12.12.2012 Views

Selected papers~ SPECIAL EDITION - Index of

Selected papers~ SPECIAL EDITION - Index of

Selected papers~ SPECIAL EDITION - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH,<br />

YOUTH AND SPORTS<br />

THE ANNALS OF THE<br />

UNIVERSITY OF ORADEA<br />

ECONOMIC SCIENCES<br />

TOM XX<br />

1 st ISSUE / JULY 2011<br />

~<strong>Selected</strong> <strong>papers~</strong><br />

<strong>SPECIAL</strong> <strong>EDITION</strong> - “20 YEARS OF ACADEMIC<br />

ECONOMIC EDUCATION IN ORADEA”<br />

ISSN 1222-569X (printed format)<br />

ISSN 1582-5450 (electronic format)


The publication <strong>of</strong> the papers in the Journal - THE ANNALS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ORADEA.<br />

ECONOMIC SCIENCES - Tom XX, 2011, ISSN 1582-5450 (electronic format), ISSN 1222-569X<br />

(printed format), a journal couted by the National Authority as B+ CNCSIS - Romania, RePEc, EBSCO,<br />

DOAJ, CABELL’S DIRECTORY OF PUBLISHING OPPORTUNITIES indexed and respectively on the<br />

site <strong>of</strong> the journal: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro, with open access, is a result <strong>of</strong> a peer review<br />

evaluation process. The papers published in this volume are exclusivily engaging authors.<br />

Editorial Board<br />

Chief Editor:<br />

Dr. Anca DODESCU, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Associate Editors:<br />

Dr. Ioana POP-COHUŢ, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Dr. Adriana GIURGIU, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Members:<br />

Academician, Mircea Maliţa, Member <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy, Romania, Dr. H.C. <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />

Dr. Gheorghe Zaman, Corresponding Member <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy, Romania, Dr. H.C. <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Oradea;<br />

Dr.Ahmet Aktas, University <strong>of</strong> Akdeniz, Alanya, Turkey;<br />

Dr.Mihaela Belu, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />

Dr. Gordon Biggs, Moray College UHI Millennium Institute, Scotland, Great Britain;<br />

Dr. Luminita Chivu, The Romanian Academy, Romania;<br />

Dr. José Cifuentes – Honrubia, University <strong>of</strong> Alicante, Spain;<br />

Dr.Mircea Ciumara, The Romanian Academy, Romania;<br />

Dr.Constantin Ciutacu, The Romanian Academy, Romania;<br />

Dr. Marin Dinu, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />

Dr.Xavier Galiegue, University <strong>of</strong> Orleans, France;<br />

Dr. Valeriu Ioan-Franc, The Romanian Academy, Romania;<br />

Dr. Zoran Ivanović, University <strong>of</strong> Rijeka, Croatia;<br />

Dr.Kormos Janos, University <strong>of</strong> Debrecen, Hungary;<br />

Dr.Eszter Lang, University <strong>of</strong> Debrecen, Hungary;<br />

Dr. Nicola Mattoscio, “G. D’Annunzio” University <strong>of</strong> Chieti, Pescara, Italy;<br />

Dr. Piero Mella, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, Italy;<br />

Miguel Angel Moreno San Juan, The Leadership Institute, Arlington, USA;<br />

Dr. Guido Montani, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, Italy;<br />

Dr. András Nábrádi, University <strong>of</strong> Debrecen, Hungary;<br />

Dr. Giuseppe Paolone, “G. D’Annunzio” University <strong>of</strong> Chieti, Pescara, Italy;<br />

Dr. Nicolae Pop, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania, Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />

Dr. Ioan Popa, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania ;<br />

Dr. Wiktor Pozniak, College <strong>of</strong> Europe, Poland;<br />

Egidio Rangone, ”G. D’Annunzio” University <strong>of</strong> Chieti, Pescara, Italy;<br />

Dr. Jean-Emmanuel Tyvaert, University <strong>of</strong> Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France;<br />

Dr. Adriana Tomescu, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Dr. Valentina Vasile, The Romanian Academy, Romania.<br />

Responsible for the English version: Dr. Mirabela Pop, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania.<br />

Honorary Committee:<br />

Academician, Mircea Maliţa, Member <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy, Romania – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />

His Excellency, Jonathan Scheele – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />

Dr. Aurel Negucioiu – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />

Dr. Gheorghe Gh. Ionescu – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />

Aldo Poli – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />

Franco Antiga - Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />

Dr. Constantin Roşca – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />

Dr. Gheorghe Olah – University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />

Dr. Gheorghe Zaman, Coresponding Member <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy, Romania – Dr. H.C. <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Oradea.


Scientific Committee:<br />

Dr. Băbăiţă Carmen, West University, Timişoara, Romania;<br />

Dr. Bătrâncea Ioan, “Babeş – Bolyai” University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;<br />

Dr. Liviu Begu, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />

Dr. Nicolae Bibu, West University, Timişoara, Romania;<br />

Dr. Rodica Boier, “Gh. Asachi” Technical University, Iaşi, Romania;<br />

Dr. Sorin Briciu, “1 Decembrie 1918″ University, Alba Iulia, Romania;<br />

Dr. Cristiana Cristureanu, “Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian University, Bucharest, Romania;<br />

Dr. Marin Dinu, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />

Dr. Liliana Feleaga, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />

Dr. Niculae Feleaga, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />

Dr. Emilian M. Dobrescu, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania;<br />

Dr. Nicoleta Farcane, West University, Timişoara, Romania;<br />

Dr. Xavier Galiegue, University <strong>of</strong> Orleans, France;<br />

Dr. Elena Hlaciuc, “Ştefan cel Mare” University, Suceava, Romania;<br />

Dr. Tatiana Moşteanu, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania - Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />

Dr. Marin Opriţescu, University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Romania;<br />

Dr. Nicolae Al. Pop , The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania – Dr. H.C <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea;<br />

Dr. Ion Popa, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />

Dr. Gheorghe Popescu, “Babes-Bolyai” University, Cluj Napoca, Romania;<br />

Dr. Gabriela Prelipcean, “Ştefan cel Mare” University, Suceava;<br />

Dr. Petru Prunea, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Dr. Gabriela Stănciulescu, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />

Dr. Ovidiu Rujan, The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania;<br />

Dr. Ioan Talpos, West University, Timişoara, Romania;<br />

Dr. Adriana Tiron Tudor, “Babeş – Bolyai” University, Cluj Napoca, Romania<br />

Dr. Jean-Emmanuel Tyvaert, University <strong>of</strong> Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France;<br />

Dr. Constantin Tulai, “Babeş-Bolyai” University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;<br />

Dr. Ioan Trenca, “Babeş-Bolyai” University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;<br />

Dr. Gordon T. Biggs, Moray College, Scotland, Great Britain;<br />

Dr. Maria Madela Abrudan, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Dr. Olimpia Ban, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Dr. Alina Bădulescu, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Dr. Mihai Berinde, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Dr. Elena Botezat, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Dr. Nicoleta Bugnar, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Dr. Gheorghe Ţară, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Dr. Naiana Ţarcă, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania;<br />

Dr. Daniela Zăpodeanu, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania.<br />

Edition prepared by:<br />

Associate editor – Dr. Ioana POP COHUŢ<br />

Ec. Cătălin ZMOLE


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

DISERTATION AT ACADEMIC CEREMONY OF AWARDING THE UNIVERSITY<br />

OF ORADEA HONOR DEGREE OF DOCTOR HONORIS CAUSA TO PROFESSOR<br />

DR. GHEORGHE ZAMAN, CORRESPONDENT MEMBER OF THE ROMANIAN<br />

ACADEMY, ON MAY 27, 2011 ................................................................................................ 9<br />

CHALLENGES, VULNERABILITIES AND WAYS OF APPROACH IN<br />

ROMANIA'S EXTERNAL DEBT SUSTAINABILITY ............................................... 11<br />

Zaman Gheorghe .......................................................................................................... 11<br />

PLENARY SESSION ............................................................................................................... 45<br />

EXPERIENCES AND TENDENCIES OF DECENTRALIZATION AT REGIONAL<br />

LEVEL IN THE EUROPEAN UNION ........................................................................... 47<br />

Dodescu Anca ............................................................................................................... 47<br />

A NEW THINKING FOR A NEW WORLD. REPRESENTATIONS FROM<br />

ECONOMY ....................................................................................................................... 63<br />

Negucioiu Aurel ............................................................................................................ 63<br />

CONTINUING INTERNATIONAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION IN THE<br />

FINANCIAL CRISIS CONTEXT ................................................................................... 85<br />

Berinde Mihai ............................................................................................................... 85<br />

EUROPEAN AUSTERITY WITHOUT GROWTH? EUROPEAN GROWTH<br />

WITHOUT EUROPEAN DEMOCRACY?HOW EUROPEAN CITIZENS CAN<br />

REVIVE THE EUROPEAN PROJECT AND DEFEAT EUROSCEPTICISM ......... 91<br />

Montani Guido .............................................................................................................. 91<br />

ACCOUNTING FOR SUSTAINABILITY: WHAT NEXT? A RESEARCH<br />

AGENDA ........................................................................................................................... 97<br />

Cunningham M. Gary ................................................................................................... 97<br />

Arne Fagerström ........................................................................................................... 97<br />

Lars G. Hassel .............................................................................................................. 97<br />

LE DYNAMISME DES TPE ET PME ET L'ÉVOLUTION DE L'ÉCONOMIE<br />

ROUMAINE .................................................................................................................... 113<br />

Jubénot Marie-Noëlle ................................................................................................. 113<br />

A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH REGARDING THE MARKETING<br />

COMMUNICATION TOOLS USED IN THE ONLINE ENVIRONMENT ............ 119<br />

Pop Nicolae Alexandru ............................................................................................... 119<br />

Acatrinei Carmen........................................................................................................ 119<br />

SECTION INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION: ......... 127<br />

SUB-SECTION: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS............................................................... 127<br />

THE IMPACT OF THE CRISIS ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE AND SOLUTIONS<br />

TO REDUCE THE CRISIS EFFECTS. CASE STUDY: ROMANIA ....................... 129<br />

Meşter Liana ............................................................................................................... 129<br />

Bugnar Nicoleta .......................................................................................................... 129<br />

Fora Andreea .............................................................................................................. 129<br />

5


SECTION: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION ......... 135<br />

SUB-SECTION: EU SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND<br />

COMPETITIVENESS ........................................................................................................... 135<br />

POVERTY AND LIVING. ROMA POOR NEIGHBORHOODS IN ROMANIA AND<br />

HUNGARY ...................................................................................................................... 137<br />

Olah Gheorghe ........................................................................................................... 137<br />

Olah Șerban ................................................................................................................ 137<br />

Flora Gavril ................................................................................................................ 137<br />

Szekedi Levente ........................................................................................................... 137<br />

UTILISATION OF BENCHMARKING TECHNIQUES FOR FUNDAMENTING<br />

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES IN THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN<br />

ROMANIA ....................................................................................................................... 185<br />

Rujan Ovidiu ............................................................................................................... 185<br />

Ţarţavulea Ramona Iulia ............................................................................................ 185<br />

Vasilescu Felician ....................................................................................................... 185<br />

Geambaşu Cristina Venera ......................................................................................... 185<br />

SECTION ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION ................................... 191<br />

SUB-SECTION: BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION ............................................................ 191<br />

THE BRAND EQUITY OF TOURISTIC DESTINATIONS – THE MEANING OF<br />

THE VALUE ................................................................................................................... 193<br />

Ban Olimpia ................................................................................................................ 193<br />

Popa Luminiţa ............................................................................................................ 193<br />

Silaghi Simona ............................................................................................................ 193<br />

THE TOURISM BARRIERS OF THE DISABLED IN ROMANIA ......................... 201<br />

Băbăiță Carmen Mihaela ........................................................................................... 201<br />

Nagy Andrea ............................................................................................................... 201<br />

Filep Adrian Viorel ..................................................................................................... 201<br />

START-UP FINANCING SOURCES: DOES GENDER MATTER? SOME<br />

EVIDENCE FOR EU AND ROMANIA ....................................................................... 207<br />

Bădulescu Alina .......................................................................................................... 207<br />

SUB-SECTION: ECONOMICS ............................................................................................ 215<br />

COMPETITIVENESS - GROWTH FACTOR. POINT OF VIEW ON THE<br />

SITUATION IN ROMANIA .......................................................................................... 217<br />

Cismaș Laura.............................................................................................................. 217<br />

Bucur Oana Nicoleta .................................................................................................. 217<br />

Pitorac Ruxandra Ioana ............................................................................................. 217<br />

DYNAMICS ECONOMIC DISPARITIES IN NORTH-WEST REGION OF<br />

ROMANIA ....................................................................................................................... 223<br />

Florea Adrian ............................................................................................................. 223<br />

ABOUT OTHER KIND OF PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH (HOMO-SAPIENS<br />

TO HOMO-OECONOMICUS) ..................................................................................... 229<br />

Jivan Alexandru .......................................................................................................... 229<br />

THE POTENTIAL OF FEMALE ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS A REGIONAL<br />

GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT ENGINE IN THE WESTERN ROMANIA ..... 237<br />

Pop Cohuț Ioana ......................................................................................................... 237


TOURISM'S CHANGING FACE: NEW AGE TOURISM VERSUS OLD<br />

TOURISM ........................................................................................................................ 245<br />

Stănciulescu Gabriela Cecilia .................................................................................... 245<br />

Molnar Elisabeta ........................................................................................................ 245<br />

Bunghez Magdalena ................................................................................................... 245<br />

YOUTH LABOUR MARKET. MOBILITY, CAREER DEVELOPMENT,<br />

INCOMES. CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES .............................................. 251<br />

Vasile Valentina .......................................................................................................... 251<br />

Vasile Liviu ................................................................................................................. 251<br />

SECTION FINANCE, BANKING AND ACCOUNTING .................................................. 265<br />

SUB-SECTION: FINANCES ................................................................................................ 265<br />

THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE PUBLIC DEFICIT<br />

OF THE EU COUNTRIES ............................................................................................ 267<br />

Bǎtrâncea Ioan ........................................................................................................... 267<br />

Bǎtrâncea Maria ......................................................................................................... 267<br />

Nichita Ramona-Anca ................................................................................................. 267<br />

SUBSECTION: ACCOUNTING .......................................................................................... 273<br />

INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE IN THE ANNUAL<br />

REPORTS OF ROMANIAN MANUFACTURING LISTED COMPANIES –<br />

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................ 275<br />

Bogdan Victoria .......................................................................................................... 275<br />

Balint Platon Judit ...................................................................................................... 275<br />

Farcaş Mariana .......................................................................................................... 275<br />

PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES ON FISCAL ...................................................... 285<br />

Morar Ioan – Dan ....................................................................................................... 285<br />

IFRS COMPLIANCE REGARDING INFORMATION DISCLOSED BY<br />

COMPANIES IN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CASE STUDY<br />

ON IAS 23 BORROWING COSTS APPLICABILITY .............................................. 289<br />

Tiron-Tudor Adriana .................................................................................................. 289<br />

Fekete-Pali-Pista Szilveszter ...................................................................................... 289<br />

Dragu Ioana-Maria .................................................................................................... 289<br />

SUBSECTION: BANKING ................................................................................................... 297<br />

MODELING ROMANIAN EXCHANGE RATE EVOLUTION WITH GARCH,<br />

TGARCH, GARCH- IN MEAN MODELS .................................................................. 299<br />

Trenca Ioan ................................................................................................................. 299<br />

Cociuba Mihail Ioan ................................................................................................... 299<br />

MONEY: FROM STATISTICAL DEFINITION TO MONETARY POLICY FOR<br />

ADOPTING EURO. ........................................................................................................ 307<br />

Zăpodeanu Daniela .................................................................................................... 307<br />

SECTION MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING ............................................................. 313<br />

SUB-SECTION: ECONOMIC INFORMATICS ................................................................ 313<br />

TOOLS USED IN DECISION MAKING ..................................................................... 315<br />

Demian Horia ............................................................................................................. 315<br />

Bernabeu Elena Perez ................................................................................................ 315<br />

Abrudan Maria Madela .............................................................................................. 315


SUB-SECTION: MARKETING ........................................................................................... 321<br />

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THE<br />

CASE OF ROMANIA. CONCEPT AND MANAGEMENT. ..................................... 323<br />

Bibu Nicolae ............................................................................................................... 323<br />

Lisetchi Mihai ............................................................................................................. 323<br />

SUB-SECTION: MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................... 331<br />

ORGANIZATIONAL STRESS AND ITS IMPACT ON WORK PERFORMANCE333<br />

Bucurean Mirela ......................................................................................................... 333<br />

Costin Mădălina-Adriana ........................................................................................... 333<br />

ELEMENTS FOR A MODEL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL SCHOOL FOR WOMEN<br />

IN RURAL AREAS OF ROMANIA ............................................................................. 339<br />

Botezat Elena .............................................................................................................. 339<br />

Tarcza Teodora ........................................................................................................... 339<br />

HOW FUTURE MANAGERS VIEW SOCIETAL CULTURE: A CROSS-<br />

COUNTRY COMPARISON .......................................................................................... 347<br />

Catana Gheorghe Alexandru ...................................................................................... 347<br />

Catana Doina ............................................................................................................. 347<br />

EXPLANATORY ECONOMETRIC METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THE<br />

BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA - GUIDE<br />

FOR DEVELOPING THE PILOT STUDY ................................................................. 353<br />

Roşca Constantin ........................................................................................................ 353<br />

THE NEED FOR PUBLIC DEBT MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF<br />

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION ............... 365<br />

Marcu Nicu ................................................................................................................. 365<br />

Meghișan Mădălina Georgeta .................................................................................... 365<br />

IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES IN THE LESS FAVOURED<br />

AREAS OF ROMANIA .................................................................................................. 375<br />

Tileagă Cosmin ........................................................................................................... 375<br />

Cosmescu Ioan ............................................................................................................ 375


Disertation at Academic Ceremony <strong>of</strong> Awarding<br />

the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Honor Degree <strong>of</strong> Doctor Honoris<br />

Causa to Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Dr. Gheorghe Zaman,<br />

Correspondent Member <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy,<br />

on May 27, 2011


CHALLENGES, VULNERABILITIES AND WAYS OF APPROACH IN<br />

ROMANIA'S EXTERNAL DEBT SUSTAINABILITY<br />

Zaman Gheorghe<br />

Correspondent Member <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy<br />

Introduction<br />

The notion <strong>of</strong> a country's external debt, measured by a complex system <strong>of</strong> static and dynamic indicators,<br />

knows a lot <strong>of</strong> approaches and opinions in the literature, more or less convergent, complementary and<br />

advanced in terms <strong>of</strong> factors.<br />

Indicators <strong>of</strong> the external public and private debt on short, medium and long term provide a snapshot <strong>of</strong><br />

indebtedness <strong>of</strong> the country and are the most researched domain in the literature, including national and<br />

international financial bodies, which adopt a series <strong>of</strong> classification criteria <strong>of</strong> countries in terms <strong>of</strong> size<br />

and dynamics <strong>of</strong> external debt.<br />

In this study, we intend to make an analysis <strong>of</strong> the volume, dynamics and structure <strong>of</strong> the current<br />

Romania's foreign debt, showing the challenges for national economic policies, present and perspective,<br />

the internal and external vulnerabilities and ways <strong>of</strong> approaching the external debt sustainability.<br />

According to the definition given by UNCTAD, a sustainable foreign debt is that level <strong>of</strong> debt which:<br />

� allows the indebted country to pay all current and future debt service without resorting to<br />

restructuring or rescheduling;<br />

� prevents accumulation <strong>of</strong> arrears and defaults;<br />

� in parallel provides an acceptable level <strong>of</strong> growth in the lending country.<br />

Until recently, Romania was considered a country with a low external debt. Currently, the situation has<br />

changed, meaning that this debt, somewhat neglected in the early transition period 1 has become a serious<br />

threat to present and future sustainability <strong>of</strong> economic development in Romania.<br />

In general, external debt concerns financial and economic interests <strong>of</strong> all parties especially creditors and<br />

debtors, by the formula "win-win", so that, currently, some countries have surplus <strong>of</strong> balance <strong>of</strong><br />

payments, usually the most developed and economically healthy, while others have deficits that, in<br />

extreme situations, can lead to inability to pay the debt, which means tough measures and policies,<br />

especially for the living standards <strong>of</strong> many generations <strong>of</strong> taxpayers.<br />

Chapter 1. Features <strong>of</strong> the volume, structure and dynamics <strong>of</strong> Romania's foreign debt<br />

Romanian cooperation with international financial institutions is not recent. If we don’t<br />

consider the period before 1990, we can say that the period from 1991 to 2011 saw some standby<br />

arrangement with the IMF which Romania has made for various reasons, the latter regarding<br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> international economic and financial crisis which manifested itself in Romania<br />

stronger and longer than in most <strong>of</strong> the developed EU countries and in some new EU member<br />

states.<br />

During 2005-2010, total external debt <strong>of</strong> Romania increased from 38.511 billion USD to<br />

120,436 billion, representing a proportion <strong>of</strong> 75%. In other words, there was an increase <strong>of</strong><br />

about 3.12 times, this representing the macroeconomic indicator with the highest dynamic the<br />

result <strong>of</strong> which was to record an absolute record, unprecedented in the economic history <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country, in terms <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the indicator, and its dynamics under the circumstances in<br />

which the level <strong>of</strong> the country’s economic and social development <strong>of</strong> 1989 was reached in<br />

2003-2004, while the GDP growth was only 138.1% during 2002-2009, which leads us to<br />

believe that the elasticity <strong>of</strong> GDP to external debt was very low.<br />

1 Several studies have shown the need to pay attention to Romania's foreign debt even since the early years <strong>of</strong><br />

transition (see Gh.Zaman, 1993, Datoria externă obsesia de care nu scăpăm (External debt- the obsession we<br />

cannot escape from), Capitalul (The Capital), June 26, pg.3).<br />

11


Table no.1.1 Total external debt <strong>of</strong> Romania in 2005-2010 1<br />

12<br />

billion U.S.D.<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2010/<br />

2005 %<br />

In billions <strong>of</strong> U.S. dollars<br />

Total external debt <strong>of</strong> which: 38,5 51,7 80,2 105,7 111,8 120,4 313<br />

Public 14,1 13,4 14,4 16,4 27,8 37,3 265<br />

Loans 6,2 6,0 6,4 7,9 19,7 28,7 462<br />

Multilateral 6,1 5,9 6,3 7,8 19,6 28,7 470<br />

Bilateral 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,07 0,08 80<br />

Bonds 3,3 3,2 3,3 3,9 3,9 3,8 115<br />

Others 2<br />

4,5 4,2 4,6 4,5 4,2 4,7 104<br />

Private 23,3 37,0 64,8 88,95 83,8 82,9 356<br />

Short term 7,8 15,8 26,8 29,9 19,3 22,9 294<br />

Long term 15,6 21,3 38 59,2 64,5 60,1 385<br />

as a percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

Total external debt <strong>of</strong> which: 38,8 42,1 47,0 51,4 68,3 74,9 193<br />

Public 14,2 10,9 8,4 8,0 17,0 23,2 163<br />

Loans 6,2 4,9 3,7 3,9 12,0 17,9 289<br />

Multilateral 6,1 4,8 3,7 3,8 12,0 17,8 292<br />

Bilateral 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,0 0,1 100<br />

Bonds 3,3 2,6 2,0 1,9 2,4 2,4 73<br />

Others 2<br />

4,6 3,4 2,7 2,2 2,6 2,9 63<br />

Private 23,5 30,1 38,0 49,3 51,2 51,6 219<br />

Short term 7,8 12,8 15,7 14,5 11,8 14,2 182<br />

Long term 15,7 17,3 22,3 28,8 39,4 37,4 238<br />

1) End <strong>of</strong> year unless otherwise specified, 2) Include private bank debt and other public debt.<br />

Source: NBR, IMF data and own calculations.<br />

Figure no. 1. Institutional structure <strong>of</strong> the total external debt by type <strong>of</strong> institutions in 2010


Data in Table no. 1.1 and Figure no.1<br />

suggest some features <strong>of</strong> Romania's foreign<br />

debt, which can lead to some real challenges<br />

for present and future national economy,<br />

namely:<br />

- the highest dynamics <strong>of</strong> external debt over<br />

the period 2005-2010 beyond the average <strong>of</strong><br />

313% for total foreign debt, there have been<br />

public multilateral loans, mainly due to big<br />

increases in 2008-2010, because <strong>of</strong> the crisis,<br />

followed by long-term private debt, which,<br />

unlike the public debt, after especially large<br />

increases in 2005-2008, decreased in 2010,<br />

when private sector lending became more<br />

expensive and more restrictive;<br />

-in terms <strong>of</strong> weight in the total external debt it<br />

is by far due to private external debt <strong>of</strong> 68.8%<br />

<strong>of</strong> which 18.3% on short term and 49.9% on<br />

long term.<br />

As for the fact that private sector is the one<br />

with the highest level <strong>of</strong> external<br />

indebtedness we shall note that there have<br />

been opinions stating that the private<br />

economic agents are free to contract external<br />

debt, as much as they can or will. This view,<br />

for the whole <strong>of</strong> sustainable economic growth<br />

in Romania, is totally wrong because:<br />

- a part <strong>of</strong> public and private debt is<br />

guaranteed publicly so the state is to pay if<br />

the private firm enters into default, a situation<br />

that reflects unfavourably on all taxpayers;<br />

- even the private external debt, without<br />

public guarantee, is relevant for the state<br />

because private economic collapse in case <strong>of</strong><br />

default <strong>of</strong> debt payment, by the effects<br />

propagated (negative externalities), entails,<br />

directly or indirectly, negative repercussions<br />

on the national economy as a whole and not<br />

seldom does the state have to intervene, as<br />

was the case <strong>of</strong> the banks in difficulty in<br />

developed countries during the present crisis,<br />

when they received financial support from the<br />

state, investment injections, or were taken by<br />

the state on the ground that they were too<br />

large (important) to crack under the slogan<br />

“too big to fail”(!).<br />

This is therefore the first challenge in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> the relation between<br />

13<br />

public and private external debt that<br />

requires further examining, taking into<br />

account the quasi-symbiotic coexistence <strong>of</strong><br />

the two types <strong>of</strong> debt, and that neither the<br />

state nor the private firms can be indifferent<br />

to bankruptcy or insolvency, both <strong>of</strong> one<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the others, due to the acknowledged or<br />

disregarded, assumed or denied, relational<br />

context <strong>of</strong> the public-private, public-public<br />

and private-private partnerships. This<br />

challenge forces us to rather a rejection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

destructive competition, the market<br />

individualism, autarchy and selfishness<br />

promoted by some experts and to better<br />

cooperation and solidarity.<br />

Another conclusion that can be drawn from<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> crisis and not only is that<br />

neither the private sector nor the public one<br />

are exempt from the developments <strong>of</strong> the<br />

"business cycle", <strong>of</strong> recessions and crises, no<br />

matter how much they would advocate one or<br />

the other. For this reason, the use <strong>of</strong> strategic<br />

positive sum games formula such as "winwin"<br />

seems to be the wisest solution.<br />

- The ratio <strong>of</strong> the total external debt to<br />

GDP gives us clues about the efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

the use <strong>of</strong> potential resource representing<br />

external borrowing - expressed as magnitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> GDP (effect) <strong>of</strong> production that reflects<br />

one unit <strong>of</strong> effort, which in this case is<br />

foreign debt. In other words, a medium and<br />

long term growth <strong>of</strong> external debt, faster than<br />

<strong>of</strong> GDP, generates doubts about the efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> the borrowed money. Not vainly<br />

does the phrase "live a life on debt" have<br />

negative connotations. If in isolated cases it<br />

may be a way to "get through", even to be<br />

able to live, at the societal level such a<br />

generalization can only have negative effects,<br />

which, whether we admit it or not, practice,<br />

reality induce into us sooner or later.<br />

In connection with this aspect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

correlation <strong>of</strong> GDP and external debt, we<br />

want to mention that there are experts who<br />

believe that having a large foreign debt is as a<br />

sign <strong>of</strong> credibility, internally or externally,<br />

and to make efforts to pay foreign debt would<br />

be a "big mistake". In support <strong>of</strong> such


easoning is brought, in my opinion totally<br />

unconvincingly, the case <strong>of</strong> periodic<br />

exemptions from external debt <strong>of</strong> heavily<br />

indebted developing or underdeveloped<br />

countries that enter default as well as deleting<br />

the external debt <strong>of</strong> the central European<br />

countries that have turned from a controlled,<br />

centralized economy to a competitive market<br />

economy. These examples cannot be<br />

considered other than exceptions, rare cases,<br />

which strengthen the rule <strong>of</strong> preserving the<br />

ability to pay, <strong>of</strong> solvency, based on loans<br />

designed, managed and reimbursed<br />

efficiently.<br />

Therefore, I think that depending on the level<br />

and characteristics <strong>of</strong> the economic and social<br />

development <strong>of</strong> each country, there are<br />

optimal or sustainable external and<br />

domestic debt levels, on different time<br />

horizons, which only the complex,<br />

multidisciplinary approaches <strong>of</strong> teams <strong>of</strong><br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals can quantify and substantiate.<br />

In conclusion, it can be said that the weight <strong>of</strong><br />

the total external debt or <strong>of</strong> its individual<br />

components in GDP, is rather determined by<br />

taking into account the complex internal and<br />

external factors acting in a national economy<br />

and not necessarily the systems <strong>of</strong> standard<br />

indicators or criteria, more or less stable over<br />

time and established by various bodies and<br />

specialists. This does not mean one should<br />

neglect the standard criteria and benchmarks,<br />

but on the contrary, to see how adequate they<br />

are in each peculiar case. Even the<br />

14<br />

applicability, the operational character, the<br />

convergence and adherence criteria <strong>of</strong> EMU<br />

have raised numerous objections not only <strong>of</strong><br />

theoretical and methodological nature but<br />

mainly practical.<br />

The evolution <strong>of</strong> external debt <strong>of</strong> Romania<br />

on quarters 1-4 2010 and quarter 1, 2011<br />

In the last five quarters, the year 2010 and<br />

quarter 1-2011, Romania's total gross external<br />

debt increased continuously (Table no.1.2),<br />

which is more a cause for concern than a<br />

safety mark because such dynamics show that<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis and the policies<br />

adopted to counter them so far have not<br />

proven to stop the urgent need to increase, at<br />

an unsustainable pace on the medium and<br />

long term, the indebtedness <strong>of</strong> the country,<br />

through new loans <strong>of</strong> considerable sizes, even<br />

if they are called "preventive"<br />

(precautionary).<br />

The largest increases were reported for longterm<br />

debt <strong>of</strong> the government and the banks,<br />

respectively 1.6 billion euro and 1.2 billion<br />

euro, amounts beyond the possibilities <strong>of</strong><br />

reimbursement, as long as its maturities make<br />

short-term debt reach more and more<br />

overburdening levels, relatively difficult to<br />

honour.<br />

So, another challenge for the Romanian<br />

foreign debt sustainability would be the very<br />

taking <strong>of</strong> actions to stop / slow down this<br />

rapid dynamic <strong>of</strong> the burden <strong>of</strong> its external<br />

debt.<br />

Table no.1.2. Structure on institutional sectors, maturities and financial instruments<br />

T1/2010 T2/2010 T3/2010 T4/2010 T1/2011<br />

Mil. euro - end <strong>of</strong><br />

period<br />

Total gross external debt 86 527,9 87 785,0 89 184,0 90 908,4 93 386,2<br />

I. GROSS EXTERNAL DEBT 71 484,0 72 244,8 73 209,2 74 918,8 77 179,7<br />

1. Government 17414,3 17 304,8 17712,8 18 394,6 20 193,7<br />

Short-term 1 096,0 967,0 1 232,0 1 491,0 2 217,0<br />

Money market instruments 1 061,0 929,0 1 132,0 1 376,0 2 141,0<br />

Loans 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0<br />

Cash and deposits 35,0 38,0 100,0 115,0 76,0<br />

Long-term 16 318,3 16 337,8 16 480,8 16 903,6 17 976,7


T1/2010 T2/2010 T3/2010 T4/2010 T1/2011<br />

Mil. euro - end <strong>of</strong><br />

period<br />

Bonds 3 790,2 3 544,2 2 848,3 2 863,0 3 010,8<br />

Loans 12 527,0 12 792,4 13 631,5 14 039,3 14 964,6<br />

Trade credits 1,1 1,2 1,0 1,3 1,3<br />

2. Monetary Authority 7 178,5 7 717,7 9 004,5 9 104,6 9 673,1<br />

Short-term 57,0 79,0 48,0 22,0 6,0<br />

Loans 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0<br />

Cash and deposits 57,0 79,0 48,0 22,0 6,0<br />

Long-term 7 121,5 7 638,7 8 956,5 9 082,6 9 667,1<br />

Bonds 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0<br />

Loans 7 121,5 7 638,7 8 956,5 9 082,6 9 667,1<br />

3. Banks 21 629,2 21 107,3 21 337,0 22 688,6 22 952,9<br />

Short-term 6 590,0 6 242,0 6 277,0 7 025,0 6 751,0<br />

Loans 327,0 555,0 574,0 1 611,0 1 798,0<br />

Cash and deposits 6 106,0 5 587,0 5 673,0 5 367,0 4 909,0<br />

Other liabilities 157,0 100,0 30,0 47,0 44,0<br />

Long-term 15 039,2 14 865,3 15 060,0 15 663,6 16201,9<br />

Bonds 183,7 120,2 146,3 125,8 130,0<br />

Loans 7411,9 7 460,9 7 243,7 7 310,1 7 555,8<br />

Other liabilities 7 443,6 7 284,2 7 670,0 8 227,7 8 516,1<br />

4. Other sectors 25 262,0 26 115,0 25 154,9 24 731,0 24 360,0<br />

Short-term 4 457,0 5 115,0 4 751,0 4 630,0 4 620,0<br />

Money market instruments 2,0 2,0 15,0 41,0 164,0<br />

Loans 3 116,0 3 264,0 3 097,0 2 956,0 3 079,0<br />

Trade credits 1 339,0 1 845,0 1 637,0 1 633,0 1 377,0<br />

Other liabilities 0,0 4,0 2,0 0,0 0,0<br />

Long-term 20 805,0 21 000,0 20 403,9 20 101,0 19 740,0<br />

Loans 20 642,5 20 841,3 20 259,9 19 989,6 19 665,1<br />

Trade credits 162,5 158,7 144,0 111,4 74,9<br />

II. INTER-COMPANY DIRECT<br />

INVESTMENT<br />

15 043,9 15 540,2 15 974,8 15 989,6 16 206,5<br />

- liabilities to affiliated enterprises 18,2 0,5 3,4 9,7 10,0<br />

- liabilities to investors ( series 15 025,7 15 539,7<br />

available from December 2001)<br />

15 971,4 15 979,9 16 196,5<br />

Source: NBR Data.<br />

The balance <strong>of</strong> chronic deficit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

balance <strong>of</strong> payments <strong>of</strong> Romania is another<br />

synthetic indicator relevant to the health <strong>of</strong><br />

the economy and hence <strong>of</strong> the sustainability<br />

<strong>of</strong> external debt (see Table no.1.3.). The<br />

higher the current account deficit, the more<br />

difficult the financing problems.<br />

15<br />

It is noted that compared to the first quarter <strong>of</strong><br />

2010, in the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2011 Romania<br />

saw a favourable trend to reduce the size <strong>of</strong><br />

the current account deficit. What is important<br />

to note is that, except for component C -<br />

Current transfers - that has a growing surplus<br />

in quarter I.2011 compared to quarter I.2010,


all other components <strong>of</strong> the current account<br />

balance – the trade balance, the services and<br />

the income – recorded negative values.<br />

In the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2011 the current<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the balance <strong>of</strong> payments showed a<br />

deficit <strong>of</strong> 634 million euros, down by 58.9<br />

16<br />

percent compared with the same period <strong>of</strong> the<br />

previous year, due to a trade deficit reduced<br />

by 64.6 percent and current transfers surplus<br />

increase by 68.0 percent (due to net transfers<br />

<strong>of</strong> public administration).<br />

Table no.1.3. Romania’s balance <strong>of</strong> payments and foreign debt – quarter I 2011<br />

- million euro -<br />

Quarter 1 <strong>of</strong> 2010 r<br />

Quarter 1 <strong>of</strong> 2011 p<br />

CREDIT DEBIT NET CREDIT DEBIT NET<br />

CURRENT ACCOUNT (A +<br />

B + C)<br />

10 725 12 269 -1 544 14 164 14 798 -634<br />

A. Goods and services 9 273 10 839 -1 566 12 482 13 242 -760<br />

a. Goods (export FOB -<br />

import FOB)<br />

7 902 9 189 -1 287 11 016 11 471 -455<br />

b. Services 1 371 1 650 -279 1 466 1 771 -305<br />

- transport 396 447 -51 451 560 -109<br />

- tourism - travel 162 244 -82 210 283 -73<br />

- other services 813 959 -146 805 928 -123<br />

B. Income 210 622 -412 251 854 -603<br />

C. Current transfers<br />

r p<br />

Revised data; Provisional data;<br />

1 242 808 434 1 431 702 729<br />

Source: National Statistics Institute (INS). FOB imports are calculated based on conversion factor<br />

CIF / FOB <strong>of</strong> 1.0834 determined by the INS.<br />

The financing <strong>of</strong> the current account<br />

deficit in the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2011, was made<br />

at a rate <strong>of</strong> 59.8 percent by non-residents'<br />

direct investment in Romania, which<br />

recorded 379 million euros 2 (compared with<br />

486 million euros in the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2010),<br />

<strong>of</strong> which intra-group loans 3 totalled 290<br />

million euros and capital equity consolidated<br />

with the estimated net loss 89 million euros.<br />

Naturally, the question arises as what sources<br />

the current account deficit will be financed<br />

from, if in the foreseeable future, the balance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the trade balance, <strong>of</strong> services and revenues<br />

continues to be negative, and current transfers<br />

diminish. In addition, privatizable state assets<br />

will be increasingly less a source <strong>of</strong> free<br />

currency given that most <strong>of</strong> them are already<br />

2 Estimative data.<br />

3 Credits <strong>of</strong> the foreign investor to the resident firm.<br />

privatized without noticeable materialisation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the foreign currency brought about in<br />

public investments or other goods and<br />

services.<br />

Medium and long term external debt was<br />

on March 31, 2011, <strong>of</strong> 74,278 million euro<br />

(79.5 percent <strong>of</strong> total external debt), up by 2.5<br />

percent as compared with December 31,<br />

2010.<br />

Short-term external debt recorded on<br />

March 31, 2011, a level <strong>of</strong> 19,126 million<br />

euro (20.5 percent <strong>of</strong> total external debt), up<br />

by 3.7 percent as compared with December<br />

31, 2010, representing a fairly threatening<br />

level for Romania's capacity to pay.


Table no.1.4. Romania's foreign debt on March 31, 2011 *<br />

and external debt service in the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2011<br />

17<br />

- million euro-<br />

External debt External debt<br />

service<br />

quarter I 2011 p<br />

Balance on<br />

31.12.2010 r<br />

Balance on<br />

31.03.2011 p<br />

I. External debt on medium and long-term 72 471 74 278 2 238<br />

1.1. Direct public debt a)<br />

16 022 17 129 366<br />

1.2. Publicly guaranteed debt b)<br />

1 708 1 637 61<br />

1.3. Publicly non-guaranteed debt 37 431 37 329 1 581<br />

1.4. Medium and long term deposits <strong>of</strong><br />

non-residents<br />

8 227 8 516 167 e<br />

1.5. IMF loans c)<br />

9 083 9 667 63<br />

II. Short-term external debt 18 437 19 126 8685 e<br />

Total external debt (I + II) 90 908 93 404 10 923<br />

*) External debt balance is cash-based (not including accrued interest and not matured), also not<br />

including allocations <strong>of</strong> SDRs by the IMF.<br />

a)<br />

external loans contracted directly by PFM (Public Finance Ministry) and by local authorities<br />

under the legislation on public debt, including the ones under GEO no.99/2009 on ratification <strong>of</strong><br />

Stand-By Agreement between Romania and IMF; b) external loans guaranteed by the PFM and the<br />

local authorities under the legislation on public debt; c) loans from the IMF under the Stand-By<br />

Arrangement with Romania, excluding the amount received from the IMF under the PFM<br />

Ordinance no.99/2009; e- estimated data; p - provisional data; r - revised data.<br />

The ratio <strong>of</strong> external debt service on medium<br />

and long term 4 was 17.9 percent in first<br />

quarter 2011, versus 33.3 percent in 2010.<br />

The degree <strong>of</strong> coverage 5 was 8.2 months <strong>of</strong><br />

imports <strong>of</strong> goods and services on March 31,<br />

2011, as compared with 8.6 months on<br />

December 31, 2010, which shows a<br />

downward trend. These external debt<br />

sustainability indicators were not considered<br />

to be "warning" indicators for Romania’s case<br />

even though by some standards they still have<br />

4 External debt service ratio on medium and long<br />

term is calculated as the ratio between the debt<br />

service on medium and long term and the exports <strong>of</strong><br />

goods and services.<br />

5 Coverage <strong>of</strong> reserves in months <strong>of</strong> imports is<br />

calculated as the ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial reserves <strong>of</strong> the NBR<br />

(foreign exchange + gold) at end <strong>of</strong> period to average<br />

monthly imports <strong>of</strong> goods and services in that period.<br />

degrees <strong>of</strong> "freedom" and "monetary" in the<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> deterioration.<br />

Over-consumption and loss <strong>of</strong><br />

competitiveness <strong>of</strong> Romanian economy, have<br />

contributed in the last two decades to<br />

relatively large and persistent current account<br />

deficits and, consequently, a rapid<br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> gross foreign debt. Factors<br />

that contributed mainly to this situation were:<br />

- relatively low structural competitiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

the Romanian economy as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

obsolete, less efficient technology and quality<br />

competitiveness <strong>of</strong> Romanian exports,<br />

- increase <strong>of</strong> unit labour costs in Romania<br />

compared to its growth in partner countries,<br />

even if it is still relatively low,<br />

- the appreciation <strong>of</strong> national currency even<br />

after Romania's EU accession in 2007,


- allocation <strong>of</strong> resources predominantly<br />

between the "tradable" sector, exporter <strong>of</strong><br />

goods and services, and the "non-tradable"<br />

sector mainly oriented towards domestic<br />

consumption.<br />

At the same time, during this period, an<br />

adverse impact was brought by the increase in<br />

wages and relative prices in the sectors <strong>of</strong><br />

"non-tradable" goods and public services<br />

(public services, services for domestic<br />

consumption, construction) as compared to<br />

the wages and prices <strong>of</strong> branches producing<br />

exportable goods and services (industry,<br />

tourism, transportation etc.). Only a small<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the loss <strong>of</strong> competitiveness was<br />

due to higher prices and wages in the<br />

"tradable" sector, as compared to increases in<br />

Romania’s partner countries as well as to the<br />

nominal appreciation <strong>of</strong> the euro.<br />

We know that improving competitiveness is a<br />

necessary precondition for the export targeted<br />

sectors, enabling the creation <strong>of</strong> new jobs and<br />

the recovery <strong>of</strong> lost positions in order to<br />

maintain external debt to a sustainable level<br />

and stop the increase in the external deficits.<br />

In the future, trade surpluses are needed so<br />

that negative structural developments in the<br />

field <strong>of</strong> income and transfers can be<br />

compensated.<br />

The effort to recover lost competitiveness<br />

involves three main, interrelated directions:<br />

- reduction <strong>of</strong> production costs by lowering<br />

certain categories <strong>of</strong> wages and underserved<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>its;<br />

- increase <strong>of</strong> productivity and promotion <strong>of</strong><br />

tradable sectors with high added value,<br />

intended for export which require investments<br />

in new technologies and equipments;<br />

- reduction <strong>of</strong> prices and wages in the<br />

country, in the "nontradable" goods and<br />

services sector, as compared to the "tradable",<br />

to motivate firms to invest and produce in this<br />

sector.<br />

18<br />

Chapter 2. Scenarios <strong>of</strong> the general<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> the sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania’s public and external debt<br />

Although there is a whole literature dedicated<br />

to models and techniques <strong>of</strong> analysis and<br />

forecast <strong>of</strong> external debt sustainability 6 , in<br />

this chapter we shall present and analyze<br />

scenarios made by IMF experts, in<br />

collaboration with Romanian specialists,<br />

regarding: the macroeconomic frame and the<br />

current policies in 2008-2016 in Romania<br />

(Table no.2.1); the sustainability <strong>of</strong> public<br />

sector debt (Table no.2.2); the sustainability<br />

<strong>of</strong> external debt from 2008 to 2010.<br />

An analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the financial and<br />

economic crisis in Romania compared to<br />

other countries (see Table 2.1 and Annexes 1<br />

- 7) highlights several features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> Romanian economy during the<br />

crisis among which:<br />

- the stronger and longer-term impact <strong>of</strong> crisis<br />

in our country compared to other countries;<br />

- relatively modest economic, financial and<br />

social performances, poorer in Romania,<br />

compared to developed countries and to some<br />

new EU member states;<br />

- a more disadvantaged external position <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania, compared to other countries, for<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the specific indicators.<br />

6 Established criteria <strong>of</strong> debt sustainability (Paris<br />

Club on Naples terms), for developing countries,<br />

based for example on the following limits:<br />

- rate <strong>of</strong> present value debt / exports (200-250%);<br />

- rate <strong>of</strong> debt service ratio / exports (20-25%);<br />

- rate <strong>of</strong> present value debt / tax revenue (28%);<br />

- the share <strong>of</strong> exports in GDP (at least 40%);• tax<br />

revenue / GDP (20%).


Table no.2.1. Romania: Macroeconomic framework, current policies, 2008/2016<br />

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />

Est. Project. Project Project. Project. Project. Project.<br />

GDP and prices (annual percentage change<br />

Real GDP 7.3 -7.1 -1.3 1.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0<br />

Real domestic<br />

demand<br />

7.3 -12.9 -1.0 1.2 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.2 4.1<br />

GDP deflator 15.2 4.1 4.5 4.7 4.3 4.6 4.9 5.1 5.2<br />

Domestic<br />

demand deflator<br />

14.4 4.2 3.5 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.7<br />

Consumer price<br />

index (average<br />

CPI)<br />

7.9 5.6 6.1 5.4 3.4 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0<br />

Consumer price<br />

index (CPI, end<br />

<strong>of</strong> period)<br />

6.3 4.7 8.0 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0<br />

Nominal wages 23.6 8.4 2.6 4.7 6.7 6.9 7.0 8.0 8.0<br />

Real exchange<br />

rate<br />

based on CPI<br />

-5.0 -7.5 1.9 -0.2 3.3 3.0 3.2 2.5 2.6<br />

Real exchange<br />

rate<br />

based on GDP<br />

deflator<br />

Monetary<br />

Aggregates<br />

(Annual<br />

percentage<br />

change)<br />

1.5 -8.8 0.4 -0.9 4.1 4.5 5.1 4.8 4.9<br />

Broad money 17.5 9.0 6.9 10.3 14.1 14.5 14.9 16.0 16.0<br />

Domestic credit<br />

Savings and<br />

investments<br />

(in%<br />

<strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />

33.7 0.9 4.7 7.7 8.7 10.4 10.9 11.4 11.8<br />

Foreign savings 11.6 4.2 4.2 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.0<br />

Gross National<br />

Saving<br />

19.7 21.1 22.2 19.5 20.1 20.8 21.5 22.0 22.7<br />

Government 1.5 -0.8 0.8 2.7 4.5 5.4 6.0 5.6 5.2<br />

Private 18.2 21.9 21.4 16.8 15.6 15.4 15.5 16.4 17.5<br />

Gross domestic<br />

investments<br />

31.3 25.3 26.4 24.6 25.2 26.0 26.7 27.1 27.6<br />

Government 6.3 6.5 7.3 7.1 7.5 8.3 8.5 7.8 7.3<br />

Private<br />

Central<br />

Government (in<br />

% <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />

25.0 18.8 19.1 17.4 17.7 17.8 18.2 19.3 20.4<br />

Income 32.2 31.4 32.8 33.3 33.7 33.5 33.2 32.4 31.7<br />

19


2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />

Est. Project. Project Project. Project. Project. Project.<br />

Tax revenues 18.4 17.8 18.1 18.9 18.9 18.7 18.6 18.5 18.5<br />

Non-fiscal<br />

income<br />

3.1 2.9 3.9 3.5 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4<br />

Grants 0.9 1.0 1.8 1.6 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.2 1.8<br />

Expenditures 37.0 38.7 39.4 37.7 36.7 36.4 35.7 34.7 33.9<br />

Fiscal balance -4.8 -7.3 -6.5 -4.4 -3.0 -2.9 -2.5 -2.3 -2.1<br />

Structural fiscal -8.5 -7.0 -4.9 -2.4 -1.6 -2.0 -2.0 -2.1 -2.1<br />

balance 1/<br />

Gross public<br />

debt (direct)<br />

19.5 27.4 33.2 36.1 36.2 36.0 35.5 34.7 33.8<br />

Balance <strong>of</strong> payments (in % <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />

Current Account -11.6 -4.2 -4.2 -5.0 -5.1 -5.2 -5.2 -5.1 -5.0<br />

Trade balance -13.8 -5.8 -4.8 -5.0 -4.7 -4.6 -4.2 -3.7 -3.2<br />

Balance <strong>of</strong><br />

services<br />

0.5 -0.6 -0.6 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2<br />

Income balance -2.7 -1.3 -1.6 -2.2 -2.3 -2.3 -2.4 -2.5 -2.6<br />

Balance <strong>of</strong><br />

transfers<br />

4.3 3.5 2.8 2.8 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.7<br />

Capital and<br />

financial<br />

account balance<br />

12.8 -1.9 1.1 5.3 8.4 8.6 8.3 5.6 6.1<br />

Balance <strong>of</strong> direct<br />

foreign<br />

investments<br />

6.7 3.0 2.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0<br />

Gross<br />

international<br />

reserves (bill.<br />

euro)<br />

28.3 30.9 36.0 40.4 43.4 44.3 45.1 44.6 47.3<br />

Gross<br />

international<br />

reserves (months<br />

<strong>of</strong> imports next<br />

year)<br />

7.8 7.4 7.8 8.0 7.8 7.2 6.7 6.1 6.1<br />

International<br />

investment<br />

position<br />

(in % <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />

-49.4 -62.7 -70.8 -75.3 -72.6 -73.0 -74.2 -72.6 -69.5<br />

External debt<br />

(in% <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />

51.4 68.3 74.5 78.9 75.4 70.4 65.5 61.1 58.4<br />

Short-term<br />

external debt<br />

(as% <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />

14.7 12.4 15.4 15.9 15.3 14.8 14.2 13.7 13.3<br />

Export volume<br />

(percentage<br />

change)<br />

8.3 -5.3 24.5 7.2 7.6 8.1 8.3 8.3 8.3<br />

Import volume<br />

(percentage<br />

7.9 -20.9 9.0 6.7 7.5 8.5 8.4 8.3 8.3<br />

20


change)<br />

Terms <strong>of</strong> trade<br />

(percentage<br />

change)<br />

Nominal GDP<br />

(in mil. lei)<br />

Nominal GDP<br />

(in mil. Euro)<br />

2008 2009 2010<br />

Est.<br />

2011<br />

Project.<br />

21<br />

2012<br />

Project<br />

2013<br />

Project.<br />

2014<br />

Project.<br />

2015<br />

Project.<br />

2016<br />

Project.<br />

2.8 -0.4 -1.8 -0.7 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.1<br />

514,700 498,008 513,641 542,035 590,247 643,816 703,827 770,546 843,680<br />

139,666 117,558 122,062 127,237 140,658 156,307 174.317 194.107 216.339<br />

Source: Estimates and projects <strong>of</strong> the Romanian authorities and the IMF staff.<br />

1/ Real fiscal balance adjusted for the automatic effects <strong>of</strong> the internal imbalances (output gap) and external<br />

imbalances (absorption gap) in the fiscal position.<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> data on the economic and financial indicators in Table 2.1 highlights some<br />

challenging issues <strong>of</strong> major significance.<br />

It is that economic growth in Romania has gone from relatively high values in 2008, to sudden<br />

and major slumps in 2009 and 2010, the real GDP moving from a growth <strong>of</strong> 7.3% to decreases<br />

<strong>of</strong> -7.1% and, respectively,-1.3% for 2011, the forecast having been 1.5%.<br />

These large and sudden changes in amplitude indicators show a case <strong>of</strong> strong shock that<br />

Romania went through, with severe enough consequences on short, medium and long term.<br />

From these shock cases we should draw lessons in the sense that the way economic decline<br />

occurs is important as well and one must always be prepared. Statements <strong>of</strong> decision makers in<br />

Romania in September 2008, that the international financial crisis "will not have direct<br />

effects" on the Romanian economy, showed how far they were from the truth:<br />

- Projections for the years 2012-2016 show rather relatively equal annual developments, which<br />

<strong>of</strong> course is only a desirable perception <strong>of</strong> quite variable future developments;<br />

- External debt as weight in GDP increased from 51.4% in 2008 to 78.9% in 2011, and in the<br />

next four years until 2016 it should stay at a high level, although with a downward trend,<br />

without reaching the level <strong>of</strong> 2008, which means that the decline triggered by the crisis, in<br />

some cases, will not have been recovered even by 2016;<br />

- Inflation is at relatively high rates in 2008-2010 and then stays quasi-constant at an annual<br />

level <strong>of</strong> 3% which by far cannot be considered as a convenient (comfortable) one;<br />

- The ICOR (incremental capital - output ratio) shows a decrease <strong>of</strong> expected economic<br />

performance and efficiency which is contrary to the sustainability <strong>of</strong> external debt and the<br />

ability to meet external debt service. Added to this is the continuation <strong>of</strong> chronicization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

deficits <strong>of</strong> the trade, services and income balances, during 2011-2016;<br />

- The gross international reserves are expected to increase to 47.3 billion euros as compared to<br />

36 billion euros in 2010. The sources <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> such reserves if they consist <strong>of</strong> new<br />

borrowings are not a factor <strong>of</strong> the strengthening <strong>of</strong> sustainability.


Table no.2.2 Romania: The sustainability <strong>of</strong> public sector debt (in % <strong>of</strong> GDP, unless otherwise specified)<br />

Current Projections Primary balance<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />

that stabilizes<br />

the debt<br />

Public sector debt 15.4 17.5 19.5 27.4 33.2 36.1 36.2 36.0 35.5 34.7 33.8 -1.4<br />

o / w foreign currency denominated 7.1 6.6 6.4 15.0 20.4 24.0 21.9 18.4 15.0 11.7 10.0<br />

Percentage change <strong>of</strong> public sector debt -0.3 2.1 2.0 7.9 5.7 2.9 0.0 -0.1 -0.6 -0.8 -0.9<br />

Flows identified as debt generators (4 +7 +12) -3.0 -0.1 2.7 7.9 7.8 2.4 0.0 -0.1 -0.6 -0.8 -0.9<br />

Primary deficit 0.6 2.4 4.1 6.1 5.1 2.7 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4<br />

Revenues and grants 32.3 32.3 32.2 31.4 32.8 33.3 33.7 33.5 33.2 32.4 31.7<br />

Primary expenditure 32.9 34.6 36.3 37.5 38.0 35.9 35.0 34.7 34.0 33.0 32.2<br />

Automatic debt dynamics -3.1 -2.3 -1.3 1.8 2.7 -0.2 -1.3 -1.3 -1.4 -1.4 -1.3<br />

Rate debt / income in public sector 47.6 54.2 60.7 87.4 101.0 108.6 107.3 107.7 106.9 107.0 106.4<br />

Gross financing need(in%) 1.8 3.9 6.3 8.4 7.2 5.4 4.7 9.1 8.1 5.6 5.0<br />

in bill. U.S.D. 2.2 6.7 12.8 13.8 11.6 9.0 8.7 18.5 18.2 14.0 13.6<br />

Scenario with key variables at their historical averages 36.1 34.2 32.5 31.0 29.6 28.4<br />

No policy change scenario (constant primary balance) in 2011-2016<br />

Key macroeconomic and fiscal assumptions<br />

36.1 37.5 38.8 39.9 41.0 42.1<br />

Real GDP growth (in percents) 7.9 6.3 7.3 -7.1 -1.3 1.5 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.0<br />

The nominal interest average rate for public debt (in percents) 6.1 5.8 5.2 6.0 5.3 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.0 5.2 5.3<br />

The real interest average rate (nominal rate minus the change in the GDP -4.5 -7.7 -10.1 1.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0<br />

deflator, in percents)<br />

Nominal appreciation (increase in U.S.D. value <strong>of</strong> local currency in percents) 19.4 6.5 -16.5 0.3 -10.7<br />

Inflation rate (GDP deflator, in percents) 10.6 13.5 15.2 4.1 4.5 4.8 4.3 4.6 4.9 5.2 5.2<br />

Growth <strong>of</strong> real primary expenditures (deflated by GDP deflator, in percents) 14.8 12.0 12.4 -3.9 -0.1 -4.5 1.8 3.3 2.2 1.0 1.5<br />

Primary deficit 0.6 2.4 4.1 6.1 5.1 2.7 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4<br />

Source: IMF<br />

22


Table 2.2 shows that the weight <strong>of</strong> public<br />

debt in GDP that increased from 15.4%<br />

in 2006 to 33.2% in 2011, will increase up<br />

to 36.2% in 2013, then coming back to<br />

33,8% in 2016. Similarly will the need <strong>of</strong><br />

gross financing increase which also is not<br />

a favourable tendency either.<br />

The nominal interest average rate on<br />

public debt will stay at over 5%, which<br />

23<br />

will strike the debt burden and the<br />

possibilities <strong>of</strong> reducing it.<br />

The inflation rate is not closer to its level<br />

in other EU countries either, which means<br />

slow evolution <strong>of</strong> nominal convergence.<br />

But what draws particular attention is the<br />

rate debt/income that shows an increasing<br />

trend during 2010-2013, which means<br />

poor performance <strong>of</strong> the economic policy<br />

mix.<br />

Table no.2.3. Romania: the framework <strong>of</strong> the sustainability <strong>of</strong> external debt, 2006-<br />

2016 (in percents <strong>of</strong> GDP, unless otherwise specified)<br />

Current Projections Current<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 account<br />

without<br />

interests<br />

that<br />

stabilize<br />

the debt<br />

External debt 42.1 47.0 51.4 68.3 74.5 78.9 75.4 70.4 65.5 61.1 68.3 -7,2<br />

Changes in external debt 3.3 4.9 4.4 16.9 6.2 4.4 -3.5 -5.0 -4.9 -4.4 -2.7<br />

Identified external debt generating flows -5.4 -1.4 0.5 10.4 -0.4 -0.5 -2.2 -2.3 -1.9 0.2 0.2<br />

Current account deficit, excl. Interest 9.2<br />

payments<br />

12.2 10.1 2.4 1.8 2.7 . 3.0 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.6<br />

Deficit in goods and services balance 12.0 14.0 13.2 6.1 5.5 5.7 5.3 5.2 4.8 4.2 3.7<br />

Export 32.1 29.2 30.4 30.7 36.0 37.8 37.7 37.6 37.4 37.2 37.0<br />

Import 44.2 43.2 43.6 36.8 41.4 43.5 43.0 42.7 42.1 41,4 40.7<br />

Capital inflows that do not generate debt -8.6<br />

(negative)<br />

-5.B -6.1 -3.4 -2.6 -4.4 -4.2 -4.7 -4.4 -2.5 -2.6<br />

Automatic debt dynamics -6.0 -7.6 -3.6 11.4 0.4 1.2 -1.0 -0.9 -0.9 -0.9 -0.8<br />

The contribution <strong>of</strong> nominal interest rate 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.4<br />

Contribution <strong>of</strong> real GDP growth -2.5 -2.1 -3.1 4.3 0.8 -1.1 -3.1 -2.9 -2.7 -2.4 -2.2<br />

Contribution <strong>of</strong> price and exchange rate -4.7<br />

changes<br />

-7.0 -2.0 5.3 -2.9<br />

Residues, including gross foreign assets 8.8<br />

change<br />

6.3 4.0 6.5 6.5 4.5 -1.4 -2.6 -2.9 -4.6 -2.9<br />

External debt ratio <strong>of</strong> exports (in percents) 131.0 160.7 169.0 222.2 207.1 208.6 199.6 187.3 175.3 164.1 157.5<br />

Gross external financing need (bill.euro) 21.7 35.9 46.2 34.9 32.5 34.4 40.2 49,8 52.1 51.8 53.9<br />

In percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP 22.2 28.8 33.1 29.7 26.6 26.9 28.4 31.6 29.7 26.5 24.8<br />

Scenario with key variables at their<br />

historical averages<br />

Key macroeconomic assumptions<br />

78.9 77.0 74.1 71.2 66.4 63.4<br />

Real GDP growth (in percents) 7.9 6.3 7.3 -7.1 -1.2 1.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0<br />

GDP deflator in euros (percentage 13.8 19.8 4.4 -9.4 4.4 3.4 5.9 6.6 7.0 6.9 7.1<br />

changes)<br />

Nominal interest rate (in percents) 3.8 3.7 3.6 2.9 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.5<br />

Export growth (euro in percents) 19.3 15.9 16.6 -14.9 20.6 10.3 10.4 10.6 10.9 10.9 10.9<br />

Imports growth (euro in percents) 25.2 24.7 13.2 -28.9 15.9 10.2 9.4 10.4 10.0 9.5 9.5<br />

Current account balance, excluding interest -9.2<br />

payments<br />

-12.2 -10.1 -2.4 -1.8 -2.7 -3.0 -3.3 -3.4 -3.6 -3.6<br />

Net capital inflows that do not generate 8.6<br />

debt<br />

5.8 6.1 3.4 2.6 4.4 4.2 4,7 4.4 2.5 2.6<br />

Source: IMF


The analysis <strong>of</strong> external debt indicators<br />

(Table no.2.3) highlights several issues<br />

challenging the level <strong>of</strong> sustainability and its<br />

impact factors, namely:<br />

- ratio <strong>of</strong> external debt to GDP has increased<br />

by 2011 then following decreases, weaker at<br />

first, then more consistent, stabilising at<br />

relatively high levels, especially if we<br />

consider Romania's ability to pay;<br />

- the rate external debt / exports increases,<br />

resulting in a relatively weak capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

export to be a source <strong>of</strong> external debt<br />

disbursement.<br />

24<br />

Chapter 3. External debt vulnerabilities<br />

As previously mentioned, a country's external<br />

debt is not only a chance for potential<br />

beneficial effects, favourable and<br />

unfavourable as well, if the management and<br />

the administration are not effective and do<br />

not take into account risks, vulnerabilities,<br />

weaknesses, especially regarding medium<br />

and long terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> repayment<br />

and provision <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> funding.<br />

According to our calculations (G. Georgescu<br />

and Gheorghe Zaman) in 2009, Romania's<br />

external debt sustainability indicators, on<br />

medium and long term, showed a trend <strong>of</strong><br />

deterioration compared to previous years<br />

(Table no.3.1.) versus limit criteria<br />

conventionally stipulated in the literature and<br />

international financial practice.<br />

Table no.3.1. Romania's external debt sustainability indicators, on medium and long<br />

term, between 2000 and 2009<br />

Indicators 2000 2006 2007 2008 2009 Maximum<br />

limit<br />

External debt / GDP 23,9 29,2 31,1 37,9 56,0 50,0<br />

External debt / Export 72,7 91,2 105,5 122,0 181,9 150,0<br />

External debt / Foreign 65,3 73,9 83,5 97,0 149,5 100,0<br />

exchange incomes<br />

Foreign exchange reserves /<br />

External debt<br />

54,2 80,0 70,6 54,6 47,2 50,0 *<br />

External debt service / Foreign<br />

exchange incomes<br />

15,0 15,8 16,3 22,7 26,0 20,0<br />

External debt service / Exports 16,7 19,4 20,5 28,5 31,7 30,0<br />

External debt service / Foreign<br />

exchange reserves<br />

42,3 26,6 27,6 42,8 36,9 40,0<br />

Foreign exchange reserves / 12,9 23,4 22,0 20,7 26,4 25,0 *<br />

GDP<br />

* minimum threshold<br />

Source: Own calculations based on data from NBR and from the National Commission for Prognosis.<br />

Moreover, for a series <strong>of</strong> indicators <strong>of</strong><br />

external debt sustainability, Romania<br />

exceeded "fault rates" in 2009, which lowers<br />

its country rating and hinders its access to<br />

international capital markets.<br />

%<br />

Although the IMF, by the recipes it<br />

recommends to countries that resort to<br />

foreign loans, focuses highly on fiscal and<br />

monetary policies, the specialists, for<br />

example pr<strong>of</strong>. Calvo G., emphasize that these


policies have not proved effective, requiring<br />

complementary actions <strong>of</strong> structural policies<br />

that should help reducing the external<br />

financial vulnerabilities, especially in<br />

economies suffering from high incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

bank loans in freely convertible currencies.<br />

For this reason, and also because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis, proposals have been<br />

made to create an emerging markets fund,<br />

as the IMF is the "lender <strong>of</strong> last resort",<br />

which ought to have lent to emerging<br />

economies under specific conditions and<br />

more conveniently so they can cope with<br />

external shocks, with the probability <strong>of</strong><br />

sudden stop <strong>of</strong> loans and with the price<br />

volatility <strong>of</strong> the capital inflows.<br />

IMF believes that the emerging European<br />

economies during crisis saw large external<br />

imbalances, the causes varying from one<br />

country to another. However, some<br />

similarities can be specified, namely: strong<br />

capital flows in the non-tradable sector 7 that<br />

registered a huge increase in price and wage,<br />

which eroded competitiveness as capital<br />

flows boosted mostly the <strong>of</strong>fer (supply) and<br />

the imports rather than the exports, and these<br />

contributed to major changes and, ultimately,<br />

non-sustainability <strong>of</strong> the positions <strong>of</strong> net<br />

foreign assets.<br />

Financial integration has played a critical role<br />

allowing the funding <strong>of</strong> the imbalances while<br />

the lack <strong>of</strong> institutions and the lack <strong>of</strong> the<br />

"national" approaches to resolve the crisis<br />

have prevented the private sector and the<br />

markets from playing a bigger role.<br />

With the banking problems being tackled and<br />

solved at national level, the problems <strong>of</strong><br />

banks and <strong>of</strong> sovereign debt in the euro area<br />

peripheral countries amplified each other. As<br />

the financial costs in the private sector<br />

depended to a growing extent on the national<br />

origin <strong>of</strong> the borrower, the financial<br />

integration was "disintegrated" acting in<br />

directions opposite from its objectives.<br />

7 Sector "nontradable" means those goods and<br />

services produced and consumed in the country.<br />

25<br />

The re-launching <strong>of</strong> long-term economic<br />

growth is the key issue in Romania. The<br />

growth and the convergence cannot be<br />

restored to their normal trajectories unless by<br />

increasing productivity, with which Romania<br />

fought hard but unsuccessfully, in the past<br />

two decades, even if it had a relatively large<br />

access to foreign capital. To enhance<br />

efficiency, we need better policies at national<br />

level, along with more effective governance<br />

at EU level that could strengthen these<br />

policies. Special attention should be given to<br />

the supervising <strong>of</strong> the financial system and to<br />

the economic integration due to their<br />

vulnerability.<br />

Multi-speed post-crisis reconstruction is<br />

underway with some emerging economies<br />

going at a higher tempo, and others, on the<br />

contrary, still fighting out <strong>of</strong> the crisis.<br />

The economic science and practices,<br />

following the recent crisis, were again alerted<br />

to the possibility to predict and take<br />

preventive measures against the crisis effects<br />

by means <strong>of</strong> early warning that could<br />

prevent or determine better training to cope<br />

with the crises and maintain the external debt<br />

sustainability and the economic development.<br />

This, especially since the economic science<br />

is accused to have been unable to predict<br />

precisely in "space and time" the economic<br />

crisis occurrence. The charges could be also<br />

brought to seismology and other sciences <strong>of</strong><br />

earth physics which do not foresee the time<br />

and place <strong>of</strong> natural disasters.<br />

Overview <strong>of</strong> literature on indicators for early<br />

warning, sudden stops and changes <strong>of</strong> current<br />

account:


Authors Main messages<br />

Milesi Ferretti and Razin<br />

(1998)<br />

Kaminsky, Lizondo and<br />

Reinhart<br />

(1998)<br />

Berg, Borensztein, Milesi-<br />

Ferretti, Pattillo<br />

(1999)<br />

Frenkel and Calvo<br />

(2004)<br />

The weak reserves and the trade ratio (terms <strong>of</strong> trade),<br />

unfavourable, may trigger changes in the current account<br />

and currency crises<br />

Some indicators can announce the possibilities <strong>of</strong> currency<br />

crises. Early warning indicators include current account<br />

deficit, over-evaluation, weak growth in exports, reserves to<br />

the "broad money"<br />

Reserves / short-term debt are also early warning indicators<br />

<strong>of</strong> currency crises. Added to these we find the current<br />

account deficit, loss <strong>of</strong> reserves, weak exports and other<br />

early warning indicators.<br />

The probability <strong>of</strong> sudden stop <strong>of</strong> foreign capital increases<br />

the size <strong>of</strong> the current account initial deficit as a percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> GDP and decreases with country’s openness.<br />

The current account deficit is the key indicator for the crisis.<br />

Edwards<br />

(2005)<br />

Mendoza and Terrones All crises in emerging economies have been associated with<br />

the "boom" <strong>of</strong> loans, although not all credit booms end in<br />

crisis.<br />

The vulnerabilities generated by the underperformant<br />

management <strong>of</strong> external debt, in<br />

the countries most affected by the current<br />

crisis in the EU (Greece, Ireland, Portugal,<br />

Spain, Romania), can be analyzed in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

fiscal, financial and structural measures,<br />

which, in various proportions present<br />

similarities, due to the unique source <strong>of</strong><br />

recipes and advice which is the International<br />

Monetary Fund.<br />

We will refer to some <strong>of</strong> the possible<br />

vulnerabilities <strong>of</strong> the measures taken in<br />

Romania for getting over the economic crisis,<br />

especially in terms <strong>of</strong> long-term effects.<br />

- The fiscal policies in Romania, to increase<br />

VAT from 19 to 24% and increase other<br />

taxes, could un-stimulate, on long term, by<br />

increasing prices, the demand and hence the<br />

supply, especially in the tradable sector<br />

which represents the overwhelming part <strong>of</strong><br />

private economic agents. On the other hand,<br />

taxation <strong>of</strong> prizes and vouchers can act in the<br />

same direction, so additional budget revenues<br />

expected might be far outweighed by the<br />

negative externalities they generate into the<br />

real economy,<br />

- The financial-monetary policies <strong>of</strong> growth<br />

<strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> prudentiality, supervision,<br />

26<br />

transparency and improvement <strong>of</strong> the way <strong>of</strong><br />

reporting, while, maintaining high interest<br />

rates for credits on short, medium and long<br />

term, they cannot achieve the expected goals<br />

<strong>of</strong> recovery and economic efficiency,<br />

- The structural policies related to reducing<br />

employment and wages in public<br />

administration, education, research, health<br />

etc. also have an adverse effect on the<br />

sustainable economic growth and on the<br />

opportunities to create funds necessary to<br />

finance maturing debt.<br />

Chapter 4. Strategic ways <strong>of</strong> approaching<br />

the external debt sustainability<br />

Public and private external debt is one <strong>of</strong><br />

the most powerful economic policy tools that<br />

can be used effectively to stimulate economic<br />

growth but which, if inefficiently used, can<br />

cause serious damage to national economies<br />

on short, medium and long term.<br />

Governments can contract debts to finance<br />

new investments in human or material<br />

capital, to outline the country's resources to<br />

counteract recessions or to meet the financing<br />

needs resulting from exceptional<br />

circumstances such as natural disasters or<br />

financial crises.


