensitive dynamic <strong>of</strong><br />
technological progress as well, such as:<br />
logistics companies, large wholesalers,<br />
mobile telecommunications, innovation in<br />
non-financial services, genetically modified<br />
seeds in agriculture. However it is worth<br />
mentioning that these services are driven, in<br />
the final analysis, by the manufacturing<br />
sector which they serve as producers <strong>of</strong><br />
"tradable" goods. The wholesale and the<br />
retail have benefited from huge benefits in<br />
recent decades, as a result <strong>of</strong> ICT<br />
development, whose material base can be<br />
found in manufacturing industry.<br />
Bhagwati also considers as wrong the second<br />
assumption <strong>of</strong> "fetishists", that manufacturing<br />
is more important for creating jobs than<br />
services. Changing the structure <strong>of</strong><br />
production for manufacturing industries does<br />
not increase the number <strong>of</strong> jobs. The<br />
increasing demand for "non-tradable"<br />
services occurs just as strong as in the years<br />
before the crisis, Bhagwati says, although<br />
there are no solid arguments in this regard.<br />
On the other hand, it is unclear whether the<br />
demand for "tradable" services will decrease<br />
or not. As emerging economies become more<br />
developed, they will want to benefit in larger<br />
quantities, from all sorts <strong>of</strong> services,<br />
including the most sophisticated, to which the<br />
U.S. and Britain have comparative<br />
advantages. Those inclining towards the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> manufacturing industry on<br />
the grounds that it would be better to<br />
stimulate exports, <strong>of</strong>ten ignore the fact that an<br />
increased volume <strong>of</strong> services becomes<br />
exportable (traded), and that rich countries<br />
tend to export more than import such<br />
services. America and England have a<br />
surplus <strong>of</strong> trade balance in such services.<br />
Rich countries face obstacles in the<br />
32<br />
capitalization <strong>of</strong> power (their economic<br />
supremacy in this field). However, the trade<br />
in services remains, from far, relatively<br />
restricted, not only in emerging economies.<br />
Mario Monti from Bocconi University in<br />
Milan found that only 20% <strong>of</strong> services in EU<br />
have a cross-border component and that the<br />
efforts to liberalize services can bring more<br />
benefits than the exhortations to stimulate<br />
manufacturing industries.<br />
In this part <strong>of</strong> the communication I wanted to<br />
bring forward a major problem that the<br />
strategic management at the macroeconomic<br />
level currently faces, in terms <strong>of</strong> sustainable<br />
development policies, sectoral and subsectoral,<br />
as a result <strong>of</strong> the de-industrialization<br />
phenomenon at a national level in countries<br />
with economies in transition and <strong>of</strong> the<br />
defragmentation <strong>of</strong> processing industries<br />
under the impact <strong>of</strong> the globalization<br />
processes and the deepening <strong>of</strong> domestic and<br />
international specialization and cooperation<br />
in the production <strong>of</strong> goods and services that<br />
imply new requirements for the management<br />
<strong>of</strong> sustainable development in conditions <strong>of</strong><br />
extensive business networks (business<br />
networking) whose hard core is represented<br />
by the multi and trans-national corporations.<br />
The conceptual and strategic reconsidering <strong>of</strong><br />
the promotion <strong>of</strong> sustainable and competitive<br />
economic structure in Romania is a<br />
prerequisite for addressing external debt<br />
sustainability that requires, complementarily,<br />
an optimal solution <strong>of</strong> other issues as well:<br />
- the ratio between domestic and foreign debt<br />
on short, medium and long term;<br />
- a correlation, in time, <strong>of</strong> the increased debt<br />
with the repayment capacity, in order to<br />
avoid insolvency;<br />
- better negotiation <strong>of</strong> conditions for bilateral<br />
and multilateral lending;<br />
- correlation <strong>of</strong> real economy with the<br />
nominal, as to ensure the primacy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
former and the latter’s role as an important<br />
factor <strong>of</strong> influence, knowing that what<br />
remains finally is only the anthropic, sociohuman<br />
capital, together with the natural one,<br />
beyond the ephemerality <strong>of</strong> the monetary<br />
financial processes;
- making the policy makers accountable for<br />
the identifying sources <strong>of</strong> external debt<br />
repayment, beyond their term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />
Bibliography<br />
Albu L., Pelinescu E., (2009), Sustainability<br />
<strong>of</strong> Public Debt and Budget Deficit,<br />
Economic Policy, October, 2009, p.33-<br />
22.<br />
Calvo G., (2007), Crisis in Emerging Market<br />
Economies: A Global Perspective,<br />
Working Paper no.441, Columbia<br />
University and NBER.<br />
Calvo G., Reinhart C. (2002), Fearing <strong>of</strong><br />
Floating, The Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Economics, MIT Press vol.112(2) mai,<br />
pp.379-408.<br />
Calvo G., Talvi E., (2005), Sudden Stop,<br />
Financial Factors and Economic<br />
Collapse in Latin America: Learning<br />
from Argentina and Chile, Working<br />
Paper 11153, Cambridge Mass:<br />
National Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />
Research;<br />
Georgescu G., (2007), Current Acount Defit<br />
and Implications on Country Risk <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania, Institute <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />
Forecasting, October 2007, p.88-97.<br />
Krugman P.R., (1979), A Model <strong>of</strong> Balance<br />
<strong>of</strong> Payments Crises, Journal <strong>of</strong> Money,<br />
Credit and Banking 11(3): 311-325;<br />
Malliaropulos D., (2011), Competitiveness,<br />
External Deficits and External Debt <strong>of</strong><br />
the Greek Economy, Economy<br />
Markets, Eurobank EFG, Volume VI,<br />
33<br />
Issue 7, April 2011,<br />
www.eurobank.gr/research ;<br />
Michael Spence and Sandile Hatshwayo<br />
(2011) „The Evolving Structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
American Economy and the<br />
Employment Challenge”, Council <strong>of</strong><br />
Foreign Relations, Working Paper,<br />
March 2011<br />
Neumeyer P.A., Perri F., (2005), Business<br />
Cycles in Emerging Economies: The<br />
Role <strong>of</strong> Interest Rates, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Monetary Economics 52(2): 345-380;<br />
Ucal M., Oksay S. (2011), The Solvency<br />
Ratio <strong>of</strong> External Debt (SRED) as an<br />
Indicator <strong>of</strong> Debt Crisis: The Case <strong>of</strong><br />
Turkey, Inst.J.Eco.Res.2011, 2(1) 166-<br />
172, available<br />
online@www.ijeronline.com<br />
Zaman Gh., Georgescu G., (2009),<br />
Structural Fund Absorbtion: A New<br />
Challenge for Romania ?, Romanian<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics, nr.1, p. 136-<br />
154; (2010), Romania external debt<br />
sustainability under crisis<br />
circumstances, Romanian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Economics, nr.1 (39), p 5-38; (2011)<br />
Sovereign Risk and Debt Sustainability<br />
- Warning Levels for Romania, Non-<br />
Linear Modelling in Economics –<br />
Beyond Standards Economics (Albu L.<br />
(editor), Editura Expert, pp.234-270;<br />
*** World Economic and Financial Survey,<br />
Regional Economic Outlook, Europe<br />
Strengthening the Recovery, May 11,<br />
IMF 2011;
Europe 1<br />
Real GDP growth and CPI inflation (%) in European countries<br />
Countries with developed<br />
economy 1<br />
34<br />
Annex 1<br />
Real GDP growth Average CPI inflation<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />
-4.5 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.8 3.0<br />
-4.0 1.7 1.7 1.9 0.7 1.9 2.5 1.8<br />
Emerging economies -5.9 4.2 4.3 4.3 8.5 6.3 7.3 6.2<br />
European Union 1<br />
-4.1 1.8 1.8 2.1 0.9 2.0 2.7 1.9<br />
Euro area -4.1 1.7 1.6 1.8 0.3 1.6 2.3 1.7<br />
Austria -3.9 2.0 2.4 2.3 0.4 1.7 2.5 2.0<br />
Belgium -2.7 2.0 1.7 1.9 0.0 2.3 2.9 2.3<br />
Cyprus -1.7 1.0 1.7 2.2 0.2 2.6 3.9 2.8<br />
Estonia -13.9 3.1 3.3 3.7 -0.1 2.9 4.7 2.1<br />
Finland -8.2 3.1 3.1 2.5 1.6 1.7 3.0 2.1<br />
France -2.5 1.5 1.6 1.8 0.1 1.7 2.1 1.7<br />
Germany -4.7 3.5 2.5 2.1 0.2 1.2 2.2 1.5<br />
Greece -2.0 -4.5 -3.0 1.1 1.4 4.7 2.5 0.5<br />
Ireland -7.6 -1.0 0.5 1.9 -1.7 -1.6 0.5 0.5<br />
Italy -5.2 1.3 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.6 2.0 2.1<br />
Luxemburg -3.7 3.4 3.0 3.1 0.4 2.3 3.5 1.7<br />
Malta -3.4 3.6 2.5 2.2 1.8 2.0 3.0 2.6<br />
Nederland -3.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.0 0.9 2.3 2.2<br />
Portugal -2.5 1.4 -1.5 -0.5 -0.9 1.4 2.4 1.4<br />
Slovakia -4.8 4.0 3.8 4.2 0.9 0.7 3.4 2.7<br />
Slovenia -8.1 1.2 2.0 2.4 0.9 1.8 2.2 3.1<br />
Spain -3.7 -0.1 0.8 1.6 -0.2 2.0 2.6 1.5<br />
Other EU countries with<br />
advanced economies<br />
Czech Republic -4.1 2.3 1.7 2.9 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0<br />
Denmark -5.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.3 2.3 2.0 2.0<br />
Sweden -5.3 5.5 3.8 3.5 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.0<br />
England<br />
Emerging EU economies<br />
-4.9 1.3 1.7 2.3 2.1 3.3 4.2 2.0<br />
Bulgaria -5.5 0.2 3.0 3.5 2.5 3.0 4.8 3.7<br />
Hungary -6.7 1.2 2.8 2.8 4.2 4.9 4.1 3.5<br />
Latvia -18.0 -0.3 3.3 4.0 3.3 -1.2 3.0 1.7<br />
Lithuania -14.7 1.3 4.6 3.8 4.4 1.2 3.1 2.9<br />
Poland 1.7 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.5 2.6 4.1 2.9<br />
Romania<br />
Non-EU advanced economies<br />
-7.1 -1.3 1.5 4.4 5.6 6.1 6.1 3.4<br />
Iceland -6.9 -3.5 2.3 2.9 12.0 5.4 2.6 2.6<br />
Israel 0.8 4.6 3.8 3.8 3.3 2.7 3.0 2.5<br />
Norway -1.4 0.4 2.9 2.5 2.2 2.4 1.8 2.2<br />
Switzerland<br />
Other emerging economies<br />
-1.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 -0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0
Real GDP growth Average CPI inflation<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />
Albania 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.6 2.2 3.6 4.5 3.5<br />
Belarus 0.2 7.6 6.8 4.8 13.0 7.7 12.9 9.7<br />
Bosnia and Herzegovina -3.1 0.8 2.2 4.0 -0.4 2.1 5.0 2.5<br />
Croatia -5.8 -1.4 1.3 1.8 2.4 1.0 3.5 2.4<br />
Macedonia -0.9 0.7 3.0 3.7 -0.8 1.5 5.2 2.0<br />
Moldova -6.0 6.9 4.5 4.8 0.0 7.4 7.5 6.3<br />
Montenegro -5.7 1.1 2.0 3.5 3.4 0.5 3.1 2.0<br />
Russia -7.8 4.0 4.8 4.5 11.7 6.9 9.3 8.0<br />
Serbia -3.1 1.8 3.0 5.0 8.1 6.2 9.9 4.1<br />
Turkey -4.7 8.2 4.6 4.5 6.3 8.6 5.7 6.0<br />
Ukraine -14.8 4.2 4.5 4.9 15.9 9.4 9.2 8.3<br />
Memorandum<br />
World -0.5 5.0 4.4 4.5 2.5 3.7 4.5 3.4<br />
Advanced economy -3.4 3.0 2.4 2.6 0.1 1.6 2.2 1.7<br />
Emergent and developing 2.7 7.3 6.5 6.5 5.2 6.2 6.9 5.3<br />
USA -2.6 2.8 2.8 2.9 -0.3 1.6 2.2 1.6<br />
Japan -6.3 3.9 1.4 2.1 -1.4 -0.7 0.2 0.2<br />
China 9.2 10.3 9.6 9.5 -0.7 3.3 5.0 2.5<br />
Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook.<br />
1 Average weighted by GDP valued at purchasing power parity<br />
35
Annex 2<br />
Emerging Europe: GDP growth in domestic demand, exports and private consumption<br />
Real GDP growth Real growth <strong>of</strong> domestic Real growth <strong>of</strong> export Real growth <strong>of</strong> private<br />
demand<br />
consumption<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />
Baltics 2<br />
-15.9 0.7 4.1 3.9 -26.2 1.6 5.0 4.1 -13.2 14.1 9.2 7.5 -20.1 -2.6 2.7 3.0<br />
Latvia -18.0 -0.3 3.3 4.0 -27.6 -0.9 3.0 4.3 -14.1 10.3 7.0 5.7 -24.1 -0.1 3.0 4.0<br />
Lithuania -14.7 1.3 4.6 3.8 -25.4 3.0 6.1 4.0 -12.7 16.3 10.5 8.5 -17.7 -4.1 2.5 2.4<br />
Central Europe 2<br />
-0.1 3.3 3.6 3.4 -3.1 2.9 3.2 3.4 -7.4 11.0 7.5 6.7 0.2 2.0 3.2 3.3<br />
Hungary -6.7 1.2 2.8 2.8 -10.8 -1.6 2.3 2.5 -9.6 13.9 9.3 8.7 -6.8 -2.6 1.5 2.2<br />
Poland 1.7 3.8 3.8 3.6 -1.0 4.0 3.4 3.7 -6.8 10.2 7.0 6.2 2.0 3.2 3.6 3.6<br />
Southeastern Europe-EU 2 -6.6 -0.9 1.9 4.1 -12.8 -1.9 1.0 4.0 -6.9 14.0 9.4 8.0 -9.5 -1.5 1.7 4.0<br />
Bulgaria -5.5 0.2 3.0 3.5 -12.7 -4.5 3.0 3.5 -11.2 16.2 9.8 7.5 -7.6 -1.2 3.6 4.0<br />
Romania -7.1 -1.3 1.5 4.4 -12.9 -1.0 0.3 4.2 -5.3 13.1 9.3 8.2 -10.2 -1.7 1.0 4.1<br />
Southeastern Europe-non- -3.0 0.8 2.5 3.6 -7.2 -3.3 1.3 3.4 -12.8 14.0 9.3 6.8 -4.2 -1.0 1.1 3.4<br />
EU 2<br />
Albania 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.6 3.1 -8.0 4.1 2.6 -1.7 29.0 1.2 7.6 6.5 -5.1 3.3 2.4<br />
Bosnia and Herzegovina -3.1 0.8 2.2 4.0 -6.4 -1.4 1.3 4.1 -6.2 9.7 6.0 4.8 -3.9 0.8 0.8 3.3<br />
Croatia -5.8 -1.4 1.3 1.8 -9.3 -5.1 0.7 2.0 -16.2 4.1 3.3 2.1 -8.5 -1.2 0.1 0.5<br />
Kosovo 2.9 4.0 5.5 5.2<br />
FYR Macedonia -0.9 0.7 3.0 3.7 -2.9 -1.1 2.4 3.8 -10.7 22.7 18.7 13.0 -3.9 1.1 2.4 3.9<br />
Rep. Montenegro -5.7 1.1 2.0 3.5 -16.9 -3.3 -1.2 1.2 -22.4 9.0 8.2 5.3 -13.4 6.8 -2.3 -0.1<br />
Serbia -3.1 1.8 3.0 5.0 -8.6 -1.2 0.9 4.8 -15.0 19.1 16.6 10.2 -2.4 -1.3 1.3 6.6<br />
European CIS countries 2<br />
-8.2 4.2 4.9 4.6 -14.4 6.5 7.6 6.1 -7.3 10.0 3.4 4.2 -5.7 3.4 7.2 6.8<br />
Belarus 0.2 7.6 6.8 4.8 -1.1 10.3 6.1 5.0 -9.0 5.1 13.3 4.7 0.0 8.6 6.9 6.9<br />
Moldova -6.0 6.9 4.5 4.8 -18.6 9.6 5.9 5.5 -12.1 12.8 7.1 9.2 -8.0 9.0 5.8 5.3<br />
Russia -7.8 4.0 4.8 4.5 -14.0 6.3 7.8 6.3 -4.7 10.2 2.4 3.8 -4.9 2.8 7.1 7.0<br />
Ukraine -14.8 4.2 4.5 4.9 -22.6 6.2 6.3 5.3 -25.1 10.4 5.9 6.7 -13.9 5.9 7.5 5.3<br />
Turkey -4.7 8.2 4.6 4.5 -7.2 12.2 5.3 5.1 -5.3 2.6 6.2 6.1 -2.2 7.3 6.1 5.7<br />
Emerging Europe 2 . 3<br />
-5.9 4.2 4.3 4.3 -10.9 5.8 5.6 5.2 -7.3 9.3 5.4 5.4 -4.5 3.3 5.6 5.6<br />
New EU member states 2 ." -3.5 2.2 3.0 3.5 -7.0 1.4 2.4 3.4 -9.0 13.0 8.3 6.8 -3.1 0.6 2.4 3.3<br />
Memorandum<br />
36
Real GDP growth Real growth <strong>of</strong> domestic Real growth <strong>of</strong> export Real growth <strong>of</strong> private<br />
demand<br />
consumption<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />
Czech Republic -4.1 2.3 1.7 2.9 -3.7 1.1 1.0 2.2 -10.8 18.0 10.3 6.3 -0.2 0.4 0.9 2.3<br />
Estonia -13.9 3.1 3.3 3.7 -20.5 -3.8 3.5 3.7 -18.7 21.7 4.1 4.9 -18.8 -1.9 2.4 2.4<br />
Slovakia -4.8 4.0 3.8 4.2 -7.9 2.7 1.8 3.6 -15.9 16.4 8.5 6.6 0.3 -0.3 2.3 3.8<br />
Slovenia -8.1 1.2 2.0 2.4 -10.1 0.4 1.0 2.2 -17.7 7.8 6.8 5.7 -0.8 0.5 1.2 2.2<br />
European Union 2 ' 5<br />
-4.1 1.8 1.8 2.1 -4.2 1.3 1.0 1.6 -12.6 10.1 6.6 5.1 -1.7 0.8 1.2 1.6<br />
1 Real export <strong>of</strong> goods and services; 2 Average weighted by GDP at PPP; 3 Includes: Albania, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Kosovo, Latvia,<br />
Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro Rep., Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Turkey and Ukraine; 4 Includes: Bulgaria, Czech Rep., Estonia, Hungary, Latvia,<br />
Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia; 5 Includes: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Rep., Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary,<br />
Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxemburg, Malta, Nederland, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and England.<br />
Source: IMF World Economic Outlook.<br />
37
Annex 3<br />
Inflation (CPI), the current account and external debt, 2009-2012 (%)<br />
CPI Inflation (average) CPI inflation at the end Current account balance / Total external debt / GDP<br />
<strong>of</strong> the period<br />
GDP<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />
Baltics 1<br />
4.0 0.3 3.1 2.5 0.3 3.2 2.9 2.4 6.2 2.5 0.5 -1.2 118.2 117.4 109.6 103.0<br />
Latvia 3.3 -1.2 3.0 1.7 -1.4 2.4 1.9 2.3 8.6 3.6 2.6 1.5 156.3 165.2 152.0 141.2<br />
Lithuania 4.4 1.2 3.1 2.9 1.3 3.6 3.5 2.5 4.5 1.8 -0.9 -2.9 91.4 85.7 82.2 78.5<br />
Central Europe 1<br />
3.6 3.1 4.1 3.0 3.9 3.3 3.8 2.8 -1.8 -2.2 -2.8 -3.1 85.3 83.5 83.7 81.5<br />
Hungary 4.2 4.9 4.1 3.5 5.6 4.2 3.9 3.2 -0.5 1.6 1.5 0.9 153.3 143.9 140.6 131.5<br />
Poland 3.5 2.6 4.1 2.9 3.5 3.1 3.8 2.7 -2.2 -3.3 -3.9 -4.2 64.9 66.8 68.4 68.5<br />
Southeastern Europe-EU 1<br />
4.7 5.3 5.7 3.5 3.9 7.0 4.4 2.8 -5.5 -3.4 -4.2 -4.4 81.4 80.6 82.4 78.5<br />
Bulgaria 2.5 3.0 4.8 3.7 1.6 4.4 5.3 2.4 -10.0 -0.8 -1.5 -2.0 113.6 102.3 94.7 88.2<br />
Romania 5.6 6.1 6.1 3.4 4.8 8.0 4.0 3.0 -4.2 -4.2 -5.0 -5.2 71.8 74.2 78.7 75.6<br />
Southeastern Europe— , non- 3.7 3.2 6.1 3.1 3.1 5.1 4.9 3.0 -7.8 -5.7 -6.9 -6.6 78.4 78.4 73.8 72.5<br />
EU 1<br />
Albania 2.2 3.6 4.5 3.5 3.7 3.4 4.0 2.9 -14.0 -10.1 -11.2 -9.8 33.5 41.6 37.7 39.1<br />
Bosnia and Herzegovina -0.4 2.1 5.0 2.5 0.0 3.1 5.0 2.5 -6.9 -6.0 -6.0 -5.7 54.9 54.6 58.6 58.4<br />
Croatia 2.4 1.0 3.5 2.4 1.9 1.9 3.5 2.4 -5.5 -1.9 -3.6 -3.6 101.9 99.3 93.4 91.4<br />
Kosovo -2.4 3.5 8.2 2.1 0.1 6.6 5.6 2.0 -16.8 -17.3 -23.1 -25.6<br />
FYR Macedonia -0.8 1.5 5.2 2.0 -1.6 3.0 7.5 2.0 -6.4 -2.8 -4.2 -4.8 57.5 56.5 57.3 58.2<br />
Rep.Montenegro 3.4 0.5 3.1 2.0 1.5 0.7 3.0 1.8 -30.3 -25.6 -24.5 -22.1 97.8 100.2 99.0 97.5<br />
Rep.Serbia 8.1 6.2 9.9 4.1 6.6 10.3 6.0 4.0 -6.9 -7.1 -7.4 -6.6 78.7 81.6 74.0 72.8<br />
European CIS countries 1<br />
12.2 7.2 9.5 8.1 9.2 8.9 8.9 7.6 2.9 3.6 4.2 2.7 43.1 37.3 30.7 28.1<br />
Belarus 13.0 7.7 12.9 9.7 10.1 9.9 13.0 9.0 -13.0 -15.5 -15.7 -15.2 44.9 51.5 57.9 63.4<br />
Moldova 0.0 7.4 7.5 6.3 0.4 8.1 7.5 5.0 -8.5 -10.9 -11.1 -11.2 65.5 67.4 70.3 74.0<br />
Russia 11.7 6.9 9.3 8.0 8.8 8.8 8.5 7.5 4.1 4.9 5.6 3.9 38.6 32.3 25.5 22.6<br />
Ukraine 15.9 9.4 9.2 8.3 12.3 9.1 10.2 7.7 -1.5 -1.9 -3.6 -3.8 88.0 83.9 80.7 80.3<br />
Turkey 6.3 8.6 5.7 6.0 6.5 6.4 7.0 5.4 -2.3 -6.5 -8.0 -8.2 43.7 40.7 43.7 46.2<br />
Emerging Europe 1 - 2<br />
8.5 6.3 7.3 6.2 7.0 7.1 7.1 5.8 -0.1 -0.5 -0.3 -1.1 57.3 52.0 47.7 45.4<br />
New EU member states 1 - 3<br />
3.2 2.9 3.9 2.9 2.9 3.7 3.6 2.7 -2.0 -2.2 -2.6 -2.8 75.7 75.1 73.9 71.2<br />
Memorandum<br />
Czech Rep. 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.3 2.2 2.0 -1.1 -2.4 -1.8 -1.2 45.5 47.4 44.0 42.0<br />
Estonia -0.1 2.9 4.7 2.1 -1.7 5.4 3.5 2.0 4.5 3.6 3.3 3.1 125.8 117.6 100.5 95.0<br />
38
CPI Inflation (average) CPI inflation at the end Current account balance / Total external debt / GDP<br />
<strong>of</strong> the period<br />
GDP<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />
Slovakia 0.9 0.7 3.4 2.7 0.1 1.3 3.4 2.9 -3.6 -3.4 -2.8 -2.7 71.9 72.1 70.4 67.8<br />
Slovenia 0.9 1.8 2.2 3.1 1.8 1.9 3.0 2.7 -1.5 -1.2 -2.0 -2.1 105.2 113.8 113.3 114.4<br />
European Union 1 ' 1<br />
0.9 2.0 2.7 1.9 1.2 2.5 2.5 1.9 -0.2 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1<br />
1 2 3<br />
Real export <strong>of</strong> goods and services; Average weighted by GDP at PPP; Includes: Albania, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary,<br />
Kosovo, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Rep.Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Turkey and Ukraine; 4 Includes: Bulgaria, Czech Rep.,<br />
Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia; 5 Include: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Rep., Denmark, Estonia, Finland,<br />
France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxemburg, Malta, Nederland, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain,<br />
Sweden and England.<br />
Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook.<br />
39
Annex 4<br />
Saving-investment balance by sectors in some European countries during 2000-2007<br />
(% <strong>of</strong> GDP, unless otherwise specified)<br />
Households Non-financial corporations Financial<br />
corporations<br />
Government Total<br />
S(E) I Net S(E) I Net S(E) I Net S(E) I Net S(E) I Net<br />
Year 2007<br />
Countries with surplus 10.2 6.5 3.8 12.6 11.1 1.5 1.0 0.3 0.7 2.8 1.7 1.0 26.6 19.6 7.0<br />
Nederland 6.9 7.5 -0.5 17.0 9.3 7.7 1.5 0.4 1.2 3.4 3.3 0.1 28.8 20.4 8.4<br />
Germany 11.5 6.2 5.3 11.4 10.5 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.6 2.4 1.4 1.0 26.0 18.3 7.6<br />
Finland 3.9 7.7 -3.7 14.9 12.5 2.5 0.7 0.3 0.4 7.6 2.5 5.1 27.1 22.9 4.2<br />
Austria 10.2 5.3 5.0 12.0 16.0 -4.0 2.3 0.7 1.6 2.6 1.1 1.4 27.2 23.2 4.0<br />
Belgium 10.0 6.7 3.3 13.6 13.7 0.0 1.3 0.8 0.6 1.7 1.6 0.1 26.7 22.8 3.9<br />
Countries with deficit<br />
40<br />
1<br />
9.0 7.7 -1.0 6.8 12.8 -2.9 1.5 0.5 0.6 2.8 3.2 -0.4 20.0 24.2 -4.2<br />
Italy 10.2 6.9 3.3 6.3 12.2 -5.9 1.3 0.4 0.9 2.3 2.3 0.0 20.1 21.9 -1.8<br />
France 10.2 7.0 3.1 7.9 11.1 -3.2 0.8 0.8 0.0 1.1 3.3 -2.2 20.0 22.2 -2.2<br />
Ireland 3.3 12.2 -8.8 9.3 9.8 -0.4 4.9 0.6 4.3 4.1 4.7 -0.5 21.7 27.2 -5.5<br />
Spain 6.9 9.7 -2.8 5.2 17.2 -12.0 2.1 0.1 2.0 6.9 4.0 2.8 21.0 31.0 -10.0<br />
Portugal 4.9 5.8 -0.9 5.6 13.6 -8.0 2.6 1.0 1.6 -0.5 2.4 -2.9 12.7 22.9 -10.2<br />
Greece 2<br />
-1.1 9.4 -10.5 10.7 7.2 3.5 2.0 0.3 1.7 -2.5 2.8 -5.3 9.0 19.7 -10.7<br />
Hard peg -6.3 4.8 -11.1 16.0 26.0 -10.0 1.3 0.1 1.1 6.0 5.4 0.6 16.9 36.3 -19.4<br />
Lithuania -3.2 3.9 -7.1 13.9 21.5 -7.6 1.5 0.1 1.3 3.6 5.3 -1.7 15.8 30.9 -15.1<br />
Estonia -0.9 8.5 -9.4 15.5 26.1 -10.6 -0.2 -0.1 -0.1 7.6 5.1 2.5 22.0 39.6 -17.7<br />
Latvia -3.0 5.0 -8.0 12.4 29.1 -16.7 3.0 0.0 3.0 5.7 6.3 -0.6 18.1 40.4 -22.3<br />
Bulgaria -14.9 3.5 -18.4 21.0 28.0 -7.0 0.7 0.4 0.3 7.6 4.9 2.7 14.3 36.8 -22.5<br />
Year 2000<br />
Countries with surplus 9.6 7.2 2.5 8.9 12.2 -3.3 1.5 0.7 0.8 2.4 2.0 0.4 22.4 22.0 0.4<br />
Nederland 6.9 7.0 -0.1 13.8 10.4 3.4 3.1 1.4 1.7 4.5 3.1 1.4 28.4 22.0 6.4<br />
Germany 10.5 7.5 2.9 6.9 12.0 -5.1 1.2 0.5 0.7 1.6 1.8 -0.2 20.2 21.8 -1.6<br />
Finland 4.4 6.6 -2.3 14.7 11.6 3.1 0.1 0.2 -0.1 9.3 2.4 6.8 28.5 20.9 7.6<br />
Austria 8.9 5.7 3.1 11.3 16.0 -4.7 2.1 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 -0.2 23.6 24.3 -0.7<br />
Belgium 10.6 5.9 4.8 12.5 13.8 -1.3 1.0 0.9 0.1 2.6 2.0 0.6 26.7 22.5 4.2<br />
Countries with deficit 1<br />
9.2 6.5 2.7 8.8 11.9 -3.1 1.2 0.6 0.6 2.0 2.9 -0.9 21.2 21.9 -0.7<br />
Italy 9.9 6.5 3.4 8.6 11.3 -2.8 0.8 0.6 0.3 1.3 2.3 -1.0 20.6 20.7 -0.1<br />
France 9.8 5.7 4.0 8.3 10.8 -2.5 1.4 0.8 0.5 2.1 3.1 -1.0 21.6 20.5 1.1
Households Non-financial corporations Financial<br />
corporations<br />
Government Total<br />
S(E) I Net S(E) I Net S(E) I Net S(E) I Net S(E) I Net<br />
Ireland 3 4.9 7.4 -2.5 9.4 8.9 0.6 2.2 0.4 1.8 3.9 4.3 -0.3 20.5 20.9 -0.4<br />
Spain 7.5 7.4 0.1 10.3 15.3 -5.0 1.5 0.4 1.1 3.0 3.2 -0.1 22.3 26.3 -4.0<br />
Portugal 7.5 8.8 -1.2 8.0 15.4 -7.4 1.7 0.7 1.0 0.5 3.7 -3.1 17.8 28.5 -10.7<br />
Greece 2.4 11.5 -9.1 8.3 7.8 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.3 -0.2 3.6 -3.8 11.3 23.3 -12.0<br />
Hard peg -1.1 2.2 -3.3 13.4 17.6 -4.2 1.8 0.7 1.1 3.1 2.6 0.5 17.2 23.0 -5.8<br />
Lithuania 4.5 3.7 0.9 5.6 12.5 -6.9 1.3 0.4 1.0 1.5 2.4 -0.8 13.0 18.9 -5.9<br />
Estonia 2.3 3.4 -1.0 16.0 21.2 -5.1 1.5 0.3 1.2 3.5 3.8 -0.3 23.4 28.7 -5.3<br />
Latvia 1.5 1.4 0.2 14.4 19.9 -5.5 2.7 1.1 1.6 0.2 1.4 -1.1 18.9 23.7 -4.8<br />
Bulgaria 4 -9.3 0.8 -10.1 18.8 19.2 -0.4 1.6 0.8 0.8 6.1 2.9 3.2 17.3 23.8 -6.5<br />
Changes in 2007 compared to 2000 (percentage points <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />
Countries with surplus 0.6 -0.7 1.3 3.7 -1.0 4.8 -0.5 -0.4 -0.1 0.4 -0.2 0.6 4.2 -2.4 6.6<br />
Nederland 0.0 0.4 -0.4 3.2 -1.1 4.3 -1.6 -1.1 -0.5 -1.1 0.2 -1.3 0.4 -1.6 2.0<br />
Germany 1.0 -1.3 2.3 4.5 -1.4 5.9 -0.5 -0.4 -0.2 0.8 -0.3 1.2 5.8 -3.5 9.3<br />
Finland -0.4 1.0 -1.5 0.2 0.9 -0.6 0.5 0.1 0.5 -1.7 0.0 -1.8 -1.4 2.0 -3.4<br />
Austria 1.4 -0.4 1.8 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.2 -0.3 0.5 1.3 -0.4 1.6 3.6 -1.1 4.7<br />
Belgium -0.6 0.9 -1.5 1.2 -0.1 1.3 0.4 -0.1 0.5 -0.8 -0.3 -0.5 0.1 0.3 -0.3<br />
Countries with deficit 1<br />
-0.2 1.3 -3.7 -2.0 0.9 0.2 0.2 -0.1 0.1 0.8 0.3 0.5 -1.1 2.3 -3.5<br />
Italy 0.3 0.4 -0.1 -2.2 0.9 -3.2 0.5 -0.2 0.6 1.0 0.0 1.0 -0.5 1.2 -1.7<br />
France 0.4 1.3 -0.9 -0.4 0.3 -0.7 -0.6 -0.1 -0.5 -1.0 0.2 -1.2 -1.6 1.7 -3.3<br />
Ireland -1.6 4.7 -6.3 -0.1 0.9 -1.0 2.7 0.2 2.4 0.2 0.4 -0.2 1.2 6.3 -5.1<br />
Spain -0.6 2.3 -2.9 -5.1 1.8 -6.9 0.6 -0.3 0.9 3.8 0.9 3.0 -1.3 4.7 -6.0<br />
Portugal -2.6 -3.0 0.4 -2.4 -1.7 -0.6 0.9 0.3 0.6 -1.0 -1.2 0.2 -5.0 -5.6 0.6<br />
Greece -3.5 -2.1 -1.4 2.4 -0.5 2.9 1.2 -0.1 1.3 -2.4 -0.8 -1.5 -2.3 -3.6 1.3<br />
Hard peg -5.3 2.6 -7.9 2.5 8.4 -5.8 -0.5 -0.5 0.0 2.9 2.8 0.1 -0.3 13.3 -13.6<br />
Lithuania -7.7 0.2 -8.0 8.3 9.1 -0.8 0.1 -0.2 0.4 2.1 2.9 -0.8 2.8 12.0 -9.2<br />
Estonia -3.3 5.1 -8.4 -0.6 4.9 -5.5 -1.7 -0.4 -1.3 4.1 1.3 2.8 -1.4 11.0 -12.4<br />
Latvia -4.5 3.6 -8.1 -2.0 9.2 -11.3 0.2 -1.1 1.4 5.5 5.0 0.5 -0.8 16.7 -17.5<br />
Bulgaria -5.6 2.7 -8.3 2.2 8.8 -6.6 -1.0 -0.4 -0.5 1.5 2.0 -0.5 -3.0 13.0 -16.0<br />
Source: Eurostat IMF, World Economic Outlook database and IMF staff calculations<br />
1Exclusively Greece, 2 2006, 3 2002, 4 2004<br />
Note: E represents gross savings; I – gross investments; Net = E-I<br />
Country groups averages are weighted with weights <strong>of</strong> nominal GDP in 2000 and 2007.<br />
41
Annex 5<br />
Emerging Europe: evolution <strong>of</strong> public debt and the<br />
general government balance<br />
(% <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />
General government balance Public debt<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />
Baltics<br />
-8.7 -7.7 -5.8 -4.2 30.8 39.1 43.1 43.8<br />
Latvia -7.8 -7.9 -5.3 -1.9 32.8 39.9 42.5 41.0<br />
Lithuania -9.2 -7.6 -6.0 -5.5 29.6 38.7 43.5 45.4<br />
Central Europe<br />
-6.6 -7.1 -3.7 -4.2 56.7 60.8 60.7 61.3<br />
Hungary<br />
-4.3 -4.1 3.9 -4.3 78.4 80.4 76.6 76.9<br />
Poland -7.2 -7.9 -5.7 -4.2 50.9 55.7 56.6 57.3<br />
Southeastern Europe-EU<br />
-5.6 -5.7 -3.9 -2.6 25.8 30.5 32.8 32.8<br />
Bulgaria<br />
-0.9 -3.6 -2.6 -1.5 15.6 18.0 19.7 20.0<br />
Romania -7.3 -6.5 -4.4 -3.0 29.6 35.2 37.8 37.7<br />
Southeastern Europe-non-EU<br />
-4.5 -4.4 -4.5 -3.9 37.5 41.8 42.6 43.6<br />
Albania<br />
-7.5 -3.7 -4.6 -4.6 60.2 59.7 59.9 60.4<br />
Bosnia and Herzegovina -5.6 -4.0 -3.0 -1.9 35.4 36.9 41.4 41.4<br />
Croatia<br />
-4.1 -5.3 -6.3 -6.1 35.4 40.0 44.1 47.6<br />
Kosovo<br />
-0.7 -2.9 -3.3 -4.1<br />
FYR Macedonia -2.7 -2.5 -2.5 -2.2 23.9 24.8 26.8 27.4<br />
Rep. Montenegro<br />
-6.5 -3.8 -3.4 -2.5 40.7 44.1 43.1 42.2<br />
Serbia<br />
-4.3 -4.5 -4.1 -2.8 36.8 44.0 40.5 39.8<br />
European CIS countries<br />
-6.0 -3.7 -1.7 -1.8 14.3 14.1 13.3 13.8<br />
Belarus<br />
-0.7 -1.8 -1.9 -2.0 20.0 22.4 25.3 27.1<br />
Moldova<br />
-6.3 -2.5 -1.9 -0.7 31.6 29.8 30.4 32.4<br />
Russia<br />
-6.3 -3.6 -1.6 -1.7 11.0 9.9' 8.5 8.8<br />
Ukraine<br />
-6.2 -5.8 -2.8 -2.5 35.3 40.5 42.6 43.5<br />
Turkey<br />
-6.2 -3.4 -2.2 -2.0 45.5 41.7 39.4 37.6<br />
Emerging Europe<br />
-6.1 -4.5 -2.5 -2.4 29.5 30.1 29.4 29.4<br />
New EU member States<br />
Memorandum<br />
-6.4 -6.5 -3.9 -3.7 43.4 48.1 49.4 50.1<br />
Czech Republic -5.8 -4.9 -3.7 -3.6 35.4 39.6 41.7 43.4<br />
Estonia -2.1 0.2 -1.0 -0.7 7.2 6.6 6.3 6.0<br />
Slovakia -7.9 -8.2 -5.2 -3.9 35.4 42.0 45.1 46.2<br />
Slovenia<br />
-5.8 -5.7 -2.0 -3.3 35.4 37.2 42.3 44.9<br />
European Union<br />
-6.8 -6.6 -4.8 -4.0 72.3 78.2 80.6 81.8<br />
Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook database<br />
42
Annex 6<br />
Emerging Europe <strong>of</strong> selected indicators <strong>of</strong> financial solidity<br />
2007-2010 1<br />
%<br />
Income to assets Share <strong>of</strong> NPL to total loans<br />
2007 2008 2009 2010 Latest 2007 2008 2009 2010 Latest<br />
Albania 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.7 Dec. 3.4 6.6 10.5 13.9 Dec.<br />
Belarus 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.7 Dec. 1.9 1.7 4.2 3.5 Dec.<br />
Bosnia and 0.9 0.4 0.1 -0.5 Sept. 3.0 3.1 5.9 9.2 Sept.<br />
Herzegovina<br />
Bulgaria 2.4 2.1 1.1 0.9 Dec. 2.1 2.5 6.4 11.9 Dec.<br />
Croatia 1.6 1.6 1.1 1.2 Dec. 4.8 4.9 7.8 11.2 Dec.<br />
Hungary 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.1 Dec. 2.3 3.0 6.7 9.1 Dec.<br />
Latvia 2.0 0.3 -3.5 -1.6 Dec. 0.8 3.6 16.4 19.0 Dec.<br />
Lithuania 1.7 1.0 -4.2 -0.3 Dec. 1.0 4.6 19.3 19.7 Dec.<br />
FYR Macedonia 1.8 1.4 0.6 0.8 Dec. 7.5 6.7 8.9 9.0 Dec.<br />
Moldova 3.9 3.5 -0.5 0.5 Dec. 3.7 5.2 16.4 13.3 Dec.<br />
Montenegro 0.7 -0.6 -0.7 -2.7 Dec. 3.2 7.2 13.5 21.0 Dec.<br />
Poland 1.9 1.5 0.8 1.1 Dec. 5.2 4.5 8.0 8.8 Dec.<br />
Romania 1.0 1.6 0.2 -0.1 Dec. 2.6 2.8 7.9 11.9 Dec.<br />
Russia 3.0 1.8 0.7 1.9 Dec. 2.5 3.8 9.5 8.2 Dec.<br />
Serbia 1.7 2.1 1.3 1.2 Sept. 11.3 15.5 17.8 Sept.<br />
Turkey 2.6 1.8 2.4 2.2 Dec. 3.6 3.8 5.6 3.8 Dec.<br />
Ukraine 1.5 1.0 -4.4 -1.5 Dec. 3.0 3.9 13.7 15.3 Dec.<br />
1 it refers to Global Financial Stability Report (April 2011)<br />
Source: IMF, Global Financial Stability Report (April 2011)<br />
43
Annex 7<br />
The main macroeconomic indicators in developing countries<br />
during 2009-2012<br />
%<br />
Current account balance to General government balance<br />
GDP<br />
to GDP<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />
Advanced European<br />
economies"<br />
0.5 0.8 0.9 0.9 -6.3 -6.1 -4.5 -3.6<br />
Euro area -0.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 -6.3 -6.1 -4.4 -3.6<br />
Austria 2.9 3.2 3.1 3.1 -3.5 -4.1 -3.1 -2.9<br />
Belgium 0.8 1.2 1.0 1.2 -6.0 -4.6 -3.9 -4.0<br />
Cyprus -7.5 -7.0 -8.9 -8.7 -6.0 -5.4 -4.5 -3.7<br />
Estonia 4.5 3.6 3.3 3.1 -2.1 0.2 -1.0 -0.7<br />
Finland 2.3 3.1 2.8 2.6 -2.9 -2.8 -1.2 -1.1<br />
France -1.9 -2.1 -2.8 -2.7 -7.6 -7.7 -6.0 -5.0<br />
Germany 5.0 5.3 5.1 4.6 -3.0 -3.3 -2.3 -1.5<br />
Greece -11.0 -10.4 -8.2 -7.1 -15.4 -9.6 -7.4 -6.2<br />
Ireland -3.0 -0.7 0.2 0.6 -14.4 -32.2 -10.8 -8.9<br />
Italy -2.1 -3.5 -3.4 -3.0 -5.3 -4.6 -4.3 -3.5<br />
Luxemburg 6.7 7.7 8.5 8.7 -0.7 -1.7 -1.1 -0.8<br />
Malta -6.9 -0.6 -1.1 -2.3 -3.7 -3.8 -2.9 -2.9<br />
Nederland 4.6 7.1 7.9 8.2 -5.4 -5.2 -3.8 -2.7<br />
Portugal -10.9 -9.9 -8.7 -8.5 -9.3 -7.3 -5.6 -5.5<br />
Slovakia -3.6 -3.4 -2.8 -2.7 -7.9 -8.2 -5.2 -3.9<br />
Slovenia -1.5 -1.2 -2.0 -2.1 -5.5 -5.2 -4.8 -4.3<br />
Spain<br />
Other EU advanced<br />
economies<br />
-5.5 -4.5 -4.8 -4.5 -11.1 -9.2 -6.2 -5.6<br />
Czech Rep. -1.1 -2.4 -1.8 -1.2 -5.8 -4.9 -3.7 -3.6<br />
Denmark 3.8 5.0 4.8 4.8 -2.8 -4.9 -3.6 -2.6<br />
Sweden 7.2 6.5 6.1 5.8 -0.8 -0.2 0.1 0.4<br />
England<br />
Non-EU advanced economies<br />
-1.7 -2.5 -2.4 -1.9 -10.3 -10.4 -8.6 -6.9<br />
Iceland -10.4 -8.0 1.1 2.1 -9.0 -6.8 -4.6 -1.3<br />
Israel 3.6 3.1 3.3 3.1 -5.6 -4.1 -3.2 -2.2<br />
Norway 13.1 12.9 16.3 16.0 10.4 10.9 13.0 12.7<br />
Switzerland 11.5 14.2 13.2 12.8 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.6<br />
European Union 2<br />
-0.2 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -6.8 -6.6 -4.8 -4.0<br />
Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook database.<br />
1<br />
Only net loans<br />
2<br />
Weighted average. General government budget weighted by PPP <strong>of</strong> GDP, current account balance in USD-<br />
weighted GDP<br />
44
Plenary session<br />
45
EXPERIENCES AND TENDENCIES OF DECENTRALIZATION AT REGIONAL<br />
LEVEL IN THE EUROPEAN UNION<br />
Dodescu Anca<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences, adodescu@uoradea.ro<br />
Abstrasct: Romania's integration into the European Union requires, in addition to the complex<br />
process <strong>of</strong> policy transfer, learning new ways to make policies characteristic to a culture <strong>of</strong> a multilevel<br />
governance and <strong>of</strong> partnerships. From the different levels <strong>of</strong> governance <strong>of</strong> the European<br />
model, the regional level ("regional governance") reflects most accurately, in our opinion, the<br />
complexity <strong>of</strong> reconfiguring the state's role in economy, at the beginning <strong>of</strong> this new millennium, in<br />
the European Union, and presents the greatest practical importance for Romania, as a new Member<br />
State in the European Union, as at the regional level structures are more flexible, and best practices<br />
more quickly assimilated. The selection <strong>of</strong> the best economic policies <strong>of</strong> regional growth and<br />
development, the choice <strong>of</strong> objectives from a number <strong>of</strong> competing options, the calibration <strong>of</strong><br />
powers, roles, competences and responsibilities, in time and space, and the promotion <strong>of</strong> solutions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the win-win type require resorting to and combination <strong>of</strong> appropriate and effective tools.<br />
Illustrative <strong>of</strong> the new context, the policy <strong>of</strong> regional growth and development must incorporate, in<br />
Romania as well, more knowledge, more creativity, new combinations <strong>of</strong> skills and new areas <strong>of</strong><br />
expertise. This paper presents the preliminary results <strong>of</strong> the research related to a post-doctoral<br />
research project: "Economic policies for regional growth and development. Challenges for<br />
Romania in the context <strong>of</strong> economic-financial crisis and integration into the European model",<br />
developed within the project "Economic scientific research, support <strong>of</strong> the welfare and human<br />
development in the European context", financed during 2010-2013 from the European Social Fund<br />
(ESF) and implemented by the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Economic Research "Costin C. Kiriţescu" <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Romanian Academy, from December 1, 2010, to November 30, 2012, coordinator: pr<strong>of</strong>. Valeriu<br />
Ioan Franc, PhD. The question we intend to answer in the present stage <strong>of</strong> our research, based on<br />
the comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> the decentralization systems <strong>of</strong> several Member States <strong>of</strong> the European<br />
Union, as well as on the analysis <strong>of</strong> regional disparities existing at the European Union level and <strong>of</strong><br />
the effects <strong>of</strong> economic integration, is - to what extent should the competences <strong>of</strong> the regional policy<br />
be concentrated in the hands <strong>of</strong> the regional authorities or <strong>of</strong> the European Union rather than to be<br />
left individually to the Member States so as they may develop their own regional policy? What we<br />
pursue in this paper, based on the analysis <strong>of</strong> experiences <strong>of</strong> decentralization <strong>of</strong> economic policy<br />
competences at the level <strong>of</strong> the European Union, is the identification <strong>of</strong> the regional implications <strong>of</strong><br />
intermingling tendencies <strong>of</strong> decentralization, centralization, respectively supranationalization and,<br />
implicitly, the analysis <strong>of</strong> the manner <strong>of</strong> reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> the state’s role in economy at the<br />
regional level, in the context <strong>of</strong> integration into the European model. The research into the manner<br />
<strong>of</strong> reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> the state’s role in economy at a regional level requires a review <strong>of</strong> the<br />
allocative, distributive and regulatory role <strong>of</strong> the state, from a the regional perspective, the analysis<br />
on the one hand, <strong>of</strong> the decentralization <strong>of</strong> economic policy competences from the national to the<br />
regional level (e.g. national level: provision <strong>of</strong> pure public goods, such as national defence and<br />
centralization <strong>of</strong> fiscal policy competences in order to achieve macroeconomic stability and income<br />
redistribution; regional level: provision <strong>of</strong> mixed public goods, such as waste collection and<br />
community police), on the other hand, centralization / supranationalization <strong>of</strong> regional competences<br />
at the level <strong>of</strong> the European Union.<br />
Keywords: the role <strong>of</strong> the state in economy, decentralization, European governance,<br />
regionalization, regional governance.<br />
JEL Classification: F15, H4, H5, H7, R5<br />
47
The concept <strong>of</strong> decentralization<br />
In the broad sense <strong>of</strong> the term,<br />
decentralization means the transfer <strong>of</strong><br />
authority or responsibility, duties or<br />
competences from the level <strong>of</strong> central public<br />
administration or central government to a<br />
lower level or from the public sector to the<br />
private sector or to non-governmental<br />
organizations. As defined by the World Bank,<br />
decentralization means “the transfer <strong>of</strong><br />
authority and responsibility for public<br />
functions from the central government to<br />
intermediate and local governments or<br />
quasi-independent government<br />
organizations and/or the private sector”<br />
(The World Bank Group, 2011). As the<br />
transfer <strong>of</strong> competences always involves the<br />
transfer <strong>of</strong> financial and human resources as<br />
well, decentralization raises not only<br />
problems <strong>of</strong> a political, administrative nature<br />
but also <strong>of</strong> economic, fiscal etc. Depending<br />
on the predominance <strong>of</strong> one or other <strong>of</strong> these<br />
aspects, the literature marks the following<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> decentralization: administrative<br />
(whose sub-forms in ascending order <strong>of</strong> the<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> decentralization are:<br />
deconcentration, delegation, devolution),<br />
economic, fiscal and political, noting that<br />
these forms are obviously interrelated. If the<br />
transfer <strong>of</strong> competences does not exceed the<br />
public sector, according to the lower level to<br />
which the duties or powers are transferred,<br />
one can speak <strong>of</strong> different levels <strong>of</strong><br />
decentralization - territorial, regional, local<br />
level etc. If the transfer <strong>of</strong> powers is from<br />
public to private sector or to NGOs, we talk<br />
about privatization and denationalization.<br />
The reasons why decentralization is brought<br />
into public debate and implemented are<br />
various. Widely debated in the literature, the<br />
reasons for decentralization can be classified,<br />
in our opinion, in three categories. The first<br />
category is related to malfunctions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
public administration or <strong>of</strong> the central<br />
government which leads to lack <strong>of</strong> response<br />
or low sensitivity to local needs: poor<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> resources, public services absent<br />
48<br />
or defective at a local level, inequities <strong>of</strong><br />
redistribution at the territorial level,<br />
blockages in the central decision making;<br />
poor planning and control <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />
and social activities, excessive bureaucracy,<br />
low efficiency, flexibility and innovativeness<br />
<strong>of</strong> public policies; low quality <strong>of</strong> public<br />
services etc. Another category <strong>of</strong> reasons for<br />
decentralization are crises: political crises<br />
(ethnic or religious conflicts, difficult postconflict<br />
situations, states <strong>of</strong> war etc.), or<br />
economic crises, implicitly fiscal, budgetary<br />
crises etc. Finally, reasons for<br />
decentralization are also represented by<br />
transitions from authoritarian political<br />
systems to democratic systems, from the<br />
system <strong>of</strong> commanded economy to the market<br />
economy etc., even the process <strong>of</strong> a state’s<br />
integration into the European Union (EU) is a<br />
form <strong>of</strong> transition.<br />
Whatever, though, the reasons <strong>of</strong><br />
decentralization, it is widely admitted that<br />
politics is the driving force behind it (Eaton et<br />
al., 2010). The typical political objectives<br />
pursued in the process <strong>of</strong> decentralization are<br />
to increase the capacity <strong>of</strong> political response<br />
and to broaden participation in political,<br />
economic and social activities at the<br />
territorial, regional or local level. Whatever<br />
their form, size etc., decentralization requires<br />
a change in the institutional rules <strong>of</strong><br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> resources and responsibilities<br />
between different levels <strong>of</strong> government,<br />
implicitly changes in power and authority<br />
and, as highlighted by Kent Eaton, Kai Kaiser<br />
and Paul Smoke – as always when power and<br />
authority are at stake – decentralization<br />
creates controversy and heated debate,<br />
regarding the justification <strong>of</strong> the need <strong>of</strong> a<br />
decentralization process, the objectives<br />
pursued, the reform involved, the possible<br />
disadvantages etc. (Eaton et al., 2010).<br />
The debate about decentralization is not new.<br />
In the EU, subject to our analysis, in the last<br />
two decades <strong>of</strong> the last century,<br />
decentralization was <strong>of</strong>ten put forward, on the
one hand, as a result <strong>of</strong> the crisis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Welfare State, leading to various experiences<br />
<strong>of</strong> reform through decentralization, the<br />
transfer <strong>of</strong> competences involved being, in<br />
this case, <strong>of</strong> the type central-local or<br />
nationalization-privatization, on the other<br />
hand, as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the fragmentation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the power <strong>of</strong> the nation-state and<br />
reconfiguration on various levels <strong>of</strong> the<br />
state’s role in the economy in the context <strong>of</strong><br />
the process <strong>of</strong> integration into EU (Dodescu,<br />
2011), further implying a transfer <strong>of</strong> powers<br />
<strong>of</strong> the central-regional and centralsupranational<br />
type.<br />
At present, under the economic-financial<br />
crisis, the reverse phenomenon <strong>of</strong><br />
centralization gains ground, confirming the<br />
validity, on a long term, <strong>of</strong> the theories on the<br />
cyclicality <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> the state’s<br />
involvement in the economy (Dobrescu,<br />
1992), on the “pendular movement” State-<br />
Market or nationalization-denationalization<br />
(Dogan and Pelasy, 1992) or on the “political<br />
pendulum” that moves between the nationaltransnational-global-European<br />
arenas,<br />
depending on the relative attraction force <strong>of</strong><br />
these magnetic fields (Wallace and Wallace,<br />
2000).<br />
In our opinion, as the days <strong>of</strong> the controversy<br />
State versus Market, in the sense <strong>of</strong> the<br />
“mirror approach”, have passed, so has the<br />
time <strong>of</strong> the polemic Centralization versus<br />
Decentralization. Located in the context <strong>of</strong><br />
globalization and instability, the debate on<br />
decentralization should take into<br />
consideration the change <strong>of</strong> governance levels<br />
and “locations” (Wallace and Wallace, 2000),<br />
the increase <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> the sub-national<br />
actors (Sharma, 2008, 2011). It is more likely<br />
the “time” <strong>of</strong> networks, partnerships,<br />
multitude <strong>of</strong> actors and interests. This trend is<br />
present both globally and at the EU level. As<br />
the World Bank showed in its reports, an<br />
appropriate balance <strong>of</strong> centralization and<br />
decentralization is essential for effective and<br />
efficient functioning <strong>of</strong> government. This<br />
49<br />
translates into balance in decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />
functions and responsibilities, on the one<br />
hand, and centralization <strong>of</strong> the roles <strong>of</strong><br />
coordination and supervision, on the other.<br />
The combination <strong>of</strong> functions resulting –<br />
decentralized responsibilities with centralized<br />
roles <strong>of</strong> coordination and monitoring – should<br />
allow strengthening <strong>of</strong> the institutional<br />
capacity at a local level and effective<br />
management <strong>of</strong> decentralized functions in<br />
partnership between local actors - local<br />
governments, local private enterprises, local<br />
NGOs etc. and central actors involved in<br />
planning, coordination etc. (The World Bank<br />
Group, 2011). Moreover, in the EU context –<br />
<strong>of</strong> an emphasis on the role <strong>of</strong> networks in<br />
developing and implementing policies, <strong>of</strong> an<br />
assertion <strong>of</strong> the “multi-level policy networks”<br />
(Börzel, 1997), unlike the traditional analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> decentralization, focusing in particular on<br />
the political, administrative and fiscal<br />
dimensions, or on the provision <strong>of</strong> services,<br />
emphasis is on the interdependences between<br />
the levels concerned with decentralization, in<br />
particular, respectively on the<br />
interdependences between actors (partners,<br />
the parties interested and the multipliers)<br />
involved (European Commission, 2007).<br />
We next undertake is to analyse the<br />
reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> state’s role in economy at<br />
a regional level, in the economic literature<br />
devoted to decentralization and in the context<br />
<strong>of</strong> the European model, in order to identify<br />
the regional implications <strong>of</strong> the<br />
interpenetration <strong>of</strong> the tendencies <strong>of</strong><br />
decentralization, centralization, respectively<br />
supranationalization. Consideration on how<br />
to reconfigure the state's role in economy at a<br />
regional level requires review <strong>of</strong> the state’s<br />
allocative, distributive and regulatory roles<br />
(Dodescu, 2000) from the regional<br />
perspective, the analysis, on the one hand, <strong>of</strong><br />
the decentralization from the national to the<br />
regional level (e.g. national level: provision<br />
<strong>of</strong> pure public goods, such as national<br />
defence and fiscal policy and centralization <strong>of</strong><br />
fiscal policy competences in order to achieve
macroeconomic stability and income<br />
redistribution; regional level: the provision <strong>of</strong><br />
mixed public goods as for example, sewage<br />
collection and community police), on the<br />
other hand, centralization in the sense <strong>of</strong><br />
supranationalization, regional competences at<br />
the EU level.<br />
The economic approach <strong>of</strong> decentralization.<br />
Examination <strong>of</strong> the way <strong>of</strong> reconfiguring the<br />
state’s allocative, distributive and the<br />
regulatory role in economy at regional level<br />
The economic literature dedicated to<br />
decentralization studies the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
different types <strong>of</strong> decentralization on<br />
efficiency, equity and/or economic<br />
equilibrium in order to define the optimal<br />
level <strong>of</strong> government decentralization based on<br />
comparing the advantages and disadvantages<br />
<strong>of</strong> different solutions for decentralization.<br />
The economic objectives pursued in the<br />
process <strong>of</strong> decentralization <strong>of</strong> production,<br />
distribution, financing etc. <strong>of</strong> goods or<br />
services at regional or local level can coincide<br />
with political objectives typical for<br />
decentralization: increased political<br />
responsiveness and participation at the<br />
territorial, regional or local level. As<br />
remarked by Kent Eaton, Kai Kaiser and Paul<br />
Smoke –“fortunately, the decentralization<br />
may be one <strong>of</strong> those situations when politics<br />
and economy can serve the same purpose”<br />
(Eaton et al., 2010). This statement should<br />
not, however, lead to too high a dose <strong>of</strong><br />
optimism.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> classical economic theory, the<br />
market is the ultimate form <strong>of</strong><br />
decentralization. At the other extreme, one<br />
might consider that the state is automatically<br />
responsible for producing and distributing<br />
public goods or services. In practice,<br />
however, the market can <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong>ten more<br />
efficient solutions than the state in the<br />
production or distribution <strong>of</strong> public goods.<br />
Also, local or regional solutions may be more<br />
effective than the central ones. On the other<br />
50<br />
hand, still in practice, if not well chosen, local<br />
solutions can cause loss <strong>of</strong> economies <strong>of</strong> scale<br />
for public services, failure in the production,<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> public services due to low<br />
administrative or technical capacity at local<br />
level. Clearly, we are talking here <strong>of</strong> the<br />
state’s allocative role and <strong>of</strong> the objective <strong>of</strong><br />
efficient resources allocation. At the same<br />
time, by decentralization the equitable<br />
distribution may be affected by providing<br />
social services that prove inadequate or do<br />
not reach all those “in need”. The cause may<br />
be the transfer <strong>of</strong> responsibilities without<br />
adequate financial resources. In this case, we<br />
talk about the state’s distributive role and<br />
about the objective <strong>of</strong> social equity. Finally,<br />
the state’s regulatory role subordinated to the<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> economic equilibrium can be<br />
affected when, for example, the coordination<br />
<strong>of</strong> economic policies moves from the hands<br />
<strong>of</strong> central government to the hands <strong>of</strong><br />
regional government and this fact deteriorates<br />
the credit conditions and the possibilities to<br />
cover budget deficits at regional level or to<br />
the hands <strong>of</strong> local government and this<br />
transfer gives way to corruption at local level.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> theory, there are some established<br />
principles underlying decentralization, a<br />
fugitive foray into their world being based on<br />
Stigler’s principles (1957) that the decisionmaking<br />
should be placed at the lowest level<br />
<strong>of</strong> government in accordance with the<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> the efficient allocation <strong>of</strong><br />
resources, the degree <strong>of</strong> decentralization<br />
being determined by the extent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
economies <strong>of</strong> scale and the effects <strong>of</strong> the type<br />
“spill-over” (benefits-costs); on Olson’ s<br />
principle, characteristic to the Public Choice<br />
School, whereby small groups <strong>of</strong> powerful<br />
interests are more efficient in absorbing<br />
public funds (Olson, 1969), on Oates’s<br />
theorem <strong>of</strong> decentralization according to<br />
which every public service should be<br />
provided at that level <strong>of</strong> government that has<br />
control over the minimum geographic area<br />
able to internalize the corresponding costs<br />
and benefits (Oates, 1972), on the principle <strong>of</strong>
subsidiarity as set by the Maastricht Treaty<br />
(1992), whose purpose is to ensure that<br />
decisions in the EU are taken at a level as<br />
close to the citizens as possible. The<br />
theoretical perspectives according to which<br />
the decentralization issue is addressed are: the<br />
traditional fiscal federalism and The New<br />
Public Management - which focus their<br />
attention on the so-called “market failures”<br />
and on the ability to deliver public goods<br />
efficiently and equitably, the Public Choice<br />
School and the Economic Institutionalism -<br />
which focus on “government failures”,<br />
respectively the approach <strong>of</strong> the “network<br />
governance” type (Shah, 2006).<br />
Defining government decentralization,<br />
considered economically, as a process <strong>of</strong><br />
transfer and distribution <strong>of</strong> state duties in the<br />
field <strong>of</strong> public expenditure and revenue, from<br />
national to local or regional level, we try to<br />
point out the specific aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
decentralization, at a regional level, in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> the three roles <strong>of</strong> the State: allocative,<br />
distributive and regulatory.<br />
a). Regional decentralization and optimal<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> resources<br />
In what the the state’s allocative role is<br />
concerned, the analysis <strong>of</strong> the regional<br />
decentralization focuses mainly on collective<br />
goods (public) goods. According to the<br />
current acceptation regarding a democratic<br />
state, the number <strong>of</strong> collective goods<br />
produced centrally needs to decrease and to<br />
be restricted mainly to pure collective goods:<br />
army, security, foreign policy, justice etc. Not<br />
all collective goods, however, must be<br />
decentralized in the same way or at the same<br />
level. The state’s role (<strong>of</strong> the central<br />
government) and the limits <strong>of</strong><br />
decentralization in ensuring the provision <strong>of</strong><br />
collective goods depend, first, on the nature<br />
<strong>of</strong> these goods and services, on the economies<br />
<strong>of</strong> scale affecting the technical efficiency and<br />
on the extent <strong>of</strong> the spillover effects, beyond<br />
jurisdictional boundaries, and on the structure<br />
51<br />
<strong>of</strong> competition in producing or delivering a<br />
particular public good or service. Therefore,<br />
choosing a solution <strong>of</strong> decentralization or a<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> solutions such as<br />
decentralized - managed competition -<br />
privatization etc. starts from the assessment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the lowest level <strong>of</strong> governmental<br />
organization, at which the public good or<br />
service can be produced and delivered<br />
effectively, or <strong>of</strong> the most appropriate forms<br />
<strong>of</strong> privatization (The World Bank Group,<br />
2011).<br />
The possibilities <strong>of</strong> decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />
collective goods supply depends primarily on<br />
their effect <strong>of</strong> overflow (spatial opening <strong>of</strong><br />
their externalities), respectively on the nonrivalry<br />
<strong>of</strong> their consumption (the possibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> their being used by a large number <strong>of</strong><br />
people without an additional production cost;<br />
a person’s consumption doesn’t reduce by<br />
anything the amount available for all others,<br />
and is therefore non-rival to the consumption<br />
<strong>of</strong> others), respectively non-exclusion <strong>of</strong> their<br />
consumption (implies that the supplier <strong>of</strong> the<br />
collective good is unable to exclude someone<br />
from the consumption <strong>of</strong> these goods<br />
reserving that right to those who will pay a<br />
price, so, once produced, the collective good<br />
is available to all, free <strong>of</strong> charge). While<br />
some collective goods are only beneficial in<br />
the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the geographical area <strong>of</strong> their<br />
place <strong>of</strong> production (local police, street<br />
lighting, coastal lighthouse for navigation,<br />
traffic lights etc.), others have a wider spatial<br />
opening <strong>of</strong> their externalities - regional (road<br />
or rail transport, postal service,<br />
telecommunications, higher education etc.) or<br />
national (national defence, justice etc.). The<br />
first category - local collective goods - is<br />
consumed exclusively at the level <strong>of</strong> a local<br />
community. The indivisible nature <strong>of</strong> these<br />
goods and their optional use create<br />
redistributive externalities (for example, those<br />
who never go out at night bear the cost <strong>of</strong><br />
lighting public without having a benefit in<br />
exchange), but these do not go beyond local<br />
boundaries, existing the possibility to
"internalize" them at a local level, the<br />
production in an optimal quantity at the local<br />
community level being possible without the<br />
externalities affecting neighbouring<br />
communities. In contrast, there are national<br />
collective goods, whose benefits are shared<br />
equally among all inhabitants <strong>of</strong> a country.<br />
The most illustrative example is the national<br />
defence, for which the risks and externalities<br />
<strong>of</strong> a possible decentralization are obvious for<br />
communities not large enough to internalize<br />
externalities. Between the two extremes we<br />
can fit the regional collective goods whose<br />
externalities extend beyond local boundaries,<br />
but which are consumed unevenly.<br />
Decentralization <strong>of</strong> their <strong>of</strong>fer is only possible<br />
if the region is large enough to internalize the<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> an overflow, with the risk <strong>of</strong><br />
insufficient supply, while centralization <strong>of</strong><br />
their <strong>of</strong>fer involves a uniformity that neglects<br />
the regional differences between the tastes<br />
and needs <strong>of</strong> the population, causing<br />
allocational and redistributive externalities.<br />
(Atkinson and Stiglitz, 1980; Brown and<br />
Jackson, 1990; Weber, 1991; Black et al.,<br />
2009).<br />
b). Regional decentralization and equitable<br />
distribution<br />
From the perspective <strong>of</strong> the state’s<br />
distributive role, regional decentralization<br />
should be analyzed according to its potential<br />
impact on the choice <strong>of</strong> domicile (emigration<br />
/ immigration) and on the firms’ location. If,<br />
for example, a regional government decides<br />
to operate a redistribution effort much higher<br />
than that <strong>of</strong> the neighbouring community,<br />
applying a very progressive taxation, the<br />
community at stake will face a phenomenon<br />
<strong>of</strong> emigration <strong>of</strong> people receiving an income<br />
higher than average to communities with<br />
lighter taxation coupled with an opposite<br />
phenomenon, the immigration <strong>of</strong> the poor.<br />
Similarly, there may be a phenomenon <strong>of</strong><br />
delocalisation <strong>of</strong> firms. For the community<br />
concerned this policy will therefore have a<br />
boomerang effect, because it will increase its<br />
52<br />
costs and diminish its revenue at the same<br />
time. Consequently, the national competence<br />
on the redistribution plan depends on the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> the following parameters: the<br />
amplitude <strong>of</strong> the redistributive correction; the<br />
disparity <strong>of</strong> the redistribution efforts<br />
undertaken by neighbouring communities, the<br />
spatial mobility <strong>of</strong> economic agents. The<br />
reduced mobility <strong>of</strong> economic agents or the<br />
strong attachment <strong>of</strong> individuals or firms to a<br />
region can counterbalance this boomerang<br />
effect. Therefore, decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />
redistributive policy determines, with the<br />
price <strong>of</strong> a greater vertical equity, a horizontal<br />
inequity, the decentralization chances being<br />
small and dependent on the spatial mobility<br />
<strong>of</strong> the economic agents, on the size and<br />
homogeneity <strong>of</strong> the regional community, in<br />
order to practice, within certain limits, an<br />
active policy <strong>of</strong> redistribution (Atkinson and<br />
Stiglitz, 1980; Brown and Jackson, 1990;<br />
Weber, 1991; Black et al., 2009).<br />
c). Regional decentralization and economic<br />
equilibrium<br />
From the perspective <strong>of</strong> the state’s regulatory<br />
role, the regional decentralization analysis<br />
must start from the indisputable fact that the<br />
economic equilibrium shows the<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> a national collective good,<br />
due to the spatial openness <strong>of</strong> its externalities.<br />
Even though their intensity varies from one<br />
region to another, the fluctuations in<br />
economic activity and the economic<br />
imbalances concern the national economy as<br />
a whole, therefore, the decentralization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
stabilization policy increases the risk that a<br />
region shall benefit from the stabilization<br />
effort <strong>of</strong> others without doing anything in<br />
exchange. On the other hand, the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
regional stabilization policy is the weaker for<br />
the region concerned, the more open it is, the<br />
multiplier effect being only partial, because a<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the induced demand addresses a<br />
production made outside the region,<br />
respectively, the higher national capital<br />
mobility is, which deteriorates the conditions
<strong>of</strong> loan at a regional level and the possibilities<br />
to cover budget deficits (Atkinson and<br />
Stiglitz, 1980; Brown and Jackson, 1990;<br />
Weber, 1991; Black et al., 2009).<br />
In conclusion, the analysis <strong>of</strong> decentralization<br />
at a regional level in terms <strong>of</strong> the three roles<br />
<strong>of</strong> the state, according to the theory <strong>of</strong> fiscal<br />
federalism, leads to a rather simple allocation<br />
scheme - the distributive and regulatory role<br />
are preferable at a central level, the allocative<br />
role being shareable or possible to<br />
decentralize in accordance with the spatial<br />
openness <strong>of</strong> the externalities <strong>of</strong> collective<br />
goods, respectively with the characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />
non-rivalry and non-exclusion <strong>of</strong> their<br />
consumption.<br />
Decentralization at the regional level in the<br />
EU. Trends<br />
The decentralization <strong>of</strong> the responsibilities <strong>of</strong><br />
governments in the EU must be considered in<br />
the context <strong>of</strong> the fiscal federalism and <strong>of</strong> the<br />
subsidiarity principle, according to the<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> the Maastricht Treaty. The<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> traditional fiscal federalism<br />
involves an administrative organization<br />
structured on three levels: federal, state, local<br />
and, implicitly, a division <strong>of</strong> fiscal<br />
responsibilities between the three levels. The<br />
specificity <strong>of</strong> the EU - as an entity that tends<br />
to become a federal state is linked to adding<br />
the regional level to the three levels <strong>of</strong> the<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> traditional fiscal federalism. Thus,<br />
at present, in the EU there are the following<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> government: union, national states,<br />
regions, local authorities (usually counties<br />
and municipalities).The allocation <strong>of</strong> powers<br />
at the appropriate level in accordance with the<br />
principle <strong>of</strong> subsidiarity stipulated by the<br />
Treaty <strong>of</strong> Maastricht answers to criticisms<br />
about the many overlaps between the upper<br />
and lower levels and to the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong><br />
the administrative arrangements from a<br />
Member State to another, hence a tendency <strong>of</strong><br />
supranationalization <strong>of</strong> competences <strong>of</strong> the<br />
national states (governments) manifesting<br />
53<br />
simultaneously at the EU level, along with<br />
the decentralization <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> their other<br />
competences to lower levels (regional and<br />
local). The principle <strong>of</strong> subsidiarity is<br />
intended to ensure that decision-making in<br />
the European Union is as closer to the citizen<br />
as possible and to validate the need for action<br />
at community level considering the<br />
possibilities existing at national, regional or<br />
local level. According to The Treaty <strong>of</strong><br />
Maastricht (Article 3b) “The Community<br />
shall act within the powers conferred and<br />
objectives assigned to it by this Treaty. In<br />
areas not within its exclusive competence, the<br />
Community shall take no action, in<br />
accordance with the principle <strong>of</strong> subsidiarity<br />
only if and ins<strong>of</strong>ar as the objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
proposed action cannot be achieved<br />
satisfactorily by the Member States, but can<br />
be better achieved at community level due to<br />
the extent or the effects <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />
action.” Relative to the state’s roles in the<br />
context <strong>of</strong> fiscal federalism and subsidiarity<br />
principle, according to the provision <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Maastricht Treaty, the supranational<br />
(European) level is in charge with<br />
coordinating the stabilization policy, its<br />
management being a competence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Member States, and with coordinating the<br />
territorial redistribution so as to ensure that<br />
all regions <strong>of</strong> the EU <strong>of</strong>fer equal opportunities<br />
and uniform provisions <strong>of</strong> certain basic<br />
services, the Member States and the local<br />
communities maintaining their<br />
responsibilities for managing social policy<br />
and income redistribution to suit the<br />
preferences <strong>of</strong> each community (Oates, 2001;<br />
Majocchi, 2008). Therefore, the regulatory<br />
role is centralized and shared between the<br />
national level (management) and<br />
supranational (coordination), the distributive<br />
role is mostly centralized and shared between<br />
the national level (management) and<br />
supranational (coordination) and<br />
decentralized at a regional and local level,<br />
depending on the possibilities to meet local<br />
community preferences. Regarding the<br />
allocative role, as already noted, this is the
one that best meets the requirements <strong>of</strong><br />
decentralization, depending on the<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> the collective goods, at a<br />
supranational level, here concentrating all<br />
efforts to strengthen the internal, single<br />
market.<br />
Practically, the European Union’s vision on<br />
the policy implementation is a decentralized<br />
one, <strong>of</strong> the “network” type, <strong>of</strong> a nonhierarchical<br />
nature, and involving subnational,<br />
national and supranational actors.<br />
Following the debates within the European<br />
Union, on “European governance”, starting<br />
from the White Paper on European<br />
Governance, adopted in July 2001, which<br />
defines clearly the five levels <strong>of</strong> governance:<br />
global, European, national, regional and<br />
local (European Commission, 2001) and<br />
describes the geographical decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />
the EU policy and the sharing <strong>of</strong> powers and<br />
responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the type EU - member<br />
states - regions (European Commission,<br />
2002), continuing with the debate on the<br />
Future <strong>of</strong> Europe, the European Constitution<br />
and the Lisbon Treaty and, more recently, the<br />
2020 Strategy, one can clearly notice the<br />
increase in the capacity <strong>of</strong> supranational<br />
regulation along with the decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />
powers <strong>of</strong> economic policy at a regional<br />
level, the implementation <strong>of</strong> the principle <strong>of</strong><br />
subsidiarity and the emphasis <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong><br />
networks in developing and implementing<br />
European policies (European Commission,<br />
2001, 2003a, 2005, 2007, 2010).<br />
However, beyond the complexity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
process <strong>of</strong> transformation <strong>of</strong> the “European<br />
governance” into a “network type<br />
governance” (Dodescu, 2011), in terms <strong>of</strong> a<br />
future federal state, the tendency <strong>of</strong><br />
supranationalization merely means an<br />
increase in the EU powers, it being added<br />
with further performance <strong>of</strong> the three roles <strong>of</strong><br />
the national state described by the public<br />
economy: allocative role (currently seen in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> strengthening the internal market<br />
and in view <strong>of</strong> the federal state, including<br />
54<br />
defence, research and development and<br />
European transport network etc.), distributive<br />
role (social protection and struggle against<br />
poverty), the regulatory role (the<br />
coordination <strong>of</strong> macroeconomic policy<br />
aiming at stability at the Union level). With a<br />
view to the European federal state, the roles<br />
<strong>of</strong> national governments are simplified,<br />
comprising the legal framework, ensuring<br />
public order, national infrastructure, public<br />
administration, regional distribution, public<br />
loans etc., while education, health, local<br />
transportation and other services <strong>of</strong> local<br />
interest will be responsibilities <strong>of</strong> local<br />
governments.<br />
Decentralization at a regional level in the<br />
EU. Experiences<br />
In the EU states, the regional level covers<br />
different political and administrative realities,<br />
being the result <strong>of</strong> a process <strong>of</strong><br />
decentralization that combines the specificity<br />
<strong>of</strong> organization <strong>of</strong> state power in relation to<br />
the territory and the historical evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
that state, to the requirement imposed by the<br />
EU <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> a sub-national<br />
administrative level but higher than the local<br />
one. For the EU, the need <strong>of</strong> a regional level<br />
is linked, primarily, to the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
financial assistance given by the regional<br />
policy, secondly, to the prospect<br />
transformation <strong>of</strong> the EU into a federal state<br />
and the high degree <strong>of</strong> autonomy granted to<br />
this level within federalism.<br />
From the perspective <strong>of</strong> historical<br />
developments <strong>of</strong> the European states, <strong>of</strong> how<br />
nation-states were formed, federalism,<br />
however, is rather an exception than a rule,<br />
Switzerland, Germany (established in the 19 th<br />
century), Austria and Belgium (established in<br />
the 20 th century, in 1920, respectively in<br />
1993) being the only federal states in Europe.<br />
Most European countries were founded as<br />
and are up to now unitary states. Obviously,<br />
in the EU, the regional level enjoys the<br />
greatest autonomy and knows the fastest
growth within the federal states (Germany,<br />
Austria, Belgium) or regional (Spain, Italy<br />
and, in some parts <strong>of</strong> the territory, in Great<br />
Britain and Portugal) - intermediate structures<br />
between the federal and unitary state. For the<br />
opposite, the regional level has a reduced<br />
autonomy, existing only for administrative<br />
reasons or as a response to the need <strong>of</strong><br />
implementing the EU regional policy within<br />
the unitary states (France, Netherlands,<br />
Greece, Ireland etc.).<br />
The administrative-territorial structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EU Member States is extremely<br />
heterogeneous and comprises generally a<br />
local level (towns, villages) and two main<br />
regional levels structured, organized and<br />
named differently from country to country,<br />
for example, “Lander” and “Kreise” in<br />
Germany, “Regions” and “Departaments” in<br />
France, “Standard regions” and “Counties” in<br />
the UK, “Regioni” and “Provincie” in Italy<br />
etc. The launch <strong>of</strong> the regional policy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EC in 1975 met the impossibility <strong>of</strong><br />
comparative assessment <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />
situation in different regions as a basis for<br />
Community intervention to correct regional<br />
imbalances. Therefore, to ensure comparable<br />
statistics at European level, the EU has<br />
developed and regulated The Nomenclature<br />
<strong>of</strong> Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS)<br />
(European Commission, 2003), a standard <strong>of</strong><br />
geographical coding regarding subdivisions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the States defined for statistical purposes,<br />
instrumental in the mechanism <strong>of</strong> allocation<br />
<strong>of</strong> structural funds. NUTS establishes in each<br />
Member State at least three hierarchical<br />
levels: NUTS 1 (“Gewesten / Regions” in<br />
Belgium, “Länder” in Germany,<br />
“Continente”, “Região dos Açores”, “Região<br />
da Madeira” in Portugal, “Scotland, Wales,<br />
Northern Ireland”, “Government Office<br />
Regions <strong>of</strong> England” in the UK), NUTS 2<br />
(“Provincies / Provinces” in Belgium,<br />
“Regierungsbezirke” in Germany,<br />
“Periferies” in Greece, “Comundidades y<br />
ciudades autónomas” in Spain, “Régions” in<br />
France, “Regions” in Ireland, “Regioni” in<br />
55<br />
Italy, “Provincies” in the Netherlands,<br />
“Länder” in Austria), NUTS 3<br />
(“Arrondissements” in Belgium,<br />
“Amtskommuner” in Denmark; “Kreise /<br />
kreisfreie Städte” in Germany, “Nomoi” in<br />
Greece, “Provincias” in Spain,<br />
“Départements” in France, “Regional<br />
authority regions” in Ireland, “Provincie” in<br />
Italy, “Län” in Sweden, “Maakunnat /<br />
landskapen” in Finland). The heterogeneity<br />
continues at the level lower than NUTS 3 as<br />
well, <strong>of</strong> the ‘small administrative units’:<br />
“Gemeenten / Communes” in Belgium,<br />
“Kommuner” in Denmark, “Gemeinden” in<br />
Germany, “Demoi / Koinotites” in Greece,<br />
“Municipios” in Spain, “Communes” in<br />
France, “Counties / County boroughs” in<br />
Ireland, “Comuni” in Italy, “Communes” in<br />
Luxembourg, “Gemeenten” in the<br />
Netherlands, “Gemeinden” in Austria,<br />
“Freguesias” in Portugal, “Kunnat /<br />
Kommuner” in Finland, “Kommuner” in<br />
Sweden and “Wards” in the UK etc.<br />
(European Commission, 2003b, 2008, 2011).<br />
Therefore, for the European Union, the need<br />
for choosing a standard unit, as the basic unit<br />
for its regional policy is more than obvious. It<br />
was elected the development region -<br />
standard unit with an average size <strong>of</strong> 13,000<br />
square kilometres and a population <strong>of</strong><br />
approximately 2.5 million inhabitants, i.e. the<br />
intermediate level – NUTS 2. According to<br />
the EC, the development region should not<br />
necessarily have an administrative character,<br />
but it was compulsorily created in all EU<br />
Member States in order to allow<br />
comparability, harmonization <strong>of</strong> regional<br />
statistics <strong>of</strong> member countries, performance<br />
<strong>of</strong> analyses at a regional level within the EU<br />
and elaboration <strong>of</strong> Community regional<br />
strategies, policies and programs. The<br />
competition to attract structural funds<br />
triggered in time, as, in fact, the EC foresaw<br />
initially, a tendency to amplify competition<br />
not so much between Member States, but<br />
between regions <strong>of</strong> the same state or <strong>of</strong><br />
different states, led to the occurrence <strong>of</strong> new
egional actors such as associations <strong>of</strong><br />
regions, independent from the national states,<br />
and <strong>of</strong> the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> regional lobby. At<br />
Community level, the emergence in 1985 <strong>of</strong><br />
the Assembly <strong>of</strong> European Regions, and in<br />
1992, by the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Maastricht, <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Committee <strong>of</strong> the Regions, are clear elements<br />
in promoting and strengthening the status <strong>of</strong><br />
regions.<br />
Far from being able to speak about regions as<br />
homogeneous entities in the EU, although the<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> region is not a subject <strong>of</strong> this<br />
paper, we shall however note the existence <strong>of</strong><br />
numerous critical voices which argue that<br />
there still is no operational definition <strong>of</strong><br />
region, from a political, juridical and<br />
administrative point <strong>of</strong> view, at the EU level,<br />
that the region is not yet and will not be any<br />
time soon at a general level in the EU, an<br />
administrative-territorial entity endowed with<br />
political representativeness. Therefore, at the<br />
EU level, the regional decentralization can be<br />
described better watching the process <strong>of</strong><br />
regionalization, which according to the<br />
typology <strong>of</strong> particular State, may be linked to<br />
existing regions as administrative-territorial<br />
units or regions created as new territorial<br />
divisions. Analysing comparatively the<br />
regionalization as a process aimed at<br />
developing regions as entities located<br />
immediately below the central state and<br />
above the local (sub-national and supra-local)<br />
in the 27 EU Member States (Chirleşan,<br />
2007; Diez, 2006; Stănciulescu and<br />
Androniceanu, 2006; Androniceanu and<br />
Stănciulescu, 2001), we can distinguish five<br />
types <strong>of</strong> regionalization, as follows:<br />
a). Administrative regionalization (easy<br />
administrative decentralization - by<br />
deconcentration) is the type <strong>of</strong><br />
regionalization resulted from the transfer by a<br />
state to local authorities or bodies directly<br />
subordinated to the central government <strong>of</strong><br />
certain tasks regarding the promotion <strong>of</strong><br />
regional economic development by<br />
mobilizing local communities and economic<br />
56<br />
organizations. In most cases, administrative<br />
regionalization is a response to the need to<br />
implement the EU regional policy. The<br />
administrative regionalization characterizes at<br />
present, at the EU level, as a rule, the unitary<br />
states. Among the EU15 Member States, we<br />
can note Greece (where 13 administrative<br />
regions were formed, responsible for regional<br />
development, led by a secretary general <strong>of</strong><br />
the region assisted by an Advisory Regional<br />
Council consisting <strong>of</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong> local<br />
communities, in each administrative region<br />
existing a so-called House <strong>of</strong> regional<br />
development), Portugal (where there were<br />
formed five regional coordinating<br />
commissions responsible for the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the regional development<br />
plan under the authority <strong>of</strong> government), the<br />
UK, except Scotland (known as a<br />
“centralised model” characterized rather by<br />
tendencies <strong>of</strong> centralizing than <strong>of</strong><br />
decentralizing, the importance given to the<br />
regional level began to increase after the<br />
recognition <strong>of</strong> the political-administrative<br />
autonomy <strong>of</strong> Scotland, Wales and Northern<br />
Ireland) and Sweden (the regional level has<br />
rather little relevance as compared to the local<br />
level, traditionally very strong in the “state <strong>of</strong><br />
consensus”, the administrative<br />
regionalization appears here under the form<br />
<strong>of</strong> delegating attributions <strong>of</strong> regional<br />
development to a district governor assisted<br />
by an Administration Board in which local<br />
interests are represented; in addition, regional<br />
competences include, primarily, the<br />
management <strong>of</strong> health services and <strong>of</strong> the<br />
system <strong>of</strong> education). The administrative<br />
decentralization also characterized the<br />
following New Member States: Bulgaria,<br />
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and<br />
Slovenia and knows also a great variety <strong>of</strong><br />
forms. For example, in Estonia there is only<br />
one Estonian Regional Development Agency,<br />
the administrative regionalization is not<br />
reflected by the existence <strong>of</strong> administrative<br />
units or administrative regions, but by the fact<br />
that state's regional development policy is<br />
implemented in the 15 districts by a
governor, in Lithuania – the policy <strong>of</strong><br />
territorial planning and regional development<br />
is managed by a governor at the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />
higher administrative units <strong>of</strong> provinces /<br />
departments, in Slovakia there are 8 regions<br />
and 8 <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong> regional administration<br />
responsible for coordinating the activity <strong>of</strong><br />
the local communities in terms <strong>of</strong> regional<br />
development. Luxembourg falls into this<br />
category as a particular case; due to the small<br />
size <strong>of</strong> the state, the four regions created do<br />
not need own institutions.<br />
b). Regionalization by cooperation between<br />
existing local collectivities (average<br />
administrative decentralization - by<br />
delegation) is the type <strong>of</strong> regionalization by<br />
the agency <strong>of</strong> decentralized institutions within<br />
the local authorities, the functions <strong>of</strong> central<br />
government in the field <strong>of</strong> regional<br />
development being taken by the existing local<br />
collectivities. Unlike administrative<br />
regionalization, regionalization through<br />
existing local collectivities supposes effective<br />
transfer <strong>of</strong> competences from central<br />
government to the regions created as<br />
institutionalized forms <strong>of</strong> cooperation<br />
between territorial collectivities. This type <strong>of</strong><br />
regionalization is limited both in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
resources and <strong>of</strong> competences and<br />
institutions. At the EU level, this type <strong>of</strong><br />
regionalization characterizes the unitary<br />
states – Denmark (14 provincial communes),<br />
Finland (20 regional councils and the socalled<br />
unions <strong>of</strong> communes), Ireland (8<br />
regional authorities and several specialized<br />
agencies) and – from the New Member States<br />
– Romania (8 development regions<br />
established by law, by voluntary cooperation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the counties, without legal personality and<br />
not being administrative-territorial units, a<br />
Regional Development Agency existing at the<br />
level each <strong>of</strong> them) and Hungary (originally<br />
there were created 8 administrative regions,<br />
which were abandoned in 1994, their<br />
functions being taken over by the provinces,<br />
which may cooperate voluntarily with other<br />
provinces through regional development<br />
57<br />
councils). There is a particular case -<br />
Germany, a federal state characterized by<br />
internal administrative regionalization at the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> the lands (cooperation between local<br />
collectivities within the lands).<br />
c). Regional decentralization (advanced<br />
administrative decentralization and average<br />
economic and fiscal decentralization)<br />
supposes the formation <strong>of</strong> regions as new<br />
territorial collectivities superior to the<br />
existing ones, whose competences regard the<br />
regional development. This type <strong>of</strong><br />
regionalization involves changing the<br />
administrative organization <strong>of</strong> the territory by<br />
the emergence <strong>of</strong> a new territorialadministrative<br />
category - the region, <strong>of</strong> the<br />
same juridical form as the existing ones, but<br />
which is part <strong>of</strong> the constitutional order <strong>of</strong> a<br />
unitary state. This type <strong>of</strong> regionalism is<br />
characterized by the absence <strong>of</strong> legislative<br />
power, administrative competence extended<br />
to fields related to regional development and<br />
fiscal power that varies from case to case. At<br />
the EU level, this form <strong>of</strong> regionalization<br />
characterized France (“unitary state in the<br />
process <strong>of</strong> decentralization”, France currently<br />
has 25 regions, constituted as autonomous<br />
communities, as a result <strong>of</strong> decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />
public administration and benefiting from the<br />
principle <strong>of</strong> free administration <strong>of</strong> local<br />
authorities, led by a Regional Council elected<br />
by universal, direct vote, the competences<br />
transferred to the regions following the<br />
decentralization process were the territorial<br />
planning, the pr<strong>of</strong>essional training and the<br />
transportation infrastructure), Sweden<br />
(characterized by a strong tradition <strong>of</strong> local<br />
autonomy, has 20 regions, led by a regional<br />
government that implements the policies<br />
decided by the government, which have their<br />
own competence in managing municipal<br />
hospitals) and as for the New Member States<br />
- Poland (16 provinces, whose leader controls<br />
the respective local community), the Czech<br />
Republic (the formation, under the<br />
Constitution, <strong>of</strong> territorial collectivities <strong>of</strong> a<br />
higher level, in the form <strong>of</strong> 3 regions).
d). Political regionalization (political<br />
decentralization or the so-called “regional<br />
autonomy”) adds legislative power to the<br />
regional decentralization. The regions have<br />
legislative power exercised by a regional<br />
assembly and in order to exercise<br />
competences an executive body is<br />
constituted, which has the features <strong>of</strong> a<br />
regional government. The competences <strong>of</strong> the<br />
region are much broader in this case and are<br />
defined and guaranteed by the Constitution <strong>of</strong><br />
the unitary state. The regions are not<br />
countries and do not have a Constitution and<br />
usually do not participate in the exercise <strong>of</strong><br />
legislative national power by their own<br />
representation. This type <strong>of</strong> regionalization<br />
affects the state’s structures. In the EU, it is<br />
characteristic to the so-called regional states -<br />
characterizing the whole territory in Spain<br />
(the right <strong>of</strong> autonomy <strong>of</strong> the regions is<br />
recognized and guaranteed by the Spanish<br />
Constitution – the state’s structure is based on<br />
the indissoluble unity <strong>of</strong> the Spanish nation<br />
and also on the recognition and guarantee <strong>of</strong><br />
the right <strong>of</strong> the regions’ autonomy), Italy<br />
(under the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Italy, the Italian<br />
Republic, unique and indivisible, recognizes,<br />
at the same time, the autonomy <strong>of</strong> the regions<br />
by adapting legislative principles and<br />
methods to the requirements <strong>of</strong> autonomy and<br />
decentralization, the regions have the power<br />
to adopt primary legislation and enjoy<br />
financial autonomy) or only certain parts <strong>of</strong><br />
the territory in the UK (Scotland in particular)<br />
and Portugal (the islands). This type <strong>of</strong><br />
regionalization does not characterize,<br />
currently, any <strong>of</strong> the New Member States.<br />
e). Regionalization by federal authorities<br />
(federalization) is characteristic to the federal<br />
states, which were born as unions <strong>of</strong> states,<br />
therefore, the regions, in this case, are states,<br />
political entities, which have a series <strong>of</strong><br />
regional and ethnic features. Unlike political<br />
regionalization characterized by an<br />
asymmetry <strong>of</strong> institutions and competences,<br />
the federal state supposes equality in the<br />
rights <strong>of</strong> the member states. At the EU level,<br />
58<br />
this form <strong>of</strong> regionalization characterizes<br />
Germany, Austria and Belgium. While the<br />
building <strong>of</strong> the modern state in Germany and<br />
Austria was done through federalism, in<br />
Belgium regionalism led to the federalization<br />
<strong>of</strong> the state, in order to allow the formation <strong>of</strong><br />
a structure that shall ensure greater autonomy<br />
to the component units (the case <strong>of</strong> Flanders),<br />
which will progressively accede to the quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> a state. The model <strong>of</strong> federalism that<br />
characterizes Germany is called cooperative<br />
federalism in which power is distributed<br />
among three levels: federal, statal (Länder)<br />
and local (regions, cities and communes), the<br />
relations between these levels being relations<br />
<strong>of</strong> cooperation dominated by the idea <strong>of</strong><br />
“administrative intermingling” <strong>of</strong> tasks and<br />
competences. From a fiscal point <strong>of</strong> view, all<br />
territorial levels participate to the tax<br />
collection to the extent to which they are also<br />
responsible for the expenses. As in Germany,<br />
in Austria the lands benefit from more<br />
competences and resources, their main<br />
function being the implementation <strong>of</strong> public<br />
policies, with the distribution <strong>of</strong> competences<br />
between the federation and the lands and the<br />
strengthening <strong>of</strong> the lands’ position being<br />
permanently debated.<br />
Obviously, this last form <strong>of</strong> regionalization,<br />
due to its high level <strong>of</strong> decentralization and<br />
territorial autonomy, answers better, in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> functionality and stability, to the<br />
complexity <strong>of</strong> European governance, the<br />
functional adaptations on levels<br />
(supranational - federal - state - regional -<br />
local) are more easily absorbed by the federal<br />
structures. This leads, however, to a series <strong>of</strong><br />
wrong approaches, the federalism being<br />
considered an expression <strong>of</strong> regionalization or<br />
a response to regionalism as opposite to the<br />
Nation-State. The main concern in the EU is<br />
that the combination <strong>of</strong> federalism and<br />
regionalization affects the territorial<br />
integrity.
Conclusions and future concerns<br />
What we aimed at in the start <strong>of</strong> this approach<br />
- a comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> the experiences<br />
and tendencies <strong>of</strong> decentralization at a<br />
regional level in the EU - led us to formulate<br />
the following conclusions:<br />
� In the EU countries, the regional level<br />
covers various political and<br />
administrative realities, being the result<br />
<strong>of</strong> a process <strong>of</strong> decentralization that<br />
combines the specificity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
organization <strong>of</strong> the state’s power in<br />
relation to the territory and the historical<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> that state with the European<br />
Union’s requirement, that <strong>of</strong> the<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> an administrative level<br />
inferior to the national level but higher<br />
than the local one.<br />
� The regional decentralization, typical to<br />
France, and embraced by Poland and the<br />
Czech Republic, from the New Member<br />
States, is an exception rather than a rule<br />
in the EU.<br />
� At the EU level, the regional<br />
decentralization can best be described<br />
following the process <strong>of</strong> regionalization<br />
which, depending on the typology <strong>of</strong> a<br />
certain state, may be related to the<br />
regions existing as administrativeterritorial<br />
units or to the regions created<br />
as new territorial divisions.<br />
� The most common type <strong>of</strong><br />
regionalization in the EU27 is the<br />
administrative regionalization (Greece,<br />
Portugal, United Kingdom except<br />
Scotland, Sweden, Bulgaria, Estonia,<br />
Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia),<br />
followed by the regionalization through<br />
existing local collectivities (Denmark,<br />
Finland, Ireland, Romania and<br />
Hungary), which represent rather<br />
functional responses to the EU’s<br />
requirements in order to allow<br />
absorption <strong>of</strong> funds allocated under the<br />
regional policy.<br />
� The more advanced forms <strong>of</strong><br />
regionalization - regionalization by<br />
federal authorities and political<br />
59<br />
regionalization - characterize only 7<br />
Member States <strong>of</strong> the EU: Germany,<br />
Austria, Belgium, Spain and Italy,<br />
Portugal (for the islands) and United<br />
Kingdom (for Scotland).<br />
� The relationship federalism -<br />
regionalization responds better to the<br />
European governance <strong>of</strong> the network<br />
type and <strong>of</strong> the multi-level type.<br />
� The expansion <strong>of</strong> regionalization in the<br />
EU is favoured by its approach as an<br />
opportunity <strong>of</strong> regional development and<br />
the blockages <strong>of</strong> regionalization are<br />
related to its approach as a threat for the<br />
territorial integrity.<br />
Consequently, our future research efforts will<br />
focus on identifying and analyzing in detail<br />
some models <strong>of</strong> best practices that have<br />
proven effective in the EU for the regional<br />
growth and development.<br />
Acknowledgments:<br />
The paper presents research results afferent to<br />
the post-doctoral research project: "Economic<br />
policies for regional growth and<br />
development. Challenges for Romania in the<br />
context <strong>of</strong> economic-financial crisis and<br />
integration into the European model",<br />
developed within the project "Economic<br />
scientific research, support <strong>of</strong> the welfare and<br />
human development in the European<br />
context", financed during 2010-2013 from the<br />
European Social Fund (ESF) and<br />
implemented by the National Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Economic Research "Costin C. Kiriţescu" <strong>of</strong><br />
the Romanian Academy, from December 1,<br />
2010, to November 30, 2012, coordinator:<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>. Valeriu Ioan Franc, PhD.<br />
References:<br />
1. Androniceanu, A. and Stănciulescu, G.<br />
Sisteme comparate de administraţie<br />
publică europeană. Bucureşti:<br />
Economica, 2001.<br />
2. Atkinson, A. and Stiglitz J. Lectures on<br />
Public Economics. New York: McGraw-<br />
Hill, 1980.
3. Black P.A., Steenekamp, T. J. and Calitz,<br />
E. Public Economics. 4th edition. Cape<br />
Town: Oxford University Press Southern<br />
Africa, 2009.<br />
4. Börzel, T.A. “What's So Special About<br />
Policy Networks? – An Exploration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Concept and Its Usefulness in Studying<br />
European Governance”, European<br />
Integration online Papers (EIoP), 1997, 1<br />
(16), 1997.<br />
http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997-016a.htm.<br />
5. Brown, C.W. and Jackson, P.M. Public<br />
Sector Economics. Cambridge: Bassil<br />
Blackwell, 1990.<br />
6. Chirleşan, D. Administraţie publică.<br />
Sisteme, Iaşi: Editura Universităţii<br />
Alexandru Ioan Cuza, 2007.<br />
7. Diez, S.P. Sisteme administrative<br />
comparate, Iaşi: Editura Universităţii<br />
Alexandru Ioan Cuza, 2006.<br />
8. Dobrescu, E. “Transition and Economic<br />
Behaviour”, Romanian Economic Review,<br />
36 (1), pp. 3-16, 1992.<br />
9. Dodescu, A. Statul şi economia de piaţă.<br />
Bucureşti: Economica, 2000.<br />
10. Dodescu, A. “State versus Market. Some<br />
arguments to surpass the “mirror<br />
approach”, Theoretical and Applied<br />
Economics, Volume XVII (2010), No.<br />
9(550), pp. 17-32, 2010.<br />
http://store.ectap.ro/articole/496.pdf.<br />
11. Dodescu, A. “The Reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Role <strong>of</strong> State in Economy at the beginning<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 21 st Century from the perspective <strong>of</strong><br />
the Eureopean Model”, Revista<br />
Economică, No. 2(55)/2011, pp.252-259,<br />
2011.<br />
http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.econo<br />
mica/archive/RE%202-55-2011.pdf.<br />
12. Dogan, M. and Pelassy, D. Economia<br />
mixtă-jumătate capitalistă, jumătate<br />
socialistă, Bucureşti: Alternative, 1992.<br />
13. Eaton, K., Kaiser, K. and Smoke, P. The<br />
Political Economy <strong>of</strong> Decentralization<br />
Reforms: Implications for Aid<br />
Effectiviness. Washington, D.C., The<br />
World Bank, 2010.<br />
60<br />
14. European Commission, 2001.”European<br />
Governance. A White Paper”,<br />
Commission communication -<br />
COM(2001)428. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/200<br />
1/com2001_0428en01.pdf.<br />
15. European Commission, 2002. “Better<br />
lawmaking”, Commission communication<br />
- COM(2002)275. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?<br />
uri=CELEX:52002DC0275:EN:NOT.<br />
16. European Commission, 2003a. “Updating<br />
and simplifying the Community Acquis”,<br />
Commission communication -<br />
COM(2003)71. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?<br />
uri=CELEX:52003DC0071:EN:NOT.<br />
17. European Commission, 2003b. Regulation<br />
(EC) No 1059/2003 <strong>of</strong> the European<br />
Parliament and <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> 26 May<br />
2003 on the establishment <strong>of</strong> a common<br />
classification <strong>of</strong> territorial units for<br />
statistics (NUTS). http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?<br />
uri=OJ:L:2003:154:0001:0041:EN:PDF<br />
18. European Commission, 2005.<br />
“Implementing the Community Lisbon<br />
programme: A strategy for the<br />
simplification <strong>of</strong> the regulatory<br />
environment”, Commission<br />
communication - COM(2005)535.<br />
http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?<br />
uri=CELEX:52005DC0535:EN:NOT.<br />
19. European Commission, 2007. Governance<br />
in the EU. A White Paper.<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/governance/index_en.h<br />
tm.<br />
20. European Commission, 2008.<br />
“Commission Regulation (EC) No<br />
11/2008 <strong>of</strong> 8 January 2008 implementing<br />
Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
European Parliament and <strong>of</strong> the Council<br />
on the establishment <strong>of</strong> a common<br />
classification <strong>of</strong> territorial units for<br />
statistics (NUTS) on the transmission <strong>of</strong><br />
the time series for the new regional<br />
breakdown”, Official Journal L 5 <strong>of</strong>
9.1.2008. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?<br />
uri=OJ:L:2008:005:0013:0014:EN:PDF.<br />
21. European Commission, 2010. “Smart<br />
Regulation in the European Union”,<br />
Commission communication -<br />
COM(2010)543. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?<br />
uri=CELEX:52010DC0543:EN:NOT.<br />
22. European Commission, 2011.<br />
http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/reg<br />
ional_policy/management/g24218_en.htm<br />
23. Majocchi, A. "Theories <strong>of</strong> fiscal<br />
federalism and the European<br />
experience", ISAE Working Papers, No.<br />
100, Rome: Institute for Studies and<br />
Economic Analyses, 2008.<br />
http://www.isae.it/Working_Papers/WP_1<br />
00_2008_Majocchi.pdf.<br />
24. Oates, W. E. “Fiscal competition and<br />
European Union: contrasting<br />
perspectives”, Regional Science and<br />
Urban Economics, vol. 31, Issue 2-3,<br />
April 2001, pp. 133-145, 2001.<br />
25. Oates, W.E. Fiscal Federalism. New<br />
York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.<br />
26. Olson, M. Jr. “The Principle <strong>of</strong> "Fiscal<br />
Equivalence": The Division <strong>of</strong><br />
Responsibilities among Different Levels<br />
<strong>of</strong> Government”, The American Economic<br />
Review, Vol. 59, No. 2, Papers and<br />
Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Eighty-first Annual<br />
Meeting <strong>of</strong> the American Economic<br />
61<br />
Association (May, 1969), pp. 479-487,<br />
1969. http://www.jstor.org/pss/1823700.<br />
27. Shah, A. Local Governance in Industrial<br />
Countries, Washington D. C.: World<br />
Bank, 2006.<br />
28. Sharma, C. K. "Emerging Dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />
Decentralization Debate in the Age <strong>of</strong><br />
Globalization", MPRA Paper, No. 6734,<br />
University Library <strong>of</strong> Munich, 2008.<br />
http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6734/.<br />
29. Sharma, C. K. "Multilevel Fiscal<br />
Governance in a Balanced Policy<br />
Environment", MPRA Paper, No. 30282,<br />
University Library <strong>of</strong> Munich,<br />
2011. http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/30282/1/MPRA_paper_302<br />
82.pdf.<br />
30. Stănciulescu, G. and Androniceanu, A.<br />
Sisteme europene de administraţie<br />
publică, Bucureşti: Uranus, 2006.<br />
31. The World Group Bank, 2011.<br />
Decentralization & Subnational Regional<br />
Economics.<br />
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTE<br />
RNAL/TOPICS/EXTPUBLICSECTORA<br />
NDGOVERNANCE/EXTDSRE/0,,menu<br />
PK:390249~pagePK:149018~piPK:14909<br />
3~theSitePK:390243,00.html.<br />
32. Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. Policy<br />
Making in the European Union. Oxford:<br />
Oxford University Press, 2000.<br />
33. Weber, L. L’Etat, acteur economique,<br />
Paris: Economica, 1991.