The external debt can create a burden for<br />

future generations, as well as a number <strong>of</strong><br />

vulnerabilities for the investment process and<br />

inflation, the resistance to crisis and recession<br />

<strong>of</strong> a country.<br />

Even before the classics <strong>of</strong> political<br />

economy, A. Smith and D. Ricardo, the<br />

problem <strong>of</strong> external debt was a concern <strong>of</strong><br />

primary importance for economic science,<br />

given the potentials that it has, both positive<br />

and negative, for countries that receive and<br />

grant loans.<br />

Usually, governments borrow on domestic or<br />

external market to finance projects <strong>of</strong> long<br />

term development that are targeted to<br />

physical infrastructure (roads, bridges,<br />

hydroelectric plants etc.). or investment<br />

inclusively in the human capital.<br />

Governments may decide to borrow in order<br />

to maintain the level <strong>of</strong> current expenditures<br />

without increasing taxes in times <strong>of</strong> crisis and<br />

recession or to finance the costs caused by<br />

natural disasters (earthquakes, floods,<br />

droughts), wars etc.<br />

On the other hand, states resort to loans to<br />

help the start <strong>of</strong> the economic growth at<br />

higher rates so as to ensure a higher<br />

consumption for the population,<br />

redistributing resources from future<br />

generations to the present ones.<br />

According to the opinions in the literature,<br />

the behaviour <strong>of</strong> policy makers has a strong<br />

penchant for short and medium term, i.e.<br />

for how long a term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice usually lasts.<br />

Regarding indebtedness, issues concerning<br />

debt repayment, after this period, interest<br />

them less or not at all. Not to say it publicly,<br />

many probably think in the sense <strong>of</strong> “aprés<br />

moi le déluge!”<br />

The external indebtedness <strong>of</strong> countries with<br />

economies in transition has shown in over<br />

two decades <strong>of</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> competitive<br />

market economy, that high levels <strong>of</strong> debt can<br />

bring a series <strong>of</strong> serious constraints on the<br />

behaviour <strong>of</strong> an independent monetary<br />

policy, especially when the debt is in hard<br />

currency and a monetary policy <strong>of</strong><br />

accommodation can lead to devaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

national currency and substantial negative<br />

effects (Calvo and Reinhat, 2002).<br />

27<br />

The set <strong>of</strong> recommendations (conditionalities<br />

accepted by governments) on the monetary<br />

and fiscal policies <strong>of</strong> different IMF stand-by<br />

arrangements and other international<br />

financial institutions also comprises a<br />

component aimed, more or less relevantly, at<br />

the need to promote real economy<br />

restructuring policies supporting sustainable<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the country borrowing. In<br />

this respect, we wish to present a viewpoint<br />

about the need for new approaches <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relationship between the sectors <strong>of</strong> industry<br />

and services in Romania, considering their<br />

role in the process <strong>of</strong> economic growth and<br />

the features <strong>of</strong> "tradable" / "exportable" and<br />

"non-tradable" goods and services.<br />

The problems <strong>of</strong> specialization and <strong>of</strong><br />

domestic and international economic<br />

cooperation, <strong>of</strong> the value chains revolve<br />

around the strategic approach <strong>of</strong> crossconditioning<br />

and inter-empowering <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relations between economic sectors<br />

(primary, secondary, tertiary, and<br />

quaternary), avoiding, for example, trap<br />

pseudo-tertialization that many transitional<br />

economies entered into, exaggerating the role<br />

<strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> services predominantly<br />

speculative, particularly financial ones.<br />

More and more experts in developing<br />

countries consider that reducing the weight <strong>of</strong><br />

manufacturing industry in GDP is a<br />

"worrying" phenomenon. In a report 8 by<br />

Michael Spence and Sandile Hatshwayo,<br />

submitted to the Council on Foreign<br />

Relations in New York, it is argued, based on<br />

advanced statistical and economic analyses,<br />

that "the American economy must find ways<br />

to develop employment in the "tradable"<br />

sector containing industries whose products<br />

are sold abroad." This sector, although<br />

comprises services, including financial ones<br />

is dominated by manufacturing industries,<br />

which in literature is called "secondary"<br />

sector. Getting over the recession and the<br />

current economic and financial crisis in most<br />

8 "The Evolving Structure <strong>of</strong> the American Economy<br />

and the Employment Challenge" by Michael Spence<br />

and Sandile Hatshwayo, Council <strong>of</strong> Foreign<br />

Relations, Working Paper, March 2011.


countries, including Romania, takes place,<br />

according to the opinion <strong>of</strong> several<br />

specialists, at the expense <strong>of</strong> the<br />

manufacturing sector, which show greater<br />

resistance to the shocks <strong>of</strong> the business cycles<br />

and the crises, compared with other sectors <strong>of</strong><br />

the national economy, more volatile and<br />

vulnerable.<br />

Both in absolute and relative terms (as weight<br />

in employment) the "tradable" sector in<br />

Romania has declined dramatically in the two<br />

decades. The creation <strong>of</strong> new jobs has been<br />

promoted especially in the services sector so<br />

as we could follow the increasing trend <strong>of</strong><br />

this weight manifested in developed<br />

economies, notwithstanding that in these<br />

countries the process was lengthy, without<br />

forcing, but with sectorial complementarities<br />

<strong>of</strong> efficiencies at the macroeconomic level.<br />

In developed countries, in absolute terms,<br />

manufacturing industry grew more slowly<br />

than services in the last two decades, which<br />

meant a reduction in relative weight. A major<br />

strategic management error in Romania was<br />

discouraging Romanian manufacturing<br />

industry, considered the result <strong>of</strong> inefficient<br />

socialist industrialization by decision makers,<br />

less or not at all savvy, who relied on the<br />

advantages <strong>of</strong> producing companies from<br />

abroad who also had the interest to expand<br />

their markets in the emerging Europe<br />

countries. Giving up the vast majority <strong>of</strong><br />

manufacturing industries in Romania and<br />

28<br />

replacing them with imported products, under<br />

the pretext that they are better, more<br />

functional, better presented and packed and at<br />

a lower cost is, at first sight, a "beneficial"<br />

measure <strong>of</strong> rinsing the national economic <strong>of</strong><br />

ineffective activities. Finally, it turned out to<br />

be counterproductive, because the most<br />

important branches generating and<br />

propagating technologic progress are in<br />

this sector as the most fertile and strong<br />

domain for R&D and technology transfer. As<br />

for the advantages the imported products<br />

have compared to local products, perhaps<br />

only partially (!) they were valid, but the<br />

negative costs are neglected (negative<br />

externalities), costs that they have produced<br />

in the entire national economy by increasing<br />

underemployment, destruction <strong>of</strong> man-made<br />

capital, export <strong>of</strong> scrap iron and negative<br />

impact on natural capital. If all these negative<br />

effects, at the macroeconomic societal level,<br />

are added with a minus to the benefits and the<br />

superiority <strong>of</strong> imported products in Romania,<br />

we shall conclude, not very favourably, that<br />

there is a "destruction" <strong>of</strong> manufacturing<br />

industry (deindustrialization), in favour <strong>of</strong><br />

services industry which, if not strictly<br />

regulated by clear legal institutional basis,<br />

may largely encourage speculation, polluting<br />

consumerism, inflation, weak, unsustainable<br />

economic development, as happened in 2009-<br />

2010.<br />

Table no.4.1 Structure in percents <strong>of</strong> employed population,<br />

on the main activities <strong>of</strong> national economy in the period 1993-2009<br />

1993 2003 2005 2008<br />

-% -<br />

2009<br />

Agriculture, hunting and<br />

forestry<br />

35,2 34,7 31,9 27,5 28,7<br />

Fishing and pisciculture 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1<br />

Industry 30,1 24,8 23,2 29,1 21,1<br />

Constructions 4,8 4,8 6,1 7,8 7,4<br />

Services 10,9 35,7 41,0 42,7 42,8<br />

Source: Romania’s Statistical Yearbook 1999, p.81 and 2010, p.91<br />

Data in the table no.4.1 show an overly large increase <strong>of</strong> the weight <strong>of</strong> services in total<br />

employment (about +31 percentage points) at the expense <strong>of</strong> industry (-9 pp) and agriculture (-<br />

6.5 pp) where a significant growth potential remains unvalued.


Table no.4.2. Contributions (%) to GDP growth on categories <strong>of</strong> resources in 2004 and 2009<br />

2004 2009<br />

Total GDP 8,5 -7,1<br />

Agriculture 2,2 -1,0<br />

Industry 1,9 -0,3<br />

Constructions 0,5 -1,4<br />

Services 3,0 -3,0<br />

Net taxes 0,9 -1,4<br />

Source: Romania’s Statistical Yearbook 2010, p.322<br />

The structure <strong>of</strong> GDP growth contribution on categories <strong>of</strong> resources (Table no.4.2) shows, for<br />

example, that in the first year <strong>of</strong> financial crisis in Romania, the services sector had the largest<br />

contribution (42.2%) to the GDP’s decline, which outlines their sensitivity and vulnerability,<br />

followed by construction sector whose unhealthy and unsustainable growth in 2008 reached<br />

exaggerated levels (+33% compared to 2007). Following a policy <strong>of</strong> promoting the services,<br />

especially those <strong>of</strong> speculative inflationist brokerage, the investment policy saw a structure that<br />

clearly disadvantaged the industry and the agriculture (Table no.4.3). Thus, the volume <strong>of</strong><br />

investment in industry as a percentage <strong>of</strong> total investments decreased by -15.6 percentage<br />

points in the period 1993-2009, and in agriculture by -3 pp.<br />

Table no.4.3. Structure in percents <strong>of</strong> net investments, on main activities <strong>of</strong> the national<br />

economy during 1993-2009<br />

1993 2003 2005 2008 2009<br />

Agriculture 6,9 5,9 2,8 3,4 3,9<br />

Industry 49,9 37,6 33,0 31,8 34,3<br />

Constructions 0,2 9,6 9,6 10,9 12,2<br />

Services 46,9 50,3 53,9 49,6<br />

Source: Romania’s Statistical Yearbook 1999, 2010, p.357.<br />

It is noted that in 2009, it is the very investment in services that showed the largest percentage<br />

decline (- 4.3 pp), which highlights the sector's vulnerability to the crisis shocks and its<br />

inability to redress without the real support <strong>of</strong> manufacturing industries, mining and<br />

agriculture.<br />

Table no.4.4 Structure in percents <strong>of</strong> the sources <strong>of</strong> investment financing<br />

2003 2008 2009<br />

Own sources 68,7 73,0 68,1<br />

Domestic credit 9,2 9,7 7,4<br />

Foreign loans 8,4 3,6 5,3<br />

State and local budget 6,9 8,2 8,8<br />

Foreign capital 0,4 0,6 1,8<br />

Other sources 6,4 4,9 8,6<br />

Source: Romania’s Statistical Yearbook, p.357<br />

29<br />

-% -


One <strong>of</strong> the most important problems <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania's getting over the crisis and entering<br />

the way to sustainable development is<br />

represented by the sources <strong>of</strong> financing the<br />

investments.<br />

The data in the table no.4.4 reveal the<br />

following:<br />

- the largest share is held by the own sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> the economic agents, weighing more than<br />

68%, which actually highlights the<br />

fundamental role <strong>of</strong> the own effort <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economy to get out <strong>of</strong> the crisis, and to which<br />

the other sources <strong>of</strong> funding can<br />

complementarily be added more or less;<br />

- internal loans have between 7 and 9% <strong>of</strong><br />

total investment funding, which is a very<br />

modest weight, showing that the banks' role<br />

30<br />

in stimulating investments is still weak,<br />

among others due to the high interest rates<br />

and the reluctance that they have for medium<br />

and long term loans in times <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

turbulence;<br />

- investment financing from public sources<br />

has increased in weight in the crisis year<br />

2009 which shows exactly the role that state<br />

can have in stimulating investments as a<br />

factor <strong>of</strong> growth;<br />

- foreign capital in the period 2003-2009 had<br />

a very small weight in investment financing,<br />

which is why an exaggeration <strong>of</strong> their role in<br />

the sustainable growth is not very beneficial;<br />

- other sources <strong>of</strong> investment financing refer<br />

to foreign loans and grants from EU<br />

structural and cohesion funds that are still<br />

insufficiently accessed.<br />

Table no.4.5 Structure in percents <strong>of</strong> GDP, on categories <strong>of</strong> resources, in the years 1999,<br />

2004, 2005 and 2009<br />

- % -<br />

1999 2004 2005 2009<br />

Agriculture, forestry and 11,1 12,5 8,4 7,1<br />

fishing<br />

Industry 27,3 24,9 24,8 27,8<br />

Constructions 4,9 5,9 6,5 11,0<br />

Services 56,7 56,7 60,3 54,1<br />

Source: Data <strong>of</strong> the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Statistics. Own calculations, Romania’s Statistical Yearbook<br />

2005, p.415<br />

In the crisis year 2009, the weight <strong>of</strong> services and constructions in total GDP on categories <strong>of</strong><br />

resources decreased by -6.2 pp and, respectively, -4.5 pp, as compared to 2005, highlighting<br />

their weak resistance and sustainability to the crisis shocks.<br />

Table no.4.6 Contribution (%) to GDP growth on categories <strong>of</strong> usages in 2004, 2005 and<br />

2009<br />

2004 2005 2009<br />

GDP 8,5 4,2 -7,1<br />

Household final consumption 9,8 7,4 -6,5<br />

Government's final consumption -1,0 0,2 0,1<br />

Fixed capital gross formation +2,4 3,4 -8,1<br />

Net Export -4,4 -4,5 7,5<br />

Changes in inventories 1,7 -2,3 -0,1<br />

Source: Data <strong>of</strong> the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Statistics. Own calculations, Romania’s Statistical Yearbook<br />

2005.


The data in Table no.4.6 emphasize that in<br />

the crisis year 2009, the net export, created<br />

in the "tradable" sector (Manufacturing)<br />

was the only one who contributed<br />

positively to GDP growth, the fixed capital<br />

gross formation and the individual<br />

consumption having a negative impact.<br />

The dramatic decrease in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

employees in the manufacturing industry in<br />

Romania is a negative phenomenon which<br />

did not contribute at all to the development <strong>of</strong><br />

the country but it rather increased its<br />

vulnerability and dependence, internally and<br />

externally. We need a radical change in the<br />

strategic management <strong>of</strong> sustainable growth<br />

<strong>of</strong> manufacturing industries, especially with<br />

when a new reindustrialization <strong>of</strong><br />

Romanian economy is more <strong>of</strong>ten discussed.<br />

The increase in the weight <strong>of</strong> financial and<br />

business insurance services is only a<br />

"favourable" appearance that could not<br />

compensate for the long-term effects and the<br />

job losses in manufacturing industry.<br />

These changes on the labour market, keeping<br />

their proportions and features, are found in<br />

developed countries as well and suggest the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> several common factors<br />

including, in the top, the technological<br />

change and globalization that allow<br />

specialization on certain goods and products<br />

but on different stages <strong>of</strong> production process.<br />

The links <strong>of</strong> the chain with the lowest added<br />

value are transferred in less developed<br />

countries or in the developing countries,<br />

where labour force is cheaper and the better<br />

paid jobs remain in the developed countries.<br />

If in America manufacturing industry<br />

declined and wages were lower, in<br />

commercial services, where America has a<br />

comparative advantage, both value added and<br />

employment increased. The same happened<br />

to non-tradable services which, by<br />

definition, remain where consumption occurs.<br />

The demand for non-tradable goods in the<br />

future may not continue to grow at the same<br />

pace as so far, considering the effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economic and financial crisis. Health,<br />

commerce and government services<br />

decreased. Therefore, government will have<br />

to focus on technologies that could serve to<br />

31<br />

develop the "tradable" sector (<strong>of</strong> goods and<br />

services exported).<br />

The economic structural evolution has its<br />

own strategic importance and may be<br />

affected in different effective ways, so that<br />

nowadays there appears as increasingly<br />

necessary strategy <strong>of</strong> reindustrialization <strong>of</strong><br />

transitional economies, after the shock<br />

deindustrialization produced during 1990-<br />

2010. In this context, we can mention that<br />

Romania follows an unfavourable trend, as<br />

compared to the global trends, in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

drastic reduction <strong>of</strong> CDI staff and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

investment and expenditure in the sector<br />

considered, along with industry and<br />

agriculture as factors <strong>of</strong> sustainable, smart<br />

and inclusive development (UE Strategy<br />

2020).<br />

There still are many uncertainties about how<br />

to implement such a strategy which does not<br />

mean that we will not have to deal with both<br />

theoretical and pragmatic terms. Many<br />

specialists would question an industrial<br />

policy that promotes manufacturing industry<br />

as a first priority.<br />

As long as a low demand keeps the interest<br />

rates and the dollar at a low level, the<br />

tradable sector is likely to grow without the<br />

need for action (impulse) from the state.<br />

America remains the world's largest<br />

manufacturing producer. Japan and America<br />

have doubled the manufacturing production<br />

output in the period 1980-2009, and, in<br />

absolute terms, the manufacturing production<br />

output did not decline in any <strong>of</strong> the G7<br />

country in this period.<br />

The manufacturing industry with low added<br />

value focused in China, where labour is<br />

cheap, but it is not clear whether this<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> comparative advantage will last<br />

long. However, China has not neglected the<br />

sustainable growth <strong>of</strong> manufacturing industry<br />

especially <strong>of</strong> branches with high added value,<br />

science-intensive, using in a first phase the<br />

massive promotion <strong>of</strong> technological transfer<br />

and assimilation <strong>of</strong> the mass <strong>of</strong> products and<br />

equipment, followed by a phase <strong>of</strong><br />

improvement in products and services<br />

acquired and, more importantly, a phase <strong>of</strong><br />

business creativity and innovation.


Jagdish Bhagwati, pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Columbia<br />

University, believes that those who favour<br />

stimulation <strong>of</strong> the manufacturing industry in<br />

the rich world suffer from the so-called<br />

"fetish" <strong>of</strong> processors (manufacturing fetish).<br />

According to Bhagwati, the fascination for<br />

manufacturing industry is based on the<br />

erroneous belief that it is more dynamic in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> technology than the services. In the<br />

services there take place sensitive dynamic <strong>of</strong><br />

technological progress as well, such as:<br />

logistics companies, large wholesalers,<br />

mobile telecommunications, innovation in<br />

non-financial services, genetically modified<br />

seeds in agriculture. However it is worth<br />

mentioning that these services are driven, in<br />

the final analysis, by the manufacturing<br />

sector which they serve as producers <strong>of</strong><br />

"tradable" goods. The wholesale and the<br />

retail have benefited from huge benefits in<br />

recent decades, as a result <strong>of</strong> ICT<br />

development, whose material base can be<br />

found in manufacturing industry.<br />

Bhagwati also considers as wrong the second<br />

assumption <strong>of</strong> "fetishists", that manufacturing<br />

is more important for creating jobs than<br />

services. Changing the structure <strong>of</strong><br />

production for manufacturing industries does<br />

not increase the number <strong>of</strong> jobs. The<br />

increasing demand for "non-tradable"<br />

services occurs just as strong as in the years<br />

before the crisis, Bhagwati says, although<br />

there are no solid arguments in this regard.<br />

On the other hand, it is unclear whether the<br />

demand for "tradable" services will decrease<br />

or not. As emerging economies become more<br />

developed, they will want to benefit in larger<br />

quantities, from all sorts <strong>of</strong> services,<br />

including the most sophisticated, to which the<br />

U.S. and Britain have comparative<br />

advantages. Those inclining towards the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> manufacturing industry on<br />

the grounds that it would be better to<br />

stimulate exports, <strong>of</strong>ten ignore the fact that an<br />

increased volume <strong>of</strong> services becomes<br />

exportable (traded), and that rich countries<br />

tend to export more than import such<br />

services. America and England have a<br />

surplus <strong>of</strong> trade balance in such services.<br />

Rich countries face obstacles in the<br />

32<br />

capitalization <strong>of</strong> power (their economic<br />

supremacy in this field). However, the trade<br />

in services remains, from far, relatively<br />

restricted, not only in emerging economies.<br />

Mario Monti from Bocconi University in<br />

Milan found that only 20% <strong>of</strong> services in EU<br />

have a cross-border component and that the<br />

efforts to liberalize services can bring more<br />

benefits than the exhortations to stimulate<br />

manufacturing industries.<br />

In this part <strong>of</strong> the communication I wanted to<br />

bring forward a major problem that the<br />

strategic management at the macroeconomic<br />

level currently faces, in terms <strong>of</strong> sustainable<br />

development policies, sectoral and subsectoral,<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> the de-industrialization<br />

phenomenon at a national level in countries<br />

with economies in transition and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

defragmentation <strong>of</strong> processing industries<br />

under the impact <strong>of</strong> the globalization<br />

processes and the deepening <strong>of</strong> domestic and<br />

international specialization and cooperation<br />

in the production <strong>of</strong> goods and services that<br />

imply new requirements for the management<br />

<strong>of</strong> sustainable development in conditions <strong>of</strong><br />

extensive business networks (business<br />

networking) whose hard core is represented<br />

by the multi and trans-national corporations.<br />

The conceptual and strategic reconsidering <strong>of</strong><br />

the promotion <strong>of</strong> sustainable and competitive<br />

economic structure in Romania is a<br />

prerequisite for addressing external debt<br />

sustainability that requires, complementarily,<br />

an optimal solution <strong>of</strong> other issues as well:<br />

- the ratio between domestic and foreign debt<br />

on short, medium and long term;<br />

- a correlation, in time, <strong>of</strong> the increased debt<br />

with the repayment capacity, in order to<br />

avoid insolvency;<br />

- better negotiation <strong>of</strong> conditions for bilateral<br />

and multilateral lending;<br />

- correlation <strong>of</strong> real economy with the<br />

nominal, as to ensure the primacy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

former and the latter’s role as an important<br />

factor <strong>of</strong> influence, knowing that what<br />

remains finally is only the anthropic, sociohuman<br />

capital, together with the natural one,<br />

beyond the ephemerality <strong>of</strong> the monetary<br />

financial processes;


- making the policy makers accountable for<br />

the identifying sources <strong>of</strong> external debt<br />

repayment, beyond their term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

Bibliography<br />

Albu L., Pelinescu E., (2009), Sustainability<br />

<strong>of</strong> Public Debt and Budget Deficit,<br />

Economic Policy, October, 2009, p.33-<br />

22.<br />

Calvo G., (2007), Crisis in Emerging Market<br />

Economies: A Global Perspective,<br />

Working Paper no.441, Columbia<br />

University and NBER.<br />

Calvo G., Reinhart C. (2002), Fearing <strong>of</strong><br />

Floating, The Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics, MIT Press vol.112(2) mai,<br />

pp.379-408.<br />

Calvo G., Talvi E., (2005), Sudden Stop,<br />

Financial Factors and Economic<br />

Collapse in Latin America: Learning<br />

from Argentina and Chile, Working<br />

Paper 11153, Cambridge Mass:<br />

National Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />

Research;<br />

Georgescu G., (2007), Current Acount Defit<br />

and Implications on Country Risk <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania, Institute <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />

Forecasting, October 2007, p.88-97.<br />

Krugman P.R., (1979), A Model <strong>of</strong> Balance<br />

<strong>of</strong> Payments Crises, Journal <strong>of</strong> Money,<br />

Credit and Banking 11(3): 311-325;<br />

Malliaropulos D., (2011), Competitiveness,<br />

External Deficits and External Debt <strong>of</strong><br />

the Greek Economy, Economy<br />

Markets, Eurobank EFG, Volume VI,<br />

33<br />

Issue 7, April 2011,<br />

www.eurobank.gr/research ;<br />

Michael Spence and Sandile Hatshwayo<br />

(2011) „The Evolving Structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

American Economy and the<br />

Employment Challenge”, Council <strong>of</strong><br />

Foreign Relations, Working Paper,<br />

March 2011<br />

Neumeyer P.A., Perri F., (2005), Business<br />

Cycles in Emerging Economies: The<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> Interest Rates, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Monetary Economics 52(2): 345-380;<br />

Ucal M., Oksay S. (2011), The Solvency<br />

Ratio <strong>of</strong> External Debt (SRED) as an<br />

Indicator <strong>of</strong> Debt Crisis: The Case <strong>of</strong><br />

Turkey, Inst.J.Eco.Res.2011, 2(1) 166-<br />

172, available<br />

online@www.ijeronline.com<br />

Zaman Gh., Georgescu G., (2009),<br />

Structural Fund Absorbtion: A New<br />

Challenge for Romania ?, Romanian<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics, nr.1, p. 136-<br />

154; (2010), Romania external debt<br />

sustainability under crisis<br />

circumstances, Romanian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics, nr.1 (39), p 5-38; (2011)<br />

Sovereign Risk and Debt Sustainability<br />

- Warning Levels for Romania, Non-<br />

Linear Modelling in Economics –<br />

Beyond Standards Economics (Albu L.<br />

(editor), Editura Expert, pp.234-270;<br />

*** World Economic and Financial Survey,<br />

Regional Economic Outlook, Europe<br />

Strengthening the Recovery, May 11,<br />

IMF 2011;


Europe 1<br />

Real GDP growth and CPI inflation (%) in European countries<br />

Countries with developed<br />

economy 1<br />

34<br />

Annex 1<br />

Real GDP growth Average CPI inflation<br />

2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

-4.5 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.8 3.0<br />

-4.0 1.7 1.7 1.9 0.7 1.9 2.5 1.8<br />

Emerging economies -5.9 4.2 4.3 4.3 8.5 6.3 7.3 6.2<br />

European Union 1<br />

-4.1 1.8 1.8 2.1 0.9 2.0 2.7 1.9<br />

Euro area -4.1 1.7 1.6 1.8 0.3 1.6 2.3 1.7<br />

Austria -3.9 2.0 2.4 2.3 0.4 1.7 2.5 2.0<br />

Belgium -2.7 2.0 1.7 1.9 0.0 2.3 2.9 2.3<br />

Cyprus -1.7 1.0 1.7 2.2 0.2 2.6 3.9 2.8<br />

Estonia -13.9 3.1 3.3 3.7 -0.1 2.9 4.7 2.1<br />

Finland -8.2 3.1 3.1 2.5 1.6 1.7 3.0 2.1<br />

France -2.5 1.5 1.6 1.8 0.1 1.7 2.1 1.7<br />

Germany -4.7 3.5 2.5 2.1 0.2 1.2 2.2 1.5<br />

Greece -2.0 -4.5 -3.0 1.1 1.4 4.7 2.5 0.5<br />

Ireland -7.6 -1.0 0.5 1.9 -1.7 -1.6 0.5 0.5<br />

Italy -5.2 1.3 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.6 2.0 2.1<br />

Luxemburg -3.7 3.4 3.0 3.1 0.4 2.3 3.5 1.7<br />

Malta -3.4 3.6 2.5 2.2 1.8 2.0 3.0 2.6<br />

Nederland -3.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.0 0.9 2.3 2.2<br />

Portugal -2.5 1.4 -1.5 -0.5 -0.9 1.4 2.4 1.4<br />

Slovakia -4.8 4.0 3.8 4.2 0.9 0.7 3.4 2.7<br />

Slovenia -8.1 1.2 2.0 2.4 0.9 1.8 2.2 3.1<br />

Spain -3.7 -0.1 0.8 1.6 -0.2 2.0 2.6 1.5<br />

Other EU countries with<br />

advanced economies<br />

Czech Republic -4.1 2.3 1.7 2.9 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0<br />

Denmark -5.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.3 2.3 2.0 2.0<br />

Sweden -5.3 5.5 3.8 3.5 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.0<br />

England<br />

Emerging EU economies<br />

-4.9 1.3 1.7 2.3 2.1 3.3 4.2 2.0<br />

Bulgaria -5.5 0.2 3.0 3.5 2.5 3.0 4.8 3.7<br />

Hungary -6.7 1.2 2.8 2.8 4.2 4.9 4.1 3.5<br />

Latvia -18.0 -0.3 3.3 4.0 3.3 -1.2 3.0 1.7<br />

Lithuania -14.7 1.3 4.6 3.8 4.4 1.2 3.1 2.9<br />

Poland 1.7 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.5 2.6 4.1 2.9<br />

Romania<br />

Non-EU advanced economies<br />

-7.1 -1.3 1.5 4.4 5.6 6.1 6.1 3.4<br />

Iceland -6.9 -3.5 2.3 2.9 12.0 5.4 2.6 2.6<br />

Israel 0.8 4.6 3.8 3.8 3.3 2.7 3.0 2.5<br />

Norway -1.4 0.4 2.9 2.5 2.2 2.4 1.8 2.2<br />

Switzerland<br />

Other emerging economies<br />

-1.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 -0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0


Real GDP growth Average CPI inflation<br />

2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

Albania 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.6 2.2 3.6 4.5 3.5<br />

Belarus 0.2 7.6 6.8 4.8 13.0 7.7 12.9 9.7<br />

Bosnia and Herzegovina -3.1 0.8 2.2 4.0 -0.4 2.1 5.0 2.5<br />

Croatia -5.8 -1.4 1.3 1.8 2.4 1.0 3.5 2.4<br />

Macedonia -0.9 0.7 3.0 3.7 -0.8 1.5 5.2 2.0<br />

Moldova -6.0 6.9 4.5 4.8 0.0 7.4 7.5 6.3<br />

Montenegro -5.7 1.1 2.0 3.5 3.4 0.5 3.1 2.0<br />

Russia -7.8 4.0 4.8 4.5 11.7 6.9 9.3 8.0<br />

Serbia -3.1 1.8 3.0 5.0 8.1 6.2 9.9 4.1<br />

Turkey -4.7 8.2 4.6 4.5 6.3 8.6 5.7 6.0<br />

Ukraine -14.8 4.2 4.5 4.9 15.9 9.4 9.2 8.3<br />

Memorandum<br />

World -0.5 5.0 4.4 4.5 2.5 3.7 4.5 3.4<br />

Advanced economy -3.4 3.0 2.4 2.6 0.1 1.6 2.2 1.7<br />

Emergent and developing 2.7 7.3 6.5 6.5 5.2 6.2 6.9 5.3<br />

USA -2.6 2.8 2.8 2.9 -0.3 1.6 2.2 1.6<br />

Japan -6.3 3.9 1.4 2.1 -1.4 -0.7 0.2 0.2<br />

China 9.2 10.3 9.6 9.5 -0.7 3.3 5.0 2.5<br />

Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook.<br />

1 Average weighted by GDP valued at purchasing power parity<br />

35


Annex 2<br />

Emerging Europe: GDP growth in domestic demand, exports and private consumption<br />

Real GDP growth Real growth <strong>of</strong> domestic Real growth <strong>of</strong> export Real growth <strong>of</strong> private<br />

demand<br />

consumption<br />

2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

Baltics 2<br />

-15.9 0.7 4.1 3.9 -26.2 1.6 5.0 4.1 -13.2 14.1 9.2 7.5 -20.1 -2.6 2.7 3.0<br />

Latvia -18.0 -0.3 3.3 4.0 -27.6 -0.9 3.0 4.3 -14.1 10.3 7.0 5.7 -24.1 -0.1 3.0 4.0<br />

Lithuania -14.7 1.3 4.6 3.8 -25.4 3.0 6.1 4.0 -12.7 16.3 10.5 8.5 -17.7 -4.1 2.5 2.4<br />

Central Europe 2<br />

-0.1 3.3 3.6 3.4 -3.1 2.9 3.2 3.4 -7.4 11.0 7.5 6.7 0.2 2.0 3.2 3.3<br />

Hungary -6.7 1.2 2.8 2.8 -10.8 -1.6 2.3 2.5 -9.6 13.9 9.3 8.7 -6.8 -2.6 1.5 2.2<br />

Poland 1.7 3.8 3.8 3.6 -1.0 4.0 3.4 3.7 -6.8 10.2 7.0 6.2 2.0 3.2 3.6 3.6<br />

Southeastern Europe-EU 2 -6.6 -0.9 1.9 4.1 -12.8 -1.9 1.0 4.0 -6.9 14.0 9.4 8.0 -9.5 -1.5 1.7 4.0<br />

Bulgaria -5.5 0.2 3.0 3.5 -12.7 -4.5 3.0 3.5 -11.2 16.2 9.8 7.5 -7.6 -1.2 3.6 4.0<br />

Romania -7.1 -1.3 1.5 4.4 -12.9 -1.0 0.3 4.2 -5.3 13.1 9.3 8.2 -10.2 -1.7 1.0 4.1<br />

Southeastern Europe-non- -3.0 0.8 2.5 3.6 -7.2 -3.3 1.3 3.4 -12.8 14.0 9.3 6.8 -4.2 -1.0 1.1 3.4<br />

EU 2<br />

Albania 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.6 3.1 -8.0 4.1 2.6 -1.7 29.0 1.2 7.6 6.5 -5.1 3.3 2.4<br />

Bosnia and Herzegovina -3.1 0.8 2.2 4.0 -6.4 -1.4 1.3 4.1 -6.2 9.7 6.0 4.8 -3.9 0.8 0.8 3.3<br />

Croatia -5.8 -1.4 1.3 1.8 -9.3 -5.1 0.7 2.0 -16.2 4.1 3.3 2.1 -8.5 -1.2 0.1 0.5<br />

Kosovo 2.9 4.0 5.5 5.2<br />

FYR Macedonia -0.9 0.7 3.0 3.7 -2.9 -1.1 2.4 3.8 -10.7 22.7 18.7 13.0 -3.9 1.1 2.4 3.9<br />

Rep. Montenegro -5.7 1.1 2.0 3.5 -16.9 -3.3 -1.2 1.2 -22.4 9.0 8.2 5.3 -13.4 6.8 -2.3 -0.1<br />

Serbia -3.1 1.8 3.0 5.0 -8.6 -1.2 0.9 4.8 -15.0 19.1 16.6 10.2 -2.4 -1.3 1.3 6.6<br />

European CIS countries 2<br />

-8.2 4.2 4.9 4.6 -14.4 6.5 7.6 6.1 -7.3 10.0 3.4 4.2 -5.7 3.4 7.2 6.8<br />

Belarus 0.2 7.6 6.8 4.8 -1.1 10.3 6.1 5.0 -9.0 5.1 13.3 4.7 0.0 8.6 6.9 6.9<br />

Moldova -6.0 6.9 4.5 4.8 -18.6 9.6 5.9 5.5 -12.1 12.8 7.1 9.2 -8.0 9.0 5.8 5.3<br />

Russia -7.8 4.0 4.8 4.5 -14.0 6.3 7.8 6.3 -4.7 10.2 2.4 3.8 -4.9 2.8 7.1 7.0<br />

Ukraine -14.8 4.2 4.5 4.9 -22.6 6.2 6.3 5.3 -25.1 10.4 5.9 6.7 -13.9 5.9 7.5 5.3<br />

Turkey -4.7 8.2 4.6 4.5 -7.2 12.2 5.3 5.1 -5.3 2.6 6.2 6.1 -2.2 7.3 6.1 5.7<br />

Emerging Europe 2 . 3<br />

-5.9 4.2 4.3 4.3 -10.9 5.8 5.6 5.2 -7.3 9.3 5.4 5.4 -4.5 3.3 5.6 5.6<br />

New EU member states 2 ." -3.5 2.2 3.0 3.5 -7.0 1.4 2.4 3.4 -9.0 13.0 8.3 6.8 -3.1 0.6 2.4 3.3<br />

Memorandum<br />

36


Real GDP growth Real growth <strong>of</strong> domestic Real growth <strong>of</strong> export Real growth <strong>of</strong> private<br />

demand<br />

consumption<br />

2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

Czech Republic -4.1 2.3 1.7 2.9 -3.7 1.1 1.0 2.2 -10.8 18.0 10.3 6.3 -0.2 0.4 0.9 2.3<br />

Estonia -13.9 3.1 3.3 3.7 -20.5 -3.8 3.5 3.7 -18.7 21.7 4.1 4.9 -18.8 -1.9 2.4 2.4<br />

Slovakia -4.8 4.0 3.8 4.2 -7.9 2.7 1.8 3.6 -15.9 16.4 8.5 6.6 0.3 -0.3 2.3 3.8<br />

Slovenia -8.1 1.2 2.0 2.4 -10.1 0.4 1.0 2.2 -17.7 7.8 6.8 5.7 -0.8 0.5 1.2 2.2<br />

European Union 2 ' 5<br />

-4.1 1.8 1.8 2.1 -4.2 1.3 1.0 1.6 -12.6 10.1 6.6 5.1 -1.7 0.8 1.2 1.6<br />

1 Real export <strong>of</strong> goods and services; 2 Average weighted by GDP at PPP; 3 Includes: Albania, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Kosovo, Latvia,<br />

Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro Rep., Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Turkey and Ukraine; 4 Includes: Bulgaria, Czech Rep., Estonia, Hungary, Latvia,<br />

Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia; 5 Includes: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Rep., Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary,<br />

Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxemburg, Malta, Nederland, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and England.<br />

Source: IMF World Economic Outlook.<br />

37


Annex 3<br />

Inflation (CPI), the current account and external debt, 2009-2012 (%)<br />

CPI Inflation (average) CPI inflation at the end Current account balance / Total external debt / GDP<br />

<strong>of</strong> the period<br />

GDP<br />

2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

Baltics 1<br />

4.0 0.3 3.1 2.5 0.3 3.2 2.9 2.4 6.2 2.5 0.5 -1.2 118.2 117.4 109.6 103.0<br />

Latvia 3.3 -1.2 3.0 1.7 -1.4 2.4 1.9 2.3 8.6 3.6 2.6 1.5 156.3 165.2 152.0 141.2<br />

Lithuania 4.4 1.2 3.1 2.9 1.3 3.6 3.5 2.5 4.5 1.8 -0.9 -2.9 91.4 85.7 82.2 78.5<br />

Central Europe 1<br />

3.6 3.1 4.1 3.0 3.9 3.3 3.8 2.8 -1.8 -2.2 -2.8 -3.1 85.3 83.5 83.7 81.5<br />

Hungary 4.2 4.9 4.1 3.5 5.6 4.2 3.9 3.2 -0.5 1.6 1.5 0.9 153.3 143.9 140.6 131.5<br />

Poland 3.5 2.6 4.1 2.9 3.5 3.1 3.8 2.7 -2.2 -3.3 -3.9 -4.2 64.9 66.8 68.4 68.5<br />

Southeastern Europe-EU 1<br />

4.7 5.3 5.7 3.5 3.9 7.0 4.4 2.8 -5.5 -3.4 -4.2 -4.4 81.4 80.6 82.4 78.5<br />

Bulgaria 2.5 3.0 4.8 3.7 1.6 4.4 5.3 2.4 -10.0 -0.8 -1.5 -2.0 113.6 102.3 94.7 88.2<br />

Romania 5.6 6.1 6.1 3.4 4.8 8.0 4.0 3.0 -4.2 -4.2 -5.0 -5.2 71.8 74.2 78.7 75.6<br />

Southeastern Europe— , non- 3.7 3.2 6.1 3.1 3.1 5.1 4.9 3.0 -7.8 -5.7 -6.9 -6.6 78.4 78.4 73.8 72.5<br />

EU 1<br />

Albania 2.2 3.6 4.5 3.5 3.7 3.4 4.0 2.9 -14.0 -10.1 -11.2 -9.8 33.5 41.6 37.7 39.1<br />

Bosnia and Herzegovina -0.4 2.1 5.0 2.5 0.0 3.1 5.0 2.5 -6.9 -6.0 -6.0 -5.7 54.9 54.6 58.6 58.4<br />

Croatia 2.4 1.0 3.5 2.4 1.9 1.9 3.5 2.4 -5.5 -1.9 -3.6 -3.6 101.9 99.3 93.4 91.4<br />

Kosovo -2.4 3.5 8.2 2.1 0.1 6.6 5.6 2.0 -16.8 -17.3 -23.1 -25.6<br />

FYR Macedonia -0.8 1.5 5.2 2.0 -1.6 3.0 7.5 2.0 -6.4 -2.8 -4.2 -4.8 57.5 56.5 57.3 58.2<br />

Rep.Montenegro 3.4 0.5 3.1 2.0 1.5 0.7 3.0 1.8 -30.3 -25.6 -24.5 -22.1 97.8 100.2 99.0 97.5<br />

Rep.Serbia 8.1 6.2 9.9 4.1 6.6 10.3 6.0 4.0 -6.9 -7.1 -7.4 -6.6 78.7 81.6 74.0 72.8<br />

European CIS countries 1<br />

12.2 7.2 9.5 8.1 9.2 8.9 8.9 7.6 2.9 3.6 4.2 2.7 43.1 37.3 30.7 28.1<br />

Belarus 13.0 7.7 12.9 9.7 10.1 9.9 13.0 9.0 -13.0 -15.5 -15.7 -15.2 44.9 51.5 57.9 63.4<br />

Moldova 0.0 7.4 7.5 6.3 0.4 8.1 7.5 5.0 -8.5 -10.9 -11.1 -11.2 65.5 67.4 70.3 74.0<br />

Russia 11.7 6.9 9.3 8.0 8.8 8.8 8.5 7.5 4.1 4.9 5.6 3.9 38.6 32.3 25.5 22.6<br />

Ukraine 15.9 9.4 9.2 8.3 12.3 9.1 10.2 7.7 -1.5 -1.9 -3.6 -3.8 88.0 83.9 80.7 80.3<br />

Turkey 6.3 8.6 5.7 6.0 6.5 6.4 7.0 5.4 -2.3 -6.5 -8.0 -8.2 43.7 40.7 43.7 46.2<br />

Emerging Europe 1 - 2<br />

8.5 6.3 7.3 6.2 7.0 7.1 7.1 5.8 -0.1 -0.5 -0.3 -1.1 57.3 52.0 47.7 45.4<br />

New EU member states 1 - 3<br />

3.2 2.9 3.9 2.9 2.9 3.7 3.6 2.7 -2.0 -2.2 -2.6 -2.8 75.7 75.1 73.9 71.2<br />

Memorandum<br />

Czech Rep. 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.3 2.2 2.0 -1.1 -2.4 -1.8 -1.2 45.5 47.4 44.0 42.0<br />

Estonia -0.1 2.9 4.7 2.1 -1.7 5.4 3.5 2.0 4.5 3.6 3.3 3.1 125.8 117.6 100.5 95.0<br />

38


CPI Inflation (average) CPI inflation at the end Current account balance / Total external debt / GDP<br />

<strong>of</strong> the period<br />

GDP<br />

2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

Slovakia 0.9 0.7 3.4 2.7 0.1 1.3 3.4 2.9 -3.6 -3.4 -2.8 -2.7 71.9 72.1 70.4 67.8<br />

Slovenia 0.9 1.8 2.2 3.1 1.8 1.9 3.0 2.7 -1.5 -1.2 -2.0 -2.1 105.2 113.8 113.3 114.4<br />

European Union 1 ' 1<br />

0.9 2.0 2.7 1.9 1.2 2.5 2.5 1.9 -0.2 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1<br />

1 2 3<br />

Real export <strong>of</strong> goods and services; Average weighted by GDP at PPP; Includes: Albania, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary,<br />

Kosovo, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Rep.Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Turkey and Ukraine; 4 Includes: Bulgaria, Czech Rep.,<br />

Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia; 5 Include: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Rep., Denmark, Estonia, Finland,<br />

France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxemburg, Malta, Nederland, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain,<br />

Sweden and England.<br />

Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook.<br />

39


Annex 4<br />

Saving-investment balance by sectors in some European countries during 2000-2007<br />

(% <strong>of</strong> GDP, unless otherwise specified)<br />

Households Non-financial corporations Financial<br />

corporations<br />

Government Total<br />

S(E) I Net S(E) I Net S(E) I Net S(E) I Net S(E) I Net<br />

Year 2007<br />

Countries with surplus 10.2 6.5 3.8 12.6 11.1 1.5 1.0 0.3 0.7 2.8 1.7 1.0 26.6 19.6 7.0<br />

Nederland 6.9 7.5 -0.5 17.0 9.3 7.7 1.5 0.4 1.2 3.4 3.3 0.1 28.8 20.4 8.4<br />

Germany 11.5 6.2 5.3 11.4 10.5 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.6 2.4 1.4 1.0 26.0 18.3 7.6<br />

Finland 3.9 7.7 -3.7 14.9 12.5 2.5 0.7 0.3 0.4 7.6 2.5 5.1 27.1 22.9 4.2<br />

Austria 10.2 5.3 5.0 12.0 16.0 -4.0 2.3 0.7 1.6 2.6 1.1 1.4 27.2 23.2 4.0<br />

Belgium 10.0 6.7 3.3 13.6 13.7 0.0 1.3 0.8 0.6 1.7 1.6 0.1 26.7 22.8 3.9<br />

Countries with deficit<br />

40<br />

1<br />

9.0 7.7 -1.0 6.8 12.8 -2.9 1.5 0.5 0.6 2.8 3.2 -0.4 20.0 24.2 -4.2<br />

Italy 10.2 6.9 3.3 6.3 12.2 -5.9 1.3 0.4 0.9 2.3 2.3 0.0 20.1 21.9 -1.8<br />

France 10.2 7.0 3.1 7.9 11.1 -3.2 0.8 0.8 0.0 1.1 3.3 -2.2 20.0 22.2 -2.2<br />

Ireland 3.3 12.2 -8.8 9.3 9.8 -0.4 4.9 0.6 4.3 4.1 4.7 -0.5 21.7 27.2 -5.5<br />

Spain 6.9 9.7 -2.8 5.2 17.2 -12.0 2.1 0.1 2.0 6.9 4.0 2.8 21.0 31.0 -10.0<br />

Portugal 4.9 5.8 -0.9 5.6 13.6 -8.0 2.6 1.0 1.6 -0.5 2.4 -2.9 12.7 22.9 -10.2<br />

Greece 2<br />

-1.1 9.4 -10.5 10.7 7.2 3.5 2.0 0.3 1.7 -2.5 2.8 -5.3 9.0 19.7 -10.7<br />

Hard peg -6.3 4.8 -11.1 16.0 26.0 -10.0 1.3 0.1 1.1 6.0 5.4 0.6 16.9 36.3 -19.4<br />

Lithuania -3.2 3.9 -7.1 13.9 21.5 -7.6 1.5 0.1 1.3 3.6 5.3 -1.7 15.8 30.9 -15.1<br />

Estonia -0.9 8.5 -9.4 15.5 26.1 -10.6 -0.2 -0.1 -0.1 7.6 5.1 2.5 22.0 39.6 -17.7<br />

Latvia -3.0 5.0 -8.0 12.4 29.1 -16.7 3.0 0.0 3.0 5.7 6.3 -0.6 18.1 40.4 -22.3<br />

Bulgaria -14.9 3.5 -18.4 21.0 28.0 -7.0 0.7 0.4 0.3 7.6 4.9 2.7 14.3 36.8 -22.5<br />

Year 2000<br />

Countries with surplus 9.6 7.2 2.5 8.9 12.2 -3.3 1.5 0.7 0.8 2.4 2.0 0.4 22.4 22.0 0.4<br />

Nederland 6.9 7.0 -0.1 13.8 10.4 3.4 3.1 1.4 1.7 4.5 3.1 1.4 28.4 22.0 6.4<br />

Germany 10.5 7.5 2.9 6.9 12.0 -5.1 1.2 0.5 0.7 1.6 1.8 -0.2 20.2 21.8 -1.6<br />

Finland 4.4 6.6 -2.3 14.7 11.6 3.1 0.1 0.2 -0.1 9.3 2.4 6.8 28.5 20.9 7.6<br />

Austria 8.9 5.7 3.1 11.3 16.0 -4.7 2.1 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 -0.2 23.6 24.3 -0.7<br />

Belgium 10.6 5.9 4.8 12.5 13.8 -1.3 1.0 0.9 0.1 2.6 2.0 0.6 26.7 22.5 4.2<br />

Countries with deficit 1<br />

9.2 6.5 2.7 8.8 11.9 -3.1 1.2 0.6 0.6 2.0 2.9 -0.9 21.2 21.9 -0.7<br />

Italy 9.9 6.5 3.4 8.6 11.3 -2.8 0.8 0.6 0.3 1.3 2.3 -1.0 20.6 20.7 -0.1<br />

France 9.8 5.7 4.0 8.3 10.8 -2.5 1.4 0.8 0.5 2.1 3.1 -1.0 21.6 20.5 1.1


Households Non-financial corporations Financial<br />

corporations<br />

Government Total<br />

S(E) I Net S(E) I Net S(E) I Net S(E) I Net S(E) I Net<br />

Ireland 3 4.9 7.4 -2.5 9.4 8.9 0.6 2.2 0.4 1.8 3.9 4.3 -0.3 20.5 20.9 -0.4<br />

Spain 7.5 7.4 0.1 10.3 15.3 -5.0 1.5 0.4 1.1 3.0 3.2 -0.1 22.3 26.3 -4.0<br />

Portugal 7.5 8.8 -1.2 8.0 15.4 -7.4 1.7 0.7 1.0 0.5 3.7 -3.1 17.8 28.5 -10.7<br />

Greece 2.4 11.5 -9.1 8.3 7.8 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.3 -0.2 3.6 -3.8 11.3 23.3 -12.0<br />

Hard peg -1.1 2.2 -3.3 13.4 17.6 -4.2 1.8 0.7 1.1 3.1 2.6 0.5 17.2 23.0 -5.8<br />

Lithuania 4.5 3.7 0.9 5.6 12.5 -6.9 1.3 0.4 1.0 1.5 2.4 -0.8 13.0 18.9 -5.9<br />

Estonia 2.3 3.4 -1.0 16.0 21.2 -5.1 1.5 0.3 1.2 3.5 3.8 -0.3 23.4 28.7 -5.3<br />

Latvia 1.5 1.4 0.2 14.4 19.9 -5.5 2.7 1.1 1.6 0.2 1.4 -1.1 18.9 23.7 -4.8<br />

Bulgaria 4 -9.3 0.8 -10.1 18.8 19.2 -0.4 1.6 0.8 0.8 6.1 2.9 3.2 17.3 23.8 -6.5<br />

Changes in 2007 compared to 2000 (percentage points <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />

Countries with surplus 0.6 -0.7 1.3 3.7 -1.0 4.8 -0.5 -0.4 -0.1 0.4 -0.2 0.6 4.2 -2.4 6.6<br />

Nederland 0.0 0.4 -0.4 3.2 -1.1 4.3 -1.6 -1.1 -0.5 -1.1 0.2 -1.3 0.4 -1.6 2.0<br />

Germany 1.0 -1.3 2.3 4.5 -1.4 5.9 -0.5 -0.4 -0.2 0.8 -0.3 1.2 5.8 -3.5 9.3<br />

Finland -0.4 1.0 -1.5 0.2 0.9 -0.6 0.5 0.1 0.5 -1.7 0.0 -1.8 -1.4 2.0 -3.4<br />

Austria 1.4 -0.4 1.8 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.2 -0.3 0.5 1.3 -0.4 1.6 3.6 -1.1 4.7<br />

Belgium -0.6 0.9 -1.5 1.2 -0.1 1.3 0.4 -0.1 0.5 -0.8 -0.3 -0.5 0.1 0.3 -0.3<br />

Countries with deficit 1<br />

-0.2 1.3 -3.7 -2.0 0.9 0.2 0.2 -0.1 0.1 0.8 0.3 0.5 -1.1 2.3 -3.5<br />

Italy 0.3 0.4 -0.1 -2.2 0.9 -3.2 0.5 -0.2 0.6 1.0 0.0 1.0 -0.5 1.2 -1.7<br />

France 0.4 1.3 -0.9 -0.4 0.3 -0.7 -0.6 -0.1 -0.5 -1.0 0.2 -1.2 -1.6 1.7 -3.3<br />

Ireland -1.6 4.7 -6.3 -0.1 0.9 -1.0 2.7 0.2 2.4 0.2 0.4 -0.2 1.2 6.3 -5.1<br />

Spain -0.6 2.3 -2.9 -5.1 1.8 -6.9 0.6 -0.3 0.9 3.8 0.9 3.0 -1.3 4.7 -6.0<br />

Portugal -2.6 -3.0 0.4 -2.4 -1.7 -0.6 0.9 0.3 0.6 -1.0 -1.2 0.2 -5.0 -5.6 0.6<br />

Greece -3.5 -2.1 -1.4 2.4 -0.5 2.9 1.2 -0.1 1.3 -2.4 -0.8 -1.5 -2.3 -3.6 1.3<br />

Hard peg -5.3 2.6 -7.9 2.5 8.4 -5.8 -0.5 -0.5 0.0 2.9 2.8 0.1 -0.3 13.3 -13.6<br />

Lithuania -7.7 0.2 -8.0 8.3 9.1 -0.8 0.1 -0.2 0.4 2.1 2.9 -0.8 2.8 12.0 -9.2<br />

Estonia -3.3 5.1 -8.4 -0.6 4.9 -5.5 -1.7 -0.4 -1.3 4.1 1.3 2.8 -1.4 11.0 -12.4<br />

Latvia -4.5 3.6 -8.1 -2.0 9.2 -11.3 0.2 -1.1 1.4 5.5 5.0 0.5 -0.8 16.7 -17.5<br />

Bulgaria -5.6 2.7 -8.3 2.2 8.8 -6.6 -1.0 -0.4 -0.5 1.5 2.0 -0.5 -3.0 13.0 -16.0<br />

Source: Eurostat IMF, World Economic Outlook database and IMF staff calculations<br />

1Exclusively Greece, 2 2006, 3 2002, 4 2004<br />

Note: E represents gross savings; I – gross investments; Net = E-I<br />

Country groups averages are weighted with weights <strong>of</strong> nominal GDP in 2000 and 2007.<br />

41


Annex 5<br />

Emerging Europe: evolution <strong>of</strong> public debt and the<br />

general government balance<br />

(% <strong>of</strong> GDP)<br />

General government balance Public debt<br />

2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

Baltics<br />

-8.7 -7.7 -5.8 -4.2 30.8 39.1 43.1 43.8<br />

Latvia -7.8 -7.9 -5.3 -1.9 32.8 39.9 42.5 41.0<br />

Lithuania -9.2 -7.6 -6.0 -5.5 29.6 38.7 43.5 45.4<br />

Central Europe<br />

-6.6 -7.1 -3.7 -4.2 56.7 60.8 60.7 61.3<br />

Hungary<br />

-4.3 -4.1 3.9 -4.3 78.4 80.4 76.6 76.9<br />

Poland -7.2 -7.9 -5.7 -4.2 50.9 55.7 56.6 57.3<br />

Southeastern Europe-EU<br />

-5.6 -5.7 -3.9 -2.6 25.8 30.5 32.8 32.8<br />

Bulgaria<br />

-0.9 -3.6 -2.6 -1.5 15.6 18.0 19.7 20.0<br />

Romania -7.3 -6.5 -4.4 -3.0 29.6 35.2 37.8 37.7<br />

Southeastern Europe-non-EU<br />

-4.5 -4.4 -4.5 -3.9 37.5 41.8 42.6 43.6<br />

Albania<br />

-7.5 -3.7 -4.6 -4.6 60.2 59.7 59.9 60.4<br />

Bosnia and Herzegovina -5.6 -4.0 -3.0 -1.9 35.4 36.9 41.4 41.4<br />

Croatia<br />

-4.1 -5.3 -6.3 -6.1 35.4 40.0 44.1 47.6<br />

Kosovo<br />

-0.7 -2.9 -3.3 -4.1<br />

FYR Macedonia -2.7 -2.5 -2.5 -2.2 23.9 24.8 26.8 27.4<br />

Rep. Montenegro<br />

-6.5 -3.8 -3.4 -2.5 40.7 44.1 43.1 42.2<br />

Serbia<br />

-4.3 -4.5 -4.1 -2.8 36.8 44.0 40.5 39.8<br />

European CIS countries<br />

-6.0 -3.7 -1.7 -1.8 14.3 14.1 13.3 13.8<br />

Belarus<br />

-0.7 -1.8 -1.9 -2.0 20.0 22.4 25.3 27.1<br />

Moldova<br />

-6.3 -2.5 -1.9 -0.7 31.6 29.8 30.4 32.4<br />

Russia<br />

-6.3 -3.6 -1.6 -1.7 11.0 9.9' 8.5 8.8<br />

Ukraine<br />

-6.2 -5.8 -2.8 -2.5 35.3 40.5 42.6 43.5<br />

Turkey<br />

-6.2 -3.4 -2.2 -2.0 45.5 41.7 39.4 37.6<br />

Emerging Europe<br />

-6.1 -4.5 -2.5 -2.4 29.5 30.1 29.4 29.4<br />

New EU member States<br />

Memorandum<br />

-6.4 -6.5 -3.9 -3.7 43.4 48.1 49.4 50.1<br />

Czech Republic -5.8 -4.9 -3.7 -3.6 35.4 39.6 41.7 43.4<br />

Estonia -2.1 0.2 -1.0 -0.7 7.2 6.6 6.3 6.0<br />

Slovakia -7.9 -8.2 -5.2 -3.9 35.4 42.0 45.1 46.2<br />

Slovenia<br />

-5.8 -5.7 -2.0 -3.3 35.4 37.2 42.3 44.9<br />

European Union<br />

-6.8 -6.6 -4.8 -4.0 72.3 78.2 80.6 81.8<br />

Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook database<br />

42


Annex 6<br />

Emerging Europe <strong>of</strong> selected indicators <strong>of</strong> financial solidity<br />

2007-2010 1<br />

%<br />

Income to assets Share <strong>of</strong> NPL to total loans<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 Latest 2007 2008 2009 2010 Latest<br />

Albania 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.7 Dec. 3.4 6.6 10.5 13.9 Dec.<br />

Belarus 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.7 Dec. 1.9 1.7 4.2 3.5 Dec.<br />

Bosnia and 0.9 0.4 0.1 -0.5 Sept. 3.0 3.1 5.9 9.2 Sept.<br />

Herzegovina<br />

Bulgaria 2.4 2.1 1.1 0.9 Dec. 2.1 2.5 6.4 11.9 Dec.<br />

Croatia 1.6 1.6 1.1 1.2 Dec. 4.8 4.9 7.8 11.2 Dec.<br />

Hungary 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.1 Dec. 2.3 3.0 6.7 9.1 Dec.<br />

Latvia 2.0 0.3 -3.5 -1.6 Dec. 0.8 3.6 16.4 19.0 Dec.<br />

Lithuania 1.7 1.0 -4.2 -0.3 Dec. 1.0 4.6 19.3 19.7 Dec.<br />

FYR Macedonia 1.8 1.4 0.6 0.8 Dec. 7.5 6.7 8.9 9.0 Dec.<br />

Moldova 3.9 3.5 -0.5 0.5 Dec. 3.7 5.2 16.4 13.3 Dec.<br />

Montenegro 0.7 -0.6 -0.7 -2.7 Dec. 3.2 7.2 13.5 21.0 Dec.<br />

Poland 1.9 1.5 0.8 1.1 Dec. 5.2 4.5 8.0 8.8 Dec.<br />

Romania 1.0 1.6 0.2 -0.1 Dec. 2.6 2.8 7.9 11.9 Dec.<br />

Russia 3.0 1.8 0.7 1.9 Dec. 2.5 3.8 9.5 8.2 Dec.<br />

Serbia 1.7 2.1 1.3 1.2 Sept. 11.3 15.5 17.8 Sept.<br />

Turkey 2.6 1.8 2.4 2.2 Dec. 3.6 3.8 5.6 3.8 Dec.<br />

Ukraine 1.5 1.0 -4.4 -1.5 Dec. 3.0 3.9 13.7 15.3 Dec.<br />

1 it refers to Global Financial Stability Report (April 2011)<br />

Source: IMF, Global Financial Stability Report (April 2011)<br />

43


Annex 7<br />

The main macroeconomic indicators in developing countries<br />

during 2009-2012<br />

%<br />

Current account balance to General government balance<br />

GDP<br />

to GDP<br />

2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

Advanced European<br />

economies"<br />

0.5 0.8 0.9 0.9 -6.3 -6.1 -4.5 -3.6<br />

Euro area -0.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 -6.3 -6.1 -4.4 -3.6<br />

Austria 2.9 3.2 3.1 3.1 -3.5 -4.1 -3.1 -2.9<br />

Belgium 0.8 1.2 1.0 1.2 -6.0 -4.6 -3.9 -4.0<br />

Cyprus -7.5 -7.0 -8.9 -8.7 -6.0 -5.4 -4.5 -3.7<br />

Estonia 4.5 3.6 3.3 3.1 -2.1 0.2 -1.0 -0.7<br />

Finland 2.3 3.1 2.8 2.6 -2.9 -2.8 -1.2 -1.1<br />

France -1.9 -2.1 -2.8 -2.7 -7.6 -7.7 -6.0 -5.0<br />

Germany 5.0 5.3 5.1 4.6 -3.0 -3.3 -2.3 -1.5<br />

Greece -11.0 -10.4 -8.2 -7.1 -15.4 -9.6 -7.4 -6.2<br />

Ireland -3.0 -0.7 0.2 0.6 -14.4 -32.2 -10.8 -8.9<br />

Italy -2.1 -3.5 -3.4 -3.0 -5.3 -4.6 -4.3 -3.5<br />

Luxemburg 6.7 7.7 8.5 8.7 -0.7 -1.7 -1.1 -0.8<br />

Malta -6.9 -0.6 -1.1 -2.3 -3.7 -3.8 -2.9 -2.9<br />

Nederland 4.6 7.1 7.9 8.2 -5.4 -5.2 -3.8 -2.7<br />

Portugal -10.9 -9.9 -8.7 -8.5 -9.3 -7.3 -5.6 -5.5<br />

Slovakia -3.6 -3.4 -2.8 -2.7 -7.9 -8.2 -5.2 -3.9<br />

Slovenia -1.5 -1.2 -2.0 -2.1 -5.5 -5.2 -4.8 -4.3<br />

Spain<br />

Other EU advanced<br />

economies<br />

-5.5 -4.5 -4.8 -4.5 -11.1 -9.2 -6.2 -5.6<br />

Czech Rep. -1.1 -2.4 -1.8 -1.2 -5.8 -4.9 -3.7 -3.6<br />

Denmark 3.8 5.0 4.8 4.8 -2.8 -4.9 -3.6 -2.6<br />

Sweden 7.2 6.5 6.1 5.8 -0.8 -0.2 0.1 0.4<br />

England<br />

Non-EU advanced economies<br />

-1.7 -2.5 -2.4 -1.9 -10.3 -10.4 -8.6 -6.9<br />

Iceland -10.4 -8.0 1.1 2.1 -9.0 -6.8 -4.6 -1.3<br />

Israel 3.6 3.1 3.3 3.1 -5.6 -4.1 -3.2 -2.2<br />

Norway 13.1 12.9 16.3 16.0 10.4 10.9 13.0 12.7<br />

Switzerland 11.5 14.2 13.2 12.8 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.6<br />

European Union 2<br />

-0.2 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -6.8 -6.6 -4.8 -4.0<br />

Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook database.<br />

1<br />

Only net loans<br />

2<br />

Weighted average. General government budget weighted by PPP <strong>of</strong> GDP, current account balance in USD-<br />

weighted GDP<br />

44


Plenary session<br />

45


EXPERIENCES AND TENDENCIES OF DECENTRALIZATION AT REGIONAL<br />

LEVEL IN THE EUROPEAN UNION<br />

Dodescu Anca<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences, adodescu@uoradea.ro<br />

Abstrasct: Romania's integration into the European Union requires, in addition to the complex<br />

process <strong>of</strong> policy transfer, learning new ways to make policies characteristic to a culture <strong>of</strong> a multilevel<br />

governance and <strong>of</strong> partnerships. From the different levels <strong>of</strong> governance <strong>of</strong> the European<br />

model, the regional level ("regional governance") reflects most accurately, in our opinion, the<br />

complexity <strong>of</strong> reconfiguring the state's role in economy, at the beginning <strong>of</strong> this new millennium, in<br />

the European Union, and presents the greatest practical importance for Romania, as a new Member<br />

State in the European Union, as at the regional level structures are more flexible, and best practices<br />

more quickly assimilated. The selection <strong>of</strong> the best economic policies <strong>of</strong> regional growth and<br />

development, the choice <strong>of</strong> objectives from a number <strong>of</strong> competing options, the calibration <strong>of</strong><br />

powers, roles, competences and responsibilities, in time and space, and the promotion <strong>of</strong> solutions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the win-win type require resorting to and combination <strong>of</strong> appropriate and effective tools.<br />

Illustrative <strong>of</strong> the new context, the policy <strong>of</strong> regional growth and development must incorporate, in<br />

Romania as well, more knowledge, more creativity, new combinations <strong>of</strong> skills and new areas <strong>of</strong><br />

expertise. This paper presents the preliminary results <strong>of</strong> the research related to a post-doctoral<br />

research project: "Economic policies for regional growth and development. Challenges for<br />