A NEW THINKING FOR A NEW WORLD. REPRESENTATIONS FROM<br />
ECONOMY<br />
Negucioiu Aurel<br />
”Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian University, Bucharest, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, Cluj-Napoca<br />
An incursion, even a succinct one, incomplete, in the universal history, in the world economic<br />
history and not in the least in the real world gives more and more “credit” to the idea according to<br />
which the movement is the main form <strong>of</strong> existence – working and evolution – <strong>of</strong> the society,<br />
economy, and <strong>of</strong> all the structures they are made <strong>of</strong>.<br />
Movement means first <strong>of</strong> all change, transformation. Its “propellant”, its internal cause is<br />
represented, in our opinion, by the unity and interaction <strong>of</strong> opposites. The changes, the<br />
transformations taking place in society and in its economy have direct or indirect authors the<br />
human beings who, using their minds, “leaven bread” and express at the beginning through<br />
thinking, the objectives that are going to complete or lessen reality. The positive changes and<br />
transformations that the people operate renew the world.<br />
For more than half <strong>of</strong> a century, the humankind has been in a vast and very complex process <strong>of</strong><br />
transformation, changes with innovative character. In other words, a process <strong>of</strong> building a new<br />
world. Hence, the need to create a new thinking. “A new thinking for a new world”. Making a halt<br />
in the field <strong>of</strong> economics – theory, science and practice – we are trying to bring to attention to those<br />
interested a few considerations concerning the truth value <strong>of</strong> some paradigms in the theoretical<br />
circuit, including their degree <strong>of</strong> rationality or irrationality.<br />
Key words: capital, industrial capital, commercial capital, financial capital, human capital, social<br />
capital, microeconomics, mezoeconomics, macroeconomics, national economy, mondial economy,<br />
mondoeconomy, world economy, economic development, eco-economic development, ecoeconomics,<br />
economic system, ecologic system, ecosystem, ecosoceco system, economic culture,<br />
community, society, knowledge based society, knowledge based economy, economic paradox, social<br />
paradox, scientific paradox, economic risk, economic chaos, economic disorder, uncertainty,<br />
economic truth, economic transition, economic society, international society, post-capitalist society,<br />
digital economy, real economy, virtual economy, symbolical economy, market, rift, discontinuance.<br />
1. Instead <strong>of</strong> introduction<br />
><br />
– Ralph Waldo Emerson –<br />
><br />
– Ian Amos Comenius –<br />
><br />
63<br />
– Eugeniu Speranţia –<br />
><br />
– Mark Twain –<br />
><br />
– Heraclitus –<br />
enemies as in all other domains. The peculiar<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> the materials it deals with, summons<br />
as foes into the field <strong>of</strong> battle the most<br />
violent, mean and malignant passions […] the<br />
Furies <strong>of</strong> private interest >><br />
– Karl Marx –<br />
><br />
– G.W.Hegel –<br />
forget that in reality there are not only these<br />
processes which, through their content and<br />
consequences are positive, but also processes<br />
and actions which connect us, such us<br />
imbalance, disorganization, destabilization<br />
and others.<br />
Through the processes mentioned which give<br />
content and shape to movement and change is<br />
done the passing from past, to present and<br />
then to future or what means the passing from<br />
old to new in the real world and the world <strong>of</strong><br />
ideas on it. Getting here we state that the new<br />
is not always superior, better, more beautiful,<br />
more efficient and necessarily more valuable<br />
than the old that it has replaced. This<br />
paradigm is available both for action and for<br />
thought.<br />
The truth is that our earthly world that we are<br />
considering among us is changing, is<br />
transforming, therefore it is renewing itself<br />
with a speed many times unnoticeable, on<br />
larger and larger and more and more<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ound surfaces. The technical base <strong>of</strong> the<br />
capitalist society economy has climbed the<br />
stairs <strong>of</strong> progress with a speed that increased<br />
together with time. The simple labour<br />
mechanization gave way to complex<br />
mechanization and this, in its turn, was more<br />
and more passed by automation in different<br />
forms and higher and higher performances.<br />
The science has come down from the , ahs transformed into an<br />
endogenous factor <strong>of</strong> production, <strong>of</strong> man’s<br />
activity in general, has merged with the other<br />
factors <strong>of</strong> production in a more and more<br />
complete scientific and technical revolution<br />
which, for several years, has had a striking<br />
world character. Also, world like are the<br />
communication and information revolution.<br />
Currently, a harder and harder to pronounce<br />
„word”, that is a more and more significant<br />
role goes to the invisible revolution whose<br />
units <strong>of</strong> measurement start with the phrase<br />
– nanosecond, nanometre or<br />
nano-millimetre.<br />
Related to these changes in the running and<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> the capitalist economy, the<br />
industrial capital crowned as a „king”,<br />
65<br />
„emperor” or „president” – was deposed and<br />
replaced with the financial capital and<br />
nowadays the trend pushing to this „high”<br />
rank the human capital is stronger and<br />
stronger.<br />
The <strong>of</strong> the<br />
changes having taken place in the last 25-30<br />
years in the contemporary world that our<br />
planet includes in its columns, the collapse <strong>of</strong><br />
the old colonial system, the collapse <strong>of</strong> the<br />
socialist systems <strong>of</strong> economy and<br />
government, the formation <strong>of</strong> the third world,<br />
the expansion <strong>of</strong> the market economy through<br />
the orientation towards it <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
socialist countries. A special part <strong>of</strong> this<br />
periodic table <strong>of</strong> elements includes by<br />
nominalization the cyclic, national,<br />
international and world economic crises, the<br />
financial crises within the same borders, the<br />
energetic, demographic crisis, the increasing<br />
economic and social inequalities among the<br />
world countries, the government and<br />
administration crises, the crises <strong>of</strong> science,<br />
education, culture, the increasing<br />
deterioration <strong>of</strong> domestic and international<br />
relations. And the things do not stop here.<br />
They do not merely exhaust the entire<br />
assembly <strong>of</strong> the changes having taken place<br />
and <strong>of</strong> those in progress.<br />
2.1. World and thinking<br />
The title <strong>of</strong> our lines was inspired by the wellknown<br />
titan <strong>of</strong> economic thinking Charles<br />
Handy who inscribed on the three books<br />
translated into Romanian, too, the following<br />
postulate-message: (1)<br />
Here, a new or a relatively new problem<br />
arises, that is the ratio or better said the ratios<br />
between world and thinking, between the new<br />
world and the new thinking.<br />
Without lingering too much on this problem,<br />
yet it is an extremely important and<br />
contemporary problem for the scientific<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> knowledge (for epistemology), we<br />
will mention the following reasons:<br />
1. The concept <strong>of</strong> in its<br />
most general and comprehensible
meaning subsumes and expresses<br />
according to dictionaries “everything<br />
that exists in reality (material world,<br />
the world <strong>of</strong> things), universe,<br />
cosmos”. It means that thinking –<br />
regarded as process and result (the<br />
world <strong>of</strong> thoughts) constitutes an<br />
important component <strong>of</strong> the world<br />
considering the meaning mentioned<br />
above.<br />
2. Therefore, the new thinking is an<br />
essential component <strong>of</strong> the new<br />
world.<br />
3. The thinking (the knowledge) has<br />
an especially complex structure,<br />
containing several subdivisions or<br />
components. Karl R. Popper<br />
distinguishes the following worlds or<br />
universes:
Another aspect – the second in our<br />
enumeration – consists in the<br />
irrefutable fact that thinking foresees<br />
and precedes more and more <strong>of</strong> the<br />
movements, therefore changes,<br />
transformations <strong>of</strong> different<br />
components <strong>of</strong> the planet Earth’s<br />
system and, for many times, not only<br />
this.<br />
To represent and ease the comprehension <strong>of</strong><br />
this truth, we will further refer to the process<br />
<strong>of</strong> labour or production <strong>of</strong> goods which is<br />
specific to human kind, quoting Karl Marx :<br />
”a spider conducts operations that resemble<br />
those <strong>of</strong> a weaver, and a bee puts to shame<br />
many an architect in the construction <strong>of</strong> her<br />
cells. But what distinguishes the worst<br />
architect from the best <strong>of</strong> bees is this, that the<br />
architect raises his structure in imagination<br />
before he erects it in reality. At the end <strong>of</strong><br />
every labour-process, we get a result that<br />
already existed in the imagination <strong>of</strong> the<br />
labourer at its commencement. He not only<br />
effects a change <strong>of</strong> form in the material on<br />
which he works, but he also realises a<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> his own that gives the law to his<br />
modus operandi, and to which he must<br />
subordinate his will. And this subordination<br />
is no mere momentary act. Besides the<br />
exertion <strong>of</strong> the bodily organs, the process<br />
demands that, during the whole operation, the<br />
workman’s will be steadily in consonance<br />
with his purpose. (4)<br />
The history <strong>of</strong> earthly world, the history <strong>of</strong><br />
human kind history mentioned in its pages<br />
that, in time, the role and importance <strong>of</strong><br />
thinking has increased in more and more<br />
pronounced rhythms. Presently, the role <strong>of</strong><br />
forerunner and notary <strong>of</strong> the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
society and economy on the steps <strong>of</strong> progress’<br />
historical ladder is being acknowledged.<br />
Moreover. There are savants stating with<br />
observable arguments that science and<br />
education must develop in more accelerated<br />
rhythms than the other structures <strong>of</strong><br />
contemporary society.<br />
And something else, too. A third aspect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ratios between the real world and new<br />
67<br />
thinking is the expansion and thoroughgoing<br />
study <strong>of</strong> the processes <strong>of</strong> thinking’s<br />
rethinking. Thinking is being rethought and,<br />
therefore, it is renewing and re-renewing and<br />
the patrimony <strong>of</strong> thoughts is getting richer<br />
both quantitatively and qualitatively. The<br />
value and the use value (utility), in other<br />
words the cognitive value and the applicative<br />
value <strong>of</strong> the new thoughts/ideas, enrich the<br />
world’s fortune, the intellectual and material<br />
potential increases too, and, together with it,<br />
the possibilities, conditions <strong>of</strong> enriching and<br />
beautifying the style and way <strong>of</strong> living and<br />
those <strong>of</strong> levelling the standard living are<br />
amplified.<br />
The truth is that the material forces and things<br />
can be destroyed only with material forces,<br />
but the ideas, new ideas have a considerable<br />
influence from the moment they have been<br />
understood and entered the world. ”If we<br />
watch history form a larger perspective, it<br />
seems that the most influential people in the<br />
last 100 years – Charles Handy writes – were<br />
not Hitler or Churchill, Stalin or Gorbatchev,<br />
but Freud, Marx and Einstein, people who did<br />
not change anything except the way in which<br />
we think, but this thing has changed<br />
everything. Francis Crick is not today a name<br />
known by everybody, but he is the one who,<br />
together with James Watson and Maurice<br />
Wilking, discovered the genetic code, the<br />
DNA, creating, thus, the science <strong>of</strong><br />
microbiology and biotechnology industry that<br />
so much <strong>of</strong> our economic future might<br />
depend so much on.” (5)<br />
3. Eco-economy - A new branch <strong>of</strong><br />
contemporary thinking (knowledge)<br />
The tree <strong>of</strong> knowledge, <strong>of</strong> science (thinking)<br />
was completed at the end <strong>of</strong> the 20th century<br />
with a new branch. Its name is eco-economy.<br />
It is under construction, enlargement and<br />
thorough study <strong>of</strong> its own object <strong>of</strong> study –<br />
the real eco-economy – the birth <strong>of</strong> this new<br />
branch <strong>of</strong> science about nature, society and<br />
economy, its ontological status, its anatomicmorphological<br />
structure, its functioning and<br />
evolution mechanism, its categories,
principles and laws governing the movement<br />
<strong>of</strong> this economic-social-ecological megasystem,<br />
the order and disorder coexisting or<br />
succeeding, the mutual reports existing<br />
among the constituent parts <strong>of</strong> the megasystem<br />
as well as between the latter and each<br />
component, in part; and last, but not least,<br />
among the ecosoceco systemic structure and<br />
other systems existing in the universe.<br />
A radiography even insufficiently detailed <strong>of</strong><br />
the national economies shows that these exist,<br />
function, and evolve in a multiple<br />
environment: social-national and<br />
international, in an international economic<br />
environment, to which the political, cultural,<br />
and moral environment are added.<br />
The mutual reports between economy and the<br />
surrounding natural environment were born<br />
together with the human society and its<br />
economy. They multiplied, diversified, and<br />
changed structurally and qualitatively<br />
together with and as the human society and<br />
surrounding nature evolved.<br />
The interactions between man (people) and<br />
nature, the multitude <strong>of</strong> relations and<br />
correlations in which these interactions took<br />
shape, manifested and still manifest<br />
themselves gave content to these new<br />
branches and sub-branches <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />
knowledge and some specific genres <strong>of</strong><br />
human activities. The itself<br />
designates and underlines three fundamental<br />
activities: labour, work and action, each <strong>of</strong><br />
them corresponding to (6) Underlying the significance <strong>of</strong><br />
each component <strong>of</strong> this <br />
Hannah wrote ”Labour is that activity which<br />
corresponds to the biological process <strong>of</strong> the<br />
human body, whose spontaneous growth,<br />
metabolism, and eventual decay are bound to<br />
the vital necessities produced and fed into the<br />
life process by labour. The human condition<br />
<strong>of</strong> labour is life itself.“ (7)<br />
"Labour is the activity corresponding to the<br />
unnatural character <strong>of</strong> the human existence,<br />
which is not imprinted in and whose death is<br />
not compensated by the perpetual cycle <strong>of</strong><br />
68<br />
species life. Labour provides an<br />
world <strong>of</strong> objects, entirely<br />
different from any natural environment.<br />
Within the borders <strong>of</strong> this artificial world,<br />
each individual life finds shelter, while the<br />
world itself is meant to last longer and exceed<br />
all individual lives. The human condition <strong>of</strong><br />
work means belonging to the world.” (8)<br />
"Action, the only activity that actually takes<br />
place between people without the mediation<br />
<strong>of</strong> objects or matter, corresponds to the<br />
human condition <strong>of</strong> plurality, that men, not<br />
the Man, live on earth and pollute the world.<br />
Although all aspects <strong>of</strong> the human condition<br />
are specifically the condition - not just a sin<br />
qua non conditio but also conditio per quam -<br />
to any political life.” (9)<br />
"The earth is just the quintessence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
human condition and as far as we know, the<br />
worldly nature is the only one in the universe<br />
that can provide human beings with a living<br />
environment where they can move and<br />
breathe effortless and without using artificial<br />
means. The artificial <strong>of</strong> the man-made world<br />
separates the human existence from any pure<br />
animal environment, but life itself is outside<br />
the artificial world and through life man<br />
remains related to all other living organisms.”<br />
(10)<br />
Above all, the labour, the production <strong>of</strong><br />
material goods necessary to meet needs,<br />
interests, desires and human goals<br />
represented, still represents and will represent<br />
a system <strong>of</strong> relationships, a process between<br />
men and nature, a process in which people<br />
cooperating in a certain way and exchanging<br />
activities, intercede, regulate and control<br />
through their own activity the exchange <strong>of</strong><br />
substances, <strong>of</strong> matter and energy between<br />
them and nature. Therefore the process <strong>of</strong><br />
production and reproduction <strong>of</strong> material<br />
goods necessary for human living and society<br />
is, in a sense, the dialectical unity <strong>of</strong> a system<br />
<strong>of</strong> relationships - relationships that are<br />
established between people and relationships<br />
taking place between people, society and<br />
natural environment. The multiple interaction<br />
between man (humans), society and its
economy on one hand and the nature<br />
surrounding them on the other hand, is a real<br />
component <strong>of</strong> the universe where we are, one<br />
<strong>of</strong> its mega-systems.<br />
4. Economy and ecology - Autonomy,<br />
identity, differences and unity<br />
4.1. Economy and ecology<br />
Undoubtedly, the real economy (the real<br />
economic system) and the real ecosystem (the<br />
real ecological system or the natural<br />
environment) as component parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
objective - material reality have their own<br />
ontological status and thus their movement -<br />
functioning and evolution are mainly<br />
governed by the laws <strong>of</strong> the universe and by<br />
its own laws (specific laws). These<br />
components have their relative autonomy and<br />
independence. The real economy includes in<br />
its structure and content the assembly <strong>of</strong> all<br />
productive forces, the assembly <strong>of</strong> the<br />
relationships is established between people<br />
and the framework <strong>of</strong> the economic activity.<br />
The two assemblies - the productive forces<br />
and economic relations - seen in their unit<br />
and interaction - form what experts call the<br />
mode <strong>of</strong> production or the economic system in<br />
the extensive meaning <strong>of</strong> the term. In its turn,<br />
the global ecological system stands for the<br />
biocenosis and biotope assembly. These<br />
systems have the self-creation, selfpreservation<br />
and self-progress ability by<br />
means <strong>of</strong> their own mechanisms. It is not<br />
accidental that the two systems – the<br />
ecological system and the economic system –<br />
represent the objective <strong>of</strong> some distinct<br />
branches <strong>of</strong> science, the environmental<br />
science and economics. The simple<br />
observation <strong>of</strong> reality shows that the<br />
ecological system and the economic system<br />
are not separated from each other by<br />
insurmountable borders and walls. And even<br />
more. There are not few situations where the<br />
economic and the ecological, more precisely<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the economic constitute components<br />
<strong>of</strong> the ecological and vice versa, parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ecological represent components <strong>of</strong> the<br />
economic. The ecological is economic and<br />
69<br />
the economic is environmentally friendly.<br />
Meaning what? There are not few situations<br />
where the economic and the ecological, more<br />
precisely parts <strong>of</strong> the economic constitute<br />
components <strong>of</strong> the ecological and vice versa,<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the ecological represent components<br />
<strong>of</strong> the economic. The ecological is economic<br />
and the economic is environmentally friendly.<br />
Meaning what? Meaning what? It is simply<br />
like that: people like all living things belong<br />
to nature, to the real ecosystem. And not only<br />
that. As many scholars argue the man is the<br />
highest product <strong>of</strong> nature. At the same time<br />
labour force represents the most important<br />
factor <strong>of</strong> production, one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
important forms <strong>of</strong> capital – the human<br />
capital. The human capacity to work, the<br />
labour has always been one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
important economic assets: under certain<br />
conditions it - labour - was a commodity and<br />
thus subject to the provisions, to the salepurchase<br />
transactions. It is again the man,<br />
regarded as subject and actor <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />
life to get some other economic codeterminations<br />
as well, depending on the<br />
place he occupied and the role he fulfilled<br />
within the economic system. Thus, he was, is<br />
and will be the owner or non-proprietor,<br />
manufacturer, distributor, dealer, customer,<br />
creditor or debtor, or more at the same time,<br />
supplier, seller or buyer <strong>of</strong> goods| he is an<br />
agriculture farmer industrialist and / or small<br />
craftsman.<br />
Yet, the process <strong>of</strong> reproduction and<br />
perpetuation <strong>of</strong> human beings is also, as it can<br />
be easily understood, a complex biological,<br />
economic, social and cultural process. (11)<br />
Simultaneously, other parts <strong>of</strong> nature become<br />
real elements <strong>of</strong> the economy at the moment<br />
and provided that they enter the economic<br />
cycle, the real economic flows.<br />
The wood (tree) cut from a natural forest<br />
becomes raw material for the furniture<br />
manufacturing factory as well as for the pulp<br />
or paper manufacturer. The wood meant for<br />
home heating is a non random economic asset<br />
for consumption. It is also the case <strong>of</strong> other<br />
component parts <strong>of</strong> nature: coal, oil, natural
gas extracted and put into use as capital<br />
goods or consumer goods. The land itself is<br />
and is becoming part <strong>of</strong> the economy as a<br />
means <strong>of</strong> work, object <strong>of</strong> labour and material<br />
requirement <strong>of</strong> performing the production<br />
process. And it is not only that. The land<br />
gives every man and<br />
ongoing space for his actions. (12) The facts<br />
stated before are true to reality, and<br />
consequently they are truths - relative and not<br />
absolute truths, partial and not total truths.<br />
Why? Because the ecological and economic<br />
identity is neither absolute nor complete it is<br />
only partial and relative. Among them there<br />
were, there are and there will always exist<br />
numerous differences. To illustrate this truth<br />
Jacques Bonnet mentioned conurbations,<br />
techno-polls (techno polis), scientific and<br />
technological parks, teleports, innovation<br />
centres, business and commercial parks,<br />
industrial areas, highways advanced countries<br />
like streaking through the heavens surface<br />
rivers and streams. To these, the nominal<br />
economy, the symbolic economy, the entire<br />
set <strong>of</strong> activities, relationships and financial<br />
flows with flows <strong>of</strong> scientific, political,<br />
cultural, economic, electronic money flows,<br />
which together with the flows <strong>of</strong> scientific,<br />
political, cultural, economic information, with<br />
flows <strong>of</strong> electronic money, constituting what<br />
scientists have called <br />
and managing object -<br />
material goods respectively, other object<br />
goods - and people in motion. (13)<br />
4.2. Ecology and economics – two sides <strong>of</strong><br />
the same coin<br />
At the risk <strong>of</strong> repeating we note that . And<br />
even more. According to the authors <strong>of</strong> the<br />
book metaphorically<br />
consider, “Ecology and economy- are two<br />
sides <strong>of</strong> same coin. Here the currency is<br />
OIKOS, our planet is the Earth, the cradle <strong>of</strong><br />
the whole life. Ecology studies the<br />
correlations between the Earth and all its<br />
70<br />
inhabitants, economy strives to manage these<br />
relationships. As science, namely as a branch<br />
<strong>of</strong> science, ecology has existed for more than<br />
a century or so and during this period it<br />
produced revelations that enable economists<br />
to manage the planet better than they and<br />
their disciples did before in the business<br />
world.” (14) Indeed, ecology and economy<br />
have, etymologically speaking, a common<br />
root - oikos. Economy has its etymological<br />
roots in the Greek oikonomia composed <strong>of</strong><br />
oikos = house, household, city and nomos =<br />
law. The roots <strong>of</strong> ecology as a branch <strong>of</strong> the<br />
scientific knowledge, as a science, are also<br />
two Greek words - oikos in the sense above<br />
mentioned and logos = science, speech,<br />
lecture, order.<br />
The root is also present in the name<br />
<strong>of</strong> both sides <strong>of</strong> the coin: eco-nomy și ecology.<br />
Both the ecological and the economic<br />
are, by structure and content, through their<br />
configuration and mechanisms – systemic<br />
compositions, in short systems holding their<br />
own status.The ecological system and the<br />
economic system. By joining the concept<br />
to we get the<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> which subsumes,<br />
focuses and expresses itself and expresses, for<br />
most scientists, if not for all <strong>of</strong> them, the<br />
ecologic system. The meaning benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
triple significance legitimacy: etymological,<br />
historical and logical-scientific. <br />
subsumes and expresses the main content <strong>of</strong><br />
the Greek oikos - so what is common to both<br />
ecological and economic, so the identical in<br />
them. No doubt, the works here as well. Nevertheless,<br />
semantically and scientifically, the notion<br />
could be also translated, in<br />
our view, as both the concept <strong>of</strong> ecological<br />
system and as the economic system. (15)<br />
5. The mega-system in<br />
reality and in thought<br />
It is now increasingly recognized that the<br />
economy and natural environment are two<br />
systemic compositions, two organic systems<br />
that are organically and indestructibly related
to each other and just as indestructibly and<br />
organically integrated with each other in a<br />
new more elevated and superior composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> existence and movement-operation and<br />
development. We have given, we do not<br />
know how rigorously the name <strong>of</strong> megasystem<br />
– the eco-eco mega-system.<br />
The concept <strong>of</strong> mega-system, eco-eco, as well<br />
as the concept <strong>of</strong> ecological system,<br />
economic system or system in general has<br />
two main meanings: the real eco-eco megasystem<br />
- a structure <strong>of</strong> a slice <strong>of</strong> reality, in our<br />
case the real eco-eco mega-system (real<br />
economy) that exists objectively,<br />
independently <strong>of</strong> the will and conscience <strong>of</strong><br />
human beings. In this determination the real<br />
eco-eco mega-system at one point became the<br />
object <strong>of</strong> scientific knowledge, a branch <strong>of</strong><br />
science. This means that it existed before<br />
scientific knowledge, and it was and will be<br />
throughout knowledge and it will be in the<br />
future as part <strong>of</strong> reality and as object <strong>of</strong> the<br />
scientific knowledge. The second meaning <strong>of</strong><br />
the eco-eco mega-system is <strong>of</strong> a theoretical<br />
eco-eco system, product (construction) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
human mind, which through knowledge,<br />
takes possession <strong>of</strong> the real intellectual ecoeco<br />
system. In our view, the theoretical ecoeco<br />
mega-system represents a reflection with<br />
the help <strong>of</strong> thinking, a copy, a photograph <strong>of</strong><br />
the real eco-eco mega-system, a shadow <strong>of</strong> it.<br />
out <strong>of</strong> which and with the<br />
help <strong>of</strong> which they build this mega-system<br />
are, generally speaking, the same from and to<br />
which the human mind constructs them.<br />
Basically these are thoughts,<br />
words, terms or concepts, categories, ideas,<br />
paradigms and even pre-paradigmatic<br />
constructions, principles and objective laws<br />
that generate movement- functioning <strong>of</strong><br />
ecological economy, its growth and<br />
development. The level and scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />
scientific knowledge <strong>of</strong> real eco-economy, <strong>of</strong><br />
the real eco-eco mega-system are given by<br />
the degree <strong>of</strong> concordance <strong>of</strong> the theoretical<br />
mega-system with the real mega-system but<br />
however high this level, or extended in<br />
length, width and depth the knowledge<br />
71<br />
acquired, the two systems are not and never<br />
can get to be identical. They are and will<br />
always be different. No matter how successful<br />
a photo would be it is not identical with the<br />
photographed object. No matter how tight the<br />
link between an object and its shadow is,<br />
however they denote different realities, even<br />
if they share some similarities. As complete<br />
as a map <strong>of</strong> a geo-economic determined space<br />
could be, and as numerous and useful the<br />
information it provides may prove, it is not<br />
identical with the reality, with the spaces they<br />
depict. The map and the respective space<br />
remain different things. The map <strong>of</strong> a country<br />
as individualized object can be reproduced in<br />
hundreds and thousands <strong>of</strong> copies, which is<br />
impossible with the represented geoeconomic<br />
space.<br />
Here is the place to mention that due to the<br />
fact that the real natural environment, the real<br />
economy and eco-economy (the eco-eco<br />
mega-system) stand for a very diverse reality<br />
and they are in a process <strong>of</strong> continuous<br />
diversification. As a result, experts have<br />
spoken on and speak about local ecoeconomy,<br />
regional eco-economy, national<br />
eco-economy, international, and lately,<br />
especially <strong>of</strong> global or world eco-economy.<br />
Simultaneously, it has been spoken especially<br />
<strong>of</strong> European, American, etc. economic<br />
models. Lately it is about the U.S. economic<br />
model, Canadian model, the German and the<br />
French ones, the economic models <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Northern European countries, the Japanese<br />
model, the Chinese one etc. In order to<br />
enlarge the image <strong>of</strong> models we also add<br />
numerous sets <strong>of</strong> models <strong>of</strong> growth and<br />
economic, social etc. development as well,<br />
which were quite frequently <br />
according to their . Currently <strong>of</strong> growth and development was<br />
completed, generally speaking, with another<br />
box – the box <strong>of</strong> eco-economic models, the<br />
models <strong>of</strong> economy based on following the<br />
ecological principles. It is beyond any doubt<br />
that the names <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the investigated<br />
models were correct and have their origins
ooted in the reality <strong>of</strong> our universe. It is not<br />
less true that the realities that concepts and<br />
models considered have proved to be highly<br />
dynamic. This circumstance began to weaken<br />
over time, to reduce the correlation between a<br />
concept, a paradigm, one model or another<br />
and the reality that it subsumed or expressed<br />
and wanted at a certain time. To make it<br />
easier to understand, we mention that the<br />
increasing, extending and deepening <strong>of</strong> the<br />
globalization processes <strong>of</strong> socio-economic<br />
life have imposed and still impose not only<br />
the completion or alteration <strong>of</strong> some<br />
concepts, categories, idea and paradigms, but<br />
they have sharpened the need to find some<br />
new concepts, ideas, solutions for the<br />
nomination and solving the new global issues.<br />
And let us not forget that one <strong>of</strong> the largest<br />
and most complicated cases <strong>of</strong> globalization<br />
is the very globalization <strong>of</strong> the economy.<br />
Most, if not all major problems <strong>of</strong><br />
contemporary world are the global problems.<br />
6. Challenges, challenges, and challenges<br />
again<br />
6.1. Setting the theoretical conceptual<br />
system<br />
The emergence <strong>of</strong> the science <strong>of</strong> ecoeconomy<br />
is, in our view, a real leap in the<br />
progress <strong>of</strong> the human knowledge. Its<br />
importance is not simply the emergence <strong>of</strong><br />
new branches, apparently, extremely,<br />
extremely vigorous in the great tree <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge and in the structure <strong>of</strong> the new<br />
thinking. As we understand things, the<br />
emergence <strong>of</strong> this new branch <strong>of</strong> science<br />
amounts to "a genuine gap" in the strong and<br />
durable wall <strong>of</strong> knowledge. It means the<br />
lighting <strong>of</strong> torches that already lights a<br />
until recently left in darkness.<br />
Now the respective is<br />
and taken in possession, at<br />
least partly, by mankind. Consequently, the<br />
powers <strong>of</strong> man and mankind increase as<br />
knowledge, science have always meant, mean<br />
now and will mean in future more light,<br />
safety and power.<br />
72<br />
Like other branches <strong>of</strong> science, eco-economy<br />
did not appear suddenly and in a perfect form<br />
from the very beginning, with an anatomicmorphological<br />
structure completely cohesive<br />
and fully matured by matching and linking<br />
thought with action, thinking with experience,<br />
phenomenon with essence, form with content,<br />
confirming, legitimizing true thoughts and<br />
ideas, denying false conceptual construction,<br />
discovering and correcting its own mistakes,<br />
the eco-economy science will be able<br />
its own its own<br />
language and eventually its own theoretical<br />
system. This is the first and one <strong>of</strong> the biggest<br />
challenges, its own open starting<br />
with its birth and having no end. Let us not<br />
forget that the science <strong>of</strong> eco-economy but will never say its<br />
last word. It is always absent. The struggle<br />
with this challenge is not easy at all, as it may<br />
seem at first sight.<br />
On the contrary, it is permanent, difficult, and<br />
full <strong>of</strong> bigger or smaller surprises. In other<br />
words it is a system <strong>of</strong> equations with a huge<br />
number <strong>of</strong> unknowns. Many factors are<br />
positive, negative and potentially neutral<br />
putting their striking stamp on the process as<br />
well as on the final outcome. For illustration<br />
only, here we mention the following factors:<br />
- The philosophy that combatants –<br />
researchers rely on, thus accept, support and<br />
promote;<br />
- The methodological position the researchers<br />
<strong>of</strong> eco-economy lie on;<br />
- The degree <strong>of</strong> arming <strong>of</strong> the combatants<br />
with the advanced opportunities <strong>of</strong> having<br />
access to information and their processing<br />
and interpretation capabilities <strong>of</strong> the stock <strong>of</strong><br />
information - ;<br />
- The discrepancies, sometimes important<br />
and very important, between reality and<br />
appearance, the thickness and density <strong>of</strong><br />
appearance;<br />
-- The differences and inconsistencies<br />
between what is seen and what is not seen;<br />
- The complexity <strong>of</strong> the ever widening <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reality <strong>of</strong> past world and <strong>of</strong> the world <strong>of</strong>
present realities. And do not forget that<br />
although the present is extremely small in<br />
duration, as reality it is a composition that<br />
combines components <strong>of</strong> the old world and<br />
new world, that the interaction between them<br />
can take the form <strong>of</strong> struggle, <strong>of</strong> mutual<br />
rejection, <strong>of</strong> mutual rejection, <strong>of</strong><br />
collaboration, cooperation and many other<br />
forms.<br />
- The subjective charge, be it large or small,<br />
still present in the personality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
combatants (researchers);<br />
- Other factors whose number by far exceeds<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> above mentioned.<br />
6.2. The place and role <strong>of</strong> the real ecologic<br />
and <strong>of</strong> the real economic within the real ecoeco<br />
mega-system<br />
As already mentioned, the eco-economy, the<br />
eco-eco mega-system represents the unity and<br />
interaction between economy and the natural<br />
environment. The true knowledge and the<br />
more complex understanding requires further<br />
clarification <strong>of</strong> the place that each <strong>of</strong> the two<br />
components occupies and <strong>of</strong> the role that the<br />
two fulfil within the mega-system.<br />
This challenge is particularly topical also<br />
because <strong>of</strong> knowledge, <strong>of</strong> the<br />
means <strong>of</strong> knowledge and interpretation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mega-system continues to be divided into<br />
different areas.<br />
The most vivid, most heated controversy take<br />
place between environmentalists and<br />
economists. There is a very successful<br />
description and presentation <strong>of</strong> the dialogue<br />
that occurs between these researchers in the<br />
famous book by Lester Brown – Ecoeconomy<br />
(16). According to him:<br />
- Environmentalists consider economy as<br />
being part <strong>of</strong> the environmental system;<br />
- Economists consider the environment as<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the economy;<br />
- Environmentalists are the first ones<br />
concerned with the limits <strong>of</strong> the natural<br />
environment, <strong>of</strong> the finite character <strong>of</strong> the<br />
planet and <strong>of</strong> resources;<br />
Economists tend not to recognize such<br />
constraints;<br />
73<br />
- Environmentalists, following the signs <strong>of</strong><br />
nature, think in terms <strong>of</strong> cycles;<br />
- Economists prove a rather linear or<br />
curvilinear thinking;<br />
- Economists have great confidence in the<br />
market;<br />
- Environmentalists <strong>of</strong>ten fail to accurately<br />
assess the market.<br />
Noting the variety <strong>of</strong> the opinions, in this case<br />
<strong>of</strong> the ecologists and <strong>of</strong> the economists, and<br />
especially <strong>of</strong> their divergent character, we put<br />
the following questions: Who is right? Who is<br />
closer to the truth and to reality? In our view,<br />
the mentioned opinions contain a number <strong>of</strong><br />
ideas and paradigms that can be the core <strong>of</strong><br />
some credible answers, that resisting in front<br />
<strong>of</strong> all the questions acquire the value <strong>of</strong> truth<br />
and can be considered authentic knowledge in<br />
the heritage <strong>of</strong> the eco-economy.<br />
Analyzing as carefully as we can “the<br />
dialogue” or more correctly “the dialogues”,<br />
we detached and we retained the following<br />
views:<br />
a) Although the real economic system<br />
has its own identity and functioning<br />
and ontological status, its<br />
interdependence with the natural<br />
environment is neither total nor<br />
absolute but only partial and relative.<br />
b) Between the surrounding nature and<br />
the real economy there are a lot <strong>of</strong><br />
mutual relations <strong>of</strong> interdependence,<br />
dependence, and interdependence.<br />
They are in a continuous interaction.<br />
The environment influences in a<br />
multilateral way the real economy. In<br />
turn, the society and the economy<br />
have created their own artificial<br />
environments that have been<br />
implemented in the structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
natural environment.<br />
c) The identity relationships,<br />
dependence and interdependence<br />
existing between the two<br />
compositions have generated a new<br />
composition, having a superior<br />
organization, existence, operation,<br />
and evolution. This composition<br />
represents an authentic mega-system<br />
that we call the ecoeco mega-system<br />
– in fact, the real economy.<br />
d) The ecoeco mega-system is a<br />
contradictory composition, a unity <strong>of</strong><br />
opposites that presume each other<br />
and are linked to each other. The two<br />
main opposites <strong>of</strong> the eco-economy<br />
74<br />
are and will remain the ecology and<br />
the economy.<br />
e) The divergence <strong>of</strong> opinions “the<br />
ecology <strong>of</strong> the environment is<br />
broader than the economy; the<br />
economy is part <strong>of</strong> the surrounding<br />
nature” and the opinion according to<br />
which the economy is more<br />
comprehensive; it includes nature in<br />
its structure and its content. Who is<br />
right? Which <strong>of</strong> the two opinions is<br />
closer to the truth? The truth is that<br />
the economy exists, functions and<br />
develops within the surrounding<br />
nature’s system. Moreover, the<br />
economy will exist, it will be able to<br />
function and to develop normally<br />
only as long as the surrounding<br />
nature will support it, only as long as<br />
the material support <strong>of</strong> the economy<br />
will resist.<br />
f) It is difficult to establish the<br />
boundary between ecology and<br />
economy. In this respect, the obstacle<br />
is represented by the identity<br />
elements awakened in both systems.<br />
The human being is, in the same<br />
time, an essential component both in<br />
ecology, as a biological human<br />
being, as well as in the economy, as<br />
workforce, capital, production factor,<br />
economic actor, etc.<br />
g) The human being and the human<br />
beings play a paradoxical role in the<br />
ambient environment “Biologically<br />
speaking, says Barry Commoner –<br />
people are part <strong>of</strong> the ambient<br />
system, like the elements <strong>of</strong> a whole.<br />
However, the economic society is<br />
made in order to exploit the<br />
environment as a whole, to produce<br />
wealth. Our paradoxical role that we<br />
play in the ambient environment as<br />
participants and as explorers distorts<br />
our picture <strong>of</strong> it.” (17)<br />
Over the years, especially in the developed<br />
countries <strong>of</strong> the world, people have built an<br />
artificial environment through their activity
that continues to create a sensation and an<br />
impression that because <strong>of</strong> this environment,<br />
whose engine is considered to be the<br />
machineries, people have got rid <strong>of</strong> their<br />
dependence on the natural environment.<br />
Error, illusion, delusion. Why? At least for<br />
the following reasons:<br />
- “The living creatures are composed<br />
almost exclusively <strong>of</strong> the same four<br />
elements: hydrogen, oxygen, carbon,<br />
and nitrogen – four elements that<br />
originally formed the initial<br />
atmosphere <strong>of</strong> the Earth.” (18)<br />
- The source <strong>of</strong> life is represented by<br />
“the thin air, water and soil <strong>of</strong> the<br />
earth and the sun rays that bathe it”.<br />
(19)<br />
- The natural environment “is one<br />
living machinery, huge and very<br />
complex, that constitutes a thin<br />
dynamic layer on the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Earth and every human activity<br />
depends on the perfect state and good<br />
functioning <strong>of</strong> this mechanism”. (20)<br />
- And “no economic system can be<br />
considered to be solid if its<br />
functioning seriously violates the<br />
principles <strong>of</strong> ecology” (21)<br />
h) The crucial and the decisive factor in<br />
the ecoeco mega-system, in other<br />
words within the eco-economy is<br />
planet Earth (the environment). The<br />
limits <strong>of</strong> the economy’s growth and<br />
development are given by the<br />
planet’s limits to support both the<br />
economic growth and development.<br />
And the most important thing – an<br />
economy tolerated by the<br />
environment and also on long term,<br />
sustainable and viable in<br />
concordance with the principles <strong>of</strong><br />
ecology compatible with the<br />
principles <strong>of</strong> ecology compatible<br />
with the environment, which Lester<br />
Brown called eco-economy, that is<br />
ecological or green economy.<br />
i) The human being’s domination over<br />
the nature. Preoccupied by the “well-<br />
75<br />
being” in general, Rene Descartes<br />
argued that people should become,<br />
by the help <strong>of</strong> the science and<br />
technology, “possessing masters <strong>of</strong><br />
the nature”. “As soon as they have<br />
possessed some general notions <strong>of</strong><br />
physics, tested in some difficult<br />
cases, we noticed, he said, how far<br />
they could take us and how different<br />
they were in comparison with the<br />
principles used so far. I considered<br />
that I could not keep them secret<br />
without making a sin against the law<br />
that forces us to contribute, as much<br />
as we could to the general wellbeing:<br />
they showed me that it was<br />
possible to reach valuable knowledge<br />
for life and instead <strong>of</strong> that<br />
speculative philosophy that was<br />
taught in schools, in order to find a<br />
practical one, by which to know the<br />
power and action <strong>of</strong> fire, water, air,<br />
stars, sky and <strong>of</strong> all the things that<br />
surrounded us, as well as we knew<br />
different jobs, we could use them in<br />
the same way for all our objectives<br />
thus, becoming masters and<br />
possessors <strong>of</strong> nature.”(22)<br />
Paradoxically, for a long time, people<br />
believed and unfortunately they still do<br />
nowadays, that one <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
criteria <strong>of</strong> the economic and social<br />
development is the degree <strong>of</strong> possession,<br />
the degree <strong>of</strong> domination <strong>of</strong> the human<br />
beings upon nature. Moreover, the<br />
extremely accelerated development <strong>of</strong> the<br />
science, technology, informatics and<br />
communication, the astonishing growth<br />
in speed <strong>of</strong> the means <strong>of</strong> transport, and<br />
especially the rapidity with which<br />
information flows, practically the death<br />
<strong>of</strong> space and time, the manufacturing <strong>of</strong><br />
some products having the same<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> the ones made by<br />
nature, as well as the production <strong>of</strong> some<br />
products (goods) that cannot be found in<br />
the nature and such other remarkable<br />
progresses that induced to many human
eings the illusion <strong>of</strong> acquisition, the<br />
conquest <strong>of</strong> an absolute and total<br />
independence towards nature and its<br />
forms. Therefore, the human being has<br />
conquest the nature, and its economy<br />
represents that “body’ that is in our<br />
planetary center in the form <strong>of</strong> a central<br />
axis, around which all the other systems<br />
spin around. The human being considers<br />
itself the planet’s lord almighty, totally<br />
independent from it. Again mistake,<br />
illusion and delusion. How can be a<br />
human being totally independent <strong>of</strong><br />
nature, when this is an organic element <strong>of</strong><br />
the planet Earth. How can the human<br />
being believe that there is an absolute<br />
independence when its entire real<br />
economy is based on nature, substance,<br />
substance, energy and force <strong>of</strong> nature?<br />
Such an understanding <strong>of</strong> reality,<br />
illusions and myths generated by the<br />
mentioned mistakes has introduced “bad<br />
elements” in the attitudes and behaviors<br />
<strong>of</strong> the human beings. Therefore, for most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the economic actors, as well as among<br />
the representatives <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />
theory, what mattered and really matters<br />
primarily is the gain, the maximum pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
and because <strong>of</strong> these their economic<br />
domination and not just economic, their<br />
domination upon some elements (parts)<br />
<strong>of</strong> nature had and unfortunately still have<br />
a colonial, usurper and destructive<br />
character.<br />
j) The economy is self-destructive<br />
The human society along with its<br />
economy, exists and moves, functions<br />
and develops in time and space. The<br />
second half <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century is<br />
known as being rich in economical<br />
progresses. Among these, we mention “<br />
an unprecedented global economic<br />
growth, <strong>of</strong> commerce and <strong>of</strong> international<br />
investments (…) the global economy has<br />
increased seven times since 1950, the<br />
global income has increased from 6<br />
billion $ in goods and services to 43<br />
billion $ in 2000, raising living standards<br />
76<br />
at unbelievable levels.” (23) During this<br />
fragment <strong>of</strong> history, in the advanced<br />
world, there was a society <strong>of</strong> welfare,<br />
frequently called “consumer society”.<br />
Also during this period, the technical and<br />
scientific revolution has clearly stated its<br />
dimension in the geographically, its<br />
intensity and depth <strong>of</strong>ten exceeding most<br />
impressive imaginations. The IT and<br />
communicational revolution has made,<br />
according to some inspired expressions,<br />
“for time and space to disappear”. It is<br />
worth mentioning, the thawing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
international economic relationships, the<br />
international economic integration and<br />
not least, there could be seen clear signs<br />
<strong>of</strong> globalization in the economic and<br />
social life. This is the way the world<br />
looks like, seen in its economic mirror.<br />
Willing to complete the image <strong>of</strong> Planet<br />
Earth, we have turned to the green mirror<br />
and this is what we have noticed: the<br />
same economic increase and<br />
development has been presented as being<br />
the product <strong>of</strong> burning huge materials <strong>of</strong><br />
cheap fossil fuels, which contributed a lot<br />
to climate destabilization.<br />
Simultaneously, this mirror has presented<br />
waves <strong>of</strong> intense heat, storms and more<br />
devastating tornadoes, ice caps are<br />
melting, the higher sea levels, and<br />
restricting land surface, even in the<br />
context in which the planet’s population<br />
is growing. (24)<br />
So, two mirrors, two images and beyond<br />
them two states. AS Lester Brown<br />
Noticed “while the economists see<br />
explosive economic indicators, the<br />
ecologists see an economy that<br />
deteriorates climate with unpredictable<br />
consequences. The economy follows the<br />
way <strong>of</strong> self-destruction. Moreover, the<br />
mutual relationships between the two<br />
elements <strong>of</strong> the ecoeco are seriously<br />
deteriorated and thus, the dangers that are<br />
threatening more and more the state (the<br />
functioning and evolution) <strong>of</strong> the entire<br />
planet. The most eloquent form <strong>of</strong> the
ecology’s and <strong>of</strong> the eco-economy’s selfdestruction<br />
is the crises in which they are<br />
struggling.<br />
k) The challenge <strong>of</strong> challenges – the<br />
conversion <strong>of</strong> the economy in ecoeconomy<br />
The science <strong>of</strong> economy has a lot <strong>of</strong><br />
challenges. In our opinion, a complete<br />
inventory is impossible to be done. The<br />
“Mendeleev-like” picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />
economic sciences’ challenges will<br />
always be completed with new blocks<br />
and new “elements”. But it will always<br />
remain open. This is the case with all the<br />
branches <strong>of</strong> science. The history <strong>of</strong><br />
science, <strong>of</strong> all its branches, tells us and<br />
proves to us the fact that the science has<br />
the first word but it does not have the last<br />
word. Acknowledging this truth, we<br />
sought to find a challenge <strong>of</strong> challenges<br />
among the ones already identified in the<br />
private economy as reality and as a<br />
science. This is “the conversion <strong>of</strong><br />
economy in eco-economy”. This was<br />
stated by Lester brown who noticed the<br />
fact that “the conversion <strong>of</strong> the economy<br />
in an eco-economy represents an<br />
extraordinary challenge. There is no<br />
precedent in the action <strong>of</strong> transforming an<br />
economy based mainly on the market<br />
forces in an economy formed on the<br />
principles <strong>of</strong> ecology” (25)<br />
Why is this conversion necessary? Lester<br />
Brown considers that “today’s global<br />
economy has been formulated by the market<br />
forces and not by the principles <strong>of</strong> ecology.<br />
Unfortunately, due to failure in reflecting<br />
total costs <strong>of</strong> the goods and services, the<br />
market provides information that mislead the<br />
decisive economic factors at all levels. This<br />
aspect has created a distorted economy,<br />
which is in conflict with the ecosystem <strong>of</strong> the<br />
planet – an economy that destroys its own<br />
natural support systems.” (26)<br />
“The market does not recognize the ecologic<br />
concepts <strong>of</strong> tolerable production and does not<br />
respect the balance <strong>of</strong> nature.” (27)<br />
According to Lester Brown, “An economy is<br />
77<br />
an economy that satisfies our demands<br />
without destroying the perspectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
future generations to fulfil their needs, as the<br />
Brundtland Committee has underlined 15<br />
years ago.” (28)<br />
Following these ideas, Lester Brown notices:<br />
There have been enough records regarding<br />
the fact that, gradually, our global economy<br />
undermines itself on several levels. If we<br />
want for the economic progress to continue,<br />
we have only the small chance <strong>of</strong><br />
systematically restructure the global<br />
economy, in order to make it bearable for the<br />
environment.” (29)<br />
These truths are undoubtedly confirmed by<br />
the ecologic crises, by the deep cracks <strong>of</strong> the<br />
correlations between the economy’s structural<br />
links as well as between the different<br />
components <strong>of</strong> the planet Earth, plus the<br />
serious contradictions between economy and<br />
nature. And we must not forget the fact that<br />
all or almost all these phenomena and<br />
realities have their source in the models <strong>of</strong><br />
economic and social growth and development<br />
that have become more and more not only unecological<br />
but also against ecology.<br />
7. In search for a better world<br />
The people regarded as living human beings ,<br />
and not only they, are obviously and<br />
constantly concerned with the improvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> their situation (state). Mentioning this<br />
general feature <strong>of</strong> the living, Karl R. Popper<br />
noticed that “Everything that is living is in<br />
search for a better world. The people, the<br />
animals, the plants and even the unicellular<br />
organisms are continuously active. Even in<br />
sleep the body actively maintains that certain<br />
state <strong>of</strong> sleep, actively defends itself <strong>of</strong> what<br />
is disturbing, <strong>of</strong> the environment. Any<br />
organism is continuously preoccupied with<br />
finding solutions. And the solutions appear<br />
from the evaluation <strong>of</strong> its state and <strong>of</strong> its<br />
environment, trying to improve them. The<br />
attempt to solve them, <strong>of</strong>ten proves to be<br />
wrong, leading to worsening. Then, other<br />
solving attempts, other test movements<br />
follow. Thus, along with life – even from the
unicellular organisms, something extremely<br />
new appears (something that has never been<br />
before: problems and active attempts to solve<br />
them evaluations, values, trial and error)<br />
(30)<br />
The actors implied in solving the problems<br />
are researchers, finders, discoverers. The<br />
activity, the anxiety or the curiosity that is<br />
given by the research are essential elements<br />
for life, for everlasting hope, for search,<br />
evaluation, finding, for learning, for value<br />
creation, for improvements, but also for the<br />
everlasting mistake, as well as for nonvalues’<br />
realization. The items listed are<br />
part <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
Karl Popper believes that “the bodies<br />
searching for a better world find invent and<br />
change new environments. They build nests,<br />
dams, mountains, but their creation with the<br />
most significant consequences is obviously<br />
the reshaping the earth’s atmosphere by<br />
enriching it with oxygen; in turn, a<br />
consequence <strong>of</strong> discovering the fact that<br />
sunlight can serve as food. Discovering this<br />
inexhaustible source <strong>of</strong> food and <strong>of</strong> the<br />
multiple methods <strong>of</strong> capturing sunlight, has<br />
created flora. And the prediction for the<br />
planet as a food source created fauna. We<br />
have created ourselves by inventing our<br />
specific human language "(31) and<br />
influencing our mind and thought with it. The<br />
instinct, the intuition and the science<br />
(knowledge) have constituted and are still<br />
constituting the main elements <strong>of</strong> the search<br />
for a better world. The sentences uttered by<br />
people represent “the main instrument with<br />
which they can describe their states.”<br />
Reaching this point we have to mention the<br />
fact that the sentences help people express<br />
objectively the truth discovered by human<br />
knowledge. Mainly in the sciences <strong>of</strong> nature –<br />
“the search for truth is connected to<br />
everything that is good and impressive <strong>of</strong><br />
what life created in search for a better life.”<br />
(32)<br />
But the reality also shows us that people,<br />
searching for a better world, have committed<br />
many errors, sometimes big ones. The saying<br />
78<br />
that “everything that is alive commits errors”<br />
is true. As K. Popper underlined, “it is<br />
obviously impossible to anticipate all the<br />
unwanted consequences <strong>of</strong> our actions. The<br />
science <strong>of</strong> nature is our biggest hope here: the<br />
method is to correct the mistakes.” (33) In<br />
this way <strong>of</strong> understanding the problem, it is<br />
obvious that the expansion and the deepening<br />
<strong>of</strong> the scientific knowledge, by which the<br />
society and the human beings take intellectual<br />
control over a growing field <strong>of</strong> reality<br />
represents and will represent the most<br />
probable way to follow in order to achieve<br />
big successes. In our opinion, the science, the<br />
knowledge is the compass that help people to<br />
orient and to lead its ship on the stormy<br />
waves <strong>of</strong> time. We like to believe that our<br />
words, even if they are not rigorous and<br />
exact, are somehow close to the truth.<br />
Towards the end <strong>of</strong> the 20 th century, the<br />
science and the scientific knowledge has<br />
recorded remarkable progresses, and<br />
according to some appreciations during this<br />
period lived approximately 90% <strong>of</strong> all the<br />
scientists who have ever existed on Earth. We<br />
also like to notice the fact that presently the<br />
human beings, the contemporary world<br />
acknowledge an invisible revolution in<br />
informatics and communications, whose main<br />
unit is “nano”. These powerful engines and<br />
forces push the human beings in a society<br />
based on scientific knowledge. However, in<br />
spite <strong>of</strong> these realities, the present society and<br />
its economy have much more problems than<br />
in any other past period, problems having no<br />
answers, no solutions. Paradoxically, the<br />
progress <strong>of</strong> the scientific knowledge<br />
discovers and creates new and new problems<br />
that are waiting to be solved.
8. A free market or another type <strong>of</strong><br />
market?<br />
A brief foray into the history <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />
thinking convinces us easily that since the<br />
modern age, the economists have given the<br />
market a special role. In other words, the<br />
market has captured more and more the<br />
attention <strong>of</strong> the economists. For Adam Smith<br />
the market represents the regulator <strong>of</strong> the<br />
labor division. Its volume determines the<br />
level reached by the division, this process,<br />
this accelerator <strong>of</strong> production. Moreover, the<br />
market is the place where “the invisible<br />
hand”, the <strong>of</strong>fer and the demand intermingle<br />
and are balanced automatically on the market,<br />
through prices. Simon de Sismondi considered<br />
that the mass consumers, their demands, the<br />
proportions <strong>of</strong> their consumption and <strong>of</strong> their<br />
incomes – all these form the market for which<br />
every single producer works. Raymonde<br />
Barre defines the market as being a “network<br />
<strong>of</strong> relationships between the agents who make<br />
the shift, that are rigorously communicated<br />
through certain means.” According to him,<br />
the market consists <strong>of</strong> distinct economic<br />
centers, linked together by means <strong>of</strong><br />
exchange networks, joined by a network <strong>of</strong><br />
forces. These centers are production centers,<br />
supply <strong>of</strong> production factors and <strong>of</strong> goods.<br />
They are linked by a functional solidarity that<br />
comes out from the necessity <strong>of</strong> their interest<br />
in developing the economic activity. For<br />
Michel Didier “the market is a social<br />
institution.” For him, “the market appears as<br />
an overall means <strong>of</strong> communication, by<br />
which sellers and buyers inform each other<br />
about products and prices before transactions<br />
are done. The markets are communication<br />
networks.”<br />
J. Bremond and A. Gélédan write in the<br />
Economic and Social Dictionary that “the<br />
market is the place where the <strong>of</strong>fers <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sellers meet the demands <strong>of</strong> the buyers, being<br />
adjusted at a certain price. The market is thus,<br />
a way <strong>of</strong> confronting demand with <strong>of</strong>fer in<br />
order to make a change <strong>of</strong> products, services<br />
or capitals.”<br />
79<br />
A quite remarkable definition, at least for us,<br />
belongs to the Polish economist Oskar Lange.<br />
He noticed that “the market is the first<br />
ordinator put in the service <strong>of</strong> man, a selfregulating<br />
machinery ensuring the balance <strong>of</strong><br />
the economic activities..” (34) D’Avenal<br />
noticed in the language <strong>of</strong> his era, <strong>of</strong> the<br />
honest liberalism: „Even in the situation<br />
when nothing id free in a state, the price <strong>of</strong><br />
the things remains free and would not be<br />
enslaved to anyone. The price <strong>of</strong> silver, land,<br />
labour, the prices <strong>of</strong> all the goods and<br />
services have never ceased being free; no<br />
legal constriction, no agreement between<br />
people have enslaved them.” (35)<br />
In Fernand Braudel's opinion "These<br />
considerations implicitly admit that the<br />
market that is not directed by anyone, it is the<br />
mechanism driving the whole economy. The<br />
economic development in Europe, and even<br />
in the world, would be the development <strong>of</strong> a<br />
market economy that has constantly increased<br />
its area, including in its rational order more<br />
and more people, more and more economic<br />
communications, close and remote, which<br />
tend to create, all together, a unity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world." (36)<br />
Still, what are the status and the condition <strong>of</strong><br />
the market in the nowadays world? A<br />
comprehensive answer fully argued by<br />
confirmed facts and thus legitimized, not by<br />
questionable opinions sometimes even<br />
refuted by reality, does not fit in the pages <strong>of</strong><br />
a communication no matter how extensive it<br />
might be. Therefore, we will limit ourselves<br />
to not more than a summary, yet as<br />
comprehensive as possible, insisting on the<br />
following:<br />
- Market - conceptually, its anatomicalmorphological<br />
structure, the forms (types),<br />
the way <strong>of</strong> operation and development, its<br />
place and its role in the contemporary<br />
economy continue to be the subject <strong>of</strong><br />
extensive and lively theoretical,<br />
methodological and practical confrontations.<br />
- Trying to summarize, a group, <strong>of</strong> course<br />
relative, we believe that on the large field <strong>of</strong><br />
confrontations about market one can
generally distinguish two trends, two<br />
approaches, namely: a) classical and<br />
contemporary liberal approach and b) nonliberal<br />
approach with its subdivisions as well<br />
as the former.<br />
- In the liberal approach, the market is a<br />
general mechanism, self-regulating; it is<br />
comprehensive and accomplishes, performs<br />
and assures in itself, through the spontaneous<br />
action, the efficient allocation <strong>of</strong> resources, <strong>of</strong><br />
production factors, orients the economic<br />
movement according to the individual needs<br />
and interests <strong>of</strong> the economic actors, while<br />
ensuring the maintenance <strong>of</strong> balance between<br />
the links <strong>of</strong> the social division <strong>of</strong> labour,<br />
between supply and demand. The economic<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> the market economy is formed by the<br />
private ownership <strong>of</strong> means <strong>of</strong> production, the<br />
fundament <strong>of</strong> autonomy and independence <strong>of</strong><br />
actors and therefore the base <strong>of</strong> the freedom<br />
<strong>of</strong> thought and movement <strong>of</strong> production<br />
factors, goods, capital and economic actors.<br />
- The most important constitutive <br />
<strong>of</strong> the market and its mechanism are: pr<strong>of</strong>it,<br />
demand, <strong>of</strong>fer, the interplay between demand<br />
and <strong>of</strong>fer, free competition and price.<br />
- This free market is by definition a pure and<br />
perfect market and ensures also pure and<br />
perfect functioning <strong>of</strong> the free market<br />
economy.<br />
- According to the second approach, the<br />
market is indeed the most important<br />
mechanism <strong>of</strong> operation and development <strong>of</strong><br />
economic life. The advocates and the<br />
supporters <strong>of</strong> this way <strong>of</strong> understanding the<br />
market and the market economy believe,<br />
however, that the market economy and the<br />
free market economy are not the same thing.<br />
The two concepts are not identical and should<br />
not be confused. Saying these and referring to<br />
the era we live in, we feel the need to add that<br />
in the debates that take place, it is <strong>of</strong>ten not<br />
said what is a confirmed truth, and, for<br />
various reasons, some truth containing<br />
paradigms are premeditatedly similar. As an<br />
example we can here mention a work,<br />
remarkable in our opinion, which presents a<br />
80<br />
total <strong>of</strong> 23 things we are NOT told about<br />
capitalism. (37)<br />
To exemplify, we shall present in a summary<br />
the main ideas contained in Chapter 1 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
book, entitled: "There is no free market"<br />
"What you are said"<br />
"Markets should be free. If governments<br />
dictate what market actors can and cannot do,<br />
the resources cannot get where they would be<br />
most effectively used. If they cannot do what<br />
they consider pr<strong>of</strong>itable, people lose their<br />
desire to invest and innovate. Thus, if the<br />
government limits or sets a threshold for<br />
rents, the owners lose their desire to maintain<br />
the properties and build new ones. Or if the<br />
government imposes a restriction on the types<br />
<strong>of</strong> financial products that can be sold, then the<br />
contracting parties, which could have<br />
benefited from innovative transactions that<br />
could meet their specific needs, would not be<br />
able to obtain the potential gain from a free<br />
contact. People need to be "free to choose" as<br />
said by the title <strong>of</strong> a famous book written by<br />
the prophet <strong>of</strong> the free market, Milton<br />
Friedman." (38)<br />
"What you are not said"<br />
"The free market does not exist. Each market<br />
has certain rules and limitations that restrict<br />
freedom <strong>of</strong> choice. A market seems to be free<br />
only as we accept unconditionally the default<br />
restrictions, which we can no longer see.<br />
There cannot be defined how a<br />
market is. The definition is a political one.<br />
The usual statement <strong>of</strong> the free market<br />
economists, that they try to defend the market<br />
from political interference, is rather false. The<br />
government is always involved, and the free<br />
market advocates are politically motivated as<br />
much as anyone. The first step to<br />
understanding capitalism is overcoming the<br />
myth that there objectively is a .<br />
The paradigmatic assumption, that nowadays<br />
there is no, and can never be, such thing as a<br />
pure and perfect free market, all-comprising<br />
and all-knowing, omnipotent, regulated by<br />
nothing and fully unregulated or deregulated,<br />
directed by nothing and completely
undirected but totally spontaneous, expresses<br />
a truth confirmed.<br />
And yet apparently there is something more<br />
that needs to be said. Okay, okay - there is no<br />
free market, but what is there? In our opinion<br />
there is a market or, as Maurice Allais writes,<br />
a markets economy. (39)<br />
A short journey through the history <strong>of</strong><br />
economic thinking provides us with no little<br />
evidence - arguments that show convincingly<br />
that the market and the market economy are,<br />
as mentioned, much older than the capitalist<br />
market economy. The same journey provides<br />
unequivocal evidence showing that the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> free competition – a fundamental<br />
element <strong>of</strong> the free market economy-, has<br />
never been comprehensive, but for a short<br />
period <strong>of</strong> time it was dominant especially in<br />
England and that it committed suicide<br />
according to the expression <strong>of</strong> K. Marx. The<br />
place <strong>of</strong> the morphological-anatomical<br />
atomized structure <strong>of</strong> the economic actors, <strong>of</strong><br />
the capitalist economy, has changed due to<br />
objective economic laws – concentration<br />
(accumulation <strong>of</strong> capital, concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
production), centralization <strong>of</strong> capital and<br />
production, <strong>of</strong> economic activity in general,<br />
competition law, uneven development – have<br />
generated a new form <strong>of</strong> capital, the<br />
monopolist capital, which personified itself as<br />
a specific type <strong>of</strong> economic actor – the<br />
monopoly in various forms: cartel, syndicate,<br />
trust, concern, corporation, etc. At this stage,<br />
competition itself has changed both its<br />
content and its forms <strong>of</strong> expression.<br />
Basically, at a growing scale, free<br />
competition gave way to monopolistic<br />
competition; full competition - pure and<br />
perfect - became imperfect competition, etc.<br />
At the same time, the mechanisms, the means<br />
and the methods <strong>of</strong> action have changed. This<br />
very thing made the subject <strong>of</strong> research <strong>of</strong><br />
political economy become richer and more<br />
complex. The new economic reality could not<br />
fail to attract the attention <strong>of</strong> the<br />
representatives <strong>of</strong> this branch <strong>of</strong> science and<br />
not only. For illustration we mention that in<br />
1933 two relevant works were published: the<br />
81<br />
book <strong>of</strong> the economist Joan Robinson,<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor at the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics in<br />
Cambridge University, entitled "The<br />
economics <strong>of</strong> imperfect competition" and,<br />
again in Cambridge, but in the United States<br />
this time, E.H. Chamberlain's work, entitled<br />
"The theory <strong>of</strong> the monopolistic competition".<br />
Also for illustration, we add the name <strong>of</strong> JM<br />
Keynes and several <strong>of</strong> his works, <strong>of</strong> which the<br />
most important, for its content and cognitive,<br />
methodological and applicative value, is "The<br />
General Theory <strong>of</strong> Employment, Interest and<br />
Money" (1936).<br />
Keynes's thinking and that <strong>of</strong> his followers, in<br />
fact Keynes's model was in a sense and the theoretical basis<br />
<strong>of</strong> operation and evolution <strong>of</strong> the Western<br />
economy and society after World War II until<br />
the early ‘70s <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century. The<br />
name given to this society is . The world economic crisis <strong>of</strong><br />
1973-1975 interrupted the way <strong>of</strong> the<br />
industrial consumer society. The same crisis,<br />
specifically the way it was addressed,<br />
understood and explained, constituted a clear<br />
rejection <strong>of</strong> Keynes thinking and a powerful<br />
return <strong>of</strong> neoclassical liberalism. Keynes's<br />
theory and the policies that had been inspired<br />
by it were brought to the culprits<br />
. In this context, two schools <strong>of</strong><br />
thinking were set up. First, there was a new -<br />
and final - attempt to make a synthesis<br />
between the neoclassical and the Keynesian<br />
analyses, synthesis performed differently than<br />
the first. Its authors were led by the French economist<br />
Edmond Malinvaud. This current <strong>of</strong> thinking<br />
believes that imbalances and long-term<br />
unemployment are possible in a world where<br />
prices and wages are flexible, but it considers<br />
that these phenomena are caused by an<br />
insufficiency <strong>of</strong> global demand - Keynesian<br />
unemployment and an insufficiency <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fer -<br />
classic unemployment.<br />
The second trend is the ultra-liberalism<br />
(Hayek - the foremost representative), the<br />
monetarism or perhaps more accurately, the<br />
monetarisms (whose no.1 representative is
Milton Friedman), plus the neoclassical<br />
economics (foremost representatives being<br />
Robert Lucas, Thomas Sargent and Neil<br />
Wallace)<br />
The third monetarist trend is the supply-side<br />
economics <strong>of</strong> (Arthur Laffer at the forefront<br />
<strong>of</strong> followers). (40)<br />
<strong>of</strong> neoclassical liberalism<br />
was an apparent victory and on short term<br />
only. The end <strong>of</strong> the first decade <strong>of</strong> the third<br />
millennium saw a complex and deep<br />
economic and financial crisis, a crisis <strong>of</strong><br />
governance and administration, as well,<br />
which, in their interaction, resulted in a deep<br />
rift in the operation and development <strong>of</strong><br />
economic, financial-monetary and social life<br />
<strong>of</strong> the current world.<br />
This crisis, more accurately the assembly <strong>of</strong><br />
crises, that swept our world, closes a period<br />
and represents a milestone and a starting<br />
point in the human history, a main sign <strong>of</strong> the<br />
renewal <strong>of</strong> society and its great structures.<br />
Economically, the crisis developed as soon as<br />
in 2008 contradicted many paradigms <strong>of</strong><br />
liberal and especially neo-liberal thinking and<br />
several steps <strong>of</strong> orientation and political<br />
action <strong>of</strong> a neoclassical-liberal nature. "The<br />
global economy lies in ruins. Although<br />
unprecedented fiscal and monetary aid<br />
prevented the financial collapse in 2008 from<br />
triggering complete destruction <strong>of</strong> the world<br />
economy, the global crash <strong>of</strong> 2008 remains<br />
the second largest economic crisis after the<br />
Great Depression."(41)<br />
It has now become much more visible that the<br />
notions, the concepts <strong>of</strong> free competition, free<br />
market economy, pure and perfect<br />
competition, all-comprising market and allknowing<br />
market, perfect market, totally<br />
spontaneous economic movement and others<br />
<strong>of</strong> the same arsenal are worthless cognitively<br />
and practically, and therefore false, and<br />
circulate in the big world as counterfeit coins<br />
or other fake things.<br />
Simultaneously, the crisis confirmed a whole<br />
range <strong>of</strong> paradigms from the Keynesist and<br />
neokeynesist (postkeynesist) thinking arsenal<br />
and practical orientation, considered, until<br />
82<br />
recently, and in many cases even now, as<br />
lacking authentic cognitive and applicative<br />
value. And it does not stop here. Why?<br />
Because the new economy, being born now,<br />
necessarily requires a new economic<br />
thinking, as well.<br />
Notes<br />
(1) Handy Charles, Epoca Irațiunii, Editura<br />
Codex, 2007; Pelerina Goală, Editura Codex,<br />
2007; Elefantul și Puricele, Editura Codex,<br />
2007.<br />
(2) Popper R. Karl, Filos<strong>of</strong>ie socială și<br />
filos<strong>of</strong>ia științei. Antologie editată de David<br />
Miller, Editura Trei, Bucharest, 2000, p. 60.<br />
(3) Op.cit., pag. 62.<br />
(4) Marx K., Capitalul, vol. I, in: Marx,<br />
Engels, Opere vol. 23, Editura Politică,<br />
Bucharest, 1966, p.191 (emphasis added by<br />
author AN).<br />
(5) Handy Charles, Epoca Irațiunii. O<br />
gândire nouă pentru o lume nouă , Editura<br />
Codex, Bucharest, 2007, p. 23 (emphasis<br />
added by author AN).<br />
(6) Arendt Hannah, Condiția umană, Ed.<br />
Casa Cărții de Știință, Cluj-Napoca, 2007,<br />
p.13 (emphasis added by author AN).<br />
(7) Idem (6) (emphasis added by author AN).<br />
(8) Idem (6) (emphasis added by author AN).<br />
(9) Idem (6) (emphasis added by author AN).<br />
(10) Arendt Hannah, Op. Cit., p. 8 (emphasis<br />
added by author AN).<br />
(11) Negucioiu Aurel, Petrescu Dacinia<br />
Crina, Introducere în eco-economie, Ed.<br />
Fundației pentru Studii Studii Europene,<br />
Cluj-Napoca, 2006, p.35.<br />
(12) Negucioiu Aurel, Petrescu Dacinia<br />
Crina, Op. Cit., pp.25-36.<br />
(13) Bonnet Jaques, Marile metropole<br />
mondiale, Ed. Institutul European, Iași, 2000,<br />
p. 209.<br />
(14) Bryant Herman, Mehrtens Susan, Al<br />
patrulea val, Ed. Antet, pp.108-109<br />
(emphasis added by author AN).<br />
(15) Negucioiu Aurel, Petrescu Dacinia<br />
Crina, Op. Cit., p.37 (emphasis added by<br />
author AN).
(16) Brown Lester, Eco-economia. Crearea<br />
unei economii pentru planeta noastră, Ed.<br />
Tehnică, Bucharest, 2001, pp.1-5 (emphasis<br />
added by author AN).<br />
(17) Commoner Barry, Cercul care se<br />
închide, Ed. Politică, Bucharest, 1989, p.11<br />
(emphasis added by author AN).<br />
(18) Commoner Barry, Op. Cit, p.21.<br />
(19) Commoner Barry, Op. Cit, p.14.<br />
(20) Commoner Barry, Op. Cit, p.20.<br />
(21) Commoner Barry, Op. Cit, p.270.<br />
(22) Decartes René, Discurs despre metoda<br />
de a ne conduce bine națiunea și a căuta<br />
adevărul în științe, Ed. Academiei Române,<br />
Bucharest, 1990, p.146 (emphasis added by<br />
author AN).<br />
(23) Brown Lester, Op. Cit., p.2.<br />
(24) Brown Lester, Op. Cit., p.3.<br />
(25) Brown Lester, Op. Cit., p.89 (emphasis<br />
added by author AN).<br />
(26) Ibidem (25), p.86 (emphasis added by<br />
author AN).<br />
(27) Ibidem (26).<br />
(28) Ibidem (26).<br />
(29) Ibidem (26), p.89 (emphasis added by<br />
author AN).<br />
(30) Popper R. Karl, În căutarea unei lumi<br />
mai bune, Ed. Humanitas, Bucharest, 1987,<br />
p.5 (emphasis added by author AN).<br />
(31) Popper R. Karl, Op. cit., p.6 (emphasis<br />
added by author AN).<br />
(32) Op.cit., p.6.<br />
(33) Op.cit., p.6 (emphasis added by author<br />
AN).<br />
(34) After Fernand Braudel, Jocurile<br />
schimbului, vol. 1, Ed. Meridiane, Bucharest,<br />
1985, p.267.<br />
(35) After Op. cit. (34), p.267 (emphasis<br />
added by author AN).<br />
83<br />
(36) Fernand Braudel, Op. cit., p.267<br />
(emphasis added by author AN).<br />
(37) Chang Ha-Joon, 23 de lucruri care nu și<br />
se spun despre capitalism. "O demistificare<br />
strălucită a unor mituri ale capitalismului"<br />
(John Gray, The Observer).<br />
“Disciple <strong>of</strong> Stephen Stiglitz and one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
most iconoclastic economists <strong>of</strong> these times,<br />
Ha-Joon Chang removes some <strong>of</strong> the myths <strong>of</strong><br />
capitalism and <strong>of</strong> the world we live in,<br />
including the myth <strong>of</strong> the free market or that<br />
technology is the way to progress for<br />
everyone. One by one, the principles <strong>of</strong><br />
economic doctrines received for granted are<br />
presented in the historical context <strong>of</strong><br />
formations, before becoming self-evident.<br />
Globalization does not make the world richer.<br />
Poor countries prove more entrepreneurial<br />
spirit than the rich ones. Better paid managers<br />
do not get better results. Based on the actual<br />
data, this book about money, equality,<br />
freedom and greed proves that free market<br />
does not only work against people, but it is<br />
also an inefficient way to manage the<br />
economy” (second cover <strong>of</strong> the book).<br />
(38) Chang Ha-Joon ,Op.cit., p.19 (emphasis<br />
added by author AN).<br />
(39) Allais Maurice, L’Europe face a son<br />
avenir: que faire?, Editions Clement Juglar,<br />
Editions Robert Lafont, 1991, especially note<br />
18, p.142.<br />
(40) Valier Jaques, Scurtă istorie a gândirii<br />
economice de la Aristotel până azi, Ed.<br />
Campania, Bucharest, pp. 122-132 (emphasis<br />
added by author AN).<br />
(41) Chang Ha-Joon, Op.Cit., p.13.
CONTINUING INTERNATIONAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION IN THE<br />
FINANCIAL CRISIS CONTEXT<br />
Berinde Mihai<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Economic Sciences Department<br />
Abstract: This research paper is based on an assessment <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> the recent financial crisis<br />
on the international trade and the way states and international organizations acted in this context.<br />
The importance <strong>of</strong> this research topic consists in identifying the way the international trade<br />
liberalization process has been affected by the financial crisis and the way anti-crisis measures<br />
deviated from the basic rules agreed under the aegis <strong>of</strong> WTO/GATT.<br />
The intended purpose <strong>of</strong> the paper is to conduct a substantive assessment <strong>of</strong> undertaken actions by<br />
the various states aimed to mitigate crisis impact on anti-dumping investigations and measures.<br />
Precisely, it was assayed whether the international financial crisis has been an opportunity for<br />
WTO member states to plainly intervene in the economy and give up the commitments they made in<br />
the context <strong>of</strong> multilateral commercial negotiations. Considering the international, regional and<br />
national effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis the topic has been copiously elaborated on by economics literature. A<br />
number <strong>of</strong> anti-crisis measures were presented encouraging massive intervention in the economy, as<br />
well as actions, particularly <strong>of</strong> International Organizations according to which measures could be<br />
taken without deviating from globally agreed mechanisms and principles. In order to be able to find<br />
out which <strong>of</strong> these two options prevailed in actions undertaken by the states the types <strong>of</strong><br />
international, regional or national anti-crisis measures were selected. Positions voiced by the<br />
World Trade Organization, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD),<br />
European Union are rendered.<br />
To answer the question about the way it has been responded in order to mitigate crisis effects,<br />
adopted anti-crisis measures were inventoried and their deviation from international rules was<br />
assessed.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the indicators used in the assessment <strong>of</strong> anti-crisis measures is the progress <strong>of</strong> the antidumping<br />
investigations and measures notified to WTO in the past 9 years for which data were<br />
available (2003-2009). The relevance <strong>of</strong> this period lies in the fact that it includes 5 pre-crisis years<br />
and 2 years when it was strongly evident.<br />
It was found that the number <strong>of</strong> anti-crisis investigations and measures has not seen significant<br />
increases during the crisis period. Moreover, it has been found that states have shown a certain<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> flexibility in construing application <strong>of</strong> certain international principles rather than<br />
relinquishing them.<br />
It is thereby demonstrated that the international trade liberalization process continues without<br />
major disruptions by the financial crisis. This gives confidence to states and business environment<br />
with respect to predictability <strong>of</strong> international trade developments.<br />
The paper has significant added value brought about by both literature processing and<br />
interpretation and the author’s experience in international trade negotiations. The very election <strong>of</strong><br />
the indicator pertaining to anti-dumping investigations and measures was based on the fact that<br />
changing trade defence mechanisms into protectionist mechanisms <strong>of</strong>ten stands for prevailing<br />
immediate crisis resolution.<br />
Keywords: financial crisis, anti-dumping investigations and measures, trade liberalization, state<br />
aid, preferential trade systems<br />
JEL Classification codes: F13, F15<br />
85
I. Introduction<br />
The topic <strong>of</strong> this paper is directly related to<br />
the financial crisis effects on international<br />
trade liberalization. It aims to identify the<br />
way anti-crisis measures affected<br />
international trade negotiations in view <strong>of</strong><br />
trade liberalization, successful performance<br />
<strong>of</strong> preferential trade systems, as well as<br />
negotiation and implementation <strong>of</strong> regional<br />
integration agreements.<br />
Trade liberalization has seen various<br />
approaches. In many instances it has been<br />
regarded as detrimental to economic<br />
development, protectionist theories<br />
attempting to maintain the need to increase<br />
borderline protection by various tariff, nontariff<br />
or para-tariff measures resulting in<br />
reduced cooperation and isolation <strong>of</strong><br />
protected economies. In these circumstances,<br />
international trade liberalization has been<br />
accepted as a solution to encourage economic<br />
development.<br />
Right after the Second World War,<br />
international trade liberalization panned out<br />
and the General Agreement on Tariffs and<br />
Trade (GATT) was negotiated in order to<br />
serve as a general framework for the<br />
liberalization process.<br />
At the time, the matter <strong>of</strong> creating the World<br />
Trade Organization was brought up for<br />
discussion as a third pillar <strong>of</strong> the world<br />
economy along with the International<br />
Monetary Fund and the International Bank<br />
for Reconstruction and Development. Failure<br />
to fully understand the liberalization process<br />
as well as the absence from negotiations <strong>of</strong><br />
some important states did not enable creation<br />
<strong>of</strong> this organization. Participating countries<br />
did not forsake the idea <strong>of</strong> creating such an<br />
organization and eventually, it was<br />
established under the Marrakech Agreement<br />
signed upon the finalization <strong>of</strong> multilateral<br />
trade negotiations within Uruguay Round. On<br />
this occasion, multilateral agreements were<br />
also renegotiated and complemented which<br />
allow member states to intervene in parallel<br />
with the liberalization process, by trade<br />
defence measures, based on well established<br />
86<br />
internationally agreed rules (agreements<br />
concerning anti-dumping measures,<br />
compensatory taxes, safeguard measures, and<br />
restrictive measures by reason <strong>of</strong> major<br />
imbalances in the balance <strong>of</strong> payments).<br />
Hence, it ensues that the liberalization<br />
process cannot and should not be seen as<br />
being apt to exclude its regulation. These are<br />
two processes going ahead together and<br />
ensure beneficial effects for economic<br />
development. International trade<br />
liberalization deepened via the multilateral<br />
negotiation rounds amongst which Uruguay<br />
Round has been the most complex and<br />
important.<br />
Another means <strong>of</strong> trade liberalization consists<br />
in the international application <strong>of</strong> customs<br />
preference systems apt to increase<br />
commercial competitiveness <strong>of</strong> products<br />
coming from developing countries in the<br />
world market. Thus, the General Preference<br />
System (GSP) was defined which provides<br />
facilities for developing countries in their<br />
relations with developed countries. Likewise,<br />
developing countries defined the General<br />
System <strong>of</strong> Trade Preferences (GSTP) and the<br />
Protocol <strong>of</strong> 16 (P-16) which should enable<br />
trade liberalization among these countries.<br />
Aware <strong>of</strong> the need to deepen the liberalization<br />
process, GATT contracting parties accepting<br />
defining in article XXIV <strong>of</strong> GATT the<br />
possibility to negotiate regional integration<br />
agreements and requirements they have to<br />
meet in order to be internationally<br />
recognized. These agreements proliferated<br />
over the past decades, while contributing<br />
significantly in trade liberalization.<br />
During the period when the financial crisis<br />
worsened, a number <strong>of</strong> protectionist theories<br />
emerged aimed at resorting to trade defence<br />
measures more frequently. There were other<br />
theories which maintained giving up during<br />
this period any trade defence measures that<br />
might adversely affect international trade.<br />
Practice has demonstrated that effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
financial crisis cannot be stopped by<br />
measures which deviate from multilaterally<br />
negotiated rules.
II. Literature review<br />
Albeit the crisis was active only three years<br />
ago, economics literature attached major<br />
importance to this phenomenon given its<br />
implications on world economy. In this<br />
context papers published under the aegis <strong>of</strong><br />
OECD, IMF, World Bank and European<br />
Commission are relevant. Moreover, the way<br />
anti-dumping investigations and measures in<br />
international trade were or were not<br />
encouraged by the crisis occurrence is tackled<br />
in various papers and periodical reports<br />
published by WTO/GATT.<br />
Once the crisis has settled into, its effects<br />
were analyzed by all international and<br />
regional organizations, and by each<br />
individual state, as well.<br />
Thus, at international level the three<br />
organizations that form the world economy<br />
pillars approached the crisis from various<br />
perspectives, i.e.<br />
- World Trade Organization (WTO) and<br />
UNCTAD focused their efforts on<br />
inventorying all anti-crisis measures adopted<br />
in the various countries and on assessing<br />
crisis impact on the international trade.<br />
- International Monetary Fund (IMF) and<br />
World Bank were more interested in the<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the financial crisis and measures<br />
which might be taken in the banking sector in<br />
order to straighten out the situation.<br />
At regional level, several „actors” (EU,<br />
EFTA, MERCOSUR) were involved in<br />
adopting measures seen as required and<br />
timely in addressing the problems created by<br />
the crisis.<br />
At the same time, states got greater freedom<br />
to act, within their competencies, for the<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> measures which should support<br />
national economies. Due to such increased<br />
freedom, the risk inherently arised that states<br />
invoke the crisis so as to adopt measures that<br />
wouldn’t have been allowed in normal<br />
circumstances due to their categorization as<br />
prohibited protectionist measures.<br />
It becomes increasingly obvious that one<br />
cannot consider addressing the crisis if<br />
87<br />
globalization and regionalization elements in<br />
the world economy are ignored. An<br />
individual solution cannot exist in the context<br />
<strong>of</strong> crisis extension at international level.<br />
III. Research methodology<br />
Research started from the assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
way the financial crisis affected the economic<br />
sector resulting in: direct investments<br />
reduction due to lower pr<strong>of</strong>it rates in the<br />
circumstances <strong>of</strong> higher credit costs, shrunk<br />
international market due to high commercial<br />
credit costs, reduced trade financing<br />
possibilities required to guarantee export<br />
credits and for measures apt to ensure<br />
promotion <strong>of</strong> exports; potential increased<br />
trade defence measures.<br />
The reason <strong>of</strong> this approach is determined by<br />
the wish to find positive responses which, by<br />
the various anti-crisis measures, the states<br />
gave to the need to mitigate their impact on<br />
their economies.<br />
The specific element <strong>of</strong> the research in this<br />
paper consists in assessing the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> anti-dumping investigations and<br />
measures notified by WTO/GATT member<br />
states. Thus, a period <strong>of</strong> 5 pre-crisis years<br />
(2003 – 2007) and 2 years <strong>of</strong> active crisis<br />
(2008 – 2009) have been considered. In the<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> final data for the full year 2010,<br />
first quarter data have been projected over the<br />
whole year so that a complete picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />
crisis effects on trade defence measures<br />
should exist.<br />
The relevance <strong>of</strong> this assessment consists in<br />
the fact that it provides a clear picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />
way states acted in the crisis period and <strong>of</strong><br />
whether they turned anti-dumping measures<br />
from the trade defence category into<br />
excessive protection ones.<br />
IV. Research results<br />
Based on the two research aspects described<br />
in the previous chapter, key results are given<br />
below. Hence, in the context <strong>of</strong> anti-crisis<br />
measures the European Union has not<br />
deviated from international principles, acting<br />
in such a manner that:
a)funds allocated by states for banks and<br />
companies should be treated as state aid<br />
whom the applicable rules in this area should<br />
be applied. However, flexibility is accepted in<br />
applying such rules (reduction <strong>of</strong> state aid<br />
authorization period from 90 days to 24<br />
hours; time limited state aids granted by<br />
reason <strong>of</strong> economic crisis, correct sizing <strong>of</strong><br />
state aids and their periodical monitoring<br />
followed by stoppage when crisis factors are<br />
no longer active; granted state aids should not<br />
deviate from community principles and<br />
should be associated with restructuring and<br />
viability processes, as well as technology<br />
modernization programs).<br />
b)export subsidizing measures should not<br />
represent deviations from principles set out<br />
within WTO;<br />
c)import surtax introduction or higher<br />
customs duties should be linked with WTO<br />
accepted circumstances.<br />
It can easily be noticed that these measures<br />
do not stand for a deviation from international<br />
rules and do not encourage primary<br />
protectionism by plain administrative<br />
interventions in the economy.<br />
Furthermore, the World Trade Organization<br />
sent out several messages concerning anticrisis<br />
measures, such as:<br />
a)the need to inventory all commercial<br />
character measures adopted by contracting<br />
parties and candidate states;<br />
b)substantiation <strong>of</strong> anti-crisis measures in<br />
consideration <strong>of</strong> mechanisms and legal<br />
instruments agreed multilaterally;<br />
c)avoid that adopted anti-crisis measures<br />
should represent more or less disguised forms<br />
<strong>of</strong> increasing protectionism.<br />
These messages are based on the fact that<br />
trade liberalization is not the root <strong>of</strong> problems<br />
created by the current crisis but rather a<br />
solution for them.<br />
Data processed by the author with respect to<br />
anti-dumping investigations and measures<br />
revealed the followings:<br />
A. Anti-dumping investigations opened by<br />
GATT Contracting Parties:<br />
88<br />
a)The average annual number <strong>of</strong> antidumping<br />
investigations in 2003-2009 is in the<br />
range <strong>of</strong> over 200 cases. Although data are<br />
available only for 2010 first quarter, by way<br />
<strong>of</strong> projections one can assume that there will<br />
be no significant deviations for this year<br />
either. Thence, it has been found that no<br />
major changes existed at the level <strong>of</strong><br />
investigations during the active crisis years<br />
against pre-crisis years;<br />
b)Main countries which opened most antidumping<br />
investigations during the active<br />
crisis period were: India (86), Argentina (47),<br />
USA (36), EU (34), China (31), Turkey and<br />
Pakistan (29);<br />
c)Among countries undergoing anti-dumping<br />
investigations in 2008 and 2009 the<br />
followings stand out: China (153), USA (22),<br />
Thailand (21), Brazil (14) and EU (10);<br />
Sectors undergoing anti-dumping<br />
investigations during 2008-2009 were: metals<br />
and metal articles (110); petrochemicals (81);<br />
textiles and textile articles (59); resins,<br />
plastics and rubber materials (52); electrical<br />
machinery and equipment (37)<br />
B. With respect to actually adopted antidumping<br />
measures:<br />
a)The average annual number <strong>of</strong> adopted<br />
measures during 2004-2009 ranges between<br />
138-159 cases.<br />
b)By projecting data available for 6 months<br />
in 2010 the number <strong>of</strong> adopted measures will<br />
not be significantly different for 2010;<br />
c)Main countries which adopted antidumping<br />
measures during 2008-2009 were:<br />
India (61), USA (38), Brazil (27), EU (24),<br />
Argentina (21), Turkey (20);<br />
d)Among countries undergoing anti-dumping<br />
measures during 2009-2009 are: China (108),<br />
South Korea (15), Thailand (14), Indonesia<br />
(13), USA (12) and India (10);<br />
e)Key product groups covered by antidumping<br />
measures during 2008-2009 were:<br />
Chemicals and petrochemicals (61), metals<br />
and metal articles (57), textiles and textile<br />
products (39), resins, plastics and rubber<br />
articles (38), electric machinery and<br />
equipment (35).
It is most obvious that during the crisis period<br />
we do not see any upsurge in anti-dumping<br />
investigations and adopted measures. It was<br />
therefore preferred to continue trade<br />
liberalization and avoid primary<br />
protectionism involving relinquishment <strong>of</strong><br />
89<br />
rules required for the normal development <strong>of</strong><br />
the liberalization process.<br />
Below is a diagram <strong>of</strong> the key groups <strong>of</strong><br />
goods undergoing anti-dumping<br />
investigations and measures adopted during<br />
2008-2009:<br />
Diagram 1. Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> anti-dumping investigations and measures by groups <strong>of</strong> products<br />
(2008-2009)<br />
110<br />
57<br />
Metals and<br />
metal articles<br />
81<br />
Source: WTO data processed by the author<br />
From the diagram above it results that key<br />
sectors exposed to both anti-dumping<br />
investigations and measures are the same,<br />
while the crisis did not have any role in<br />
stimulating such measures in other areas than<br />
the ones considered as sensitive.<br />
V. Conclusions<br />
Since international trade was no root <strong>of</strong> the<br />
financial crisis but rather a solution to<br />
mitigate its impact on world economy, this<br />
paper highlights the following factual aspects:<br />
- trade liberalization in observance <strong>of</strong><br />
requirements set out in GATT/WTO has not<br />
been essentially affected by the crisis. Thus,<br />
Uruguay Round resulted objectives have not<br />
been jeopardized or abandoned, customs<br />
preference systems have not undergone<br />
61<br />
Chemicals and<br />
petrochemicals<br />
Anti-dumping investigations<br />
Anti-dumping measures<br />
59<br />
39<br />
Textiles and<br />
textile products<br />
52<br />
38<br />
Resins,<br />
plastics and<br />
rubber articles<br />
changes and neither have they been<br />
relinquished, while internationally negotiated<br />
regional integration agreements continued to<br />
exist and operate in normal conditions;<br />
- the international financial crisis has not<br />
determined the European Union and the other<br />
Contracting Parties to give up their own rules<br />
in the matter <strong>of</strong> state aid but rather a more<br />
flexible attitude was noted which resulted in<br />
reduced authorization aid request<br />
examination periods which were sufficiently<br />
important during this period, particularly to<br />
the benefit <strong>of</strong> the banking system. Moreover,<br />
objectives and aid granting requirements have<br />
not seen any changes determined by the<br />
crisis;<br />
- multilaterally set out rules in the matter <strong>of</strong><br />
anti-dumping investigations and measures<br />
37<br />
35<br />
Electric<br />
machinery and<br />
equipment
continued to be enforced without easier<br />
access <strong>of</strong> the same, nor turning them into<br />
protectionist measures. We do not see any<br />
massive increase <strong>of</strong> cases where it would<br />
have been resorted to such investigations nor<br />
any dramatic changes concerning affected<br />
economic sectors by anti-dumping<br />
investigations and measures. It is evident that<br />
Contracting Parties took WTO messages into<br />
consideration to the effect that in adopting<br />
crisis effects containment measures those<br />
measures that do not deviate from<br />
multilaterally agreed principles and rules<br />
should be selected. It is also evident that it<br />
has been preferred to continue international<br />
trade liberalization and by no means use plain<br />
administrative interventions in the economy<br />
and excessive primary protection <strong>of</strong> the same.<br />
- the crisis has not significantly affected<br />
products considered as sensitive from the<br />
perspective <strong>of</strong> anti-dumping investigations<br />
and measures.<br />
VI. Bibliography<br />
1.Brian Keeley, Patrick Love. Les essentiels<br />
de l'OCDE. De la crise à la reprise. Causes,<br />
déroulement et conséquences de la Grande<br />
Récession. Éditions OCDE, ISBN:<br />
9789264079427, 2011<br />
2.European Central Bank. Report on the<br />
lessons learned from the financial crisis with<br />
regard to the functioning <strong>of</strong> European<br />
financial market infrastructures. ISBN: 978-<br />
92-899-0626-5, 2010<br />
3.European Commission, EUROSTAT. EU27<br />
international trade in services declined in<br />
2009 following the onset <strong>of</strong> the global<br />
financial crisis. ISSN: 1977-0316, 2010<br />
90<br />
4.European Commission, EUROSTAT. Key<br />
figures on European business with a special<br />
feature on the recession, ISBN: 978-92-79-<br />
15243-6, 2010<br />
5.European Commission. Handbook on<br />
community rules for State aid to SMEs.<br />
Including temporary State aid measures to<br />
support access to finance in the current<br />
financial and economic crisis. ISBN: 978-92-<br />
79-12267-5, 2009<br />
6.European Commission. Economic crisis in<br />
Europe. Causes, consequences and responses.<br />
ISBN: 978-92-79-11368-0, 2009<br />
7.Giurgiu, Adriana, An Overview <strong>of</strong> the<br />
General Evolution <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Foreign<br />
Trade after 1989, while Trying to join the EU<br />
(I), „Analele Universităţii din Oradea –<br />
Secţiunea Ştiinţe Economice – Tom XIX,<br />
2010”, No. 1, pp. 53-58<br />
8.Giurgiu, Adriana, An Overview <strong>of</strong> the<br />
General Evolution <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Foreign<br />
Trade after 1989, while Trying to join the EU<br />
(II), „Analele Universităţii din Oradea –<br />
Secţiunea Ştiinţe Economice – Tom XIX,<br />
2010”, No. 2, pp. 100-106<br />
9.International Monetary Fund. World<br />
Economic Outlook, April 2011. 'Tensions<br />
from the Two-Speed Recovery.<br />
Unemployment, Commodities, and Capital<br />
Flows. ISBN 978-1-61635-059-8, 2011<br />
10.OCDE. La crise financière. Réforme et<br />
stratégies de sortie. Éditions OCDE, ISBN:<br />
9789264073043, 2010<br />
11.World Trade Organization. Anti-dumping<br />
Gateway. Accessed April 20, 2011<br />
http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/a<br />
dp_e.html
EUROPEAN AUSTERITY WITHOUT GROWTH? EUROPEAN GROWTH<br />
WITHOUT EUROPEAN DEMOCRACY?HOW EUROPEAN CITIZENS CAN<br />
REVIVE THE EUROPEAN PROJECT AND DEFEAT EUROSCEPTICISM<br />
Montani Guido<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, International Political Economy<br />
The European project is facing a crisis. Citizens no longer understand what the EU is about. Young<br />
people and the new ruling class have forgotten the clear message <strong>of</strong> the European project launched<br />
just after the Second World War “No wars ever again among Europeans.” The founding fathers <strong>of</strong><br />
the European Union are mentioned in history textbooks, but today Europe is felt as an irritating<br />
bureaucracy. In Europe, peace and economic stability are considered as a natural state, a gift from<br />
above. Why keep a useless EU alive?<br />
The state <strong>of</strong> the European Union is swiftly degenerating. In almost all the member states, the anti-<br />
European forces are gaining ground. Populism is not a new ideology and is not necessarily<br />
European: let’s recall Peronism. In today’s Europe populism is the new manifestation <strong>of</strong><br />
nationalism. In Italy the Lega Nord is in Berlusconi’s eurosceptic government. In France, the<br />
National Front is endangering UMP’s hegemony. In Belgium the rows between the Flemish and the<br />
Walloons threatens the state’s unity. In the Netherlands, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Austria and<br />
Finland, populist forces are either in the government or strongly influencing the government.<br />
National-populism is different from the nationalism <strong>of</strong> the past. De Gaulle’s nationalism was an<br />
ideology founded on the “grandeur” <strong>of</strong> France’s history and on a certain idea <strong>of</strong> Europe, which<br />
was “l’Europe de patrie”, a kind <strong>of</strong> European unity accepting French leadership in world politics.<br />
Today national-populism is a form <strong>of</strong> micro-nationalism: it opposes the European project but<br />
without having a serious alternative. This is why populism is dangerous. Its real goal is not only the<br />
breaking down <strong>of</strong> the European Union but also the disintegration <strong>of</strong> the old nation states into<br />
micro-ethnic states, as what happened in former Yugoslavia.<br />
European populism and euroscepticism are<br />
two faces <strong>of</strong> the same coin. Democratic pro-<br />
European parties cannot fight them<br />
successfully in the nation-states. Both are the<br />
product <strong>of</strong> the crisis <strong>of</strong> the European project.<br />
The crisis started at the end <strong>of</strong> the Cold War,<br />
because the European Union leaders failed to<br />
exploit the favourable occasion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
enlargement to complete the project <strong>of</strong> the<br />
founding fathers. We can recall a certain<br />
number <strong>of</strong> lost occasions. The Maastricht<br />
Treaty was an unsatisfactory compromise: a<br />
Monetary Union without an Economic Union<br />
and Political Union. The European<br />
Convention worked out a Treaty-Constitution<br />
without establishing a European government.<br />
Moreover it did not change the unanimity rule<br />
for the ratification process, even though the<br />
principle <strong>of</strong> the double majority <strong>of</strong> citizens<br />
and states was granted in the constitutional<br />
91<br />
draft-project. So, when the French and the<br />
Dutch rejected the Treaty-Constitution with a<br />
referendum, nobody noticed that a “minority”<br />
<strong>of</strong> citizens voted against it, while a “majority”<br />
had already approved the Treaty-Constitution.<br />
Now we have the Lisbon Treaty, which is<br />
considered a substitute <strong>of</strong> the Treaty-<br />
Constitution. Meanwhile the political<br />
atmosphere has changed. The old generation<br />
<strong>of</strong> people who experienced the tragedy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world war is no longer involved. The new<br />
ruling class is grappling with new problems:<br />
international terrorism, the difficulties<br />
concerning the enlargement, immigration, the<br />
challenges <strong>of</strong> global economy, the<br />
increasingly difficult Atlantic partnership, the<br />
inability <strong>of</strong> Europe to spur growth.<br />
In this new political environment the<br />
European Union is considered as a set <strong>of</strong><br />
institutions useful for national governments,
ut not for a long-term project which is worth<br />
achieving, the “first assises de la Fédération<br />
Européenne” as was stated in the Schuman<br />
Declaration. Moreover, the relative power<br />
between France and Germany – the old<br />
engine <strong>of</strong> European unity – has changed<br />
dramatically. After the War, France was the<br />
only European state capable <strong>of</strong> taking the<br />
initiative to unite Europe and it did. Now,<br />
after its national unification, Germany is<br />
looking for a new world status, both from the<br />
economic and the political point <strong>of</strong> view, as<br />
its ambition to enter the UN Security Council<br />
shows. So, slowly but resolutely, the Franco-<br />
German engine <strong>of</strong> European integration has<br />
turned into a kind <strong>of</strong> directoire. Since the<br />
Lisbon Treaty did not solve the problem <strong>of</strong><br />
the European government, France and<br />
Germany started to talk about the need for<br />
“European governance”, which according to<br />
Mr. Sarkozy and Mrs Merkel should be<br />
nothing but the European Council, where the<br />
main decisions concerning foreign policy and<br />
finances, are taken unanimously. The<br />
outcome <strong>of</strong> this project is that, when the<br />
financial crisis burst, the Franco-German<br />
directoire took the leadership, imposing<br />
intergovernmental solutions, outside the<br />
traditional “institutional triangle”: the<br />
European Parliament, the Council <strong>of</strong><br />
Ministers and the Commission. According to<br />
the Treaty, these institutions must decide on<br />
the basis <strong>of</strong> the communitarian method: the<br />
European Parliament and the Council <strong>of</strong><br />
Ministers co-legislate and the Commission<br />
executes (in such a case the Commission<br />
becomes the “government” <strong>of</strong> the Union). On<br />
the contrary, the directoire excludes the<br />
European Parliament almost completely from<br />
the decision-making process.<br />
As far as the financial crisis is concerned,<br />
without entering into a pedantic account <strong>of</strong><br />
the decisions taken, suffice it to say that the<br />
problem was thus conceived: how much<br />
should the virtuous states <strong>of</strong> the Union pay in<br />
order to avoid the failure <strong>of</strong> the vicious states,<br />
the so-called PIGS? In order to do that, the<br />
European Stability Mechanism (ESM) was<br />
92<br />
established, thanks to a change in the Treaty,<br />
so that the finances put in the ESM will<br />
always be under the control <strong>of</strong> national<br />
governments. This mechanism, together with<br />
the European semester, should increase the<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> the rules <strong>of</strong> national fiscal policies<br />
and guarantee the necessary austerity. It is an<br />
improvement <strong>of</strong> the old Growth and Stability<br />
Pact (GSP). But it will also perpetuate<br />
conflicts among national governments. On<br />
the contrary, a solution in line with the<br />
European spirit, not requiring a change in the<br />
Treaty, was easily available: it would have<br />
sufficed to agree to an increase in the<br />
European budget (as much as the ESM)<br />
providing new “own resources” to the<br />
European Union. The Monetary Union is the<br />
institution which provides a crucial European<br />
public good: monetary stability. If the<br />
Monetary Union is in danger, because <strong>of</strong><br />
mismanagement in some state, this state<br />
should comply with the rules agreed upon,<br />
but all European citizens, whatever their<br />
nationality, should contribute to rescue <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Monetary Union.<br />
The directoire scheme is not only inefficient,<br />
since it produces weak and provisional<br />
solutions to European problems, but also<br />
unstable, because when the economy is<br />
concerned, Germany takes the leadership, but<br />
when the problem requires a military<br />
engagement – as has happened with<br />
Qaddafi’s Libya – France takes the<br />
leadership; it is undemocratic, because it<br />
discriminates small countries and excludes<br />
the European Parliament (therefore the<br />
citizens) from the decision making process:<br />
can European citizens or the European<br />
Parliament dismiss the directoire?; it is<br />
harmful, because it would feed the wrong<br />
belief that the EU is only an additional<br />
instrument for national governments and that<br />
greater political unity is not necessary. To<br />
conclude, the intergovernmental method and<br />
the will to establish a European directoire are<br />
the true causes <strong>of</strong> euroscepticism, the revival<br />
<strong>of</strong> nationalism and the rise <strong>of</strong> populist<br />
movements in Europe.
* * *<br />
In spite <strong>of</strong> the EU crisis, the European project<br />
is not dead. The present ruling class is unable<br />
to have a “vision” for the future <strong>of</strong> the<br />
European Union, but luckily the original<br />
institutions created by Europe’s fathers are<br />
wiser. Jean Monnet said: “the life <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Institutions is longer than the life <strong>of</strong> men, and<br />
for this reason institutions can, if they are<br />
well planned, accumulate and hand down<br />
wisdom to several generations.” This is the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament, an<br />
institution already conceived with the ECSC.<br />
After its election by universal suffrage, in<br />
1979, the European Parliament has become<br />
the only legitimate institution representing the<br />
will <strong>of</strong> European citizens. In fact, since 1979,<br />
on the occasion <strong>of</strong> every change in the Treaty,<br />
the European Parliament was able to increase<br />
its power. Now, with the Lisbon Treaty, it<br />
also has the constitutional power to start the<br />
reform <strong>of</strong> the Treaty. Some recent events<br />
show that the European Parliament feels<br />
awkward with the increasing lordliness <strong>of</strong><br />
national governments. It is worth recalling<br />
three recent initiatives.<br />
A group <strong>of</strong> 97 MEPs, members <strong>of</strong> the EPP,<br />
the Greens, the ALDE, and the S&D, has<br />
created the “Spinelli Group” – a network<br />
open to contributions <strong>of</strong> civil society – on the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> a “Manifesto” which states:<br />
“Unfortunately, whereas the formidable<br />
challenges <strong>of</strong> a manifold crisis demand<br />
common responses, drawn at least at<br />
European level, too many politicians fall<br />
tempted to believing in national salvation<br />
only. In time <strong>of</strong> interdependence and a<br />
globalised world, clinging to national<br />
sovereignties and intergovernmentalism is not<br />
only warfare against the European spirit; it is<br />
but an addiction to political impotence. …<br />
Nationalism is an ideology <strong>of</strong> the past. Our<br />
goal is a federal and post-national Europe, a<br />
Europe <strong>of</strong> the citizens.” For the time being,<br />
the Spinelli Group has organised public<br />
debates on the occasion <strong>of</strong> European Council,<br />
93<br />
proposing a “Shadow Council” as an<br />
alternative to the national governments point<br />
<strong>of</strong> view. Of course, its aim is to gain a wider<br />
consensus in the European Parliament and in<br />
the public opinion in order to relaunch the<br />
institutional reform <strong>of</strong> the European Union.<br />
The second initiative is the reform <strong>of</strong> the<br />
electoral system for the European Parliament.<br />
The Constitutional Commission <strong>of</strong> the EP has<br />
already approved, on April 2011, the proposal<br />
<strong>of</strong> the federalist MEP Andrew Duff, to set<br />
aside 25 seats for candidates elected through<br />
pan-European lists presented by European<br />
political parties, starting with the next<br />
elections in 2014. This transnational<br />
constituency will oblige European parties to<br />
present prominent political personalities, well<br />
known all over Europe, and with the chance<br />
<strong>of</strong> becoming President <strong>of</strong> the European<br />
Commission, if he/she is elected and if<br />
his/her party or the coalition <strong>of</strong> parties obtain<br />
the majority <strong>of</strong> voters. Every elector will have<br />
two votes: one for the national list and one for<br />
the transnational list. According to Duff:<br />
“MEPs from all the main party groups have<br />
reached a strong consensus on the need to<br />
reform Parliament. Under the proposed<br />
scheme, the next European elections in 2014<br />
will take on a genuine European dimension.<br />
The opportunity <strong>of</strong> using a second vote for<br />
transnational MEPs should galvanise voters<br />
who have come to recognise that national<br />
political parties no longer work to sustain<br />
European integration in an efficient or<br />
democratic way.”<br />
The third initiative was taken by three MEPs<br />
– Jutta Haug (S&D), Alain Lamassoure (EPP)<br />
and Guy Verh<strong>of</strong>stadt (ALDE) – who<br />
launched the proposal “Europe for Growth.<br />
For a Radical Change in Financing the EU”.<br />
Lamassoure is also the President <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Budget Commission <strong>of</strong> the EP: this proposal<br />
should be considered as the necessary<br />
complement to the austerity plan <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Council. If the European economy is not able<br />
to grow, to create jobs and to compete in the<br />
global market, the austerity plan is certainly<br />
doomed to failure. As we have already
noticed, at Maastricht the decision to create<br />
an Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)<br />
was made, but the reality is that only the M<br />
leg <strong>of</strong> the plan was built, the E leg was<br />
forgotten. Today we have one European<br />
currency for 17 member states, but 17<br />
national financial policies. This asymmetric<br />
economic governance does not work, as the<br />
crisis <strong>of</strong> the sovereign debts has shown. The<br />
problem is: is an autonomous financial policy<br />
for the EU possible? In fact, the EU has its<br />
own budget, but its size is only <strong>of</strong> 1% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
and a great part <strong>of</strong> it is devoted to agricultural<br />
policy; moreover it is practically financed by<br />
national resources only. The result is that<br />
each state requires the “net return” from its<br />
payments to the EU, so that at the end <strong>of</strong><br />
worn out debates among national ministers<br />
the European budget becomes an external<br />
support to national budgets. The crucial role<br />
<strong>of</strong> the European budget, which should be to<br />
provide European public goods, which are not<br />
feasible at a nationional level, is completely<br />
denied.<br />
“Europe for Growth” proposes two<br />
ambitious goals. The first is to end the system<br />
<strong>of</strong> national contributions, going back to the<br />
original idea <strong>of</strong> genuine European resources.<br />
The present budget <strong>of</strong> the EU can be totally<br />
financed by 1% <strong>of</strong> VAT, a carbon tax and, if<br />
necessary, by a financial transaction tax. The<br />
second goal is a public investment plan,<br />
financed entirely by Project Bonds issued by<br />
the EIB. The main reason for such a plan is<br />
that “in the last three decades the public<br />
investment ratio in the eurozone has declined<br />
by more than 1% <strong>of</strong> GDP. This trend has<br />
contributed significantly to making the<br />
eurozone a low-growth area. This trend<br />
should be reversed. This can be done by a<br />
new programme <strong>of</strong> project bond issues aimed<br />
at raising the public investment ratio in the<br />
eurozone by 1% <strong>of</strong> GDP. Since the eurozone<br />
GDP amounts to approximately €10 trillion,<br />
this means that the new yearly Euro project<br />
bond issue <strong>of</strong> €100 billion aimed at financing<br />
public investments should be undertaken.”<br />
94<br />
One should notice that the size <strong>of</strong> this plan is<br />
three times the Delors Plan <strong>of</strong> 1993.<br />
The three initiatives are crucial to change the<br />
outcome and the meaning <strong>of</strong> the next<br />
European elections in 2014. Since 1979 the<br />
turnout has continuously declined from one<br />
election to the other. The explanation is<br />
simple. Since there is not a clear European<br />
policy at stake and there is not a European<br />
government the citizens can choose, the<br />
European elections turn out to be a<br />
summation <strong>of</strong> national elections. The<br />
European Parliament is not considered a<br />
crucial institution for the future <strong>of</strong> the<br />
European citizens and, in effect, the European<br />
Council, i.e. national governments, takes the<br />
main decisions. But, if the citizens can<br />
choose, in the European constituency, a<br />
European leader who can also become<br />
President <strong>of</strong> the European Commission, and if<br />
the main European parties include a Plan for<br />
European growth, more public investments<br />
and more jobs in their programme, citizens<br />
could find a real interest in participating in<br />
the European elections. In such a case the<br />
newly elected European Parliament must<br />
keep the commitment made before the<br />
electors. A growth policy cannot be carried<br />
out without the active support <strong>of</strong> the citizens,<br />
civil society organisations, political parties<br />
and trade unions; in short, a European growth<br />
policy is impossible without European<br />
democracy.<br />
* * *<br />
The participation <strong>of</strong> citizens in the European<br />
project cannot be limited to European<br />
elections. In a democratic community citizens<br />
debate public issues daily and either support<br />
or blame their political parties and their<br />
government. But do a European public space<br />
and a European people exist? The fact that<br />
eurosceptics were <strong>of</strong> the opinion that a<br />
European public space and a European demos<br />
did not exist significantly affected the debate<br />
on the European Constitution. Now, the<br />
Lisbon Treaty <strong>of</strong>fers the opportunity to
overcome that criticism. One million citizens<br />
can take the initiative in inviting the<br />
European Commission “to submit any<br />
appropriate proposal on matters where<br />
citizens consider that a legal act <strong>of</strong> the Union<br />
is required.” Of course, also eurosceptic<br />
forces can exploit the European Citizens’<br />
Initiative (ECI). Indeed every ECI will spur<br />
useful public debates in the EU and provoke a<br />
reply from political parties and European<br />
institutions. In any case, the ECI can be<br />
exploited for fostering European political<br />
unity. For instance, an ECI could invite the<br />
Commission to provide all the legal acts<br />
necessary to implement the proposal <strong>of</strong><br />
“Europe for Growth.” This initiative can be<br />
supported not only by the main European<br />
parties, but also by trade unions, European<br />
95<br />
business associations, local governments,<br />
civil society organisations and countless<br />
citizens.<br />
In 1989, many citizens gathered together in<br />
the squares <strong>of</strong> Eastern European countries to<br />
claim democratic regimes. Today, Arabian<br />
citizens are protesting and fighting against<br />
their dictators. Every people should find their<br />
way and their means to affirm or to put<br />
forward more democracy. In the EU there is<br />
no dictator to be fought. The enemy <strong>of</strong><br />
European democracy is intergovernmentalism<br />
with its ideological base: euroscepticism. If<br />
the proposed ECI is successful, eurosceptics<br />
will stop talking about the non-existence <strong>of</strong> a<br />
European demos and the way for<br />
transforming the EU into a true supranational<br />
democracy will be open.
ACCOUNTING FOR SUSTAINABILITY: WHAT NEXT? A RESEARCH<br />
AGENDA<br />
Cunningham M. Gary<br />
Jönköping International Business School Jönköping, Sweden<br />
Arne Fagerström<br />
Jönköping International Business School Jönköping Sweden<br />
Lars G. Hassel<br />
Åbo Akademi University Åbo, Finland<br />
Abstract: This working paper responds to increasing calls for more and different forms <strong>of</strong><br />
accounting research involvement in accounting for sustainability. It seeks to provide background,<br />
clarify the accounting research issues, and suggest research methods. The background analysis<br />
indicates that accounting for sustainability must go beyond supplemental reporting <strong>of</strong> ecological<br />
and social information to include such emerging issues as integrated reporting <strong>of</strong> sustainability<br />
information along with financial reporting. Additional emerging issues are needs <strong>of</strong> users <strong>of</strong><br />
sustainability reports, auditing and other assurance <strong>of</strong> sustainability information, and sustainability<br />
implications <strong>of</strong> financial failure, accounting and auditing failures, and lack <strong>of</strong> enforcement.<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> integrated reporting against traditional financial accounting theory concepts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> financial reporting and the postulates <strong>of</strong> going concern, reporting entity, monetary unit,<br />
and time period, indicates a need for substantial changes in the traditional financial accounting<br />
model if sustainability issues are to be integrated. The agenda concludes with five research issues<br />
and methods:<br />
- An accounting research framework for sustainability using general systems theory<br />
approaches that have been useful for similar emerging issues.<br />
- Reporting <strong>of</strong> sustainability information which has been the focus <strong>of</strong> most research to date,<br />
and the emerging important topic <strong>of</strong> integrated reporting.<br />
- Users <strong>of</strong> sustainable information, their uses and perceived needs, an area that has been<br />
largely neglected in research to date.<br />
- Auditing and assurance issues that are taking on greater importance as more users<br />
demand assurance for sustainability information. Issues include standards to be used and<br />
users’ expectations and reactions.<br />
- Financial distress and sustainability consequences <strong>of</strong> accounting and enforcement<br />
failures that are just now being recognized as sustainability issues.<br />
Keywords: accounting for sustainability, integrated reporting, needs <strong>of</strong> users, audit, assurance<br />
JEL codes: M41, O16, M42<br />
1. Introduction<br />
In recent months, calls for more accounting<br />
involvement in sustainability issues have<br />
become stronger, more frequent, and more<br />
urgent. As discussed below, though, there is<br />
no common notion <strong>of</strong> sustainability,<br />
especially in an accounting context. For this<br />
research agenda, we tentatively, as a starting<br />
point, draw upon the classic economist Sir<br />
John Hicks who developed the concept <strong>of</strong><br />
consumption being what would leave a<br />
97<br />
person as well <strong>of</strong>f at the end <strong>of</strong> the period as<br />
at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the period. Our working<br />
notion <strong>of</strong> sustainability is that a sustainable<br />
entity is one that is as well <strong>of</strong>f at the end <strong>of</strong> a<br />
period as at the beginning with respect to use<br />
<strong>of</strong> all resources: e.g. environmental, human,<br />
ecological, social, financial, and<br />
technological.<br />
Much <strong>of</strong> the previous research has used the<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> sustainability developed by<br />
Buntland (1987) over 25 years ago for the
World Commission <strong>of</strong> Environment and<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> the United Nations.<br />
Buntland’s definition focuses on sustainable<br />
development ensuring that it meets current<br />
needs without sacrificing needs <strong>of</strong> future<br />
generations (quoted and cited by Kasperiet,<br />
2011). Buntdland’s definition while<br />
innovative and ground-breaking for the time,<br />
can be seen as somewhat obsolete for the<br />
current era <strong>of</strong> research into accounting for<br />
sustainability. Among other things, it focuses<br />
on external sustainability, i.e. sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />
ecological and social systems, while the<br />
current focus <strong>of</strong> research into accounting for<br />
sustainability is on sustainability <strong>of</strong> an entity,<br />
usually sustainability. As the research agenda<br />
progresses, especially with the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> a research framework, a more<br />
comprehensive definition <strong>of</strong> sustainability is<br />
expected.<br />
Despite no common notion, the terms<br />
“sustainability” and “accountability”, usually<br />
in environmental and social contexts, are<br />
being used widely. New journals are being<br />
launched to publish research exclusively or<br />
primarily on accounting for sustainability,<br />
e.g. Social and Environmental Accountability<br />
Journal and Sustainability Accounting,<br />
Management, and Policy Journal. A recent<br />
major international academic accounting<br />
conference <strong>of</strong> the International Association<br />
for Accounting Education & Research<br />
(IAAER) held in Singapore in November,<br />
2010, featured panel discussions <strong>of</strong><br />
practitioners and academics that called clearly<br />
for more involvement <strong>of</strong> academics to do<br />
research in accounting for sustainability,<br />
notably in auditing, but also in other<br />
accounting roles. At another recent<br />
international academic accounting<br />
conference, Asian Pacific Conference on<br />
International Accounting Issues held in<br />
Australia in November 2010, a speaker from<br />
a governmental pension fund agency in<br />
Australia was somewhat critical <strong>of</strong> academic<br />
accountants’ lack <strong>of</strong> involvement in<br />
accounting for sustainability; she indicated<br />
that if the academic accountants did not get<br />
98<br />
more involved soon, some other groups<br />
would.<br />
Thomas L. Friedman, a New York Times<br />
columnist and award-winning author, in his<br />
recent book on sustainability, Hot Flat and<br />
Crowded, Release 2.0 (2009), has explicitly<br />
used accounting terminology (discussed in<br />
more detail below) to describe inadequacies<br />
<strong>of</strong> current accounting practice for<br />
sustainability. Major international businessoriented<br />
newspapers write about essentially<br />
the same issues. Dedicated research in<br />
sustainable investing has been ongoing for<br />
some five years. Notably, the Sustainability<br />
Investment Research Platform (SIRP)<br />
(www.sirp.se) in Sweden has been a world<br />
leader in such research. It is now recognized<br />
by SIRP and others that accounting for<br />
sustainability is the ongoing next major<br />
research area.<br />
The Principles <strong>of</strong> Responsible Investment<br />
(PRI) Academic Network <strong>of</strong> the UN<br />
(http://academic.unpri.org/), among other<br />
things, publishes the RI Digest <strong>of</strong> academic<br />
research articles in sustainability.<br />
Increasingly, the RI digest has been<br />
reviewing accounting research articles,<br />
notably about disclosures, e.g. Solomon and<br />
Solomon, (2006), reported and reviewed in<br />
December 2010. The Centre for Social and<br />
Environmental Accounting Research,<br />
Accountability, Transparency, Sustainability<br />
(CSEAR) (http://www.standrews.ac.uk/~csearweb/)<br />
has been created<br />
at the University <strong>of</strong> St. Andrews in the UK to<br />
provide information resources, sponsor<br />
workshops, and other activities to help<br />
researchers and scholars exploring social,<br />
environmental, and sustainability accounting,<br />
auditing and reporting and related topics.<br />
In the immediate Middle Eastern<br />
revolutionary activity, the terms<br />
“sustainable”, “accountability”,<br />
“transparency”, and the like are being spoken<br />
casually and loosely. The Kuwait Fund in its<br />
paid advertisements touts investments in<br />
sustainable ventures. News commentators<br />
talk about sustainable regimes as opposed to
stable regimes. Opposition protestors demand<br />
transparency and accountability. It is<br />
obviously much too soon to develop research<br />
implications for accounting for sustainability<br />
for these activities. Nonetheless, the<br />
increasing use <strong>of</strong> the jargon <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />
sustainability cannot be ignored.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the major issues in accounting for<br />
sustainability it is the lack <strong>of</strong> a common<br />
notion <strong>of</strong> accounting roles in sustainability,<br />
nor even what constitutes sustainability in an<br />
accounting context. The various notions <strong>of</strong><br />
sustainability and accounting for<br />
sustainability, while not conflicting, and<br />
indeed complementary, reflect a need for a<br />
more detailed accounting research agenda to<br />
identify research issues, establish more<br />
precise concepts, definitions, and notions to<br />
provide near-term future directions. This<br />
paper and the agenda it presents are intended<br />
to represent a first step in that direction by<br />
giving structure to identifying and discussing<br />
specific groups <strong>of</strong> research issues for<br />
accounting for sustainability, along with<br />
possible methodologies and data sources. The<br />
remainder <strong>of</strong> this paper is organized as<br />
follows:<br />
Section 2 presents background<br />
information underlying the groups <strong>of</strong><br />
research issues that are indentified.<br />
Section 3 analyzes issues in<br />
accounting for sustainability with<br />
respect to traditional accounting<br />
practice, notably the four postulates<br />
<strong>of</strong> accounting.<br />
Section 4 Presents specific research<br />
issue along with research methods<br />
and sources. Some <strong>of</strong> these issues are<br />
better developed than others.<br />
Section 5 gives a concluding<br />
discussion including identifying<br />
contributions <strong>of</strong> the research.<br />
2.0. Background<br />
During the past few years, many accounting<br />
academics, and indeed many accounting<br />
practitioners, have viewed sustainability<br />
almost exclusively as representing<br />
99<br />
environmental, i.e. ecological, and sometimes<br />
social issues, and sustainability reporting as<br />
telling how ‘green’ and socially responsible a<br />
company has been. This view <strong>of</strong><br />
sustainability reflects a common view<br />
developed over 25 years ago by the<br />
Brundtland commission <strong>of</strong> the United Nations<br />
(UN) that sustainability is meeting needs <strong>of</strong><br />
current generations without sacrificing future<br />
generations’ needs (Brundtland 1987). A<br />
large number <strong>of</strong> academic publications<br />
reflects this view (e.g. Adams 2010, Gray<br />
2010, and sources cited by them). Panelists at<br />
the IAAER conference (2010), however, were<br />
clear that current approaches to sustainability<br />
reporting are too narrow and inadequate for<br />
many reasons; especially the notion <strong>of</strong><br />
accounting for sustainability is much broader<br />
than mere environmental (ecological) and<br />
social reporting and the role <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />
involvement must be much broader to include<br />
such activities as risk assessment and<br />
providing assurance including auditing.<br />
It is now widely recognized, but not well<br />
documented in academic publications, that<br />
sustainability goes beyond mere<br />
environmental (ecological) and social issues,<br />
and includes sustainability <strong>of</strong> an enterprise as<br />
a business involving production, sales, and<br />
marketing, as well as being sustainable<br />
financially, legally, and in other similar ways.<br />
Poor environmental (ecological) and social<br />
performance can indeed lead to unsustainable<br />
business activity as evidenced by such<br />
phenomena as consumer boycotts <strong>of</strong> some<br />
large retail enterprises that were viewed as<br />
selling products made by suppliers using<br />
child labor and other socially and<br />
environmentally unacceptable practices.<br />
Users <strong>of</strong> financial information consistently<br />
indicate a desire to have more information to<br />
allow them to assess sustainability and risk<br />
related to sustainability. Thomas L. Friedman<br />
(2009), the award winning author mentioned<br />
in the introduction, links both financial<br />
sustainability in the recent financial crisis and<br />
environmental sustainability as being part <strong>of</strong><br />
the same phenomenon: inadequate accounting
that does not adequately consider risk: If the<br />
true risks involved in these subprime<br />
mortgages or default insurance had been<br />
priced into these products, they would never<br />
have been rated the way they were. Investors<br />
would have been much more wary and<br />
demanded much higher yields before buying<br />
them, which would have forced the mortgage<br />
brokers to be more careful in deciding to<br />
whom to give these mortgages and the banks<br />
to be more careful in choosing which ones to<br />
bundle. (Friedman 2009, pg. 15).<br />
While pricing <strong>of</strong> products might be viewed as<br />
a marketing issue, under IFRS and accounting<br />
standards <strong>of</strong> most industrialized countries,<br />
valuation <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> the products sold and<br />
the inventory <strong>of</strong> buyers would require an<br />
adequate risk assessment to measure amounts<br />
in financial statements <strong>of</strong> both sellers and<br />
buyers. Furthermore, the principle <strong>of</strong> going<br />
concern applies to all valuations in financial<br />
statements and underpricing <strong>of</strong> financial risk<br />
raises serious issues <strong>of</strong> going concern. The<br />
going concern principle is essentially the<br />
same as sustainability when making financial<br />
accounting valuations. (Going concern issues<br />
are discussed in more detail shortly.) As a<br />
result, sustainability failures in the recent<br />
financial crisis related to inadequate pricing<br />
<strong>of</strong> risk in products are indeed issues <strong>of</strong><br />
accounting for sustainability. Then, when<br />
writing about environmental issues discussing<br />
a 2005 report <strong>of</strong> the Millennium Ecosystem<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> the United Nations, Friedman<br />
comments:<br />
Yet because most nations do not put a price<br />
on [the natural resources consumed] they too<br />
are ‘underpriced’ and therefore<br />
overexploited—with the pr<strong>of</strong>its privatized<br />
and the losses socialized. (Friedman 2009 pg.<br />
25)<br />
Then quoting the World Wild Life Fund’s<br />
Living Planet 2008 Report:<br />
‘The world is currently struggling with the<br />
consequences <strong>of</strong> over-valuing its financial<br />
assets, but a more fundamental crisis looms<br />
ahead—an ecological credit crunch caused by<br />
undervaluing the environmental assets that<br />
100<br />
are the basis <strong>of</strong> all life and prosperity.’<br />
(Friedman 2009 pg. 25).<br />
Under current accounting standards, the value<br />
<strong>of</strong> ecological resources used would not<br />
normally be used to measure product prices<br />
or report values in financial reports; thus<br />
Friedman seems to advocate a new<br />
accounting paradigm for accounting for<br />
sustainability that incorporates use <strong>of</strong><br />
environmental and social resources in<br />
accounting measurements. In both <strong>of</strong> these<br />
situations, as well as throughout the book,<br />
Friedman, a well read, literate, and articulate<br />
writer, but a non-accountant, uses accounting<br />
terminology to link both financial and<br />
ecological sustainability failures and attribute<br />
the cause <strong>of</strong> both to the same phenomenon,<br />
underpricing <strong>of</strong> assets and products sold due<br />
to failure to consider sustainability risk.<br />
Similar calls for a new accounting model to<br />
incorporate external costs have been made by<br />
others, e.g. the Accounting for Sustainability<br />
Group (2006) and Epstein (2008).<br />
Recent attention to so-called integrated<br />
reporting has come from the Accounting for<br />
Sustainability Project<br />
(www.accountingforsustainability.org)<br />
among other places. As discussed in more<br />
detail shortly, this project includes initiatives<br />
<strong>of</strong> the International Integrated Reporting<br />
Committee (IIRC)<br />
(http://www.integratedreporting.org/) to<br />
develop a new reporting model that will<br />
better reflect the interconnected impact <strong>of</strong><br />
financial, environmental, social and<br />
governance factors. There is, however, no<br />
common notion <strong>of</strong> what constitutes integrated<br />
reporting. Many believe that ‘integrated’ is<br />
merely including environmental and social<br />
information along with financial information,<br />
while others view ‘integrated’ as<br />
incorporating sustainability factors within<br />
accounting measurements.<br />
3.0. Accounting for sustainability with<br />
Respect to Traditional Accounting<br />
When environmental (ecological), social, and<br />
other social issues reporting are viewed from
the perspective <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />
sustainability, many issues emerge that have<br />
not yet been addressed and now need to be<br />
examined from the perspective <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />
accounting and financial reporting practice.<br />
3.1. Integrated reporting<br />
The recent call for integrated reporting<br />
involves reporting sustainability issues in<br />
parallel with financial reports, incorporating<br />
sustainability issues in accounting<br />
measurements in financial reports, or both.<br />
Many inconsistencies arise, though, that have<br />
not been considered and should be analyzed<br />
along with respect to traditional financial<br />
reporting theory and concepts. Among the<br />
inconsistencies that arise, in Anglo-Saxon<br />
countries, the purpose <strong>of</strong> financial reporting is<br />
expressed as assessing the likelihood and<br />
timing <strong>of</strong> future cash flows, thus implying<br />
that accounting measurements should be<br />
ultimately related to cash flow. The theory<br />
adds, though that future cash flows are best<br />
assessed by accrual accounting. Many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
suggestions about including sustainability<br />
into accounting measurements would not<br />
involve direct future cash flows, such as use<br />
<strong>of</strong> environmental resources, unless for<br />
circumstances when a carbon tax or carbon<br />
permits might be assessed. Therefore, it<br />
would be very difficult to include such<br />
measurements without changing a major<br />
aspect <strong>of</strong> traditional financial reporting theory<br />
that exists in most countries. Also, the<br />
conceptual framework <strong>of</strong> the IFRS, US<br />
GAAP, and similar concepts <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />
principles in many countries contain the<br />
following four fundamental postulates,<br />
although these concepts predate both IFRS<br />
and the US GAAP conceptual frameworks,<br />
and terminology varies.<br />
-Going concern<br />
-Reporting entity<br />
-Monetary unit<br />
-Time period<br />
The going concern concept assumes that an<br />
entity will be in business for the foreseeable<br />
future and will be able to realize its assets and<br />
101<br />
complete its obligations. This concept affects<br />
valuation bases for measurements <strong>of</strong> many<br />
items on financial reports. It is also the basis<br />
for auditors’ reports on financial statements.<br />
Sustainability is essentially the same concept<br />
as going concern because lack <strong>of</strong><br />
sustainability implies lack <strong>of</strong> a going concern,<br />
and a sustainable entity must necessarily be a<br />
going concern. As discussed in more detail<br />
shortly, well-known going-concern failures<br />
such as Enron and sub-prime mortgage<br />
collapses have resulted massive social costs<br />
and clearly represent lack <strong>of</strong> sustainability.<br />
The reporting entity concept defines<br />
the entity for which financial reports are<br />
prepared. Traditionally, financial reports are<br />
prepared for an economic entity, usually<br />
defined in legal terms as being a consolidated<br />
group in which one dominant entity controls<br />
<strong>of</strong> the group. With integrated financial<br />
reporting, the appropriate reporting entity for<br />
sustainability reporting may differ<br />
considerably from the reporting entity for<br />
financial reporting purposes. As two<br />
examples: First, recent publicity about retail<br />
companies that sell clothes made by child<br />
labor, and similar situations in other<br />
industries, indicate that transparent and<br />
informative reporting should include the<br />
entire supply chain in an entity’s<br />
sustainability reporting. Second, as has been<br />
discussed recently, the environmental impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> a company’s products is also a significant<br />
element to be considered in assessing a<br />
company’s sustainability so the reporting<br />
entity for integrated reporting might consider<br />
customers or other users <strong>of</strong> a company’s<br />
products.<br />
Traditional financial reporting is based on<br />
monetary units in which all non-monetary<br />
items are reported as an equivalent monetary<br />
amount. Almost all environmental and social<br />
information in reports to date are in narrative<br />
non-monetary terms. Under some notions <strong>of</strong><br />
integrated reporting, environmental and social<br />
information would be incorporated into<br />
accounting measurements. Also as discussed<br />
above, Friedman (2009) and others imply a
new accounting in which environmental risk,<br />
which included financial risk, is incorporated<br />
into product pricing. Under the costs attach<br />
principle <strong>of</strong> traditional financial accounting,<br />
costs are included in product prices and<br />
similar measurements if there is a payment<br />
(or similar actual use <strong>of</strong> resources owned);<br />
there has been no measurement method to<br />
incorporate use <strong>of</strong> “free” environmental<br />
resources nor potentially damaging<br />
environmental resources through emissions <strong>of</strong><br />
such things as carbon dioxide and other<br />
greenhouse gases. Carbon trading schemes<br />
are in their earliest stages <strong>of</strong> development in<br />
Europe and some other places, but so far no<br />
accounting measurement has been proposed<br />
to include the cost <strong>of</strong> carbon emission<br />
purchases into products and similar<br />
accounting measurements. Figge and Hahn<br />
(2004) in their Advance project have<br />
developed the Advance Model (see also<br />
http://advance-project.org) in which, among<br />
other things, sustainable value added is<br />
computed in monetary terms for various types<br />
<strong>of</strong> emissions. These sustainable values,<br />
though, are not incorporated into accounting<br />
measurements, but could conceivably be<br />
reported in integrated reports. Sustainable<br />
values as now computed are more suitable for<br />
management control and management<br />
accounting purposes.<br />
Under the time period concept, traditional<br />
financial reporting is based on specific time<br />
periods, almost always one year, based on<br />
perceived users’ needs for timely information<br />
covering discreet time periods <strong>of</strong> optimal<br />
length to make meaningful decisions. Two<br />
approaches have traditionally been used<br />
although with variations among countries:<br />
First the revenue-expense approach measures<br />
revenues earned during a year to derive a<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it for the year; assets and liabilities are<br />
residuals. Second, the asset-liability approach<br />
measures assets and liabilities at the end and<br />
the beginning and <strong>of</strong> a year, subtracting the<br />
difference as pr<strong>of</strong>it for the year divided into<br />
revenues and expenses. The asset-liability<br />
approach has been adopted by IFRS and US<br />
102<br />
GAAP, but the revenue-expense approach<br />
remains in some countries, notably Finland.<br />
The asset-liability approach is clearly more<br />
compatible with sustainability accounting as<br />
indicated in the introduction because it<br />
focuses on consumption <strong>of</strong> resources that<br />
would leave a company as sustainable at the<br />
beginning as at the end. Nonetheless, both<br />
approaches are problematic for integrated<br />
reporting because <strong>of</strong> the rigid notion <strong>of</strong><br />
financial reporting that occurs in annual<br />
increments. Many issues <strong>of</strong> sustainability<br />
relate to long term consequences for the<br />
environment, for example from past<br />
environmental damage as in the oil fields <strong>of</strong><br />
Nigeria and coal mining regions <strong>of</strong> the U.S,<br />
and damage from emissions over the life<br />
cycle <strong>of</strong> products like automobiles.<br />
3.2. Auditing and other assurance<br />
The panel discussion at the IAAER<br />
conference (November 2010) clearly<br />
contained a call for accounting researchers to<br />
be involved in additional roles in accounting<br />
for sustainability, notably auditing. Users <strong>of</strong><br />
financial information, notably investors, it is<br />
claimed, need, almost demand, increasing<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> assurance on sustainability<br />
information, notably assurance <strong>of</strong> information<br />
in management commentaries and<br />
environmental reports. The anecdotal<br />
statements claim that investors require such<br />
assurance in order to make proper risk<br />
assessments <strong>of</strong> sustainability, especially<br />
because <strong>of</strong> documented false environmental<br />
statements presented in annual reports. In the<br />
Massey Coal case in the US, as part <strong>of</strong> a legal<br />
settlement, Massey agreed to provide audited<br />
statements <strong>of</strong> workplace safety and<br />
protections <strong>of</strong> the environment (Harris 2011).<br />
The call for more auditor assurance <strong>of</strong><br />
environmental reports is also reflected in<br />
personal interviews with international<br />
accounting firms. Some countries, e.g.<br />
Sweden, allow auditors to <strong>of</strong>fer both positive<br />
and negative assurance on environmental<br />
reports, i.e. positive assurance in which<br />
auditors examine evidence as in a financial
audit and give a pr<strong>of</strong>essional opinion about its<br />
reliability, and negative assurance in which<br />
the auditor states there is no reason to suspect<br />
the information is not reliable. Companies<br />
choose to provide environmental and social<br />
information, it is claimed, to obtain<br />
reputational benefits not necessarily related to<br />
risk. Assurance, if any, would be used to<br />
achieve greater reputational benefits; few<br />
companies are willing to pay for positive<br />
assurance because <strong>of</strong> limited perceived<br />
benefits. Calls for greater assurance<br />
<strong>of</strong> sustainability information, however<br />
defined, are based on anecdotes, assertion,<br />
conjecture, etc. It seems fairly certain,<br />
though, that interests <strong>of</strong> investors and<br />
creditors in assessing sustainability risk in<br />
making decisions have been largely ignored<br />
and are just now being realized. As a result<br />
there is a current need for accounting research<br />
to assess investors’ and creditors’ perceived<br />
needs for assured sustainability information,<br />
how they use it, market reaction to the<br />
information, etc.<br />
3.3. Financial failures, Reporting and<br />
Auditing failures, and Enforcement<br />
Yet another set <strong>of</strong> accounting-forsustainability<br />
situations within the past few<br />
years are the well-known financial<br />
sustainability failures and near failures <strong>of</strong><br />
companies like Enron, WorldCom, Parmalat,<br />
and Ahold and financial institution failures in<br />
due to sub-prime mortgages. These financial<br />
sustainability failures resulted not only in<br />
investor and creditor losses but also massive<br />
losses for society and are clearly social and<br />
environmental sustainability issues as well.<br />
The sustainability failures were directly<br />
related to non-compliance with accounting<br />
standards, audit failures, and enforcement<br />
failures. In addition, the going concern<br />
concept implies financial sustainability and<br />
these organizations clearly were not going<br />
concerns. While there have been extensive<br />
research and publication about the highpr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
cases, little research has been<br />
conducted in the context <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />
103<br />
sustainability. Research has shown, however,<br />
continued lack <strong>of</strong> compliance with accounting<br />
standards and apparent lack <strong>of</strong> enforcement,<br />
especially in Europe (e.g. Carrara et al. 2010;<br />
Fagerström et al. 2009, 2007a, 2007b). It is<br />
also recognized that lack <strong>of</strong> adequate<br />
enforcement <strong>of</strong> accounting standards within<br />
in the EU is contributing to lack <strong>of</strong> reliability<br />
<strong>of</strong> published accounting reports and thus the<br />
ability <strong>of</strong> users <strong>of</strong> financial reports to assess<br />
sustainability risks. As widely reported in the<br />
business media, in October 2010, the<br />
European Commission announced its<br />
intention to examine compliance with<br />
accounting standards, the role <strong>of</strong> auditors, and<br />
enforcement. It is too soon to assess the<br />
consequences <strong>of</strong> this action by the European<br />
Commission, but it is clearly an issue within<br />
accounting for sustainability.<br />
4. Research Issues<br />
With the analysis above <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />
sustainability in the context <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />
accounting theory and practice, and recent<br />
events, this agenda now develops some<br />
specific research issues along with research<br />
methods and data sources.<br />
4.1. A Research Framework for Accounting<br />
for Sustainability<br />
A conceptual framework to guide researchers<br />
and practitioners in accounting for<br />
sustainability is an essential first step in this<br />
research agenda because <strong>of</strong> various notions <strong>of</strong><br />
sustainability and the roles <strong>of</strong> accounting in<br />
accounting for sustainability that exist at the<br />
moment, and lack <strong>of</strong> a common language.<br />
Such frameworks have been successful in<br />
guiding emerging areas <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />
research in the past. In the 1970s, as the<br />
phenomena <strong>of</strong> multinational companies<br />
became sufficiently large to warrant ongoing<br />
accounting research, a seminal study, An<br />
Accounting Research Framework for<br />
Multinational Enterprises (Cunningham<br />
1978) facilitated accounting research for<br />
multinational enterprises for coming decades.<br />
A similar but less elaborate framework also
facilitated research into accounting research<br />
for performance reporting and accountability<br />
in governmental entities (Cunningham and<br />
Harris 2005) when this issue emerged as an<br />
issue for accounting research. Such a<br />
framework in accounting for sustainability<br />
would, among other things, identify, explore,<br />
and analyze systematically:<br />
-Various notions <strong>of</strong> sustainability to<br />
assess which ones represent roles for<br />
accounting, and to what extent.<br />
-Groups and individuals who have or<br />
potentially could have an<br />
involvement in accounting for<br />
sustainability, including Assistant<br />
Lecturers <strong>of</strong> reports; users <strong>of</strong> such<br />
information, e.g. banks and<br />
investment analysts; assurers <strong>of</strong> such<br />
information, i.e. auditors or similar<br />
groups; regulators; other<br />
organizations, e.g. the United<br />
Nations and its PRI academic<br />
network, who have taken a direct<br />
interest and action in the issue; and<br />
policy makers such as the European<br />
Commission.<br />
-Different forms and levels <strong>of</strong><br />
accountability, e.g. financial<br />
reporting and assurance there<strong>of</strong>;<br />
integrated reporting <strong>of</strong> financial and<br />
other sustainability accounting<br />
information; reporting sustainability<br />
information outside the financial<br />
reports and assurance there<strong>of</strong>;<br />
incorporating sustainability risk and<br />
use <strong>of</strong> resources in accounting<br />
measurements; other elements <strong>of</strong><br />
accountability for sustainability<br />
risks; managerial accounting;<br />
management control systems; etc.<br />
-Identifying and describing various<br />
notions <strong>of</strong> a sustainable entity that<br />
would be the object <strong>of</strong><br />
accountability.<br />
-Matching the interests <strong>of</strong> groups and<br />
individuals with regard to<br />
sustainability with different forms<br />
and levels <strong>of</strong> accountability.<br />
104<br />
-Developing a common language to<br />
discuss and guide future research.<br />
Similar to An Accounting Research<br />
Framework for Multinational Enterprises<br />
(Cunningham 1978, pg. 1), this research<br />
framework seeks to facilitate continuing<br />
research in accounting for sustainability by<br />
describing in detail gaps in current<br />
knowledge, specific issues that require<br />
research, factors that should be considered<br />
when conducting the research, and suggesting<br />
research approaches. One important aspect is<br />
to identify failures in past research and means<br />
to overcome the failures. It also provides a<br />
common taxonomy and language for<br />
continuing research. Following Cunningham<br />
(1976, pp. 31-61) and sources cited by him,<br />
this part <strong>of</strong> the research agenda uses a general<br />
systems theory approach as the primary<br />
methodological and analytical tool (described<br />
in more detail shortly). General systems<br />
theory is especially well suited to develop<br />
conceptual frameworks in business contexts<br />
and especially for accounting research<br />
because it allows researchers to explore such<br />
relevant aspects as:<br />
-The scope <strong>of</strong> the agenda and which systems<br />
are included in this scope.<br />
-System boundaries, i.e. what is included in a<br />
system and what remains outside in the<br />
environment. It is important to note (as<br />
discussed below) that the word<br />
“environment” has a different meaning<br />
than is commonly used in the literature on<br />
accounting for sustainability so far. For this<br />
framework, boundary considerations are<br />
important for such issues as defining<br />
sustainability in accounting contexts; what is<br />
inside systems <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />
sustainability, and what remains outside in<br />
the environment; and whether sustainability<br />
reporting and financial reporting are separate<br />
systems or can become integrated into a<br />
single reporting system.<br />
-System regulation and control. For this<br />
framework, regulation and control factors<br />
deal not only with such obvious issues as<br />
standards and enforcement, but also what
type <strong>of</strong> outputs from accounting for<br />
sustainability are to be produced and for<br />
whom.<br />
4.1.1. Methodology<br />
This part <strong>of</strong> the research agenda uses the<br />
general systems methodology discussed in<br />
Cunningham (1978 Chapter two). General<br />
systems theory is not a theory per se but<br />
instead an approach to guide analysis and<br />
development <strong>of</strong> more specific research<br />
approaches. It is also a first step in grounded<br />
theory approaches which represent back and<br />
forth analyses <strong>of</strong> a system and its<br />
environment to build a theory.<br />
-Under general systems theory, each system<br />
is viewed as part <strong>of</strong> a larger system and each<br />
system can be viewed as having one or more<br />
subsystems. The issue is to identify the<br />
system <strong>of</strong> interest for the research issue at<br />
hand, and the boundaries <strong>of</strong> that system.<br />
Thus, the system <strong>of</strong> interest can be defined in<br />
different ways for different research<br />
purposes. As discussed above, from a<br />
sustainability perspective, the system <strong>of</strong><br />
interest can include a company and its supply<br />
chain as well as users <strong>of</strong> its products during<br />
the product life cycle. In defining the<br />
boundary <strong>of</strong> the system <strong>of</strong> interest, everything<br />
that remains outside the boundary is<br />
considered to be the environment. As noted<br />
above, this definition <strong>of</strong> “environment” is<br />
different from the term “environment”<br />
used in the research literature to date<br />
which typically views environment as<br />
representing ecological resources. Among<br />
other things, the analysis considers properties<br />
<strong>of</strong> the system <strong>of</strong> interest, properties <strong>of</strong><br />
subsystems, and properties <strong>of</strong> the<br />
environment, including influences <strong>of</strong> each on<br />
the other.<br />
Other important aspects <strong>of</strong> general systems<br />
theory are the notions <strong>of</strong> regulation and<br />
control. Control is generally defined as<br />
setting expectations, monitoring outcomes<br />
against those expectations, and taking actions<br />
if necessary to make necessary changes to<br />
achieve desired outcomes. Thus control<br />
105<br />
typically occurs outside a system in the<br />
environment, depending on how the boundary<br />
between a system and its environment is<br />
defined. Regulation represents activities and<br />
subsystems designed within a system to<br />
achieve the desired outcomes somewhat<br />
automatically without explicit intervention.<br />
Notions <strong>of</strong> what constitutes regulation and<br />
control differ depending on how the system<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest and the environment is defined.<br />
The concepts <strong>of</strong> regulation and control have<br />
obvious implications for accounting for<br />
sustainability. One example is establishing<br />
standards for sustainability reporting, a<br />
control function, and the steps taken by an<br />
entity to assure compliance with standards.<br />
4.2. Reporting Sustainability Information<br />
In some countries, e.g. Sweden, a form <strong>of</strong><br />
integrated reporting is required for certain<br />
companies, e.g. those with state ownership,<br />
following the triple bottom line <strong>of</strong> the Global<br />
Reporting Initiative (GRI)<br />
(www.globalreporting.org/Home). In<br />
addition, several other companies have been<br />
voluntarily reporting environmental and<br />
social information for some years. Recent<br />
attention to so-called integrated reporting has<br />
come from the Accounting for Sustainability<br />
Project<br />
(www.accountingforsustainability.org). This<br />
project includes initiatives <strong>of</strong> the International<br />
Integrated Reporting Committee (IIRC)<br />
(http://www.integratedreporting.org/) to<br />
develop a new reporting model that will<br />
better reflect the interconnected impact <strong>of</strong><br />
financial, environmental, social and<br />
governance factors. The IIRC includes,<br />
among others, representatives from the major<br />
international accounting firms, securities<br />
exchanges, the Financial Accounting<br />
Standards Board (FASB) <strong>of</strong> the US, and the<br />
International Accounting Standards Board<br />
(IASB). As mentioned above, though, there<br />
is, however, no common notion <strong>of</strong> what<br />
constitutes integrated reporting.<br />
Also as mentioned above, anecdotally,<br />
companies report such so-called sustainability
information and sometimes seek assurance <strong>of</strong><br />
such to achieve reputational benefits.<br />
Research is needed to identify what type <strong>of</strong><br />
reputational benefits companies expect to<br />
achieve. A further issue is<br />
establishing standards for sustainability<br />
reporting. The Global Reporting Initiative<br />
(GRI) (www.globalreporting.org/Home), a<br />
network-based organization based in the<br />
Netherlands, provides standards for voluntary<br />
reporting <strong>of</strong> supplemental sustainability<br />
disclosures. GRI reporting standards are<br />
required in Sweden for the companies that are<br />
required to report the so-called triple bottom<br />
line. The IIRC as part <strong>of</strong> the UN PRI is also<br />
establishing reporting standards. Research<br />
could be useful to determine the criteria by<br />
which companies, accounting firms and<br />
others choose reporting standards.<br />
4.2.1. Research Methods<br />
The primary research methods for this set <strong>of</strong><br />
issues would be content analysis and field<br />
studies. With respect to content analysis,<br />
because <strong>of</strong> different notions <strong>of</strong> what<br />
represents integrated reporting, it would be<br />
useful to examine actual reports under the<br />
different approaches to learn differences and<br />
their impacts. Content analysis might also be<br />
used to examine reports <strong>of</strong> different<br />
companies that use different types <strong>of</strong><br />
reporting standards to assess different<br />
impacts. A further analysis <strong>of</strong> the groups<br />
promulgating the standards to determine their<br />
intentions and desired results can be useful.<br />
Such content analyses can be complimented<br />
by field studies <strong>of</strong> the companies that<br />
currently report sustainability information to<br />
determine the difficulty or ease <strong>of</strong><br />
implementation and extent <strong>of</strong> compliance.<br />
Field studies represent a form <strong>of</strong> grounded<br />
theory in which researchers engage with the<br />
field to discover phenomena <strong>of</strong> interest to be<br />
used to develop a theory. Field studies by<br />
Fagerström et al. (2009, 2007a, 2007b) have<br />
examined similar issues in implementation<br />
and compliance with reporting standards and<br />
provide a model for this research agenda.<br />
106<br />
Field studies can be useful to assess the<br />
reputational benefits companies attempt to<br />
achieve from reporting environmental and<br />
social information. Field study research by<br />
Cunningham and Harris (2005) on a similar<br />
topic about performance reporting <strong>of</strong><br />
governmental entities was a significant<br />
contribution to accountability research for<br />
such entities and can also be used as a model<br />
in this research.<br />
4.3. Users <strong>of</strong> Sustainability Information.<br />
As mentioned in the background, research<br />
and discussion in accounting for<br />
sustainability so far have almost exclusively<br />
focused on companies that prepare and<br />
present sustainability information. There is<br />
very recent recognition that the needs <strong>of</strong> users<br />
<strong>of</strong> the information must be considered as<br />
well. The research framework for accounting<br />
for sustainability as described in 4.1 would<br />
necessarily address some <strong>of</strong> these issues.<br />
Research is also needed to address directly<br />
users’ perceived needs and reactions to them.<br />
Anecdotal evidence suggests that financial<br />
analysts, one major user group, routinely<br />
discard supplemental environmental<br />
disclosures. Instead, anecdotally, analysts<br />
want information that allows assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
risk. Somewhat contradictory prior research<br />
has shown that financial analysts, do consider<br />
sustainability risk information when making<br />
recommendations to their clients (H. Nilsson,<br />
et al. 2008). Other research reported by the<br />
SIRP (www.sirp.se) indicates a market<br />
reaction to sustainability risk under certain<br />
situations thus suggesting that some users <strong>of</strong><br />
sustainability information do use such<br />
information. Research is needed not only to<br />
assess whether sustainability risk information<br />
is desired and used, but the form in which<br />
sustainability risk incorporated in accounting<br />
reports, e.g. in integrated reports, in product<br />
prices according to as suggested by Friedman<br />
(2009), and in other accounting<br />
measurements.