Romania in the context <strong>of</strong> economic-financial crisis and integration into the European model",<br />

developed within the project "Economic scientific research, support <strong>of</strong> the welfare and human<br />

development in the European context", financed during 2010-2013 from the European Social Fund<br />

(ESF) and implemented by the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Economic Research "Costin C. Kiriţescu" <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Romanian Academy, from December 1, 2010, to November 30, 2012, coordinator: pr<strong>of</strong>. Valeriu<br />

Ioan Franc, PhD. The question we intend to answer in the present stage <strong>of</strong> our research, based on<br />

the comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> the decentralization systems <strong>of</strong> several Member States <strong>of</strong> the European<br />

Union, as well as on the analysis <strong>of</strong> regional disparities existing at the European Union level and <strong>of</strong><br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> economic integration, is - to what extent should the competences <strong>of</strong> the regional policy<br />

be concentrated in the hands <strong>of</strong> the regional authorities or <strong>of</strong> the European Union rather than to be<br />

left individually to the Member States so as they may develop their own regional policy? What we<br />

pursue in this paper, based on the analysis <strong>of</strong> experiences <strong>of</strong> decentralization <strong>of</strong> economic policy<br />

competences at the level <strong>of</strong> the European Union, is the identification <strong>of</strong> the regional implications <strong>of</strong><br />

intermingling tendencies <strong>of</strong> decentralization, centralization, respectively supranationalization and,<br />

implicitly, the analysis <strong>of</strong> the manner <strong>of</strong> reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> the state’s role in economy at the<br />

regional level, in the context <strong>of</strong> integration into the European model. The research into the manner<br />

<strong>of</strong> reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> the state’s role in economy at a regional level requires a review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

allocative, distributive and regulatory role <strong>of</strong> the state, from a the regional perspective, the analysis<br />

on the one hand, <strong>of</strong> the decentralization <strong>of</strong> economic policy competences from the national to the<br />

regional level (e.g. national level: provision <strong>of</strong> pure public goods, such as national defence and<br />

centralization <strong>of</strong> fiscal policy competences in order to achieve macroeconomic stability and income<br />

redistribution; regional level: provision <strong>of</strong> mixed public goods, such as waste collection and<br />

community police), on the other hand, centralization / supranationalization <strong>of</strong> regional competences<br />

at the level <strong>of</strong> the European Union.<br />

Keywords: the role <strong>of</strong> the state in economy, decentralization, European governance,<br />

regionalization, regional governance.<br />

JEL Classification: F15, H4, H5, H7, R5<br />

47


The concept <strong>of</strong> decentralization<br />

In the broad sense <strong>of</strong> the term,<br />

decentralization means the transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

authority or responsibility, duties or<br />

competences from the level <strong>of</strong> central public<br />

administration or central government to a<br />

lower level or from the public sector to the<br />

private sector or to non-governmental<br />

organizations. As defined by the World Bank,<br />

decentralization means “the transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

authority and responsibility for public<br />

functions from the central government to<br />

intermediate and local governments or<br />

quasi-independent government<br />

organizations and/or the private sector”<br />

(The World Bank Group, 2011). As the<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> competences always involves the<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> financial and human resources as<br />

well, decentralization raises not only<br />

problems <strong>of</strong> a political, administrative nature<br />

but also <strong>of</strong> economic, fiscal etc. Depending<br />

on the predominance <strong>of</strong> one or other <strong>of</strong> these<br />

aspects, the literature marks the following<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> decentralization: administrative<br />

(whose sub-forms in ascending order <strong>of</strong> the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> decentralization are:<br />

deconcentration, delegation, devolution),<br />

economic, fiscal and political, noting that<br />

these forms are obviously interrelated. If the<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> competences does not exceed the<br />

public sector, according to the lower level to<br />

which the duties or powers are transferred,<br />

one can speak <strong>of</strong> different levels <strong>of</strong><br />

decentralization - territorial, regional, local<br />

level etc. If the transfer <strong>of</strong> powers is from<br />

public to private sector or to NGOs, we talk<br />

about privatization and denationalization.<br />

The reasons why decentralization is brought<br />

into public debate and implemented are<br />

various. Widely debated in the literature, the<br />

reasons for decentralization can be classified,<br />

in our opinion, in three categories. The first<br />

category is related to malfunctions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

public administration or <strong>of</strong> the central<br />

government which leads to lack <strong>of</strong> response<br />

or low sensitivity to local needs: poor<br />

allocation <strong>of</strong> resources, public services absent<br />

48<br />

or defective at a local level, inequities <strong>of</strong><br />

redistribution at the territorial level,<br />

blockages in the central decision making;<br />

poor planning and control <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />

and social activities, excessive bureaucracy,<br />

low efficiency, flexibility and innovativeness<br />

<strong>of</strong> public policies; low quality <strong>of</strong> public<br />

services etc. Another category <strong>of</strong> reasons for<br />

decentralization are crises: political crises<br />

(ethnic or religious conflicts, difficult postconflict<br />

situations, states <strong>of</strong> war etc.), or<br />

economic crises, implicitly fiscal, budgetary<br />

crises etc. Finally, reasons for<br />

decentralization are also represented by<br />

transitions from authoritarian political<br />

systems to democratic systems, from the<br />

system <strong>of</strong> commanded economy to the market<br />

economy etc., even the process <strong>of</strong> a state’s<br />

integration into the European Union (EU) is a<br />

form <strong>of</strong> transition.<br />

Whatever, though, the reasons <strong>of</strong><br />

decentralization, it is widely admitted that<br />

politics is the driving force behind it (Eaton et<br />

al., 2010). The typical political objectives<br />

pursued in the process <strong>of</strong> decentralization are<br />

to increase the capacity <strong>of</strong> political response<br />

and to broaden participation in political,<br />

economic and social activities at the<br />

territorial, regional or local level. Whatever<br />

their form, size etc., decentralization requires<br />

a change in the institutional rules <strong>of</strong><br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> resources and responsibilities<br />

between different levels <strong>of</strong> government,<br />

implicitly changes in power and authority<br />

and, as highlighted by Kent Eaton, Kai Kaiser<br />

and Paul Smoke – as always when power and<br />

authority are at stake – decentralization<br />

creates controversy and heated debate,<br />

regarding the justification <strong>of</strong> the need <strong>of</strong> a<br />

decentralization process, the objectives<br />

pursued, the reform involved, the possible<br />

disadvantages etc. (Eaton et al., 2010).<br />

The debate about decentralization is not new.<br />

In the EU, subject to our analysis, in the last<br />

two decades <strong>of</strong> the last century,<br />

decentralization was <strong>of</strong>ten put forward, on the


one hand, as a result <strong>of</strong> the crisis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Welfare State, leading to various experiences<br />

<strong>of</strong> reform through decentralization, the<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> competences involved being, in<br />

this case, <strong>of</strong> the type central-local or<br />

nationalization-privatization, on the other<br />

hand, as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the fragmentation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the power <strong>of</strong> the nation-state and<br />

reconfiguration on various levels <strong>of</strong> the<br />

state’s role in the economy in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

the process <strong>of</strong> integration into EU (Dodescu,<br />

2011), further implying a transfer <strong>of</strong> powers<br />

<strong>of</strong> the central-regional and centralsupranational<br />

type.<br />

At present, under the economic-financial<br />

crisis, the reverse phenomenon <strong>of</strong><br />

centralization gains ground, confirming the<br />

validity, on a long term, <strong>of</strong> the theories on the<br />

cyclicality <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> the state’s<br />

involvement in the economy (Dobrescu,<br />

1992), on the “pendular movement” State-<br />

Market or nationalization-denationalization<br />

(Dogan and Pelasy, 1992) or on the “political<br />

pendulum” that moves between the nationaltransnational-global-European<br />

arenas,<br />

depending on the relative attraction force <strong>of</strong><br />

these magnetic fields (Wallace and Wallace,<br />

2000).<br />

In our opinion, as the days <strong>of</strong> the controversy<br />

State versus Market, in the sense <strong>of</strong> the<br />

“mirror approach”, have passed, so has the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> the polemic Centralization versus<br />

Decentralization. Located in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

globalization and instability, the debate on<br />

decentralization should take into<br />

consideration the change <strong>of</strong> governance levels<br />

and “locations” (Wallace and Wallace, 2000),<br />

the increase <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> the sub-national<br />

actors (Sharma, 2008, 2011). It is more likely<br />

the “time” <strong>of</strong> networks, partnerships,<br />

multitude <strong>of</strong> actors and interests. This trend is<br />

present both globally and at the EU level. As<br />

the World Bank showed in its reports, an<br />

appropriate balance <strong>of</strong> centralization and<br />

decentralization is essential for effective and<br />

efficient functioning <strong>of</strong> government. This<br />

49<br />

translates into balance in decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />

functions and responsibilities, on the one<br />

hand, and centralization <strong>of</strong> the roles <strong>of</strong><br />

coordination and supervision, on the other.<br />

The combination <strong>of</strong> functions resulting –<br />

decentralized responsibilities with centralized<br />

roles <strong>of</strong> coordination and monitoring – should<br />

allow strengthening <strong>of</strong> the institutional<br />

capacity at a local level and effective<br />

management <strong>of</strong> decentralized functions in<br />

partnership between local actors - local<br />

governments, local private enterprises, local<br />

NGOs etc. and central actors involved in<br />

planning, coordination etc. (The World Bank<br />

Group, 2011). Moreover, in the EU context –<br />

<strong>of</strong> an emphasis on the role <strong>of</strong> networks in<br />

developing and implementing policies, <strong>of</strong> an<br />

assertion <strong>of</strong> the “multi-level policy networks”<br />

(Börzel, 1997), unlike the traditional analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> decentralization, focusing in particular on<br />

the political, administrative and fiscal<br />

dimensions, or on the provision <strong>of</strong> services,<br />

emphasis is on the interdependences between<br />

the levels concerned with decentralization, in<br />

particular, respectively on the<br />

interdependences between actors (partners,<br />

the parties interested and the multipliers)<br />

involved (European Commission, 2007).<br />

We next undertake is to analyse the<br />

reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> state’s role in economy at<br />

a regional level, in the economic literature<br />

devoted to decentralization and in the context<br />

<strong>of</strong> the European model, in order to identify<br />

the regional implications <strong>of</strong> the<br />

interpenetration <strong>of</strong> the tendencies <strong>of</strong><br />

decentralization, centralization, respectively<br />

supranationalization. Consideration on how<br />

to reconfigure the state's role in economy at a<br />

regional level requires review <strong>of</strong> the state’s<br />

allocative, distributive and regulatory roles<br />

(Dodescu, 2000) from the regional<br />

perspective, the analysis, on the one hand, <strong>of</strong><br />

the decentralization from the national to the<br />

regional level (e.g. national level: provision<br />

<strong>of</strong> pure public goods, such as national<br />

defence and fiscal policy and centralization <strong>of</strong><br />

fiscal policy competences in order to achieve


macroeconomic stability and income<br />

redistribution; regional level: the provision <strong>of</strong><br />

mixed public goods as for example, sewage<br />

collection and community police), on the<br />

other hand, centralization in the sense <strong>of</strong><br />

supranationalization, regional competences at<br />

the EU level.<br />

The economic approach <strong>of</strong> decentralization.<br />

Examination <strong>of</strong> the way <strong>of</strong> reconfiguring the<br />

state’s allocative, distributive and the<br />

regulatory role in economy at regional level<br />

The economic literature dedicated to<br />

decentralization studies the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

different types <strong>of</strong> decentralization on<br />

efficiency, equity and/or economic<br />

equilibrium in order to define the optimal<br />

level <strong>of</strong> government decentralization based on<br />

comparing the advantages and disadvantages<br />

<strong>of</strong> different solutions for decentralization.<br />

The economic objectives pursued in the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> decentralization <strong>of</strong> production,<br />

distribution, financing etc. <strong>of</strong> goods or<br />

services at regional or local level can coincide<br />

with political objectives typical for<br />

decentralization: increased political<br />

responsiveness and participation at the<br />

territorial, regional or local level. As<br />

remarked by Kent Eaton, Kai Kaiser and Paul<br />

Smoke –“fortunately, the decentralization<br />

may be one <strong>of</strong> those situations when politics<br />

and economy can serve the same purpose”<br />

(Eaton et al., 2010). This statement should<br />

not, however, lead to too high a dose <strong>of</strong><br />

optimism.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> classical economic theory, the<br />

market is the ultimate form <strong>of</strong><br />

decentralization. At the other extreme, one<br />

might consider that the state is automatically<br />

responsible for producing and distributing<br />

public goods or services. In practice,<br />

however, the market can <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong>ten more<br />

efficient solutions than the state in the<br />

production or distribution <strong>of</strong> public goods.<br />

Also, local or regional solutions may be more<br />

effective than the central ones. On the other<br />

50<br />

hand, still in practice, if not well chosen, local<br />

solutions can cause loss <strong>of</strong> economies <strong>of</strong> scale<br />

for public services, failure in the production,<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> public services due to low<br />

administrative or technical capacity at local<br />

level. Clearly, we are talking here <strong>of</strong> the<br />

state’s allocative role and <strong>of</strong> the objective <strong>of</strong><br />

efficient resources allocation. At the same<br />

time, by decentralization the equitable<br />

distribution may be affected by providing<br />

social services that prove inadequate or do<br />

not reach all those “in need”. The cause may<br />

be the transfer <strong>of</strong> responsibilities without<br />

adequate financial resources. In this case, we<br />

talk about the state’s distributive role and<br />

about the objective <strong>of</strong> social equity. Finally,<br />

the state’s regulatory role subordinated to the<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> economic equilibrium can be<br />

affected when, for example, the coordination<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic policies moves from the hands<br />

<strong>of</strong> central government to the hands <strong>of</strong><br />

regional government and this fact deteriorates<br />

the credit conditions and the possibilities to<br />

cover budget deficits at regional level or to<br />

the hands <strong>of</strong> local government and this<br />

transfer gives way to corruption at local level.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> theory, there are some established<br />

principles underlying decentralization, a<br />

fugitive foray into their world being based on<br />

Stigler’s principles (1957) that the decisionmaking<br />

should be placed at the lowest level<br />

<strong>of</strong> government in accordance with the<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> the efficient allocation <strong>of</strong><br />

resources, the degree <strong>of</strong> decentralization<br />

being determined by the extent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economies <strong>of</strong> scale and the effects <strong>of</strong> the type<br />

“spill-over” (benefits-costs); on Olson’ s<br />

principle, characteristic to the Public Choice<br />

School, whereby small groups <strong>of</strong> powerful<br />

interests are more efficient in absorbing<br />

public funds (Olson, 1969), on Oates’s<br />

theorem <strong>of</strong> decentralization according to<br />

which every public service should be<br />

provided at that level <strong>of</strong> government that has<br />

control over the minimum geographic area<br />

able to internalize the corresponding costs<br />

and benefits (Oates, 1972), on the principle <strong>of</strong>


subsidiarity as set by the Maastricht Treaty<br />

(1992), whose purpose is to ensure that<br />

decisions in the EU are taken at a level as<br />

close to the citizens as possible. The<br />

theoretical perspectives according to which<br />

the decentralization issue is addressed are: the<br />

traditional fiscal federalism and The New<br />

Public Management - which focus their<br />

attention on the so-called “market failures”<br />

and on the ability to deliver public goods<br />

efficiently and equitably, the Public Choice<br />

School and the Economic Institutionalism -<br />

which focus on “government failures”,<br />

respectively the approach <strong>of</strong> the “network<br />

governance” type (Shah, 2006).<br />

Defining government decentralization,<br />

considered economically, as a process <strong>of</strong><br />

transfer and distribution <strong>of</strong> state duties in the<br />

field <strong>of</strong> public expenditure and revenue, from<br />

national to local or regional level, we try to<br />

point out the specific aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

decentralization, at a regional level, in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> the three roles <strong>of</strong> the State: allocative,<br />

distributive and regulatory.<br />

a). Regional decentralization and optimal<br />

allocation <strong>of</strong> resources<br />

In what the the state’s allocative role is<br />

concerned, the analysis <strong>of</strong> the regional<br />

decentralization focuses mainly on collective<br />

goods (public) goods. According to the<br />

current acceptation regarding a democratic<br />

state, the number <strong>of</strong> collective goods<br />

produced centrally needs to decrease and to<br />

be restricted mainly to pure collective goods:<br />

army, security, foreign policy, justice etc. Not<br />

all collective goods, however, must be<br />

decentralized in the same way or at the same<br />

level. The state’s role (<strong>of</strong> the central<br />

government) and the limits <strong>of</strong><br />

decentralization in ensuring the provision <strong>of</strong><br />

collective goods depend, first, on the nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> these goods and services, on the economies<br />

<strong>of</strong> scale affecting the technical efficiency and<br />

on the extent <strong>of</strong> the spillover effects, beyond<br />

jurisdictional boundaries, and on the structure<br />

51<br />

<strong>of</strong> competition in producing or delivering a<br />

particular public good or service. Therefore,<br />

choosing a solution <strong>of</strong> decentralization or a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> solutions such as<br />

decentralized - managed competition -<br />

privatization etc. starts from the assessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the lowest level <strong>of</strong> governmental<br />

organization, at which the public good or<br />

service can be produced and delivered<br />

effectively, or <strong>of</strong> the most appropriate forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> privatization (The World Bank Group,<br />

2011).<br />

The possibilities <strong>of</strong> decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />

collective goods supply depends primarily on<br />

their effect <strong>of</strong> overflow (spatial opening <strong>of</strong><br />

their externalities), respectively on the nonrivalry<br />

<strong>of</strong> their consumption (the possibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> their being used by a large number <strong>of</strong><br />

people without an additional production cost;<br />

a person’s consumption doesn’t reduce by<br />

anything the amount available for all others,<br />

and is therefore non-rival to the consumption<br />

<strong>of</strong> others), respectively non-exclusion <strong>of</strong> their<br />

consumption (implies that the supplier <strong>of</strong> the<br />

collective good is unable to exclude someone<br />

from the consumption <strong>of</strong> these goods<br />

reserving that right to those who will pay a<br />

price, so, once produced, the collective good<br />

is available to all, free <strong>of</strong> charge). While<br />

some collective goods are only beneficial in<br />

the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the geographical area <strong>of</strong> their<br />

place <strong>of</strong> production (local police, street<br />

lighting, coastal lighthouse for navigation,<br />

traffic lights etc.), others have a wider spatial<br />

opening <strong>of</strong> their externalities - regional (road<br />

or rail transport, postal service,<br />

telecommunications, higher education etc.) or<br />

national (national defence, justice etc.). The<br />

first category - local collective goods - is<br />

consumed exclusively at the level <strong>of</strong> a local<br />

community. The indivisible nature <strong>of</strong> these<br />

goods and their optional use create<br />

redistributive externalities (for example, those<br />

who never go out at night bear the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

lighting public without having a benefit in<br />

exchange), but these do not go beyond local<br />

boundaries, existing the possibility to


"internalize" them at a local level, the<br />

production in an optimal quantity at the local<br />

community level being possible without the<br />

externalities affecting neighbouring<br />

communities. In contrast, there are national<br />

collective goods, whose benefits are shared<br />

equally among all inhabitants <strong>of</strong> a country.<br />

The most illustrative example is the national<br />

defence, for which the risks and externalities<br />

<strong>of</strong> a possible decentralization are obvious for<br />

communities not large enough to internalize<br />

externalities. Between the two extremes we<br />

can fit the regional collective goods whose<br />

externalities extend beyond local boundaries,<br />

but which are consumed unevenly.<br />

Decentralization <strong>of</strong> their <strong>of</strong>fer is only possible<br />

if the region is large enough to internalize the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> an overflow, with the risk <strong>of</strong><br />

insufficient supply, while centralization <strong>of</strong><br />

their <strong>of</strong>fer involves a uniformity that neglects<br />

the regional differences between the tastes<br />

and needs <strong>of</strong> the population, causing<br />

allocational and redistributive externalities.<br />

(Atkinson and Stiglitz, 1980; Brown and<br />

Jackson, 1990; Weber, 1991; Black et al.,<br />

2009).<br />

b). Regional decentralization and equitable<br />

distribution<br />

From the perspective <strong>of</strong> the state’s<br />

distributive role, regional decentralization<br />

should be analyzed according to its potential<br />

impact on the choice <strong>of</strong> domicile (emigration<br />

/ immigration) and on the firms’ location. If,<br />

for example, a regional government decides<br />

to operate a redistribution effort much higher<br />

than that <strong>of</strong> the neighbouring community,<br />

applying a very progressive taxation, the<br />

community at stake will face a phenomenon<br />

<strong>of</strong> emigration <strong>of</strong> people receiving an income<br />

higher than average to communities with<br />

lighter taxation coupled with an opposite<br />

phenomenon, the immigration <strong>of</strong> the poor.<br />

Similarly, there may be a phenomenon <strong>of</strong><br />

delocalisation <strong>of</strong> firms. For the community<br />

concerned this policy will therefore have a<br />

boomerang effect, because it will increase its<br />

52<br />

costs and diminish its revenue at the same<br />

time. Consequently, the national competence<br />

on the redistribution plan depends on the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the following parameters: the<br />

amplitude <strong>of</strong> the redistributive correction; the<br />

disparity <strong>of</strong> the redistribution efforts<br />

undertaken by neighbouring communities, the<br />

spatial mobility <strong>of</strong> economic agents. The<br />

reduced mobility <strong>of</strong> economic agents or the<br />

strong attachment <strong>of</strong> individuals or firms to a<br />

region can counterbalance this boomerang<br />

effect. Therefore, decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />

redistributive policy determines, with the<br />

price <strong>of</strong> a greater vertical equity, a horizontal<br />

inequity, the decentralization chances being<br />

small and dependent on the spatial mobility<br />

<strong>of</strong> the economic agents, on the size and<br />

homogeneity <strong>of</strong> the regional community, in<br />

order to practice, within certain limits, an<br />

active policy <strong>of</strong> redistribution (Atkinson and<br />

Stiglitz, 1980; Brown and Jackson, 1990;<br />

Weber, 1991; Black et al., 2009).<br />

c). Regional decentralization and economic<br />

equilibrium<br />

From the perspective <strong>of</strong> the state’s regulatory<br />

role, the regional decentralization analysis<br />

must start from the indisputable fact that the<br />

economic equilibrium shows the<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> a national collective good,<br />

due to the spatial openness <strong>of</strong> its externalities.<br />

Even though their intensity varies from one<br />

region to another, the fluctuations in<br />

economic activity and the economic<br />

imbalances concern the national economy as<br />

a whole, therefore, the decentralization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stabilization policy increases the risk that a<br />

region shall benefit from the stabilization<br />

effort <strong>of</strong> others without doing anything in<br />

exchange. On the other hand, the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

regional stabilization policy is the weaker for<br />

the region concerned, the more open it is, the<br />

multiplier effect being only partial, because a<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the induced demand addresses a<br />

production made outside the region,<br />

respectively, the higher national capital<br />

mobility is, which deteriorates the conditions


<strong>of</strong> loan at a regional level and the possibilities<br />

to cover budget deficits (Atkinson and<br />

Stiglitz, 1980; Brown and Jackson, 1990;<br />

Weber, 1991; Black et al., 2009).<br />

In conclusion, the analysis <strong>of</strong> decentralization<br />

at a regional level in terms <strong>of</strong> the three roles<br />

<strong>of</strong> the state, according to the theory <strong>of</strong> fiscal<br />

federalism, leads to a rather simple allocation<br />

scheme - the distributive and regulatory role<br />

are preferable at a central level, the allocative<br />

role being shareable or possible to<br />

decentralize in accordance with the spatial<br />

openness <strong>of</strong> the externalities <strong>of</strong> collective<br />

goods, respectively with the characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

non-rivalry and non-exclusion <strong>of</strong> their<br />

consumption.<br />

Decentralization at the regional level in the<br />

EU. Trends<br />

The decentralization <strong>of</strong> the responsibilities <strong>of</strong><br />

governments in the EU must be considered in<br />

the context <strong>of</strong> the fiscal federalism and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subsidiarity principle, according to the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> the Maastricht Treaty. The<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> traditional fiscal federalism<br />

involves an administrative organization<br />

structured on three levels: federal, state, local<br />

and, implicitly, a division <strong>of</strong> fiscal<br />

responsibilities between the three levels. The<br />

specificity <strong>of</strong> the EU - as an entity that tends<br />

to become a federal state is linked to adding<br />

the regional level to the three levels <strong>of</strong> the<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> traditional fiscal federalism. Thus,<br />

at present, in the EU there are the following<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> government: union, national states,<br />

regions, local authorities (usually counties<br />

and municipalities).The allocation <strong>of</strong> powers<br />

at the appropriate level in accordance with the<br />

principle <strong>of</strong> subsidiarity stipulated by the<br />

Treaty <strong>of</strong> Maastricht answers to criticisms<br />

about the many overlaps between the upper<br />

and lower levels and to the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong><br />

the administrative arrangements from a<br />

Member State to another, hence a tendency <strong>of</strong><br />

supranationalization <strong>of</strong> competences <strong>of</strong> the<br />

national states (governments) manifesting<br />

53<br />

simultaneously at the EU level, along with<br />

the decentralization <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> their other<br />

competences to lower levels (regional and<br />

local). The principle <strong>of</strong> subsidiarity is<br />

intended to ensure that decision-making in<br />

the European Union is as closer to the citizen<br />

as possible and to validate the need for action<br />

at community level considering the<br />

possibilities existing at national, regional or<br />

local level. According to The Treaty <strong>of</strong><br />

Maastricht (Article 3b) “The Community<br />

shall act within the powers conferred and<br />

objectives assigned to it by this Treaty. In<br />

areas not within its exclusive competence, the<br />

Community shall take no action, in<br />

accordance with the principle <strong>of</strong> subsidiarity<br />

only if and ins<strong>of</strong>ar as the objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposed action cannot be achieved<br />

satisfactorily by the Member States, but can<br />

be better achieved at community level due to<br />

the extent or the effects <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

action.” Relative to the state’s roles in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> fiscal federalism and subsidiarity<br />

principle, according to the provision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Maastricht Treaty, the supranational<br />

(European) level is in charge with<br />

coordinating the stabilization policy, its<br />

management being a competence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Member States, and with coordinating the<br />

territorial redistribution so as to ensure that<br />

all regions <strong>of</strong> the EU <strong>of</strong>fer equal opportunities<br />

and uniform provisions <strong>of</strong> certain basic<br />

services, the Member States and the local<br />

communities maintaining their<br />

responsibilities for managing social policy<br />

and income redistribution to suit the<br />

preferences <strong>of</strong> each community (Oates, 2001;<br />

Majocchi, 2008). Therefore, the regulatory<br />

role is centralized and shared between the<br />

national level (management) and<br />

supranational (coordination), the distributive<br />

role is mostly centralized and shared between<br />

the national level (management) and<br />

supranational (coordination) and<br />

decentralized at a regional and local level,<br />

depending on the possibilities to meet local<br />

community preferences. Regarding the<br />

allocative role, as already noted, this is the


one that best meets the requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

decentralization, depending on the<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> the collective goods, at a<br />

supranational level, here concentrating all<br />

efforts to strengthen the internal, single<br />

market.<br />

Practically, the European Union’s vision on<br />

the policy implementation is a decentralized<br />

one, <strong>of</strong> the “network” type, <strong>of</strong> a nonhierarchical<br />

nature, and involving subnational,<br />

national and supranational actors.<br />

Following the debates within the European<br />

Union, on “European governance”, starting<br />

from the White Paper on European<br />

Governance, adopted in July 2001, which<br />

defines clearly the five levels <strong>of</strong> governance:<br />

global, European, national, regional and<br />

local (European Commission, 2001) and<br />

describes the geographical decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />

the EU policy and the sharing <strong>of</strong> powers and<br />

responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the type EU - member<br />

states - regions (European Commission,<br />

2002), continuing with the debate on the<br />

Future <strong>of</strong> Europe, the European Constitution<br />

and the Lisbon Treaty and, more recently, the<br />

2020 Strategy, one can clearly notice the<br />

increase in the capacity <strong>of</strong> supranational<br />

regulation along with the decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />

powers <strong>of</strong> economic policy at a regional<br />

level, the implementation <strong>of</strong> the principle <strong>of</strong><br />

subsidiarity and the emphasis <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong><br />

networks in developing and implementing<br />

European policies (European Commission,<br />

2001, 2003a, 2005, 2007, 2010).<br />

However, beyond the complexity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> transformation <strong>of</strong> the “European<br />

governance” into a “network type<br />

governance” (Dodescu, 2011), in terms <strong>of</strong> a<br />

future federal state, the tendency <strong>of</strong><br />

supranationalization merely means an<br />

increase in the EU powers, it being added<br />

with further performance <strong>of</strong> the three roles <strong>of</strong><br />

the national state described by the public<br />

economy: allocative role (currently seen in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> strengthening the internal market<br />

and in view <strong>of</strong> the federal state, including<br />

54<br />

defence, research and development and<br />

European transport network etc.), distributive<br />

role (social protection and struggle against<br />

poverty), the regulatory role (the<br />

coordination <strong>of</strong> macroeconomic policy<br />

aiming at stability at the Union level). With a<br />

view to the European federal state, the roles<br />

<strong>of</strong> national governments are simplified,<br />

comprising the legal framework, ensuring<br />

public order, national infrastructure, public<br />

administration, regional distribution, public<br />

loans etc., while education, health, local<br />

transportation and other services <strong>of</strong> local<br />

interest will be responsibilities <strong>of</strong> local<br />

governments.<br />

Decentralization at a regional level in the<br />

EU. Experiences<br />

In the EU states, the regional level covers<br />

different political and administrative realities,<br />

being the result <strong>of</strong> a process <strong>of</strong><br />

decentralization that combines the specificity<br />

<strong>of</strong> organization <strong>of</strong> state power in relation to<br />

the territory and the historical evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

that state, to the requirement imposed by the<br />

EU <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> a sub-national<br />

administrative level but higher than the local<br />

one. For the EU, the need <strong>of</strong> a regional level<br />

is linked, primarily, to the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

financial assistance given by the regional<br />

policy, secondly, to the prospect<br />

transformation <strong>of</strong> the EU into a federal state<br />

and the high degree <strong>of</strong> autonomy granted to<br />

this level within federalism.<br />

From the perspective <strong>of</strong> historical<br />

developments <strong>of</strong> the European states, <strong>of</strong> how<br />

nation-states were formed, federalism,<br />

however, is rather an exception than a rule,<br />

Switzerland, Germany (established in the 19 th<br />

century), Austria and Belgium (established in<br />

the 20 th century, in 1920, respectively in<br />

1993) being the only federal states in Europe.<br />

Most European countries were founded as<br />

and are up to now unitary states. Obviously,<br />

in the EU, the regional level enjoys the<br />

greatest autonomy and knows the fastest


growth within the federal states (Germany,<br />

Austria, Belgium) or regional (Spain, Italy<br />

and, in some parts <strong>of</strong> the territory, in Great<br />

Britain and Portugal) - intermediate structures<br />

between the federal and unitary state. For the<br />

opposite, the regional level has a reduced<br />

autonomy, existing only for administrative<br />

reasons or as a response to the need <strong>of</strong><br />

implementing the EU regional policy within<br />

the unitary states (France, Netherlands,<br />

Greece, Ireland etc.).<br />

The administrative-territorial structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

EU Member States is extremely<br />

heterogeneous and comprises generally a<br />

local level (towns, villages) and two main<br />

regional levels structured, organized and<br />

named differently from country to country,<br />

for example, “Lander” and “Kreise” in<br />

Germany, “Regions” and “Departaments” in<br />

France, “Standard regions” and “Counties” in<br />

the UK, “Regioni” and “Provincie” in Italy<br />

etc. The launch <strong>of</strong> the regional policy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

EC in 1975 met the impossibility <strong>of</strong><br />

comparative assessment <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />

situation in different regions as a basis for<br />

Community intervention to correct regional<br />

imbalances. Therefore, to ensure comparable<br />

statistics at European level, the EU has<br />

developed and regulated The Nomenclature<br />

<strong>of</strong> Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS)<br />

(European Commission, 2003), a standard <strong>of</strong><br />

geographical coding regarding subdivisions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the States defined for statistical purposes,<br />

instrumental in the mechanism <strong>of</strong> allocation<br />

<strong>of</strong> structural funds. NUTS establishes in each<br />

Member State at least three hierarchical<br />

levels: NUTS 1 (“Gewesten / Regions” in<br />

Belgium, “Länder” in Germany,<br />

“Continente”, “Região dos Açores”, “Região<br />

da Madeira” in Portugal, “Scotland, Wales,<br />

Northern Ireland”, “Government Office<br />

Regions <strong>of</strong> England” in the UK), NUTS 2<br />

(“Provincies / Provinces” in Belgium,<br />

“Regierungsbezirke” in Germany,<br />

“Periferies” in Greece, “Comundidades y<br />

ciudades autónomas” in Spain, “Régions” in<br />

France, “Regions” in Ireland, “Regioni” in<br />

55<br />

Italy, “Provincies” in the Netherlands,<br />

“Länder” in Austria), NUTS 3<br />

(“Arrondissements” in Belgium,<br />

“Amtskommuner” in Denmark; “Kreise /<br />

kreisfreie Städte” in Germany, “Nomoi” in<br />

Greece, “Provincias” in Spain,<br />

“Départements” in France, “Regional<br />

authority regions” in Ireland, “Provincie” in<br />

Italy, “Län” in Sweden, “Maakunnat /<br />

landskapen” in Finland). The heterogeneity<br />

continues at the level lower than NUTS 3 as<br />

well, <strong>of</strong> the ‘small administrative units’:<br />

“Gemeenten / Communes” in Belgium,<br />

“Kommuner” in Denmark, “Gemeinden” in<br />

Germany, “Demoi / Koinotites” in Greece,<br />

“Municipios” in Spain, “Communes” in<br />

France, “Counties / County boroughs” in<br />

Ireland, “Comuni” in Italy, “Communes” in<br />

Luxembourg, “Gemeenten” in the<br />

Netherlands, “Gemeinden” in Austria,<br />

“Freguesias” in Portugal, “Kunnat /<br />

Kommuner” in Finland, “Kommuner” in<br />

Sweden and “Wards” in the UK etc.<br />

(European Commission, 2003b, 2008, 2011).<br />

Therefore, for the European Union, the need<br />

for choosing a standard unit, as the basic unit<br />

for its regional policy is more than obvious. It<br />

was elected the development region -<br />

standard unit with an average size <strong>of</strong> 13,000<br />

square kilometres and a population <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 2.5 million inhabitants, i.e. the<br />

intermediate level – NUTS 2. According to<br />

the EC, the development region should not<br />

necessarily have an administrative character,<br />

but it was compulsorily created in all EU<br />

Member States in order to allow<br />

comparability, harmonization <strong>of</strong> regional<br />

statistics <strong>of</strong> member countries, performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> analyses at a regional level within the EU<br />

and elaboration <strong>of</strong> Community regional<br />

strategies, policies and programs. The<br />

competition to attract structural funds<br />

triggered in time, as, in fact, the EC foresaw<br />

initially, a tendency to amplify competition<br />

not so much between Member States, but<br />

between regions <strong>of</strong> the same state or <strong>of</strong><br />

different states, led to the occurrence <strong>of</strong> new


egional actors such as associations <strong>of</strong><br />

regions, independent from the national states,<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> regional lobby. At<br />

Community level, the emergence in 1985 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Assembly <strong>of</strong> European Regions, and in<br />

1992, by the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Maastricht, <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Committee <strong>of</strong> the Regions, are clear elements<br />

in promoting and strengthening the status <strong>of</strong><br />

regions.<br />

Far from being able to speak about regions as<br />

homogeneous entities in the EU, although the<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> region is not a subject <strong>of</strong> this<br />

paper, we shall however note the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

numerous critical voices which argue that<br />

there still is no operational definition <strong>of</strong><br />

region, from a political, juridical and<br />

administrative point <strong>of</strong> view, at the EU level,<br />

that the region is not yet and will not be any<br />

time soon at a general level in the EU, an<br />

administrative-territorial entity endowed with<br />

political representativeness. Therefore, at the<br />

EU level, the regional decentralization can be<br />

described better watching the process <strong>of</strong><br />

regionalization, which according to the<br />

typology <strong>of</strong> particular State, may be linked to<br />

existing regions as administrative-territorial<br />

units or regions created as new territorial<br />

divisions. Analysing comparatively the<br />

regionalization as a process aimed at<br />

developing regions as entities located<br />

immediately below the central state and<br />

above the local (sub-national and supra-local)<br />

in the 27 EU Member States (Chirleşan,<br />

2007; Diez, 2006; Stănciulescu and<br />

Androniceanu, 2006; Androniceanu and<br />

Stănciulescu, 2001), we can distinguish five<br />

types <strong>of</strong> regionalization, as follows:<br />

a). Administrative regionalization (easy<br />

administrative decentralization - by<br />

deconcentration) is the type <strong>of</strong><br />

regionalization resulted from the transfer by a<br />

state to local authorities or bodies directly<br />

subordinated to the central government <strong>of</strong><br />

certain tasks regarding the promotion <strong>of</strong><br />

regional economic development by<br />

mobilizing local communities and economic<br />

56<br />

organizations. In most cases, administrative<br />

regionalization is a response to the need to<br />

implement the EU regional policy. The<br />

administrative regionalization characterizes at<br />

present, at the EU level, as a rule, the unitary<br />

states. Among the EU15 Member States, we<br />

can note Greece (where 13 administrative<br />

regions were formed, responsible for regional<br />

development, led by a secretary general <strong>of</strong><br />

the region assisted by an Advisory Regional<br />

Council consisting <strong>of</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong> local<br />

communities, in each administrative region<br />

existing a so-called House <strong>of</strong> regional<br />

development), Portugal (where there were<br />

formed five regional coordinating<br />

commissions responsible for the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the regional development<br />

plan under the authority <strong>of</strong> government), the<br />

UK, except Scotland (known as a<br />

“centralised model” characterized rather by<br />

tendencies <strong>of</strong> centralizing than <strong>of</strong><br />

decentralizing, the importance given to the<br />

regional level began to increase after the<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> the political-administrative<br />

autonomy <strong>of</strong> Scotland, Wales and Northern<br />

Ireland) and Sweden (the regional level has<br />

rather little relevance as compared to the local<br />

level, traditionally very strong in the “state <strong>of</strong><br />

consensus”, the administrative<br />

regionalization appears here under the form<br />

<strong>of</strong> delegating attributions <strong>of</strong> regional<br />

development to a district governor assisted<br />

by an Administration Board in which local<br />

interests are represented; in addition, regional<br />

competences include, primarily, the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> health services and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

system <strong>of</strong> education). The administrative<br />

decentralization also characterized the<br />

following New Member States: Bulgaria,<br />

Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and<br />

Slovenia and knows also a great variety <strong>of</strong><br />

forms. For example, in Estonia there is only<br />

one Estonian Regional Development Agency,<br />

the administrative regionalization is not<br />

reflected by the existence <strong>of</strong> administrative<br />

units or administrative regions, but by the fact<br />

that state's regional development policy is<br />

implemented in the 15 districts by a


governor, in Lithuania – the policy <strong>of</strong><br />

territorial planning and regional development<br />

is managed by a governor at the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

higher administrative units <strong>of</strong> provinces /<br />

departments, in Slovakia there are 8 regions<br />

and 8 <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong> regional administration<br />

responsible for coordinating the activity <strong>of</strong><br />

the local communities in terms <strong>of</strong> regional<br />

development. Luxembourg falls into this<br />

category as a particular case; due to the small<br />

size <strong>of</strong> the state, the four regions created do<br />

not need own institutions.<br />

b). Regionalization by cooperation between<br />

existing local collectivities (average<br />

administrative decentralization - by<br />

delegation) is the type <strong>of</strong> regionalization by<br />

the agency <strong>of</strong> decentralized institutions within<br />

the local authorities, the functions <strong>of</strong> central<br />

government in the field <strong>of</strong> regional<br />

development being taken by the existing local<br />

collectivities. Unlike administrative<br />

regionalization, regionalization through<br />

existing local collectivities supposes effective<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> competences from central<br />

government to the regions created as<br />

institutionalized forms <strong>of</strong> cooperation<br />

between territorial collectivities. This type <strong>of</strong><br />

regionalization is limited both in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

resources and <strong>of</strong> competences and<br />

institutions. At the EU level, this type <strong>of</strong><br />

regionalization characterizes the unitary<br />

states – Denmark (14 provincial communes),<br />

Finland (20 regional councils and the socalled<br />

unions <strong>of</strong> communes), Ireland (8<br />

regional authorities and several specialized<br />

agencies) and – from the New Member States<br />

– Romania (8 development regions<br />

established by law, by voluntary cooperation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the counties, without legal personality and<br />

not being administrative-territorial units, a<br />

Regional Development Agency existing at the<br />

level each <strong>of</strong> them) and Hungary (originally<br />

there were created 8 administrative regions,<br />

which were abandoned in 1994, their<br />

functions being taken over by the provinces,<br />

which may cooperate voluntarily with other<br />

provinces through regional development<br />

57<br />

councils). There is a particular case -<br />

Germany, a federal state characterized by<br />

internal administrative regionalization at the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the lands (cooperation between local<br />

collectivities within the lands).<br />

c). Regional decentralization (advanced<br />

administrative decentralization and average<br />

economic and fiscal decentralization)<br />

supposes the formation <strong>of</strong> regions as new<br />

territorial collectivities superior to the<br />

existing ones, whose competences regard the<br />

regional development. This type <strong>of</strong><br />

regionalization involves changing the<br />

administrative organization <strong>of</strong> the territory by<br />

the emergence <strong>of</strong> a new territorialadministrative<br />

category - the region, <strong>of</strong> the<br />

same juridical form as the existing ones, but<br />

which is part <strong>of</strong> the constitutional order <strong>of</strong> a<br />

unitary state. This type <strong>of</strong> regionalism is<br />

characterized by the absence <strong>of</strong> legislative<br />

power, administrative competence extended<br />

to fields related to regional development and<br />

fiscal power that varies from case to case. At<br />

the EU level, this form <strong>of</strong> regionalization<br />

characterized France (“unitary state in the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> decentralization”, France currently<br />

has 25 regions, constituted as autonomous<br />

communities, as a result <strong>of</strong> decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />

public administration and benefiting from the<br />

principle <strong>of</strong> free administration <strong>of</strong> local<br />

authorities, led by a Regional Council elected<br />

by universal, direct vote, the competences<br />

transferred to the regions following the<br />

decentralization process were the territorial<br />

planning, the pr<strong>of</strong>essional training and the<br />

transportation infrastructure), Sweden<br />

(characterized by a strong tradition <strong>of</strong> local<br />

autonomy, has 20 regions, led by a regional<br />

government that implements the policies<br />

decided by the government, which have their<br />

own competence in managing municipal<br />

hospitals) and as for the New Member States<br />

- Poland (16 provinces, whose leader controls<br />

the respective local community), the Czech<br />

Republic (the formation, under the<br />

Constitution, <strong>of</strong> territorial collectivities <strong>of</strong> a<br />

higher level, in the form <strong>of</strong> 3 regions).


d). Political regionalization (political<br />

decentralization or the so-called “regional<br />

autonomy”) adds legislative power to the<br />

regional decentralization. The regions have<br />

legislative power exercised by a regional<br />

assembly and in order to exercise<br />

competences an executive body is<br />

constituted, which has the features <strong>of</strong> a<br />

regional government. The competences <strong>of</strong> the<br />

region are much broader in this case and are<br />

defined and guaranteed by the Constitution <strong>of</strong><br />

the unitary state. The regions are not<br />

countries and do not have a Constitution and<br />

usually do not participate in the exercise <strong>of</strong><br />

legislative national power by their own<br />

representation. This type <strong>of</strong> regionalization<br />

affects the state’s structures. In the EU, it is<br />

characteristic to the so-called regional states -<br />

characterizing the whole territory in Spain<br />

(the right <strong>of</strong> autonomy <strong>of</strong> the regions is<br />

recognized and guaranteed by the Spanish<br />

Constitution – the state’s structure is based on<br />

the indissoluble unity <strong>of</strong> the Spanish nation<br />

and also on the recognition and guarantee <strong>of</strong><br />

the right <strong>of</strong> the regions’ autonomy), Italy<br />

(under the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Italy, the Italian<br />

Republic, unique and indivisible, recognizes,<br />

at the same time, the autonomy <strong>of</strong> the regions<br />

by adapting legislative principles and<br />

methods to the requirements <strong>of</strong> autonomy and<br />

decentralization, the regions have the power<br />

to adopt primary legislation and enjoy<br />

financial autonomy) or only certain parts <strong>of</strong><br />

the territory in the UK (Scotland in particular)<br />

and Portugal (the islands). This type <strong>of</strong><br />

regionalization does not characterize,<br />

currently, any <strong>of</strong> the New Member States.<br />

e). Regionalization by federal authorities<br />

(federalization) is characteristic to the federal<br />

states, which were born as unions <strong>of</strong> states,<br />

therefore, the regions, in this case, are states,<br />

political entities, which have a series <strong>of</strong><br />

regional and ethnic features. Unlike political<br />

regionalization characterized by an<br />

asymmetry <strong>of</strong> institutions and competences,<br />

the federal state supposes equality in the<br />

rights <strong>of</strong> the member states. At the EU level,<br />

58<br />

this form <strong>of</strong> regionalization characterizes<br />

Germany, Austria and Belgium. While the<br />

building <strong>of</strong> the modern state in Germany and<br />

Austria was done through federalism, in<br />

Belgium regionalism led to the federalization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the state, in order to allow the formation <strong>of</strong><br />

a structure that shall ensure greater autonomy<br />

to the component units (the case <strong>of</strong> Flanders),<br />

which will progressively accede to the quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> a state. The model <strong>of</strong> federalism that<br />

characterizes Germany is called cooperative<br />

federalism in which power is distributed<br />

among three levels: federal, statal (Länder)<br />

and local (regions, cities and communes), the<br />

relations between these levels being relations<br />

<strong>of</strong> cooperation dominated by the idea <strong>of</strong><br />

“administrative intermingling” <strong>of</strong> tasks and<br />

competences. From a fiscal point <strong>of</strong> view, all<br />

territorial levels participate to the tax<br />

collection to the extent to which they are also<br />

responsible for the expenses. As in Germany,<br />

in Austria the lands benefit from more<br />

competences and resources, their main<br />

function being the implementation <strong>of</strong> public<br />

policies, with the distribution <strong>of</strong> competences<br />

between the federation and the lands and the<br />

strengthening <strong>of</strong> the lands’ position being<br />

permanently debated.<br />

Obviously, this last form <strong>of</strong> regionalization,<br />

due to its high level <strong>of</strong> decentralization and<br />

territorial autonomy, answers better, in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> functionality and stability, to the<br />

complexity <strong>of</strong> European governance, the<br />

functional adaptations on levels<br />

(supranational - federal - state - regional -<br />

local) are more easily absorbed by the federal<br />

structures. This leads, however, to a series <strong>of</strong><br />

wrong approaches, the federalism being<br />

considered an expression <strong>of</strong> regionalization or<br />

a response to regionalism as opposite to the<br />

Nation-State. The main concern in the EU is<br />

that the combination <strong>of</strong> federalism and<br />

regionalization affects the territorial<br />

integrity.


Conclusions and future concerns<br />

What we aimed at in the start <strong>of</strong> this approach<br />

- a comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> the experiences<br />

and tendencies <strong>of</strong> decentralization at a<br />

regional level in the EU - led us to formulate<br />

the following conclusions:<br />

� In the EU countries, the regional level<br />

covers various political and<br />

administrative realities, being the result<br />

<strong>of</strong> a process <strong>of</strong> decentralization that<br />

combines the specificity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organization <strong>of</strong> the state’s power in<br />

relation to the territory and the historical<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> that state with the European<br />

Union’s requirement, that <strong>of</strong> the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> an administrative level<br />

inferior to the national level but higher<br />

than the local one.<br />

� The regional decentralization, typical to<br />

France, and embraced by Poland and the<br />

Czech Republic, from the New Member<br />

States, is an exception rather than a rule<br />

in the EU.<br />

� At the EU level, the regional<br />

decentralization can best be described<br />

following the process <strong>of</strong> regionalization<br />

which, depending on the typology <strong>of</strong> a<br />

certain state, may be related to the<br />

regions existing as administrativeterritorial<br />

units or to the regions created<br />

as new territorial divisions.<br />

� The most common type <strong>of</strong><br />

regionalization in the EU27 is the<br />

administrative regionalization (Greece,<br />

Portugal, United Kingdom except<br />

Scotland, Sweden, Bulgaria, Estonia,<br />

Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia),<br />

followed by the regionalization through<br />

existing local collectivities (Denmark,<br />

Finland, Ireland, Romania and<br />

Hungary), which represent rather<br />

functional responses to the EU’s<br />

requirements in order to allow<br />

absorption <strong>of</strong> funds allocated under the<br />

regional policy.<br />

� The more advanced forms <strong>of</strong><br />

regionalization - regionalization by<br />

federal authorities and political<br />

59<br />

regionalization - characterize only 7<br />

Member States <strong>of</strong> the EU: Germany,<br />

Austria, Belgium, Spain and Italy,<br />

Portugal (for the islands) and United<br />

Kingdom (for Scotland).<br />

� The relationship federalism -<br />

regionalization responds better to the<br />

European governance <strong>of</strong> the network<br />

type and <strong>of</strong> the multi-level type.<br />

� The expansion <strong>of</strong> regionalization in the<br />

EU is favoured by its approach as an<br />

opportunity <strong>of</strong> regional development and<br />

the blockages <strong>of</strong> regionalization are<br />

related to its approach as a threat for the<br />

territorial integrity.<br />

Consequently, our future research efforts will<br />

focus on identifying and analyzing in detail<br />

some models <strong>of</strong> best practices that have<br />

proven effective in the EU for the regional<br />

growth and development.<br />

Acknowledgments:<br />

The paper presents research results afferent to<br />

the post-doctoral research project: "Economic<br />

policies for regional growth and<br />

development. Challenges for Romania in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> economic-financial crisis and<br />

integration into the European model",<br />

developed within the project "Economic<br />

scientific research, support <strong>of</strong> the welfare and<br />

human development in the European<br />

context", financed during 2010-2013 from the<br />

European Social Fund (ESF) and<br />

implemented by the National Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Economic Research "Costin C. Kiriţescu" <strong>of</strong><br />

the Romanian Academy, from December 1,<br />

2010, to November 30, 2012, coordinator:<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>. Valeriu Ioan Franc, PhD.<br />

References:<br />

1. Androniceanu, A. and Stănciulescu, G.<br />

Sisteme comparate de administraţie<br />

publică europeană. Bucureşti:<br />

Economica, 2001.<br />

2. Atkinson, A. and Stiglitz J. Lectures on<br />

Public Economics. New York: McGraw-<br />

Hill, 1980.


3. Black P.A., Steenekamp, T. J. and Calitz,<br />

E. Public Economics. 4th edition. Cape<br />

Town: Oxford University Press Southern<br />

Africa, 2009.<br />

4. Börzel, T.A. “What's So Special About<br />

Policy Networks? – An Exploration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Concept and Its Usefulness in Studying<br />

European Governance”, European<br />

Integration online Papers (EIoP), 1997, 1<br />

(16), 1997.<br />

http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997-016a.htm.<br />

5. Brown, C.W. and Jackson, P.M. Public<br />

Sector Economics. Cambridge: Bassil<br />

Blackwell, 1990.<br />

6. Chirleşan, D. Administraţie publică.<br />

Sisteme, Iaşi: Editura Universităţii<br />

Alexandru Ioan Cuza, 2007.<br />

7. Diez, S.P. Sisteme administrative<br />

comparate, Iaşi: Editura Universităţii<br />

Alexandru Ioan Cuza, 2006.<br />

8. Dobrescu, E. “Transition and Economic<br />

Behaviour”, Romanian Economic Review,<br />

36 (1), pp. 3-16, 1992.<br />

9. Dodescu, A. Statul şi economia de piaţă.<br />

Bucureşti: Economica, 2000.<br />

10. Dodescu, A. “State versus Market. Some<br />

arguments to surpass the “mirror<br />

approach”, Theoretical and Applied<br />

Economics, Volume XVII (2010), No.<br />

9(550), pp. 17-32, 2010.<br />

http://store.ectap.ro/articole/496.pdf.<br />

11. Dodescu, A. “The Reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> State in Economy at the beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 21 st Century from the perspective <strong>of</strong><br />

the Eureopean Model”, Revista<br />

Economică, No. 2(55)/2011, pp.252-259,<br />

2011.<br />

http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.econo<br />

mica/archive/RE%202-55-2011.pdf.<br />

12. Dogan, M. and Pelassy, D. Economia<br />

mixtă-jumătate capitalistă, jumătate<br />

socialistă, Bucureşti: Alternative, 1992.<br />

13. Eaton, K., Kaiser, K. and Smoke, P. The<br />

Political Economy <strong>of</strong> Decentralization<br />

Reforms: Implications for Aid<br />

Effectiviness. Washington, D.C., The<br />

World Bank, 2010.<br />

60<br />

14. European Commission, 2001.”European<br />

Governance. A White Paper”,<br />

Commission communication -<br />

COM(2001)428. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/200<br />

1/com2001_0428en01.pdf.<br />

15. European Commission, 2002. “Better<br />

lawmaking”, Commission communication<br />

- COM(2002)275. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?<br />

uri=CELEX:52002DC0275:EN:NOT.<br />

16. European Commission, 2003a. “Updating<br />

and simplifying the Community Acquis”,<br />

Commission communication -<br />

COM(2003)71. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?<br />

uri=CELEX:52003DC0071:EN:NOT.<br />

17. European Commission, 2003b. Regulation<br />

(EC) No 1059/2003 <strong>of</strong> the European<br />

Parliament and <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> 26 May<br />

2003 on the establishment <strong>of</strong> a common<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> territorial units for<br />

statistics (NUTS). http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?<br />

uri=OJ:L:2003:154:0001:0041:EN:PDF<br />

18. European Commission, 2005.<br />

“Implementing the Community Lisbon<br />

programme: A strategy for the<br />

simplification <strong>of</strong> the regulatory<br />

environment”, Commission<br />

communication - COM(2005)535.<br />

http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?<br />

uri=CELEX:52005DC0535:EN:NOT.<br />

19. European Commission, 2007. Governance<br />

in the EU. A White Paper.<br />

http://ec.europa.eu/governance/index_en.h<br />

tm.<br />

20. European Commission, 2008.<br />

“Commission Regulation (EC) No<br />

11/2008 <strong>of</strong> 8 January 2008 implementing<br />

Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

European Parliament and <strong>of</strong> the Council<br />

on the establishment <strong>of</strong> a common<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> territorial units for<br />

statistics (NUTS) on the transmission <strong>of</strong><br />

the time series for the new regional<br />

breakdown”, Official Journal L 5 <strong>of</strong>


9.1.2008. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?<br />

uri=OJ:L:2008:005:0013:0014:EN:PDF.<br />

21. European Commission, 2010. “Smart<br />

Regulation in the European Union”,<br />

Commission communication -<br />

COM(2010)543. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?<br />

uri=CELEX:52010DC0543:EN:NOT.<br />

22. European Commission, 2011.<br />

http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/reg<br />

ional_policy/management/g24218_en.htm<br />

23. Majocchi, A. "Theories <strong>of</strong> fiscal<br />

federalism and the European<br />

experience", ISAE Working Papers, No.<br />

100, Rome: Institute for Studies and<br />

Economic Analyses, 2008.<br />

http://www.isae.it/Working_Papers/WP_1<br />

00_2008_Majocchi.pdf.<br />

24. Oates, W. E. “Fiscal competition and<br />

European Union: contrasting<br />

perspectives”, Regional Science and<br />

Urban Economics, vol. 31, Issue 2-3,<br />

April 2001, pp. 133-145, 2001.<br />

25. Oates, W.E. Fiscal Federalism. New<br />

York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.<br />

26. Olson, M. Jr. “The Principle <strong>of</strong> "Fiscal<br />

Equivalence": The Division <strong>of</strong><br />

Responsibilities among Different Levels<br />

<strong>of</strong> Government”, The American Economic<br />

Review, Vol. 59, No. 2, Papers and<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Eighty-first Annual<br />

Meeting <strong>of</strong> the American Economic<br />

61<br />

Association (May, 1969), pp. 479-487,<br />

1969. http://www.jstor.org/pss/1823700.<br />

27. Shah, A. Local Governance in Industrial<br />

Countries, Washington D. C.: World<br />

Bank, 2006.<br />

28. Sharma, C. K. "Emerging Dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />

Decentralization Debate in the Age <strong>of</strong><br />

Globalization", MPRA Paper, No. 6734,<br />

University Library <strong>of</strong> Munich, 2008.<br />

http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6734/.<br />

29. Sharma, C. K. "Multilevel Fiscal<br />

Governance in a Balanced Policy<br />

Environment", MPRA Paper, No. 30282,<br />

University Library <strong>of</strong> Munich,<br />

2011. http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/30282/1/MPRA_paper_302<br />

82.pdf.<br />

30. Stănciulescu, G. and Androniceanu, A.<br />

Sisteme europene de administraţie<br />

publică, Bucureşti: Uranus, 2006.<br />

31. The World Group Bank, 2011.<br />

Decentralization & Subnational Regional<br />

Economics.<br />

http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTE<br />

RNAL/TOPICS/EXTPUBLICSECTORA<br />

NDGOVERNANCE/EXTDSRE/0,,menu<br />

PK:390249~pagePK:149018~piPK:14909<br />

3~theSitePK:390243,00.html.<br />

32. Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. Policy<br />

Making in the European Union. Oxford:<br />

Oxford University Press, 2000.<br />

33. Weber, L. L’Etat, acteur economique,<br />

Paris: Economica, 1991.


A NEW THINKING FOR A NEW WORLD. REPRESENTATIONS FROM<br />

ECONOMY<br />

Negucioiu Aurel<br />

”Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian University, Bucharest, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, Cluj-Napoca<br />

An incursion, even a succinct one, incomplete, in the universal history, in the world economic<br />

history and not in the least in the real world gives more and more “credit” to the idea according to<br />

which the movement is the main form <strong>of</strong> existence – working and evolution – <strong>of</strong> the society,<br />

economy, and <strong>of</strong> all the structures they are made <strong>of</strong>.<br />

Movement means first <strong>of</strong> all change, transformation. Its “propellant”, its internal cause is<br />

represented, in our opinion, by the unity and interaction <strong>of</strong> opposites. The changes, the<br />

transformations taking place in society and in its economy have direct or indirect authors the<br />

human beings who, using their minds, “leaven bread” and express at the beginning through<br />

thinking, the objectives that are going to complete or lessen reality. The positive changes and<br />

transformations that the people operate renew the world.<br />

For more than half <strong>of</strong> a century, the humankind has been in a vast and very complex process <strong>of</strong><br />

transformation, changes with innovative character. In other words, a process <strong>of</strong> building a new<br />

world. Hence, the need to create a new thinking. “A new thinking for a new world”. Making a halt<br />

in the field <strong>of</strong> economics – theory, science and practice – we are trying to bring to attention to those<br />

interested a few considerations concerning the truth value <strong>of</strong> some paradigms in the theoretical<br />

circuit, including their degree <strong>of</strong> rationality or irrationality.<br />

Key words: capital, industrial capital, commercial capital, financial capital, human capital, social<br />

capital, microeconomics, mezoeconomics, macroeconomics, national economy, mondial economy,<br />

mondoeconomy, world economy, economic development, eco-economic development, ecoeconomics,<br />

economic system, ecologic system, ecosystem, ecosoceco system, economic culture,<br />

community, society, knowledge based society, knowledge based economy, economic paradox, social<br />

paradox, scientific paradox, economic risk, economic chaos, economic disorder, uncertainty,<br />

economic truth, economic transition, economic society, international society, post-capitalist society,<br />

digital economy, real economy, virtual economy, symbolical economy, market, rift, discontinuance.<br />

1. Instead <strong>of</strong> introduction<br />

><br />

– Ralph Waldo Emerson –<br />

><br />

– Ian Amos Comenius –<br />

><br />

63<br />

– Eugeniu Speranţia –<br />

><br />

– Mark Twain –<br />

><br />

– Heraclitus –<br />


enemies as in all other domains. The peculiar<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the materials it deals with, summons<br />

as foes into the field <strong>of</strong> battle the most<br />

violent, mean and malignant passions […] the<br />

Furies <strong>of</strong> private interest >><br />

– Karl Marx –<br />

><br />

– G.W.Hegel –<br />


forget that in reality there are not only these<br />

processes which, through their content and<br />

consequences are positive, but also processes<br />

and actions which connect us, such us<br />

imbalance, disorganization, destabilization<br />

and others.<br />

Through the processes mentioned which give<br />

content and shape to movement and change is<br />

done the passing from past, to present and<br />

then to future or what means the passing from<br />

old to new in the real world and the world <strong>of</strong><br />

ideas on it. Getting here we state that the new<br />

is not always superior, better, more beautiful,<br />

more efficient and necessarily more valuable<br />

than the old that it has replaced. This<br />

paradigm is available both for action and for<br />

thought.<br />

The truth is that our earthly world that we are<br />

considering among us is changing, is<br />

transforming, therefore it is renewing itself<br />

with a speed many times unnoticeable, on<br />

larger and larger and more and more<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ound surfaces. The technical base <strong>of</strong> the<br />

capitalist society economy has climbed the<br />

stairs <strong>of</strong> progress with a speed that increased<br />

together with time. The simple labour<br />

mechanization gave way to complex<br />

mechanization and this, in its turn, was more<br />

and more passed by automation in different<br />

forms and higher and higher performances.<br />

The science has come down from the , ahs transformed into an<br />

endogenous factor <strong>of</strong> production, <strong>of</strong> man’s<br />

activity in general, has merged with the other<br />

factors <strong>of</strong> production in a more and more<br />

complete scientific and technical revolution<br />

which, for several years, has had a striking<br />

world character. Also, world like are the<br />

communication and information revolution.<br />

Currently, a harder and harder to pronounce<br />

„word”, that is a more and more significant<br />

role goes to the invisible revolution whose<br />

units <strong>of</strong> measurement start with the phrase<br />

– nanosecond, nanometre or<br />

nano-millimetre.<br />

Related to these changes in the running and<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> the capitalist economy, the<br />

industrial capital crowned as a „king”,<br />

65<br />

„emperor” or „president” – was deposed and<br />

replaced with the financial capital and<br />

nowadays the trend pushing to this „high”<br />

rank the human capital is stronger and<br />

stronger.<br />

The <strong>of</strong> the<br />

changes having taken place in the last 25-30<br />

years in the contemporary world that our<br />

planet includes in its columns, the collapse <strong>of</strong><br />

the old colonial system, the collapse <strong>of</strong> the<br />

socialist systems <strong>of</strong> economy and<br />

government, the formation <strong>of</strong> the third world,<br />

the expansion <strong>of</strong> the market economy through<br />

the orientation towards it <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the<br />

socialist countries. A special part <strong>of</strong> this<br />

periodic table <strong>of</strong> elements includes by<br />

nominalization the cyclic, national,<br />

international and world economic crises, the<br />

financial crises within the same borders, the<br />

energetic, demographic crisis, the increasing<br />

economic and social inequalities among the<br />

world countries, the government and<br />

administration crises, the crises <strong>of</strong> science,<br />

education, culture, the increasing<br />

deterioration <strong>of</strong> domestic and international<br />

relations. And the things do not stop here.<br />

They do not merely exhaust the entire<br />

assembly <strong>of</strong> the changes having taken place<br />

and <strong>of</strong> those in progress.<br />

2.1. World and thinking<br />

The title <strong>of</strong> our lines was inspired by the wellknown<br />

titan <strong>of</strong> economic thinking Charles<br />

Handy who inscribed on the three books<br />

translated into Romanian, too, the following<br />

postulate-message: (1)<br />

Here, a new or a relatively new problem<br />

arises, that is the ratio or better said the ratios<br />

between world and thinking, between the new<br />

world and the new thinking.<br />

Without lingering too much on this problem,<br />

yet it is an extremely important and<br />

contemporary problem for the scientific<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> knowledge (for epistemology), we<br />

will mention the following reasons:<br />

1. The concept <strong>of</strong> in its<br />

most general and comprehensible


meaning subsumes and expresses<br />

according to dictionaries “everything<br />

that exists in reality (material world,<br />

the world <strong>of</strong> things), universe,<br />

cosmos”. It means that thinking –<br />

regarded as process and result (the<br />

world <strong>of</strong> thoughts) constitutes an<br />

important component <strong>of</strong> the world<br />

considering the meaning mentioned<br />

above.<br />

2. Therefore, the new thinking is an<br />

essential component <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

world.<br />

3. The thinking (the knowledge) has<br />

an especially complex structure,<br />

containing several subdivisions or<br />

components. Karl R. Popper<br />

distinguishes the following worlds or<br />

universes:


Another aspect – the second in our<br />

enumeration – consists in the<br />

irrefutable fact that thinking foresees<br />

and precedes more and more <strong>of</strong> the<br />

movements, therefore changes,<br />

transformations <strong>of</strong> different<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the planet Earth’s<br />

system and, for many times, not only<br />

this.<br />

To represent and ease the comprehension <strong>of</strong><br />

this truth, we will further refer to the process<br />

<strong>of</strong> labour or production <strong>of</strong> goods which is<br />

specific to human kind, quoting Karl Marx :<br />

”a spider conducts operations that resemble<br />

those <strong>of</strong> a weaver, and a bee puts to shame<br />

many an architect in the construction <strong>of</strong> her<br />

cells. But what distinguishes the worst<br />

architect from the best <strong>of</strong> bees is this, that the<br />

architect raises his structure in imagination<br />

before he erects it in reality. At the end <strong>of</strong><br />

every labour-process, we get a result that<br />

already existed in the imagination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

labourer at its commencement. He not only<br />

effects a change <strong>of</strong> form in the material on<br />

which he works, but he also realises a<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> his own that gives the law to his<br />

modus operandi, and to which he must<br />

subordinate his will. And this subordination<br />

is no mere momentary act. Besides the<br />

exertion <strong>of</strong> the bodily organs, the process<br />

demands that, during the whole operation, the<br />

workman’s will be steadily in consonance<br />

with his purpose. (4)<br />

The history <strong>of</strong> earthly world, the history <strong>of</strong><br />

human kind history mentioned in its pages<br />

that, in time, the role and importance <strong>of</strong><br />

thinking has increased in more and more<br />

pronounced rhythms. Presently, the role <strong>of</strong><br />

forerunner and notary <strong>of</strong> the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

society and economy on the steps <strong>of</strong> progress’<br />

historical ladder is being acknowledged.<br />

Moreover. There are savants stating with<br />

observable arguments that science and<br />

education must develop in more accelerated<br />

rhythms than the other structures <strong>of</strong><br />

contemporary society.<br />

And something else, too. A third aspect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ratios between the real world and new<br />

67<br />

thinking is the expansion and thoroughgoing<br />

study <strong>of</strong> the processes <strong>of</strong> thinking’s<br />

rethinking. Thinking is being rethought and,<br />

therefore, it is renewing and re-renewing and<br />

the patrimony <strong>of</strong> thoughts is getting richer<br />

both quantitatively and qualitatively. The<br />

value and the use value (utility), in other<br />

words the cognitive value and the applicative<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the new thoughts/ideas, enrich the<br />

world’s fortune, the intellectual and material<br />

potential increases too, and, together with it,<br />

the possibilities, conditions <strong>of</strong> enriching and<br />

beautifying the style and way <strong>of</strong> living and<br />

those <strong>of</strong> levelling the standard living are<br />

amplified.<br />

The truth is that the material forces and things<br />

can be destroyed only with material forces,<br />

but the ideas, new ideas have a considerable<br />

influence from the moment they have been<br />

understood and entered the world. ”If we<br />

watch history form a larger perspective, it<br />

seems that the most influential people in the<br />

last 100 years – Charles Handy writes – were<br />

not Hitler or Churchill, Stalin or Gorbatchev,<br />

but Freud, Marx and Einstein, people who did<br />

not change anything except the way in which<br />

we think, but this thing has changed<br />

everything. Francis Crick is not today a name<br />

known by everybody, but he is the one who,<br />

together with James Watson and Maurice<br />

Wilking, discovered the genetic code, the<br />

DNA, creating, thus, the science <strong>of</strong><br />

microbiology and biotechnology industry that<br />

so much <strong>of</strong> our economic future might<br />

depend so much on.” (5)<br />

3. Eco-economy - A new branch <strong>of</strong><br />

contemporary thinking (knowledge)<br />

The tree <strong>of</strong> knowledge, <strong>of</strong> science (thinking)<br />

was completed at the end <strong>of</strong> the 20th century<br />

with a new branch. Its name is eco-economy.<br />

It is under construction, enlargement and<br />

thorough study <strong>of</strong> its own object <strong>of</strong> study –<br />

the real eco-economy – the birth <strong>of</strong> this new<br />

branch <strong>of</strong> science about nature, society and<br />

economy, its ontological status, its anatomicmorphological<br />

structure, its functioning and<br />

evolution mechanism, its categories,


principles and laws governing the movement<br />

<strong>of</strong> this economic-social-ecological megasystem,<br />

the order and disorder coexisting or<br />

succeeding, the mutual reports existing<br />

among the constituent parts <strong>of</strong> the megasystem<br />

as well as between the latter and each<br />

component, in part; and last, but not least,<br />

among the ecosoceco systemic structure and<br />

other systems existing in the universe.<br />

A radiography even insufficiently detailed <strong>of</strong><br />

the national economies shows that these exist,<br />

function, and evolve in a multiple<br />

environment: social-national and<br />

international, in an international economic<br />

environment, to which the political, cultural,<br />

and moral environment are added.<br />

The mutual reports between economy and the<br />

surrounding natural environment were born<br />

together with the human society and its<br />

economy. They multiplied, diversified, and<br />

changed structurally and qualitatively<br />

together with and as the human society and<br />

surrounding nature evolved.<br />

The interactions between man (people) and<br />

nature, the multitude <strong>of</strong> relations and<br />

correlations in which these interactions took<br />

shape, manifested and still manifest<br />

themselves gave content to these new<br />

branches and sub-branches <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />

knowledge and some specific genres <strong>of</strong><br />

human activities. The itself<br />

designates and underlines three fundamental<br />

activities: labour, work and action, each <strong>of</strong><br />

them corresponding to (6) Underlying the significance <strong>of</strong><br />

each component <strong>of</strong> this <br />

Hannah wrote ”Labour is that activity which<br />

corresponds to the biological process <strong>of</strong> the<br />

human body, whose spontaneous growth,<br />

metabolism, and eventual decay are bound to<br />

the vital necessities produced and fed into the<br />

life process by labour. The human condition<br />

<strong>of</strong> labour is life itself.“ (7)<br />

"Labour is the activity corresponding to the<br />

unnatural character <strong>of</strong> the human existence,<br />

which is not imprinted in and whose death is<br />

not compensated by the perpetual cycle <strong>of</strong><br />

68<br />

species life. Labour provides an<br />

world <strong>of</strong> objects, entirely<br />

different from any natural environment.<br />

Within the borders <strong>of</strong> this artificial world,<br />

each individual life finds shelter, while the<br />

world itself is meant to last longer and exceed<br />

all individual lives. The human condition <strong>of</strong><br />

work means belonging to the world.” (8)<br />

"Action, the only activity that actually takes<br />

place between people without the mediation<br />

<strong>of</strong> objects or matter, corresponds to the<br />

human condition <strong>of</strong> plurality, that men, not<br />

the Man, live on earth and pollute the world.<br />

Although all aspects <strong>of</strong> the human condition<br />

are specifically the condition - not just a sin<br />

qua non conditio but also conditio per quam -<br />

to any political life.” (9)<br />

"The earth is just the quintessence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

human condition and as far as we know, the<br />

worldly nature is the only one in the universe<br />

that can provide human beings with a living<br />

environment where they can move and<br />

breathe effortless and without using artificial<br />

means. The artificial <strong>of</strong> the man-made world<br />

separates the human existence from any pure<br />

animal environment, but life itself is outside<br />

the artificial world and through life man<br />

remains related to all other living organisms.”<br />

(10)<br />

Above all, the labour, the production <strong>of</strong><br />

material goods necessary to meet needs,<br />

interests, desires and human goals<br />

represented, still represents and will represent<br />

a system <strong>of</strong> relationships, a process between<br />

men and nature, a process in which people<br />

cooperating in a certain way and exchanging<br />

activities, intercede, regulate and control<br />

through their own activity the exchange <strong>of</strong><br />

substances, <strong>of</strong> matter and energy between<br />

them and nature. Therefore the process <strong>of</strong><br />

production and reproduction <strong>of</strong> material<br />

goods necessary for human living and society<br />

is, in a sense, the dialectical unity <strong>of</strong> a system<br />

<strong>of</strong> relationships - relationships that are<br />

established between people and relationships<br />

taking place between people, society and<br />

natural environment. The multiple interaction<br />

between man (humans), society and its


economy on one hand and the nature<br />

surrounding them on the other hand, is a real<br />

component <strong>of</strong> the universe where we are, one<br />

<strong>of</strong> its mega-systems.<br />

4. Economy and ecology - Autonomy,<br />

identity, differences and unity<br />

4.1. Economy and ecology<br />

Undoubtedly, the real economy (the real<br />

economic system) and the real ecosystem (the<br />

real ecological system or the natural<br />

environment) as component parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

objective - material reality have their own<br />

ontological status and thus their movement -<br />

functioning and evolution are mainly<br />

governed by the laws <strong>of</strong> the universe and by<br />

its own laws (specific laws). These<br />

components have their relative autonomy and<br />

independence. The real economy includes in<br />

its structure and content the assembly <strong>of</strong> all<br />

productive forces, the assembly <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relationships is established between people<br />

and the framework <strong>of</strong> the economic activity.<br />

The two assemblies - the productive forces<br />

and economic relations - seen in their unit<br />

and interaction - form what experts call the<br />

mode <strong>of</strong> production or the economic system in<br />

the extensive meaning <strong>of</strong> the term. In its turn,<br />

the global ecological system stands for the<br />

biocenosis and biotope assembly. These<br />

systems have the self-creation, selfpreservation<br />

and self-progress ability by<br />

means <strong>of</strong> their own mechanisms. It is not<br />

accidental that the two systems – the<br />

ecological system and the economic system –<br />

represent the objective <strong>of</strong> some distinct<br />

branches <strong>of</strong> science, the environmental<br />

science and economics. The simple<br />

observation <strong>of</strong> reality shows that the<br />

ecological system and the economic system<br />

are not separated from each other by<br />

insurmountable borders and walls. And even<br />

more. There are not few situations where the<br />

economic and the ecological, more precisely<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the economic constitute components<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ecological and vice versa, parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ecological represent components <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economic. The ecological is economic and<br />

69<br />

the economic is environmentally friendly.<br />

Meaning what? There are not few situations<br />

where the economic and the ecological, more<br />

precisely parts <strong>of</strong> the economic constitute<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the ecological and vice versa,<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the ecological represent components<br />

<strong>of</strong> the economic. The ecological is economic<br />

and the economic is environmentally friendly.<br />

Meaning what? Meaning what? It is simply<br />

like that: people like all living things belong<br />

to nature, to the real ecosystem. And not only<br />

that. As many scholars argue the man is the<br />

highest product <strong>of</strong> nature. At the same time<br />

labour force represents the most important<br />

factor <strong>of</strong> production, one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

important forms <strong>of</strong> capital – the human<br />

capital. The human capacity to work, the<br />

labour has always been one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

important economic assets: under certain<br />

conditions it - labour - was a commodity and<br />

thus subject to the provisions, to the salepurchase<br />

transactions. It is again the man,<br />

regarded as subject and actor <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />

life to get some other economic codeterminations<br />

as well, depending on the<br />

place he occupied and the role he fulfilled<br />

within the economic system. Thus, he was, is<br />

and will be the owner or non-proprietor,<br />

manufacturer, distributor, dealer, customer,<br />

creditor or debtor, or more at the same time,<br />

supplier, seller or buyer <strong>of</strong> goods| he is an<br />

agriculture farmer industrialist and / or small<br />

craftsman.<br />

Yet, the process <strong>of</strong> reproduction and<br />

perpetuation <strong>of</strong> human beings is also, as it can<br />

be easily understood, a complex biological,<br />

economic, social and cultural process. (11)<br />

Simultaneously, other parts <strong>of</strong> nature become<br />

real elements <strong>of</strong> the economy at the moment<br />

and provided that they enter the economic<br />

cycle, the real economic flows.<br />

The wood (tree) cut from a natural forest<br />

becomes raw material for the furniture<br />

manufacturing factory as well as for the pulp<br />

or paper manufacturer. The wood meant for<br />

home heating is a non random economic asset<br />

for consumption. It is also the case <strong>of</strong> other<br />

component parts <strong>of</strong> nature: coal, oil, natural


gas extracted and put into use as capital<br />

goods or consumer goods. The land itself is<br />

and is becoming part <strong>of</strong> the economy as a<br />

means <strong>of</strong> work, object <strong>of</strong> labour and material<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> performing the production<br />

process. And it is not only that. The land<br />

gives every man and<br />

ongoing space for his actions. (12) The facts<br />

stated before are true to reality, and<br />

consequently they are truths - relative and not<br />

absolute truths, partial and not total truths.<br />

Why? Because the ecological and economic<br />

identity is neither absolute nor complete it is<br />

only partial and relative. Among them there<br />

were, there are and there will always exist<br />

numerous differences. To illustrate this truth<br />

Jacques Bonnet mentioned conurbations,<br />

techno-polls (techno polis), scientific and<br />

technological parks, teleports, innovation<br />

centres, business and commercial parks,<br />

industrial areas, highways advanced countries<br />

like streaking through the heavens surface<br />

rivers and streams. To these, the nominal<br />

economy, the symbolic economy, the entire<br />

set <strong>of</strong> activities, relationships and financial<br />

flows with flows <strong>of</strong> scientific, political,<br />

cultural, economic, electronic money flows,<br />

which together with the flows <strong>of</strong> scientific,<br />

political, cultural, economic information, with<br />

flows <strong>of</strong> electronic money, constituting what<br />

scientists have called <br />

and managing object -<br />

material goods respectively, other object<br />

goods - and people in motion. (13)<br />

4.2. Ecology and economics – two sides <strong>of</strong><br />

the same coin<br />

At the risk <strong>of</strong> repeating we note that . And<br />

even more. According to the authors <strong>of</strong> the<br />

book metaphorically<br />

consider, “Ecology and economy- are two<br />

sides <strong>of</strong> same coin. Here the currency is<br />

OIKOS, our planet is the Earth, the cradle <strong>of</strong><br />

the whole life. Ecology studies the<br />

correlations between the Earth and all its<br />

70<br />

inhabitants, economy strives to manage these<br />

relationships. As science, namely as a branch<br />

<strong>of</strong> science, ecology has existed for more than<br />

a century or so and during this period it<br />

produced revelations that enable economists<br />

to manage the planet better than they and<br />

their disciples did before in the business<br />

world.” (14) Indeed, ecology and economy<br />

have, etymologically speaking, a common<br />

root - oikos. Economy has its etymological<br />

roots in the Greek oikonomia composed <strong>of</strong><br />

oikos = house, household, city and nomos =<br />

law. The roots <strong>of</strong> ecology as a branch <strong>of</strong> the<br />

scientific knowledge, as a science, are also<br />

two Greek words - oikos in the sense above<br />

mentioned and logos = science, speech,<br />

lecture, order.<br />

The root is also present in the name<br />

<strong>of</strong> both sides <strong>of</strong> the coin: eco-nomy și ecology.<br />

Both the ecological and the economic<br />

are, by structure and content, through their<br />

configuration and mechanisms – systemic<br />

compositions, in short systems holding their<br />

own status.The ecological system and the<br />

economic system. By joining the concept<br />

to we get the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> which subsumes,<br />

focuses and expresses itself and expresses, for<br />

most scientists, if not for all <strong>of</strong> them, the<br />

ecologic system. The meaning benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

triple significance legitimacy: etymological,<br />

historical and logical-scientific. <br />

subsumes and expresses the main content <strong>of</strong><br />

the Greek oikos - so what is common to both<br />

ecological and economic, so the identical in<br />

them. No doubt, the works here as well. Nevertheless,<br />

semantically and scientifically, the notion<br />

could be also translated, in<br />

our view, as both the concept <strong>of</strong> ecological<br />

system and as the economic system. (15)<br />

5. The mega-system in<br />

reality and in thought<br />

It is now increasingly recognized that the<br />

economy and natural environment are two<br />

systemic compositions, two organic systems<br />

that are organically and indestructibly related


to each other and just as indestructibly and<br />

organically integrated with each other in a<br />

new more elevated and superior composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> existence and movement-operation and<br />

development. We have given, we do not<br />

know how rigorously the name <strong>of</strong> megasystem<br />

– the eco-eco mega-system.<br />

The concept <strong>of</strong> mega-system, eco-eco, as well<br />

as the concept <strong>of</strong> ecological system,<br />

economic system or system in general has<br />

two main meanings: the real eco-eco megasystem<br />

- a structure <strong>of</strong> a slice <strong>of</strong> reality, in our<br />

case the real eco-eco mega-system (real<br />

economy) that exists objectively,<br />

independently <strong>of</strong> the will and conscience <strong>of</strong><br />

human beings. In this determination the real<br />

eco-eco mega-system at one point became the<br />

object <strong>of</strong> scientific knowledge, a branch <strong>of</strong><br />

science. This means that it existed before<br />

scientific knowledge, and it was and will be<br />

throughout knowledge and it will be in the<br />

future as part <strong>of</strong> reality and as object <strong>of</strong> the<br />

scientific knowledge. The second meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

the eco-eco mega-system is <strong>of</strong> a theoretical<br />

eco-eco system, product (construction) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

human mind, which through knowledge,<br />

takes possession <strong>of</strong> the real intellectual ecoeco<br />

system. In our view, the theoretical ecoeco<br />

mega-system represents a reflection with<br />

the help <strong>of</strong> thinking, a copy, a photograph <strong>of</strong><br />

the real eco-eco mega-system, a shadow <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

out <strong>of</strong> which and with the<br />

help <strong>of</strong> which they build this mega-system<br />

are, generally speaking, the same from and to<br />

which the human mind constructs them.<br />

Basically these are thoughts,<br />

words, terms or concepts, categories, ideas,<br />

paradigms and even pre-paradigmatic<br />

constructions, principles and objective laws<br />

that generate movement- functioning <strong>of</strong><br />

ecological economy, its growth and<br />

development. The level and scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />

scientific knowledge <strong>of</strong> real eco-economy, <strong>of</strong><br />

the real eco-eco mega-system are given by<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> concordance <strong>of</strong> the theoretical<br />

mega-system with the real mega-system but<br />

however high this level, or extended in<br />

length, width and depth the knowledge<br />

71<br />

acquired, the two systems are not and never<br />

can get to be identical. They are and will<br />

always be different. No matter how successful<br />

a photo would be it is not identical with the<br />

photographed object. No matter how tight the<br />

link between an object and its shadow is,<br />

however they denote different realities, even<br />

if they share some similarities. As complete<br />

as a map <strong>of</strong> a geo-economic determined space<br />

could be, and as numerous and useful the<br />

information it provides may prove, it is not<br />

identical with the reality, with the spaces they<br />

depict. The map and the respective space<br />

remain different things. The map <strong>of</strong> a country<br />

as individualized object can be reproduced in<br />

hundreds and thousands <strong>of</strong> copies, which is<br />

impossible with the represented geoeconomic<br />

space.<br />

Here is the place to mention that due to the<br />

fact that the real natural environment, the real<br />

economy and eco-economy (the eco-eco<br />

mega-system) stand for a very diverse reality<br />

and they are in a process <strong>of</strong> continuous<br />

diversification. As a result, experts have<br />

spoken on and speak about local ecoeconomy,<br />

regional eco-economy, national<br />

eco-economy, international, and lately,<br />

especially <strong>of</strong> global or world eco-economy.<br />

Simultaneously, it has been spoken especially<br />

<strong>of</strong> European, American, etc. economic<br />

models. Lately it is about the U.S. economic<br />

model, Canadian model, the German and the<br />

French ones, the economic models <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Northern European countries, the Japanese<br />

model, the Chinese one etc. In order to<br />

enlarge the image <strong>of</strong> models we also add<br />

numerous sets <strong>of</strong> models <strong>of</strong> growth and<br />

economic, social etc. development as well,<br />

which were quite frequently <br />

according to their . Currently <strong>of</strong> growth and development was<br />

completed, generally speaking, with another<br />

box – the box <strong>of</strong> eco-economic models, the<br />

models <strong>of</strong> economy based on following the<br />

ecological principles. It is beyond any doubt<br />

that the names <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the investigated<br />

models were correct and have their origins


ooted in the reality <strong>of</strong> our universe. It is not<br />

less true that the realities that concepts and<br />

models considered have proved to be highly<br />

dynamic. This circumstance began to weaken<br />

over time, to reduce the correlation between a<br />

concept, a paradigm, one model or another<br />

and the reality that it subsumed or expressed<br />

and wanted at a certain time. To make it<br />

easier to understand, we mention that the<br />

increasing, extending and deepening <strong>of</strong> the<br />

globalization processes <strong>of</strong> socio-economic<br />

life have imposed and still impose not only<br />

the completion or alteration <strong>of</strong> some<br />

concepts, categories, idea and paradigms, but<br />

they have sharpened the need to find some<br />

new concepts, ideas, solutions for the<br />

nomination and solving the new global issues.<br />

And let us not forget that one <strong>of</strong> the largest<br />

and most complicated cases <strong>of</strong> globalization<br />

is the very globalization <strong>of</strong> the economy.<br />

Most, if not all major problems <strong>of</strong><br />

contemporary world are the global problems.<br />

6. Challenges, challenges, and challenges<br />

again<br />

6.1. Setting the theoretical conceptual<br />

system<br />

The emergence <strong>of</strong> the science <strong>of</strong> ecoeconomy<br />

is, in our view, a real leap in the<br />

progress <strong>of</strong> the human knowledge. Its<br />

importance is not simply the emergence <strong>of</strong><br />

new branches, apparently, extremely,<br />

extremely vigorous in the great tree <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge and in the structure <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

thinking. As we understand things, the<br />

emergence <strong>of</strong> this new branch <strong>of</strong> science<br />

amounts to "a genuine gap" in the strong and<br />

durable wall <strong>of</strong> knowledge. It means the<br />

lighting <strong>of</strong> torches that already lights a<br />

until recently left in darkness.<br />

Now the respective is<br />

and taken in possession, at<br />

least partly, by mankind. Consequently, the<br />

powers <strong>of</strong> man and mankind increase as<br />

knowledge, science have always meant, mean<br />

now and will mean in future more light,<br />

safety and power.<br />

72<br />

Like other branches <strong>of</strong> science, eco-economy<br />

did not appear suddenly and in a perfect form<br />

from the very beginning, with an anatomicmorphological<br />

structure completely cohesive<br />

and fully matured by matching and linking<br />

thought with action, thinking with experience,<br />

phenomenon with essence, form with content,<br />

confirming, legitimizing true thoughts and<br />

ideas, denying false conceptual construction,<br />

discovering and correcting its own mistakes,<br />

the eco-economy science will be able<br />

its own its own<br />

language and eventually its own theoretical<br />

system. This is the first and one <strong>of</strong> the biggest<br />

challenges, its own open starting<br />

with its birth and having no end. Let us not<br />

forget that the science <strong>of</strong> eco-economy but will never say its<br />

last word. It is always absent. The struggle<br />

with this challenge is not easy at all, as it may<br />

seem at first sight.<br />

On the contrary, it is permanent, difficult, and<br />

full <strong>of</strong> bigger or smaller surprises. In other<br />

words it is a system <strong>of</strong> equations with a huge<br />

number <strong>of</strong> unknowns. Many factors are<br />

positive, negative and potentially neutral<br />

putting their striking stamp on the process as<br />

well as on the final outcome. For illustration<br />

only, here we mention the following factors:<br />

- The philosophy that combatants –<br />

researchers rely on, thus accept, support and<br />

promote;<br />

- The methodological position the researchers<br />

<strong>of</strong> eco-economy lie on;<br />

- The degree <strong>of</strong> arming <strong>of</strong> the combatants<br />

with the advanced opportunities <strong>of</strong> having<br />

access to information and their processing<br />

and interpretation capabilities <strong>of</strong> the stock <strong>of</strong><br />

information - ;<br />

- The discrepancies, sometimes important<br />

and very important, between reality and<br />

appearance, the thickness and density <strong>of</strong><br />

appearance;<br />

-- The differences and inconsistencies<br />

between what is seen and what is not seen;<br />

- The complexity <strong>of</strong> the ever widening <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reality <strong>of</strong> past world and <strong>of</strong> the world <strong>of</strong>


present realities. And do not forget that<br />

although the present is extremely small in<br />

duration, as reality it is a composition that<br />

combines components <strong>of</strong> the old world and<br />

new world, that the interaction between them<br />

can take the form <strong>of</strong> struggle, <strong>of</strong> mutual<br />

rejection, <strong>of</strong> mutual rejection, <strong>of</strong><br />

collaboration, cooperation and many other<br />

forms.<br />

- The subjective charge, be it large or small,<br />

still present in the personality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

combatants (researchers);<br />

- Other factors whose number by far exceeds<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> above mentioned.<br />

6.2. The place and role <strong>of</strong> the real ecologic<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the real economic within the real ecoeco<br />

mega-system<br />

As already mentioned, the eco-economy, the<br />

eco-eco mega-system represents the unity and<br />

interaction between economy and the natural<br />

environment. The true knowledge and the<br />

more complex understanding requires further<br />

clarification <strong>of</strong> the place that each <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

components occupies and <strong>of</strong> the role that the<br />

two fulfil within the mega-system.<br />

This challenge is particularly topical also<br />

because <strong>of</strong> knowledge, <strong>of</strong> the<br />

means <strong>of</strong> knowledge and interpretation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mega-system continues to be divided into<br />

different areas.<br />

The most vivid, most heated controversy take<br />

place between environmentalists and<br />

economists. There is a very successful<br />

description and presentation <strong>of</strong> the dialogue<br />

that occurs between these researchers in the<br />

famous book by Lester Brown – Ecoeconomy<br />

(16). According to him:<br />

- Environmentalists consider economy as<br />

being part <strong>of</strong> the environmental system;<br />

- Economists consider the environment as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the economy;<br />

- Environmentalists are the first ones<br />

concerned with the limits <strong>of</strong> the natural<br />

environment, <strong>of</strong> the finite character <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planet and <strong>of</strong> resources;<br />

Economists tend not to recognize such<br />

constraints;<br />

73<br />

- Environmentalists, following the signs <strong>of</strong><br />

nature, think in terms <strong>of</strong> cycles;<br />

- Economists prove a rather linear or<br />

curvilinear thinking;<br />

- Economists have great confidence in the<br />

market;<br />

- Environmentalists <strong>of</strong>ten fail to accurately<br />

assess the market.<br />


Noting the variety <strong>of</strong> the opinions, in this case<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ecologists and <strong>of</strong> the economists, and<br />

especially <strong>of</strong> their divergent character, we put<br />

the following questions: Who is right? Who is<br />

closer to the truth and to reality? In our view,<br />

the mentioned opinions contain a number <strong>of</strong><br />

ideas and paradigms that can be the core <strong>of</strong><br />

some credible answers, that resisting in front<br />

<strong>of</strong> all the questions acquire the value <strong>of</strong> truth<br />

and can be considered authentic knowledge in<br />

the heritage <strong>of</strong> the eco-economy.<br />

Analyzing as carefully as we can “the<br />

dialogue” or more correctly “the dialogues”,<br />

we detached and we retained the following<br />

views:<br />

a) Although the real economic system<br />

has its own identity and functioning<br />

and ontological status, its<br />

interdependence with the natural<br />

environment is neither total nor<br />

absolute but only partial and relative.<br />

b) Between the surrounding nature and<br />

the real economy there are a lot <strong>of</strong><br />

mutual relations <strong>of</strong> interdependence,<br />

dependence, and interdependence.<br />

They are in a continuous interaction.<br />

The environment influences in a<br />

multilateral way the real economy. In<br />

turn, the society and the economy<br />

have created their own artificial<br />

environments that have been<br />

implemented in the structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

natural environment.<br />

c) The identity relationships,<br />

dependence and interdependence<br />

existing between the two<br />

compositions have generated a new<br />

composition, having a superior<br />

organization, existence, operation,<br />

and evolution. This composition<br />

represents an authentic mega-system<br />

that we call the ecoeco mega-system<br />

– in fact, the real economy.<br />

d) The ecoeco mega-system is a<br />

contradictory composition, a unity <strong>of</strong><br />

opposites that presume each other<br />

and are linked to each other. The two<br />

main opposites <strong>of</strong> the eco-economy<br />

74<br />

are and will remain the ecology and<br />

the economy.<br />

e) The divergence <strong>of</strong> opinions “the<br />

ecology <strong>of</strong> the environment is<br />

broader than the economy; the<br />

economy is part <strong>of</strong> the surrounding<br />

nature” and the opinion according to<br />

which the economy is more<br />

comprehensive; it includes nature in<br />

its structure and its content. Who is<br />

right? Which <strong>of</strong> the two opinions is<br />

closer to the truth? The truth is that<br />

the economy exists, functions and<br />

develops within the surrounding<br />

nature’s system. Moreover, the<br />

economy will exist, it will be able to<br />

function and to develop normally<br />

only as long as the surrounding<br />

nature will support it, only as long as<br />

the material support <strong>of</strong> the economy<br />

will resist.<br />

f) It is difficult to establish the<br />

boundary between ecology and<br />

economy. In this respect, the obstacle<br />

is represented by the identity<br />

elements awakened in both systems.<br />

The human being is, in the same<br />

time, an essential component both in<br />

ecology, as a biological human<br />

being, as well as in the economy, as<br />

workforce, capital, production factor,<br />

economic actor, etc.<br />

g) The human being and the human<br />

beings play a paradoxical role in the<br />

ambient environment “Biologically<br />

speaking, says Barry Commoner –<br />

people are part <strong>of</strong> the ambient<br />

system, like the elements <strong>of</strong> a whole.<br />

However, the economic society is<br />

made in order to exploit the<br />

environment as a whole, to produce<br />

wealth. Our paradoxical role that we<br />

play in the ambient environment as<br />

participants and as explorers distorts<br />

our picture <strong>of</strong> it.” (17)<br />

Over the years, especially in the developed<br />

countries <strong>of</strong> the world, people have built an<br />

artificial environment through their activity


that continues to create a sensation and an<br />

impression that because <strong>of</strong> this environment,<br />

whose engine is considered to be the<br />

machineries, people have got rid <strong>of</strong> their<br />

dependence on the natural environment.<br />

Error, illusion, delusion. Why? At least for<br />

the following reasons:<br />

- “The living creatures are composed<br />

almost exclusively <strong>of</strong> the same four<br />

elements: hydrogen, oxygen, carbon,<br />

and nitrogen – four elements that<br />

originally formed the initial<br />

atmosphere <strong>of</strong> the Earth.” (18)<br />

- The source <strong>of</strong> life is represented by<br />

“the thin air, water and soil <strong>of</strong> the<br />

earth and the sun rays that bathe it”.<br />

(19)<br />

- The natural environment “is one<br />

living machinery, huge and very<br />

complex, that constitutes a thin<br />

dynamic layer on the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Earth and every human activity<br />

depends on the perfect state and good<br />

functioning <strong>of</strong> this mechanism”. (20)<br />

- And “no economic system can be<br />

considered to be solid if its<br />

functioning seriously violates the<br />

principles <strong>of</strong> ecology” (21)<br />

h) The crucial and the decisive factor in<br />

the ecoeco mega-system, in other<br />

words within the eco-economy is<br />

planet Earth (the environment). The<br />

limits <strong>of</strong> the economy’s growth and<br />

development are given by the<br />

planet’s limits to support both the<br />

economic growth and development.<br />

And the most important thing – an<br />

economy tolerated by the<br />

environment and also on long term,<br />

sustainable and viable in<br />

concordance with the principles <strong>of</strong><br />

ecology compatible with the<br />

principles <strong>of</strong> ecology compatible<br />

with the environment, which Lester<br />

Brown called eco-economy, that is<br />

ecological or green economy.<br />

i) The human being’s domination over<br />

the nature. Preoccupied by the “well-<br />

75<br />

being” in general, Rene Descartes<br />

argued that people should become,<br />

by the help <strong>of</strong> the science and<br />

technology, “possessing masters <strong>of</strong><br />

the nature”. “As soon as they have<br />

possessed some general notions <strong>of</strong><br />

physics, tested in some difficult<br />

cases, we noticed, he said, how far<br />

they could take us and how different<br />

they were in comparison with the<br />

principles used so far. I considered<br />

that I could not keep them secret<br />

without making a sin against the law<br />

that forces us to contribute, as much<br />

as we could to the general wellbeing:<br />

they showed me that it was<br />

possible to reach valuable knowledge<br />

for life and instead <strong>of</strong> that<br />

speculative philosophy that was<br />

taught in schools, in order to find a<br />

practical one, by which to know the<br />

power and action <strong>of</strong> fire, water, air,<br />

stars, sky and <strong>of</strong> all the things that<br />

surrounded us, as well as we knew<br />

different jobs, we could use them in<br />

the same way for all our objectives<br />

thus, becoming masters and<br />

possessors <strong>of</strong> nature.”(22)<br />

Paradoxically, for a long time, people<br />

believed and unfortunately they still do<br />

nowadays, that one <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />

criteria <strong>of</strong> the economic and social<br />

development is the degree <strong>of</strong> possession,<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> domination <strong>of</strong> the human<br />

beings upon nature. Moreover, the<br />

extremely accelerated development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

science, technology, informatics and<br />

communication, the astonishing growth<br />

in speed <strong>of</strong> the means <strong>of</strong> transport, and<br />

especially the rapidity with which<br />

information flows, practically the death<br />

<strong>of</strong> space and time, the manufacturing <strong>of</strong><br />

some products having the same<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> the ones made by<br />

nature, as well as the production <strong>of</strong> some<br />

products (goods) that cannot be found in<br />

the nature and such other remarkable<br />

progresses that induced to many human


eings the illusion <strong>of</strong> acquisition, the<br />

conquest <strong>of</strong> an absolute and total<br />

independence towards nature and its<br />

forms. Therefore, the human being has<br />

conquest the nature, and its economy<br />

represents that “body’ that is in our<br />

planetary center in the form <strong>of</strong> a central<br />

axis, around which all the other systems<br />

spin around. The human being considers<br />

itself the planet’s lord almighty, totally<br />

independent from it. Again mistake,<br />

illusion and delusion. How can be a<br />

human being totally independent <strong>of</strong><br />

nature, when this is an organic element <strong>of</strong><br />

the planet Earth. How can the human<br />

being believe that there is an absolute<br />

independence when its entire real<br />

economy is based on nature, substance,<br />

substance, energy and force <strong>of</strong> nature?<br />

Such an understanding <strong>of</strong> reality,<br />

illusions and myths generated by the<br />

mentioned mistakes has introduced “bad<br />

elements” in the attitudes and behaviors<br />

<strong>of</strong> the human beings. Therefore, for most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the economic actors, as well as among<br />

the representatives <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />

theory, what mattered and really matters<br />

primarily is the gain, the maximum pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

and because <strong>of</strong> these their economic<br />

domination and not just economic, their<br />

domination upon some elements (parts)<br />

<strong>of</strong> nature had and unfortunately still have<br />

a colonial, usurper and destructive<br />

character.<br />

j) The economy is self-destructive<br />

The human society along with its<br />

economy, exists and moves, functions<br />

and develops in time and space. The<br />

second half <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century is<br />

known as being rich in economical<br />

progresses. Among these, we mention “<br />

an unprecedented global economic<br />

growth, <strong>of</strong> commerce and <strong>of</strong> international<br />

investments (…) the global economy has<br />

increased seven times since 1950, the<br />

global income has increased from 6<br />

billion $ in goods and services to 43<br />

billion $ in 2000, raising living standards<br />

76<br />

at unbelievable levels.” (23) During this<br />

fragment <strong>of</strong> history, in the advanced<br />

world, there was a society <strong>of</strong> welfare,<br />

frequently called “consumer society”.<br />

Also during this period, the technical and<br />

scientific revolution has clearly stated its<br />

dimension in the geographically, its<br />

intensity and depth <strong>of</strong>ten exceeding most<br />

impressive imaginations. The IT and<br />

communicational revolution has made,<br />

according to some inspired expressions,<br />

“for time and space to disappear”. It is<br />

worth mentioning, the thawing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

international economic relationships, the<br />

international economic integration and<br />

not least, there could be seen clear signs<br />

<strong>of</strong> globalization in the economic and<br />

social life. This is the way the world<br />

looks like, seen in its economic mirror.<br />

Willing to complete the image <strong>of</strong> Planet<br />

Earth, we have turned to the green mirror<br />

and this is what we have noticed: the<br />

same economic increase and<br />

development has been presented as being<br />

the product <strong>of</strong> burning huge materials <strong>of</strong><br />

cheap fossil fuels, which contributed a lot<br />

to climate destabilization.<br />

Simultaneously, this mirror has presented<br />

waves <strong>of</strong> intense heat, storms and more<br />

devastating tornadoes, ice caps are<br />

melting, the higher sea levels, and<br />

restricting land surface, even in the<br />

context in which the planet’s population<br />

is growing. (24)<br />

So, two mirrors, two images and beyond<br />

them two states. AS Lester Brown<br />

Noticed “while the economists see<br />

explosive economic indicators, the<br />

ecologists see an economy that<br />

deteriorates climate with unpredictable<br />

consequences. The economy follows the<br />

way <strong>of</strong> self-destruction. Moreover, the<br />

mutual relationships between the two<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> the ecoeco are seriously<br />

deteriorated and thus, the dangers that are<br />

threatening more and more the state (the<br />

functioning and evolution) <strong>of</strong> the entire<br />

planet. The most eloquent form <strong>of</strong> the


ecology’s and <strong>of</strong> the eco-economy’s selfdestruction<br />

is the crises in which they are<br />

struggling.<br />

k) The challenge <strong>of</strong> challenges – the<br />

conversion <strong>of</strong> the economy in ecoeconomy<br />

The science <strong>of</strong> economy has a lot <strong>of</strong><br />

challenges. In our opinion, a complete<br />

inventory is impossible to be done. The<br />

“Mendeleev-like” picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economic sciences’ challenges will<br />

always be completed with new blocks<br />

and new “elements”. But it will always<br />

remain open. This is the case with all the<br />

branches <strong>of</strong> science. The history <strong>of</strong><br />

science, <strong>of</strong> all its branches, tells us and<br />

proves to us the fact that the science has<br />

the first word but it does not have the last<br />

word. Acknowledging this truth, we<br />

sought to find a challenge <strong>of</strong> challenges<br />

among the ones already identified in the<br />

private economy as reality and as a<br />

science. This is “the conversion <strong>of</strong><br />

economy in eco-economy”. This was<br />

stated by Lester brown who noticed the<br />

fact that “the conversion <strong>of</strong> the economy<br />

in an eco-economy represents an<br />

extraordinary challenge. There is no<br />

precedent in the action <strong>of</strong> transforming an<br />

economy based mainly on the market<br />

forces in an economy formed on the<br />

principles <strong>of</strong> ecology” (25)<br />

Why is this conversion necessary? Lester<br />

Brown considers that “today’s global<br />

economy has been formulated by the market<br />

forces and not by the principles <strong>of</strong> ecology.<br />

Unfortunately, due to failure in reflecting<br />

total costs <strong>of</strong> the goods and services, the<br />

market provides information that mislead the<br />

decisive economic factors at all levels. This<br />

aspect has created a distorted economy,<br />

which is in conflict with the ecosystem <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planet – an economy that destroys its own<br />

natural support systems.” (26)<br />

“The market does not recognize the ecologic<br />

concepts <strong>of</strong> tolerable production and does not<br />

respect the balance <strong>of</strong> nature.” (27)<br />

According to Lester Brown, “An economy is<br />

77<br />

an economy that satisfies our demands<br />

without destroying the perspectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

future generations to fulfil their needs, as the<br />

Brundtland Committee has underlined 15<br />

years ago.” (28)<br />

Following these ideas, Lester Brown notices:<br />

There have been enough records regarding<br />

the fact that, gradually, our global economy<br />

undermines itself on several levels. If we<br />

want for the economic progress to continue,<br />

we have only the small chance <strong>of</strong><br />

systematically restructure the global<br />

economy, in order to make it bearable for the<br />

environment.” (29)<br />

These truths are undoubtedly confirmed by<br />

the ecologic crises, by the deep cracks <strong>of</strong> the<br />

correlations between the economy’s structural<br />

links as well as between the different<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the planet Earth, plus the<br />

serious contradictions between economy and<br />

nature. And we must not forget the fact that<br />

all or almost all these phenomena and<br />

realities have their source in the models <strong>of</strong><br />

economic and social growth and development<br />

that have become more and more not only unecological<br />

but also against ecology.<br />

7. In search for a better world<br />

The people regarded as living human beings ,<br />

and not only they, are obviously and<br />

constantly concerned with the improvement<br />

<strong>of</strong> their situation (state). Mentioning this<br />

general feature <strong>of</strong> the living, Karl R. Popper<br />

noticed that “Everything that is living is in<br />

search for a better world. The people, the<br />

animals, the plants and even the unicellular<br />

organisms are continuously active. Even in<br />

sleep the body actively maintains that certain<br />

state <strong>of</strong> sleep, actively defends itself <strong>of</strong> what<br />

is disturbing, <strong>of</strong> the environment. Any<br />

organism is continuously preoccupied with<br />

finding solutions. And the solutions appear<br />

from the evaluation <strong>of</strong> its state and <strong>of</strong> its<br />

environment, trying to improve them. The<br />

attempt to solve them, <strong>of</strong>ten proves to be<br />

wrong, leading to worsening. Then, other<br />

solving attempts, other test movements<br />

follow. Thus, along with life – even from the


unicellular organisms, something extremely<br />

new appears (something that has never been<br />

before: problems and active attempts to solve<br />

them evaluations, values, trial and error)<br />

(30)<br />

The actors implied in solving the problems<br />

are researchers, finders, discoverers. The<br />

activity, the anxiety or the curiosity that is<br />

given by the research are essential elements<br />

for life, for everlasting hope, for search,<br />

evaluation, finding, for learning, for value<br />

creation, for improvements, but also for the<br />

everlasting mistake, as well as for nonvalues’<br />

realization. The items listed are<br />

part <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

Karl Popper believes that “the bodies<br />

searching for a better world find invent and<br />

change new environments. They build nests,<br />

dams, mountains, but their creation with the<br />

most significant consequences is obviously<br />

the reshaping the earth’s atmosphere by<br />

enriching it with oxygen; in turn, a<br />

consequence <strong>of</strong> discovering the fact that<br />

sunlight can serve as food. Discovering this<br />

inexhaustible source <strong>of</strong> food and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

multiple methods <strong>of</strong> capturing sunlight, has<br />

created flora. And the prediction for the<br />

planet as a food source created fauna. We<br />

have created ourselves by inventing our<br />

specific human language "(31) and<br />

influencing our mind and thought with it. The<br />

instinct, the intuition and the science<br />

(knowledge) have constituted and are still<br />

constituting the main elements <strong>of</strong> the search<br />

for a better world. The sentences uttered by<br />

people represent “the main instrument with<br />

which they can describe their states.”<br />

Reaching this point we have to mention the<br />

fact that the sentences help people express<br />

objectively the truth discovered by human<br />

knowledge. Mainly in the sciences <strong>of</strong> nature –<br />

“the search for truth is connected to<br />

everything that is good and impressive <strong>of</strong><br />

what life created in search for a better life.”<br />

(32)<br />

But the reality also shows us that people,<br />

searching for a better world, have committed<br />

many errors, sometimes big ones. The saying<br />

78<br />

that “everything that is alive commits errors”<br />

is true. As K. Popper underlined, “it is<br />

obviously impossible to anticipate all the<br />

unwanted consequences <strong>of</strong> our actions. The<br />

science <strong>of</strong> nature is our biggest hope here: the<br />

method is to correct the mistakes.” (33) In<br />

this way <strong>of</strong> understanding the problem, it is<br />

obvious that the expansion and the deepening<br />

<strong>of</strong> the scientific knowledge, by which the<br />

society and the human beings take intellectual<br />

control over a growing field <strong>of</strong> reality<br />

represents and will represent the most<br />

probable way to follow in order to achieve<br />

big successes. In our opinion, the science, the<br />

knowledge is the compass that help people to<br />

orient and to lead its ship on the stormy<br />

waves <strong>of</strong> time. We like to believe that our<br />

words, even if they are not rigorous and<br />

exact, are somehow close to the truth.<br />

Towards the end <strong>of</strong> the 20 th century, the<br />

science and the scientific knowledge has<br />

recorded remarkable progresses, and<br />

according to some appreciations during this<br />

period lived approximately 90% <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

scientists who have ever existed on Earth. We<br />

also like to notice the fact that presently the<br />

human beings, the contemporary world<br />

acknowledge an invisible revolution in<br />

informatics and communications, whose main<br />

unit is “nano”. These powerful engines and<br />

forces push the human beings in a society<br />

based on scientific knowledge. However, in<br />

spite <strong>of</strong> these realities, the present society and<br />

its economy have much more problems than<br />

in any other past period, problems having no<br />

answers, no solutions. Paradoxically, the<br />

progress <strong>of</strong> the scientific knowledge<br />

discovers and creates new and new problems<br />

that are waiting to be solved.


8. A free market or another type <strong>of</strong><br />

market?<br />

A brief foray into the history <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />

thinking convinces us easily that since the<br />

modern age, the economists have given the<br />

market a special role. In other words, the<br />

market has captured more and more the<br />

attention <strong>of</strong> the economists. For Adam Smith<br />

the market represents the regulator <strong>of</strong> the<br />

labor division. Its volume determines the<br />

level reached by the division, this process,<br />

this accelerator <strong>of</strong> production. Moreover, the<br />

market is the place where “the invisible<br />

hand”, the <strong>of</strong>fer and the demand intermingle<br />

and are balanced automatically on the market,<br />

through prices. Simon de Sismondi considered<br />

that the mass consumers, their demands, the<br />

proportions <strong>of</strong> their consumption and <strong>of</strong> their<br />

incomes – all these form the market for which<br />

every single producer works. Raymonde<br />

Barre defines the market as being a “network<br />

<strong>of</strong> relationships between the agents who make<br />

the shift, that are rigorously communicated<br />

through certain means.” According to him,<br />

the market consists <strong>of</strong> distinct economic<br />

centers, linked together by means <strong>of</strong><br />

exchange networks, joined by a network <strong>of</strong><br />

forces. These centers are production centers,<br />

supply <strong>of</strong> production factors and <strong>of</strong> goods.<br />

They are linked by a functional solidarity that<br />

comes out from the necessity <strong>of</strong> their interest<br />

in developing the economic activity. For<br />

Michel Didier “the market is a social<br />

institution.” For him, “the market appears as<br />

an overall means <strong>of</strong> communication, by<br />

which sellers and buyers inform each other<br />

about products and prices before transactions<br />

are done. The markets are communication<br />

networks.”<br />

J. Bremond and A. Gélédan write in the<br />

Economic and Social Dictionary that “the<br />

market is the place where the <strong>of</strong>fers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sellers meet the demands <strong>of</strong> the buyers, being<br />

adjusted at a certain price. The market is thus,<br />

a way <strong>of</strong> confronting demand with <strong>of</strong>fer in<br />

order to make a change <strong>of</strong> products, services<br />

or capitals.”<br />

79<br />

A quite remarkable definition, at least for us,<br />

belongs to the Polish economist Oskar Lange.<br />

He noticed that “the market is the first<br />

ordinator put in the service <strong>of</strong> man, a selfregulating<br />

machinery ensuring the balance <strong>of</strong><br />

the economic activities..” (34) D’Avenal<br />

noticed in the language <strong>of</strong> his era, <strong>of</strong> the<br />

honest liberalism: „Even in the situation<br />

when nothing id free in a state, the price <strong>of</strong><br />

the things remains free and would not be<br />

enslaved to anyone. The price <strong>of</strong> silver, land,<br />

labour, the prices <strong>of</strong> all the goods and<br />

services have never ceased being free; no<br />

legal constriction, no agreement between<br />

people have enslaved them.” (35)<br />

In Fernand Braudel's opinion "These<br />

considerations implicitly admit that the<br />

market that is not directed by anyone, it is the<br />

mechanism driving the whole economy. The<br />

economic development in Europe, and even<br />

in the world, would be the development <strong>of</strong> a<br />

market economy that has constantly increased<br />

its area, including in its rational order more<br />

and more people, more and more economic<br />

communications, close and remote, which<br />

tend to create, all together, a unity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world." (36)<br />

Still, what are the status and the condition <strong>of</strong><br />

the market in the nowadays world? A<br />

comprehensive answer fully argued by<br />

confirmed facts and thus legitimized, not by<br />

questionable opinions sometimes even<br />

refuted by reality, does not fit in the pages <strong>of</strong><br />

a communication no matter how extensive it<br />

might be. Therefore, we will limit ourselves<br />

to not more than a summary, yet as<br />

comprehensive as possible, insisting on the<br />

following:<br />

- Market - conceptually, its anatomicalmorphological<br />

structure, the forms (types),<br />

the way <strong>of</strong> operation and development, its<br />

place and its role in the contemporary<br />

economy continue to be the subject <strong>of</strong><br />

extensive and lively theoretical,<br />

methodological and practical confrontations.<br />

- Trying to summarize, a group, <strong>of</strong> course<br />

relative, we believe that on the large field <strong>of</strong><br />

confrontations about market one can


generally distinguish two trends, two<br />

approaches, namely: a) classical and<br />

contemporary liberal approach and b) nonliberal<br />

approach with its subdivisions as well<br />

as the former.<br />

- In the liberal approach, the market is a<br />

general mechanism, self-regulating; it is<br />

comprehensive and accomplishes, performs<br />

and assures in itself, through the spontaneous<br />

action, the efficient allocation <strong>of</strong> resources, <strong>of</strong><br />

production factors, orients the economic<br />

movement according to the individual needs<br />

and interests <strong>of</strong> the economic actors, while<br />

ensuring the maintenance <strong>of</strong> balance between<br />

the links <strong>of</strong> the social division <strong>of</strong> labour,<br />

between supply and demand. The economic<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> the market economy is formed by the<br />

private ownership <strong>of</strong> means <strong>of</strong> production, the<br />

fundament <strong>of</strong> autonomy and independence <strong>of</strong><br />

actors and therefore the base <strong>of</strong> the freedom<br />

<strong>of</strong> thought and movement <strong>of</strong> production<br />

factors, goods, capital and economic actors.<br />

- The most important constitutive <br />

<strong>of</strong> the market and its mechanism are: pr<strong>of</strong>it,<br />

demand, <strong>of</strong>fer, the interplay between demand<br />

and <strong>of</strong>fer, free competition and price.<br />

- This free market is by definition a pure and<br />

perfect market and ensures also pure and<br />

perfect functioning <strong>of</strong> the free market<br />

economy.<br />

- According to the second approach, the<br />

market is indeed the most important<br />

mechanism <strong>of</strong> operation and development <strong>of</strong><br />

economic life. The advocates and the<br />

supporters <strong>of</strong> this way <strong>of</strong> understanding the<br />

market and the market economy believe,<br />

however, that the market economy and the<br />

free market economy are not the same thing.<br />

The two concepts are not identical and should<br />

not be confused. Saying these and referring to<br />

the era we live in, we feel the need to add that<br />

in the debates that take place, it is <strong>of</strong>ten not<br />

said what is a confirmed truth, and, for<br />

various reasons, some truth containing<br />

paradigms are premeditatedly similar. As an<br />

example we can here mention a work,<br />

remarkable in our opinion, which presents a<br />

80<br />

total <strong>of</strong> 23 things we are NOT told about<br />

capitalism. (37)<br />

To exemplify, we shall present in a summary<br />

the main ideas contained in Chapter 1 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

book, entitled: "There is no free market"<br />

"What you are said"<br />

"Markets should be free. If governments<br />

dictate what market actors can and cannot do,<br />

the resources cannot get where they would be<br />

most effectively used. If they cannot do what<br />

they consider pr<strong>of</strong>itable, people lose their<br />

desire to invest and innovate. Thus, if the<br />

government limits or sets a threshold for<br />

rents, the owners lose their desire to maintain<br />

the properties and build new ones. Or if the<br />

government imposes a restriction on the types<br />

<strong>of</strong> financial products that can be sold, then the<br />

contracting parties, which could have<br />

benefited from innovative transactions that<br />

could meet their specific needs, would not be<br />

able to obtain the potential gain from a free<br />

contact. People need to be "free to choose" as<br />

said by the title <strong>of</strong> a famous book written by<br />

the prophet <strong>of</strong> the free market, Milton<br />

Friedman." (38)<br />

"What you are not said"<br />

"The free market does not exist. Each market<br />

has certain rules and limitations that restrict<br />

freedom <strong>of</strong> choice. A market seems to be free<br />

only as we accept unconditionally the default<br />

restrictions, which we can no longer see.<br />

There cannot be defined how a<br />

market is. The definition is a political one.<br />

The usual statement <strong>of</strong> the free market<br />

economists, that they try to defend the market<br />

from political interference, is rather false. The<br />

government is always involved, and the free<br />

market advocates are politically motivated as<br />

much as anyone. The first step to<br />

understanding capitalism is overcoming the<br />

myth that there objectively is a .<br />

The paradigmatic assumption, that nowadays<br />

there is no, and can never be, such thing as a<br />

pure and perfect free market, all-comprising<br />

and all-knowing, omnipotent, regulated by<br />

nothing and fully unregulated or deregulated,<br />

directed by nothing and completely


undirected but totally spontaneous, expresses<br />

a truth confirmed.<br />

And yet apparently there is something more<br />

that needs to be said. Okay, okay - there is no<br />

free market, but what is there? In our opinion<br />

there is a market or, as Maurice Allais writes,<br />

a markets economy. (39)<br />

A short journey through the history <strong>of</strong><br />

economic thinking provides us with no little<br />

evidence - arguments that show convincingly<br />

that the market and the market economy are,<br />

as mentioned, much older than the capitalist<br />

market economy. The same journey provides<br />

unequivocal evidence showing that the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> free competition – a fundamental<br />

element <strong>of</strong> the free market economy-, has<br />

never been comprehensive, but for a short<br />

period <strong>of</strong> time it was dominant especially in<br />

England and that it committed suicide<br />

according to the expression <strong>of</strong> K. Marx. The<br />

place <strong>of</strong> the morphological-anatomical<br />

atomized structure <strong>of</strong> the economic actors, <strong>of</strong><br />

the capitalist economy, has changed due to<br />

objective economic laws – concentration<br />

(accumulation <strong>of</strong> capital, concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

production), centralization <strong>of</strong> capital and<br />

production, <strong>of</strong> economic activity in general,<br />

competition law, uneven development – have<br />

generated a new form <strong>of</strong> capital, the<br />

monopolist capital, which personified itself as<br />

a specific type <strong>of</strong> economic actor – the<br />

monopoly in various forms: cartel, syndicate,<br />

trust, concern, corporation, etc. At this stage,<br />

competition itself has changed both its<br />

content and its forms <strong>of</strong> expression.<br />

Basically, at a growing scale, free<br />

competition gave way to monopolistic<br />

competition; full competition - pure and<br />

perfect - became imperfect competition, etc.<br />

At the same time, the mechanisms, the means<br />

and the methods <strong>of</strong> action have changed. This<br />

very thing made the subject <strong>of</strong> research <strong>of</strong><br />

political economy become richer and more<br />

complex. The new economic reality could not<br />

fail to attract the attention <strong>of</strong> the<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> this branch <strong>of</strong> science and<br />

not only. For illustration we mention that in<br />

1933 two relevant works were published: the<br />

81<br />

book <strong>of</strong> the economist Joan Robinson,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor at the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics in<br />

Cambridge University, entitled "The<br />

economics <strong>of</strong> imperfect competition" and,<br />

again in Cambridge, but in the United States<br />

this time, E.H. Chamberlain's work, entitled<br />

"The theory <strong>of</strong> the monopolistic competition".<br />

Also for illustration, we add the name <strong>of</strong> JM<br />

Keynes and several <strong>of</strong> his works, <strong>of</strong> which the<br />

most important, for its content and cognitive,<br />

methodological and applicative value, is "The<br />

General Theory <strong>of</strong> Employment, Interest and<br />

Money" (1936).<br />

Keynes's thinking and that <strong>of</strong> his followers, in<br />

fact Keynes's model was in a sense and the theoretical basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> operation and evolution <strong>of</strong> the Western<br />

economy and society after World War II until<br />

the early ‘70s <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century. The<br />

name given to this society is . The world economic crisis <strong>of</strong><br />

1973-1975 interrupted the way <strong>of</strong> the<br />

industrial consumer society. The same crisis,<br />

specifically the way it was addressed,<br />

understood and explained, constituted a clear<br />

rejection <strong>of</strong> Keynes thinking and a powerful<br />

return <strong>of</strong> neoclassical liberalism. Keynes's<br />

theory and the policies that had been inspired<br />

by it were brought to the culprits<br />

. In this context, two schools <strong>of</strong><br />

thinking were set up. First, there was a new -<br />

and final - attempt to make a synthesis<br />

between the neoclassical and the Keynesian<br />

analyses, synthesis performed differently than<br />

the first. Its authors were led by the French economist<br />

Edmond Malinvaud. This current <strong>of</strong> thinking<br />

believes that imbalances and long-term<br />

unemployment are possible in a world where<br />

prices and wages are flexible, but it considers<br />

that these phenomena are caused by an<br />

insufficiency <strong>of</strong> global demand - Keynesian<br />

unemployment and an insufficiency <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fer -<br />

classic unemployment.<br />

The second trend is the ultra-liberalism<br />

(Hayek - the foremost representative), the<br />

monetarism or perhaps more accurately, the<br />

monetarisms (whose no.1 representative is


Milton Friedman), plus the neoclassical<br />

economics (foremost representatives being<br />

Robert Lucas, Thomas Sargent and Neil<br />

Wallace)<br />

The third monetarist trend is the supply-side<br />

economics <strong>of</strong> (Arthur Laffer at the forefront<br />

<strong>of</strong> followers). (40)<br />

<strong>of</strong> neoclassical liberalism<br />

was an apparent victory and on short term<br />

only. The end <strong>of</strong> the first decade <strong>of</strong> the third<br />

millennium saw a complex and deep<br />

economic and financial crisis, a crisis <strong>of</strong><br />

governance and administration, as well,<br />

which, in their interaction, resulted in a deep<br />

rift in the operation and development <strong>of</strong><br />

economic, financial-monetary and social life<br />

<strong>of</strong> the current world.<br />

This crisis, more accurately the assembly <strong>of</strong><br />

crises, that swept our world, closes a period<br />

and represents a milestone and a starting<br />

point in the human history, a main sign <strong>of</strong> the<br />

renewal <strong>of</strong> society and its great structures.<br />

Economically, the crisis developed as soon as<br />

in 2008 contradicted many paradigms <strong>of</strong><br />

liberal and especially neo-liberal thinking and<br />

several steps <strong>of</strong> orientation and political<br />

action <strong>of</strong> a neoclassical-liberal nature. "The<br />

global economy lies in ruins. Although<br />

unprecedented fiscal and monetary aid<br />

prevented the financial collapse in 2008 from<br />

triggering complete destruction <strong>of</strong> the world<br />

economy, the global crash <strong>of</strong> 2008 remains<br />

the second largest economic crisis after the<br />

Great Depression."(41)<br />

It has now become much more visible that the<br />

notions, the concepts <strong>of</strong> free competition, free<br />

market economy, pure and perfect<br />

competition, all-comprising market and allknowing<br />

market, perfect market, totally<br />

spontaneous economic movement and others<br />

<strong>of</strong> the same arsenal are worthless cognitively<br />

and practically, and therefore false, and<br />

circulate in the big world as counterfeit coins<br />

or other fake things.<br />

Simultaneously, the crisis confirmed a whole<br />

range <strong>of</strong> paradigms from the Keynesist and<br />

neokeynesist (postkeynesist) thinking arsenal<br />

and practical orientation, considered, until<br />

82<br />

recently, and in many cases even now, as<br />

lacking authentic cognitive and applicative<br />

value. And it does not stop here. Why?<br />

Because the new economy, being born now,<br />

necessarily requires a new economic<br />

thinking, as well.<br />

Notes<br />

(1) Handy Charles, Epoca Irațiunii, Editura<br />

Codex, 2007; Pelerina Goală, Editura Codex,<br />

2007; Elefantul și Puricele, Editura Codex,<br />

2007.<br />

(2) Popper R. Karl, Filos<strong>of</strong>ie socială și<br />

filos<strong>of</strong>ia științei. Antologie editată de David<br />

Miller, Editura Trei, Bucharest, 2000, p. 60.<br />

(3) Op.cit., pag. 62.<br />

(4) Marx K., Capitalul, vol. I, in: Marx,<br />

Engels, Opere vol. 23, Editura Politică,<br />

Bucharest, 1966, p.191 (emphasis added by<br />

author AN).<br />

(5) Handy Charles, Epoca Irațiunii. O<br />

gândire nouă pentru o lume nouă , Editura<br />

Codex, Bucharest, 2007, p. 23 (emphasis<br />

added by author AN).<br />

(6) Arendt Hannah, Condiția umană, Ed.<br />

Casa Cărții de Știință, Cluj-Napoca, 2007,<br />

p.13 (emphasis added by author AN).<br />

(7) Idem (6) (emphasis added by author AN).<br />

(8) Idem (6) (emphasis added by author AN).<br />

(9) Idem (6) (emphasis added by author AN).<br />

(10) Arendt Hannah, Op. Cit., p. 8 (emphasis<br />

added by author AN).<br />

(11) Negucioiu Aurel, Petrescu Dacinia<br />

Crina, Introducere în eco-economie, Ed.<br />

Fundației pentru Studii Studii Europene,<br />

Cluj-Napoca, 2006, p.35.<br />

(12) Negucioiu Aurel, Petrescu Dacinia<br />

Crina, Op. Cit., pp.25-36.<br />

(13) Bonnet Jaques, Marile metropole<br />

mondiale, Ed. Institutul European, Iași, 2000,<br />

p. 209.<br />

(14) Bryant Herman, Mehrtens Susan, Al<br />

patrulea val, Ed. Antet, pp.108-109<br />

(emphasis added by author AN).<br />

(15) Negucioiu Aurel, Petrescu Dacinia<br />

Crina, Op. Cit., p.37 (emphasis added by<br />

author AN).


(16) Brown Lester, Eco-economia. Crearea<br />

unei economii pentru planeta noastră, Ed.<br />

Tehnică, Bucharest, 2001, pp.1-5 (emphasis<br />

added by author AN).<br />

(17) Commoner Barry, Cercul care se<br />

închide, Ed. Politică, Bucharest, 1989, p.11<br />

(emphasis added by author AN).<br />

(18) Commoner Barry, Op. Cit, p.21.<br />

(19) Commoner Barry, Op. Cit, p.14.<br />

(20) Commoner Barry, Op. Cit, p.20.<br />

(21) Commoner Barry, Op. Cit, p.270.<br />

(22) Decartes René, Discurs despre metoda<br />

de a ne conduce bine națiunea și a căuta<br />

adevărul în științe, Ed. Academiei Române,<br />

Bucharest, 1990, p.146 (emphasis added by<br />

author AN).<br />

(23) Brown Lester, Op. Cit., p.2.<br />

(24) Brown Lester, Op. Cit., p.3.<br />

(25) Brown Lester, Op. Cit., p.89 (emphasis<br />

added by author AN).<br />

(26) Ibidem (25), p.86 (emphasis added by<br />

author AN).<br />

(27) Ibidem (26).<br />

(28) Ibidem (26).<br />

(29) Ibidem (26), p.89 (emphasis added by<br />

author AN).<br />

(30) Popper R. Karl, În căutarea unei lumi<br />

mai bune, Ed. Humanitas, Bucharest, 1987,<br />

p.5 (emphasis added by author AN).<br />

(31) Popper R. Karl, Op. cit., p.6 (emphasis<br />

added by author AN).<br />

(32) Op.cit., p.6.<br />

(33) Op.cit., p.6 (emphasis added by author<br />

AN).<br />

(34) After Fernand Braudel, Jocurile<br />

schimbului, vol. 1, Ed. Meridiane, Bucharest,<br />

1985, p.267.<br />

(35) After Op. cit. (34), p.267 (emphasis<br />

added by author AN).<br />

83<br />

(36) Fernand Braudel, Op. cit., p.267<br />

(emphasis added by author AN).<br />

(37) Chang Ha-Joon, 23 de lucruri care nu și<br />

se spun despre capitalism. "O demistificare<br />

strălucită a unor mituri ale capitalismului"<br />

(John Gray, The Observer).<br />

“Disciple <strong>of</strong> Stephen Stiglitz and one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

most iconoclastic economists <strong>of</strong> these times,<br />

Ha-Joon Chang removes some <strong>of</strong> the myths <strong>of</strong><br />

capitalism and <strong>of</strong> the world we live in,<br />

including the myth <strong>of</strong> the free market or that<br />

technology is the way to progress for<br />

everyone. One by one, the principles <strong>of</strong><br />

economic doctrines received for granted are<br />

presented in the historical context <strong>of</strong><br />

formations, before becoming self-evident.<br />

Globalization does not make the world richer.<br />

Poor countries prove more entrepreneurial<br />

spirit than the rich ones. Better paid managers<br />

do not get better results. Based on the actual<br />

data, this book about money, equality,<br />

freedom and greed proves that free market<br />

does not only work against people, but it is<br />

also an inefficient way to manage the<br />

economy” (second cover <strong>of</strong> the book).<br />

(38) Chang Ha-Joon ,Op.cit., p.19 (emphasis<br />

added by author AN).<br />

(39) Allais Maurice, L’Europe face a son<br />

avenir: que faire?, Editions Clement Juglar,<br />

Editions Robert Lafont, 1991, especially note<br />

18, p.142.<br />

(40) Valier Jaques, Scurtă istorie a gândirii<br />

economice de la Aristotel până azi, Ed.<br />

Campania, Bucharest, pp. 122-132 (emphasis<br />

added by author AN).<br />

(41) Chang Ha-Joon, Op.Cit., p.13.


CONTINUING INTERNATIONAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION IN THE<br />

FINANCIAL CRISIS CONTEXT<br />

Berinde Mihai<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Economic Sciences Department<br />

Abstract: This research paper is based on an assessment <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> the recent financial crisis<br />

on the international trade and the way states and international organizations acted in this context.<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> this research topic consists in identifying the way the international trade<br />

liberalization process has been affected by the financial crisis and the way anti-crisis measures<br />

deviated from the basic rules agreed under the aegis <strong>of</strong> WTO/GATT.<br />

The intended purpose <strong>of</strong> the paper is to conduct a substantive assessment <strong>of</strong> undertaken actions by<br />

the various states aimed to mitigate crisis impact on anti-dumping investigations and measures.<br />

Precisely, it was assayed whether the international financial crisis has been an opportunity for<br />

WTO member states to plainly intervene in the economy and give up the commitments they made in<br />

the context <strong>of</strong> multilateral commercial negotiations. Considering the international, regional and<br />

national effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis the topic has been copiously elaborated on by economics literature. A<br />

number <strong>of</strong> anti-crisis measures were presented encouraging massive intervention in the economy, as<br />

well as actions, particularly <strong>of</strong> International Organizations according to which measures could be<br />

taken without deviating from globally agreed mechanisms and principles. In order to be able to find<br />

out which <strong>of</strong> these two options prevailed in actions undertaken by the states the types <strong>of</strong><br />

international, regional or national anti-crisis measures were selected. Positions voiced by the<br />

World Trade Organization, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD),<br />

European Union are rendered.<br />

To answer the question about the way it has been responded in order to mitigate crisis effects,<br />

adopted anti-crisis measures were inventoried and their deviation from international rules was<br />

assessed.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the indicators used in the assessment <strong>of</strong> anti-crisis measures is the progress <strong>of</strong> the antidumping<br />

investigations and measures notified to WTO in the past 9 years for which data were<br />

available (2003-2009). The relevance <strong>of</strong> this period lies in the fact that it includes 5 pre-crisis years<br />

and 2 years when it was strongly evident.<br />

It was found that the number <strong>of</strong> anti-crisis investigations and measures has not seen significant<br />

increases during the crisis period. Moreover, it has been found that states have shown a certain<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> flexibility in construing application <strong>of</strong> certain international principles rather than<br />

relinquishing them.<br />

It is thereby demonstrated that the international trade liberalization process continues without<br />

major disruptions by the financial crisis. This gives confidence to states and business environment<br />

with respect to predictability <strong>of</strong> international trade developments.<br />

The paper has significant added value brought about by both literature processing and<br />

interpretation and the author’s experience in international trade negotiations. The very election <strong>of</strong><br />

the indicator pertaining to anti-dumping investigations and measures was based on the fact that<br />

changing trade defence mechanisms into protectionist mechanisms <strong>of</strong>ten stands for prevailing<br />

immediate crisis resolution.<br />

Keywords: financial crisis, anti-dumping investigations and measures, trade liberalization, state<br />

aid, preferential trade systems<br />

JEL Classification codes: F13, F15<br />

85


I. Introduction<br />

The topic <strong>of</strong> this paper is directly related to<br />

the financial crisis effects on international<br />

trade liberalization. It aims to identify the<br />

way anti-crisis measures affected<br />

international trade negotiations in view <strong>of</strong><br />

trade liberalization, successful performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> preferential trade systems, as well as<br />

negotiation and implementation <strong>of</strong> regional<br />

integration agreements.<br />

Trade liberalization has seen various<br />

approaches. In many instances it has been<br />

regarded as detrimental to economic<br />

development, protectionist theories<br />

attempting to maintain the need to increase<br />

borderline protection by various tariff, nontariff<br />

or para-tariff measures resulting in<br />

reduced cooperation and isolation <strong>of</strong><br />

protected economies. In these circumstances,<br />

international trade liberalization has been<br />

accepted as a solution to encourage economic<br />

development.<br />

Right after the Second World War,<br />

international trade liberalization panned out<br />

and the General Agreement on Tariffs and<br />

Trade (GATT) was negotiated in order to<br />

serve as a general framework for the<br />

liberalization process.<br />

At the time, the matter <strong>of</strong> creating the World<br />

Trade Organization was brought up for<br />

discussion as a third pillar <strong>of</strong> the world<br />

economy along with the International<br />

Monetary Fund and the International Bank<br />

for Reconstruction and Development. Failure<br />

to fully understand the liberalization process<br />

as well as the absence from negotiations <strong>of</strong><br />

some important states did not enable creation<br />

<strong>of</strong> this organization. Participating countries<br />

did not forsake the idea <strong>of</strong> creating such an<br />

organization and eventually, it was<br />

established under the Marrakech Agreement<br />

signed upon the finalization <strong>of</strong> multilateral<br />

trade negotiations within Uruguay Round. On<br />

this occasion, multilateral agreements were<br />

also renegotiated and complemented which<br />

allow member states to intervene in parallel<br />

with the liberalization process, by trade<br />

defence measures, based on well established<br />

86<br />

internationally agreed rules (agreements<br />

concerning anti-dumping measures,<br />

compensatory taxes, safeguard measures, and<br />

restrictive measures by reason <strong>of</strong> major<br />

imbalances in the balance <strong>of</strong> payments).<br />

Hence, it ensues that the liberalization<br />

process cannot and should not be seen as<br />

being apt to exclude its regulation. These are<br />

two processes going ahead together and<br />

ensure beneficial effects for economic<br />

development. International trade<br />

liberalization deepened via the multilateral<br />

negotiation rounds amongst which Uruguay<br />

Round has been the most complex and<br />

important.<br />

Another means <strong>of</strong> trade liberalization consists<br />

in the international application <strong>of</strong> customs<br />

preference systems apt to increase<br />

commercial competitiveness <strong>of</strong> products<br />

coming from developing countries in the<br />

world market. Thus, the General Preference<br />

System (GSP) was defined which provides<br />

facilities for developing countries in their<br />

relations with developed countries. Likewise,<br />

developing countries defined the General<br />

System <strong>of</strong> Trade Preferences (GSTP) and the<br />

Protocol <strong>of</strong> 16 (P-16) which should enable<br />

trade liberalization among these countries.<br />

Aware <strong>of</strong> the need to deepen the liberalization<br />

process, GATT contracting parties accepting<br />

defining in article XXIV <strong>of</strong> GATT the<br />

possibility to negotiate regional integration<br />

agreements and requirements they have to<br />

meet in order to be internationally<br />

recognized. These agreements proliferated<br />

over the past decades, while contributing<br />

significantly in trade liberalization.<br />

During the period when the financial crisis<br />

worsened, a number <strong>of</strong> protectionist theories<br />

emerged aimed at resorting to trade defence<br />

measures more frequently. There were other<br />

theories which maintained giving up during<br />

this period any trade defence measures that<br />

might adversely affect international trade.<br />

Practice has demonstrated that effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

financial crisis cannot be stopped by<br />

measures which deviate from multilaterally<br />

negotiated rules.