4.3.1. Research methods<br />
Field study research methods similar to those<br />
discussed above (Fagerström et al. 2009,<br />
2007a, 2007b) are useful to learn more about<br />
potential users <strong>of</strong> integrated reports, what<br />
they expect, different formats they prefer, and<br />
similar items. The primary research method<br />
for this issue could be experimental research<br />
along the lines used by Baker and<br />
Cunningham (1993) when assessing the<br />
perceptions <strong>of</strong> bankers about different sets <strong>of</strong><br />
assurance standards on their loan decisions is<br />
a model for this analysis. With respect to<br />
experiments, persons in each treatment group<br />
would be a priori viewed as essentially<br />
identical and making the same types <strong>of</strong><br />
decisions following the approach <strong>of</strong><br />
Cunningham and Baker (1992). In their<br />
study, subjects <strong>of</strong> experiments were attending<br />
training and education classes sponsored by a<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional bankers’ association; the<br />
association supported the type <strong>of</strong> research and<br />
virtually all participants voluntarily chose to<br />
participate. The subjects for this and similar<br />
issues in this research agenda could be<br />
similar, not necessarily in educational classes,<br />
but groups <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who use reports<br />
<strong>of</strong> sustainability information. In addition, or<br />
alternatively, students could be used as<br />
surrogates for users <strong>of</strong> sustainability<br />
accounting information. Numerous<br />
accounting-related experiments using<br />
students as surrogates have been conducted<br />
and published by Michael Shields and<br />
Graeme Harrison, among others; these studies<br />
are too numerous to cite here, but can be<br />
readily located and examined. Similarly,<br />
experimental studies in sustainability under<br />
the auspices <strong>of</strong> the SIRP (www.sirp.se) have<br />
used students as surrogates for pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
who use sustainability information. These<br />
studies cite evidence that students perform as<br />
well as actual subjects in these types <strong>of</strong><br />
experiments.<br />
107<br />
4.4. Auditing and Other Assurance <strong>of</strong><br />
Sustainability Information<br />
As mentioned in the introduction,<br />
background, and discussions above, a major<br />
emerging issue is the extent to which users <strong>of</strong><br />
sustainability information expect assurance;<br />
at what level, negative or positive; and in<br />
what form, supplemental or incorporated in<br />
financial measurements. A further issue<br />
within this agenda issue is establishing both<br />
standards for sustainability reporting and<br />
standards against which assurance is given.<br />
As mentioned above, the Global Reporting<br />
Initiative (GRI), a network-based<br />
organization based in the Netherlands,<br />
provides standards for voluntary reporting <strong>of</strong><br />
supplemental sustainability disclosures. The<br />
IIRC as part <strong>of</strong> the UN PRI is also<br />
establishing reporting standards. For<br />
assurance, as one example, major accounting<br />
firms in Sweden use assurance standards<br />
published by Föreneningen Auktoriserade<br />
Revisorer (FAR) (www.far.se) in FAR<br />
RevR6<br />
(http://www.far.se/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/FA<br />
R_2010/FAR_TYCKER/INFORMATIONS<br />
MATERIAL/GRANSKNINGAVHALLBAR<br />
HETSREDOVISNING.PDF), although use <strong>of</strong><br />
such standards is apparently voluntary. FAR<br />
RevR6 is taken from (essentially a translation<br />
<strong>of</strong>) the International Standard on Assurance<br />
Engagements 3000 (ISAE 3000)<br />
(http://www.accountability21.net/uploadedFil<br />
es/Issues/ISAE_3000.pdf) developed in the<br />
Netherlands. A competing set <strong>of</strong> assurance<br />
standards, though, has been developed by<br />
AccountAbility<br />
(http://www.accountability.org/) in its<br />
AA1000 AS. Despite the organization’s claim<br />
<strong>of</strong> wide-spread acceptance, there is no<br />
indication that such standards are used in<br />
Nordic countries. Yet another set <strong>of</strong> standards<br />
is incorporated in the Greenhouse Gas<br />
Protocol Initiative<br />
(http://www.ghgprotocol.org/).<br />
These sets <strong>of</strong> assurance standards, while not<br />
always in direct competition because they<br />
relate to different types <strong>of</strong> sustainability
information, overlap sufficiently to create<br />
uncertainty and complexity in accountants’<br />
roles <strong>of</strong> providing assurance. Because <strong>of</strong><br />
multiple sets <strong>of</strong> standards for both reporting<br />
and assurance, yet another set <strong>of</strong> issues to be<br />
addressed in this research agenda is the<br />
criteria by which companies and<br />
organizations providing assurance voluntarily<br />
choose standards to use in reporting and in<br />
assurance engagements. When sustainability<br />
information is included in accounting<br />
measurements, e.g. pricing products to<br />
include external resource costs and including<br />
sustainability risk in financial products,<br />
additional issues <strong>of</strong> reporting standards and<br />
assurance standards are presented. Similar<br />
issues are presented in integrated reporting<br />
when environmental and social concerns<br />
would be included in accounting<br />
measurements. Current accounting standards<br />
in almost every country, including Nordic<br />
countries, do not permit such accounting<br />
measurements; likewise auditing standards<br />
for such measurements are not available.<br />
4.4.1. Research Methods<br />
The previous research by Baker and<br />
Cunningham (1993) discussed above, is an<br />
ideal model for the type <strong>of</strong> research on<br />
assurance levels in this research agenda. In<br />
that experiment, bank loan <strong>of</strong>ficers were<br />
asked to make decisions based on financial<br />
statements prepared using, among other<br />
things, different levels <strong>of</strong> audit assurance and<br />
different accounting standards. Field<br />
studies like Fagerström et al. (2009, 2007a,<br />
2007b) and Cunningham and Harris (2005)<br />
are a grounded theory approach useful<br />
models to examine auditors’ perceptions <strong>of</strong><br />
different levels <strong>of</strong> assurance and standards.<br />
4.5. Financial Distress, Non-compliance<br />
with Financial Reporting Standards, and<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> Enforcement<br />
Despite the fact that past financial failures,<br />
notably Enron and sub-prime mortgage<br />
crises, have resulted in massive social costs,<br />
there is only recent recognition that financial<br />
108<br />
distress, <strong>of</strong>ten related to failure to consider<br />
different types <strong>of</strong> sustainability risk, noncompliance<br />
with financial reporting<br />
standards, and enforcement <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />
standards, is an issue <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />
sustainability. As discussed in the<br />
introduction and background, though,<br />
Friedman (2009) views ecological risk and<br />
financial distress to be integrally related<br />
through inadequate accounting for risks. Even<br />
though financial and other sustainability risks<br />
are recently receiving attention, the going<br />
concern concept has been an essential<br />
concept in financial reporting and auditing for<br />
many years. Research would be useful to<br />
assess the extent to which users <strong>of</strong> financial<br />
information, notably banks, investment<br />
analysts, and financial analysts, view the link<br />
between financial distress risk and ecological<br />
risk as being integrally related as does<br />
Friedman (2009).<br />
Non-compliance with financial reporting<br />
standards has been an accounting research<br />
topic for at least the last 10 years in which<br />
wide-spread non-compliance was discovered,<br />
and by implication apparent lack <strong>of</strong><br />
enforcement (e.g. Carrara, et al. 2010,<br />
Fagerström et al. 2009, 2007a, 2007b; and<br />
sources cited by them). Such research,<br />
though, focused on detecting non-compliance<br />
without implications for sustainability. As<br />
indicated in these studies, non-compliance<br />
with accounting standards and lack <strong>of</strong><br />
enforcement are readily apparent and should<br />
be apparent to users <strong>of</strong> financial reports.<br />
Research could assess the impact on apparent<br />
non-compliance with accounting standards on<br />
users <strong>of</strong> the information, notably bankers and<br />
bank investment analysts.<br />
A very recent study by the publishers <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Asset 4 data base has indicated that<br />
companies that report sustainable information<br />
also have abnormal returns, suggesting that<br />
investors and/or analysts do not consider<br />
sustainability information in their decisions.<br />
By implication, failure to consider<br />
sustainability risk could lead to abnormally<br />
low returns or loss through financial failure.
Research is useful to assess any relation <strong>of</strong><br />
negative or lack <strong>of</strong> reported sustainability<br />
information on low returns or failure.<br />
4.5.1. Research Methods<br />
This line <strong>of</strong> research could follow an<br />
approach by Baboukardos (2011, 2010). The<br />
research would involve content analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
publicly listed European companies to<br />
identify lack <strong>of</strong> compliance. Examination <strong>of</strong><br />
stock market reaction to the lack <strong>of</strong><br />
compliance and other faulty financial<br />
information could then use the well-known<br />
value relevance model and other well known<br />
models that assess market reactions to<br />
accounting information. Among others<br />
outputs, the well known measurement <strong>of</strong><br />
Tobin’s Q gives an indicator <strong>of</strong> risk. Similar<br />
research methods can be used to assess the<br />
value relevance <strong>of</strong> negative sustainability<br />
information. In addition, the well known<br />
bankruptcy prediction models can be used to<br />
assess the ability <strong>of</strong> negative sustainability<br />
information to signal financial failure. The<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> the Asset 4 data base now<br />
facilitates research methods using large<br />
samples and more sophisticated quantitative<br />
methods.<br />
5.0. Concluding discussion<br />
This purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper has been to give<br />
structure to the diverse, disjointed area <strong>of</strong><br />
research into accounting for sustainability,<br />
providing background, including identifying<br />
research issues, and possible research<br />
methods. In introduction and background<br />
discussions, it was apparent that the focus to<br />
date on reporting environmental, i.e.<br />
ecological, and sometimes social and<br />
governance information is narrow and<br />
inadequate. Instead, new additional research<br />
areas are emerging and some traditional<br />
research areas are taking on new perspectives.<br />
These include:<br />
- A call for integrated reporting that<br />
integrates environmental (ecological),<br />
social, and governance information along<br />
with financial reports. Differing notions <strong>of</strong><br />
109<br />
what represents integration exist,<br />
however.<br />
- Interests <strong>of</strong> users <strong>of</strong> sustainability<br />
information, including integrated reports,<br />
must be considered.<br />
- Calls for expanded roles <strong>of</strong> auditors and<br />
other assurers.<br />
- Expanding research issues <strong>of</strong> financial<br />
failures, accounting and auditing failures,<br />
and lack <strong>of</strong> enforcement to recognize an<br />
essential sustainability component.<br />
After presenting background, the paper<br />
analyzes the emerging issues against<br />
traditional accounting concepts, notably the<br />
postulates <strong>of</strong> going concern, entity, monetary<br />
unit and time period, the paper identified<br />
many research issues that need to be resolved.<br />
These were presented in five sets <strong>of</strong> research<br />
issues for accounting for sustainability<br />
In the process, the paper presented<br />
background material and then identified five<br />
sets <strong>of</strong> research issues in accounting for<br />
sustainability along with methods and data<br />
sources for each:<br />
- An accounting research framework for<br />
sustainability to be based on similar<br />
frameworks for other emerging<br />
accounting research issues using general<br />
systems theory approaches. This<br />
framework identifies systems <strong>of</strong> interest<br />
and the environment and necessarily<br />
challenges the traditional notions <strong>of</strong><br />
reporting entity and time period, among<br />
others.<br />
- Reporting <strong>of</strong> sustainability information<br />
which has been the focus <strong>of</strong> most research<br />
to date, and the emerging important topic<br />
<strong>of</strong> integrated reporting. The analysis<br />
challenges entity, monetary unit, and time<br />
period concepts as well as addresses<br />
which standards are to be used and how to<br />
incorporate environmental and social<br />
issues into accounting measurements.<br />
- Users <strong>of</strong> sustainable information, their<br />
uses and perceived needs. This is an area<br />
that has been largely neglected in research<br />
to date. Research using field studies and
experiments is needed to assess users’<br />
needs and expectations.<br />
- Auditing and assurance issues that are<br />
taking on greater importance as more<br />
users demand assurance for the<br />
sustainability information. Issues <strong>of</strong> which<br />
standards to be used can be explored and<br />
experiments would be used to assess<br />
users’ expectations and how they react to<br />
different types and levels <strong>of</strong> assurance.<br />
- Financial distress and sustainability<br />
consequences <strong>of</strong> accounting and<br />
enforcement failures that are just now<br />
being recognized as sustainability issues.<br />
Research using traditional market<br />
methods, notably the value relevance<br />
model and bankruptcy prediction models<br />
This agenda while ambitious gives definite<br />
structure and clearly indicates a substantial<br />
change in traditional view <strong>of</strong> accounting,<br />
reporting, and auditing in a new era <strong>of</strong><br />
sustainability.<br />
References:<br />
Publications<br />
1. Adams, Carol (2010), “Editorial”,<br />
Sustainability Accounting, Management and<br />
Policy Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 5-9<br />
2. Baboukardos, Diogenes (2011<br />
forthcoming), “Transparency in Fair Value<br />
Accounting under IFRS: An Examination <strong>of</strong><br />
Greek Listed Companies’ Level <strong>of</strong><br />
Compliance with IFRS Goodwill Disclosure<br />
Requirements”, in The Economies <strong>of</strong> Balkan<br />
and Eastern Europe Countries in the changed<br />
world. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge<br />
Scholars Publishing.<br />
3. Baboukardos Diogenes (2010), “Does<br />
Transparency Affect Relevance? Evidence<br />
from Goodwill Disclosures <strong>of</strong> Listed<br />
Companies on Athens Stock Exchange”,<br />
Working Paper, Jönköping International<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Business, Jönköping, Sweden.<br />
4. Berger, Axel (2010), “The Development<br />
and Status <strong>of</strong> Enforcement in the European<br />
Union”, Accounting in Europe, Vol. 7, Nos.<br />
1-2, pp. 15-35.<br />
110<br />
Brundtland, Gro H. (1987), Our Common<br />
Future: The World Commission on<br />
Environment and Development. Oxford, UK:<br />
Oxford University Press.<br />
5. Carrara, Mario, et al. (2010), “The impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> IFRS on reporting for business<br />
combinations: an in-depth analysis using the<br />
telecommunications industry”, paper<br />
presented at Asian-Pacific Conference on<br />
International Accounting issues, Gold Coast,<br />
Australia, and Nordic Financial Accounting<br />
Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark,<br />
November 2010.<br />
6. Cunningham, Gary M. (1977), An<br />
Accounting Research Framework for<br />
Multinational Enterprises. Ann Arbor, MI,<br />
USA: UMI Research Press.<br />
7. Cunningham, Gary M. and Harris, Jean E.<br />
(2001),“A Heuristic Framework for<br />
Accountability <strong>of</strong> Governmental Subunits”<br />
Public Management Review, Vol. 3 No. 2,<br />
June 2001, pp. 145-165.<br />
8. Cunningham, Gary M. and Harris, Jean E.<br />
(2005) “Towards a Theory <strong>of</strong> Performance<br />
Reporting in Achieving Public Sector<br />
Accountability: A Field Study, Public<br />
Budgeting & Finance Journal, Vol. 25 No. 2,<br />
pp. 15-42.<br />
9. Epstein, Mark. (2008), Making<br />
Sustainability Work, Best Practices in<br />
Managing and Measuring Corporate Social,<br />
Environmental, and Economic Impacts. (San<br />
Francisco, CA, USA: Greenleaf Publishing).<br />
10. Fagerström, Arne, et al. (2009),<br />
“Financial Reporting <strong>of</strong> Foreign Subsidiaries<br />
to Multinational Parent Companies: A Field<br />
Study” Journal for International Business<br />
and Entrepreneurship Development Vol. 4,<br />
No. 3, pp. 179-190<br />
11. Fagerström, Arne, et al., (2007a)<br />
“Research note: Compliance With<br />
Consolidation (Group) Accounting<br />
Standards-The Vertical Adjustment Issue:<br />
Field Studies <strong>of</strong> Swedish Multinationals”,<br />
International Journal <strong>of</strong> Accounting and<br />
Performance Evaluation. Vol. 4 No. 6, 2007,<br />
pp. 650-665.
12. Fagerström, Arne, et al., (2007b)<br />
“Compliance With Consolidation (Group)<br />
Accounting Standards—The Vertical<br />
Adjustment Issue: A Survey <strong>of</strong> Swedish<br />
Multinationals”, Journal for Global Business<br />
Advancement, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 37-48.<br />
13. Figge, Frank and Hahn, Tobias, (2004)<br />
“Sustainable Value Added—measuring<br />
corporate contributions to sustainability<br />
beyond eco-efficiency”, Ecological<br />
Economics, Vol. 48, pp. 173– 187.<br />
14. Friedman, Thomas L. (2009), Hot Flat<br />
and Crowded, Release 2.0 updated and<br />
expanded. New York, NY, USA:<br />
Picador/Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.<br />
15. Gray, Rob (2010), “A re-evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
social, environmental and sustainability<br />
accounting: an exploration <strong>of</strong> an emerging<br />
trans-disciplinary fiend?”, Sustainability<br />
Accounting, Management and Policy Journal,<br />
Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 11-32.<br />
111<br />
16. Harris, Jean E. (2011), “A New Model<br />
from Old Energy for Promoting Corporate <strong>of</strong><br />
Social Responsibility: the Case <strong>of</strong> Massey<br />
Energy Company”. Unpublished working<br />
paper.<br />
17. Kaspereit, Thomas, “The Value<br />
Relevance <strong>of</strong> Corporate Sustainability and<br />
Sustainability Reporting in Europe,” working<br />
paper presented at British Accounting and<br />
Finance Association annual conference,<br />
Birmingham, UK, April 2001.<br />
18. Nilsson, Henrik, et al. (2008), “A Study<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Provision <strong>of</strong> Environmental<br />
Information in Financial Analysts’ Research<br />
Reports”, Sustainable Development, No. 16,<br />
pp. 180-194.<br />
19. Solomon, J. F., and Solomon A. (2006),<br />
"Private social, ethical and environmental<br />
disclosure." Accounting, Auditing &<br />
Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp.<br />
564-591.
112
LE DYNAMISME DES TPE ET PME ET L'ÉVOLUTION DE L'ÉCONOMIE<br />
ROUMAINE<br />
Jubénot Marie-Noëlle<br />
Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France<br />
Marc de la Ville fromoit, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France<br />
Abstract: The Entrepreneurship concept has its roots in the mid-1970s, it is getting really important<br />
much later in the 1990s (Hernandez, 2010). The entrepreneur is at the heart <strong>of</strong> regional<br />
development as an engine <strong>of</strong> growth. It concerns the creation <strong>of</strong> enterprises, but also management,<br />
business development and networking. The aim <strong>of</strong> our research is to characterize the private sector<br />
development in Romania since the beginning <strong>of</strong> the transition to define the role <strong>of</strong> SMBs in the<br />
dynamics <strong>of</strong> development, identify the current weaknesses <strong>of</strong> the private sector and propose<br />
solutions. For our study, we used several previous studies on the characterization <strong>of</strong> the Romanian<br />
economy since the beginning <strong>of</strong> the transition. We also used recent data from the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Economy. We also used the large literature on entrepreneurship and business networks. The<br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> the Romanian economy is obtained by comparison with countries in the area but<br />
also some data from highly industrialized countries or countries <strong>of</strong> the south. Each transition is<br />
experiencing its own economic development based on its specific history and choices in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
economic and social policies. According to our research, the private sector is characterized by an<br />
increase in the number <strong>of</strong> businesses created, but the density <strong>of</strong> firms per capita is still low<br />
compared to other countries in the area. On the other hand, companies are mostly micro<br />
(businesses without employees to create their own jobs) or small (less than 9 employees). This<br />
demonstrates a real dynamism in business creation. However, the creation <strong>of</strong> many SMBs may not<br />
be an end in itself. Entreprises have to develop in order to face competition and to achieve<br />
economies <strong>of</strong> scale, or they can even join or create their networks.<br />
Keywords: Micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), transition, clusters<br />
Classification JEL: M20, P20<br />
Abstract: L’économie de l’entrepreneuriat trouve ses racines dans le milieu des années 1970, mais<br />
connaît son essor dans les années 1990. Elle place l’entrepreneur au cœur du développement des<br />
territoires comme moteur de la croissance. Elle concerne la création d’entreprises mais aussi le<br />
management, le développement des entreprises et les réseaux. L'objectif de notre recherche est de<br />
caractériser le développement du secteur privé en Roumanie depuis le début de la transition afin de<br />
définir la place des TPE/PME dans la dynamique de développement, de déceler les faiblesses actuelles<br />
du secteur privé et de proposer des solutions. Pour notre étude, nous avons utilisé plusieurs travaux<br />
antérieurs concernant la caractérisation de la l'économie roumaine depuis le début de la transition. Nous<br />
avons aussi utilisé des données récentes provenant du ministère de l'économie. Nous avons également<br />
fait appel à la nombreuse littérature concernant l'entrepreneuriat et les réseaux d'entreprises. La<br />
caractérisation de l'économie roumaine s'obtient par comparaison avec des pays de la zone mais aussi<br />
quelques données provenant de pays très industrialisés ou encore des pays du sud. Chaque pays en<br />
transition connaît sa propre évolution économique en fonction de son histoire spécifique et de ses choix<br />
en termes de politiques économique et sociale. Selon nos recherches, le secteur privé se caractérise par<br />
une augmentation croissante du nombre d'entreprises créées, cependant la densité des entreprises par<br />
habitants est encore peu élevée par rapport à d'autres pays de la zone. D'autre part, les entreprises sont<br />
pour la plupart des micros (entreprises sans salariés permettant de créer son propre emploi) ou de<br />
petites entreprises (moins de 9 salariés). Ce qui témoigne d'un dynamisme réel dans la création<br />
d'entreprise. Cependant, la création de nombreuses TPE/ PME ne peut être une fin en soi. Les<br />
entreprises ont vocations à se développer ou à s'associer pour faire face à la concurrence et pour<br />
réaliser des économies d'échelle.<br />
Mots-clé : TPE/PME, transition, densité, réseaux<br />
113
Introduction :<br />
L'objectif de cette article est d'évaluer les<br />
forces et les faiblesses du secteur privé<br />
roumain. La démarche est la suivante : nous<br />
rappellerons dans une première partie les<br />
problèmes qui se sont posés pour la<br />
Roumanie au début de la période de<br />
transition, notamment les types et les causes<br />
des retards qui sont apparus par rapport à<br />
d'autres pays de la région. Dans une seconde<br />
partie, nous traiterons principalement des<br />
attentes et des difficultés liées à la<br />
privatisation de l'économie roumaine. Puis<br />
nous nous attarderons dans une troisième<br />
partie sur la structure du secteur privé<br />
114<br />
roumain aujourd'hui. Face aux insuffisances<br />
constatées, la constitution de réseaux<br />
d'entreprises peut permettre de palier aux<br />
insuffisances du secteur privé.<br />
I - Le processus de la transition<br />
Au début de la période de transition la<br />
Roumanie a pris un peu de retard dans le<br />
processus de libéralisation économique,<br />
contrairement à la Hongrie, la Pologne et<br />
dans une moindre mesure la<br />
Tchécoslovaquie, comme l'indique le tableau<br />
suivant :<br />
Tableau 1 : Indices de libéralisation*<br />
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Cumul<br />
89-97<br />
politique de<br />
stabilisation<br />
Bulgarie 0,13 0,19 0,62 0,66 0,66 0,64 0,58 0,65 0,79 4,92 01/02/91<br />
Hongrie 0,34 0,57 0,74 0,78 0,82 0,86 0,9 0,9 0,93 6,84 01/03/90<br />
Pologne 0,24 0,68 0,72 0,82 0,82 0,86 0,89 0,89 0,89 6,81 01/01/90<br />
Roumanie 0 0,22 0,36 0,45 0,58 0,68 0,71 0,72 0,75 4,47 01/01/93<br />
Slovaquie 0 0,16 0,79 0,86 0,83 0,83 0,86 0,86 0,86 6,05 01/01/91<br />
Tchéquie 0 0,16 0,79 0,86 0,9 0,90 0,93 0,93 0,93 6,4 01/01/91<br />
Moldavie 0,04 0,04 0,1 0,38 0,51 0,55 0,68 0,75 0,75 3,8 01/09/93<br />
* L’indice de libéralisation compris de 0 à1 est une moyenne de trois indices séparés : la libéralisation des marchés<br />
domestiques (pondération de 0,3) ; la libéralisation du commerce extérieur (0,3) ; la privatisation et la réforme<br />
bancaire (0,4). La somme des indices annuels depuis 1989 est un indicateur de l’étendue des réformes.<br />
Source : De Melo Martha, Denizer Cevdet, Gelb Alan, « Patterns <strong>of</strong> Transition from Plan to Market », The World<br />
Bank Economic Review, Vol. 10, n° 3, pp.397-424. In : World Economic Outlook, World Bank, 2000.<br />
Le tableau suivant nous donne une évaluation du niveau actuel de libéralisation pour certaines<br />
économies en transition :<br />
Private<br />
sector<br />
share/GDP<br />
Large-scale<br />
privatisation<br />
Tableau 2 :État de la réforme en 2010<br />
Small-scale<br />
privatisation<br />
Price<br />
liberalisation<br />
Trade<br />
and foreign<br />
exchange<br />
Competition<br />
policy<br />
Overall<br />
infrastructure<br />
reform<br />
Bulgaria 75 % « 4 » « 4 » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 3 » « 3 »<br />
Croatia 70 % « 3+ » « 4+ » « 4 » « 4+ » « 3 » « 3 »
Private<br />
sector<br />
share/GDP<br />
Large-scale<br />
privatisation<br />
Small-scale<br />
privatisation<br />
Price<br />
liberalisation<br />
115<br />
Trade<br />
and foreign<br />
exchange<br />
Competition<br />
policy<br />
Overall<br />
infrastructure<br />
reform<br />
Hungary 80 % « 4 » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 3+ » « 4- »<br />
Moldova 65 % « 3 » « 4 » « 4 » « 4+ » « 2+ » « 2+ »<br />
Poland 75 % « 4-↑ » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 3+ » « 3+ »<br />
Romania 70 % « 4- » « 4- » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 3↑ » « 3+ »<br />
Slovak<br />
Rep.<br />
80 % « 4 » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 3+ » « 3+ »<br />
Slovenia 70 % « 3 » « 4+ » « 4 » « 4+ » « 3- » « 3 »<br />
Source : Transition Report 2010, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development<br />
The transition indicators range from 1 to 4+, with 1 representing little or no change from a rigid centrally<br />
planned economy and 4+ representing the standards <strong>of</strong> an industrialised market economy.<br />
↑ and ↓ arrows indicate a change from the previous year. One arrow indicates a movement <strong>of</strong> one point (from 4<br />
to 4+, for example). Up arrows indicate upgrades, down arrows indicate downgrades.<br />
Les rapports de 1997 et 2000 de la la<br />
Commission Européenne soulignaient que le<br />
processus de restructuration et de<br />
privatisation avaient pris du retard et<br />
manquait de transparence, retardant ainsi<br />
l'émergence d'un secteur privé dynamique et<br />
compétitif et que les problèmes de la<br />
corruption et du marché noir devaient être<br />
résolus. Depuis, la Roumanie a développé<br />
une politique industrielle considérée<br />
conforme aux principes communautaires. La<br />
Roumanie a adopté une série d'initiatives en<br />
faveur du développement des petites et<br />
moyennes entreprises (PME), notamment : la<br />
participation au programme pluriannuel pour<br />
les entreprises, l'adhésion depuis 2002 à la<br />
charte européenne des petites entreprises,<br />
l'adoption en 2004 d'une loi sur les incitations<br />
à la création et au développement de PME, la<br />
simplification et l'amélioration des<br />
procédures administratives, la création d'un<br />
Fonds de garantie... Néanmoins, cette<br />
politique reste contrainte par certaines<br />
faiblesses structurelles.<br />
II - Les conditions de la privatisation<br />
Le développement du secteur privé peut se<br />
réaliser de deux façons concomitantes : la<br />
privatisation des entreprises d'état et la<br />
stimulation de l'entrepreneuriat privé. Les<br />
grandes entreprises d’État privatisées ont été<br />
peu favorables en général à l'instauration des<br />
nouvelles règles de marché, à la<br />
transformation des structures productives.<br />
Elles ont eut plutôt tendance à résister aux<br />
modifications et exploiter leurs situations de<br />
monopoles. En revanche, la création<br />
d'entreprise et l'entrepreneuriat jouent un rôle<br />
moteur dans le domaine de l’innovation. Le<br />
nombre de création d'entreprises ne cesse de<br />
croître en Roumanie depuis le début de la<br />
transition, comme indiqué ci-dessous :
Taille des<br />
entreprises<br />
Tableau 3 : Evolution des TPE et PME en Roumanie, 1999-2005<br />
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Micro 294.597 279.893 280.448 285.207 313.485 358.242 477.969<br />
Petite 25.987 29.417 31.249 32.010 34.883 36.080 39.721<br />
Moyenne 6.102 6.864 7.455 7.989 8.342 8.674 8.576<br />
Total 326.686 316.174 319.152 325.206 356.710 402.996 526.318<br />
Source : Neault (2007)<br />
Cependant, la densité des TPE/PME.de 24,3<br />
pour 1000 habitants fin 2005, contre 54 à<br />
l'ouest de l'Europe (Neault, 2007), est<br />
insuffisante. Or pour Chandan, Mumtaz, et<br />
Parkash (2009), la croissance et le<br />
développement des PME permettent dans les<br />
pays pauvres ou émergents d'atténuer la<br />
pauvreté et la promouvoir les exportations.<br />
Les PME auraient joué un rôle crucial dans le<br />
développement de pays tels que Taiwan.<br />
Dans les pays développés, la promotion des<br />
PME serait l'un des moyens de booster<br />
l'activité. Certaines études définissent les<br />
PME à partir du nombre de salariés, d'autres<br />
en fonction de l'ampleur de l'activité.<br />
116<br />
Pour Nuno Castel-Branco (2003), les<br />
différences de la structure de la dynamique<br />
sociale et économique entre secteurs<br />
impliquent des politiques de promotion des<br />
PME différenciées. Les politiques pro-PME<br />
peuvent viser, entre autres, la mobilisation du<br />
secteur informel, la création d'emploi, la<br />
meilleure allocation des capitaux nationaux et<br />
l'innovation technologique.<br />
III - Dynamisme des TPE/PME en<br />
Roumanie<br />
Depuis le début de la transition, l'économie<br />
roumaine s'est beaucoup privatisée. Selon la<br />
classification d'Eurostat en micro-, petites,<br />
moyennes et grandes entreprises en fonction<br />
du nombre de salariés, la plupart des<br />
entreprises sont des micro-entreprises<br />
Tableau 5 : Structure des entreprises actives par taille et par secteur, en 2008<br />
Types d'entreprise : Micro<br />
0 - 9<br />
salariés<br />
petites<br />
10 - 49<br />
salariés<br />
moyennes<br />
50 - 249<br />
salariés<br />
grandes<br />
250 salariés et<br />
plus<br />
Industrie et construction 78,60% 15,70% 4,70% 1,00%<br />
Commerce<br />
services<br />
et autres<br />
92,30% 6,60% 1,00% 0,10%<br />
Sources : Institul National deStatistica (INSSE), ROMANIA<br />
En France et au Japon, la part des TPE/PME<br />
est très élevée, elle est respectivement de 97<br />
% et 99%,, mais avec densité d'entreprise<br />
beaucoup plus importante. L'auto-emploi,<br />
pour faire face au chômage et à la précarité,<br />
explique en partie le phénomène de la micro<br />
entreprise. Mais, pour Nuno Castel-Branco<br />
(2003), la TPE/PME ne peut être une fin en<br />
soi. La nature de l'accumulation capitaliste est<br />
d'éviter la concurrence grâce à<br />
l'accroissement de la taille de l'entreprise au<br />
moyen par exemple des fusions et
acquisitions, ou de l'extension interne via<br />
l'investissement. Mais, une autre stratégie,<br />
celle de favoriser les interactions interentreprises<br />
(M. Perry, 1999) par un<br />
développement horizontal (association de<br />
petites structures complémentaires) permet<br />
de palier à la petite taille des entreprises.<br />
Plusieurs types de réseaux d’entreprises : les<br />
districts industriels, les milieux innovateurs,<br />
les grappes d’entreprises (clusters) ont<br />
émergé depuis une vingtaine d’années, avec<br />
le modèle des districts italiens.<br />
La Roumanie tente d'intégrer cette dimension.<br />
Elle a participé, par exemple, au projet<br />
européen OMNI-NET (Opto-Micro-Nano<br />
Innovative Network Exploiting<br />
Transversality) coordonné par Opticsvalley<br />
(le réseau des acteurs de l'optique, de<br />
l'électronique et du logiciel en Ile de France)<br />
de décembre 2005 à mai 2008, dans le cadre<br />
du programme « Europe Innova » de la<br />
Commission européenne. L’objectif principal<br />
du projet était de favoriser le développement<br />
de coopérations entre 6 réseaux européens<br />
dans les domaines de l'optique, de la microélectronique<br />
et des nanotechnologies, et de<br />
lancer des coopérations technologiques au<br />
niveau européen.<br />
La mobilisation des acteurs publics, comme<br />
privés, dans la mise en place de réseaux est<br />
jugée essentielle afin de donner aux<br />
entreprises l'accès à de nouveaux marchés, à<br />
des équipements, ressources ou<br />
infrastructures, … Le phénomène cluster est<br />
présent dans de nombreux pays occidentaux<br />
mais aussi au Sud (Brésil et Inde notamment).<br />
Les entreprises ne pourront bien tirer leur<br />
épingle du jeu relativement à la<br />
mondialisation qu’en se positionnant ainsi au<br />
cœur des réseaux, qui sont une source<br />
d’innovation.<br />
117<br />
Conclusion :<br />
Le secteur privé connait un véritable<br />
dynamisme caractérisé par l'évolution<br />
positive du nombre de créations d'entreprise<br />
ainsi que la mise en place de politiques<br />
industrielles favorables aux entreprises.<br />
Cependant, la Roumanie souffre encore d'un<br />
retard par rapport à d'autres pays en transition<br />
de la région, tels que la Hongrie ou la<br />
Pologne. Le secteur privé souffre de la très<br />
petite taille des entreprises et surtout de la<br />
faiblesse de la densité des entreprises par<br />
rapport au nombre d'habitants. Outre la<br />
poursuite nécessaire des efforts de la<br />
Roumanie pour renforcer son secteur<br />
productif, le développement de réseaux<br />
d'entreprises peut s'avérer être une solution<br />
intéressante pour renforcer le dynamisme<br />
économique.<br />
Références<br />
Amit Raphael, Klapper Leora, Guillén Mauro<br />
F. and Quesada Juan Manuel (2007), World<br />
Bank Policy Research Working Paper,<br />
No.4313.<br />
Brown David, Earle John and Lup Dana (<br />
2004), “What Makes Small Firms Grow?<br />
Evidence from Romania”, The Institute for<br />
the Study <strong>of</strong> Labor(IZA) , Discussion Paper<br />
No. 1343; Upjohn Institute Staff Working<br />
Paper, No. 03-94, October.<br />
Chandan Lal Rohra, Mumtaz Junejo, Parkash<br />
Lal (2009), « Impact <strong>of</strong> SMEs Business on<br />
Foreign Exchange Earnings <strong>of</strong> Pakistan<br />
Through Export from Sindh », Australian<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(2):<br />
1113-1121, 2009.<br />
European Bank for Reconstruction and<br />
Development (2010) Transition Report.<br />
Hernandez Emile-Michel (2010),<br />
L'entrepreneur une approche par les<br />
compétences, éd. : ems management et<br />
société, 223 pages juin<br />
Imai Masayuki (2007), « Crise, redressement<br />
économique et perspective d'adhésion à l'UE :<br />
le cas de la Bulgarie », Cahiers de<br />
l'Association Tiers-Monde, N°22-2007.
Kermadec Claire de (2006), « Le commerce<br />
de détail en Europe : diversité et convergence<br />
des tissus commerciaux », INSEE.<br />
Labaronne Daniel (1997 ), « Les lenteurs de<br />
la privatisation en Roumanie. Une analyse du<br />
comportement des acteurs publics », Revue<br />
d'études comparatives Est-Ouest, Vol. 28, No<br />
28-1, pp101-128.<br />
Loomets Piret and Venesaar Urve (2006),<br />
« The Role <strong>of</strong> Entrepreneurship in Economic<br />
Development and Implications for SME<br />
Policy in Estonia », Paper presented to the<br />
14th Nordic Conference on Small Business<br />
Research, May 11-13, Stockholm, Sweden.<br />
Neault Emilia (2007), « Market research:<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> the organizational<br />
development process implementation within<br />
Romanian SMEs », www.soluk.org/files/SMEsRomania%20-<br />
%20Emilia%20Neault.doc.<br />
Perry Martin (1999), Small firms and<br />
Network Economies, Routledge.<br />
Petrosyan Anna and Szabó Antal (2006),<br />
« Small and medium-sized enterprises in the<br />
Caucasian countries in transition », Asia<br />
Europe Journal, Vol. 5, No 1, pp 115-132.<br />
118<br />
Russu Corneliu ( 2006), « La Contribution<br />
des Investissements Étrangers à la<br />
Restructuration Industrielle en Roumanie »,<br />
Institutul Naţional de Cercetări Economice,<br />
Centrul de Economia Industriei şi Serviciilor,<br />
Calea 13, Septembrie Nr.13, Sector 5,<br />
Bucureşti Vol. LVIII, No. 2/2006, pp 1-8.<br />
Shelburne Robert C. ( 2007), the economic<br />
situation and outlook in mid-2007 for the<br />
UNECE economies - Europe, North America<br />
and the CIS, United Nations Economic<br />
Commission for Europe, Geneva, Switerland,<br />
dicussion paper series, No. 2007.3, June<br />
2007.<br />
United Nations Economic Commission for<br />
Europe, Geneva, Switerland (2005), Some<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> recent trade developments in<br />
south-east Europe, discussion paper series,<br />
No. 2005.6 December.<br />
Wild Gérard (2001), Economie de la<br />
transition : le dossier, CEPII No 2001 – 08,<br />
Octobre.<br />
Nuno Castel-Branco Carlos(2003) « A<br />
Critique <strong>of</strong> SME-led Approaches to<br />
Economic Development », May.
A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH REGARDING THE MARKETING<br />
COMMUNICATION TOOLS USED IN THE ONLINE ENVIRONMENT<br />
Pop Nicolae Alexandru<br />
Academia de Studii Economice Bucureşti, Facultatea de Marketing<br />
Acatrinei Carmen<br />
Academia de Studii Economice Bucureşti, Facultatea de Administrarea Afacerilor, cu predare în limbi<br />
străine<br />
Abstract: Starting from the meaning <strong>of</strong> the communication process in marketing, the authors try to<br />
identify its role in assuring the continuity <strong>of</strong> the management process in what concerns the<br />
relationships between all the partners <strong>of</strong> the company, on the long term. An emphasis is made on the<br />
role <strong>of</strong> online communication and its tools in relationship marketing. In order to validate some <strong>of</strong><br />
the mentioned ideas the authors have chosen to undertake a qualitative marketing research among<br />
the managers <strong>of</strong> some Romanian tourism companies. The qualitative part <strong>of</strong> the study had as<br />
purpose the identification <strong>of</strong> the main tools which form the basis <strong>of</strong> the communication with the<br />
beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the touristic services, <strong>of</strong> the way in which the companies use the online<br />
communication tools for attracting, keeping and developing the long term relationships with their<br />
customers in the virtual environment. The following tools have been analyzed: websites, email<br />
marketing campaigns, e-newsletters, online advertising, search engines, sponsored links, blogs, RSS<br />
feed, social networks, forums, online discussion groups, portals, infomediaries and instant<br />
messaging. The chosen investigation method was the selective survey, the research technique –<br />
explorative interrogation and the research instrument – semi structured detailed interview, based<br />
on a conversation guide.<br />
A very important fact is the classification resulted after the respondents were requested to mention<br />
the most efficient tools for attracting customers and for maintaining the relationships with them.<br />
Although the notoriety <strong>of</strong> the online marketing tools is high, there are some tools that are known by<br />
definition, but are not used at all or are not used correctly; or are not known by definition, but are<br />
used in practice.<br />
The authors contributed by validating a performing methodology <strong>of</strong> qualitative research, a study<br />
which will open new ways and means for making the online communication tools used for touristic<br />
services in Romania more operational. It is to be mentioned that the chosen domain <strong>of</strong> application<br />
has not yet been researched within the national literature.<br />
The qualitative research results will form the basis for a quantitative study among the consumers <strong>of</strong><br />
touristic services in order to identify their opinion in what concerns the usage <strong>of</strong> online marketing<br />
tools by the tourism companies in maintaining the relationships with them.<br />
Keywords: Relationship Marketing, CRM, Online Marketing Communication, Market Research<br />
JEL Classification: M31<br />
Introduction<br />
The new communication media have<br />
registered an exponential development among<br />
the delivery - reception methods <strong>of</strong> the<br />
information between people. Marketing<br />
which is viewed as the analysis and action on<br />
the market has not remained immune to the<br />
major challenges determined by the<br />
119<br />
occurrence and development <strong>of</strong> the virtual<br />
communication – based on the internet<br />
applications. The strategic vision, that marks<br />
the evolution <strong>of</strong> contemporary marketing,<br />
assures a long term relationship between the<br />
companies and their market (Pop 2006: 36).<br />
The efficient administration <strong>of</strong> the companies<br />
moves the central focus <strong>of</strong> the marketing
action towards assuring the continuity and<br />
administration, on a long term basis, <strong>of</strong> the<br />
relationship with all the partners involved in<br />
this process.<br />
Having as target to make this activity<br />
continuous and bivalent, the company assures<br />
the success <strong>of</strong> the messages it wants to send<br />
and receive. In the modern business<br />
environment the online interaction has<br />
different multiple advantages starting from<br />
smaller costs, time efficiency for the<br />
participants, a secure transaction framework<br />
and a friendly communication environment.<br />
The knowledge and most important the usage<br />
<strong>of</strong> the online communication tools in what<br />
concerns the management <strong>of</strong> the relationships<br />
with all the stakeholders <strong>of</strong> a company must<br />
be monitored permanently by using the<br />
marketing research means.<br />
Marketing communication facilitated by<br />
the online tools<br />
The literature referring to the new marketing<br />
communication tools is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
developed in the field. A large number <strong>of</strong> the<br />
analyzed aspects start from the<br />
communication mechanism and concentrate<br />
over the management <strong>of</strong> this process<br />
according to the particularities that the digital<br />
economy imposes over the speed <strong>of</strong><br />
transmission, delivery and responses <strong>of</strong> the<br />
recipients to the messages with which they<br />
are “overwhelmed”. As a consequence, the<br />
term <strong>of</strong> online marketing is defined more<br />
clearly (Meyerson and Scarborough 2008),<br />
which not only covers the communication<br />
area, but also focuses on it. The major<br />
changes that affected the technological,<br />
legislative, social and economic environment<br />
(Smith and Taylor 2004: 216 and next)<br />
generate an entirely new face <strong>of</strong> the<br />
communication act.<br />
The Romanian reader can benefit <strong>of</strong> a<br />
systematic approach <strong>of</strong> the marketing aspect<br />
in the digital era by having access to the<br />
translated reference books in the field, such<br />
as Kotler et al. or Gay et al. (Kotler, Jian and<br />
Maesincee 2009; Gay, Charlesworth and<br />
120<br />
Esen 2009). It is requested to diminish the<br />
role <strong>of</strong> internet into communication due to the<br />
fact that this remains mainly a<br />
communication method in which”... the value<br />
is represented by the message not the nature<br />
<strong>of</strong> the transmission” (Gay, Charlesworth and<br />
Esen 2009: 389). The customization, the<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> the message or the access at<br />
request <strong>of</strong> the user, makes it easier for the<br />
message to be personalized. This fact<br />
transforms the new tools <strong>of</strong> online<br />
communication in real relationship marketing<br />
tools, the later having as purpose a long term<br />
relationship between all the stakeholders and<br />
the products, services or brands <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fering<br />
company (Gummesson 2008: 36-40).<br />
Relationship marketing, in its turn, also faced<br />
at the beginning <strong>of</strong> this millennium new<br />
developments creating a real interface for a<br />
highly anticipated field, the one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
demand holder’s reactions - representing the<br />
network marketing (Schebesch, Pop and<br />
Pelău 2010: 37-45; Bruhn and Koehler 2010;<br />
Roullet and Droulers 2010). All these<br />
developments reflect a significant change <strong>of</strong><br />
the relationship between the participants in<br />
the selling and buying acts, their<br />
transformation from receivers and senders in<br />
partners in the process satisfying the <strong>of</strong><br />
needs. The implication <strong>of</strong> the consumers in<br />
the production and distribution <strong>of</strong> the tangible<br />
goods and services, which satisfy their needs,<br />
becomes an important step in the entire<br />
process. Communication no longer belongs<br />
only to the one that <strong>of</strong>fers, it sometimes even<br />
takes place without involving that person,<br />
having unexpected effects on the act <strong>of</strong><br />
selling and purchasing (Trusov, Bucklin and<br />
Pauwels 2009: 90-102).<br />
Once the global coordinates <strong>of</strong> the online<br />
strategy are settled, it is necessary to carefully<br />
select the communication and promotion<br />
tools because the moment a user accesses a<br />
company’s website, he / she can be an actual<br />
or a potential customer.<br />
The online marketing mix (Adler 2010: 14)<br />
includes plenty <strong>of</strong> components and requires<br />
the following steps: planning, implementation
and control. During the planning phase there<br />
are established the tools that will be used and<br />
the channels through which they will become<br />
operational. The most well known and used<br />
tools are the: websites, emails, e-newsletters,<br />
search engines, sponsored links, blogs, RSS<br />
feds, social networks, forums and online<br />
discussion groups, portals, infomediaries and<br />
instant messaging (Pantea and Vegheş 2008:<br />
202). The implementation phase presumes<br />
that, once the tools have been chosen,<br />
decisions related to the design, characteristics<br />
and frequency <strong>of</strong> use must be taken. During<br />
the final part, the control, the marketing<br />
activities are monitored carefully, interfering<br />
if necessary. During this step the results can<br />
be partially measured, and if necessary, the<br />
instrument can be withdrawn. Finally, the<br />
results will be measured and conclusions will<br />
be drawn for future actions.<br />
Methodological notes<br />
In order to validate some <strong>of</strong> the ideas<br />
mentioned above, it has been chosen the<br />
organisation, development and interpretation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> a qualitative research among<br />
the managers <strong>of</strong> tourism companies from<br />
Romania. The term <strong>of</strong> tourism company will<br />
be used from now on in order to refer to any<br />
travel agency / tour operator or touristic<br />
services provider, no matter if it is a hotel<br />
network (national or international), hotel,<br />
guesthouse, transport company (national or<br />
international), air travel company, railway or<br />
maritime company. The touristic services<br />
represent one <strong>of</strong> the services’ domains that<br />
are well fitted for the introduction and<br />
generalization <strong>of</strong> the online marketing<br />
communication tools. The qualitative part <strong>of</strong><br />
the research has focused on identifying the<br />
major tools that form the communication<br />
basis with the consumers <strong>of</strong> touristic services;<br />
the method in which the tourism companies<br />
from Bucharest use them or intend to use<br />
them in the future and on stating hypotheses<br />
regarding the way in which the potential<br />
customers are attracted and how the<br />
relationship with them is maintained.<br />
121<br />
The four objectives <strong>of</strong> the research (O1-O4)<br />
have focused on identifying the major virtual<br />
tools that the travel agencies use in order to<br />
attract potential customers, on the<br />
communication with the former or actual<br />
consumers <strong>of</strong> touristic services, on<br />
identifying the way in which the respective<br />
companies use the online tools and also on<br />
the reasons they are chosen for identifying<br />
their usage. The researched online marketing<br />
tools were the following: website, e-mail<br />
marketing campaigns, e-newsletter, online<br />
advertising, research engines, sponsored<br />
links, blogs, social networks, forums, online<br />
discussion groups, portals, infomediaries and<br />
instant messaging.<br />
The chosen investigation method was the<br />
selective survey, the research technique –<br />
explorative interrogation and the research<br />
instrument – semi structured detailed<br />
interview, based on a conversation guide (Pop<br />
2001: 86-87; Cătoiu et al. 2002: 207). The<br />
period when the research took place was 7-25<br />
February 2011.<br />
The main hypotheses <strong>of</strong> the research:<br />
H1. The companies operating on the tourism<br />
market in Romania use virtual marketing<br />
tools in order to attract potential customers<br />
and to maintain the relationship with the<br />
present clients.<br />
H2. The majority <strong>of</strong> online marketing tools<br />
are known and used more and more by the<br />
companies operating on the tourism market in<br />
Romania, implicitly by their managers.<br />
H3. The tourism companies use / combine<br />
certain online marketing tools in order to<br />
attract potential customers to their websites<br />
and also some online marketing tools for<br />
maintaining and developing the relationship<br />
with them, the majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents<br />
being satisfied with the results obtained after<br />
using the tools.<br />
H4. In the future, the marketing strategy <strong>of</strong><br />
the tourism companies will also include<br />
online actions for attracting customers and for<br />
maintaining the relationships with them.<br />
It has been achieved the interviewing <strong>of</strong> 18<br />
representatives <strong>of</strong> tourism companies (10
epresentatives <strong>of</strong> travel agencies, 4 hotel<br />
representatives, 3 from transportation<br />
companies and one airline company<br />
representative), these companies have an<br />
updated website and the headquarters in (or<br />
also in) Bucharest.<br />
The interview had an average length <strong>of</strong> 40<br />
minutes. The registration <strong>of</strong> the answers<br />
given by the respondents has been done by<br />
recording on magnetic tape, in case <strong>of</strong> 16<br />
companies, the rest expressing their will to<br />
answer in writing to the questions from the<br />
interview guide.<br />
The working tools that have been used to<br />
analyze and interpret the data obtained from<br />
the interviews are: content analysis (Bardin<br />
1977: 43 și next), semantic differentiation<br />
(Cătoiu et al., 2002: 152-154) and Likert<br />
scale (Plăiaş et al. 2008: 361-363).<br />
Main results obtained and their<br />
implications<br />
The presentation <strong>of</strong> the main results, obtained<br />
after analyzing and processing the data, will<br />
be done taking into account the objectives<br />
and hypothesis that formed the basis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
research:<br />
O1. Identification <strong>of</strong> the relational means and<br />
tools used by the travel agencies and touristic<br />
services providers from Romania to relate<br />
with their customers;<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents<br />
there have been noticed different views in the<br />
answers and the main problem raised by all<br />
was referring to the effects <strong>of</strong> the actual<br />
economical-financial crisis on the economy,<br />
which brought major changes in the strategy<br />
<strong>of</strong> the companies and in the way they are<br />
allocating the afferent communication budget.<br />
All the interviewed tourism companies have a<br />
website where they present their <strong>of</strong>fers, the<br />
details referring to the touristic services they<br />
provide; the website being unanimously<br />
considered very important for attracting<br />
customers. Other means <strong>of</strong> attracting<br />
customers mentioned by the company<br />
representatives were the commercial<br />
messages sent by email to the database with<br />
122<br />
customers (natural or legal persons), the<br />
company newsletters, the sponsored links and<br />
also the presence <strong>of</strong> the company on social<br />
networks.<br />
After attracting customers, the majority <strong>of</strong><br />
companies consider important to retain these<br />
customers, keeping and developing the<br />
relationship, which they have with these<br />
people who benefitted from their <strong>of</strong>fered<br />
services. One tool mentioned by all<br />
companies as being used in order to relate<br />
with the customers was the newsletter, which<br />
helps them inform the customers regarding<br />
the new <strong>of</strong>fers, promotions, projects or new<br />
events, contests or surveys. The databases for<br />
the newsletters are made mostly by legal<br />
persons, being harder to create a database<br />
with natural persons. In this category, the<br />
companies have also mentioned sending<br />
emails with a commercial content, the<br />
presence on the social networks or the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> a chat window on the website<br />
which gives the customer the possibility to<br />
contact directly a company representative.<br />
Based on these answers, H1 hypothesis is<br />
validated.<br />
O2. Identification <strong>of</strong> the degree to which the<br />
online marketing tools are known and used by<br />
the representatives <strong>of</strong> tourism companies for<br />
relating with the customers;<br />
To a very high proportion all the company<br />
representatives have stated that they know all<br />
the online marketing tools. A few <strong>of</strong> them<br />
stated that they do not know for sure what<br />
means email marketing and the difference<br />
between this tool and the newsletter; RSS<br />
feed is rather known by its name rather than<br />
the way it is used; the instant messaging was<br />
another unclear topic for some and this is<br />
why there were mentioned examples such as<br />
“Yahoo Messenger”, “Skype”, the chat<br />
window, etc. The H2 hypothesis is shown as<br />
being true.<br />
O3. Determine how travel agencies use<br />
online marketing tools and the degree <strong>of</strong><br />
satisfaction obtained after their employment;<br />
The respondents were asked how and for<br />
what purpose they use each <strong>of</strong> the online
marketing tools. Based on the answers there<br />
can seen an alignment <strong>of</strong> the views regarding<br />
the purpose and the usage methods <strong>of</strong> the<br />
online tools: the website is in general the first<br />
contact <strong>of</strong> an internet user, potential or<br />
present customer, with the company, in the<br />
virtual environment; this is why it is very<br />
important to manage it correctly and to keep<br />
it functioning in a proper way, the website<br />
being used for presenting the company, its<br />
<strong>of</strong>fers and important news; email marketing<br />
and e-newsletters: these two concepts have<br />
been confused a lot by the representatives<br />
during the interviews, in terms <strong>of</strong> their<br />
purpose and <strong>of</strong> the way they are used; thus<br />
based on the answers <strong>of</strong> the respondents, we<br />
can state the fact that there is a disaccord<br />
between the theoretic definition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
concepts and their practical use by the<br />
tourism companies; though both tools have<br />
been recognized by the company<br />
representatives as being used for attracting<br />
customers and also for maintaining the<br />
relationship with them; search engines: all<br />
the respondents consider vital for their<br />
company to be shown among the first results<br />
after generating a search, their website to<br />
appear on the first pages <strong>of</strong> the search engines<br />
after the customers introduce some key terms;<br />
sponsored links: all their users (one third <strong>of</strong><br />
the respondents) declared themselves to be<br />
very satisfied with the number <strong>of</strong> viewers<br />
attracted to the website by the sponsored links<br />
that appear mostly on the search engines;<br />
blogs: the providers <strong>of</strong> tourism services do<br />
not have company blogs, but intend to use<br />
this tool in the future; RSS feed: none <strong>of</strong> the<br />
respondents mentioned this tool among the<br />
ones their company is using; social networks:<br />
no matter if it was a travel agency or a<br />
touristic services provider, all <strong>of</strong> the<br />
respondents acknowledged the growing<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> the social networks; forums<br />
and online discussion groups: none <strong>of</strong> the<br />
participating companies has an integrated<br />
forum in the company’s website, only one<br />
third <strong>of</strong> the respondent companies <strong>of</strong>fer their<br />
customers the possibility to add comments on<br />
123<br />
their websites; portals and infomediaries:<br />
only <strong>of</strong> few <strong>of</strong> the company representatives<br />
that stated their opinion believe that these<br />
tools can help in attracting customers, but less<br />
for maintaining the relationship; instant<br />
messaging: all the company representatives<br />
that use instant messaging stated that they use<br />
this tool for attracting new customers and for<br />
maintaining the relationship with them,<br />
though only approximately 30% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
customers who have benefitted from touristic<br />
services contact the company afterwards.<br />
All the company representatives declared<br />
themselves satisfied and very satisfied <strong>of</strong> the<br />
results obtained after using online marketing<br />
tools in order to attract customers or maintain<br />
the relationship with them; hypothesis H3 is<br />
confirmed.<br />
O4. Identification <strong>of</strong> the companies’ future<br />
steps / strategies in terms <strong>of</strong> the relationship<br />
with their customers;<br />
The same as it was until now, in the future the<br />
marketing strategies will have as a core<br />
concept the customer and all the company’s<br />
actions will take place around him. Managing<br />
the relationships with the customers will be a<br />
mix between the attraction and loyalty<br />
methods using traditional tools, the well<br />
established online ones and also the “new”<br />
online tools (social networks, blogs which<br />
might be used to interact with the customers).<br />
Hypothesis H4 is validated, the respondents<br />
being certain about their need to maintain the<br />
relationship with the customers in the online<br />
environment, without ignoring or substituting<br />
the <strong>of</strong>fline actions.<br />
Conclusions, limits and future directions <strong>of</strong><br />
research<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> the interviews it has been<br />
established that from the online marketing<br />
tools presented to the respondents, only three<br />
<strong>of</strong> them are used just for attracting customers<br />
(the search engines, the online advertising<br />
and the sponsored links), the others being<br />
used in the same time for attracting<br />
customers and maintaining or developing the<br />
relationship with them (website, email
marketing, e-newsletter, blog, RSS feed,<br />
social networks, forums, online discussion<br />
groups, portals, infomediaries and instant<br />
messaging). Of a major importance is the<br />
classification resulted after the respondents<br />
were requested to mention the most efficient<br />
tools for customer attraction and maintenance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the relationship with them. As a result, the<br />
most efficient online marketing tools for<br />
attracting customers are: company’s website,<br />
search engines, sponsored links, enewsletters,<br />
email marketing, social<br />
networks, online advertising; and for<br />
maintaining the relationship with the<br />
customers: the website, e-newsletters, email<br />
marketing, social networks and instant<br />
messaging.<br />
Despite the fact that the notoriety <strong>of</strong> the<br />
online marketing tools is high, there are some<br />
tools that are not known as a concept, that are<br />
not used at all or not used properly; or are<br />
known as a concept, but used in a wrong<br />
manner in practice. Though the term <strong>of</strong><br />
infomediaries is specific for the tourism<br />
market, the ones in the business do not know<br />
its definition, but they know how it works.<br />
The term <strong>of</strong> instant messaging was also not<br />
very clear, being necessary to give examples;<br />
RSS feed tool is known better by name rather<br />
than implementation. The biggest problem is<br />
the confusion that appeared during the<br />
interviews between two tools highly used by<br />
the companies, email marketing and enewsletter.<br />
The difference between these two<br />
concepts was presented in a previous work <strong>of</strong><br />
the authors (Pantea and Pop 2010: 738-739).<br />
The exploratory research is recommended in<br />
case it is wanted the better understanding <strong>of</strong> a<br />
certain phenomenon, in comparison with the<br />
descriptive or causal research which is chosen<br />
for testing specific hypotheses or for studying<br />
the differences between variables (Malhotra<br />
and Briks 2007: 201 and next). The limits <strong>of</strong><br />
the present qualitative research are<br />
represented by the fact that it had an<br />
exploratory character aiming to understand<br />
what happens inside the studied field and to<br />
124<br />
study the social phenomena without “explicit<br />
outcomes” (Schutt 2009: 344 and next).<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the present qualitative research<br />
will form the basis for a quantitative study<br />
among the consumers in order to determine<br />
their opinion related to the way the online<br />
marketing tools are used by the tourism<br />
companies.<br />
This article is a result <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
“Doctoral Program and PhD Students in<br />
the education research and innovation<br />
triangle”. This project is co funded by<br />
European Social Fund through The Sectorial<br />
Operational Programme for Human<br />
Resources Development 2007-2013,<br />
coordinated by The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong><br />
Economic Studies.<br />
References<br />
1.Adler, Max. A Study <strong>of</strong> Marketing and<br />
Online Marketing Tools which Improve<br />
Online Success. Norderstedt: Grin Verlag,<br />
2010.<br />
2.Bardin, Laurence. L’Analyse de contenu.<br />
Paris: Presses Universitaires de France,<br />
1977.<br />
3.Bruhn, Manfred and Koehler, Richard. Wie<br />
Marken wirken. Impulse aus der<br />
Neurooekonomie fuer die Markenfuehrung.<br />
Munchen: Vahlen Verlag, 2010.<br />
4.Cătoiu, Iacob (coord.). Cercetări de<br />
marketing. București: Uranus, 2002.<br />
5.Gay, Richard, Charlesworth, Alan and<br />
Esen, Rita. Marketing on-line. O abordare<br />
orientată spre client. Bucureşti: All, 2009.<br />
6.Gummesson, Evert. Total Relationship<br />
Marketing. Third Edition. Amsterdam:<br />
Elsevier, 2008.<br />
7.Kotler, Philip, Jian, Dipak and Maesincee,<br />
Suvit. Marketing in era digitala. Bucuresti:<br />
Meteor, 2009.<br />
8.Malhotra, Naresh and Birks, David.<br />
Marketing research: An applied Approach.<br />
Third Edition. Harlow: Prentice Hall, 2007.<br />
9.Meyerson, Mitch and Scarborough, Mary.<br />
Mastering Online Marketing. Canada:<br />
Entrepreneur Media, 2008.
10.Pantea, Carmen and Pop, Nicolae. ”Email<br />
marketing campaigns: the easiest path from<br />
organizations to consumers – an exploratory<br />
assessment.” Analele Universităţii din<br />
Oradea – Fascicula Ştiinţe Economice TOM<br />
XIX 1(2010): 737-742.<br />
11.Pantea, Carmen and Vegheş, Călin.<br />
”Romanian consumers’ view on using online<br />
marketing tools in building and managing<br />
customer relations.” International<br />
Conference on Business Excellence, Braşov,<br />
publicat în Special issue <strong>of</strong> Review <strong>of</strong><br />
Management and Economical Engineering<br />
VII, 6(2008): 201-204.<br />
12.Plăiaş, Ioan (coord.). Cercetări de<br />
marketing. Cluj-Napoca: Risoprint, 2008.<br />
13.Pop, Nicolae. ”O nouă paradigmă în<br />
marketingul contemporan: marketingul<br />
relațional.” Management & Marketing I,<br />
3(2006): 33-44.<br />
14.Pop, Nicolae. Marketing. Bucureşti:<br />
Didactică şi Pedagogică, 2001.<br />
125<br />
15.Roullet, Bernard and Droulers, Olivier.<br />
Neuromarketing. Le marketing revisite par<br />
les neurosciences du consomateur. Paris:<br />
DUNOD, 2010.<br />
16.Schebesch, Klauss, Pop Nicolae and<br />
Pelău, Corina. ”Marketing computational – o<br />
noua paradigma in marketingul<br />
contemporan.” Revista Romana de<br />
Marketing 1(2010): 37-45.<br />
17.Schutt, Russel. Investigating the Social<br />
World. The Process and Practice <strong>of</strong> Research.<br />
Sixth Edition. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge<br />
Press, 2009.<br />
18.Smith, Paul and Taylor, Jonathan.<br />
Marketing communications: An integrated<br />
approach.Forth Edition. Londra: Kogan Page<br />
Ltd., 2004.<br />
19.Trusov, Michael, Bucklin, Randolph and<br />
Pauwels, Koen. ”Effect <strong>of</strong> Word-<strong>of</strong>-Mouth<br />
versus Traditional Marketing.” Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Marketing LXXIII, 5(2009): 90-102.
126
Section International Business and European Integration:<br />
Sub-section: International Business
THE IMPACT OF THE CRISIS ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE AND SOLUTIONS<br />
TO REDUCE THE CRISIS EFFECTS. CASE STUDY: ROMANIA<br />
Meşter Liana<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />
Bugnar Nicoleta<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />
Fora Andreea<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />
Abstract: The economic crisis creates a series <strong>of</strong> consequences such as loss <strong>of</strong> jobs, reducing<br />
wages, insecurity <strong>of</strong> the population, reducing standard <strong>of</strong> living, material hardships, low selfconfidence<br />
and hope for the better, illnesses, altered human relationships, social protests, ever<br />
greater scale strikes, in other words, deterioration <strong>of</strong> the economic environment.<br />
This paper aims to identify possible solutions to improve the effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis on the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
life, based on figures from surveys conducted by research firms and the possible correlations to be<br />
made between these dates, without attempting to consider that these solutions are unique or the<br />
best. The main indicators considered for identifying the negative aspects <strong>of</strong> the crisis among the<br />
population are: the evolution <strong>of</strong> unemployment, changes in gross domestic product or wage<br />
developments in the economy and the share <strong>of</strong> expenditure linked to the basic needs out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
income earned. Regarding the possible solutions to reduce the population crisis, they are closely<br />
related to the credit and monetary policy, and also to the budgetary policy.<br />
Under the impact <strong>of</strong> the economic crisis, the business environment in Romania has suffered. Sub<br />
impactul crizei economice, mediul de afaceri din Romania a avut de suferit. Since most investments<br />
in 2008 were <strong>of</strong> foreign origin, the fact that this crisis has affected Romania as well did not surprise<br />
anyone. Nowadays Romania's business climate is characterized by lack <strong>of</strong> direct foreign<br />
investments and self funding sources whereas the population declares itself in a large proportion –<br />
more than 50% - to be affected by the crisis (1).<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis can also be observed in the evolution <strong>of</strong> consumers’ behavior who fearing<br />
lay<strong>of</strong>fs and declining revenue, not only turned to buying the same products or to purchase cheaper<br />
products, but also to reducing the amount <strong>of</strong> the purchased products.The quality <strong>of</strong> social life is<br />
essential and strongly related to stimulating economic activity.Satisfaction felt by the consumer will<br />
determine the level <strong>of</strong> consumption and will influence and ultimately decide the supply level. An<br />
adequate economic policy in Romania to restore the balance between supply and demand in the<br />
market may induce a state <strong>of</strong> economic recovery. This should be the objective <strong>of</strong> anti-crisis policies.<br />
Keywords: crisis, quality <strong>of</strong> life, unemployment rate, gross domestic product, wages rate, social<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> life, economic environment<br />
JEL: F41, F41, J17<br />
1. The quality <strong>of</strong> life in the current crisis<br />
The direct impact <strong>of</strong> the crisis on the<br />
population leads to altered social conditions<br />
<strong>of</strong> life. A social indicator for the economic<br />
crisis assessment is the evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
unemployment rate. Given the systemic<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> the global economy, the problems<br />
the U.S. economy was confronted with were<br />
129<br />
felt and widespread in Europe and, <strong>of</strong> course,<br />
on other continents as well. If in 2007, the<br />
improvement <strong>of</strong> the economic conditions,<br />
those <strong>of</strong> the labour market included, resulted<br />
in an employment rate <strong>of</strong> the labour force at<br />
European level <strong>of</strong> 68% and a decrease in the<br />
unemployment rate up to 7% unemployment<br />
rate, in 2009 the unemployment rate<br />
increased by 2.2 percent, reaching 11% in
2010, and the employment rate decreased by<br />
2.5% in the EU.<br />
Another relevant indicator is the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
the gross domestic product. In 2009 as<br />
compared to the year 2008, the GDP<br />
decreased by 4.1% for the euro area and by<br />
4.3% on average for the 27 European<br />
countries.<br />
Inevitably, the economic crisis effects were<br />
felt in Romania as well. Studies have shown<br />
that, given the global recession, the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> bankruptcy cases has increased<br />
significantly up to the half <strong>of</strong> the year 2009.<br />
In Romania, for instance, the number <strong>of</strong><br />
bankruptcies increased by 27% during 2008-<br />
2009, although 2008 had been a record year<br />
in this respect - for companies in Romania<br />
bankruptcies nearly doubled in 2008<br />
compared to 2007 and most <strong>of</strong> them were in<br />
the trade. Moreover, there are a number <strong>of</strong><br />
sectors affected strongly by bankruptcy:<br />
trade, distribution, wood and wood products<br />
manufacture (412 cases), transport (causes:<br />
the increase <strong>of</strong> fuel prices, which led to the<br />
insolvency <strong>of</strong> small carriers) construction,<br />
textile, manufacturing, hospitality sector<br />
(causes: poor competitiveness, lack <strong>of</strong><br />
qualified personnel, poor management<br />
strategy) the catering and automotive<br />
industry, the areas with the lowest risk,<br />
where they recorded the fewest cases <strong>of</strong><br />
insolvency, are producing and supplying<br />
electricity and heat, water and gas,<br />
metallurgy, financial intermediation ,<br />
telecommunications and IT. For example, in<br />
Romania since 2008, the number <strong>of</strong><br />
payments made under conditions <strong>of</strong><br />
insolvency has increased the production<br />
twice and three times that <strong>of</strong> wholesale and<br />
retail trade, construction and only in the<br />
construction industry were recorded 10 or<br />
more payments in circumstances <strong>of</strong><br />
insolvency.<br />
In Romania, the crisis in the construction<br />
sector has caused problems to companies in<br />
the wood industry, leading to lower orders<br />
and financial difficulties among companies<br />
in the forest administration. The annual<br />
130<br />
review <strong>of</strong> working time evolution also<br />
revealed that the length <strong>of</strong> the workweek<br />
reflected a clear distinction among the 27:<br />
only 13 <strong>of</strong> the EU countries had working<br />
weeks longer than the EU average. The<br />
longer working week was recorded in<br />
Romania, where full time employees were<br />
working, on average, about 41.8 hours a<br />
week.<br />
Regarding the evolution <strong>of</strong> wages between<br />
2008 and 2007, all EU countries have<br />
recorded increases in average wages agreed<br />
in collective agreements. However, the surge<br />
in inflation rate has reduced the wages rise<br />
set in the collective agreements, from 3.6%<br />
in 2007 to 1.3% in 2008 in real terms. In<br />
countries where real wages have still<br />
continued to grow (and for Romania),<br />
increases were much lower in 2008 than in<br />
2007.<br />
It is obvious that there are differences and<br />
similarities between Member States in<br />
Europe. Yet the satisfaction levels vary<br />
significantly among social groups: people<br />
with higher incomes, better health status,<br />
secure jobs and higher levels <strong>of</strong> education<br />
are generally more satisfied with their lives.<br />
Although Bulgaria and Romania have a<br />
similar GDP per capita, the level <strong>of</strong><br />
satisfaction in Romania is much higher than<br />
in Bulgaria. Consequently, there is no<br />
proportional relationship between national<br />
income and level <strong>of</strong> satisfaction. 70% <strong>of</strong> EU<br />
citizens have a dwelling, and nearly half <strong>of</strong><br />
them hold it definitively, without any<br />
mortgage or loan. The proportion <strong>of</strong> people<br />
with home ownership is much higher in<br />
countries <strong>of</strong> Central and Eastern Europe<br />
where, on average, 74% <strong>of</strong> citizens have<br />
total ownership <strong>of</strong> the housing, the highest<br />
proportion being recorded in Romania (87%)<br />
-this high percentage <strong>of</strong> ownership does not<br />
translate into a higher quality <strong>of</strong> housing.<br />
The recession <strong>of</strong> 2008 has fundamentally<br />
changed the living conditions <strong>of</strong> many<br />
European citizens, causing for Romania a<br />
decline <strong>of</strong> the possibilities to provide the<br />
basic needs: adequate warming <strong>of</strong> the house,
an annual holiday, new furniture to replace<br />
old furniture, a meal that includes meat,<br />
chicken or fish every other day, new clothes<br />
and means <strong>of</strong> taking care <strong>of</strong> guests at home a<br />
meal that includes meat, chicken or fish<br />
every other day, new clothes and means <strong>of</strong><br />
taking care <strong>of</strong> guests at home - from 30% in<br />
2007 to 26% in 2009, significant differences<br />
being perceived throughout the country as<br />
well: 25% <strong>of</strong> the poorest people lack four <strong>of</strong><br />
six items, while a percentage <strong>of</strong> 25% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
wealthiest citizens t lack only one element.<br />
In Turkey, the Former Yugoslav Republic <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary,<br />
Lithuania, Slovakia and Latvia, 25% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
richest people suffer from many<br />
131<br />
shortcomings than the poorest 25% in<br />
Denmark, Sweden, Luxembourg and the<br />
Netherlands.<br />
There is an obvious downward trend in<br />
Europe from 2007 to 2009 in nearly all states<br />
regarding the satisfaction with the level <strong>of</strong><br />
living. In Romania, this trend is sudden, the<br />
largest decline in satisfaction with the level<br />
<strong>of</strong> living were recorded among people <strong>of</strong> 65<br />
or more who have suffered the greatest<br />
decrease in quality <strong>of</strong> life in general as a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> the fall in the purchasing power <strong>of</strong><br />
pensions.<br />
Regarding the evolution <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong><br />
jobs, it is shown in the following table (table<br />
no. 1):<br />
Table no. 1 Jobs lost and created by sectors in 2009-2010<br />
Fields <strong>of</strong> activity Nr. jobs lost / created<br />
Automobile production -70377<br />
Financial intermediation -57417<br />
Public administration and defence -46802<br />
Trade -44621<br />
Machinery and equipment production -42545<br />
Post and telecommunications -35452<br />
Metallurgy -23770<br />
Road transport -22712<br />
Electric equipment production -21358<br />
Food and drink production -20466<br />
Financial intermediation 6215<br />
Computer and related activities 6470<br />
Coal Mining 7650<br />
Other economic activities 8592<br />
Post and telecommunications 8860<br />
Electricity, gas and hot water supply 11510<br />
Automobile production 12744<br />
Public administration and defence 13999<br />
Hotels and restaurants 22220<br />
Retail 47157<br />
Source: adapted from http://www.eur<strong>of</strong>ound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2010/16/ro/1/EF1016RO.pdf.<br />
The Romanian economy has lost more than<br />
370,000 jobs over the last year. In late 2009,<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> employees had fallen from<br />
4.73 million jobs to 4.36 million. 40% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
jobs lost in 2009 belonged to the<br />
construction and industry field. At the end <strong>of</strong><br />
2009, the number <strong>of</strong> employees fell from<br />
4.73 million jobs to 4.36 million. 40% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
jobs lost in 2009 and belonged to the<br />
construction industry. After 2005, over a
third <strong>of</strong> the new jobs have been created by<br />
the state, and personnel costs incurred by<br />
public money have doubled the budget. The<br />
fact is that the missing 370,000 jobs by the<br />
end <strong>of</strong> 2009 equal the number <strong>of</strong> jobs created<br />
in five years <strong>of</strong> economic boom.<br />
2. Anti-crisis solutions:<br />
There are a number <strong>of</strong> protectionist measures<br />
to be found in the specialized literature<br />
meant to diminish the effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis. -<br />
In his book Après la démocratie, Emmanuel<br />
Todd (2), considers that when confronted<br />
with the "brutality" <strong>of</strong> the crisis and <strong>of</strong> the<br />
unemployment rise, more and more people<br />
were in favour <strong>of</strong> the strengthening <strong>of</strong><br />
protectionist measures, starting with a form<br />
<strong>of</strong> "European protectionism "done in the<br />
name <strong>of</strong>" a necessary correspondence<br />
between economic and social spaces. " This<br />
solution is proposed taking into account the<br />
fact that rising wages will encourage<br />
consumers to absorb more <strong>of</strong> the market<br />
<strong>of</strong>fered, resulting therefore in real<br />
possibilities <strong>of</strong> production relaunching.<br />
Michel Aglietta (3) believes that, given the<br />
current crisis, the adoption <strong>of</strong> protectionist<br />
measures could be a factor that deepens the<br />
crisis and brings along the risk <strong>of</strong> damaging<br />
relations between states, this claim is based<br />
on the fact that a concerted international<br />
action is absolutely necessary for successful<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> existing measures to halt<br />
the crisis. Even if the European<br />
protectionism helped the economies <strong>of</strong><br />
European countries in fighting against the<br />
international market, there are factors that<br />
hinder the adoption and implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
protectionist measures in the EU domestic<br />
policy, factors resulting from the differences<br />
between the economic development <strong>of</strong> EU<br />
countries.<br />
Michel Aglietta believes that Europe has<br />
been pr<strong>of</strong>oundly affected during this period<br />
<strong>of</strong> crisis (4) because <strong>of</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> a<br />
robust and well-based industrial policy, and<br />
also due to the promotion <strong>of</strong> a clear policy<br />
against competition coming from outside the<br />
132<br />
EU. In this context, the research and<br />
development policies remain the national<br />
ones, generating an unnecessary competition<br />
between companies from different EU<br />
countries, a process also exacerbated by<br />
political sensitivities between countries; EU<br />
holds its own responsibility because it<br />
supported the fight for the dominant position<br />
in the EU through protectionist measures<br />
against other areas, America, Asia, this<br />
European protectionism preventing firms<br />
from moving towards the development <strong>of</strong><br />
extra-European activities. –<br />
Referring to the book written by Emmanuel<br />
Todd, Daniel Bensaïd asks in his article<br />
"Keynes et après? (5) "to protect? whom<br />
and against whom? If Europe started by<br />
adopting social measures <strong>of</strong> convergence in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> jobs, income, social protection,<br />
labour rights, harmonization <strong>of</strong> taxation, then<br />
Europe might legitimize the adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
protective measures and not the interests <strong>of</strong><br />
selfish industrialists and those in the<br />
financial environment whom it favours."<br />
Europe could help the developed countries in<br />
supporting the joint development through<br />
agreements with less developed countries in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> migration, technical cooperation,<br />
fair trade. Without these measures, he<br />
believes, the protectionism <strong>of</strong> the rich would<br />
have negative consequences upon these<br />
developing countries as main effects.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the measures put forward in order to<br />
reduce the impact <strong>of</strong> the crises upon the<br />
European Union countries, is a European<br />
economic recovery plan (6), which has<br />
proposed to come not only with supporting<br />
solutions for EU countries, but also practical<br />
help in this regard.<br />
Thus, the plan devised at the European level<br />
aims at using all available means and<br />
instruments <strong>of</strong> action at EU and national<br />
level; it is a plan meant ultimately to lead to<br />
economic growth and creating jobs by means<br />
<strong>of</strong> the objectives to promote economic<br />
recovery and that lead, ultimately, to<br />
economic growth and creating jobs.
The strategic objectives <strong>of</strong> the Recovery<br />
Plan were:<br />
- stimulate demand and consumer<br />
confidence;<br />
- harmonization <strong>of</strong> market conditions with<br />
the requirements in terms <strong>of</strong> competitiveness<br />
by stimulating economic growth and new<br />
jobs;<br />
- stimulate economic activity without<br />
affecting the environment security.<br />
To achieve these objectives, there were<br />
proposed concrete measures that can be<br />
implemented in the economies <strong>of</strong> EU<br />
countries with the aid provided by EU<br />
institutions.<br />
The monetary and credit policy - is vital<br />
when in crisis and must be managed<br />
carefully by the bank that carries it out - the<br />
European Central Bank ECB. In this respect,<br />
the ECB has created a drop in euro zone<br />
interest rates to stabilize the markets by<br />
lending money to supply banks with cash to<br />
help their clients. Similarly, the European<br />
Investment Bank EIB will increase by about<br />
15 billion its annual interventions in the EU<br />
countries' economies by providing loans to<br />
positively influence and lead these national<br />
economy out <strong>of</strong> recession whereas the<br />
European Bank for Reconstruction and<br />
Development will help the new Member<br />
States with 500 million per year to get out <strong>of</strong><br />
recession and to start the economic recovery.<br />
Budget policy – within the national budgets<br />
for 2009, and then for 2010 there were<br />
measures to be taken requiring an amount <strong>of</strong><br />
approx. 170 billion or 1.2% <strong>of</strong> GDP at EU<br />
level so as to produce positive effects, and,<br />
if possible, long term ones: to boost<br />
purchasing power <strong>of</strong> consumers by<br />
improving the functionality <strong>of</strong> market<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> emergency measures to<br />
strengthen the link between wage-fixing<br />
mechanism and the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
productivity, employment policy supporting<br />
and facilitating labour market transitions,<br />
reducing administrative costs.<br />
For blurring effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis on global<br />
business environment, the Government<br />
133<br />
Strategy for improving the business<br />
environment 2010-2011 proposes a number<br />
<strong>of</strong> measures to be implemented with minimal<br />
cost: restoring flows <strong>of</strong> foreign capital,<br />
promoting responsible business conduct,<br />
reduce trade costs and providing national<br />
consulting firms to solve the crisis.<br />
The government provides a series <strong>of</strong> actions<br />
aimed at:<br />
- improving the dialogue by creating publicprivate<br />
consultations designed to ensure<br />
greater transparency in the regulations;<br />
- supporting the business environment by<br />
encouraging freelance pr<strong>of</strong>essions;<br />
- developing the cooperation with<br />
specialized departments <strong>of</strong> the central<br />
government institutions.<br />
The EU has published recommendations in<br />
individual reports on each Member State to<br />
achieve the objectives <strong>of</strong> the annual package<br />
"Lisbon". These recommendations have as a<br />
major priority the protection <strong>of</strong> the European<br />
citizens regarding the consequences <strong>of</strong> the<br />
financial crisis and the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
several policies such as integration,<br />
retraining, valuation <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
competencies, especially in what the<br />
licensed unemployed workers are concerned.<br />
Conclusions:<br />
Many economists, coming from different<br />
socio-cultural spaces, aim at finding further<br />
reforms for getting out the crisis. Their<br />
dilemma lies in the fact that I cannot answer<br />
exactly to what extent the preservation <strong>of</strong><br />
capitalist structures, as they were promoted<br />
through the writings <strong>of</strong> the interwar<br />
reformers can still be possible under current<br />
conditions. For Romania, the confidence in<br />
overcoming the crisis is still, the lowest in<br />
Europe. However, the direction is positive:<br />
in 2011 the population confidence index<br />
measured by the Consumer Confidence<br />
Barometer for the European Commission has<br />
recorded an average increase compared to<br />
the average <strong>of</strong> the year 2010, reaching -46 to<br />
-54, showing the Romanians more optimistic<br />
especially at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year.
References<br />
1. *** Mednet Marketing Research<br />
Center.<br />
2. Todd, Emmanuel. Après la<br />
démocratie, Paris, Editura Gallimard,<br />
2008<br />
3. Aglietta, Michel. Quelle réforme du<br />
système monétaire international ?<br />
article published in « Alternatives<br />
Économiques » magazine, Hors-série<br />
poche, nr. 43bis, April, 2010, pg. 172<br />
134<br />
4. Aglietta, Michel. Quelle réforme du<br />
système monétaire international ?.<br />
article published in « Alternatives<br />
Économiques » magazine, Hors-série<br />
poche, nr. 43bis, April, 2010, pg.174<br />
5. Bensaïd, Daniel. Keynes et après ?,<br />
published in «Contretemps», nr. 4,<br />
March, 2010<br />
6. «Un plan européen pour la relance<br />
économique», strategic report, 2009,<br />
Luxembourg.
Section: International Business and European Integration<br />
Sub-section: EU Sustainable Economic Development and<br />
Competitiveness
POVERTY AND LIVING. ROMA POOR NEIGHBORHOODS IN ROMANIA AND<br />
HUNGARY<br />
Olah Gheorghe<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />
Olah Șerban<br />
Univerisity <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />
Flora Gavril<br />
Christian Partium University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />
Szekedi Levente<br />
Christian Partium University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />
The first part <strong>of</strong> our paper is a theoretical debate <strong>of</strong> the most important research results concerning<br />
the Roma population in Romania and Hungary, while in the second part we proceed to the<br />
interpretation <strong>of</strong> our own empirical research data.<br />
Methodologically, our research is based on sociological survey. Data concerning sociooccupational<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> Roma communities have been collected by means <strong>of</strong> a questionnaire<br />
based survey <strong>of</strong> active aged Roma population from Oradea and neighbouiring rural localities in<br />
Romania and Hungary (Oşorhei, Ineu de Criş, Biharkeresztes, Told).<br />
The paper concludes with policy reccommendations aimed at the members <strong>of</strong> the target group.<br />
This paper presents the outcome <strong>of</strong> an euroregional<br />
comparative research conducted in<br />
2010 in two neighboring border areas: Bihor<br />
(Romania) and Hajdu-Bihar (Hungary),<br />
financed by a grant awarded by the European<br />
Regional Development Fund. The first part <strong>of</strong><br />
the paper includes a theoretical overview <strong>of</strong><br />
the most important research results<br />
concerning the Roma population in Romania<br />
and Hungary, while in the second part we<br />
proceed to the analysis <strong>of</strong> our own empirical<br />
research data. Methodologically, our research<br />
is based on the sociological survey. Data<br />
concerning socio-occupational characteristics<br />
<strong>of</strong> Roma communities have been collected by<br />
means <strong>of</strong> a questionnaire based survey <strong>of</strong><br />
active aged Roma population from Oradea<br />
and neighboring rural localities in Romania<br />
and Hungary (Oşorhei, Ineu de Criş,<br />
Biharkeresztes, Told). Due to the fact that<br />
data set is very large and complex we will<br />
focus on data concerning living conditions in<br />
poor neighborhoods.<br />
137<br />
1.1. Introduction<br />
The Roma (or Gypsies) are a unique minority<br />
in Europe. Unlike other ethnic groups, they<br />
have no historical homeland and live in<br />
almost all countries in Europe and Central<br />
Asia. The origin <strong>of</strong> the Roma in Europe is<br />
widely debated. Historical documents<br />
indicate that Roma have migrated in waves<br />
from northern India to Europe between the 9 th<br />
and the 14 th century. On the other hand,<br />
historical studies show that the Roma were<br />
very much persecuted by the majority from<br />
the very beginning <strong>of</strong> their arrival in Europe.<br />
The measures taken against them ranged from<br />
hanging, drowning, reddening with iron,<br />
imprisonment, enslavement, deportation. The<br />
Western Europeans were more drastic in their<br />
measures against the Roma than the more<br />
permitting Turks, who invaded the South-<br />
East and parts <strong>of</strong> Central Europe 9 . Perhaps<br />
this explains even in today Europe a greater<br />
9 Fraser, Angus, 2010, Țiganii, Editura Humanitas,<br />
București, p. 190
concentration <strong>of</strong> Roma in the Cenral and<br />
Eastern European countries.<br />
Roma is an extremely diverse population with<br />
multiple subgroups based on language,<br />
history, religion and different occupations.<br />
While in some countries Roma are nomadic,<br />
most <strong>of</strong> them in Central and Eastern Europe<br />
have become sedentary – some <strong>of</strong> them in the<br />
days <strong>of</strong> the Ottoman rule and others in the<br />
socialist period. 10<br />
Estimating the size <strong>of</strong> the Roma population is<br />
a complicated issue. Census data are intensely<br />
disputed as many Roma do not identify<br />
themselves as Roma in surveys. On the other<br />
hand, the <strong>of</strong>ficial figures, the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />
population censuses are contradicted by other<br />
studies which aimed to estimate the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> Roma population 11 . Some estimates show<br />
that the number <strong>of</strong> Roma increased up to 6<br />
and 9 percent in Bulgaria, Macedonia,<br />
Slovakia and Romania. These percentages<br />
may increase for the foreseeable future<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the difference between fertility<br />
rates in populations <strong>of</strong> Roma and non-Roma.<br />
Romania has the largest Roma population in<br />
Europe, estimated figures ranging from 1 to 2<br />
millions. A large Roma population (between<br />
400,000 and 1 million) lives in Hungary,<br />
Bulgaria, Slovakia, Turkey and Serbia. The<br />
largest population <strong>of</strong> Roma in Western<br />
Europe is in Spain (about 630,000), France<br />
(310,000), Germany (70,000) and Italy<br />
(130,000). In total between 7 and 9 million<br />
Roma live in Europe - a population equal to<br />
that <strong>of</strong> Sweden or Austria. 12<br />
The Roma population in Romania and<br />
Hungary has some special characteristics<br />
compared to other minorities. By tradition, it<br />
10 Ringold, Dena, Orenstein, Mitchell, Wilkens,<br />
Erika,2003, Roma in an Expanding Europe.<br />
Breaking the Poverty Cycle, The World Bank, p.1<br />
11 Preoteasa, Ana Maria, 2003, Prezentarea unei<br />
cercetări internaționale cu privire la starea<br />
romilor în Europa Centrală și de Est, in Calitatea<br />
Vieții, XIV, no.2, p.265<br />
12 Ringold, Dena, Orenstein, Mitchell, Wilkens,<br />
Erika, 2003, Roma in an Expanding Europe.<br />
Breaking the Poverty Cycle, The World Bank, p.1<br />
138<br />
is a population with a low social status,<br />
typical object <strong>of</strong> comparison as the poorest<br />
category <strong>of</strong> population and strongly exposed<br />
to discrimination and social exclusion. To<br />
these one should add other features, such as<br />
failure <strong>of</strong> modernity or difficulties <strong>of</strong><br />
identifying the exact size <strong>of</strong> the Roma<br />
population. 13<br />
Historically, the Roma population had a<br />
disadvantaged position over the centuries.<br />
While by the end <strong>of</strong> the XIX th century, Roma<br />
were slaves on the estates <strong>of</strong> Romanian or<br />
Hungarian nobles (Transylvania), in the last<br />
two centuries, this population has<br />
experienced a period <strong>of</strong> emancipation, have<br />
been <strong>of</strong>fered equal rights with the majority<br />
population and small land plots. In the<br />
socialist period the situation <strong>of</strong> Roma<br />
populations improved to some extent. These<br />
policies resulted in a relative improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
their education level and the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />
their involvement in the formal economy.<br />
However, the price they paid was forced<br />
integration and a loss <strong>of</strong> cultural specificity. 14<br />
The post-communist transition has caused<br />
many changes in the life <strong>of</strong> Roma<br />
communities. Some Roma even regret the<br />
socialist regime; even if they were not<br />
recognized as a national minority, the<br />
assimilation policies were <strong>of</strong>fering them at<br />
least some degree material safety. In contrast,<br />
the post-socialist period was full <strong>of</strong> changes<br />
and paradoxes for Roma. On one hand, it<br />
allowed the recognition <strong>of</strong> Roma identity,<br />
politically and culturally, on the other hand, it<br />
emphasized the economic and social<br />
marginalization and rejection <strong>of</strong> this<br />
community. 15<br />
In the present context, the Roma issue is not a<br />
simple one. Several economic and social<br />
factors are combined here; while the ethnic<br />
dimension <strong>of</strong> the problems can not be<br />
13 Voicu, Mălina( coordinator), 2007, Nevoi și<br />
resurse în comunitățile de romi, Soros Foundation<br />
Romania,București, 2007, p.7<br />
14 Ibidem<br />
15 Pons, Emanuelle, 1999, Țiganii din România,<br />
Editura Compania, București, p. 137
ignored, it stems to great extent from the<br />
crisis crossed by Romania and Hungary<br />
during the transition period, which has a<br />
particular effect on the Roma population.<br />
Viewed in economic terms, we can say that<br />
Roma are the poorest population in Romania<br />
and Hungary, perceiveing the economic<br />
vulnerability and social exclusion as their<br />
main problems. 16 The poverty level <strong>of</strong> this<br />
ethnic group is a combinated outcome <strong>of</strong><br />
several factors. As Marian Preda stated,<br />
poverty can be considered only a specific<br />
dimension <strong>of</strong> social exclusion, the financial<br />
one 17 . Other forms <strong>of</strong> exclusion are also<br />
involved: exclusion from the democratic and<br />
legal system, labor market exclusion,<br />
exclusion from the state welfare system,<br />
exclusion from the family and community<br />
system.<br />
According to recent research, the causal<br />
factors seem to have mainly an individual<br />
determination and to a certain extent, a<br />
cultural one, pointing to self-exclusion 18 . The<br />
economic vulnerability <strong>of</strong> Roma is thus<br />
caused by a complex <strong>of</strong> factors such as low<br />
educational and vocational training, the<br />
precarious position on the labor market, the<br />
great number <strong>of</strong> children in Roma families,<br />
their discrimination by the majority group<br />
and the involvement in the informal<br />
economy. One can speak <strong>of</strong> a vicious circle in<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> the Roma. Being poor in the vast<br />
majority, they do not have the resources to<br />
complete their educational and pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
training. Many <strong>of</strong> them not having jobs, they<br />
get involved in the informal economy, or<br />
immigrate to western countries.<br />
1.2. Roma in the sociological literature<br />
The sociological literature on the problems <strong>of</strong><br />
the Roma community is rich. The research<br />
16 Voicu, Mălina( coordinator), 2007, Nevoi și<br />
resurse în comunitățile de romi, Soros Foundation<br />
Romania,București, p.7<br />
17 Preda, Marian, 2002, Politica socială românească<br />
între sărăcie și globalizare, Editura Polirom, Iaşi, p.<br />
101<br />
18 Ibidem, p. 168<br />
139<br />
developed on the Roma communities is<br />
achieved both by quantitative and qualitative<br />
methods. Both approaches appear to have<br />
pros and cons. Quantitative methods are<br />
useful to illustrate comparisons between the<br />
populations <strong>of</strong> Roma and non-Roma, both at<br />
a national and a European level. On the other<br />
hand, information on Roma can not be<br />
regarded as the most reliable data and they<br />
are also difficult to be obtained. Due to<br />
statistical problems related to ethnic selfidentification,<br />
the quantitative research has<br />
serious limitations. However, the quantitative<br />
data provide possibilities for comparative<br />
analyses <strong>of</strong> welfare measures that can<br />
improve the elaboration and implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> social policies.<br />
While quantitative research shows that Roma<br />
poverty is distinct, it does not provide an<br />
adequate basis for understanding the specific<br />
dynamics circumscribing Roma economic<br />
vulnerability. In this field <strong>of</strong> study, qualitative<br />
research might have a higher effectiveness in<br />
identifying social processes, mechanisms and<br />
relationships between variables that are<br />
difficult to be emphasised by using<br />
exclusively quantitative methods. Qualitative<br />
research, however, has also certain<br />
disadvantages. It tends to focus on just one<br />
specific issue, focusing on a limited number<br />
<strong>of</strong> factors. That is why a combination <strong>of</strong><br />
quantitative and qualitative methods can<br />
provide a complementary set <strong>of</strong> perspectives<br />
leading to a better understanding <strong>of</strong> social<br />
problems and policies. 19<br />
A remarkable comparative research project<br />
on the Roma community in six Central and<br />
Eastern European Countries (Hungary,<br />
Bulgaria, Slovakia, Poland, Russia and<br />
Romania), both quantitative and qualitative,<br />
has been conducted between 1999 and 2000,<br />
coordinated by Ivan Szelenyi (Yale<br />
19 Ringold, Dena, Orenstein, Mitchell, Wilkens,<br />
Erika,2003, Roma in an Expanding Europe.<br />
Breaking the Poverty Cycle,The World Bank, p.4
University). 20 Some interesting<br />
methodological conclusions for the study <strong>of</strong><br />
Roma communities have been drawn. During<br />
one year, the researchers analyzed between<br />
10,000 and 19,000 Roma households. In the<br />
same time a questionnaire was applied on an<br />
oversample <strong>of</strong> Roma in Bulgaria, Hungary,<br />
Poland and Romania. The researchers have<br />
also made some qualitative studies <strong>of</strong><br />
communities in extreme poverty in these<br />
countries.<br />
In 1993 people in all countries experience a<br />
similar deterioration in living standards<br />
compared to 1988. Since 2000 the trend is a<br />
decrease <strong>of</strong> the poverty in countries that have<br />
implemented more rigorous liberal reforms,<br />
for instance Hungary and Poland, as well as<br />
in countries with slow progress to the model<br />
<strong>of</strong> liberal capitalism. 21<br />
The study revealed that transnational<br />
differences are as important as the ethnic<br />
differences. For example, Roma in Hungary<br />
are slightly poorer than non-Roma in<br />
Bulgaria. In all the countries, Roma are<br />
overrepresented in the poorest deciles <strong>of</strong><br />
population. However, most <strong>of</strong> the very poor<br />
people consist <strong>of</strong> non-Roma. There is also a<br />
significant category <strong>of</strong> Roma who has a good<br />
enough standard <strong>of</strong> living in all the countries<br />
mentioned. The conclusion <strong>of</strong> the researchers<br />
is that the Roma who have successfully<br />
maintained the traditions were more likely to<br />
avoid the trap <strong>of</strong> poverty than those<br />
assimilated to the fringes <strong>of</strong> society.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the most quoted qualitative studies in<br />
the international literature studying the Roma<br />
is the English anthropologist Michael<br />
Stewart’s, presented in “The Time <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Gypsies” (1997), a remarkable social<br />
ethnography <strong>of</strong> the Roma in the Hungarian<br />
town <strong>of</strong> Harangos, located at north <strong>of</strong><br />
Budapest, a survey using the method <strong>of</strong><br />
participatory observation. The English<br />
anthropologist developed the research<br />
20 One outcome <strong>of</strong> this research is a work entitled<br />
Poverty, Ethnicity and Gender in Transitional<br />
Society (2002).<br />
21 Ibidem, p.9<br />
140<br />
through a field work conducted during 18<br />
months between the years 1984 and 1985.<br />
During this period he lived with his wife and<br />
children in an area called “The third class” in<br />
a Roma neighborhood <strong>of</strong> the town, a town<br />
where, according to a census <strong>of</strong> that time,<br />
around 1000 Roma lived.<br />
Until 1989 the <strong>of</strong>ficial communist policy was<br />
to integrate the Roma in the “leading” class,<br />
the communist working class. However,<br />
Roma have found ways to maintain their own<br />
identity. Michael Stewart's book examines the<br />
refusal <strong>of</strong> Roma to abandon their lifestyle and<br />
accept assimilation to the majority<br />
population. Forget, Michael Stewart warns us<br />
early in the book, about the carefree freedom<br />
<strong>of</strong> caravans and campfires. These men lived<br />
hard and brutal sometimes. They dreamed <strong>of</strong><br />
richness gained through gambling and<br />
stealing horses, but in reality were poor as a<br />
church mouse. They lived in ghettos, but their<br />
names and law argued that the Roma are<br />
working people, <strong>of</strong>ten working for low wages<br />
in industry and collective farms. And despite<br />
the marginal position and sufferings they<br />
endured they preserved the dignity and the<br />
joy <strong>of</strong> being Roma. 22<br />
Michael Stewart's book describes the<br />
cultivation, celebration and reinvention <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cultural difference and diversity <strong>of</strong> some<br />
people deemed by their superiors too stupid<br />
and uncivilized to have their own culture.<br />
Since the beginning <strong>of</strong> the Second World War<br />
there were two dramatic ways to solve the<br />
“gypsy problem”. Between 1941 and 1945,<br />
the Nazis exterminated about 500,000 Roma<br />
in their effort to clear the “degenerated” and<br />
“antisocial”way <strong>of</strong> life. Between 1957 and<br />
1989, said Stewart, a different type <strong>of</strong> anti-<br />
Gypsy campaign took place in the Eastern<br />
Europe. Nobody was made prisoner, left to<br />
die alone. Repression and discrimination did<br />
not exist in the plan <strong>of</strong> the communist<br />
reformers. But the final goal was strikingly<br />
similar to the fascist one, the Gypsies<br />
22 Michael Stewart,1997, The Time <strong>of</strong> the Gypsies,<br />
Westview Press, Colorado, p. 1
disappearance. The East European<br />
communists’ task in 1957, says the English<br />
anthropologist, was really Herculean: the<br />
cultural assimilation <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> people<br />
who had suffered discrimination for<br />
centuries. The former Yugoslavia being<br />
partially an exception, Gypsies had been<br />
subjected to a systematic campaign <strong>of</strong><br />
assimilation. Czechoslovakia, Poland, Soviet<br />
Union, Romania and Hungary pursued almost<br />
identical policies. 23<br />
The English anthropologist notes, however,<br />
that, ironically, far from being assimilated in<br />
the working class, the problems associated<br />
with the Gypsies became larger as the<br />
campaign <strong>of</strong> assimilation continued. Stewart<br />
noted that in the Hungary <strong>of</strong> the period the<br />
research was held, the Gypsy issue was given<br />
greater importance than ever, since the 1930s.<br />
Two sources led to this attitude. First there<br />
was a dramatic gap between the theory <strong>of</strong><br />
social inclusion and the reality <strong>of</strong> increasing<br />
social differentiation. The Communists told<br />
to the non-Roma that they had done much to<br />
improve the lives <strong>of</strong> Roma and their<br />
disappearance could be expected soon. But<br />
there was little evidence in this case. Two: the<br />
policies reproducted in a new form the old<br />
ideas about gypsies being “others”. The<br />
economic and social system entered into<br />
crisis in 1980s, the Gypsies otherness became<br />
clearer and more ominous.<br />
The Romanian literature on the Roma issues<br />
is related especially to the researches carried<br />
out by the Institute for Quality <strong>of</strong> Life in<br />
Bucharest. 24 The work coordinated by Elena<br />
23 Ibidem, p.5<br />
24 After 1990, a number <strong>of</strong> research papers on this<br />
area appeared: Cătălin Zamfir and Elena Zamfir,<br />
Gypsies between worry and neglect (1993), Cătălin<br />
Zamfir and Marian Preda, Roma in Romania (2002),<br />
Marian Preda, Romanian social policy between<br />
poverty and globalization (2002), Manuela<br />
Stănculescu and Ionica Berevoiescu, Poor as a<br />
church mouse, looking for another life (2004). In the<br />
work A new challenge: the social development<br />
(2006), coordinated by Cătălin Zamfir and Laura<br />
Stoica, there is a chapter signed by the sociologist<br />
141<br />
and Cătălin Zamfir, Gypsies between worry<br />
and neglect (1993) can be regarded as the<br />
first and perhaps the most extensive analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> the problems <strong>of</strong> Roma in Romania, based<br />
on a quantitative research on a representative<br />
sample <strong>of</strong> Roma households. In this book a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> issues concerning the Roma are<br />
considered, such as housing, education,<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essions and occupations, family and<br />
living conditions <strong>of</strong> the children.<br />
Nine features are invoked - social-economic<br />
trends <strong>of</strong> the Roma population - which have<br />
an overwhelming effect on their their<br />
opportunities: decreased access to jobs<br />
<strong>of</strong>fered by the modern economy, labor market<br />
niches that Roma have a special access<br />
(traditional pr<strong>of</strong>essions, businesses on their<br />
own, unskilled jobs), precarious and uncertain<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> many economic resources<br />
traditionally exploited by the Roma, marginal<br />
or even deviant exploitation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
community, increasing crime, its organized<br />
character and violence, antagonizing relations<br />
between the majority population and Roma<br />
population, the number <strong>of</strong> children, poor<br />
housing conditions and migration to cities<br />
and the risk <strong>of</strong> “pockets” <strong>of</strong> poverty and<br />
chronic juvenile with a strong ethnic coloring.<br />
The conclusion <strong>of</strong> the whole analysis is that<br />
the Roma population faces serious social and<br />
economic crisis. The traditional life strategies<br />
provide only the chance <strong>of</strong> survival in this<br />
crisis, but not for its overcoming.<br />
1.3. Living in poor areas<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> the poor areas as living<br />
spaces is an integral part <strong>of</strong> any discourse on<br />
new poverty and its focus on clearly defined<br />
territories. To validate an area as poor<br />
assumes the presence <strong>of</strong> deprivation<br />
concerning the housing and the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
precarious living conditions. In this regard,<br />
the poor areas are described as areas with no<br />
or poorly equipped facilities, poor natural<br />
environment, the house in an advanced state<br />
Mihai Surdu on school segregation and schools with<br />
Roma students.