II. Literature review<br />

Albeit the crisis was active only three years<br />

ago, economics literature attached major<br />

importance to this phenomenon given its<br />

implications on world economy. In this<br />

context papers published under the aegis <strong>of</strong><br />

OECD, IMF, World Bank and European<br />

Commission are relevant. Moreover, the way<br />

anti-dumping investigations and measures in<br />

international trade were or were not<br />

encouraged by the crisis occurrence is tackled<br />

in various papers and periodical reports<br />

published by WTO/GATT.<br />

Once the crisis has settled into, its effects<br />

were analyzed by all international and<br />

regional organizations, and by each<br />

individual state, as well.<br />

Thus, at international level the three<br />

organizations that form the world economy<br />

pillars approached the crisis from various<br />

perspectives, i.e.<br />

- World Trade Organization (WTO) and<br />

UNCTAD focused their efforts on<br />

inventorying all anti-crisis measures adopted<br />

in the various countries and on assessing<br />

crisis impact on the international trade.<br />

- International Monetary Fund (IMF) and<br />

World Bank were more interested in the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> the financial crisis and measures<br />

which might be taken in the banking sector in<br />

order to straighten out the situation.<br />

At regional level, several „actors” (EU,<br />

EFTA, MERCOSUR) were involved in<br />

adopting measures seen as required and<br />

timely in addressing the problems created by<br />

the crisis.<br />

At the same time, states got greater freedom<br />

to act, within their competencies, for the<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> measures which should support<br />

national economies. Due to such increased<br />

freedom, the risk inherently arised that states<br />

invoke the crisis so as to adopt measures that<br />

wouldn’t have been allowed in normal<br />

circumstances due to their categorization as<br />

prohibited protectionist measures.<br />

It becomes increasingly obvious that one<br />

cannot consider addressing the crisis if<br />

87<br />

globalization and regionalization elements in<br />

the world economy are ignored. An<br />

individual solution cannot exist in the context<br />

<strong>of</strong> crisis extension at international level.<br />

III. Research methodology<br />

Research started from the assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

way the financial crisis affected the economic<br />

sector resulting in: direct investments<br />

reduction due to lower pr<strong>of</strong>it rates in the<br />

circumstances <strong>of</strong> higher credit costs, shrunk<br />

international market due to high commercial<br />

credit costs, reduced trade financing<br />

possibilities required to guarantee export<br />

credits and for measures apt to ensure<br />

promotion <strong>of</strong> exports; potential increased<br />

trade defence measures.<br />

The reason <strong>of</strong> this approach is determined by<br />

the wish to find positive responses which, by<br />

the various anti-crisis measures, the states<br />

gave to the need to mitigate their impact on<br />

their economies.<br />

The specific element <strong>of</strong> the research in this<br />

paper consists in assessing the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> anti-dumping investigations and<br />

measures notified by WTO/GATT member<br />

states. Thus, a period <strong>of</strong> 5 pre-crisis years<br />

(2003 – 2007) and 2 years <strong>of</strong> active crisis<br />

(2008 – 2009) have been considered. In the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> final data for the full year 2010,<br />

first quarter data have been projected over the<br />

whole year so that a complete picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />

crisis effects on trade defence measures<br />

should exist.<br />

The relevance <strong>of</strong> this assessment consists in<br />

the fact that it provides a clear picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />

way states acted in the crisis period and <strong>of</strong><br />

whether they turned anti-dumping measures<br />

from the trade defence category into<br />

excessive protection ones.<br />

IV. Research results<br />

Based on the two research aspects described<br />

in the previous chapter, key results are given<br />

below. Hence, in the context <strong>of</strong> anti-crisis<br />

measures the European Union has not<br />

deviated from international principles, acting<br />

in such a manner that:


a)funds allocated by states for banks and<br />

companies should be treated as state aid<br />

whom the applicable rules in this area should<br />

be applied. However, flexibility is accepted in<br />

applying such rules (reduction <strong>of</strong> state aid<br />

authorization period from 90 days to 24<br />

hours; time limited state aids granted by<br />

reason <strong>of</strong> economic crisis, correct sizing <strong>of</strong><br />

state aids and their periodical monitoring<br />

followed by stoppage when crisis factors are<br />

no longer active; granted state aids should not<br />

deviate from community principles and<br />

should be associated with restructuring and<br />

viability processes, as well as technology<br />

modernization programs).<br />

b)export subsidizing measures should not<br />

represent deviations from principles set out<br />

within WTO;<br />

c)import surtax introduction or higher<br />

customs duties should be linked with WTO<br />

accepted circumstances.<br />

It can easily be noticed that these measures<br />

do not stand for a deviation from international<br />

rules and do not encourage primary<br />

protectionism by plain administrative<br />

interventions in the economy.<br />

Furthermore, the World Trade Organization<br />

sent out several messages concerning anticrisis<br />

measures, such as:<br />

a)the need to inventory all commercial<br />

character measures adopted by contracting<br />

parties and candidate states;<br />

b)substantiation <strong>of</strong> anti-crisis measures in<br />

consideration <strong>of</strong> mechanisms and legal<br />

instruments agreed multilaterally;<br />

c)avoid that adopted anti-crisis measures<br />

should represent more or less disguised forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> increasing protectionism.<br />

These messages are based on the fact that<br />

trade liberalization is not the root <strong>of</strong> problems<br />

created by the current crisis but rather a<br />

solution for them.<br />

Data processed by the author with respect to<br />

anti-dumping investigations and measures<br />

revealed the followings:<br />

A. Anti-dumping investigations opened by<br />

GATT Contracting Parties:<br />

88<br />

a)The average annual number <strong>of</strong> antidumping<br />

investigations in 2003-2009 is in the<br />

range <strong>of</strong> over 200 cases. Although data are<br />

available only for 2010 first quarter, by way<br />

<strong>of</strong> projections one can assume that there will<br />

be no significant deviations for this year<br />

either. Thence, it has been found that no<br />

major changes existed at the level <strong>of</strong><br />

investigations during the active crisis years<br />

against pre-crisis years;<br />

b)Main countries which opened most antidumping<br />

investigations during the active<br />

crisis period were: India (86), Argentina (47),<br />

USA (36), EU (34), China (31), Turkey and<br />

Pakistan (29);<br />

c)Among countries undergoing anti-dumping<br />

investigations in 2008 and 2009 the<br />

followings stand out: China (153), USA (22),<br />

Thailand (21), Brazil (14) and EU (10);<br />

Sectors undergoing anti-dumping<br />

investigations during 2008-2009 were: metals<br />

and metal articles (110); petrochemicals (81);<br />

textiles and textile articles (59); resins,<br />

plastics and rubber materials (52); electrical<br />

machinery and equipment (37)<br />

B. With respect to actually adopted antidumping<br />

measures:<br />

a)The average annual number <strong>of</strong> adopted<br />

measures during 2004-2009 ranges between<br />

138-159 cases.<br />

b)By projecting data available for 6 months<br />

in 2010 the number <strong>of</strong> adopted measures will<br />

not be significantly different for 2010;<br />

c)Main countries which adopted antidumping<br />

measures during 2008-2009 were:<br />

India (61), USA (38), Brazil (27), EU (24),<br />

Argentina (21), Turkey (20);<br />

d)Among countries undergoing anti-dumping<br />

measures during 2009-2009 are: China (108),<br />

South Korea (15), Thailand (14), Indonesia<br />

(13), USA (12) and India (10);<br />

e)Key product groups covered by antidumping<br />

measures during 2008-2009 were:<br />

Chemicals and petrochemicals (61), metals<br />

and metal articles (57), textiles and textile<br />

products (39), resins, plastics and rubber<br />

articles (38), electric machinery and<br />

equipment (35).


It is most obvious that during the crisis period<br />

we do not see any upsurge in anti-dumping<br />

investigations and adopted measures. It was<br />

therefore preferred to continue trade<br />

liberalization and avoid primary<br />

protectionism involving relinquishment <strong>of</strong><br />

89<br />

rules required for the normal development <strong>of</strong><br />

the liberalization process.<br />

Below is a diagram <strong>of</strong> the key groups <strong>of</strong><br />

goods undergoing anti-dumping<br />

investigations and measures adopted during<br />

2008-2009:<br />

Diagram 1. Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> anti-dumping investigations and measures by groups <strong>of</strong> products<br />

(2008-2009)<br />

110<br />

57<br />

Metals and<br />

metal articles<br />

81<br />

Source: WTO data processed by the author<br />

From the diagram above it results that key<br />

sectors exposed to both anti-dumping<br />

investigations and measures are the same,<br />

while the crisis did not have any role in<br />

stimulating such measures in other areas than<br />

the ones considered as sensitive.<br />

V. Conclusions<br />

Since international trade was no root <strong>of</strong> the<br />

financial crisis but rather a solution to<br />

mitigate its impact on world economy, this<br />

paper highlights the following factual aspects:<br />

- trade liberalization in observance <strong>of</strong><br />

requirements set out in GATT/WTO has not<br />

been essentially affected by the crisis. Thus,<br />

Uruguay Round resulted objectives have not<br />

been jeopardized or abandoned, customs<br />

preference systems have not undergone<br />

61<br />

Chemicals and<br />

petrochemicals<br />

Anti-dumping investigations<br />

Anti-dumping measures<br />

59<br />

39<br />

Textiles and<br />

textile products<br />

52<br />

38<br />

Resins,<br />

plastics and<br />

rubber articles<br />

changes and neither have they been<br />

relinquished, while internationally negotiated<br />

regional integration agreements continued to<br />

exist and operate in normal conditions;<br />

- the international financial crisis has not<br />

determined the European Union and the other<br />

Contracting Parties to give up their own rules<br />

in the matter <strong>of</strong> state aid but rather a more<br />

flexible attitude was noted which resulted in<br />

reduced authorization aid request<br />

examination periods which were sufficiently<br />

important during this period, particularly to<br />

the benefit <strong>of</strong> the banking system. Moreover,<br />

objectives and aid granting requirements have<br />

not seen any changes determined by the<br />

crisis;<br />

- multilaterally set out rules in the matter <strong>of</strong><br />

anti-dumping investigations and measures<br />

37<br />

35<br />

Electric<br />

machinery and<br />

equipment


continued to be enforced without easier<br />

access <strong>of</strong> the same, nor turning them into<br />

protectionist measures. We do not see any<br />

massive increase <strong>of</strong> cases where it would<br />

have been resorted to such investigations nor<br />

any dramatic changes concerning affected<br />

economic sectors by anti-dumping<br />

investigations and measures. It is evident that<br />

Contracting Parties took WTO messages into<br />

consideration to the effect that in adopting<br />

crisis effects containment measures those<br />

measures that do not deviate from<br />

multilaterally agreed principles and rules<br />

should be selected. It is also evident that it<br />

has been preferred to continue international<br />

trade liberalization and by no means use plain<br />

administrative interventions in the economy<br />

and excessive primary protection <strong>of</strong> the same.<br />

- the crisis has not significantly affected<br />

products considered as sensitive from the<br />

perspective <strong>of</strong> anti-dumping investigations<br />

and measures.<br />

VI. Bibliography<br />

1.Brian Keeley, Patrick Love. Les essentiels<br />

de l'OCDE. De la crise à la reprise. Causes,<br />

déroulement et conséquences de la Grande<br />

Récession. Éditions OCDE, ISBN:<br />

9789264079427, 2011<br />

2.European Central Bank. Report on the<br />

lessons learned from the financial crisis with<br />

regard to the functioning <strong>of</strong> European<br />

financial market infrastructures. ISBN: 978-<br />

92-899-0626-5, 2010<br />

3.European Commission, EUROSTAT. EU27<br />

international trade in services declined in<br />

2009 following the onset <strong>of</strong> the global<br />

financial crisis. ISSN: 1977-0316, 2010<br />

90<br />

4.European Commission, EUROSTAT. Key<br />

figures on European business with a special<br />

feature on the recession, ISBN: 978-92-79-<br />

15243-6, 2010<br />

5.European Commission. Handbook on<br />

community rules for State aid to SMEs.<br />

Including temporary State aid measures to<br />

support access to finance in the current<br />

financial and economic crisis. ISBN: 978-92-<br />

79-12267-5, 2009<br />

6.European Commission. Economic crisis in<br />

Europe. Causes, consequences and responses.<br />

ISBN: 978-92-79-11368-0, 2009<br />

7.Giurgiu, Adriana, An Overview <strong>of</strong> the<br />

General Evolution <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Foreign<br />

Trade after 1989, while Trying to join the EU<br />

(I), „Analele Universităţii din Oradea –<br />

Secţiunea Ştiinţe Economice – Tom XIX,<br />

2010”, No. 1, pp. 53-58<br />

8.Giurgiu, Adriana, An Overview <strong>of</strong> the<br />

General Evolution <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Foreign<br />

Trade after 1989, while Trying to join the EU<br />

(II), „Analele Universităţii din Oradea –<br />

Secţiunea Ştiinţe Economice – Tom XIX,<br />

2010”, No. 2, pp. 100-106<br />

9.International Monetary Fund. World<br />

Economic Outlook, April 2011. 'Tensions<br />

from the Two-Speed Recovery.<br />

Unemployment, Commodities, and Capital<br />

Flows. ISBN 978-1-61635-059-8, 2011<br />

10.OCDE. La crise financière. Réforme et<br />

stratégies de sortie. Éditions OCDE, ISBN:<br />

9789264073043, 2010<br />

11.World Trade Organization. Anti-dumping<br />

Gateway. Accessed April 20, 2011<br />

http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/a<br />

dp_e.html


EUROPEAN AUSTERITY WITHOUT GROWTH? EUROPEAN GROWTH<br />

WITHOUT EUROPEAN DEMOCRACY?HOW EUROPEAN CITIZENS CAN<br />

REVIVE THE EUROPEAN PROJECT AND DEFEAT EUROSCEPTICISM<br />

Montani Guido<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, International Political Economy<br />

The European project is facing a crisis. Citizens no longer understand what the EU is about. Young<br />

people and the new ruling class have forgotten the clear message <strong>of</strong> the European project launched<br />

just after the Second World War “No wars ever again among Europeans.” The founding fathers <strong>of</strong><br />

the European Union are mentioned in history textbooks, but today Europe is felt as an irritating<br />

bureaucracy. In Europe, peace and economic stability are considered as a natural state, a gift from<br />

above. Why keep a useless EU alive?<br />

The state <strong>of</strong> the European Union is swiftly degenerating. In almost all the member states, the anti-<br />

European forces are gaining ground. Populism is not a new ideology and is not necessarily<br />

European: let’s recall Peronism. In today’s Europe populism is the new manifestation <strong>of</strong><br />

nationalism. In Italy the Lega Nord is in Berlusconi’s eurosceptic government. In France, the<br />

National Front is endangering UMP’s hegemony. In Belgium the rows between the Flemish and the<br />

Walloons threatens the state’s unity. In the Netherlands, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Austria and<br />

Finland, populist forces are either in the government or strongly influencing the government.<br />

National-populism is different from the nationalism <strong>of</strong> the past. De Gaulle’s nationalism was an<br />

ideology founded on the “grandeur” <strong>of</strong> France’s history and on a certain idea <strong>of</strong> Europe, which<br />

was “l’Europe de patrie”, a kind <strong>of</strong> European unity accepting French leadership in world politics.<br />

Today national-populism is a form <strong>of</strong> micro-nationalism: it opposes the European project but<br />

without having a serious alternative. This is why populism is dangerous. Its real goal is not only the<br />

breaking down <strong>of</strong> the European Union but also the disintegration <strong>of</strong> the old nation states into<br />

micro-ethnic states, as what happened in former Yugoslavia.<br />

European populism and euroscepticism are<br />

two faces <strong>of</strong> the same coin. Democratic pro-<br />

European parties cannot fight them<br />

successfully in the nation-states. Both are the<br />

product <strong>of</strong> the crisis <strong>of</strong> the European project.<br />

The crisis started at the end <strong>of</strong> the Cold War,<br />

because the European Union leaders failed to<br />

exploit the favourable occasion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enlargement to complete the project <strong>of</strong> the<br />

founding fathers. We can recall a certain<br />

number <strong>of</strong> lost occasions. The Maastricht<br />

Treaty was an unsatisfactory compromise: a<br />

Monetary Union without an Economic Union<br />

and Political Union. The European<br />

Convention worked out a Treaty-Constitution<br />

without establishing a European government.<br />

Moreover it did not change the unanimity rule<br />

for the ratification process, even though the<br />

principle <strong>of</strong> the double majority <strong>of</strong> citizens<br />

and states was granted in the constitutional<br />

91<br />

draft-project. So, when the French and the<br />

Dutch rejected the Treaty-Constitution with a<br />

referendum, nobody noticed that a “minority”<br />

<strong>of</strong> citizens voted against it, while a “majority”<br />

had already approved the Treaty-Constitution.<br />

Now we have the Lisbon Treaty, which is<br />

considered a substitute <strong>of</strong> the Treaty-<br />

Constitution. Meanwhile the political<br />

atmosphere has changed. The old generation<br />

<strong>of</strong> people who experienced the tragedy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world war is no longer involved. The new<br />

ruling class is grappling with new problems:<br />

international terrorism, the difficulties<br />

concerning the enlargement, immigration, the<br />

challenges <strong>of</strong> global economy, the<br />

increasingly difficult Atlantic partnership, the<br />

inability <strong>of</strong> Europe to spur growth.<br />

In this new political environment the<br />

European Union is considered as a set <strong>of</strong><br />

institutions useful for national governments,


ut not for a long-term project which is worth<br />

achieving, the “first assises de la Fédération<br />

Européenne” as was stated in the Schuman<br />

Declaration. Moreover, the relative power<br />

between France and Germany – the old<br />

engine <strong>of</strong> European unity – has changed<br />

dramatically. After the War, France was the<br />

only European state capable <strong>of</strong> taking the<br />

initiative to unite Europe and it did. Now,<br />

after its national unification, Germany is<br />

looking for a new world status, both from the<br />

economic and the political point <strong>of</strong> view, as<br />

its ambition to enter the UN Security Council<br />

shows. So, slowly but resolutely, the Franco-<br />

German engine <strong>of</strong> European integration has<br />

turned into a kind <strong>of</strong> directoire. Since the<br />

Lisbon Treaty did not solve the problem <strong>of</strong><br />

the European government, France and<br />

Germany started to talk about the need for<br />

“European governance”, which according to<br />

Mr. Sarkozy and Mrs Merkel should be<br />

nothing but the European Council, where the<br />

main decisions concerning foreign policy and<br />

finances, are taken unanimously. The<br />

outcome <strong>of</strong> this project is that, when the<br />

financial crisis burst, the Franco-German<br />

directoire took the leadership, imposing<br />

intergovernmental solutions, outside the<br />

traditional “institutional triangle”: the<br />

European Parliament, the Council <strong>of</strong><br />

Ministers and the Commission. According to<br />

the Treaty, these institutions must decide on<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> the communitarian method: the<br />

European Parliament and the Council <strong>of</strong><br />

Ministers co-legislate and the Commission<br />

executes (in such a case the Commission<br />

becomes the “government” <strong>of</strong> the Union). On<br />

the contrary, the directoire excludes the<br />

European Parliament almost completely from<br />

the decision-making process.<br />

As far as the financial crisis is concerned,<br />

without entering into a pedantic account <strong>of</strong><br />

the decisions taken, suffice it to say that the<br />

problem was thus conceived: how much<br />

should the virtuous states <strong>of</strong> the Union pay in<br />

order to avoid the failure <strong>of</strong> the vicious states,<br />

the so-called PIGS? In order to do that, the<br />

European Stability Mechanism (ESM) was<br />

92<br />

established, thanks to a change in the Treaty,<br />

so that the finances put in the ESM will<br />

always be under the control <strong>of</strong> national<br />

governments. This mechanism, together with<br />

the European semester, should increase the<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the rules <strong>of</strong> national fiscal policies<br />

and guarantee the necessary austerity. It is an<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> the old Growth and Stability<br />

Pact (GSP). But it will also perpetuate<br />

conflicts among national governments. On<br />

the contrary, a solution in line with the<br />

European spirit, not requiring a change in the<br />

Treaty, was easily available: it would have<br />

sufficed to agree to an increase in the<br />

European budget (as much as the ESM)<br />

providing new “own resources” to the<br />

European Union. The Monetary Union is the<br />

institution which provides a crucial European<br />

public good: monetary stability. If the<br />

Monetary Union is in danger, because <strong>of</strong><br />

mismanagement in some state, this state<br />

should comply with the rules agreed upon,<br />

but all European citizens, whatever their<br />

nationality, should contribute to rescue <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Monetary Union.<br />

The directoire scheme is not only inefficient,<br />

since it produces weak and provisional<br />

solutions to European problems, but also<br />

unstable, because when the economy is<br />

concerned, Germany takes the leadership, but<br />

when the problem requires a military<br />

engagement – as has happened with<br />

Qaddafi’s Libya – France takes the<br />

leadership; it is undemocratic, because it<br />

discriminates small countries and excludes<br />

the European Parliament (therefore the<br />

citizens) from the decision making process:<br />

can European citizens or the European<br />

Parliament dismiss the directoire?; it is<br />

harmful, because it would feed the wrong<br />

belief that the EU is only an additional<br />

instrument for national governments and that<br />

greater political unity is not necessary. To<br />

conclude, the intergovernmental method and<br />

the will to establish a European directoire are<br />

the true causes <strong>of</strong> euroscepticism, the revival<br />

<strong>of</strong> nationalism and the rise <strong>of</strong> populist<br />

movements in Europe.


* * *<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> the EU crisis, the European project<br />

is not dead. The present ruling class is unable<br />

to have a “vision” for the future <strong>of</strong> the<br />

European Union, but luckily the original<br />

institutions created by Europe’s fathers are<br />

wiser. Jean Monnet said: “the life <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Institutions is longer than the life <strong>of</strong> men, and<br />

for this reason institutions can, if they are<br />

well planned, accumulate and hand down<br />

wisdom to several generations.” This is the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament, an<br />

institution already conceived with the ECSC.<br />

After its election by universal suffrage, in<br />

1979, the European Parliament has become<br />

the only legitimate institution representing the<br />

will <strong>of</strong> European citizens. In fact, since 1979,<br />

on the occasion <strong>of</strong> every change in the Treaty,<br />

the European Parliament was able to increase<br />

its power. Now, with the Lisbon Treaty, it<br />

also has the constitutional power to start the<br />

reform <strong>of</strong> the Treaty. Some recent events<br />

show that the European Parliament feels<br />

awkward with the increasing lordliness <strong>of</strong><br />

national governments. It is worth recalling<br />

three recent initiatives.<br />

A group <strong>of</strong> 97 MEPs, members <strong>of</strong> the EPP,<br />

the Greens, the ALDE, and the S&D, has<br />

created the “Spinelli Group” – a network<br />

open to contributions <strong>of</strong> civil society – on the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> a “Manifesto” which states:<br />

“Unfortunately, whereas the formidable<br />

challenges <strong>of</strong> a manifold crisis demand<br />

common responses, drawn at least at<br />

European level, too many politicians fall<br />

tempted to believing in national salvation<br />

only. In time <strong>of</strong> interdependence and a<br />

globalised world, clinging to national<br />

sovereignties and intergovernmentalism is not<br />

only warfare against the European spirit; it is<br />

but an addiction to political impotence. …<br />

Nationalism is an ideology <strong>of</strong> the past. Our<br />

goal is a federal and post-national Europe, a<br />

Europe <strong>of</strong> the citizens.” For the time being,<br />

the Spinelli Group has organised public<br />

debates on the occasion <strong>of</strong> European Council,<br />

93<br />

proposing a “Shadow Council” as an<br />

alternative to the national governments point<br />

<strong>of</strong> view. Of course, its aim is to gain a wider<br />

consensus in the European Parliament and in<br />

the public opinion in order to relaunch the<br />

institutional reform <strong>of</strong> the European Union.<br />

The second initiative is the reform <strong>of</strong> the<br />

electoral system for the European Parliament.<br />

The Constitutional Commission <strong>of</strong> the EP has<br />

already approved, on April 2011, the proposal<br />

<strong>of</strong> the federalist MEP Andrew Duff, to set<br />

aside 25 seats for candidates elected through<br />

pan-European lists presented by European<br />

political parties, starting with the next<br />

elections in 2014. This transnational<br />

constituency will oblige European parties to<br />

present prominent political personalities, well<br />

known all over Europe, and with the chance<br />

<strong>of</strong> becoming President <strong>of</strong> the European<br />

Commission, if he/she is elected and if<br />

his/her party or the coalition <strong>of</strong> parties obtain<br />

the majority <strong>of</strong> voters. Every elector will have<br />

two votes: one for the national list and one for<br />

the transnational list. According to Duff:<br />

“MEPs from all the main party groups have<br />

reached a strong consensus on the need to<br />

reform Parliament. Under the proposed<br />

scheme, the next European elections in 2014<br />

will take on a genuine European dimension.<br />

The opportunity <strong>of</strong> using a second vote for<br />

transnational MEPs should galvanise voters<br />

who have come to recognise that national<br />

political parties no longer work to sustain<br />

European integration in an efficient or<br />

democratic way.”<br />

The third initiative was taken by three MEPs<br />

– Jutta Haug (S&D), Alain Lamassoure (EPP)<br />

and Guy Verh<strong>of</strong>stadt (ALDE) – who<br />

launched the proposal “Europe for Growth.<br />

For a Radical Change in Financing the EU”.<br />

Lamassoure is also the President <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Budget Commission <strong>of</strong> the EP: this proposal<br />

should be considered as the necessary<br />

complement to the austerity plan <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Council. If the European economy is not able<br />

to grow, to create jobs and to compete in the<br />

global market, the austerity plan is certainly<br />

doomed to failure. As we have already


noticed, at Maastricht the decision to create<br />

an Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)<br />

was made, but the reality is that only the M<br />

leg <strong>of</strong> the plan was built, the E leg was<br />

forgotten. Today we have one European<br />

currency for 17 member states, but 17<br />

national financial policies. This asymmetric<br />

economic governance does not work, as the<br />

crisis <strong>of</strong> the sovereign debts has shown. The<br />

problem is: is an autonomous financial policy<br />

for the EU possible? In fact, the EU has its<br />

own budget, but its size is only <strong>of</strong> 1% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

and a great part <strong>of</strong> it is devoted to agricultural<br />

policy; moreover it is practically financed by<br />

national resources only. The result is that<br />

each state requires the “net return” from its<br />

payments to the EU, so that at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

worn out debates among national ministers<br />

the European budget becomes an external<br />

support to national budgets. The crucial role<br />

<strong>of</strong> the European budget, which should be to<br />

provide European public goods, which are not<br />

feasible at a nationional level, is completely<br />

denied.<br />

“Europe for Growth” proposes two<br />

ambitious goals. The first is to end the system<br />

<strong>of</strong> national contributions, going back to the<br />

original idea <strong>of</strong> genuine European resources.<br />

The present budget <strong>of</strong> the EU can be totally<br />

financed by 1% <strong>of</strong> VAT, a carbon tax and, if<br />

necessary, by a financial transaction tax. The<br />

second goal is a public investment plan,<br />

financed entirely by Project Bonds issued by<br />

the EIB. The main reason for such a plan is<br />

that “in the last three decades the public<br />

investment ratio in the eurozone has declined<br />

by more than 1% <strong>of</strong> GDP. This trend has<br />

contributed significantly to making the<br />

eurozone a low-growth area. This trend<br />

should be reversed. This can be done by a<br />

new programme <strong>of</strong> project bond issues aimed<br />

at raising the public investment ratio in the<br />

eurozone by 1% <strong>of</strong> GDP. Since the eurozone<br />

GDP amounts to approximately €10 trillion,<br />

this means that the new yearly Euro project<br />

bond issue <strong>of</strong> €100 billion aimed at financing<br />

public investments should be undertaken.”<br />

94<br />

One should notice that the size <strong>of</strong> this plan is<br />

three times the Delors Plan <strong>of</strong> 1993.<br />

The three initiatives are crucial to change the<br />

outcome and the meaning <strong>of</strong> the next<br />

European elections in 2014. Since 1979 the<br />

turnout has continuously declined from one<br />

election to the other. The explanation is<br />

simple. Since there is not a clear European<br />

policy at stake and there is not a European<br />

government the citizens can choose, the<br />

European elections turn out to be a<br />

summation <strong>of</strong> national elections. The<br />

European Parliament is not considered a<br />

crucial institution for the future <strong>of</strong> the<br />

European citizens and, in effect, the European<br />

Council, i.e. national governments, takes the<br />

main decisions. But, if the citizens can<br />

choose, in the European constituency, a<br />

European leader who can also become<br />

President <strong>of</strong> the European Commission, and if<br />

the main European parties include a Plan for<br />

European growth, more public investments<br />

and more jobs in their programme, citizens<br />

could find a real interest in participating in<br />

the European elections. In such a case the<br />

newly elected European Parliament must<br />

keep the commitment made before the<br />

electors. A growth policy cannot be carried<br />

out without the active support <strong>of</strong> the citizens,<br />

civil society organisations, political parties<br />

and trade unions; in short, a European growth<br />

policy is impossible without European<br />

democracy.<br />

* * *<br />

The participation <strong>of</strong> citizens in the European<br />

project cannot be limited to European<br />

elections. In a democratic community citizens<br />

debate public issues daily and either support<br />

or blame their political parties and their<br />

government. But do a European public space<br />

and a European people exist? The fact that<br />

eurosceptics were <strong>of</strong> the opinion that a<br />

European public space and a European demos<br />

did not exist significantly affected the debate<br />

on the European Constitution. Now, the<br />

Lisbon Treaty <strong>of</strong>fers the opportunity to


overcome that criticism. One million citizens<br />

can take the initiative in inviting the<br />

European Commission “to submit any<br />

appropriate proposal on matters where<br />

citizens consider that a legal act <strong>of</strong> the Union<br />

is required.” Of course, also eurosceptic<br />

forces can exploit the European Citizens’<br />

Initiative (ECI). Indeed every ECI will spur<br />

useful public debates in the EU and provoke a<br />

reply from political parties and European<br />

institutions. In any case, the ECI can be<br />

exploited for fostering European political<br />

unity. For instance, an ECI could invite the<br />

Commission to provide all the legal acts<br />

necessary to implement the proposal <strong>of</strong><br />

“Europe for Growth.” This initiative can be<br />

supported not only by the main European<br />

parties, but also by trade unions, European<br />

95<br />

business associations, local governments,<br />

civil society organisations and countless<br />

citizens.<br />

In 1989, many citizens gathered together in<br />

the squares <strong>of</strong> Eastern European countries to<br />

claim democratic regimes. Today, Arabian<br />

citizens are protesting and fighting against<br />

their dictators. Every people should find their<br />

way and their means to affirm or to put<br />

forward more democracy. In the EU there is<br />

no dictator to be fought. The enemy <strong>of</strong><br />

European democracy is intergovernmentalism<br />

with its ideological base: euroscepticism. If<br />

the proposed ECI is successful, eurosceptics<br />

will stop talking about the non-existence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

European demos and the way for<br />

transforming the EU into a true supranational<br />

democracy will be open.


ACCOUNTING FOR SUSTAINABILITY: WHAT NEXT? A RESEARCH<br />

AGENDA<br />

Cunningham M. Gary<br />

Jönköping International Business School Jönköping, Sweden<br />

Arne Fagerström<br />

Jönköping International Business School Jönköping Sweden<br />

Lars G. Hassel<br />

Åbo Akademi University Åbo, Finland<br />

Abstract: This working paper responds to increasing calls for more and different forms <strong>of</strong><br />

accounting research involvement in accounting for sustainability. It seeks to provide background,<br />

clarify the accounting research issues, and suggest research methods. The background analysis<br />

indicates that accounting for sustainability must go beyond supplemental reporting <strong>of</strong> ecological<br />

and social information to include such emerging issues as integrated reporting <strong>of</strong> sustainability<br />

information along with financial reporting. Additional emerging issues are needs <strong>of</strong> users <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainability reports, auditing and other assurance <strong>of</strong> sustainability information, and sustainability<br />

implications <strong>of</strong> financial failure, accounting and auditing failures, and lack <strong>of</strong> enforcement.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> integrated reporting against traditional financial accounting theory concepts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> financial reporting and the postulates <strong>of</strong> going concern, reporting entity, monetary unit,<br />

and time period, indicates a need for substantial changes in the traditional financial accounting<br />

model if sustainability issues are to be integrated. The agenda concludes with five research issues<br />

and methods:<br />

- An accounting research framework for sustainability using general systems theory<br />

approaches that have been useful for similar emerging issues.<br />

- Reporting <strong>of</strong> sustainability information which has been the focus <strong>of</strong> most research to date,<br />

and the emerging important topic <strong>of</strong> integrated reporting.<br />

- Users <strong>of</strong> sustainable information, their uses and perceived needs, an area that has been<br />

largely neglected in research to date.<br />

- Auditing and assurance issues that are taking on greater importance as more users<br />

demand assurance for sustainability information. Issues include standards to be used and<br />

users’ expectations and reactions.<br />

- Financial distress and sustainability consequences <strong>of</strong> accounting and enforcement<br />

failures that are just now being recognized as sustainability issues.<br />

Keywords: accounting for sustainability, integrated reporting, needs <strong>of</strong> users, audit, assurance<br />

JEL codes: M41, O16, M42<br />

1. Introduction<br />

In recent months, calls for more accounting<br />

involvement in sustainability issues have<br />

become stronger, more frequent, and more<br />

urgent. As discussed below, though, there is<br />

no common notion <strong>of</strong> sustainability,<br />

especially in an accounting context. For this<br />

research agenda, we tentatively, as a starting<br />

point, draw upon the classic economist Sir<br />

John Hicks who developed the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

consumption being what would leave a<br />

97<br />

person as well <strong>of</strong>f at the end <strong>of</strong> the period as<br />

at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the period. Our working<br />

notion <strong>of</strong> sustainability is that a sustainable<br />

entity is one that is as well <strong>of</strong>f at the end <strong>of</strong> a<br />

period as at the beginning with respect to use<br />

<strong>of</strong> all resources: e.g. environmental, human,<br />

ecological, social, financial, and<br />

technological.<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> the previous research has used the<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> sustainability developed by<br />

Buntland (1987) over 25 years ago for the


World Commission <strong>of</strong> Environment and<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> the United Nations.<br />

Buntland’s definition focuses on sustainable<br />

development ensuring that it meets current<br />

needs without sacrificing needs <strong>of</strong> future<br />

generations (quoted and cited by Kasperiet,<br />

2011). Buntdland’s definition while<br />

innovative and ground-breaking for the time,<br />

can be seen as somewhat obsolete for the<br />

current era <strong>of</strong> research into accounting for<br />

sustainability. Among other things, it focuses<br />

on external sustainability, i.e. sustainability <strong>of</strong><br />

ecological and social systems, while the<br />

current focus <strong>of</strong> research into accounting for<br />

sustainability is on sustainability <strong>of</strong> an entity,<br />

usually sustainability. As the research agenda<br />

progresses, especially with the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> a research framework, a more<br />

comprehensive definition <strong>of</strong> sustainability is<br />

expected.<br />

Despite no common notion, the terms<br />

“sustainability” and “accountability”, usually<br />

in environmental and social contexts, are<br />

being used widely. New journals are being<br />

launched to publish research exclusively or<br />

primarily on accounting for sustainability,<br />

e.g. Social and Environmental Accountability<br />

Journal and Sustainability Accounting,<br />

Management, and Policy Journal. A recent<br />

major international academic accounting<br />

conference <strong>of</strong> the International Association<br />

for Accounting Education & Research<br />

(IAAER) held in Singapore in November,<br />

2010, featured panel discussions <strong>of</strong><br />

practitioners and academics that called clearly<br />

for more involvement <strong>of</strong> academics to do<br />

research in accounting for sustainability,<br />

notably in auditing, but also in other<br />

accounting roles. At another recent<br />

international academic accounting<br />

conference, Asian Pacific Conference on<br />

International Accounting Issues held in<br />

Australia in November 2010, a speaker from<br />

a governmental pension fund agency in<br />

Australia was somewhat critical <strong>of</strong> academic<br />

accountants’ lack <strong>of</strong> involvement in<br />

accounting for sustainability; she indicated<br />

that if the academic accountants did not get<br />

98<br />

more involved soon, some other groups<br />

would.<br />

Thomas L. Friedman, a New York Times<br />

columnist and award-winning author, in his<br />

recent book on sustainability, Hot Flat and<br />

Crowded, Release 2.0 (2009), has explicitly<br />

used accounting terminology (discussed in<br />

more detail below) to describe inadequacies<br />

<strong>of</strong> current accounting practice for<br />

sustainability. Major international businessoriented<br />

newspapers write about essentially<br />

the same issues. Dedicated research in<br />

sustainable investing has been ongoing for<br />

some five years. Notably, the Sustainability<br />

Investment Research Platform (SIRP)<br />

(www.sirp.se) in Sweden has been a world<br />

leader in such research. It is now recognized<br />

by SIRP and others that accounting for<br />

sustainability is the ongoing next major<br />

research area.<br />

The Principles <strong>of</strong> Responsible Investment<br />

(PRI) Academic Network <strong>of</strong> the UN<br />

(http://academic.unpri.org/), among other<br />

things, publishes the RI Digest <strong>of</strong> academic<br />

research articles in sustainability.<br />

Increasingly, the RI digest has been<br />

reviewing accounting research articles,<br />

notably about disclosures, e.g. Solomon and<br />

Solomon, (2006), reported and reviewed in<br />

December 2010. The Centre for Social and<br />

Environmental Accounting Research,<br />

Accountability, Transparency, Sustainability<br />

(CSEAR) (http://www.standrews.ac.uk/~csearweb/)<br />

has been created<br />

at the University <strong>of</strong> St. Andrews in the UK to<br />

provide information resources, sponsor<br />

workshops, and other activities to help<br />

researchers and scholars exploring social,<br />

environmental, and sustainability accounting,<br />

auditing and reporting and related topics.<br />

In the immediate Middle Eastern<br />

revolutionary activity, the terms<br />

“sustainable”, “accountability”,<br />

“transparency”, and the like are being spoken<br />

casually and loosely. The Kuwait Fund in its<br />

paid advertisements touts investments in<br />

sustainable ventures. News commentators<br />

talk about sustainable regimes as opposed to


stable regimes. Opposition protestors demand<br />

transparency and accountability. It is<br />

obviously much too soon to develop research<br />

implications for accounting for sustainability<br />

for these activities. Nonetheless, the<br />

increasing use <strong>of</strong> the jargon <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />

sustainability cannot be ignored.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the major issues in accounting for<br />

sustainability it is the lack <strong>of</strong> a common<br />

notion <strong>of</strong> accounting roles in sustainability,<br />

nor even what constitutes sustainability in an<br />

accounting context. The various notions <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainability and accounting for<br />

sustainability, while not conflicting, and<br />

indeed complementary, reflect a need for a<br />

more detailed accounting research agenda to<br />

identify research issues, establish more<br />

precise concepts, definitions, and notions to<br />

provide near-term future directions. This<br />

paper and the agenda it presents are intended<br />

to represent a first step in that direction by<br />

giving structure to identifying and discussing<br />

specific groups <strong>of</strong> research issues for<br />

accounting for sustainability, along with<br />

possible methodologies and data sources. The<br />

remainder <strong>of</strong> this paper is organized as<br />

follows:<br />

Section 2 presents background<br />

information underlying the groups <strong>of</strong><br />

research issues that are indentified.<br />

Section 3 analyzes issues in<br />

accounting for sustainability with<br />

respect to traditional accounting<br />

practice, notably the four postulates<br />

<strong>of</strong> accounting.<br />

Section 4 Presents specific research<br />

issue along with research methods<br />

and sources. Some <strong>of</strong> these issues are<br />

better developed than others.<br />

Section 5 gives a concluding<br />

discussion including identifying<br />

contributions <strong>of</strong> the research.<br />

2.0. Background<br />

During the past few years, many accounting<br />

academics, and indeed many accounting<br />

practitioners, have viewed sustainability<br />

almost exclusively as representing<br />

99<br />

environmental, i.e. ecological, and sometimes<br />

social issues, and sustainability reporting as<br />

telling how ‘green’ and socially responsible a<br />

company has been. This view <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainability reflects a common view<br />

developed over 25 years ago by the<br />

Brundtland commission <strong>of</strong> the United Nations<br />

(UN) that sustainability is meeting needs <strong>of</strong><br />

current generations without sacrificing future<br />

generations’ needs (Brundtland 1987). A<br />

large number <strong>of</strong> academic publications<br />

reflects this view (e.g. Adams 2010, Gray<br />

2010, and sources cited by them). Panelists at<br />

the IAAER conference (2010), however, were<br />

clear that current approaches to sustainability<br />

reporting are too narrow and inadequate for<br />

many reasons; especially the notion <strong>of</strong><br />

accounting for sustainability is much broader<br />

than mere environmental (ecological) and<br />

social reporting and the role <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />

involvement must be much broader to include<br />

such activities as risk assessment and<br />

providing assurance including auditing.<br />

It is now widely recognized, but not well<br />

documented in academic publications, that<br />

sustainability goes beyond mere<br />

environmental (ecological) and social issues,<br />

and includes sustainability <strong>of</strong> an enterprise as<br />

a business involving production, sales, and<br />

marketing, as well as being sustainable<br />

financially, legally, and in other similar ways.<br />

Poor environmental (ecological) and social<br />

performance can indeed lead to unsustainable<br />

business activity as evidenced by such<br />

phenomena as consumer boycotts <strong>of</strong> some<br />

large retail enterprises that were viewed as<br />

selling products made by suppliers using<br />

child labor and other socially and<br />

environmentally unacceptable practices.<br />

Users <strong>of</strong> financial information consistently<br />

indicate a desire to have more information to<br />

allow them to assess sustainability and risk<br />

related to sustainability. Thomas L. Friedman<br />

(2009), the award winning author mentioned<br />

in the introduction, links both financial<br />

sustainability in the recent financial crisis and<br />

environmental sustainability as being part <strong>of</strong><br />

the same phenomenon: inadequate accounting


that does not adequately consider risk: If the<br />

true risks involved in these subprime<br />

mortgages or default insurance had been<br />

priced into these products, they would never<br />

have been rated the way they were. Investors<br />

would have been much more wary and<br />

demanded much higher yields before buying<br />

them, which would have forced the mortgage<br />

brokers to be more careful in deciding to<br />

whom to give these mortgages and the banks<br />

to be more careful in choosing which ones to<br />

bundle. (Friedman 2009, pg. 15).<br />

While pricing <strong>of</strong> products might be viewed as<br />

a marketing issue, under IFRS and accounting<br />

standards <strong>of</strong> most industrialized countries,<br />

valuation <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> the products sold and<br />

the inventory <strong>of</strong> buyers would require an<br />

adequate risk assessment to measure amounts<br />

in financial statements <strong>of</strong> both sellers and<br />

buyers. Furthermore, the principle <strong>of</strong> going<br />

concern applies to all valuations in financial<br />

statements and underpricing <strong>of</strong> financial risk<br />

raises serious issues <strong>of</strong> going concern. The<br />

going concern principle is essentially the<br />

same as sustainability when making financial<br />

accounting valuations. (Going concern issues<br />

are discussed in more detail shortly.) As a<br />

result, sustainability failures in the recent<br />

financial crisis related to inadequate pricing<br />

<strong>of</strong> risk in products are indeed issues <strong>of</strong><br />

accounting for sustainability. Then, when<br />

writing about environmental issues discussing<br />

a 2005 report <strong>of</strong> the Millennium Ecosystem<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> the United Nations, Friedman<br />

comments:<br />

Yet because most nations do not put a price<br />

on [the natural resources consumed] they too<br />

are ‘underpriced’ and therefore<br />

overexploited—with the pr<strong>of</strong>its privatized<br />

and the losses socialized. (Friedman 2009 pg.<br />

25)<br />

Then quoting the World Wild Life Fund’s<br />

Living Planet 2008 Report:<br />

‘The world is currently struggling with the<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> over-valuing its financial<br />

assets, but a more fundamental crisis looms<br />

ahead—an ecological credit crunch caused by<br />

undervaluing the environmental assets that<br />

100<br />

are the basis <strong>of</strong> all life and prosperity.’<br />

(Friedman 2009 pg. 25).<br />

Under current accounting standards, the value<br />

<strong>of</strong> ecological resources used would not<br />

normally be used to measure product prices<br />

or report values in financial reports; thus<br />

Friedman seems to advocate a new<br />

accounting paradigm for accounting for<br />

sustainability that incorporates use <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental and social resources in<br />

accounting measurements. In both <strong>of</strong> these<br />

situations, as well as throughout the book,<br />

Friedman, a well read, literate, and articulate<br />

writer, but a non-accountant, uses accounting<br />

terminology to link both financial and<br />

ecological sustainability failures and attribute<br />

the cause <strong>of</strong> both to the same phenomenon,<br />

underpricing <strong>of</strong> assets and products sold due<br />

to failure to consider sustainability risk.<br />

Similar calls for a new accounting model to<br />

incorporate external costs have been made by<br />

others, e.g. the Accounting for Sustainability<br />

Group (2006) and Epstein (2008).<br />

Recent attention to so-called integrated<br />

reporting has come from the Accounting for<br />

Sustainability Project<br />

(www.accountingforsustainability.org)<br />

among other places. As discussed in more<br />

detail shortly, this project includes initiatives<br />

<strong>of</strong> the International Integrated Reporting<br />

Committee (IIRC)<br />

(http://www.integratedreporting.org/) to<br />

develop a new reporting model that will<br />

better reflect the interconnected impact <strong>of</strong><br />

financial, environmental, social and<br />

governance factors. There is, however, no<br />

common notion <strong>of</strong> what constitutes integrated<br />

reporting. Many believe that ‘integrated’ is<br />

merely including environmental and social<br />

information along with financial information,<br />

while others view ‘integrated’ as<br />

incorporating sustainability factors within<br />

accounting measurements.<br />

3.0. Accounting for sustainability with<br />

Respect to Traditional Accounting<br />

When environmental (ecological), social, and<br />

other social issues reporting are viewed from


the perspective <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />

sustainability, many issues emerge that have<br />

not yet been addressed and now need to be<br />

examined from the perspective <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

accounting and financial reporting practice.<br />

3.1. Integrated reporting<br />

The recent call for integrated reporting<br />

involves reporting sustainability issues in<br />

parallel with financial reports, incorporating<br />

sustainability issues in accounting<br />

measurements in financial reports, or both.<br />

Many inconsistencies arise, though, that have<br />

not been considered and should be analyzed<br />

along with respect to traditional financial<br />

reporting theory and concepts. Among the<br />

inconsistencies that arise, in Anglo-Saxon<br />

countries, the purpose <strong>of</strong> financial reporting is<br />

expressed as assessing the likelihood and<br />

timing <strong>of</strong> future cash flows, thus implying<br />

that accounting measurements should be<br />

ultimately related to cash flow. The theory<br />

adds, though that future cash flows are best<br />

assessed by accrual accounting. Many <strong>of</strong> the<br />

suggestions about including sustainability<br />

into accounting measurements would not<br />

involve direct future cash flows, such as use<br />

<strong>of</strong> environmental resources, unless for<br />

circumstances when a carbon tax or carbon<br />

permits might be assessed. Therefore, it<br />

would be very difficult to include such<br />

measurements without changing a major<br />

aspect <strong>of</strong> traditional financial reporting theory<br />

that exists in most countries. Also, the<br />

conceptual framework <strong>of</strong> the IFRS, US<br />

GAAP, and similar concepts <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />

principles in many countries contain the<br />

following four fundamental postulates,<br />

although these concepts predate both IFRS<br />

and the US GAAP conceptual frameworks,<br />

and terminology varies.<br />

-Going concern<br />

-Reporting entity<br />

-Monetary unit<br />

-Time period<br />

The going concern concept assumes that an<br />

entity will be in business for the foreseeable<br />

future and will be able to realize its assets and<br />

101<br />

complete its obligations. This concept affects<br />

valuation bases for measurements <strong>of</strong> many<br />

items on financial reports. It is also the basis<br />

for auditors’ reports on financial statements.<br />

Sustainability is essentially the same concept<br />

as going concern because lack <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainability implies lack <strong>of</strong> a going concern,<br />

and a sustainable entity must necessarily be a<br />

going concern. As discussed in more detail<br />

shortly, well-known going-concern failures<br />

such as Enron and sub-prime mortgage<br />

collapses have resulted massive social costs<br />

and clearly represent lack <strong>of</strong> sustainability.<br />

The reporting entity concept defines<br />

the entity for which financial reports are<br />

prepared. Traditionally, financial reports are<br />

prepared for an economic entity, usually<br />

defined in legal terms as being a consolidated<br />

group in which one dominant entity controls<br />

<strong>of</strong> the group. With integrated financial<br />

reporting, the appropriate reporting entity for<br />

sustainability reporting may differ<br />

considerably from the reporting entity for<br />

financial reporting purposes. As two<br />

examples: First, recent publicity about retail<br />

companies that sell clothes made by child<br />

labor, and similar situations in other<br />

industries, indicate that transparent and<br />

informative reporting should include the<br />

entire supply chain in an entity’s<br />

sustainability reporting. Second, as has been<br />

discussed recently, the environmental impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> a company’s products is also a significant<br />

element to be considered in assessing a<br />

company’s sustainability so the reporting<br />

entity for integrated reporting might consider<br />

customers or other users <strong>of</strong> a company’s<br />

products.<br />

Traditional financial reporting is based on<br />

monetary units in which all non-monetary<br />

items are reported as an equivalent monetary<br />

amount. Almost all environmental and social<br />

information in reports to date are in narrative<br />

non-monetary terms. Under some notions <strong>of</strong><br />

integrated reporting, environmental and social<br />

information would be incorporated into<br />

accounting measurements. Also as discussed<br />

above, Friedman (2009) and others imply a


new accounting in which environmental risk,<br />

which included financial risk, is incorporated<br />

into product pricing. Under the costs attach<br />

principle <strong>of</strong> traditional financial accounting,<br />

costs are included in product prices and<br />

similar measurements if there is a payment<br />

(or similar actual use <strong>of</strong> resources owned);<br />

there has been no measurement method to<br />

incorporate use <strong>of</strong> “free” environmental<br />

resources nor potentially damaging<br />

environmental resources through emissions <strong>of</strong><br />

such things as carbon dioxide and other<br />

greenhouse gases. Carbon trading schemes<br />

are in their earliest stages <strong>of</strong> development in<br />

Europe and some other places, but so far no<br />

accounting measurement has been proposed<br />

to include the cost <strong>of</strong> carbon emission<br />

purchases into products and similar<br />

accounting measurements. Figge and Hahn<br />

(2004) in their Advance project have<br />

developed the Advance Model (see also<br />

http://advance-project.org) in which, among<br />

other things, sustainable value added is<br />

computed in monetary terms for various types<br />

<strong>of</strong> emissions. These sustainable values,<br />

though, are not incorporated into accounting<br />

measurements, but could conceivably be<br />

reported in integrated reports. Sustainable<br />

values as now computed are more suitable for<br />

management control and management<br />

accounting purposes.<br />

Under the time period concept, traditional<br />

financial reporting is based on specific time<br />

periods, almost always one year, based on<br />

perceived users’ needs for timely information<br />

covering discreet time periods <strong>of</strong> optimal<br />

length to make meaningful decisions. Two<br />

approaches have traditionally been used<br />

although with variations among countries:<br />

First the revenue-expense approach measures<br />

revenues earned during a year to derive a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it for the year; assets and liabilities are<br />

residuals. Second, the asset-liability approach<br />

measures assets and liabilities at the end and<br />

the beginning and <strong>of</strong> a year, subtracting the<br />

difference as pr<strong>of</strong>it for the year divided into<br />

revenues and expenses. The asset-liability<br />

approach has been adopted by IFRS and US<br />

102<br />

GAAP, but the revenue-expense approach<br />

remains in some countries, notably Finland.<br />

The asset-liability approach is clearly more<br />

compatible with sustainability accounting as<br />

indicated in the introduction because it<br />

focuses on consumption <strong>of</strong> resources that<br />

would leave a company as sustainable at the<br />

beginning as at the end. Nonetheless, both<br />

approaches are problematic for integrated<br />

reporting because <strong>of</strong> the rigid notion <strong>of</strong><br />

financial reporting that occurs in annual<br />

increments. Many issues <strong>of</strong> sustainability<br />

relate to long term consequences for the<br />

environment, for example from past<br />

environmental damage as in the oil fields <strong>of</strong><br />

Nigeria and coal mining regions <strong>of</strong> the U.S,<br />

and damage from emissions over the life<br />

cycle <strong>of</strong> products like automobiles.<br />

3.2. Auditing and other assurance<br />

The panel discussion at the IAAER<br />

conference (November 2010) clearly<br />

contained a call for accounting researchers to<br />

be involved in additional roles in accounting<br />

for sustainability, notably auditing. Users <strong>of</strong><br />

financial information, notably investors, it is<br />

claimed, need, almost demand, increasing<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> assurance on sustainability<br />

information, notably assurance <strong>of</strong> information<br />

in management commentaries and<br />

environmental reports. The anecdotal<br />

statements claim that investors require such<br />

assurance in order to make proper risk<br />

assessments <strong>of</strong> sustainability, especially<br />

because <strong>of</strong> documented false environmental<br />

statements presented in annual reports. In the<br />

Massey Coal case in the US, as part <strong>of</strong> a legal<br />

settlement, Massey agreed to provide audited<br />

statements <strong>of</strong> workplace safety and<br />

protections <strong>of</strong> the environment (Harris 2011).<br />

The call for more auditor assurance <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental reports is also reflected in<br />

personal interviews with international<br />

accounting firms. Some countries, e.g.<br />

Sweden, allow auditors to <strong>of</strong>fer both positive<br />

and negative assurance on environmental<br />

reports, i.e. positive assurance in which<br />

auditors examine evidence as in a financial


audit and give a pr<strong>of</strong>essional opinion about its<br />

reliability, and negative assurance in which<br />

the auditor states there is no reason to suspect<br />

the information is not reliable. Companies<br />

choose to provide environmental and social<br />

information, it is claimed, to obtain<br />

reputational benefits not necessarily related to<br />

risk. Assurance, if any, would be used to<br />

achieve greater reputational benefits; few<br />

companies are willing to pay for positive<br />

assurance because <strong>of</strong> limited perceived<br />

benefits. Calls for greater assurance<br />

<strong>of</strong> sustainability information, however<br />

defined, are based on anecdotes, assertion,<br />

conjecture, etc. It seems fairly certain,<br />

though, that interests <strong>of</strong> investors and<br />

creditors in assessing sustainability risk in<br />

making decisions have been largely ignored<br />

and are just now being realized. As a result<br />

there is a current need for accounting research<br />

to assess investors’ and creditors’ perceived<br />

needs for assured sustainability information,<br />

how they use it, market reaction to the<br />

information, etc.<br />

3.3. Financial failures, Reporting and<br />

Auditing failures, and Enforcement<br />

Yet another set <strong>of</strong> accounting-forsustainability<br />

situations within the past few<br />

years are the well-known financial<br />

sustainability failures and near failures <strong>of</strong><br />

companies like Enron, WorldCom, Parmalat,<br />

and Ahold and financial institution failures in<br />

due to sub-prime mortgages. These financial<br />

sustainability failures resulted not only in<br />

investor and creditor losses but also massive<br />

losses for society and are clearly social and<br />

environmental sustainability issues as well.<br />

The sustainability failures were directly<br />

related to non-compliance with accounting<br />

standards, audit failures, and enforcement<br />

failures. In addition, the going concern<br />

concept implies financial sustainability and<br />

these organizations clearly were not going<br />

concerns. While there have been extensive<br />

research and publication about the highpr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

cases, little research has been<br />

conducted in the context <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />

103<br />

sustainability. Research has shown, however,<br />

continued lack <strong>of</strong> compliance with accounting<br />

standards and apparent lack <strong>of</strong> enforcement,<br />

especially in Europe (e.g. Carrara et al. 2010;<br />

Fagerström et al. 2009, 2007a, 2007b). It is<br />

also recognized that lack <strong>of</strong> adequate<br />

enforcement <strong>of</strong> accounting standards within<br />

in the EU is contributing to lack <strong>of</strong> reliability<br />

<strong>of</strong> published accounting reports and thus the<br />

ability <strong>of</strong> users <strong>of</strong> financial reports to assess<br />

sustainability risks. As widely reported in the<br />

business media, in October 2010, the<br />

European Commission announced its<br />

intention to examine compliance with<br />

accounting standards, the role <strong>of</strong> auditors, and<br />

enforcement. It is too soon to assess the<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> this action by the European<br />

Commission, but it is clearly an issue within<br />

accounting for sustainability.<br />

4. Research Issues<br />

With the analysis above <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />

sustainability in the context <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

accounting theory and practice, and recent<br />

events, this agenda now develops some<br />

specific research issues along with research<br />

methods and data sources.<br />

4.1. A Research Framework for Accounting<br />

for Sustainability<br />

A conceptual framework to guide researchers<br />

and practitioners in accounting for<br />

sustainability is an essential first step in this<br />

research agenda because <strong>of</strong> various notions <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainability and the roles <strong>of</strong> accounting in<br />

accounting for sustainability that exist at the<br />

moment, and lack <strong>of</strong> a common language.<br />

Such frameworks have been successful in<br />

guiding emerging areas <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />

research in the past. In the 1970s, as the<br />

phenomena <strong>of</strong> multinational companies<br />

became sufficiently large to warrant ongoing<br />

accounting research, a seminal study, An<br />

Accounting Research Framework for<br />

Multinational Enterprises (Cunningham<br />

1978) facilitated accounting research for<br />

multinational enterprises for coming decades.<br />

A similar but less elaborate framework also


facilitated research into accounting research<br />

for performance reporting and accountability<br />

in governmental entities (Cunningham and<br />

Harris 2005) when this issue emerged as an<br />

issue for accounting research. Such a<br />

framework in accounting for sustainability<br />

would, among other things, identify, explore,<br />

and analyze systematically:<br />

-Various notions <strong>of</strong> sustainability to<br />

assess which ones represent roles for<br />

accounting, and to what extent.<br />

-Groups and individuals who have or<br />

potentially could have an<br />

involvement in accounting for<br />

sustainability, including Assistant<br />

Lecturers <strong>of</strong> reports; users <strong>of</strong> such<br />

information, e.g. banks and<br />

investment analysts; assurers <strong>of</strong> such<br />

information, i.e. auditors or similar<br />

groups; regulators; other<br />

organizations, e.g. the United<br />

Nations and its PRI academic<br />

network, who have taken a direct<br />

interest and action in the issue; and<br />

policy makers such as the European<br />

Commission.<br />

-Different forms and levels <strong>of</strong><br />

accountability, e.g. financial<br />

reporting and assurance there<strong>of</strong>;<br />

integrated reporting <strong>of</strong> financial and<br />

other sustainability accounting<br />

information; reporting sustainability<br />

information outside the financial<br />

reports and assurance there<strong>of</strong>;<br />

incorporating sustainability risk and<br />

use <strong>of</strong> resources in accounting<br />

measurements; other elements <strong>of</strong><br />

accountability for sustainability<br />

risks; managerial accounting;<br />

management control systems; etc.<br />

-Identifying and describing various<br />

notions <strong>of</strong> a sustainable entity that<br />

would be the object <strong>of</strong><br />

accountability.<br />

-Matching the interests <strong>of</strong> groups and<br />

individuals with regard to<br />

sustainability with different forms<br />

and levels <strong>of</strong> accountability.<br />

104<br />

-Developing a common language to<br />

discuss and guide future research.<br />

Similar to An Accounting Research<br />

Framework for Multinational Enterprises<br />

(Cunningham 1978, pg. 1), this research<br />

framework seeks to facilitate continuing<br />

research in accounting for sustainability by<br />

describing in detail gaps in current<br />

knowledge, specific issues that require<br />

research, factors that should be considered<br />

when conducting the research, and suggesting<br />

research approaches. One important aspect is<br />

to identify failures in past research and means<br />

to overcome the failures. It also provides a<br />

common taxonomy and language for<br />

continuing research. Following Cunningham<br />

(1976, pp. 31-61) and sources cited by him,<br />

this part <strong>of</strong> the research agenda uses a general<br />

systems theory approach as the primary<br />

methodological and analytical tool (described<br />

in more detail shortly). General systems<br />

theory is especially well suited to develop<br />

conceptual frameworks in business contexts<br />

and especially for accounting research<br />

because it allows researchers to explore such<br />

relevant aspects as:<br />

-The scope <strong>of</strong> the agenda and which systems<br />

are included in this scope.<br />

-System boundaries, i.e. what is included in a<br />

system and what remains outside in the<br />

environment. It is important to note (as<br />

discussed below) that the word<br />

“environment” has a different meaning<br />

than is commonly used in the literature on<br />

accounting for sustainability so far. For this<br />

framework, boundary considerations are<br />

important for such issues as defining<br />

sustainability in accounting contexts; what is<br />

inside systems <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />

sustainability, and what remains outside in<br />

the environment; and whether sustainability<br />

reporting and financial reporting are separate<br />

systems or can become integrated into a<br />

single reporting system.<br />

-System regulation and control. For this<br />

framework, regulation and control factors<br />

deal not only with such obvious issues as<br />

standards and enforcement, but also what


type <strong>of</strong> outputs from accounting for<br />

sustainability are to be produced and for<br />

whom.<br />

4.1.1. Methodology<br />

This part <strong>of</strong> the research agenda uses the<br />

general systems methodology discussed in<br />

Cunningham (1978 Chapter two). General<br />

systems theory is not a theory per se but<br />

instead an approach to guide analysis and<br />

development <strong>of</strong> more specific research<br />

approaches. It is also a first step in grounded<br />

theory approaches which represent back and<br />

forth analyses <strong>of</strong> a system and its<br />

environment to build a theory.<br />

-Under general systems theory, each system<br />

is viewed as part <strong>of</strong> a larger system and each<br />

system can be viewed as having one or more<br />

subsystems. The issue is to identify the<br />

system <strong>of</strong> interest for the research issue at<br />

hand, and the boundaries <strong>of</strong> that system.<br />

Thus, the system <strong>of</strong> interest can be defined in<br />

different ways for different research<br />

purposes. As discussed above, from a<br />

sustainability perspective, the system <strong>of</strong><br />

interest can include a company and its supply<br />

chain as well as users <strong>of</strong> its products during<br />

the product life cycle. In defining the<br />

boundary <strong>of</strong> the system <strong>of</strong> interest, everything<br />

that remains outside the boundary is<br />

considered to be the environment. As noted<br />

above, this definition <strong>of</strong> “environment” is<br />

different from the term “environment”<br />

used in the research literature to date<br />

which typically views environment as<br />

representing ecological resources. Among<br />

other things, the analysis considers properties<br />

<strong>of</strong> the system <strong>of</strong> interest, properties <strong>of</strong><br />

subsystems, and properties <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environment, including influences <strong>of</strong> each on<br />

the other.<br />

Other important aspects <strong>of</strong> general systems<br />

theory are the notions <strong>of</strong> regulation and<br />

control. Control is generally defined as<br />

setting expectations, monitoring outcomes<br />

against those expectations, and taking actions<br />

if necessary to make necessary changes to<br />

achieve desired outcomes. Thus control<br />

105<br />

typically occurs outside a system in the<br />

environment, depending on how the boundary<br />

between a system and its environment is<br />

defined. Regulation represents activities and<br />

subsystems designed within a system to<br />

achieve the desired outcomes somewhat<br />

automatically without explicit intervention.<br />

Notions <strong>of</strong> what constitutes regulation and<br />

control differ depending on how the system<br />

<strong>of</strong> interest and the environment is defined.<br />

The concepts <strong>of</strong> regulation and control have<br />

obvious implications for accounting for<br />

sustainability. One example is establishing<br />

standards for sustainability reporting, a<br />

control function, and the steps taken by an<br />

entity to assure compliance with standards.<br />

4.2. Reporting Sustainability Information<br />

In some countries, e.g. Sweden, a form <strong>of</strong><br />

integrated reporting is required for certain<br />

companies, e.g. those with state ownership,<br />

following the triple bottom line <strong>of</strong> the Global<br />

Reporting Initiative (GRI)<br />

(www.globalreporting.org/Home). In<br />

addition, several other companies have been<br />

voluntarily reporting environmental and<br />

social information for some years. Recent<br />

attention to so-called integrated reporting has<br />

come from the Accounting for Sustainability<br />

Project<br />

(www.accountingforsustainability.org). This<br />

project includes initiatives <strong>of</strong> the International<br />

Integrated Reporting Committee (IIRC)<br />

(http://www.integratedreporting.org/) to<br />

develop a new reporting model that will<br />

better reflect the interconnected impact <strong>of</strong><br />

financial, environmental, social and<br />

governance factors. The IIRC includes,<br />

among others, representatives from the major<br />

international accounting firms, securities<br />

exchanges, the Financial Accounting<br />

Standards Board (FASB) <strong>of</strong> the US, and the<br />

International Accounting Standards Board<br />

(IASB). As mentioned above, though, there<br />

is, however, no common notion <strong>of</strong> what<br />

constitutes integrated reporting.<br />

Also as mentioned above, anecdotally,<br />

companies report such so-called sustainability


information and sometimes seek assurance <strong>of</strong><br />

such to achieve reputational benefits.<br />

Research is needed to identify what type <strong>of</strong><br />

reputational benefits companies expect to<br />

achieve. A further issue is<br />

establishing standards for sustainability<br />

reporting. The Global Reporting Initiative<br />

(GRI) (www.globalreporting.org/Home), a<br />

network-based organization based in the<br />

Netherlands, provides standards for voluntary<br />

reporting <strong>of</strong> supplemental sustainability<br />

disclosures. GRI reporting standards are<br />

required in Sweden for the companies that are<br />

required to report the so-called triple bottom<br />

line. The IIRC as part <strong>of</strong> the UN PRI is also<br />

establishing reporting standards. Research<br />

could be useful to determine the criteria by<br />

which companies, accounting firms and<br />

others choose reporting standards.<br />

4.2.1. Research Methods<br />

The primary research methods for this set <strong>of</strong><br />

issues would be content analysis and field<br />

studies. With respect to content analysis,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> different notions <strong>of</strong> what<br />

represents integrated reporting, it would be<br />

useful to examine actual reports under the<br />

different approaches to learn differences and<br />

their impacts. Content analysis might also be<br />

used to examine reports <strong>of</strong> different<br />

companies that use different types <strong>of</strong><br />

reporting standards to assess different<br />

impacts. A further analysis <strong>of</strong> the groups<br />

promulgating the standards to determine their<br />

intentions and desired results can be useful.<br />

Such content analyses can be complimented<br />

by field studies <strong>of</strong> the companies that<br />

currently report sustainability information to<br />

determine the difficulty or ease <strong>of</strong><br />

implementation and extent <strong>of</strong> compliance.<br />

Field studies represent a form <strong>of</strong> grounded<br />

theory in which researchers engage with the<br />

field to discover phenomena <strong>of</strong> interest to be<br />

used to develop a theory. Field studies by<br />

Fagerström et al. (2009, 2007a, 2007b) have<br />

examined similar issues in implementation<br />

and compliance with reporting standards and<br />

provide a model for this research agenda.<br />

106<br />

Field studies can be useful to assess the<br />

reputational benefits companies attempt to<br />

achieve from reporting environmental and<br />

social information. Field study research by<br />

Cunningham and Harris (2005) on a similar<br />

topic about performance reporting <strong>of</strong><br />

governmental entities was a significant<br />

contribution to accountability research for<br />

such entities and can also be used as a model<br />

in this research.<br />

4.3. Users <strong>of</strong> Sustainability Information.<br />

As mentioned in the background, research<br />

and discussion in accounting for<br />

sustainability so far have almost exclusively<br />

focused on companies that prepare and<br />

present sustainability information. There is<br />

very recent recognition that the needs <strong>of</strong> users<br />

<strong>of</strong> the information must be considered as<br />

well. The research framework for accounting<br />

for sustainability as described in 4.1 would<br />

necessarily address some <strong>of</strong> these issues.<br />

Research is also needed to address directly<br />

users’ perceived needs and reactions to them.<br />

Anecdotal evidence suggests that financial<br />

analysts, one major user group, routinely<br />

discard supplemental environmental<br />

disclosures. Instead, anecdotally, analysts<br />

want information that allows assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

risk. Somewhat contradictory prior research<br />

has shown that financial analysts, do consider<br />

sustainability risk information when making<br />

recommendations to their clients (H. Nilsson,<br />

et al. 2008). Other research reported by the<br />

SIRP (www.sirp.se) indicates a market<br />

reaction to sustainability risk under certain<br />

situations thus suggesting that some users <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainability information do use such<br />

information. Research is needed not only to<br />

assess whether sustainability risk information<br />

is desired and used, but the form in which<br />

sustainability risk incorporated in accounting<br />

reports, e.g. in integrated reports, in product<br />

prices according to as suggested by Friedman<br />

(2009), and in other accounting<br />

measurements.