<strong>of</strong> degradation and poorly provided with<br />
urban facilities. The specific phenomena for<br />
the poor areas are housing insecurity and<br />
overcrowded housing. 25<br />
There are several important analyses on<br />
living in poor areas in the international<br />
literature. In the West sociologists are<br />
primarily concerned with the poor areas <strong>of</strong><br />
the urban, <strong>of</strong>ten called ghetto or banlieue. As<br />
William Wilson, an African-American<br />
sociologist considers, the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
black people in the ghetto is the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reduced access to employment and<br />
socialization. European sociologists such as<br />
Loic Wacquant, are adding another element,<br />
namely the already mentioned stigmatization<br />
<strong>of</strong> people living in poor areas <strong>of</strong> large urban<br />
agglomerations. The Dutch researcher Eva<br />
van Kempen also mentions a fourth factor,<br />
the limited access to social rights 26 .<br />
In connection with the topic discussed, there<br />
is a recently completed European project<br />
coordinated by Ronald Van Kempen, a Dutch<br />
urban geographer at the University <strong>of</strong><br />
Utrecht, entitled Large Housing Estates in<br />
Europe: Good Practices and New Visions for<br />
Sustainable Cities and Neighborhoods. The<br />
main objectives <strong>of</strong> this project (which<br />
includes case studies in cities in Hungary)<br />
were to identify the social and economic<br />
changes that took place in the social world <strong>of</strong><br />
the blocks built after the Second World War<br />
and the development <strong>of</strong> some items which<br />
proved to be important in the success or<br />
failure <strong>of</strong> the social policies applied to the<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> blocks 27 . The researchers concluded<br />
25 Stănculescu, ManuelaS<strong>of</strong>ia, Berevoescu, Ionica,<br />
2004, Sărac lipit,caut altă viață!, Editura Nemira,<br />
București, p.128<br />
26 Van Kempen, Eva, în Marcuse, Peter și Van<br />
Kempen, Ronald, 2002, Of States and Cities,<br />
Oxford University Press, p.245<br />
27 Murie, Alan, Siedow-Knorr, Thomas, Van<br />
Kempen, Ronald, 2003, Large Housing Estates in<br />
Europe.General Developments and Theoretical<br />
Backgrounds, Utrecht University, p.11<br />
142<br />
that these areas <strong>of</strong> blocks concentrate people<br />
with modest incomes and a low stock <strong>of</strong><br />
social cultural and political capital. The block<br />
areas are also characterized by a higher rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> unemployment and crime and a higher<br />
level <strong>of</strong> social exclusion. Although the<br />
researchers found that the block areas are in a<br />
state <strong>of</strong> failing all over Europe, there are also<br />
situations where deprivation, bad construction<br />
and management do not result in revocation.<br />
Second, East-West differences are noticed in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> social cohesion and solidarity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
inhabitants <strong>of</strong> the blocks in the projects <strong>of</strong><br />
rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> buildings and layout <strong>of</strong> the<br />
green spaces surrounding these buildings.<br />
With regard to housing problems in the poor<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> Romania (most papers on this topic<br />
focusing on the housing problems <strong>of</strong> Roma<br />
communities), I should mention the work <strong>of</strong><br />
researchers like Cătălin and Elena Zamfir<br />
(1993), Cătălin Zamfir and Marian Preda (<br />
2002), Manuela Stănculescu and Ionica<br />
Berevoescu (2004), Cătălin Berescu and<br />
Mariana Celac (2006) or Cosima Rughiniş<br />
(2008). The main issues considered by these<br />
works are: poor housing, housing density,<br />
documents <strong>of</strong> the buildings and land<br />
ownership and access to utilities. The main<br />
findings <strong>of</strong> the authors are the significant<br />
differences between the statuses <strong>of</strong> Roma and<br />
non-Roma, and also the significant<br />
differences between rural and urban areas, the<br />
Roma living in the rural environment having<br />
poor living conditions. We will see to what<br />
extent some <strong>of</strong> these findings could be<br />
verified on the cases studied by us in Bihor<br />
and Hajdu Bihar.<br />
1.4. Roma in Bihor and Hajdu-Bihar<br />
1.4.1 Bihor County<br />
Bihor County is the third in Romania<br />
according to the percentage <strong>of</strong> the Roma per<br />
population (5.01%), after Mureş County<br />
(6.96%) and Sălaj County (5.01%). There are<br />
around 30,200 Roma in Bihor County. Most<br />
<strong>of</strong> them live in Oradea, 6,000 to a total <strong>of</strong><br />
206,000 inhabitants. The most concentrated<br />
Roma communities are in Săcuieni (3,700),
Tinca (2,500), Diosig (1,500), Batăr (1,500),<br />
Sânmartin (1,070), Aleşd (1,000), Suplacu de<br />
Barcău (900) and Ineu (850).<br />
Roma, statistically a minority, are 89% <strong>of</strong><br />
those who abandon school in Bihor County<br />
and, according to police estimations, 8 <strong>of</strong> 10<br />
<strong>of</strong>fences are committed by Roma. Only 10%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Roma are employed and only 50% <strong>of</strong><br />
them have an identity card. These are some<br />
statistical data which illustrate a dramatic<br />
reality <strong>of</strong> this minority. As in the other parts<br />
<strong>of</strong> Romania, the problems the Roma have to<br />
face in Bihor are the low level <strong>of</strong> education,<br />
the dropout, the precarious position on the<br />
labor market, living and health problems.<br />
In recent years, two qualitative studies have<br />
been conducted on the Roma in Bihor: The<br />
first study (Olah, 2004) focused especially<br />
on the dropout, stressed that education is a<br />
major factor for the modernization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Roma’s life, maybe the decisive factor, and<br />
that the low level <strong>of</strong> education is strongly<br />
correlated with the precarious integration <strong>of</strong><br />
the Roma on the labor market and with the<br />
juvenile delinquency. An important<br />
conclusion <strong>of</strong> the study is that Roma elite<br />
with high education should be the solution for<br />
the change <strong>of</strong> the dramatic situation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Roma communities 28 . The second study<br />
(Olah-Baltatescu 2008) focused on the<br />
problems <strong>of</strong> the Roma in Oradea 29 . The data<br />
analysis confirmed that the problems <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Roma are related to:<br />
- improper conditions <strong>of</strong> living<br />
- extreme poverty<br />
- the precarious health (especially contagious<br />
diseases like TBC)<br />
28 Olah, Șerban, 2009, The School Dropout in Bihor<br />
county. A Qualitative Approach , Revista<br />
Universitara de Sociologie, Craiova, Romania, Year<br />
VI, nr.1(11), p.101<br />
29 Olah, Șerban, Băltățescu, Sergiu, 2008, Nevoi şi<br />
servicii sociale în comunităţile de romi. Studiu<br />
calitativ în municipiul Oradea in Revista de<br />
Asistență socială (nr.3-4), București, ISSN 1583-<br />
0698,p.34<br />
143<br />
- lack <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional training, the precarious<br />
position on the labor market, low incomes<br />
due to the lack <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional training<br />
- the precarious education.<br />
The initiative <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Government<br />
in 2000-2004 to create some special places<br />
for the students <strong>of</strong> the Roma communities<br />
seems to be efficient. There is also needed a<br />
more active involvement <strong>of</strong> the NGOs, Town<br />
Halls, leaders <strong>of</strong> the Roma communities.<br />
The main reasons <strong>of</strong> the dropout in Bihor are:<br />
poverty, low level <strong>of</strong> education <strong>of</strong> the parents<br />
in the Roma community, the parents’ lack <strong>of</strong><br />
interest for school problems, family life<br />
disorganization, the tradition in the Roma<br />
community, the wrong attitude <strong>of</strong> some<br />
teachers towards some pupils, especially<br />
Roma, the low number <strong>of</strong> school<br />
psychologists in the schools <strong>of</strong> Bihor and the<br />
friends <strong>of</strong> the pupil.<br />
Both mentioned research papers are<br />
underlining the necessity <strong>of</strong> continuing the<br />
social projects for the Roma, developing the<br />
NGOs which carry out such projects and<br />
forming the elite <strong>of</strong> the Roma community<br />
who will support the disadvantaged<br />
communities by involving them in such<br />
projects.<br />
1.4.2. Hajdu-Bihar County<br />
In Hajdu-Bihar, 10 836 persons declared<br />
Roma identity at the latest census (in 2001),<br />
comprising 5,7 % <strong>of</strong> the total Roma<br />
population <strong>of</strong> Hungary. The share <strong>of</strong> Roma<br />
within the county’s total population is 2 %.<br />
However, the number <strong>of</strong> those who live a<br />
specific Roma way <strong>of</strong> life is much higher. A<br />
nationwide representative survey conducted<br />
by the Hungarian Statistical Office in 2003<br />
found that in Hajdu-Bihor county 44 200<br />
persons (8, 2% <strong>of</strong> the total population) are<br />
assigned a Roma (Gypsy) identity by their<br />
immediate neighborhood. According to this<br />
indicator, Hajdu-Bihor is the county with the<br />
fifth largest Roma population in Hungary.<br />
The Roma population <strong>of</strong> Hajdu –Bihor<br />
country is confronting to a large extent with
the same problems as their co-ethnics at the<br />
other side <strong>of</strong> the border:<br />
- Comparatively very high rates <strong>of</strong> fertility<br />
combined with high rates <strong>of</strong> mortality, which<br />
results in a rather young age structure<br />
compared to that <strong>of</strong> the county’s total<br />
population<br />
- Much lower educational level than the<br />
county average<br />
- Extremely reduced level <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
activity/employment<br />
A survey <strong>of</strong> 200 Roma families conducted by<br />
the Department <strong>of</strong> Sociology at the<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Debrecen 30 found that the rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> Roma employment is six times lower (in<br />
case <strong>of</strong> female population seven times lower)<br />
compared to the general rate <strong>of</strong> employment.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the Roma subjects questioned during<br />
the survey expressed their desire to work, but<br />
complained <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> job opportunities.<br />
Beyond this general image, however, a rather<br />
perceptible generation-related differentiation<br />
has been observed. Members <strong>of</strong> the middle<br />
aged generation who had been occupied in<br />
economic activities during communist times<br />
are more likely to be employed today as well,<br />
compared to the members <strong>of</strong> the new<br />
generation socialized after 1989, who tend to<br />
prefer social benefits instead <strong>of</strong> work. Most<br />
<strong>of</strong> them never had any legal job.<br />
As far as perception <strong>of</strong> the employers’<br />
attitudes is concerned, 72% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
respondents said they never experienced any<br />
discrimination while looking for a workplace,<br />
however 26% <strong>of</strong> those questioned indicated<br />
that they were not hired due their belonging<br />
to the Roma population. Among the surveyed<br />
families 40% have some links with<br />
agriculture: 18% is cultivating a piece <strong>of</strong><br />
land, 10 % are occupied with livestockfarming,<br />
and 12 % are doing both. In the case<br />
they would receive free <strong>of</strong> charge agricultural<br />
30 Beres, Csaba, 2004, A Hajdu-Bihar megyeben<br />
elo Roma lakossag helyzete.<br />
http://www.romaweb.hu/doc.../szociologiai_tanulma<br />
ny_hbm.doc<br />
144<br />
land for personal use from the local<br />
government, 25% declared that they would<br />
not cultivate it, but 72 % said that they would.<br />
(41% would produce only for personal use,<br />
31% even for the market)<br />
The survey found that in the preceding month<br />
10% <strong>of</strong> the respondents had some income<br />
originating from occasional, usually<br />
agricultural work. One working day in the<br />
local agriculture is normally 10 hours long,<br />
and the per diem payment stands at 3000<br />
forints (approximately 12 euros). Persons<br />
belonging to the poorest strata <strong>of</strong> Roma<br />
population, most <strong>of</strong> who also suffer <strong>of</strong><br />
various illnesses, cannot access even this<br />
rather modest work opportunity.<br />
On the other hand, the results <strong>of</strong> research<br />
show that in certain conditions occasional<br />
work might also become a resource <strong>of</strong><br />
upward social mobility. For example, in one<br />
rural locality (Bagamer), 50 Roma workers<br />
employed in agriculture on day to day basis<br />
managed to learn how to produce horseradish,<br />
and subsequently used this knowledge<br />
in order to start their own small farms, in<br />
pieces <strong>of</strong> land bought from or lent by local<br />
inhabitants. A social land-lease program by<br />
the county authorities encouraged Roma<br />
communities to start agricultural initiatives<br />
(such as poppy seeds cultivating or goat –<br />
breeding) in other localities as well. Some <strong>of</strong><br />
these endeavors proved successful, but others<br />
failed, mainly due to the lack <strong>of</strong> Roma<br />
agricultural tradition and business skills. In<br />
order to maximize the outcome <strong>of</strong> these<br />
programs, members <strong>of</strong> the Debrecen<br />
University research team suggested that as a<br />
first step it would be more beneficial and<br />
sustainable to focus on producing for family<br />
consume, rather than for the market.<br />
1.5. Quantitative Data Analysis<br />
How satisfied are Roma with their life? Is the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> Roma in Hungary higher<br />
than that in Romania? Which is the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
Roma living in the two countries? What is the<br />
relationship between the Roma and various<br />
items <strong>of</strong> labor? Which is the level <strong>of</strong>
education and occupational training? What<br />
work experience they have in the formal<br />
economy? What incomes do they have? How<br />
healthy they are? How religious they are?<br />
These are only a few <strong>of</strong> the starting questions<br />
<strong>of</strong> a quantitative research conducted between<br />
January 10 to March 7, 2010 in several urban<br />
and rural areas in Romania and Hungary. The<br />
research is an integral part <strong>of</strong> a cross-border<br />
project called Roma Employment, funded by<br />
the European Regional Development Fund. 31<br />
This project analyses the integration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Roma into the labor market in Romania and<br />
Hungary and includes both a research<br />
component (data collection, a test <strong>of</strong><br />
occupational skills, applying a questionnaire,<br />
conducting focus groups) and practical<br />
activities such as organizing two job fairs for<br />
Roma (Oradea and Biharkeresztes).<br />
The quantitative research aimed at collecting<br />
data on quality <strong>of</strong> Roma life in settlements<br />
with a high density <strong>of</strong> people belonging to<br />
this category: Oradea, Osorhei, Ineu de Cris<br />
in Romania and Biharkeresztes and Told in<br />
Hungary. It should also be noted that in most<br />
<strong>of</strong> these places Roma live in neighborhoods<br />
where they are the majority. We have to<br />
mention that interpretation <strong>of</strong> our research<br />
data is based on comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> two<br />
samples <strong>of</strong> Roma, one from Romania(Bihor<br />
county) and another from Hungary(Hajdu-<br />
Bihar county). The sampling method used is<br />
the non-probabilistic one and involves the<br />
snowball principle. Only persons able to work<br />
and who are seeking employment, aged<br />
between 18 and 55, were selected. In total, a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> 322 subjects answered to the<br />
questions.<br />
As collected data are numerous and<br />
extremely complex, in thi paper we focus<br />
only on those related to living conditions. We<br />
aim to realize the presentation and analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
the full set <strong>of</strong> quantitative and qualitative data<br />
in a volume dedicated to the study <strong>of</strong> Roma in<br />
Romania and Hungary.<br />
31<br />
145<br />
In our research we will test several<br />
hypotheses which we shall mention below.<br />
H1. There are significant differences between<br />
the housing conditions <strong>of</strong> Roma in Romania<br />
and Hungary.<br />
H2. There is a significant relationship<br />
between satisfaction with life and satisfaction<br />
with housing.<br />
H3: There is a direct link between satisfaction<br />
with housing and income.<br />
H4: There is a direct link between the size <strong>of</strong><br />
dwelling and income.<br />
H5: There is a negative correlation between<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> persons in the household and<br />
the income.<br />
1.5.1. Satisfaction with life<br />
How satisfied are Roma with their life? What<br />
are the determinants <strong>of</strong> the satisfaction with<br />
life? The research results drawn from the<br />
research samples in Romania and Hungary<br />
are shown in the tables below.
40<br />
30<br />
Count 50<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
…<br />
foarte satisfacut<br />
Table 1. Satisfaction with life at the Hungarian Roma<br />
13,86%<br />
satisfacut<br />
42,57%<br />
oarecum<br />
satisfacut<br />
cat sunteti de multumit cu viata in prezent<br />
146<br />
37,62%<br />
nesatisfacut<br />
4,95%<br />
nici satsifacut,<br />
nici nesatisfacut<br />
0,99%<br />
99
30,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
Percent 40,0%<br />
10,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
Table 2. Satisfaction with life at the Romanian Roma<br />
7,21%<br />
foarte<br />
satisfacut<br />
17,57%<br />
satisfacut<br />
18,47%<br />
oarecum<br />
satisfacut<br />
cat sunteti de multumit cu viata in prezent<br />
147<br />
31,98%<br />
nesatisfacut<br />
17,12%<br />
nici satsifacut,<br />
nici nesatisfacut<br />
7,66%<br />
99
We can see in the two tables that on the one hand, the share <strong>of</strong> very satisfied in Romania is<br />
higher (7. 21% vs 0%) and also the percentage <strong>of</strong> those dissatisfied is lower (31. 98%<br />
compared to 37. 62%). Is this happening because <strong>of</strong> a higher quality <strong>of</strong> life or the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
other factors? We will give an answer along the way.<br />
1.5.2 The economic vulnerability <strong>of</strong> the Roma<br />
A first step we need to make is to see the perception <strong>of</strong> the Roma on poverty.<br />
50,0%<br />
40,0%<br />
30,0%<br />
Percent 60,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
10,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
30,69%<br />
nu ne ajung nici<br />
pentru a putea<br />
trai<br />
Table 3. Income poverty (Roma in Hungary)<br />
59,41%<br />
ne ajung doar<br />
sa supravietuim<br />
fara a putea sa<br />
cumparam ceva<br />
mai bun sau sa<br />
strangem ceva<br />
bani<br />
6,93%<br />
reusim sa<br />
strangem ceva<br />
bani sau sa<br />
cumparam ceva<br />
mai bu, dar cu<br />
economii si<br />
sacrificii<br />
Gândindu-va la veniturile totale ale familiei, puteti spune ca va ajung sau<br />
nu?<br />
148<br />
0,99%<br />
ne ajung destul<br />
de bine pentru<br />
ceea ce avem<br />
nevoie<br />
0,99%<br />
9<br />
0,99%<br />
99
40,0%<br />
30,0%<br />
Percent 50,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
10,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
Table 4. Income poverty (Roma in Romania)<br />
39,19%<br />
nu ne ajung nici pentru a putea<br />
trai<br />
ne ajung doar sa supravietuim<br />
fara a putea sa cumparam<br />
ceva mai bun sau sa strangem<br />
ceva bani<br />
49,10%<br />
Gândindu-va la veniturile totale ale familiei, puteti spune ca va ajung sau…<br />
Comparing the two tables, we can see that the Roma in both countries perceive themselves<br />
poor and very poor. If we observe the first two items, the percentages are quit similar in the two<br />
countries (about 88. 29% in Romania compared to 90% in Hungary). If we take items 3 and 4<br />
however, the situation is more favorable for the Roma in Hungary (8%) compared to 2. 25%<br />
for the Roma in Romania.<br />
149<br />
reusim sa strangem ceva bani<br />
sau sa cumparam ceva mai<br />
bu, dar cu economii si sacrificii<br />
0,90%<br />
ne ajung destul de bine pentru<br />
ceea ce avem nevoie<br />
1,35%<br />
9,46%<br />
99
1.5.3. Housing conditions<br />
A first step towards interpreting the above mentioned surprising situation is to inquire about<br />
the living conditions in the two countries. How satisfied are the Roma with their home? Here<br />
are the data from Hungary.<br />
Table. 5 Satisfaction with housing at Roma in Hungary<br />
30<br />
20<br />
Count 40<br />
10<br />
0<br />
2,97%<br />
foarte nemultumit<br />
4,95%<br />
nemultumit<br />
36,63%<br />
nici multumit, nici<br />
nemultumit<br />
multumirea cu locuinta<br />
A question to be raised is how the satisfaction with life is associated with the satisfaction with<br />
housing. The regression model applied to the data from Hungary proves a significant<br />
combination, but not a strong link between the two variables, as will appear in the data<br />
presented in the annex 1.<br />
150<br />
28,71%<br />
multumit<br />
24,75%<br />
foarte multumit<br />
1,98%<br />
99
25,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
15,0%<br />
Percent<br />
10,0%<br />
5,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
Table 6. Satisfaction with housing at Roma in Romania<br />
0,90%<br />
0<br />
19,82%<br />
foarte<br />
nemultumit<br />
13,51%<br />
nemultumit<br />
We can notice in the two graphics, on the one<br />
hand, that the percentage <strong>of</strong> satisfied and very<br />
satisfied is higher in Hungary (26. 71% and<br />
24. 79%) compared to Romania (18. 47% and<br />
20. 27%, and secondly that the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
dissatisfied and very dissatisfied is much<br />
higher in Romania (19. 82% and 13. 5%)<br />
compared with those in Hungary (4. 95%,<br />
respectively 2. 97%). Perhaps this is due to<br />
issues such as housing density, housing size,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> rooms and the materials the houses<br />
are made <strong>of</strong>.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> our assumptions is related to the direct<br />
link between satisfaction with life and<br />
satisfaction with housing. Making a<br />
regression analysis on the data from<br />
Romania, we can see that the association<br />
between the two variables is significant and,<br />
nici multumit,<br />
nici<br />
nemultumit<br />
Satisfacția cu locuința<br />
151<br />
18,02%<br />
20,27%<br />
multumit<br />
18,47%<br />
foarte<br />
multumit<br />
9,01%<br />
as shown by the data in the table below, the<br />
correlation between the two variables is over<br />
0.79, so it is quite strong. The comparison<br />
between the two regression analysis (the<br />
Romanian and Hungarian cases) shows a<br />
stronger association between the data from<br />
Romania than in those from Hungary.<br />
In most studies the income seems to be the<br />
best predictor <strong>of</strong> satisfaction with life, so it<br />
would be interesting to have a look at the<br />
results <strong>of</strong> the regression model between the<br />
income and the satisfaction with<br />
life(annex3).The correlation coefficient<br />
(r=0,99) proves a very strong link between<br />
these two variables.On the other hand the<br />
regression model between the income and<br />
satisfaction with housing (a significant<br />
combination and a very strong connection)<br />
99
proves that in the case <strong>of</strong> Hungary, the<br />
income variable is a better predictor <strong>of</strong> life<br />
satisfaction than the satisfaction with<br />
housing(annex5).<br />
Applying the same regression analysis for<br />
Romania, we notice a significant association<br />
and a stronger link (although the values are<br />
very close) than that between satisfaction<br />
with housing and satisfaction with life. The<br />
differences that arise between the situation in<br />
Romania and Hungary are likely due to<br />
differences in income between the Roma in<br />
the two countries, but also to the way the<br />
Roma minority relates to their neighbors. The<br />
data presented in this paper show us that the<br />
Roma in Romania live in neighborhoods with<br />
Roma majority, while the Roma in Hungary<br />
live in ethnically rather mixed areas.<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
Count 60<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
152<br />
Further we proceeded to test the link<br />
between housing and income satisfactionin<br />
Romania (annex 6). The data demonstrate a<br />
significant association between the two<br />
variables and also a strong connection. This<br />
assumption/hypothesis is valid for<br />
Hungary.The data demonstrate a significant<br />
association between the two variables and<br />
also a strong connection, in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania. So, this hypothesis is valid for<br />
Romania, too. We note in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania a stronger value <strong>of</strong> the correlation<br />
coefficient, but the difference from the<br />
coefficient <strong>of</strong> Hungary is too small (0. 813 vs.<br />
0. 701) for giving rise to any interpretation.<br />
An important item in many inquiries about<br />
housing in poor areas is the state <strong>of</strong> dwelling<br />
ownership.<br />
Table. 7 State <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> dwelling (Roma in Hungary)<br />
0,99%<br />
platesc chirie<br />
la proprietar<br />
0,99%<br />
platesc chirie<br />
la consiliul<br />
local<br />
51,49%<br />
sunt<br />
proprietar<br />
41,58%<br />
locuiesc la o<br />
ruda<br />
2,97%<br />
locuiesc la o<br />
persoana<br />
care nu imi<br />
este ruda<br />
cine este proprietarul locuintei actuale<br />
0,99%<br />
alta situatie<br />
0,99%<br />
99
40,0%<br />
30,0%<br />
Percent 50,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
10,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
Table 8 State <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> dwelling (Roma in Romania)<br />
0,90%<br />
platesc chirie<br />
la proprietar<br />
30,18%<br />
platesc chirie<br />
la consiliul<br />
local<br />
41,44%<br />
sunt<br />
proprietar<br />
cine este proprietarul locuintei actuale<br />
153<br />
16,67%<br />
locuiesc la o<br />
ruda<br />
…<br />
locuiesc la o<br />
persoana<br />
care nu imi<br />
este ruda<br />
4,05%<br />
alta situatie<br />
6,76%<br />
99
When comparing the two situations, we can notice some aspects. First, in Romania there are several cases in which they pay rent to the<br />
City Council (30. 18%) compared to a very small percentage, 0. 99% in Hungary. The percentage <strong>of</strong> those who are owners is more<br />
favorable for Hungary, 51. 49% compared to 41. 44% in Romania, while in Hungary there are many more cases when the family lives at a<br />
relative, 41. 58%, and when the family lives at persons who are not relatives, 2.97%, compared to Roma in Romania (16. 67% and 0%).<br />
Table 9. The materials the houses <strong>of</strong> the Roma are made <strong>of</strong> (in Hungary)<br />
40<br />
Count 60<br />
20<br />
0<br />
60,40%<br />
caramida<br />
…<br />
beton<br />
34,65%<br />
vaioaga<br />
…<br />
paianta<br />
Din ce material e construita locuinta dumneavoastra?<br />
154<br />
…<br />
lemn<br />
…<br />
alt material<br />
3,96%<br />
9<br />
0,99%<br />
99
40,0%<br />
30,0%<br />
Percent 50,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
10,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
Table 10. The materials the houses <strong>of</strong> the Roma are made <strong>of</strong> (in Romania)<br />
36,04%<br />
caramida<br />
2,70%<br />
beton<br />
42,34%<br />
vaioaga<br />
Din ce material e construita locuinta dumneavoastra?<br />
155<br />
0,45%<br />
paianta<br />
8,56%<br />
lemn<br />
2,70%<br />
alt material<br />
7,21%<br />
99
We can see in the two graphs that the Roma in Hungary have more modern houses, built mostly <strong>of</strong> brick (60. 40%) and a smaller<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> adobe (34. 65%), while the dwellings <strong>of</strong> the Bihor County Roma are mainly made <strong>of</strong> adobe (42. 34%), brick (36. 04%), but<br />
also other materials (wood-8. 56%, concrete 2.7%, half-timber work 0. 45%).<br />
Table. 11 How many people live in your home? (Roma in Hungary)<br />
156
Table 12. How many people live in your home? (Roma in Romania)<br />
We can notice in the two tables that housing density is higher in Romania than in Hungary, as in the case <strong>of</strong> 6-7 or more than 7 persons in<br />
the household, the share <strong>of</strong> cases in Romania (33. 33% and 12. 61%) being higher than in Hungary (27. 72% respectively 5. 94%). On the<br />
other hand, for 1 or 2-3 persons in a house, the situation in Hungary is comparatively better (8. 91% and 20. 79%) than in Romania (0. 45%<br />
respectively 13. 5%). These data should be added to those on the dwelling area, number <strong>of</strong> rooms and facilities.<br />
157
Table 13. The size <strong>of</strong> the Roma dwelling in Hungary<br />
158
50,0%<br />
40,0%<br />
30,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
10,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
42,34%<br />
Table 14. The size <strong>of</strong> the Roma dwelling in Romania<br />
26,13%<br />
sub 30 de intre 31 si<br />
metri 40 m2<br />
patrati<br />
16,67%<br />
intre 41 si<br />
50 m2<br />
3,15%<br />
intre 51 si<br />
60 m2<br />
Care este mărimea aproximativă a locuinței?<br />
159<br />
2,25%<br />
intre 61 si<br />
80 m2<br />
0,90%<br />
intre 81 si<br />
100 m2<br />
0,45%<br />
peste 100<br />
m2<br />
0,90%<br />
9<br />
7,21%<br />
99
We can notice in these two tables that while in Romania the housing size is mainly under 60 sq.m., the prevailing housing area is over 60<br />
sq.m. in Hungary.It seems that the size <strong>of</strong> housing is a significant indicator <strong>of</strong> the gap which separates housing conditions and more<br />
generally the civilizational integration levels <strong>of</strong> the Roma living in the two countries.<br />
Table 15. How many rooms does your dwelling have? (Hungarian Roma)<br />
160
Table 16. How many rooms does your dwelling have? (Romanian Roma)<br />
Again the difference is very high between the two samples. A share <strong>of</strong> 44.4% <strong>of</strong> Hungarian Roma live in houses with three rooms or more,<br />
while the corresponding percentage in the Romanian sample is only 13.4%. However, the situation is rather different in the case <strong>of</strong> houses<br />
with one or two rooms (79% <strong>of</strong> Roma in Romania and 64.4% in Hungary).<br />
According to the results <strong>of</strong> regression analysis in both countries there is a significant link between the housing size and income and also<br />
between the number <strong>of</strong> persons in the dwelling and the income(annexes 7 to 10). This outcome denotes the frequent occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />
161
multiple disadvantaging factors(such as precarious living conditions, high number <strong>of</strong> family members living in small size dwellings and<br />
extremely low level <strong>of</strong> income).<br />
40<br />
Count 60<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Table 17. Dwellings with bathroom facilities (Hungarian Roma)<br />
5,94%<br />
baie in casa, wc in<br />
curte<br />
69,31%<br />
baie + wc in casa<br />
fara baie, wc<br />
propriu in curtea<br />
casei<br />
Locuinta dumneavoastra este dotata cu grup sanitar?<br />
162<br />
21,78%<br />
1,98%<br />
fara baie, wc in<br />
folosinta comuna<br />
0,99%<br />
99
40,0%<br />
30,0%<br />
Percent 50,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
10,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
Table 18. Dwellings with bathroom facilities (Romanian Roma)<br />
8,11%<br />
baie in casa, wc in<br />
curte<br />
40,09%<br />
baie + wc in casa<br />
fara baie, wc<br />
propriu in curtea<br />
casei<br />
Locuinta dumneavoastra este dotata cu grup sanitar?<br />
The two tables show very clearly that the Roma in Hungary have better living conditions than those from Romania. If we compare those<br />
with the best conditions, i.ee with bathroom and toilet in the house, the weights <strong>of</strong> the two samples are 69.31% in Hungary and 40.09% in<br />
Romania. If we compare instead those with the worst conditions, in other words those who do not have a bathroom in the house and a toilet<br />
in common usage, the corresponding values are 14.86% in Romania, respectively 1.99% in Hungary.<br />
Another important housing facility is the home kitchen. The following two tables illustrate the situation in the two cases.<br />
163<br />
30,18%<br />
14,86%<br />
fara baie, wc in<br />
folosinta comuna<br />
6,76%<br />
99
80<br />
60<br />
Count 100<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
98,02%<br />
in casa<br />
Table 19. Kitchen in the house (Hungarian Roma)<br />
…<br />
separat de casa<br />
nu are bucatarie<br />
acoperita<br />
Locuinta dumneavoastra are bucatarie?<br />
164<br />
…<br />
…<br />
bucatarie cu<br />
folosinta comuna<br />
1,98%<br />
99
50,0%<br />
40,0%<br />
30,0%<br />
Percent 60,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
10,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
59,46%<br />
in casa<br />
Table 20. Kitchen in the house (Romanian Roma)<br />
7,66%<br />
separat de casa<br />
nu are bucatarie<br />
acoperita<br />
Locuinta dumneavoastra are bucatarie?<br />
165<br />
24,77%<br />
0,90%<br />
bucatarie cu<br />
folosinta comuna<br />
7,21%<br />
99
Comparing the situation in the two contries, some important differences occur again. Thus, if 98.02% <strong>of</strong> Roma households in Hungary<br />
have a kitchen in the house, this is happening only in 59. 46% <strong>of</strong> Roma in Romania. Instead we have here a percentage <strong>of</strong> 7.66% <strong>of</strong> cases<br />
in which the kitchen is separated from the house, 24.77% have a not covered kitchen and even a small percentage (0. 90%) use common<br />
kitchen with other families in town.<br />
Table 21. Is there current water in the household you actually live? (Roma in Hungary)<br />
40<br />
Count 60<br />
20<br />
0<br />
69,31%<br />
conducta de apa<br />
in casa<br />
6,93%<br />
conducta de apa<br />
in curte<br />
…<br />
fantana in curte<br />
In locuinta in care traiti in prezent exista apa<br />
166<br />
22,77%<br />
apa in fata curtii<br />
la mai putin de<br />
100 de metri<br />
…<br />
apa in fata curtii<br />
la mai mult de<br />
100 de metri<br />
0,99%<br />
99
Table 22. Is there current water in the household you actually live? (Roma in Romania)<br />
40,0%<br />
30,0%<br />
Percent 50,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
10,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
43,69%<br />
conducta de<br />
apa in casa<br />
1,35%<br />
conducta de<br />
apa in curte<br />
9,91%<br />
fantana in curte<br />
In locuinta in care traiti in prezent exista apa<br />
167<br />
15,32%<br />
apa in fata curtii<br />
la mai putin de<br />
100 de metri<br />
21,62%<br />
apa in fata curtii<br />
la mai mult de<br />
100 de metri<br />
8,11%<br />
99
In terms <strong>of</strong> water use in the home, there are are also significant differences between the two<br />
cases. Thus, in Hungary 69.31% compared to 43.69% in Romania are endowed with water<br />
pipe in the house. 9.91% have a fountain/well in the courtyard in Romania compared to zero<br />
percent in Hungary. 15.32% <strong>of</strong> the Roma households in the Romanian sample are using the<br />
water source in the front <strong>of</strong> the courtyard at less than 100 meters compared to 22.7% in the<br />
Hungarian sample. 21.62% <strong>of</strong> the Roma households in the Romanian sample have water in the<br />
front <strong>of</strong> the courtyard at more than 100 meters compared to 0% in the Hungarian sample.<br />
Again, big differences appear between the two cases.<br />
1.5.5. The poverty <strong>of</strong> the neighborhood<br />
The Roma <strong>of</strong> the samples selected from the two countries live, in most cases, in poor<br />
neighborhoods compared with the majority. In our survey we inquire about the perception <strong>of</strong><br />
the Roma on the neighborhoods in which their dwellings are.<br />
Table 23. The perception <strong>of</strong> the poverty <strong>of</strong> the neighborhood (Hungarian Roma)<br />
30<br />
20<br />
Count 40<br />
10<br />
0<br />
23,76%<br />
toata lumea sau aproape toata<br />
lumea este saraca<br />
28,71%<br />
majoritatea oamenilor sunt<br />
saraci<br />
exista in egala masura oameni<br />
care sunt si oameni care nu<br />
sunt saraci<br />
36,63%<br />
7,92%<br />
majoritatea nu sunt saraci<br />
Care din urmatoarele afirmatii descrie cartierul in care locuiti in prezent?<br />
168<br />
nimeni sau aproape nimeni nu<br />
este sarac<br />
…<br />
0,99%<br />
9<br />
1,98%<br />
99
Table 24. The perception <strong>of</strong> the poverty <strong>of</strong> the neighborhood (Romanian Roma)<br />
50,0%<br />
40,0%<br />
30,0%<br />
Percent 60,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
10,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
54,50%<br />
toata lumea sau<br />
aproape toata<br />
lumea este<br />
saraca<br />
27,93%<br />
majoritatea<br />
oamenilor sunt<br />
saraci<br />
exista in egala<br />
masura oameni<br />
care sunt si<br />
oameni care nu<br />
sunt saraci<br />
Care din urmatoarele afirmatii descrie cartierul in care locuiti in prezent?<br />
It can be clearly seen that the perceived level <strong>of</strong> poverty is much higher in the Roma<br />
neighborhoods in Romania compared to that in Hungary. If we take the first two items<br />
(Everybody or almost everybody is poor and Most <strong>of</strong> the people are poor), their percentage is<br />
definitely higher for Romania, 82.4%, compared to 52.4% for Hungary. As far as item 4 is<br />
concerned (Most <strong>of</strong> them are not poor), we notice that the relevant percentage is lower in<br />
Romania (1.80%), than in Hungary(7.92%).<br />
To have a better idea about the neighborhood <strong>of</strong> the Roma households, let’s see who the<br />
neighbors <strong>of</strong> the subjects <strong>of</strong> our sample are (Roma or non-Roma neighbors).<br />
169<br />
7,21%<br />
1,80%<br />
majoritatea nu<br />
sunt saraci<br />
0,90%<br />
nimeni sau<br />
aproape nimeni<br />
nu este sarac<br />
7,66%<br />
99
30<br />
20<br />
Count 40<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Table 25. Who are the neighbors <strong>of</strong> the Roma? (Hungarian Roma)<br />
33,66%<br />
traiesc numai sau<br />
aproape numai<br />
familii rome<br />
19,80%<br />
exista in egala<br />
masura familii rome<br />
si nerome<br />
exista cateva familii<br />
rome dar majoritatea<br />
sunt nerome<br />
Ce persoane traiesc in zona din vecinatatea casei dumneavoastra?<br />
170<br />
32,67%<br />
11,88%<br />
nu sunt familii rome<br />
in apropiere<br />
1,98%<br />
99
80,0%<br />
60,0%<br />
Percent 100,0%<br />
40,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
Table 26. Who are the neighbors <strong>of</strong> the Roma? (Romanian Roma)<br />
82,88%<br />
traiesc numai sau<br />
aproape numai<br />
familii rome<br />
8,56%<br />
exista in egala<br />
masura familii rome<br />
si nerome<br />
Ce persoane traiesc in zona din vecinatatea casei dumneavoastra?<br />
Although the localities were selected by Romanian and Hungarian experts on the criterion <strong>of</strong><br />
poverty and occurence <strong>of</strong> social problems <strong>of</strong> the Roma communities, we can notice differences<br />
in the ethnic composition <strong>of</strong> the neighborhoods. In Romania, the Roma tend to live in compact<br />
areas with Roma majority population (82.88%), while in Hungary the percentage is only<br />
33.66%. However if we take items 3 and 4, the situation is clearly different for the two<br />
countries (44.55% in Hungary and 1.35% in Romania).<br />
171<br />
0,45%<br />
exista cateva familii<br />
rome dar<br />
majoritatea sunt<br />
nerome<br />
0,90%<br />
nu sunt familii rome<br />
in apropiere<br />
7,21%<br />
99
50,0%<br />
40,0%<br />
30,0%<br />
Percent 60,0%<br />
20,0%<br />
10,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
Table 27. Satisfaction with the neighborhood ( Roma from Hungary)<br />
8,91%<br />
foarte<br />
nemultumit<br />
10,89%<br />
nemultumit<br />
51,49%<br />
nici multumit, nici<br />
nemultumit<br />
multumirea cu cartierul<br />
172<br />
18,81%<br />
multumit<br />
7,92%<br />
foarte multumit<br />
1,98%<br />
99
20,0%<br />
15,0%<br />
Percent 25,0%<br />
10,0%<br />
5,0%<br />
0,0%<br />
Table 28. Satisfaction with the neighborhood ( Roma from Romania)<br />
0,45%<br />
0<br />
22,97%<br />
foarte<br />
nemultumit<br />
15,77%<br />
nemultumit<br />
17,57%<br />
nici<br />
multumit,<br />
nici<br />
nemultumit<br />
multumirea cu cartierul<br />
Concerning the satisfaction with the neighborhood, we notice again that the percentage <strong>of</strong> those<br />
very dissatisfied and dissatisfied is much higher(almost twice as high)in Romania than in<br />
Hungary (about 38.77% compared to almost 20%).It is interesting to notice that the percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> those satisfied and very satisfied is greater in Romania (around 33.79% compared to almost<br />
27%).<br />
173<br />
16,67%<br />
multumit<br />
17,12%<br />
foarte<br />
multumit<br />
0,45%<br />
32<br />
9,01%<br />
99
1.5. Conclusions<br />
Analyzing the data on the Roma communities<br />
living in Romania and Hungary, we can find<br />
some significant differences. Even if Roma in<br />
Romania are more satisfied with their life,<br />
perhaps as the consequence <strong>of</strong> their more<br />
traditional life outlook, but also due to the<br />
ethnic composition <strong>of</strong> their neighbourhood,<br />
the Roma living in Hungary seem to be more<br />
satisfied with their dwellings. In terms <strong>of</strong><br />
most objective indicators (ownership status,<br />
building materials, the number <strong>of</strong> rooms, the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> persons in the household, the<br />
hygiene, the posession <strong>of</strong> bathroom, toilet,<br />
kitchen, heating), Roma in Hungary are<br />
living in comparatively better conditions.<br />
In contrast with their co-ethnics from<br />
Romania, Hungarian Roma live in<br />
neighborhoods that include both Roma and<br />
non-Roma, an aspect that has a great<br />
importance in their integration into society.<br />
Although according to Michael Stewart they<br />
resisted assimilation during socialism, our<br />
data demonstrate that today they seem to be<br />
much closer to the civilizational level <strong>of</strong> the<br />
larger society than ever before. It is worth to<br />
mention that they define themselves mostly<br />
as Hungarian Roma („magyar cigany”),<br />
unlike Roma from Romania, who mainly<br />
identify with their traditional community<br />
belonging (neamuri). The higher level <strong>of</strong><br />
integration <strong>of</strong> Roma in Hungary is also<br />
proved by the attachment <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> them to<br />
the mainstream churches, while in case <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania the influence <strong>of</strong> Neo-Protestant<br />
religious communities is much higher among<br />
the Roma population.<br />
One indicator <strong>of</strong> integration is the one related<br />
to housing quality. From this point <strong>of</strong> view<br />
too, Roma in Hungary are socially more<br />
integrated than the Roma in Romania. Their<br />
dwellings indicate a serious lag compared<br />
both to the Roma in Hungary, but also to the<br />
majority group. Roma in Romania seem to be<br />
much more traditional if we analyze all these<br />
indicators <strong>of</strong> housing quality.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> differences between localities,<br />
they are more pronounced in Romania,<br />
174<br />
where, according to our data, the community<br />
<strong>of</strong> Osorhei seems to be the poorest, having<br />
worse conditions not only compared to<br />
Oradea, but also to Ineu de Cris. Relatively<br />
small differences can be noticed in Hungary,<br />
between the communities <strong>of</strong> Biharkeresztes<br />
and Told, may be due to geographical<br />
proximity and to the fact that Told is a rural<br />
community while Biharkeresztes became a<br />
town only recently, still having mostly semirural<br />
community features.<br />
Housing is an important indicator <strong>of</strong> the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life, influencing the health status,<br />
the participation in education and perhaps to<br />
some extent also the level <strong>of</strong> integration into<br />
the formal economy. For the development <strong>of</strong><br />
the quality <strong>of</strong> housing, a more active<br />
involvement <strong>of</strong> the Government and <strong>of</strong> the<br />
local authorities, as well as the involvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> NGOs and Roma leaders is needed, even if<br />
the home’s quality primarily depends on the<br />
income level <strong>of</strong> each family, and that is a<br />
problem in each case.<br />
It is true that the same issue depends also on<br />
the neighborhood. If Roma see that the<br />
neighbors are poor and do not make efforts to<br />
improve their living conditions, they are<br />
tempted to do the same. If instead their<br />
neighbours belong to another ethnic group<br />
and Roma see that they have higher living<br />
conditions, this may also be an incentive for<br />
Roma. This fact is influencing to a large<br />
extent the difference between housing<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> Roma in Hungary compared<br />
with those from Romania. Roma in Romania<br />
live in compact areas with a high density <strong>of</strong><br />
social problems and a serious shortage <strong>of</strong><br />
modernity. Perhaps a solution would be that<br />
Roma in Romania live in ethnically mixed<br />
neighborhoods or areas. Roma in Romania<br />
are isolated, marginalized, segregated<br />
compared to other ethnic groups both in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> housing, participation in education or<br />
integration into the formal economy. On the<br />
other hand, there is also a dissociating<br />
mechanism probably related to their<br />
traditional values.
Probably long-term solutions would be largescale<br />
investments in educational and also<br />
social economy programs, which could<br />
promote a better integration into the formal<br />
economy and to the successfull securing <strong>of</strong><br />
sustainable sources <strong>of</strong> income leading to<br />
better housing and civilizational conditions as<br />
well.<br />
Bibliography:<br />
1. Beres, Csaba, 2004, A Hajdu-Bihar<br />
megyeben elo Roma lakossag helyzete.<br />
http://www.romaweb.hu/doc.../szociologiai_t<br />
anulmany_hbm.doc<br />
2. Fraser, Angus, 2010, Țiganii, Editura<br />
Humanitas, București<br />
3. Marcuse, Peter și Van Kempen, Ronald,<br />
2002, Of States and Cities, Oxford University<br />
Press<br />
4. Murie, Alan, Siedow-Knorr, Thomas, Van<br />
Kempen, Ronald, 2003, Large Housing<br />
Estates in Europe.General Developments and<br />
Theoretical Backgrounds, Utrecht University<br />
5. Olah, Șerban, 2009, The School Dropout in<br />
Bihor county. A Qualitative Approach,<br />
Revista Universitara de Sociologie, Craiova,<br />
Romania, Year VI, nr.1(11)<br />
6. Olah, Șerban, Băltățescu, Sergiu, 2008,<br />
Nevoi şi servicii sociale în comunităţile de<br />
romi. Studiu calitativ în municipiul Oradea in<br />
175<br />
Revista de Asistență socială (nr.3-4),<br />
București<br />
7. Pons, Emanuelle, 1999,Ţiganii din<br />
România, Editura Compania, Bucureşti<br />
8. Preda, Marian, 2002, Politica socială<br />
românească între sărăcie şi globalizare,<br />
Editura Polirom, Iaşi<br />
9. Preoteasa, Ana Maria,2003, Prezentarea<br />
unei cercetări internaţionale cu privire la<br />
starea romilor în Europa Centrală şi de Est, în<br />
Calitatea Vieţii,XIV, nr.2<br />
10. Ringold, Dena, Orenstein, Mitchell,<br />
Wilkens, Erika, 2003, Roma in an Expanding<br />
Europe. Breaking the Poverty Cycle, 2003,<br />
The World Bank<br />
11. Stănculescu, ManuelaS<strong>of</strong>ia, Berevoescu,<br />
Ionica, 2004, Sărac lipit, caut altă viață!,<br />
Editura Nemira, București<br />
12. Stewart,Michael, 1997, The Time <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Gypsies, Westview Press, Colorado<br />
13. Szelenyi, Ivan, 2002, Poverty, Ethnicithy<br />
and Gender in Transitional Societies,<br />
Akademiai Kiado, Budapest<br />
14. Voicu, Mălina( coordonator),2007, Nevoi<br />
şi resurse în comunităţile de romi, Fundaţia<br />
Soros România,Bucureşti<br />
15. Zamfir,Cătălin, Zamfir,Elena<br />
1993,Ţiganii între îngrijorare şi ignorare,<br />
Editura Alternative, Bucureşti
ANNEXES<br />
Annex 1. Simple regression analysis between satisfaction with housing and<br />
satisfaction with life (for Hungary)<br />
Model Summary<br />
Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />
Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />
1 ,696(a) ,485 ,479 6,891<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Satisfaction with housing<br />
ANOVA(b)<br />
Model<br />
Sum <strong>of</strong><br />
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />
1 Regression 4419,361 1 4419,361 93,063 ,000(a)<br />
Residual 4701,312 99 47,488<br />
Total 9120,673 100<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Satisfac tion with housing<br />
b Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />
Coefficients(a)<br />
Unstandardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
Model<br />
B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />
1 (Constant) 1,518 ,743 2,042 ,044<br />
176<br />
Standardized<br />
Coefficients t Sig.<br />
Satisfaction with housing ,497 ,051 ,696 9,647 ,000<br />
a Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />
Annex 2. Simple regression analysis between satisfaction with housing and satisfaction<br />
with life (for Romania)<br />
Model Summary<br />
Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />
Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />
1 ,795(a) ,632 ,630 15,515<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Satisfaction with housing
ANOVA(b)<br />
Model<br />
Sum <strong>of</strong><br />
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />
1 Regression 90903,165 1 90903,165 377,662 ,000(a)<br />
Residual 52954,006 220 240,700<br />
Total 143857,171 221<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Satisfaction with housing<br />
b Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />
Coefficients(a)<br />
Unstandardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
Model<br />
B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />
1 (Constant) 2,118 1,131 1,872 ,062<br />
177<br />
Standardized<br />
Coefficients t Sig.<br />
Satisfaction with housing ,735 ,038 ,795 19,434 ,000<br />
a Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />
Annex 3. Simple regression model between income and satisfaction with life (for<br />
Hungary)<br />
Model Summary<br />
Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />
Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />
1 ,990(a) ,981 ,980 1,336<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />
ANOVA(b)<br />
Model<br />
Sum <strong>of</strong><br />
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />
1 Regression 8944,003 1 8944,003 5011,926 ,000(a)<br />
Residual 176,670 99 1,785<br />
Total 9120,673 100<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />
b Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life
Coefficients(a)<br />
Unstandardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
Model<br />
B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />
1 (Constant) 1,549 ,138 11,190 ,000<br />
Thinking about the total<br />
family income, can you<br />
say that it is enough or<br />
not?<br />
a Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />
178<br />
Standardized<br />
Coefficients t Sig.<br />
,974 ,014 ,990 70,795 ,000<br />
Annex 4. Simple regression model between income and satisfaction with life (for<br />
Romania)<br />
Model Summary<br />
Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />
Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />
1 ,829(a) ,688 ,686 14,292<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />
ANOVA(b)<br />
Model<br />
Sum <strong>of</strong><br />
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />
1 Regression 98920,358 1 98920,358 484,291 ,000(a)<br />
Residual 44936,813 220 204,258<br />
Total 143857,171 221<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />
b Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />
Coefficients(a)<br />
Unstandardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
Standardized<br />
Coefficients t Sig.<br />
Model<br />
B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />
1 (Constant) 2,682 1,026 2,614 ,010<br />
Thinking about the total<br />
family income, can you<br />
say that it is enough or<br />
not?<br />
a Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />
,740 ,034 ,829 22,007 ,000
Annex 5. Simple regression between income and satisfaction with housing (for Hungary)<br />
Model Summary<br />
Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />
Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />
1 ,701(a) ,491 ,486 9,596<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough<br />
or not?<br />
ANOVA(b)<br />
Model<br />
Sum <strong>of</strong><br />
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />
1 Regression 8791,698 1 8791,698 95,468 ,000(a)<br />
Residual 9116,996 99 92,091<br />
Total 17908,693 100<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?b<br />
Dependent Variable: satisfaction with housing<br />
Coefficients(a)<br />
Unstandardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
179<br />
Standardized<br />
Coefficients t Sig.<br />
Model<br />
B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />
1 (Constant)<br />
Thinking about the total<br />
2,860 ,994 2,876 ,005<br />
family income, can you<br />
say that it is enough or<br />
not?<br />
,965 ,099 ,701 9,771 ,000<br />
a Dependent Variable: satisfaction with housing<br />
Annex 6. Simple regression between income and satisfaction with<br />
housing (for Romania)<br />
Model Summary<br />
Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />
Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />
1 ,813(a) ,662 ,660 16,079<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?
ANOVA(b)<br />
Model<br />
Sum <strong>of</strong><br />
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />
1 Regression 111217,744 1 111217,744 430,183 ,000(a)<br />
Residual 56877,918 220 258,536<br />
Total 168095,662 221<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?b<br />
Dependent Variable: satisfaction with housing<br />
Coefficients(a)<br />
Unstandardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
Model<br />
B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />
1 (Constant) 3,167 1,154 2,744 ,007<br />
Thinking about the total<br />
family income, can you<br />
say that it is enough or<br />
not?<br />
a Dependent Variable: satisfaction with housing<br />
180<br />
Standardized<br />
Coefficients t Sig.<br />
,785 ,038 ,813 20,741 ,000<br />
Annex 7. The regression model for the relationship between housing size and<br />
income (Roma in Hungary)<br />
Model Summary<br />
Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />
Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />
1 ,698(a) ,488 ,483 9,474<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />
ANOVA(b)<br />
Model<br />
Sum <strong>of</strong><br />
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />
1 Regression 8464,729 1 8464,729 94,299 ,000(a)<br />
Residual 8886,717 99 89,765<br />
Total 17351,446 100<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />
b Dependent Variable: which is the approximate area <strong>of</strong> the dwelling?
Coefficients(a)<br />
Unstandardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
181<br />
Standardized<br />
Coefficients t Sig.<br />
Model<br />
B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />
1 (Constant)<br />
Thinking about the total<br />
4,703 ,982 4,790 ,000<br />
family income, can you<br />
say that it is enough or<br />
not?<br />
,947 ,098 ,698 9,711 ,000<br />
a Dependent Variable: which is the approximate area <strong>of</strong> the dwelling?<br />
These tables show a significant association and also a strong relationship.<br />
Annex 8. The regression model for the relationship between the number <strong>of</strong> the persons in<br />
the dwelling and income (Roma in Hungary)<br />
Model Summary<br />
Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />
Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />
1 ,991(a) ,981 ,981 1,322<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />
ANOVA(b)<br />
Model<br />
Sum <strong>of</strong><br />
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />
1 Regression 9058,863 1 9058,863 5184,618 ,000(a)<br />
Residual 172,978 99 1,747<br />
Total 9231,842 100<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />
b Dependent Variable: How many persons live in your house?<br />
Coefficients(a)<br />
Unstandardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
Standardized<br />
Coefficients t Sig.<br />
Model<br />
B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />
1 (Constant)<br />
Thinking about the total<br />
1,205 ,137 8,796 ,000<br />
family income, can you<br />
say that it is enough or<br />
not?<br />
,980 ,014 ,991 72,004 ,000<br />
a Dependent Variable: How many persons live in your house?
Annex 9. The regression model for the relationship between housing size and income<br />
(Roma in Romania)<br />
Model Summary<br />
Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />
Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />
1 ,800(a) ,641 ,639 15,124<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />
ANOVA(b)<br />
Model<br />
Sum <strong>of</strong><br />
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />
1 Regression 89746,698 1 89746,698 392,372 ,000(a)<br />
Residual 50320,261 220 228,728<br />
Total 140066,959 221<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?b<br />
Dependent Variable: which is the approximate area <strong>of</strong> the dwelling?<br />
Coefficients(a)<br />
Unstandardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
Model<br />
B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />
1 (Constant) 1,355 1,086 1,248 ,213<br />
Thinking about the total<br />
family income, can you<br />
say that it is enough or<br />
not?<br />
a Dependent Variable: which is the approximate area <strong>of</strong> the dwelling?<br />
182<br />
Standardized<br />
Coefficients t Sig.<br />
,705 ,036 ,800 19,808 ,000<br />
Annex 10. The regression model for the relationship between the number <strong>of</strong> the persons<br />
in the dwelling and income (Roma in Romania)<br />
Model Summary<br />
Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />
Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />
1 ,862(a) ,743 ,742 12,589<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?
ANOVA(b)<br />
Model<br />
Sum <strong>of</strong><br />
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />
1 Regression 100782,651 1 100782,651 635,916 ,000(a)<br />
Residual 34866,520 220 158,484<br />
Total 135649,171 221<br />
a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />
b Dependent Variable: How many persons live in your house?<br />
Coefficients(a)<br />
Unstandardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
Model<br />
B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />
1 (Constant) 2,274 ,904 2,516 ,013<br />
Thinking about the total<br />
family income, can you<br />
say that it is enough or<br />
not?<br />
a Dependent Variable: How many persons live in your house?<br />
183<br />
Standardized<br />
Coefficients t Sig.<br />
,747 ,030 ,862 25,217 ,000
184
UTILISATION OF BENCHMARKING TECHNIQUES FOR FUNDAMENTING<br />
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES IN THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN<br />
ROMANIA<br />
Rujan Ovidiu<br />
Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies Faculty <strong>of</strong> International Business and Economics<br />
Ţarţavulea Ramona Iulia<br />
Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies Faculty <strong>of</strong> International Business and Economics<br />
Vasilescu Felician<br />
Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies Faculty <strong>of</strong> International Business and Economics<br />
Geambaşu Cristina Venera<br />
Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies Faculty <strong>of</strong> Accounting and Management Information Systems<br />
Abstract: Benchmarking is a method used to measure the products, services and processes in comparison to an<br />
entity recognized as a leader in terms <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> its operations. Used in the years 1970-1980 in the<br />
strategic management <strong>of</strong> the company currently has proven to be increasingly useful in many areas, including<br />
in international analysis models. In the European Union benchmarking indicators are used especially in the<br />
digital economy and as perspective indicators for 2011-2015 (Eurostat, Database).<br />
In the introduction we present and define forms <strong>of</strong> benchmarking, as well as a number <strong>of</strong> specific terms, which<br />
contribute to a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the content <strong>of</strong> this scientific work. Time series are used to highlight<br />
advances in labor productivity in EU countries, and the analysis is particularized for two countries: Romania<br />
and Germany. Quantitative data were collected from the source Eurostat website.<br />
A comprehensive indicator at macroeconomic level is resource productivity, representing GDP in relation with<br />
domestic consumption <strong>of</strong> material (DCM). DCM measures the amount <strong>of</strong> materials used directly by an<br />
economy. It is presented in tabular form for all European Union countries and Switzerland, as evolving over a<br />
period <strong>of</strong> eight years.<br />
Benchmarking method is used to highlight some differences (gaps) between EU countries regarding<br />
productivity and particularly the one between Germany and Romania is highlighted, concerning the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> manufacturing industries. It is expected that this gap will diminish. The gap was highlighted by<br />
relevant graphics and interpretations. The second part <strong>of</strong> the paper focuses on comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> factors<br />
productivity using the production function. We analyze labor and capital productivity and other factors that<br />
determine the level <strong>of</strong> production. For highlighting the contribution <strong>of</strong> the labour factor we used the number <strong>of</strong><br />
hours worked, considering that it reflects the analyzed phenomenon more realistically. For highlighting the<br />
contribution <strong>of</strong> capital factor we used as an indicator the capital stock in euros, available for Germany in the<br />
Eurostat database, and for Romania in the Statistical Yearbook 2009, expressed in RON, as comparable prices<br />
and then converted into euros at the average rate calculated by the NBR . The results for the entire<br />
manufacturing industry represent the basis for further expansion <strong>of</strong> benchmarking to the main components <strong>of</strong><br />
this industry, especially automobile building, transportation vechicules, furniture, clothing, leather chemical,<br />
etc.., providing a scientific basis to fundament the economic policies including commercial ones.<br />
Keywords: benchmarking, labor productivity, resource productivity, capital productivity, sustainable<br />
development strategy<br />
JEL Codes: F15 - Economic Integration, F31 - Foreign Exchange, L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing<br />
1. Introduction: Characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />
benchmarking<br />
Benchmarking - a process that aims at<br />
seeking solutions to enhance the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> the organization, based on<br />
the best methods and procedures <strong>of</strong> the<br />
185<br />
industry. Setting business goals based on<br />
optimal methods and procedures existing in<br />
the industry are an important factor in the<br />
success <strong>of</strong> business strategy.<br />
Benchmarking techniques were originally<br />
developed in strategic management in order
to identify aspects through which one can<br />
compare an organization with similar<br />
organizations, even though they may<br />
function in a different industry or have a<br />
different target group <strong>of</strong> customers. In<br />
addition, benchmarking can be a valuable<br />
tool to identify areas, systems or processes<br />
that need improvement, which can take the<br />
form <strong>of</strong> a continuous development or <strong>of</strong> a<br />
dramatic change as business process<br />
reengineering.<br />
There are several types <strong>of</strong> benchmarking, the<br />
most common being: - Technical<br />
benchmarking - involves identifying<br />
products and services capability, especially<br />
in comparison with similar products and<br />
services <strong>of</strong> leading competitors, market<br />
leaders, using a scale <strong>of</strong> 1-4 (4 being the best<br />
score) to quantify properties <strong>of</strong> products and<br />
services from your organization. If input data<br />
about products and services are difficult to<br />
obtain, they may be regarded as<br />
inappropriate to be competitive.<br />
- Competitive benchmarking - involves a<br />
quantification <strong>of</strong> the main attributes,<br />
functions or values associated with products<br />
or services, so you can make a comparison<br />
between them and those <strong>of</strong> market leader<br />
(Sherman and Zhu, 2006)<br />
- Functional benchmarking – represents<br />
using benchmarking methods to compare a<br />
particular business function in two or more<br />
companies (Lerna and Price, 1995). Camp<br />
(1989) defines it as a particular function<br />
comparison with best practices in that area.<br />
Our aim is to conduct a study on industries<br />
in different countries using benchmarking.<br />
The research methodology consists <strong>of</strong><br />
preparing the statistical series for a period<br />
long enough to show realistically the<br />
phenomena investigated, on productivity in<br />
EU member states and highlighting<br />
indicators <strong>of</strong> efficiency in manufacturing<br />
production in Romania and Germany. The<br />
indicators were estimated using the Cobb-<br />
Douglas function <strong>of</strong> production for the<br />
manufacturing industry in the two countries,<br />
186<br />
using data according to CAEN Rev.1.1<br />
(including 2008).<br />
2. Literature review<br />
The International Association Global<br />
Benchmarking Network (GBN) is joining<br />
private and public institutions, non-pr<strong>of</strong>it or<br />
research organizations which have expertise<br />
in benchmarking. The role <strong>of</strong> this association<br />
is to share knowledge and capabilities in the<br />
field <strong>of</strong> benchmarking through exchange <strong>of</strong><br />
experience between its members and<br />
promoting the best practices identified.<br />
Through the association's members, who are<br />
from different parts <strong>of</strong> the globe, the<br />
association keeps in touch with the current<br />
stage <strong>of</strong> development in the field <strong>of</strong><br />
benchmarking and enhances the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> this branch <strong>of</strong> study.<br />
In order to use benchmarking techniques it is<br />
essential to have a common understanding <strong>of</strong><br />
specific terminology, which enable experts<br />
to express their ideas in a concise manner. In<br />
this respect GBN association has developed<br />
a glossary <strong>of</strong> terms. For a better<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> this research paper, we<br />
considered necessary to present a selection<br />
<strong>of</strong> some relevant terms from the glossary <strong>of</strong><br />
benchmarking terms, as it follows:<br />
- Benchmarking Gap - represents the<br />
difference in performance between an<br />
activity conducted at a company and the<br />
same activity at other competitors on the<br />
market.<br />
- Benchmarking <strong>of</strong> sectors - compares<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> two sectors, the purposes <strong>of</strong><br />
comparison being to take best practices from<br />
one sector, and applies them to the weakest<br />
sector on that particular criterion.<br />
- The productivity <strong>of</strong> capital - is an<br />
economic indicator <strong>of</strong> productivity, which<br />
measures the level <strong>of</strong> output (in euro or<br />
dollar) made for each euro/dollar invested in<br />
fixed assets. - Core competence - a<br />
company's strategic capability, which gives<br />
them a market advantage. - Productivity<br />
Benchmarking - provides companies with a<br />
systematic method to compile indicators <strong>of</strong>
economic growth in order to create a table <strong>of</strong><br />
economic productivity used to identify<br />
activities and processes which do not add<br />
value, but represent an additional cost.<br />
Another important concept that will be used<br />
in the proposed research is that <strong>of</strong> labor<br />
productivity. The generally accepted<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> labor productivity is quantity <strong>of</strong><br />
production obtained per unit <strong>of</strong> labor, which<br />
can be represented by the number <strong>of</strong> hours<br />
worked, number <strong>of</strong> employed persons<br />
(employees and other categories) or number<br />
<strong>of</strong> employees. The version which takes into<br />
account the number <strong>of</strong> hours worked is the<br />
most used, reflecting more realistic the<br />
phenomenon analyzed. The labor<br />
productivity determined using the number <strong>of</strong><br />
employees, it is easier to calculate, but the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> results is more modest. (Bolstorff<br />
and Rosenbaum, 2003)<br />
Labor productivity can be determined for<br />
different representations <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
performance: total production or gross value<br />
added. We opted for the last presented<br />
expression <strong>of</strong> performance. Statistical data<br />
show significant differences between<br />
countries on this indicator.<br />
3. Research Methodology<br />
The research objective is to realize a<br />
comparative study between the performance<br />
<strong>of</strong> industries in different countries, and we<br />
chose Romania and Germany in particular.<br />
The research methodology consists in taking<br />
187<br />
the benchmarking method, and apply it in<br />
research <strong>of</strong> industry performance, comparing<br />
different countries <strong>of</strong> the European Union (to<br />
complete the picture <strong>of</strong> the studied<br />
phenomenon, we introduced the comparisons<br />
also Switzerland). We sought to highlight<br />
indicators <strong>of</strong> manufacturing production<br />
efficiency in Romania, taking specific<br />
indicators in Germany as point <strong>of</strong> reference.<br />
It should be noted from the very beginning<br />
that, during 2000 - 2007 (2008), for which<br />
we had available statistics provided by<br />
Eurostat, Romania has a notable gap<br />
compared with Germany.<br />
4. Comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> labor<br />
productivity<br />
Regardless <strong>of</strong> the calculation method (see<br />
Literature review), labor productivity is only<br />
a partial measure <strong>of</strong> productivity, showing<br />
the cumulative effect <strong>of</strong> several factors:<br />
mainly capital and intermediate<br />
consumption, and technological and<br />
organizational efficiency, economies <strong>of</strong> scale<br />
or potential growth in utilization <strong>of</strong><br />
production capacity. A comprehensive<br />
indicator at macroeconomic level is resource<br />
productivity, representing GDP in relation<br />
with domestic consumption <strong>of</strong> material<br />
(DCM). DCM measures the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
materials used directly by an economy. In<br />
table 1, this indicator is presented for the EU<br />
members and Switzerland for the year 2007<br />
compared with 2000.
Table 1: Resource productivity in the years 2000 and 2007 in EU countries and Switzerland<br />
(EUR per kg)<br />
2000 2007 2000 2007<br />
UE 27 1,21 1,3 Lithuania 0,44 0,43<br />
UE 15 1,4 1,57 Luxemburg 2,78 4,32<br />
Belgium 1,32 1,47 Hungary 0,45 0,6<br />
Bulgaria 0,13 0,14 Malta 3 2,14<br />
Czech Republic 0,33 0,42 Holland 2,16 2,6<br />
Denmark 1,28 1,24 Austria 1,41 1,4<br />
Germany 1,41 1,71 Poland 0,32 0,38<br />
Estonia 0,32 0,27 Portugal 0,66 0,62<br />
Ireland 0,63 0,66 Romania 0,18 0,14<br />
Greece 0,88 0,98 Slovenia 0,48 0,46<br />
Spain 0,93 0,9 Slovakia 0,4 0,49<br />
France 1,64 1,8 Finland 0,76 0,79<br />
Italy 1,25 1,6 Sweden 1,71 1,79<br />
Cyprus 0,66 0,64 United Kingdom 2,11 2,54<br />
Letonia 0,24 0,31 Switzerland 3,05 3,36<br />
Data source: Eurostat, Statistics, Sustainable Consumption and Production<br />
We observe that the pursued indicator values<br />
are dispersed (from 0.13 Bulgaria, 4.32<br />
Luxemburg), for 18 out <strong>of</strong> 28 countries<br />
(including Switzerland) the value <strong>of</strong><br />
indicators has increased, most important<br />
being in Luxembourg, United Kingdom,<br />
Switzerland, Germany and Italy; for other 10<br />
countries the value <strong>of</strong> the indicator has<br />
decreased, highlighting a diminish <strong>of</strong><br />
efficiency in resources utilization.<br />
188<br />
To emphasize the important differences<br />
between countries on the resource<br />
productivity and its changes over time, we<br />
presented in chart 1 a upwards ranking <strong>of</strong><br />
countries by indicator values in 2007, based<br />
on data in Table 1.<br />
It appears that both the EU 27 and EU 15<br />
increased in resource productivity, and<br />
former socialist countries, now EU members,<br />
without exception, are at levels below the<br />
EU 27 average.<br />
Figure 1: Comparison between the productivity <strong>of</strong> resources in 27 EU countries (and<br />
Switzerland) and Romania in 2000-2007<br />
Source: Based on data from Eurostat Statistics, Sustainable Consumption and Production
Romania, as well as Bulgaria, is experiencing an amazingly low level <strong>of</strong> this indicator and,<br />
unlike Bulgaria, has recorded a decrease in time. Figure 1 shows a comparison between the<br />
evolution in time <strong>of</strong> the indicator in Romania and the European Union average.<br />
1,5<br />
1<br />
0,5<br />
0<br />
Figure 2: Comparison between the average productivity <strong>of</strong> resources in EU 27 countries and<br />
Romania during 2000-2007<br />
Source: Based on the data from Eurostat, Statistics, Sustainable Consumption and Production<br />
5. Capital productivity and capital stock<br />
Capital productivity index shows the<br />
economic result (gross value added) produced<br />
by a certain amount <strong>of</strong> immobile productive<br />
capital.<br />
To measure the capital stock involved in a<br />
production process, literature and empirical<br />
analysis recommends several methods:<br />
- The flow <strong>of</strong> productive services provided by<br />
an asset in the production process;<br />
- Gross stock <strong>of</strong> capital obtained by<br />
cumulating the investment flow, adjusted by<br />
the rate <strong>of</strong> removal from service <strong>of</strong> capital<br />
goods.<br />
- The net stock <strong>of</strong> capital obtained by<br />
correcting the gross stock capital with the loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> productive capacity.<br />
Given the availability <strong>of</strong> statistical data, we<br />
used the gross stock <strong>of</strong> capital to estimate the<br />
coefficients for the production function. In<br />
the process <strong>of</strong> estimating the production<br />
function coefficients, we have highlighted the<br />
contribution <strong>of</strong> other factors, besides labor<br />
and capital.<br />
Multifactor productivity (MPF) allows the<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> distinct contributions <strong>of</strong><br />
labor, capital, intermediate consumption and<br />
technology/efficiency to the final production.<br />
This contribution is shown by indicator PMF<br />
UE 27 România<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
189<br />
- KLEMS (capital-labor-energy-materialsservices),<br />
considered to be the most<br />
comprehensive measure <strong>of</strong> efficiency at<br />
industry level, calculated only for 25<br />
countries from the EU, Romania and Bulgaria<br />
being excepted.<br />
6. Results <strong>of</strong> the research and conclusions<br />
For econometric estimation <strong>of</strong> production<br />
function coefficients for the manufacturing<br />
industry in the two countries, we used<br />
statistical data about gross value added (VA),<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> hours worked (HEMP) and<br />
gross capital stock (KGFCF) from the<br />
Eurostat database for Germany and the<br />
corresponding data <strong>of</strong> the same variables in<br />
the Statistical Yearbook <strong>of</strong> Romania 2009.<br />
Variables were converted from RON to euro<br />
for Romania, using the average annual<br />
exchange rate, published by the BNR. Before<br />
2000, the exchange rate seemed to distort the<br />
value sizes studied, so we decided to limit the<br />
time series data to the period 2000-2007,<br />
although statistics provide data since 1995.<br />
The production function has the following<br />
expression:<br />
Y = A * L α * K β , where Y, L and k are<br />
respectively VA, HEMP and KGFCF and the<br />
exponents are elasticities <strong>of</strong> output
(production) to input (production factors). A<br />
expresses the contribution <strong>of</strong> other factors,<br />
besides labor and capital. The values<br />
190<br />
estimated using multiple regression are<br />
summarized in Table 2.<br />
Table 2: Estimated coefficients for the production function related to the manufacturing<br />
industry in Romania and Germany for the period 2000-2007.<br />
A α β<br />
Germany 19,04085387 0,857702548 0,146318628<br />
Romania 0,581636175 0,052085522 0,972634345<br />
Source: made by author based on econometric calculations<br />
In Germany the elasticity <strong>of</strong> production to<br />
labor is 0.86, that means work contributed<br />
decisevely to the increase <strong>of</strong> production in the<br />
period studied, while in Romania it is close to<br />
zero. Coefficient A shows the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
technical refinements, organizational, etc.<br />
over production growth: it is high in Germany<br />
and low in Romania. Unlike labor factor,<br />
capital factor has had a remarkable<br />
contribution to increasing the production in<br />
Romania (although this increase was modest).<br />
We provide those interested many useful<br />
statistical data series concerning the<br />
investigated theme.<br />
We believe that the elements outlined above<br />
can represent the base for analysis for all<br />
Romanian manufacturing industries because<br />
the comparison <strong>of</strong> them with several leaders<br />
<strong>of</strong> the world economy can represent the<br />
scientific fundament necessary for<br />
elaboration <strong>of</strong> economic policies.<br />
7. Bibliography<br />
Books<br />
1. Jack B. Revelle 's Quality Essentials: A<br />
Reference Guide from A to Z, ASQ Quality<br />
Press, 2004, pages 8-9.<br />
2. Bogan, Christopher E., English, Michael J.<br />
Benchmarking for Best Practices: Winning<br />
through Innovative Adaptation, New York:<br />
McGraw-Hill, 1994, ISBN 0070063753<br />
3. Bolstorff, Peter Rosenbaum, Robert,<br />
Supply Chain Excellence: A Handbook for<br />
Dramatic Improvement Using the SCOR<br />
Model, USA: AMACOM, 2003<br />
4. Zhu, Joe, Quantitative models for<br />
Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking:<br />
Data Development Analysis with<br />
Spreadsheets and Dea Excel Solver, Boston:<br />
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003<br />
Articles<br />
1. Camp R.C. 1993, A Bible for<br />
benchmarking, by Xerox. Financial Executive<br />
(July / August), pp 23-27.<br />
2. Sherman, David H., Zhu, Joe,<br />
Benchmarking to Seek Lower-Cost High-<br />
Quality Service with Data Envelopment<br />
Analysis: Evidence from the U.S. bank<br />
application<br />
Web sites:<br />
1.How to Use Benchmarking in Business,<br />
accesed 20 April 2011,<br />
http://management.about.com/cs/benchmarki<br />
ng/a/Benchmarking.htm<br />
2.Benchmarking - Past, Present and Future,<br />
accesed 24 April 2011,<br />
http://www.benchnet.com/bppf2003e.cfm<br />
3.Strategy – benchmarking, accesed 24 April<br />
2011,<br />
http://tutor2u.net/business/strategy/benchmar<br />
king.htm
Section Economics and Business Administration<br />
Sub-section: Business Administration
192
THE BRAND EQUITY OF TOURISTIC DESTINATIONS – THE MEANING OF<br />
THE VALUE<br />
Ban Olimpia<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics science<br />
Popa Luminiţa<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics science<br />
Silaghi Simona<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics science<br />
Abstract: In today’s global economy, each place competes with other places for economic benefits.<br />
Destination has become a product that has to be promoted and sold in the most advantageous<br />
terms. The work bellow is an analysis <strong>of</strong> “brand equity” concept for touristic destinations, as<br />
found in the specific literature. Destination brands differ from product brands, major distinction<br />
being given by their stability/ instability. Brands <strong>of</strong> products are stable; this constant is maintained<br />
by the use <strong>of</strong> quality standards. Even in case <strong>of</strong> services, situation can be controlled, as quality<br />
standards could be perpetuated by a franchise system. Destinations are not depending on a single<br />
person, who decides, but a variety <strong>of</strong> them, economic agents, businesses, institutions and local<br />
population that can create/print form and structure changes <strong>of</strong> the destination.<br />
The concept de brand equity applied for touristic destinations, is something relatively recent. The<br />
dimensions <strong>of</strong> a brand for touristic destinations are: awareness, image, loyalty, quality and value.<br />
All these dimensions build the branding equity <strong>of</strong> a destination. There is interdependency, between<br />
quality, image, loyalty and value. In order to determine the perception in regards to the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
tourism services in Romania, in 2010 a comprehensive study was done among the inhabitants <strong>of</strong><br />
Oradea city. Through this study we have pursued several objectives: to assess the importance <strong>of</strong><br />
service characteristics, performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> tourism services in Romania, tourism personnel<br />
evaluation, in terms <strong>of</strong> evaluation and performance, perception <strong>of</strong> the quality-price ratio for<br />
Romania, compared with other tourist destinations. We call on the exploratory study conducted, as<br />
the value <strong>of</strong> the dimension- destination <strong>of</strong> the brand equity is given by the price-quality ratio. Using<br />
an explorative study on the market <strong>of</strong> Oradea city, it was highlighted the connection between<br />
perception <strong>of</strong> touristic services, estimation price-quality (value) and the loyalty potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />
foreign clients in proportion with the Romanian tourists, consumers <strong>of</strong> the Romanian touristic<br />
products.<br />
Keywords: brand equity, destination, tourism, survey, Oradea<br />
Code JEL: M21, M31<br />
1. Introduction in the „brand equity” <strong>of</strong> a<br />
destination:<br />
In relatively recent works, branding was<br />
treated as an essential subject (Aaker 1996),<br />
(Aaker and Joachimsthaler 2000), (Kania<br />
2001). Modern branding appeared in the<br />
XIXth century and includes legal instruments<br />
as: logos, campaigns, identity systems,<br />
personality and the links between them. In<br />
tourism, branding is understood as being<br />
193<br />
“(…) a unique combination <strong>of</strong> product<br />
characteristics and added values, both<br />
functional and non-functional, which have<br />
taken on a relevant meaning which is<br />
inextricably linked to the brand, awarnesses<br />
<strong>of</strong> wich might be conscious or<br />
intuitive.(Morgan 1998: 140)”<br />
Destination branding is even more recent.<br />
Among the first books that were exlusively<br />
dedicated to this subject, we mention<br />
Destination Branding (Morgan, Pritchard and
oger Pride:2002), and also the published<br />
works in special number <strong>of</strong> the Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Brand Management (Hall:2002), (Harrison:<br />
2002) and (Morgan, Pritchard and Piggott:<br />
2002). When talking about touristic<br />
destinations, brand equity is still a vague<br />
concept. The theoretical delimitation <strong>of</strong> this<br />
subject is still subject <strong>of</strong> changes. Brand<br />
equity is the process <strong>of</strong> not only establishing<br />
the characteristic <strong>of</strong> a brand, but also<br />
establishing the value <strong>of</strong> that characteristic. It<br />
comes from the financial evaluation literature<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 1990s (Barwise 1993). Aaker and<br />
Joachimsthaler (Aaker and Joachimsthaler<br />
2000), both had an important contribution to<br />
the theoretical substantiation <strong>of</strong> brand equity.<br />
They launched the idea that the value <strong>of</strong> a<br />
brand is given by the: awareness <strong>of</strong> the brand,<br />
perceived quality <strong>of</strong> the brand, brand<br />
associations and loyalty for the brand.<br />
Hankinson completed the theory <strong>of</strong> brand<br />
value, by adding the concept <strong>of</strong> brand<br />
network, where the destination brand has four<br />
functions: (1) as a communicator, when the<br />
brand “represents a mark <strong>of</strong> ownership, and a<br />
means <strong>of</strong> product differentiation manifested<br />
in legally protected names, logos, and<br />
trademarks”; (2) as a perceptible entity<br />
“which appeal to the consumer senses,<br />
reasons, and emotions; (3) “brands as value<br />
enhancers,” that leads to the concept <strong>of</strong> brand<br />
equity; and (4) “brands as relationships,<br />
where the brand is built with personality and<br />
establishes a form <strong>of</strong> relationship with the<br />
consumer. (Hankinson 2004: 110–111),<br />
(Blain, Stuard and Ritchie 2005: 329).<br />
Using the brand is one <strong>of</strong> the primary forms<br />
<strong>of</strong> product differentiation. The question is to<br />
what extent branding as part <strong>of</strong> marketing<br />
strategy can be used to create brand equity for<br />
a touristic destination that is not yet known,<br />
virtually the same time seeking notoriety and<br />
differentiation. There are opinions that say<br />
that this is possible. ( Room 1992:13–21)<br />
For a consumer, brand evaluation is simple.<br />
Brand equity value is given by the difference<br />
in price between a generic product and an<br />
equivalent one that “has a name”. This<br />
194<br />
reference to generic products is increasingly<br />
difficult, as almost all generic products do not<br />
exist anymore. In regards to the touristic<br />
destinations, the brand equity evaluation<br />
method requires changes, as the comparison<br />
“on the shelves <strong>of</strong> a store” is not possible. In<br />
case <strong>of</strong> tourism destinations, the indicators<br />
used for assessing brand equity is: the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> tourists who choose a destination, the<br />
volume <strong>of</strong> expenditure made in that<br />
destination and the length <strong>of</strong> stay.<br />
2. The dimensions <strong>of</strong> tourism destination<br />
brand<br />
The experiential factor marks a significant<br />
difference between products and destinations.<br />
A destination cannot be tried, seen before<br />
purchase and consumption, therefore the idea<br />
<strong>of</strong> having a guarantee is excluded. The<br />
touristic product <strong>of</strong> a destination product is<br />
experiential by nature and it differs for each<br />
customer because <strong>of</strong> the internalization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
experience.<br />
Novelty is essential to differentiate<br />
destinations. Tourist trip requires differences<br />
between place <strong>of</strong> residence and destination,<br />
among other destinations and chosen<br />
destination. This is why, in many promotional<br />
messages, the novelty is found even in the<br />
title or slogan. (Pride 2007)<br />
A destination must be different from many<br />
points <strong>of</strong> view to worth the time and the<br />
money, but the novelty cannot be simply<br />
declared, it must be demonstrated -”novelty<br />
cannot simply declared, it must brand<br />
equityearned” (Cai, Gartner and Munar<br />
2009: 54)<br />
Novelty given by the destination is<br />
recognized in the perception <strong>of</strong> the consumers<br />
- consumers must be aware <strong>of</strong> the differences<br />
between their residency and other<br />
destinations.<br />
The dimensions <strong>of</strong> “destination brand” are<br />
different than the product brand, although<br />
mainly follows the same steps. Theorists and<br />
practitioners support the idea that places are<br />
being branded the same as products and
services are. Kotler extended the concept <strong>of</strong><br />
brand from products to destinations.<br />
Konecnik and Gartner (Konecnik and Gartner<br />
2007: 400–421) have proposed four<br />
dimensions that can be applied to<br />
destinations: awareness, loyalty, image and<br />
quality. Tasci, Gartner and So (Tasci,<br />
Gartner and So 2007) have added another<br />
one, the value, which we consider to be<br />
appropriate.<br />
Different consumer segments evaluate each<br />
<strong>of</strong> these dimensions in different and<br />
significant ways.<br />
• Awareness is an essential dimension <strong>of</strong> the<br />
brand. It is the first step in building brand<br />
equity. A place can be known in a certain<br />
context before it can be considered a potential<br />
destination. Goodall (Goodall 1993)<br />
identified four levels <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> a place:<br />
knowledge, familiarity, top <strong>of</strong> mind and<br />
dominant. Dominant has here the meaning <strong>of</strong><br />
the spotlight for various reasons, it is what is<br />
called a "hot spot" and may be positive or<br />
negative in nature.<br />
• The image is the dimension that attracted<br />
the most attention <strong>of</strong> researchers, there are a<br />
considerable number <strong>of</strong> articles on this<br />
subject. Initially it was thought that the image<br />
can substitute for the other dimensions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
brand, but this opinion has remained isolated.<br />
The roots <strong>of</strong> the brand are reflected in the<br />
destination image studies initiated since the<br />
1970s (Hunt 1975)<br />
Creating a brand does not mean branding,<br />
though it’s the base <strong>of</strong> the brand-building.<br />
Building the image is one step closer to the<br />
brand, but what still lacks is the brand<br />
identity. (Cai 2002)<br />
Loyalty is given by repeat visit or repeat<br />
purchase.<br />
• Quality is a subjective term, but can be<br />
operationalized through a series <strong>of</strong> scales. As<br />
an independent dimension (and not subject to<br />
image), it has been studied by many<br />
researchers (Fick and Ritchie 1991);<br />
(Murphy, Pritchard and Smith 2000). Quality<br />
is assessed from consumer’s perspective, in<br />
fact the quality perception is evaluated.<br />
195<br />
Quality is a key dimension <strong>of</strong> brand equity <strong>of</strong><br />
a product and maintaining it is mandatory,<br />
this rule extends to the tourism destination as<br />
well. Establishing and maintaining a quality<br />
level for a destination requires controlling all<br />
products and services “supplied” by the<br />
destination and this is something very<br />
difficult to realize. On a tourist destination,<br />
the quality can be ensured only in regards to<br />
the common objectives such as museums,<br />
reservations etc. but it is perceived in regards<br />
to accommodations and individual services.<br />
The brand is a guarantee <strong>of</strong> quality (<strong>of</strong> a<br />
certain quality). Consumers expect and are<br />
willing to pay extra for the peace <strong>of</strong> mind that<br />
a brand is providing them. "At the Same<br />
Time, visitors can also expect to pay a<br />
premium for this assurance <strong>of</strong> quality and<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> perceived risk.” (Blain, Stuarda<br />
and Ritchie 2005: 330)<br />
• The brand equity value is the most recently<br />
studied dimension and is seen as part <strong>of</strong><br />
quality, reflected in the price paid for a<br />
product. The importance <strong>of</strong> price in the<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> BE was recognized by several<br />
researchers (Echtner and Ritchie 1993).<br />
However the price is not synonymous with<br />
quality. Value does not refer to quality or<br />
price, as much as it refers to favorable or notfavorable<br />
price-quality ratio. For example, a<br />
services package can be seen as valuable, not<br />
at the expense <strong>of</strong> the high quality services,<br />
but at the expense <strong>of</strong> quality-price ratio.<br />
Consumer segments related to mass tourism<br />
focus more on value, understood as “fair<br />
value for the money”.<br />
Operationalizing the dimensions by a scale <strong>of</strong><br />
measurement is a necessary precondition in<br />
order to isolate the dimensions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
destination.<br />
3.Research methodology and results<br />
The research was conducted in two stages:<br />
March-April 2010 and March-April 2011.<br />
The first phase was conducted in March-April<br />
2010 on a sample <strong>of</strong> 1060 people from the<br />
population <strong>of</strong> Oradea city. The sampling<br />
method chosen was the stratification method
(with a margin <strong>of</strong> error <strong>of</strong> 3%) and the used<br />
criteria was the age. After the criteria the<br />
distribution was chosen, as follows: 150<br />
people aged 18-24 years, 234 people aged 25-<br />
34 years, 208 people aged between 35-44<br />
years, 192 people aged 45-54 years, 152<br />
people aged between 55-64 years, 124<br />
persons aged between 65-80 years. There<br />
were investigated persons who benefited <strong>of</strong><br />
accommodation at least once during the<br />
period 2007 - until the time <strong>of</strong> the survey.<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> the research was to<br />
investigate Oradea`s population level <strong>of</strong><br />
satisfaction in regards to the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
tourist/guest services and the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
tourism personnel services in Romania, and<br />
the results were presented in the paper “Guest<br />
services quality assesment in tourism, using<br />
an attributes scale” (Ban and Popa 2010)<br />
The second stage <strong>of</strong> the research was<br />
conducted between March-April 2011 on a<br />
sample <strong>of</strong> 62 people, consisting <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />
tourists present in Oradea and the<br />
surrounding area, therefore active consumers<br />
<strong>of</strong> tourism services in Romania. The<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> the sample, based on age<br />
criteria is as follows: four persons aged<br />
15% 1%<br />
31%<br />
very high<br />
high<br />
53%<br />
medium<br />
low<br />
196<br />
between 18-24 years, 6 persons aged between<br />
25-34 years, 20 people aged between 35-44<br />
years, 22 people aged between 45-54 years,<br />
eight persons aged 55-64 years, two persons<br />
aged 65-80 years.<br />
The investigation on the price level<br />
perception <strong>of</strong> Oradea`s population, has<br />
produced the following results: more than<br />
half (52.6%) believe that the level <strong>of</strong> prices<br />
in Romanian tourism is high, while a<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> 31.1% believe that the prices<br />
are prohibitively high. Summing up the<br />
percentages, 83.7% believe that the level <strong>of</strong><br />
prices in Romanian tourism exceed far<br />
beyond what consumers are willing to pay.<br />
Only a percentage <strong>of</strong> 14.7% believe that<br />
prices are right, at a medium level, while only<br />
1.6% <strong>of</strong> the respondents believe the<br />
Romanian tourism prices are low.<br />
Unlike the Romanian people, a percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
64.5% <strong>of</strong> the foreign tourists consider that the<br />
prices <strong>of</strong> tourism services in Romania are at a<br />
medium level and only 25.8% consider that<br />
the prices are at a high level. No foreign<br />
tourist investigated in this research<br />
considered that the price level is very high.<br />
(produced by the authors)<br />
Figure 1 (a) Opinions <strong>of</strong> Oradea`s population in regards to the prices <strong>of</strong> tourism services<br />
(b) Views <strong>of</strong> foreign tourists in regards to the prices <strong>of</strong> tourism services in Romania<br />
Any assessment <strong>of</strong> cost is directly or<br />
indirectly in relation to the perceived value <strong>of</strong><br />
the product.Regarding the option for their<br />
10% 0%<br />
64%<br />
26%<br />
very high<br />
high<br />
medium<br />
low<br />
future vacation destination, it is not surprising<br />
the relatively small percentage <strong>of</strong> those who<br />
chose Romania, but the fact that the values
ecorded for Oradea’s population and foreign<br />
tourists are close. The premise was that many<br />
more Romanians would choose Romania.<br />
By using the SPSS s<strong>of</strong>tware, was verified the<br />
type <strong>of</strong> link that exists between the desire <strong>of</strong><br />
the foreign tourists to return to Romania<br />
(loyalty required by the brand equity) and<br />
78%<br />
78%<br />
22%<br />
197<br />
their evaluation <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> tourism<br />
services in Romania. A positive correlation<br />
was identified, with a very high level <strong>of</strong><br />
significance, which supports the idea that the<br />
choice <strong>of</strong> a tourism destination is based on<br />
the perceived quality <strong>of</strong> tourism services <strong>of</strong><br />
that particular destination.<br />
(produced by the authors)<br />
Figure No. 2 (a) Opinions <strong>of</strong> Oradea `s population on future holiday destination choice<br />
(b) views <strong>of</strong> foreign tourists iin regards to their next holiday destination choice<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
22%<br />
in Romania<br />
out <strong>of</strong> Romania<br />
in Romania<br />
out Romania<br />
(produced by the authors)<br />
Figure 3. Oradea inhabitants’ opinions in regards to the quality <strong>of</strong> tourism services in<br />
Romania and <strong>of</strong> foreign tourists’ opinions on the quality <strong>of</strong> tourism services in Romania<br />
4. Conclusions<br />
The increase <strong>of</strong> the brand equity <strong>of</strong> a<br />
destination is a natural goal. The dimensions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the brand <strong>of</strong> a tourism destination are:<br />
awareness, image, loyalty, quality and value.<br />
These dimensions are building the brand<br />
equity <strong>of</strong> a destination. Between quality,<br />
84%<br />
foreign tourists romanian tourists<br />
16%<br />
in Romania<br />
out <strong>of</strong> Romania<br />
very high<br />
high<br />
medium<br />
low<br />
very low<br />
image, loyalty and value there is<br />
interdependence.<br />
The exploratory study performed on Oradea’s<br />
market highlighted the link between<br />
perceived quality <strong>of</strong> tourism services, “value<br />
for money” assessment <strong>of</strong> tourism services<br />
(the value) and the potential <strong>of</strong> customers’
loyalty. The results <strong>of</strong> the study conducted on<br />
foreign tourists have shown that a perception<br />
<strong>of</strong> high or very high quality <strong>of</strong> services is<br />
directly related to the option <strong>of</strong> visiting<br />
Romania and hence a perception <strong>of</strong> a medium<br />
or low quality <strong>of</strong> tourism services is related to<br />
the intention <strong>of</strong> choosing another destination.<br />
The percentage <strong>of</strong> those who wish to return to<br />
Romania is low, only 16%.<br />
The perception <strong>of</strong> poor quality tourism<br />
services is also related to the big picture, as<br />
the countries in Central and Eastern Europe<br />
are associated with inconsistent quality, poor<br />
service <strong>of</strong> bad quality, poor quality <strong>of</strong><br />
accommodation (Hall, 1999).<br />
The effort <strong>of</strong> changing the reality <strong>of</strong> tourism<br />
services in Romania has to be supported by<br />
the effort <strong>of</strong> changing the image-umbrella <strong>of</strong><br />
an entire geographic region.<br />
Bibliography<br />
Books:<br />
1.Aaker, David A. Building Strong Brands.<br />
New York: Free Press, 1996.<br />
2.Aaker, David A., Joachimsthaler, E. Brand<br />
Leadership. NewYork: Free Press, 2000.<br />
3.Cai, A.L., Gartner, W.C., Munar, A.M.,<br />
Tourism Branding: Communities in Action.<br />
Bridging Tourism Theory and Practice, vol.1,<br />
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009.<br />
4.Goodall, B. “How Tourists Choose their<br />
Holidays: An Analytical Framework”. In<br />
Marketing in the Tourism Industry: The<br />
Promotion <strong>of</strong> Destination Regions, B. Goodal<br />
and G. Ashworth, eds., 1-17. London:<br />
Routledge, 1993.<br />
5.Kania, Deborah. Branding.com: Online<br />
Branding for Marketing Success. Chicago:<br />
American Marketing Association, 2001.<br />
6.Morgan N.; Pritchard Annette. Tourism<br />
Promotion and Power. Creating Images,<br />
Creating Identities, John Wiley and Sons,<br />
1998.<br />
7.Morgan, Nigel, Pritchard, Annette and<br />
Pride, Roger. Destination Branding: Creating<br />
the Unique Destination Proposition. Oxford,<br />
UK:Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.<br />
198<br />
8.Room, A. History <strong>of</strong> Branding. In<br />
Branding: A Key Marketing Tool, J. Murphy,<br />
ed., Houndmills: Macmillan, 1992.<br />
Articles in magazines / journals online:<br />
1.Ban, Olimpia; Popa, Luminiţa “Guest<br />
services quality assesment in tourism, using<br />
an attributes scale”, International Conference<br />
"European Integration - New Challenges"<br />
Sixth Edition, Oradea, 28-29 May 2010.<br />
Accessed on February 20, 2011.<br />
2.http://ideas.repec.org/cgibin/htsearch?q=Ban+Olimpia&ul=%2Fora%2<br />
Fjournl.<br />
3.Barwise, P. “Introduction to the Special<br />
Issue on Brand Equity”. International<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Research in Marketing 10(1)<br />
(1993): 3–8.<br />
4.Cai, L. “Cooperative Branding for Rural<br />
Destinations”. Annals <strong>of</strong> Tourism Research<br />
29(3)(2002):720–742.<br />
5.Blain, Carmen, Stuard, E. L. and Ritchie,<br />
J.R.B. ”Destination Branding: Insights and<br />
Practices from Destination Management<br />
Organizations”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Travel Research,<br />
43(2005): 328-338. Accessed on August 29,<br />
2007, http://jtr.sagepub.com.<br />
6.Echtner, C., and B. Ritchie. “The<br />
Measurement <strong>of</strong> Destination Image: An<br />
Empirical Assessment”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Travel<br />
Research 31(4)(1993): 3–13.<br />
7.Fick, G., Ritchie, B. “Measuring Service<br />
Quality in the Travel and Tourism Industry”.<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Travel Research 30(2)(1991): 2–9.<br />
8.Hall, D. “Destination branding, niche<br />
marketing and national image projection in<br />
Central and Eastern Europe”. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Vacation Marketing, 5(3)(1999): 227-237.<br />
Accessed on 18 th <strong>of</strong> April 2009,<br />
http://jtr.sagepub.com.<br />
9.Hall, D. “Brand Development, Tourism<br />
and National Identity: The Re-imaging <strong>of</strong><br />
Former Yugoslavia”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Brand<br />
Management, 9(2002)(4/5): 323–34.<br />
10.Hankinson, Graham. “Relational Network<br />
Brands: Towards a Conceptual Model <strong>of</strong><br />
Place Brands.” Journal <strong>of</strong> Vacation<br />
Marketing, 10 (2)(2004): 109–121.
11.Harrison, S. “Culture, Tourism and Local<br />
Community: The Heritage Identity <strong>of</strong> the Isle<br />
<strong>of</strong> Man.” Journal <strong>of</strong> Brand Management,<br />
9(2002) (4/5): 355–71;<br />
12.Hunt, J. “Image as a Factor in Tourism<br />
Development”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Travel Research<br />
13(3) (1975): 1–7.<br />
13.Konecnik, M., and W. Gartner.<br />
“Customer-Based Brand equity for a<br />
Destination”. Annals <strong>of</strong> Tourism Research<br />
34(2)(2007): 400–421.<br />
14.Morgan, N., A. Pritchard, and R. Piggott.<br />
“New Zealand, 100% Pure: The Creation <strong>of</strong> a<br />
Powerful Niche Destination Brand”. Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Brand Management, 9(2002) (4/5): 335–<br />
54.<br />
199<br />
15.Murphy, P., M. Pritchard, and B. Smith.<br />
“The Destination Product and Its Impact on<br />
Traveler Perceptions”. Tourism Management<br />
21(1)(2000):43–52.<br />
16.Pride, R. “A Challenger Approach to<br />
Destination Marketing. Keynote Presentation<br />
at the 2nd International Conference on<br />
Destination Branding and Marketing”,<br />
Institute for Tourism Studies, Macau (SAR),<br />
China, Decembrand equityr., 2007.<br />
17.Tasci, A., W. Gartner şi So, A. “Branding<br />
Macao: An Application <strong>of</strong> Strategic Branding<br />
for Destinations”. 2nd International<br />
Conference on Destination Branding and<br />
Marketing, Institute for Tourism Studies,<br />
Macau (SAR), China, Decembrand equity,<br />
2007
200
THE TOURISM BARRIERS OF THE DISABLED IN ROMANIA<br />
Băbăiță Carmen Mihaela<br />
University <strong>of</strong> the West Timisoara, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />
Nagy Andrea<br />
University <strong>of</strong> the West Timisoara, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />
Filep Adrian Viorel<br />
University <strong>of</strong> the West Timisoara<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />
Abstract: This article seeks to address a very sensitive issue in Romania, the disabled tourism. The<br />
natural question is whether tourism can respond and meet the needs <strong>of</strong> such people. Internationally,<br />
the researches in detail about tourism for people with disabilities are limited in this direction, and<br />
those who exist are focused more on lack <strong>of</strong> physical access to certain services in the hotel units.<br />
As for the problems (barriers) that a person with disabilities may face when seeking to participate<br />
in the act <strong>of</strong> travel there were found numerous internal and external barriers in trying to participate<br />
in tourism activities<br />
The study seeks to identify how normal people behave towards people with disabilities and aims to<br />
demonstrate the existence <strong>of</strong> correlations between the responses <strong>of</strong> the interviewees, which would<br />
lead to the presentation as close to the truth as possible <strong>of</strong> the results from the sample (section),<br />
transposed over the population from which the sample belongs and also lead to finding conclusions<br />
on which there could be made several proposals.<br />
Keywords: tourism, disability, social tourism, attitude, internal and external barries<br />
Cod JEL: M10, L83<br />
1.Introduction<br />
Tourism in its current form appeared only in<br />
the XIX th However, some social historians say that<br />
tourism has emerged a few decades earlier,<br />
with the opening <strong>of</strong> camps for disadvantaged<br />
century. Actions related to social children, as well as the opening <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tourism began in 1936, when the twentieth century, youth hostels. The<br />
International Labour Organization (ILO) emergence <strong>of</strong> hostels and bed & breakfast<br />
agreed that the on access to paid leave accommodation system occurred in the late<br />
should be done by tourism (Convention nineteenth century. At that time, most tourist<br />
No.52.). In essence, this agreement has also facilities where the ones in the private sector<br />
been mentioned in the Universal or belonging to other organizations willing<br />
Declaration <strong>of</strong> Human Rights in 1948, to improve tourist access to a much larger<br />
stating that “everyone has the right to rest number <strong>of</strong> people and making a pr<strong>of</strong>it.<br />
and leisure, including reasonable limitation After the Second World War ended some<br />
<strong>of</strong> working hours and periodic holidays with social policies were implemented in several<br />
pay”.<br />
countries as subsidies for private housing,<br />
Thus we can say that tourism has emerged as their renovation, modernization <strong>of</strong><br />
a social practice due to the ethical demands equipment and infrastructure, and as well as<br />
<strong>of</strong> the representatives <strong>of</strong> employees, aid to the population. Also, many<br />
justifying the legitimacy <strong>of</strong> a specific right, associations have been created under<br />
so thus the right to travel, as an extension <strong>of</strong> different unions, travelling families , work<br />
the right to work, to rest and to take paid councils, etc. all had as main objectives<br />
leave.<br />
social development and expanding social<br />
tourism.<br />
201
2. Disabled tourism<br />
This article seeks to address a very sensitive<br />
issue in Romania, the disabled tourism.<br />
According to the 448 / 6 December 2006 law<br />
, people with disabilities are those people<br />
who, because <strong>of</strong> physical illness, mental or<br />
sensory impairments, lack skills that prevent<br />
them from caring out normal daily<br />
activities, requiring protective measures in<br />
support <strong>of</strong> recovery and social inclusion.<br />
The natural question is whether tourism can<br />
respond and meet the needs <strong>of</strong> such people.<br />
Internationally, the researches in detail about<br />
tourism for people with disabilities are<br />
limited in this direction, and those who exist<br />
are focused more on lack <strong>of</strong> physical access<br />
to certain services in the hotel units.<br />
Very few studies have been published<br />
concerning the issue <strong>of</strong> tourism and people<br />
with disabilities (Burnett & Baker, 2001,<br />
Darcy, 1998, 2002). Some academics<br />
specialized on tourism were concern with<br />
this problems in the late 1980s and early<br />
1990s (Smith,1987; Muloin, 1992), Smith's<br />
work being one <strong>of</strong> the few works published<br />
in a major tourism publication. Since then,<br />
academics in the field <strong>of</strong> tourism have been<br />
silent on this subject. Also referring to the<br />
disabilities literature which is characterized<br />
by the lack <strong>of</strong> consideration <strong>of</strong> those issues,<br />
identify one or two studies. Various studies<br />
are as well illustrated by the Canadian<br />
Tourism Commission (1997), Nurnett and<br />
Baker's work (2001 ) in the U.S..<br />
The broad spectrum <strong>of</strong> disability problem<br />
has become a field <strong>of</strong> study since the early<br />
50.. Typically, these studies and debates<br />
related to persons with disabilities ,in orbit<br />
around the social model <strong>of</strong> disability,<br />
emerged in Britain in 1976 from the activity<br />
against segregation by the Physically Unfit<br />
Union .<br />
Disability is a generic term for diseases or<br />
disabilities, activity limitations and<br />
participation restrictions as defined in the<br />
international classification <strong>of</strong> functioning,<br />
and health disability adopted and approved<br />
202<br />
by the World Health Organization to show<br />
the negative aspect <strong>of</strong> individual context<br />
interaction (Law 448 / 6 December. 2006,<br />
Art. 5, pct.16).<br />
Researchers Hugh and Paterson (1997) say<br />
that the company creates an environment<br />
that does not take into account the needs <strong>of</strong><br />
those with disabilities. They tried to make a<br />
clear distinction between those with<br />
impaired and those with disabilities. Such<br />
disorders refer to the normal functioning <strong>of</strong><br />
the individual caused by mental or sensory<br />
dysfunctions and disability is the loss or<br />
limitation <strong>of</strong> opportunities to live normally<br />
in society on an equal level with others due<br />
to physical barriers. The fact is however that<br />
until nowadays a social model for people<br />
with disabilities wasn't treated in tourism<br />
literature.<br />
3. OBSTACLES IN ACCESS OF THE<br />
PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES<br />
As for the problems (barriers) that a person<br />
with disabilities may face when seeking to<br />
participate in the act <strong>of</strong> travel there were<br />
found numerous internal and external<br />
barriers in trying to participate in tourism<br />
activities . These barriers can be classified<br />
as:<br />
Internal barriers are obstacles that must be<br />
overcome before a person becomes active in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> tourism and that the individual has<br />
the greatest control over these barriers. In<br />
this way people with disabilities should be<br />
helped through institutionalization at the<br />
recovery units. For example in Romania this<br />
aid is extremely small as about 3.62% <strong>of</strong><br />
people benefit from institutionalization<br />
External barriers - which may inhibit their<br />
journey, they may limit the options or reduce<br />
satisfaction. This category includes:<br />
architectural barriers such as stairs, toilet<br />
accessibility, accommodation, and<br />
environmental barriers difficult paths, tree<br />
roots or other obstructions outside, means <strong>of</strong><br />
transport, especially the local variety <strong>of</strong><br />
means <strong>of</strong> transport, which includes cars,<br />
buses and taxis ; laws and regulations that
prohibit the people with disabilities to bring<br />
necessary equipment with them,<br />
communication difficulties both at home and<br />
at the receiving person, negative attitudes<br />
from service providers and incorrect<br />
information. Tourists with a disability must<br />
consider that foreign travel agencies must<br />
break down these barriers.<br />
In 2002, Darcy reveals that attitudes<br />
towards individuals with disabilities, and<br />
research undertaken on this market segment,<br />
in particular, have evolved significantly in<br />
the last 25 years. Originally attitudes,<br />
regarding disability were conceptualized in a<br />
framework <strong>of</strong> personal tragedy, concentrated<br />
on individual helplessness. The person was<br />
treated as an unfortunate victim. Since then,<br />
the emergence <strong>of</strong> political movements for<br />
the rights <strong>of</strong> persons with disabilities have<br />
changed the overall impression <strong>of</strong> personal<br />
tragedy, to disability as a form <strong>of</strong> social<br />
oppression.<br />
The way in which disability is<br />
conceptualized and natural attitudes have a<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ound effect on society and people with<br />
disabilities. First <strong>of</strong> all, attitude influences<br />
individual behavior regarding people with<br />
disabilities Understanding disability as an"<br />
abnormality" <strong>of</strong> a person rather than a social<br />
failure, it outlines behaviors that lead to<br />
isolation and marginalization. In many cases,<br />
certain behaviors are not intentional but<br />
rather are rooted in social practices "nondisabled".<br />
Second, attitudes form public<br />
opinions, attitudes which influence social<br />
and public policies, resource allocation and<br />
access to education, transportation, jobs, etc..<br />
Finally, prevailing attitudes influence the<br />
perception <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities <strong>of</strong><br />
themselves .<br />
4. RESEARCH DIRECTIONS<br />
The study seeks to identify how normal<br />
people behave towards people with<br />
disabilities and aims to demonstrate the<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> correlations between the<br />
responses <strong>of</strong> the interviewees, which would<br />
lead to the presentation as close to the truth<br />
203<br />
as possible <strong>of</strong> the results from the sample<br />
(section), transposed over the population<br />
from which the sample belongs and also lead<br />
to finding conclusions on which there could<br />
be made several proposals.<br />
Between the specific objectives we find:<br />
knowledge or the social prerequisites,<br />
psychological and cultural <strong>of</strong> the<br />
interviewees; discovering the causes that<br />
lead to negative feelings, on people with<br />
disabilities, eliminate the causes, proposed<br />
ways <strong>of</strong> intervention and trying to change the<br />
behavior <strong>of</strong> the normal people.<br />
Knowing the psychological assumptions<br />
helps determine the way people act,<br />
understand the personal points view and also<br />
allows the identification <strong>of</strong> certain measures<br />
by which those with disabilities could be<br />
integrated and accepted in society.<br />
Discovering the causes which lead in<br />
forming an opinion regarding people with<br />
disabilities could be one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
important secondary objective, this objective<br />
is important because it may act directly on<br />
the case and not on the effect that results.<br />
Finally the directions <strong>of</strong> intervention in<br />
modifying behavior <strong>of</strong> the normal people<br />
towards people with disabilities should be<br />
materialized at the end <strong>of</strong> the present study.<br />
The modeling <strong>of</strong> the behavior occurs when<br />
the stimuli are identified, the basic<br />
behavioral processes are analyzed, the<br />
explanatory variables <strong>of</strong> behavior and<br />
behavioral response.<br />
5. RESULTS INTERPRETATION<br />
The research was conducted on the basis <strong>of</strong> a<br />
questionnaire. Sample size was 100 people<br />
chosen randomly. The sample was<br />
structured: 40% <strong>of</strong> them are under 24 years,<br />
20% <strong>of</strong> people are between 25-30 years old,<br />
8% <strong>of</strong> people between 31-35 years old , 14%<br />
between 36-45 years and the rest, 18% are<br />
people over 45 years. Of these 62% were<br />
women and 38% were male. Regarding the<br />
marital status <strong>of</strong> respondents 44% aren't<br />
married, 34% are married and the rest belong
to other categories (divorced, widowed or<br />
living with partner).<br />
The study was conducted by distributing<br />
questionnaires in urban areas, in Timisoara,<br />
and 62% <strong>of</strong> the respondents have completed<br />
either a college, a university or a postgraduate<br />
study, while 32% are high school<br />
graduates. We can say that the education<br />
level has a major influence in assessing the<br />
behavior <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities, in the<br />
knowledge that education is directly<br />
proportional to the positive responses in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> acceptance, understanding and<br />
helping these people with disabilities. This<br />
can be observed from the study because the<br />
question <strong>of</strong> concerning "helping people with<br />
disabilities", 94% <strong>of</strong> the respondents would<br />
be willing to help such a person and 72% <strong>of</strong><br />
them, have done it already.<br />
Regarding the attitudes <strong>of</strong> normal people<br />
towards people with disabilities in society, it<br />
is found that the opinions <strong>of</strong> those people are<br />
divided. On a scale containing five possible<br />
answers: from compassion, mercy,<br />
acceptance, restraint, and indifference it is<br />
found that compared to the normal version <strong>of</strong><br />
acceptance chosen by 34% <strong>of</strong> respondents,<br />
there is a balance between compassion and<br />
restraint (16% <strong>of</strong> the responses for each<br />
question) and an imbalance between<br />
compassion and indifference, they have<br />
chosen 32% and 2% <strong>of</strong> respondents (an<br />
insignificant percentage). Because according<br />
to the glossary "compassion" is associated<br />
with a sense <strong>of</strong> understanding and sympathy<br />
to the suffering and misery concerning<br />
someone; positive feelings total overall 82%<br />
<strong>of</strong> responses , a sign that these people are<br />
understood and are given support from<br />
individuals.<br />
Regarding the people's situation in Romania,<br />
it is not a very good one because the<br />
perception to the human rights <strong>of</strong> persons<br />
with disabilities knows negative aspects. To<br />
analyze the situation <strong>of</strong> peoples with<br />
disabilities in Romania there were developed<br />
three questions:<br />
204<br />
1. "Do you think that there are<br />
respected the human rights <strong>of</strong><br />
people with disabilities in<br />
Romania?": 68% consider that the<br />
right are not respected, 22% said<br />
yes and 10% <strong>of</strong> them do not know or<br />
are not interested.<br />
2. "Do you consider that people with<br />
disabilities should receive certain<br />
gratuities?": 84%, have replied yes<br />
and 16% said that they do not.<br />
3. "Should programs against<br />
discrimination <strong>of</strong> the disabled, be<br />
introduced in schools?'': 62% said<br />
yes, 16% said no and 22% believe<br />
that these things must be learned at<br />
home.<br />
In conclusion, the Romanian society does<br />
not help people with disabilities in Romania<br />
and the fundamental rights are not respected.<br />
In principle these people would be helped by<br />
the state through the granting <strong>of</strong> gratuities<br />
and benefits. What is crucial is that programs<br />
against discrimination <strong>of</strong> the disabled should<br />
be introduced in schools, because it is known<br />
that the children's education must contain<br />
rules that causes them to act ethically and<br />
morally towards these people.<br />
When asked "What do you think the<br />
integration <strong>of</strong> disabled people in society", the<br />
answers "very important " and "Important"<br />
occupy the largest share <strong>of</strong> responses 54%<br />
and 28%. We can say that 82% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
respondents believes that integration <strong>of</strong><br />
persons with disabilities in society is<br />
extremely important and agree with this<br />
point <strong>of</strong> view, and consider that such people<br />
should not be marginalized.<br />
Also on the problem in terms <strong>of</strong> employment<br />
chances <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities. In this<br />
sense 78% <strong>of</strong> people with normal capacity to<br />
work, inform that employers are reluctant in<br />
hiring these people. 80% <strong>of</strong> those surveyed<br />
said they have colleagues at work with<br />
disabilities and that there are no cooperation<br />
or social issues, but there exists a significant<br />
number <strong>of</strong> people who would not agree to<br />
collaborate at work with them, which is
concerning because 14% <strong>of</strong> them answered<br />
like this<br />
Regarding the participation <strong>of</strong> disabled<br />
people to the act <strong>of</strong> tourism, individuals<br />
answers were hopeful because even if, as the<br />
disabled are not accepted at work, the<br />
situation is different in a hotel, 92% <strong>of</strong><br />
respondents would not be disturbed by the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities in a hotel<br />
where they were individually penned.<br />
When asked "What do you think about<br />
tourism products for people with<br />
disabilities?" being an open question,<br />
respondents were able to freely choose their<br />
answers without being restricted by answers.<br />
The answers to the questions above are<br />
different and presented in a special way by<br />
each interviewee. The most frequent<br />
response was "I have not heard about such<br />
products for people with disabilities" Those<br />
who have heard and know these products are<br />
<strong>of</strong> the opinion that the number <strong>of</strong> products is<br />
very small compared to the number <strong>of</strong><br />
people with disabilities, and that these<br />
products are not known even by the<br />
recipients, and are difficult to obtain even if<br />
you belong in that category disabled. The<br />
most important thing about these products is<br />
that it gives people with disabilities the<br />
opportunity to socialize and integrate into<br />
the society.<br />
Another view <strong>of</strong> respondents: state<br />
organizations, regional and local ones do not<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer aid to the disabled.<br />
Regarding the promotion <strong>of</strong> these products,<br />
media channels do not consider this as an<br />
important fact and do not promote them<br />
because they do not obtain financial benefits.<br />
Existing channels that promote such<br />
products are local ones but <strong>of</strong> no national<br />
importance.<br />
Other opinions say that those people with<br />
disabilities should receive such products<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> destination, travel time or<br />
means <strong>of</strong> transport chosen, thus a social<br />
development <strong>of</strong> tourism and also building<br />
access roads and other facilities absolutely<br />
205<br />
necessary for each hotel , motel, resort,<br />
tourist destination.<br />
6. CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSALS<br />
Surrounded by negative attitudes, people<br />
with disabilities can internalize negative<br />
beliefs and attitudes. It is recognized that the<br />
nature and severity <strong>of</strong> disability can affect<br />
the scope <strong>of</strong> activities to which a person can<br />
participate, but may also influence how the<br />
tourist experience is formed.<br />
After analyzing the data we can say that<br />
people with disabilities are accepted in<br />
society by all other categories <strong>of</strong> people by<br />
supporting the integration process,<br />
respondents have the opinion that this<br />
process is <strong>of</strong> great importance and that it<br />
should exist in any modern society; besides<br />
the fact that the states must be required to<br />
provide the disabled and give certain<br />
financial gratuities and psychosocial help.<br />
Most people have the opinion that people<br />
with disabilities and people with disabilities<br />
face difficulties in finding jobs, qualified or<br />
unqualified. Their problems are accentuated<br />
and supported by the reluctance <strong>of</strong><br />
employers, higher health costs and other<br />
types <strong>of</strong> insurances. In addition to these<br />
serious problems, these people are refused at<br />
interviews because <strong>of</strong> their condition.<br />
Although 86% <strong>of</strong> respondents would not be<br />
''bothered'' to work with people with<br />
disabilities that is not reflected in obtaining a<br />
job, from the individuals concerned.<br />
Granting help to such a person is a fairly<br />
widespread phenomenon in Romania, as<br />
reflected by the number <strong>of</strong> responses, which<br />
shows a great solidarity among people<br />
belonging to all social categories and more<br />
than 10% <strong>of</strong> respondents have in their<br />
families people with disabilities and face<br />
with all the problems that such a person may<br />
have.<br />
The most important person's perspective<br />
refers to introducing these special programs<br />
against discrimination for people with<br />
disabilities in schools. These programs lead<br />
to changes in behavior and attitudes towards
people with disabilities and disabled.<br />
Through these programs there are removed<br />
barriers <strong>of</strong> communication, the emphasis is<br />
on socialization and integration, on giving<br />
unconditional aid and late but not least social<br />
acceptance <strong>of</strong> each people.<br />
The attitude <strong>of</strong> respondents should be<br />
improved and may even reach some<br />
collaborations, events, games and excursions<br />
for all people (including people with<br />
disabilities). These events have a crucial role<br />
in changing the negative aspects and<br />
strengthen the already existing ones.<br />
Facilities for disabled people, should be<br />
necessarily placed in any institution, means<br />
<strong>of</strong> transportation, hotels, resort, and other<br />
accommodations and tourist destinations,<br />
etc. These facilities could be regulated by<br />
laws, governmental decisions and a<br />
supervision is required.<br />
Tourism products for people with disabilities<br />
should be promoted on the channels known<br />
by the public, the number <strong>of</strong> products should<br />
cover as much <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong><br />
recipients. This can be done by organizing<br />
cyclical products or circuit ones so that in<br />
the course <strong>of</strong> two years all disabled people<br />
would enjoy a product <strong>of</strong> this kind.<br />
206<br />
Bibliography<br />
1. Buruiana, G., (2009), Macroeconomic<br />
Policies in tourism, Editura Uranus,<br />
Bucuresti<br />
2. Burnett, J., and H. Bender-Baker,<br />
(2001), Assessing the Travel-related<br />
Behaviors <strong>of</strong> the Mobility-disabled<br />
Consumer, Journal <strong>of</strong> Travel Research<br />
40:4–11.<br />
3. Darcy, S., (1998), Anxiety to Access:<br />
Tourism Patterns and Experiences <strong>of</strong><br />
Disabled New, South Wales People with<br />
a Physical Disability. Sydney: Tourism<br />
New South Wales.<br />
4. Darcy, S., (2002), Marginalised<br />
Participation: Physical Disability, High<br />
Support Needs and Tourism, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Hospitality and Tourism Management<br />
9:61–72.<br />
5. Matthew Kwai-sang Yau, Bob<br />
McKercher, Tanya L. Packer, (2004),<br />
Traveling with a Disability, More than<br />
an Access Issue, Annals <strong>of</strong> Tourism<br />
Research, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 946–960<br />
6. Muloin, S., (1992), Wilderness Access<br />
for Persons with a Disability. In<br />
Ecotourism, G. Harper and B. Weiler,<br />
eds., pp. 20–25.<br />
7. Smith, R., (1987), Leisure <strong>of</strong> Tourist<br />
with a Disability: Barriers to Travel.<br />
Annals <strong>of</strong> Tourism
START-UP FINANCING SOURCES: DOES GENDER MATTER? SOME<br />
EVIDENCE FOR EU AND ROMANIA<br />
Bădulescu Alina<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />
Abstract: Although financial resources are very important in SMEs in general, and for start-ups in<br />
particular, many entrepreneurs face numerous restrictions in finding sources for start-up financing.<br />
The present article aims to investigate the similarities or differences in start-up financing sources<br />
due to gender issues, otherwise to investigate if female entrepreneurs use (or have access) different<br />
financial sources in the early stage <strong>of</strong> their business.<br />
As reported by the literature, access to finance is one <strong>of</strong> the most important issues for SMEs and<br />
nascent entrepreneurs. Moreover, among the main financial issues, the first one is the access to<br />
start-up finance (Schwartz, 1976; Carter and Cannon, 1992; Johnson and Storey, 1993; Koper,<br />
1993; Van Auken et al, 1993; Carter and Rosa, 1998, FOBS survey 2005). In all sectors, women use<br />
for starting up businesses substantially less capital then men. Women encounter, more then men,<br />
credibility problems when dealing with bankers. This problem causes important effects concerning<br />
the performance, survival and growth <strong>of</strong> women-run businesses.<br />
The present research focuses on revealing how male and female entrepreneurs face and solve the<br />
problem <strong>of</strong> start-up financing sources. The methodology is based on using the dataset “Enterprises<br />
managed by the founder - broken down by gender <strong>of</strong> the entrepreneur”, available in EUROSTAT<br />
database. The data selected refers to the start-up financing sources available for European Union<br />
and Romania, regarding activities included in NACE: Industry and services excluding public<br />
administration and management activities <strong>of</strong> holding companies and 2005 as time <strong>of</strong> reference. The<br />
data were used to make some comparison between: male versus female entrepreneurs in EU; male<br />
versus female entrepreneurs in Romania; EU entrepreneurs versus Romanian entrepreneurs.<br />
The main findings reveal that there are no significant differences between men and women<br />
concerning the start-up financing sources. The main sources are the internal ones: own fund and<br />
savings (ranging from 82% to 92%), and financial assistance from family and friend (ranging from<br />
25% to 34%), both for male and female entrepreneurs, both for EU as an aggregate and Romania.<br />
Among the external sources, bank loans are the most important: they have been indicated by 17% <strong>of</strong><br />
the females (EU) and 19% <strong>of</strong> the males, about 10 times more than the other external sources<br />
together: capital contributions from other enterprises and venture capital. There are no significant<br />
gender differences in EU case, and also there are not in the case <strong>of</strong> Romania. Apparently, gender<br />
does not matter about sources used for start-up financing. The most significant difference concerns<br />
the financial support from public authorities as financial source. The number <strong>of</strong> female<br />
entrepreneurs indicating financial support from public authorities as a source for start-up financing<br />
represents 6.18% in EU, versus 0.17% in Romania (36 times less in Romania than the EU average),<br />
while for men the figures are 4.85% in EU versus 0.30% in Romania (16 times less in Romania).<br />
This gap brings again in front <strong>of</strong> policy responsible the imperative <strong>of</strong> financially supporting nascent<br />
entrepreneurs, as the key to sustainable economic growth.<br />
Keywords: entrepreneurship, women entrepreneurship, financial sources for business start-up<br />
JEL code: M13<br />
207
Introduction<br />
Entrepreneurship is widely considered as a<br />
driving force <strong>of</strong> economic growth, job<br />
creation and promoting innovations, and thus,<br />
an important focus <strong>of</strong> economic policies. As a<br />
result, the number and incidence <strong>of</strong> SMEs in<br />
the national economies are increasing<br />
constantly. Nevertheless, fostering<br />
entrepreneurship needs providing fair access<br />
to financing. Unfortunately, the access to<br />
finance is mentioned as one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
important barriers (Hughes and Storey, 1994)<br />
and in the case <strong>of</strong> female entrepreneurs, the<br />
situation is even worse.<br />
In this paper we are going to investigate the<br />
differences (if there are any) between female<br />
entrepreneurs and male entrepreneurs with<br />
respect to the sources <strong>of</strong> start-up financing,<br />
for EU and Romanian case. The paper is<br />
organised as follows: in the first part, we<br />
make a brief review <strong>of</strong> the literature; in the<br />
second part we present the methodology used,<br />
in the third part we emphasize the main<br />
results, and finally we conclude.<br />
1. A brief review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
Start up financing is a major problem for the<br />
nascent entrepreneurs, as banks, the most<br />
important lending supplier, are reluctant to<br />
involve in SMEs financing, for reason related<br />
to asymmetrical information - adverse<br />
selection and moral hazard. The financial<br />
problem is a constant <strong>of</strong> the entire life-cycle<br />
<strong>of</strong> the SME, but researches showed that the<br />
first stage <strong>of</strong> existence (from idea to start up<br />
and then, first steps to development) is more<br />
affected by financial restriction then<br />
following stages. Especially in the so-called<br />
“valley <strong>of</strong> death” stage, the problems are very<br />
serious and most starting entrepreneurs use<br />
their own savings, family and business angels<br />
support (see Badulescu and Badulescu 2010).<br />
Theoretical explanations <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
the internal finance (personal savings or<br />
retained earnings) in the SMEs case are<br />
confirmed by recent European Barometer on<br />
Entrepreneurship (EC, 2009). According to<br />
this, across all EU Member States, a majority<br />
208<br />
<strong>of</strong> interviewees agreed that it was difficult to<br />
start one’s own business due to a lack <strong>of</strong><br />
available financial support. In Greece,<br />
Bulgaria, Latvia, Slovakia, Spain and<br />
Romania, 90% or more <strong>of</strong> the respondents<br />
agreed (strongly agreed and agreed) with that<br />
statement. At the bottom <strong>of</strong> the ranking,<br />
people in Finland, Austria and the<br />
Netherlands agreed with the statement on a<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> less than two-thirds (56%-<br />
63%).<br />
Female entrepreneurs, more than males, face<br />
start-up financial difficulties. Start up finance<br />
is one <strong>of</strong> the most cited problems in the case<br />
<strong>of</strong> women entrepreneurs. For example, the<br />
most important problems facing women<br />
entrepreneurs are – in the opinion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
specialist agencies cited by CEEDR 2000 – as<br />
follows:<br />
-Start up finance (indicated by more than<br />
25% as a major problem);<br />
-Finance for growth (indicated by more than<br />
20% as a major problem);<br />
-Discrimination by finance providers<br />
(indicated by more than 15% as a major<br />
problem). All <strong>of</strong> these are related to the<br />
access to finance.<br />
Among the four areas <strong>of</strong> finance identified as<br />
posing problems for women by Carter, S.<br />
(2000) and then Carter, Anderson and Shaw<br />
(2001), the first one is access to start-up<br />
finance (Schwartz, 1976; Carter and Cannon,<br />
1992; Johnson and Storey, 1993; Koper,<br />
1993; Van Auken et al, 1993; Carter and<br />
Rosa, 1998, FOBS survey 2005). Irrespective<br />
<strong>of</strong> sector and location, women start in<br />
business with only one-third the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
capital used by men. Women are more likely<br />
to encounter credibility problems when<br />
dealing with bankers. It is difficult to raise<br />
start-up finance. Some studies have shown<br />
links between low start-up capital and<br />
subsequent poor performance. Female<br />
entrepreneurs use substantially less capital at<br />
start-up than male owners, although intrasectoral<br />
similarities demonstrate that gender<br />
was only one <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> variables<br />
affecting the business financing process
(Carter S. and Rosa P. 1998). The majority <strong>of</strong><br />
women business owners have had to rely to a<br />
significant extent on self-generated finance<br />
during the start-up period <strong>of</strong> their business.<br />
Whilst many small businesses face<br />
difficulties in accessing the finance that they<br />
need (particularly at start-up), organizations<br />
specialising in providing support for female<br />
entrepreneurs clearly feel that this is one area<br />
where their clients face greater difficulties<br />
than their male counterparts. Shaw, Carter<br />
and Brierton (2001) have found research that<br />
suggests women face more difficulty when<br />
seeking finance to set up and grow their<br />
business. They note that women use only one<br />
third <strong>of</strong> the starting capital that men do,<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> sector; on-going growth<br />
finance may be less available for female<br />
owned firms than it is for male enterprises,<br />
largely due to women’s difficulty in<br />
penetrating informal financial networks.<br />
More women-owned businesses, for example,<br />
used family savings, household income,<br />
inheritance, grants and friends as sources <strong>of</strong><br />
business finance. ”In fact, Carter and<br />
Anderson (2001) found that women’s<br />
personal savings constitute between 80% and<br />
99% <strong>of</strong> initial capitalisation, compared to<br />
men where the figure is between 30% and<br />
59%. Although this may seem admirable it<br />
can <strong>of</strong>ten have a negative effect on the<br />
business (Sannikova 2007).<br />
Using a panel <strong>of</strong> 2000 Dutch start-ups<br />
(1994), Verheul and Thurik (2001, p. 14 )<br />
found out that „female entrepreneurs have a<br />
smaller amount <strong>of</strong> start-up capital than their<br />
male counterparts, but that they do not<br />
significantly differ with respect to the<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> financial capital”. Women<br />
starts up their business with less capital than<br />
men, and this can be attributed to a direct<br />
effect („gender effect”: men and women<br />
having the same characteristics but different<br />
with respect to the way <strong>of</strong> financing their<br />
businesses) and to an indirect effect („the<br />
female pr<strong>of</strong>ile”: differences related to<br />
business type, management and<br />
experience)(Verheul and Thurik, 2001).<br />
209<br />
Smaller financial resources to start up<br />
business leads unfortunately to less business<br />
performance and growth (Welter et al. 2006).<br />
2.Methodology<br />
Aiming to reveal the similarities or<br />
differences between female and male<br />
entrepreneurs’ start-up financing sources, in<br />
EU and Romania, we used the dataset<br />
“Enterprises managed by the founder -<br />
broken down by gender <strong>of</strong> the entrepreneur”,<br />
available in Eurostat database. We select<br />
from this database the data regarding the<br />
start-up financing source available for<br />
European Union (aggregate changing<br />
according to countries available) and<br />
Romania. Available data refers to NACE:<br />
Industry and services excluding public<br />
administration and management activities <strong>of</strong><br />
holding companies and to the year 2005.<br />
First, we select the data for the EU, broken by<br />
the gender <strong>of</strong> the founder and manager <strong>of</strong> the<br />
firm and search to arrange the sources for<br />
start-up financing starting with the most<br />
important, e.g. more nominated by the<br />
respondents. Second, we did the same thing<br />
for the data available for Romania, sorting<br />
them by relevance. Third, we tried to make<br />
some comparison between:<br />
-Male versus female entrepreneurs in EU<br />
-Male versus female entrepreneurs in<br />
Romania<br />
-EU entrepreneurs versus Romanian<br />
entrepreneurs.<br />
3.Discussion and results<br />
As the literature reported, and according to<br />
expectations, the main source for start-up<br />
financing used by women nascent<br />
entrepreneurs in EU are the own funds and<br />
savings. More than 4 out <strong>of</strong> 5 cited own funds<br />
and savings as a source for start-up financing,<br />
followed by the financial assistance from<br />
family and friends, reported by 3 out <strong>of</strong> ten<br />
women entrepreneurs. Far from these internal<br />
sources, the external sources are barely<br />
mentioned. Even we approach bank loans<br />
together - with and without collateral – they
are mentioned by only 1 out <strong>of</strong> 6 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
respondents. If we approach separately bank<br />
loans without and with collateral, the third<br />
source appears to be The financial support<br />
from public authorities (mentioned by 6% <strong>of</strong><br />
Sources <strong>of</strong> financing - total<br />
Own funds or savings<br />
Financial assistance from family or friends<br />
Bank loan with collateral<br />
Financial support from public authorities<br />
Bank loan without collateral<br />
Capital contribution from other enterprises<br />
Venture capital<br />
210<br />
the respondents). Capital contributions from<br />
other enterprises and venture capital are<br />
nominated by only 1.34% <strong>of</strong> the women<br />
entrepreneurs. The complete picture is shown<br />
below:<br />
Chart 1. Sources for start-up financing, NACE industry and services, EU, males and<br />
females, 2005<br />
Source: based on Eurostat database<br />
Basically, the same ranking applies for men<br />
entrepreneurs. Own fund and savings, and<br />
financial assistance from family and friends<br />
are the first two sources for start-up<br />
financing. Own funds and savings are<br />
mentioned by 87% <strong>of</strong> the men (even more<br />
than the 82% in the case <strong>of</strong> women), while<br />
financial assistance from family and friends is<br />
mentioned by 25% <strong>of</strong> the men (less than the<br />
30% indicated by women). This little<br />
difference can be attributed to the fact that<br />
men may have (or may consider that!) more<br />
personal money than women, so essentially<br />
the same money are, for men, own fund, and<br />
for women, family’s money. It may be also<br />
an indication <strong>of</strong> the less effective networking<br />
in the case <strong>of</strong> women (explaining why<br />
financial assistance from friend is less<br />
important than in men’s case. And also, do<br />
not forget that women have more women<br />
friends (with less financial resources) and<br />
94971<br />
77853<br />
60821<br />
28928<br />
27698<br />
10354<br />
11785<br />
5867<br />
17597<br />
5452<br />
3374<br />
746<br />
2037<br />
520<br />
210799<br />
242951<br />
0 100000 200000 300000<br />
Males Females<br />
men have more men friends. Bank loans with<br />
collateral are the third financing source.<br />
Together, bank loans (without and with<br />
collateral) are indicated by 18.64% <strong>of</strong> men<br />
(versus 16.64% <strong>of</strong> women). Financial support<br />
from public authorities (mentioned by 4.85%)<br />
and capital contributions from other<br />
enterprises and venture capital (mentioned by<br />
2.23% <strong>of</strong> the respondents) are still marginal<br />
sources.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> Romanian entrepreneurs, the<br />
picture is mainly similar, as expected. The<br />
main source is, far from the others, own funds<br />
or savings, indicated as financing sources by<br />
90% <strong>of</strong> the female entrepreneurs and even<br />
more by male entrepreneurs. The second<br />
source is financial assistance from family and<br />
friends (indicated by 1 out <strong>of</strong> 3 entrepreneurs,<br />
males and females). Bank loans are indicated<br />
by 7% <strong>of</strong> the Romanian female entrepreneurs,<br />
and 9.24% <strong>of</strong> the Romanian male
entrepreneurs (for comparison, bank loans<br />
have been indicated by 17-19% in EU case).<br />
Capital contribution from other enterprises<br />
and venture capital are almost not used as<br />
start-up financial sources. Financial support<br />
Sources <strong>of</strong> financing - total<br />
Own funds or savings<br />
Financial assistance from family or friends<br />
Bank loan with collateral<br />
Bank loan without collateral<br />
Venture capital<br />
Capital contribution from other enterprises<br />
Financial support from public authorities<br />
211<br />
from public authorities is effectively nonexistent,<br />
with 0.17% <strong>of</strong> the females and<br />
0.30% <strong>of</strong> the male entrepreneurs indicating as<br />
a start-up financial source.<br />
Chart 2. Sources for start-up financing, NACE industry and services, Romania, males and<br />
females, 2005<br />
Source: based on Eurostat database<br />
4.Conclusions and further implications<br />
Main sources for start-up financing remain<br />
internal sources: own fund and savings, and<br />
financial assistance from family and friend,<br />
both for male and female entrepreneurs, both<br />
for EU as an aggregate and Romania, a new<br />
member state and still developing economy.<br />
Regarding the external sources, bank loans<br />
are the most important: they have been<br />
indicated by 17% <strong>of</strong> the females (EU) and<br />
19% <strong>of</strong> the males, about 10 times more than<br />
the other external sources together: capital<br />
17831<br />
16075<br />
11078<br />
5792<br />
1130<br />
648<br />
1529<br />
615<br />
82<br />
38<br />
304<br />
37<br />
96<br />
30<br />
29568<br />
32251<br />
0 10000 20000 30000 40000<br />
Males Females<br />
contributions from other enterprises and<br />
venture capital. There are no significant<br />
gender differences in EU case, and also there<br />
are not in the case <strong>of</strong> Romania. Apparently,<br />
gender does not matter about sources used for<br />
start-up financing. The access to external<br />
financial sources is restricted for<br />
entrepreneurs <strong>of</strong> both genders: only 1 <strong>of</strong> 6<br />
nascent entrepreneurs has access to them. The<br />
complete picture and comparison are shown<br />
in Table 1.
Table 1. Sources for start-up financing: males versus females, Romania versus EU (2005)<br />
Source for start-up financing Indicated<br />
by … %<br />
<strong>of</strong> the<br />
females<br />
(EU)<br />
212<br />
Indicated<br />
by … %<br />
<strong>of</strong> the<br />
females<br />
(RO)<br />
Indicated<br />
by … %<br />
<strong>of</strong> the<br />
males<br />
(EU)<br />
Indicate<br />
d by …<br />
% <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
males<br />
(RO)<br />
Own funds or savings 81.98 90.15 86.77 91.68<br />
Financial assistance from family or<br />
friends<br />
30.46 32.48 25.03 34.35<br />
Bank loan without collateral 5.74 3.45 7.24 4.74<br />
Bank loan with collateral 10.9 3.63 11.4 3.50<br />
Capital contribution from other 0.79 0.21 1.39 0.94<br />
enterprises<br />
Venture capital 0.55 0.21 0.84 0.25<br />
Financial support from public authorities 6.18 0.17 4.85 0.30<br />
More than gender seems to matter the<br />
development stage and/or public involvement<br />
in policies and programmes fostering<br />
entrepreneurship. The most significant<br />
difference revealed by the data is related to<br />
the financial support from public authorities.<br />
The number <strong>of</strong> female entrepreneurs<br />
indicating financial support from public<br />
authorities as a source for start-up financing<br />
represents 6.18% in EU, versus 0.17% in<br />
Romania (36 times less in Romania than the<br />
EU average), while for men the figures are<br />
4.85% in EU versus 0.30% in Romania (16<br />
times less in Romania). Probably the gap is<br />
even bigger now, after implementing<br />
numerous European programmes in fostering<br />
women entrepreneurship.<br />
After all, if gender does not matter, there<br />
other things that matters: entrepreneurship<br />
policies!<br />
Some further research can be carried out<br />
regarding other things that matter: economic<br />
sector can be one, so different NACE in the<br />
EU database are to be studied further. And<br />
further policies should be enforced to<br />
promote, foster and support (financially<br />
included!) entrepreneurship, as an important<br />
key to economic growing and social progress.<br />
References:<br />
1.Carter S. and Cannon T. 1992. Women as<br />
Entrepreneurs, London: Academic Press<br />
2.Carter S. and Rosa P. 1998.‘The financing<br />
<strong>of</strong> male- and female-owned businesses’, in:<br />
Entrepreneurship and Regional Development,<br />
10(3), 225-241<br />
3.Carter, S. 2000. “Gender and Enterprise”,<br />
in: Carter S. and Jones Evans D. (eds),<br />
Enterprise and Small Business: Principles,<br />
Practice and Policy, Addison Wesley<br />
4.Carter S and Anderson S.2001. On the<br />
move: Women and men business owners in<br />
the United Kingdom, Washington DC:<br />
NFWBO and IBM, p. 5<br />
5.European Commission 2000. Young<br />
Entrepreneurs, Women Entrepreneurs, Ethnic<br />
Minority Entrepreneurs and Co-ntrepreneurs<br />
in the European Union and Central and<br />
Eastern Europe, Final Report to the European<br />
Commission, Centre For Enterprise And<br />
Economic Development Research (CEEDR),<br />
Middlesex University Business School, UK,<br />
http://Ec.Europa.Eu/Enterprise/Policies/Sme/<br />
Files/Craft/Craft-<br />
Studies/Documents/Completereport_En.Pdf
6.European Commission 2009 . Flash<br />
Eurobarometer Entrepreneurship in the EU<br />
and beyond. A survey in the U, EFTA<br />
countries, Croatia, Turkey, the US, Japan,<br />
South Korea and China. Analytical report<br />
Fieldwork: December 2009, p. 76<br />
7.Hughes, A. and D. J. Storey. 1994, Finance<br />
and the Small Firm, London and New York:<br />
Routledge.<br />
8.Greene, Patricia G.; Hart, Myra M.;<br />
Gatewood, Elizabeth J.; Brush, Candida G.;<br />
Carter, Nancy M. 2003. Women<br />
Entrepreneurs: Moving Front and Center: An<br />
Overview <strong>of</strong> Research and Theory,<br />
http://usasbe.org/knowledge/whitepapers/gree<br />
ne2003.pdf<br />
213<br />
9.Sannikova, E. 2007. Regulatory<br />
Impediments to Enterprise Development:<br />
Mobilizing Women's Economic Potential,<br />
International Conference on Reducing<br />
Barriers to Entrepreneurship and Encouraging<br />
Enterprise Development: Policy Options, 18-<br />
19 June 2007<br />
10.Shaw, E., Carter, S. and Brierton, J. 2001.<br />
Unequal Entrepreneurs: Why female<br />
enterprise is an uphill business, The Industrial<br />
Society<br />
11.Verheul, I. and Thurok, R. 2001. “Start-<br />
Up Capital: Does Gender Matter?” Small<br />
Business Economics 16: 329–345<br />
12.Welter, F., D. Smallbone and N. Isakova.<br />
2006. Enterprising Women in Transition<br />
Economies, (eds), Aldershot, Ashgate
Sub-section: Economics
COMPETITIVENESS - GROWTH FACTOR. POINT OF VIEW ON THE<br />
SITUATION IN ROMANIA<br />
Cismaș Laura<br />
The West University <strong>of</strong> Timisoara, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />
Bucur Oana Nicoleta<br />
The West University <strong>of</strong> Timisoara, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />
Pitorac Ruxandra Ioana<br />
The West University <strong>of</strong> Timisoara, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />
Abstract: This paper considers the issue <strong>of</strong> competitiveness <strong>of</strong> national economy, making specific<br />
reference to the economic situation <strong>of</strong> Romania in the year 2010.<br />
The diversity <strong>of</strong> views on approaches to competitiveness in the literature requires consultation <strong>of</strong><br />
reports prepared by prestigious international forums and organizations, using relevant indicators<br />
and economic variables.<br />
Keywords: Competitiveness, economic growth, productivity, economic environment, economic<br />
efficiency.<br />
JEL Codes: F43, O47<br />
1. Introduction<br />
Competitiveness means the way in which<br />
nations and the economic environment given<br />
all powers to achieve its prosperity.<br />
Competitiveness study allows "the possibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> comparing the performance achieved, and<br />
future growth potential" (Spataru) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
company and the economic environment.<br />
Analyzing the structure and dynamics <strong>of</strong> the<br />
competitive system is also an element <strong>of</strong><br />
absolute completion <strong>of</strong> analysis and relevant<br />
government decisions targeting companies<br />
involved in production activity (Airoldi,<br />
Brunetti and Coda in 2005: 322), all aimed at<br />
raising environmental performance national<br />
economy.<br />
In economics, competitiveness is identified as<br />
the main active element in the procurement<br />
and delivery performance during the<br />
competition, the organization the role <strong>of</strong> 'the<br />
situation is in better position as compared to<br />
its competitor for the "defeat" for the<br />
purposes <strong>of</strong> reporting gave a performance<br />
criterion and followed by all competitors<br />
(Voiculescu 2001: 6).<br />
217<br />
2. Defining the level <strong>of</strong> competitiveness<br />
based approach<br />
The concept can be approached at<br />
mondoeconomic, macroeconomic and<br />
microeconomic level. In that respect this<br />
industry experts opinions on the definition<br />
depending on the level <strong>of</strong> approach:<br />
- "Global competitiveness is a matter <strong>of</strong><br />
economics that analyzes the facts and policies<br />
that shape a nation's ability to create and<br />
maintain an environment conducive to<br />
supporting and achieving better value for<br />
their enterprises and prosperity <strong>of</strong> its<br />
people"(World Competitiveness Yearbook).<br />
- "Competitiveness is defined as that set <strong>of</strong><br />
factors, policies and institutions that<br />
determine the current level <strong>of</strong> productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
a country. Productivity determines both the<br />
welfare <strong>of</strong> an economy at a time, and its<br />
growth potential in the future. Empirical<br />
research has shown that developing a<br />
knowledge-based economy is one <strong>of</strong> the key<br />
factors enhancing the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> an<br />
economy"(Imbrescu and Băbăiţă).
- "The competitiveness <strong>of</strong> markets, refers to<br />
the degree to which individual firms have the<br />
power to influence market prices or terms on<br />
which their product is sold. The individual<br />
firm has less power to influence the market<br />
on selling their product, the more competitive<br />
is the market" (Lipsei and Chrystal 1999: 252<br />
).<br />
- “The level at which it generates is the<br />
microeconomic competitiveness. A country<br />
becomes competitive when you manage to<br />
build that environment that allows each<br />
company to become effective added value, to<br />
be able to survive or develop in any national<br />
economic environment, especially<br />
internationally. The level at which it<br />
maintains and strengthens the<br />
competitiveness <strong>of</strong> the macro. The country<br />
maintains or improves its pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />
internationally when it decides to apply the<br />
set <strong>of</strong> economic policies necessary to<br />
stimulate the achieving optimum expansion at<br />
the micro level”(Spataru).<br />
Creating a competitive system is an important<br />
issue and a policy <strong>of</strong> “Washington<br />
Consensus” for economic growth in<br />
developing states (Baumol, Litan and<br />
Schramm 2009: 52).<br />
Representation <strong>of</strong> the competitive system, the<br />
example <strong>of</strong> a competitive economic market<br />
can be achieved only by extensive<br />
competition model representation.<br />
Competitive system structure: the<br />
competition extended) is a necessary<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> existence and developing a real<br />
competitive.<br />
The four pillars <strong>of</strong> the macroeconomic level<br />
the competitive system are newcomers<br />
(especially entrepreneurs), customers<br />
(consumers), suppliers and manufacturers <strong>of</strong><br />
goods substitutable (those who have the<br />
ability to conduct marketing pressures).<br />
If new entrants can affect competition by<br />
larger volumes <strong>of</strong> production and reducing<br />
unit costs through a variety <strong>of</strong> products,<br />
manufacturers <strong>of</strong> substitutable products or<br />
services will be the source <strong>of</strong> uncertainty for<br />
new entrants if the price / benefit will be one<br />
218<br />
<strong>of</strong> those consumers’ expectations accordingly<br />
have propensities for such goods.<br />
Providers will become competitive in<br />
particular by focusing on service quality and<br />
price <strong>of</strong> services and clients, through<br />
negotiation and price elasticity will be the<br />
most important word to say.<br />
The competitiveness suggests safety,<br />
efficiency, quality, high productivity,<br />
adaptability, successful, modern<br />
management, superior products, low cost.<br />
In the battle for new markets, firms need to<br />
emphasize their strengths to gain the ground<br />
to competitors. Also they have to defend<br />
these benefits, known and recognized by<br />
constant efforts and also to know and accept<br />
that are the strengths <strong>of</strong> its competitors. At<br />
the same time, significantly increase the<br />
interest and effort to obtain business benefits<br />
both the domestic and international market.<br />
Competitive or competitive ability is just that<br />
part on which power and economic strength<br />
<strong>of</strong> the economic conditions <strong>of</strong> a market<br />
economy. Therefore, development <strong>of</strong><br />
competitiveness, acquiring and maintaining<br />
competitive advantage and effective use <strong>of</strong><br />
the factors influencing it, is the main goal<br />
toward which all economic agents.<br />
3. Implications <strong>of</strong> competitive markets in<br />
the growth states<br />
The contemporary world has undergone a<br />
series <strong>of</strong> connections between markets and<br />
increasing competitiveness <strong>of</strong> the country's<br />
economic performance in the economic<br />
environment runs its business. In this respect<br />
shows experts in the field: "To be effective,<br />
must include an economic and pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />
business based on competitive (...) the true<br />
economic substance produced by them, their<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability depends on economic strength<br />
and level to live the great country"(Verboncu<br />
and Zalman 2005:41).<br />
The competitiveness <strong>of</strong> a country is assessed<br />
by its capacity (Gavrila 2009: 131):<br />
- to export<br />
- to attract FDI
- to harness resources and increase real per<br />
capita GDP<br />
- prices were more positive than those <strong>of</strong><br />
competitors, the <strong>of</strong>fer is characterized by<br />
quality, diversity and timeliness<br />
A national economy is competitive in the<br />
long term, they ensure the sustainable<br />
increase <strong>of</strong> welfare and population dynamics<br />
due to the high overall productivity <strong>of</strong> factors<br />
<strong>of</strong> production.<br />
It is clear that the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> an<br />
economy depends decisively on the business<br />
environment, businesses are the engine <strong>of</strong><br />
economic growth. Improve business access to<br />
factors <strong>of</strong> their participation in the European<br />
Single Market, investment in optimizing their<br />
industrial base, while respecting the<br />
principles <strong>of</strong> sustainable development is a<br />
critical prerequisite for the operation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Romanian economy competitive.<br />
As described by Michael Porter in the latest<br />
edition (2008) <strong>of</strong> his famous works, ''About<br />
the competition, the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> a<br />
country do not relate primarily to<br />
macroeconomic stability, neither labor nor<br />
public policies, or practices management, but<br />
especially in productivity. A nation is<br />
competitive when it allows the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> the determinants <strong>of</strong> productivity and<br />
increasing productivity.<br />
219<br />
Depending on factors contributing to<br />
productivity, the report prepared by the<br />
World Economic Forum identified three<br />
stages in which the countries, namely:<br />
Stage I: The competitiveness <strong>of</strong> production<br />
due to factors - factor - driven (force <strong>of</strong><br />
unskilled or poorly qualified natural<br />
resources). The economy is particularly<br />
competitive because <strong>of</strong> lower prices, but the<br />
products are less complex. However,<br />
assuming the presence <strong>of</strong> certain basic<br />
conditions are essential (institutions,<br />
infrastructure, macroeconomics, health and<br />
primary education).<br />
Stage II: Competitiveness by factors <strong>of</strong><br />
efficiency - efficiency - driven (production<br />
more efficient, better quality products).<br />
Competitive conditions related to higher<br />
education and continuous training and ability<br />
to benefit from existing technologies.<br />
Stage III: The competitiveness based on<br />
innovation - innovation-driven (new products<br />
from innovative, complex production<br />
processes).<br />
The importance <strong>of</strong> individual factors,<br />
expressed by weight in the total contribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> the three pillars <strong>of</strong> competitiveness<br />
depends on the stage in which the country<br />
concerned.<br />
Table 1 The pillars <strong>of</strong> competitiveness (on a scale from 1 a worst - 7 the most powerful)<br />
Basic requirements Score Romania<br />
Institutions 3,7<br />
Infrastructure 2,7<br />
Macroeconomic stability 4,6<br />
Health and primary education 5,5<br />
Effciency enhancers<br />
Higher education and training 4,3<br />
Goods market effciency 4,2<br />
Labor market effciency 4,3<br />
Financial market sophistication 4,4<br />
Technological readiness 3,8<br />
Market size 4,5<br />
Innovation and sophistication factors<br />
Business sophistication 3,8<br />
Innovation 3,1<br />
Source: World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010
4. Romania's place in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
competitiveness in 2010?<br />
According to the Romanian Institute for<br />
Social and Economic Research Polls -<br />
IRECSON, Romania is one <strong>of</strong> the last places<br />
among the 58 states, namely the 54th place,<br />
ahead <strong>of</strong> Argentina, Croatia, Ukraine and<br />
Venezuela. In front <strong>of</strong> us, at very short<br />
distance are Bulgaria (who score a 0.6%<br />
higher than the score <strong>of</strong> Romania) and<br />
Slovenia which has a spacing <strong>of</strong> 1.2 points<br />
from November. In the case <strong>of</strong> former<br />
communist countries until 1989 before we<br />
can see that under the current economic<br />
crisis, Hungary (42), Estonia (34) and Poland<br />
(32) have found solutions to increase<br />
competitiveness, Romania (54) and Czech<br />
Republic (29) retain their positions from 2009<br />
to 2010, while Bulgaria (53), Slovenia (52),<br />
Slovakia (49) and Lithuania (43) have<br />
recorded substantial decreases ranging from<br />
20 to 12 seats. For a better building on<br />
evolution, that the positions occupied in<br />
recent years, the Yearbook presents<br />
individual country specific contributory<br />
factors in terms <strong>of</strong> competitiveness and the<br />
disadvantaged.<br />
In 2010 Romania registered a decline in<br />
economic performance, ranked 32 in 2009,<br />
ranked 47 in 2010. Although this chapter we<br />
have seen a drop <strong>of</strong> 15 seats still remain<br />
before countries like Greece (48), Russia<br />
(49), Turkey (50), Estonia (52), Slovakia<br />
(54), Ukraine (55) Lithuania (57). Regarding<br />
the efficiency <strong>of</strong> government, I dropped one<br />
place from 2009, topped 50. Regarding<br />
infrastructure, I grew up 10 seats in 2010<br />
compared to 2009, peaking at number 43 in<br />
2010, and Chapter Efficiency business, grew<br />
13 seats, up from 56 in 2009 ranked the 49th<br />
place in 2010.<br />
Unfortunately, Romania has made significant<br />
gains in terms <strong>of</strong> business efficiency and<br />
infrastructure were not enough to increase<br />
competitiveness as a whole, but given that the<br />
economic performance and efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />
government Chapter I declined, maintaining<br />
the position <strong>of</strong> Romania in 2010, to 2009<br />
220<br />
levels is due the first two factors. Credit<br />
business is beginning to strengthen in recent<br />
years and investment in telecommunications<br />
infrastructure and in research are beginning to<br />
become visible, helping them to contribute in<br />
2010 to maintain the competitiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania in 2009, the economic crisis.<br />
Strengths <strong>of</strong> the business concerns in<br />
particular the progress made by the Romanian<br />
companies in their concern for customer<br />
satisfaction for a proper wage service sector,<br />
and staff management positions, at a salary<br />
that is comparable to that in other EU<br />
countries.<br />
However, to further strengthen the business<br />
environment we need to improve some<br />
aspects which for 2010 is still the weak points<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> competitiveness, namely: the need<br />
for specialists in finance raised by the need to<br />
increase the capacity <strong>of</strong> Romanian companies'<br />
adaptability to market changes the need to<br />
increase transparency <strong>of</strong> financial institutions<br />
in Romania, the stock market decline, and<br />
finding solutions so enterprise debts not<br />
restrict their ability to be competitive.<br />
Negative aspects (aspects <strong>of</strong> which Romania<br />
is ranked the lowest in the context <strong>of</strong> global<br />
competitiveness) in terms <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
performance are related to direct investment<br />
abroad, investments in capital markets<br />
abroad, receipts from tourism and real GDP<br />
growth.<br />
Even though the Chapter Efficiency sit well<br />
in the government's total public debt and<br />
collect taxes on income, weaknesses in the<br />
system in terms <strong>of</strong> competitiveness in 2010<br />
relate mostly to the lack <strong>of</strong> public contracts<br />
open to all bidders, the black market<br />
economy that does not allow and competition<br />
law can not stop unfair competition.<br />
In conclusion, overall, we assess the<br />
competitiveness <strong>of</strong> Romanian economy as a<br />
"disappointing performance." In many ways<br />
they are signs <strong>of</strong> competitiveness,<br />
competitiveness appears other way to start,<br />
but in most economic indicators speak for<br />
lags, lack <strong>of</strong> competitiveness.
Heritage Foundation and Wall Street Journal<br />
<strong>Index</strong> <strong>of</strong> Economic Freedom determines (S),<br />
assuming that economic freedom is a<br />
221<br />
precondition for prosperity <strong>of</strong> individuals and<br />
in turn a key driver for competitiveness.<br />
Source: <strong>Index</strong> <strong>of</strong> Economic Freedom, Heritage Foundation, 2010<br />
Chart no. 1 Rating States <strong>of</strong> Europe according to ILE<br />
According to the results <strong>of</strong> this study, the<br />
2010 edition, Romania is the 63rd country<br />
in the world in terms <strong>of</strong> economic freedom,<br />
and ranked 28th in Europe.<br />
The Heritage analysis, Romania has<br />
achieved a 64.2 index points above the<br />
global average. After comparing the first<br />
countries in Europe, according to each<br />
indicator <strong>of</strong> economic freedom, Romania<br />
has high scores for: free trade, fiscal<br />
freedom, government spending, and<br />
significantly lower scores than the best<br />
countries in Europe obtained if : property<br />
rights and freedom from corruption, as<br />
these areas are necessary for developing<br />
solutions.<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the study conducted by the<br />
Heritage Foundation shows that Romania's<br />
economy is moving towards a greater<br />
economic freedom index.<br />
5. Conclusions<br />
For Romania, economic competitiveness is<br />
a major component <strong>of</strong> national<br />
development strategy for 2007-2013. For<br />
this purpose a special program was<br />
developed (Sectoral Operational<br />
Programme ‘Increasing <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />
Competitiveness ‘’SOP) in accordance<br />
with the Lisbon strategy on improving the<br />
economic competitiveness <strong>of</strong> the European<br />
Union.<br />
In full accordance with the conduct <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Commission’s proposals for<br />
Competitiveness and Innovation<br />
Framework 2007-2013, the priorities <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania’s competitiveness strategy, which<br />
take into account and take into account the<br />
guidelines proposed by the Commission for<br />
Cohesion Policy 2007 – 2013, are:<br />
- Improving access to emergency market,<br />
capital, technology businesses, especially<br />
small and medium enterprises;
- Developing knowledge-based economy:<br />
including the promotion <strong>of</strong> innovation and<br />
development <strong>of</strong> a competitive;<br />
- Improve energy efficiency and use<br />
renewable energy.<br />
Competitiveness, although <strong>of</strong>ten studied in<br />
recent decades even in Romania, remains a<br />
qualitative concept, draw conclusions on<br />
the competitive status is rather the depth <strong>of</strong><br />
analysis, the information behind it, the<br />
evaluator’s experience and, not least,<br />
points <strong>of</strong> view that makes analysis.<br />
Acknowledgements:<br />
1. This article is the result <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
POSDRU/88/1.5./S/55287 "Doctoral<br />
Programme in Economics at the European<br />
Standards Knowledge (DOESEC). This<br />
project is co-funded by the European<br />
Social Fund Through the Sectoral<br />
Operational Human Resources<br />
Development Programme for 2007-2013,<br />
coordinated by The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong><br />
Economic Studies in partnership with West<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Timisoara.<br />
2. "This work was partially funded by<br />
contract<br />
POSDRU/CPP107/DMI1.5/S/78421,<br />
strategic project ID 78 421 (2010), c<strong>of</strong>inanced<br />
by European Social Fund - Invest<br />
in People, by Human Resources<br />
Development Operational Programme<br />
2007-2013".<br />
222<br />
References<br />
1.Airoldi, G. Brunetti, G. Coda, V. Corso di<br />
economia aziendale. Bologna: il Mulino. 2005.<br />
2.Fung, K. V. Fung, K. W. Wond, Y.<br />
,Concurenţa într-o lume plată. Cum să<br />
construim o companie într-o lume fără graniţe.,<br />
Bucureşti: Editura Publică, 2009<br />
3.Gavrilă, I. Gavrilă, Tatiana. Competitivitate şi<br />
mediu concurenţial: Promovarea şi protejarea<br />
concurenţei în Uniunea Europeană. Bucureşti :<br />
Editura Economică, 2009<br />
4.Hamel, G. Prahalad, C. K. Competiţia pentru<br />
viitor. Bucureşti: Editura Meteor Press, 2008<br />
5.Kahn, S. Geopolitica Uniuni Europene.<br />
Bucureşti: Editura Cartier Istoric, 2008<br />
6.Lipsey, R. G. Chrystal, K. A. Economia<br />
pozitivă. Bucureşti : Editura Economică, 1999<br />
7.Porter, Michael, E. Despre concurenţă.<br />
Bucureşti: Editura Meteor Press, 2008<br />
8.Voiculescu, Dan. Mereuţă, Cezar. Analiza de<br />
competitivitate a economiei româneşti.<br />
Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Române, 1998<br />
9.Voiculescu, D. Competitivitatea – note de<br />
curs. Bucureşti: Editura Economică, 2000<br />
10.Voiculescu, Dan. Competiţie şi<br />
competitivitate. Bucureşti: Editura Economică,<br />
2001<br />
11.Cismaş, Laura. Stan, Laura-Melinda.<br />
Avantaj competitiv şi performanţă în contextul<br />
responsabilizării sociale a companiilor. The<br />
Romanian Economic Journal, Year XIII, nr. 35.<br />
2010<br />
12.Cismaş, Laura. Bucur Oana Realitatea<br />
romaneasca din perspectiva libertatii<br />
economice. Conferinta internationala Oameni,<br />
idei, experiente, Supliment al revistei Analele<br />
Universitatii „Eftimie Murgu” Resita, Fascicula<br />
II – Studii Economice, ISSN 1584 – 0972, 22-<br />
23 octombrie 2010<br />
13.Dăianu, Daniel. “Cursa pentru<br />
competitivitate”. Ziarul Jurnalul Naţional, 8<br />
martie 2006<br />
14.Spătaru, M. „Factorii competitivităţii<br />
naţionale”, Universitatea Petrol-Gaze, Ploieşti<br />
15.www.topbusiness.ro<br />
16.www.IRECSON.ro (Institutul Român de<br />
Cercetări Economice Sociale şi Sondaje)<br />
17.www.FMI.ro (Fondul Monetar Internaţional)<br />
18.www.WEFORUM.org (World Economic<br />
Forum)<br />
19.www.IMD.ch (Anuarul Competitivităţii<br />
Mondiale – World Competitiveness Yearbook)
DYNAMICS ECONOMIC DISPARITIES IN NORTH-WEST REGION OF<br />
ROMANIA<br />
Florea Adrian<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />
Abstract: Even though over the years has enjoyed wide media coverage, with highlighted aspects,<br />
discrepancies and inequalities <strong>of</strong> economic potential between different regions <strong>of</strong> the world, or even<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the same countries always remained topical. Difficulties arising from these differences were<br />
always felt, extremely painful by humans.<br />
Analyzing distinctly, participation <strong>of</strong> each county to the GDP <strong>of</strong> the Northwest Region and the<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> all indicators, we can identify significant discrepancies between counties, regions<br />
and municipalities. This is one <strong>of</strong> the reasons that led us trying to identify the causes that generated<br />
the current situation. From the perspective <strong>of</strong> the contribution <strong>of</strong> each county in the Northwest<br />
Region to Region's domestic product composition, the first place is taken by Cluj county 32.3%,<br />
followed by Bihor with 24.3%, Maramures, with 14.9% Satu-Mare, 12.1%, Bistrita-Nasaud, 9.1%<br />
and 7.2% Salaj. Consulting <strong>of</strong> the Regional Operational Programme 2007-2013 indicates that the<br />
poorest areas in the Northwest Region are in Maramures and Bistrita-Nasaud.<br />
An important part <strong>of</strong> the active population <strong>of</strong> North-West Region was employed in public<br />
enterprises and an increase <strong>of</strong> unemployment in the counties <strong>of</strong> Salaj, Satu Mare and Maramures<br />
became predictable, imminent amid restructuring <strong>of</strong> public enterprises with losses. Studies <strong>of</strong><br />
employed population by sectors <strong>of</strong> the economy, shows a high rate <strong>of</strong> population employed in<br />
services in the counties <strong>of</strong> Cluj and Bihor and high employment in agriculture on other four<br />
counties. In a modern market economy, services are most concentrated labors, and how the<br />
workforce is distributed in the Northwest region also shows an imbalance. How Northwest Region<br />
is participating in international economic cycle has major effects on the population's living<br />
standards. Relevant for the inter-district disparities analysis is the human and agents behavior<br />
analysis and the savings and loan relationships. How people behave in these ratios in each county<br />
tells us much about their economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />
Attenuation <strong>of</strong> long distance gaps in the Northwest region remains a very complex problem,<br />
attempts to decrease it, is bringing into question, not infrequently contradictory<br />
strategies. Supporting the few remaining state-owned enterprises in the region could lead to a<br />
revival <strong>of</strong> activity, attracting attention <strong>of</strong> foreign investors can thus lead to recovery <strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong> the<br />
labor resources <strong>of</strong> the Region. Expansion and modernization <strong>of</strong> transport and distribution networks<br />
would provide a further chance to faster development <strong>of</strong> the North-West by exploiting the growing<br />
regional economic resources available, enhancing economic relations both intra and extra<br />
regional.<br />
But we can not fail to mention the part state should play in orchestrating these measures. Despite<br />
the independence <strong>of</strong> regions, they are subordinated to the central administration, and strategic<br />
investment policy depends to an overwhelming extent <strong>of</strong> it. Only by linking effective measures at<br />
national, regional and local level will alleviate the sustainable economic gaps.<br />
Keywords: disparities, restructuring, reforms, investments, consequences<br />
JEL: E01, E24, J11, R12, W24<br />
223
The issue <strong>of</strong> disparities and inequalities <strong>of</strong> the<br />
economic potential existing between different<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> the world or even between regions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the same countries always remained valid,<br />
despite the fact that over time it has received<br />
wide media coverage. Difficulties arising<br />
from these differences were always felt<br />
particularly painful by humans.<br />
Currently, the economy is characterized by an<br />
increased mobility <strong>of</strong> all its components, and<br />
economic disparities have begun to worry<br />
more and more economic researchers. As a<br />
result, simply finding the economic<br />
disparities is not satisfying anyone anymore.<br />
Maybe that's why people who believe that it<br />
is necessary to identify the necessity to<br />
maintain and deepen the gaps identified cases<br />
depending on the particularities and<br />
specificities <strong>of</strong> each area. It must also<br />
decipher their consequences, because they are<br />
not limited to the current period, but<br />
designing, influencing economic relations on<br />
a longer period. In the spirit <strong>of</strong> the statement<br />
we want to present an analysis by<br />
geographical regions, North-West <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania. Among the envisaged objectives<br />
we include: identifying the causes <strong>of</strong><br />
economic disparities emphasis <strong>of</strong> inter-county<br />
geographic area North West <strong>of</strong> Romania,<br />
which are the economic effects <strong>of</strong> these interdistrict<br />
disparities<br />
According to information provided by the<br />
Regional Development North West Agency,<br />
the North-West region (northern<br />
Transylvania) is close to European markets,<br />
with good road access, rail and air has a<br />
strategic geographical position, being the<br />
gateway to Romania from the European<br />
Union and Ukraine. Even if the region is<br />
crossed by 7 European roads, has peripheral<br />
position over the European transport<br />
corridors, the connection with eminent poles<br />
in the neighborhood, with other regions is<br />
still difficult. According to the same sources,<br />
224<br />
the North-West <strong>of</strong> Romania has an area <strong>of</strong><br />
34,159 km ² representing 14.3% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
area <strong>of</strong> the country. Part <strong>of</strong> this region are the<br />
counties: Bihor, Bistrita-Nasaud, Cluj,<br />
Maramures, Satu Mare and Salaj having a<br />
population <strong>of</strong> 2,744,914 (14.32% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
population <strong>of</strong> the country) and has an average<br />
density <strong>of</strong> 80.1 inhabitants per square<br />
kilometer. For that is the number <strong>of</strong><br />
administrative-territorial units (421),<br />
distributed as follows: 42 cities including 15<br />
municipalities, 398 communes and 1823<br />
villages.<br />
Analyzing separately each county<br />
participating in the formation <strong>of</strong> regional<br />
GDP and the composition <strong>of</strong> the indicators,<br />
we can identify significant discrepancies<br />
between counties, regions and<br />
municipalities. This is one <strong>of</strong> the reasons that<br />
led us trying to identify the causes that<br />
generated the current situation.<br />
From the perspective <strong>of</strong> contribution each<br />
county has in North-West Region’s domestic<br />
product formation, first place is taken by Cluj<br />
county with 32.3%, followed by Bihar with<br />
24.3%, Maramures, with 14.9% Satu-Mare,<br />
12.1%, Bistrita-Nasaud, 9.1% and 7.2% Salaj.<br />
Consulting <strong>of</strong> the Regional Operational<br />
Programme 2007-2013 indicates that the<br />
poorest areas in the Northwest Region are in<br />
Maramures and Bistrita-Nasaud. Here were<br />
identified most areas <strong>of</strong> industrial<br />
decline. Intra-regional differences are closely<br />
related to the degree <strong>of</strong> industrialization, the<br />
counties most powerful and industrialized<br />
early - Cluj and Bihor - having a high<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> the employed population<br />
(44.5% and 45.7%), while less counties and<br />
later industrial - Satu Mare and Bistrita-<br />
Nasaud - have lower weights (39.6% and<br />
38.0%). Un-industrialization has led to a<br />
restricted job use in industry in counties <strong>of</strong><br />
North-west, but with large differences from<br />
one area to another.
Table 1 Unemployment in North-West<br />
2007 2008 2009 2010<br />
Bihor 2,4 3 5,8 5,8<br />
Bistriţa 2,4 2,8 8,2 6,3<br />
Cluj 3 2,9 6,3 4,9<br />
Maramureş 3,4 3,7 6,4 6<br />
Satu Mare 2,6 3 6 6,3<br />
Sălaj 4,4 5,5 10,3 8,2<br />
Made by author based on information found on the website:<br />
http://www.insse.ro/cms/rw/pages/buletinStatJud.ro.do<br />
An important part <strong>of</strong> the active population <strong>of</strong><br />
North-West Region was employed in public<br />
enterprises and an increase <strong>of</strong> unemployment<br />
in the counties <strong>of</strong> Salaj, Satu Mare and<br />
Maramures became predictable, imminent<br />
amid restructuring <strong>of</strong> public enterprises with<br />
losses. Other areas in decline are: the Apuseni<br />
Mountains and the northern mountain area.<br />
Mining sector restructurations has affected<br />
this sector and led to massive lay<strong>of</strong>fs in the<br />
area <strong>of</strong> Baia Mare-Borsa-Viseu.<br />
A lower number <strong>of</strong> unemployed in Cluj and<br />
Bihor to the major foreign investment, which<br />
have diminished, even partially, the effects <strong>of</strong><br />
industry restructuring. North-West has<br />
attracted a relatively high number <strong>of</strong> firms<br />
with foreign participation, sometimes<br />
grouped in clusters (eg major foreign<br />
investors in Bihor County - primarily<br />
producers <strong>of</strong> technological equipment). But<br />
we can observe that they are generally SMEs,<br />
who <strong>of</strong>ten work as subcontractors or contract<br />
work or operate based on business ties,<br />
traditional Western Europe. It should be<br />
noted that SMEs present in the Northwest<br />
region <strong>of</strong> the country accounts for 15% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
national total. The existence <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />
investors to operate in the same field at the<br />
same time can create both advantages and<br />
disadvantages. On Bihor ‘s labor market<br />
multinationals had a visible contribution to<br />
the unemployment rate and the constant<br />
increase in demand for qualified manpower,<br />
services development.<br />
Studies <strong>of</strong> employed population by sectors <strong>of</strong><br />
the economy, shows a high rate <strong>of</strong> population<br />
225<br />
employed in services in counties <strong>of</strong> Cluj and<br />
Bihor and high employment in agriculture on<br />
other four counties. In a modern market<br />
economy, services are most concentrated<br />
labors, and how the workforce is distributed<br />
in the Northwest region also shows an<br />
imbalance. Counties in which the<br />
employment <strong>of</strong> labor resources is higher in<br />
services, like Cluj and Bihor, also raises the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> economic development compared to<br />
other counties.<br />
The presence, quite shy, <strong>of</strong> industrial parks in<br />
the Northwest Region counties, and also their<br />
unequal distribution in the Region, is<br />
supplying the gaps. We notice the early<br />
existence in Cluj County <strong>of</strong> three industrial<br />
parks: Tetarom1 Cluj-Napoca, Cluj Napoca<br />
Tetrarom2 , Dej ARC Park, which attracted<br />
investments <strong>of</strong> hundreds <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong><br />
euros. A significant impact on the local<br />
economy has the making <strong>of</strong> the industrial<br />
park <strong>of</strong> the Finnish giant Nokia (Tetrarom3),<br />
Nokia investment reaching half billion<br />
euros. Existence in Bihor county <strong>of</strong> those two<br />
industrial parks, one located in Oradea and<br />
one in the west <strong>of</strong> the county, between<br />
Oradea and the border with Hungary, has<br />
created a domino-type effect, attracting other<br />
foreign investors and companies. So Shin<br />
Heung Precision <strong>of</strong>Korea, U.S. Plexus that<br />
made investments <strong>of</strong> over EUR 20 million<br />
and a Canadian company that produces<br />
equipment (Celestica) made an investment <strong>of</strong><br />
over 84 million, those 3 assuring to employ<br />
over 3,000 people. In other county we could<br />
see 25 million euros invested by the French
company Michellin in a tire factory in Zalau,<br />
the Natuzzi Italian corporation in a furniture<br />
manufacturing facility in Baia-Mare in the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> 40 million euros in Satu Mare<br />
Schemmer German company has invested 10<br />
million euros in the production <strong>of</strong> tubes for<br />
cable protection, and in Bistrita-Nasaud a<br />
germany company Leoni Wyring System’s<br />
presence is noted, producing automotive<br />
wiring, but also companies with Italian<br />
capital such as Tesitura, Italtextil and Storia,<br />
active in textiles field. In all counties in the<br />
Table 2 Average monthly wage<br />
Salariaţi<br />
(raportat la totalul<br />
populaţiei) (%)<br />
226<br />
region, except Bistrita-Nasaud, industrial<br />
parks have been established.<br />
The top foreign investors in the county <strong>of</strong><br />
Cluj is the leader <strong>of</strong> the Region, and placing<br />
their capital where conditions exist for<br />
achieving higher returns. All these elements<br />
lead to the development <strong>of</strong> the labor market,<br />
bringing financial resources, significantly<br />
reducing the unemployment rate, while<br />
generating an increase in GDP per inhabitant<br />
(Table 2).<br />
Salariul<br />
mediu net<br />
lunar(euro)<br />
PIB<br />
(pe cap de locuitor)<br />
Bihor 27,3 249 5550<br />
Bistriţa 19,2 261 4712<br />
Cluj 28,5 345 7100<br />
Maramureş 17,8 235 4090<br />
Satu Mare 19,5 259 4459<br />
Sălaj 17,6 265 4337<br />
Source: National Commission for Prognosis http://www.cnp.ro/ro/prognoze<br />
In the Northwest Region, we noted important<br />
differences between the counties both in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> employees compared to<br />
the total population, the net average wage,<br />
and GDP per inhabitants. A cause <strong>of</strong> this<br />
situation may be the preference <strong>of</strong> investors<br />
to place capital in more developed counties,<br />
such as Cluj, at the expense <strong>of</strong> others.<br />
Another effect <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> gaps in the<br />
North West is population migration. If the<br />
external migration is already well known,<br />
became a phenomenon very carefully studied<br />
by the European institutions, migration<br />
between counties in the Region being<br />
seriously considered, to my knowledge, until<br />
now.<br />
Relevant inter-district disparities analysis is<br />
to analyze the behavior <strong>of</strong> the population and<br />
the savings and loan relationships.How<br />
people behave in these ratios in each county<br />
tells us much about their economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />
The information presented in the table 3,<br />
allows us to identify different behaviors for<br />
each <strong>of</strong> the counties residents regarding loans<br />
and deposits. As expected, most <strong>of</strong> the loans<br />
(in absolute value) are in the county <strong>of</strong> Cluj,<br />
followed in order by Bihor, Maramures, Satu<br />
Mare and Bistrita-Nasaud. Perhaps more<br />
relevant is the percentage <strong>of</strong> outstanding<br />
loans, Cluj and Satu Mare, where only 9.8%<br />
and 9.1% <strong>of</strong> total loans, Bistrita-Nasaud most<br />
delicate position having 18.2% <strong>of</strong> total loans,<br />
while the values <strong>of</strong> Bihor and<br />
Maramures 13.2% and 11% standing in the<br />
middle somewhere.<br />
Following the structure <strong>of</strong> loans, it is noted<br />
that in the Maramures home credits do not<br />
exceed 31.7% <strong>of</strong> total loans to the public. The<br />
explanation could be given by the fact that a<br />
large number <strong>of</strong> Maramures people are<br />
working abroad, money they send being used<br />
primarily to create new residential areas, so<br />
the necessary credits for this area is
smaller. Cluj in turn, has the highest share <strong>of</strong><br />
housing credits in total loans, approximately<br />
42.44%, this being due to increased<br />
development <strong>of</strong> the area in recent years, the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> students who chose Cluj as the city<br />
<strong>of</strong> residence after graduation, relatively high<br />
price <strong>of</strong> real estate in this area compared to<br />
other areas as well as greater employment and<br />
income more consistent work performed by<br />
227<br />
residents in the area. Bistrita, Satu Mare and<br />
Bihor have comparative value <strong>of</strong> real estate<br />
loans in total loans ratio, with values ranging<br />
between 34% and 36%, remarkable being the<br />
fact that in absolute value Bihor is ranked<br />
second after Cluj with a double value total<br />
loans and real estate compared to the other<br />
counties.<br />
Table 3 Information on credit report in the Northwest Region (mil. RON)<br />
Total<br />
credite<br />
Lei şi<br />
valută<br />
Total<br />
restante<br />
Lei şi<br />
valută<br />
Total<br />
credite<br />
populatie<br />
Lei şi<br />
valută<br />
Total<br />
credite<br />
locuinte<br />
Lei şi<br />
valută<br />
Total<br />
depozite la<br />
termen lei şi<br />
valută<br />
Bihor 6071.9 1788.5 2575.8 645.3 2395.8<br />
Bistriţa 2135.5 809 1170.2 290.3 1026.7<br />
Cluj 9197.8 862.8 4694.9 1574.7 5583.6<br />
Maramureş 3107.9 264.5 1445.1 305 1524.9<br />
Satu Mare 2632.1 193.1 1099.4 266.5 1040.1<br />
Source: BNR – Territorial structure <strong>of</strong> non-bank loans and customer deposits<br />
http://www.bnr.ro/Indicatori-agregati-privind-institutiile-de-credit-3368.aspx<br />
Attenuation <strong>of</strong> long distance gaps in the<br />
Northwest region remains a very complex<br />
problem, attempts to decrease it, is bringing<br />
into question, not infrequently contradictory<br />
strategies. Supporting the few remaining<br />
state-owned enterprises in the region could<br />
lead to a revival <strong>of</strong> activity, attracting<br />
attention <strong>of</strong> foreign investors can thus lead to<br />
recovery <strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong> the labor resources <strong>of</strong><br />
the Region.The level <strong>of</strong> resource utilization<br />
services sector should also be carefully<br />
considered.<br />
Expansion and modernization <strong>of</strong> transport<br />
and distribution networks would provide a<br />
further chance to faster development <strong>of</strong> the<br />
North-West by exploiting the growing<br />
regional economic resources available,<br />
intensifying economic relations both intra and<br />
extra regional.<br />
But we can not fail to mention the part state<br />
should play in orchestrating these<br />
measures. Despite the independence <strong>of</strong><br />
regions, they are subordinated to the central<br />
administration, and strategic investment<br />
policy depends to an overwhelming extent <strong>of</strong><br />
it. Only by linking effective measures at<br />
national, regional and local level will<br />
alleviate the sustainable economic gaps.<br />
References:<br />
1. Dascălu, Maria Nicoleta and Cârstea,<br />
Gheorghe. Autonomie locală și dezvoltare<br />
regională. București: Economica, 2009<br />
2. Fometescu, Casiana and Coșea, Mircea .<br />
Dezvoltarea economică regională a României<br />
în condițiile integrării în Uniunea Europeană.<br />
București: Economica, 2008<br />
3. Idu, Pompilia and Bal, Ana. Politica de<br />
dezvoltare regionala a Uniunii Europene :<br />
Implicațiile aplicării ei in Romania.<br />
București: Economica, 2009<br />
4. Agenția de dezvoltare regională Nord-vest.<br />
Accessed May 1, 2011. www.nord-vest.ro<br />
5. Oficiul național al Registrului Comerțului.<br />
Accessed April 30, 2011. http://www.onrc.ro/<br />
6. Banca Națională a României. Accessed 22<br />
aprilie, 2011. www.bnr.ro
7. Bugetul anual al Județului Sălaj. Accessed<br />
April 29, 2011.<br />
http://www.zalausj.ro/ro/informatii/buget201<br />
1.pdf?PHPSESSID=1cjlcooc5mijip9eapnd3uf<br />
6j6<br />
8. Institutul Național de Statistică al<br />
României. Accessed April 29, 2011.<br />
http://www.insse.ro/cms/rw/pages/index.ro.d<br />
o<br />
9. Județul Satu-mare - centralizator investiții.<br />
Accessed April 29, 2011. http://www.satu-<br />
228<br />
mare.ro/fisiere/buget/2011/centraliz_2011_in<br />
vestitii.pdf<br />
10. Comisia Națională de Prognoză.<br />
Accessed April 30, 2011. http://www.cnp.ro/<br />
11. Situația investitorilor în Parcul Industrial<br />
Eurobussines. Accessed April, 12 2011.<br />
http://www.oradea.ro/parcul-industrialeurobusiness-oradea/situatia-investitorilor-inparcul-industrial
ABOUT OTHER KIND OF PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH (HOMO-SAPIENS<br />
TO HOMO-OECONOMICUS)<br />
Jivan Alexandru<br />
Universitatea de Vest din Timişoara Facultatea de Economie şi de Administrare a Afacerilor<br />
Abstract: Part <strong>of</strong> a larger research, this paper ranges among the matter <strong>of</strong> ideas confrontation<br />
concerning the causes <strong>of</strong> the economic crises and those keys to be passed. Paper aims at finding<br />
and praising the defining elements <strong>of</strong> our economy, in the purpose <strong>of</strong> better understanding the<br />
nowadays crisis, and at presenting certain conceptually different approaches. In this purpose,<br />
analytical presentations are focussed on the specific realities <strong>of</strong> the economic life that are in<br />
position in the last centuries, which are considered to be favouring the arriving to the critical states<br />
in the last years and to be promoting those maintaining, or which allow explaining certain effects<br />
and tendencies.<br />
The approach is made from the angle <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> the productivity that is had in view and<br />
highlighted in the market regulating mechanisms, and <strong>of</strong> the due growth. The paper is grounded on<br />
important analysis on the matter (including anterior researches <strong>of</strong> the author), but their dimensions<br />
does not allow their presentation in the abstract. Analysis starts from interpreting the very<br />
nowadays crisis, from different sites concerning the core (general) causes, by correlating with<br />
certain features <strong>of</strong> the industrialized consuming society. More recent references are made in the<br />
literature on the matter. Modern western economy is defined from the angle <strong>of</strong> focussing on<br />
material-quantitative productivity and growth. Analysis tries to explain certain effects concerning<br />
this kind <strong>of</strong> focus. Interesting effects and tendencies are noticed, that miss to the traditional<br />
approaches. Further on an opposed theoretic model is discussed. This is built and developed inside<br />
the service economy (on the case <strong>of</strong> two conceptually similar approaches, came from two different<br />
sources <strong>of</strong> economic thought in the field; original contributions <strong>of</strong> the author are involved).<br />
Adequately to the knowledge society, this last one is considered more favourable for homo sapiens,<br />
at least once the visible effects <strong>of</strong> the last two hundred years model are revealed, which are<br />
dominated by homo oeconomicus. This reference model being set up, a short foray is intuitively<br />
made in the perspectives <strong>of</strong> humanity on long run and on very long time, in the supposed maintain<br />
<strong>of</strong> the present economic model. In all those presentations and analyses, connections are made with<br />
other papers on the matter, in the purpose <strong>of</strong> more pr<strong>of</strong>ound study.<br />
The conclusions concern the practical possibility <strong>of</strong> the model opposed to the industrialist economic<br />
crisis. The details highlighted from the analysis <strong>of</strong> the conceptual comparison between models and<br />
prospections bring, in the final, at proposing solutions, grounded on fundamental requirements on<br />
the line <strong>of</strong> humanity’s values, with didactic addressing to the young generation. The elements <strong>of</strong><br />
contribution <strong>of</strong> the author are underlined in the presented matter.<br />
Keywords: productivity, modern growth, economic crisis, knowledge society, service economy<br />
JEL: A13, H49, I25<br />
1. Introduction<br />
The nowadays crisis looks like a systemic<br />
crisis <strong>of</strong> the whole life <strong>of</strong> humans that was<br />
(and still is) approached in the modern<br />
tidiness, just like in the times <strong>of</strong><br />
industrialization.<br />
229<br />
It looks like humanity arrived to the limits <strong>of</strong><br />
a way <strong>of</strong> living that proved itself to be<br />
destructive for the planet and for the living <strong>of</strong><br />
our own species on a very long time.<br />
That what is certain is that, for Romania, the<br />
crisis is total: Romanian scientific research<br />
rather does no more exists, that we are
integrated in Europe on positions <strong>of</strong> a<br />
marginal country, that Romanians are<br />
importing the most <strong>of</strong> the apples and potatoes<br />
they eat, that our country is in enormous debt<br />
to the foreign banks, that the Romanian<br />
education lost all its chances to come back to<br />
the performances it had two decades ago, that<br />
the health <strong>of</strong> the population is under the<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> certain decisions <strong>of</strong> the same (and<br />
rather generalized) principle <strong>of</strong> elimination<br />
(and not <strong>of</strong> construction) etc.<br />
For the analysis <strong>of</strong> Romania’s economy can<br />
be invoked the exceptional book <strong>of</strong> Marius<br />
Băcescu and Dionysius Fota (Băcescu and<br />
Fota, 2009).<br />
In this paper we will bring the discussion<br />
mainly in the field <strong>of</strong> service economy: this<br />
was that what made possible the necessity <strong>of</strong><br />
approaching productivity, efficiency and<br />
growth in widened horizons to be seen. It<br />
happened in the postmodern epoch, when the<br />
traditional view was replaced, by taking into<br />
account certain social aspects and other, more<br />
than the monetary narrow economic. For a<br />
Short Literature Review, please also see the<br />
chapter no. 4.<br />
2. The crisis <strong>of</strong> the world as a capitalist<br />
extensity spread<br />
In opposition with the well-known growing<br />
intensity by industrial means, that is usual<br />
and preached in the theories concerning the<br />
modern world, the consuming society meant<br />
rather a simple spread <strong>of</strong> a model – the<br />
capitalist one – as Issac Johsua shown<br />
(Johsua, 2006). In the chapter 7 „« Nouvelle<br />
économie » ou l'utopie du capital”, the author<br />
we cited spokes about “over-accumulation”<br />
<strong>of</strong> capital, meaning accumulating it in a<br />
rhythm that the economy cannot support, on a<br />
long run, the pr<strong>of</strong>it ratio anticipated by those<br />
who supply the funds. The financial capital <strong>of</strong><br />
the world brought us in crisis, sais Issac<br />
Johsua. This research, published before the<br />
nowadays crisis, spokes about the generating<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> what followed – as we have all<br />
seen. “The crisis <strong>of</strong> «the new economy» was<br />
not surmounted, but only stocked in the<br />
230<br />
accumulated lack <strong>of</strong> equilibrium”, sais the<br />
author at pp. 240. The superficial character,<br />
from the economic point <strong>of</strong> view (founded on<br />
“moment solutions”, having beneficial results<br />
in the short run, but generating spread effects,<br />
including in the long run, aggravating effects)<br />
is exceptionally synthesised when Johsua<br />
shows that, in critical situations, “America<br />
rescued itself just as it lived: on credit. The<br />
pick up again was so realised, not by reducing<br />
certain anterior dysfunctions <strong>of</strong> the American<br />
economy, but contrary, starting from them, by<br />
increasing them.” (pp. 243).<br />
The central goal on the market (and the<br />
criterion <strong>of</strong> “selection” by “competition”) is<br />
the gain, found in computed productivity. The<br />
method consists in cheating models <strong>of</strong><br />
economy, by evading its genuine roles <strong>of</strong> tool<br />
for covering people’s needs; and, by this, the<br />
economy is preached like a goal by itself; the<br />
slogans <strong>of</strong> liberty and <strong>of</strong> “fair competition” in<br />
the economy, but the economy that is<br />
producing those which are really necessary<br />
(economy that was dominant two-three<br />
centuries ago) is let in the outside <strong>of</strong> the<br />
efficiency: there is else that the market<br />
acknowledge and admits as rewarding and<br />
moneymaking; i.e. the gains are from<br />
winning in the “fair” competition, including<br />
the intense exploitation <strong>of</strong> the natural<br />
reserves, speculation etc.<br />
A main result is that primary needs, as food,<br />
and flu and tuberculosis cure) are abandoned<br />
to the market laws, at a subsistence level:<br />
they are maintained in this way in the<br />
”poverty trap” (this matter is developed in our<br />
paper Jivan, 2008).<br />
The existence <strong>of</strong> mass poverty also annulates<br />
or maintains to a minimal level the qualitative<br />
improving trends – which should be<br />
correlated with the increase in the price. The<br />
price increases very much, for relatively low<br />
improvements, for strictly opulent<br />
improvements, for advertising and mostly for<br />
good indicators established by the rate<br />
agencies (which are private firms and have<br />
private interests too); quality decreases for
the low price levels – having as a unique<br />
alternative the total give-up to those supplies.<br />
Prices are judged not in function <strong>of</strong> the<br />
quantities, but according to percentages <strong>of</strong> the<br />
revenues allocated to those buys. So, the<br />
situation (the current, given situation), <strong>of</strong> the<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> significant revenues above the<br />
fundamental needs (which can receive the<br />
most varied destinations, it is too little in the<br />
direction <strong>of</strong> improving or increasing<br />
alimentation) generates this marginal state <strong>of</strong><br />
agriculture in the capitals beholders’<br />
economic action options. The issue <strong>of</strong><br />
sponsoring agriculture is a mechanism which<br />
is external to the market, from outside the<br />
free competition, which tries to correct a<br />
situation (fair from the market logics point <strong>of</strong><br />
view), which risks leading to a dangerous<br />
diminishing <strong>of</strong> the agriculture weight in the<br />
entrepreneurs’ options.<br />
The suppliers remain attracted – according to<br />
the market criteria, as well – by the luxury<br />
consumptions segment. Disequilibrium at the<br />
individuals’ level results (Jivan, 2008). The<br />
optimizing system does no longer work, as<br />
well as the self-regulating mechanisms. A<br />
waste <strong>of</strong> values, <strong>of</strong> resources, <strong>of</strong> efforts result;<br />
this generates inflation.<br />
3. Usual perceptions, including in the<br />
periods <strong>of</strong> crisis<br />
It was shown (Jivan, 2010) how, in the<br />
traditional (classical) economic model, pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
and interest are usually seen as varying with<br />
capital amount, economic growth being<br />
generated by material investment, which is<br />
about quantitative growth <strong>of</strong> tools, machines,<br />
money and other forms <strong>of</strong> capital<br />
employment for production which generates<br />
quantitative growth <strong>of</strong> production. But the<br />
economic growth can be better generated by<br />
growing returns: productivity and the quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> being lucrative are given by innovation,<br />
information, knowledge, science, brains,<br />
including the results <strong>of</strong> human capital<br />
formation and education; growth is varying<br />
with inter-relational growth and with<br />
intellectual factor. (Jivan, 1995).<br />
231<br />
The usual angle <strong>of</strong> approach and level <strong>of</strong><br />
analysis is that <strong>of</strong> the accountants’ books, as<br />
well as the source <strong>of</strong> data; but in the<br />
accountancy books <strong>of</strong> business, the place <strong>of</strong><br />
such services may be less important than the<br />
place industry takes, even if the genuine<br />
essential generation <strong>of</strong> things has another<br />
logics (from Jivan, 2009). The understanding<br />
<strong>of</strong> the economists must go above the<br />
businessmen’s reasoning.<br />
Such a wrong approach is also in certain<br />
government policies concerning education<br />
and scientific research. Unfortunately they let<br />
us see the state <strong>of</strong> our country.<br />
We discussed the materialist fallacy<br />
(classical, or Marxist); it is a big mistake to<br />
see mostly the expenditures in services (and<br />
blame them all as a whole), because <strong>of</strong> their<br />
immateriality – proving lack <strong>of</strong><br />
understanding. We have also seen the<br />
consumption fallacy (Keynesian). They are as<br />
fallacious as any other exaggerations, like any<br />
speculating production, aiming exclusively to<br />
gain, with no respect for its environment<br />
(Mother Nature, social, moral environment).<br />
Any activity can be destructive (Jivan, 2010).<br />
But at aggregate economy scale (national,<br />
world-wide), useful performances are mutual,<br />
mostly, one way or another, at least by the<br />
mediation <strong>of</strong> the generalized market (see here<br />
our synthesis on the market as global<br />
servicing, in Jivan 1996).<br />
Knowledge society implies an opened minded<br />
view and an interdisciplinary vision, which<br />
are superior to the narrow economic<br />
approach, including the care for the social<br />
problem, for the planetary environment and<br />
such like, among which moral-institutional<br />
aspects are also important. Even production<br />
and consume are replaced with “functioning”<br />
and with the creation <strong>of</strong> utility; and the place<br />
<strong>of</strong> immaterial activities is really central.<br />
The choice between ways should not be a<br />
dilemma: the best permanent answer is<br />
aureea mediocritas, the equilibrium and<br />
avoiding any extreme and narrow view.<br />
4. An opposite model
On the line <strong>of</strong> research opened by service<br />
economy, observations, critics and proposals<br />
were made at micro as well as macroeconomic<br />
levels. Between those many<br />
research, we mention here only these realized<br />
by Jean-Claude Delaunay, Jean Gadrey (like<br />
particularly Delaunay, Gadrey, 1987 and<br />
Gadrey, 1992 and others), Jacques de Bandt<br />
(De Bandt, 1991), Orio Giarini (particularly<br />
Giarini, Stahel, 1993 and Giarini and<br />
Lauberge, 1997), André Barcet, Joel<br />
Bonnamy and many other authors<br />
(particularly the papers in Revue d'Economie<br />
Industrielle - no. 43, 1988).<br />
Jean Gadrey (Gadrey, 2010) criticizes the<br />
industrialized economy, speaking (at pp. 88)<br />
about the “double dictatorship”, (i) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world markets (that are not regulated) and (ii)<br />
<strong>of</strong> the agricultural “liberal-productivist”<br />
politics. He requires a more complex analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> the productivity <strong>of</strong> an industrialized<br />
production process: not just the growing<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> the modern tools and<br />
machines, but also the time <strong>of</strong> work<br />
consumed for their fabrication should<br />
supplementary be recorded as a cost; a cost<br />
that should not be ignored. He also proposes<br />
the deduction <strong>of</strong> the estimated value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
big damages involved by industrialized and<br />
chemical production (including in food) and<br />
long distances transport: those damages<br />
should diminish the pretended growth that<br />
modern industrialized productions pretend<br />
realize.<br />
Gadrey argues (pp 85-86) that the usual<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> growth and productivity is<br />
interested only by the quantitative aspects,<br />
making no difference between an output that<br />
is protective for Mother Nature, not-polluting,<br />
ecologic, on one hand, and an output based<br />
on big consumes and waste <strong>of</strong> energy and less<br />
healthy for humans or even worse.<br />
Gadrey spokes about the fact that an investing<br />
economic activity and a consuming one are<br />
considered to be „equivalent” in the<br />
numerical usual analyzes. There is a<br />
comparison made by quantitative criteria,<br />
232<br />
with no respect to the qualitative and more<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ound aspects.<br />
All those critics and recommendations are<br />
revealing critical aspects <strong>of</strong> the usual<br />
productivity and growth models. In contrast<br />
with the usual (growing, industrialist) model,<br />
he proposes, in his large-hearted approach, a<br />
new one, using a “new type” <strong>of</strong> progress, the<br />
true progress, pr<strong>of</strong>ound, not just superficially<br />
quantitative and not only on the short run.<br />
Another approach is that <strong>of</strong> servicity,<br />
proposed like an extension or even a rebuff to<br />
productivity, at The 9th Seminar on the<br />
Service Economy (PROGRES – Programme<br />
<strong>of</strong> Research in the Economics <strong>of</strong> Services,<br />
A.S.E.C) in Geneva, September, 6 th -7 th ,<br />
1993. Firstly included in a paper published in<br />
the review <strong>of</strong> Services World Forum (Jivan,<br />
1993), the concept was later developed in<br />
other papers and books. The concept <strong>of</strong><br />
servicity is grounded on the point <strong>of</strong> view in<br />
the modern marketing optics and on service<br />
economics.<br />
The concept we call servicity would mean<br />
exactly the effective intrinsic productivity,<br />
the effects <strong>of</strong> human activity consisting in<br />
generating general and absolute plusses. It is<br />
in opposition with computed productivity,<br />
generating palpable concrete plus to the<br />
concerned individual, therefore relatively to a<br />
specific economic agent (with no concern<br />
with the rest <strong>of</strong> the world, with the ensemble)<br />
Such approaches prepared the conceptual<br />
field for the European requirements <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge society and knowledge based<br />
economy, <strong>of</strong> more seriously taking into<br />
account the natural and social environment.<br />
Ulterior, the ideas were developed, and<br />
between the most recent exemplificative<br />
research we mention those on innovation,<br />
productivity and performance, <strong>of</strong> Faïz Gallouj<br />
(Gadrey and Gallouj, 2002, Gallouj and<br />
Djellal, 2010), Faridah Djellal (Djellal and<br />
Gallouj, 2008) and others.<br />
As concerns the matter <strong>of</strong> indicators, between<br />
the preoccupations in the field, we limit us to<br />
mention only about the important European<br />
project known (shortly) under the name <strong>of</strong>
Stiglitz – one <strong>of</strong> the two big Nobel Laureates<br />
economists who are mastering, together with<br />
Amartya Sen, those research, to what work<br />
numerous and other big specialists.<br />
5. Long term prospects <strong>of</strong> humanity<br />
Mankind should see that, in business practice,<br />
the narrow pursuing <strong>of</strong> the goals <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
(and calculated productivity growth) and the<br />
interest and gaining principles, brought us in<br />
the position <strong>of</strong> buying the water from stores<br />
(please see the developments <strong>of</strong> the matter in<br />
Jivan, 2011), and there already are first signs<br />
<strong>of</strong> buying also the air (another vital genuine<br />
resource) on the market in a foreseeable<br />
future. The bear conditions for life are<br />
sacrificed for gaining more money. In these<br />
conditions, mankind should apply another<br />
widening <strong>of</strong> horizons, like Marshall made<br />
(please also see our Jivan, 2011, where from<br />
is the presentation here): the impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> people on the environment, the<br />
impact on Mother Nature and, implicitly on<br />
its own future (on a longer time that market<br />
can appropriately manage) should be<br />
considered.<br />
Humans can already see that the most<br />
important must be the entire existent (the<br />
notions <strong>of</strong> Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen can<br />
be used or Gheorghe Popescu’s „the Joint<br />
Living Whole”, in Popescu, 2006), including<br />
the environment, and the utility and costs, for<br />
it, <strong>of</strong> the output, <strong>of</strong> the whole economic<br />
activity and <strong>of</strong> any human act. People should<br />
no more use only the individualist approach,<br />
and should take into account not only the<br />
economic actors (both buyer and seller), but<br />
also the others, directly involved and not<br />
involved, present and not present, the entire<br />
environment <strong>of</strong> the persons directly decisive<br />
in the trade, from the most comprehensive<br />
point <strong>of</strong> view: in the space as well as in the<br />
time dimensions. It includes the whole human<br />
society, Mother Nature, the Planet, the notyet-born<br />
generations. And it takes into<br />
account different means and fields <strong>of</strong> action<br />
in the human society.<br />
233<br />
Centuries <strong>of</strong> industrialism and market<br />
domination passed and the effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
market values (determined by short and<br />
medium interests and regulated on the long<br />
run only by mercantile criterion – costs, gain<br />
and pr<strong>of</strong>it) become to let be seen the planet<br />
destruction.<br />
In such a widened approach, firstly the<br />
economic science (and, by time, all humans)<br />
should take into account the costs and effects<br />
for all the parts <strong>of</strong> the reality that are affected,<br />
even if they are active or passive parts, even<br />
if they wanted or wanted not to participate to<br />
the processes <strong>of</strong> humans’ economy, even if<br />
they were not warned or they did not know at<br />
least that they are involved in the economic<br />
process and effects, even if they are present<br />
or not yet born.<br />
Furthering what Marshall made, we could<br />
surpassed the strictly economic angle <strong>of</strong><br />
perceiving reality, which proved already to be<br />
also too narrow: we should introduce a third<br />
category <strong>of</strong> time, for having a more complete<br />
comprehension <strong>of</strong> events, in space and also in<br />
the historic view. The short run and long run<br />
must be completed with the very long term,<br />
proving the historical capacity <strong>of</strong> perception<br />
<strong>of</strong> our human species. In the post-modern<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> realities, humans must<br />
already have the clear-sightedness to accept<br />
that if the same way <strong>of</strong> living is persistently<br />
pursued, no chance will remain.<br />
Georgescu-Roegen hardly tried to teach us<br />
about another kind <strong>of</strong> economics we should<br />
study, learn, teach and apply, but he was<br />
marginalized (Georgescu-Roegen, 2009) –<br />
may be precisely because <strong>of</strong> this attitude.
6. What can we, still, make?<br />
In despite <strong>of</strong> the usual principles <strong>of</strong><br />
competition (invocate also by the economic<br />
traditionalist approach – still dominant), the<br />
special human (superior to the strict<br />
economic and short run) principles are<br />
surviving, (even in poorness or in societies<br />
what are week from the economic point <strong>of</strong><br />
view), like also a big enough number <strong>of</strong> their<br />
bearers and preachers. Their extension and<br />
spreading is not an exception, but a tendency,<br />
mostly in the knowledge society: it is and<br />
should be consistent with it.<br />
The mercantile values represent just a tool<br />
and must remain a tool. In our times, homosapiens<br />
must now show his superior<br />
knowledge and thinking: superior and much<br />
more widen than the simple economic one.<br />
And must teach and widen the mind <strong>of</strong> homooeconomicus<br />
too. This is the fight <strong>of</strong> our<br />
times. The task is in the field <strong>of</strong> learning and<br />
<strong>of</strong> teaching the young generations, not in the<br />
spirit <strong>of</strong> private speculation, but in the team<br />
spirit <strong>of</strong> work, care and concern for the whole<br />
environment, as a common good for living. A<br />
superior rationality must be put in.<br />
The economic functioning can be oriented on<br />
realizing the general well-being and on<br />
attending the interests <strong>of</strong> the whole human<br />
society, exactly and just by a well-considered<br />
and well-settled legislation – which points out<br />
the optimizing valences <strong>of</strong> the market<br />
mechanisms. (Jivan, 2009).<br />
Science has the new task <strong>of</strong> knowing how and<br />
when the market mechanisms act in an<br />
improving direction: “how and when” means<br />
the legal conditions requested (that society<br />
should settle). A superior outlook upon the<br />
final (compensated) results <strong>of</strong> the efforts and<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> any human activities is necessary.<br />
Efficiency should not be no more narrowly<br />
limited by the economic criteria, but should<br />
concern the best for the person, for the<br />
society, for the world, balanced between the<br />
present and the future. Taking into account<br />
the disequilibrium we spoke about, we<br />
propose analytical studies concerning a<br />
certain criteria system in the matter.<br />
234<br />
Bibliography<br />
1.Băcescu Marius and Fota Dyonisus. The<br />
Economic Crisis in Romania’s 2009 (in<br />
Romanian). Bucharest: Universitară<br />
Publishing House, 2009.<br />
2.De Bandt, Jaques. Les services, productivité<br />
et prix. Paris: Economica Pulishing House,<br />
1991.<br />
3.Delaunay, Jean-Claude and Gadrey, Jean.<br />
Les enjeux de la societé de service. Paris:<br />
Presses de la Fondation Nationale des<br />
Sciences Politiques Publishing House, 1987.<br />
4.Garey, Jean. L'économie des services.Paris:<br />
La Decouverte Publishing House, 1992<br />
5.Djellal, Faridah and Gallouj, Faïz.<br />
Measuring and Improving Productivity in<br />
Services. Issues, Strategies and Challenges.,<br />
Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA:<br />
Edward Elgar, 2008.<br />
6.Gadrey, Jean. Adieu à la croissance. Bien<br />
vivre dans un monde solidaire. Paris: Les<br />
petits matins/Alternatives Économiques,<br />
2010.<br />
7.Gadrey, Jean and Gallouj, Faïz (Edited by).<br />
Productivity, Innovation and Knowledge in<br />
Services. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton,<br />
MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2002.<br />
8.Gallouj, Faïz and Djellal, Faridah (Edited<br />
by). The Handbook <strong>of</strong> Innovation and<br />
Services. A Multi-disciplinary Perspective.<br />
Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: ,<br />
Edward Elgar, 2010.<br />
9.Georgescu-Roegen, Nicolas. The Entropy<br />
Law and Economic Process. Bucharest:<br />
National Bank Publishing House, 2009.<br />
10.Giarini, Orio and Stahel, Walter R. The<br />
limits to Certainty, Facing Risks in the New<br />
Service Economy. International Studies in the<br />
Service Economy, 2nd Revised Edition,<br />
1993.<br />
11.Giarini, Orio and Loubergé, Henry. Les<br />
rendements décroissants de la technologie.<br />
Paris: Dunod, 1979.<br />
12.Jivan, Alexandru. “Completions to<br />
Marshallian Out-Look, Consistent with<br />
Knowledge Based Economy”. Timisoara<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics, no. 13(2011).
13.Jivan, Alexandru. „Do People (no longer)<br />
Need Food? A Few Reflections on the Market<br />
Mechanisms and Their Effects” (paper<br />
translated in English by Adina Popovici),<br />
Caiete de drept Internaţional, Anul VI<br />
(2008): 153-158.<br />
14.Jivan, Alexandru. “Two Fallacies in<br />
Approaching the Current Crisis”. REBS<br />
(Review <strong>of</strong> Economic & Business Studies),<br />
3(2009), Special Issue: 85-104.<br />
15.Jivan, Alexandru. “Major<br />
Misunderstandings in Economic Crises, in the<br />
Light <strong>of</strong> Knowledge Society”. In proceedings<br />
<strong>of</strong> International Conference “European<br />
Integration - New Challenges for the<br />
Romanian Economy” - 6th Edition,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Publishing House,<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, May 28-29, 2010: 633.<br />
235<br />
16.Jivan, Alexandru. Modern Services – a<br />
Challenge for the Economic Theory and<br />
Practice (in Romanian). Timisoara: Mirton<br />
Publishing House, 1996.<br />
17.Jivan, Alexandru. The Intellectual Tertiary<br />
Sector Economics (in Romanian). Timisoara:<br />
Mirton Publishing House, 1995.<br />
18.Jivan, Alexandru. “Services and<br />
Servicity”. SWF Bulletin, no. 3-4 (Jully-<br />
December 1993): 16-24.<br />
19.Johsua, Issac. Une trajectoire du capital:<br />
de la crise de 1929 à celle de la nouvelle<br />
économie, Paris: Syllapse Publishing House,<br />
2006.<br />
20.Popescu, Constantin. Rationality and<br />
Hope. The Paradigm <strong>of</strong> the Entire Living<br />
Whole (in Romanian), Bucharest:<br />
Renaissance Publishing House, 2006.<br />
21.Revue d'Economie Industrielle. 43(1988).
236
THE POTENTIAL OF FEMALE ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS A REGIONAL<br />
GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT ENGINE IN THE WESTERN ROMANIA<br />
Pop Cohuț Ioana<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />
Abstract: Starting from the objectives, activities, and the results <strong>of</strong> the empirical, quantitative, and<br />
qualitative research carried out in the AntrES project (AntrES - Project acronym "Entrepreneurship<br />
and Equal Opportunities. A new school for women entrepreneurship" – Antreprenoriatul şi<br />
egalitatea de şanse. Un nou model de şcoală antreprenorială pentru femei), during the two years <strong>of</strong><br />
implementation, in the Western Romania referring to the new businesses start up; business<br />
development; the motivation and difficulties <strong>of</strong> female entrepreneurs and potentially enterprising<br />
women; <strong>of</strong> their perceptions regarding the need for entrepreneurship education, the role <strong>of</strong> female<br />
entrepreneurship promotion and the impact <strong>of</strong> the successful models on new businesses start up –<br />
this paper presents directions <strong>of</strong> action meant to emphasize and support the potential <strong>of</strong> the female<br />
entrepreneurship in Romania, as a regional growth and development engine.<br />
Keywords: women entrepreneurship, new businesses start up, regional development<br />
JEL Codes: B54, H81, M13, M21, R11, R28, R53, R58<br />
REL Codes: 13C, 14D, 14 K, 16H , 18F, 18G, 20J<br />
The potential <strong>of</strong> female entrepreneurship –<br />
as a research subject<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> the potential <strong>of</strong> female<br />
entrepreneurship in Romania starts from the<br />
premise that encouraging and supporting new<br />
businesses is one <strong>of</strong> the most important<br />
economic and social activities due to the<br />
impact on economic growth, innovation, job<br />
creation and the rise <strong>of</strong> living standards<br />
(Brush Candida et al., 2007). The literature in<br />
the field shows that women play an important<br />
role in the economic activity in many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world’s economies (Minitti et al., 2005, apud<br />
Brush Candida et al., 2007). According to<br />
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM,<br />
Reynols et al., 2003), women represent 33%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the total <strong>of</strong> those initiating a business, with<br />
variations from a country to another<br />
according to cultural factors, natural and<br />
industrial resources together with the policies<br />
meant to stimulate the entrepreneurship and<br />
the attitude and faith in the female<br />
entrepreneurship. Although the number <strong>of</strong><br />
business women is increasing, the rate <strong>of</strong><br />
female self-employment is systematically<br />
237<br />
lower than that <strong>of</strong> men (Schimidt and Parker,<br />
2003, apud Brindley Clare, 2007).<br />
For Romania, studies show that for all the<br />
development regions, the most important<br />
problems in stimulating the spirit <strong>of</strong> female<br />
entrepreneurship are the low density <strong>of</strong><br />
SMEs, the limited entrepreneurial culture, the<br />
reduced entrepreneurial spirit, especially<br />
among women and mainly in the rural area,<br />
the lack <strong>of</strong> programmes promoting<br />
entrepreneurship, especially female<br />
entrepreneurship, the lack <strong>of</strong> programmes<br />
supporting self-employment initiatives.<br />
Taking into consideration these aspects, our<br />
research is trying to emphasise that through<br />
measures educating the entrepreneurial<br />
culture among women – as a determining<br />
factor <strong>of</strong> self-employment, the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
those setting up a business may increase<br />
significantly with a direct impact on the<br />
regional development. In our opinion, this<br />
aspect is significant, taking into account that<br />
we are referring to a single measure – that <strong>of</strong><br />
educating and motivating the female<br />
entrepreneurial spirit which can, correlated
with measures supporting the access to<br />
financing, improving the social assistance<br />
system and especially supporting children’s<br />
raise and education (Brindley Clare, 2007),<br />
lifelong learning (Drumond, 2004),<br />
supporting the development <strong>of</strong> the business<br />
(Brindley Clare, 2007), promoting the female<br />
entrepreneurship by successful business<br />
women, promoting good practices, determine<br />
the significant increase <strong>of</strong> this objective,<br />
underlying the still unexploited potential <strong>of</strong><br />
Romanian female entrepreneurship.<br />
Objectives and directions <strong>of</strong> action – aspects<br />
regarding the research methodology<br />
Taking into consideration these premises, our<br />
research was delineated on at least three<br />
directions, <strong>of</strong> those mentioned above, that is:<br />
- to ensure the female entrepreneurial<br />
education for the support <strong>of</strong> new business<br />
start up;<br />
- to support the development <strong>of</strong> already<br />
initiated businesses;<br />
- to promote and motivate the female<br />
entrepreneurship.<br />
Our three objectives could be materialised by<br />
implementing the project “Entrepreneurship<br />
and Equality <strong>of</strong> Chances. An Inter-regional<br />
Model <strong>of</strong> Entrepreneurial School for<br />
Women” (acronym AntrES), implemented in<br />
the North-Western and Western Regions <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania (counties Maramureş, Satu Mare,<br />
Bihor, Arad, Timiş, Caraş-Severin) 32 , which<br />
had as objectives, among others:<br />
- to provide training in order to acquire<br />
capabilities in the field <strong>of</strong> business start<br />
up; to provide training in the field <strong>of</strong><br />
entrepreneurial culture formation and<br />
promotion, in order to improve the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> knowledge regarding a<br />
successful business initiation,<br />
organization, and working;<br />
- to provide training for women in the<br />
field <strong>of</strong> business administration and<br />
development and to favour the<br />
improvement <strong>of</strong> the entrepreneurial<br />
32 For more information, see www.antres.ro<br />
238<br />
spirit within the SMEs having women<br />
as managers or administrators;<br />
- to promote and stimulate the<br />
entrepreneurial spirit among women so<br />
that they can behave as active<br />
entrepreneurs; to promote active<br />
learning, lifelong learning, including<br />
the e-learning methods and techniques;<br />
to promote the competition spirit by<br />
organizing contests and awarding the<br />
best business plans.<br />
AntrES project addressed a number <strong>of</strong> 1800<br />
women <strong>of</strong> the six counties situated along the<br />
Romanian Western border, grouped into three<br />
target groups. The first target group is made<br />
up <strong>of</strong> 288 women, SME managers, wishing to<br />
develop their business, from the counties<br />
situated along the Romanian Western border<br />
(Maramureş, Satu-Mare, Bihor, Arad, Timiş,<br />
Caraş-Severin). It concerns, at the level <strong>of</strong><br />
each county, a number <strong>of</strong> 48 women<br />
managers who have been trained in the town<br />
where they work, as it follows: 24 at the<br />
territorial centre situated in the county capital<br />
city and 24 at the level <strong>of</strong> local centres (6 for<br />
each <strong>of</strong> the 4 local centres in each county),<br />
respectively a total <strong>of</strong> 288 women in all 6<br />
counties. For this target group the project had<br />
in view the improvement <strong>of</strong> the intra- and<br />
entrepreneurial managerial skills in order to<br />
develop the existing business, to optimally<br />
use the opportunities existing on the market,<br />
the success factors increasing competitivity,<br />
the management and marketing strategies etc.<br />
and the promotion <strong>of</strong> the adaptability, with<br />
effects on the performance, stability <strong>of</strong> SMEs<br />
and the employment level. The second target<br />
group is made up <strong>of</strong> 1440 women wishing to<br />
start up their own business, in the counties<br />
situated along the Western Romanian border<br />
(Maramureş, Satu-Mare, Bihor, Arad, Timiş,<br />
Caraş-Severin). It concerns, at the level <strong>of</strong><br />
each county, a number <strong>of</strong> 240 women, trained<br />
where they live, as it follows: 24 at the<br />
territorial centre situated in the county capital<br />
city and 72 at the level <strong>of</strong> local centres (18 for<br />
each <strong>of</strong> the 4 local centres in each county),<br />
144 at the level <strong>of</strong> rural centres (12 for each
<strong>of</strong> the 12 rural centres in each county),<br />
respectively a total <strong>of</strong> 1440 women from all<br />
the 6 counties. For this target group the<br />
project had in view the formation <strong>of</strong><br />
entrepreneurial culture, the increase <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ability to transform business ideas into actual<br />
actions, by providing the necessary<br />
information regarding the business<br />
environment and the local existing<br />
opportunities, the drawing up <strong>of</strong> a business<br />
plan, the organization and carry out <strong>of</strong> a<br />
successful business etc. and by services<br />
supporting the initiation <strong>of</strong> a business, having<br />
as effect the generation <strong>of</strong> an increased<br />
number <strong>of</strong> businesses, both in the urban and<br />
in the rural areas. The third target group is<br />
made up <strong>of</strong> 72 women, last year students in<br />
Economics who have been trained to become<br />
coordinators in the entrepreneurial field and<br />
who currently have a job as rural<br />
coordinators in the project. It concerns, at<br />
the level <strong>of</strong> each county, a number <strong>of</strong> 12<br />
women, selected from in the partner<br />
university centres, respectively a total <strong>of</strong> 72<br />
coordinators at the level <strong>of</strong> the 6 six counties.<br />
For this target group the project had in view<br />
the acquisition <strong>of</strong> the coordinator skills in the<br />
field <strong>of</strong> business start up, the increase <strong>of</strong> these<br />
people’s capacity to become promoters <strong>of</strong><br />
entrepreneurship, as well as the increase <strong>of</strong><br />
the awareness and promotion <strong>of</strong> the positive<br />
attitude to entrepreneurial culture and to <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
services supporting the start up <strong>of</strong> a business.<br />
Research study and results<br />
To reach the three objectives mentioned<br />
previously, the activities carried out in the six<br />
counties in the implementation area on three<br />
levels: territorial, local, and rural, were<br />
channelled on the following directions:<br />
1. The organization <strong>of</strong> courses in the<br />
Entrepreneurial school for women, Start<br />
up <strong>of</strong> Business – courses attended by a<br />
total number <strong>of</strong> 1512 women; the impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> these training activities in the<br />
entrepreneurial field on women wishing<br />
to start up their own business can be seen<br />
in the openness regarding the training<br />
239<br />
activities, the avowal <strong>of</strong> the need for<br />
entrepreneurial education and counselling<br />
“The courses <strong>of</strong> Entrepreneurial School<br />
have been for me the first encounter with<br />
economic theory... I have acquired a<br />
theoretical basis which, collocated with<br />
the already existing practice, form a solid<br />
basis for the business I want to start up.”<br />
(Meluţ Corina, Oradea, Bihor); “... this<br />
course represented an important<br />
opportunity being provided with all the<br />
latest necessary information in order to<br />
start up a business. The form <strong>of</strong><br />
presenting the information was clear,<br />
concise, and mostly accessible... the<br />
project team has had the highest<br />
contribution ... which provided the<br />
necessary counselling, during the entire<br />
learning process ... the knowledge<br />
acquired here will represent an<br />
important support in my future business.<br />
((Roiban Roxana, Timişoara, Timiş); “...<br />
to accumulate new knowledge, to deepen<br />
new concepts, to better assess the<br />
qualities a female entrepreneur needs<br />
and, with the help <strong>of</strong> the business plan, to<br />
evaluate the business we wish to start up<br />
... it has greatly facilitated the<br />
communication and interconnection<br />
among us...” (Vărguţa Marta, Arad,<br />
Arad); the opportunity <strong>of</strong> training<br />
activities for personal development “It<br />
has been an opportunity which helped us<br />
to make n important step for my<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional development. I have<br />
discovered managerial qualities that I<br />
did not know I had .... (Tanko Erika, Satu<br />
Mare, Maramureş).<br />
2. The organization <strong>of</strong> courses at the<br />
Entrepreneurial school for women,<br />
Business Development – courses attended<br />
by a total number <strong>of</strong> 288 women<br />
managers <strong>of</strong> the six counties. The impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> the training activities on the women<br />
managers is also significant: personal<br />
development: “.... it helped me rediscover<br />
myself and develop pr<strong>of</strong>essionally. These<br />
courses have taught me how to present
myself pr<strong>of</strong>essionally, my knowledge and<br />
experience acquired through practice”<br />
(Dăncescu Livia, Oradea, Bihor); the<br />
opportunity to meet successful women<br />
managers and to share the experience and<br />
difficulties <strong>of</strong> running a business “...the<br />
experts invited shared aspects from their<br />
own successful experience, which has<br />
been beneficial for me.” (Anton<br />
Maricica, Timişoara, Timiş); the desire<br />
to improve, motivation and reciprocal<br />
encouragement “....I have had the<br />
opportunity to learn new things, which<br />
are <strong>of</strong> real help to me both in running<br />
the business that I currently have and in<br />
assessing the business I want to set up.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> action learning method<br />
allowed us to discuss with the other<br />
business women about the achievements<br />
and hardships we had encountered when<br />
running our businesses, to share our<br />
common experiences to the women<br />
wishing to start up a business ....” (Taşcă<br />
Carmen, Arad, Arad); “...the theoretical<br />
part and the practical studies, too ... have<br />
helped me involve and motivate the<br />
partners through a positive control <strong>of</strong> the<br />
business, each trying to understand that<br />
that the performance <strong>of</strong> a firm is not only<br />
revenues but other factors such as<br />
financial control factors, employees and<br />
generally the performance <strong>of</strong> the entire<br />
activity”. (Azap Mihaela, Reşiţa, Caraş<br />
Severin); “... women were poorly<br />
represented in the business environment,<br />
stimulating and encouraging through this<br />
course the women’s initiative regarding<br />
the development and initiation <strong>of</strong> their<br />
own businesses in order to acquire<br />
financial independence and to bravely<br />
enter the business world ...” (Laza<br />
Doina, Satu Mare, Satu Mare).<br />
The integration <strong>of</strong> the Action Learning [1]<br />
method in the AntrES Entrepreneurial<br />
School, for both categories <strong>of</strong> courses –<br />
Business Start up and Business Development,<br />
had in view the achievement <strong>of</strong> the objectives<br />
proposed beyond the simple supply <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong><br />
240<br />
knowledge for the initiation, development or<br />
support <strong>of</strong> the business, by determining the<br />
change based on learning, in the real meaning<br />
<strong>of</strong> the word. The use <strong>of</strong> the action learning<br />
method “with and from the others”, by<br />
forming mixed sets (groups) – made up <strong>of</strong><br />
women <strong>of</strong> all the three target groups: women<br />
managers <strong>of</strong> their own business wishing to<br />
develop it, women wishing to start up their<br />
own business and last year students in<br />
Economics, who have been trained and have<br />
become coordinators in the field <strong>of</strong><br />
entrepreneurship; therefore, women with and<br />
without any entrepreneurial experience, in<br />
different stages <strong>of</strong> knowledge and<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship. Within<br />
these sets, women have been encouraged to<br />
discuss freely, based on the subjects<br />
suggested by the course book and<br />
applications, and also from the perspective <strong>of</strong><br />
their own experience, being stimulated to<br />
share their own problems and to mutually<br />
give advice to each other, to ask and answer,<br />
being an inspiration for the others, mutually<br />
motivating, learning from each other. In<br />
completing and stimulating the use <strong>of</strong> this<br />
method, an external expert, preferably a wellknown<br />
woman entrepreneur or a woman with<br />
well-known pr<strong>of</strong>essional capabilities was<br />
invited for the subject tackled, at the level <strong>of</strong><br />
that particular city or village, willing to share<br />
with the course participants her success story<br />
or her own experience in the field.<br />
3. The organization <strong>of</strong> the contest “My<br />
Business Plan”, where all the 1800<br />
trained women participated. The contest<br />
“My Business Plan!” was organized on<br />
three levels, in order to evaluate, select,<br />
emphasize, promote, and award the best<br />
Business plans made by the course<br />
attendants trained in the project. The<br />
contest was open to all the participants to<br />
the training activities from the target<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> the project, that is a total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> 1800 women. It took place in<br />
2010 in three phases, thus: 1st Phase –<br />
Levels: territorial – selection / interregional<br />
– prize award; 2nd Phase –
Levels: local – selection / territorial –<br />
prize award; 3rd Phase – Levels: rural –<br />
selection / territorial – prize award. Each<br />
<strong>of</strong> the phases <strong>of</strong> the contest “ My<br />
Business Plan!” had 2 stages:<br />
� Highlighting the business plans – a<br />
stage where all the business plans<br />
entered the competition, business<br />
plans made by the women selected in<br />
the target group in the<br />
Entrepreneurial school for women, a<br />
stage in which, after the Evaluation<br />
Commissions evaluated the business<br />
plans, 50% <strong>of</strong> the business plans<br />
from the urban areas were<br />
highlighted and 30% from the rural<br />
areas. The highlighting <strong>of</strong> the<br />
business plans was made by giving<br />
diplomas. The business plans have<br />
been promoted on the site <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project www.antres.ro in the section<br />
AntrES Winners – The Presentation<br />
Catalogue <strong>of</strong> the Winners, 1st, 2nd<br />
and 3rd Phase 33 , and through massmedia<br />
during the actions meant to<br />
ensure the visibility <strong>of</strong> the project,<br />
information and advertising<br />
regarding the project. As a result <strong>of</strong><br />
this stage, a total number <strong>of</strong> 724<br />
women from the three target groups<br />
<strong>of</strong> the project were highlighted and<br />
promoted, 387 from the urban area<br />
and 337 from the rural area, as well<br />
as the business plans made by them<br />
at the Entrepreneurial school for<br />
women.<br />
� Awarding the business plans, a stage<br />
where only the business plans<br />
recommended in the previous stage<br />
participated. After the contest at this<br />
level, out <strong>of</strong> the 724 business plans<br />
33 See www.antres.ro, Catalogue <strong>of</strong> AntrES Winners<br />
1st phase – territorial level selection / inter-regional<br />
level prize award; Catalogue <strong>of</strong> AntrES Winners 2nd<br />
phase – local level – selection / territorial level –<br />
prize award, Catalogue <strong>of</strong> AntrES Winners 3rd<br />
phase - rural level – selection / local level – prize<br />
award.<br />
241<br />
highlighted and promoted, a total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> 408 business plans were<br />
recommended to be awarded. These<br />
plans entered the 2nd phase <strong>of</strong><br />
evaluation, after which 111 women<br />
wishing to start up their own<br />
business were awarded, with<br />
minimum amounts necessary to<br />
initiate the business (amounts<br />
ranging between 1000 and 2000 lei).<br />
The impact <strong>of</strong> organizing this contest and the<br />
activity to promote the female<br />
entrepreneurship have determined then<br />
increase <strong>of</strong> the motivation among women<br />
wishing to start up a business, which has<br />
determined the setting up <strong>of</strong> total number <strong>of</strong><br />
180 businesses in the six counties where the<br />
project was implemented.<br />
Taking into account the demonstrated impact<br />
on the female entrepreneurship <strong>of</strong><br />
entrepreneurial education, <strong>of</strong> the models, <strong>of</strong><br />
the learning from the other’s experience,<br />
success or mistakes, by using the Action<br />
Learning method , mainly characterised by<br />
Learning with and from the others, the<br />
AntrES Entrepreneurial School had in view –<br />
and we believe it succeeded – to help the<br />
women mangers to better understand their<br />
business, to develop it and to become real<br />
entrepreneurs, the women wishing to start up<br />
their own business to give them the necessary<br />
courage and force to attract and mobilize<br />
resources in order to become entrepreneurs,<br />
and the young coordinators in the field <strong>of</strong><br />
entrepreneurship to transform them into<br />
promoters <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship from<br />
conviction and not from necessity.<br />
This paper represents an attempt to contribute<br />
to the increase <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
entrepreneurial potential in the Western<br />
Romania and not only, the encouragement <strong>of</strong><br />
female entrepreneurship, an instrument to<br />
disseminate knowledge, information and<br />
practical experience resulted from this<br />
project.<br />
Acknowledgments:
This paper was made in the project<br />
“Entrepreneurship and the Equality <strong>of</strong><br />
Chances. An Inter-regional Model <strong>of</strong> Women<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Entrepreneurship” (acronym<br />
AntrES), a strategic project co-financed by<br />
the Social European Fund, Sectoral<br />
Operational Programme Human Resources<br />
Development 2007-2013, “Investing in<br />
people!”, Priority Axis 3 “Increasing<br />
adaptability <strong>of</strong> workers and enterprises”,<br />
Major Intervention Domain 3. 1 “Promoting<br />
entrepreneurial culture”, Contract:<br />
POSDRU/9I/3.1/S/5 (grant value<br />
12,500,104,00 lei), which took place between<br />
5.01.2009 - 5.01.2011 under the coordination<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Oradea, in partnership with: West University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Timişoara; “Aurel Vlaicu” University,<br />
Arad; North University <strong>of</strong> Baia-Mare;<br />
“Eftimie Murgu” University, Reşiţa;<br />
Commercial Academy <strong>of</strong> Satu Mare;<br />
Management Scientific Society <strong>of</strong> Romania<br />
and The National Agency for Equal<br />
Opportunities between Women and Men;<br />
website: www.antres.ro.<br />
242<br />
Notes:<br />
1. According to the Action Learning method<br />
(“Learning with and through action”), the<br />
difference between to know and to understand<br />
is the following: to know means to be capable<br />
<strong>of</strong> doing it; to understand means to be<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> changing the reality that you<br />
understood. Learning means Progress, which<br />
in its turn represents our capacity to produce<br />
the Change into better. The use <strong>of</strong> the Action<br />
Learning method starts from the premise,<br />
widely accepted in the literature, that<br />
entrepreneurship is learnt to a higher extent<br />
through informal or non-formal means than<br />
through the formal education system.<br />
Bibliography:<br />
1. Brindley Clare, Women and New Business<br />
Creation, Breaking Down the Risk Barriers,<br />
in Carter M. Nancy; Henry Colette; Cinneide<br />
O Barra; Johnston Kate (Eds.) - Female<br />
Entrepreneurship – Implication for<br />
education, training and policy, Routledge<br />
Taylor & Francis Group, London and New<br />
York, Routledge Advances in Management<br />
and Business Studies collection, New York,<br />
2007;<br />
2. Brush G. Candida; Carter Nancy;<br />
Gatewood Elizabeth, Green Patricia, Hart<br />
Myra, Enhancing women’s financial strategy<br />
for growth, in Carter M. Nancy; Henry<br />
Colette; Cinneide O Barra; Johnston Kate<br />
(Eds.) - Female Entrepreneurship –<br />
Implication for education, training and<br />
policy, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group,<br />
London and New York, Routledge Advances<br />
in Management and Business Studies<br />
collection, New York, 2007;<br />
3. Cantando Mary, Leading with Care, How<br />
women around the world are inspiring<br />
business, empowering communities, and<br />
creating opportunity, Jossey-Bass a Wiley<br />
Imprint, San Francisco, 2009;<br />
4. Carter M. Nancy; Henry Colette; Cinneide<br />
O Barra; Johnston Kate (Eds.) - Female<br />
Entrepreneurship – Implication for<br />
education, training and policy, Routledge<br />
Taylor & Francis Group, London and New
York, Routledge Advances in Management<br />
and Business Studies collection, New York,<br />
2007;<br />
5. Dodescu Anca, Pop Cohuţ Ioana (coord.),<br />
Premiantele AntrES. Studii de caz pentru<br />
analiza antreprenoriatului feminin în context<br />
regional şi local, Vol. I – Vol. II, ISBN: 978-<br />
606-10-0343-3, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />
Publishing House, 2010.<br />
6. Dodescu, A. (coord.), Barker, A., Brihan,<br />
A., Giurgiu A. (2004) Ghid practic Action<br />
Learning, Editura Universităţii din Oradea,<br />
Oradea;<br />
7. Dodescu, A. (coord.), Barker, A. , Giurgiu<br />
A. (2004) Un nou model de şcoală<br />
antreprenorială în domeniul resurselor<br />
umane (A New Model <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong><br />
Entrepreneurship in the field <strong>of</strong> Human<br />
Resources Development), University <strong>of</strong><br />
Oradea Publishing House, Oradea;<br />
243<br />
8. Drumond, H. (2004) “See You Next Week?<br />
A Study <strong>of</strong> Entrapment in a Small Business”,<br />
International Small Business Journal, 22, 5,<br />
487-502;<br />
9. Minitti, M; Arenius, P and Langowitz, N.,<br />
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2004<br />
Report and Women and Entrepreneurship,<br />
Babson Park, MA and London, Babson<br />
College and London Business School;<br />
10. Reynolds, P.D.; Bygrave, W.P., Autio, E.<br />
and others (2003), Global Entrepreneurship<br />
Monitor;<br />
11. Schmidt, R.A and Parker, C. (2003),<br />
Diversity in Independent Retailing Barriers<br />
and Benefits – the impact <strong>of</strong> Gender,<br />
International Journal <strong>of</strong> Retail and<br />
Distribution Management, 31, 8, 428-439;
244
TOURISM'S CHANGING FACE: NEW AGE TOURISM VERSUS OLD TOURISM<br />
Stănciulescu Gabriela Cecilia<br />
The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania<br />
Molnar Elisabeta<br />
The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania<br />
Bunghez Magdalena<br />
The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania<br />
Abstract: Times are changing and so are the demands and expectations <strong>of</strong> the 'new' traveller, the<br />
search for different experiences, different adventures, different lifestyles has paved the way for this<br />
concept called the 'new tourism' Attention is being turned to exploring new frontiers or daring to go<br />
where traditional thought did not allow.<br />
"New" tourists however, are increasingly being seen to be environmentally sensitive, displaying<br />
respect for the culture <strong>of</strong> host nations and looking to experience and learn rather than merely stand<br />
back and gaze. "New" tourists are participators not spectators. Things that would never appear on<br />
the list <strong>of</strong> the "mass" tourist such as adventure, getting <strong>of</strong> the beaten track and mingling with the<br />
locals are now the foundations <strong>of</strong> the new tourist experiences.<br />
Responding to the shift in market dynamics towards a "New" style <strong>of</strong> tourist, a number <strong>of</strong> initiatives<br />
have or are likely to fuel the growth <strong>of</strong> experiential tourism, these include: network tourism<br />
initiatives; the development <strong>of</strong> interpretive highways; the explosion <strong>of</strong> interpretive centers;the latest<br />
trend towards regional base camps. A new era has arrived, and a new kind <strong>of</strong> tourism is<br />
emerging, sustainable, environmentally and socially responsible, and characterized by flexibility<br />
and choice. A new type <strong>of</strong> tourist is driving it: more educated, experienced, independent,<br />
conservation-minded, respectful <strong>of</strong> cultures, and insistent on value for money. Typically these<br />
tourists are turning away from travel and prefer to have a high level <strong>of</strong> involvement in the<br />
organisation <strong>of</strong> their trip.<br />
Key words: old tourism,new tourism, market, changes, strategies<br />
Introduction<br />
Until 19th century, travel for recreation was<br />
only undertaken by the elite. With the advent<br />
<strong>of</strong> rail, mass travel was available for the first<br />
time and destinations such as Brighton, UK<br />
and Coney Island, NY developed. Status was<br />
then defined by the mode <strong>of</strong> travel. In 20th<br />
century status was revealed by the nature <strong>of</strong><br />
the destinations. Travel and tourism has been<br />
going on since time immemorial, and for the<br />
'twentieth century tourist, the world has<br />
become one large department store <strong>of</strong><br />
countrysides and cities'. By 21st century,<br />
travel became a new economy - tourism -<br />
available to all with enough money.<br />
The focus in the tourism industry has shifted<br />
from air travel, overnights, meals and so on to<br />
total experiences or fantasy worlds associated<br />
245<br />
with specific. This new tourism phenomenon<br />
is not only influenced by economic factors<br />
but also by new cultures and a new<br />
generation <strong>of</strong> tourists. In tourism, the<br />
different destinations compete worldwide<br />
through globalisation. The paradigm shift<br />
from mass tourism (also known as Fordian<br />
Tourism), which was the norm for more than<br />
three decades, no longer suffices to achieve<br />
competitiveness in tourism enterprises and<br />
regions. A new paradigm, or new tourism, is<br />
gathering momentum owing to its ability to<br />
face prevailing circumstances.<br />
Modern information and communication<br />
technology development in symbiosis with<br />
the transformation <strong>of</strong> tourism demand gave<br />
rise to a new tourism. This paradigm shift is<br />
not easy to define but is indicative <strong>of</strong> a new
type <strong>of</strong> tourist who wants a new or different<br />
product. The new tourists are more<br />
experienced, more educated, more "green",<br />
more flexible, more independent, more<br />
quality-conscious and "harder to please" than<br />
ever before. Furthermore, they are well read<br />
and know what they want and where they<br />
want to go The different approach <strong>of</strong> the<br />
new tourist's creates a demand for new<br />
products. The small, medium and micro<br />
entrepreneurs within the tourism industry are<br />
dependent on major tourism developments. It<br />
is essential role <strong>of</strong> these small entrepreneurs<br />
be increased to deal with the changing<br />
demands <strong>of</strong> the new tourists. In Canada, 20%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the population is truly entrepreneurial<br />
while in South Africa the role <strong>of</strong><br />
entrepreneurs is still extremely small. Only<br />
about 4% <strong>of</strong> the South African population is<br />
truly entrepreneurial.<br />
What is New Tourism?<br />
New Tourism is characterised mainly by<br />
supersegmentation <strong>of</strong> demand, the need for<br />
flexibility <strong>of</strong> supply and distribution, and<br />
achieving pr<strong>of</strong>itability through diagonal<br />
integration and subsequent system economies<br />
and integrated values, instead <strong>of</strong> economies<br />
<strong>of</strong> scale. This paradigm permits the tourism<br />
industry to <strong>of</strong>fer products adapted to the<br />
increasingly complex and diverse needs <strong>of</strong><br />
demand, while being competitive with the old<br />
standardized products. These markets <strong>of</strong><br />
experience have become global, affecting the<br />
demand as well as the supply side <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tourism industry. The tourism industry has<br />
undergone pr<strong>of</strong>ound changes, which have<br />
been categorized by Poon (1993) in the<br />
following groups: (a) new consumers, (b)<br />
new technologies, (c) new forms <strong>of</strong><br />
production, (d) new management styles, and<br />
(e) new prevailing circumstances. As result <strong>of</strong><br />
the super segmentation <strong>of</strong> demand there is a<br />
very strong need for in-depth knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
the market in order to identify the clusters <strong>of</strong><br />
consumer traits and needs. This knowledge<br />
will enable the tourism enterprises to develop<br />
those products that will give a greater<br />
246<br />
competitive edge, and to place them on the<br />
market using efficient methods <strong>of</strong><br />
communication and distribution. Flexibility is<br />
also a very relevant factor since it can assist<br />
the enterprise in adapting to the new demand<br />
requirements. This factor is relevant in<br />
several areas: flexibility in the organisation<br />
and in the production and distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
tourism products; flexibility in reservation,<br />
purchasing and payment systems; and<br />
flexibility in ways in which the tourism<br />
product is consumed. New technologies are<br />
fundamental in this respect and, in particular,<br />
in the expansion and development <strong>of</strong> new<br />
systems <strong>of</strong> tourism information. Diagonal<br />
integration is the final basic element.<br />
Compared with vertical and horizontal<br />
integration, which characterise the massstandardised<br />
production paradigm, this is a<br />
process by which the tourism enterprise can<br />
develop and compete not only in one activity,<br />
but also within a wider framework, seeking<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability on the basis <strong>of</strong> system<br />
economies, obtaining synergies between<br />
different products and <strong>of</strong>fering services well<br />
integrated in the value systems <strong>of</strong> consumers.<br />
Key shifts in global tourism market trends are<br />
as follows:<br />
In the long term, the average standard <strong>of</strong><br />
living in western developed countries will<br />
increase, as will the amount <strong>of</strong> discretionary<br />
money available for travel;<br />
Rising affluence will bring with it increases<br />
in the amount <strong>of</strong> free time available. Longer<br />
weekends and increased paid holidays have<br />
helped to stimulate expansion in attraction<br />
visitation;<br />
There is a shift in emphasis from passive fun<br />
to active learning;<br />
Activity or special interest holidays are likely<br />
to gain at the expense <strong>of</strong> conventional<br />
sightseeing, visiting and other passive<br />
experiences;<br />
There is growing concern about the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
modern industry, including tourism, on the<br />
physical and social environment;<br />
There is growing awareness <strong>of</strong> risks to<br />
personal health and safety;
Leisure time will be used more actively, for<br />
mental development as well as physical<br />
exercise;<br />
People aged 45 to 64 years <strong>of</strong> age will be<br />
growing significantly in number to the year<br />
2010. In the United States alone, this age<br />
group is forecasted to grow by 31% by the<br />
year 2000;<br />
The potential visitor <strong>of</strong> the future will be:<br />
older, more affluent; more demanding; more<br />
247<br />
thoughtful and discriminating; and more<br />
active physically and mentally;<br />
Timeframes for decision-making windows<br />
will be smaller. Hence, one-stop-shopping for<br />
all-inclusive packages will continue to be<br />
appealing; and<br />
Consumers will increasingly seek low impact<br />
tourism facilities, consistent with<br />
environmental values and the desire not to<br />
contribute to negative impacts.
The New Tourist<br />
The travelling consumer <strong>of</strong> today (let alone in<br />
the future) is very different from any other<br />
time in history. The most successful<br />
businesses in the travel industry are those that<br />
respond to the challenge through the use <strong>of</strong><br />
technology, innovative marketing programs,<br />
better training <strong>of</strong> staff and by developing a<br />
closeness and understanding <strong>of</strong> its<br />
customers/guests. The differences in travel<br />
patterns in the next century will be more<br />
related to what consumers are seeking in a<br />
travel experience than in how they travel.<br />
Today's traveller, the well-heeled or footloose<br />
back-packer, is usually informed, educated,<br />
and more <strong>of</strong>ten than not, fully aware <strong>of</strong> what<br />
he or she wants from their travels. For them<br />
the optimisation <strong>of</strong> time and money is the key<br />
and they prepare for their trip by researching<br />
their destination through the Web and the<br />
experiences <strong>of</strong> friends and fellow travellers.<br />
Mass media has responded to this shift and<br />
further fuelled the search for experiences<br />
through the promotion <strong>of</strong> a vast range <strong>of</strong><br />
lifestyle/adventure programs which have<br />
evolved more recently into experiential<br />
248<br />
voyeuristic docu-dramas referred to as reality<br />
programmes. Attention is being turned to<br />
exploring new frontiers or daring to go where<br />
traditional thought did not allow.<br />
In Tourism, Technology and Competitive<br />
Strategies, author Auliana Poon speaks about<br />
the changes in consumer behaviour and<br />
values which are the critical driving forces for<br />
the new tourism. The new tourist is<br />
experienced, more flexible, independent,<br />
quality conscious and harder to please.<br />
"New" tourists however, are increasingly<br />
being seen to be environmentally sensitive,<br />
displaying respect for the culture <strong>of</strong> host<br />
nations and looking to experience and learn<br />
rather than merely stand back and gaze.<br />
"New" tourists are participators not<br />
spectators. Things that would never appear on<br />
the list <strong>of</strong> the "mass" tourist such as<br />
adventure, getting <strong>of</strong> the beaten track and<br />
mingling with the locals are now the<br />
foundations <strong>of</strong> the new tourist experiences.<br />
Typically these tourists are turning away<br />
from travel and prefer to have a high level <strong>of</strong><br />
involvement in the organisation <strong>of</strong> their trip.<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> Old and New Tourists<br />
New Tourists<br />
Search for the sun => Experience something different<br />
Follow the masses => Want to be in charge<br />
Here today, gone tomorrow => See and enjoy but not destroy<br />
Just to show that you had been => Just for the fun <strong>of</strong> it<br />
Having => Being<br />
Superiority => Understanding<br />
Like attractions => Like sports<br />
Precautions => Adventurous<br />
Eat in hotel => Try local fare<br />
Homogeneous => Hybrid<br />
Source: Tourism, Technology and Competitive Strategies, Auliana Poon
Travel is no longer a novelty to the new<br />
tourist. Studies support what industry<br />
executives have been noticing for the last few<br />
years. People expect more out <strong>of</strong> their<br />
vacations than they used to and they are more<br />
adventuresome. Surveys done by the<br />
Canadian Tourism Research Institute indicate<br />
a high degree <strong>of</strong> interest in getaway<br />
vacations, ecotourism, cultural tourism and<br />
combining a business trip with a pleasure trip.<br />
Over the next ten years, tourism products and<br />
attractions will have to cater to visitors who<br />
are more demanding and discriminating, as<br />
well as more active and more purposeful in<br />
their choice <strong>of</strong> destination. There will be a<br />
shift in emphasis from passive fun to active<br />
learning, and the quality and genuineness <strong>of</strong><br />
visitor experiences will be crucial to future<br />
success in a competitive market. An Acronym<br />
that is relevant to describe the 'new' tourist is<br />
REAL, which stands for:Rewarding<br />
Enriching Adventuresome Learning<br />
Experience.<br />
A key underpinning concept for REAL<br />
tourism is authenticity <strong>of</strong> experience, which is<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten related to the environment and culture<br />
and seen to be unaffected by "mass" tourism.<br />
The New Tourists prefer to be regarded as<br />
travellers and not tourists. Some specific<br />
points which need to be kept in mind while<br />
dealing with the New Tourist are:<br />
This type <strong>of</strong> traveller requires a completely<br />
different marketing approach.<br />
They avoid conventional glossy marketing<br />
mechanisms and prefer to use reliable sources<br />
such as word <strong>of</strong> mouth referrals, their own<br />
independent research and trusted<br />
publications;<br />
They desire experiences as opposed to<br />
products and services;<br />
They can be called experiential traveller s,<br />
they extend across all age groups and<br />
traditional market segments;<br />
249<br />
New Tourism for the New Tourist<br />
To enable new tourism attractions to stand the<br />
test <strong>of</strong> time and satisfy the demanding<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> the evolving 'new' tourist, the<br />
following criteria should be applied to<br />
existing and proposed attractions:<br />
- That the attraction <strong>of</strong>fers a distinct,<br />
unique experience that cannot easily<br />
be replicated by competitors;<br />
- That the attraction is value added<br />
through 'best practice' interpretation,<br />
which preferably utilises a 'human<br />
element' such as interpretive guides,<br />
seasoned veterans and/or local<br />
characters;<br />
- That, where possible, the experience<br />
is externalised within the<br />
natural/actual setting rather than<br />
internalised within a false/reproduced<br />
setting;<br />
- That the attraction <strong>of</strong>fers an exciting,<br />
authentic, interactive and educational<br />
experience;<br />
- That 'comfort' should not<br />
compromise the authenticity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
experience;<br />
- That the attraction adheres to<br />
ecologically sustainable development<br />
principles;<br />
- That the attraction avoids the over<br />
reliance on technological interpretive<br />
devices that will become quickly<br />
outdated; and<br />
- That the attraction <strong>of</strong>fers a choice in<br />
the form <strong>of</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong>fered.<br />
Responding to the shift in market dynamics<br />
towards a "New" style <strong>of</strong> tourist, a number <strong>of</strong><br />
initiatives need to be taken so as to fuel the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> experiential tourism these include:<br />
- Network tourism initiatives;<br />
- The development <strong>of</strong> interpretive<br />
highways;<br />
- The explosion <strong>of</strong> interpretive centers<br />
- The latest trend towards regional<br />
base camps.