4.3.1. Research methods<br />

Field study research methods similar to those<br />

discussed above (Fagerström et al. 2009,<br />

2007a, 2007b) are useful to learn more about<br />

potential users <strong>of</strong> integrated reports, what<br />

they expect, different formats they prefer, and<br />

similar items. The primary research method<br />

for this issue could be experimental research<br />

along the lines used by Baker and<br />

Cunningham (1993) when assessing the<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> bankers about different sets <strong>of</strong><br />

assurance standards on their loan decisions is<br />

a model for this analysis. With respect to<br />

experiments, persons in each treatment group<br />

would be a priori viewed as essentially<br />

identical and making the same types <strong>of</strong><br />

decisions following the approach <strong>of</strong><br />

Cunningham and Baker (1992). In their<br />

study, subjects <strong>of</strong> experiments were attending<br />

training and education classes sponsored by a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional bankers’ association; the<br />

association supported the type <strong>of</strong> research and<br />

virtually all participants voluntarily chose to<br />

participate. The subjects for this and similar<br />

issues in this research agenda could be<br />

similar, not necessarily in educational classes,<br />

but groups <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who use reports<br />

<strong>of</strong> sustainability information. In addition, or<br />

alternatively, students could be used as<br />

surrogates for users <strong>of</strong> sustainability<br />

accounting information. Numerous<br />

accounting-related experiments using<br />

students as surrogates have been conducted<br />

and published by Michael Shields and<br />

Graeme Harrison, among others; these studies<br />

are too numerous to cite here, but can be<br />

readily located and examined. Similarly,<br />

experimental studies in sustainability under<br />

the auspices <strong>of</strong> the SIRP (www.sirp.se) have<br />

used students as surrogates for pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />

who use sustainability information. These<br />

studies cite evidence that students perform as<br />

well as actual subjects in these types <strong>of</strong><br />

experiments.<br />

107<br />

4.4. Auditing and Other Assurance <strong>of</strong><br />

Sustainability Information<br />

As mentioned in the introduction,<br />

background, and discussions above, a major<br />

emerging issue is the extent to which users <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainability information expect assurance;<br />

at what level, negative or positive; and in<br />

what form, supplemental or incorporated in<br />

financial measurements. A further issue<br />

within this agenda issue is establishing both<br />

standards for sustainability reporting and<br />

standards against which assurance is given.<br />

As mentioned above, the Global Reporting<br />

Initiative (GRI), a network-based<br />

organization based in the Netherlands,<br />

provides standards for voluntary reporting <strong>of</strong><br />

supplemental sustainability disclosures. The<br />

IIRC as part <strong>of</strong> the UN PRI is also<br />

establishing reporting standards. For<br />

assurance, as one example, major accounting<br />

firms in Sweden use assurance standards<br />

published by Föreneningen Auktoriserade<br />

Revisorer (FAR) (www.far.se) in FAR<br />

RevR6<br />

(http://www.far.se/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/FA<br />

R_2010/FAR_TYCKER/INFORMATIONS<br />

MATERIAL/GRANSKNINGAVHALLBAR<br />

HETSREDOVISNING.PDF), although use <strong>of</strong><br />

such standards is apparently voluntary. FAR<br />

RevR6 is taken from (essentially a translation<br />

<strong>of</strong>) the International Standard on Assurance<br />

Engagements 3000 (ISAE 3000)<br />

(http://www.accountability21.net/uploadedFil<br />

es/Issues/ISAE_3000.pdf) developed in the<br />

Netherlands. A competing set <strong>of</strong> assurance<br />

standards, though, has been developed by<br />

AccountAbility<br />

(http://www.accountability.org/) in its<br />

AA1000 AS. Despite the organization’s claim<br />

<strong>of</strong> wide-spread acceptance, there is no<br />

indication that such standards are used in<br />

Nordic countries. Yet another set <strong>of</strong> standards<br />

is incorporated in the Greenhouse Gas<br />

Protocol Initiative<br />

(http://www.ghgprotocol.org/).<br />

These sets <strong>of</strong> assurance standards, while not<br />

always in direct competition because they<br />

relate to different types <strong>of</strong> sustainability


information, overlap sufficiently to create<br />

uncertainty and complexity in accountants’<br />

roles <strong>of</strong> providing assurance. Because <strong>of</strong><br />

multiple sets <strong>of</strong> standards for both reporting<br />

and assurance, yet another set <strong>of</strong> issues to be<br />

addressed in this research agenda is the<br />

criteria by which companies and<br />

organizations providing assurance voluntarily<br />

choose standards to use in reporting and in<br />

assurance engagements. When sustainability<br />

information is included in accounting<br />

measurements, e.g. pricing products to<br />

include external resource costs and including<br />

sustainability risk in financial products,<br />

additional issues <strong>of</strong> reporting standards and<br />

assurance standards are presented. Similar<br />

issues are presented in integrated reporting<br />

when environmental and social concerns<br />

would be included in accounting<br />

measurements. Current accounting standards<br />

in almost every country, including Nordic<br />

countries, do not permit such accounting<br />

measurements; likewise auditing standards<br />

for such measurements are not available.<br />

4.4.1. Research Methods<br />

The previous research by Baker and<br />

Cunningham (1993) discussed above, is an<br />

ideal model for the type <strong>of</strong> research on<br />

assurance levels in this research agenda. In<br />

that experiment, bank loan <strong>of</strong>ficers were<br />

asked to make decisions based on financial<br />

statements prepared using, among other<br />

things, different levels <strong>of</strong> audit assurance and<br />

different accounting standards. Field<br />

studies like Fagerström et al. (2009, 2007a,<br />

2007b) and Cunningham and Harris (2005)<br />

are a grounded theory approach useful<br />

models to examine auditors’ perceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

different levels <strong>of</strong> assurance and standards.<br />

4.5. Financial Distress, Non-compliance<br />

with Financial Reporting Standards, and<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> Enforcement<br />

Despite the fact that past financial failures,<br />

notably Enron and sub-prime mortgage<br />

crises, have resulted in massive social costs,<br />

there is only recent recognition that financial<br />

108<br />

distress, <strong>of</strong>ten related to failure to consider<br />

different types <strong>of</strong> sustainability risk, noncompliance<br />

with financial reporting<br />

standards, and enforcement <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />

standards, is an issue <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />

sustainability. As discussed in the<br />

introduction and background, though,<br />

Friedman (2009) views ecological risk and<br />

financial distress to be integrally related<br />

through inadequate accounting for risks. Even<br />

though financial and other sustainability risks<br />

are recently receiving attention, the going<br />

concern concept has been an essential<br />

concept in financial reporting and auditing for<br />

many years. Research would be useful to<br />

assess the extent to which users <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

information, notably banks, investment<br />

analysts, and financial analysts, view the link<br />

between financial distress risk and ecological<br />

risk as being integrally related as does<br />

Friedman (2009).<br />

Non-compliance with financial reporting<br />

standards has been an accounting research<br />

topic for at least the last 10 years in which<br />

wide-spread non-compliance was discovered,<br />

and by implication apparent lack <strong>of</strong><br />

enforcement (e.g. Carrara, et al. 2010,<br />

Fagerström et al. 2009, 2007a, 2007b; and<br />

sources cited by them). Such research,<br />

though, focused on detecting non-compliance<br />

without implications for sustainability. As<br />

indicated in these studies, non-compliance<br />

with accounting standards and lack <strong>of</strong><br />

enforcement are readily apparent and should<br />

be apparent to users <strong>of</strong> financial reports.<br />

Research could assess the impact on apparent<br />

non-compliance with accounting standards on<br />

users <strong>of</strong> the information, notably bankers and<br />

bank investment analysts.<br />

A very recent study by the publishers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Asset 4 data base has indicated that<br />

companies that report sustainable information<br />

also have abnormal returns, suggesting that<br />

investors and/or analysts do not consider<br />

sustainability information in their decisions.<br />

By implication, failure to consider<br />

sustainability risk could lead to abnormally<br />

low returns or loss through financial failure.


Research is useful to assess any relation <strong>of</strong><br />

negative or lack <strong>of</strong> reported sustainability<br />

information on low returns or failure.<br />

4.5.1. Research Methods<br />

This line <strong>of</strong> research could follow an<br />

approach by Baboukardos (2011, 2010). The<br />

research would involve content analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

publicly listed European companies to<br />

identify lack <strong>of</strong> compliance. Examination <strong>of</strong><br />

stock market reaction to the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

compliance and other faulty financial<br />

information could then use the well-known<br />

value relevance model and other well known<br />

models that assess market reactions to<br />

accounting information. Among others<br />

outputs, the well known measurement <strong>of</strong><br />

Tobin’s Q gives an indicator <strong>of</strong> risk. Similar<br />

research methods can be used to assess the<br />

value relevance <strong>of</strong> negative sustainability<br />

information. In addition, the well known<br />

bankruptcy prediction models can be used to<br />

assess the ability <strong>of</strong> negative sustainability<br />

information to signal financial failure. The<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> the Asset 4 data base now<br />

facilitates research methods using large<br />

samples and more sophisticated quantitative<br />

methods.<br />

5.0. Concluding discussion<br />

This purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper has been to give<br />

structure to the diverse, disjointed area <strong>of</strong><br />

research into accounting for sustainability,<br />

providing background, including identifying<br />

research issues, and possible research<br />

methods. In introduction and background<br />

discussions, it was apparent that the focus to<br />

date on reporting environmental, i.e.<br />

ecological, and sometimes social and<br />

governance information is narrow and<br />

inadequate. Instead, new additional research<br />

areas are emerging and some traditional<br />

research areas are taking on new perspectives.<br />

These include:<br />

- A call for integrated reporting that<br />

integrates environmental (ecological),<br />

social, and governance information along<br />

with financial reports. Differing notions <strong>of</strong><br />

109<br />

what represents integration exist,<br />

however.<br />

- Interests <strong>of</strong> users <strong>of</strong> sustainability<br />

information, including integrated reports,<br />

must be considered.<br />

- Calls for expanded roles <strong>of</strong> auditors and<br />

other assurers.<br />

- Expanding research issues <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

failures, accounting and auditing failures,<br />

and lack <strong>of</strong> enforcement to recognize an<br />

essential sustainability component.<br />

After presenting background, the paper<br />

analyzes the emerging issues against<br />

traditional accounting concepts, notably the<br />

postulates <strong>of</strong> going concern, entity, monetary<br />

unit and time period, the paper identified<br />

many research issues that need to be resolved.<br />

These were presented in five sets <strong>of</strong> research<br />

issues for accounting for sustainability<br />

In the process, the paper presented<br />

background material and then identified five<br />

sets <strong>of</strong> research issues in accounting for<br />

sustainability along with methods and data<br />

sources for each:<br />

- An accounting research framework for<br />

sustainability to be based on similar<br />

frameworks for other emerging<br />

accounting research issues using general<br />

systems theory approaches. This<br />

framework identifies systems <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

and the environment and necessarily<br />

challenges the traditional notions <strong>of</strong><br />

reporting entity and time period, among<br />

others.<br />

- Reporting <strong>of</strong> sustainability information<br />

which has been the focus <strong>of</strong> most research<br />

to date, and the emerging important topic<br />

<strong>of</strong> integrated reporting. The analysis<br />

challenges entity, monetary unit, and time<br />

period concepts as well as addresses<br />

which standards are to be used and how to<br />

incorporate environmental and social<br />

issues into accounting measurements.<br />

- Users <strong>of</strong> sustainable information, their<br />

uses and perceived needs. This is an area<br />

that has been largely neglected in research<br />

to date. Research using field studies and


experiments is needed to assess users’<br />

needs and expectations.<br />

- Auditing and assurance issues that are<br />

taking on greater importance as more<br />

users demand assurance for the<br />

sustainability information. Issues <strong>of</strong> which<br />

standards to be used can be explored and<br />

experiments would be used to assess<br />

users’ expectations and how they react to<br />

different types and levels <strong>of</strong> assurance.<br />

- Financial distress and sustainability<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> accounting and<br />

enforcement failures that are just now<br />

being recognized as sustainability issues.<br />

Research using traditional market<br />

methods, notably the value relevance<br />

model and bankruptcy prediction models<br />

This agenda while ambitious gives definite<br />

structure and clearly indicates a substantial<br />

change in traditional view <strong>of</strong> accounting,<br />

reporting, and auditing in a new era <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainability.<br />

References:<br />

Publications<br />

1. Adams, Carol (2010), “Editorial”,<br />

Sustainability Accounting, Management and<br />

Policy Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 5-9<br />

2. Baboukardos, Diogenes (2011<br />

forthcoming), “Transparency in Fair Value<br />

Accounting under IFRS: An Examination <strong>of</strong><br />

Greek Listed Companies’ Level <strong>of</strong><br />

Compliance with IFRS Goodwill Disclosure<br />

Requirements”, in The Economies <strong>of</strong> Balkan<br />

and Eastern Europe Countries in the changed<br />

world. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge<br />

Scholars Publishing.<br />

3. Baboukardos Diogenes (2010), “Does<br />

Transparency Affect Relevance? Evidence<br />

from Goodwill Disclosures <strong>of</strong> Listed<br />

Companies on Athens Stock Exchange”,<br />

Working Paper, Jönköping International<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Business, Jönköping, Sweden.<br />

4. Berger, Axel (2010), “The Development<br />

and Status <strong>of</strong> Enforcement in the European<br />

Union”, Accounting in Europe, Vol. 7, Nos.<br />

1-2, pp. 15-35.<br />

110<br />

Brundtland, Gro H. (1987), Our Common<br />

Future: The World Commission on<br />

Environment and Development. Oxford, UK:<br />

Oxford University Press.<br />

5. Carrara, Mario, et al. (2010), “The impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> IFRS on reporting for business<br />

combinations: an in-depth analysis using the<br />

telecommunications industry”, paper<br />

presented at Asian-Pacific Conference on<br />

International Accounting issues, Gold Coast,<br />

Australia, and Nordic Financial Accounting<br />

Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark,<br />

November 2010.<br />

6. Cunningham, Gary M. (1977), An<br />

Accounting Research Framework for<br />

Multinational Enterprises. Ann Arbor, MI,<br />

USA: UMI Research Press.<br />

7. Cunningham, Gary M. and Harris, Jean E.<br />

(2001),“A Heuristic Framework for<br />

Accountability <strong>of</strong> Governmental Subunits”<br />

Public Management Review, Vol. 3 No. 2,<br />

June 2001, pp. 145-165.<br />

8. Cunningham, Gary M. and Harris, Jean E.<br />

(2005) “Towards a Theory <strong>of</strong> Performance<br />

Reporting in Achieving Public Sector<br />

Accountability: A Field Study, Public<br />

Budgeting & Finance Journal, Vol. 25 No. 2,<br />

pp. 15-42.<br />

9. Epstein, Mark. (2008), Making<br />

Sustainability Work, Best Practices in<br />

Managing and Measuring Corporate Social,<br />

Environmental, and Economic Impacts. (San<br />

Francisco, CA, USA: Greenleaf Publishing).<br />

10. Fagerström, Arne, et al. (2009),<br />

“Financial Reporting <strong>of</strong> Foreign Subsidiaries<br />

to Multinational Parent Companies: A Field<br />

Study” Journal for International Business<br />

and Entrepreneurship Development Vol. 4,<br />

No. 3, pp. 179-190<br />

11. Fagerström, Arne, et al., (2007a)<br />

“Research note: Compliance With<br />

Consolidation (Group) Accounting<br />

Standards-The Vertical Adjustment Issue:<br />

Field Studies <strong>of</strong> Swedish Multinationals”,<br />

International Journal <strong>of</strong> Accounting and<br />

Performance Evaluation. Vol. 4 No. 6, 2007,<br />

pp. 650-665.


12. Fagerström, Arne, et al., (2007b)<br />

“Compliance With Consolidation (Group)<br />

Accounting Standards—The Vertical<br />

Adjustment Issue: A Survey <strong>of</strong> Swedish<br />

Multinationals”, Journal for Global Business<br />

Advancement, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 37-48.<br />

13. Figge, Frank and Hahn, Tobias, (2004)<br />

“Sustainable Value Added—measuring<br />

corporate contributions to sustainability<br />

beyond eco-efficiency”, Ecological<br />

Economics, Vol. 48, pp. 173– 187.<br />

14. Friedman, Thomas L. (2009), Hot Flat<br />

and Crowded, Release 2.0 updated and<br />

expanded. New York, NY, USA:<br />

Picador/Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.<br />

15. Gray, Rob (2010), “A re-evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

social, environmental and sustainability<br />

accounting: an exploration <strong>of</strong> an emerging<br />

trans-disciplinary fiend?”, Sustainability<br />

Accounting, Management and Policy Journal,<br />

Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 11-32.<br />

111<br />

16. Harris, Jean E. (2011), “A New Model<br />

from Old Energy for Promoting Corporate <strong>of</strong><br />

Social Responsibility: the Case <strong>of</strong> Massey<br />

Energy Company”. Unpublished working<br />

paper.<br />

17. Kaspereit, Thomas, “The Value<br />

Relevance <strong>of</strong> Corporate Sustainability and<br />

Sustainability Reporting in Europe,” working<br />

paper presented at British Accounting and<br />

Finance Association annual conference,<br />

Birmingham, UK, April 2001.<br />

18. Nilsson, Henrik, et al. (2008), “A Study<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Provision <strong>of</strong> Environmental<br />

Information in Financial Analysts’ Research<br />

Reports”, Sustainable Development, No. 16,<br />

pp. 180-194.<br />

19. Solomon, J. F., and Solomon A. (2006),<br />

"Private social, ethical and environmental<br />

disclosure." Accounting, Auditing &<br />

Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp.<br />

564-591.


112


LE DYNAMISME DES TPE ET PME ET L'ÉVOLUTION DE L'ÉCONOMIE<br />

ROUMAINE<br />

Jubénot Marie-Noëlle<br />

Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France<br />

Marc de la Ville fromoit, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France<br />

Abstract: The Entrepreneurship concept has its roots in the mid-1970s, it is getting really important<br />

much later in the 1990s (Hernandez, 2010). The entrepreneur is at the heart <strong>of</strong> regional<br />

development as an engine <strong>of</strong> growth. It concerns the creation <strong>of</strong> enterprises, but also management,<br />

business development and networking. The aim <strong>of</strong> our research is to characterize the private sector<br />

development in Romania since the beginning <strong>of</strong> the transition to define the role <strong>of</strong> SMBs in the<br />

dynamics <strong>of</strong> development, identify the current weaknesses <strong>of</strong> the private sector and propose<br />

solutions. For our study, we used several previous studies on the characterization <strong>of</strong> the Romanian<br />

economy since the beginning <strong>of</strong> the transition. We also used recent data from the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Economy. We also used the large literature on entrepreneurship and business networks. The<br />

characterization <strong>of</strong> the Romanian economy is obtained by comparison with countries in the area but<br />

also some data from highly industrialized countries or countries <strong>of</strong> the south. Each transition is<br />

experiencing its own economic development based on its specific history and choices in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

economic and social policies. According to our research, the private sector is characterized by an<br />

increase in the number <strong>of</strong> businesses created, but the density <strong>of</strong> firms per capita is still low<br />

compared to other countries in the area. On the other hand, companies are mostly micro<br />

(businesses without employees to create their own jobs) or small (less than 9 employees). This<br />

demonstrates a real dynamism in business creation. However, the creation <strong>of</strong> many SMBs may not<br />

be an end in itself. Entreprises have to develop in order to face competition and to achieve<br />

economies <strong>of</strong> scale, or they can even join or create their networks.<br />

Keywords: Micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), transition, clusters<br />

Classification JEL: M20, P20<br />

Abstract: L’économie de l’entrepreneuriat trouve ses racines dans le milieu des années 1970, mais<br />

connaît son essor dans les années 1990. Elle place l’entrepreneur au cœur du développement des<br />

territoires comme moteur de la croissance. Elle concerne la création d’entreprises mais aussi le<br />

management, le développement des entreprises et les réseaux. L'objectif de notre recherche est de<br />

caractériser le développement du secteur privé en Roumanie depuis le début de la transition afin de<br />

définir la place des TPE/PME dans la dynamique de développement, de déceler les faiblesses actuelles<br />

du secteur privé et de proposer des solutions. Pour notre étude, nous avons utilisé plusieurs travaux<br />

antérieurs concernant la caractérisation de la l'économie roumaine depuis le début de la transition. Nous<br />

avons aussi utilisé des données récentes provenant du ministère de l'économie. Nous avons également<br />

fait appel à la nombreuse littérature concernant l'entrepreneuriat et les réseaux d'entreprises. La<br />

caractérisation de l'économie roumaine s'obtient par comparaison avec des pays de la zone mais aussi<br />

quelques données provenant de pays très industrialisés ou encore des pays du sud. Chaque pays en<br />

transition connaît sa propre évolution économique en fonction de son histoire spécifique et de ses choix<br />

en termes de politiques économique et sociale. Selon nos recherches, le secteur privé se caractérise par<br />

une augmentation croissante du nombre d'entreprises créées, cependant la densité des entreprises par<br />

habitants est encore peu élevée par rapport à d'autres pays de la zone. D'autre part, les entreprises sont<br />

pour la plupart des micros (entreprises sans salariés permettant de créer son propre emploi) ou de<br />

petites entreprises (moins de 9 salariés). Ce qui témoigne d'un dynamisme réel dans la création<br />

d'entreprise. Cependant, la création de nombreuses TPE/ PME ne peut être une fin en soi. Les<br />

entreprises ont vocations à se développer ou à s'associer pour faire face à la concurrence et pour<br />

réaliser des économies d'échelle.<br />

Mots-clé : TPE/PME, transition, densité, réseaux<br />

113


Introduction :<br />

L'objectif de cette article est d'évaluer les<br />

forces et les faiblesses du secteur privé<br />

roumain. La démarche est la suivante : nous<br />

rappellerons dans une première partie les<br />

problèmes qui se sont posés pour la<br />

Roumanie au début de la période de<br />

transition, notamment les types et les causes<br />

des retards qui sont apparus par rapport à<br />

d'autres pays de la région. Dans une seconde<br />

partie, nous traiterons principalement des<br />

attentes et des difficultés liées à la<br />

privatisation de l'économie roumaine. Puis<br />

nous nous attarderons dans une troisième<br />

partie sur la structure du secteur privé<br />

114<br />

roumain aujourd'hui. Face aux insuffisances<br />

constatées, la constitution de réseaux<br />

d'entreprises peut permettre de palier aux<br />

insuffisances du secteur privé.<br />

I - Le processus de la transition<br />

Au début de la période de transition la<br />

Roumanie a pris un peu de retard dans le<br />

processus de libéralisation économique,<br />

contrairement à la Hongrie, la Pologne et<br />

dans une moindre mesure la<br />

Tchécoslovaquie, comme l'indique le tableau<br />

suivant :<br />

Tableau 1 : Indices de libéralisation*<br />

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Cumul<br />

89-97<br />

politique de<br />

stabilisation<br />

Bulgarie 0,13 0,19 0,62 0,66 0,66 0,64 0,58 0,65 0,79 4,92 01/02/91<br />

Hongrie 0,34 0,57 0,74 0,78 0,82 0,86 0,9 0,9 0,93 6,84 01/03/90<br />

Pologne 0,24 0,68 0,72 0,82 0,82 0,86 0,89 0,89 0,89 6,81 01/01/90<br />

Roumanie 0 0,22 0,36 0,45 0,58 0,68 0,71 0,72 0,75 4,47 01/01/93<br />

Slovaquie 0 0,16 0,79 0,86 0,83 0,83 0,86 0,86 0,86 6,05 01/01/91<br />

Tchéquie 0 0,16 0,79 0,86 0,9 0,90 0,93 0,93 0,93 6,4 01/01/91<br />

Moldavie 0,04 0,04 0,1 0,38 0,51 0,55 0,68 0,75 0,75 3,8 01/09/93<br />

* L’indice de libéralisation compris de 0 à1 est une moyenne de trois indices séparés : la libéralisation des marchés<br />

domestiques (pondération de 0,3) ; la libéralisation du commerce extérieur (0,3) ; la privatisation et la réforme<br />

bancaire (0,4). La somme des indices annuels depuis 1989 est un indicateur de l’étendue des réformes.<br />

Source : De Melo Martha, Denizer Cevdet, Gelb Alan, « Patterns <strong>of</strong> Transition from Plan to Market », The World<br />

Bank Economic Review, Vol. 10, n° 3, pp.397-424. In : World Economic Outlook, World Bank, 2000.<br />

Le tableau suivant nous donne une évaluation du niveau actuel de libéralisation pour certaines<br />

économies en transition :<br />

Private<br />

sector<br />

share/GDP<br />

Large-scale<br />

privatisation<br />

Tableau 2 :État de la réforme en 2010<br />

Small-scale<br />

privatisation<br />

Price<br />

liberalisation<br />

Trade<br />

and foreign<br />

exchange<br />

Competition<br />

policy<br />

Overall<br />

infrastructure<br />

reform<br />

Bulgaria 75 % « 4 » « 4 » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 3 » « 3 »<br />

Croatia 70 % « 3+ » « 4+ » « 4 » « 4+ » « 3 » « 3 »


Private<br />

sector<br />

share/GDP<br />

Large-scale<br />

privatisation<br />

Small-scale<br />

privatisation<br />

Price<br />

liberalisation<br />

115<br />

Trade<br />

and foreign<br />

exchange<br />

Competition<br />

policy<br />

Overall<br />

infrastructure<br />

reform<br />

Hungary 80 % « 4 » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 3+ » « 4- »<br />

Moldova 65 % « 3 » « 4 » « 4 » « 4+ » « 2+ » « 2+ »<br />

Poland 75 % « 4-↑ » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 3+ » « 3+ »<br />

Romania 70 % « 4- » « 4- » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 3↑ » « 3+ »<br />

Slovak<br />

Rep.<br />

80 % « 4 » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 4+ » « 3+ » « 3+ »<br />

Slovenia 70 % « 3 » « 4+ » « 4 » « 4+ » « 3- » « 3 »<br />

Source : Transition Report 2010, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development<br />

The transition indicators range from 1 to 4+, with 1 representing little or no change from a rigid centrally<br />

planned economy and 4+ representing the standards <strong>of</strong> an industrialised market economy.<br />

↑ and ↓ arrows indicate a change from the previous year. One arrow indicates a movement <strong>of</strong> one point (from 4<br />

to 4+, for example). Up arrows indicate upgrades, down arrows indicate downgrades.<br />

Les rapports de 1997 et 2000 de la la<br />

Commission Européenne soulignaient que le<br />

processus de restructuration et de<br />

privatisation avaient pris du retard et<br />

manquait de transparence, retardant ainsi<br />

l'émergence d'un secteur privé dynamique et<br />

compétitif et que les problèmes de la<br />

corruption et du marché noir devaient être<br />

résolus. Depuis, la Roumanie a développé<br />

une politique industrielle considérée<br />

conforme aux principes communautaires. La<br />

Roumanie a adopté une série d'initiatives en<br />

faveur du développement des petites et<br />

moyennes entreprises (PME), notamment : la<br />

participation au programme pluriannuel pour<br />

les entreprises, l'adhésion depuis 2002 à la<br />

charte européenne des petites entreprises,<br />

l'adoption en 2004 d'une loi sur les incitations<br />

à la création et au développement de PME, la<br />

simplification et l'amélioration des<br />

procédures administratives, la création d'un<br />

Fonds de garantie... Néanmoins, cette<br />

politique reste contrainte par certaines<br />

faiblesses structurelles.<br />

II - Les conditions de la privatisation<br />

Le développement du secteur privé peut se<br />

réaliser de deux façons concomitantes : la<br />

privatisation des entreprises d'état et la<br />

stimulation de l'entrepreneuriat privé. Les<br />

grandes entreprises d’État privatisées ont été<br />

peu favorables en général à l'instauration des<br />

nouvelles règles de marché, à la<br />

transformation des structures productives.<br />

Elles ont eut plutôt tendance à résister aux<br />

modifications et exploiter leurs situations de<br />

monopoles. En revanche, la création<br />

d'entreprise et l'entrepreneuriat jouent un rôle<br />

moteur dans le domaine de l’innovation. Le<br />

nombre de création d'entreprises ne cesse de<br />

croître en Roumanie depuis le début de la<br />

transition, comme indiqué ci-dessous :


Taille des<br />

entreprises<br />

Tableau 3 : Evolution des TPE et PME en Roumanie, 1999-2005<br />

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Micro 294.597 279.893 280.448 285.207 313.485 358.242 477.969<br />

Petite 25.987 29.417 31.249 32.010 34.883 36.080 39.721<br />

Moyenne 6.102 6.864 7.455 7.989 8.342 8.674 8.576<br />

Total 326.686 316.174 319.152 325.206 356.710 402.996 526.318<br />

Source : Neault (2007)<br />

Cependant, la densité des TPE/PME.de 24,3<br />

pour 1000 habitants fin 2005, contre 54 à<br />

l'ouest de l'Europe (Neault, 2007), est<br />

insuffisante. Or pour Chandan, Mumtaz, et<br />

Parkash (2009), la croissance et le<br />

développement des PME permettent dans les<br />

pays pauvres ou émergents d'atténuer la<br />

pauvreté et la promouvoir les exportations.<br />

Les PME auraient joué un rôle crucial dans le<br />

développement de pays tels que Taiwan.<br />

Dans les pays développés, la promotion des<br />

PME serait l'un des moyens de booster<br />

l'activité. Certaines études définissent les<br />

PME à partir du nombre de salariés, d'autres<br />

en fonction de l'ampleur de l'activité.<br />

116<br />

Pour Nuno Castel-Branco (2003), les<br />

différences de la structure de la dynamique<br />

sociale et économique entre secteurs<br />

impliquent des politiques de promotion des<br />

PME différenciées. Les politiques pro-PME<br />

peuvent viser, entre autres, la mobilisation du<br />

secteur informel, la création d'emploi, la<br />

meilleure allocation des capitaux nationaux et<br />

l'innovation technologique.<br />

III - Dynamisme des TPE/PME en<br />

Roumanie<br />

Depuis le début de la transition, l'économie<br />

roumaine s'est beaucoup privatisée. Selon la<br />

classification d'Eurostat en micro-, petites,<br />

moyennes et grandes entreprises en fonction<br />

du nombre de salariés, la plupart des<br />

entreprises sont des micro-entreprises<br />

Tableau 5 : Structure des entreprises actives par taille et par secteur, en 2008<br />

Types d'entreprise : Micro<br />

0 - 9<br />

salariés<br />

petites<br />

10 - 49<br />

salariés<br />

moyennes<br />

50 - 249<br />

salariés<br />

grandes<br />

250 salariés et<br />

plus<br />

Industrie et construction 78,60% 15,70% 4,70% 1,00%<br />

Commerce<br />

services<br />

et autres<br />

92,30% 6,60% 1,00% 0,10%<br />

Sources : Institul National deStatistica (INSSE), ROMANIA<br />

En France et au Japon, la part des TPE/PME<br />

est très élevée, elle est respectivement de 97<br />

% et 99%,, mais avec densité d'entreprise<br />

beaucoup plus importante. L'auto-emploi,<br />

pour faire face au chômage et à la précarité,<br />

explique en partie le phénomène de la micro<br />

entreprise. Mais, pour Nuno Castel-Branco<br />

(2003), la TPE/PME ne peut être une fin en<br />

soi. La nature de l'accumulation capitaliste est<br />

d'éviter la concurrence grâce à<br />

l'accroissement de la taille de l'entreprise au<br />

moyen par exemple des fusions et


acquisitions, ou de l'extension interne via<br />

l'investissement. Mais, une autre stratégie,<br />

celle de favoriser les interactions interentreprises<br />

(M. Perry, 1999) par un<br />

développement horizontal (association de<br />

petites structures complémentaires) permet<br />

de palier à la petite taille des entreprises.<br />

Plusieurs types de réseaux d’entreprises : les<br />

districts industriels, les milieux innovateurs,<br />

les grappes d’entreprises (clusters) ont<br />

émergé depuis une vingtaine d’années, avec<br />

le modèle des districts italiens.<br />

La Roumanie tente d'intégrer cette dimension.<br />

Elle a participé, par exemple, au projet<br />

européen OMNI-NET (Opto-Micro-Nano<br />

Innovative Network Exploiting<br />

Transversality) coordonné par Opticsvalley<br />

(le réseau des acteurs de l'optique, de<br />

l'électronique et du logiciel en Ile de France)<br />

de décembre 2005 à mai 2008, dans le cadre<br />

du programme « Europe Innova » de la<br />

Commission européenne. L’objectif principal<br />

du projet était de favoriser le développement<br />

de coopérations entre 6 réseaux européens<br />

dans les domaines de l'optique, de la microélectronique<br />

et des nanotechnologies, et de<br />

lancer des coopérations technologiques au<br />

niveau européen.<br />

La mobilisation des acteurs publics, comme<br />

privés, dans la mise en place de réseaux est<br />

jugée essentielle afin de donner aux<br />

entreprises l'accès à de nouveaux marchés, à<br />

des équipements, ressources ou<br />

infrastructures, … Le phénomène cluster est<br />

présent dans de nombreux pays occidentaux<br />

mais aussi au Sud (Brésil et Inde notamment).<br />

Les entreprises ne pourront bien tirer leur<br />

épingle du jeu relativement à la<br />

mondialisation qu’en se positionnant ainsi au<br />

cœur des réseaux, qui sont une source<br />

d’innovation.<br />

117<br />

Conclusion :<br />

Le secteur privé connait un véritable<br />

dynamisme caractérisé par l'évolution<br />

positive du nombre de créations d'entreprise<br />

ainsi que la mise en place de politiques<br />

industrielles favorables aux entreprises.<br />

Cependant, la Roumanie souffre encore d'un<br />

retard par rapport à d'autres pays en transition<br />

de la région, tels que la Hongrie ou la<br />

Pologne. Le secteur privé souffre de la très<br />

petite taille des entreprises et surtout de la<br />

faiblesse de la densité des entreprises par<br />

rapport au nombre d'habitants. Outre la<br />

poursuite nécessaire des efforts de la<br />

Roumanie pour renforcer son secteur<br />

productif, le développement de réseaux<br />

d'entreprises peut s'avérer être une solution<br />

intéressante pour renforcer le dynamisme<br />

économique.<br />

Références<br />

Amit Raphael, Klapper Leora, Guillén Mauro<br />

F. and Quesada Juan Manuel (2007), World<br />

Bank Policy Research Working Paper,<br />

No.4313.<br />

Brown David, Earle John and Lup Dana (<br />

2004), “What Makes Small Firms Grow?<br />

Evidence from Romania”, The Institute for<br />

the Study <strong>of</strong> Labor(IZA) , Discussion Paper<br />

No. 1343; Upjohn Institute Staff Working<br />

Paper, No. 03-94, October.<br />

Chandan Lal Rohra, Mumtaz Junejo, Parkash<br />

Lal (2009), « Impact <strong>of</strong> SMEs Business on<br />

Foreign Exchange Earnings <strong>of</strong> Pakistan<br />

Through Export from Sindh », Australian<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(2):<br />

1113-1121, 2009.<br />

European Bank for Reconstruction and<br />

Development (2010) Transition Report.<br />

Hernandez Emile-Michel (2010),<br />

L'entrepreneur une approche par les<br />

compétences, éd. : ems management et<br />

société, 223 pages juin<br />

Imai Masayuki (2007), « Crise, redressement<br />

économique et perspective d'adhésion à l'UE :<br />

le cas de la Bulgarie », Cahiers de<br />

l'Association Tiers-Monde, N°22-2007.


Kermadec Claire de (2006), « Le commerce<br />

de détail en Europe : diversité et convergence<br />

des tissus commerciaux », INSEE.<br />

Labaronne Daniel (1997 ), « Les lenteurs de<br />

la privatisation en Roumanie. Une analyse du<br />

comportement des acteurs publics », Revue<br />

d'études comparatives Est-Ouest, Vol. 28, No<br />

28-1, pp101-128.<br />

Loomets Piret and Venesaar Urve (2006),<br />

« The Role <strong>of</strong> Entrepreneurship in Economic<br />

Development and Implications for SME<br />

Policy in Estonia », Paper presented to the<br />

14th Nordic Conference on Small Business<br />

Research, May 11-13, Stockholm, Sweden.<br />

Neault Emilia (2007), « Market research:<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> the organizational<br />

development process implementation within<br />

Romanian SMEs », www.soluk.org/files/SMEsRomania%20-<br />

%20Emilia%20Neault.doc.<br />

Perry Martin (1999), Small firms and<br />

Network Economies, Routledge.<br />

Petrosyan Anna and Szabó Antal (2006),<br />

« Small and medium-sized enterprises in the<br />

Caucasian countries in transition », Asia<br />

Europe Journal, Vol. 5, No 1, pp 115-132.<br />

118<br />

Russu Corneliu ( 2006), « La Contribution<br />

des Investissements Étrangers à la<br />

Restructuration Industrielle en Roumanie »,<br />

Institutul Naţional de Cercetări Economice,<br />

Centrul de Economia Industriei şi Serviciilor,<br />

Calea 13, Septembrie Nr.13, Sector 5,<br />

Bucureşti Vol. LVIII, No. 2/2006, pp 1-8.<br />

Shelburne Robert C. ( 2007), the economic<br />

situation and outlook in mid-2007 for the<br />

UNECE economies - Europe, North America<br />

and the CIS, United Nations Economic<br />

Commission for Europe, Geneva, Switerland,<br />

dicussion paper series, No. 2007.3, June<br />

2007.<br />

United Nations Economic Commission for<br />

Europe, Geneva, Switerland (2005), Some<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> recent trade developments in<br />

south-east Europe, discussion paper series,<br />

No. 2005.6 December.<br />

Wild Gérard (2001), Economie de la<br />

transition : le dossier, CEPII No 2001 – 08,<br />

Octobre.<br />

Nuno Castel-Branco Carlos(2003) « A<br />

Critique <strong>of</strong> SME-led Approaches to<br />

Economic Development », May.


A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH REGARDING THE MARKETING<br />

COMMUNICATION TOOLS USED IN THE ONLINE ENVIRONMENT<br />

Pop Nicolae Alexandru<br />

Academia de Studii Economice Bucureşti, Facultatea de Marketing<br />

Acatrinei Carmen<br />

Academia de Studii Economice Bucureşti, Facultatea de Administrarea Afacerilor, cu predare în limbi<br />

străine<br />

Abstract: Starting from the meaning <strong>of</strong> the communication process in marketing, the authors try to<br />

identify its role in assuring the continuity <strong>of</strong> the management process in what concerns the<br />

relationships between all the partners <strong>of</strong> the company, on the long term. An emphasis is made on the<br />

role <strong>of</strong> online communication and its tools in relationship marketing. In order to validate some <strong>of</strong><br />

the mentioned ideas the authors have chosen to undertake a qualitative marketing research among<br />

the managers <strong>of</strong> some Romanian tourism companies. The qualitative part <strong>of</strong> the study had as<br />

purpose the identification <strong>of</strong> the main tools which form the basis <strong>of</strong> the communication with the<br />

beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the touristic services, <strong>of</strong> the way in which the companies use the online<br />

communication tools for attracting, keeping and developing the long term relationships with their<br />

customers in the virtual environment. The following tools have been analyzed: websites, email<br />

marketing campaigns, e-newsletters, online advertising, search engines, sponsored links, blogs, RSS<br />

feed, social networks, forums, online discussion groups, portals, infomediaries and instant<br />

messaging. The chosen investigation method was the selective survey, the research technique –<br />

explorative interrogation and the research instrument – semi structured detailed interview, based<br />

on a conversation guide.<br />

A very important fact is the classification resulted after the respondents were requested to mention<br />

the most efficient tools for attracting customers and for maintaining the relationships with them.<br />

Although the notoriety <strong>of</strong> the online marketing tools is high, there are some tools that are known by<br />

definition, but are not used at all or are not used correctly; or are not known by definition, but are<br />

used in practice.<br />

The authors contributed by validating a performing methodology <strong>of</strong> qualitative research, a study<br />

which will open new ways and means for making the online communication tools used for touristic<br />

services in Romania more operational. It is to be mentioned that the chosen domain <strong>of</strong> application<br />

has not yet been researched within the national literature.<br />

The qualitative research results will form the basis for a quantitative study among the consumers <strong>of</strong><br />

touristic services in order to identify their opinion in what concerns the usage <strong>of</strong> online marketing<br />

tools by the tourism companies in maintaining the relationships with them.<br />

Keywords: Relationship Marketing, CRM, Online Marketing Communication, Market Research<br />

JEL Classification: M31<br />

Introduction<br />

The new communication media have<br />

registered an exponential development among<br />

the delivery - reception methods <strong>of</strong> the<br />

information between people. Marketing<br />

which is viewed as the analysis and action on<br />

the market has not remained immune to the<br />

major challenges determined by the<br />

119<br />

occurrence and development <strong>of</strong> the virtual<br />

communication – based on the internet<br />

applications. The strategic vision, that marks<br />

the evolution <strong>of</strong> contemporary marketing,<br />

assures a long term relationship between the<br />

companies and their market (Pop 2006: 36).<br />

The efficient administration <strong>of</strong> the companies<br />

moves the central focus <strong>of</strong> the marketing


action towards assuring the continuity and<br />

administration, on a long term basis, <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relationship with all the partners involved in<br />

this process.<br />

Having as target to make this activity<br />

continuous and bivalent, the company assures<br />

the success <strong>of</strong> the messages it wants to send<br />

and receive. In the modern business<br />

environment the online interaction has<br />

different multiple advantages starting from<br />

smaller costs, time efficiency for the<br />

participants, a secure transaction framework<br />

and a friendly communication environment.<br />

The knowledge and most important the usage<br />

<strong>of</strong> the online communication tools in what<br />

concerns the management <strong>of</strong> the relationships<br />

with all the stakeholders <strong>of</strong> a company must<br />

be monitored permanently by using the<br />

marketing research means.<br />

Marketing communication facilitated by<br />

the online tools<br />

The literature referring to the new marketing<br />

communication tools is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

developed in the field. A large number <strong>of</strong> the<br />

analyzed aspects start from the<br />

communication mechanism and concentrate<br />

over the management <strong>of</strong> this process<br />

according to the particularities that the digital<br />

economy imposes over the speed <strong>of</strong><br />

transmission, delivery and responses <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recipients to the messages with which they<br />

are “overwhelmed”. As a consequence, the<br />

term <strong>of</strong> online marketing is defined more<br />

clearly (Meyerson and Scarborough 2008),<br />

which not only covers the communication<br />

area, but also focuses on it. The major<br />

changes that affected the technological,<br />

legislative, social and economic environment<br />

(Smith and Taylor 2004: 216 and next)<br />

generate an entirely new face <strong>of</strong> the<br />

communication act.<br />

The Romanian reader can benefit <strong>of</strong> a<br />

systematic approach <strong>of</strong> the marketing aspect<br />

in the digital era by having access to the<br />

translated reference books in the field, such<br />

as Kotler et al. or Gay et al. (Kotler, Jian and<br />

Maesincee 2009; Gay, Charlesworth and<br />

120<br />

Esen 2009). It is requested to diminish the<br />

role <strong>of</strong> internet into communication due to the<br />

fact that this remains mainly a<br />

communication method in which”... the value<br />

is represented by the message not the nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> the transmission” (Gay, Charlesworth and<br />

Esen 2009: 389). The customization, the<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> the message or the access at<br />

request <strong>of</strong> the user, makes it easier for the<br />

message to be personalized. This fact<br />

transforms the new tools <strong>of</strong> online<br />

communication in real relationship marketing<br />

tools, the later having as purpose a long term<br />

relationship between all the stakeholders and<br />

the products, services or brands <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

company (Gummesson 2008: 36-40).<br />

Relationship marketing, in its turn, also faced<br />

at the beginning <strong>of</strong> this millennium new<br />

developments creating a real interface for a<br />

highly anticipated field, the one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

demand holder’s reactions - representing the<br />

network marketing (Schebesch, Pop and<br />

Pelău 2010: 37-45; Bruhn and Koehler 2010;<br />

Roullet and Droulers 2010). All these<br />

developments reflect a significant change <strong>of</strong><br />

the relationship between the participants in<br />

the selling and buying acts, their<br />

transformation from receivers and senders in<br />

partners in the process satisfying the <strong>of</strong><br />

needs. The implication <strong>of</strong> the consumers in<br />

the production and distribution <strong>of</strong> the tangible<br />

goods and services, which satisfy their needs,<br />

becomes an important step in the entire<br />

process. Communication no longer belongs<br />

only to the one that <strong>of</strong>fers, it sometimes even<br />

takes place without involving that person,<br />

having unexpected effects on the act <strong>of</strong><br />

selling and purchasing (Trusov, Bucklin and<br />

Pauwels 2009: 90-102).<br />

Once the global coordinates <strong>of</strong> the online<br />

strategy are settled, it is necessary to carefully<br />

select the communication and promotion<br />

tools because the moment a user accesses a<br />

company’s website, he / she can be an actual<br />

or a potential customer.<br />

The online marketing mix (Adler 2010: 14)<br />

includes plenty <strong>of</strong> components and requires<br />

the following steps: planning, implementation


and control. During the planning phase there<br />

are established the tools that will be used and<br />

the channels through which they will become<br />

operational. The most well known and used<br />

tools are the: websites, emails, e-newsletters,<br />

search engines, sponsored links, blogs, RSS<br />

feds, social networks, forums and online<br />

discussion groups, portals, infomediaries and<br />

instant messaging (Pantea and Vegheş 2008:<br />

202). The implementation phase presumes<br />

that, once the tools have been chosen,<br />

decisions related to the design, characteristics<br />

and frequency <strong>of</strong> use must be taken. During<br />

the final part, the control, the marketing<br />

activities are monitored carefully, interfering<br />

if necessary. During this step the results can<br />

be partially measured, and if necessary, the<br />

instrument can be withdrawn. Finally, the<br />

results will be measured and conclusions will<br />

be drawn for future actions.<br />

Methodological notes<br />

In order to validate some <strong>of</strong> the ideas<br />

mentioned above, it has been chosen the<br />

organisation, development and interpretation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> a qualitative research among<br />

the managers <strong>of</strong> tourism companies from<br />

Romania. The term <strong>of</strong> tourism company will<br />

be used from now on in order to refer to any<br />

travel agency / tour operator or touristic<br />

services provider, no matter if it is a hotel<br />

network (national or international), hotel,<br />

guesthouse, transport company (national or<br />

international), air travel company, railway or<br />

maritime company. The touristic services<br />

represent one <strong>of</strong> the services’ domains that<br />

are well fitted for the introduction and<br />

generalization <strong>of</strong> the online marketing<br />

communication tools. The qualitative part <strong>of</strong><br />

the research has focused on identifying the<br />

major tools that form the communication<br />

basis with the consumers <strong>of</strong> touristic services;<br />

the method in which the tourism companies<br />

from Bucharest use them or intend to use<br />

them in the future and on stating hypotheses<br />

regarding the way in which the potential<br />

customers are attracted and how the<br />

relationship with them is maintained.<br />

121<br />

The four objectives <strong>of</strong> the research (O1-O4)<br />

have focused on identifying the major virtual<br />

tools that the travel agencies use in order to<br />

attract potential customers, on the<br />

communication with the former or actual<br />

consumers <strong>of</strong> touristic services, on<br />

identifying the way in which the respective<br />

companies use the online tools and also on<br />

the reasons they are chosen for identifying<br />

their usage. The researched online marketing<br />

tools were the following: website, e-mail<br />

marketing campaigns, e-newsletter, online<br />

advertising, research engines, sponsored<br />

links, blogs, social networks, forums, online<br />

discussion groups, portals, infomediaries and<br />

instant messaging.<br />

The chosen investigation method was the<br />

selective survey, the research technique –<br />

explorative interrogation and the research<br />

instrument – semi structured detailed<br />

interview, based on a conversation guide (Pop<br />

2001: 86-87; Cătoiu et al. 2002: 207). The<br />

period when the research took place was 7-25<br />

February 2011.<br />

The main hypotheses <strong>of</strong> the research:<br />

H1. The companies operating on the tourism<br />

market in Romania use virtual marketing<br />

tools in order to attract potential customers<br />

and to maintain the relationship with the<br />

present clients.<br />

H2. The majority <strong>of</strong> online marketing tools<br />

are known and used more and more by the<br />

companies operating on the tourism market in<br />

Romania, implicitly by their managers.<br />

H3. The tourism companies use / combine<br />

certain online marketing tools in order to<br />

attract potential customers to their websites<br />

and also some online marketing tools for<br />

maintaining and developing the relationship<br />

with them, the majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents<br />

being satisfied with the results obtained after<br />

using the tools.<br />

H4. In the future, the marketing strategy <strong>of</strong><br />

the tourism companies will also include<br />

online actions for attracting customers and for<br />

maintaining the relationships with them.<br />

It has been achieved the interviewing <strong>of</strong> 18<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> tourism companies (10


epresentatives <strong>of</strong> travel agencies, 4 hotel<br />

representatives, 3 from transportation<br />

companies and one airline company<br />

representative), these companies have an<br />

updated website and the headquarters in (or<br />

also in) Bucharest.<br />

The interview had an average length <strong>of</strong> 40<br />

minutes. The registration <strong>of</strong> the answers<br />

given by the respondents has been done by<br />

recording on magnetic tape, in case <strong>of</strong> 16<br />

companies, the rest expressing their will to<br />

answer in writing to the questions from the<br />

interview guide.<br />

The working tools that have been used to<br />

analyze and interpret the data obtained from<br />

the interviews are: content analysis (Bardin<br />

1977: 43 și next), semantic differentiation<br />

(Cătoiu et al., 2002: 152-154) and Likert<br />

scale (Plăiaş et al. 2008: 361-363).<br />

Main results obtained and their<br />

implications<br />

The presentation <strong>of</strong> the main results, obtained<br />

after analyzing and processing the data, will<br />

be done taking into account the objectives<br />

and hypothesis that formed the basis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

research:<br />

O1. Identification <strong>of</strong> the relational means and<br />

tools used by the travel agencies and touristic<br />

services providers from Romania to relate<br />

with their customers;<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents<br />

there have been noticed different views in the<br />

answers and the main problem raised by all<br />

was referring to the effects <strong>of</strong> the actual<br />

economical-financial crisis on the economy,<br />

which brought major changes in the strategy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the companies and in the way they are<br />

allocating the afferent communication budget.<br />

All the interviewed tourism companies have a<br />

website where they present their <strong>of</strong>fers, the<br />

details referring to the touristic services they<br />

provide; the website being unanimously<br />

considered very important for attracting<br />

customers. Other means <strong>of</strong> attracting<br />

customers mentioned by the company<br />

representatives were the commercial<br />

messages sent by email to the database with<br />

122<br />

customers (natural or legal persons), the<br />

company newsletters, the sponsored links and<br />

also the presence <strong>of</strong> the company on social<br />

networks.<br />

After attracting customers, the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

companies consider important to retain these<br />

customers, keeping and developing the<br />

relationship, which they have with these<br />

people who benefitted from their <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

services. One tool mentioned by all<br />

companies as being used in order to relate<br />

with the customers was the newsletter, which<br />

helps them inform the customers regarding<br />

the new <strong>of</strong>fers, promotions, projects or new<br />

events, contests or surveys. The databases for<br />

the newsletters are made mostly by legal<br />

persons, being harder to create a database<br />

with natural persons. In this category, the<br />

companies have also mentioned sending<br />

emails with a commercial content, the<br />

presence on the social networks or the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> a chat window on the website<br />

which gives the customer the possibility to<br />

contact directly a company representative.<br />

Based on these answers, H1 hypothesis is<br />

validated.<br />

O2. Identification <strong>of</strong> the degree to which the<br />

online marketing tools are known and used by<br />

the representatives <strong>of</strong> tourism companies for<br />

relating with the customers;<br />

To a very high proportion all the company<br />

representatives have stated that they know all<br />

the online marketing tools. A few <strong>of</strong> them<br />

stated that they do not know for sure what<br />

means email marketing and the difference<br />

between this tool and the newsletter; RSS<br />

feed is rather known by its name rather than<br />

the way it is used; the instant messaging was<br />

another unclear topic for some and this is<br />

why there were mentioned examples such as<br />

“Yahoo Messenger”, “Skype”, the chat<br />

window, etc. The H2 hypothesis is shown as<br />

being true.<br />

O3. Determine how travel agencies use<br />

online marketing tools and the degree <strong>of</strong><br />

satisfaction obtained after their employment;<br />

The respondents were asked how and for<br />

what purpose they use each <strong>of</strong> the online


marketing tools. Based on the answers there<br />

can seen an alignment <strong>of</strong> the views regarding<br />

the purpose and the usage methods <strong>of</strong> the<br />

online tools: the website is in general the first<br />

contact <strong>of</strong> an internet user, potential or<br />

present customer, with the company, in the<br />

virtual environment; this is why it is very<br />

important to manage it correctly and to keep<br />

it functioning in a proper way, the website<br />

being used for presenting the company, its<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers and important news; email marketing<br />

and e-newsletters: these two concepts have<br />

been confused a lot by the representatives<br />

during the interviews, in terms <strong>of</strong> their<br />

purpose and <strong>of</strong> the way they are used; thus<br />

based on the answers <strong>of</strong> the respondents, we<br />

can state the fact that there is a disaccord<br />

between the theoretic definition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

concepts and their practical use by the<br />

tourism companies; though both tools have<br />

been recognized by the company<br />

representatives as being used for attracting<br />

customers and also for maintaining the<br />

relationship with them; search engines: all<br />

the respondents consider vital for their<br />

company to be shown among the first results<br />

after generating a search, their website to<br />

appear on the first pages <strong>of</strong> the search engines<br />

after the customers introduce some key terms;<br />

sponsored links: all their users (one third <strong>of</strong><br />

the respondents) declared themselves to be<br />

very satisfied with the number <strong>of</strong> viewers<br />

attracted to the website by the sponsored links<br />

that appear mostly on the search engines;<br />

blogs: the providers <strong>of</strong> tourism services do<br />

not have company blogs, but intend to use<br />

this tool in the future; RSS feed: none <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents mentioned this tool among the<br />

ones their company is using; social networks:<br />

no matter if it was a travel agency or a<br />

touristic services provider, all <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents acknowledged the growing<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> the social networks; forums<br />

and online discussion groups: none <strong>of</strong> the<br />

participating companies has an integrated<br />

forum in the company’s website, only one<br />

third <strong>of</strong> the respondent companies <strong>of</strong>fer their<br />

customers the possibility to add comments on<br />

123<br />

their websites; portals and infomediaries:<br />

only <strong>of</strong> few <strong>of</strong> the company representatives<br />

that stated their opinion believe that these<br />

tools can help in attracting customers, but less<br />

for maintaining the relationship; instant<br />

messaging: all the company representatives<br />

that use instant messaging stated that they use<br />

this tool for attracting new customers and for<br />

maintaining the relationship with them,<br />

though only approximately 30% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

customers who have benefitted from touristic<br />

services contact the company afterwards.<br />

All the company representatives declared<br />

themselves satisfied and very satisfied <strong>of</strong> the<br />

results obtained after using online marketing<br />

tools in order to attract customers or maintain<br />

the relationship with them; hypothesis H3 is<br />

confirmed.<br />

O4. Identification <strong>of</strong> the companies’ future<br />

steps / strategies in terms <strong>of</strong> the relationship<br />

with their customers;<br />

The same as it was until now, in the future the<br />

marketing strategies will have as a core<br />

concept the customer and all the company’s<br />

actions will take place around him. Managing<br />

the relationships with the customers will be a<br />

mix between the attraction and loyalty<br />

methods using traditional tools, the well<br />

established online ones and also the “new”<br />

online tools (social networks, blogs which<br />

might be used to interact with the customers).<br />

Hypothesis H4 is validated, the respondents<br />

being certain about their need to maintain the<br />

relationship with the customers in the online<br />

environment, without ignoring or substituting<br />

the <strong>of</strong>fline actions.<br />

Conclusions, limits and future directions <strong>of</strong><br />

research<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> the interviews it has been<br />

established that from the online marketing<br />

tools presented to the respondents, only three<br />

<strong>of</strong> them are used just for attracting customers<br />

(the search engines, the online advertising<br />

and the sponsored links), the others being<br />

used in the same time for attracting<br />

customers and maintaining or developing the<br />

relationship with them (website, email


marketing, e-newsletter, blog, RSS feed,<br />

social networks, forums, online discussion<br />

groups, portals, infomediaries and instant<br />

messaging). Of a major importance is the<br />

classification resulted after the respondents<br />

were requested to mention the most efficient<br />

tools for customer attraction and maintenance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the relationship with them. As a result, the<br />

most efficient online marketing tools for<br />

attracting customers are: company’s website,<br />

search engines, sponsored links, enewsletters,<br />

email marketing, social<br />

networks, online advertising; and for<br />

maintaining the relationship with the<br />

customers: the website, e-newsletters, email<br />

marketing, social networks and instant<br />

messaging.<br />

Despite the fact that the notoriety <strong>of</strong> the<br />

online marketing tools is high, there are some<br />

tools that are not known as a concept, that are<br />

not used at all or not used properly; or are<br />

known as a concept, but used in a wrong<br />

manner in practice. Though the term <strong>of</strong><br />

infomediaries is specific for the tourism<br />

market, the ones in the business do not know<br />

its definition, but they know how it works.<br />

The term <strong>of</strong> instant messaging was also not<br />

very clear, being necessary to give examples;<br />

RSS feed tool is known better by name rather<br />

than implementation. The biggest problem is<br />

the confusion that appeared during the<br />

interviews between two tools highly used by<br />

the companies, email marketing and enewsletter.<br />

The difference between these two<br />

concepts was presented in a previous work <strong>of</strong><br />

the authors (Pantea and Pop 2010: 738-739).<br />

The exploratory research is recommended in<br />

case it is wanted the better understanding <strong>of</strong> a<br />

certain phenomenon, in comparison with the<br />

descriptive or causal research which is chosen<br />

for testing specific hypotheses or for studying<br />

the differences between variables (Malhotra<br />

and Briks 2007: 201 and next). The limits <strong>of</strong><br />

the present qualitative research are<br />

represented by the fact that it had an<br />

exploratory character aiming to understand<br />

what happens inside the studied field and to<br />

124<br />

study the social phenomena without “explicit<br />

outcomes” (Schutt 2009: 344 and next).<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the present qualitative research<br />

will form the basis for a quantitative study<br />

among the consumers in order to determine<br />

their opinion related to the way the online<br />

marketing tools are used by the tourism<br />

companies.<br />

This article is a result <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

“Doctoral Program and PhD Students in<br />

the education research and innovation<br />

triangle”. This project is co funded by<br />

European Social Fund through The Sectorial<br />

Operational Programme for Human<br />

Resources Development 2007-2013,<br />

coordinated by The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong><br />

Economic Studies.<br />

References<br />

1.Adler, Max. A Study <strong>of</strong> Marketing and<br />

Online Marketing Tools which Improve<br />

Online Success. Norderstedt: Grin Verlag,<br />

2010.<br />

2.Bardin, Laurence. L’Analyse de contenu.<br />

Paris: Presses Universitaires de France,<br />

1977.<br />

3.Bruhn, Manfred and Koehler, Richard. Wie<br />

Marken wirken. Impulse aus der<br />

Neurooekonomie fuer die Markenfuehrung.<br />

Munchen: Vahlen Verlag, 2010.<br />

4.Cătoiu, Iacob (coord.). Cercetări de<br />

marketing. București: Uranus, 2002.<br />

5.Gay, Richard, Charlesworth, Alan and<br />

Esen, Rita. Marketing on-line. O abordare<br />

orientată spre client. Bucureşti: All, 2009.<br />

6.Gummesson, Evert. Total Relationship<br />

Marketing. Third Edition. Amsterdam:<br />

Elsevier, 2008.<br />

7.Kotler, Philip, Jian, Dipak and Maesincee,<br />

Suvit. Marketing in era digitala. Bucuresti:<br />

Meteor, 2009.<br />

8.Malhotra, Naresh and Birks, David.<br />

Marketing research: An applied Approach.<br />

Third Edition. Harlow: Prentice Hall, 2007.<br />

9.Meyerson, Mitch and Scarborough, Mary.<br />

Mastering Online Marketing. Canada:<br />

Entrepreneur Media, 2008.


10.Pantea, Carmen and Pop, Nicolae. ”Email<br />

marketing campaigns: the easiest path from<br />

organizations to consumers – an exploratory<br />

assessment.” Analele Universităţii din<br />

Oradea – Fascicula Ştiinţe Economice TOM<br />

XIX 1(2010): 737-742.<br />

11.Pantea, Carmen and Vegheş, Călin.<br />

”Romanian consumers’ view on using online<br />

marketing tools in building and managing<br />

customer relations.” International<br />

Conference on Business Excellence, Braşov,<br />

publicat în Special issue <strong>of</strong> Review <strong>of</strong><br />

Management and Economical Engineering<br />

VII, 6(2008): 201-204.<br />

12.Plăiaş, Ioan (coord.). Cercetări de<br />

marketing. Cluj-Napoca: Risoprint, 2008.<br />

13.Pop, Nicolae. ”O nouă paradigmă în<br />

marketingul contemporan: marketingul<br />

relațional.” Management & Marketing I,<br />

3(2006): 33-44.<br />

14.Pop, Nicolae. Marketing. Bucureşti:<br />

Didactică şi Pedagogică, 2001.<br />

125<br />

15.Roullet, Bernard and Droulers, Olivier.<br />

Neuromarketing. Le marketing revisite par<br />

les neurosciences du consomateur. Paris:<br />

DUNOD, 2010.<br />

16.Schebesch, Klauss, Pop Nicolae and<br />

Pelău, Corina. ”Marketing computational – o<br />

noua paradigma in marketingul<br />

contemporan.” Revista Romana de<br />

Marketing 1(2010): 37-45.<br />

17.Schutt, Russel. Investigating the Social<br />

World. The Process and Practice <strong>of</strong> Research.<br />

Sixth Edition. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge<br />

Press, 2009.<br />

18.Smith, Paul and Taylor, Jonathan.<br />

Marketing communications: An integrated<br />

approach.Forth Edition. Londra: Kogan Page<br />

Ltd., 2004.<br />

19.Trusov, Michael, Bucklin, Randolph and<br />

Pauwels, Koen. ”Effect <strong>of</strong> Word-<strong>of</strong>-Mouth<br />

versus Traditional Marketing.” Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Marketing LXXIII, 5(2009): 90-102.


126


Section International Business and European Integration:<br />

Sub-section: International Business


THE IMPACT OF THE CRISIS ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE AND SOLUTIONS<br />

TO REDUCE THE CRISIS EFFECTS. CASE STUDY: ROMANIA<br />

Meşter Liana<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />

Bugnar Nicoleta<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />

Fora Andreea<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />

Abstract: The economic crisis creates a series <strong>of</strong> consequences such as loss <strong>of</strong> jobs, reducing<br />

wages, insecurity <strong>of</strong> the population, reducing standard <strong>of</strong> living, material hardships, low selfconfidence<br />

and hope for the better, illnesses, altered human relationships, social protests, ever<br />

greater scale strikes, in other words, deterioration <strong>of</strong> the economic environment.<br />

This paper aims to identify possible solutions to improve the effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis on the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

life, based on figures from surveys conducted by research firms and the possible correlations to be<br />

made between these dates, without attempting to consider that these solutions are unique or the<br />

best. The main indicators considered for identifying the negative aspects <strong>of</strong> the crisis among the<br />

population are: the evolution <strong>of</strong> unemployment, changes in gross domestic product or wage<br />

developments in the economy and the share <strong>of</strong> expenditure linked to the basic needs out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

income earned. Regarding the possible solutions to reduce the population crisis, they are closely<br />

related to the credit and monetary policy, and also to the budgetary policy.<br />

Under the impact <strong>of</strong> the economic crisis, the business environment in Romania has suffered. Sub<br />

impactul crizei economice, mediul de afaceri din Romania a avut de suferit. Since most investments<br />

in 2008 were <strong>of</strong> foreign origin, the fact that this crisis has affected Romania as well did not surprise<br />

anyone. Nowadays Romania's business climate is characterized by lack <strong>of</strong> direct foreign<br />

investments and self funding sources whereas the population declares itself in a large proportion –<br />

more than 50% - to be affected by the crisis (1).<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis can also be observed in the evolution <strong>of</strong> consumers’ behavior who fearing<br />

lay<strong>of</strong>fs and declining revenue, not only turned to buying the same products or to purchase cheaper<br />

products, but also to reducing the amount <strong>of</strong> the purchased products.The quality <strong>of</strong> social life is<br />

essential and strongly related to stimulating economic activity.Satisfaction felt by the consumer will<br />

determine the level <strong>of</strong> consumption and will influence and ultimately decide the supply level. An<br />

adequate economic policy in Romania to restore the balance between supply and demand in the<br />

market may induce a state <strong>of</strong> economic recovery. This should be the objective <strong>of</strong> anti-crisis policies.<br />

Keywords: crisis, quality <strong>of</strong> life, unemployment rate, gross domestic product, wages rate, social<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> life, economic environment<br />

JEL: F41, F41, J17<br />

1. The quality <strong>of</strong> life in the current crisis<br />

The direct impact <strong>of</strong> the crisis on the<br />

population leads to altered social conditions<br />

<strong>of</strong> life. A social indicator for the economic<br />

crisis assessment is the evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

unemployment rate. Given the systemic<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the global economy, the problems<br />

the U.S. economy was confronted with were<br />

129<br />

felt and widespread in Europe and, <strong>of</strong> course,<br />

on other continents as well. If in 2007, the<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> the economic conditions,<br />

those <strong>of</strong> the labour market included, resulted<br />

in an employment rate <strong>of</strong> the labour force at<br />

European level <strong>of</strong> 68% and a decrease in the<br />

unemployment rate up to 7% unemployment<br />

rate, in 2009 the unemployment rate<br />

increased by 2.2 percent, reaching 11% in


2010, and the employment rate decreased by<br />

2.5% in the EU.<br />

Another relevant indicator is the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

the gross domestic product. In 2009 as<br />

compared to the year 2008, the GDP<br />

decreased by 4.1% for the euro area and by<br />

4.3% on average for the 27 European<br />

countries.<br />

Inevitably, the economic crisis effects were<br />

felt in Romania as well. Studies have shown<br />

that, given the global recession, the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> bankruptcy cases has increased<br />

significantly up to the half <strong>of</strong> the year 2009.<br />

In Romania, for instance, the number <strong>of</strong><br />

bankruptcies increased by 27% during 2008-<br />

2009, although 2008 had been a record year<br />

in this respect - for companies in Romania<br />

bankruptcies nearly doubled in 2008<br />

compared to 2007 and most <strong>of</strong> them were in<br />

the trade. Moreover, there are a number <strong>of</strong><br />

sectors affected strongly by bankruptcy:<br />

trade, distribution, wood and wood products<br />

manufacture (412 cases), transport (causes:<br />

the increase <strong>of</strong> fuel prices, which led to the<br />

insolvency <strong>of</strong> small carriers) construction,<br />

textile, manufacturing, hospitality sector<br />

(causes: poor competitiveness, lack <strong>of</strong><br />

qualified personnel, poor management<br />

strategy) the catering and automotive<br />

industry, the areas with the lowest risk,<br />

where they recorded the fewest cases <strong>of</strong><br />

insolvency, are producing and supplying<br />

electricity and heat, water and gas,<br />

metallurgy, financial intermediation ,<br />

telecommunications and IT. For example, in<br />

Romania since 2008, the number <strong>of</strong><br />

payments made under conditions <strong>of</strong><br />

insolvency has increased the production<br />

twice and three times that <strong>of</strong> wholesale and<br />

retail trade, construction and only in the<br />

construction industry were recorded 10 or<br />

more payments in circumstances <strong>of</strong><br />

insolvency.<br />

In Romania, the crisis in the construction<br />

sector has caused problems to companies in<br />

the wood industry, leading to lower orders<br />

and financial difficulties among companies<br />

in the forest administration. The annual<br />

130<br />

review <strong>of</strong> working time evolution also<br />

revealed that the length <strong>of</strong> the workweek<br />

reflected a clear distinction among the 27:<br />

only 13 <strong>of</strong> the EU countries had working<br />

weeks longer than the EU average. The<br />

longer working week was recorded in<br />

Romania, where full time employees were<br />

working, on average, about 41.8 hours a<br />

week.<br />

Regarding the evolution <strong>of</strong> wages between<br />

2008 and 2007, all EU countries have<br />

recorded increases in average wages agreed<br />

in collective agreements. However, the surge<br />

in inflation rate has reduced the wages rise<br />

set in the collective agreements, from 3.6%<br />

in 2007 to 1.3% in 2008 in real terms. In<br />

countries where real wages have still<br />

continued to grow (and for Romania),<br />

increases were much lower in 2008 than in<br />

2007.<br />

It is obvious that there are differences and<br />

similarities between Member States in<br />

Europe. Yet the satisfaction levels vary<br />

significantly among social groups: people<br />

with higher incomes, better health status,<br />

secure jobs and higher levels <strong>of</strong> education<br />

are generally more satisfied with their lives.<br />

Although Bulgaria and Romania have a<br />

similar GDP per capita, the level <strong>of</strong><br />

satisfaction in Romania is much higher than<br />

in Bulgaria. Consequently, there is no<br />

proportional relationship between national<br />

income and level <strong>of</strong> satisfaction. 70% <strong>of</strong> EU<br />

citizens have a dwelling, and nearly half <strong>of</strong><br />

them hold it definitively, without any<br />

mortgage or loan. The proportion <strong>of</strong> people<br />

with home ownership is much higher in<br />

countries <strong>of</strong> Central and Eastern Europe<br />

where, on average, 74% <strong>of</strong> citizens have<br />

total ownership <strong>of</strong> the housing, the highest<br />

proportion being recorded in Romania (87%)<br />

-this high percentage <strong>of</strong> ownership does not<br />

translate into a higher quality <strong>of</strong> housing.<br />

The recession <strong>of</strong> 2008 has fundamentally<br />

changed the living conditions <strong>of</strong> many<br />

European citizens, causing for Romania a<br />

decline <strong>of</strong> the possibilities to provide the<br />

basic needs: adequate warming <strong>of</strong> the house,


an annual holiday, new furniture to replace<br />

old furniture, a meal that includes meat,<br />

chicken or fish every other day, new clothes<br />

and means <strong>of</strong> taking care <strong>of</strong> guests at home a<br />

meal that includes meat, chicken or fish<br />

every other day, new clothes and means <strong>of</strong><br />

taking care <strong>of</strong> guests at home - from 30% in<br />

2007 to 26% in 2009, significant differences<br />

being perceived throughout the country as<br />

well: 25% <strong>of</strong> the poorest people lack four <strong>of</strong><br />

six items, while a percentage <strong>of</strong> 25% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

wealthiest citizens t lack only one element.<br />

In Turkey, the Former Yugoslav Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary,<br />

Lithuania, Slovakia and Latvia, 25% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

richest people suffer from many<br />

131<br />

shortcomings than the poorest 25% in<br />

Denmark, Sweden, Luxembourg and the<br />

Netherlands.<br />

There is an obvious downward trend in<br />

Europe from 2007 to 2009 in nearly all states<br />

regarding the satisfaction with the level <strong>of</strong><br />

living. In Romania, this trend is sudden, the<br />

largest decline in satisfaction with the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> living were recorded among people <strong>of</strong> 65<br />

or more who have suffered the greatest<br />

decrease in quality <strong>of</strong> life in general as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the fall in the purchasing power <strong>of</strong><br />

pensions.<br />

Regarding the evolution <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong><br />

jobs, it is shown in the following table (table<br />

no. 1):<br />

Table no. 1 Jobs lost and created by sectors in 2009-2010<br />

Fields <strong>of</strong> activity Nr. jobs lost / created<br />

Automobile production -70377<br />

Financial intermediation -57417<br />

Public administration and defence -46802<br />

Trade -44621<br />

Machinery and equipment production -42545<br />

Post and telecommunications -35452<br />

Metallurgy -23770<br />

Road transport -22712<br />

Electric equipment production -21358<br />

Food and drink production -20466<br />

Financial intermediation 6215<br />

Computer and related activities 6470<br />

Coal Mining 7650<br />

Other economic activities 8592<br />

Post and telecommunications 8860<br />

Electricity, gas and hot water supply 11510<br />

Automobile production 12744<br />

Public administration and defence 13999<br />

Hotels and restaurants 22220<br />

Retail 47157<br />

Source: adapted from http://www.eur<strong>of</strong>ound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2010/16/ro/1/EF1016RO.pdf.<br />

The Romanian economy has lost more than<br />

370,000 jobs over the last year. In late 2009,<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> employees had fallen from<br />

4.73 million jobs to 4.36 million. 40% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

jobs lost in 2009 belonged to the<br />

construction and industry field. At the end <strong>of</strong><br />

2009, the number <strong>of</strong> employees fell from<br />

4.73 million jobs to 4.36 million. 40% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

jobs lost in 2009 and belonged to the<br />

construction industry. After 2005, over a


third <strong>of</strong> the new jobs have been created by<br />

the state, and personnel costs incurred by<br />

public money have doubled the budget. The<br />

fact is that the missing 370,000 jobs by the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> 2009 equal the number <strong>of</strong> jobs created<br />

in five years <strong>of</strong> economic boom.<br />

2. Anti-crisis solutions:<br />

There are a number <strong>of</strong> protectionist measures<br />

to be found in the specialized literature<br />

meant to diminish the effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis. -<br />

In his book Après la démocratie, Emmanuel<br />

Todd (2), considers that when confronted<br />

with the "brutality" <strong>of</strong> the crisis and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

unemployment rise, more and more people<br />

were in favour <strong>of</strong> the strengthening <strong>of</strong><br />

protectionist measures, starting with a form<br />

<strong>of</strong> "European protectionism "done in the<br />

name <strong>of</strong>" a necessary correspondence<br />

between economic and social spaces. " This<br />

solution is proposed taking into account the<br />

fact that rising wages will encourage<br />

consumers to absorb more <strong>of</strong> the market<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered, resulting therefore in real<br />

possibilities <strong>of</strong> production relaunching.<br />

Michel Aglietta (3) believes that, given the<br />

current crisis, the adoption <strong>of</strong> protectionist<br />

measures could be a factor that deepens the<br />

crisis and brings along the risk <strong>of</strong> damaging<br />

relations between states, this claim is based<br />

on the fact that a concerted international<br />

action is absolutely necessary for successful<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> existing measures to halt<br />

the crisis. Even if the European<br />

protectionism helped the economies <strong>of</strong><br />

European countries in fighting against the<br />

international market, there are factors that<br />

hinder the adoption and implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

protectionist measures in the EU domestic<br />

policy, factors resulting from the differences<br />

between the economic development <strong>of</strong> EU<br />

countries.<br />

Michel Aglietta believes that Europe has<br />

been pr<strong>of</strong>oundly affected during this period<br />

<strong>of</strong> crisis (4) because <strong>of</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

robust and well-based industrial policy, and<br />

also due to the promotion <strong>of</strong> a clear policy<br />

against competition coming from outside the<br />

132<br />

EU. In this context, the research and<br />

development policies remain the national<br />

ones, generating an unnecessary competition<br />

between companies from different EU<br />

countries, a process also exacerbated by<br />

political sensitivities between countries; EU<br />

holds its own responsibility because it<br />

supported the fight for the dominant position<br />

in the EU through protectionist measures<br />

against other areas, America, Asia, this<br />

European protectionism preventing firms<br />

from moving towards the development <strong>of</strong><br />

extra-European activities. –<br />

Referring to the book written by Emmanuel<br />

Todd, Daniel Bensaïd asks in his article<br />

"Keynes et après? (5) "to protect? whom<br />

and against whom? If Europe started by<br />

adopting social measures <strong>of</strong> convergence in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> jobs, income, social protection,<br />

labour rights, harmonization <strong>of</strong> taxation, then<br />

Europe might legitimize the adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

protective measures and not the interests <strong>of</strong><br />

selfish industrialists and those in the<br />

financial environment whom it favours."<br />

Europe could help the developed countries in<br />

supporting the joint development through<br />

agreements with less developed countries in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> migration, technical cooperation,<br />

fair trade. Without these measures, he<br />

believes, the protectionism <strong>of</strong> the rich would<br />

have negative consequences upon these<br />

developing countries as main effects.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the measures put forward in order to<br />

reduce the impact <strong>of</strong> the crises upon the<br />

European Union countries, is a European<br />

economic recovery plan (6), which has<br />

proposed to come not only with supporting<br />

solutions for EU countries, but also practical<br />

help in this regard.<br />

Thus, the plan devised at the European level<br />

aims at using all available means and<br />

instruments <strong>of</strong> action at EU and national<br />

level; it is a plan meant ultimately to lead to<br />

economic growth and creating jobs by means<br />

<strong>of</strong> the objectives to promote economic<br />

recovery and that lead, ultimately, to<br />

economic growth and creating jobs.


The strategic objectives <strong>of</strong> the Recovery<br />

Plan were:<br />

- stimulate demand and consumer<br />

confidence;<br />

- harmonization <strong>of</strong> market conditions with<br />

the requirements in terms <strong>of</strong> competitiveness<br />

by stimulating economic growth and new<br />

jobs;<br />

- stimulate economic activity without<br />

affecting the environment security.<br />

To achieve these objectives, there were<br />

proposed concrete measures that can be<br />

implemented in the economies <strong>of</strong> EU<br />

countries with the aid provided by EU<br />

institutions.<br />

The monetary and credit policy - is vital<br />

when in crisis and must be managed<br />

carefully by the bank that carries it out - the<br />

European Central Bank ECB. In this respect,<br />

the ECB has created a drop in euro zone<br />

interest rates to stabilize the markets by<br />

lending money to supply banks with cash to<br />

help their clients. Similarly, the European<br />

Investment Bank EIB will increase by about<br />

15 billion its annual interventions in the EU<br />

countries' economies by providing loans to<br />

positively influence and lead these national<br />

economy out <strong>of</strong> recession whereas the<br />

European Bank for Reconstruction and<br />

Development will help the new Member<br />

States with 500 million per year to get out <strong>of</strong><br />

recession and to start the economic recovery.<br />

Budget policy – within the national budgets<br />

for 2009, and then for 2010 there were<br />

measures to be taken requiring an amount <strong>of</strong><br />

approx. 170 billion or 1.2% <strong>of</strong> GDP at EU<br />

level so as to produce positive effects, and,<br />

if possible, long term ones: to boost<br />

purchasing power <strong>of</strong> consumers by<br />

improving the functionality <strong>of</strong> market<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> emergency measures to<br />

strengthen the link between wage-fixing<br />

mechanism and the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

productivity, employment policy supporting<br />

and facilitating labour market transitions,<br />

reducing administrative costs.<br />

For blurring effects <strong>of</strong> the crisis on global<br />

business environment, the Government<br />

133<br />

Strategy for improving the business<br />

environment 2010-2011 proposes a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> measures to be implemented with minimal<br />

cost: restoring flows <strong>of</strong> foreign capital,<br />

promoting responsible business conduct,<br />

reduce trade costs and providing national<br />

consulting firms to solve the crisis.<br />

The government provides a series <strong>of</strong> actions<br />

aimed at:<br />

- improving the dialogue by creating publicprivate<br />

consultations designed to ensure<br />

greater transparency in the regulations;<br />

- supporting the business environment by<br />

encouraging freelance pr<strong>of</strong>essions;<br />

- developing the cooperation with<br />

specialized departments <strong>of</strong> the central<br />

government institutions.<br />

The EU has published recommendations in<br />

individual reports on each Member State to<br />

achieve the objectives <strong>of</strong> the annual package<br />

"Lisbon". These recommendations have as a<br />

major priority the protection <strong>of</strong> the European<br />

citizens regarding the consequences <strong>of</strong> the<br />

financial crisis and the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

several policies such as integration,<br />

retraining, valuation <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

competencies, especially in what the<br />

licensed unemployed workers are concerned.<br />

Conclusions:<br />

Many economists, coming from different<br />

socio-cultural spaces, aim at finding further<br />

reforms for getting out the crisis. Their<br />

dilemma lies in the fact that I cannot answer<br />

exactly to what extent the preservation <strong>of</strong><br />

capitalist structures, as they were promoted<br />

through the writings <strong>of</strong> the interwar<br />

reformers can still be possible under current<br />

conditions. For Romania, the confidence in<br />

overcoming the crisis is still, the lowest in<br />

Europe. However, the direction is positive:<br />

in 2011 the population confidence index<br />

measured by the Consumer Confidence<br />

Barometer for the European Commission has<br />

recorded an average increase compared to<br />

the average <strong>of</strong> the year 2010, reaching -46 to<br />

-54, showing the Romanians more optimistic<br />

especially at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year.


References<br />

1. *** Mednet Marketing Research<br />

Center.<br />

2. Todd, Emmanuel. Après la<br />

démocratie, Paris, Editura Gallimard,<br />

2008<br />

3. Aglietta, Michel. Quelle réforme du<br />

système monétaire international ?<br />

article published in « Alternatives<br />

Économiques » magazine, Hors-série<br />

poche, nr. 43bis, April, 2010, pg. 172<br />

134<br />

4. Aglietta, Michel. Quelle réforme du<br />

système monétaire international ?.<br />

article published in « Alternatives<br />

Économiques » magazine, Hors-série<br />

poche, nr. 43bis, April, 2010, pg.174<br />

5. Bensaïd, Daniel. Keynes et après ?,<br />

published in «Contretemps», nr. 4,<br />

March, 2010<br />

6. «Un plan européen pour la relance<br />

économique», strategic report, 2009,<br />

Luxembourg.


Section: International Business and European Integration<br />

Sub-section: EU Sustainable Economic Development and<br />

Competitiveness


POVERTY AND LIVING. ROMA POOR NEIGHBORHOODS IN ROMANIA AND<br />

HUNGARY<br />

Olah Gheorghe<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />

Olah Șerban<br />

Univerisity <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />

Flora Gavril<br />

Christian Partium University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />

Szekedi Levente<br />

Christian Partium University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />

The first part <strong>of</strong> our paper is a theoretical debate <strong>of</strong> the most important research results concerning<br />

the Roma population in Romania and Hungary, while in the second part we proceed to the<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> our own empirical research data.<br />

Methodologically, our research is based on sociological survey. Data concerning sociooccupational<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> Roma communities have been collected by means <strong>of</strong> a questionnaire<br />

based survey <strong>of</strong> active aged Roma population from Oradea and neighbouiring rural localities in<br />

Romania and Hungary (Oşorhei, Ineu de Criş, Biharkeresztes, Told).<br />

The paper concludes with policy reccommendations aimed at the members <strong>of</strong> the target group.<br />

This paper presents the outcome <strong>of</strong> an euroregional<br />

comparative research conducted in<br />

2010 in two neighboring border areas: Bihor<br />

(Romania) and Hajdu-Bihar (Hungary),<br />

financed by a grant awarded by the European<br />

Regional Development Fund. The first part <strong>of</strong><br />

the paper includes a theoretical overview <strong>of</strong><br />

the most important research results<br />

concerning the Roma population in Romania<br />

and Hungary, while in the second part we<br />

proceed to the analysis <strong>of</strong> our own empirical<br />

research data. Methodologically, our research<br />

is based on the sociological survey. Data<br />

concerning socio-occupational characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> Roma communities have been collected by<br />

means <strong>of</strong> a questionnaire based survey <strong>of</strong><br />

active aged Roma population from Oradea<br />

and neighboring rural localities in Romania<br />

and Hungary (Oşorhei, Ineu de Criş,<br />

Biharkeresztes, Told). Due to the fact that<br />

data set is very large and complex we will<br />

focus on data concerning living conditions in<br />

poor neighborhoods.<br />

137<br />

1.1. Introduction<br />

The Roma (or Gypsies) are a unique minority<br />

in Europe. Unlike other ethnic groups, they<br />

have no historical homeland and live in<br />

almost all countries in Europe and Central<br />

Asia. The origin <strong>of</strong> the Roma in Europe is<br />

widely debated. Historical documents<br />

indicate that Roma have migrated in waves<br />

from northern India to Europe between the 9 th<br />

and the 14 th century. On the other hand,<br />

historical studies show that the Roma were<br />

very much persecuted by the majority from<br />

the very beginning <strong>of</strong> their arrival in Europe.<br />

The measures taken against them ranged from<br />

hanging, drowning, reddening with iron,<br />

imprisonment, enslavement, deportation. The<br />

Western Europeans were more drastic in their<br />

measures against the Roma than the more<br />

permitting Turks, who invaded the South-<br />

East and parts <strong>of</strong> Central Europe 9 . Perhaps<br />

this explains even in today Europe a greater<br />

9 Fraser, Angus, 2010, Țiganii, Editura Humanitas,<br />

București, p. 190


concentration <strong>of</strong> Roma in the Cenral and<br />

Eastern European countries.<br />

Roma is an extremely diverse population with<br />

multiple subgroups based on language,<br />

history, religion and different occupations.<br />

While in some countries Roma are nomadic,<br />

most <strong>of</strong> them in Central and Eastern Europe<br />

have become sedentary – some <strong>of</strong> them in the<br />

days <strong>of</strong> the Ottoman rule and others in the<br />

socialist period. 10<br />

Estimating the size <strong>of</strong> the Roma population is<br />

a complicated issue. Census data are intensely<br />

disputed as many Roma do not identify<br />

themselves as Roma in surveys. On the other<br />

hand, the <strong>of</strong>ficial figures, the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population censuses are contradicted by other<br />

studies which aimed to estimate the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> Roma population 11 . Some estimates show<br />

that the number <strong>of</strong> Roma increased up to 6<br />

and 9 percent in Bulgaria, Macedonia,<br />

Slovakia and Romania. These percentages<br />

may increase for the foreseeable future<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the difference between fertility<br />

rates in populations <strong>of</strong> Roma and non-Roma.<br />

Romania has the largest Roma population in<br />

Europe, estimated figures ranging from 1 to 2<br />

millions. A large Roma population (between<br />

400,000 and 1 million) lives in Hungary,<br />

Bulgaria, Slovakia, Turkey and Serbia. The<br />

largest population <strong>of</strong> Roma in Western<br />

Europe is in Spain (about 630,000), France<br />

(310,000), Germany (70,000) and Italy<br />

(130,000). In total between 7 and 9 million<br />

Roma live in Europe - a population equal to<br />

that <strong>of</strong> Sweden or Austria. 12<br />

The Roma population in Romania and<br />

Hungary has some special characteristics<br />

compared to other minorities. By tradition, it<br />

10 Ringold, Dena, Orenstein, Mitchell, Wilkens,<br />

Erika,2003, Roma in an Expanding Europe.<br />

Breaking the Poverty Cycle, The World Bank, p.1<br />

11 Preoteasa, Ana Maria, 2003, Prezentarea unei<br />

cercetări internaționale cu privire la starea<br />

romilor în Europa Centrală și de Est, in Calitatea<br />

Vieții, XIV, no.2, p.265<br />

12 Ringold, Dena, Orenstein, Mitchell, Wilkens,<br />

Erika, 2003, Roma in an Expanding Europe.<br />

Breaking the Poverty Cycle, The World Bank, p.1<br />

138<br />

is a population with a low social status,<br />

typical object <strong>of</strong> comparison as the poorest<br />

category <strong>of</strong> population and strongly exposed<br />

to discrimination and social exclusion. To<br />

these one should add other features, such as<br />

failure <strong>of</strong> modernity or difficulties <strong>of</strong><br />

identifying the exact size <strong>of</strong> the Roma<br />

population. 13<br />

Historically, the Roma population had a<br />

disadvantaged position over the centuries.<br />

While by the end <strong>of</strong> the XIX th century, Roma<br />

were slaves on the estates <strong>of</strong> Romanian or<br />

Hungarian nobles (Transylvania), in the last<br />

two centuries, this population has<br />

experienced a period <strong>of</strong> emancipation, have<br />

been <strong>of</strong>fered equal rights with the majority<br />

population and small land plots. In the<br />

socialist period the situation <strong>of</strong> Roma<br />

populations improved to some extent. These<br />

policies resulted in a relative improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

their education level and the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

their involvement in the formal economy.<br />

However, the price they paid was forced<br />

integration and a loss <strong>of</strong> cultural specificity. 14<br />

The post-communist transition has caused<br />

many changes in the life <strong>of</strong> Roma<br />

communities. Some Roma even regret the<br />

socialist regime; even if they were not<br />

recognized as a national minority, the<br />

assimilation policies were <strong>of</strong>fering them at<br />

least some degree material safety. In contrast,<br />

the post-socialist period was full <strong>of</strong> changes<br />

and paradoxes for Roma. On one hand, it<br />

allowed the recognition <strong>of</strong> Roma identity,<br />

politically and culturally, on the other hand, it<br />

emphasized the economic and social<br />

marginalization and rejection <strong>of</strong> this<br />

community. 15<br />

In the present context, the Roma issue is not a<br />

simple one. Several economic and social<br />

factors are combined here; while the ethnic<br />

dimension <strong>of</strong> the problems can not be<br />

13 Voicu, Mălina( coordinator), 2007, Nevoi și<br />

resurse în comunitățile de romi, Soros Foundation<br />

Romania,București, 2007, p.7<br />

14 Ibidem<br />

15 Pons, Emanuelle, 1999, Țiganii din România,<br />

Editura Compania, București, p. 137


ignored, it stems to great extent from the<br />

crisis crossed by Romania and Hungary<br />

during the transition period, which has a<br />

particular effect on the Roma population.<br />

Viewed in economic terms, we can say that<br />

Roma are the poorest population in Romania<br />

and Hungary, perceiveing the economic<br />

vulnerability and social exclusion as their<br />

main problems. 16 The poverty level <strong>of</strong> this<br />

ethnic group is a combinated outcome <strong>of</strong><br />

several factors. As Marian Preda stated,<br />

poverty can be considered only a specific<br />

dimension <strong>of</strong> social exclusion, the financial<br />

one 17 . Other forms <strong>of</strong> exclusion are also<br />

involved: exclusion from the democratic and<br />

legal system, labor market exclusion,<br />

exclusion from the state welfare system,<br />

exclusion from the family and community<br />

system.<br />

According to recent research, the causal<br />

factors seem to have mainly an individual<br />

determination and to a certain extent, a<br />

cultural one, pointing to self-exclusion 18 . The<br />

economic vulnerability <strong>of</strong> Roma is thus<br />

caused by a complex <strong>of</strong> factors such as low<br />

educational and vocational training, the<br />

precarious position on the labor market, the<br />

great number <strong>of</strong> children in Roma families,<br />

their discrimination by the majority group<br />

and the involvement in the informal<br />

economy. One can speak <strong>of</strong> a vicious circle in<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> the Roma. Being poor in the vast<br />

majority, they do not have the resources to<br />

complete their educational and pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

training. Many <strong>of</strong> them not having jobs, they<br />

get involved in the informal economy, or<br />

immigrate to western countries.<br />

1.2. Roma in the sociological literature<br />

The sociological literature on the problems <strong>of</strong><br />

the Roma community is rich. The research<br />

16 Voicu, Mălina( coordinator), 2007, Nevoi și<br />

resurse în comunitățile de romi, Soros Foundation<br />

Romania,București, p.7<br />

17 Preda, Marian, 2002, Politica socială românească<br />

între sărăcie și globalizare, Editura Polirom, Iaşi, p.<br />

101<br />

18 Ibidem, p. 168<br />

139<br />

developed on the Roma communities is<br />

achieved both by quantitative and qualitative<br />

methods. Both approaches appear to have<br />

pros and cons. Quantitative methods are<br />

useful to illustrate comparisons between the<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> Roma and non-Roma, both at<br />

a national and a European level. On the other<br />

hand, information on Roma can not be<br />

regarded as the most reliable data and they<br />

are also difficult to be obtained. Due to<br />

statistical problems related to ethnic selfidentification,<br />

the quantitative research has<br />

serious limitations. However, the quantitative<br />

data provide possibilities for comparative<br />

analyses <strong>of</strong> welfare measures that can<br />

improve the elaboration and implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> social policies.<br />

While quantitative research shows that Roma<br />

poverty is distinct, it does not provide an<br />

adequate basis for understanding the specific<br />

dynamics circumscribing Roma economic<br />

vulnerability. In this field <strong>of</strong> study, qualitative<br />

research might have a higher effectiveness in<br />

identifying social processes, mechanisms and<br />

relationships between variables that are<br />

difficult to be emphasised by using<br />

exclusively quantitative methods. Qualitative<br />

research, however, has also certain<br />

disadvantages. It tends to focus on just one<br />

specific issue, focusing on a limited number<br />

<strong>of</strong> factors. That is why a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

quantitative and qualitative methods can<br />

provide a complementary set <strong>of</strong> perspectives<br />

leading to a better understanding <strong>of</strong> social<br />

problems and policies. 19<br />

A remarkable comparative research project<br />

on the Roma community in six Central and<br />

Eastern European Countries (Hungary,<br />

Bulgaria, Slovakia, Poland, Russia and<br />

Romania), both quantitative and qualitative,<br />

has been conducted between 1999 and 2000,<br />

coordinated by Ivan Szelenyi (Yale<br />

19 Ringold, Dena, Orenstein, Mitchell, Wilkens,<br />

Erika,2003, Roma in an Expanding Europe.<br />

Breaking the Poverty Cycle,The World Bank, p.4


University). 20 Some interesting<br />

methodological conclusions for the study <strong>of</strong><br />

Roma communities have been drawn. During<br />

one year, the researchers analyzed between<br />

10,000 and 19,000 Roma households. In the<br />

same time a questionnaire was applied on an<br />

oversample <strong>of</strong> Roma in Bulgaria, Hungary,<br />

Poland and Romania. The researchers have<br />

also made some qualitative studies <strong>of</strong><br />

communities in extreme poverty in these<br />

countries.<br />

In 1993 people in all countries experience a<br />

similar deterioration in living standards<br />

compared to 1988. Since 2000 the trend is a<br />

decrease <strong>of</strong> the poverty in countries that have<br />

implemented more rigorous liberal reforms,<br />

for instance Hungary and Poland, as well as<br />

in countries with slow progress to the model<br />

<strong>of</strong> liberal capitalism. 21<br />

The study revealed that transnational<br />

differences are as important as the ethnic<br />

differences. For example, Roma in Hungary<br />

are slightly poorer than non-Roma in<br />

Bulgaria. In all the countries, Roma are<br />

overrepresented in the poorest deciles <strong>of</strong><br />

population. However, most <strong>of</strong> the very poor<br />

people consist <strong>of</strong> non-Roma. There is also a<br />

significant category <strong>of</strong> Roma who has a good<br />

enough standard <strong>of</strong> living in all the countries<br />

mentioned. The conclusion <strong>of</strong> the researchers<br />

is that the Roma who have successfully<br />

maintained the traditions were more likely to<br />

avoid the trap <strong>of</strong> poverty than those<br />

assimilated to the fringes <strong>of</strong> society.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the most quoted qualitative studies in<br />

the international literature studying the Roma<br />

is the English anthropologist Michael<br />

Stewart’s, presented in “The Time <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Gypsies” (1997), a remarkable social<br />

ethnography <strong>of</strong> the Roma in the Hungarian<br />

town <strong>of</strong> Harangos, located at north <strong>of</strong><br />

Budapest, a survey using the method <strong>of</strong><br />

participatory observation. The English<br />

anthropologist developed the research<br />

20 One outcome <strong>of</strong> this research is a work entitled<br />

Poverty, Ethnicity and Gender in Transitional<br />

Society (2002).<br />

21 Ibidem, p.9<br />

140<br />

through a field work conducted during 18<br />

months between the years 1984 and 1985.<br />

During this period he lived with his wife and<br />

children in an area called “The third class” in<br />

a Roma neighborhood <strong>of</strong> the town, a town<br />

where, according to a census <strong>of</strong> that time,<br />

around 1000 Roma lived.<br />

Until 1989 the <strong>of</strong>ficial communist policy was<br />

to integrate the Roma in the “leading” class,<br />

the communist working class. However,<br />

Roma have found ways to maintain their own<br />

identity. Michael Stewart's book examines the<br />

refusal <strong>of</strong> Roma to abandon their lifestyle and<br />

accept assimilation to the majority<br />

population. Forget, Michael Stewart warns us<br />

early in the book, about the carefree freedom<br />

<strong>of</strong> caravans and campfires. These men lived<br />

hard and brutal sometimes. They dreamed <strong>of</strong><br />

richness gained through gambling and<br />

stealing horses, but in reality were poor as a<br />

church mouse. They lived in ghettos, but their<br />

names and law argued that the Roma are<br />

working people, <strong>of</strong>ten working for low wages<br />

in industry and collective farms. And despite<br />

the marginal position and sufferings they<br />

endured they preserved the dignity and the<br />

joy <strong>of</strong> being Roma. 22<br />

Michael Stewart's book describes the<br />

cultivation, celebration and reinvention <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cultural difference and diversity <strong>of</strong> some<br />

people deemed by their superiors too stupid<br />

and uncivilized to have their own culture.<br />

Since the beginning <strong>of</strong> the Second World War<br />

there were two dramatic ways to solve the<br />

“gypsy problem”. Between 1941 and 1945,<br />

the Nazis exterminated about 500,000 Roma<br />

in their effort to clear the “degenerated” and<br />

“antisocial”way <strong>of</strong> life. Between 1957 and<br />

1989, said Stewart, a different type <strong>of</strong> anti-<br />

Gypsy campaign took place in the Eastern<br />

Europe. Nobody was made prisoner, left to<br />

die alone. Repression and discrimination did<br />

not exist in the plan <strong>of</strong> the communist<br />

reformers. But the final goal was strikingly<br />

similar to the fascist one, the Gypsies<br />

22 Michael Stewart,1997, The Time <strong>of</strong> the Gypsies,<br />

Westview Press, Colorado, p. 1


disappearance. The East European<br />

communists’ task in 1957, says the English<br />

anthropologist, was really Herculean: the<br />

cultural assimilation <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> people<br />

who had suffered discrimination for<br />

centuries. The former Yugoslavia being<br />

partially an exception, Gypsies had been<br />

subjected to a systematic campaign <strong>of</strong><br />

assimilation. Czechoslovakia, Poland, Soviet<br />

Union, Romania and Hungary pursued almost<br />

identical policies. 23<br />

The English anthropologist notes, however,<br />

that, ironically, far from being assimilated in<br />

the working class, the problems associated<br />

with the Gypsies became larger as the<br />

campaign <strong>of</strong> assimilation continued. Stewart<br />

noted that in the Hungary <strong>of</strong> the period the<br />

research was held, the Gypsy issue was given<br />

greater importance than ever, since the 1930s.<br />

Two sources led to this attitude. First there<br />

was a dramatic gap between the theory <strong>of</strong><br />

social inclusion and the reality <strong>of</strong> increasing<br />

social differentiation. The Communists told<br />

to the non-Roma that they had done much to<br />

improve the lives <strong>of</strong> Roma and their<br />

disappearance could be expected soon. But<br />

there was little evidence in this case. Two: the<br />

policies reproducted in a new form the old<br />

ideas about gypsies being “others”. The<br />

economic and social system entered into<br />

crisis in 1980s, the Gypsies otherness became<br />

clearer and more ominous.<br />

The Romanian literature on the Roma issues<br />

is related especially to the researches carried<br />

out by the Institute for Quality <strong>of</strong> Life in<br />

Bucharest. 24 The work coordinated by Elena<br />

23 Ibidem, p.5<br />

24 After 1990, a number <strong>of</strong> research papers on this<br />

area appeared: Cătălin Zamfir and Elena Zamfir,<br />

Gypsies between worry and neglect (1993), Cătălin<br />

Zamfir and Marian Preda, Roma in Romania (2002),<br />

Marian Preda, Romanian social policy between<br />

poverty and globalization (2002), Manuela<br />

Stănculescu and Ionica Berevoiescu, Poor as a<br />

church mouse, looking for another life (2004). In the<br />

work A new challenge: the social development<br />

(2006), coordinated by Cătălin Zamfir and Laura<br />

Stoica, there is a chapter signed by the sociologist<br />

141<br />

and Cătălin Zamfir, Gypsies between worry<br />

and neglect (1993) can be regarded as the<br />

first and perhaps the most extensive analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the problems <strong>of</strong> Roma in Romania, based<br />

on a quantitative research on a representative<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> Roma households. In this book a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> issues concerning the Roma are<br />

considered, such as housing, education,<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essions and occupations, family and<br />

living conditions <strong>of</strong> the children.<br />

Nine features are invoked - social-economic<br />

trends <strong>of</strong> the Roma population - which have<br />

an overwhelming effect on their their<br />

opportunities: decreased access to jobs<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by the modern economy, labor market<br />

niches that Roma have a special access<br />

(traditional pr<strong>of</strong>essions, businesses on their<br />

own, unskilled jobs), precarious and uncertain<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> many economic resources<br />

traditionally exploited by the Roma, marginal<br />

or even deviant exploitation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

community, increasing crime, its organized<br />

character and violence, antagonizing relations<br />

between the majority population and Roma<br />

population, the number <strong>of</strong> children, poor<br />

housing conditions and migration to cities<br />

and the risk <strong>of</strong> “pockets” <strong>of</strong> poverty and<br />

chronic juvenile with a strong ethnic coloring.<br />

The conclusion <strong>of</strong> the whole analysis is that<br />

the Roma population faces serious social and<br />

economic crisis. The traditional life strategies<br />

provide only the chance <strong>of</strong> survival in this<br />

crisis, but not for its overcoming.<br />

1.3. Living in poor areas<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the poor areas as living<br />

spaces is an integral part <strong>of</strong> any discourse on<br />

new poverty and its focus on clearly defined<br />

territories. To validate an area as poor<br />

assumes the presence <strong>of</strong> deprivation<br />

concerning the housing and the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

precarious living conditions. In this regard,<br />

the poor areas are described as areas with no<br />

or poorly equipped facilities, poor natural<br />

environment, the house in an advanced state<br />

Mihai Surdu on school segregation and schools with<br />

Roma students.


<strong>of</strong> degradation and poorly provided with<br />

urban facilities. The specific phenomena for<br />

the poor areas are housing insecurity and<br />

overcrowded housing. 25<br />

There are several important analyses on<br />

living in poor areas in the international<br />

literature. In the West sociologists are<br />

primarily concerned with the poor areas <strong>of</strong><br />

the urban, <strong>of</strong>ten called ghetto or banlieue. As<br />

William Wilson, an African-American<br />

sociologist considers, the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

black people in the ghetto is the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reduced access to employment and<br />

socialization. European sociologists such as<br />

Loic Wacquant, are adding another element,<br />

namely the already mentioned stigmatization<br />

<strong>of</strong> people living in poor areas <strong>of</strong> large urban<br />

agglomerations. The Dutch researcher Eva<br />

van Kempen also mentions a fourth factor,<br />

the limited access to social rights 26 .<br />

In connection with the topic discussed, there<br />

is a recently completed European project<br />

coordinated by Ronald Van Kempen, a Dutch<br />

urban geographer at the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Utrecht, entitled Large Housing Estates in<br />

Europe: Good Practices and New Visions for<br />

Sustainable Cities and Neighborhoods. The<br />

main objectives <strong>of</strong> this project (which<br />

includes case studies in cities in Hungary)<br />

were to identify the social and economic<br />

changes that took place in the social world <strong>of</strong><br />

the blocks built after the Second World War<br />

and the development <strong>of</strong> some items which<br />

proved to be important in the success or<br />

failure <strong>of</strong> the social policies applied to the<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> blocks 27 . The researchers concluded<br />

25 Stănculescu, ManuelaS<strong>of</strong>ia, Berevoescu, Ionica,<br />

2004, Sărac lipit,caut altă viață!, Editura Nemira,<br />

București, p.128<br />

26 Van Kempen, Eva, în Marcuse, Peter și Van<br />

Kempen, Ronald, 2002, Of States and Cities,<br />

Oxford University Press, p.245<br />

27 Murie, Alan, Siedow-Knorr, Thomas, Van<br />

Kempen, Ronald, 2003, Large Housing Estates in<br />

Europe.General Developments and Theoretical<br />

Backgrounds, Utrecht University, p.11<br />

142<br />

that these areas <strong>of</strong> blocks concentrate people<br />

with modest incomes and a low stock <strong>of</strong><br />

social cultural and political capital. The block<br />

areas are also characterized by a higher rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> unemployment and crime and a higher<br />

level <strong>of</strong> social exclusion. Although the<br />

researchers found that the block areas are in a<br />

state <strong>of</strong> failing all over Europe, there are also<br />

situations where deprivation, bad construction<br />

and management do not result in revocation.<br />

Second, East-West differences are noticed in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> social cohesion and solidarity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

inhabitants <strong>of</strong> the blocks in the projects <strong>of</strong><br />

rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> buildings and layout <strong>of</strong> the<br />

green spaces surrounding these buildings.<br />

With regard to housing problems in the poor<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> Romania (most papers on this topic<br />

focusing on the housing problems <strong>of</strong> Roma<br />

communities), I should mention the work <strong>of</strong><br />

researchers like Cătălin and Elena Zamfir<br />

(1993), Cătălin Zamfir and Marian Preda (<br />

2002), Manuela Stănculescu and Ionica<br />

Berevoescu (2004), Cătălin Berescu and<br />

Mariana Celac (2006) or Cosima Rughiniş<br />

(2008). The main issues considered by these<br />

works are: poor housing, housing density,<br />

documents <strong>of</strong> the buildings and land<br />

ownership and access to utilities. The main<br />

findings <strong>of</strong> the authors are the significant<br />

differences between the statuses <strong>of</strong> Roma and<br />

non-Roma, and also the significant<br />

differences between rural and urban areas, the<br />

Roma living in the rural environment having<br />

poor living conditions. We will see to what<br />

extent some <strong>of</strong> these findings could be<br />

verified on the cases studied by us in Bihor<br />

and Hajdu Bihar.<br />

1.4. Roma in Bihor and Hajdu-Bihar<br />

1.4.1 Bihor County<br />

Bihor County is the third in Romania<br />

according to the percentage <strong>of</strong> the Roma per<br />

population (5.01%), after Mureş County<br />

(6.96%) and Sălaj County (5.01%). There are<br />

around 30,200 Roma in Bihor County. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> them live in Oradea, 6,000 to a total <strong>of</strong><br />

206,000 inhabitants. The most concentrated<br />

Roma communities are in Săcuieni (3,700),


Tinca (2,500), Diosig (1,500), Batăr (1,500),<br />

Sânmartin (1,070), Aleşd (1,000), Suplacu de<br />

Barcău (900) and Ineu (850).<br />

Roma, statistically a minority, are 89% <strong>of</strong><br />

those who abandon school in Bihor County<br />

and, according to police estimations, 8 <strong>of</strong> 10<br />

<strong>of</strong>fences are committed by Roma. Only 10%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Roma are employed and only 50% <strong>of</strong><br />

them have an identity card. These are some<br />

statistical data which illustrate a dramatic<br />

reality <strong>of</strong> this minority. As in the other parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> Romania, the problems the Roma have to<br />

face in Bihor are the low level <strong>of</strong> education,<br />

the dropout, the precarious position on the<br />

labor market, living and health problems.<br />

In recent years, two qualitative studies have<br />

been conducted on the Roma in Bihor: The<br />

first study (Olah, 2004) focused especially<br />

on the dropout, stressed that education is a<br />

major factor for the modernization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Roma’s life, maybe the decisive factor, and<br />

that the low level <strong>of</strong> education is strongly<br />

correlated with the precarious integration <strong>of</strong><br />

the Roma on the labor market and with the<br />

juvenile delinquency. An important<br />

conclusion <strong>of</strong> the study is that Roma elite<br />

with high education should be the solution for<br />

the change <strong>of</strong> the dramatic situation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Roma communities 28 . The second study<br />

(Olah-Baltatescu 2008) focused on the<br />

problems <strong>of</strong> the Roma in Oradea 29 . The data<br />

analysis confirmed that the problems <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Roma are related to:<br />

- improper conditions <strong>of</strong> living<br />

- extreme poverty<br />

- the precarious health (especially contagious<br />

diseases like TBC)<br />

28 Olah, Șerban, 2009, The School Dropout in Bihor<br />

county. A Qualitative Approach , Revista<br />

Universitara de Sociologie, Craiova, Romania, Year<br />

VI, nr.1(11), p.101<br />

29 Olah, Șerban, Băltățescu, Sergiu, 2008, Nevoi şi<br />

servicii sociale în comunităţile de romi. Studiu<br />

calitativ în municipiul Oradea in Revista de<br />

Asistență socială (nr.3-4), București, ISSN 1583-<br />

0698,p.34<br />

143<br />

- lack <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional training, the precarious<br />

position on the labor market, low incomes<br />

due to the lack <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional training<br />

- the precarious education.<br />

The initiative <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Government<br />

in 2000-2004 to create some special places<br />

for the students <strong>of</strong> the Roma communities<br />

seems to be efficient. There is also needed a<br />

more active involvement <strong>of</strong> the NGOs, Town<br />

Halls, leaders <strong>of</strong> the Roma communities.<br />

The main reasons <strong>of</strong> the dropout in Bihor are:<br />

poverty, low level <strong>of</strong> education <strong>of</strong> the parents<br />

in the Roma community, the parents’ lack <strong>of</strong><br />

interest for school problems, family life<br />

disorganization, the tradition in the Roma<br />

community, the wrong attitude <strong>of</strong> some<br />

teachers towards some pupils, especially<br />

Roma, the low number <strong>of</strong> school<br />

psychologists in the schools <strong>of</strong> Bihor and the<br />

friends <strong>of</strong> the pupil.<br />

Both mentioned research papers are<br />

underlining the necessity <strong>of</strong> continuing the<br />

social projects for the Roma, developing the<br />

NGOs which carry out such projects and<br />

forming the elite <strong>of</strong> the Roma community<br />

who will support the disadvantaged<br />

communities by involving them in such<br />

projects.<br />

1.4.2. Hajdu-Bihar County<br />

In Hajdu-Bihar, 10 836 persons declared<br />

Roma identity at the latest census (in 2001),<br />

comprising 5,7 % <strong>of</strong> the total Roma<br />

population <strong>of</strong> Hungary. The share <strong>of</strong> Roma<br />

within the county’s total population is 2 %.<br />

However, the number <strong>of</strong> those who live a<br />

specific Roma way <strong>of</strong> life is much higher. A<br />

nationwide representative survey conducted<br />

by the Hungarian Statistical Office in 2003<br />

found that in Hajdu-Bihor county 44 200<br />

persons (8, 2% <strong>of</strong> the total population) are<br />

assigned a Roma (Gypsy) identity by their<br />

immediate neighborhood. According to this<br />

indicator, Hajdu-Bihor is the county with the<br />

fifth largest Roma population in Hungary.<br />

The Roma population <strong>of</strong> Hajdu –Bihor<br />

country is confronting to a large extent with


the same problems as their co-ethnics at the<br />

other side <strong>of</strong> the border:<br />

- Comparatively very high rates <strong>of</strong> fertility<br />

combined with high rates <strong>of</strong> mortality, which<br />

results in a rather young age structure<br />

compared to that <strong>of</strong> the county’s total<br />

population<br />

- Much lower educational level than the<br />

county average<br />

- Extremely reduced level <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

activity/employment<br />

A survey <strong>of</strong> 200 Roma families conducted by<br />

the Department <strong>of</strong> Sociology at the<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Debrecen 30 found that the rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> Roma employment is six times lower (in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> female population seven times lower)<br />

compared to the general rate <strong>of</strong> employment.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the Roma subjects questioned during<br />

the survey expressed their desire to work, but<br />

complained <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> job opportunities.<br />

Beyond this general image, however, a rather<br />

perceptible generation-related differentiation<br />

has been observed. Members <strong>of</strong> the middle<br />

aged generation who had been occupied in<br />

economic activities during communist times<br />

are more likely to be employed today as well,<br />

compared to the members <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

generation socialized after 1989, who tend to<br />

prefer social benefits instead <strong>of</strong> work. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> them never had any legal job.<br />

As far as perception <strong>of</strong> the employers’<br />

attitudes is concerned, 72% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents said they never experienced any<br />

discrimination while looking for a workplace,<br />

however 26% <strong>of</strong> those questioned indicated<br />

that they were not hired due their belonging<br />

to the Roma population. Among the surveyed<br />

families 40% have some links with<br />

agriculture: 18% is cultivating a piece <strong>of</strong><br />

land, 10 % are occupied with livestockfarming,<br />

and 12 % are doing both. In the case<br />

they would receive free <strong>of</strong> charge agricultural<br />

30 Beres, Csaba, 2004, A Hajdu-Bihar megyeben<br />

elo Roma lakossag helyzete.<br />

http://www.romaweb.hu/doc.../szociologiai_tanulma<br />

ny_hbm.doc<br />

144<br />

land for personal use from the local<br />

government, 25% declared that they would<br />

not cultivate it, but 72 % said that they would.<br />

(41% would produce only for personal use,<br />

31% even for the market)<br />

The survey found that in the preceding month<br />

10% <strong>of</strong> the respondents had some income<br />

originating from occasional, usually<br />

agricultural work. One working day in the<br />

local agriculture is normally 10 hours long,<br />

and the per diem payment stands at 3000<br />

forints (approximately 12 euros). Persons<br />

belonging to the poorest strata <strong>of</strong> Roma<br />

population, most <strong>of</strong> who also suffer <strong>of</strong><br />

various illnesses, cannot access even this<br />

rather modest work opportunity.<br />

On the other hand, the results <strong>of</strong> research<br />

show that in certain conditions occasional<br />

work might also become a resource <strong>of</strong><br />

upward social mobility. For example, in one<br />

rural locality (Bagamer), 50 Roma workers<br />

employed in agriculture on day to day basis<br />

managed to learn how to produce horseradish,<br />

and subsequently used this knowledge<br />

in order to start their own small farms, in<br />

pieces <strong>of</strong> land bought from or lent by local<br />

inhabitants. A social land-lease program by<br />

the county authorities encouraged Roma<br />

communities to start agricultural initiatives<br />

(such as poppy seeds cultivating or goat –<br />

breeding) in other localities as well. Some <strong>of</strong><br />

these endeavors proved successful, but others<br />

failed, mainly due to the lack <strong>of</strong> Roma<br />

agricultural tradition and business skills. In<br />

order to maximize the outcome <strong>of</strong> these<br />

programs, members <strong>of</strong> the Debrecen<br />

University research team suggested that as a<br />

first step it would be more beneficial and<br />

sustainable to focus on producing for family<br />

consume, rather than for the market.<br />

1.5. Quantitative Data Analysis<br />

How satisfied are Roma with their life? Is the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> Roma in Hungary higher<br />

than that in Romania? Which is the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

Roma living in the two countries? What is the<br />

relationship between the Roma and various<br />

items <strong>of</strong> labor? Which is the level <strong>of</strong>


education and occupational training? What<br />

work experience they have in the formal<br />

economy? What incomes do they have? How<br />

healthy they are? How religious they are?<br />

These are only a few <strong>of</strong> the starting questions<br />

<strong>of</strong> a quantitative research conducted between<br />

January 10 to March 7, 2010 in several urban<br />

and rural areas in Romania and Hungary. The<br />

research is an integral part <strong>of</strong> a cross-border<br />

project called Roma Employment, funded by<br />

the European Regional Development Fund. 31<br />

This project analyses the integration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Roma into the labor market in Romania and<br />

Hungary and includes both a research<br />

component (data collection, a test <strong>of</strong><br />

occupational skills, applying a questionnaire,<br />

conducting focus groups) and practical<br />

activities such as organizing two job fairs for<br />

Roma (Oradea and Biharkeresztes).<br />

The quantitative research aimed at collecting<br />

data on quality <strong>of</strong> Roma life in settlements<br />

with a high density <strong>of</strong> people belonging to<br />

this category: Oradea, Osorhei, Ineu de Cris<br />

in Romania and Biharkeresztes and Told in<br />

Hungary. It should also be noted that in most<br />

<strong>of</strong> these places Roma live in neighborhoods<br />

where they are the majority. We have to<br />

mention that interpretation <strong>of</strong> our research<br />

data is based on comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> two<br />

samples <strong>of</strong> Roma, one from Romania(Bihor<br />

county) and another from Hungary(Hajdu-<br />

Bihar county). The sampling method used is<br />

the non-probabilistic one and involves the<br />

snowball principle. Only persons able to work<br />

and who are seeking employment, aged<br />

between 18 and 55, were selected. In total, a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> 322 subjects answered to the<br />

questions.<br />

As collected data are numerous and<br />

extremely complex, in thi paper we focus<br />

only on those related to living conditions. We<br />

aim to realize the presentation and analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the full set <strong>of</strong> quantitative and qualitative data<br />

in a volume dedicated to the study <strong>of</strong> Roma in<br />

Romania and Hungary.<br />

31<br />

145<br />

In our research we will test several<br />

hypotheses which we shall mention below.<br />

H1. There are significant differences between<br />

the housing conditions <strong>of</strong> Roma in Romania<br />

and Hungary.<br />

H2. There is a significant relationship<br />

between satisfaction with life and satisfaction<br />

with housing.<br />

H3: There is a direct link between satisfaction<br />

with housing and income.<br />

H4: There is a direct link between the size <strong>of</strong><br />

dwelling and income.<br />

H5: There is a negative correlation between<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> persons in the household and<br />

the income.<br />

1.5.1. Satisfaction with life<br />

How satisfied are Roma with their life? What<br />

are the determinants <strong>of</strong> the satisfaction with<br />

life? The research results drawn from the<br />

research samples in Romania and Hungary<br />

are shown in the tables below.


40<br />

30<br />

Count 50<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

…<br />

foarte satisfacut<br />

Table 1. Satisfaction with life at the Hungarian Roma<br />

13,86%<br />

satisfacut<br />

42,57%<br />

oarecum<br />

satisfacut<br />

cat sunteti de multumit cu viata in prezent<br />

146<br />

37,62%<br />

nesatisfacut<br />

4,95%<br />

nici satsifacut,<br />

nici nesatisfacut<br />

0,99%<br />

99


30,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

Percent 40,0%<br />

10,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

Table 2. Satisfaction with life at the Romanian Roma<br />

7,21%<br />

foarte<br />

satisfacut<br />

17,57%<br />

satisfacut<br />

18,47%<br />

oarecum<br />

satisfacut<br />

cat sunteti de multumit cu viata in prezent<br />

147<br />

31,98%<br />

nesatisfacut<br />

17,12%<br />

nici satsifacut,<br />

nici nesatisfacut<br />

7,66%<br />

99


We can see in the two tables that on the one hand, the share <strong>of</strong> very satisfied in Romania is<br />

higher (7. 21% vs 0%) and also the percentage <strong>of</strong> those dissatisfied is lower (31. 98%<br />

compared to 37. 62%). Is this happening because <strong>of</strong> a higher quality <strong>of</strong> life or the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

other factors? We will give an answer along the way.<br />

1.5.2 The economic vulnerability <strong>of</strong> the Roma<br />

A first step we need to make is to see the perception <strong>of</strong> the Roma on poverty.<br />

50,0%<br />

40,0%<br />

30,0%<br />

Percent 60,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

10,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

30,69%<br />

nu ne ajung nici<br />

pentru a putea<br />

trai<br />

Table 3. Income poverty (Roma in Hungary)<br />

59,41%<br />

ne ajung doar<br />

sa supravietuim<br />

fara a putea sa<br />

cumparam ceva<br />

mai bun sau sa<br />

strangem ceva<br />

bani<br />

6,93%<br />

reusim sa<br />

strangem ceva<br />

bani sau sa<br />

cumparam ceva<br />

mai bu, dar cu<br />

economii si<br />

sacrificii<br />

Gândindu-va la veniturile totale ale familiei, puteti spune ca va ajung sau<br />

nu?<br />

148<br />

0,99%<br />

ne ajung destul<br />

de bine pentru<br />

ceea ce avem<br />

nevoie<br />

0,99%<br />

9<br />

0,99%<br />

99


40,0%<br />

30,0%<br />

Percent 50,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

10,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

Table 4. Income poverty (Roma in Romania)<br />

39,19%<br />

nu ne ajung nici pentru a putea<br />

trai<br />

ne ajung doar sa supravietuim<br />

fara a putea sa cumparam<br />

ceva mai bun sau sa strangem<br />

ceva bani<br />

49,10%<br />

Gândindu-va la veniturile totale ale familiei, puteti spune ca va ajung sau…<br />

Comparing the two tables, we can see that the Roma in both countries perceive themselves<br />

poor and very poor. If we observe the first two items, the percentages are quit similar in the two<br />

countries (about 88. 29% in Romania compared to 90% in Hungary). If we take items 3 and 4<br />

however, the situation is more favorable for the Roma in Hungary (8%) compared to 2. 25%<br />

for the Roma in Romania.<br />

149<br />

reusim sa strangem ceva bani<br />

sau sa cumparam ceva mai<br />

bu, dar cu economii si sacrificii<br />

0,90%<br />

ne ajung destul de bine pentru<br />

ceea ce avem nevoie<br />

1,35%<br />

9,46%<br />

99


1.5.3. Housing conditions<br />

A first step towards interpreting the above mentioned surprising situation is to inquire about<br />

the living conditions in the two countries. How satisfied are the Roma with their home? Here<br />

are the data from Hungary.<br />

Table. 5 Satisfaction with housing at Roma in Hungary<br />

30<br />

20<br />

Count 40<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2,97%<br />

foarte nemultumit<br />

4,95%<br />

nemultumit<br />

36,63%<br />

nici multumit, nici<br />

nemultumit<br />

multumirea cu locuinta<br />

A question to be raised is how the satisfaction with life is associated with the satisfaction with<br />

housing. The regression model applied to the data from Hungary proves a significant<br />

combination, but not a strong link between the two variables, as will appear in the data<br />

presented in the annex 1.<br />

150<br />

28,71%<br />

multumit<br />

24,75%<br />

foarte multumit<br />

1,98%<br />

99


25,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

15,0%<br />

Percent<br />

10,0%<br />

5,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

Table 6. Satisfaction with housing at Roma in Romania<br />

0,90%<br />

0<br />

19,82%<br />

foarte<br />

nemultumit<br />

13,51%<br />

nemultumit<br />

We can notice in the two graphics, on the one<br />

hand, that the percentage <strong>of</strong> satisfied and very<br />

satisfied is higher in Hungary (26. 71% and<br />

24. 79%) compared to Romania (18. 47% and<br />

20. 27%, and secondly that the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

dissatisfied and very dissatisfied is much<br />

higher in Romania (19. 82% and 13. 5%)<br />

compared with those in Hungary (4. 95%,<br />

respectively 2. 97%). Perhaps this is due to<br />

issues such as housing density, housing size,<br />

number <strong>of</strong> rooms and the materials the houses<br />

are made <strong>of</strong>.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> our assumptions is related to the direct<br />

link between satisfaction with life and<br />

satisfaction with housing. Making a<br />

regression analysis on the data from<br />

Romania, we can see that the association<br />

between the two variables is significant and,<br />

nici multumit,<br />

nici<br />

nemultumit<br />

Satisfacția cu locuința<br />

151<br />

18,02%<br />

20,27%<br />

multumit<br />

18,47%<br />

foarte<br />

multumit<br />

9,01%<br />

as shown by the data in the table below, the<br />

correlation between the two variables is over<br />

0.79, so it is quite strong. The comparison<br />

between the two regression analysis (the<br />

Romanian and Hungarian cases) shows a<br />

stronger association between the data from<br />

Romania than in those from Hungary.<br />

In most studies the income seems to be the<br />

best predictor <strong>of</strong> satisfaction with life, so it<br />

would be interesting to have a look at the<br />

results <strong>of</strong> the regression model between the<br />

income and the satisfaction with<br />

life(annex3).The correlation coefficient<br />

(r=0,99) proves a very strong link between<br />

these two variables.On the other hand the<br />

regression model between the income and<br />

satisfaction with housing (a significant<br />

combination and a very strong connection)<br />

99


proves that in the case <strong>of</strong> Hungary, the<br />

income variable is a better predictor <strong>of</strong> life<br />

satisfaction than the satisfaction with<br />

housing(annex5).<br />

Applying the same regression analysis for<br />

Romania, we notice a significant association<br />

and a stronger link (although the values are<br />

very close) than that between satisfaction<br />

with housing and satisfaction with life. The<br />

differences that arise between the situation in<br />

Romania and Hungary are likely due to<br />

differences in income between the Roma in<br />

the two countries, but also to the way the<br />

Roma minority relates to their neighbors. The<br />

data presented in this paper show us that the<br />

Roma in Romania live in neighborhoods with<br />

Roma majority, while the Roma in Hungary<br />

live in ethnically rather mixed areas.<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

Count 60<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

152<br />

Further we proceeded to test the link<br />

between housing and income satisfactionin<br />

Romania (annex 6). The data demonstrate a<br />

significant association between the two<br />

variables and also a strong connection. This<br />

assumption/hypothesis is valid for<br />

Hungary.The data demonstrate a significant<br />

association between the two variables and<br />

also a strong connection, in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania. So, this hypothesis is valid for<br />

Romania, too. We note in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania a stronger value <strong>of</strong> the correlation<br />

coefficient, but the difference from the<br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> Hungary is too small (0. 813 vs.<br />

0. 701) for giving rise to any interpretation.<br />

An important item in many inquiries about<br />

housing in poor areas is the state <strong>of</strong> dwelling<br />

ownership.<br />

Table. 7 State <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> dwelling (Roma in Hungary)<br />

0,99%<br />

platesc chirie<br />

la proprietar<br />

0,99%<br />

platesc chirie<br />

la consiliul<br />

local<br />

51,49%<br />

sunt<br />

proprietar<br />

41,58%<br />

locuiesc la o<br />

ruda<br />

2,97%<br />

locuiesc la o<br />

persoana<br />

care nu imi<br />

este ruda<br />

cine este proprietarul locuintei actuale<br />

0,99%<br />

alta situatie<br />

0,99%<br />

99


40,0%<br />

30,0%<br />

Percent 50,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

10,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

Table 8 State <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> dwelling (Roma in Romania)<br />

0,90%<br />

platesc chirie<br />

la proprietar<br />

30,18%<br />

platesc chirie<br />

la consiliul<br />

local<br />

41,44%<br />

sunt<br />

proprietar<br />

cine este proprietarul locuintei actuale<br />

153<br />

16,67%<br />

locuiesc la o<br />

ruda<br />

…<br />

locuiesc la o<br />

persoana<br />

care nu imi<br />

este ruda<br />

4,05%<br />

alta situatie<br />

6,76%<br />

99


When comparing the two situations, we can notice some aspects. First, in Romania there are several cases in which they pay rent to the<br />

City Council (30. 18%) compared to a very small percentage, 0. 99% in Hungary. The percentage <strong>of</strong> those who are owners is more<br />

favorable for Hungary, 51. 49% compared to 41. 44% in Romania, while in Hungary there are many more cases when the family lives at a<br />

relative, 41. 58%, and when the family lives at persons who are not relatives, 2.97%, compared to Roma in Romania (16. 67% and 0%).<br />

Table 9. The materials the houses <strong>of</strong> the Roma are made <strong>of</strong> (in Hungary)<br />

40<br />

Count 60<br />

20<br />

0<br />

60,40%<br />

caramida<br />

…<br />

beton<br />

34,65%<br />

vaioaga<br />

…<br />

paianta<br />

Din ce material e construita locuinta dumneavoastra?<br />

154<br />

…<br />

lemn<br />

…<br />

alt material<br />

3,96%<br />

9<br />

0,99%<br />

99


40,0%<br />

30,0%<br />

Percent 50,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

10,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

Table 10. The materials the houses <strong>of</strong> the Roma are made <strong>of</strong> (in Romania)<br />

36,04%<br />

caramida<br />

2,70%<br />

beton<br />

42,34%<br />

vaioaga<br />

Din ce material e construita locuinta dumneavoastra?<br />

155<br />

0,45%<br />

paianta<br />

8,56%<br />

lemn<br />

2,70%<br />

alt material<br />

7,21%<br />

99


We can see in the two graphs that the Roma in Hungary have more modern houses, built mostly <strong>of</strong> brick (60. 40%) and a smaller<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> adobe (34. 65%), while the dwellings <strong>of</strong> the Bihor County Roma are mainly made <strong>of</strong> adobe (42. 34%), brick (36. 04%), but<br />

also other materials (wood-8. 56%, concrete 2.7%, half-timber work 0. 45%).<br />

Table. 11 How many people live in your home? (Roma in Hungary)<br />

156


Table 12. How many people live in your home? (Roma in Romania)<br />

We can notice in the two tables that housing density is higher in Romania than in Hungary, as in the case <strong>of</strong> 6-7 or more than 7 persons in<br />

the household, the share <strong>of</strong> cases in Romania (33. 33% and 12. 61%) being higher than in Hungary (27. 72% respectively 5. 94%). On the<br />

other hand, for 1 or 2-3 persons in a house, the situation in Hungary is comparatively better (8. 91% and 20. 79%) than in Romania (0. 45%<br />

respectively 13. 5%). These data should be added to those on the dwelling area, number <strong>of</strong> rooms and facilities.<br />

157


Table 13. The size <strong>of</strong> the Roma dwelling in Hungary<br />

158


50,0%<br />

40,0%<br />

30,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

10,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

42,34%<br />

Table 14. The size <strong>of</strong> the Roma dwelling in Romania<br />

26,13%<br />

sub 30 de intre 31 si<br />

metri 40 m2<br />

patrati<br />

16,67%<br />

intre 41 si<br />

50 m2<br />

3,15%<br />

intre 51 si<br />

60 m2<br />

Care este mărimea aproximativă a locuinței?<br />

159<br />

2,25%<br />

intre 61 si<br />

80 m2<br />

0,90%<br />

intre 81 si<br />

100 m2<br />

0,45%<br />

peste 100<br />

m2<br />

0,90%<br />

9<br />

7,21%<br />

99


We can notice in these two tables that while in Romania the housing size is mainly under 60 sq.m., the prevailing housing area is over 60<br />

sq.m. in Hungary.It seems that the size <strong>of</strong> housing is a significant indicator <strong>of</strong> the gap which separates housing conditions and more<br />

generally the civilizational integration levels <strong>of</strong> the Roma living in the two countries.<br />

Table 15. How many rooms does your dwelling have? (Hungarian Roma)<br />

160


Table 16. How many rooms does your dwelling have? (Romanian Roma)<br />

Again the difference is very high between the two samples. A share <strong>of</strong> 44.4% <strong>of</strong> Hungarian Roma live in houses with three rooms or more,<br />

while the corresponding percentage in the Romanian sample is only 13.4%. However, the situation is rather different in the case <strong>of</strong> houses<br />

with one or two rooms (79% <strong>of</strong> Roma in Romania and 64.4% in Hungary).<br />

According to the results <strong>of</strong> regression analysis in both countries there is a significant link between the housing size and income and also<br />

between the number <strong>of</strong> persons in the dwelling and the income(annexes 7 to 10). This outcome denotes the frequent occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

161


multiple disadvantaging factors(such as precarious living conditions, high number <strong>of</strong> family members living in small size dwellings and<br />

extremely low level <strong>of</strong> income).<br />

40<br />

Count 60<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Table 17. Dwellings with bathroom facilities (Hungarian Roma)<br />

5,94%<br />

baie in casa, wc in<br />

curte<br />

69,31%<br />

baie + wc in casa<br />

fara baie, wc<br />

propriu in curtea<br />

casei<br />

Locuinta dumneavoastra este dotata cu grup sanitar?<br />

162<br />

21,78%<br />

1,98%<br />

fara baie, wc in<br />

folosinta comuna<br />

0,99%<br />

99


40,0%<br />

30,0%<br />

Percent 50,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

10,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

Table 18. Dwellings with bathroom facilities (Romanian Roma)<br />

8,11%<br />

baie in casa, wc in<br />

curte<br />

40,09%<br />

baie + wc in casa<br />

fara baie, wc<br />

propriu in curtea<br />

casei<br />

Locuinta dumneavoastra este dotata cu grup sanitar?<br />

The two tables show very clearly that the Roma in Hungary have better living conditions than those from Romania. If we compare those<br />

with the best conditions, i.ee with bathroom and toilet in the house, the weights <strong>of</strong> the two samples are 69.31% in Hungary and 40.09% in<br />

Romania. If we compare instead those with the worst conditions, in other words those who do not have a bathroom in the house and a toilet<br />

in common usage, the corresponding values are 14.86% in Romania, respectively 1.99% in Hungary.<br />

Another important housing facility is the home kitchen. The following two tables illustrate the situation in the two cases.<br />

163<br />

30,18%<br />

14,86%<br />

fara baie, wc in<br />

folosinta comuna<br />

6,76%<br />

99


80<br />

60<br />

Count 100<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

98,02%<br />

in casa<br />

Table 19. Kitchen in the house (Hungarian Roma)<br />

…<br />

separat de casa<br />

nu are bucatarie<br />

acoperita<br />

Locuinta dumneavoastra are bucatarie?<br />

164<br />

…<br />

…<br />

bucatarie cu<br />

folosinta comuna<br />

1,98%<br />

99


50,0%<br />

40,0%<br />

30,0%<br />

Percent 60,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

10,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

59,46%<br />

in casa<br />

Table 20. Kitchen in the house (Romanian Roma)<br />

7,66%<br />

separat de casa<br />

nu are bucatarie<br />

acoperita<br />

Locuinta dumneavoastra are bucatarie?<br />

165<br />

24,77%<br />

0,90%<br />

bucatarie cu<br />

folosinta comuna<br />

7,21%<br />

99


Comparing the situation in the two contries, some important differences occur again. Thus, if 98.02% <strong>of</strong> Roma households in Hungary<br />

have a kitchen in the house, this is happening only in 59. 46% <strong>of</strong> Roma in Romania. Instead we have here a percentage <strong>of</strong> 7.66% <strong>of</strong> cases<br />

in which the kitchen is separated from the house, 24.77% have a not covered kitchen and even a small percentage (0. 90%) use common<br />

kitchen with other families in town.<br />

Table 21. Is there current water in the household you actually live? (Roma in Hungary)<br />

40<br />

Count 60<br />

20<br />

0<br />

69,31%<br />

conducta de apa<br />

in casa<br />

6,93%<br />

conducta de apa<br />

in curte<br />

…<br />

fantana in curte<br />

In locuinta in care traiti in prezent exista apa<br />

166<br />

22,77%<br />

apa in fata curtii<br />

la mai putin de<br />

100 de metri<br />

…<br />

apa in fata curtii<br />

la mai mult de<br />

100 de metri<br />

0,99%<br />

99


Table 22. Is there current water in the household you actually live? (Roma in Romania)<br />