Conclusion<br />
A new tourism is emerging, sustainable,<br />
environmentally and socially responsible, and<br />
characterised by flexibility and choice. A new<br />
type <strong>of</strong> tourist is driving it: more educated,<br />
experienced, independent, conservationminded,<br />
respectful <strong>of</strong> cultures, and insistent<br />
on value for money.<br />
Starting in the eighties and mid-eighties<br />
(depending on the tourism receiving region in<br />
question) a number <strong>of</strong> dramatic<br />
environmental changes occurred which<br />
moved the "tourism industry" much closer to<br />
the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the new economy. Used<br />
to more convenience, faster service and more<br />
options from his/her every-day-life the new<br />
tourist also insisted on more options, more<br />
entertainment and fun, more diversified<br />
sports facilities and cultural variety in his/her<br />
vacation. This new consumer (tourist) thereby<br />
has exercised pressure upon the tourism<br />
industry and tourism enterprises to develop<br />
new products, services and experiences.<br />
Information technology is opening up an<br />
astonishing array <strong>of</strong> travel and vacation<br />
options for this new tourist. To remain<br />
competitive, tourism destinations and<br />
industry players alike must adapt. For many,<br />
the challenge is to "reinvent" tourism. Market<br />
intelligence, innovation, and closeness to<br />
250<br />
customers have become the new imperatives.<br />
Thus, on the horizon <strong>of</strong> the postmodern<br />
landscape, a New Age <strong>of</strong> tourism is dawning:<br />
New Age tourism for New Age people.<br />
References<br />
1. POON, A. (1993), Tourism, technology<br />
and competitive strategies.<br />
2. VAN HOVE, N. 1996. Globalisation <strong>of</strong><br />
tourism demand: the underlying factors and<br />
the impact on marketing strategy<br />
3. SAMEULSON, R.J. 1997. Globalisation<br />
on the march.<br />
4. CHRISTOPFER, C. 2003. Classic reviews<br />
in tourism<br />
5. SMERAL, E. 1998. The impact <strong>of</strong><br />
globalisation on small and medium<br />
enterprises: new challenges for tourism<br />
policies in European countries<br />
6. KELLER, P. 1996. Globalisation and<br />
tourism: a facinating topic for research<br />
http://www.fasttrack.org/resources/news/opin<br />
ion_editorial/971015wp.html.<br />
http://www.law.indiana.edu.glsj/vol5/no1/pir<br />
ages.html (23.7.98)<br />
http://www.rgs.org/NR/rdonlyres/38EC0973-<br />
BC22-434B-B1A5-<br />
463C3B799208/0/Tourism.pdf<br />
http://www.ectaa.org/LinkClick.aspx?filetick<br />
et=y8qguk%2FjvyI%3D&tabid=103
YOUTH LABOUR MARKET. MOBILITY, CAREER DEVELOPMENT,<br />
INCOMES. CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES<br />
Vasile Valentina<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> National Economy-<br />
Romanian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences<br />
Vasile Liviu<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> National Economy-<br />
Romanian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences<br />
This paper presents the main characteristics <strong>of</strong> the youth labour market, with a special view on<br />
mobility, career development and incomes. The paper is substantiated by and continues the<br />
researches <strong>of</strong> the authors on the topic <strong>of</strong> labour force mobility and on the one <strong>of</strong> adaptability,<br />
respectively on youths’ beahviour on labour market (with particular consideration <strong>of</strong> young<br />
graduates) highlighting the factors that adjust choices regarding taking up a job, career<br />
advancement, labour motivation, pr<strong>of</strong>essional and personal satisfaction opportunities which are<br />
provided by the labour market at local level, in country and abroad. Quantitative and qualitative<br />
indicators are presented about Romanian youths’ labour market within the European context<br />
during the transition period. The impact <strong>of</strong> the crisis on youths’ labour market is analysed,<br />
highlighting the challenges and opportunities, the particularities <strong>of</strong> the newly created jobs and<br />
especially the knowledge, skills and competencies requirements (KSC). The authors propose both<br />
the improvement <strong>of</strong> the systems <strong>of</strong> indicators for defining the potential and presence <strong>of</strong> youth on the<br />
labour market, the economic and social impact <strong>of</strong> external mobility <strong>of</strong> young graduates and an<br />
integrated scheme <strong>of</strong> policy measures for promoting adaptability and performance integration on<br />
Romanian labour market <strong>of</strong> youth. Particular attention is paid to presenting policy instruments for<br />
halting/diminishing the brain drain and brain shopping phenomena by promoting an attractive<br />
(pr<strong>of</strong>essionally and monetary) supply for employment in Romania’s local economy. The authors<br />
succeed in highlighting the functional links between the education market (labour force supply) and<br />
labour market (employment demand <strong>of</strong> the business environment) underpinning the requirement <strong>of</strong><br />
integrated management <strong>of</strong> labour potential in the years preceding studies’ finalization and up to the<br />
post-insertion years by multi-criteria analysis models and graduate career tracking programmes.<br />
Correlative measures are suggested for policies, procedures and monitoring instruments <strong>of</strong> youths’<br />
adaptability on labour market, as alternative to external migration/mobility for labour.<br />
Keywords: labour market, education market, young graduate adaptability, labour mobility, career<br />
development<br />
JEL classification: J40, I20, J61, I25<br />
I. Introduction<br />
Youth employment is much more volatile<br />
than the one <strong>of</strong> mature labour force. Youth<br />
labour market is characterised by<br />
opportunities’ deficit for decent employment,<br />
diminishing jobs, employment precariousness<br />
(increases in the number <strong>of</strong> part-time jobs,<br />
temporary employment) and wages’<br />
reduction. Young people are faced also with<br />
increased difficulties on entering the labour<br />
251<br />
market, considering that also during the<br />
economic expansion period there were<br />
already issues related to the creation <strong>of</strong> new<br />
jobs for them. The lack <strong>of</strong> employment<br />
perspectives in a decent job on entering the<br />
labour market affects/compromises their path<br />
on labour market and career development.<br />
Additionally, unemployment among young<br />
individuals presents specific vulnerabilities –<br />
higher sensitivity to the variations <strong>of</strong>
economic activity, difficulties in creating new<br />
jobs for youth, longer duration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
unemployment period, and easier entry on the<br />
informal labour market, which turns into a<br />
true refuge, particularly for graduates.<br />
Experts’ estimations appreciate that an<br />
increase in total unemployment rate by 1 per<br />
cent is accompanied by an employment<br />
diminishment among youth <strong>of</strong> about 1.1 – 1.8<br />
per cents, and Romania is one <strong>of</strong> the EU<br />
Member States with the highest<br />
unemployment rate <strong>of</strong> youth and its increase<br />
is expected (about 3 times higher than the<br />
general unemployment rate). The crisis<br />
“generates” precarious jobs for youth, which<br />
are weakly remunerated very <strong>of</strong>ten under<br />
their skills’ level, triggering loss/depreciation<br />
<strong>of</strong> competencies, or long-term unemployment<br />
and discouragement, hence increased poverty<br />
incidence.<br />
Considerable numerical and structural gaps<br />
are present on labour market between supply<br />
(outcome <strong>of</strong> education for vocational<br />
training) and demand (job requirements on<br />
the national labour market), which are<br />
amplified in some fields by the free<br />
movement <strong>of</strong> labour force (attractiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
some better paid jobs, not necessarily in the<br />
same training field), so that a significant<br />
deficit emerges for skilled staff in fields such<br />
as constructions, industry, services, including<br />
here health care ones, while on the European<br />
labour market our citizens deliver<br />
preponderantly low/un-skilled labour.<br />
On the education market, the curriculum<br />
adjustment and the range <strong>of</strong> skills on<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essions and fields <strong>of</strong> sciences has low<br />
flexibility, remaining behind as considered<br />
from KSCs demanded on labour market, and<br />
the link between school and business<br />
environment is erratic, punctual, or inexistent<br />
in most field (lack <strong>of</strong> cooperation for practice,<br />
internship, etc. and the system <strong>of</strong> scholarships<br />
provided by the business environment among<br />
graduates is strongly unbalanced tending to<br />
being inexistent). The difference between the<br />
demand on labour market and the supply <strong>of</strong><br />
labour from among the graduates is strongly<br />
252<br />
imbalanced, in most cases a period <strong>of</strong> training<br />
is necessary for labour market insertion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
graduates (either on the job or by courses<br />
provided by authorised institutions for adult<br />
education on the LLL market, and by courses<br />
<strong>of</strong> the National Council for Adult Training -<br />
NCAT).<br />
In the current paper we intend to highlight the<br />
fault lines between the educational system<br />
and the labour market and to present an<br />
integrated system <strong>of</strong> instruments and support<br />
mechanisms for dynamic balancing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
labour demand and labour supply represented<br />
by the insertion <strong>of</strong> young graduates.<br />
II. Literature review<br />
Youth adaptability on labour market, their<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional insertion and the KSCs deficit<br />
are issues widely debated by experts,<br />
particularly as outcome <strong>of</strong> the propagated<br />
effects on long term which they generate.<br />
Young people enter the labour market<br />
unprepared, without practical skills, their<br />
theoretical knowledge is either outdated or<br />
incomplete, and their basic competencies –<br />
generic and specific – are weakly developed<br />
(Vasile,V., 2009). The transition from school<br />
to active life and labour integration <strong>of</strong> youth<br />
represents an essential issue with a strong<br />
economic and social impact as it is also an<br />
important measurement <strong>of</strong> the external<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> the educational system (Vasile,<br />
L., 2011). The concerns in order to promote<br />
(performance) employment <strong>of</strong> youth, and the<br />
efforts <strong>of</strong> integrating young people on the<br />
local labour market were intensified during<br />
the period <strong>of</strong> crisis, and at EU level were<br />
realised a series <strong>of</strong> studies and researches <strong>of</strong><br />
the various aspects regarding this issue (EU,<br />
2011). Additionally EU 2020, integrates in<br />
the development targets both young<br />
generation’s participation to education to a<br />
share <strong>of</strong> 40%, and a diminishment <strong>of</strong> early<br />
school leaving under 10%, which are<br />
performances difficult to reach by Romania<br />
(from 16 % in 2008 the intention is to<br />
increase to almost 27% in the case <strong>of</strong> the<br />
share <strong>of</strong> graduates <strong>of</strong> tertiary education aged
from 30-34 years and also from 15,9% in the<br />
same year to reduce to 11,3% the rate <strong>of</strong> early<br />
school leaving). At the same time, EC, by<br />
“Youth on the move” proposes in 2010 a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> 4 priorities for lowering youth<br />
unemployment: support for pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
insertion and career development; support for<br />
youth in risk situations; promoting a support<br />
social network and sustaining<br />
entrepreneurship and self-employment.<br />
Increased concerns are shown also at national<br />
level by supporting the absorption <strong>of</strong><br />
structural funds for priority objectives that<br />
support youth (adaptability to the labour<br />
market, post-doctoral studies, etc.), as well as<br />
by developing topical surveys (NIS, 2000,<br />
2009). We still can remind the topical studies<br />
realised by various other institutions, based<br />
on projects financed with domestic funds, or<br />
international ones, yet these provide only for<br />
a partial, fragmented image related to the<br />
issue <strong>of</strong> youths on labour market (Nicolescu,<br />
L 2002, Săpătoru D Caplanova A &<br />
Slantcheva S, 2002)<br />
As result, there is no relevant information<br />
source that would aid the education system to<br />
permanently adjust/adapt the educational<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile to the requirements <strong>of</strong> the business<br />
environment (<strong>of</strong> the graduate career tracking<br />
program at national level), and the market<br />
allows just for punctual regulation on shortterm<br />
by CVT courses especially, which does<br />
not solve the issue <strong>of</strong> the anticipative<br />
character <strong>of</strong> the educational system against<br />
the labour demand expressed by the real<br />
economy. The outcomes <strong>of</strong> the survey<br />
repeated in 2009, associated with the reform<br />
measures on both markets (education and<br />
labour) allow for formulating some<br />
conclusions/partial outcomes and may<br />
represent milestones for defining the<br />
framework for improving the communication<br />
relationships/channels between the two<br />
systems/markets. Moreover, there are<br />
neither systematic studies nor even a<br />
national databank for monitoring the<br />
socio-pr<strong>of</strong>essional insertion <strong>of</strong> graduates<br />
on labour market in the first years by<br />
253<br />
highlighting the dysfunctions in forecasting<br />
educational content, and an adequate<br />
system <strong>of</strong> indicators that would allow for<br />
evaluating the impact <strong>of</strong> the university<br />
system on the Romanian economy and<br />
society is non-existent, as well. Only<br />
fragmented studies are made at the level <strong>of</strong><br />
individual universities, without an attempt <strong>of</strong><br />
aggregating the outcomes. The requirement<br />
<strong>of</strong> such approaches and the first national<br />
initiatives were rendered concrete in<br />
developing a methodology and working<br />
instruments regarding monitoring studies <strong>of</strong><br />
insertion on labour market for higher<br />
education graduates from Romania (MECT,<br />
2008), which were applied for the first time<br />
by means <strong>of</strong> a pilot project initiated within<br />
SOPHRD (Damian, R.M., 2011). The<br />
questionnaire developed on this topic is<br />
applied to a restricted target-group<br />
represented by graduates <strong>of</strong> state- and private<br />
higher education institutions after one year,<br />
and then after five years since graduation, but<br />
only for the universities involved in the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the study.<br />
III. Youth labour market. Main<br />
characteristics and development<br />
In the context <strong>of</strong> the economic transition<br />
process, the labour market from Romania was<br />
faced with important changes, shown in the<br />
diminishment <strong>of</strong> the active and employed<br />
population, in the increased unemployment<br />
among young individuals and growth <strong>of</strong> longterm<br />
unemployment, in the limited capacity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the economy to create new jobs and to<br />
ensure stimulative work remuneration in<br />
accordance with performance and importance<br />
<strong>of</strong> supplied work, by the lack <strong>of</strong> attractiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> the jobs for young graduates, particularly<br />
for those finishing tertiary education. As<br />
result, labour mobility increased especially<br />
external mobility <strong>of</strong> workers, and the stock <strong>of</strong><br />
migrant population is estimated currently to<br />
total almost 4 million persons (in the<br />
registered and unregistered economy).<br />
Labour market reform and the changes in the<br />
human capital management model from
Romania have known a sinuous development,<br />
much delayed as compared with the demands<br />
<strong>of</strong> the economic and social environment. This<br />
issue was left on a secondary plane, as it was<br />
considered that the regulations on the other<br />
markets will generate the required changes to<br />
ensure labour market functionality. If we<br />
consider the requirements <strong>of</strong> an efficient<br />
labour market, as support for sustaining<br />
competitiveness, we may appreciate that the<br />
labour market after two decades <strong>of</strong><br />
reform/adjustment and a period <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> about 8 years: a) does not ensure<br />
an efficient allocation <strong>of</strong> human capital<br />
within the economy, nor its performance use;<br />
b) the remuneration system is rigid in relation<br />
to performance and work involvement, and<br />
does not stimulate to a sufficient extent the<br />
additional effort, in particular for the public<br />
sector; c) mobility on fields <strong>of</strong> activity is<br />
relatively low, even for common pr<strong>of</strong>essions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the national economy due on one hand to<br />
the rigid recruitment and selection systems <strong>of</strong><br />
the staff (the criterion <strong>of</strong> experience is<br />
defining in most cases), and on the other hand<br />
due to the high differences in the<br />
remuneration on branches and fields <strong>of</strong><br />
activity (especially with respect to the<br />
bonuses and advantages system (bonus for<br />
the importance <strong>of</strong> the branch, stability bonus,<br />
etc.); d) opportunities’ equalities in career<br />
advancement and remuneration albeit<br />
stipulated in regulation documents and<br />
development strategies <strong>of</strong> human resources,<br />
the practice shows frequently derails there<strong>of</strong>.<br />
Hence, we cannot consider efficiency and<br />
flexibility on labour market as support factor<br />
<strong>of</strong> competitiveness (the seventh pillar “labour<br />
market efficiency”, Global Competitiveness<br />
Report 2009-2010), and as positive input to<br />
increasing economic growth and sustainable<br />
human development, to retaining young<br />
graduates on the national labour market and<br />
decreasing migration propensity.<br />
During the entire transition period is recorded<br />
a diminishment in the size <strong>of</strong> labour market<br />
associated with higher flexibility but on the<br />
background <strong>of</strong> increasingly stronger de-<br />
254<br />
correlation under the quantitative and<br />
qualitative aspect between labour demand and<br />
supply, especially on the labour market<br />
segment specific for young graduates. Low<br />
concerns exist for the efficient allocation <strong>of</strong><br />
labour force at local level, by stimulating<br />
through active measures internal mobility for<br />
labour. The concentration <strong>of</strong> investments in<br />
high-density population urban areas and the<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> instruments for supporting internal<br />
mobility for labour (living and/or transport<br />
conditions) triggered increasingly stronger<br />
decoupling under quantitative and qualitative<br />
aspect between demand and supply for labour<br />
at regional/local level. Temporary<br />
migration for labour is preferred by<br />
working-age household members,<br />
particularly the young individuals aged up<br />
to 35 years, instead <strong>of</strong> territorial mobility<br />
<strong>of</strong> the household or commuting. Very <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
deficits are encountered on some markets<br />
and labour force surplus on<br />
trades/pr<strong>of</strong>essions on others, the<br />
differences being covered rather by<br />
external migration flows (emigration <strong>of</strong><br />
Romanians to Western Europe, Israel or<br />
Canada, and immigration from the East on<br />
the local labour markets, especially the<br />
ones in Moldova and in the central region<br />
<strong>of</strong> the country). Unfortunately, to a large<br />
extent, such balances are made due to the<br />
informal market, the benefits being partial<br />
both for employees (wages but without social<br />
insurance), and employers (lower costs but<br />
without instruments for long-term incentives<br />
for performance and labour involvement),<br />
and also for the society (reduced<br />
contributions to social funds and unpaid<br />
taxes).<br />
The crisis period generates significant<br />
changes on labour market, in the opinion <strong>of</strong><br />
social partners, disruptions and atypical<br />
developments, non-performance and actual<br />
restrictions in the way <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
turnaround. The previous economic growth is<br />
proven as unsustainable and the Romanian<br />
economy drops by more than 7% in 2009 and<br />
yet another about 1.5% in 2010. The
constriction <strong>of</strong> economic activity triggers<br />
considerable unemployment in the private<br />
sector but also personnel reductions in the<br />
public sector, but on administrative criteria <strong>of</strong><br />
diminishing personnel expenditures<br />
(budgetary corrections are operated uniformly<br />
on ministries). The number <strong>of</strong> governmental<br />
agencies are reduced by half, yet ministerial<br />
structures increase, reductions are made in<br />
education, health care and research strictly on<br />
economic reasoning, without defining the<br />
medium- and long-term needs both for<br />
quality and efficient educational and health<br />
services, as well as for technological progress<br />
within the business environment, as solution<br />
for exiting the crisis and economic<br />
turnaround. The European principles <strong>of</strong><br />
supporting continuing learning and<br />
stimulating the generation <strong>of</strong> RDI outcomes<br />
applicable within economy are acknowledged<br />
as necessary, yet unsupported in practice,<br />
employment is practically blocked by the<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> demand from the business<br />
environment and administrative lay<strong>of</strong>fs<br />
within the public sector. Unemployment<br />
increases, the active measures on labour<br />
market are even more downsized (the level<br />
from the period <strong>of</strong> economic growth varying<br />
around 2% in total unemployment fund, for<br />
instance) and employees participation to CVT<br />
decreases dramatically (Romania was placed<br />
on the last position in the EU with a<br />
255<br />
participation to CVT courses <strong>of</strong> about 1,3%<br />
in the last 2 years.<br />
Unemployment among youngsters is higher<br />
than the average, about 2-3 times, and higher<br />
for men. Young people are predominant<br />
among unemployed who never worked and<br />
they represent a third <strong>of</strong> the long-term<br />
unemployed.<br />
The youth labour market is different as<br />
challenges and restrictions, being more<br />
vulnerable to migration “attractiveness”.<br />
Young individuals represent the most mobile<br />
segment <strong>of</strong> migrant population, especially for<br />
external migration. Aspirations about<br />
incomes and pr<strong>of</strong>essional career and the<br />
relative independence from family (single, or<br />
without children) make them be more open<br />
towards jobs at longer distances, if they<br />
satisfy expectations. On the other hand, the<br />
situation <strong>of</strong> youth on labour market is<br />
difficult as they are regarded a vulnerable<br />
group: they have more difficulties in finding a<br />
job due to lack <strong>of</strong> working experience (in<br />
Romania only a small share <strong>of</strong> the young are<br />
employed during their university studies and<br />
only few, by exception, during the period <strong>of</strong><br />
upper-secondary studies). In the last years, ejobs<br />
mobility and increasing part-time<br />
employment already during the period <strong>of</strong><br />
study have attenuated the pressure on<br />
insertion unemployment rate.
ILO unemployment rate in Romania and EU, total and for the age group 15-24 years<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Sursa: Eurostat (2009), http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal.<br />
The youths employment model is defined by<br />
the following characteristics: part-time jobs,<br />
contracts on determined periods <strong>of</strong> time, high<br />
mobility from one job to another in the first<br />
year after finalising studies, diminished<br />
wages towards the legal limit for the<br />
graduated level <strong>of</strong> studies, dual employment,<br />
or only within the informal economy, low<br />
perspectives <strong>of</strong> access to a career in the first<br />
years, practical competencies and skills<br />
deficits triggering inclusively employment in<br />
inferior jobs to the training received in<br />
school. All these aspects define a nonperformance<br />
and weakly stimulating model<br />
for stability, career advancement and personal<br />
development. At an employment rate <strong>of</strong> the<br />
working-age population (15 to 64 years) <strong>of</strong><br />
about 60% in Q3 2009, were employed 26%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the young individuals (15 to 24 years <strong>of</strong><br />
age). The highest employment level is among<br />
graduates <strong>of</strong> higher education (84,6%) for the<br />
same period and decreases to about 45% for<br />
70<br />
65<br />
60<br />
55<br />
50<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
Youths activity and employment rate, 2002-2009<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
256<br />
EU15-ILO unemployment<br />
rate - total<br />
EU15- ILO unemployment<br />
rate, 15-24 years old<br />
RO- ILO unemployment<br />
rate- total<br />
RO- ILO unemployment<br />
rate, 15-24 years old<br />
those with the lowest training levels (NIS,<br />
2009). As fields, youngsters aged 15-24 years<br />
are employed preponderantly in<br />
constructions, trade, hotels and restaurants,<br />
and those from the age group 25-34 years <strong>of</strong><br />
age in real estate transactions and trade. Men<br />
are best represented within all sociopr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
categories, partially justified also<br />
by the fertile life span <strong>of</strong> women and hence<br />
the lower share <strong>of</strong> participation to labour<br />
market.<br />
The activity rate and the employment rate for<br />
youths aged 15-24 years is lower than the<br />
national average, due to: reduced population<br />
cohorts (as result <strong>of</strong> demographic decline), to<br />
extended education period, to poor<br />
employment attractiveness provided by the<br />
market and to the national employment model<br />
which does not promote youth employment<br />
during the period <strong>of</strong> studies, save by<br />
exception.<br />
Source: Labour force in Romania – employment and unemployment– Q 2, 2009, NIS<br />
Consequently, the two rates are placed about<br />
20 pp under the general average. At the same<br />
2008<br />
2009<br />
Activity rate, 15-64 years<br />
old<br />
Activity rate, 15-24 years<br />
old<br />
Employment rate, 15-64<br />
years old
time, against the Lisbon objectives, the<br />
working-age population employment rate in<br />
2008 places Romania at a distance <strong>of</strong> 11 pp<br />
(70%), and for the women at a distance <strong>of</strong> 7,5<br />
pp (60% objective).<br />
Secondary education graduates have an<br />
employment rate varying on averages<br />
around the national values, the employment<br />
rate in the rural area being in reversed<br />
proportion to the education level in the case<br />
<strong>of</strong> pre-university levels <strong>of</strong> study, and the<br />
opportunities provided by the rural area<br />
being in (paid or unpaid) activities<br />
developed in agriculture. Estimates<br />
(CEDEFOP, 2008) show that up to the year<br />
2015, approximately 30% <strong>of</strong> the jobs shall<br />
require higher education and almost 50% at<br />
least upper-secondary education with a<br />
significant decrease <strong>of</strong> the jobs requiring a<br />
low skill level. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional insertion <strong>of</strong> a<br />
graduate is strongly influenced by the<br />
attended school, the field <strong>of</strong> study, the<br />
economic development level <strong>of</strong> the region,<br />
the firms/companies in whom he/she<br />
effected internship or worked during<br />
studies, the recruitment firms where he/she<br />
sustained interviews, on the attended<br />
conferences and trainings, etc.<br />
Occupational guidance already during highschool<br />
<strong>of</strong> youngsters towards the<br />
40,00%<br />
20,00%<br />
0,00%<br />
Source: Eurostat on-line database<br />
257<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional pr<strong>of</strong>ile and choice <strong>of</strong><br />
university training in relationship to the<br />
intended trade/pr<strong>of</strong>ession for career<br />
development, correlated with gained<br />
aptitudes and competencies, but also with<br />
the demand on labour market trigger a<br />
higher employment rate <strong>of</strong> graduates and<br />
less time searching for a job<br />
“adequate/corresponding” to individual<br />
aspirations. From this perspective,<br />
employment opportunity is in reverse<br />
proportionality to the sum <strong>of</strong> self-imposed<br />
restrictions <strong>of</strong> the graduate. This is also the<br />
reason why for young individuals (15-24 de<br />
year) the long-term unemployment rate<br />
(unemployment <strong>of</strong> 6 months or over) was,<br />
for instance in Q3 2009 <strong>of</strong> 10,4% , and the<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> long-term unemployment<br />
among youths <strong>of</strong> 46,9% (at an average<br />
unemployment rate <strong>of</strong> 6,8% per total and <strong>of</strong><br />
22,3% among those aged between 15-24<br />
years). Women have an unemployment rate<br />
by approximately 30% lower as compared<br />
with men. However, they register an<br />
enrolment rate in high-school, respectively<br />
tertiary education significantly higher than<br />
the one <strong>of</strong> men, a situation which explains<br />
the lower employment rate which is<br />
specific to them (Vasile V., 2009).<br />
Share <strong>of</strong> the young unemployed at the half <strong>of</strong> the year 2009<br />
19,60% 18,30%<br />
România<br />
Media UE<br />
33,60%<br />
Spania<br />
28,20%<br />
Letonia<br />
24,90%<br />
Italia<br />
6,00%<br />
Olanda<br />
8,90% 9% 10,50%<br />
Danemarca<br />
Austria<br />
Germania<br />
18,20%<br />
Polonia
If we refer to action methods on the labour<br />
market, the youth is more incisive and resort<br />
to direct and modern methods in searching for<br />
a job, take more risks at an interview and the<br />
negotiation <strong>of</strong> working conditions and<br />
incomes. Between finishing school and taking<br />
up an activity at the first significant job,<br />
74.1% have searched a job using active<br />
methods (direct contacting <strong>of</strong> employers or <strong>of</strong><br />
the decision factors responsible with hiring<br />
37.9%). The insertion rate <strong>of</strong> tertiary<br />
education graduates is lower against the<br />
average situation per total youth who are<br />
hired and particularly in the first year after<br />
graduation, due to the fact that an university<br />
graduate will search longer and have higher<br />
expectations with respect to the workplace –<br />
under the aspect <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>essional pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />
the workplace and <strong>of</strong> the provided<br />
remuneration level (very <strong>of</strong>ten much lower<br />
than graduates’ expectations). Even though<br />
the state grants tax facilities on employing<br />
youths (for instance, the employer will<br />
receive for a 12 months period the minimum<br />
wage on economy) due to the complementary<br />
conditions (including the obligation to remain<br />
on the job for at least 2 years) and <strong>of</strong> the high<br />
mobility <strong>of</strong> youths in search for the right job<br />
corresponding to their pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
aspirations, the share <strong>of</strong> those resorting to<br />
these facilities is very low. On medium- and<br />
long-term, job security for youths with<br />
tertiary education is relatively higher, but also<br />
the opportunities for mobility based on<br />
employment advantages are more. In<br />
general, young graduates are considered on<br />
insertion on the labour market as having the<br />
disadvantage <strong>of</strong> lacking experience, yet the<br />
advantages are net superior: potentially high<br />
productivity, adaptability and acceptance <strong>of</strong><br />
novelty, theoretic knowledge, so as to be<br />
considered “relatively cheap”, as lack <strong>of</strong><br />
experience diminishes the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />
insertion wage towards the minimum legal<br />
limits. The hampering lack <strong>of</strong> experience can<br />
be relatively easily dealt away with by<br />
training on the job, which depending on trade<br />
258<br />
and skills level attracts lower or higher<br />
continuing training costs. Yet, these costs are<br />
absorbed on medium-term by individual<br />
outcomes and performance, if there is<br />
employment motivation. Job motivation and<br />
satisfaction are very important components<br />
for graduates and youths in general, and<br />
therefore they turn easier into unemployed<br />
and search for a relatively longer period <strong>of</strong><br />
time an adequate workplace. Consequently,<br />
the unemployment rate for the age group 25-<br />
34 is closer to the average one, which leads to<br />
the idea that youths after graduation have a<br />
short period <strong>of</strong> feverishly searching a job,<br />
with frequent changes and alternating<br />
unemployment and employment periods, until<br />
succeeding to find a job or to migrate for<br />
employment outside the country.<br />
IV. Ways <strong>of</strong> diminishing discrepancies<br />
between demand and supply on youths’<br />
labour market. Milestones for an<br />
integrated balance model for insertion<br />
employment<br />
Youths on labour market remain a<br />
disadvantaged group, and as risk are<br />
considered: a) for the society as<br />
unemployment on local/national market and<br />
their migration as brain drain/brain shopping<br />
lead to waste <strong>of</strong> resources due to the nonvalued<br />
investment in education done in the<br />
country and loss on medium- and long-term<br />
average <strong>of</strong> GDP and diminishment <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
increase; b) for the labour market, in event<br />
they fail to get employment according to their<br />
training pr<strong>of</strong>ile and in a pr<strong>of</strong>essionally and<br />
financially attractive job. The pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the<br />
young worker is defined on a hand by<br />
education (knowledge and theoretic<br />
competencies, especially), occupational<br />
flexibility, availability for LLL and, on the<br />
other hand, the attitude (to work, job,<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional career, status on labour market:<br />
employed, self-employed, etc.); geographic<br />
mobility. The size and balance on labour<br />
market are defined by the medium- and longterm<br />
trends: demographic decline by delays
in family grounding and in the decision to<br />
have children, mobility for career and<br />
incomes – geographic or virtual –<br />
employment volatility, entrepreneurship<br />
development and self-employment, lower<br />
elasticity by unemployment, increase in the<br />
stock <strong>of</strong> incorporated education and<br />
permanent updating by LLL, gender<br />
convergence on trades, pr<strong>of</strong>essions,<br />
specialisation fields, including at managerial<br />
level and presence in the political life, the<br />
interest for developing a successful<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional career.<br />
An integrated model for ensuring mobile<br />
balance on labour market presupposes at<br />
least three components: education for labour<br />
market as integral part <strong>of</strong> LLL, defining the<br />
business environment demand by means <strong>of</strong><br />
KSCs and ensuring a social network <strong>of</strong><br />
stimulating employment on local/national<br />
market. For each component a number <strong>of</strong><br />
indicators for quantitative measurements can<br />
be defined and then weighted/adjusted with<br />
the qualitative variables resulting from<br />
dedicated surveys (graduated track survey<br />
and labour market for youth questionnaire).<br />
The selected variables were <strong>of</strong> 3 up to 6 for<br />
each component depending on the demanded<br />
training level for the job and scarcity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
specialists. In the case <strong>of</strong> a job for a tertiary<br />
education graduate, as minimum quantitative<br />
indicators were defined: a) for the education<br />
for labour market component were considered<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> graduates on specialties, the<br />
aggregated index <strong>of</strong> generic competencies<br />
and the KSCs index specific to the pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
and hierarchical level <strong>of</strong> the job; b) for<br />
defining the labour demand within the<br />
business environment was considered the<br />
specific demand <strong>of</strong> similar jobs, workplace<br />
stability and the substitution index <strong>of</strong> the<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional pr<strong>of</strong>ile; finally, for c) social<br />
indicators <strong>of</strong> stimulation, at least at the<br />
comparative level <strong>of</strong> wages and additional<br />
wage packages can be considered the<br />
geographic indicator (defined by the<br />
rural/urban environment) and the local<br />
development level (GDP/area inhabitant or<br />
259<br />
the development lag against the national<br />
average). Balancing the values <strong>of</strong> aggregated<br />
indicators on each component indicate the<br />
compatibility state and attractiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
employment for youths, while the imbalance<br />
situations points out the migration risk – brain<br />
drain/brain shopping or the employment<br />
option by substitution (another pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile but for which minimum competencies<br />
are proven for taking up the job). The job<br />
experience variable non-specific to young<br />
graduates and the advantages <strong>of</strong> the employer<br />
from insertion employment are considered in<br />
operating selection <strong>of</strong> equivalent candidates<br />
(IEN, 2010). Albeit in the incipient stage <strong>of</strong><br />
developing and testing on youth market, this<br />
algorithm allows on one hand for guiding the<br />
educational system to curricula adjustment<br />
and focusing learning outcomes on KSCs<br />
demanded on labour market, and on the other<br />
hand in guiding employers towards<br />
recruitment from the local market or from the<br />
national/international market, as well as to the<br />
association with the development on variants<br />
<strong>of</strong> employment <strong>of</strong> the e-work type for some<br />
trades/pr<strong>of</strong>essions and, respectively jobs. The<br />
current developments and dysfunctions on the<br />
youth labour market, particularly during the<br />
period <strong>of</strong> crisis when the volatility elements<br />
were more prominent, support the need <strong>of</strong><br />
developing ex-ante and ex-post management<br />
mechanisms <strong>of</strong> potential (youth) labour force<br />
employment by combining counselling and<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional guidance with internship periods<br />
and graduate tracking management,<br />
employer/alumni engagement strategies,<br />
industrial relations development and<br />
stimulative wage package, LLL, career<br />
development model, etc.
V. Brief conclusions<br />
The labour market, respectively the business<br />
environment is more exigent in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
the young labour force which enters labour<br />
market after graduation. Youths have more<br />
difficulty in finding a job corresponding both<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionally and monetary, the reason why<br />
both employment fluctuations from<br />
employment to unemployment and viceversa,<br />
and longer periods <strong>of</strong> unemployment<br />
are an important barometer <strong>of</strong> permanent<br />
education system’s reform in Romania.<br />
Moreover, information about vocational<br />
training programmes or for on the job<br />
adjustment may provide information about<br />
dysfunctions and correlations’ lack between<br />
the education system and demand on labour<br />
market, while the following might be<br />
considered as the most significant ones:<br />
- Youths entering on labour market after<br />
graduation <strong>of</strong> secondary or tertiary education<br />
live preponderantly in the urban area, and<br />
men are more numerous; accessibility <strong>of</strong><br />
higher education is better for those in the<br />
urban area, opportunities closer to the<br />
beneficiary and, very <strong>of</strong>ten, financial<br />
restrictions are the most important.<br />
- The shares <strong>of</strong> their employment and<br />
unemployment against the age group to<br />
which they belong has not underwent<br />
significant changes, just as the passage rate to<br />
higher education which improved but not to a<br />
significant share and, unfortunately, did not<br />
generate a proportional improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
graduates’ education quality, but to the<br />
contrary.<br />
- Still the diploma is more important than<br />
proven skills and knowledge, in particular for<br />
the public sector. The business environment<br />
becomes gradually increasingly rigid from<br />
this viewpoint and requires evidence on<br />
hiring <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional competencies’<br />
certification, and in their absence,<br />
employment is made on a job requiring<br />
inferior training and/or the knowledge deficit<br />
is compensated by CVT on the job.<br />
- The activity rate decreases, young<br />
individuals on one hand postpone entering the<br />
260<br />
labour market, and pursue several educational<br />
tertiary paths (<strong>of</strong>ten in completely different<br />
fields) or continue their studies for<br />
masters/doctorate or, on the other hand after<br />
graduation (or early leaving) are active on the<br />
black market, or migrate for employment in<br />
low skilled jobs, inferior to gained education.<br />
- The main reasons <strong>of</strong> early school leaving<br />
are still <strong>of</strong> current concern, respectively the<br />
high cost <strong>of</strong> schooling (especially for those<br />
from the rural area) and/or associated with the<br />
need <strong>of</strong> working for incomes (dependency on<br />
families with low incomes or other types <strong>of</strong><br />
difficulties). An important reason <strong>of</strong> failing to<br />
finalise studies is represented also by the<br />
inefficiency <strong>of</strong> the evaluation/certification<br />
systems on graduation which consider<br />
inflexible evaluation schemes and less<br />
adjusted to the practical finality <strong>of</strong> education<br />
– knowledge verification instead <strong>of</strong><br />
competencies certification, etc.<br />
- The lack <strong>of</strong> a flexible, coherent and<br />
accessible to all system for continuing<br />
training, including by<br />
certification/continuation/ and/or transition<br />
from the formal to the informal and nonformal<br />
system.<br />
- Another issue which is difficult to measure<br />
but is particularly relevant under the aspect <strong>of</strong><br />
compatibility between education market and<br />
labour market, between the chosen pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
and competencies for practicing this<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ession in performance conditions is<br />
represented by the analysis “first significant<br />
job” – under the aspect <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
and search duration.<br />
- Finally, another important aspect <strong>of</strong><br />
individual performance during active life is<br />
represented by the informal education related<br />
to the behaviour on labour market and<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional development. The example <strong>of</strong><br />
parents and extended family members may<br />
define to a significant share the labour market<br />
behaviour <strong>of</strong> young graduates and their<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional path.<br />
Failure to acknowledge such aspects in a<br />
systematic way and their analysis affect the<br />
feedback processes within the educational
process, maintaining dysfunctions and gaps<br />
between education market and labour market,<br />
rendered concrete, finally, by loss <strong>of</strong> human<br />
capital, <strong>of</strong> investments in education, loss <strong>of</strong><br />
potential value added as result <strong>of</strong> nonperformance<br />
work or giving up work after<br />
graduation. The relatively high level <strong>of</strong> this<br />
youths’ unemployment rate emphasises the<br />
necessity <strong>of</strong> a closer link between the<br />
educational and vocational system and the<br />
labour market. Finalising and applying<br />
methodologies <strong>of</strong> monitoring young<br />
graduates insertion for various educational<br />
forms (vocational, upper-secondary, tertiary)<br />
is a priority, just as the development <strong>of</strong> more<br />
flexible and efficient systems <strong>of</strong> organising<br />
internship for students. Last but not least, a<br />
more careful analysis is expected with respect<br />
to the competencies which Romanian<br />
employers regard as important for the success<br />
<strong>of</strong> their companies and the adjustment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
educational and vocational supply to them,<br />
periodical update <strong>of</strong> occupational and<br />
vocational training standards, and <strong>of</strong> the<br />
educational curriculum in close dependency<br />
to the change dynamics on labour market.<br />
Bibliography<br />
1. Damian, R.M., (2011) – University<br />
Graduates and Labour Market, Romanian<br />
Tracer Study, Strategic projects for Romanian<br />
Higher Education, FSE investing in People,<br />
UEFISCDI, prezentare la Conferinta Life<br />
after graduation: The Role <strong>of</strong> Graduate<br />
Employment and Tracking Systems for<br />
Continuous Curricula Development and<br />
Quality Enhancement in Higher Education<br />
UNESCO –CEPES si ULBS, mai 2011Sibiu<br />
2. Nicolescu, L (2002) Contribution <strong>of</strong><br />
Higher Education to the transition towards<br />
the market economy: The case <strong>of</strong> Romania In<br />
K Liuhto & J Jumpponen (Ed) Ten years <strong>of</strong><br />
Transition;<br />
3. Săpătoru D Caplanova A & Slantcheva S<br />
(2002) Estimating the value <strong>of</strong> public and<br />
private higher education in Central and<br />
Eastern Europe: Labour market outcomes and<br />
institutional forms in Bulgaria, Romania and<br />
261<br />
Slovakia (Report to PHARE ACE P98-1020-<br />
R project),<br />
4. Vasile, V coord, (2009) – Improving<br />
vocational competencies among graduates<br />
and youths: A chance for the future -Strategy<br />
and Policy Studies SPOS 2009, Study no. 4<br />
European Institute <strong>of</strong> Romania<br />
http://www.ier.ro/documente/spos_2009/Stud<br />
iul_4_EN_site.pdf<br />
5. Vasile L, (2011) – Particularitati si efecte<br />
economic-sociale ale migratiei fortei de<br />
munca in conditiile globalizarii.Repere<br />
strategice si politici in Romania, teza de<br />
doctorat, INCE-Academia Romana, 2011<br />
6. CEDEFOP (2008) – Future skills needs in<br />
Europe,<br />
www.lisboncouncil.net/component/download<br />
s/?id=212,<br />
http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/developing<br />
-lifelong-learning/index.aspx<br />
7. EC (2011) – Youth employment measures,<br />
European Employment Observatory Review,<br />
2010, Social Europe, Directorate General for<br />
Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion<br />
8. IEN (2010) – Studiu privind piata fortei de<br />
munca tinere in lucrarea “Efectele crizei<br />
asupra pietei muncii. Mecanisme si politici<br />
pentru cresterea ocuparii si performanta in<br />
munca” (coord Vasile V) in Programul<br />
Evaluarea Stării Economiei Naţionale - ESEN<br />
2009-2010 (PF-AR) INCE/Academia<br />
Română – in manuscris, pe CD<br />
9. INS (2000) - AMIGO, Ancheta<br />
complementară”Tranziţia de la şcoală la<br />
muncă”, trt III 2000,<br />
10. INS (2009) -Accesul tinerilor pe piata<br />
muncii, modul ad hoc la Ancheta AMIGO, tr<br />
II 2009 si comunicat de presa nr 237 din 3<br />
decembrie 2009 Accesul tinerilor pe piaţa<br />
forţei de muncă Modul ad hoc ataşat<br />
cercetării statistice asupra forţei de muncă în<br />
gospodării (AMIGO) în trimestrul II 2009 -<br />
adresat tinerilor în vârstă de 15-34 ani<br />
11. MECT, (2008) - Ordin nr.<br />
6012/21.11.2008 pentru aprobarea<br />
Metodologiei şi a instrumentelor de lucru<br />
privind studiile de monitorizare a inserţiei pe<br />
piaţa muncii a absolvenţilor de învăţământ
superior din România<br />
http://www.edu.ro/index.php/articles/11137.<br />
12. WEF (2009) - Global Competitiveness<br />
report 2009-2010,<br />
https://members.weforum.org/pdf/GCR09/G<br />
CR20092010fullreport.pdf, World Economic<br />
262<br />
Forum 2009.<br />
http://www.weforum.org/issues/globalcompetitiveness
263
Section Finance, Banking and Accounting<br />
Sub-section: Finances
THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE PUBLIC DEFICIT<br />
OF THE EU COUNTRIES<br />
Bǎtrâncea Ioan<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />
Bǎtrâncea Maria<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />
Bogdan Vodǎ University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania<br />
Nichita Ramona-Anca<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />
Abstract: In this paper, the authors make an analysis <strong>of</strong> the second wave <strong>of</strong> the actual World<br />
Financial Crisis. They present the consequences <strong>of</strong> the first wave <strong>of</strong> the World Financial Crisis,<br />
namely the Banking Crisis, on the EU countries public debts.<br />
Keywords: analysis, crisis, public debts, EU<br />
JEL Classification: G30<br />
1. European Bailout Plan<br />
The first wave <strong>of</strong> the global financial crisis<br />
consisted <strong>of</strong> a deep crisis within the<br />
international banking system caused by<br />
mortgage contracts. The devastating effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> this first wave were only delayed - not<br />
eliminated - by states interventions through<br />
state bailouts given to banks in difficulty. To<br />
mitigate the effects <strong>of</strong> this crisis, the<br />
European Bailout Plan was passed in 2008<br />
within the EU Zone, which in summary<br />
provided the following:<br />
- Any financial support had to be given on<br />
time and it was temporary;<br />
- Taxpayers interests had to be protected;<br />
- Remaining shareholders had to deal with<br />
governmental interventions;<br />
- Governments were free to change<br />
companies management when necessary;<br />
- Governments were entitled to changing<br />
banking wage policies;<br />
- Stipulations relating to EU Bailout Plan had<br />
to be followed as stated;<br />
- No secondary effects on other UE members<br />
were allowed.<br />
267<br />
Besides the bailout amount <strong>of</strong> 1465 billion<br />
Euros, the EU Bailout Plan also stipulated<br />
that bailed banks could not give dividends to<br />
investors until the total amount received by<br />
them was returned to the governments.<br />
Moreover, governments had the right to be<br />
represented on the board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> bailed<br />
banks by special observers. As a consequence<br />
<strong>of</strong> the above stipulations, European stock<br />
markets fell the very next day this plan was<br />
approved.<br />
There were also some exceptions. Many<br />
French banks like Credit Agricole or BNP<br />
Parisbas refused governmental help because<br />
<strong>of</strong> its interfering role in bank management.<br />
Other banks accepted the bailout plan, as<br />
following: Barclay’s (UK): 1.62 billion £;<br />
Royal Bank <strong>of</strong> Scotland (UK): 5 billion £;<br />
Fortis (The Netherlands/Belgium): 11.2<br />
billion €; Dexia (France/Belgium): 6.4 billion<br />
€; Hypo Real Estate (Germany): 35 billion €.<br />
This bailout given to banks by EU states was<br />
misunderstood by them, for several reasons,<br />
among which the following:
- When banks know that the state will support<br />
them during crises, they can afford to take<br />
bigger risks.<br />
- Without more regulation, banks are driven<br />
to increase their returns by taking bigger<br />
risks.<br />
- When banks gain huge amounts <strong>of</strong> money,<br />
they keep the pr<strong>of</strong>its; when banks loose, it is<br />
the state that pays.<br />
Looking back, one can see that the European<br />
public has discovered an interesting fact: the<br />
2008-2009 fiscal stimulus programs, which<br />
were aimed at forestalling an even greater<br />
crisis, generated more debts than jobs. By<br />
analyzing this situation, one conclusion<br />
arises: cheap money (through cost and high<br />
liquidity levels) has deepened the crisis.<br />
2. It’s all in the history<br />
Recent past history showed, on one hand, the<br />
financial crisis deepened the problems <strong>of</strong><br />
several European countries because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
monetary and financial structures <strong>of</strong> the Euro<br />
zone. On the other hand, the crisis resulted in<br />
extreme shortage <strong>of</strong> liquidity for European<br />
banks. During 2007-2008, banks <strong>of</strong> core Euro<br />
zone countries (Germany, France, The<br />
Netherlands, Belgium) continued to lend to<br />
peripheral countries (Italy, Spain, Ireland,<br />
Greece, Portugal). Gross cross-border claims<br />
from core to periphery reached 1.5 trillion<br />
Euros in 2008, representing almost three<br />
times the capital <strong>of</strong> core banks.<br />
The European Central Bank (ECB)<br />
intervened, lending freely and making it<br />
possible for banks to start dealing with their<br />
weak position. Also, the ECB reaction was<br />
very different in 2009 when states were<br />
facing growing borrowing needs due to the<br />
crisis. The ECB watched as interest rates<br />
rose, financial institutions speculated against<br />
state debt, and state bankruptcy raised its<br />
head. In such a difficult financial<br />
environment, the Euro zone left each state to<br />
defend itself in the financial markets.<br />
When looking closer at the above mentioned<br />
time line, the following can be stated: The<br />
financial crisis has been followed by a wave<br />
268<br />
<strong>of</strong> governmental defaults on public debt<br />
obligations; The financial crisis has led to, or<br />
exacerbated, sharp economic downturns, low<br />
government revenues, widening government<br />
deficits, and high levels <strong>of</strong> debt, pushing<br />
many governments into default; As recovery<br />
from the global financial crisis begins, the<br />
global recession endures, at some point to the<br />
threat <strong>of</strong> a second wave <strong>of</strong> the crisis:<br />
sovereign debt crisis.<br />
3. Sovereign debt crises<br />
In a financial crisis, government spending<br />
increases dramatically in the attempt to<br />
stabilize the financial system and stimulate<br />
economic activity. Hence, tax revenues fall,<br />
fiscal surpluses turn into deficits and existing<br />
deficits increase. Because <strong>of</strong> the difficult<br />
financial situation, all sixteen members <strong>of</strong> the<br />
European Monetary Union (EMU) have<br />
violated treaty limits on allowable budget<br />
deficits (some more than four times).<br />
Moreover, the leading economies <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world have all seen their deficits shoot<br />
higher, some to record levels.<br />
Among all the obstacles, there is a certainty:<br />
when economies are contracting or even grow<br />
slowly, bringing these deficits back down to<br />
earth, the situation turns into an unenviable<br />
challenge. Governments have to survive by<br />
turning to the markets. Then those increased<br />
deficits turn into growing debt loads. When<br />
debt reaches 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the GDP threshold,<br />
the borrowing costs for governments start<br />
ticking higher and so does the market<br />
scrutiny. Related to this topic and in the<br />
attempt to warn financial markets, the IMF<br />
stated in 2010 that five <strong>of</strong> the top seven<br />
developed countries in the world would have<br />
debt levels exceeding 100 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
during the next four years.<br />
If deficits and debts rise and economic<br />
activity appears unlikely to solve fiscal<br />
problems, the creditworthiness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
government falls under intense scrutiny.<br />
That’s when downgrades appear. This is the<br />
situation many countries around the world<br />
had to face in 2009 and 2010, when the
sovereign debt crises burst. Greece’s<br />
sovereign debt rating has been downgraded to<br />
junk status. Spain has lost its AAA rating. UK<br />
could have lost its AAA status if its deficit<br />
would not have been addressed. Across the<br />
ocean, Japan’s outlook has been cut to<br />
negative and rating agencies have even<br />
warned the U.S.<br />
In such an environment, when investors see<br />
more risk, they require more return.<br />
Therefore, the borrowing costs for troubled<br />
countries rises. Then, it becomes harder to<br />
finance spending needs and harder to finance<br />
existing debt. That’s when defaults show up.<br />
Unless governments can demonstrate they’re<br />
willing to take tough steps to reign in debt,<br />
crisis can spread quickly.<br />
4. Public deficit, nowadays problem in the<br />
EU<br />
Regarding the issue <strong>of</strong> the EU public deficit,<br />
it must be stated that this economic<br />
phenomenon is accepted within the union<br />
until it exceeds values stated in documents<br />
like: Maastricht Treaty (1992); Stability and<br />
Growth Pact (1997).<br />
According to the Maastricht Treaty, countries<br />
have to meet several convergence criteria,<br />
among which the following:<br />
- An inflation rate no more than 1.5% higher<br />
than the average <strong>of</strong> the three lowest inflation<br />
rates <strong>of</strong> EU member states over the previous<br />
year;<br />
- Long-term interest rates must not exceed by<br />
more than 2% the lowest inflation rates <strong>of</strong> EU<br />
countries over the previous year;<br />
- The Member State is required to join the<br />
exchange-rate mechanism (ERM II) for two<br />
consecutive years before entering the Euro<br />
269<br />
zone and it should not have devalued its<br />
currency during the period;<br />
- A government budget deficit must not<br />
exceed 3% <strong>of</strong> each country’s GDP at the end<br />
<strong>of</strong> the preceding fiscal year;<br />
- A gross debt to GDP ratio must not exceed<br />
60% at the end <strong>of</strong> the preceding fiscal year.<br />
On the other hand, the Stability and Growth<br />
Pact (1997) provided:<br />
- mechanisms for multilateral surveillance<br />
and enforcement;<br />
- stated that budgetary positions should<br />
normally be “close to balance or in surplus”;<br />
- if requirements are broken, EU can apply a<br />
fine <strong>of</strong> 0.5 % <strong>of</strong> the GDP to its members.<br />
To comply with the provisions <strong>of</strong> the two<br />
treaties, EU members had to impose a strict<br />
budget discipline, because the budget<br />
positions <strong>of</strong> some countries pose a risk for the<br />
sustainability <strong>of</strong> the public finances <strong>of</strong> these<br />
countries and <strong>of</strong> the European Monetary<br />
Union (EMU) as a whole. Moreover, the<br />
national fiscal policies <strong>of</strong> EU members were<br />
strictly subordinated to the inflation target <strong>of</strong><br />
the European Central Bank. Also, the national<br />
governments were obliged to meet rigid<br />
parameters and could not use fiscal policies<br />
freely to increase growth and employment.<br />
Nevertheless, since the financial meltdown<br />
has begun, 20 EU countries (among which all<br />
16 <strong>of</strong> the EMU’s members) have been guilty<br />
<strong>of</strong> excessive spending. During all this period,<br />
European governments were and still are<br />
struggling to rein in deficits after the worst<br />
downturn since World War II. The table<br />
below presents some data concerning the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> deficits:
As it can be seen, twenty member countries<br />
are facing EU deadlines to get their budgets<br />
back in shape. They are all deemed crucial to<br />
economic stability and growth as the EU<br />
claws back from recession. A review <strong>of</strong> the<br />
situation in Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and<br />
Malta shows all four countries have taken<br />
adequate steps to narrow their deficits. There<br />
are requests that Malta and Lithuania are<br />
granted another 1 and 2 years to get back in<br />
shape.<br />
Most analysts stated that in 2010<br />
unemployment rate in the EU would reach the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> 10.25% and the public deficit would<br />
be 7.5% <strong>of</strong> EU GDP. In 2009 budget<br />
shortfalls <strong>of</strong> two or three times the EU limit<br />
would have been unthinkable in most<br />
countries. Because many countries have<br />
exceeding deficits, the EU Commission<br />
proposed deadlines to reduce gaps. Here are<br />
some examples:<br />
- Hungary met its 2009 deficit target <strong>of</strong> 3.9%<br />
<strong>of</strong> GDP. It has until 2011 to bring its deficit<br />
below 3%.<br />
Table no. 1 Budgetary Deficit/GDP<br />
COUNTRY 2007 2008 2009<br />
Ireland 0.1 -7.3 -14.3<br />
Greece -5.1 -7.7 -13.6<br />
United Kingdom -2.8 -4.9 -11.5<br />
Spain 1.9 -4.1 -11.2<br />
Portugal -2.6 -2.8 -9.4<br />
Iceland 5.4 -13.5 -9.1<br />
Latvia -0.3 -4.1 -9<br />
Lithuania -1 -3.3 -8.9<br />
Romania -2.5 -5.4 -8.3<br />
France -2.7 -3.3 -7.5<br />
Netherlands 0.2 0.7 -5.3<br />
Hungary -5 -3.8 -4<br />
Bulgaria 0.1 1.8 -3.9<br />
Malta -2.2 -4.5 -3.8<br />
Source: Eurostat data<br />
270<br />
- Latvia ended 2009 with a deficit projected<br />
at just below 10% <strong>of</strong> GDP, as recommended<br />
by the EU. The target for 2010 was 8.5%.<br />
- 13 countries were given 2-5 years to<br />
reinstate fiscal discipline: Italy, Belgium<br />
(until 2012); Germany, France, Spain,<br />
Austria, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic,<br />
Slovakia, Slovenia, Portugal (until 2013);<br />
Ireland (until 2014); UK (until 2014-2015).<br />
The significant indicator for any country is<br />
Gross Debt to GDP Ratio, which has<br />
deteriorated strongly due to recession,<br />
stimulus, capital injection in banks, and<br />
reached dangerous levels in 2010 for the<br />
balance <strong>of</strong> European economies, as it follows:<br />
Greece 115%; Italy 116%; Belgium 97.2%;<br />
UK 78.7%; Portugal 77.4%, France 76.1%;<br />
Germany 72.1%; Austria 69.1%; Ireland<br />
64%, Finland 41.3%. Many analysts think<br />
that the problem in today’s Europe is due to a<br />
natural evolution <strong>of</strong> things and that the<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> the financial crisis follows this<br />
pattern: over indebtedness was shifted from<br />
home buyers on to banks, then transferred to<br />
governments (e.g. the recent sovereign debt
crisis in Greece is only a natural development<br />
<strong>of</strong> things).<br />
To prevent amplification <strong>of</strong> budgetary<br />
problems and their propagation in the EU, the<br />
27 EU states have to reduce public deficit and<br />
have received guidelines from the EU to<br />
achieve this goal within 2011-2014.<br />
5. The situation <strong>of</strong> Greece, “Achilles Heel<br />
<strong>of</strong> the EU”<br />
Greece has accumulated high levels <strong>of</strong> debt<br />
during the decade before the crisis, when<br />
capital markets were highly liquid. As the<br />
crisis has unfolded, and capital markets have<br />
become more illiquid, Greece may no longer<br />
be able to roll over its maturing debt<br />
obligations. Some analysts have discussed the<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> a Greek default. Greece has<br />
relied heavily on external financing for<br />
funding the budget. Between 2001, when it<br />
adopted the euro as its currency, and 2008,<br />
Greece’s reported budget deficits averaged<br />
5% per year, compared to a Euro-zone<br />
average <strong>of</strong> 2%. Its current account deficits<br />
averaged 9% per year, compared to a Eurozone<br />
average <strong>of</strong> 1%.<br />
The causes <strong>of</strong> financial crisis in Greece can<br />
be grouped into two categories, namely:<br />
- Domestic causes: high government spending<br />
<strong>of</strong> successive Greek governments; weak<br />
revenue collection; structural rigidities in<br />
Greece’s economy.<br />
- International causes: access to capital at<br />
low interest rates after adopting the Euro;<br />
weak enforcement <strong>of</strong> EU rules concerning<br />
debt and deficit ceilings facilitated Greece’s<br />
ability to accumulate high levels <strong>of</strong> external<br />
debt.<br />
To prevent the entry <strong>of</strong> Greece into collapse,<br />
Euro-zone countries and the International<br />
Monetary Fund, seeking to halt a widening<br />
European debt crisis that has threatened the<br />
stability <strong>of</strong> the Euro, agreed to extend Greece<br />
an unprecedented €110 billion ($147 billion)<br />
rescue in return for Draconian budget cuts.<br />
Germany, whose population has been deeply<br />
sceptical <strong>of</strong> a bailout, beared the largest share<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Euro-zone contribution, namely €22.3<br />
271<br />
billion <strong>of</strong> the total amount. The Euro-zone<br />
loans carry an interest rate <strong>of</strong> about 5%,<br />
compared to about 3% for the IMF<br />
contribution. Some €10 billion will be set<br />
aside as “bank stabilization” fund for use if<br />
the condition <strong>of</strong> Greek financial institutions<br />
worsens.<br />
The Greek government has promised to slash<br />
and then freeze public sector wages, raise sin<br />
taxes, increase value-added taxes, impose a<br />
new levy on businesses, cut pension<br />
payments and increase retirement ages for<br />
some public-sector workers. The steps are<br />
expected to save the state €30 billion through<br />
2013. Thus, the Greek government has<br />
adopted the following measures:<br />
- Public sector limit <strong>of</strong> €1,000 introduced to<br />
bi-annual bonus, abolished entirely for those<br />
earning over €3,000 a month;<br />
- An 8% cut on public sector allowances and<br />
a 3% pay cut for DEKO (public sector<br />
utilities) employees;<br />
- Limit <strong>of</strong> €800 per month to 13 th and 14 th<br />
monthly pension instalments; abolished for<br />
pensioners receiving over €2,500 a month;<br />
- Return <strong>of</strong> a special tax on high pensions;<br />
- Changes concerning laws governing lay-<strong>of</strong>fs<br />
and overtime payment;<br />
- Extraordinary taxes imposed on company<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>its;<br />
- Increases in VAT to 23%, 11% and 5.5%.<br />
- 10% rise in luxury taxes and taxes on<br />
alcohol, cigarettes, and fuel;<br />
- Equalization <strong>of</strong> men and women pension<br />
age limits;<br />
- General pension age has not been changed,<br />
but a mechanism has been introduced to scale<br />
them to life expectancy changes;<br />
- Average retirement age for public sector<br />
workers has increased from 61 to 65;<br />
- Public-owned companies to be reduced<br />
from 6,000 to 2,000.<br />
Only the nearest future will show whether<br />
these harsh methods have generated the<br />
appropriate results.<br />
6. Broader implications <strong>of</strong> Greece crisis:<br />
Spillover Effect
During the last two years, there were several<br />
concerns that Greece’s crisis could spill over<br />
to other European countries in difficult<br />
economic positions, including Portugal,<br />
Ireland, Italy, and Spain. European authorities<br />
warned that debt programs in Greece and<br />
other high deficit countries such as Spain,<br />
Portugal, Ireland and even Italy may affect<br />
stronger European countries. Greece’s foreign<br />
policy focus on the region and growing trade<br />
volumes between neighbour countries like<br />
Serbia, Albania, Macedonia, Romania,<br />
Bulgaria and Turkey could not remain<br />
indifferent to the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the crisis next<br />
door.<br />
All their concerns were entirely justifiable.<br />
PIIGS ZONE, that is Portugal, Ireland, Italy,<br />
Greece, Spain, borrowed heavily during the<br />
credit bubble. Some argued that the spillover<br />
effect could appear in Europe just as it<br />
appeared in Asia, where investors’ herding<br />
behaviour contributed to the spillover <strong>of</strong><br />
Asian financial crisis (1997-1998). Others<br />
argued the spillover hypothesis was unlikely<br />
to happen: the low levels <strong>of</strong> national savings<br />
in Greece and Portugal put these countries in<br />
the weakest financial position, at 7.2% <strong>of</strong><br />
GDP and 10.2% <strong>of</strong> GDP respectively,<br />
compared to an EU average <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />
20%. Spain and Ireland, by contrast, were<br />
closer to the EU average at 19% <strong>of</strong> GDP and<br />
17% <strong>of</strong> GDP, respectively, putting them in a<br />
stronger financial position.<br />
Two macroeconomic indicators were<br />
significant for the evolution <strong>of</strong> these<br />
countries, namely: government expenditure as<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> GDP and government consolidated<br />
gross debt as percent <strong>of</strong> GDP. The figures for<br />
each country were as following: Portugal:<br />
spending 51%; debt 77%; Ireland: spending<br />
48%; debt 64%; Italy: spending 52%; debt<br />
116%; Greece: spending 50%; debt 116%;<br />
Spain: spending 46%; debt 53%.<br />
7. Conclusions<br />
272<br />
All in all, when referring to the implications<br />
<strong>of</strong> the world financial crisis on the European<br />
public deficit, it can be stated that the bubble<br />
disease has spread to the whole financial<br />
system, making governments to bail banks<br />
and acquire liabilities. Although liabilities are<br />
necessary, borrowing more to satisfy previous<br />
debt obligation will only delay the problem,<br />
not solve it. Nowadays, it’s too early to<br />
measure the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the bailout plan<br />
for the Euro-zone. In our view, time is the<br />
best solution to the debt problem. Giving it 5-<br />
8 years, reducing spending and increasing<br />
saving to pay down the debts is the most<br />
pragmatic way <strong>of</strong> solving it.<br />
8. References<br />
Single-author books:<br />
1.Lamfalussy, Alexandre. Financial Crises in<br />
Emerging Economies. New Haven: Yale<br />
University Press, 2000.<br />
Articles in journals:<br />
2.Buti, Marco, Larch, Martin. The<br />
Commission propsals for stronger EU<br />
economic governance. VoxEU, 14 th <strong>of</strong><br />
October (2010).<br />
3.Dabrowski, Marek. Macroeconomic<br />
surveillance within the EU. CASE network Ebriefs,<br />
No. 13(2010).<br />
4.EFC. Lessons from the financial crisis for<br />
European financial stability arrangements,<br />
EFC High-Level Working Group on Cross-<br />
Border Financial Stability Arrangements. 18 th<br />
June(2009).<br />
5.European Council. Strengthening Economic<br />
Governance in the EU, Report <strong>of</strong> the Task<br />
Force to the European Council. Brussels, 21 st<br />
<strong>of</strong> October(2010).<br />
6.Monti, Mario. A new strategy for the single<br />
market. Report to the President <strong>of</strong> the<br />
European Commission. 9 th <strong>of</strong> May(2010).<br />
7.Wolf, Martin. The Challenges <strong>of</strong> Managing<br />
our Post-crisis World. Financial Times, 30 th<br />
<strong>of</strong> December(2009).
Subsection: Accounting
INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE IN THE ANNUAL<br />
REPORTS OF ROMANIAN MANUFACTURING LISTED COMPANIES –<br />
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK<br />
Bogdan Victoria<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />
Balint Platon Judit<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />
Farcaş Mariana<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />
Abstract: One <strong>of</strong> the most researched topic regarding financial reporting and disclosure <strong>of</strong> today is<br />
the way intellectual capital or knowledge assets contributes to the improving <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
information disclosed and create or add value to business performance. Also, it is acknowledged<br />
that a company has access to a variety <strong>of</strong> tools for disclosing information on intellectual capital. In<br />
our study we have decided to investigate the concept, the measurement models and the intellectual<br />
capital disclosure practices using as the source <strong>of</strong> our documentation books, articles, working<br />
papers and online publications. So, in the first part <strong>of</strong> our research we have presented several<br />
points <strong>of</strong> view in respect to the concept <strong>of</strong> knowledge assets or intellectual capital and in the second<br />
part we have reviewed the literature on the topic highlightening several scholars opinion on<br />
reporting and disclosure issues.<br />
Keywords: knowledge, intellectual capital, reporting practices, disclosure, annual reports<br />
JEL codes: M41, M10, G14, D83<br />
1. Introduction<br />
In knowledge based economy value is the<br />
result <strong>of</strong> knowledge and information.<br />
Moreover, business organizations can not<br />
generate pr<strong>of</strong>its without ideas, skills talent<br />
and intelligence <strong>of</strong> humans. As Depres and<br />
Chauvel (2000) observed beside it’s<br />
concentration on intangibles, knowledge<br />
economy is characterized by networked,<br />
digital, virtual and extremely fast moving<br />
businesses, better performing, the primary<br />
factor <strong>of</strong> production is knowledge. The three<br />
pillars <strong>of</strong> knowledge economy according to<br />
Stewart (2001) are:<br />
- knowledge as the most important factor <strong>of</strong><br />
production; creating value through<br />
knowledge economy is the process <strong>of</strong><br />
creating value from information;<br />
- knowledge assets; intellectual capital has<br />
become the most important knowledge assets<br />
embedded in talent, skills, know-how, know-<br />
275<br />
what, relationships and other human values<br />
that can be used to create value;<br />
- adaption to knowledge economy in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
adopting new business language, new<br />
management techniques, new corporate<br />
governance practices, new technologies and<br />
strategies and why not, new accounting.<br />
Studying the literature written on the topic we<br />
have found as Tseng and Goo (2005)<br />
underlined that there is a common lack <strong>of</strong> a<br />
clear definition that would appropriately<br />
describe the concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital.<br />
Also, regarding intellectual capital<br />
components we have found in the studied<br />
literature that intellectual capital is not<br />
detached. As Maditinos, Sevic and Tsaidiris<br />
(2009) pointed out several scholars grouped<br />
intellectual capital in four categories: human<br />
capital; structural capital; customer capital<br />
and innovation capital (Edvinsson and<br />
Malone, 1997; Ross et al., 1997; Stewart,
1997, Sveiby, 1997; Chen et al., 2004, Tseng<br />
and Goo, 2005).<br />
Our paper is organized as follows. The next<br />
section objective is to underline the<br />
differences between classical assets and<br />
knowledge based assets focusing on<br />
definition and recognition <strong>of</strong> intellectual<br />
capital. The literature review section is<br />
concentrated on intellectual capital<br />
measurement models and also reporting<br />
issues. In the last section we have drawn the<br />
conclusions and the limits <strong>of</strong> our study.<br />
2. From classical assets to knowledge based<br />
assets<br />
Companies, regardless <strong>of</strong> their size, in order<br />
to undertake their activity and create value,<br />
own both tangible and intangible assets.<br />
Buildings, work equipments and instalations,<br />
computers are, <strong>of</strong> course, tangible assets, and<br />
the ways in which these generate value for a<br />
company and affect performance have been<br />
the subject <strong>of</strong> theoretical and practical<br />
speculations in economic literature in past<br />
centuries. On the other hand, the considerable<br />
growth in the diversity <strong>of</strong> intangible assets<br />
has reoriented, in the last few decades, the<br />
focus <strong>of</strong> researchers from tangible to<br />
knowledge based assets. But, what are<br />
knowledge based assets? In contrast with<br />
tangible asssets, these are more dificult to<br />
identify, to clasify, to asses and highlight in<br />
the structures <strong>of</strong> financial situations. Yet, in a<br />
knowledge based economy, it is imperatively<br />
important to understand which activity<br />
generates real added value and to adapt<br />
contemporary financial reporting to this<br />
economic reality. Knowledge based assets or<br />
intangible assets have existed for a very long<br />
time. As Cohen (2008) so vividly remarked,<br />
the first caveman to light a fire knew that he<br />
held valuable information. This ability <strong>of</strong> his<br />
represented an intangible asset. Expanding on<br />
this reasoning, Cohen underscored the fact<br />
that the people who invented the alphabet or<br />
the ones who created the calendar or the<br />
numeral system were early inventors <strong>of</strong><br />
extremely important intangible assets. It’s a<br />
276<br />
pity they did not know how to patent their<br />
inventions or protect their works through<br />
copyright (Cohen, 2008:25). It is vital to keep<br />
in mind that the terms <strong>of</strong> knowledge,<br />
intangibles and intellectual capital are usually<br />
used interchangeably. As Mansour et al.<br />
(2008) emphasize the terms <strong>of</strong> intangibles in<br />
accounting literature, knowledge assets by<br />
economist and intellectual capital in the<br />
management and legal literature are refer<br />
essentially to the same thing: a nonphysical<br />
claim to future benefits. Unlike the physical<br />
or classical assets, the knowledge assets are<br />
characterized by increasing return on scale.<br />
Return is the outcome <strong>of</strong> value generated by<br />
innovation (discovery), unique organizational<br />
designs or human resources practice<br />
(Mansour et al., 2008).<br />
An interesting point <strong>of</strong> view is <strong>of</strong> Bontis<br />
(1998). He emphasized that intellectual<br />
capital has been considered by many, defined<br />
by some, understood by a select few and<br />
formally valued by practically no one. Most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the literature written on intellectual capital,<br />
according to Bontis (1998) makes a set <strong>of</strong><br />
claims that are related to the value and<br />
intangible nature <strong>of</strong> this resource. As Bontis<br />
(1998) noticed the concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual<br />
capital was first introduced by Kenneth<br />
Galbraith in 1969, who believed that<br />
intellectual capital was more than pure<br />
intellect but included “intellectual action”. It<br />
is the move from “having” knowledge and<br />
skills to “using” the knowledge and skills that<br />
is captured in a numerous way in the<br />
literature. The management literature shows<br />
two main streams that discuss knowledge<br />
assets, in opinion <strong>of</strong> Marr et al. (2004). One<br />
<strong>of</strong> them, taking an epistemological approach,<br />
interprets knowledge as an entity and<br />
discusses the differences between information<br />
and knowledge and the implications for<br />
knowledge management, whereas the other<br />
stream <strong>of</strong> literature discusses knowledge as<br />
an organizational asset that has to be<br />
managed in order to improve organizational<br />
performance. The later stream <strong>of</strong> research<br />
seeks to help managers in managing and
evaluating the company performance (Teece,<br />
2000; Roos et al, 1997; Stewart, 1997). In<br />
Marr et al. vision a major contribution<br />
provided by this research stream is the<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital, which help<br />
managers to identify and classify the<br />
knowledge components <strong>of</strong> an organization.<br />
The authors also considered that intellectual<br />
capital contributed to a better understanding<br />
<strong>of</strong> knowledge assets and was a first step<br />
towards a less abstract and more operative<br />
conceptualizing <strong>of</strong> knowledge.<br />
As Abeysekera (2007) noticed several authors<br />
have taken a long-term view in defining and<br />
analyzing the nature <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital,<br />
though their definitions have varied<br />
significantly (Edvinsson and Sullivan, 1996;<br />
Brooking, 1997; Edvinsson, 1997; Edvinsson<br />
and Malone, 1998; Klein, 1998; Knight,<br />
1999). Because in our paper we are analysing<br />
mainly intellectual capital reporting and<br />
disclosure, we are interested in the definition<br />
<strong>of</strong> Edvinsson and Sullivan (1996). In their<br />
opinion intellectual capital can be defined as<br />
knowledge that can be converted into value.<br />
Buck et al. (2001) consider that the<br />
expression “intellectual capital statement”<br />
refers to “capital”, emphasizing the<br />
accounting value. While some authors use the<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital while referring<br />
to the knowledge <strong>of</strong> a social community, such<br />
as an organization or pr<strong>of</strong>essional practice<br />
groups (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998), other<br />
scholars interpret intellectual capital as a<br />
human resource (Boudreau and Ramstad,<br />
1997; Liebowitz and Wright, 1999) or<br />
associate it with information technology<br />
(Davenport and Prusak, 1998). Abeysekera<br />
and Guthrie (2002) consider there is<br />
considerable ambiguity as to what constitutes<br />
intellectual assets, some scholars including all<br />
intangibles (Ross et al., 1997; Knight, 1999)<br />
but others do not recognize intangibles in the<br />
financial statements (Caddy, 2000; Edvinsson<br />
and Sullivan, 1996). Abeysekera and Guthrie<br />
(2002) also point out the fact that most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
definitions <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital are based on<br />
recognizing knowledge or intellectual assets<br />
277<br />
only. They have ignored the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />
existence <strong>of</strong> intellectual liabilities in the<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital (Harvey and<br />
Lusch, 1999; Caddy 2000) and external<br />
intellectual liabilities (Dzinkowski, 2000).<br />
But Abeysekera (2001) suggests that if<br />
knowledge is well managed then value is<br />
added via intellectual capital and if it is badly<br />
managed, this may lead to intellectual<br />
liabilities. According to Tseng and Goo<br />
(2005) there is a common lack <strong>of</strong> a clear<br />
definition that would appropriately describe<br />
the concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital. However,<br />
they seem to adopt Stewart’s (1997)<br />
definition, also widely, recognized, that<br />
intellectual capital has been formalized,<br />
captured and enforced so as to generate an<br />
advanced value to the organization.<br />
Regarding intellectual capital components we<br />
have found in the studied literature that<br />
intellectual capital is not detached. As<br />
Maditinos, Sevic and Tsaidiris (2009) pointed<br />
out several scholars grouped intellectual<br />
capital in four categories: human capital;<br />
structural capital; customer capital and<br />
innovation capital (Edvinsson and Malone,<br />
1997; Ross et al., 1997; Stewart, 1997,<br />
Sveiby, 1997; Chen et al., 2004, Tseng and<br />
Goo, 2005).<br />
3. Literature review on intellectual capital<br />
measurement models<br />
As reflected in the various studies conducted<br />
by different scholars found in the literature,<br />
measuring intellectual capital is not a science<br />
as “exact” as mathemathics or accounting.<br />
According to CEN (2004) (1), there are many<br />
interdependencies with other activities and<br />
quite <strong>of</strong>ten the context in which value is<br />
created is not the same as the one in which<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the knowledge efforts take place.<br />
And as noted by Iske and Boekh<strong>of</strong>f (2001)<br />
value is not an “intrinsic” property <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge: the value <strong>of</strong> knowledge fully<br />
depends on how knowledge is being used.<br />
Some knowledge can have a lot <strong>of</strong> value in<br />
one situation but be worthless in another. As
we can see in the figure bellow, value can be added in five dimensions:<br />
Fig 1.<br />
Source: CEN (2004), European Guide to good Practice in Knowledge<br />
Management – Part 4: Guidelines for Measuring Knowledge Management, pg. 7<br />
Many approaches to the measurement <strong>of</strong><br />
intellectual capital can be identified in the<br />
literature. In Sveiby’s (2) view<br />
the measuring approaches for intangibles fall<br />
into at least four categories <strong>of</strong> measurement<br />
approaches.<br />
Direct Intellectual Capital methods (DIC)<br />
estimates the value <strong>of</strong> intangible assets by<br />
identifying its various components. Once<br />
these components are identified, they can be<br />
directly evaluated, either individually or as an<br />
aggregated coefficient. Market<br />
Capitalization Methods (MCM) calculates<br />
the difference between a company's market<br />
capitalization and its stockholders' equity as<br />
the value <strong>of</strong> its intellectual capital or<br />
intangible assets. Return on Assets methods<br />
(ROA) - average pre-tax earnings <strong>of</strong> a<br />
company for a period <strong>of</strong> time are divided by<br />
the average tangible assets <strong>of</strong> the company.<br />
The result is a company ROA that is then<br />
compared with its industry average. The<br />
278<br />
difference is multiplied by the company's<br />
average tangible assets to calculate the<br />
average annual earnings from the intangibles.<br />
Dividing the above-average earnings by the<br />
company's average cost <strong>of</strong> capital or an<br />
interest rate, one can derive an estimate <strong>of</strong> the<br />
value <strong>of</strong> its intangible assets or intellectual<br />
capital. Scorecard Methods (SC) - the<br />
various components <strong>of</strong> intangible assets or<br />
intellectual capital are identified and<br />
indicators and indices are generated and<br />
reported in scorecards or as graphs. SC<br />
methods are similar to DIC methods, expect<br />
that no estimate is made <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
intangible assets. A composite index may or<br />
may not be produced. The figure bellow<br />
highlights the four above mentioned well<br />
known measurement approaches and shows<br />
that one may consider various facets, such as<br />
financial valuation, or high levels <strong>of</strong><br />
evaluation that measure the effect <strong>of</strong> a<br />
knowledge management implementation in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> macroelements or at a lower level, that is at the organizational component level.
Fig. 2<br />
Sourse: Karl-Erik Sveiby , Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets, 2001, updated 27.04.2010<br />
As we have found in the studied literature<br />
Skandia is considered the first large<br />
company to have made a truly coherent effort<br />
at measuring knowledge assets (Bontis 1996;<br />
Huseman & Goodman, 1999). In 1985<br />
Skandia developed the first internally<br />
intellectual capital report and became the first<br />
company to issue an intellectual capital<br />
addendum accompanying its traditional<br />
financial report to shareholders in 1994. Leif<br />
Edvinsson, the chief architect behind<br />
Skandia’s initiatives, developed a dynamic<br />
and holistic intellectual capital reporting<br />
model called the Navigator with five areas <strong>of</strong><br />
focus: financial, customer, process, renewal<br />
and development and human capital (Bontis,<br />
2001). According to Edvinsson and Malone<br />
(1997) the new accounting taxonomy sought<br />
to identify the roots odf a company’s value by<br />
measuring hidden dynamic factors that<br />
underlie the visible company <strong>of</strong> buildings and<br />
products. As Bontis (2001) noticed Skandia’s<br />
value scheme contains both financial and<br />
non-financial building blocks that combine to<br />
estimate the company’s market value. This<br />
conceptualization achieved a balance for<br />
Skandia in trying to represent both financial<br />
and non-financial reporting, uncovering and<br />
279<br />
visualizing its intellectual capital, tying its<br />
strategic vision to the company’s core<br />
competencies reflecting knowledge sharing<br />
technology and knowledge assets beyond<br />
intellectual property and reflecting its market<br />
value better.<br />
The Intangible Assets Monitor (Sveiby,<br />
1997) is a method for measuring intellectual<br />
capital and a presentation format that displays<br />
a number <strong>of</strong> relevant indicators for measuring<br />
intellectual capital un a simple fashion. The<br />
choice <strong>of</strong> indicators depends on the<br />
organizational strategy. On the surface, the<br />
Intangible Assets Monitor looks similar to the<br />
Kaplan Norton Balanced Score Card,<br />
however there are significant differences. The<br />
Intangible Assets Monitor can be integrated<br />
into management information systems and it<br />
should be accompanied by a number <strong>of</strong><br />
comments. Only a few <strong>of</strong> the suggested<br />
indicators should be selected and designed<br />
the main purpose to achieve is to get a broad<br />
picture. So, essentially management selects<br />
indicators, based on the strategic objectives <strong>of</strong><br />
the firm, to measure four aspects <strong>of</strong> creating<br />
value from three classes <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital<br />
labeled: people’s competence, internal<br />
structure, external structure and value
creation ways are: growth, renewal,<br />
utilization/efficiency and risk<br />
reduction/stability.<br />
Intellectual Capital-<strong>Index</strong> is an example <strong>of</strong><br />
“second generation” practices that attempt to<br />
consolidate all the different individual<br />
indicators into a single index, and to correlate<br />
the changes in intellectual capital with<br />
changes in the market (Roos et al., 1997). The<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> an IC-<strong>Index</strong> was first advanced by<br />
Goran Roos and his colleagues at Intellectual<br />
Capital Services Ltd., and was first used by<br />
Skandia in its IC supplement to the annual<br />
report. According to Roos et al. (1997) the<br />
IC-<strong>Index</strong> has several distinct features: it is an<br />
idiosyncratic measure; it focuses on the<br />
monitoring <strong>of</strong> the dynamics <strong>of</strong> IC; it is<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> taken into account performance<br />
from prior periods; it shed light on a company<br />
different from an external view typically<br />
based on an examination <strong>of</strong> physical assets; it<br />
is a self-correcting index meaning that if<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> the IC-index does not reflect<br />
changes <strong>of</strong> the market value <strong>of</strong> the company,<br />
then the choice <strong>of</strong> capital forms, weights<br />
and/or indicators is flawed. Like most other<br />
measures <strong>of</strong> tangible assets, an IC-index does<br />
depend on value judgements, in the choice <strong>of</strong><br />
weights, indicators and even the assumption<br />
that intellectual capital is present and<br />
important in company operations. Also, Roos<br />
et al. (1997) argue that intellectual capital<br />
measurement and especially a consolidated<br />
measure such as the IC-index makes a larger<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the organization visible and open to<br />
valuation.<br />
According to Bontis et al. (1999), Economic<br />
Value Added (EVA) was introduce by Stern<br />
Stewart as a comprehensive performance<br />
measure that uses the variables <strong>of</strong> capital<br />
budgeting, financial planning, goal setting,<br />
performance measurement, shareholder<br />
communication and incentive compensation<br />
to account properly for all ways in which<br />
corporate value can be added or lost. While<br />
several scholars consider that economic value<br />
added is the net result <strong>of</strong> all managerial<br />
activities, Bontis et al (1999) described EVA<br />
280<br />
as providing a common language and<br />
benchmark for managers to discuss value<br />
creation and also can increase the legitimacy<br />
<strong>of</strong> a company in the eyes <strong>of</strong> financial markets.<br />
EVA is intended to <strong>of</strong>fer improvements to<br />
market value added calculation. Similar to<br />
EVA, MVA method derives from the Alfred<br />
Marshall concept <strong>of</strong> „economic pr<strong>of</strong>it”. MVA<br />
is the difference between actual market value<br />
<strong>of</strong> the company (invested capital) and the<br />
present value <strong>of</strong> invested capital. In other<br />
words MVA is the difference between cash<br />
out or what investors could get by selling at<br />
the present conditions <strong>of</strong> firm and market and<br />
cah in or what investors contributed over the<br />
years from the beginning <strong>of</strong> the firm.<br />
Tobin’s Q ratio named Q ratio or q, is the<br />
market value <strong>of</strong> invested capital relative to<br />
assets replacement cost (Tobin, 1969). The Q<br />
is the ratio <strong>of</strong> the stock market value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
firm divided by the replacement cost <strong>of</strong> its<br />
assets and changes in Q provide a proxy for<br />
measuring effective performance or not <strong>of</strong> a<br />
firm’s intellectual capital. Tobin developed<br />
the Q ratio as a measure to help predict<br />
investment decision independent on<br />
macroeconomic factors such as interest rate.<br />
In Stewart’s (1997) opinion Tobin’s Q ratio<br />
was not developed as a measure <strong>of</strong><br />
intellectual capital, but former Federal<br />
Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan has noted<br />
that high Q and market to book ratios reflect<br />
the value <strong>of</strong> investments in technology and<br />
human capital. Norton and Kaplan’s Balance<br />
Score Card was created to help managers to<br />
transform organization’s strategy into a<br />
reliable set <strong>of</strong> performances that will provide<br />
framework for a strategic measurement and<br />
management system (Anghel, 2008). A<br />
company’s performance is measured by<br />
indicators covering four major focus<br />
perspectives: financial perspective, customer<br />
perspective, internal process perspective and<br />
learning perspective (Kaplan and Norton,<br />
1996). Balance Score Card indicators are<br />
based on the strategic objectives <strong>of</strong> the firm.<br />
This measurement model <strong>of</strong> intangible assets<br />
was developed considering the ability <strong>of</strong> a
company to exploit and develop its intangible<br />
assets. The Value Added Intellectual<br />
Coefficienttm (VAIC tm ) methodology,<br />
developed by Ante Pulic (1998), is an<br />
analytical procedure designed to enable<br />
management, shareholders and other relevant<br />
stakeholders to effectively monitor and<br />
evaluate the efficiency <strong>of</strong> VA by a firm’s<br />
total resources and each major resource<br />
component. Pulic (1998) states the higher the<br />
VAIC tm coefficient, the better the efficiency<br />
<strong>of</strong> VA by a firm’s total resources. Formally,<br />
VAIC tm is a composite sum <strong>of</strong> three<br />
indicators: (1) Value Added Capital<br />
Coefficient (VACA) – indicator <strong>of</strong> VA<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> capital employed; Value Added<br />
Human Capital (VAHU) – indicator <strong>of</strong> VA<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> human capital; and (3)<br />
Structural Capital Value Added (STVA) –<br />
indicator <strong>of</strong> VA efficiency <strong>of</strong> structural<br />
capital.<br />
Baruch Lev’s model (1999), knowledge<br />
capital earnings, reveals a way to measure<br />
assets, intellectual eranings and knowledge<br />
earnings. As Lev’s describe his model in an<br />
interview taken by Alan Webber in 1999 (3),<br />
„it’s a computation that starts with what I<br />
call normalized earnings – a measure that’s<br />
based on past and future earnings...My<br />
approach looks at the past. Based on those<br />
forecast, I create an average and I call that<br />
average normalized earnings. From those<br />
normalized earnings, I then substract an<br />
average return on physical and financial<br />
assets, based on the theory that these are<br />
substitutable assets...when I substract from<br />
the total normalised earnings a reasonable<br />
return on the physical and financial assets I<br />
define what remains as the konwledge<br />
earnings”. Further on in the same interview<br />
Baruch Lev mention that technological<br />
capabilities index is based on measures <strong>of</strong><br />
inputs, such as investment in R&D,<br />
investment in product development,<br />
investment in information systems; on<br />
measures <strong>of</strong> intermediate outputs, such as<br />
patens and trademarks; on measures <strong>of</strong><br />
competitive position such as the number <strong>of</strong><br />
281<br />
people who access a particular web site and<br />
on measures based on the ultimate output –<br />
commercialization.<br />
These where some <strong>of</strong> the models that over the<br />
past years were developed to measure<br />
intellectual capital or in general intangible or<br />
knowledge assets.<br />
4. Literature review on intellectual capital<br />
reporting practices<br />
Several scholars have concentrated their<br />
efforts toward understanding and analyzing<br />
intellectual capital reporting practices. For<br />
instance, Abeysekera and Guthrie (2006)<br />
identify the following categories <strong>of</strong><br />
intellectual capital reporting: ratios and<br />
values; reporting intellectual capital via<br />
intellectual capital statements; theoretical<br />
models. Concerning reporting intellectual<br />
capital as ratios and values Roos et al. (1997)<br />
states that intellectual capital is by definition<br />
intangibles and therefore the only possible<br />
way to measure them is by proxy variables or<br />
indicators. Authors like Abeysekera and<br />
Guthrie (2006) considered that there<br />
techniques could be classified into two<br />
broader sub-categories: the firm macro level<br />
for inter-firm comparisons; and <strong>of</strong> measuring<br />
and reporting within firm level (micro) for<br />
interdivisional comparisons. In regard to<br />
reporting intellectual capital through<br />
intellectual capital statements, empirical<br />
models have been proposed to measure<br />
intellectual capital items (Leibowitz &<br />
Wright, 1999; Decker & Hoog, 2000). Some<br />
models used activity based costing to<br />
determinate cost and market value to<br />
determine revenue. In Abeysekera’s vision<br />
(2001) another conceptual approach is to<br />
report intellectual capital in relation to the<br />
“fair value” <strong>of</strong> the firm and to recognize<br />
intellectual revenue or intellectual expense as<br />
the difference <strong>of</strong> fair value between two<br />
periods within the traditional accounting<br />
system. Also, Abeysekera and Guthrie (2006)<br />
identified five major frameworks <strong>of</strong><br />
intellectual capital reporting: structures<br />
holding intellectual assets, developed by
Sveiby (1997), focused on intellectual assets;<br />
capital holding intellectual items, that<br />
analysis intellectual capital in relation to<br />
intellectual assets (Edvinsson, 1997;<br />
Edvinsson and Malone, 1998; Roos et al.,<br />
1997); assets representing intellectual capital,<br />
that focused on intellectual assets and was in<br />
Brooking (1999) interest; strategic and<br />
measurement root focused on the role <strong>of</strong><br />
intellectual capital, that was in attention <strong>of</strong><br />
Roos et al. (1997) research and a combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> assets and capital representing intellectual<br />
capital, developed by IFAC in 1998 and<br />
Dzinkowski (2000).<br />
As Abeysekera (2001) noted annual reports<br />
are an ideal research location for applying the<br />
intellectual capital framework because they<br />
provide a good proxy with which to measure<br />
the comparative positions and trends <strong>of</strong><br />
intellectual capital between firms, industries<br />
and countries. Several papers and studies that<br />
we have found in the literature concerning<br />
intellectual capital issues has used annual<br />
reports as source documents to discover the<br />
status <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital <strong>of</strong> companies<br />
(Abeysekera and Guthrie, 2005; Brennan,<br />
2001; Guthrie and Petty, 2000; Vergauwen<br />
and van Alem, 2005). The value-creation<br />
capabilities <strong>of</strong> different organizations and<br />
entities are studied in the last decade by<br />
several authors like Edvinsson (2002), Bontis<br />
(2004), Tallman et al. (2004), Bonfour and<br />
Edvinsson (2005), Schiuma et al. (2005).<br />
Also, several theoretical contributions have<br />
underlined the strategic importance <strong>of</strong><br />
intangible resources for the value creation<br />
capabilities, some <strong>of</strong> them tried to build<br />
approaches and tools more oriented towards<br />
project and management processes or<br />
analyzed the relationship between knowledge<br />
resources, value creation capabilities and<br />
competitiveness (Bontis, 2004; Bonfour and<br />
Edvinsson, 2005; Pulic, 2005). Lev and<br />
Sougiannis (1996) valued and calculated<br />
intangibles and then correlated those values<br />
with financial measures while Edvinsson<br />
(1997) identified the so called “hidden<br />
values” <strong>of</strong> a company and developed an<br />
282<br />
intellectual capital management model. Also,<br />
various prior studies have suggested that the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital disclosure in<br />
annual reports is relatively low.<br />
5. Conclusions and limits <strong>of</strong> the research<br />
As it can be understood from the above<br />
presented issues concerning the intellectual<br />
capital concept, measurement models and<br />
reporting practices we did not found in the<br />
studied literature on the topic much<br />
homogeneity and uniform views. Also, our<br />
work was a difficult one taking into account<br />
the very rich and diverse literature. However,<br />
we consider that we have synthesized the<br />
main or important aspects regarding the<br />
definition, the measurement and reporting <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge assets. But, there are a few aspects<br />
that were not discussed and this is surely one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the limits <strong>of</strong> our study. Another limit refers<br />
to the fact that we have not pointed out<br />
separately the contributions <strong>of</strong> domestic<br />
authors interested in this subject.<br />
Note<br />
(1) European Committee for Standardization<br />
(Comite Europeen de normalization),<br />
European Guide to good Practice in<br />
Knowledge Management – Part 4: Guidelines<br />
for Measuring Knowledge Management<br />
(2)<br />
http://www.sveiby.com/articles/IntangibleMe<br />
thods.htm/updated 07 April 2010<br />
(3)<br />
http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/31/lev.html?<br />
page=0%2C3/download on 10.01.2011<br />
References<br />
Books<br />
1. Bounfour A., Edvinsson L.. Intellectual<br />
Capital for Communities. Elsevier.<br />
Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005<br />
2. Cohen J.A.. Imobilizarile necorporale -<br />
Evaluare si Beneficii Economice. Bucuresti:<br />
Editura Irecson, 2008<br />
3. Davenport T.H., Prusak L.. Working<br />
Knowledge: How Organizations Manage
What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business<br />
School Press, 1998<br />
4. Edvinsson L..Corporate Longitude.<br />
London: Perason Education, 2002<br />
5. Edvinsson L.. Malone M.S.. Intellectual<br />
Capital.London: Judy Piatkus Publishers,<br />
1998<br />
6. Klein D.A.. The Strategic management <strong>of</strong><br />
Intellectual Capital. Butterworth-Heinemann,<br />
Woburn, M.A., 1998<br />
7. Pulic A.. Value Creation Efficiency at<br />
National and Regional Levels: Case Study -<br />
Croatia and the European Union, Chapter 12<br />
in Bonfour A., Edvinsson L., (eds).<br />
Intellectual Capital for Community - Nations,<br />
Regions and Cities. Elsevier Butterworth-<br />
Heinemann, 2005<br />
8. Schiuma G., Lerro A.. Carlucci D. An<br />
Interfirm Perspective on Intellectual Capital.<br />
pp. 155-169 in Marr B.(eds). Perspectives in<br />
Intellectual Capital, Elsevier Butterworth-<br />
Heinemann, 2005<br />
9. Sveiby K.E..The new organisational<br />
wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge<br />
based assets. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler,<br />
1997<br />
10. Roos J., Roos G., Dragonetti N.C.,<br />
Edvinsson L., Intellectual Capital:<br />
Navigating the New Business Landscape.<br />
London: Macmillan Press, 1997<br />
11. Stewart T.A., Intellectual Capital: The<br />
New Wealth <strong>of</strong> Organizations. New York:<br />
Doubleday/Currency 1997<br />
12. Teece D.J.. Managing Intellectual<br />
Capital: Organizational, Strategic and Policy<br />
Dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University<br />
Press, 2000<br />
Publications<br />
1. Anghel I. (2008) “Analiza şi evaluarea<br />
capitalului intelectual şi a activelor<br />
necorporale”, Revista de economie Teoretică<br />
şi Aplicată, nr. 3, pp. 80-83<br />
2. Abeysekera I., (2001) ”Intellectual capital<br />
and knowledge management: two sides <strong>of</strong> the<br />
same coin” Economic Review, Colombo,<br />
April/June, Feature, vol. 27 no.01-03, pp. 31-<br />
33<br />
283<br />
3. Abeysekera I., Guthrie J., (2002) "An<br />
update review <strong>of</strong> literature on intellectual<br />
capital reporting"", available online at<br />
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstra<br />
ct_id=1362158/ downloaded on 10.11.2010<br />
4. Abeysekera I., Guthrie J., (2005) "Annual<br />
reporting trends <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital in Sri<br />
Lanka", Critical Perspectives on Accounting,<br />
vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 151-163<br />
5. Abeysekera I.K., (2007) "Intellectual<br />
capital reporting between a developing and<br />
developed nation"", Journal <strong>of</strong> Intellectual<br />
Capital, vol. 8 no.2, pp. 329-345<br />
6. Bontis N., (1998) "Intellectual capital: an<br />
an exploratory study that develops measures<br />
and models", Management Decision, vol. 36,<br />
no.2, pp. 63-76<br />
7. Bontis N., (2004) "National Intellectual<br />
Capital <strong>Index</strong>", Journal <strong>of</strong> Intellectual<br />
Capital, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13-39<br />
8. Boudreau J.W., Ramstad P.M., (1997)<br />
"Measuring intellectual capital: learning form<br />
financial history", Human Resource<br />
Management, vol. 36, no. 3, pp 343-356<br />
9. Brennan N., (2001) "Reporting intellectual<br />
capital in annual reports: evidence from<br />
Ireland", Accounting, Auditing &<br />
Accountability Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, pp.<br />
423-436<br />
10. Brooking A., (1997) "The management <strong>of</strong><br />
intellectual capital", Long Range Planning,<br />
vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 364-365<br />
11. Bukh P.N.D., Larsen H.H., Mouritsen J.,<br />
(2001) "Constructing intellectual capital<br />
statements", Scandinavian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 87-108<br />
12. Caddy I., (2000) "Intellectual capital:<br />
recognizing both assets and liabilities",<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Intellectual Capital, vol. 1 no. 2,<br />
pp. 1469-1930<br />
13. Chen J.Z., Xie H.Y, (2004) "Measuring<br />
intellectual capital: a new model and<br />
empirical study", Journal <strong>of</strong> Intellectual<br />
Capital, 5(1), pp. 195-212<br />
14. Dekker R., Hoog R., (2000) "The<br />
monetary value <strong>of</strong> knowledge assets: a micro<br />
approach", Expert Systems with Applications,<br />
18(2), february, pp. 111-124
15. Dzinkowski R., (2000) "The measurement<br />
and management <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital: an<br />
introduction", Management Accounting,<br />
78(2), february, pp. 32-36<br />
16. Edvinsson L., (1997) "Developing<br />
intellectual capital at Skandia", Long Range<br />
Planning, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 366-373<br />
17. Edvinsson L., Sullivan P., (1996)<br />
"Developing a model for managing<br />
intellectual capital", European Management<br />
Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 356-364<br />
18. Guthrie J., Petty R., (2000) "Intellectual<br />
capital: Australian annual reporting<br />
practices", Journal <strong>of</strong> Intellectual Capital,<br />
vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 241-251<br />
19. Harvey M.G., Lusch R. F., (1999)<br />
"Balancing the intellectual capital books:<br />
intangible liabilities", European Management<br />
Journal, 17(1), february, pp. 85-92<br />
20. Iske P., Boekh<strong>of</strong>f T., (2001) "The Value<br />
<strong>of</strong> Knowledge Doesn't Exist"", KM<br />
Magazine, vol. 5, issue 2<br />
21. Knight D.J., (1999) "Performance<br />
measures for increasing intellectual capital",<br />
Planning Review, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 22-27<br />
22. Lev B., Sougiannis T., ( 1996) "The<br />
capitalization, amortization and value<br />
relevance <strong>of</strong> R&D", Journal <strong>of</strong> Accounting<br />
and Economics, vol. 21, pp. 107 - 138<br />
23. Liebowitz J., Wright K., (1999) "Does<br />
measuring knowledge make cents?", Expert<br />
Systems with Aplications, vol. 17, no. 5, pp.<br />
99-103<br />
24. Maditinos D., Sevic Z., Tsairidis C.,<br />
(2009)"Intellectual Capital and Business<br />
Performance: An Empirical Study for the<br />
Greek Listed Companies", 7th International<br />
Conference on Accounting and Finance in<br />
Transition, 23-25 July 2009, Greenwich,<br />
London<br />
25. Mansour E., Mohammad A., Missi F.,<br />
(2008) "Validity <strong>of</strong> Accounting Models in the<br />
Knowledge Era"", European and<br />
Mediterranean Conference on Information<br />
Systems, 2008<br />
26. Marr B., Schiuma G., Neely A., (2004)<br />
"Intellectual capital - defining key<br />
284<br />
performance indicators for organizational<br />
knowledge assets", Business Process<br />
Management Journal, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 551-<br />
569<br />
27. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S., (1998) "Social<br />
capital, intellectual capital and the<br />
organizational advantage", Academy <strong>of</strong><br />
Management Review, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 242-<br />
266<br />
28. Petty R.M., Cuganesan S., Finch N., Ford<br />
G., (2009) "Intellectual Capital and<br />
Valuation: Challenges in the Voluntary<br />
Disclosure <strong>of</strong> Value Drivers", Academic and<br />
Business Research Institute , Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Finance and Accountancy, August 2009,<br />
pp.1-7 available online at<br />
http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09177.pdf<br />
downloaded on 15.01.2011<br />
29. Sveiby K.E., (2001–2010) "Methods for<br />
Measuring Intangible assets", available online<br />
at<br />
http://www.sveiby.com/articles/IntangibleMe<br />
thods.htm<br />
30. Tallman S., Jenkins M., Henry N., Pinch<br />
S., (2004) "Knowledge, clusters and<br />
competitive advantage", Academy <strong>of</strong><br />
Management Review, vol. 29 no. 2 pp.258-<br />
271<br />
31. Tseng C.Y., Goo Y.J.J., ()"Intellectual<br />
capital and corporate value in an emerging<br />
economy: empirical study <strong>of</strong> Taiwanese<br />
manufacturers", R&D Management, 35(2),<br />
pp. 187-201<br />
32. Vergauwen P.G.M.C., van Alem F.J.C.,<br />
(2005) "Annual report IC disclosures in The<br />
Netherlands, France and Germany", Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Intellectual Capital, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 89-<br />
104<br />
33. European Committee for Standardization,<br />
(2004) "European Guide to Good practice in<br />
Knowledge management - Part 4: Guidelines<br />
for Measuring KM", available online at<br />
ftp://cenftp1.cenorm.be/PUBLIC/CWAs/e-<br />
Europe/KM/CWA14924-04-2004-Mar.pdf<br />
downloaded on 28.10.2010
Morar Ioan – Dan<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />
PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES ON FISCAL<br />
Abstract: Fiscal science advertise in most analytical situations, while the principles reiterated by<br />
specialists in the field in various specialized works<br />
The two components <strong>of</strong> taxation, the tax system relating to the theoretical and the practical<br />
procedures relating to tax are marked by frequent references and invocations <strong>of</strong> the underlying<br />
principles to tax.<br />
This paper attempts a return on equity fiscal general vision as a principle <strong>of</strong>ten invoked and used to<br />
justify tax policies, but so <strong>of</strong>ten violated the laws fiscality .<br />
Also want to emphasize the importance <strong>of</strong> devising procedures to ensure fiscal equitable treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> taxpayers.<br />
Specific approach <strong>of</strong> this paper is based on the notion that tax equity is based on equality before tax<br />
and social policies <strong>of</strong> the executive that would be more effective than using the other tax<br />
instruments.<br />
I want to emphasize that if the scientific approach to justify the unequal treatment <strong>of</strong> the tax law is<br />
based on the various social problems <strong>of</strong> the taxpayers, then deviates from the issue <strong>of</strong> tax fairness<br />
justification explaining the need to promote social policies usually more attractive to taxpayers.<br />
Modern tax techniques are believed to be promoted especially in order to ensure an increasing level<br />
<strong>of</strong> high efficiency at the expense <strong>of</strong> the taxpayers obligations to ensure equality before the law tax.<br />
On the other hand, tax inequities reaction generates multiple recipients from the first budget plan,<br />
but finalities unfair measures can not quantify and no timeline for the reaction, usually not known.<br />
But while statistics show fluctuations in budgetary revenues and <strong>of</strong>ten find in literature reviews and<br />
analysis relevant to a connection between changes in government policies, budget execution and<br />
outcome.<br />
The effects <strong>of</strong> inequality on tax on tax procedures and budgetary revenues are difficult to quantify<br />
and is among others to this work.<br />
Providing tax equity without combining it with the principles <strong>of</strong> discrimination and neutrality in the<br />
tax to ensure an objective <strong>of</strong> fiscal policy.<br />
Keywords: fiscal science, the principles <strong>of</strong> taxation ,fiscal, tax, fiscal revenues, budget, crisis<br />
JEL Codes: H20<br />
Imposition <strong>of</strong> the theoretical principles <strong>of</strong><br />
science is tax procedures such as the practical<br />
form <strong>of</strong> taxation, the latter being comprised<br />
<strong>of</strong> specific operations taxation.<br />
The principles, generallly, there are rules,<br />
customs, descriptions or definitions accepted<br />
in time by repeating to their individualization<br />
as dedicated as such time.<br />
How the tax is an important part <strong>of</strong> social life,<br />
from ancient times it was a high regulatory<br />
component level in different periods in the<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> society.<br />
285<br />
Feeding practices are emerging as national<br />
budgets techniques quite late, we can say that<br />
the great empires like the Roman Empire,<br />
Byzantine Empire or state organizations<br />
during the later Middle Ages and especially<br />
in modern times have used techniques that<br />
have evolved time, so to speak in<br />
contemporary modern tax procedures and<br />
techniques.<br />
Although ways to attract financial resources<br />
from state treasures states or organizations<br />
have the same economic content, however,<br />
different forms from country to country while
also differed. But the great thinkers and<br />
especially classical political economy, Adam<br />
Smith precursor fails to define the rules<br />
governing the taxation process more objective<br />
to be achieved, namely in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
imposing peaks.<br />
Maximums were imposed along the<br />
remaining time and raised in the special cases<br />
in the literature so far is talk <strong>of</strong> three groups<br />
<strong>of</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> taxation, namely the<br />
principles <strong>of</strong> fiscal efficiency, fiscal equity<br />
principles and principles <strong>of</strong> economic policy<br />
and social.<br />
Principles <strong>of</strong> taxation yield based on the idea<br />
that taxes should be placed so that it brings<br />
maximum revenue with minimal state<br />
expenditure, in other words, is characterized<br />
by productivity. Productivity in turn is an<br />
indicator that expresses the efficiency, and in<br />
this case is also a feature <strong>of</strong> the tax cost.<br />
As an indication, in general, productivity<br />
expresses the ratio between results and effort,<br />
and if taxes this indicator is the ratio between<br />
tax revenues and state efforts to attract them,<br />
in fact, tax administration costs.<br />
These costs are quantified and the fiscal<br />
system can be determined, in fact, are the<br />
fiscal costs <strong>of</strong> maintenance. We know that if<br />
indirect taxes tax procedures involve a higher<br />
tax payers in the process starting with<br />
maintenance records purchases and sales,<br />
continuing with the calculation <strong>of</strong> taxes, their<br />
declaration and <strong>of</strong> course their pay.<br />
The participation <strong>of</strong> contributors to the tax<br />
administration requires an effort on their part<br />
and savings from the tax authority.<br />
It is interesting to determine the involvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> taxpayers in the administration <strong>of</strong> taxes<br />
and how constitutional law is the imposition<br />
<strong>of</strong> tax by taxpayers that they were required to<br />
maintain records on tax and other obligations,<br />
such as declarations on a particular type <strong>of</strong><br />
data carrier, or the obligation to submit and<br />
maintain certain records prior accounting and<br />
other information related to trim taxes<br />
otherwise.<br />
On the other hand in case <strong>of</strong> direct taxes is<br />
based on a fiscal apparatus restricted<br />
286<br />
participation <strong>of</strong> taxpayers, meaning that taxes<br />
on buildings, land, vehicles, tax on personal<br />
income from independent activities carried<br />
out by the retained the source <strong>of</strong> rents from<br />
agricultural activities and other with the end<br />
<strong>of</strong> regulation, the unit tax on the taxpayer<br />
prepares the tax statement, enforceable<br />
document, it will be followed to the<br />
collection <strong>of</strong> amounts assessed.<br />
If the pr<strong>of</strong>it tax, income microenterprises,<br />
dividends and others taxpayer tax return and<br />
calculate the actual tax. And if those indirect<br />
taxes and direct tax authority has the right<br />
and obligation to control activity for each tax<br />
separately .In this context we can say that<br />
indirect taxes are more pr<strong>of</strong>itable than direct<br />
taxes.<br />
Tax return is influenced by the level <strong>of</strong><br />
accuracy <strong>of</strong> tax law, if it allows or not or if<br />
you fraudulent tax evasion against the law<br />
even if it is located that you do not leave<br />
room for interpretation. If the tax is paid by<br />
all taxpayers who have taxable same table, it<br />
is characterized by universality, quality tax<br />
cost.<br />
So we know that in fact violated tax laws are<br />
fraudulent or are bypassed by the taxpayers,<br />
so that part <strong>of</strong> planned to collect tax revenues<br />
do not reach the collection. Level budget tax<br />
revenue is a function and device performance<br />
fiscal control, the device should be based on<br />
tax laws and procedures <strong>of</strong> tax control<br />
equivocal performance.<br />
The level <strong>of</strong> failures to receive is not equal to<br />
the degree <strong>of</strong> tax evasion primarily because<br />
we do not know if the planned revenues are<br />
well grounded and if he can not evolve as<br />
macroeconomic indicators once assumed the<br />
public budget planning.<br />
The most important problem <strong>of</strong> collecting the<br />
fraudulent evasion <strong>of</strong> taxes is an important<br />
topic as complicated as it is.<br />
In the literature <strong>of</strong>ten talks about avoiding the<br />
tax law on an escapist phenomenon without<br />
breaking the law, called the fraudulent<br />
evasion.<br />
In this context I put my problem reporting<br />
escapist content phenomenon, if we refer to
tax law, if we refer to planned tax revenues or<br />
the principle <strong>of</strong> universality <strong>of</strong> taxation. In the<br />
first case the tax law is not broken, so in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> jurisdictional comparison is<br />
pointless.<br />
Reporting on planned tax revenue does not<br />
generate an eloquent comparison to the<br />
process <strong>of</strong> planning can be faulty and so the<br />
comparison suffering . Remains third<br />
comparison, the principle <strong>of</strong> imposing, this<br />
principle can be violated, in which, however,<br />
does not violate law rule than universally<br />
accepted.<br />
I personally, not breaking the law does not<br />
accept such employment, considering honest<br />
trader and indicates those interested in just<br />
talking about tax evasion, fraud phenomenon<br />
par excellence. Rinciples violation <strong>of</strong><br />
universality, a principle is violated<br />
continually bcare fact, primarily affecting<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability and return on any taxation can be<br />
no question <strong>of</strong> tax fairness.<br />
A tax and cost is characterized by stability, a<br />
tax that must be seen as two spots <strong>of</strong> view,<br />
namely, the stability <strong>of</strong> the tax law and tax<br />
revenue stability. Stability <strong>of</strong> resistance<br />
translates into tax law tax law in time, which<br />
means that the law would be well located and<br />
comprises all the details required in the tax<br />
case.<br />
Cash inflows fiscal stability means that when<br />
tax rates change and change proceeds in the<br />
same way. It is said that excise taxes are<br />
stable so that when tax rates rise and increase<br />
revenues.<br />
If these taxes are apparently betting heavily<br />
on the psychological factor <strong>of</strong> about certain<br />
flaws in the case <strong>of</strong> alcohol and tobacco, the<br />
habit if auto fuel.<br />
Another quality <strong>of</strong> taxes, namely the<br />
imposition <strong>of</strong> convenience, in fact one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
maxims <strong>of</strong> taxation, taxation with fairness,<br />
certainty <strong>of</strong> imposition <strong>of</strong> taxation and<br />
economic qualities, put forward by Adam<br />
Shmith, can be considered a necessary feature<br />
cost taxes, and contributing to increasing the<br />
collection tax revenue.<br />
287<br />
Fairness is a principle <strong>of</strong> taxation <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
invoked in literature, but it seems the most<br />
difficult fiscal respected in practice. Fair<br />
treatment for all taxpayers from the tax<br />
authorities is a goal difficult to achieve in<br />
practice in tax and general appropriateness<br />
societate.Totusi promotion, discrimination<br />
and neutrality to the tax authorities may result<br />
in equal treatment from the tax law.<br />
Equality before the treasury can be absolute<br />
when the taxpayer owes an equal amount <strong>of</strong><br />
Tax expressed in absolute terms, or may be<br />
relative when the taxpayer owes a relatively<br />
equal nsuma expressed in relative numbers, in<br />
percent, this is the proportional share.<br />
In time, when economic and social life to<br />
sophisticated and revenue obtained from<br />
various sources the question <strong>of</strong> contributory<br />
capacity taxpayers, taking into account their<br />
economic situation, their social, family, their<br />
health status and other variables to justify<br />
differential treatment to the tax authority, in<br />
other words one that can pay more to do.<br />
They rely so under the influence <strong>of</strong> leftist<br />
thought after the French Revolution to<br />
provide income tratamentulechitabil public<br />
increasingly larger.<br />
The literature talks about horizontal equity<br />
and vertical equity on, the evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> tax fairness.<br />
Treatment involves horizontal comparison<br />
income <strong>of</strong> two or more persons get equal pay<br />
but from different sources, and if vertical<br />
equity is to compare the incomes <strong>of</strong> two or<br />
more different persons who earn income from<br />
the same source, context in which Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />
Constantin Tulai in his” Public Finance and<br />
Taxation”highlights the risk <strong>of</strong> such<br />
comparisons, in fact beneficial to express<br />
report with the taxpayer, to transfer the<br />
emphasis on gender equality before tax<br />
through tax .<br />
Time evolution <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> tax equity<br />
reflects the intent to transfer treasury<br />
importance to gender equality through taxes<br />
or tax reports, obviously in financial<br />
purposes. Accepting equality through taxes,<br />
accept and practice invasive in terms <strong>of</strong> tax
authorities, tax policies are used exclusively<br />
for government.<br />
Of course many <strong>of</strong> our peers need<br />
government help because <strong>of</strong> illness, because<br />
<strong>of</strong> family and <strong>of</strong> course other reasons that<br />
they need help in different ways. In this<br />
context, however, we must ask ourselves<br />
whether such interventions for social<br />
purposes to be promoted through taxes or<br />
using other levers.<br />
It is obvious that if the executives involved in<br />
the tax account, the first result is that it<br />
distorts the acceptance address, that the<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficial intention <strong>of</strong> the taxpayer and those<br />
who do not enjoy such tax benefits conferred<br />
will try to bypass the tax law.<br />
I think for social interventions can be<br />
promoted through other means, such as state<br />
social insurance systems, at other institutions<br />
<strong>of</strong> social protection for the taxpayer and not<br />
to confuse the proper push other adverse<br />
judgments propriety, and labor market<br />
competition capital and ultimately to tax<br />
evasion.<br />
On the other hand and tax procedures are<br />
hampered and will suffer in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
efficiency and their bureaucratic<br />
phenomenon, by appealing to all sorts <strong>of</strong><br />
supporting operations to access tax<br />
advantages or disadvantages for others put in<br />
the work <strong>of</strong> contributors.<br />
The third group <strong>of</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> taxation are<br />
those that concern economic and social<br />
policies. Taxes are the main source <strong>of</strong><br />
288<br />
revenue for the state, but a tool, an effective<br />
lever to influence consumatori.Principiile<br />
taxpayers in their capacity as neutral taxation,<br />
the tax discrimination, lack <strong>of</strong> arbitrariness,<br />
impersonality and the legitimacy <strong>of</strong> taxes.<br />
Use taxes in their capacity as leverage<br />
requires diversifying financial operations tax<br />
procedure.<br />
Bibliography<br />
1. Mihail C. Demetrescu, „Politici economice<br />
şi financiare de ieri şi de azi” („Middle Age<br />
Financial Sociology and Finances”)<br />
Tipografia Federatiei Nationale Cooperatiste,<br />
Bucharest,1946<br />
2. Morar Ioan Dan, „Sistemul fiscal<br />
românesc.Traditie si capacitate de adaptare”<br />
(„Romanian Taxation System. Tradition and<br />
Adaptation Capacity”), Ed.Dacia, Cluj-<br />
Napoca, 2000;<br />
3. Văcărel Iulian, „Politici economice şi<br />
financiare de ieri şi de azi” („Financial and<br />
Economic Policies – Old and New”), Ed.<br />
Economica, Bucuresti, 1996;<br />
4. Constantin Tulai, „Finantele publice si<br />
fiscalitatea” („Public Finances and Taxation<br />
System”) Casa Cartii de Stiinta, Cluj-<br />
Napoca,2003<br />
5. Radu Vasile,Intre echilibru si<br />
recesiune,Editura Economica 1998.(Balance<br />
between<br />
recession, Economics 1998) ;<br />
6. Codul Fiscal ,L 571/2003, republicata<br />
(Code, L 571/2003, republished)
IFRS COMPLIANCE REGARDING INFORMATION DISCLOSED BY<br />
COMPANIES IN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CASE STUDY<br />
ON IAS 23 BORROWING COSTS APPLICABILITY<br />
Tiron-Tudor Adriana<br />
Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences and Business Administration<br />
Fekete-Pali-Pista Szilveszter<br />
Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences and Business Administration<br />
Dragu Ioana-Maria<br />
Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences and Business Administration<br />
Abstract: This paper concentrates on information disclosure regarding IAS 23, being included in<br />
accounting research field. It comprises an empirical study on the correlation between information<br />
published by companies in consolidated financial statements with respect to borrowing cost policies<br />
and a series <strong>of</strong> variables that characterize a firm. The objectives <strong>of</strong> this paper involve estimating<br />
and establishing an econometric model in which is assumed that disclosure index for information<br />
required by IAS 23 depends on certain elements in the form <strong>of</strong> country <strong>of</strong> origin, sales, total assets,<br />
debt ratio, solvency, ROA and ROE. International accounting literature presents a series <strong>of</strong> studies<br />
on the subject <strong>of</strong> compliance with IAS disclosure requirements. Similar with this paper, various<br />
authors considered annual reports as starting point for data gathering in their reasearch on<br />
disclosure phenomena. The criteria used for data gathering, processing and analysing have been<br />
previously used in a successful manner by important scientists who published in accounting field.<br />
The methodology used involves Disclosure <strong>Index</strong> computation, as well as SPSS data processing,<br />
analysis and interpretation. Results show that the model is valid, meaning that there is correlation<br />
between information disclosure with respect to IAS 23 and the analyzed variables. According to our<br />
estimated econometric model, most <strong>of</strong> the variables maintain a certain influence on disclosure as we<br />
can observe a significant correlation level between the studied elements. This research contributes<br />
to the development <strong>of</strong> both accounting field and international accounting literature, by studying<br />
borrowing costs disclosed information in relation to certain elements that best characterize the<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> a company. Although an empirical paper, it concentrates also on accounting practices, as<br />
it uses real data extracted from annual reports and consolidated financial statements. The<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> this research relies in its originality approach, by studying the information disclosure<br />
for borrowing costs that represent one <strong>of</strong> the most important accounting fields.<br />
Keywords: information, disclosure, borrowing costs, annual reports, correlation<br />
JEL Codes: C51, C53, M41<br />
I. Introduction<br />
International accounting literature contains a<br />
serie <strong>of</strong> studies on disclosure. The most<br />
recent <strong>of</strong> them, involve the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
compliance with IAS requirements. Many<br />
scientists have started to consider annual<br />
reports in their reasearch on disclosure<br />
phenomena. In addition, this paper uses<br />
certain criteria in data gathering, processing<br />
and analysing that have been previously used<br />
in a successful manner by important scientists<br />
289<br />
who published in accounting field. Regarding<br />
the motivation for implementing this<br />
research, there is a need to establish the level<br />
<strong>of</strong> IFRS compliance, as both recognition and<br />
appliance <strong>of</strong> IAS is considered to be an<br />
essential element in the process <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />
development. Further on, by analysing<br />
information disclosure in financial reports,<br />
and defining its correlation to some key<br />
indicators that show the financial position and<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> companies, IFRS requirements
egarding information made public could<br />
meet progress in compliance. This study<br />
contributes to a better understanding <strong>of</strong> IFRS<br />
compliance as well as <strong>of</strong> the factors that<br />
influence information disclosure.<br />
Furthermore, international organisms from<br />
accounting field should supervize IAS<br />
acceptance and thus the process <strong>of</strong> disclosure<br />
is one imporant part <strong>of</strong> it.<br />
II. Literature review<br />
Nowadays is becoming more and more<br />
difficult to make economic forecasts whithout<br />
having the necessary information. Decisions<br />
cannot be made in the absence <strong>of</strong> information<br />
disclosure. Further on, in all fields there is a<br />
need for published information, otherwise<br />
negative effects <strong>of</strong> non-disclosure can appear<br />
(Edmiston 2011:281-320). There is evidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> the fact that a ’real-time reporting’ can be<br />
attained only through continuous evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
financial reporting, in order for accounting<br />
standards and policies addopted by<br />
companies in practice to reach a common<br />
point (Kueppers and Sullivan 2010:292).<br />
International accounting literature mentions<br />
the benefits <strong>of</strong> improved disclosure (Lang and<br />
Lundholm 1993), as firms increase intensity<br />
<strong>of</strong> disclosure efforts before <strong>of</strong>fering public<br />
debt and equity, and thus from compliance<br />
with international standards (Barry et al.<br />
1991). There have been many attempts to<br />
study the level <strong>of</strong> disclosure for mandatory<br />
and voluntary issues using disclosure index.<br />
Donna Street (Street 2001:27-35) made a<br />
research on factors that generate<br />
noncompliance, and uses regression analysis<br />
in order to estimate their correlation to<br />
information disclosure. By studying the<br />
information made public in annual reports,<br />
some sientists try in fact to underline the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> disclosure for accounting and<br />
for the economy, in general. According to<br />
them, the process <strong>of</strong> disclosure assumes three<br />
main aspects or characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />
information to be disclosed (Hossain 2008:<br />
661): efficiency from economical point <strong>of</strong><br />
view <strong>of</strong> disclosed information, influence <strong>of</strong><br />
290<br />
published information on economic agents’<br />
behavior, background <strong>of</strong> disclosure decision.<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the study reveals that banks seldom<br />
choose to disclose voluntary elements; on the<br />
other hand, for mandatory issues, disclosure<br />
and transparency meets compliance. Hossain<br />
et al. (Hossain et al. 2009:664-667) made a<br />
study on corporate disclosure measurement<br />
for financial and non-financial companies.<br />
Their research is based on some analysis<br />
criteria, including: size <strong>of</strong> the firm given by<br />
turnover or sales, pr<strong>of</strong>itability (ROE, ROA),<br />
complexity <strong>of</strong> business- industry, activity<br />
field, country <strong>of</strong> origin, and assets. According<br />
to the authors, all these variables are<br />
supposed to influence information disclosure<br />
in financial reporting. In scoring <strong>of</strong> disclosure<br />
index, they used 0 for non disclosed and 1 for<br />
disclosed, which is known as the unweighted<br />
disclosure approach. Another research on<br />
disclosure concerns public listed companies<br />
in Malaysia (Lee 2010: 40-42) in which is<br />
studied the level <strong>of</strong> human resource<br />
information disclosed in correlation to a<br />
series <strong>of</strong> variables: size, industry and listing.<br />
The conceptual and relational SPSS analysis<br />
is based on information disclosed in<br />
companies’ annual reports. Some researchers<br />
intended to create models for borrowing<br />
costs, in order to facilitate decisions and<br />
secure debt (Booth 2006: 70-72). In addition,<br />
ROE and ROA ratio indicators are used in<br />
empirical research to perform comparative<br />
analysis for companies’ data in relation to<br />
borrowing costs (Bohusova and Nerudova<br />
2009: 35-39). Other studies on capitalization<br />
<strong>of</strong> borrowing costs and their disclosure<br />
(Chung et al. 1993: 886-893) investigate<br />
firms from oil and gas industry, the analysis<br />
revealing two types <strong>of</strong> companies: successful<br />
efforts that expense borrowing costs, and are<br />
expensed full costs which capitalize costs.
III. Research methodology<br />
The methodology used involves Disclosure<br />
<strong>Index</strong> computation, as well as SPSS data<br />
processing, analysis and interpretation <strong>of</strong><br />
results. Data gathering implies a selection <strong>of</strong><br />
companies and a detailed read through all<br />
their consolidated financial statements.<br />
Research development is being sustained by<br />
certain analysis criteria, such as: market<br />
capitalization, company pr<strong>of</strong>ile, headquarter,<br />
or time period. The number <strong>of</strong> firms involved<br />
in the study has been elected in accordance to<br />
the market capitalization level corresponding<br />
to each one <strong>of</strong> the ten countries implied in the<br />
research (France, Germany, Spain, Italy,<br />
Poland, Austria, Romania, Hungary, Ukraine<br />
and Bulgaria) and the period <strong>of</strong> study<br />
comprises a five years’ analysis (from year<br />
2005 to 2009). The elements determined for<br />
all the 92 participating companies include:<br />
disclosure index, sales, total assets, gearing-<br />
solvency and debt rate-, ROE, ROA.<br />
Regarding the information disclosed by firms<br />
in their consolidated financial statements, the<br />
paper investigates the compliance with<br />
Disclosure Checklists <strong>of</strong> borrowing costs that<br />
is disclosing the accounting policy adopted<br />
with respect to borrowing costs, amount <strong>of</strong><br />
capitalized borrowing costs and<br />
capitalization rate.<br />
291<br />
The function that best describes the<br />
econometric model can be presented as<br />
follows:<br />
DIt = ∂0 + ∂1 Sales + ∂2 TA + ∂3 DebtRatio +<br />
∂4 Solvency + ∂5 ROA + ∂6 ROE + ∂7<br />
Country (1)<br />
In the above function, t is the year <strong>of</strong> study<br />
and takes values from 2005 to 2009.<br />
Disclosure <strong>Index</strong> determination involved two<br />
stages. First <strong>of</strong> all, for each one <strong>of</strong> the three<br />
items to be disclosed, in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
borrowing costs policy adopted by company,<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> capitalysed borrowing costs and<br />
capitalization rate, were denoted with ’1’ in<br />
case information for that item has been<br />
disclosed in the annual report, and ’0’ for the<br />
firm that did not publish the rspective<br />
information. The second step involved<br />
summing up the result for the three elements,<br />
and then dividing by three- as this was the<br />
maximum probability for disclosure.<br />
DI = ∑(di effectively presented)/ ∑( di<br />
all the possible cases) (2)
IV. Interpretation <strong>of</strong> results<br />
Table no. 1. SPSS- Descriptive statistics: Correlations<br />
(Source: own computations)<br />
Year<br />
2005<br />
Year<br />
2006<br />
Variables<br />
Dependent<br />
DI<br />
Variables<br />
Dependent<br />
DI<br />
Independent<br />
Sales, Total<br />
Assets, Debt Rate,<br />
Solvency, ROA,<br />
ROE<br />
Independent<br />
Sales, Total<br />
Assets, Debt Rate,<br />
Solvency, ROA,<br />
ROE<br />
Table no. 2. Results<br />
Variable Alfa T (sign.) F (sign.) Adj.R²<br />
Sales 5,970 0,167 4,974 0,396<br />
T.A. 5,353 0,159<br />
Debt rate 0,039 0,291<br />
Solvency 0,032 0,238<br />
ROA 0,109 0,016<br />
ROE -0,0013 0,019<br />
Variable Alfa T (sign.) F (sign.) Adj.R²<br />
Sales 3,422 0,236 4,611 0,373<br />
Total Assets 9,253 0,188<br />
Debt rate -0,0057 0,039<br />
Solvency 0,058 0,037<br />
ROA -0,0023 0,411<br />
ROE 0,00423 0,481<br />
Disclosure <strong>Index</strong><br />
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
DI 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
Sales 0,102 0,076 0,073 0,132 0,076<br />
Total Asset 0,105 0,093 0,051 0,091 0,070<br />
Debt ratio -0,058 -0,185 ** -0,214 ** 0,062 0,159 *<br />
Solvency 0,075 0,187 ** 0,211 ** -0.073 -0,181 **<br />
ROA 0,224 ** 0,024 0,115 0,003 -0,031<br />
ROE 0,216 ** -0,005 -0,027 0,009 -0,011<br />
Romania -0,545 *** -0,529 *** -0,564 *** -0,450 *** -0,432 ***<br />
Bulgaria 0,025 0,007 0,011 0,003 -0,034<br />
Hungary 0,255 * 0,305 ** 0,229 ** 0,170 * 0,147 *<br />
Poland 0,056 0,0015 0,024 0,006 -0,075<br />
Ukraine 0,031 0,008 0,013 0,003 0,130<br />
Spain 0,066 0,017 0,028 0,007 -0,089<br />
France 0,042 0,231 ** 0,263 * 0,097 0,079<br />
Italy -0,175 ** 0,127 0,129 -0,114 -0,080<br />
Germany 0,139 * 0,043 0,036 0,060 0,201<br />
Austria 0,052 0,014 0,022 0,139 0,092<br />
Significance *, for Sig ≤ 0,10 **, for Sig ≤ 0,05 ***, for Sig ≤ 0,01<br />
292
Year<br />
2007<br />
Year<br />
2008<br />
Year<br />
2009<br />
Variables<br />
Dependent<br />
DI<br />
Variables<br />
Dependent<br />
DI<br />
Variables<br />
Dependent<br />
DI<br />
Independent<br />
Independent<br />
Sales, Total<br />
Assets, Debt Rate,<br />
Solvency, ROA,<br />
ROE<br />
Independent<br />
Sales, Total<br />
Assets, Debt Rate,<br />
Solvency, ROA,<br />
ROE<br />
Sales, Total Assets, Debt Rate, Solvency,<br />
ROA, ROE<br />
Table no.1 presents the correlation between<br />
Disclosure <strong>Index</strong> and its corresponding<br />
variables (Sales, Total Assets, Debt ratio,<br />
Solvency, ROA, ROE). In analyzing the<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> correlation coefficients for the 5<br />
years’ period (2005-2009), we consider three<br />
significance thresholds, <strong>of</strong> 10%, 5% and 1%.<br />
The results show that according to our<br />
estimated econometric model, most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
variables (Sales, Total Assets, ROE and<br />
ROA), maintain a strong influence on<br />
disclosure for year 2005, as we can observe a<br />
high correlation level between the studied<br />
elements. In addition, we can observe that in<br />
most <strong>of</strong> the case, Pearson Coefficient<br />
Variable Alfa T (sign.) F (sign.) Adj.R²<br />
Sales 3,0988 0,244 4,897 0,391<br />
Total Assets -0,017 0,315<br />
Debt rate -0,0085 0,020<br />
Solvency 0,060 0,022<br />
ROA -0,0014 0,137<br />
ROE 0,0037 0,399<br />
Variable Alfa T (sign.) F (sign.) Adj.R²<br />
Sales 3,982 0,105 2,683 0,217<br />
Total Assets -3,7 0,195<br />
Debt rate 0,235 0,278<br />
Solvency 0,331 0,244<br />
ROA 0,005 0,490<br />
ROE -0,0005 0,467<br />
(Source: own computations)<br />
293<br />
Variable Alfa T F Adj.R²<br />
(sign.) (sign.)<br />
Sales 1,1826 0,234 2,672 0,216<br />
Total<br />
Assets<br />
-0,861 0,253<br />
Debt rate -0,101 0,065<br />
Solvency -0,088 0,042<br />
ROA -0,443 0,385<br />
ROE 0,0949 0,459<br />
registers values that are above the<br />
significance levels (see Table no.1). One <strong>of</strong><br />
the variables that influences disclosure index<br />
with respect to borrowing costs is represented<br />
by sales. Pearson Coefficient for sales (0,102)<br />
shows that the more complex the company is,<br />
having a high turnover, the higher the level <strong>of</strong><br />
published information. This is also valid for<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> total asset. Its coefficient <strong>of</strong> 0,105<br />
demonstrates that as a firm increases its<br />
assets, it is also willing to publish a greater<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> information. On the other hand, for<br />
both debt ratio and solvency there is a low<br />
correlation level in their relation to disclosure<br />
index. For instance, debt rate has a negative
correlation with respect to DI, which means<br />
that is some <strong>of</strong> the cases (tough, few, as the<br />
value <strong>of</strong> -0,058 does not indicate a significant<br />
influence) when a company’s debt ratio<br />
increases, disclosure concerning borrowing<br />
costs has in contrast a tendency to decrease.<br />
Concerning ROA and ROE for year 2005,<br />
although they seem to be highly correlated<br />
with the indicator showing information<br />
published by firms in accordance with IAS<br />
23, the significance level is lower than 0,05<br />
(see Table no.2). For years 2006 and 2007 we<br />
can state that again debt ratio and solvency<br />
show high correlation, but similar with the<br />
previous year, the level <strong>of</strong> significance does<br />
not reach 5% (see Table no.2). The other<br />
variables do not register coefficients that<br />
should indicate a relevant influence for<br />
disclosed information regarding borrowing<br />
costs. However, there is the exception <strong>of</strong><br />
Pearson’s coefficient for ROA recorded in<br />
2007 (0,115), that stands for a strong<br />
correlation between disclosure index and<br />
ROA for the mentioned year. The last period<br />
<strong>of</strong> our analysis (2008-2009) is characterized<br />
by some evidence <strong>of</strong> correlation- sales from<br />
2008 (0,132), as well as debt ratio and<br />
solvency, in 2009 although for the last two<br />
items the significance level is under 10%,<br />
respectively 5% (see Table no.2). Regarding<br />
the assumption that the country in which a<br />
company has it’s headquarter and where it<br />
has been set up has an influence politics<br />
adopted concerning information made public,<br />
the findings suggest that Romanian<br />
companies have similar behaviors when it<br />
comes to publishing information regarding<br />
borrowing costs. In addition, the significance<br />
level is lower than 1%. Further on, Bulgaria<br />
registers a small influence on disclosure<br />
index for the entire period <strong>of</strong> 5 years’<br />
analysis, the maximum value being under<br />
0,03. Similar values for Pearson’s’<br />
Coefficients are recorded for Poland and<br />
Spain, that present a negative correlation in<br />
2009 (-0,075 and -0,089). Ukraine does not<br />
seem to have an important influence on<br />
disclosure with respect to borrowing costs,<br />
294<br />
excepting year 2009 (0,130). For France,<br />
there is evidence for high correlation in 2006<br />
and 2007, but the significance level is under<br />
5% and 10%. In case <strong>of</strong> Italy, it seems that<br />
there is both positive and negative strong<br />
correlation. For years 2006 and 2007 the<br />
recorded values (0,127 and 0,129), imply that<br />
this country influences the firms that have<br />
headquarters and were set up within its<br />
borders, in the matter <strong>of</strong> information<br />
disclosure policy for IAS 23 issues. In 2008,<br />
Austria recorded a high degree <strong>of</strong> influence<br />
on its companies with respect to borrowing<br />
costs, while in 2009 Germany seems to also<br />
have a great impact on the way its firms<br />
publish information <strong>of</strong> IAS 23 appliance.<br />
Finally, regarding the relevance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
econometric model, according the SPSS<br />
analysis, the dependent variable (disclosure<br />
index for borrowing costs information) is<br />
explained through the model in a percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> 39% in 2005 and 2007, 37% for 2006,<br />
while in 2008 and 2009 this amount decreases<br />
to 21%. In addition, the values for adjusted<br />
R² stand as evidence for the mentioned facts.<br />
V. Conclusions<br />
This paper is meant to study the consistency<br />
<strong>of</strong> information published by companies in<br />
their consolidated financial reports. The<br />
research objective relates to the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
international accounting standard IAS 23<br />
Borrowing Cost demands on companies’<br />
accounting policies. Further on, the study<br />
involves estimating and establishing an<br />
econometric model in which is assumed that<br />
disclosure index for information required by<br />
IAS 23 depends on certain elements in the<br />
form <strong>of</strong> country <strong>of</strong> origin, sales, total assets,<br />
debt ratio, ROA and ROE. The importance <strong>of</strong><br />
this research relies in its originality approach,<br />
by studying the information disclosure for<br />
borrowing costs for a 5 years’ period, starting<br />
with 2005, until 2009, and also by<br />
considering a large sample <strong>of</strong> companies<br />
being significantly chosen. On the whole, this<br />
paper is meant to bring a national and<br />
international contribution to the literature <strong>of</strong>
orrowing costs, as one <strong>of</strong> the most important<br />
accounting fields.<br />
Results show that the model is valid, meaning<br />
that there is correlation between information<br />
disclosure with respect to IAS 23 and the<br />
analyzed variables. According to our<br />
estimated econometric model, most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
variables maintain a certain influence on<br />
disclosure as we can observe a significant<br />
correlation level between the studied<br />
elements. Regarding the relevance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
econometric model, according the SPSS<br />
analysis, the dependent variable -disclosure<br />
index for borrowing costs information- is<br />
explained by the model, adjusted R² taking<br />
values between 21% and 39%. This research<br />
contributes to the development <strong>of</strong> both<br />
accounting field and international accounting<br />
literature, by studying borrowing costs<br />
disclosed information in relation to certain<br />
elements that best characterize the activity <strong>of</strong><br />
a company. Although an empirical paper, it<br />
concentrates also on accounting practices, as<br />
it uses real data extracted from annual reports<br />
and consolidated financial statements.<br />
295<br />
VI. References<br />
Bohusova Hana, Nerudova Danuse, “IFRS and<br />
US GAAP Convergence in the area <strong>of</strong><br />
Borrowing Costs”, International Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Business Research 9(2009): 35-39.<br />
Barry Marks, Benson, Earl D. and Raman K.K..<br />
“The Effect <strong>of</strong> Voluntary GAAP Compliance<br />
and Financial Disclosure on Governmental<br />
Borrowing Costs”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Accounting,<br />
Auditing, and Finance 6(1991): 303-319.<br />
Booth James R. and Booth Lena Chua. “Loan<br />
Collateral Decisions and Corporate Borrowing<br />
Costs”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Money, Credit and Banking<br />
38(2006): 70-72.<br />
Chung, Kwan-Hyun, Ghicas Dimitrios, Pastena<br />
Victor. “Lenders’ Use <strong>of</strong> Accounting<br />
Information in the Oil and Gas Industry”. The<br />
Accounting Review 68(1993): 885-895.<br />
Edmiston Stuart C.. “Secrets worth keeping:<br />
toward a principled basis for stigmatized<br />
property disclosure statutes”. UCLA Law<br />
Review. 58(2011): 282-300.<br />
Hossain, M.A., Akhtaruddin, M., Yao, Lee.<br />
“Corporate Governance and Voluntary<br />
Disclosure in Corporate Annual Reports <strong>of</strong><br />
Malaysian Listed Firms”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied<br />
Management Accounting Research 7(2009): 1-<br />
20.<br />
Hossain, Mohammed. “The Extent <strong>of</strong><br />
Disclosure in Annual Reports <strong>of</strong> Banking<br />
Companies: The Case <strong>of</strong> India”. European<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Scientific Research 4 (2008): 660-<br />
681.<br />
Kueppers Robert J. and Sullivan Kristen B..<br />
“How and why an independent audit matters”.<br />
International Journal <strong>of</strong> disclosure and<br />
governance 7(2010): 286-293.<br />
Lang, M. and Lundholm, R., ”Cross-sectional<br />
determinants <strong>of</strong> analyst ratings <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />
disclosures”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Accounting Research.<br />
31(1993): 246-271.<br />
Lee, M.H., 2010, Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Annual Reports<br />
on Human Resource Disclosure using content<br />
analysis. Unitar E-Journal. 6(2010).<br />
Street, Donna. “Observance <strong>of</strong> International<br />
Accounting Standards: Factors explaining noncompliance”.<br />
ACCA Research Report 74(2001):<br />
1-127.
Subsection: Banking
MODELING ROMANIAN EXCHANGE RATE EVOLUTION WITH GARCH,<br />
TGARCH, GARCH- IN MEAN MODELS<br />
Trenca Ioan<br />
Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />
Cociuba Mihail Ioan<br />
Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />
Abstract: In this paper we analyze the return <strong>of</strong> exchange rate in order to test and analyze the best<br />
models which are capable <strong>of</strong> forecasting accurately there evolution. We apply the GARCH family<br />
models on the exchange rate return in order to obtain the best models for there volatility. Financial<br />
time series <strong>of</strong>ten exhibit abnormal characteristics, such as: serial correlation, non-stationarity,<br />
heteroskedasticity, asymmetric and are leptokurtic. Due to these characteristics autoregressive<br />
models such as autoregressive (AR), moving average (MA) and autoregressive integrated movingaverage<br />
(ARIMA) are unable to capture the evolution <strong>of</strong> financial series, to represent the special<br />
characteristic <strong>of</strong> financial a hole new range <strong>of</strong> models where developed : generalized<br />
autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), which are taking into account the<br />
heteroskedasticity <strong>of</strong> the errors term. The GARCH model allows for lags in the autoregressive term<br />
and in the variance term incorporates lags <strong>of</strong> the previous variance and also for the errors. The<br />
GARCH family has expanded in the last years in order to incorporate for asymmetry (Threshold<br />
GARCH, TGARCH) and risk (GARCH -in Mean).<br />
We analyze the evolution <strong>of</strong> exchange rate for: Euro/RON, dollar/RON, yen/RON, British<br />
pound/RON, Swiss franc/RON for a period <strong>of</strong> five years from 2005 till 2011, we observe that in the<br />
analyzed period there are 2 sub-periods: 2005-2007 in which the RON appreciated constantly, and<br />
2007-2011 in which the trend is depreciation for RON in respect to all the five currencies and the<br />
volatility was sensible higher than in the previous period. We obtain the returns on exchange rate<br />
by using the following transformation r=log(curs_t)-log(curs_t-1); the five analyzed series display<br />
an leptokurtic and asymmetric behavioral. Using the GARCH, TGARCH and GARCH-in Mean<br />
models, we explicit the evolution <strong>of</strong> volatility throw this period, choosing the best model using the<br />
following : minimizing the value <strong>of</strong> the sum <strong>of</strong> squared errors, Akaike and Bayesian Information<br />
Criterion.<br />
Keywords: exchange rate, GARCH, TGARCH, AIC, BIC.<br />
JEL Classification: G01, G21<br />
1. Introduction<br />
The evolution <strong>of</strong> Romanian exchange rate<br />
represent an important factor for a hole range<br />
<strong>of</strong> economic actors: banks, governmental<br />
agencies, companies and households, so the<br />
fluctuations <strong>of</strong> exchange rate and the ability<br />
to forecast her evolution is very important.<br />
For banks which must comply to the<br />
recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Basel Committee and<br />
which are ,usually, having open position on<br />
different currencies it is vital that they can<br />
understand and prognoses the future<br />
299<br />
exchanges rates in order to minimize the risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> losses; for governmental agencies<br />
(especially the Romanian IRS) the evolution<br />
<strong>of</strong> Euro/Ron is important due to the fact that<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the taxes are expressed in Euro;<br />
exchange rate fluctuation can have a great on<br />
companies if there debts is in foreign<br />
currency or if the export/import; for<br />
households which in Romania are in debt<br />
especially in foreign currency the devaluation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ron can lead to bankruptcy. Over 60<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> loans are denominated in foreign
currency in Romania which makes our<br />
economy very sensitive to the fluctuations in<br />
exchange rates (especially Euro, dollar, yen,<br />
swiss franc). All <strong>of</strong> these reason makes<br />
important the study <strong>of</strong> exchange rates<br />
evolution.<br />
The evaluation or devaluation <strong>of</strong> currency is<br />
not a bad think per se, what raises difficulties<br />
is their volatility because in general financial<br />
time series, including exchange rate, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
exhibit abnormal characteristics, such as:<br />
serial correlation, non-stationarity,<br />
heteroskedasticity, asymmetric and are<br />
leptokurtic.<br />
2. Literature review<br />
The theory <strong>of</strong> purchasing power parity (PPP)<br />
was the first which managed to explain the<br />
fluctuations in exchange rate values in real<br />
terms , but there are limits <strong>of</strong> this theory<br />
[Guglielmo&Luis,2010] because it cannot<br />
explain the volatility, the main critics brought<br />
to this theory being given by the reduced<br />
relevance <strong>of</strong> the obtained methods and the<br />
necessity to use large amount <strong>of</strong> data series. If<br />
analyzing the exchange rate evolution from a<br />
nominal point there are problems for the<br />
researchers, for eg. the structure <strong>of</strong> the data<br />
series on the financial markets (because these<br />
are generally leptokurtic, the moment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
order 3 <strong>of</strong> the series is much bigger than in<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> normal distribution), leading to an<br />
increase <strong>of</strong> the probability <strong>of</strong> the appearance<br />
<strong>of</strong> extreme phenomena, also if the series are<br />
stationary or there is any evidence for<br />
structural breaks.<br />
The best models used for modeling the<br />
volatility are the ARCH models [Engel,<br />
yt= Β0 + et (1)<br />
et | It-1 ~ N(0, ht) (2)<br />
ht= ά0 + ά1* e 2 t-1 , ά0 > 0, 0 ≤ ά1 < 1 (3)<br />
300<br />
1982] and then the GARCH generalization<br />
[Bollerslev, 1986] which lead to the<br />
appearance <strong>of</strong> some instruments advanced<br />
enough to model the financial series. The<br />
appearance <strong>of</strong> the GARCH models lead to a<br />
better understanding and a modeling <strong>of</strong> the<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> the financial series, these models<br />
developing both in univariate and<br />
multivariate models [Bauwens, 2006]. The<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> the Romanian exchange rate has<br />
been analyzed being used the GARCH<br />
modeling by Codirlasu [2001] on the series<br />
ROL/EURO and ROL/DOLAR for the period<br />
2000-2001, being remarked the fact that the<br />
series follow an asymmetric ARCH process.<br />
Using series available during the period<br />
1999-2003, Necula [2008] applies the<br />
GARCH and the Copula-GARCH modeling,<br />
concluding that the dynamic models <strong>of</strong> the<br />
type Copula-GARCH bring more information<br />
and stability concerning the obtained results.<br />
3. Data used and methodology<br />
The analyzed series are 5 currencies: Euro,<br />
dollar, British pound , Japanese yen and<br />
Swiss franc, the analyzed period is between<br />
January 3, 2005 and April 29, 2011, daily<br />
series; the date are obtained from Romanian<br />
National Bank <strong>of</strong>ficial site www.bnro.ro and<br />
the econometrics s<strong>of</strong>tware packaged used is<br />
GRETL, in order to obtain returns from the<br />
daily series we apply the following<br />
transformation:<br />
r = log (curst) – log (curst-1 ) .<br />
The ARCH models developed by<br />
Engel [1982] have the following<br />
equations:
The equation(1) expresses the series<br />
evolution, a following a normal distribution<br />
law <strong>of</strong> conditional equations (2) and (3).<br />
Equations 2 and 3 express the ARCH type<br />
models, autoregressive models with<br />
different time variance, residuals follow a<br />
normal law <strong>of</strong> 0 mean and ht variance. The<br />
value <strong>of</strong> ά0 and ά1 must be positive, and<br />
ά1 has a value between [0,1] in order to<br />
301<br />
avoid an explosive processes, also<br />
errors(residuals) follow a normal<br />
distribution law.<br />
ARCH models have been developed later in<br />
the GARCH (Generalized autoregressive<br />
conditional heteroskedasticity) by<br />
Bollerslev [1986], which bring the use <strong>of</strong><br />
lags as an innovation in equation variance,<br />
equations in the GARCH (1,1) case are:<br />
yt = β0 + et (4)<br />
et | It-1 ~ N(0, ht) (5)<br />
ht = ά0 +ά1 *e 2 t-1+ β1* ht-1 , ά0 > 0, 0 ≤ ά1< 1 (6)<br />
It have been observed that on the financial<br />
markets the assets prices are influenced by<br />
the news (also called innovation) , so that a<br />
bad news generates more volatility than a<br />
good news. A GARCH model which treats<br />
ht= ά0 +ά1 e 2 t-1+γ *dt-1* e 2 t-1+β1* ht-1 (7)<br />
where: dt = 1 if et 0 .<br />
Also in order to reflect the relation between<br />
risk and return another models where<br />
proposed in order to incorporate this<br />
differently the bad-good news was<br />
proposed by Zakoian [1993] – Threshold<br />
GARCH. It is an asymmetric model in<br />
which the conditional volatility is:<br />
characteristics [Engle,1987], GARCH in<br />
mean model have the following<br />
characteristic:<br />
yt = β0 + et + θ*ht (8)<br />
et | It-1 ~ N(0, ht) (9)<br />
ht = ά0 +ά1 *e 2 t-1+ β1* ht-1 , ά0 > 0, 0 ≤ ά1< 1 (10)<br />
In this model as the volatility rises the<br />
return are rising too, this models are useful<br />
in order to capture the risk <strong>of</strong> the assets.<br />
4. Exchange rate models: GARCH,<br />
TGARCH and GARCH in Mean<br />
Using the return<br />
r = log (curst) – log (curst-1),<br />
we obtain the following evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
series:
R_DOLAR R_EURO R_FRANC R_LIRA R_YEN<br />
Mean -0.003560 0.002223 0.013383 -0.012068 0.010834<br />
Median -0.048804 -0.017661 -0.020991 -0.038889 -0.091837<br />
Maximum 4.434815 3.385650 5.223699 4.018345 10.80639<br />
Minimum -4.968370 -5.106356 -5.027989 -4.838047 -7.547544<br />
Std. Dev. 0.874067 0.487860 0.702979 0.746555 1.133958<br />
Skewness 0.277802 0.050525 0.290114 0.072925 0.678837<br />
Kurtosis 6.729989 16.06188 9.472018 7.815664 11.90174<br />
Jarque-Bera 955.2118 11460.17 2836.024 1559.066 5446.158<br />
Probability 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000<br />
Sum -5.739149 3.582965 21.57408 -19.45334 17.46505<br />
Sum Sq.<br />
Dev. 1230.792 383.4293 796.1225 897.8817 2071.521<br />
Observations 1612 1612 1612 1612 1612<br />
The return <strong>of</strong> the series are different from<br />
zero for all the return, the highest return is<br />
obtain for the Swiss franc 1.33% and the<br />
lowest for the British pound – 1.20%; from<br />
the 5 currency two have negative return: the<br />
British pound -1.20% and the American<br />
dollar -0.3%. The standard deviation which<br />
measures the risk associated with these<br />
currency are the highest for Yen 1.13 and the<br />
lowest for EURO 0.48, also all the currency<br />
302<br />
are asymmetric and leptokurtic. All the series<br />
where tested for stationarity using the ADF<br />
test and also for the ARCH effect: the series<br />
are stationary and the ARCH effect is present.<br />
The evolution <strong>of</strong> the return (Fig.1) are having<br />
the characteristic <strong>of</strong> an GARCH model with<br />
periods <strong>of</strong> high volatility followed by periods<br />
<strong>of</strong> low volatility, also we can observe that the<br />
highest volatility is in 2008-2009 when the<br />
financial crisis hit the markets.
Fig.1. Evolution <strong>of</strong> return 2005 -2011<br />
We explicit the TARCH model for dollar as being:<br />
Table 1. TARCH Model dollar<br />
Dependent Variable: R_DOLAR<br />
Sample (adjusted): 1/07/2005 4/29/2011<br />
Included observations: 1609 after adjustments<br />
Variable Coefficient Std. Error z-Statistic Prob.<br />
R_DOLAR(-1) 0.048747 0.025227 1.932310 0.0533<br />
R_DOLAR(-2) -0.029834 0.027110 -1.100462 0.2711<br />
R_DOLAR(-3) -0.046187 0.025247 -1.829397 0.0673<br />
Variance Equation<br />
C 0.009057 0.002396 3.780163 0.0002<br />
RESID(-1)^2 0.071693 0.009958 7.199375 0.0000<br />
RESID(-1)^2*(RESID(-1)
We observe that the coefficient <strong>of</strong> the<br />
equation are representative at the population<br />
level with a 95% confidence except for the<br />
second lag <strong>of</strong> the return. The normality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
estimation is analyzed throw the Durbin-<br />
Table 2. GARCH in Mean for dollar<br />
304<br />
Watson test which is under the critical level<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2.<br />
Using the information criterion: Akaike,<br />
Schwarz we have selected this model for<br />
being the most performant from the<br />
TGACRH family models.<br />
Dependent Variable: R_DOLAR<br />
Date: 05/14/11 Time: 15:35<br />
Sample (adjusted): 1/07/2005 4/29/2011<br />
GARCH = C(5) + C(6)*RESID(-1)^2 + C(7)*GARCH(-1)<br />
Variable Coefficient Std. Error z-Statistic Prob.<br />
LOG(GARCH) 0.043134 0.020789 2.074855 0.0380<br />
R_DOLAR(-1) 0.045477 0.025094 1.812215 0.0700<br />
R_DOLAR(-2) -0.033026 0.027023 -1.222125 0.2217<br />
R_DOLAR(-3) -0.053874 0.025031 -2.152348 0.0314<br />
Variance Equation<br />
C 0.008319 0.002410 3.452184 0.0006<br />
RESID(-1)^2 0.061833 0.007541 8.199630 0.0000<br />
GARCH(-1) 0.926816 0.008588 107.9201 0.0000<br />
R-squared 0.014756 Mean dependent var -0.004295<br />
Adjusted R-squared 0.012914 S.D. dependent var 0.874680<br />
S.E. <strong>of</strong> regression 0.869013 Akaike info criterion 2.351012<br />
Sum squared resid 1212.071 Schwarz criterion 2.374433<br />
Log likelihood -1884.389 Durbin-Watson stat 1.918963<br />
For the GARCH in Mean model we used for quantifying the risk in the mean equations after<br />
testing the model with a variance that the best way to integrate risk is using the logarithm <strong>of</strong><br />
variance.
Fig.2 The evolution <strong>of</strong> conditional variance for dollar in a TGARC model<br />
5. Conclusion<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> using TGARCH and<br />
GARCH in Mean models is to <strong>of</strong>fer a better<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the volatility which is found<br />
on financial markets, because financial assets<br />
have some abnormal characteristics, such as:<br />
serial correlation, non-stationarity,<br />
heteroskedasticity, asymmetric and are<br />
leptokurtic it is important to take into account<br />
them. GARCH asymmetric models , like<br />
TGARCH and GARCH in Mean, are <strong>of</strong>fering<br />
the possibility for better forecasting on these<br />
assets. In this models we postulated that the<br />
error term is following a normal distribution :<br />
et | It-1 ~ N(0, ht) but there are others<br />
possibilities: student, Generalized Error<br />
Distribution, student skewed and skewed<br />
Generalized Error Distribution. Another<br />
factor which we need to take into the<br />
consideration is the possibility <strong>of</strong> structural<br />
breaks in the series.<br />
References<br />
1. Adkins Lee, Using GRETL for Principles <strong>of</strong><br />
Econometrics, 2010, www.learneconometrics.com<br />
2. Bitca Robert et al, Pro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the endogeneity <strong>of</strong><br />
the optimum monetary zones, 2007,<br />
www.batca.files.wordpress.com.<br />
3. Bollerslev T., A conditionally heteroskedastic<br />
time series model for speculative prices and rates<br />
<strong>of</strong> return - The review <strong>of</strong> economics and statistics,<br />
1987 - JSTOR<br />
305<br />
4. Codirlasu Adrian, Analiza econometrica a<br />
volatilitatii cursului de schimb,<br />
http://www.d<strong>of</strong>in.ase.ro/acodirlasu/wp/d<strong>of</strong>in2001/<br />
arch.pdf<br />
5. COTTREL, Allin, LUCHETTI, Riccardi, Gretl<br />
User Guide, 2010, gretl.sourceforge.net<br />
6. Codirlasu Adrian & Nicolae Chidesciuc,<br />
Applied Econometrics using Eviews 5.1, Second<br />
Edition, 2008, http://www.d<strong>of</strong>in.ase.ro/acodirlasu/<br />
7. Engle, R.F., D.M. Lilien and R.P. Robbins,<br />
(1987), “Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in<br />
the Term Structure: The ARCH-M Model,”<br />
Econometrica, 55, 391-407.<br />
8. Engle, RF Autoregressive conditional<br />
heteroscedasticity with estimates <strong>of</strong> the variance <strong>of</strong><br />
United Kingdom inflation- Econometrica: Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Econometric Society,1982- JSTOR,<br />
9. Guglielmo&Luis, Long Memory and Volatility<br />
Dynamics in the US Dollar Exchange Rate,<br />
2010, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1596083<br />
10. Gujarati Damodar, Basic Econometrics, 4th<br />
Edition, pg.858, 2004, Editura McGraw-Hill<br />
11. Hill Carter, Principles <strong>of</strong> Econometrics, pg.<br />
364, 3rd Edition, 2008, Editura Wiley<br />
12.Mugur Isarescu, “Romania - passing to euro”<br />
BNR , 2007, May, www.bnro.ro<br />
13. Necula Ciprian, Modelarea si previzionarea<br />
cursului de schimb, 2008, www.d<strong>of</strong>in.ase.ro<br />
14. www.bnro.ro<br />
15. www.gretl.sourceforge.net/<br />
16. www.bnro.ro<br />
17. www.d<strong>of</strong>in.ase.ro/acodirlasu/lect/<br />
18. www.reuters.ro<br />
19.www.learneconometrics.com/gretl.html
306
MONEY: FROM STATISTICAL DEFINITION TO MONETARY POLICY FOR<br />
ADOPTING EURO.<br />
Zăpodeanu Daniela<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />
Abstract: The evolution <strong>of</strong> monetary aggregates is closely related to the economic cycle, especially<br />
the evolution <strong>of</strong> GDP. The study aims to analyse the primary monetary aggregates (M1), the<br />
secondary (M2) and the tertiary (M3) in three Central and Eastern European countries: Romania,<br />
Bulgaria and Poland. The countries were chosen as follows: Romania and Bulgaria on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />
the economic and geographical closeness and Poland as a benchmark for the first group. The data<br />
used are money supply, monetary aggregates: primary, secondary and tertiary, in Romania, Poland<br />
and Bulgaria, for the period January 2004 - March 2011, the monthly series are obtained from<br />
central bank websites, Poland's Central Bank and Bulgarian National Statistical Institute. The<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> monetary aggregates <strong>of</strong> the three countries was compared with the Euro area and it<br />
was noticed a high degree <strong>of</strong> similarity between countries more developed economically as<br />
compared to less developed countries. From the viewpoint <strong>of</strong> optimum currency areas, it is<br />
necessary that the countries that adopt the Euro would respond symmetrically to external shocks<br />
and also have similar economic behaviour. Our study aims, in this respect, to analyse the<br />
components and the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the monetary aggregates, as well as the trends existing within<br />
them. The analysis <strong>of</strong> the correlation between monetary aggregates will show how the way in which<br />
the monetary mass and aggregates behave and which the sense <strong>of</strong> connection established between<br />
these countries is. We find that Romania and Bulgaria have a similar comportment, the correlation<br />
between these being the highest, we observe some differences between Romania and Bulgaria<br />
versus Poland.<br />
Keywords: Monetary Aggregate, Gross Domestic Product, Monetary policy, Euro Zone<br />
JEL Classification: E42, E52<br />
1. Introductory notions<br />
The evolution <strong>of</strong> monetary aggregates is<br />
closely related to the economic cycle,<br />
especially the evolution <strong>of</strong> GDP [Fagan,<br />
Henry, 1998]. The study aims to analyse the<br />
primary monetary aggregates (M1), the<br />
secondary (M2) and the tertiary (M3) in three<br />
Central and Eastern European countries:<br />
Romania, Bulgaria and Poland. The countries<br />
were chosen as follows: Romania and<br />
Bulgaria on the basis <strong>of</strong> the economic and<br />
geographical closeness, and Poland as a<br />
benchmark. The study aims to observe the<br />
similarities concerning money supply that<br />
exist between these countries and the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> monetary aggregates as an<br />
instrument <strong>of</strong> monetary policy in these<br />
countries. Following the EU accession, these<br />
countries will adopt the euro, the forecasts<br />
307<br />
being: Romania - 2015, Bulgaria - 2013,<br />
Poland 2012 (2013); The theory <strong>of</strong> optimal<br />
currency areas shows how important is the<br />
economic synchronization for countries with<br />
a single currency.<br />
Within the Economic Monetary Union, the<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> monetary aggregates is stated,<br />
since 2007, according to the methodology <strong>of</strong><br />
the European Central Bank (NBR Monthly<br />
Report, 2009):<br />
1. Narrow money supply (M1) includes<br />
currency in circulation (banknotes and coins)<br />
and deposits readily convertible into cash or<br />
used for payment by bank transfer called<br />
overnight deposits.<br />
2. Intermediate money supply (M2) includes<br />
narrow money (M1) plus time deposits with<br />
maturity <strong>of</strong> up to two years and adding<br />
deposits redeemable at a period <strong>of</strong> notice <strong>of</strong>
up to 3 months. The definition <strong>of</strong> M2 mirrors<br />
the interest in analyzing and monitoring a<br />
monetary aggregate which, apart from cash,<br />
includes deposits with a high degree <strong>of</strong><br />
liquidity.<br />
3. Broad money supply (M3) comprises<br />
intermediate money (M2), and marketable<br />
instruments issued by the monetary financial<br />
institutions sector; money market<br />
instruments, especially money market fund<br />
shares/units and repurchase agreements are<br />
included in the aggregate (a high degree <strong>of</strong><br />
liquidity makes these instruments close<br />
substitutes for deposits).<br />
The way <strong>of</strong> defining monetary aggregates in<br />
Romania and Bulgaria before the<br />
harmonization with the European Central<br />
Bank requirements was:<br />
- M1 - Narrow money supply, which<br />
comprises: currency outside the banking<br />
system, sight deposits (until December 1991<br />
time deposits <strong>of</strong> economic agents as well);<br />
- Quasi-money – which, together with M1,<br />
form M2 (broad money) and which<br />
comprises: household savings, term or<br />
restricted deposits in Lei, foreign currency<br />
deposits <strong>of</strong> residents.<br />
2. Literature Review<br />
The monetary union (or currency union) -<br />
means adopting the same currency in<br />
neighbouring countries or that <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
important commercial partner; we witness the<br />
dollarization in Latin America (Ecuador,<br />
Peru) and the euro area. For Romania an<br />
important significance has been given by the<br />
''euro zone''; now that our country is a EU<br />
member, it should focus on continuing the<br />
process <strong>of</strong> integration into European<br />
economic and monetary union and the next<br />
step is to adopt the euro. Establishing the euro<br />
area was a long process that had as its starting<br />
point the Delors report <strong>of</strong> 1989, which<br />
proposed a realization <strong>of</strong> monetary union in<br />
three steps. The benefits <strong>of</strong> achieving a<br />
monetary union are related to the existence <strong>of</strong><br />
an optimal currency areas, optimum currency<br />
area is defined as a geographical region in<br />
308<br />
which the member states must use fixed<br />
exchange rates or a single currency, while<br />
there are also criteria that a country must<br />
satisfy to be part <strong>of</strong> an optimal currency area<br />
(Mundell, 1961):<br />
-high degree <strong>of</strong> labour mobility;<br />
-diversified production;<br />
-degree <strong>of</strong> openness <strong>of</strong> the economy;<br />
-symmetry <strong>of</strong> external shocks.<br />
From this point <strong>of</strong> view, the European Union<br />
is not entirely an optimum currency area,<br />
there are differences in labour mobility (in<br />
particular because <strong>of</strong> language barriers).<br />
However, joining an economic union and<br />
then a monetary union, with the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> EU acquis and the<br />
liberalization <strong>of</strong> the movement <strong>of</strong> labour<br />
force showed that the level <strong>of</strong> integration in<br />
the euro area is increasing (Bîtcă et al, 2007),<br />
and also that the euro zone economies<br />
become integrated as a result <strong>of</strong> monetary<br />
union[Baldwin, 2006 ].<br />
A preliminary stage <strong>of</strong> adopting the euro is<br />
compliance with the provision <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Maastricht Treaty (1992):<br />
- the average inflation rate should not<br />
exceed with more than 1.5 percentage<br />
points the average <strong>of</strong> the most performant<br />
three members<br />
- the long-term interest rates should not<br />
exceed with more than two percentage<br />
points the average <strong>of</strong> the top performing<br />
members<br />
- consolidated budget deficit should be<br />
less than 3% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
- public debt should be below 60% <strong>of</strong><br />
GDP<br />
- exchange rate fluctuations against the<br />
euro should fall within a corridor <strong>of</strong> + / -<br />
15% <strong>of</strong> the average level.<br />
Bulgaria: in 1997, as a result <strong>of</strong> excessive<br />
borrowing, Bulgaria became insolvent, the<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> Monetary Council was<br />
decided in July 1997, the exchange rate level<br />
was fixed at 1000 leva for a German mark.<br />
The establishment <strong>of</strong> the Monetary Council<br />
has been beneficial in terms <strong>of</strong> controlling<br />
inflation, thus, from the peak <strong>of</strong> 1044% in
1997, the inflation was reduced to 18.7% in<br />
1998, 2.6% in 1999, 10.3% in 2000, 7.4% in<br />
2001, 5.8% in 2002 and in the EU preaccession<br />
period (2003-2007) it fluctuated<br />
between a minimum <strong>of</strong> 2.3% and a maximum<br />
309<br />
<strong>of</strong> 7.3%. Getting over the critical period,<br />
which was caused by entering into insolvency<br />
in 2000s, by structural reforms and by EU<br />
accession in 2007, made Bulgaria to fix its<br />
target <strong>of</strong> joining the euro zone as 2012.<br />
Fig.1 Eurozone and the use <strong>of</strong> European single currency<br />
(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro)<br />
Poland: After 2000, the Polish Central Bank<br />
will focus on inflation targeting, and is due to<br />
adopt the euro by 2014, which supposes<br />
compliance with ERM II requirements two<br />
years before acceding to the euro area. Poland<br />
is a success story, managing the performance<br />
to continue its growth even during the crisis.<br />
Romania: After accession to the EU,<br />
Romania must abide by the obligations <strong>of</strong> EU<br />
membership and will have to join the euro<br />
zone, the time horizon forecast is after 2015,<br />
with a period <strong>of</strong> at least two years preceding<br />
that, during which it will comply with the<br />
regulations <strong>of</strong> exchange mechanism <strong>of</strong> ERM<br />
II, which involves a controlled national<br />
currency fluctuations against the euro within<br />
a deviation band <strong>of</strong> +/- 15%. Romania meets<br />
only one <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Maastricht<br />
Treaty, namely the public debt and, on the<br />
edge, the exchange rate fluctuation. Through<br />
the reforms and agreements with International<br />
bodies, it is aimed at the reduction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
budget deficit below 3%, while the central<br />
bank aims to control inflation, although this<br />
year's inflation target will be exceeded.<br />
3. Data used and methodology<br />
The data used are money supply, monetary<br />
aggregates: primary, secondary and tertiary,<br />
in Romania, Poland and Bulgaria, for the<br />
period January 2004 - March 2011, the<br />
monthly series are obtained from central bank<br />
websites, Poland's Central Bank and<br />
Bulgarian National Statistical Institute.<br />
To analyse the evolution <strong>of</strong> money supply<br />
and monetary aggregates in the three<br />
countries, we shall calculate the correlation<br />
that exists between the evolution <strong>of</strong> M1, M2<br />
and M3, so the correlation is defined as:<br />
ρ = corr (x, y) = cov (x, y) / σx σy =<br />
E [(X-Xm)(YYM)]/ σx σy,<br />
- where XM,YM represent the mean <strong>of</strong><br />
X, respectively Y,<br />
- and σx, σy represent the mean<br />
squared deviation <strong>of</strong> X, respectively Y.
The analysis <strong>of</strong> the correlation between<br />
monetary aggregates will show how the way<br />
in which the monetary mass and aggregates<br />
behave and which the sense <strong>of</strong> connection<br />
established between these countries is.<br />
310<br />
4. The analysis <strong>of</strong> monetary aggregates<br />
(M1, M2, M3) in Romania, Bulgaria,<br />
Poland<br />
For these countries, the period analysed is<br />
related to two major events:<br />
- European Union adheration.<br />
- economic crisis.<br />
Fig.2 shows the evolution <strong>of</strong> money supply<br />
(M3) and primary aggregate (M1); the money<br />
supply in the period under analysis has a<br />
growth tendency, consistent with the<br />
economic growth witnessed by these<br />
countries in the pre-crisis period, except in<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria where from mid-2008 to<br />
2009 the money supply (M3) shrinks due to<br />
the decrease in GDP.<br />
Fig. 2. Evolution <strong>of</strong> M1, M3 in Romania, Bulgary, Poland 2004-2011<br />
The primary aggregate (M1) has a much more<br />
volatile evolution, this being also due to the<br />
fact that the assets constituting the aggregate<br />
are <strong>of</strong> the most liquid type, and thus,<br />
particularly sensitive to changes in economic<br />
climate; with Romania and Bulgaria, M1<br />
decreases, during 2008 for Bulgaria and the at<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> 2009 for Romania, while Poland<br />
is the only country in which M1 growth<br />
continues. The evolution <strong>of</strong> money supply,<br />
being closely related to GDP trend, the<br />
conclusions drawn show that in both<br />
Romania and Bulgaria the money supply<br />
growth rate has slowed down due to the<br />
downturn. However, the fact the trend is<br />
nevertheless positive raises questions about<br />
monetary policies in both countries because<br />
the excess <strong>of</strong> money can turn into inflation.
Fig. 3. Primary component <strong>of</strong> aggregate money supply M1 in total<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> the component <strong>of</strong> the money<br />
supply, it is seen in Fig.3 that, for both<br />
Romania and Bulgaria, the primary aggregate<br />
(most liquid) is below 45% for Romania and<br />
under 38% for Bulgaria, much less than in the<br />
pre-crisis period (over 50% for both<br />
countries) which shows that the economic<br />
crisis has manifested itself at the level <strong>of</strong> nonbank<br />
agents, as well, by lowering the amount<br />
<strong>of</strong> cash and the value <strong>of</strong> sight accounts. While<br />
with Romania and Bulgaria M1 is still<br />
decreasing, in Poland, after a period <strong>of</strong><br />
decline <strong>of</strong> a similar magnitude to that in the<br />
other countries analysed, it recovered to<br />
levels comparable to those in the pre-crisis<br />
period.<br />
The correlation between the monetary<br />
mass and the aggregates in Romania,<br />
Poland and Bulgaria<br />
To analyse the evolution <strong>of</strong> money supply<br />
and monetary aggregates in the three<br />
countries, we calculate the correlation that<br />
exists between the evolution <strong>of</strong> M1, M2 and<br />
M3; so the correlation is defined as:<br />
ρ = corr (x, y) = cov (x, y) / σx σy = E [(X-<br />
Xm)(YYM)]/ σx σy,<br />
- where XM,YM represent the mean <strong>of</strong> X,<br />
respectively Y,<br />
- and σx, σy represent the mean squared<br />
deviation <strong>of</strong> X, respectively Y.<br />
311<br />
Table 1. Correlation matrix <strong>of</strong> Monetary<br />
aggregates<br />
M1 Pl_M1 Ro_M1 M1<br />
0.88 0.97 Bg_M1<br />
1 0.93 Pl_M1<br />
M2 Pl_M2 Ro_M2 M2<br />
0.98 0.98 Bg_M2<br />
1 0.96 Pl_M2<br />
M3 Pl_M3 Ro_M3 M2<br />
0.98 0.99 Bg_M3<br />
1 0.99 Pl_M3<br />
Based on monetary value and monetary<br />
aggregates M1 and M2 between January 2004<br />
and March 2011, their correlation matrix was<br />
calculated. Statistically, the correlation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
results <strong>of</strong> the secondary aggregate (M2) and<br />
the tertiary one (M3) shows a close link<br />
between the developments in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania, Bulgaria and Poland. With the<br />
secondary aggregate, the highest correlation<br />
is between Romania and Bulgaria or,<br />
respectively, Romania and Poland, this<br />
showing that the evolution <strong>of</strong> money supply<br />
in our country, on one hand, presents the<br />
features <strong>of</strong> an underdeveloped economy (such<br />
as Bulgaria) and, on the other hand, is similar<br />
to Poland - a country with a large population.<br />
The most noticeable differences are found<br />
with the primary aggregate, the highest
correlation is observed for Romania and<br />
Bulgaria which shows that these countries<br />
have been equally affected by the economic<br />
crisis and the behaviour <strong>of</strong> non-bank agents in<br />
these countries was similar, namely a<br />
decrease in cash holdings and short-term<br />
deposits. The lowest level <strong>of</strong> correlation is<br />
remarked between Bulgaria and Poland which<br />
is due to the fact that after the first effects <strong>of</strong><br />
the economic crisis in Poland, the primary<br />
aggregate returned to levels comparable to<br />
the pre-crisis period, while in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
Bulgaria the decline <strong>of</strong> this aggregate<br />
continues.<br />
Conclusions<br />
Explaining money throw the statistical<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> money aggregates is ,obviously<br />
,more than presenting the static situation <strong>of</strong><br />
monetary aggregates because the level <strong>of</strong><br />
them is an important objective <strong>of</strong> the<br />
monetary policy, the main criteria which are<br />
followed in determining the main<br />
monetary aggregates are: the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
aggregates to be set as an intermediate target<br />
for the monetary policy, the controllability<br />
that can be exercise by the central bank<br />
authority on its growth, the possibility to<br />
allow the monetary authority to react quickly<br />
entitles us to say that pursuit <strong>of</strong> monetary<br />
aggregates is required for fulfilling the<br />
criteria for euro adoption.<br />
The tertiary aggregates are usually more<br />
difficult to calculated and also are to narrow<br />
to supervise by the central bank so in practice<br />
usually its used the secondary aggregate<br />
targeting<br />
The biggest differences are found within the<br />
primary aggregate, the highest correlation is<br />
observed between Romania and Bulgaria; this<br />
shows that these countries have been equally<br />
affected by the economic crisis and the<br />
behaviour <strong>of</strong> non-bank agents in these<br />
countries was similar, namely a decrease in<br />
cash holdings and short-term deposits. The<br />
lowest level <strong>of</strong> correlation is remarked<br />
312<br />
between Bulgaria and Poland which is due to<br />
the fact that after the first effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
economic crisis in Poland, the primary<br />
aggregate returned to levels comparable to<br />
the pre-crisis period, while in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
Bulgaria the decline <strong>of</strong> this aggregate<br />
continues.<br />
Bibliography<br />
1. ADKINS, Lee, Using Gretl for Principles<br />
<strong>of</strong> Econometrics, 2009 ,<br />
learneconometrics.org<br />
2. Baldwin, Richard (2006). In or Out: Does<br />
it Matter? An Evidence-Based Analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Euro's Trade Effects , London: Centre for<br />
Economic Policy Research. ISBN<br />
189812891X.<br />
3. CERNA, Silviu, Economie monetară,<br />
Editura Universității de Vest, Timișoara,<br />
2009<br />
4. COTTREL, Allin, LUCHETTI,<br />
Riccardi, Gretl User Guide, 2010,<br />
gretl.sourceforge.net<br />
5. Damodar N. Gujarati, Basic<br />
Econometrics , Mcgraw-Hill; 4th edition<br />
(May 2002)<br />
6. Fagan, Gabriel, Henry, Jérôme, Long<br />
run money demand in the EU: Evidence for<br />
area-wide aggregates, Empirical Economics,<br />
1998, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01294419<br />
7. Mundell, RA - The American Economic<br />
Review, 1961, A theory <strong>of</strong> optimum currency<br />
Areas, 1961.<br />
8. Robert Bîtcă et al., Dovezi ale<br />
endogenităţii zonelor monetare optime,<br />
(Evidence <strong>of</strong> the endogeneity <strong>of</strong> optimum<br />
currency areas), 2007,<br />
www.batca.files.wordpress.com.<br />
9. ZĂPODEANU, Daniela, Politici<br />
Monetare, Ed. Dacia, Cluj-. Napoca, 2002<br />
10. www.gretl.sourceforge.net/<br />
11. www.bnro.ro<br />
12. http://www.nbp.pl<br />
13. http://www.bnb.bg/<br />
14. www.learneconometrics.com/gretl.html
Section Management and Marketing<br />
Sub-section: Economic Informatics
TOOLS USED IN DECISION MAKING<br />
Demian Horia<br />
Str. Universitatii nr 1, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania<br />
Bernabeu Elena Perez<br />
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Spain<br />
Abrudan Maria Madela<br />
Str. Universitatii nr 1, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania<br />
Abstract: Decision making is one <strong>of</strong> the important tasks <strong>of</strong> every manager. The process <strong>of</strong> taking<br />
decisions has to be based on knowledge. For optimizing this process some s<strong>of</strong>tware solutions has<br />
been created. In this article we tried to summarize some <strong>of</strong> the features which exists in some<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware applications.<br />
Keywords: decision making, risk solver<br />
Introduction<br />
Knowledge is the main source <strong>of</strong> competitive<br />
advantage in the knowledge economy and<br />
innovation in organizations involved in the<br />
services sector.[1] It’s really about the<br />
transformation <strong>of</strong> information into useful data<br />
management process. We must keep in mind,<br />
however, that the speed with which<br />
information circulates, accessibility, search<br />
and how their storage are critical factors to be<br />
taken into account in streamlining decisionmaking.<br />
Taking into account the likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />
achieving results, several models are<br />
developed to optimize decisions, starting<br />
from the classification <strong>of</strong> decisions: decisions<br />
in conditions <strong>of</strong> certainty, risk and<br />
uncertainty. The elements that distinguish<br />
these types <strong>of</strong> decisions is very important for<br />
all - managers and s<strong>of</strong>tware developers.<br />
While the development <strong>of</strong> computer<br />
applications has raised no problems using<br />
established models in case <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
consequences known with certainty -<br />
ELECTRE, for example - the real challenge<br />
for s<strong>of</strong>tware developers is to optimize the<br />
decisions <strong>of</strong> category risk and uncertainty.<br />
In the service sector, as in any other field <strong>of</strong><br />
economics, all computer application are<br />
based on the distinction between definitions<br />
<strong>of</strong> risk and uncertainty:<br />
315<br />
-risk is present when future events<br />
occur with measurable probability<br />
-uncertainty is present when the<br />
likelihood <strong>of</strong> future events is<br />
indefinite or incalculable (Frank H.<br />
Knight, 1921)<br />
Between different algorithms used inside the<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware “Monte Carlo has become a<br />
standard tool <strong>of</strong> risk management” [PRO02]<br />
According to Michele Gambera, the accuracy<br />
<strong>of</strong> the results is limited by the number <strong>of</strong><br />
simulated histories. The process <strong>of</strong> simulation<br />
will be longer when we have more data. So,<br />
an important issue will be how fast a<br />
computer program can do all the calculations.<br />
New technologies which were developed will<br />
improve the speed <strong>of</strong> the calculations. Cloud<br />
computing is one <strong>of</strong> this technology. If we are<br />
taking into consideration cloud computing,<br />
we have to be aware that the algorithm has to<br />
be done in parallel and also if there are a<br />
mechanism <strong>of</strong> sending and receiving subsets<br />
<strong>of</strong> data between these processes. Monte Carlo<br />
algorithm is one which can be done in<br />
parallel computing.<br />
In Monte Carlo simulation an important fact<br />
is the distribution which we used for our<br />
model. There is a lot <strong>of</strong> distribution which<br />
can be used like normal distribution, uniform<br />
distribution, triangular distribution and so on.
According to an article <strong>of</strong> S. Savage, S.<br />
Scholtes, and D. Zweidler “simulations<br />
without acceptable input distributions are like<br />
light bulbs without electricity”, and they<br />
observe very well that “Only a few people<br />
within an organization have the expertise to<br />
estimate probability distributions, and even<br />
fewer have the managerial authority to get<br />
their estimates accepted on an enterprise-wide<br />
basis”. One <strong>of</strong> their ideas was to manage<br />
probability distributions centrally and to<br />
replace the classical probability distributions<br />
with stochastic libraries a pre-generated<br />
random trials that approximate” stochastic<br />
inputs or can be the results <strong>of</strong> simulation and<br />
optimization models.<br />
ProbabilityManagement.org has presented the<br />
DIST Distribution String which brings to<br />
Monte Carlo simulation, a data structure that<br />
contains thousands <strong>of</strong> Monte Carlo trials.<br />
These trials are compressed through XML, so<br />
that structure can be store in the single cell <strong>of</strong><br />
a spreadsheet or in a field <strong>of</strong> a data base. The<br />
main advantages <strong>of</strong> DIST is that it can be<br />
generated by experts, to represent virtually<br />
any type <strong>of</strong> probability distribution, and then<br />
Also a Model Pane which consists <strong>of</strong> four<br />
tabs will be displayed in the right part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
screen. Model tab is used for seeing the<br />
description for the current model which can<br />
be one <strong>of</strong> Optimization, Simulation or<br />
Decision tree. Platform tab is used for<br />
defining parameters for Optimization Model,<br />
parameters for Simulation Model or<br />
parameters for decision Tree Model.<br />
Engine tab is used for specifying engine<br />
which will be used in solving the problem.<br />
We can select from Standard GRG Nonlinear<br />
Engine, Standard LP/Quadratic Engine,<br />
316<br />
it can be distributed to others in a<br />
standardized format.<br />
Other important concept is to use interactive<br />
simulation in your model.<br />
Risk Solver Platform is developed by<br />
FrontlineSystems and is fully integrated with<br />
Micros<strong>of</strong>t Excel. This s<strong>of</strong>tware can be used<br />
for linear and non-linear model, for<br />
conventional optimization, for decision tree<br />
model, for risk analysis and Monte Carlo<br />
simulation.<br />
“This package was also the first, and as <strong>of</strong><br />
this date, the most powerful interactive Monte<br />
Carlo simulation package for Micros<strong>of</strong>t<br />
Excel. For simple simulations involving a few<br />
variables, it can perform 100,000 trials<br />
essentially instantly, as the user changes<br />
parameters in the model.”<br />
[http://probabilitymanagement.org/S<strong>of</strong>tware.h<br />
tm]<br />
Immediate after installation the menu <strong>of</strong><br />
Excel will be improved with a ribbon with<br />
specific option for optimization and<br />
simulation, like it can be seen in the<br />
following figure.<br />
Standard Evolutionary Engine, Standard<br />
Interval Global Engine, Standard SOCP<br />
Barrier Engine, Risk Solver Engine, or we<br />
can let it choose automatically which engine<br />
to use in solving the problem. Which engine<br />
should we use? Their recommendation is to<br />
try them all, and use the one that performs<br />
best on your model.[RISK01]<br />
For every <strong>of</strong> these engine we can define some<br />
parameters which will be used, like Monte<br />
Carlo number <strong>of</strong> trials, the algorithm used for<br />
random number generations, number <strong>of</strong><br />
iterations, Integer tolerance, Multi Start and
so on. Integer tolerance is used to stop finding<br />
a solution in Branch and Bound algorithm,<br />
when the relative difference between the best<br />
found solution and the best possible solution<br />
is less than this value. If this value is set to<br />
zero, the algorithm will be stopped with the<br />
true optimal integer solution.<br />
When Multistart option is set to true, methods<br />
for finding global solution to the problem will<br />
be used.<br />
Output tab is used for displaying the results.<br />
Nonlinear problems are more difficult to<br />
solve than linear problems. In risk solver<br />
platform an important advantage is that <strong>of</strong><br />
using (Analyze without solving) button,<br />
which will help us in finding the model. If the<br />
nonlinear problem is convex, the global<br />
optimal solution will be found.<br />
For using this platform we have to be familiar<br />
with Micros<strong>of</strong>t Excel. The platform came<br />
with a lot <strong>of</strong> useful examples for<br />
optimization, simulation and simulation &<br />
optimization like Simple Business Plan<br />
Forecast Model with Uncertainty, an example<br />
illustrating modeling an investment fund's<br />
growth given uncertain return rates, an<br />
example illustrating modeling multi-period<br />
317<br />
Inventory problems with uncertain demand,<br />
an example illustrating the use <strong>of</strong> Monte-<br />
Carlo Simulation to estimate workforce levels<br />
required to meet demand, an example<br />
illustrating use <strong>of</strong> Monte-Carlo Simulation in<br />
Airline Yield Management; this example also<br />
shows the use <strong>of</strong> a parameterized simulation<br />
model to arrive at good decision policies<br />
under uncertainty.<br />
It is very important to mention that a useful<br />
package named Risk Solver Engine can be<br />
used to develop and deploy application to<br />
users.<br />
Risk Solver Platform came with a set <strong>of</strong><br />
functions which can be used for defining<br />
optimization models and Monte Carlo<br />
simulation models. According to their<br />
documentation most <strong>of</strong> these functions will<br />
be used for Monte Carlo simulation models,<br />
or for the uncertain elements <strong>of</strong> stochastic<br />
optimization models.<br />
We have tried to solve a problem <strong>of</strong> making<br />
reservation to a hotel, in the following<br />
conditions. Our hotels have 50 rooms, and the<br />
price for a room is 39 EURO. In case a client<br />
will cancel the reservation, hotel will not<br />
refund the price <strong>of</strong> the first night <strong>of</strong><br />
accommodation. In case the tourist will show<br />
up and no room will be available a<br />
compensation <strong>of</strong> 25% <strong>of</strong> the price <strong>of</strong> a room<br />
will be paid by the hotel for tourist<br />
accommodation in another hotel.<br />
In less than 5 minutes we can create a model<br />
<strong>of</strong> our problem based on the model which is<br />
defined in YieldManagementModel2.XLS<br />
file. The distribution <strong>of</strong> cancelation will be a<br />
LogNormal distribution <strong>of</strong> 5% with a<br />
standard deviation <strong>of</strong> 2%. For this we used<br />
PSILogNormal function which generates<br />
random number <strong>of</strong> tourist cancelations. We<br />
prefer this model because we can see exactly<br />
the evolution <strong>of</strong> simulation for each particular<br />
case, and we can make an idea about the<br />
algoritm.
For number <strong>of</strong> booking we used<br />
=PsiSimParam(C19:BB19) which tell to<br />
Solver engine that a different simulation will<br />
be made for each value <strong>of</strong> a cell from the<br />
domain C19 to BB19. We also used<br />
=PsiMean($C$15,C18) do define the<br />
expected revenue in each case <strong>of</strong> simulations.<br />
We also set the number <strong>of</strong> trials per<br />
simulation to 10000 for more accuracy. In<br />
less than 3 seconds on our computer we<br />
To solve this problem solver was simulate all<br />
50 cases with 10000 <strong>of</strong> situations in 0.25<br />
seconds.<br />
318<br />
obtain the results to our problems which<br />
indicate us to use 53 rooms in the process <strong>of</strong><br />
making reservations.<br />
Another very useful thing is the displaying <strong>of</strong><br />
the results which can be viewed and analyzed<br />
in a different window like the above on. We<br />
can combine multiple simulations in our<br />
analyzing or we can see the results for only<br />
one.<br />
The same problem can be solved if we define<br />
a simulation &optimization model. For this<br />
model we used only PSILogNormal and
PSIMean functions as it can be seen in the following figure.<br />
We define an maximum objective <strong>of</strong> C16, we<br />
put a condition that number <strong>of</strong> booking has to<br />
be an integer (we cannot book 5.34 rooms),<br />
and we also set that C11 is a variable, like it<br />
can be seen in the model above in the<br />
optimization section. Another parameters <strong>of</strong><br />
the engine is 1 simulation and 1000 <strong>of</strong> trials<br />
per simulation. We start with button.<br />
Solver has found a solution in our case in 6.8<br />
seconds after informing us that our model<br />
contains uncertainity, and Risk solver<br />
Another interesting part <strong>of</strong> Risk Solver Platform are Decision Tree.<br />
319<br />
platform will analyze our formula to<br />
determine the best methods for solving it.<br />
Also it determine that our models is non<br />
linear in decision variables and cannot be<br />
solved by stochastic programming or robust<br />
optimization methods. At the end inform us<br />
that Branch &Bound algorithm has found the<br />
best <strong>of</strong> the locally optimal solutions. The<br />
results are 53 bookings like in the preceding<br />
solutions.
Conclusions<br />
1.Risk Solver platform can be used in solving<br />
different services optimization problems<br />
when we are working with uncertainty.<br />
2.SAS can be mention as a leader on risk<br />
management for banking.<br />
3.Using simulation & optimization it takes<br />
more time to Risk Solver Platform to solve<br />
our problem, but is more ease to define the<br />
model and to interpret the results.<br />
Bibliography:<br />
1.[SAV01] S. Savage, S. Scholtes, and D.<br />
Zweidler, 2006,“Probability Management,<br />
Part 2,” OR/MS Today, April 2006, Vol. 33,<br />
No. 2.<br />
[RISK01] Risk Solver Platform Reference<br />
guide- version 10.0<br />
[PRO01] ProbabilityManagement.org, 2011<br />
2.[PRO02]<br />
http://probabilitymanagement.org/Library/IW<br />
M11MarApr_MonteCarlo.pdf<br />
3.[BOY01] Stephen Boyd, Arpita Ghosh, and<br />
Alessandro Magnani- Brench and Bound<br />
methods – Stanford university 2003<br />
320<br />
4. Shradhanand, Amarjeet Kaur, and Dr.<br />
Satbir Jain. Use <strong>of</strong> fuzzy logic in s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
development. Issues in Information Systems.<br />
Volume VIII, No. 2, 2007<br />
5. Kahraman C, Fuzzy Multi-Criteria<br />
Decision Making.Theory and Applications<br />
with Recent Developments. Springer<br />
Science+Business Media 2008. ISBN 978-0-<br />
387-76812-0<br />
6. Gurevich G, Kliger D. and Levy O.<br />
Decision-making under uncertainty – A field<br />
study <strong>of</strong> cumulative prospect theory. Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Banking & Finance 33 (2009) 1221–1229<br />
7. Feng G and Mingzhe W. Route Choice<br />
Behavior Model with Guidance Information.<br />
J Transpn Sys Eng & IT, 2010, 10(6), 64−69.<br />
8.<br />
http://www.palisade.com/decisiontools_suite/<br />
9. http://www.solver.com/platform/risksolver-platform.htm<br />
10.<br />
http://www.oracle.com/us/products/middlewa<br />
re/bus-int/crystalball/index.html
Sub-section: Marketing
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THE<br />
CASE OF ROMANIA. CONCEPT AND MANAGEMENT.<br />
Bibu Nicolae<br />
West University, Timisoara (Romania)<br />
Faculty Of Economics And Business Administration (FEAA)<br />
Lisetchi Mihai<br />
West University, Timisoara (Romania)<br />
Faculty Of Economics And Business Administration (FEAA)<br />
Abstract: The public administration has a major role in partnerships establishing and operating<br />
with different community actors aiming at solving specific community problems. In the process <strong>of</strong><br />
identifying and solving the community problems the actions <strong>of</strong> the non-governmental organisations<br />
are considered as “alternatives” to the solutions <strong>of</strong> the public administration.<br />
The advantages <strong>of</strong> an on-going collaboration between non-governmental organisations, as relevant<br />
agents in the social economy, and the public authorities aiming at solving the community problems<br />
were identified and aknowledged by both sides representatives. The access to complementary<br />
resources, and implicitly, an increase in the range <strong>of</strong> actions <strong>of</strong> the partners beyond mathematical<br />
calculus, an increase in the credibility and public image <strong>of</strong> the partners, as well as the social benefit<br />
corollary to positive models established within the community, are only a few <strong>of</strong> the arguments. The<br />
question raised is why this type <strong>of</strong> a more consistent approach is not used in the current practices <strong>of</strong><br />
solving the community issues in Romania. The following causes should be considered in response to<br />
this question: the lack <strong>of</strong> an associative culture at the level <strong>of</strong> all potential partners, the access to<br />
resources is by far too limited on behalf <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the two parts involved, a neutral, thus,<br />
unrestrictive legislative environment, but at the same time, unstimulating towards an associative<br />
action, i.e. limited management capacities on both sides.<br />
From this perspectives, this paper aims at clarifying the partnership concept (definition, typology),<br />
the public-private partnership role in solving community problems and the management issues<br />
related: partners identification, negociation <strong>of</strong> the cooperation protocol, decision making process<br />
and resource management, assesment, etc.<br />
Keywords: partnership, public administration, non-governmental organizations, public-private<br />
partnership, partnership management.<br />
JEL Classification codes: L33, L38<br />
I. Public Administration and Partnership<br />
Practice<br />
Bringing suplementary resources represents<br />
the aim <strong>of</strong> the openess <strong>of</strong> the public<br />
institutions to public-private partnership, as<br />
an instrument in community problems solving<br />
process. This openess is a must considering<br />
the genuine explosion <strong>of</strong> citizens’ public<br />
needs coroborated with the cronic lack <strong>of</strong><br />
resources any public institution has to face,<br />
regardless which part <strong>of</strong> the world it<br />
functions.<br />
323<br />
The Partnership Concept<br />
Assuming partnership as a governing<br />
principle represents, from a political point <strong>of</strong><br />
view, a democratic option and, thus, has the<br />
significance <strong>of</strong> a political message;<br />
meantime, it implies an great effort to ensure<br />
its institutional and procedural premises and,<br />
by consequance, has the significance <strong>of</strong> a<br />
institutional development program, situation<br />
which brings advantages and risks<br />
simultanously. Among its advantages for the<br />
public authorities are increased public support<br />
for their ongoing programs, atracting
suplementary resources compared with the<br />
ones commonly available to public authorities<br />
and an increased adaptation <strong>of</strong> the public<br />
services to the community needs (Bancila et<br />
al. 2002:42). Partnership is not a purpose in<br />
itself, but, from a methodological point <strong>of</strong><br />
view, it is a way to approach problems, while<br />
from a managerial point <strong>of</strong> view it is an<br />
instrument used in solving problems.<br />
Partnership is the way, formal or informal,<br />
through which two or more parties act<br />
together in order to achieve a joint goal or<br />
joint objectives, based on a joint plan <strong>of</strong><br />
action and joint dedicated resources and<br />
under a joint resources and activities<br />
management. The specific approach through<br />
which resources are jointly dedicated under a<br />
joint management makes the difference<br />
between partnership and cooperation concept<br />
while the differences between the two words<br />
are difficult to notice from a semantic point<br />
<strong>of</strong> view. In the same respect, joint<br />
management makes the difference between a<br />
partnership and a funding relation.<br />
As far as it concern the decision process, in<br />
partnership relation, the parties must not<br />
necessarly have equal shares, but is important<br />
that they are treated as sitting on equal<br />
grounds because partnership can not be build<br />
on a subordination relation. Consequantly, in<br />
a partnership, the decision power can be split<br />
between parties evenly or proportionally with<br />
their contribution (Bancila et al. 2002:40).<br />
The partnership types can be considered<br />
based on diverse criteria, acting<br />
simultanously or independently, which<br />
generate a relatively complex typology<br />
(Bancila et al. 2002:39). Thus, from a legal<br />
point <strong>of</strong> view, partnerships can be formal or<br />
informal. When the goal is specific enough<br />
and achiving it is not a problem, an informal<br />
partnership can be established if the parties<br />
are similar entities, knowing each other and,<br />
eventually, having a cooperation history<br />
together. In the case <strong>of</strong> a more complexe or<br />
long term or if parties are different type <strong>of</strong><br />
entities (NGOs and public authorities, or<br />
NGOs <strong>of</strong> different nationalities), partnership<br />
324<br />
tends to be formalised. Another criteria for<br />
partnerships classification is the type <strong>of</strong> the<br />
partnership goal. Thus, one can find<br />
representation partnerships like federations,<br />
unions, councils, aliances, coalitions, etc.<br />
together with operational partnerships which<br />
implies the existance <strong>of</strong> specific projects as a<br />
reason <strong>of</strong> the venture. Partneships can be<br />
established on a long or short term, with its<br />
own funding or attracted funding, etc.<br />
Meantime, it should be mentioned that<br />
public-private partnership, as a specific cas <strong>of</strong><br />
partnership [1], may define an public<br />
authorities’ initiative to solve community<br />
problems by involving a private partners,<br />
either from business sector, or nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
sector. This paper is focusing on the second<br />
category <strong>of</strong> potential private partners.<br />
NGOs as Public Policy Subjects in Romania<br />
Coagulation and development <strong>of</strong> the<br />
nonpr<strong>of</strong>it sector, as an alternative to the<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> the market and public institutions,<br />
creates the opportunity <strong>of</strong> an analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
public authorities-NGOs partnership<br />
management and, implicitly, the clarification<br />
<strong>of</strong> the nongovernmental organization concept.<br />
Comparing to the other categories <strong>of</strong><br />
institutions which operate in the community,<br />
nonpr<strong>of</strong>it nongovernmental organizations<br />
(commonly known as nongovernmental<br />
organizations - NGOs) ressamble to private<br />
commercial entities concerning the way they<br />
function, but their goals and objectives are<br />
focused on social needs approached through<br />
public interest activities, without a<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>it (if does exist) among<br />
the persons involved in the activities. This<br />
brings NGOs closer to the logic <strong>of</strong> the public<br />
institutions (Andersen et al. 2010:8). There<br />
are many definitions on the nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
nongovernmental organization concept.<br />
According to the structural-functional<br />
definition (Salomon 1992:6), NGOs should<br />
meet couple <strong>of</strong> criteria: to have an<br />
institutional structure, to be <strong>of</strong> private nature,<br />
to do not share pr<strong>of</strong>it, to be self governed, to<br />
be volunteer run.
Further, the discussion is focusing on only<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the NGOs, more precisely, in the<br />
meaning <strong>of</strong> this text, nongovernmental<br />
organizations or nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations are<br />
defined as an organizational category, formed<br />
by institutionalised entities, <strong>of</strong> private nature,<br />
dedicated to social needs, independent from<br />
public institutions and not interested in<br />
political power (i.e. political parties) or pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
(i.e. commercial private organizations).<br />
In some countries, the relations between<br />
NGOs and public authorities have a long and<br />
well grounded history. For other countries,<br />
Romania included, relations without an<br />
evident political character between NGOs and<br />
public authorities represent a new type <strong>of</strong><br />
public relations emerged in the beggining <strong>of</strong><br />
the ’90ties. They were possible only when<br />
democratic changes in former socialist<br />
countries started while previously their<br />
governments kept all private initiatives under<br />
strict surveillance and administrative control<br />
(ICNL 2000). All the governmental<br />
strategies issued in Romania after 1990<br />
included public authorities-NGOs<br />
partnerships as a constant objective for all<br />
governments. Periodically legislative and<br />
institutional initiatives aimed to facilitate<br />
public authorities-NGOs sectoral, national<br />
and local consultations were announced<br />
(Liseţchi and Olteanu 1998:3). While the<br />
governmental interest for NGOs has a history<br />
<strong>of</strong> over 20 years, a review <strong>of</strong> the public policy<br />
on NGOs main hallmarks shows that actual<br />
period is a transitional one and Romania is<br />
still in a phase <strong>of</strong> institutional set up (Lisetchi<br />
2006:1).<br />
NGOs’ Evaluation by Public Authorities<br />
In order to evaluate the NGOs’ potential to be<br />
associated in the public policies elaboration,<br />
implementation and evaluation process, and,<br />
also, to apply the Romanian legal norms<br />
(O.G. 26/2000), it is useful for the public<br />
authorities to elaborate an appropriate<br />
methodology. Public perception on NGOs is<br />
an important factor in assessing this potential<br />
(Bancila et al. 2002:45). NGOs shows an<br />
325<br />
higher level <strong>of</strong> public trust comparing to<br />
authorities (FDSC 2010). Citizens’<br />
appreciation for NGOs is as increased as<br />
they: facilitate the citizens’ participation,<br />
strengthen cohesion and solidarity, get<br />
involved in partnerships with the authorities<br />
and have strong local roots. NGOs seem to be<br />
less trustful if perceived as part <strong>of</strong> the public<br />
system, beneficiary and consumers <strong>of</strong> public<br />
resources, or if they are perceived as week or<br />
centred on their own goals, if these are<br />
different from those <strong>of</strong> the community<br />
(Bancila et al. 2002:45).<br />
Assessment Criteria <strong>of</strong> Public Policies on<br />
NGO<br />
In order to foster the possibility <strong>of</strong> evaluating<br />
the willingness <strong>of</strong> the public authorities to get<br />
involved with the non-governmental<br />
organizations it is necessary to employ some<br />
criteria to ensure a standardised assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
the associative behaviour <strong>of</strong> the public<br />
administration towards potential community<br />
partners. Such criteria (Bancila et al.<br />
2002:45-46) are as follows:<br />
a) existing institutionalised structures that<br />
link the public authorities to the<br />
associative sector;<br />
b) exiting solution grids, accurately and<br />
univocally defined, such as recurrent<br />
institutionalized processes;<br />
c) applying the principle <strong>of</strong> equal<br />
opportunities to any non-governmental<br />
organisations that request assistance;<br />
d) applying the principle <strong>of</strong> supply and<br />
demand in any public administration-<br />
NGO relation;<br />
e) employing accurate selection criteria <strong>of</strong><br />
the services <strong>of</strong>fered by the organizations;<br />
f) the access <strong>of</strong> organisations to public<br />
services contracting within equal terms as<br />
other economic agents;<br />
g) the registration <strong>of</strong> relevant information<br />
regarding the organisations that perform<br />
their activity within the covered<br />
geographical area;<br />
h) jointly designing a job description <strong>of</strong> the<br />
public clerk whose attributions should
entail the relationship with the nongovernmental<br />
organisations;<br />
i) showing interest in raising the awareness<br />
and the sense <strong>of</strong> responsibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />
elected <strong>of</strong>ficials in relation to the<br />
electorate;<br />
II. The Partnership between Public<br />
Administration and Non-Governmental<br />
Organisations The Opportunity <strong>of</strong> a<br />
Partnership between Public Administration<br />
and NGOs<br />
The advantages <strong>of</strong> an on-going collaboration<br />
between non-governmental organisations, as<br />
relevant agents in the social economy, and the<br />
public authorities aiming at solving the<br />
community problems, are as follows: the<br />
access to complementary resources, and<br />
implicitly, an increase in the range <strong>of</strong> actions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the partners beyond mathematical calculus,<br />
an increase in the credibility and public image<br />
<strong>of</strong> the partners, as well as the social benefit<br />
corollary to positive models established<br />
within the community, etc.<br />
In the process <strong>of</strong> identifying and solving the<br />
community problems the actions <strong>of</strong> the nongovernmental<br />
organisations are considered as<br />
“alternatives” to the solutions <strong>of</strong> the public<br />
administration. In order to render perspicuous<br />
the choice <strong>of</strong> the word “alternative”, it is<br />
necessary to explain that communities do not<br />
have to choose between the development<br />
model brought forth by the public authorities<br />
and a model suggested by the organisations,<br />
for the very reason that organisations cannot<br />
launch such an <strong>of</strong>fer. Only in exceptional<br />
circumstances can NGOs entirely solve a<br />
community problem. At the same time, the<br />
way in which NGOs take action can represent<br />
a model <strong>of</strong> approaching a problematic matter,<br />
not the only way or the best way, however,<br />
most definitely efficient from the perspective<br />
<strong>of</strong> a cost/benefit analysis. This does not mean<br />
that non-governmental organisations are to<br />
replace the public administration or that they<br />
are to perform the duties <strong>of</strong> the latter. The<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> the non-governmental organisations<br />
does not represent an alternative per se to the<br />
326<br />
services <strong>of</strong>fered by the public institutions.<br />
NGOs represent an action method<br />
complementary to the activities <strong>of</strong> the<br />
administration, through which the community<br />
becomes responsible towards solving their<br />
own issues (Lisetchi 2006:1). In this context,<br />
the partnership can be considered a<br />
desirable principle <strong>of</strong> action which can be<br />
found, to a certain extant, in the<br />
organizational culture and the practice <strong>of</strong><br />
some public institutions.<br />
Management Approach <strong>of</strong> the Public<br />
Administration - NGOs Partnership<br />
In an atempt to optimize the public<br />
administration-NGOs partnership, some<br />
specific aspects are to be considered:<br />
a) different resources: the authorities have the<br />
possibility to allocate public funds, as well as<br />
the capacity to issue regulations, while the<br />
NGOs have the possibility <strong>of</strong> accessing<br />
private funds, respectively, the expertise to<br />
solve specific issues and the capacity to<br />
motivate/mobilise volunteers.<br />
b) working method: the operation capacity <strong>of</strong><br />
the authorities is limited by the attributions<br />
foreseen by their regulations, respectively, a<br />
slow reaction held back by bureaucracy and<br />
the propensity towards solving the general<br />
issues, while the NGOs are more flexible,<br />
faster in their reactions and the tendency to<br />
focus on specific problems.<br />
c) the organisational structure and culture:<br />
the authorities are larger organisations<br />
comprising complex structures, while NGOs<br />
are smaller organisations with simpler<br />
structures (Altman-Sauer et al. 2001:34).<br />
The differences can generate tension; the<br />
main obstacles that hinder an efficient<br />
relationship between the NGOs and the<br />
public authorities have been identified: (I)<br />
different perspectives <strong>of</strong> the two sides<br />
concerning the same matter, (II) the lack <strong>of</strong><br />
understanding the peculiarity <strong>of</strong> the activity<br />
carried into effect by the other, (III) the<br />
particular economic and cultural effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
community on the communication methods,<br />
on the spreading <strong>of</strong> the information and <strong>of</strong> the
decision-making and (IV) the power relations<br />
between the two parts involved (Altman-<br />
Sauer et al. 2001: 35-38). The common<br />
element that was identified by the two sides,<br />
i.e. the fact that it addresses the same group<br />
(members <strong>of</strong> the community sharing the same<br />
problems) and the capacity to find solutions<br />
for the above-mentioned obstacles, can lead<br />
to an advantageous cooperation between<br />
public administration and NGOs, that will,<br />
consequently, benefit the community.<br />
Cooperation within a public-private<br />
partnership is facilitated in the following<br />
circumstances: collaboration should focus on<br />
a single matter, the purposes are clearly<br />
stated, public participation in the process <strong>of</strong><br />
solving the community problems, each<br />
partner should devote time and resources to<br />
plan the cooperation, the intentions and<br />
coordinates <strong>of</strong> the partnership should be<br />
clearly established by the two parts, the<br />
necessary resources for a good cooperation<br />
within the partnership should be accurately<br />
identified, assessed and allocated,<br />
communication should be appropriate and<br />
efficient, the attributions, skills and<br />
responsibilities <strong>of</strong> each partner should be<br />
specified, a decision-making system based on<br />
the equal status <strong>of</strong> the partners should be<br />
designed (Altman-Sauer et al. 2001:34-35).<br />
Exercising the Public Administration-<br />
NGOs Partnership in Romania<br />
If at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the last decade nongovernmental<br />
organisations were perceived<br />
as being rather anti-governmental by the<br />
public authorities, partnerships between them<br />
being exceptional, currently things have<br />
changed considerably with the opportunities<br />
<strong>of</strong>fered by the European financing<br />
programmes prior to Romania’s accession to<br />
the E.U. The fact that the European Union,<br />
according to the financing programme, either<br />
imposed on the public administration the<br />
partnership with the non-governmental<br />
organisations, respectively, imposing on the<br />
public institutions the partnership with<br />
NGOs, or it granted a higher score for such<br />
327<br />
collaborations, has lead to a spectacular<br />
proliferation <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> public-private<br />
partnerships in Romania. It is worth<br />
mentioning that, as a consequence, more<br />
funders took up this approach as part <strong>of</strong> their<br />
financing policies. Given this context,<br />
towards the end <strong>of</strong> the last decade,<br />
partnerships became a purpose themselves,<br />
being assessed inconsistently in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />
management or the results <strong>of</strong> such a process.<br />
On the other hand, financing the projects <strong>of</strong><br />
the non-governmental organisations by the<br />
public authorities, as a recommended practice<br />
by the community development theory, has<br />
lead to an extensive employment <strong>of</strong> the term<br />
partnership in the marketing discourse.<br />
Nevertheless, such an interpretation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
financing relationship between the two types<br />
<strong>of</strong> institutions, even if valued on first sight, is<br />
abusive if compared to the concept <strong>of</strong><br />
partnership which entails a process <strong>of</strong> codecision<br />
in operating the tasks to be handled<br />
by the parts involved in the partnership.<br />
Regarding the above-mentioned issues, the<br />
problem raised is that the public-private<br />
partnership is deprived <strong>of</strong> its deep structure<br />
and meaning.<br />
To bring forth a general perspective regarding<br />
the practice <strong>of</strong> the public-private partnership,<br />
it is worth mentioning that, as in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania, the current legal framework allows<br />
the development <strong>of</strong> the relations between<br />
public authorities and the non-governmental<br />
organisations (OG 26/2000). The question<br />
raised is why this type <strong>of</strong> a more consistent<br />
approach is not used in the current practices<br />
<strong>of</strong> solving the community issues in Romania.<br />
The following causes should be considered in<br />
response to this question (Lisetchi 2006:20):<br />
the lack <strong>of</strong> an associative culture at the level<br />
<strong>of</strong> all potential partners, the access to<br />
resources is by far too limited on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />
any <strong>of</strong> the two parts involved, a neutral, thus,<br />
unrestrictive legislative environment, but at<br />
the same time, unstimulating towards an<br />
associative action, i.e. limited management<br />
capacities on both sides. Concerning the issue<br />
<strong>of</strong> the associative culture, the GLOBE
Romania research (Bibu et al. 2008) shows<br />
that in relation to the obtained score for the<br />
cultural dimension criterion, Institutional<br />
Collectivism (Collectivism I), Romania is<br />
situated on a scale from 1 to 7 at a relatively<br />
low level, 3.75, in comparison with the rest <strong>of</strong><br />
the world. This number outlines the degree to<br />
which institutional practices at the social and<br />
organisational level encourage and<br />
compensate for the collective distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
the resources and the collective action. A low<br />
number indicates less collectivism, thus, more<br />
individualism in relation to the general<br />
interest in society. Nonetheless, the score <strong>of</strong><br />
5.43 for the cultural dimension Group<br />
Collectivism (Collectivism II) is situated at<br />
a higher level on the world scale, which<br />
indicates that in Romania individual<br />
expressions <strong>of</strong> pride, loyalty and cohesion<br />
within smaller groups, such as the<br />
organisation, the family, are more recurrent.<br />
Romanian culture favours smaller groups and<br />
their interests and puts at a disadvantage the<br />
general interest in the society. Consequently,<br />
the associative factor is not favoured by the<br />
Romanian culture. The narrow interest <strong>of</strong> the<br />
group they belong to is the strongest.<br />
Perforce, it is necessary to clearly point out<br />
the common areas <strong>of</strong> the two partners in order<br />
to render the partnerships viable.<br />
In practice there are naturally more<br />
differences in approaching the way in which<br />
the authorities and NGOs relate to<br />
community problems. Public administration<br />
tends to unfold partnerships in especially in<br />
certain fields: unemployment, social care,<br />
local development, citizen-public<br />
administration relation, health, SMEs,<br />
environmental care, education, the non-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
associative sector, the protection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
disabled, tourism development, child care,<br />
regional development, culture (Bancila et al.<br />
2002:42).<br />
In establishing the partnership vocation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
NGOs, the representatives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
administration tend to employ, in this very<br />
same order, the following indicators: the<br />
objectives <strong>of</strong> the organisation, the target-<br />
328<br />
group, the resources <strong>of</strong> the organisation, the<br />
impact, the level the public participation.<br />
There is a considerable difference between<br />
this evaluation grid and the one carried into<br />
effect by the financing foundations (for<br />
example, the small amount <strong>of</strong> importance<br />
given to the impact), which can be explained<br />
through the different experience in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> an organisation and its<br />
programmes.<br />
In Romania, according to the public<br />
administration representatives, the following<br />
major obstacles stand in the way <strong>of</strong> the<br />
administration-NGO partnership: deficiencies<br />
in the functioning <strong>of</strong> the authorities 29%,<br />
inadequate institutional and legislative<br />
environment 22%, authority resources 15%,<br />
disfunctions in the running <strong>of</strong> the NGO 15%,<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> information 10% (Bancila et al.<br />
2002:44). In effect, it was noticed that in the<br />
past few years in Romania, falling beyond an<br />
existing theory concept and favourable<br />
narrative discourse, there still exists an<br />
unequal involvement <strong>of</strong> the two potential<br />
partners in the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />
collaboration. Naturally, there are also many<br />
cases <strong>of</strong> partnerships between nongovernmental<br />
organisations and public<br />
institutions, this fact being registered<br />
positively. The truth <strong>of</strong> the matter is that, on<br />
the background <strong>of</strong> the opening declarations <strong>of</strong><br />
the public authorities on the common actions,<br />
there is a passive attitude towards this type <strong>of</strong><br />
approach on behalf <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the institutions<br />
(Lisetchi 2006:21-22). The initiative<br />
regarding the common resolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
problems <strong>of</strong> public interest continues to be to<br />
a great extent in the hands <strong>of</strong> nongovernmental<br />
organisations. Needless to say,<br />
not all organisations can be included in our<br />
analysis, as well as not all public institutions<br />
are part <strong>of</strong> this discussion. Nuances <strong>of</strong> the<br />
discourse should be observed in the context<br />
<strong>of</strong> a reality in which not all non-governmental<br />
organisations should take a role in the public<br />
welfare, insomuch as the assertion above does<br />
not mean that all public institutions should<br />
collaborate with non-governmental
organisations in order to deal with<br />
community problems. NGOs are, in general,<br />
the ones who request the collaboration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
public authorities according to various<br />
conditions: individual priorities, willingness<br />
to work in a partnership, the public relations<br />
image <strong>of</strong> the organisation, etc. The public<br />
administration accepts or refuses to be<br />
involved in such actions. At a surface level,<br />
the normality <strong>of</strong> the situation described above<br />
cannot be refuted. The problem, though, that<br />
should be raised revolves around the attitude<br />
towards the responsibility <strong>of</strong> solving the<br />
community issues <strong>of</strong> the two potential<br />
partners. If, for the public administration, this<br />
type <strong>of</strong> responsibility is legally regulated,<br />
having a binding character, imposed, and,<br />
eventually, it represents the reason to be <strong>of</strong> a<br />
public institution, for the non-governmental<br />
organisations, as structures <strong>of</strong> private<br />
initiative, taking this kind <strong>of</strong> responsibility is<br />
the result <strong>of</strong> the individual willingness,<br />
motivated by the interest in the public welfare<br />
<strong>of</strong> a private group. (Lisetchi 2006:22).<br />
Recommendations Regarding the Public<br />
Administration-NGO Partnership<br />
The problem <strong>of</strong> the partnership between the<br />
public administration and the nongovernmental<br />
organisations represented an<br />
interest point for the Romanian<br />
nongovernmental sector even from the period<br />
<strong>of</strong> the first mandate <strong>of</strong> The Group for the<br />
Implementation <strong>of</strong> the Resolution <strong>of</strong> the NGO<br />
National Forum (GIR) formed in 1998. Thus,<br />
some general recommendations that make<br />
direct reference to the current discussion can<br />
be enlisted among the mentioned activities<br />
within the context <strong>of</strong> a GIR proposition<br />
regarding the future actions <strong>of</strong> the associative<br />
sector:<br />
a) The reinforcement <strong>of</strong> the local and central<br />
public administration capacities to work with<br />
the civil society, manifested through public<br />
authorities agreement procedures <strong>of</strong> the nongovernmental<br />
organisations as service<br />
providers and organisers <strong>of</strong> citizen consulting<br />
centres<br />
329<br />
b) Involving the citizen in the public<br />
decision-making on the basis <strong>of</strong> pre-arranged<br />
procedures<br />
Altman-Sauer, Henderson and Whitaker<br />
(2001:37-38) have a couple <strong>of</strong><br />
recommendations for the two parts involved<br />
in the promotion <strong>of</strong> the NGO-public<br />
administration partnership:<br />
What can the non-governmental organisations<br />
do?<br />
1. Inform the relevant authorities throughout<br />
the year about their progress, not only in the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> the partnership launching or fund<br />
raising.<br />
2. Attach importance to the functioning <strong>of</strong> the<br />
entire community, not only to the<br />
organisation target group.<br />
3. They should be responsible and fair and<br />
bring pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> that to the public eye.<br />
4. To reinforce the trust <strong>of</strong> the public in the<br />
organisation by presenting a trustworthy and<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional image.<br />
5. To help the community learn how to<br />
manage the problems that the organisation<br />
tries to solve and into which they have not<br />
gained an insight yet.<br />
What can the public authorities do?<br />
1. Diminish the frustrations, tensions and<br />
mistrust in the NGO.<br />
2. Ensure an overt management <strong>of</strong> the<br />
financial requests which come on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />
the NGOs.<br />
3. Tackle the problems and needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
community as being part <strong>of</strong> it, not only the<br />
ones <strong>of</strong> the NGOs.<br />
4. Recognise the potential <strong>of</strong> the NGO as a<br />
serious investment.<br />
What can the non-governmental organisations<br />
and the public authorities do together?<br />
1. Exchange information during their<br />
common work relations, as well as in general.<br />
2. To commonly use certain resources.<br />
3. To develop clear guidelines about each<br />
part’s expectations and work on this to reach<br />
a common balance ground.
4. To aknowledge the other part as the best<br />
support for dealing with the public sector<br />
priorities.<br />
Apart from the usefulness <strong>of</strong> these<br />
recommendations, it is foreseeable that<br />
carrying them into effect in the partnership<br />
between the public administration and the<br />
non-governmental organizations is done<br />
progressively, during a slow process<br />
conditioned by the common culture in<br />
Romania, both at an institutional and at an<br />
individual level. Nevertheless, their value is<br />
highlighted by the possibility <strong>of</strong> their use as a<br />
referential point towards which the<br />
organisational behaviour <strong>of</strong> the two types <strong>of</strong><br />
institutions should be oriented, as well as<br />
criteria for a post-factum evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
management and the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />
partnerships.<br />
Note:<br />
1. It is worth mentioning that the partnership<br />
typology also comprises public-public or<br />
private-private partnerships, apart from the<br />
public-private one.<br />
References<br />
1. Altman-Sauer, Lydian, Henderson,<br />
Margaret and Whitaker, Gordon P.,<br />
Strengthening Relationships between Local<br />
Governments and Nonpr<strong>of</strong>its, Vol.66, No.2,<br />
Winter 2001, 2001, Accessed May 12, 2011.<br />
http://sogpubs.unc.edu/electronicversions/pg/<br />
pgwin01/article4.pdf<br />
2. Andersen et al., România 2010. Sectorul<br />
neguvernamental – pr<strong>of</strong>il, tendinţe,<br />
provocări, Bucuresti: Fundaţia pentru<br />
Dezvoltarea Societăţii Civile 2010<br />
330<br />
3. Bancila et al., Organizatii<br />
neguvernamentale, Ghid practic, Timişoara:<br />
editura Brumar, 2002<br />
4. Bibu, et al., Romanian Societal Culture: A<br />
culture towards Westernization?, 2008<br />
5. Fundatia pentru Dezvoltarea Societatii<br />
Civile (FDSC), Organizatiile<br />
neguvernamentale conteaza: bilantul a 20 de<br />
ani de existenta, text disponibil la:<br />
http://www.fdsc.ro/pagini/organizatiileneguvernamentale-conteaza.php,<br />
2010,<br />
accesat la 13 martie 2011<br />
6. International Center for Not-for-Pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
Law (ICNL), Comparative Assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
NGO/Government Partnership in Romania,<br />
2000, accessed May 12, 2011<br />
http://www.icnl.org/knowledge/ijnl/vol2iss3/<br />
p_1.htm<br />
7. Mihai, Liseţchi and Ion, Olteanu,<br />
“Organizaţiile neguvernamentale şi conceptul<br />
de parteneriat”, Carte alba la Forumul<br />
Naţional ONG 1998, 1998<br />
8. Liseţchi, Mihai “Parteneriatul administratie<br />
publica - organizatii neguvernamentale. De la<br />
declaratii de intentie la politici publice” Carte<br />
alba la Forumul Naţional ONG, 1999<br />
9. Lisetchi Mihai, Model participativ de<br />
elaborare a unei politici publice privind ONG<br />
in Romania, lucrare de dizertatie elaborata in<br />
cadrul Masteratului de Politici Publice si<br />
Advocacy, Facultatea de Stiinte Politice,<br />
Universitatea de Vest Timisoara, 2006<br />
10. Ordonanţa Guvernului nr. 26/2000,<br />
Capitolului VIII, cu modificarile introduse de<br />
L 246/2005.<br />
11. Salomon, Lester, America’s Nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
Sector: A Primer, New York: The Foundation<br />
Center, 1992
Sub-section: Management
ORGANIZATIONAL STRESS AND ITS IMPACT ON WORK PERFORMANCE<br />
Bucurean Mirela<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />
Costin Mădălina-Adriana<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />
Abstract: Nowadays, in times <strong>of</strong> economic crisis, most managers or entrepreneurs have to cope with<br />
a lot <strong>of</strong> new job challenges which can easily transform into stressors. Work related stress is <strong>of</strong><br />
growing concern because it has significant economic implications for the organization. Even if<br />
some stress is a normal part <strong>of</strong> life, excessive stress can influence one’s productivity, health and<br />
emotions and it has to be taken under control. When people lose confidence, they refuse to take<br />
responsibilities, they get quickly irritated, they are unsatisfied <strong>of</strong> their job, their performance will be<br />
very low and the organization will be in danger. Fortunately, most managers and entrepreneurs<br />
know which stress main symptoms are and have the necessary knowledge for managing and<br />
reducing it before it can affect employees’ daily work.<br />
Stress can have an impact both on the organizational welfare and on personal behavior <strong>of</strong><br />
supervisors or employees, that’s why, the ability <strong>of</strong> managing it can make the difference between<br />
job’s success or failure.<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to study Romanian managers and entrepreneurs from Bihor County’s<br />
perception regarding the stress phenomenon, if they feel that they are affected by stress, if they<br />
promote some methods to reduce it and if they consider that stress can influence the organizational<br />
performance.<br />
As a research method we used an online questionnaire, applied to a number <strong>of</strong> 75 managers and<br />
entrepreneurs that represent the target group <strong>of</strong> the project "Flexibility and performance through<br />
management", project financed by the European Social Fund - "Invest in people". Each participant<br />
had to answer a number <strong>of</strong> 35 questions regarding stress and the results will be presented in this<br />
paper. The main conclusion is that, even if job itself is seen as a stressor, there are other important<br />
factors that can produce stress such as: family problems, personal problems or social problems.<br />
Keywords: organizational stress, impact, managers, entrepreneurs, work performance<br />
Cod JEL lucrare: M54<br />
1. Organizational stress<br />
Organizational stress can be defined as an<br />
emotional, cognitive, behavioral and<br />
physiological response to the aggressive and<br />
harmful aspects <strong>of</strong> work, work environment<br />
and organizational climate. It is a condition<br />
characterized by feelings <strong>of</strong> helplessness in<br />
solving tasks.<br />
In other words, work-related stress is people’s<br />
reaction when they have to face some<br />
demands or special tasks that are out <strong>of</strong> their<br />
abilities or knowledge.<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> organizational stress<br />
333<br />
The main types <strong>of</strong> organizational stress can<br />
be considered the following (1):<br />
Eustress represents a positive kind <strong>of</strong> stress<br />
and helps people to prepare their mind and<br />
body for whatever is about to occur in the<br />
future. Eustress can develop one’s energy,<br />
creativity or competitive spirit and can <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
the strength for achieving performance.<br />
Distress occurs when something affects one’s<br />
routine for a short period <strong>of</strong> time. It has a<br />
negative impact on people and it contains the<br />
following categories <strong>of</strong> stress: acute stress<br />
and chronic stress.
Acute stress appears when a change<br />
transforms one <strong>of</strong> the usual works that a<br />
person do. Although it seems to be an intense<br />
type <strong>of</strong> stress, it passes very quickly. The<br />
symptoms to that king <strong>of</strong> stress are:<br />
headaches, hypertensions, rapid heartbeat and<br />
stomach problems.<br />
Chronic stress is the most serious type <strong>of</strong><br />
stress and can be very harmful for people’s<br />
health. It occurs when something changes the<br />
routine for a long period <strong>of</strong> time, from weeks<br />
to years. This kind <strong>of</strong> stress appears when<br />
facing several work or personal failures.<br />
2. The effects <strong>of</strong> stress on the<br />
entrepreneurs/managers and stress<br />
management<br />
334<br />
Sources, symptoms and effects <strong>of</strong> stress for<br />
entrepreneurs/managers<br />
After analyzing the causes <strong>of</strong> organizational<br />
stress we can distinguish between those who<br />
act solely on entrepreneurs or managers.<br />
These causes can be the following:<br />
- the diversity and complexity <strong>of</strong> tasks;<br />
- high responsibilities that require<br />
management positions;<br />
- concern for the organization’s future;<br />
- aware <strong>of</strong> the potential effects <strong>of</strong> a poorly<br />
developed decision;<br />
- inappropriate management style;<br />
- excessive centralization <strong>of</strong> authority;<br />
- the existence <strong>of</strong> poorly pr<strong>of</strong>essional trained<br />
subordinates;<br />
- the extension <strong>of</strong> work program due to the<br />
emergence <strong>of</strong> some special situations.<br />
The relationship between stress sources, symptoms and diseases caused by stress for<br />
managers/entrepreneurs, can be graphically represented like this (Fig. no. 1):<br />
Figure no.1 The relationship between stress sources, symptoms and diseases caused by stress<br />
for managers/entrepreneurs (2)<br />
Adaptation by: Agrawal, Rita, Stress in life and at work, Response books, London, 2001, p. 146
Ways <strong>of</strong> managing individual stress<br />
There are a lot <strong>of</strong> actions that individuals can<br />
take in order to manage their stress level and<br />
to prevent them from developing into more<br />
serious problems. The main positive actions<br />
that people can take fall into three categories:<br />
- modification <strong>of</strong> behavior;<br />
- development <strong>of</strong> a healthy lifestyle;<br />
- alteration <strong>of</strong> mindset.<br />
When talking about behavior, the<br />
interventions that can be made are:<br />
- being more assertive: listen to others,<br />
respect others, tell others what you feel or<br />
need, negotiate, compromise, being selfconfidence.<br />
- improving time management: establish<br />
priorities, make a list <strong>of</strong> what must be done,<br />
eliminate time-wasting activities, focus on<br />
essentials, be able to delegate effectively,<br />
learn to say “no”, organize daily activities,<br />
make a list <strong>of</strong> targets.<br />
- avoid perfectionism<br />
- avoid getting angry over things that you<br />
cannot influence;<br />
- accept (sometimes) the errors <strong>of</strong> yourself<br />
and others;<br />
- smile and give affection;<br />
- practice being a good listener;<br />
- learn to relax;<br />
- learn to turn stressful life events into<br />
challenges for personal growth;<br />
- get used to take some “time out”.<br />
As far as healthy lifestyle is concerned, the<br />
main activities that people can follow are:<br />
- a healthy diet: alcohol taken with<br />
moderation, limited quantity <strong>of</strong> caffeine,<br />
avoid carbohydrates, eat fruits, vegetables<br />
and sufficient quantity <strong>of</strong> water;<br />
- regular exercise: reduce muscle tension,<br />
increase energy, maintains self-image,<br />
appearance and tends to control weight, helps<br />
to clear the mind <strong>of</strong> worrying thoughts;<br />
- relaxation: improve sleep patterns,<br />
ameliorate pain, reduces stress response,<br />
increase self-esteem;<br />
- increase leisure time and taking up hobbies.<br />
335<br />
The third area in which people can make<br />
interventions refers to the alteration <strong>of</strong><br />
mindset, including:<br />
- modification <strong>of</strong> perspectives;<br />
- self-talk;<br />
- positive thinking;<br />
Ways <strong>of</strong> managing organizational stress<br />
There are a lot <strong>of</strong> strategies that can be<br />
applied when talking about managing<br />
organizational stress, such as:<br />
- early prevention and elimination <strong>of</strong> workrelated<br />
problems that can produce stress;<br />
- change work demands;<br />
- ensure that employees have the necessary<br />
knowledge and abilities to perform<br />
effectively their jobs;<br />
- improve constantly the technique used at<br />
work;<br />
- apply a proper management style;<br />
- ensure a proper work environment;<br />
- <strong>of</strong>fer employees a stress management<br />
training in order to teach them ways <strong>of</strong><br />
overcoming stress;<br />
- increase the support needed by employees;<br />
- ensure a good level <strong>of</strong> cooperation within<br />
employees;<br />
- clearly define disciplinary procedures;<br />
- establish a supportive working culture in<br />
order that employees feel integral to the<br />
organization and are motivated to achieve its<br />
goals;<br />
- <strong>of</strong>fer employees the necessary support and<br />
information for developing their career;<br />
- encourage flexible work schedules;<br />
- try to manage the change process in a way<br />
that employees cannot become stressed due to<br />
it.<br />
3. Case study - aspects <strong>of</strong> stress perception <strong>of</strong><br />
entrepreneurs and managers from Bihor<br />
County<br />
The proposed research was conducted by<br />
using the database <strong>of</strong> the project "Flexibility<br />
and performance through management"<br />
developed in partnership by the Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Economics and Business Administration,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Craiova and the Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea as a
partner, no <strong>of</strong> contract<br />
POSDRU/81/3.2/S/57620, implementation<br />
period: 12/02/2010 to 01/31/2012 in the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong>: 2,137,229 lei.<br />
The project's general objective is to develop<br />
the pr<strong>of</strong>essional skills <strong>of</strong> general managers in<br />
order to prepare them to promote the<br />
adaptability and the introduction <strong>of</strong> new<br />
technologies. The specific objectives are: the<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional training <strong>of</strong> 180 entrepreneurs and<br />
SMEs managers from two development<br />
regions in order to promote new forms <strong>of</strong><br />
work organization and new technologies with<br />
reduced environmental impact; the increasing<br />
<strong>of</strong> informational level <strong>of</strong> the target group<br />
entrepreneurs and managers when talking<br />
about the necessity <strong>of</strong> introduction and the<br />
compliance <strong>of</strong> safety and health rules at work.<br />
Further the study will be referred to the target<br />
group <strong>of</strong> the NW - Bihor County.<br />
Research Methodology<br />
This research is a descriptive one and its aim<br />
is to provide an image at a certain time on the<br />
studied phenomenon - stress. For<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> this quantitative research<br />
was chosen as a research method - the survey.<br />
For this purpose, a structured questionnaire<br />
was developed in two parts with 35 questions.<br />
336<br />
The target population is the target group -<br />
Bihor County entrepreneurs and managers,<br />
participants in the course <strong>of</strong> the project -<br />
"Flexibility and performance through<br />
management", project financed by the<br />
European Social Fund - "Invest in people".<br />
The database <strong>of</strong> the target group -<br />
entrepreneurs and managers from Bihor<br />
County is based on online questionnaires.<br />
This database has a total <strong>of</strong> 75 entries.<br />
The respondent’s structure<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> affiliation to a business category<br />
entrepreneur/manager, 40% <strong>of</strong> respondents<br />
are entrepreneurs and 60% are managers at all<br />
levels within the SMEs.<br />
Gender structure. The share <strong>of</strong> women in the<br />
total number <strong>of</strong> respondents is 40%, 60% are<br />
men.<br />
Age. Taking into consideration the age in<br />
completed years, the situation is as follows:<br />
16%, 18 – 24 years, 73%, 25 – 45 years, 9%,<br />
45 – 54 years, 2%, 55 – 64 years.<br />
Regarding family status, most participants are<br />
married (62.8%), 34.8% are unmarried,<br />
0.04% being divorced.<br />
Stress and stress concerns<br />
45% <strong>of</strong> respondents work more than 48 hours<br />
per week. In these circumstances, it is not<br />
surprising that 70% <strong>of</strong> respondents believe<br />
they are affected by stress (Fig. no. 2).<br />
Figure no. 2 Working time/week in the case <strong>of</strong> managers<br />
and entrepreneurs from Bihor County
It follows therefore that a larger number <strong>of</strong> respondents believe they are affected by stress. 69%<br />
say they are concerned about stress, but only 21% say they have adopted measures to combat<br />
stress. Also a small number <strong>of</strong> managers (18%) say that the organization in which workers have<br />
been taken measures to combat stress. (Fig. no. 3))<br />
Figure no. 3 Managers, entrepreneurs and organization’s attitude towards stress<br />
To a large extent (85%) respondents considered that work is the main source <strong>of</strong> stress in their<br />
lives. (Fig. no. 4)<br />
Figure no. 4 The main stress factors<br />
337
Over 65% <strong>of</strong> questioned people said they<br />
would continue to work even if they did not<br />
have any financial need. Many managers,<br />
however, (60%) would prefer "to work<br />
elsewhere."<br />
A minority <strong>of</strong> respondents (16%) say that<br />
there are situations in which stress motivate<br />
them to act in order to achieve something - it<br />
is positive stress (eustress); but the most<br />
common is negative stress (distress), when<br />
body and / or mind begin to respond<br />
negatively to stress agents. Over 85% <strong>of</strong><br />
respondents considered that the stress level is<br />
much higher now as compared to five years<br />
ago.<br />
4. Conclusions<br />
According to the conducted cross research the<br />
conclusions are the following:<br />
- entrepreneurs are more stressed than<br />
managers;<br />
- women entrepreneurs/managers are more<br />
stressed than men entrepreneurs/managers;<br />
- married entrepreneurs/managers are more<br />
stressed than unmarried<br />
entrepreneurs/managers;<br />
- the majority entrepreneurs/managers<br />
believes that stress level is much higher now<br />
as compared to five years ago;<br />
- the entrepreneurs and managers are<br />
concerned about stress;<br />
- on personal level, entrepreneurs/managers<br />
usually fail to take measures to combat stress;<br />
- within the organization are generally not<br />
taken measures to combat stress;<br />
- the situations in which stress motivate<br />
entrepreneurs/managers to act to achieve<br />
something are rare;<br />
338<br />
- entrepreneurs/managers believe that work is<br />
the main source <strong>of</strong> stress in their lives;<br />
- entrepreneurs/managers would continue to<br />
work even if they did not have any financial<br />
need;<br />
- most <strong>of</strong> managers would prefer "to work<br />
elsewhere".<br />
Concluding, although the work is considered<br />
the main source <strong>of</strong> stress, not the work itself<br />
is stressful, but the conditions and social<br />
environments in which it unfolds.<br />
Notes<br />
(1) “Types <strong>of</strong> stress – some good, some bad”,<br />
Accessed April 18, 2011.<br />
http://www.stressfocus.com/stress_focus_arti<br />
cle/types-<strong>of</strong>-stress.htm<br />
(2) Agrawal. Rita. Stress in life and at work.<br />
London, England: Response books Publishing<br />
House, 2001.<br />
Bibliography:<br />
1.Agrawal. Rita. Stress in life and at work.<br />
London, England: Response books Publishing<br />
House, 2001.<br />
2.Bucurean, Mirela. Antreprenoriatul si<br />
managementul micilor afaceri. Oradea:<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Publishing House,<br />
2009.<br />
3.Spiers, Carole. Tolley’s Managing Stress in<br />
the Workplace. London, England: LexisNexis<br />
Tolley Publishing House, 2003.<br />
4.*** “Causes and cures <strong>of</strong> stress in<br />
organizations”, Accessed April 21, 2011.<br />
5.http://statpac.org/walonick/organizationalstress.htm<br />
*** “Types <strong>of</strong> stress – some good, some<br />
bad”, Accessed April 18, 2011.<br />
6.http://www.stressfocus.com/stress_focus_ar<br />
ticle/types-<strong>of</strong>-stress.htm
ELEMENTS FOR A MODEL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL SCHOOL FOR WOMEN<br />
IN RURAL AREAS OF ROMANIA<br />
Botezat Elena<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />
Tarcza Teodora<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />
Abstract: Romanian mentality, especially in rural areas is deeply influenced by culture, literature<br />
and history <strong>of</strong> the Romanian people. This proves to be both adaptable and rooted in the old<br />
Romanian traditions and customs. In the last two decades, the transition from socialism to<br />
capitalism, modern society, the socio-economic development <strong>of</strong> the country has left strong<br />
impressions on the way <strong>of</strong> thought, expression and action <strong>of</strong> the Romanian people. Women in rural<br />
areas are no exception. As some groups <strong>of</strong> people interested in their development <strong>of</strong> socialeconomic<br />
scale, rural women are trying to adapt, to evolve, to overcome the barriers imposed at<br />
psychologically, socially and financially.<br />
The paper highlights the results <strong>of</strong> a survey on a sample <strong>of</strong> 979 women students in the project<br />
"Entrepreneurship and Equal Opportunities. An inter-regional model for women entrepreneurial<br />
school "(AntrES acronym), which certified mediators intention to initiate their own business.The<br />
results <strong>of</strong> questionnaires have provided important information about the character, ambition,<br />
motivation, courage, and moral support and financial support to women entrepreneurs based in<br />
Romania, including those in rural areas. The information obtained inetrmediul "I shattered" 7<br />
myths about starting a business in our country. Romanian entrepreneur spirit, women in rural areas<br />
in Romania is not only a manifestation <strong>of</strong> strong desire to improve living standards in financial<br />
terms, but rather an "effort" to improve and "beauty" <strong>of</strong> the individual, family, environment and<br />
society we belong!<br />
In developed countries, at its home, female entrepreneurship is trying to reform, to seek new<br />
solutions to rethink the principles, to exercise imagination, to learn. Here, in Romania standard<br />
behavior still predominates. Female entrepreneurs are doing what everyone else in the same<br />
category does. The future however belongs to those who will opt diversity, surprise, excitement,<br />
personalization. How could this happen in the Romanian rural environment and take place in a<br />
sustainable way?<br />
Keywords: antreprenoriat feminin, mentalitate românească, mediul rural, mituri, potenţial<br />
Jel code: M12, M52<br />
1. Continuity and change in rural Romania<br />
"The main feature <strong>of</strong> Romanian people is its<br />
gregarism, a condition imposed by the<br />
circumstances and traditions, no<br />
entrepreneurs come out from within the rural<br />
population, however exists a tradition <strong>of</strong><br />
collective work, each aligning with what<br />
others do. From the perspective <strong>of</strong> the future,<br />
gregarism continued as such, can be fatal.<br />
Modern society requires individuality,<br />
consciousness <strong>of</strong> effort and personal<br />
sacrifice". (Radulescu-Motru in Maliţa C.<br />
M., 2010). Modernity entered the Romanian<br />
339<br />
society over 200 years, but has not<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>oundly changed economic and social life,<br />
especially in rural areas, the Romanian<br />
village. The continouos transition <strong>of</strong><br />
Romanian society and especially the latter,<br />
the last 20 years, gave bith to a mosaic, a<br />
modern "type patch" without a clear dominant<br />
form. It is a modern trend, ie a type <strong>of</strong><br />
modernity that affects only a certain part <strong>of</strong><br />
society and is beneficial only to certain<br />
groups concerned with their economic and<br />
social condition. (Schifirneţ, C., 2007, 2008).<br />
Romanian mentality is the result <strong>of</strong> survival
in a given area, seen as a drama in time -<br />
paraphrase by Patrick Geddes, who proposes<br />
the term "survey before action", ie the need<br />
for building action on a synergy between<br />
ecology, economics, politics and<br />
anthropology. Data collection should blend<br />
with the description, explanation, observation<br />
integrated into a systemic research, in which<br />
the mentality seems to occupy a central place<br />
as part <strong>of</strong> a unique spiritual model,<br />
specifically built over time, which determine<br />
the motivation for use <strong>of</strong> resources on a<br />
territory (area, central area, region).<br />
Romanian mentality, especially in rural areas<br />
shows a great capacity for adaptation and also<br />
versatility, a balance between idealism and<br />
fear, between the initiation <strong>of</strong> large projects<br />
and autoassertion <strong>of</strong> certain limits. In fact,<br />
Romanians have all the features, static<br />
distributed in the population, but what is<br />
evident is that they change according to<br />
circumstances, meaning they are adaptable<br />
(Maliţa, M., 2010; Draghicescu, D., 1995).<br />
Adaptability, as a intermediate soul structure<br />
between Western creative ability and Oriental<br />
passive resignation may mean evolution,<br />
intelligence, finesse, suppleness, as progress<br />
may mean cowardice, duplicity, cunning,<br />
superficial. (Ralea, in Maliţa M. M., 2010).<br />
There seems to be more obvious what Mihail<br />
Ralea says in his book in 1933, Romanian<br />
Phenomenon, that "progress towards<br />
modernity will never come from autochthon<br />
localism, but <strong>of</strong> Europeanization".<br />
"Romanianism, ie, what is particularly unique<br />
and Romanian, is not done, yet not<br />
coagulated, but with a bergsonian formula, is<br />
yet to be done. He's still that prospect that is<br />
questing, endeavouring itself "said Michael<br />
Ralea. This emerging trend is visible in many<br />
Romanian villages in western Romania, with<br />
new and modern homes, through various<br />
goods and crafts exposed along the road and<br />
especially by many rural firms who have<br />
found qualified and cheaper labour force,<br />
lower rents, lower taxes. In addition it seems<br />
to be some kind <strong>of</strong> reconciliation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
"house" with "work", after over 20 years,<br />
340<br />
during which millions <strong>of</strong> Romanian worked<br />
in Europe where they have adapted, were<br />
integrated and learned. Sometimes by bitter<br />
lessons, sometimes paying a price too high.<br />
Some have returned and are looking to do<br />
something, here at home, home being a state<br />
<strong>of</strong> mind rather than a specific location. Rural<br />
community, like all other social forms, is the<br />
result <strong>of</strong> six components: biological, moral,<br />
religious, aesthetic, economic and political<br />
(Braileanu, T., 2000). Migration <strong>of</strong><br />
Romanians abroad was primarily due to<br />
financial reasons, poverty. What we need to<br />
say at this point, however, is that it talks<br />
about three types <strong>of</strong> poverty: "Poverty <strong>of</strong><br />
goods and money (type I), moral poverty<br />
(mediocrity <strong>of</strong> social feelings, <strong>of</strong> the sense <strong>of</strong><br />
family, <strong>of</strong> the love <strong>of</strong> nation, love for God<br />
and neighbor), which is a poor type II and<br />
poverty type III, the one in<br />
knowledge"(Daniel Bell Badescu, I., 2005).<br />
"The dominant mentality is that <strong>of</strong> trade and<br />
finances, which have created, trained and<br />
handled a consumption society, in which the<br />
citizen identity has been replaced with the<br />
credit card. There is no falsification <strong>of</strong> the<br />
human essence more bitter than the<br />
representation <strong>of</strong> man as a seeker <strong>of</strong> silver<br />
pots. He looks, indeed, other treasures, which<br />
ensure a dignified life and by merit earned<br />
through effort and wise strategy ... The crisis<br />
revealed the weakness, which requires time<br />
for healing and normalization". (Maliţa, M.,<br />
2010).<br />
2.The research <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurial<br />
intentions <strong>of</strong> women in rural areas within<br />
the project AntrEs<br />
Between January 2009 and December 2010,<br />
was implemented by the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences as coordinator,<br />
the project "Entrepreneurship and Equal<br />
Opportunities. An inter-regional<br />
entrepreneurial school model for women<br />
"(acronym AntrES) strategic project financed<br />
by the European Social Fund, the key area <strong>of</strong><br />
intervention "Promoting an entrepreneurial<br />
culture". The main objective <strong>of</strong> the project
was to promote equal opportunities for<br />
entrepreneurship by encouraging the<br />
involvement <strong>of</strong> women, in general, rural<br />
women, especially in the initiation and<br />
development <strong>of</strong> their business in the context<br />
<strong>of</strong> sustainable development <strong>of</strong> communities in<br />
the counties located along the western border<br />
<strong>of</strong> Romania (Bihor, Timis, Arad, Maramures,<br />
Caras-Severin, Satu-Mare). Among the<br />
specific objectives were enrolled: providing<br />
training to acquire expertise in business<br />
startup; active promotion <strong>of</strong> lifelong learning,<br />
promoting competitive spirit by awarding the<br />
best business plans, dissemination <strong>of</strong> best<br />
practices in entrepreneurship in order to<br />
develop sustainable communities in the<br />
counties located along the western border <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania.<br />
The study conducted between July 2010 and<br />
March 2011 followed the intentions <strong>of</strong> a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> 874 women - women business<br />
school graduates from rural areas <strong>of</strong> West<br />
Romania to start their own business.<br />
Data were collected through a survey at the<br />
beginning and end <strong>of</strong> the Module I course -<br />
Starting a business, conducted between July-<br />
September 2010 by non-directed interviews<br />
and by the study <strong>of</strong> documents prepared<br />
within the project mentioned above.<br />
The initial sample consisting <strong>of</strong> 979 women<br />
presented a series <strong>of</strong> characteristics retrieved<br />
synthetically as follows: average age is 35.47<br />
years, 74.6% are married, two-thirds live in<br />
households with one or two children, 66% are<br />
employed and 84% did not initiate any deal<br />
so far. 43% <strong>of</strong> the total have undergraduate<br />
and graduate studies, almost 60% work for<br />
the state (public administration or education)<br />
and intends to open a business in trade - 32,<br />
4% as expected in agriculture.<br />
According to the latest data, the number <strong>of</strong><br />
newly established businesses by the<br />
entrepreneurial business school graduates at<br />
the rural level is 88 (10% <strong>of</strong> graduates), as<br />
follows: Bihor – 18, Timis - 8, Arad - 12,<br />
Maramureş - 29, Caras-Severin - 9, Satu<br />
Mare - 12.<br />
341<br />
What factors have led these graduates to take<br />
action to overcome their fears and leave their<br />
habits? And especially what are the key<br />
elements on which an entrepreneurial school<br />
for rural Romanian women must be based to<br />
succeed?<br />
In an attempt to provide a consistent answer<br />
to these questions, we will start from the<br />
results <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire analysis,<br />
questionnaire applied in the 72 rural centers<br />
<strong>of</strong> business school for women, to a total <strong>of</strong><br />
979 respondents:<br />
- Question 1: What do you think are the<br />
chances to open a successful business? 12%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the respondents believe that the chances to<br />
open a successful business are high and 53%<br />
believe the chances are average;<br />
- Question 2: What are the qualities you think<br />
a woman needs to open a business? Choice<br />
number 1 was: confidence, courage, optimism<br />
- for 184 respondents (18.79%); intelligence,<br />
intellectual resources - 130 respondents<br />
(13.27%); will and ambition - 128<br />
respondents (13.07%);<br />
- Question 3: Which is the reason you are<br />
willing to start a business? Responses were:<br />
the need to earn more - 46%, the desire for<br />
fulfillment - 33%, desire to have a higher<br />
social and pr<strong>of</strong>essional status - 12%;<br />
- Question 4: What support elements do you<br />
think are needed to start a business? 66.49% -<br />
financial and material resources, emotional<br />
support (family, friends, close) - 10.72%;<br />
- Question 5: What do you think are the areas<br />
in which to start a successful business? Trade<br />
- 335 respondents (34.21%), tourism - 210<br />
respondents (21.45%), other services - 118<br />
respondents (12.05%);<br />
- Question 6: How should labour be seen to<br />
succeed in business? A pleasure - 79%, a<br />
necessity - 9%, a duty - 8% non answers -<br />
4%;<br />
- Question 7: What is the factor which<br />
depends primarily on success in business?<br />
Courage / audacity - 30%; intelligence -<br />
lucidity - 23%; exercise capacity - 15%;<br />
socio-economic context - 13%; chance - 11%;<br />
imagination - 4%; non answers - 4%
The review <strong>of</strong> the results is shown below.<br />
Seven myths dispelled<br />
The first myth: Second hand entrepreneurs do<br />
not take risks!<br />
Reality: The entrepreneur may seem to the<br />
uninformed spectator strait-laced and<br />
conservative, but that does not mean that he is<br />
not prepared to engage boldly assuming<br />
significant risks. Like when you prepare to<br />
climb a high mountain, you can be fearful,<br />
but such a challenge puts the blood in motion<br />
and can generate a momentum and a huge<br />
effort. And something more: "the Romanian<br />
is more difficult to move and easier to stop. It<br />
does not seek immediate spectacular results,<br />
but other more subtle and pr<strong>of</strong>ound ". (Maliţa,<br />
M., 2010). The society within us, a product <strong>of</strong><br />
the spirit <strong>of</strong> our times, puts his stamp on the<br />
limited, strait-laced <strong>of</strong> our thinking. "We all<br />
live in a very narrow cage, the spirit <strong>of</strong> our<br />
age in which we have very little freedom <strong>of</strong><br />
movement. If in different ages, people have<br />
thought in different ways, not because it was<br />
due to expanded cage, but for the fact he was<br />
moved from place". (Szent-Gyögyi, A.,<br />
1981).<br />
Second myth: With the ability <strong>of</strong> an<br />
entrepreneur you have to be born!<br />
Reality: Man is build, as a road as long as it is<br />
it starts with the first kilometer. In our<br />
opinion, even if someone does not seem to be<br />
an entrepreneur, he/she can become! There<br />
are no few recent examples populating the<br />
area <strong>of</strong> knowledge that we have access. "Life<br />
itself is what you want it to be” (Marcus<br />
Aurelius). To do this you first have to believe<br />
(strongly). "Transformation, real change<br />
always occurs from the inside out ... arising<br />
from work which toils at the roots, operating<br />
on our way <strong>of</strong> thinking, on the paradigms that<br />
define our character and create the lens<br />
through which we view the world (Stephen R.<br />
Covey)". Romania is trying to change the<br />
binding data and seeks to define objectives<br />
and methods that allow more suitable ways to<br />
promote the interests, <strong>of</strong> which the first is<br />
survival." (Maliţa, M., 2010).<br />
342<br />
The third myth: In business you enter to make<br />
money!<br />
Reality: A pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> production<br />
management for a long time explains to his<br />
students the importance <strong>of</strong> "a job well done",<br />
until he was interrupted by a (bored) student<br />
who said (determined) ”I do not want to make<br />
products, I want to make money ". The<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essor (calmly) asked:" And the money for<br />
what?". Contrary to popular saying, money<br />
brings happiness. A kind <strong>of</strong> happiness. One<br />
direct, material that is not rejected at all, or<br />
even a more subtle dependent on the holder<br />
person, most envied (the joy <strong>of</strong> giving).<br />
Poverty is far from being "a card" and has<br />
little to do with "honesty" (almost at all).<br />
Therefore we advocate for "wealthy and<br />
honest" and not for ”poor and honest ". At the<br />
same time, with more conviction, we believe<br />
that continuing to work hard in a business<br />
where money is no longer a problem is<br />
something to be appreciated (very much).<br />
What is worth saying at this point is that the<br />
path to "having" (sparingly!) has many other<br />
items, ie determination. Obsession to make<br />
money seems to be a fairly sure way not to<br />
get them!<br />
Fourth myth: In business you have no friends!<br />
Reality: Is it all true that "the spirit <strong>of</strong><br />
democratic capitalism, which led to<br />
development was to encourage individual,<br />
based on deep understanding that this is the<br />
main source <strong>of</strong> economic and social power<br />
(Novak, M. Ionescu Gh in Gh, 1997). But this<br />
is individualism? That crazy idea that "the<br />
world begins and ends with you", that you are<br />
enough? Not so, the existential model is quite<br />
different. Beyond having with what to live,<br />
you have to have something to live for. It is<br />
natural to pay special attention to our<br />
business, our goals, our ideas. But the result<br />
<strong>of</strong> an exclusive concentration on interests and<br />
selfish attitude <strong>of</strong> seeing the world as a whole<br />
and the people around us as tools used in our<br />
plans lead to counterproductive and<br />
disgraceful results. Key terms <strong>of</strong> today's<br />
economy, durability, in my view, female
entrepreneurship in rural areas <strong>of</strong> western<br />
Romania, refers primarily to the people!<br />
Fifth myth: A successful business requires a<br />
great idea!<br />
Reality: Setting up a business from such a<br />
conception may be a bad idea. Few<br />
businesses have been based on such an idea.<br />
In fact, some have been established simply<br />
based on an idea more simple, banal even<br />
while another group were raised from the<br />
ashes <strong>of</strong> failure. "the Romanian can not<br />
accept almost any event or program in a form<br />
which is given, or is required. The Romanian<br />
is realistic. He rates fiction, myths and<br />
legends he likes, but keeps his feet on the<br />
ground ". (Maliţa, M., 2010). We join the<br />
mathematician Grigore Moisil’s opinion, that<br />
the logic is rather a nuanced reasoning in<br />
which thinking is evolving in a direction that<br />
includes, besides true and false or dubious<br />
value as possible, with possible and<br />
necessary.<br />
The sixth myth: In business the most<br />
important thing is "to deal"!<br />
Reality: Our view is that the vital question for<br />
an entrepreneur is not : "How well am I<br />
doing?" Or "How can I cope?" Or even "How<br />
well we handle ourselves to cope<br />
competition?" but "How can we make things<br />
better tomorrow than we did today? ". The<br />
history <strong>of</strong> a business is written by its people<br />
and their work is the special "ingredient" in<br />
the "magic formula" that "is to grow". "The<br />
Romanian undertakes all the action, if it has a<br />
real motivation." (Maliţa, M., 2010).<br />
Motivation is an emotional drive type, but<br />
with rational arguments. More strings must<br />
vibrate: ambition, rewards, influence, social<br />
position, reputation. But beyond these events<br />
rather selfish comes a heavy argument: "you<br />
are what you know to do".<br />
The Seventh Myth: You have to be lucky to<br />
succeed in business!<br />
Reality: Reflecting on the essence <strong>of</strong> success,<br />
J. Willard Marriott, wrote in his diary:<br />
"Discipline is the most important thing in the<br />
world. Where there is no discipline, there is<br />
no character. And with no character, there is<br />
343<br />
no progress ... problems gives us the chance<br />
to grow. And usually, we get the thing for<br />
which we worked. If it encounters obstacles<br />
and overcome them, we anneal our character<br />
and qualities that bring success". "Long term<br />
success <strong>of</strong> a business organization, is<br />
determined by three main factors: 1. good<br />
planning <strong>of</strong> various activities / actions, 2. a<br />
better implementation <strong>of</strong> various plans /<br />
strategies, 3. luck or that non-chance in a<br />
given context. " (But the chance never comes<br />
to an unprepared mind – o. n.) (Harrington &<br />
Harrington, 2001).<br />
3.Preserving the essence and stimulate<br />
progress<br />
In our view, in rural areas, women have a real<br />
chance in the direction <strong>of</strong> setting up a<br />
business because "the village is the shrine<br />
where she took refuge and is kept living the<br />
manifestation <strong>of</strong> the Romanian people"<br />
(Dimitrie Gusti) including the preservation <strong>of</strong><br />
moral values and skills necessary to create a<br />
complete product, in other words knowledge.<br />
As Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Allen Wilson, a biologist at UC<br />
Berkeley who has studied closely the<br />
behavior <strong>of</strong> birds, knowledge creation and<br />
dissemination <strong>of</strong> appropriate behaviour had to<br />
do with three basic elements: 1. mobility (the<br />
ability to move freely to learn and<br />
experience) 2. spread within the community<br />
(the ability to transfer from individual to<br />
community building communities <strong>of</strong> best<br />
practice), 3. innovation (the ability to develop<br />
new skills to take advantage <strong>of</strong> new<br />
knowledge in specific environmental<br />
conditions) (Hjelmervike Ove R., 2001). We<br />
have identified the existence <strong>of</strong> these<br />
elements in the rural areas <strong>of</strong> western<br />
Romania, including examples <strong>of</strong> adaptation<br />
between the most interesting. Adaptation,<br />
defining feature is based on the characteristic<br />
skills: knowledge, information, experience,<br />
which can be put into use to create wealth<br />
and remain the same in any social<br />
environment. Efficient use <strong>of</strong> knowledge,<br />
skills, abilities and cultural values <strong>of</strong> rural<br />
women towards encouraging female
entrepreneurship depends on public<br />
awareness that women, who prove to be more<br />
vulnerable, more exposed to "insolvency" are<br />
much more concerned than men on what she<br />
spends, what she earns for food, education<br />
and child and family health insurance<br />
(Brockhaus, R. & Horwitz, P., 1986 Miniti,<br />
M. & Naud, W. 2010). Despite many<br />
obstacles in the way <strong>of</strong> Romanian rural<br />
female entrepreneurship, we believe that it "is<br />
about to get done, although is still that<br />
prospect that is questing, endeavouring itself"<br />
(Michael Ralea).<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> this statement there are three<br />
important aspects:<br />
• the existence <strong>of</strong> a potential consisting <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge, information and experience<br />
which can help achieve competitive products<br />
and services;<br />
• the ability <strong>of</strong> this potential to transform in a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> operational elements, creating<br />
value, to be integrated into final products;<br />
• grafting this potential <strong>of</strong> adaptation as a<br />
characteristic feature, which is a<br />
transformation, an adjustment, a location, a<br />
selection that you cannot do without having<br />
inside the affinity with what you choose. In<br />
our view, rural female entrepreneurship in<br />
Romania is not only something that is<br />
expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> improved incomes, the<br />
desire to avoid dependence on others or even<br />
better control <strong>of</strong> their lives but most <strong>of</strong> all, "a<br />
deed " that improves the person concerned<br />
and the world around them. It takes however<br />
a first generation <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurial skills to<br />
rehabilitate honest skill, science - and pride -<br />
to do what you do with virtue. Future will not<br />
mimic models but invent them!<br />
References<br />
Books<br />
1.Brăileanu, T., Teoria comunităţii morale,<br />
Bucureşti: Editura Albatros, 2000;<br />
2.Brockhaus, R. & Horwitz, P., Psychology <strong>of</strong><br />
the entrepreneur. In D. Sexton & R. Smilor<br />
(eds.), The Art & Science <strong>of</strong> Entrepreneurship,<br />
Cambridge: Ballinger, 25-48, 1986;<br />
344<br />
3.Chang, Ha-J., 23 de lucruri care nu ţi se<br />
spun despre capitalism, Iaşi: Editura Polirom,<br />
2011;<br />
4.Drăghicescu, D., Din psihologia poporului<br />
român – Introducere, Bucureşti: Editura<br />
Albatros, 1995;<br />
5.Dodescu Anca, Bădulescu Alina, Giurgiu<br />
Adriana, Pop Cohuţ Ioana, Antreprenoriatul<br />
feminin în Vestul României – încadrări<br />
tooretice şi provocări concrete, Bucureşti:<br />
Editura Economica, 289-301, 2010;<br />
6.Franklin B., The Autobiography and Other<br />
Things, New York: New American Library,<br />
1961;<br />
7.Gilder, G., Welth and Poverty, New York:<br />
Basic Books, 1981<br />
8.Handy, Ch., (1994), The Empty Raincoat,<br />
Londra: Hutchinson, 1994;<br />
9.Harrington H.J., Harrington J.S.,<br />
Management total, Bucureşti: Editura Teora,<br />
2001;<br />
10.Ionescu Gh., Gh., Cultura afacerilor.<br />
Modelul american, Bucureşti: Editura<br />
Economica, 1997;<br />
11.Maliţa, M., Cuminţenia pământului.<br />
Strategii de supravieţuire în istoria poporului<br />
român, Bucureşti: Editura Corint, 2010;<br />
12.Maslow, A. H. Motivaţie şi personalitate,<br />
Bucureşti: Editura Trei, 2008;<br />
13.Rădulescu-Motru, C., Psihologia<br />
poporului român, antologie de Constantin<br />
Schifirneţ, Bucureşti: Editura Albatros, 1999;<br />
14.Schifirneţ, C., From Romanian Indigenous<br />
Modernization <strong>of</strong> Europenization,<br />
Globalization and Policies <strong>of</strong> Development,<br />
Bucureşti: Ed. comunicare.ro 2007, pp.133-<br />
138;<br />
15.Schifirneţ, C., Tendentioous Modernity<br />
and Innovation, Education, Research and<br />
Innovation, Bucureşti, Ed. comunicare.ro,<br />
2008, pp.385-390;<br />
16.Szent-Gyögyi, A., Speech for Life,<br />
Bucharest: Politica Publishinghouse, 1981;<br />
17.Voicu, B., Penuria post-modernă a<br />
postcomunismului românesc, Iaşi: Editura<br />
Expert Projects, 2005;<br />
18.Zamfir, C., Incertitudinea – o perspectivă<br />
psihosociologică in Zamfir, C., Spre o
paradigmă a gândirii sociologice, Iaşi:<br />
Editura Cantes, 1999, pp. 327-364.<br />
Articles /On-line magazines articles<br />
1.Bădescu, I., Demopolitica în Occident, în<br />
Europa Centrală şi în Eurasia, în Revista de<br />
Geopolitică, nr. 1(5), an IV, (2005);<br />
2.Botezat, E., Women’s Business Potential<br />
from the Western Part <strong>of</strong> Romania, Paper at<br />
5 th WSEAS International Conference on<br />
Economy and Management Transformation<br />
(EMT’10), (2010), 597-604,<br />
http://www.wseas.us/conferences/2010/timiso<br />
ara2/emt/program.htm<br />
3.Botezat, E., Learning Women from<br />
Western Part <strong>of</strong> Romania Business. An<br />
Empirical Aproach, International Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Education and Information, Issue 2, Volume<br />
5, (2011), 258-261,<br />
http://www.naun.org/journals/educationinfor<br />
mation/19-782.pdf<br />
4.Carsrud, A., Olm, K. & Eddy, G.,<br />
Entrepreneurs-mentors, networks & successful<br />
345<br />
new venture development: an exploratory<br />
study. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Small Business,<br />
(1987) 12:13-18;<br />
5.Hjelmervike Ove R., Innovation in the<br />
knowledge-based economy. A process model<br />
for knowledge creation and sharing, Paper at<br />
OECD High-Level Forum on Knowledge<br />
Management, February 8-9, Copenhagen,<br />
(2001);<br />
6.Ionescu, Gh., Gh., Cultural Caryatides <strong>of</strong><br />
the Romanians Business Potential, The<br />
Romanian Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Ethics, Vol. 1,<br />
October, (2007);<br />
7.Ionescu, Gh., Gh., Women in Business, a<br />
Cross Cultural Approach, The Romanian<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Ethics, Vol. 2, April,<br />
(2008);<br />
8.Tsuya, N. &Mason K., Changing Gender<br />
Roles and Below-Replacement Fertility in<br />
Japan, Papaer at IUSSP Seminar on Gender<br />
and Family Change in Industrialized<br />
Contrries, Rome, Italy, (1992).
346
HOW FUTURE MANAGERS VIEW SOCIETAL CULTURE: A CROSS-<br />
COUNTRY COMPARISON<br />
Catana Gheorghe Alexandru<br />
Technical University <strong>of</strong> Cluj-Napoca<br />
Catana Doina<br />
Technical University <strong>of</strong> Cluj-Napoca<br />
Abstract: Our study aims at enriching the existing literature about the prospective managers view<br />
<strong>of</strong> an ideal societal value system and the existing cultural practices in their society. The findings<br />
about the students’ perception on cultural practices and their expectations about societal culture<br />
are helpful in imagining the societal culture in its dynamics. The research sample consists <strong>of</strong> 727<br />
students in business and engineering on undergraduate and graduate levels from Romania and<br />
Slovenia. The reason we have chosen to compare Romanian sample with the cultural pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the<br />
“average” future manager from Slovenia is the scientific curiosity <strong>of</strong> finding out if there are signs<br />
<strong>of</strong> cultural convergence <strong>of</strong> Romania with a previous communist country, and an older member <strong>of</strong><br />
European Union. In doing so, our study will hopefully broaden the body <strong>of</strong> knowledge about the<br />
cultural convergence (or divergence?) between the former socialist countries joining European<br />
Union. The theoretical and methodological foundation is rooted in GLOBE international research<br />
project. Our findings revealed that at practices level,Romanians perceive significant higher Power<br />
Distance and significant lower mean value for Uncertainty Avoidance. At the expectations level, the<br />
Romanians and Slovenians are very similar in the desire concerning their societies orientation<br />
toward In group/Family Collectivism, Assertiveness and Performance Orientation, and record<br />
significant differenced in all the other societal values. The fact that for all the cultural expectations<br />
the future managers assign different mean values than for the correspondent practices make us<br />
expect that they will act to change their cultural environments. Still, the cultural orientation <strong>of</strong><br />
Romanian future middle managers will differ in many regards from the Slovenian sample averages.<br />
Keywords: societal culture, cultural practice, cultural value, Romania, Slovenia<br />
JEL clasification: M14, M19<br />
1. Introduction<br />
Starting from GLOBE international research<br />
project dealing with top and middle<br />
managers, GLOBE STUDENT project was<br />
initiated (2008) 34 , aiming at targeting future<br />
managers, to be recruited mostly from today’s<br />
students in business and engineering. One <strong>of</strong><br />
its objectives is to determine the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />
future managers from their perceptions on<br />
and expectations about societal culture<br />
dimensions point <strong>of</strong> view. The main research<br />
question concerns the similarities and<br />
34 The project is co-ordinated by R. Lang from<br />
Chemnitz University <strong>of</strong> Technology. The data for<br />
Slovenia has been collected by D. Pucko and T.<br />
Cater (University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana)<br />
347<br />
differences between the Romanians with the<br />
average future manager in Slovenia. The<br />
reason we have chosen to compare Romanian<br />
sample with the cultural pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the<br />
“average” future manager from Slovenia is<br />
the scientific curiosity <strong>of</strong> finding out if there<br />
are signs <strong>of</strong> cultural convergence <strong>of</strong> Romania<br />
with a previous communist country, and an<br />
older member <strong>of</strong> European Union. In doing<br />
so, our study will hopefully broaden the body<br />
<strong>of</strong> knowledge about the cultural convergence<br />
(or divergence?) between the former socialist<br />
countries joining European Union.<br />
Specifically, we will try to answer the<br />
following research questions:<br />
1.Which are (if any) the significant<br />
differences between Romanian
students perceptions <strong>of</strong> current<br />
societal practices and those <strong>of</strong><br />
students from Slovenia?<br />
2.How do Romanian students’<br />
societal values (expectations) differ<br />
(if) from those <strong>of</strong> students from<br />
Slovenia?<br />
2. Theoretical background<br />
As known, there is no single generally<br />
accepted definition <strong>of</strong> societal culture<br />
(Chhokar et al, 2007:3). Our study shares the<br />
definition used by GLOBE international<br />
research project: “shared motives, values,<br />
beliefs, identities and events that result from<br />
common experiences <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong><br />
collectives and are transmitted across age<br />
generations” (House et al., 2002: 5). The<br />
GLOBE project distingwishes between<br />
practices (“as it is”) and values (“as it should<br />
be”). Values distinguishing a culture from the<br />
others are predictors for cultural practices, as<br />
well as for leadership features and behaviours<br />
in that culture (House et al. 2002). In all<br />
societies, the shared values become good<br />
predictors <strong>of</strong> future practices.<br />
GLOBE project operationalised culture in<br />
nine dimensions: 1) Uncertainty Avoidance;<br />
2) Future Orientation; 3) Power Distance; 4)<br />
Collectivism I (societal collectivism); 5)<br />
Humane Orientation; 6. Performance<br />
Orientation; 7) Collectivism II (in-group<br />
collectivism); 8) Gender Egalitarianism; 9)<br />
Assertiveness (House et al., 2002: 5-6). As<br />
the GLOBE researchers acknowledge (House<br />
et al., 2002: 6), the first six dimensions are<br />
rooted in cultural dimensions defined<br />
originally by H<strong>of</strong>stede (1980), Future<br />
Orientation and Humane Orientation from<br />
Kluckholn & Strodtbeck (1961), Putnam<br />
348<br />
(1993) and McClelland (1985), while<br />
Performance Orientation from McClelland<br />
(1985). Short definitions <strong>of</strong> these cultural<br />
dimensions are given in GLOBE related book<br />
(House et all, 2004:3).<br />
Our research compares the cultural<br />
foundations <strong>of</strong> prospective managers and<br />
leaders in Romania and Slovenia. The<br />
findings about the students’ expectations<br />
about societal culture are helpful in imagining<br />
the societal culture in its dynamics. Accepting<br />
that values “high in centrality, pervasive, and<br />
supported by powerful sanctions and high<br />
consensus and supporters <strong>of</strong> these values hold<br />
positions <strong>of</strong> high prestige and authority”<br />
(Williams 1979: 34) are resistant to change,<br />
we also are aware that they change especially<br />
when one generation succeeds another<br />
(Keating et al., 2002: 637).<br />
3. Methodology<br />
GLOBE student project uses the section 1 (as<br />
it is) and, respectively, section 3 (as should<br />
be) GLOBE research Beta questionnaires<br />
(House et al., 2004) with some modifications<br />
required by the subjects’ nature (students).<br />
Scales in section 1 ask the students to value<br />
“the way our society is” (practices), while<br />
scales in section 3 ask the students opinion<br />
about “the way our society should be”<br />
(values) using a seven points Likert scale.<br />
The surveys were carried out in either 2008<br />
or the first half <strong>of</strong> 2009. The respondents are<br />
enroled at the Technical University <strong>of</strong> Cluj-<br />
Napoca, Babes-Bolyai University (Cluj–<br />
Napoca) and Petru Maior University in<br />
Targu-Mures (Romania) and at University <strong>of</strong><br />
Ljubljana (Slovenia). Table 1 shows the joint<br />
sample structure <strong>of</strong> our respondents, which<br />
gave us usable data.<br />
Table 1: Sample structure<br />
What subject area/ study path do you study?<br />
Country <strong>of</strong> origin Business/ Economics Engineering Total<br />
Romania 166 261 427<br />
Slovenia 150 150 300<br />
TOTAL (valid answers) 316 411 727
Collected empirical data has been processed<br />
with SPSS 17. Descriptive statistical analysis<br />
was carried out separately for Romanian and<br />
Slovenian sample. In comparing Romanian<br />
sample with the Slovenian one, the<br />
independent samples t-test was used, with<br />
0.05 significance threshold.<br />
4. Findings<br />
The research findings concern: 1) differences<br />
between Romanian and Slovenian students’<br />
perceptions <strong>of</strong> current cultural practices; 2)<br />
differences between Romanian and Slovenian<br />
349<br />
students’ expectations concerning societal<br />
values.<br />
4.1. Differences in perceptions: Romanian<br />
vs. Slovenian students<br />
Table 2 displays the significant differences<br />
between Romanian and Slovenian sample<br />
with respect <strong>of</strong> perceptions <strong>of</strong> societal culture<br />
practices, while the differences between the<br />
mean values <strong>of</strong> perceptions on cultural<br />
practices in Romania and Slovenia are<br />
displayed in Figure 1<br />
Table 2. Significant differences in cultural practices: Romania vs. Slovenia<br />
Cultural practice<br />
(“society as it is”)<br />
Romania Slovenia Absolut<br />
differences<br />
t-test<br />
(sig 2-tailed)<br />
Uncertainty Avoidance 3.49 4.19 - 0.70 - 11.617 (0.000)<br />
Future Orientation 3.44 3.79 - 0.35 - 4.659** (0.000)<br />
Power Distance 5.81 5.03 0.78 12.306** (0.000)<br />
Collectivism I<br />
(Institutional)<br />
3.78 4.04 - 0.26 - 3.920 (0.000)<br />
Humane Orientation 3.83 3.97 - 0.14 - 2.204 (0.028)<br />
Performance Orientation 3.66 4.05 - 0.39 - 5.089 (0.000)<br />
Collectivism II (in 5.13 5.22 (0.175)<br />
group)<br />
Gender Egalitarianism 3.99 4.13 - 0.14 - 2.427** (0.016)<br />
Assertiveness 3.51 4.24 - 0.73 -<br />
10.587**(0.000)<br />
95% confidence; *two independent samples; ** equal variances not assumed<br />
Uncertainty Avoidance<br />
Assertiveness<br />
Gender Egalitarianism<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Future Orientation<br />
Power Distance<br />
Collectivism II<br />
Performance Orientation<br />
Collectivism I<br />
Humane Orientation<br />
Romania Slovenia<br />
Figure 1. Differences in perception <strong>of</strong> cultural practices: Romania vs. Slovenia (mean<br />
scores)
T-test <strong>of</strong> differences between the mean scores<br />
(two independent samples) shows that the<br />
Romanians perceive significant higher Power<br />
Distance (t = 12.306; sig = 0.000) than the<br />
Slovenians (equal variaces not assumed).<br />
Significant lower mean values are recorded<br />
by Romanians for (decreasing order):<br />
Uncertainty Avoidance (t = - 11.617; sig =<br />
0.000), Assertiveness (t = - 10.587; sig. =<br />
0.000), Performance Orientation (t = - 5.089;<br />
sig = 0.000), Future Orientation (t = - 4.659;<br />
sig = 0.000), Institutional Collectivism (t = -<br />
3.920; sig = 0.000), Gender Egalitarianism (t<br />
= - 2.427; sig = 0.016) and Humane<br />
Orientation (t = -2.204; sig = 0.028). The lack<br />
350<br />
<strong>of</strong> significant differences for Collectivism II<br />
(In group/Family) might be interpreted as a<br />
convergence in practicing tight relationships<br />
within membership group in both countries.<br />
4.2. Differences in expectations: Romanian<br />
vs. Slovenian students<br />
The data in Table 3 summarized the<br />
significant differences between the most<br />
appreciated cultural values by the future<br />
managers and leaders in the Romanian and<br />
Slovenia and the “spider” in Figure 2 reveals<br />
the differences between the average score <strong>of</strong><br />
cultural expectations (values) in Romania and<br />
Slovenia.<br />
Table 3. Significant differences in societal values: Romania vs. Slovenia (mean scores)*<br />
Cultural value<br />
Romania Slovenia Absolut differences t-test<br />
(“society as it should be”)<br />
(sig 2-tailed)<br />
Uncertainty Avoidance 5.10 4.55 0.55 9.427 (0.000)<br />
Future Orientation 5.23 4.74 0.49 6.781 (0.000)<br />
Power Distance 2.65 2.94 -0.29 - 3.737 (0.000)**<br />
Collectivism I (Institutional) 4.94 4.46 0.48 7.069 (0.000)**<br />
Humane Orientation 5.41 5.08 0.33 4.887 (0.000)**<br />
Performance Orientation 5.89 5.78 0.11 (0.068)<br />
Collectivism II (in group) 5.70 5.69 0.01 (0.824)<br />
Gender Egalitarianism 4.42 4.55 -0.13 - 2.384 (0.011)**<br />
Assertiveness 4.01 4.09 -0.08 (0.186)<br />
*two independent samples; ** equal variances not assumed<br />
Gender Egalitarianism<br />
Uncertainty Avoidance<br />
7<br />
Assertiveness<br />
Future Orientation<br />
5<br />
Collectivism II<br />
Performance Orientation<br />
3<br />
1<br />
Romania Slovenia<br />
Power Distance<br />
Collectivism I<br />
Humane Orientation<br />
Figure 2. Differences between average scores <strong>of</strong> cultural expectations: Romania vs. Slovenia
As seen, there is no (or very low) difference<br />
between the mean scores (p
embedded elements <strong>of</strong> management, seem to<br />
be more difficult to achieve (Lang/Steger<br />
2002), the fact that for all the cultural values<br />
the future managers assign different mean<br />
values than for the correspondent practices<br />
make us expect that they will act to change<br />
their cultural environments. Still, the cultural<br />
orientation <strong>of</strong> Romanian future middle<br />
managers will differ in many regards from the<br />
Slovenian sample averages.<br />
We are aware that our research findings have<br />
a few limitations, among which the<br />
assumption that business and engineering<br />
students will become a core part <strong>of</strong> the future<br />
population <strong>of</strong> managers. Beyond the<br />
limitations, we believe that our findings <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
certain insights into relevant issues for<br />
researchers, academics and consultants in<br />
management and leadership, as well as for<br />
today’s practitioners, especially related to<br />
culture dynamics in the region. The<br />
dissemination <strong>of</strong> our research findings among<br />
active managers, researchers, academic staff<br />
and management consultants may contribute<br />
to improving the management training <strong>of</strong><br />
students, as well as the management practices<br />
in Europe. Future research should focus on<br />
studying cultural practices and value systems<br />
in directions like possible differences in<br />
respondents’ relevant perceptions based on<br />
subjects demographic characteristics (age,<br />
gender, field <strong>of</strong> study, major subject etc.). In<br />
addition, comparisons could be making with<br />
other countries taking part to GLOBE student<br />
project.<br />
References<br />
1.Catana, Doina, Catana, Gheorghe A. “Societal<br />
culture dimensions: a comparison <strong>of</strong> future<br />
and present managers in Romania”, [2011] under<br />
review<br />
2.Chhokar, Jagdeep S., Brodbeck, Felix C.,<br />
House, Robert J (eds.), Culture and Leadership<br />
Across theWorld: The GLOBE book <strong>of</strong> in-depth<br />
studies <strong>of</strong> 25 societies, Lawrence Erlbaum<br />
Associates, Publishers, New York, [2007]<br />
352<br />
3.H<strong>of</strong>stede, Geert, Cultures consequences:<br />
International differences in work related values,<br />
Sage, London [1980]<br />
4.H<strong>of</strong>stede, Geert, Cultures consequences:<br />
comparing values, behaviors, institutions and<br />
organizations across nations, Sage, London<br />
[2001]<br />
5.House, Robert.J, Javidan, Mansour, Hanges,<br />
Paul W, Dorfman, Peter, “Understanding cultures<br />
and implicit leadership theories across the globe:<br />
an introduction to project GLOBE”, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
World Business, 37, [2002]: 3 – 10<br />
6.House, Robert J., Javidan, Mansour, Dorfman,<br />
Peter W., Gupta, Wipin P. (eds.), Culture,<br />
leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study<br />
<strong>of</strong> 62 societies, Thousand Oaks: Sage [2004]<br />
7.Keating, Mary A., Martin, Gillian, Szabo, Erna,<br />
“Do managers and students share the same<br />
perceptions <strong>of</strong> societal culture?” International<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Intercultural Relations, 26, [2002]: 633<br />
– 652<br />
8.Kluckhohn Rockwood Florence, Strodtbeck,<br />
Fred L., Variations in value orientations, New<br />
York: Harper Collins [1961]<br />
9.Lang, Rainhart, Steger, Thomas, “The odyssey<br />
<strong>of</strong> management knowledge to transforming<br />
societies: A critical review <strong>of</strong> a theoretical<br />
alternative”, Human Resource Development<br />
International, 5, [2002]: 279-294<br />
10.Luca, Adina, “Studiu despre valorile si<br />
comportamentul romanesc din perspectiva<br />
dimensiunilor culturale dupa metoda lui Geert<br />
H<strong>of</strong>stede” INTERACT [2005],<br />
http://anatolbasarab.files.wordpress.com<br />
/2010/05/studiu_h<strong>of</strong>stete5.pdf, accessed March 1,<br />
2011<br />
11.McClelland, David, C., Human motivation,<br />
Glenview, Il: Scott, Foresman, [1985]<br />
12.Putnam, Robert D., Leonardi, Robert, Nanetti,<br />
Raffaela Y, Making democracy work, Princeton,<br />
N.J., Princeton University Press [1993]<br />
13.Williams, Robin M.Jr, Change and stability in<br />
values and value systems: A sociological<br />
perspective. Understanding human values:<br />
Individual and societal (ed.) Rokeach, M. New<br />
York: Free Press [1979]<br />
*** itim International, Geert H<strong>of</strong>sted cultural<br />
dimensions, http://www.geert-h<strong>of</strong>stede.com,<br />
accessed March 10, 2011
EXPLANATORY ECONOMETRIC METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THE<br />
BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA - GUIDE FOR<br />
DEVELOPING THE PILOT STUDY<br />
Research coordinator:<br />
Roşca Constantin<br />
SSMAR<br />
Research team:<br />
Roşca Doina - University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Horticulture<br />
Manolescu Adriana -Agora University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />
Roşca Adrian - University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanics<br />
Dodescu Anca Otilia - University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />
Abrudan Maria Madela - University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />
Dănăiaţă Doina - West University <strong>of</strong> Timişoara<br />
Sîrbu Mirela -University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economical Sciences<br />
Negulescu Cristian - “Spiru Haret” University <strong>of</strong> Craiova<br />
Dragomir Laurenţiu - University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economical Sciences<br />
Judeu Viorina Maria - Agora University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />
Morariu Alunica - University “Ştefan cel Mare” Suceava<br />
Lukas Edit - University “Dunărea de Jos” Galaţi<br />
Cîrnu Doru - University ”Constantin Brâncuşi” Târgu Jiu<br />
Morăraşu Irina - Hight School “Carol I” Craiova<br />
Abstract: Our paper, entitled "Explanatory Econometric Method for the Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Behaviour<br />
Management in Organizations in Romania" reflects the wide opening <strong>of</strong> econometric modelling to<br />
quantify the Romanian management issues, representing a practical guidance on multiple recovery<br />
plans to fund the huge data collected as part COMOR project launched by the Scientific Society <strong>of</strong><br />
Management in Romania to characterize the behaviour <strong>of</strong> managers in the Romanian economic<br />
organizations. Construction <strong>of</strong> these models <strong>of</strong>fers possibilities for complex analysis, descriptive<br />
and factorial sequence <strong>of</strong> firms, counties, geographical areas, but comprehensive summary <strong>of</strong><br />
studies on the macroeconomic level. Scientific knowledge through a comprehensive assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
managerial behaviour in the most representative types <strong>of</strong> business organizations <strong>of</strong> all geographical<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> the country are, in the context <strong>of</strong> globalization, one way to prevent surprises market<br />
economy. Thus, the results <strong>of</strong> this exploratory research will provide economic environment, and not<br />
only strong argument for anticipating decisions in order to choose the best economic policies, with<br />
beneficial effects as conclusive and with as few undesirable implications. Research based on the<br />
opinions <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> respondents approved, processed through a variety <strong>of</strong> instruments subject<br />
<strong>of</strong> extensive econometric and interdisciplinary interpretation, psycho-socio-economic management,<br />
is a modest contribution to the affirmation <strong>of</strong> local scientific research that aim for theoretical and<br />
applied Romanian school <strong>of</strong> management by defining:<br />
- knowledge <strong>of</strong> behaviour management in all types <strong>of</strong> business organizations in Romania;<br />
- identifying the Romanian space dimensions <strong>of</strong> organizational culture as a reflection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
peculiarities <strong>of</strong> national culture and especially <strong>of</strong> the main ethnic-specific subcultures;<br />
- pr<strong>of</strong>ile defining effective manager and leader <strong>of</strong> excellence in terms <strong>of</strong> character traits and their<br />
behaviour.<br />
Keywords: econometrics, management, organizational culture, descriptive analysis, factorial<br />
analysis.<br />
Coduri JEL: M12<br />
353
1. Preamble<br />
Without proposes to develop the defining<br />
elements <strong>of</strong> econometrics, the specific<br />
features <strong>of</strong> this scientific field in relation to<br />
statistics, mathematical statistics or in the<br />
preamble <strong>of</strong> our approach using econometric<br />
method in an exploratory research on<br />
behaviour management in large scale<br />
economic organizations Romania, makes<br />
some-option argument on the use <strong>of</strong><br />
econometric indicators to quantify the value<br />
judgments <strong>of</strong> various socio-economic<br />
variables <strong>of</strong> our research.<br />
According to this, we refer to adopt the<br />
following key behaviours <strong>of</strong> econometrics,<br />
the study undertaken in this specific case,<br />
namely:<br />
- factual component that the specific area<br />
under investigation is a reality <strong>of</strong><br />
management processes in a well defined<br />
geographical area: economic organizations in<br />
Romania as the unit <strong>of</strong> observation, that<br />
respondents from these organizations as units<br />
<strong>of</strong> sampling;<br />
- conceptual component <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
management for the dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />
INPUTS<br />
Working levels<br />
- Economic<br />
variables<br />
- Social<br />
variables<br />
- variable<br />
value<br />
judgments<br />
Initial information<br />
354<br />
organizational culture, specific types <strong>of</strong><br />
managerial behaviour different subcultures <strong>of</strong><br />
the Romanian space and effective leader and<br />
the typology <strong>of</strong> excellence;<br />
- logical-formal component that we built<br />
quantitative models and rational behaviour on<br />
different sides <strong>of</strong> managerial and calling their<br />
methods inferential statistics (theory and<br />
theory tests estimate) that draw a general<br />
conclusion from the quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
several private facts I checked the<br />
assumptions made in terms <strong>of</strong> management<br />
theory in general and human resource<br />
management theory in particular.<br />
2. The construction <strong>of</strong> econometric models<br />
Depending on the scale and complexity <strong>of</strong><br />
research, but also the degree <strong>of</strong> deepening the<br />
analysis, econometric models used in<br />
research as set out above as shown in Fig. 1<br />
managerial explanatory models are composed<br />
<strong>of</strong> a more or less complex input variables, a<br />
process <strong>of</strong> transformation <strong>of</strong> probability<br />
distributions mathematically range <strong>of</strong> views<br />
expressed by the exponents, a set <strong>of</strong> variables<br />
leads to the result (the outputs).<br />
PROCESS OUTPUTS<br />
Psycho-social<br />
analysis tools<br />
- Central<br />
Tendency<br />
- Variation<br />
- Correlation<br />
- Tables<br />
- Charts<br />
Structures <strong>of</strong> the<br />
managerial<br />
variables<br />
Fig. 1 The systemic structure <strong>of</strong> the econometric model<br />
Conclusions<br />
- Cultural<br />
dimensions<br />
- Types <strong>of</strong><br />
behaviour<br />
- Leadership<br />
Consequences <strong>of</strong><br />
the basic<br />
assumptions
Building models based on the initial<br />
capitalization <strong>of</strong> knowledge in the context <strong>of</strong><br />
econometrics integrated knowledge<br />
management and organizational psycho<br />
specific limits <strong>of</strong> investigator.<br />
Assumptions that formed the basis for models<br />
reflect the volume and quality <strong>of</strong> information<br />
we had about the reality investigated using<br />
the following input variables:<br />
- economic variables <strong>of</strong> the statistical units <strong>of</strong><br />
observation <strong>of</strong> the firms: the field <strong>of</strong> activity<br />
according to CAEN code, size <strong>of</strong><br />
organization based on the number <strong>of</strong><br />
employees, ownership <strong>of</strong> equity;<br />
- social variables <strong>of</strong> the statistical unit<br />
surveyed (respondents): sex, age, marital<br />
status, level <strong>of</strong> schooling and education in<br />
management, the position in the<br />
organizational hierarchy (managers,<br />
performers);<br />
- variable value judgments, those measurable<br />
by designating entities beach views<br />
expressed, and which were assigned<br />
numerical values on the scale from highly<br />
positive (strongly agree) to highly negative<br />
(disagree).<br />
The information held in the observation data<br />
was processed using the managerial structure<br />
<strong>of</strong> the variables <strong>of</strong> a system <strong>of</strong> statistical and<br />
mathematical indicators consisting <strong>of</strong>:<br />
position indicators (weights), indicators <strong>of</strong><br />
central tendency (arithmetic mean, median,<br />
modulus and asymmetry); indicators <strong>of</strong><br />
change (amplitude variation, individual<br />
deviation, standard deviation, the dispersion,<br />
coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation); indicators<br />
correlation (regression coefficient, correlation<br />
table, the correlation chart).<br />
The conclusions derived through econometric<br />
models are logical consequences <strong>of</strong><br />
assumptions underlying the inferential<br />
analysis process allowed the release <strong>of</strong> initial<br />
information content <strong>of</strong> their dormant state to<br />
highlight the following variables outcome<br />
(output):<br />
- dimensions <strong>of</strong> organizational culture: power<br />
distance, individualism-collectivism,<br />
355<br />
masculinity-femininity, uncertainty<br />
avoidance, future orientation (long-short);<br />
- types <strong>of</strong> managerial behaviour: management<br />
approach, work style, attitude toward change,<br />
policies and practices <strong>of</strong> motivation,<br />
organizational communication procedures<br />
and practices, and / or interpersonal, concern<br />
for performance;<br />
- behavioural pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> character and<br />
effective leader;<br />
- typology <strong>of</strong> excellence leader.<br />
3. The econometric method, basis for<br />
analysis<br />
Ultimately seeking a comprehensive and as<br />
accurate characterization <strong>of</strong> the different<br />
structures <strong>of</strong> management variables, we<br />
focused our approach on two lines <strong>of</strong><br />
analysis: a quantitative analysis focused on<br />
value judgments, on the one hand by the<br />
statistical units <strong>of</strong> observation (firms), and<br />
secondly by statistical sampling units<br />
(respondents) and the second direction<br />
oriented qualitative analysis with indicators<br />
<strong>of</strong> variation and correlation.<br />
The two types <strong>of</strong> correlation analysis<br />
(quantitative and qualitative) we decided to<br />
identify and characterize managerial<br />
behaviour in key areas <strong>of</strong> economic activity<br />
across different subcultures <strong>of</strong> the Romanian<br />
territory and into the major temperamental<br />
traits <strong>of</strong> different managers and executors<br />
geographical areas <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />
To meet this requirements-goal, we adopted a<br />
systemic approach, whereby we develop an<br />
analysis stratified by different levels <strong>of</strong><br />
aggregation (system elements) as follows:<br />
- for large enterprises at the microeconomic<br />
level (on request);<br />
- mezoeconomic level with aggregated<br />
counties, regions and macro-economic<br />
development;<br />
- at the macroeconomic level, with<br />
conclusions on the national economy.
3.1. Descriptive Analysis<br />
The quantitative analysis (descriptive) was<br />
used in structure relative sizes (weights)<br />
calculated as percentage ratio to the whole<br />
party, namely:<br />
part<br />
p % � �100<br />
whole<br />
With the help <strong>of</strong> weights, which are<br />
indicators <strong>of</strong> position, it is argued:<br />
a) representativeness <strong>of</strong> the total economic<br />
organizations observed, reflecting the domain<br />
structure <strong>of</strong> economic activity (agriculture,<br />
mining, manufacturing, construction,<br />
transport, trade, etc.), by the degree <strong>of</strong> size<br />
(50-100 employees, 101-250 , 251-500, over<br />
500 employees), by type <strong>of</strong> capital ownership<br />
(public, private);<br />
b) the reliability <strong>of</strong> judgments <strong>of</strong> value (total<br />
agreement, partial agreement, indecision,<br />
partly disagree, strongly disagree) expressed<br />
by respondents in different social variables<br />
(gender, age, education, hierarchy within the<br />
organization) for each item (question ) that<br />
characterize a specific variable Managerial<br />
dimensions <strong>of</strong> organizational culture,<br />
managerial behaviour, characteristic traits <strong>of</strong><br />
leadership.<br />
3.2. Factorial Analysis<br />
Unlike the descriptive analysis, in which we<br />
used a single indicator, one that characterizes<br />
Likert Score<br />
5<br />
levels<br />
3 levels<br />
2<br />
levels<br />
356<br />
the position <strong>of</strong> a given quantitative variable<br />
(part) throughout the community studied, the<br />
factor analysis we made use <strong>of</strong> a true system<br />
<strong>of</strong> indicators with which we managed many<br />
sides to put out quality <strong>of</strong> managerial<br />
behaviour in its various aspects.<br />
Without abusing detail on the material we<br />
present a brief overview <strong>of</strong> these indicators,<br />
their relationships with computers and how to<br />
use the process to review the research,<br />
according to the valence <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> them.<br />
Thus, the system <strong>of</strong> indicators that I did not<br />
use the factor analysis, is composed <strong>of</strong>:<br />
measures <strong>of</strong> central tendency, simple<br />
indicators <strong>of</strong> change, synthetic indicators <strong>of</strong><br />
variation, correlation indicators.<br />
3.2.1. Specification<br />
Before developing each indicator used in<br />
factor analysis, we make two methodological<br />
notes:<br />
1. Calculating each <strong>of</strong> the indicators that are<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the groups mentioned above, a process<br />
required to convert the numeric expression<br />
value judgments on a Likert-type scale. Thus,<br />
depending on the range <strong>of</strong> value judgments<br />
provided by the construction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
questionnaire respondents used the primary<br />
data collection, conversion was done on 5, 3<br />
or 2 levels, as in the models below:<br />
at ap i dp dt<br />
5 4 3 2 1<br />
a i d<br />
3 2 1<br />
yes no<br />
1 0<br />
Legend:<br />
at – total agreement i – indecision a – agree<br />
ap – partial agreement dp – partially disagree d - disagree<br />
dt – total disagree<br />
Fig. 2. Model <strong>of</strong> conversion <strong>of</strong> opinions to numerical expressions
2. To measure respondents' opinions on a<br />
particular variable studied, we started from<br />
the premise that people are honest in<br />
expressing their beliefs and opinions,<br />
however, to arrive at generalized conclusions,<br />
we have relied on a single question.<br />
Therefore, for each variable outcome<br />
(dimensions <strong>of</strong> organizational culture,<br />
behaviour management, effective leader or<br />
typology pr<strong>of</strong>ile leader <strong>of</strong> excellence), the<br />
questionnaire applied, we have formulated a<br />
set <strong>of</strong> questions that allow us to establish the<br />
position <strong>of</strong> respondents to a variable or<br />
another. For example, to measure the cultural<br />
dimension "individualism - collectivism"<br />
were formulated 16 questions, or to<br />
characterize the size <strong>of</strong> "masculinity -<br />
femininity" were used six questions etc.<br />
3.2.2. Indicators <strong>of</strong> central tendency<br />
From this group <strong>of</strong> indicators have appealed<br />
to the mean, median and dominant module.<br />
These indicators, allowed us to put out the<br />
essential trends <strong>of</strong> the variability <strong>of</strong> responses<br />
to the questions in the questionnaire. Thus,<br />
the mean value ( x ), as a synthetic<br />
expression levels <strong>of</strong> individual value<br />
judgments embodied in a single<br />
representative level, which highlights the<br />
average scores <strong>of</strong> opinions expressed by<br />
respondents to each question in questionnaire<br />
responses from the entire range <strong>of</strong> intensely<br />
positive the intensely negative, was<br />
calculated as a weighted arithmetic mean<br />
formula:<br />
n<br />
�<br />
i�<br />
x � m<br />
xi<br />
fi<br />
1 , where :<br />
f<br />
�<br />
i<br />
i�1<br />
x - means medium value;<br />
xi – Spectrum opinions expressed on the scale<br />
<strong>of</strong> values (i) from 1-5;<br />
fi – the number <strong>of</strong> respondents, m, varying<br />
according to the level <strong>of</strong> aggregation:<br />
business, county, region developing, country.<br />
357<br />
The median (Me) is the average score<br />
occupying the central place statistical series<br />
ordered in ascending or descending, so the<br />
average scores <strong>of</strong> the series number <strong>of</strong> values<br />
which divides into two equal parts. When the<br />
series has an odd number <strong>of</strong> terms, the<br />
median score is given by the rank n<br />
;<br />
n �1<br />
where the series has an even number <strong>of</strong> terms,<br />
the median is given by the central terms <strong>of</strong><br />
simple arithmetic.<br />
Statistics compiled for each question series<br />
that helps to characterize a variable result, has<br />
different meanings depending on the content<br />
and the level at which lies such analysis:<br />
- at the firm level, the series is comprised <strong>of</strong><br />
average score <strong>of</strong> the views expressed by each<br />
respondent;<br />
- at the county level, the average score is<br />
made up <strong>of</strong> the views expressed by the<br />
average sample firm in each county;<br />
- development in the region, the average<br />
mean score <strong>of</strong> opinions expressed by counties<br />
comprising the region's development.<br />
At any level <strong>of</strong> aggregation, median<br />
highlights the question that was most<br />
meaningful significance to characterize the<br />
result <strong>of</strong> research variable. It is important, in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> theory, construction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
questionnaire in future research.<br />
Module (Mo) or dominant frequency is the<br />
value that has score greater.<br />
Is determined using the statistical series as the<br />
median scores obtained by highlighting the<br />
tendency <strong>of</strong> respondents to a particular judge<br />
stated value <strong>of</strong> the spectrum: from highly<br />
positive to highly negative, and from total<br />
acceptance to total rejection.<br />
Asymmetry (As) is the indicator that allows<br />
us to know the degree <strong>of</strong> skew or non<br />
symmetry dimensional distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
symmetry, from the position and values <strong>of</strong> the<br />
indicators <strong>of</strong> central tendency: mean, median<br />
and the module.<br />
Form distribution with left and right<br />
asymmetry can be analyzed either by using
graphical methods or calculating indicators <strong>of</strong><br />
asymmetry.<br />
Graphical representation <strong>of</strong> statistical series<br />
provides a suggestive picture <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong><br />
asymmetry using, on a case by case<br />
frequency polygon and histogram.<br />
Indicators <strong>of</strong> asymmetry are expressed both<br />
in absolute size and in relative sizes.<br />
Asymmetry is calculated absolute<br />
relationship:<br />
As � x � Mo<br />
To make comparisons between statistical<br />
series resort to indicators <strong>of</strong> asymmetry<br />
relative. Among them, we stopped at what is<br />
called the asymmetry coefficients authors:<br />
Pearson and Yule.<br />
Pearson coefficient <strong>of</strong> asymmetry (Cas) is<br />
calculated using the formula:<br />
x � Mo<br />
�<br />
C as<br />
This coefficient can take values between -1<br />
and +1, as the absolute value is less than the<br />
Pearson coefficient, the asymmetry is smaller.<br />
The value <strong>of</strong> this coefficient has the following<br />
meanings:<br />
Cas = 0 symmetry means the terms <strong>of</strong><br />
the series;<br />
Cas � 0 distinguish a left skewed<br />
distribution;<br />
Cas � 0 we deal with a distribution<br />
skewed to the right.<br />
Yule asymmetry coefficient (C'as) is<br />
calculated in cases where we determined the<br />
median statistical series (Me), using the<br />
formula:<br />
3( x � Me)<br />
C'as=<br />
Yule coefficient can take values between -3<br />
and + 3 and used when between three<br />
measures <strong>of</strong> central tendency relationship is<br />
verified:<br />
Module = Average - 3 (Average -<br />
Median)<br />
Coefficient will show a higher degree <strong>of</strong><br />
symmetry as will be closer to zero.<br />
�<br />
�<br />
358<br />
3.2.3. Indicators <strong>of</strong> change<br />
If our research, the value judgments<br />
expressed by different respondents, more or<br />
less with each other, may be more or less<br />
scattered close to the average score, regarded<br />
as the most representative value for the<br />
research unit (sample taken enrolment).<br />
These indicators allow us to characterize the<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> homogeneity or opinions expressed<br />
in the scattering <strong>of</strong> a social group in general<br />
(at the company, county, geographic area,<br />
etc..), as well as some <strong>of</strong> its structures<br />
(gender, age, education, hierarchy).<br />
In this group <strong>of</strong> indicators <strong>of</strong> change there are<br />
two groups: simple indicators <strong>of</strong> change<br />
(amplitude variation, e.g. individual<br />
deviations) and synthetic indicators <strong>of</strong><br />
variation (standard deviation, the dispersion,<br />
coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation).<br />
With these indicators we develop the analysis<br />
at different degrees <strong>of</strong> depth, allowing us to<br />
put some light on the qualitative side <strong>of</strong> the<br />
value judgments expressed by respondents.<br />
Amplitude variation (A) is the indicator by<br />
which, in-depth analysis, especially analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> the company or the county, determine the<br />
differences between extreme values <strong>of</strong> the<br />
views expressed by respondents. The<br />
amplitude <strong>of</strong> variation is greater, the opinions<br />
are different, and vice versa. It is expressed in<br />
two forms: absolute amplitude (Aa) and<br />
relative amplitude (A %), relationships with<br />
the following calculation:<br />
� x � x<br />
A a<br />
max<br />
min<br />
Aa<br />
A%<br />
� �100<br />
x –<br />
x<br />
represents the opinions score; x – means<br />
value scores<br />
Individual deviations (di) are calculated as<br />
the difference between each variation<br />
recorded (score value judgments) and their<br />
arithmetic means (average score), using<br />
equations:
da i<br />
� x � x for individual absolute<br />
da<br />
deviations; d%<br />
� �100<br />
for individual<br />
x<br />
absolute deviations<br />
It is mainly used in the analysis at the firm<br />
level, and only exceptionally in the county.<br />
Standard deviation, standard deviation or<br />
standard deviation (�) is calculated as the<br />
average squared deviations <strong>of</strong> the score<br />
recorded for each item determined opinions<br />
characterizing variable outcome (dimensions<br />
<strong>of</strong> organizational culture, behaviour<br />
management, etc.) from their arithmetic mean<br />
. To this end we used the relationship:<br />
� �<br />
n<br />
�<br />
i�1<br />
( x � x)<br />
i<br />
�<br />
Thus, using this indicator consider how the<br />
respondents opinions vary on the scale <strong>of</strong><br />
value judgments (from at to dt) calculated<br />
from the average <strong>of</strong> each variable result.<br />
Example:<br />
Variable result sought: Behaviour managers<br />
in different situations.<br />
Faces situational managers:<br />
1. Attitude towards settling tensions/conflict<br />
in the workplace.<br />
2. Attitude towards the expression <strong>of</strong> the<br />
performers, opinions about their work<br />
address.<br />
3. Attitude towards mistakes by employees<br />
during the activities.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> statistical units <strong>of</strong><br />
observation in Suceava County = 15<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> statistical sampling units<br />
(respondents) = 222<br />
Based on data from Appendix 1, Table<br />
present standard deviations below the mean<br />
score calculated from the views expressed by<br />
respondents to characterize both the current<br />
state and considered to be normal in the<br />
organizations surveyed.<br />
f<br />
i<br />
2<br />
f<br />
i<br />
359<br />
Managers' behaviour in different situational<br />
Analysis Symbol Current Desired<br />
indicators<br />
practice practice<br />
1. Average<br />
value<br />
judgments<br />
x<br />
3,727 4,183<br />
2. Standard<br />
deviation<br />
� 0,258 0,279<br />
Summary interpretation <strong>of</strong> these indicators<br />
leads to the following conclusions:<br />
1. Almost ¾ <strong>of</strong> respondents say that current<br />
practice managers are interested in<br />
maintaining a spirit <strong>of</strong> understanding and<br />
cooperation between employees and are<br />
involved as mediators between the parties<br />
when there are situations <strong>of</strong> tension or<br />
conflict, are open to collaboration in the team<br />
encouraging employee participation in<br />
solving practical service problems and is also<br />
tolerant <strong>of</strong> the mistakes they inadvertently<br />
committed during the activities.<br />
2. Value judgments expressed by respondents<br />
is quite high values clustered around (partly<br />
agree to strongly agree).<br />
3. Despite the favourable findings about the<br />
behaviour <strong>of</strong> managers in the three situational<br />
instances, the number <strong>of</strong> respondents who<br />
believe it would be better place, is almost<br />
10% higher than the existing situation (83.7%<br />
vs. 74.5%).<br />
A hierarchy <strong>of</strong> employees who desire<br />
signifies a strong attachment to the goals <strong>of</strong><br />
the organization is working is as follows:<br />
- 86.3% (11.8% more than the current<br />
situation) believes that managers should make<br />
greater use <strong>of</strong> employee participation with<br />
solutions to solve the tasks;<br />
- 89% (8.1% more than the current situation)<br />
believes that managers should intervene more<br />
effectively and to ease tension or conflict<br />
between state employees;<br />
- 75.7% (7.4% more than the current<br />
situation) believes that managers should be<br />
more sympathetic to unintentional mistakes<br />
committed during the activities, especially by<br />
young people who need more support to their<br />
immediate bosses.
4. Even if the range <strong>of</strong> value judgments is<br />
somewhat higher in practice desired by<br />
respondents, (standard deviation 0.279 to<br />
0.258) shows that the average score is 12.2%<br />
higher than the current practice, which means<br />
that "total agreement", the whole scale <strong>of</strong><br />
assessment is crucial.<br />
Dispersion or variance � 2 a variable result is<br />
calculated with a simple arithmetic average <strong>of</strong><br />
the squared terms <strong>of</strong> statistical series which<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> questions score variable that is<br />
characterized by the relationship:<br />
n<br />
�<br />
�<br />
xi<br />
� x<br />
i<br />
�<br />
n<br />
1<br />
2<br />
( )<br />
2<br />
� , where n is the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> items that characterize each variable<br />
outcome (dimension <strong>of</strong> organizational<br />
culture, types <strong>of</strong> managerial behaviour etc.).<br />
The coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation (v) is the ratio<br />
between the average standard deviation and<br />
statistical series, and shows us the degree <strong>of</strong><br />
homogeneity <strong>of</strong> the collectivity <strong>of</strong> questions /<br />
answers that characterize a variable outcome,<br />
using the relation:<br />
�<br />
v� �100<br />
x<br />
The higher the coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation is close<br />
to zero, the variance is lower, so statistical<br />
collectivity is more homogeneous and the<br />
media has a higher level <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />
3.2.4. Indicators <strong>of</strong> correlation<br />
In our research we are dealing with direct<br />
factorial correlations, simple linear type,<br />
which led us to make use <strong>of</strong> the following<br />
indicators <strong>of</strong> intensity commensurate factorial<br />
causal links between variables symbolized by<br />
x1, x2 , ...., xn and the variable outcome or<br />
effect variable y symbolized: the correlation<br />
table, the graphic method and the regression<br />
coefficient.<br />
With the correlation table identifies issues<br />
such as: the existence and meaning <strong>of</strong><br />
correlation, the shape and intensity <strong>of</strong> causal<br />
links. Thus, we use the correlation table<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> causal links between traits <strong>of</strong><br />
360<br />
character which designates the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the<br />
effective leader, the variables x and types <strong>of</strong><br />
managerial behaviour, the variable result. So,<br />
for example, may reveal the correlation<br />
between some features <strong>of</strong> the leader, such as<br />
courage, self-confidence, will, its rigor on the<br />
one hand, his attitude toward change, on the<br />
other side.<br />
Corelograma as a graphic expression <strong>of</strong> the<br />
correlation, is constructed as follows: the<br />
abscissa scale is going to represent the values<br />
<strong>of</strong> variable x factorial, and the ordinate y pass<br />
variable values result by uniting intersection<br />
points <strong>of</strong> coordinates x, y, is obtained<br />
expressing corelograma suggestive<br />
correlation that we want to highlight in<br />
particular.<br />
Regression coefficient. As a method <strong>of</strong><br />
econometrics, regression helps to determine<br />
the contribution <strong>of</strong> the factors underlying<br />
(causative) effect <strong>of</strong> variability phenomena.<br />
Since in our research are linear causal links,<br />
to measure the strength <strong>of</strong> correlation using<br />
linear function <strong>of</strong> the form:<br />
Yx = a +bx, where<br />
Yx - are theoretical variables;a - y result<br />
variable values are determined outside the<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> variable x factorial;<br />
b - is the regression coefficient;<br />
x - represents the values <strong>of</strong> x1, x2 , ...., xn<br />
factorial <strong>of</strong> variable x.<br />
The coefficients a and b is determined using<br />
ordinary least squares method, using<br />
relations:<br />
a y � � � represents the<br />
� u(x<br />
) , where: u(x<br />
)<br />
first order cantered factor for variable x. It<br />
has zero value.<br />
� xy<br />
b � , where: x - xi variants are<br />
2<br />
n�<br />
X<br />
deviations from their average<br />
y - yi variants are deviations from their<br />
average<br />
In our research we measure the linear<br />
correlation between the intensity <strong>of</strong><br />
respondents‘social variables (gender, age,<br />
marital status, education level, the position in
the organizational hierarchy), as variable<br />
factors and value judgments, as a floating<br />
effect. Thus, we build correlation coefficients<br />
entering the following notation for the<br />
variable factor x:<br />
Sex: male x1, female x2<br />
Age: 30 years x1, 30 - 44 years x2,<br />
between 45 - 60 years x3, x4 over 60 years<br />
Education: elementary x1, x2<br />
environments, beyond x3<br />
Hierarchy: top managers x1, x2<br />
middle managers, managers <strong>of</strong> basic x3, x4<br />
performers.<br />
Similarly, we introduce the following<br />
notation for the variable y result (value<br />
judgments about the dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />
organizational culture, types <strong>of</strong> managerial<br />
behaviour, effective leader pr<strong>of</strong>ile, types <strong>of</strong><br />
Excellence leader):<br />
Total agreement<br />
y1<br />
Partial agreement<br />
y2<br />
Indecision y3<br />
Partial disagree y4<br />
Total disagree y5<br />
or<br />
agreement y1<br />
indecision y2<br />
disagree y3<br />
Conclusions<br />
The models described in this paper is the set<br />
<strong>of</strong> indicators is based on an econometric<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> descriptive and factor analysis,<br />
structural and managerial behaviour in<br />
comparative economic organizations in<br />
Romania. Among them were:<br />
- to characterize the dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />
organizational culture at all levels <strong>of</strong><br />
361<br />
aggregation: the big companies, counties,<br />
regions, macro, national economy;<br />
- characterization <strong>of</strong> managerial behaviour in<br />
all types <strong>of</strong> business organizations by field <strong>of</strong><br />
activity according to CAEN code, by type <strong>of</strong><br />
ownership <strong>of</strong> capital, depending on their size<br />
as number <strong>of</strong> employees;<br />
- description <strong>of</strong> character and behavioural<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the effective manager;<br />
- characterization <strong>of</strong> the leader <strong>of</strong> excellence;<br />
- according to various categories <strong>of</strong><br />
respondents (by sex, age, education,<br />
hierarchy) on the various elements listed<br />
above characterization etc.<br />
These econometric models, with minimal<br />
possibilities for the interpretation <strong>of</strong> measured<br />
results are used in the study phase <strong>of</strong> the pilot<br />
- the example <strong>of</strong> Suceava county, to develop<br />
national analysis by established analytical<br />
team in Bucharest, Craiova, Oradea, Suceava,<br />
Targu Mures, Galati, Resita, Braşov most<br />
competent scholars with interests in<br />
management, sociology and organizational<br />
psychology, computer science, econometrics.<br />
Bibliography<br />
1. Chelcea S., Metodologia cercetării<br />
sociologice. Metode cantitative şi calitative<br />
(ediţia a III-a, revăzută şi adăugită), Editura<br />
Economică, Bucureşti, 2007<br />
1.1. Georgescu V., Econometrie, Editura<br />
Universitaria, Craiova, 1997<br />
1.2. Pecican E. S., Econometrie, Editura<br />
ALL, Bucureşti, 1994<br />
1.3. Tövissi L., Pecican E. S., Curs de calcul<br />
economic. Metode şi tehnici<br />
econometrice ale calculului economic,<br />
Lito ASE, Bucureşti, 1974
Item Score<br />
Elements <strong>of</strong> synthetic indicators <strong>of</strong> change,<br />
based on scores from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)<br />
xi<br />
Respondents<br />
fi<br />
xi fi xi - x (xi - x ) 2<br />
362<br />
Annex 1<br />
Actual practice<br />
(xi - x ) 2 fi<br />
51 4,045 222 897,95 0,318 0,101124 22,4495<br />
53 3,725 222 826,95 -0,02 0,004 0,0888<br />
64 3.412 222 757,46 -0,315 0,0992 22,0224<br />
Total x<br />
3,727<br />
Item Score<br />
xi<br />
*<br />
( � )<br />
� � xi x<br />
n<br />
�<br />
x<br />
i fi<br />
2482,36<br />
2<br />
2<br />
� ;<br />
� �<br />
�<br />
( x � x)<br />
i<br />
�<br />
f<br />
i<br />
2<br />
f<br />
0,<br />
200724<br />
� � 0,<br />
0669<br />
3<br />
i<br />
�<br />
*<br />
44,<br />
5607<br />
�<br />
666<br />
0,<br />
258<br />
0,<br />
258<br />
v � �100<br />
� �100<br />
� 6,<br />
9%<br />
x 3,<br />
727<br />
�<br />
Respondents<br />
fi<br />
∑(x - x ) 2<br />
0,200724<br />
xi fi xi - x (xi - x ) 2<br />
∑(xi - x ) 2 fi<br />
44,5607<br />
Desired practice<br />
(xi - x ) 2 fi<br />
51 4, 450 222 987,90 0,267 0,071289 15,8262<br />
53 4,315 222 957,93 0,132<br />
0,002299<br />
0,5106<br />
64 3,784 222 840,05 -0,399<br />
0,159201<br />
35,3426<br />
Total X<br />
4,183 * � xi<br />
fi<br />
2785,88<br />
*<br />
∑(x - x ) 2<br />
0,232789<br />
( � )<br />
� � xi x<br />
n<br />
0,<br />
232789<br />
� � 0,<br />
0776<br />
3<br />
( x � x)<br />
∑(xi - x ) 2 fi<br />
51,6794<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
i<br />
i 51,<br />
6794<br />
� ; � �<br />
� � 0,<br />
279<br />
�<br />
0,<br />
279<br />
v � �100<br />
� �100<br />
�<br />
x 4,<br />
183<br />
�<br />
Annex 2<br />
�<br />
f<br />
i<br />
6,<br />
67%<br />
f<br />
666
Q51<br />
Q53<br />
Q64<br />
Content questions to characterize the behaviour <strong>of</strong> managers in different situations<br />
If a state <strong>of</strong> tension or<br />
conflict, managers<br />
To impose their<br />
views in solving<br />
work tasks,<br />
employees<br />
Compared mistakes<br />
during their work,<br />
managers<br />
Pa work for reconciliation through<br />
Pd<br />
dialogue with those involved<br />
should work for reconciliation through<br />
dialogue<br />
Pa by managers are encouraged to respect<br />
the opinions <strong>of</strong> others<br />
Pd should be encouraged by managers to<br />
respect the opinions <strong>of</strong> others<br />
363<br />
Opinion score<br />
x<br />
4,045<br />
4,450<br />
Opinion<br />
score<br />
x<br />
3,725<br />
4,315<br />
Opinion score<br />
x<br />
Pa are sympathetic (tolerant) 3,412<br />
Pd Should be sympathetic (tolerant) 3,784
364
THE NEED FOR PUBLIC DEBT MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF<br />
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION<br />
Marcu Nicu<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />
Meghișan Mădălina Georgeta<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />
Public debt is created when the necessary resources for the socio-economic development <strong>of</strong> a state<br />
are greater than the opportunities that exist at that time. The destination <strong>of</strong> the necessary resources<br />
acquired from foreign markets can be either consumption by raising the standard <strong>of</strong> living (on short<br />
term) or investments in order to reduce the discrepancies in relation to the European Union through<br />
investments in infrastructure, jobs, human and technical capital development.<br />
The scientific research aims to clarify several key objectives, namely: the theoretical concept and its<br />
belonging in the governance politics; the dynamics <strong>of</strong> public debt in Romania and the identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> specific features <strong>of</strong> the indebtedness decision, the influence <strong>of</strong> the current global economic crisis<br />
on the Romanian economy, the analysis <strong>of</strong> Romania's public debt sustainability integrated in the<br />
European structures, and proposals for action in order to return as soon as possible to a positive<br />
economic dynamics with direct impact on people's standard <strong>of</strong> living.<br />
The theme <strong>of</strong> this research is contemporary in the context <strong>of</strong> the financial and economical global<br />
crisis and the difficulties in overcoming this period. The need to coordination the fiscal and<br />
budgetary policies in Romania, the awareness that the accumulation <strong>of</strong> a large public debt presents<br />
a threat to future generations, the increase <strong>of</strong> the tax pressure over a market that trends towards<br />
globalization and the impact that the aging <strong>of</strong> the population will have on the public finances<br />
sparked public controversy, both in the academic environment and in the media. To continuously<br />
borrow resources and maintain a stable level for them requires a sustainable public debt, an<br />
important objective <strong>of</strong> any state’s tax policy. A sustainable public debt is the result <strong>of</strong> the market<br />
and <strong>of</strong> the fiscal and budgetary policy decisions.<br />
Although the sustainability <strong>of</strong> public finances and implicitly <strong>of</strong> public debt has been an issue<br />
extensively debated for over a century, they currently remain vague concepts. Although, intuitively,<br />
it is natural to consider that a fiscal policy is sustainable if it avoids financial collapse, there is no<br />
generally accepted definition in terms <strong>of</strong> sustainable public debt, respectively a sustainable level <strong>of</strong><br />
public debt. The methodology <strong>of</strong> this research is stressed by the large number <strong>of</strong> statistical data on<br />
public debt dynamics used in the analysis, relevant in this regard are the national and international<br />
databases: the National Bank <strong>of</strong> Romania, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Public Finances, World Bank, Euro stat, the<br />
statistical database <strong>of</strong> the European Commission, the database <strong>of</strong> the International Monetary Fund,<br />
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the normative documents consulted<br />
in order to ensure the terminological accuracy <strong>of</strong> the concepts, the numerous theoretical and<br />
empirical studies <strong>of</strong> Romanian and foreign specialists, the views and arguments <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />
researchers with high experience in the field.<br />
The personal contribution to the researched field is present throughout this work. Thus, I aimed to<br />
clarify some theoretical aspects <strong>of</strong> the issues addressed, <strong>of</strong> some concepts and economic notions to<br />
elucidate the studied phenomenon by using a large number <strong>of</strong> statistical data in order to analyses<br />
the dynamics <strong>of</strong> public debt in Romania, in comparison with other former communist countries and<br />
to formulate proposals for a long-term sustained recovery and a sustainable economic growth.<br />
Keywords: public debt, budget deficit, external financing, public debt management, degree <strong>of</strong><br />
indebtedness, public debt service<br />
JEL Codes: H63 - Debt, Debt Management, Sovereign Debt<br />
365
I. Introduction:<br />
"The need for public debt management in the<br />
context <strong>of</strong> sustainable development within the<br />
European Union” presents the main<br />
theoretical issues related to public debt<br />
management and its importance in the<br />
effective management <strong>of</strong> public debt, over the<br />
objectives and risks associated with public<br />
debt management. Moreover, the main<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> public debt management is to<br />
ensure that the government’s need <strong>of</strong> funding<br />
and its payment obligations are met at the<br />
lowest possible cost, on medium and long<br />
term, consistent with a prudent degree <strong>of</strong> risk<br />
. The issues <strong>of</strong> public debt management <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
start from the lack <strong>of</strong> attention <strong>of</strong> decisionmakers<br />
regarding the benefits <strong>of</strong> a cautious<br />
debt management strategy and the costs <strong>of</strong> a<br />
weak macroeconomic management <strong>of</strong><br />
excessive levels <strong>of</strong> public debt. In the first<br />
case, public authorities should pay attention<br />
to the beneficiaries resulting from the use <strong>of</strong> a<br />
prudent public debt management strategy and<br />
<strong>of</strong> public policies that are coordinated in a<br />
complete macroeconomic framework. In the<br />
second case, fiscal-budgetary policies,<br />
monetary policies and exchange rate policies<br />
that are inappropriate to the economic<br />
situation generate uncertainty in the financial<br />
markets regarding the future returns <strong>of</strong><br />
investment expressed in local currency,<br />
which will lead investors to request higher<br />
risk premiums. Particularly in emerging or<br />
developed markets, debtors and creditors<br />
alike, applying long-term commitments can<br />
suffocate the development <strong>of</strong> financial<br />
markets and they can severely impede public<br />
debt managers’ efforts to protect the<br />
government from refinancing and currency<br />
exchange risks.<br />
Moreover, poorly structured public debt in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> maturity, currency or the<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> the interest rate to which<br />
unfunded big liabilities are added, were<br />
important factors in the induction and<br />
propagation <strong>of</strong> the debt crisis in many<br />
countries over time.<br />
366<br />
The process <strong>of</strong> managing public debt<br />
portfolio is a priority for every government in<br />
order to reduce medium and long term<br />
exposure to risks.<br />
The main objective in process <strong>of</strong> public debt<br />
management is represented by providing for<br />
the governmental financing needs in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
minimizing long term costs and limiting the<br />
risks involved. In our country, during the<br />
period proposed for analysis, a series <strong>of</strong><br />
measures for the permanent improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
the legal and institutional framework for<br />
public debt management were taken. These<br />
measures corresponded to a positive<br />
macroeconomic context; Romania obtained<br />
the best results at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the<br />
transition period. Analyzing the<br />
macroeconomic and policies - fiscal,<br />
budgetary, monetary, <strong>of</strong> exchange rate – one<br />
can see their continuous orientation towards<br />
public debt and budgetary deficit. The<br />
financing strategy for the budget deficit and<br />
the refinancing strategy for public debt will<br />
focus on contracting domestic loans by<br />
launching the issuance <strong>of</strong> public securities.<br />
Domestic public debt represents the total <strong>of</strong><br />
loans contracted directly by the state or<br />
guaranteed by it, from the internal market, in<br />
order to cover fiscal deficits, by financing and<br />
refinancing them. Also, domestic public debt<br />
represents the state’s takeover <strong>of</strong> debts based<br />
on special laws, due to losses registered by<br />
some companies and state-owned banks. A<br />
series <strong>of</strong> public spending, financed in order to<br />
achieve objectives <strong>of</strong> national interest can<br />
also be seen as domestic public debt. The<br />
annual growth <strong>of</strong> external public debt (direct<br />
and guaranteed) was based on a rigorous<br />
foundation regarding the contract criteria,<br />
within limits that did not exceed the country's<br />
capacity to assure the service, respectively the<br />
reimbursement <strong>of</strong> capital rates, interests and<br />
related fees without a strict policy regarding<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> borrowed resources.<br />
An incorrect structured debt by maturity date<br />
is an important factor in triggering the<br />
economic crisis. Short and medium term<br />
contracted loans with variable interest rates
may expose the state budget to a high risk if<br />
the international capital markets have<br />
changed the conditions regarding the<br />
refinancement <strong>of</strong> these loans. International<br />
financial organizations, the IMF and the<br />
World Bank, make suggestions on<br />
contracting loans for the purposes <strong>of</strong> directing<br />
those loans towards those on long term, thus<br />
avoiding countries’ indebtedness on short and<br />
medium term. Also, an analysis <strong>of</strong> internal<br />
and external public debt service is presented.<br />
II. Literature review<br />
Foreign loans allow a country to invest and<br />
consume beyond its domestic production<br />
capacity and therefore, to finance the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> capital not only by<br />
mobilizing domestic savings, but also by<br />
drawing resources from countries with capital<br />
surplus. In order to define external public<br />
debt will start from the definition <strong>of</strong> external<br />
debt as the due amount in currency, at some<br />
point, by one country(s) to other countries<br />
and / or international financial institution on<br />
the basis <strong>of</strong> the credits received by the state<br />
(government), by private companies with the<br />
state’s guarantee and also by companies or<br />
individuals, that remains to be paid in a<br />
period longer than one year 35 .<br />
The internationally accepted definition <strong>of</strong><br />
external debt that results from the research<br />
conducted by international organizations,<br />
which have as the main field <strong>of</strong> activity<br />
crediting those countries that face problems<br />
in providing for their financial needs, presents<br />
gross external debt at one point as "the total<br />
<strong>of</strong> contractual liabilities used and unpaid by<br />
residents to nonresidents and the residents'<br />
obligation to reimburse capital rates, with or<br />
without interest, or to pay interest with or<br />
without capital rates 36 ."<br />
35 Ceauşu, Iulian. Enciclopedic Managerial<br />
Dictionary, Vol. I. Bucharest: Academic<br />
Management Publishing, 2000;, p. 264.<br />
36 Klein, Thomas M., External Debt Management –<br />
An Introduction, World Bank Technical Paper<br />
Number 245, Washington, D.C., p. 56.<br />
367<br />
In Romania, the Law <strong>of</strong> Public Debt No.<br />
313/2004 defines the external governmental<br />
public debt as "the part <strong>of</strong> the governmental<br />
public debt representing all financial<br />
obligations <strong>of</strong> the state that derive from loans<br />
contracted directly or guaranteed by the state<br />
from nonresidents individuals or legal entities<br />
in Romania"<br />
External public debt is a key parameter to<br />
assess the state <strong>of</strong> public finances; it can be<br />
defined as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the following<br />
macro economical issues 37 :<br />
� low production capacity in relation to<br />
consumption, investments and public<br />
expenditures;<br />
� insufficient domestic saving, in relation<br />
to investments and the budgetary deficit,<br />
� a overly high current account deficit,<br />
compared with net inflows <strong>of</strong> funds (debt<br />
is exempted);<br />
� Excessive capital outflows in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
direct investment or "capital leaks"<br />
abroad.<br />
Consequently, the role <strong>of</strong> external public debt<br />
can be seen through the following<br />
implications 38 :<br />
a) external loans allow the contracting<br />
country to invest and consume beyond<br />
its current internal possibilities and, in<br />
fact, to finance capital development not<br />
only by mobilizing domestic savings,<br />
but also by using the savings <strong>of</strong><br />
countries with capital surplus;<br />
b) External loans may lead to a faster<br />
economic growth, enabling the financing<br />
<strong>of</strong> a greater volume <strong>of</strong> investments and<br />
the mobilization <strong>of</strong> the country’s<br />
available resources, giving them a more<br />
cautious but a more effective usage.<br />
c) External loans can also serve to finance<br />
temporary deficits <strong>of</strong> the balance <strong>of</strong><br />
payments and can provide the authorities<br />
with the solution to avoid to taking<br />
37 Gaftoniuc, Simona. International Finances.<br />
Bucharest: Economic Publishing, 2000, p. 403.<br />
38 Klein, Thomas M., External Debt Management –<br />
An Introduction, World Bank Technical Paper<br />
Number 245, Washington, D.C., p. 2.
actions that could jeopardize the<br />
country's development program.<br />
III. Research Methodology.<br />
In order to assess the level <strong>of</strong> external public<br />
debt and to correlate it with the situation <strong>of</strong><br />
other macroeconomic variables (these ratios<br />
are more conclusive than the absolute size <strong>of</strong><br />
debt), a series <strong>of</strong> indicators are being used:<br />
- external public debt in the year<br />
(DPE):<br />
DPE � DPE � DPE ,<br />
- d g<br />
- where:<br />
- DPEd is the external public debt <strong>of</strong><br />
the state;<br />
- DPEg is the external public debt<br />
guaranteed by the state.<br />
- External public debt service (SDPE),<br />
which represents the payments due in<br />
order to reimburse external public<br />
debt, representing the mature rates in<br />
a period <strong>of</strong> one year (RDPE), the<br />
interests and the related fees as well<br />
as the costs <strong>of</strong> issuance and<br />
placement <strong>of</strong> securities (DobDPE) 3940 :<br />
Dob R SDPE � � ; (1)<br />
- DPE DPE<br />
- the share <strong>of</strong> external public debt in GDP:<br />
DPE<br />
- DPE/ PIB � �100<br />
; (2)<br />
PIB<br />
- the share <strong>of</strong> external public debt in the<br />
volume <strong>of</strong> exports <strong>of</strong> goods and services<br />
(E)<br />
DPE<br />
- DPE/ E � �100<br />
; (3)<br />
E<br />
- the share <strong>of</strong> interests <strong>of</strong> the existing<br />
external debt in GDP<br />
DobDPE<br />
- DobDPE<br />
� �100<br />
/ PIB<br />
; (4)<br />
PIB<br />
39 Moşteanu, Tatiana (coord.) şi colectiv, Finanţe<br />
publice: note de curs şi aplicaţii pentru seminar,<br />
Editura Universitară, Bucureşti, 2005, p. 264<br />
368<br />
- the share <strong>of</strong> the external public debt<br />
service in GDP:<br />
SDPE<br />
- SDPE / PIB � �100<br />
; (5)<br />
PIB<br />
- the share <strong>of</strong> external public debt service<br />
in the volume <strong>of</strong> exports <strong>of</strong> goods and<br />
services:<br />
SDPE<br />
- SDPE / E � �100<br />
; (6)<br />
E<br />
- external public debt service in the state’s<br />
budget expenditures (ChBS):<br />
SDPE<br />
SDPE / Ch � �100<br />
. (7)<br />
BS Ch<br />
IV. Results <strong>of</strong> the research<br />
The period 2007-2010 was characterized by<br />
the expression <strong>of</strong> the global financial and<br />
economical crisis. Although all European<br />
countries have been marked by different<br />
bubbles (the most frequent being the real<br />
estate bubbles), the crisis manifested<br />
unevenly, depending on specific conditions<br />
and governmental policies from each country<br />
and especially depending on the anti-crisis<br />
measures taken as a response to the crisis.<br />
In Romania, in comparison with developed<br />
countries, external public debt has been and<br />
continues to be the main component <strong>of</strong> public<br />
debt. Throughout the period, the actual public<br />
debt was fueled substantially by external<br />
loans and only to a lesser extent on the<br />
domestic loans, this structure being specific<br />
to developing countries which lack their own<br />
capital market capable <strong>of</strong> meeting the needs<br />
<strong>of</strong> the private and the public sector. The funds<br />
attracted were from international<br />
organizations (IMF, IEB) with compliance to<br />
the conditions imposed and in the cases<br />
where the government could not meet those<br />
conditions, it turned to private banks that<br />
granted loans but with a higher interest rate.<br />
Under the pressure <strong>of</strong> external financing <strong>of</strong><br />
budgetary deficit, the authorities have<br />
promoted macroeconomic austerity measures,<br />
aimed to restrict governmental spending,<br />
reorganize the system <strong>of</strong> pensions paid from<br />
BS
public funds, the system <strong>of</strong> social benefits<br />
and health insurances, which had short-term<br />
constriction effects.<br />
The painful budgetary adjustments, especially<br />
in the field <strong>of</strong> social benefits have been<br />
politically legitimated by the "state reform"<br />
slogan and the construction <strong>of</strong> a neoliberal<br />
minimal state.<br />
In reality, this approach was not accompanied<br />
by an appropriate and encouraging fiscal<br />
recovery, especially in the field <strong>of</strong> labor<br />
taxation nor by a real liberalization <strong>of</strong> some<br />
services or the entrustment <strong>of</strong> infrastructure<br />
works to the market.<br />
An extremely important issue for fiscal and<br />
budgetary sustainability on long-term remains<br />
the reduced capacity to collect public<br />
revenues, which causes an additional tax<br />
burden on taxpayers and keeps the premises<br />
for structural budget deficits. In this respect,<br />
the areas that require special attention should<br />
aim to modernize the rural economy, adjust<br />
the tax level <strong>of</strong> properties, the taxed labor<br />
shortages, tax evasion and the numerous<br />
exceptions to the general tax regime. The<br />
reduced ability to collect or to generate<br />
additional budgetary revenues imposes on<br />
Romania a redefinition <strong>of</strong> the fields <strong>of</strong> state<br />
intervention.<br />
In the long term, macroeconomic policies<br />
should aim to achieve general economic<br />
balance, a medium and long-term sustainable<br />
economic growth with the purpose to achieve<br />
real convergence, whether it will be<br />
expressed by growth <strong>of</strong> GDP per capita, by<br />
reducing labor costs, by the relocation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
share <strong>of</strong> national economy branches in the<br />
generation <strong>of</strong> GDP or by the degree <strong>of</strong><br />
openness <strong>of</strong> the Romanian economy.<br />
The draining budgetary measures taken in<br />
2010 have been misinterpreted as an actual<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> the Romanian state’s<br />
intervention in the economy; they rather<br />
represent the only solution to reduce the<br />
budget deficit because <strong>of</strong> its funding<br />
difficulties.<br />
369<br />
V. Conclusions<br />
For the recovery <strong>of</strong> the Central and Eastern<br />
European economies several groups <strong>of</strong><br />
countries can be distinguished. Some<br />
countries have managed to contradict the<br />
experts forecasts, obtaining better results<br />
(Poland, Czech Republic), others have met<br />
their forecasts, those being the countries with<br />
the strongest economies in the EU (France,<br />
Germany), while others faced the collapse <strong>of</strong><br />
their national economies (Greece, Spain).<br />
To help cushion the impact on their citizens,<br />
governments have implemented a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
initiatives. There are three important reasons<br />
why the analyzed countries were affected by<br />
the crisis. Firstly, the dependence on the<br />
foreign capital inflows (the ability to attract<br />
foreign investments meant to develop the<br />
national economy) and the money sent home<br />
by those working abroad to support<br />
consumption and hence the national budget.<br />
For example, in Romania and Bulgaria in<br />
2009, the money sent home dropped by 30% -<br />
50% compared to 2008 levels. Secondly, a<br />
large part <strong>of</strong> their exports were for countries<br />
in the region and the euro zone, so that the<br />
volume <strong>of</strong> transactions fell dramatically.<br />
Thirdly, several <strong>of</strong> the analyzed countries had<br />
their national currency dependent on the Euro<br />
and the weakened economies had been<br />
strongly influenced by Euros fluctuations<br />
which have <strong>of</strong>ten suffocated the exports.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> Poland, the government used<br />
quickly and effectively all the European<br />
funds at its disposal in order to cover the<br />
capital withdrawals amid the international<br />
crisis, the current account deficit became<br />
stable and zloty’s fall was stopped by the<br />
central bank <strong>of</strong> Warsaw with the help <strong>of</strong><br />
BCE, avoiding mortgage debtors’ entry into<br />
payment incapacity on mortgage loans<br />
denominated in foreign currencies.<br />
Although the government has contracted a<br />
loan through the new "flexible credit<br />
arrangement" <strong>of</strong> the IMF, in very favorable<br />
conditions, the National Bank <strong>of</strong> Poland was<br />
not forced to resort to these reserves.<br />
Although it had to postpone its accession to
the European exchange rate mechanism<br />
(ERM II), the Polish government initiated an<br />
extensive privatization program to reduce the<br />
budget deficit and maintain public debt below<br />
50% <strong>of</strong> GDP. Thus, Poland regained the<br />
investors’ confidence that began to return to<br />
their country. Because <strong>of</strong> the fact that this<br />
economic crisis was much longer than<br />
expected, the 50% threshold was exceeded<br />
due to the financing needs <strong>of</strong> the budget<br />
deficit which has increased 5 times in the<br />
period under review. The goal <strong>of</strong> the deficit<br />
was the need for co-financing the projects<br />
with EU grants and also the investments in<br />
infrastructure that is why the output from this<br />
EU recession will find Poland with a healthy<br />
economy based on sustainable development.<br />
Before the crisis started, Romania faced a<br />
high budget deficit, an overly indebted<br />
private sector, a real estate bubble and an<br />
over heated economy, Romania called on the<br />
help <strong>of</strong> the IMF in order to flatten the<br />
adjustment <strong>of</strong> internal and external<br />
imbalances set in motion by the global<br />
economic crisis.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the delay <strong>of</strong> the Government in<br />
adopting tough structural reform measures<br />
and reduce public spending, eventually to<br />
channel the funds at its disposal to the<br />
economic sectors that would really help the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> a sustainable economic<br />
development, Romania was looked at and<br />
cataloged by the analysts as being without an<br />
economic horizon. Even though the<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> the public debt in the GDP is a<br />
reduced one (30.8% in 2010) it is alarming<br />
that this public debt has risen with 300% in<br />
the analyzed period, from the borrowed sums<br />
being financed the social budgets deficits, the<br />
Government being content with a relative<br />
quietness <strong>of</strong> the social strata and waiting for<br />
the passing <strong>of</strong> this period without major<br />
interventions. The measure to reduce<br />
budgetary spending by cutting 25% in the<br />
public sector did not have a macroeconomic<br />
result because <strong>of</strong> the useless spending made<br />
from the same amount. In the analyzed<br />
370<br />
period, Romania was the only country that<br />
had registered a decrease in productivity.<br />
An aspect that probably did not get enough<br />
attention is that the financing <strong>of</strong> the excessive<br />
budgetary deficits, whether is done internally<br />
or internationally, is not a costless action. On<br />
the contrary, the level <strong>of</strong> the interest rate at<br />
which the debt has been contracted, as well as<br />
its schedule are extremely important aspects<br />
and can become an extreme burden, as<br />
situations exist in which the principal <strong>of</strong> the<br />
debt can be compared with the interest.<br />
Confronted with the lack <strong>of</strong> immediate low<br />
cost financing, some states have even<br />
advanced the unorthodox solution that the<br />
government securities be repurchased by the<br />
central bank. This option can not even be<br />
taken into consideration, as the conditions <strong>of</strong><br />
the Romania’s accession to the Monetary<br />
Union targets too also other dimensions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
nominal convergence, beside the stability <strong>of</strong><br />
the public finances, as would be: inflation, the<br />
stability <strong>of</strong> the exchange rate, interest rates,<br />
which would strongly affected by such a<br />
decision.
Bibliography<br />
1. Albu, Lucian-Liviu, Pelinescu,<br />
Elena. Suteinability <strong>of</strong> public debt,.<br />
Bucharest: Romanian Centre for<br />
Economic Policies, 2002;<br />
2. Beleanu, Pavel and Anghelache,<br />
Gabriela. Romania’s Public Fiances.<br />
Bucharest: Economic Publishing,<br />
2005;<br />
3. Burada, Mihaela Alina. “ The ration<br />
between internal and external public<br />
debt“ “ Economic Tribune”<br />
Publishing no. 19/2004;<br />
4. Ceauşu, Iulian. Enciclopedic<br />
Managerial Dictionary, Vol. I.<br />
Bucharest: Academic Management<br />
Publishing, 2000;<br />
5. Gaftoniuc, Simona. International<br />
Finances. Bucharest: Economic<br />
Publishing, 2000;<br />
371<br />
6. Klein, Thomas M.. External Debt<br />
Management – An Introduction.<br />
World Bank Technical Paper<br />
Number 245, Washington, D.C.;<br />
7. Moşteanu, Tatiana. Public finances:<br />
notes and applications. Bucharest:<br />
University Publishing, 2005;<br />
8. *** The strategy for managing<br />
guvernmental public debt 2011-<br />
2013;<br />
9. *** Public debt law no. 313/2004;<br />
10. *** Anual reports <strong>of</strong> BNR during<br />
2001-2010;<br />
11. *** Anual reports <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Public Finances regarding<br />
Romania’s external public debt<br />
during 2000-2010;<br />
12. *** Anual reports <strong>of</strong> the IMF from:<br />
1997, 2000, 2002 si 2009<br />
13. *** Data series regarding the<br />
evolution <strong>of</strong> Romania’s external<br />
public debt during 1990-2010 given<br />
by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Public Finances
372
IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES IN THE LESS FAVOURED AREAS<br />
OF ROMANIA<br />
Tileagă Cosmin<br />
“Lucian Blaga” University <strong>of</strong> Sibiu<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />
Cosmescu Ioan<br />
“Lucian Blaga” University <strong>of</strong> Sibiu<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />
Abstract: This paper deals with finding solutions for improving the economic activities in<br />
Romania’s undeveloped areas, which still represent a major problem for this country’s economy.<br />
During 1999 and 2009, these areas were considered tax havens, due to some facilities accorded by<br />
the Government and the EU (headage compensatory allowances*, tax deductions, non-refundable<br />
funds). Many had the opportunity to invest in those regions, but no positive effect was to be seen.<br />
Tulcea County (Danube Delta area), coal mine regions, rural areas and the North-East area<br />
(Suceava and Botoşani county) are considered to be Romania’s less favoured areas.<br />
Keywords: less favoured areas, non-refundable funds, tax havens, economic growth, economic<br />
activities<br />
JEL clasification: E60<br />
Introduction<br />
Nowadays, every less favoured area from<br />
Romania represents a major problem for<br />
regional development, having a negative<br />
impact on Romania’s economy. It is proven<br />
that long-term growth strategies for lessfavoured<br />
areas require especially the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> infrastructure and national<br />
institutions, which kept those areas<br />
backwards. Since 1999, open trade between<br />
countries has been considered to stimulate the<br />
economic growth, both at national and<br />
regional level. This growth was <strong>of</strong>ten suppose<br />
to trickle down to less favoured areas. In<br />
other words, this was considered a process<br />
whereby the economic gains from economic<br />
growth would pass down throughout the<br />
entire society, eventually giving rise to<br />
development.<br />
* The objective <strong>of</strong> these schemes is to provide a<br />
reasonable level <strong>of</strong> income for farmers where natural<br />
production conditions are least favourable so as to<br />
conserve the countryside by the prevention <strong>of</strong> further<br />
depopulation <strong>of</strong> rural areas. Compensatory<br />
allowances are payable to farmers for the keeping <strong>of</strong><br />
cattle, sheep and goats. (www.europa.eu)<br />
373<br />
People living in less-favoured areas represent<br />
around the globe 40% <strong>of</strong> the rural population,<br />
suffering from chronic poverty. In what<br />
Romania is concerned, a study from 2010<br />
reveals that closely 33% <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania is living with less than 200 Euros a<br />
month.<br />
Less-favoured areas are defined as „remote<br />
regions with limited natural resource base,<br />
where problemes <strong>of</strong> chronic poverty and<br />
resource degradation tend to be the same. In<br />
the same time these areas have a limited<br />
agriculture potential, with poor infrastructure<br />
and service suport”.<br />
However, it is necessary to distinguish the<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> less-favoured area with<br />
development potential. This area would be an<br />
ideal place where investment especially in<br />
infrastructure and tourism can be productive<br />
and sustainable.<br />
A large number <strong>of</strong> implementing directives<br />
comprise the current classification <strong>of</strong> the LFA<br />
<strong>of</strong> each European Member State into three<br />
types:<br />
-Mountain areas (rural areas around the<br />
Carpathian Mountains) where altitude,<br />
climate and slopes, reduce the chance <strong>of</strong>
investments. The major problem for this areas<br />
still represents the process <strong>of</strong> deforestation,<br />
the lack <strong>of</strong> mountain resorts, and the lack <strong>of</strong><br />
infrastructure.<br />
-LFAs which are marked by poor soil<br />
conditions (especially low agricultural<br />
productivity), low population densities or<br />
even depopulation tendencies. In Romania<br />
Tulcea county (Danube Delta area) could be<br />
considered an area with a low rate <strong>of</strong><br />
investments, low soil productivity mainly<br />
because the Danube.<br />
-LFAs which are related to small areas with<br />
specific handicaps relating to the<br />
environment, landscape development, low<br />
agricultural activity, low tourism<br />
development. This area in Romania may be<br />
found in the North-East <strong>of</strong> the territory,<br />
including Botoşani and Suceava county. This<br />
area represents a major undeveloped region<br />
<strong>of</strong> Romania, mainly due to migration to other<br />
countries or even in more developed areas <strong>of</strong><br />
Romania.<br />
To find solutions in order to develop the less<br />
favoured areas, some objectives must be<br />
established: finding an economic balance<br />
between regions, finding new ways to attract<br />
new investors, developing agriculture,<br />
industry and especially tourism to enhance<br />
the value <strong>of</strong> the local resources, inforce the<br />
cooperation between the regional areas.<br />
Two important elements always play an<br />
important role for less-favoured areas:<br />
defected political institutions and poor<br />
infrastructure (poor infrastructure <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
implies a long transport duration or difficult<br />
communication between a LFA and other<br />
regions). These two elements are especially<br />
revelevant because <strong>of</strong> their link to the effects<br />
on the economic growth. Moreover, the<br />
political environment has a strong impact on<br />
the economic growth <strong>of</strong> the less-favoured<br />
area, meaning that in Romania the funds<br />
accorded by the Government to regions are<br />
not equally distributed.<br />
374<br />
Less-favoured mountain areas, and rural<br />
areas<br />
The less-favoured mountain areas, which<br />
represent aproximately 29,93% <strong>of</strong> Romania’s<br />
territory are the homeplace for 2.400.000<br />
romanians. The economic activities from<br />
these areas are mainly those related to the<br />
wood and furniture industry, agriculture and<br />
animal breeding. In the areas surrouding the<br />
Carpathian Mountains, due to the numerous<br />
protected areas, tourism is not welldeveloped,<br />
excepting the winter season when<br />
the winter resorts are full <strong>of</strong> tourists<br />
practising the winter sports.<br />
A major problem for this area represents the<br />
process <strong>of</strong> deforestation, which causes<br />
numerous landslips and floods. It is well<br />
know that there is a lack <strong>of</strong> modern woodland<br />
planting that affects negatively the imagine <strong>of</strong><br />
this area. Once a tree is being planted, it<br />
needs around 40 or 50 years to grow to<br />
maturity.<br />
The forests <strong>of</strong>fer important resources for the<br />
economy <strong>of</strong> this less-favoured area.<br />
Excepting wood, mushrooms, seeds, forest<br />
fruits, firtrees, mineral waters represent<br />
significant resources.<br />
On a short term, tourism and especially<br />
mountains resorts should be considered<br />
strong points for developing the local<br />
economy, especially during the winter. In<br />
addition, due to the speed <strong>of</strong> falling waters<br />
coming from the mountains, hydro-electric<br />
power plants could <strong>of</strong>fer to this area a new<br />
opportunity to attract new investors,<br />
becoming an area stong enough to generate<br />
new workplaces and greater amount <strong>of</strong><br />
„green-energy”.<br />
The less-favoured areas from the mountains<br />
(mainly the rural areas) in Romania are<br />
characterised by a scattered population and<br />
very low quality infrastructure – for example,<br />
only 33% <strong>of</strong> rural residents are connected to a<br />
water supply network and only 10% to a<br />
sewerage system, while only 10% <strong>of</strong> rural<br />
roads are considered <strong>of</strong> „adequate standard”<br />
with asphalt cover. The basic social<br />
infrastructure (health and education systems,
finance) is much less developed than in urban<br />
areas. These factors have a negative impact<br />
on the quality <strong>of</strong> life in the rural areas,<br />
increase migration, create environment<br />
problems, hamper economic development and<br />
exacerbate health.<br />
In what rural tourism is concerned, this<br />
represents a significant potential which is not<br />
sufficient valorised. The tourism sector in<br />
2009 in the rural areas, showed an increase in<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> accomodation structures and<br />
accomodation capacity. The development <strong>of</strong><br />
rural tourism in rural areas depends on the<br />
specific <strong>of</strong> each region, agricultural products,<br />
ethnographic regions and folklore. It also<br />
depends very much on the existence and<br />
especially the quality <strong>of</strong> the tourist pension,<br />
different types <strong>of</strong> recreation activities,<br />
practising agriculture and in some areas<br />
winegrowing and animal breeding. For<br />
example the specific tourism for Bucovina<br />
(North East less favoured area) is religious<br />
tourism, in Maramureş it is the architecture<br />
and folklore, while in Transylvania the<br />
spotlight is the reacreational and cultural<br />
tourism, food and wine. The mountain and<br />
forestry areas in Romania ensure the<br />
opportunities for practising tourism, in<br />
particular the so called eco-tourism which<br />
could be an alternative income, generating in<br />
this way different activities that could <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
potential development, due to the unique<br />
landscapes, native hospitability, wellconserved<br />
traditions and food.<br />
Noteworthy modernization, development and<br />
innovation are mandatory for Romania’s<br />
tourism, together with creating modern and<br />
competitive tourism products. The main<br />
reasons why tourism is not that well<br />
developed in these areas are that there is a<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> organisation, promotion, information<br />
as well as qualitatively low tourism<br />
infrastructure.<br />
The mountain and rural areas are affected by<br />
the significant lack <strong>of</strong> infrastructure which<br />
retrains both the economic development and<br />
the most important: the quality <strong>of</strong> life. The<br />
roads are the most important transportation<br />
375<br />
routes, but the quality and development <strong>of</strong><br />
rural road and traffic is a long way behind the<br />
European standard. The undevelopment <strong>of</strong><br />
the road blocks the economic growth, and<br />
interferes with other difficulties concerning<br />
the medical and educational servicies. The<br />
road represents the key element for the<br />
economic development among the fields <strong>of</strong><br />
human, social and economic develpment.<br />
Watter supply is another key for the quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> life, as well as in a direct relation to the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> economic activities in rural<br />
areas. As an interesting fact in the less<br />
favoured areas <strong>of</strong> Romania only 33% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rural inhabitans have access to the public<br />
water network.<br />
As opportunities for development it is<br />
important the exploitation <strong>of</strong> wood, not<br />
exceedind the annual operating capacity,<br />
exploiting accessory products (berries, herbs,<br />
mushrooms, pine cones), extend forestry<br />
product processing industry taking into<br />
account regional sustainable development,<br />
increasing mechanization <strong>of</strong> forestry products<br />
and create a system to record the number <strong>of</strong><br />
the cutten trees.<br />
Attracting investors requires a modern<br />
infrastructure, forest road development,<br />
execution <strong>of</strong> simple pathways for wood<br />
processing machinery. In addition, the<br />
mechanization <strong>of</strong> woodworking would be a<br />
step forward in what development <strong>of</strong><br />
mountain areas is concerned.<br />
North-East less favoured area<br />
The underdevelopment <strong>of</strong> this area appears to<br />
be correlated with rising unemployment, the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> rural activities and failure to<br />
attract foreign investors. The North-East area<br />
is marked by the dependence on agriculture,<br />
and especially its proximity to other<br />
disadvantaged regions (Ukraine and<br />
Moldavia). It is the only region in the country<br />
with positive natural growth, the share <strong>of</strong><br />
young population is high, and as positive<br />
aspects there is an effective education system<br />
in the large cities and skilled labor.<br />
As weakness points, the rate <strong>of</strong> poverty is
high along with the rate <strong>of</strong> migration to the<br />
outside region, there is a lack <strong>of</strong> openness to<br />
change and especially modernization, the<br />
crime rate is higher that in the developed<br />
regions. To these are added the aging<br />
population <strong>of</strong> the region, undeveloped spirit<br />
<strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship, poor business support<br />
infrastructure, poor implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
product quality assurance system, the low<br />
level <strong>of</strong> industrialization <strong>of</strong> wood, insufficient<br />
promotion <strong>of</strong> the region's investment<br />
potential, lack <strong>of</strong> cooperation between<br />
universities and the poor quality <strong>of</strong> public<br />
servicies, the lack <strong>of</strong> specific knowledge in<br />
business development, namely the creation <strong>of</strong><br />
new jobs.<br />
From an economic perspective, there is<br />
already a development <strong>of</strong> the activities related<br />
to the exploitation and wood processing, good<br />
financial banking and insurance<br />
infrastructure, and a large numer <strong>of</strong><br />
specialists in forestry, trade and public<br />
servicies. The industrial structure is fragile<br />
mainly due to the usage <strong>of</strong> outdated<br />
technology, having a negative impact on<br />
productivity and economic efficiency.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> tourism there is a high share <strong>of</strong><br />
private ownership in the tourism sector, the<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> spa and national cultural centers,<br />
along with the existence <strong>of</strong> developing the<br />
religious tourism (the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
monasteries), mountain sports (hinking,<br />
skiing, paragliding), and the existence <strong>of</strong><br />
traditional folklore events <strong>of</strong> the region.<br />
The road infrastructure is poorly developed<br />
between East-West areas <strong>of</strong> the region, there<br />
is also a low percentage <strong>of</strong> upgraded roads,<br />
together with the density <strong>of</strong> railway lines<br />
being unequal in accordance with the<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> the electrified railways.<br />
Furthermore, the small numer <strong>of</strong> cities with<br />
natural gas distribution systems,<br />
underdeveloped telephone network in rural<br />
areas, poor infrastructure development for<br />
leisure activities and outdated water treatment<br />
and waste management systems, are the main<br />
things to be changed for developing this<br />
deprived area.<br />
376<br />
As geographical influence, the winter<br />
contributes to disadvantage the area as many<br />
investors fear the harshness <strong>of</strong> the winter cold<br />
weather (in transport, industry).<br />
The North-East region may become a major<br />
area <strong>of</strong> concern for investors, EU supporting<br />
less favoured areas. There is a legislative<br />
framework regarding the development <strong>of</strong> this<br />
area, providing many facilities to investors,<br />
including potential experienced staff for<br />
research.<br />
As opportunity, it should be taken into<br />
account the privatization and restructuring <strong>of</strong><br />
state-owned companies, the legal framework<br />
<strong>of</strong> local government involvement in regional<br />
development is being favorable to this region.<br />
Aceelerating the economic recovery and<br />
sustainable development represents the key<br />
objectives to ensure the overpassing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
actual life condition. Development involves<br />
creating the necessary infrastructure to<br />
promote the business environment,<br />
supporting SME 41 s, developing<br />
entrepreneurship, rural development.<br />
In connection with development, the<br />
industrial potential should be reevaluated in<br />
order to promote existing and new branches<br />
<strong>of</strong> industry. Building up a business<br />
infrastructure should help the development <strong>of</strong><br />
the pr<strong>of</strong>itable activities for the less-favoured<br />
areas, having a positive impact on the<br />
deprived area only with a strict control <strong>of</strong> the<br />
local authorities (in the occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />
phantom companies without creating new<br />
jobs, or poorly paid) and support for access to<br />
new technologies, efficient and clean.<br />
Therefore, to ensure the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />
region, it is required effective cooperative<br />
ventures to develop effective managerial<br />
skills and support technology development.<br />
Although, being a less-favoured area with<br />
limited natural resources, human resource is<br />
considered a valuable treasure <strong>of</strong> this region.<br />
Investing in human resources is a priority <strong>of</strong><br />
any regional development strategy. Just by<br />
raising the educational standards and human<br />
41 Small and Medium Enterprises.
esource training system, economic recovery<br />
could be achived, raising the standard <strong>of</strong><br />
living.<br />
Priority strategic directions in the upcoming<br />
years should focus on upgrading old roads,<br />
upgrading rural telecommunications<br />
infrastructure, modernization <strong>of</strong> water<br />
systems, municipal waste by attracting<br />
European funding grants. economic growth is<br />
the most important indicator <strong>of</strong> the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> a region. In this way creating<br />
a competitive economy is a decisive factor in<br />
the evolvment <strong>of</strong> an area or industrial<br />
enterprise.<br />
There are assumptions that can form the basis<br />
for economic recovery, namely:<br />
-existence <strong>of</strong> an industrial infrastructure in<br />
almost all sub-branches (machine building,<br />
chemical, petrochemical, food, textiles,<br />
medicines, wood, etc.);<br />
-existence <strong>of</strong> a well-trained personnel.<br />
-existence <strong>of</strong> companies in the industry,<br />
which benefited from consistent and fresh<br />
capital.<br />
-dynamics <strong>of</strong> small and medium enterprises.<br />
Tourism development in the NE<br />
disadvantaged<br />
Tourism is a priority, and by the enhancement<br />
<strong>of</strong> existing targets, improving the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
tourism services, responding to the actual<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> customers, the image <strong>of</strong><br />
tourism could be improved by creating a<br />
positive image <strong>of</strong> tourism in the area.<br />
The region presents many opportunities for<br />
various and complex recreational activities:<br />
religious-tourism, supported by the existence<br />
<strong>of</strong> an impressive number <strong>of</strong> churches and<br />
monasteries, historical monuments<br />
throughout the region; cultural-historical<br />
tourism, the existing museums, famous<br />
castles and a great cultural heritage and<br />
folklore <strong>of</strong> the region.<br />
For the economic progress, namely tourism,<br />
following investment in tourism, agrotourism<br />
support, upgrading roads in<br />
mountainous areas can sketch some results:<br />
-Increase the number <strong>of</strong> visitors to the North-<br />
377<br />
East region, and investing money in<br />
upgrading areas.<br />
-Increase the volume <strong>of</strong> private investment in<br />
tourism.<br />
-Increase the volume <strong>of</strong> requests for<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> vacation homes that bring<br />
additional revenue to local budgets.<br />
-Creating a positive image that <strong>of</strong>fers<br />
prospects for large-scale business and<br />
investment.<br />
-Working with the media, advertising that<br />
will help promote the area.<br />
-Improving the financial situation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
disadvantaged population.<br />
-Scale applications for sponsorship grants for<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> new technologies in the health<br />
system.<br />
Financial facilities given to the lessfavoured<br />
areas.<br />
To assist disadvantaged areas, the Romanian<br />
government has proposed that by 2013, these<br />
areas should be given various grants and tax<br />
breaks to help economic development.<br />
For new investments made in a deprived area,<br />
investors can benefit from one or more <strong>of</strong> the<br />
following features:<br />
-full refund <strong>of</strong> customs duties for machinery,<br />
equipment, equipment, vehicles (excluding<br />
cars), other depreciable assets which are<br />
imported to carry and operate investments in<br />
the area, as well as raw materials, spare parts<br />
and / or imported components necessary to<br />
achieve performance in the area<br />
-exemption from pr<strong>of</strong>it tax during the lifetime<br />
<strong>of</strong> the deprived area<br />
-financing special programs, approved by<br />
Government Decision<br />
-finance companies investment projects,<br />
through co-participation <strong>of</strong> the state to the<br />
social capital<br />
-discounted rates for car transport, inland<br />
waterways and rail<br />
-reducing income tax by up to 50%.<br />
These measures taken by the Government,<br />
aim at equalizing currently considered<br />
disadvantaged areas, with already developed<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> Romania.
CASE STUDY: THE IMPACT OF STATE<br />
AID TO ROMANIA LESS-FAVOURED<br />
AREAS -ROMANIAN GOVERNMENT<br />
AND COMPETITION COUNCIL<br />
2000-2009<br />
TOTAL:<br />
Tax Incentives<br />
584<br />
Nonrefundable<br />
2.<br />
funds<br />
300.000<br />
250.000<br />
200.000<br />
150.000<br />
100.000<br />
50.000<br />
0<br />
378<br />
Regional development policy is an essential<br />
component <strong>of</strong> the reform process in Romania,<br />
mainly aimed at reducing economic and<br />
social imbalances accumulated, preventing<br />
the emergence <strong>of</strong> new imbalances and<br />
support the overall sustainable development<br />
<strong>of</strong> all regions <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />
Evolution <strong>of</strong> regional aid in Romania during 2000-2009 (RON)<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
66. 384<br />
63. 800<br />
252. 017<br />
230. 957<br />
21. 060<br />
237. 110<br />
207. 568<br />
29. 152<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
194. 155<br />
179. 476<br />
13. 719<br />
TOTAL:<br />
Tax Incentives<br />
Non-refundable funds<br />
The general trend <strong>of</strong> decrease in the volume <strong>of</strong> such aid by 2008 is because the vast majority <strong>of</strong><br />
aid was granted as tax incentives. Since 2007, new schemes have been initiated with the<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> regional state aid, in full compliance with EU rules.<br />
Also while checking operators in June 2010 (a total <strong>of</strong> 109 from disadvantaged areas), a study<br />
was conducted on two questions:<br />
249. 353<br />
245. 957<br />
2. 098<br />
99. 644<br />
77. 391<br />
20. 944<br />
100. 948<br />
84. 162<br />
16. 655<br />
67. 582<br />
29. 080<br />
38. 502<br />
154. 226<br />
13. 206<br />
141. 020<br />
179. 376<br />
7. 130<br />
172. 246
1. "What are the problems faced by the society?”<br />
2%<br />
2% 5%<br />
3% 3%<br />
8%<br />
So it may be noted that the majority consider that there is a low demand due to the current<br />
crisis, followed by those who believe that there is a huge financial jam and the high prices <strong>of</strong><br />
utilities.<br />
2. "What measures do you think the state should take in order to raise the social-economic level<br />
<strong>of</strong> the disadvantaged area? "<br />
5%<br />
8%<br />
13%<br />
14%<br />
15%<br />
55%<br />
Conclusion<br />
Disadvantaged areas in Romania were<br />
considered tax havens, the ghost business<br />
having prospered without bringing any<br />
positive aspects to the less-favoured region. A<br />
2010 study, conducted by Pro TV campaign,<br />
showed that 33% <strong>of</strong> Romanians live with a<br />
wage <strong>of</strong> about 200 euros per month. Between<br />
1998 and 2010 there were approximately 160<br />
cities declared disadvantaged, where many<br />
companies tried to move its headquarters to<br />
Problems <strong>of</strong> the Society<br />
56%<br />
379<br />
Low demand and high<br />
taxation<br />
Financial Jam<br />
High prices <strong>of</strong> utilities and<br />
raw materials<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> qualified labor<br />
Developing the less-favoured areas<br />
4% 4% 3%<br />
Further tax incentives<br />
Adequate infrastructure<br />
Support for jobs and training<br />
Simplified procedure for<br />
accessing funds<br />
the enjoyment <strong>of</strong> the exemptions (about 6<br />
billion RON). Companies wishing to relocate<br />
their headquarters in these areas had no such<br />
development project, creating a monopoly on<br />
the labor market, taking advantage prodiving<br />
extremly low wages for people who were<br />
wiling to work.<br />
Moreover, a investor from a deprived area is<br />
required to engage minimum 2 employees<br />
residing in that area, which would lead to<br />
lower unemployment in the disadvantaged
egion. State aid to disadvantaged areas led<br />
the companies to develop diversified<br />
economic activity, the population has become<br />
more responsive to the conversion process.<br />
Most companies have relied exclusively on<br />
these grants from the government instead <strong>of</strong><br />
continuing research and finding its own<br />
funds, tax incentives were an additional cost<br />
for Ministry <strong>of</strong> Public Finance, who had to<br />
make numerous tax inspection. For the best<br />
possible structural funds for the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> disadvantaged areas is recommended to<br />
promote information campaigns in both<br />
economic agents and local authorities. The<br />
authorities also need to simplify legislation<br />
for obtaining grants. Attracting investors<br />
outside the LFA can be achieved by creating<br />
industrial parks along with investment in<br />
local infrastructure.<br />
Linked to the yield, most traders have noticed<br />
a decline in pr<strong>of</strong>it in 2005, the period during<br />
which state aid stopped, increases recorded in<br />
2006 and 2007, followed by a period <strong>of</strong><br />
declining pr<strong>of</strong>its, because <strong>of</strong> the decreased<br />
number funds granted. Migration factor (or<br />
even interregional migration in other<br />
European countries) resulted in a decrease <strong>of</strong><br />
GDP especially the North-East region.<br />
However, there are positive signs, as<br />
investors obtained licenses in less-favoured<br />
areas, have created an estimated 44,300 new<br />
jobs (Source: The Competition Council in the<br />
year 2009), representing about 5.3% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total unemployment number.<br />
Less-favoured areas in Romania could easily<br />
disappear if the political factor would not<br />
have direct impact on the funds granted, only<br />
changing legislation and eliminating regional<br />
bureaucracy, would lead to an improvement<br />
in the economic situation <strong>of</strong> each region.<br />
380<br />
References<br />
Oskam,A. J., Komen, MHC., Wobst, P.,<br />
Yalew, A, Trade Policies and development <strong>of</strong><br />
Less-Favoured Areas:Evidence from<br />
Literature, 2006<br />
Kuyenvenhoven, A., Ruben, R., Pender, J.,<br />
Sustainable Poverty Reduction in Lessfavoured<br />
Areas:Problems, Options and<br />
Strategies, 2007<br />
Kuyenvenhoven, A., Ruben, R., Pender, J.,<br />
Development Strategies for Less-favoured<br />
Areas, 2003<br />
Kuyenvenhoven, A., Ruben, R., Pender, J.,<br />
Investing in poor people in less-favoured<br />
areas:Institutions, Technologies and Policies<br />
for poverty alleviation and sustainable<br />
resource use, 2003<br />
Pender, J., Hazell, P., Promoting sustainable<br />
development in Less-favoured Areas, 2000<br />
National Rural Development Programme<br />
2007-2013, Romania<br />
http://ec. europa.<br />
eu/agriculture/consultations/lfa/index_en. htm<br />
www. adrnordest. ro<br />
www. adr. ro<br />
www. antreprenortanar. ro<br />
www. fonduri-structurale-europene. ro/<br />
www. consiliulconcurentei. ro<br />
http://eur-lex. europa. eu/en/index. htm<br />
www. apia. org. ro/dir_iacs/ppt. pdf<br />
http://www. mdrl. ro/index. php?p=159<br />
http://www. ier.<br />
ro/documente/formare/Politica_regionala. pdf<br />
Această lucrare/articol a beneficiat de suport<br />
financiar prin proiectul,,Studii Post-<br />
Doctorale în Economie: program de formare<br />
continuă a cercetătorilor de elită – SPODE”,<br />
contract de finanţare nr.<br />
POSDRU/89/1.5/S/61755, proiect finanţat din<br />
Fondul Social European prin Programul<br />
Operaţional Sectorial Dezvoltarea Resurselor<br />
Umane 2007-2013