40,0%<br />

30,0%<br />

Percent 50,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

10,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

43,69%<br />

conducta de<br />

apa in casa<br />

1,35%<br />

conducta de<br />

apa in curte<br />

9,91%<br />

fantana in curte<br />

In locuinta in care traiti in prezent exista apa<br />

167<br />

15,32%<br />

apa in fata curtii<br />

la mai putin de<br />

100 de metri<br />

21,62%<br />

apa in fata curtii<br />

la mai mult de<br />

100 de metri<br />

8,11%<br />

99


In terms <strong>of</strong> water use in the home, there are are also significant differences between the two<br />

cases. Thus, in Hungary 69.31% compared to 43.69% in Romania are endowed with water<br />

pipe in the house. 9.91% have a fountain/well in the courtyard in Romania compared to zero<br />

percent in Hungary. 15.32% <strong>of</strong> the Roma households in the Romanian sample are using the<br />

water source in the front <strong>of</strong> the courtyard at less than 100 meters compared to 22.7% in the<br />

Hungarian sample. 21.62% <strong>of</strong> the Roma households in the Romanian sample have water in the<br />

front <strong>of</strong> the courtyard at more than 100 meters compared to 0% in the Hungarian sample.<br />

Again, big differences appear between the two cases.<br />

1.5.5. The poverty <strong>of</strong> the neighborhood<br />

The Roma <strong>of</strong> the samples selected from the two countries live, in most cases, in poor<br />

neighborhoods compared with the majority. In our survey we inquire about the perception <strong>of</strong><br />

the Roma on the neighborhoods in which their dwellings are.<br />

Table 23. The perception <strong>of</strong> the poverty <strong>of</strong> the neighborhood (Hungarian Roma)<br />

30<br />

20<br />

Count 40<br />

10<br />

0<br />

23,76%<br />

toata lumea sau aproape toata<br />

lumea este saraca<br />

28,71%<br />

majoritatea oamenilor sunt<br />

saraci<br />

exista in egala masura oameni<br />

care sunt si oameni care nu<br />

sunt saraci<br />

36,63%<br />

7,92%<br />

majoritatea nu sunt saraci<br />

Care din urmatoarele afirmatii descrie cartierul in care locuiti in prezent?<br />

168<br />

nimeni sau aproape nimeni nu<br />

este sarac<br />

…<br />

0,99%<br />

9<br />

1,98%<br />

99


Table 24. The perception <strong>of</strong> the poverty <strong>of</strong> the neighborhood (Romanian Roma)<br />

50,0%<br />

40,0%<br />

30,0%<br />

Percent 60,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

10,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

54,50%<br />

toata lumea sau<br />

aproape toata<br />

lumea este<br />

saraca<br />

27,93%<br />

majoritatea<br />

oamenilor sunt<br />

saraci<br />

exista in egala<br />

masura oameni<br />

care sunt si<br />

oameni care nu<br />

sunt saraci<br />

Care din urmatoarele afirmatii descrie cartierul in care locuiti in prezent?<br />

It can be clearly seen that the perceived level <strong>of</strong> poverty is much higher in the Roma<br />

neighborhoods in Romania compared to that in Hungary. If we take the first two items<br />

(Everybody or almost everybody is poor and Most <strong>of</strong> the people are poor), their percentage is<br />

definitely higher for Romania, 82.4%, compared to 52.4% for Hungary. As far as item 4 is<br />

concerned (Most <strong>of</strong> them are not poor), we notice that the relevant percentage is lower in<br />

Romania (1.80%), than in Hungary(7.92%).<br />

To have a better idea about the neighborhood <strong>of</strong> the Roma households, let’s see who the<br />

neighbors <strong>of</strong> the subjects <strong>of</strong> our sample are (Roma or non-Roma neighbors).<br />

169<br />

7,21%<br />

1,80%<br />

majoritatea nu<br />

sunt saraci<br />

0,90%<br />

nimeni sau<br />

aproape nimeni<br />

nu este sarac<br />

7,66%<br />

99


30<br />

20<br />

Count 40<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Table 25. Who are the neighbors <strong>of</strong> the Roma? (Hungarian Roma)<br />

33,66%<br />

traiesc numai sau<br />

aproape numai<br />

familii rome<br />

19,80%<br />

exista in egala<br />

masura familii rome<br />

si nerome<br />

exista cateva familii<br />

rome dar majoritatea<br />

sunt nerome<br />

Ce persoane traiesc in zona din vecinatatea casei dumneavoastra?<br />

170<br />

32,67%<br />

11,88%<br />

nu sunt familii rome<br />

in apropiere<br />

1,98%<br />

99


80,0%<br />

60,0%<br />

Percent 100,0%<br />

40,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

Table 26. Who are the neighbors <strong>of</strong> the Roma? (Romanian Roma)<br />

82,88%<br />

traiesc numai sau<br />

aproape numai<br />

familii rome<br />

8,56%<br />

exista in egala<br />

masura familii rome<br />

si nerome<br />

Ce persoane traiesc in zona din vecinatatea casei dumneavoastra?<br />

Although the localities were selected by Romanian and Hungarian experts on the criterion <strong>of</strong><br />

poverty and occurence <strong>of</strong> social problems <strong>of</strong> the Roma communities, we can notice differences<br />

in the ethnic composition <strong>of</strong> the neighborhoods. In Romania, the Roma tend to live in compact<br />

areas with Roma majority population (82.88%), while in Hungary the percentage is only<br />

33.66%. However if we take items 3 and 4, the situation is clearly different for the two<br />

countries (44.55% in Hungary and 1.35% in Romania).<br />

171<br />

0,45%<br />

exista cateva familii<br />

rome dar<br />

majoritatea sunt<br />

nerome<br />

0,90%<br />

nu sunt familii rome<br />

in apropiere<br />

7,21%<br />

99


50,0%<br />

40,0%<br />

30,0%<br />

Percent 60,0%<br />

20,0%<br />

10,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

Table 27. Satisfaction with the neighborhood ( Roma from Hungary)<br />

8,91%<br />

foarte<br />

nemultumit<br />

10,89%<br />

nemultumit<br />

51,49%<br />

nici multumit, nici<br />

nemultumit<br />

multumirea cu cartierul<br />

172<br />

18,81%<br />

multumit<br />

7,92%<br />

foarte multumit<br />

1,98%<br />

99


20,0%<br />

15,0%<br />

Percent 25,0%<br />

10,0%<br />

5,0%<br />

0,0%<br />

Table 28. Satisfaction with the neighborhood ( Roma from Romania)<br />

0,45%<br />

0<br />

22,97%<br />

foarte<br />

nemultumit<br />

15,77%<br />

nemultumit<br />

17,57%<br />

nici<br />

multumit,<br />

nici<br />

nemultumit<br />

multumirea cu cartierul<br />

Concerning the satisfaction with the neighborhood, we notice again that the percentage <strong>of</strong> those<br />

very dissatisfied and dissatisfied is much higher(almost twice as high)in Romania than in<br />

Hungary (about 38.77% compared to almost 20%).It is interesting to notice that the percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> those satisfied and very satisfied is greater in Romania (around 33.79% compared to almost<br />

27%).<br />

173<br />

16,67%<br />

multumit<br />

17,12%<br />

foarte<br />

multumit<br />

0,45%<br />

32<br />

9,01%<br />

99


1.5. Conclusions<br />

Analyzing the data on the Roma communities<br />

living in Romania and Hungary, we can find<br />

some significant differences. Even if Roma in<br />

Romania are more satisfied with their life,<br />

perhaps as the consequence <strong>of</strong> their more<br />

traditional life outlook, but also due to the<br />

ethnic composition <strong>of</strong> their neighbourhood,<br />

the Roma living in Hungary seem to be more<br />

satisfied with their dwellings. In terms <strong>of</strong><br />

most objective indicators (ownership status,<br />

building materials, the number <strong>of</strong> rooms, the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> persons in the household, the<br />

hygiene, the posession <strong>of</strong> bathroom, toilet,<br />

kitchen, heating), Roma in Hungary are<br />

living in comparatively better conditions.<br />

In contrast with their co-ethnics from<br />

Romania, Hungarian Roma live in<br />

neighborhoods that include both Roma and<br />

non-Roma, an aspect that has a great<br />

importance in their integration into society.<br />

Although according to Michael Stewart they<br />

resisted assimilation during socialism, our<br />

data demonstrate that today they seem to be<br />

much closer to the civilizational level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

larger society than ever before. It is worth to<br />

mention that they define themselves mostly<br />

as Hungarian Roma („magyar cigany”),<br />

unlike Roma from Romania, who mainly<br />

identify with their traditional community<br />

belonging (neamuri). The higher level <strong>of</strong><br />

integration <strong>of</strong> Roma in Hungary is also<br />

proved by the attachment <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> them to<br />

the mainstream churches, while in case <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania the influence <strong>of</strong> Neo-Protestant<br />

religious communities is much higher among<br />

the Roma population.<br />

One indicator <strong>of</strong> integration is the one related<br />

to housing quality. From this point <strong>of</strong> view<br />

too, Roma in Hungary are socially more<br />

integrated than the Roma in Romania. Their<br />

dwellings indicate a serious lag compared<br />

both to the Roma in Hungary, but also to the<br />

majority group. Roma in Romania seem to be<br />

much more traditional if we analyze all these<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> housing quality.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> differences between localities,<br />

they are more pronounced in Romania,<br />

174<br />

where, according to our data, the community<br />

<strong>of</strong> Osorhei seems to be the poorest, having<br />

worse conditions not only compared to<br />

Oradea, but also to Ineu de Cris. Relatively<br />

small differences can be noticed in Hungary,<br />

between the communities <strong>of</strong> Biharkeresztes<br />

and Told, may be due to geographical<br />

proximity and to the fact that Told is a rural<br />

community while Biharkeresztes became a<br />

town only recently, still having mostly semirural<br />

community features.<br />

Housing is an important indicator <strong>of</strong> the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> life, influencing the health status,<br />

the participation in education and perhaps to<br />

some extent also the level <strong>of</strong> integration into<br />

the formal economy. For the development <strong>of</strong><br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> housing, a more active<br />

involvement <strong>of</strong> the Government and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

local authorities, as well as the involvement<br />

<strong>of</strong> NGOs and Roma leaders is needed, even if<br />

the home’s quality primarily depends on the<br />

income level <strong>of</strong> each family, and that is a<br />

problem in each case.<br />

It is true that the same issue depends also on<br />

the neighborhood. If Roma see that the<br />

neighbors are poor and do not make efforts to<br />

improve their living conditions, they are<br />

tempted to do the same. If instead their<br />

neighbours belong to another ethnic group<br />

and Roma see that they have higher living<br />

conditions, this may also be an incentive for<br />

Roma. This fact is influencing to a large<br />

extent the difference between housing<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> Roma in Hungary compared<br />

with those from Romania. Roma in Romania<br />

live in compact areas with a high density <strong>of</strong><br />

social problems and a serious shortage <strong>of</strong><br />

modernity. Perhaps a solution would be that<br />

Roma in Romania live in ethnically mixed<br />

neighborhoods or areas. Roma in Romania<br />

are isolated, marginalized, segregated<br />

compared to other ethnic groups both in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> housing, participation in education or<br />

integration into the formal economy. On the<br />

other hand, there is also a dissociating<br />

mechanism probably related to their<br />

traditional values.


Probably long-term solutions would be largescale<br />

investments in educational and also<br />

social economy programs, which could<br />

promote a better integration into the formal<br />

economy and to the successfull securing <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainable sources <strong>of</strong> income leading to<br />

better housing and civilizational conditions as<br />

well.<br />

Bibliography:<br />

1. Beres, Csaba, 2004, A Hajdu-Bihar<br />

megyeben elo Roma lakossag helyzete.<br />

http://www.romaweb.hu/doc.../szociologiai_t<br />

anulmany_hbm.doc<br />

2. Fraser, Angus, 2010, Țiganii, Editura<br />

Humanitas, București<br />

3. Marcuse, Peter și Van Kempen, Ronald,<br />

2002, Of States and Cities, Oxford University<br />

Press<br />

4. Murie, Alan, Siedow-Knorr, Thomas, Van<br />

Kempen, Ronald, 2003, Large Housing<br />

Estates in Europe.General Developments and<br />

Theoretical Backgrounds, Utrecht University<br />

5. Olah, Șerban, 2009, The School Dropout in<br />

Bihor county. A Qualitative Approach,<br />

Revista Universitara de Sociologie, Craiova,<br />

Romania, Year VI, nr.1(11)<br />

6. Olah, Șerban, Băltățescu, Sergiu, 2008,<br />

Nevoi şi servicii sociale în comunităţile de<br />

romi. Studiu calitativ în municipiul Oradea in<br />

175<br />

Revista de Asistență socială (nr.3-4),<br />

București<br />

7. Pons, Emanuelle, 1999,Ţiganii din<br />

România, Editura Compania, Bucureşti<br />

8. Preda, Marian, 2002, Politica socială<br />

românească între sărăcie şi globalizare,<br />

Editura Polirom, Iaşi<br />

9. Preoteasa, Ana Maria,2003, Prezentarea<br />

unei cercetări internaţionale cu privire la<br />

starea romilor în Europa Centrală şi de Est, în<br />

Calitatea Vieţii,XIV, nr.2<br />

10. Ringold, Dena, Orenstein, Mitchell,<br />

Wilkens, Erika, 2003, Roma in an Expanding<br />

Europe. Breaking the Poverty Cycle, 2003,<br />

The World Bank<br />

11. Stănculescu, ManuelaS<strong>of</strong>ia, Berevoescu,<br />

Ionica, 2004, Sărac lipit, caut altă viață!,<br />

Editura Nemira, București<br />

12. Stewart,Michael, 1997, The Time <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Gypsies, Westview Press, Colorado<br />

13. Szelenyi, Ivan, 2002, Poverty, Ethnicithy<br />

and Gender in Transitional Societies,<br />

Akademiai Kiado, Budapest<br />

14. Voicu, Mălina( coordonator),2007, Nevoi<br />

şi resurse în comunităţile de romi, Fundaţia<br />

Soros România,Bucureşti<br />

15. Zamfir,Cătălin, Zamfir,Elena<br />

1993,Ţiganii între îngrijorare şi ignorare,<br />

Editura Alternative, Bucureşti


ANNEXES<br />

Annex 1. Simple regression analysis between satisfaction with housing and<br />

satisfaction with life (for Hungary)<br />

Model Summary<br />

Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />

Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />

1 ,696(a) ,485 ,479 6,891<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Satisfaction with housing<br />

ANOVA(b)<br />

Model<br />

Sum <strong>of</strong><br />

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

1 Regression 4419,361 1 4419,361 93,063 ,000(a)<br />

Residual 4701,312 99 47,488<br />

Total 9120,673 100<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Satisfac tion with housing<br />

b Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />

Coefficients(a)<br />

Unstandardized<br />

Coefficients<br />

Model<br />

B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />

1 (Constant) 1,518 ,743 2,042 ,044<br />

176<br />

Standardized<br />

Coefficients t Sig.<br />

Satisfaction with housing ,497 ,051 ,696 9,647 ,000<br />

a Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />

Annex 2. Simple regression analysis between satisfaction with housing and satisfaction<br />

with life (for Romania)<br />

Model Summary<br />

Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />

Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />

1 ,795(a) ,632 ,630 15,515<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Satisfaction with housing


ANOVA(b)<br />

Model<br />

Sum <strong>of</strong><br />

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

1 Regression 90903,165 1 90903,165 377,662 ,000(a)<br />

Residual 52954,006 220 240,700<br />

Total 143857,171 221<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Satisfaction with housing<br />

b Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />

Coefficients(a)<br />

Unstandardized<br />

Coefficients<br />

Model<br />

B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />

1 (Constant) 2,118 1,131 1,872 ,062<br />

177<br />

Standardized<br />

Coefficients t Sig.<br />

Satisfaction with housing ,735 ,038 ,795 19,434 ,000<br />

a Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />

Annex 3. Simple regression model between income and satisfaction with life (for<br />

Hungary)<br />

Model Summary<br />

Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />

Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />

1 ,990(a) ,981 ,980 1,336<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />

ANOVA(b)<br />

Model<br />

Sum <strong>of</strong><br />

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

1 Regression 8944,003 1 8944,003 5011,926 ,000(a)<br />

Residual 176,670 99 1,785<br />

Total 9120,673 100<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />

b Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life


Coefficients(a)<br />

Unstandardized<br />

Coefficients<br />

Model<br />

B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />

1 (Constant) 1,549 ,138 11,190 ,000<br />

Thinking about the total<br />

family income, can you<br />

say that it is enough or<br />

not?<br />

a Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />

178<br />

Standardized<br />

Coefficients t Sig.<br />

,974 ,014 ,990 70,795 ,000<br />

Annex 4. Simple regression model between income and satisfaction with life (for<br />

Romania)<br />

Model Summary<br />

Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />

Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />

1 ,829(a) ,688 ,686 14,292<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />

ANOVA(b)<br />

Model<br />

Sum <strong>of</strong><br />

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

1 Regression 98920,358 1 98920,358 484,291 ,000(a)<br />

Residual 44936,813 220 204,258<br />

Total 143857,171 221<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />

b Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />

Coefficients(a)<br />

Unstandardized<br />

Coefficients<br />

Standardized<br />

Coefficients t Sig.<br />

Model<br />

B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />

1 (Constant) 2,682 1,026 2,614 ,010<br />

Thinking about the total<br />

family income, can you<br />

say that it is enough or<br />

not?<br />

a Dependent Variable: how satisfied are you with your present life<br />

,740 ,034 ,829 22,007 ,000


Annex 5. Simple regression between income and satisfaction with housing (for Hungary)<br />

Model Summary<br />

Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />

Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />

1 ,701(a) ,491 ,486 9,596<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough<br />

or not?<br />

ANOVA(b)<br />

Model<br />

Sum <strong>of</strong><br />

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

1 Regression 8791,698 1 8791,698 95,468 ,000(a)<br />

Residual 9116,996 99 92,091<br />

Total 17908,693 100<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?b<br />

Dependent Variable: satisfaction with housing<br />

Coefficients(a)<br />

Unstandardized<br />

Coefficients<br />

179<br />

Standardized<br />

Coefficients t Sig.<br />

Model<br />

B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />

1 (Constant)<br />

Thinking about the total<br />

2,860 ,994 2,876 ,005<br />

family income, can you<br />

say that it is enough or<br />

not?<br />

,965 ,099 ,701 9,771 ,000<br />

a Dependent Variable: satisfaction with housing<br />

Annex 6. Simple regression between income and satisfaction with<br />

housing (for Romania)<br />

Model Summary<br />

Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />

Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />

1 ,813(a) ,662 ,660 16,079<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?


ANOVA(b)<br />

Model<br />

Sum <strong>of</strong><br />

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

1 Regression 111217,744 1 111217,744 430,183 ,000(a)<br />

Residual 56877,918 220 258,536<br />

Total 168095,662 221<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?b<br />

Dependent Variable: satisfaction with housing<br />

Coefficients(a)<br />

Unstandardized<br />

Coefficients<br />

Model<br />

B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />

1 (Constant) 3,167 1,154 2,744 ,007<br />

Thinking about the total<br />

family income, can you<br />

say that it is enough or<br />

not?<br />

a Dependent Variable: satisfaction with housing<br />

180<br />

Standardized<br />

Coefficients t Sig.<br />

,785 ,038 ,813 20,741 ,000<br />

Annex 7. The regression model for the relationship between housing size and<br />

income (Roma in Hungary)<br />

Model Summary<br />

Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />

Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />

1 ,698(a) ,488 ,483 9,474<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />

ANOVA(b)<br />

Model<br />

Sum <strong>of</strong><br />

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

1 Regression 8464,729 1 8464,729 94,299 ,000(a)<br />

Residual 8886,717 99 89,765<br />

Total 17351,446 100<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />

b Dependent Variable: which is the approximate area <strong>of</strong> the dwelling?


Coefficients(a)<br />

Unstandardized<br />

Coefficients<br />

181<br />

Standardized<br />

Coefficients t Sig.<br />

Model<br />

B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />

1 (Constant)<br />

Thinking about the total<br />

4,703 ,982 4,790 ,000<br />

family income, can you<br />

say that it is enough or<br />

not?<br />

,947 ,098 ,698 9,711 ,000<br />

a Dependent Variable: which is the approximate area <strong>of</strong> the dwelling?<br />

These tables show a significant association and also a strong relationship.<br />

Annex 8. The regression model for the relationship between the number <strong>of</strong> the persons in<br />

the dwelling and income (Roma in Hungary)<br />

Model Summary<br />

Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />

Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />

1 ,991(a) ,981 ,981 1,322<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />

ANOVA(b)<br />

Model<br />

Sum <strong>of</strong><br />

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

1 Regression 9058,863 1 9058,863 5184,618 ,000(a)<br />

Residual 172,978 99 1,747<br />

Total 9231,842 100<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />

b Dependent Variable: How many persons live in your house?<br />

Coefficients(a)<br />

Unstandardized<br />

Coefficients<br />

Standardized<br />

Coefficients t Sig.<br />

Model<br />

B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />

1 (Constant)<br />

Thinking about the total<br />

1,205 ,137 8,796 ,000<br />

family income, can you<br />

say that it is enough or<br />

not?<br />

,980 ,014 ,991 72,004 ,000<br />

a Dependent Variable: How many persons live in your house?


Annex 9. The regression model for the relationship between housing size and income<br />

(Roma in Romania)<br />

Model Summary<br />

Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />

Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />

1 ,800(a) ,641 ,639 15,124<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />

ANOVA(b)<br />

Model<br />

Sum <strong>of</strong><br />

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

1 Regression 89746,698 1 89746,698 392,372 ,000(a)<br />

Residual 50320,261 220 228,728<br />

Total 140066,959 221<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?b<br />

Dependent Variable: which is the approximate area <strong>of</strong> the dwelling?<br />

Coefficients(a)<br />

Unstandardized<br />

Coefficients<br />

Model<br />

B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />

1 (Constant) 1,355 1,086 1,248 ,213<br />

Thinking about the total<br />

family income, can you<br />

say that it is enough or<br />

not?<br />

a Dependent Variable: which is the approximate area <strong>of</strong> the dwelling?<br />

182<br />

Standardized<br />

Coefficients t Sig.<br />

,705 ,036 ,800 19,808 ,000<br />

Annex 10. The regression model for the relationship between the number <strong>of</strong> the persons<br />

in the dwelling and income (Roma in Romania)<br />

Model Summary<br />

Adjusted R Std. Error <strong>of</strong><br />

Model R R Square Square the Estimate<br />

1 ,862(a) ,743 ,742 12,589<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?


ANOVA(b)<br />

Model<br />

Sum <strong>of</strong><br />

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

1 Regression 100782,651 1 100782,651 635,916 ,000(a)<br />

Residual 34866,520 220 158,484<br />

Total 135649,171 221<br />

a Predictors: (Constant), Thinking about the total family income, can you say that it is enough or not?<br />

b Dependent Variable: How many persons live in your house?<br />

Coefficients(a)<br />

Unstandardized<br />

Coefficients<br />

Model<br />

B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error<br />

1 (Constant) 2,274 ,904 2,516 ,013<br />

Thinking about the total<br />

family income, can you<br />

say that it is enough or<br />

not?<br />

a Dependent Variable: How many persons live in your house?<br />

183<br />

Standardized<br />

Coefficients t Sig.<br />

,747 ,030 ,862 25,217 ,000


184


UTILISATION OF BENCHMARKING TECHNIQUES FOR FUNDAMENTING<br />

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES IN THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY IN<br />

ROMANIA<br />

Rujan Ovidiu<br />

Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies Faculty <strong>of</strong> International Business and Economics<br />

Ţarţavulea Ramona Iulia<br />

Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies Faculty <strong>of</strong> International Business and Economics<br />

Vasilescu Felician<br />

Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies Faculty <strong>of</strong> International Business and Economics<br />

Geambaşu Cristina Venera<br />

Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies Faculty <strong>of</strong> Accounting and Management Information Systems<br />

Abstract: Benchmarking is a method used to measure the products, services and processes in comparison to an<br />

entity recognized as a leader in terms <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> its operations. Used in the years 1970-1980 in the<br />

strategic management <strong>of</strong> the company currently has proven to be increasingly useful in many areas, including<br />

in international analysis models. In the European Union benchmarking indicators are used especially in the<br />

digital economy and as perspective indicators for 2011-2015 (Eurostat, Database).<br />

In the introduction we present and define forms <strong>of</strong> benchmarking, as well as a number <strong>of</strong> specific terms, which<br />

contribute to a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the content <strong>of</strong> this scientific work. Time series are used to highlight<br />

advances in labor productivity in EU countries, and the analysis is particularized for two countries: Romania<br />

and Germany. Quantitative data were collected from the source Eurostat website.<br />

A comprehensive indicator at macroeconomic level is resource productivity, representing GDP in relation with<br />

domestic consumption <strong>of</strong> material (DCM). DCM measures the amount <strong>of</strong> materials used directly by an<br />

economy. It is presented in tabular form for all European Union countries and Switzerland, as evolving over a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> eight years.<br />

Benchmarking method is used to highlight some differences (gaps) between EU countries regarding<br />

productivity and particularly the one between Germany and Romania is highlighted, concerning the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> manufacturing industries. It is expected that this gap will diminish. The gap was highlighted by<br />

relevant graphics and interpretations. The second part <strong>of</strong> the paper focuses on comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> factors<br />

productivity using the production function. We analyze labor and capital productivity and other factors that<br />

determine the level <strong>of</strong> production. For highlighting the contribution <strong>of</strong> the labour factor we used the number <strong>of</strong><br />

hours worked, considering that it reflects the analyzed phenomenon more realistically. For highlighting the<br />

contribution <strong>of</strong> capital factor we used as an indicator the capital stock in euros, available for Germany in the<br />

Eurostat database, and for Romania in the Statistical Yearbook 2009, expressed in RON, as comparable prices<br />

and then converted into euros at the average rate calculated by the NBR . The results for the entire<br />

manufacturing industry represent the basis for further expansion <strong>of</strong> benchmarking to the main components <strong>of</strong><br />

this industry, especially automobile building, transportation vechicules, furniture, clothing, leather chemical,<br />

etc.., providing a scientific basis to fundament the economic policies including commercial ones.<br />

Keywords: benchmarking, labor productivity, resource productivity, capital productivity, sustainable<br />

development strategy<br />

JEL Codes: F15 - Economic Integration, F31 - Foreign Exchange, L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing<br />

1. Introduction: Characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

benchmarking<br />

Benchmarking - a process that aims at<br />

seeking solutions to enhance the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> the organization, based on<br />

the best methods and procedures <strong>of</strong> the<br />

185<br />

industry. Setting business goals based on<br />

optimal methods and procedures existing in<br />

the industry are an important factor in the<br />

success <strong>of</strong> business strategy.<br />

Benchmarking techniques were originally<br />

developed in strategic management in order


to identify aspects through which one can<br />

compare an organization with similar<br />

organizations, even though they may<br />

function in a different industry or have a<br />

different target group <strong>of</strong> customers. In<br />

addition, benchmarking can be a valuable<br />

tool to identify areas, systems or processes<br />

that need improvement, which can take the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> a continuous development or <strong>of</strong> a<br />

dramatic change as business process<br />

reengineering.<br />

There are several types <strong>of</strong> benchmarking, the<br />

most common being: - Technical<br />

benchmarking - involves identifying<br />

products and services capability, especially<br />

in comparison with similar products and<br />

services <strong>of</strong> leading competitors, market<br />

leaders, using a scale <strong>of</strong> 1-4 (4 being the best<br />

score) to quantify properties <strong>of</strong> products and<br />

services from your organization. If input data<br />

about products and services are difficult to<br />

obtain, they may be regarded as<br />

inappropriate to be competitive.<br />

- Competitive benchmarking - involves a<br />

quantification <strong>of</strong> the main attributes,<br />

functions or values associated with products<br />

or services, so you can make a comparison<br />

between them and those <strong>of</strong> market leader<br />

(Sherman and Zhu, 2006)<br />

- Functional benchmarking – represents<br />

using benchmarking methods to compare a<br />

particular business function in two or more<br />

companies (Lerna and Price, 1995). Camp<br />

(1989) defines it as a particular function<br />

comparison with best practices in that area.<br />

Our aim is to conduct a study on industries<br />

in different countries using benchmarking.<br />

The research methodology consists <strong>of</strong><br />

preparing the statistical series for a period<br />

long enough to show realistically the<br />

phenomena investigated, on productivity in<br />

EU member states and highlighting<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> efficiency in manufacturing<br />

production in Romania and Germany. The<br />

indicators were estimated using the Cobb-<br />

Douglas function <strong>of</strong> production for the<br />

manufacturing industry in the two countries,<br />

186<br />

using data according to CAEN Rev.1.1<br />

(including 2008).<br />

2. Literature review<br />

The International Association Global<br />

Benchmarking Network (GBN) is joining<br />

private and public institutions, non-pr<strong>of</strong>it or<br />

research organizations which have expertise<br />

in benchmarking. The role <strong>of</strong> this association<br />

is to share knowledge and capabilities in the<br />

field <strong>of</strong> benchmarking through exchange <strong>of</strong><br />

experience between its members and<br />

promoting the best practices identified.<br />

Through the association's members, who are<br />

from different parts <strong>of</strong> the globe, the<br />

association keeps in touch with the current<br />

stage <strong>of</strong> development in the field <strong>of</strong><br />

benchmarking and enhances the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> this branch <strong>of</strong> study.<br />

In order to use benchmarking techniques it is<br />

essential to have a common understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

specific terminology, which enable experts<br />

to express their ideas in a concise manner. In<br />

this respect GBN association has developed<br />

a glossary <strong>of</strong> terms. For a better<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> this research paper, we<br />

considered necessary to present a selection<br />

<strong>of</strong> some relevant terms from the glossary <strong>of</strong><br />

benchmarking terms, as it follows:<br />

- Benchmarking Gap - represents the<br />

difference in performance between an<br />

activity conducted at a company and the<br />

same activity at other competitors on the<br />

market.<br />

- Benchmarking <strong>of</strong> sectors - compares<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> two sectors, the purposes <strong>of</strong><br />

comparison being to take best practices from<br />

one sector, and applies them to the weakest<br />

sector on that particular criterion.<br />

- The productivity <strong>of</strong> capital - is an<br />

economic indicator <strong>of</strong> productivity, which<br />

measures the level <strong>of</strong> output (in euro or<br />

dollar) made for each euro/dollar invested in<br />

fixed assets. - Core competence - a<br />

company's strategic capability, which gives<br />

them a market advantage. - Productivity<br />

Benchmarking - provides companies with a<br />

systematic method to compile indicators <strong>of</strong>


economic growth in order to create a table <strong>of</strong><br />

economic productivity used to identify<br />

activities and processes which do not add<br />

value, but represent an additional cost.<br />

Another important concept that will be used<br />

in the proposed research is that <strong>of</strong> labor<br />

productivity. The generally accepted<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> labor productivity is quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

production obtained per unit <strong>of</strong> labor, which<br />

can be represented by the number <strong>of</strong> hours<br />

worked, number <strong>of</strong> employed persons<br />

(employees and other categories) or number<br />

<strong>of</strong> employees. The version which takes into<br />

account the number <strong>of</strong> hours worked is the<br />

most used, reflecting more realistic the<br />

phenomenon analyzed. The labor<br />

productivity determined using the number <strong>of</strong><br />

employees, it is easier to calculate, but the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> results is more modest. (Bolstorff<br />

and Rosenbaum, 2003)<br />

Labor productivity can be determined for<br />

different representations <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

performance: total production or gross value<br />

added. We opted for the last presented<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> performance. Statistical data<br />

show significant differences between<br />

countries on this indicator.<br />

3. Research Methodology<br />

The research objective is to realize a<br />

comparative study between the performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> industries in different countries, and we<br />

chose Romania and Germany in particular.<br />

The research methodology consists in taking<br />

187<br />

the benchmarking method, and apply it in<br />

research <strong>of</strong> industry performance, comparing<br />

different countries <strong>of</strong> the European Union (to<br />

complete the picture <strong>of</strong> the studied<br />

phenomenon, we introduced the comparisons<br />

also Switzerland). We sought to highlight<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> manufacturing production<br />

efficiency in Romania, taking specific<br />

indicators in Germany as point <strong>of</strong> reference.<br />

It should be noted from the very beginning<br />

that, during 2000 - 2007 (2008), for which<br />

we had available statistics provided by<br />

Eurostat, Romania has a notable gap<br />

compared with Germany.<br />

4. Comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> labor<br />

productivity<br />

Regardless <strong>of</strong> the calculation method (see<br />

Literature review), labor productivity is only<br />

a partial measure <strong>of</strong> productivity, showing<br />

the cumulative effect <strong>of</strong> several factors:<br />

mainly capital and intermediate<br />

consumption, and technological and<br />

organizational efficiency, economies <strong>of</strong> scale<br />

or potential growth in utilization <strong>of</strong><br />

production capacity. A comprehensive<br />

indicator at macroeconomic level is resource<br />

productivity, representing GDP in relation<br />

with domestic consumption <strong>of</strong> material<br />

(DCM). DCM measures the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

materials used directly by an economy. In<br />

table 1, this indicator is presented for the EU<br />

members and Switzerland for the year 2007<br />

compared with 2000.


Table 1: Resource productivity in the years 2000 and 2007 in EU countries and Switzerland<br />

(EUR per kg)<br />

2000 2007 2000 2007<br />

UE 27 1,21 1,3 Lithuania 0,44 0,43<br />

UE 15 1,4 1,57 Luxemburg 2,78 4,32<br />

Belgium 1,32 1,47 Hungary 0,45 0,6<br />

Bulgaria 0,13 0,14 Malta 3 2,14<br />

Czech Republic 0,33 0,42 Holland 2,16 2,6<br />

Denmark 1,28 1,24 Austria 1,41 1,4<br />

Germany 1,41 1,71 Poland 0,32 0,38<br />

Estonia 0,32 0,27 Portugal 0,66 0,62<br />

Ireland 0,63 0,66 Romania 0,18 0,14<br />

Greece 0,88 0,98 Slovenia 0,48 0,46<br />

Spain 0,93 0,9 Slovakia 0,4 0,49<br />

France 1,64 1,8 Finland 0,76 0,79<br />

Italy 1,25 1,6 Sweden 1,71 1,79<br />

Cyprus 0,66 0,64 United Kingdom 2,11 2,54<br />

Letonia 0,24 0,31 Switzerland 3,05 3,36<br />

Data source: Eurostat, Statistics, Sustainable Consumption and Production<br />

We observe that the pursued indicator values<br />

are dispersed (from 0.13 Bulgaria, 4.32<br />

Luxemburg), for 18 out <strong>of</strong> 28 countries<br />

(including Switzerland) the value <strong>of</strong><br />

indicators has increased, most important<br />

being in Luxembourg, United Kingdom,<br />

Switzerland, Germany and Italy; for other 10<br />

countries the value <strong>of</strong> the indicator has<br />

decreased, highlighting a diminish <strong>of</strong><br />

efficiency in resources utilization.<br />

188<br />

To emphasize the important differences<br />

between countries on the resource<br />

productivity and its changes over time, we<br />

presented in chart 1 a upwards ranking <strong>of</strong><br />

countries by indicator values in 2007, based<br />

on data in Table 1.<br />

It appears that both the EU 27 and EU 15<br />

increased in resource productivity, and<br />

former socialist countries, now EU members,<br />

without exception, are at levels below the<br />

EU 27 average.<br />

Figure 1: Comparison between the productivity <strong>of</strong> resources in 27 EU countries (and<br />

Switzerland) and Romania in 2000-2007<br />

Source: Based on data from Eurostat Statistics, Sustainable Consumption and Production


Romania, as well as Bulgaria, is experiencing an amazingly low level <strong>of</strong> this indicator and,<br />

unlike Bulgaria, has recorded a decrease in time. Figure 1 shows a comparison between the<br />

evolution in time <strong>of</strong> the indicator in Romania and the European Union average.<br />

1,5<br />

1<br />

0,5<br />

0<br />

Figure 2: Comparison between the average productivity <strong>of</strong> resources in EU 27 countries and<br />

Romania during 2000-2007<br />

Source: Based on the data from Eurostat, Statistics, Sustainable Consumption and Production<br />

5. Capital productivity and capital stock<br />

Capital productivity index shows the<br />

economic result (gross value added) produced<br />

by a certain amount <strong>of</strong> immobile productive<br />

capital.<br />

To measure the capital stock involved in a<br />

production process, literature and empirical<br />

analysis recommends several methods:<br />

- The flow <strong>of</strong> productive services provided by<br />

an asset in the production process;<br />

- Gross stock <strong>of</strong> capital obtained by<br />

cumulating the investment flow, adjusted by<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> removal from service <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

goods.<br />

- The net stock <strong>of</strong> capital obtained by<br />

correcting the gross stock capital with the loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> productive capacity.<br />

Given the availability <strong>of</strong> statistical data, we<br />

used the gross stock <strong>of</strong> capital to estimate the<br />

coefficients for the production function. In<br />

the process <strong>of</strong> estimating the production<br />

function coefficients, we have highlighted the<br />

contribution <strong>of</strong> other factors, besides labor<br />

and capital.<br />

Multifactor productivity (MPF) allows the<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> distinct contributions <strong>of</strong><br />

labor, capital, intermediate consumption and<br />

technology/efficiency to the final production.<br />

This contribution is shown by indicator PMF<br />

UE 27 România<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

189<br />

- KLEMS (capital-labor-energy-materialsservices),<br />

considered to be the most<br />

comprehensive measure <strong>of</strong> efficiency at<br />

industry level, calculated only for 25<br />

countries from the EU, Romania and Bulgaria<br />

being excepted.<br />

6. Results <strong>of</strong> the research and conclusions<br />

For econometric estimation <strong>of</strong> production<br />

function coefficients for the manufacturing<br />

industry in the two countries, we used<br />

statistical data about gross value added (VA),<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> hours worked (HEMP) and<br />

gross capital stock (KGFCF) from the<br />

Eurostat database for Germany and the<br />

corresponding data <strong>of</strong> the same variables in<br />

the Statistical Yearbook <strong>of</strong> Romania 2009.<br />

Variables were converted from RON to euro<br />

for Romania, using the average annual<br />

exchange rate, published by the BNR. Before<br />

2000, the exchange rate seemed to distort the<br />

value sizes studied, so we decided to limit the<br />

time series data to the period 2000-2007,<br />

although statistics provide data since 1995.<br />

The production function has the following<br />

expression:<br />

Y = A * L α * K β , where Y, L and k are<br />

respectively VA, HEMP and KGFCF and the<br />

exponents are elasticities <strong>of</strong> output


(production) to input (production factors). A<br />

expresses the contribution <strong>of</strong> other factors,<br />

besides labor and capital. The values<br />

190<br />

estimated using multiple regression are<br />

summarized in Table 2.<br />

Table 2: Estimated coefficients for the production function related to the manufacturing<br />

industry in Romania and Germany for the period 2000-2007.<br />

A α β<br />

Germany 19,04085387 0,857702548 0,146318628<br />

Romania 0,581636175 0,052085522 0,972634345<br />

Source: made by author based on econometric calculations<br />

In Germany the elasticity <strong>of</strong> production to<br />

labor is 0.86, that means work contributed<br />

decisevely to the increase <strong>of</strong> production in the<br />

period studied, while in Romania it is close to<br />

zero. Coefficient A shows the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

technical refinements, organizational, etc.<br />

over production growth: it is high in Germany<br />

and low in Romania. Unlike labor factor,<br />

capital factor has had a remarkable<br />

contribution to increasing the production in<br />

Romania (although this increase was modest).<br />

We provide those interested many useful<br />

statistical data series concerning the<br />

investigated theme.<br />

We believe that the elements outlined above<br />

can represent the base for analysis for all<br />

Romanian manufacturing industries because<br />

the comparison <strong>of</strong> them with several leaders<br />

<strong>of</strong> the world economy can represent the<br />

scientific fundament necessary for<br />

elaboration <strong>of</strong> economic policies.<br />

7. Bibliography<br />

Books<br />

1. Jack B. Revelle 's Quality Essentials: A<br />

Reference Guide from A to Z, ASQ Quality<br />

Press, 2004, pages 8-9.<br />

2. Bogan, Christopher E., English, Michael J.<br />

Benchmarking for Best Practices: Winning<br />

through Innovative Adaptation, New York:<br />

McGraw-Hill, 1994, ISBN 0070063753<br />

3. Bolstorff, Peter Rosenbaum, Robert,<br />

Supply Chain Excellence: A Handbook for<br />

Dramatic Improvement Using the SCOR<br />

Model, USA: AMACOM, 2003<br />

4. Zhu, Joe, Quantitative models for<br />

Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking:<br />

Data Development Analysis with<br />

Spreadsheets and Dea Excel Solver, Boston:<br />

Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003<br />

Articles<br />

1. Camp R.C. 1993, A Bible for<br />

benchmarking, by Xerox. Financial Executive<br />

(July / August), pp 23-27.<br />

2. Sherman, David H., Zhu, Joe,<br />

Benchmarking to Seek Lower-Cost High-<br />

Quality Service with Data Envelopment<br />

Analysis: Evidence from the U.S. bank<br />

application<br />

Web sites:<br />

1.How to Use Benchmarking in Business,<br />

accesed 20 April 2011,<br />

http://management.about.com/cs/benchmarki<br />

ng/a/Benchmarking.htm<br />

2.Benchmarking - Past, Present and Future,<br />

accesed 24 April 2011,<br />

http://www.benchnet.com/bppf2003e.cfm<br />

3.Strategy – benchmarking, accesed 24 April<br />

2011,<br />

http://tutor2u.net/business/strategy/benchmar<br />

king.htm


Section Economics and Business Administration<br />

Sub-section: Business Administration


192


THE BRAND EQUITY OF TOURISTIC DESTINATIONS – THE MEANING OF<br />

THE VALUE<br />

Ban Olimpia<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics science<br />

Popa Luminiţa<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics science<br />

Silaghi Simona<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics science<br />

Abstract: In today’s global economy, each place competes with other places for economic benefits.<br />

Destination has become a product that has to be promoted and sold in the most advantageous<br />

terms. The work bellow is an analysis <strong>of</strong> “brand equity” concept for touristic destinations, as<br />

found in the specific literature. Destination brands differ from product brands, major distinction<br />

being given by their stability/ instability. Brands <strong>of</strong> products are stable; this constant is maintained<br />

by the use <strong>of</strong> quality standards. Even in case <strong>of</strong> services, situation can be controlled, as quality<br />

standards could be perpetuated by a franchise system. Destinations are not depending on a single<br />

person, who decides, but a variety <strong>of</strong> them, economic agents, businesses, institutions and local<br />

population that can create/print form and structure changes <strong>of</strong> the destination.<br />

The concept de brand equity applied for touristic destinations, is something relatively recent. The<br />

dimensions <strong>of</strong> a brand for touristic destinations are: awareness, image, loyalty, quality and value.<br />

All these dimensions build the branding equity <strong>of</strong> a destination. There is interdependency, between<br />

quality, image, loyalty and value. In order to determine the perception in regards to the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

tourism services in Romania, in 2010 a comprehensive study was done among the inhabitants <strong>of</strong><br />

Oradea city. Through this study we have pursued several objectives: to assess the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

service characteristics, performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> tourism services in Romania, tourism personnel<br />

evaluation, in terms <strong>of</strong> evaluation and performance, perception <strong>of</strong> the quality-price ratio for<br />

Romania, compared with other tourist destinations. We call on the exploratory study conducted, as<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> the dimension- destination <strong>of</strong> the brand equity is given by the price-quality ratio. Using<br />

an explorative study on the market <strong>of</strong> Oradea city, it was highlighted the connection between<br />

perception <strong>of</strong> touristic services, estimation price-quality (value) and the loyalty potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />

foreign clients in proportion with the Romanian tourists, consumers <strong>of</strong> the Romanian touristic<br />

products.<br />

Keywords: brand equity, destination, tourism, survey, Oradea<br />

Code JEL: M21, M31<br />

1. Introduction in the „brand equity” <strong>of</strong> a<br />

destination:<br />

In relatively recent works, branding was<br />

treated as an essential subject (Aaker 1996),<br />

(Aaker and Joachimsthaler 2000), (Kania<br />

2001). Modern branding appeared in the<br />

XIXth century and includes legal instruments<br />

as: logos, campaigns, identity systems,<br />

personality and the links between them. In<br />

tourism, branding is understood as being<br />

193<br />

“(…) a unique combination <strong>of</strong> product<br />

characteristics and added values, both<br />

functional and non-functional, which have<br />

taken on a relevant meaning which is<br />

inextricably linked to the brand, awarnesses<br />

<strong>of</strong> wich might be conscious or<br />

intuitive.(Morgan 1998: 140)”<br />

Destination branding is even more recent.<br />

Among the first books that were exlusively<br />

dedicated to this subject, we mention<br />

Destination Branding (Morgan, Pritchard and


oger Pride:2002), and also the published<br />

works in special number <strong>of</strong> the Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Brand Management (Hall:2002), (Harrison:<br />

2002) and (Morgan, Pritchard and Piggott:<br />

2002). When talking about touristic<br />

destinations, brand equity is still a vague<br />

concept. The theoretical delimitation <strong>of</strong> this<br />

subject is still subject <strong>of</strong> changes. Brand<br />

equity is the process <strong>of</strong> not only establishing<br />

the characteristic <strong>of</strong> a brand, but also<br />

establishing the value <strong>of</strong> that characteristic. It<br />

comes from the financial evaluation literature<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 1990s (Barwise 1993). Aaker and<br />

Joachimsthaler (Aaker and Joachimsthaler<br />

2000), both had an important contribution to<br />

the theoretical substantiation <strong>of</strong> brand equity.<br />

They launched the idea that the value <strong>of</strong> a<br />

brand is given by the: awareness <strong>of</strong> the brand,<br />

perceived quality <strong>of</strong> the brand, brand<br />

associations and loyalty for the brand.<br />

Hankinson completed the theory <strong>of</strong> brand<br />

value, by adding the concept <strong>of</strong> brand<br />

network, where the destination brand has four<br />

functions: (1) as a communicator, when the<br />

brand “represents a mark <strong>of</strong> ownership, and a<br />

means <strong>of</strong> product differentiation manifested<br />

in legally protected names, logos, and<br />

trademarks”; (2) as a perceptible entity<br />

“which appeal to the consumer senses,<br />

reasons, and emotions; (3) “brands as value<br />

enhancers,” that leads to the concept <strong>of</strong> brand<br />

equity; and (4) “brands as relationships,<br />

where the brand is built with personality and<br />

establishes a form <strong>of</strong> relationship with the<br />

consumer. (Hankinson 2004: 110–111),<br />

(Blain, Stuard and Ritchie 2005: 329).<br />

Using the brand is one <strong>of</strong> the primary forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> product differentiation. The question is to<br />

what extent branding as part <strong>of</strong> marketing<br />

strategy can be used to create brand equity for<br />

a touristic destination that is not yet known,<br />

virtually the same time seeking notoriety and<br />

differentiation. There are opinions that say<br />

that this is possible. ( Room 1992:13–21)<br />

For a consumer, brand evaluation is simple.<br />

Brand equity value is given by the difference<br />

in price between a generic product and an<br />

equivalent one that “has a name”. This<br />

194<br />

reference to generic products is increasingly<br />

difficult, as almost all generic products do not<br />

exist anymore. In regards to the touristic<br />

destinations, the brand equity evaluation<br />

method requires changes, as the comparison<br />

“on the shelves <strong>of</strong> a store” is not possible. In<br />

case <strong>of</strong> tourism destinations, the indicators<br />

used for assessing brand equity is: the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> tourists who choose a destination, the<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> expenditure made in that<br />

destination and the length <strong>of</strong> stay.<br />

2. The dimensions <strong>of</strong> tourism destination<br />

brand<br />

The experiential factor marks a significant<br />

difference between products and destinations.<br />

A destination cannot be tried, seen before<br />

purchase and consumption, therefore the idea<br />

<strong>of</strong> having a guarantee is excluded. The<br />

touristic product <strong>of</strong> a destination product is<br />

experiential by nature and it differs for each<br />

customer because <strong>of</strong> the internalization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experience.<br />

Novelty is essential to differentiate<br />

destinations. Tourist trip requires differences<br />

between place <strong>of</strong> residence and destination,<br />

among other destinations and chosen<br />

destination. This is why, in many promotional<br />

messages, the novelty is found even in the<br />

title or slogan. (Pride 2007)<br />

A destination must be different from many<br />

points <strong>of</strong> view to worth the time and the<br />

money, but the novelty cannot be simply<br />

declared, it must be demonstrated -”novelty<br />

cannot simply declared, it must brand<br />

equityearned” (Cai, Gartner and Munar<br />

2009: 54)<br />

Novelty given by the destination is<br />

recognized in the perception <strong>of</strong> the consumers<br />

- consumers must be aware <strong>of</strong> the differences<br />

between their residency and other<br />

destinations.<br />

The dimensions <strong>of</strong> “destination brand” are<br />

different than the product brand, although<br />

mainly follows the same steps. Theorists and<br />

practitioners support the idea that places are<br />

being branded the same as products and


services are. Kotler extended the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

brand from products to destinations.<br />

Konecnik and Gartner (Konecnik and Gartner<br />

2007: 400–421) have proposed four<br />

dimensions that can be applied to<br />

destinations: awareness, loyalty, image and<br />

quality. Tasci, Gartner and So (Tasci,<br />

Gartner and So 2007) have added another<br />

one, the value, which we consider to be<br />

appropriate.<br />

Different consumer segments evaluate each<br />

<strong>of</strong> these dimensions in different and<br />

significant ways.<br />

• Awareness is an essential dimension <strong>of</strong> the<br />

brand. It is the first step in building brand<br />

equity. A place can be known in a certain<br />

context before it can be considered a potential<br />

destination. Goodall (Goodall 1993)<br />

identified four levels <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> a place:<br />

knowledge, familiarity, top <strong>of</strong> mind and<br />

dominant. Dominant has here the meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

the spotlight for various reasons, it is what is<br />

called a "hot spot" and may be positive or<br />

negative in nature.<br />

• The image is the dimension that attracted<br />

the most attention <strong>of</strong> researchers, there are a<br />

considerable number <strong>of</strong> articles on this<br />

subject. Initially it was thought that the image<br />

can substitute for the other dimensions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

brand, but this opinion has remained isolated.<br />

The roots <strong>of</strong> the brand are reflected in the<br />

destination image studies initiated since the<br />

1970s (Hunt 1975)<br />

Creating a brand does not mean branding,<br />

though it’s the base <strong>of</strong> the brand-building.<br />

Building the image is one step closer to the<br />

brand, but what still lacks is the brand<br />

identity. (Cai 2002)<br />

Loyalty is given by repeat visit or repeat<br />

purchase.<br />

• Quality is a subjective term, but can be<br />

operationalized through a series <strong>of</strong> scales. As<br />

an independent dimension (and not subject to<br />

image), it has been studied by many<br />

researchers (Fick and Ritchie 1991);<br />

(Murphy, Pritchard and Smith 2000). Quality<br />

is assessed from consumer’s perspective, in<br />

fact the quality perception is evaluated.<br />

195<br />

Quality is a key dimension <strong>of</strong> brand equity <strong>of</strong><br />

a product and maintaining it is mandatory,<br />

this rule extends to the tourism destination as<br />

well. Establishing and maintaining a quality<br />

level for a destination requires controlling all<br />

products and services “supplied” by the<br />

destination and this is something very<br />

difficult to realize. On a tourist destination,<br />

the quality can be ensured only in regards to<br />

the common objectives such as museums,<br />

reservations etc. but it is perceived in regards<br />

to accommodations and individual services.<br />

The brand is a guarantee <strong>of</strong> quality (<strong>of</strong> a<br />

certain quality). Consumers expect and are<br />

willing to pay extra for the peace <strong>of</strong> mind that<br />

a brand is providing them. "At the Same<br />

Time, visitors can also expect to pay a<br />

premium for this assurance <strong>of</strong> quality and<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> perceived risk.” (Blain, Stuarda<br />

and Ritchie 2005: 330)<br />

• The brand equity value is the most recently<br />

studied dimension and is seen as part <strong>of</strong><br />

quality, reflected in the price paid for a<br />

product. The importance <strong>of</strong> price in the<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> BE was recognized by several<br />

researchers (Echtner and Ritchie 1993).<br />

However the price is not synonymous with<br />

quality. Value does not refer to quality or<br />

price, as much as it refers to favorable or notfavorable<br />

price-quality ratio. For example, a<br />

services package can be seen as valuable, not<br />

at the expense <strong>of</strong> the high quality services,<br />

but at the expense <strong>of</strong> quality-price ratio.<br />

Consumer segments related to mass tourism<br />

focus more on value, understood as “fair<br />

value for the money”.<br />

Operationalizing the dimensions by a scale <strong>of</strong><br />

measurement is a necessary precondition in<br />

order to isolate the dimensions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

destination.<br />

3.Research methodology and results<br />

The research was conducted in two stages:<br />

March-April 2010 and March-April 2011.<br />

The first phase was conducted in March-April<br />

2010 on a sample <strong>of</strong> 1060 people from the<br />

population <strong>of</strong> Oradea city. The sampling<br />

method chosen was the stratification method


(with a margin <strong>of</strong> error <strong>of</strong> 3%) and the used<br />

criteria was the age. After the criteria the<br />

distribution was chosen, as follows: 150<br />

people aged 18-24 years, 234 people aged 25-<br />

34 years, 208 people aged between 35-44<br />

years, 192 people aged 45-54 years, 152<br />

people aged between 55-64 years, 124<br />

persons aged between 65-80 years. There<br />

were investigated persons who benefited <strong>of</strong><br />

accommodation at least once during the<br />

period 2007 - until the time <strong>of</strong> the survey.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> the research was to<br />

investigate Oradea`s population level <strong>of</strong><br />

satisfaction in regards to the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

tourist/guest services and the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

tourism personnel services in Romania, and<br />

the results were presented in the paper “Guest<br />

services quality assesment in tourism, using<br />

an attributes scale” (Ban and Popa 2010)<br />

The second stage <strong>of</strong> the research was<br />

conducted between March-April 2011 on a<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> 62 people, consisting <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />

tourists present in Oradea and the<br />

surrounding area, therefore active consumers<br />

<strong>of</strong> tourism services in Romania. The<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> the sample, based on age<br />

criteria is as follows: four persons aged<br />

15% 1%<br />

31%<br />

very high<br />

high<br />

53%<br />

medium<br />

low<br />

196<br />

between 18-24 years, 6 persons aged between<br />

25-34 years, 20 people aged between 35-44<br />

years, 22 people aged between 45-54 years,<br />

eight persons aged 55-64 years, two persons<br />

aged 65-80 years.<br />

The investigation on the price level<br />

perception <strong>of</strong> Oradea`s population, has<br />

produced the following results: more than<br />

half (52.6%) believe that the level <strong>of</strong> prices<br />

in Romanian tourism is high, while a<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> 31.1% believe that the prices<br />

are prohibitively high. Summing up the<br />

percentages, 83.7% believe that the level <strong>of</strong><br />

prices in Romanian tourism exceed far<br />

beyond what consumers are willing to pay.<br />

Only a percentage <strong>of</strong> 14.7% believe that<br />

prices are right, at a medium level, while only<br />

1.6% <strong>of</strong> the respondents believe the<br />

Romanian tourism prices are low.<br />

Unlike the Romanian people, a percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

64.5% <strong>of</strong> the foreign tourists consider that the<br />

prices <strong>of</strong> tourism services in Romania are at a<br />

medium level and only 25.8% consider that<br />

the prices are at a high level. No foreign<br />

tourist investigated in this research<br />

considered that the price level is very high.<br />

(produced by the authors)<br />

Figure 1 (a) Opinions <strong>of</strong> Oradea`s population in regards to the prices <strong>of</strong> tourism services<br />

(b) Views <strong>of</strong> foreign tourists in regards to the prices <strong>of</strong> tourism services in Romania<br />

Any assessment <strong>of</strong> cost is directly or<br />

indirectly in relation to the perceived value <strong>of</strong><br />

the product.Regarding the option for their<br />

10% 0%<br />

64%<br />

26%<br />

very high<br />

high<br />

medium<br />

low<br />

future vacation destination, it is not surprising<br />

the relatively small percentage <strong>of</strong> those who<br />

chose Romania, but the fact that the values


ecorded for Oradea’s population and foreign<br />

tourists are close. The premise was that many<br />

more Romanians would choose Romania.<br />

By using the SPSS s<strong>of</strong>tware, was verified the<br />

type <strong>of</strong> link that exists between the desire <strong>of</strong><br />

the foreign tourists to return to Romania<br />

(loyalty required by the brand equity) and<br />

78%<br />

78%<br />

22%<br />

197<br />

their evaluation <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> tourism<br />

services in Romania. A positive correlation<br />

was identified, with a very high level <strong>of</strong><br />

significance, which supports the idea that the<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> a tourism destination is based on<br />

the perceived quality <strong>of</strong> tourism services <strong>of</strong><br />

that particular destination.<br />

(produced by the authors)<br />

Figure No. 2 (a) Opinions <strong>of</strong> Oradea `s population on future holiday destination choice<br />

(b) views <strong>of</strong> foreign tourists iin regards to their next holiday destination choice<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

22%<br />

in Romania<br />

out <strong>of</strong> Romania<br />

in Romania<br />

out Romania<br />

(produced by the authors)<br />

Figure 3. Oradea inhabitants’ opinions in regards to the quality <strong>of</strong> tourism services in<br />

Romania and <strong>of</strong> foreign tourists’ opinions on the quality <strong>of</strong> tourism services in Romania<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

The increase <strong>of</strong> the brand equity <strong>of</strong> a<br />

destination is a natural goal. The dimensions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the brand <strong>of</strong> a tourism destination are:<br />

awareness, image, loyalty, quality and value.<br />

These dimensions are building the brand<br />

equity <strong>of</strong> a destination. Between quality,<br />

84%<br />

foreign tourists romanian tourists<br />

16%<br />

in Romania<br />

out <strong>of</strong> Romania<br />

very high<br />

high<br />

medium<br />

low<br />

very low<br />

image, loyalty and value there is<br />

interdependence.<br />

The exploratory study performed on Oradea’s<br />

market highlighted the link between<br />

perceived quality <strong>of</strong> tourism services, “value<br />

for money” assessment <strong>of</strong> tourism services<br />

(the value) and the potential <strong>of</strong> customers’


loyalty. The results <strong>of</strong> the study conducted on<br />

foreign tourists have shown that a perception<br />

<strong>of</strong> high or very high quality <strong>of</strong> services is<br />

directly related to the option <strong>of</strong> visiting<br />

Romania and hence a perception <strong>of</strong> a medium<br />

or low quality <strong>of</strong> tourism services is related to<br />

the intention <strong>of</strong> choosing another destination.<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> those who wish to return to<br />

Romania is low, only 16%.<br />

The perception <strong>of</strong> poor quality tourism<br />

services is also related to the big picture, as<br />

the countries in Central and Eastern Europe<br />

are associated with inconsistent quality, poor<br />

service <strong>of</strong> bad quality, poor quality <strong>of</strong><br />

accommodation (Hall, 1999).<br />

The effort <strong>of</strong> changing the reality <strong>of</strong> tourism<br />

services in Romania has to be supported by<br />

the effort <strong>of</strong> changing the image-umbrella <strong>of</strong><br />

an entire geographic region.<br />

Bibliography<br />

Books:<br />

1.Aaker, David A. Building Strong Brands.<br />

New York: Free Press, 1996.<br />

2.Aaker, David A., Joachimsthaler, E. Brand<br />

Leadership. NewYork: Free Press, 2000.<br />

3.Cai, A.L., Gartner, W.C., Munar, A.M.,<br />

Tourism Branding: Communities in Action.<br />

Bridging Tourism Theory and Practice, vol.1,<br />

Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009.<br />

4.Goodall, B. “How Tourists Choose their<br />

Holidays: An Analytical Framework”. In<br />

Marketing in the Tourism Industry: The<br />

Promotion <strong>of</strong> Destination Regions, B. Goodal<br />

and G. Ashworth, eds., 1-17. London:<br />

Routledge, 1993.<br />

5.Kania, Deborah. Branding.com: Online<br />

Branding for Marketing Success. Chicago:<br />

American Marketing Association, 2001.<br />

6.Morgan N.; Pritchard Annette. Tourism<br />

Promotion and Power. Creating Images,<br />

Creating Identities, John Wiley and Sons,<br />

1998.<br />

7.Morgan, Nigel, Pritchard, Annette and<br />

Pride, Roger. Destination Branding: Creating<br />

the Unique Destination Proposition. Oxford,<br />

UK:Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.<br />

198<br />

8.Room, A. History <strong>of</strong> Branding. In<br />

Branding: A Key Marketing Tool, J. Murphy,<br />

ed., Houndmills: Macmillan, 1992.<br />

Articles in magazines / journals online:<br />

1.Ban, Olimpia; Popa, Luminiţa “Guest<br />

services quality assesment in tourism, using<br />

an attributes scale”, International Conference<br />

"European Integration - New Challenges"<br />

Sixth Edition, Oradea, 28-29 May 2010.<br />

Accessed on February 20, 2011.<br />

2.http://ideas.repec.org/cgibin/htsearch?q=Ban+Olimpia&ul=%2Fora%2<br />

Fjournl.<br />

3.Barwise, P. “Introduction to the Special<br />

Issue on Brand Equity”. International<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Research in Marketing 10(1)<br />

(1993): 3–8.<br />

4.Cai, L. “Cooperative Branding for Rural<br />

Destinations”. Annals <strong>of</strong> Tourism Research<br />

29(3)(2002):720–742.<br />

5.Blain, Carmen, Stuard, E. L. and Ritchie,<br />

J.R.B. ”Destination Branding: Insights and<br />

Practices from Destination Management<br />

Organizations”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Travel Research,<br />

43(2005): 328-338. Accessed on August 29,<br />

2007, http://jtr.sagepub.com.<br />

6.Echtner, C., and B. Ritchie. “The<br />

Measurement <strong>of</strong> Destination Image: An<br />

Empirical Assessment”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Travel<br />

Research 31(4)(1993): 3–13.<br />

7.Fick, G., Ritchie, B. “Measuring Service<br />

Quality in the Travel and Tourism Industry”.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Travel Research 30(2)(1991): 2–9.<br />

8.Hall, D. “Destination branding, niche<br />

marketing and national image projection in<br />

Central and Eastern Europe”. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Vacation Marketing, 5(3)(1999): 227-237.<br />

Accessed on 18 th <strong>of</strong> April 2009,<br />

http://jtr.sagepub.com.<br />

9.Hall, D. “Brand Development, Tourism<br />

and National Identity: The Re-imaging <strong>of</strong><br />

Former Yugoslavia”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Brand<br />

Management, 9(2002)(4/5): 323–34.<br />

10.Hankinson, Graham. “Relational Network<br />

Brands: Towards a Conceptual Model <strong>of</strong><br />

Place Brands.” Journal <strong>of</strong> Vacation<br />

Marketing, 10 (2)(2004): 109–121.


11.Harrison, S. “Culture, Tourism and Local<br />

Community: The Heritage Identity <strong>of</strong> the Isle<br />

<strong>of</strong> Man.” Journal <strong>of</strong> Brand Management,<br />

9(2002) (4/5): 355–71;<br />

12.Hunt, J. “Image as a Factor in Tourism<br />

Development”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Travel Research<br />

13(3) (1975): 1–7.<br />

13.Konecnik, M., and W. Gartner.<br />

“Customer-Based Brand equity for a<br />

Destination”. Annals <strong>of</strong> Tourism Research<br />

34(2)(2007): 400–421.<br />

14.Morgan, N., A. Pritchard, and R. Piggott.<br />

“New Zealand, 100% Pure: The Creation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Powerful Niche Destination Brand”. Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Brand Management, 9(2002) (4/5): 335–<br />

54.<br />

199<br />

15.Murphy, P., M. Pritchard, and B. Smith.<br />

“The Destination Product and Its Impact on<br />

Traveler Perceptions”. Tourism Management<br />

21(1)(2000):43–52.<br />

16.Pride, R. “A Challenger Approach to<br />

Destination Marketing. Keynote Presentation<br />

at the 2nd International Conference on<br />

Destination Branding and Marketing”,<br />

Institute for Tourism Studies, Macau (SAR),<br />

China, Decembrand equityr., 2007.<br />

17.Tasci, A., W. Gartner şi So, A. “Branding<br />

Macao: An Application <strong>of</strong> Strategic Branding<br />

for Destinations”. 2nd International<br />

Conference on Destination Branding and<br />

Marketing, Institute for Tourism Studies,<br />

Macau (SAR), China, Decembrand equity,<br />

2007


200


THE TOURISM BARRIERS OF THE DISABLED IN ROMANIA<br />

Băbăiță Carmen Mihaela<br />

University <strong>of</strong> the West Timisoara, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />

Nagy Andrea<br />

University <strong>of</strong> the West Timisoara, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />

Filep Adrian Viorel<br />

University <strong>of</strong> the West Timisoara<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />

Abstract: This article seeks to address a very sensitive issue in Romania, the disabled tourism. The<br />

natural question is whether tourism can respond and meet the needs <strong>of</strong> such people. Internationally,<br />

the researches in detail about tourism for people with disabilities are limited in this direction, and<br />

those who exist are focused more on lack <strong>of</strong> physical access to certain services in the hotel units.<br />

As for the problems (barriers) that a person with disabilities may face when seeking to participate<br />

in the act <strong>of</strong> travel there were found numerous internal and external barriers in trying to participate<br />

in tourism activities<br />

The study seeks to identify how normal people behave towards people with disabilities and aims to<br />

demonstrate the existence <strong>of</strong> correlations between the responses <strong>of</strong> the interviewees, which would<br />

lead to the presentation as close to the truth as possible <strong>of</strong> the results from the sample (section),<br />

transposed over the population from which the sample belongs and also lead to finding conclusions<br />

on which there could be made several proposals.<br />

Keywords: tourism, disability, social tourism, attitude, internal and external barries<br />

Cod JEL: M10, L83<br />

1.Introduction<br />

Tourism in its current form appeared only in<br />

the XIX th However, some social historians say that<br />

tourism has emerged a few decades earlier,<br />

with the opening <strong>of</strong> camps for disadvantaged<br />

century. Actions related to social children, as well as the opening <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tourism began in 1936, when the twentieth century, youth hostels. The<br />

International Labour Organization (ILO) emergence <strong>of</strong> hostels and bed & breakfast<br />

agreed that the on access to paid leave accommodation system occurred in the late<br />

should be done by tourism (Convention nineteenth century. At that time, most tourist<br />

No.52.). In essence, this agreement has also facilities where the ones in the private sector<br />

been mentioned in the Universal or belonging to other organizations willing<br />

Declaration <strong>of</strong> Human Rights in 1948, to improve tourist access to a much larger<br />

stating that “everyone has the right to rest number <strong>of</strong> people and making a pr<strong>of</strong>it.<br />

and leisure, including reasonable limitation After the Second World War ended some<br />

<strong>of</strong> working hours and periodic holidays with social policies were implemented in several<br />

pay”.<br />

countries as subsidies for private housing,<br />

Thus we can say that tourism has emerged as their renovation, modernization <strong>of</strong><br />

a social practice due to the ethical demands equipment and infrastructure, and as well as<br />

<strong>of</strong> the representatives <strong>of</strong> employees, aid to the population. Also, many<br />

justifying the legitimacy <strong>of</strong> a specific right, associations have been created under<br />

so thus the right to travel, as an extension <strong>of</strong> different unions, travelling families , work<br />

the right to work, to rest and to take paid councils, etc. all had as main objectives<br />

leave.<br />

social development and expanding social<br />

tourism.<br />

201


2. Disabled tourism<br />

This article seeks to address a very sensitive<br />

issue in Romania, the disabled tourism.<br />

According to the 448 / 6 December 2006 law<br />

, people with disabilities are those people<br />

who, because <strong>of</strong> physical illness, mental or<br />

sensory impairments, lack skills that prevent<br />

them from caring out normal daily<br />

activities, requiring protective measures in<br />

support <strong>of</strong> recovery and social inclusion.<br />

The natural question is whether tourism can<br />

respond and meet the needs <strong>of</strong> such people.<br />

Internationally, the researches in detail about<br />

tourism for people with disabilities are<br />

limited in this direction, and those who exist<br />

are focused more on lack <strong>of</strong> physical access<br />

to certain services in the hotel units.<br />

Very few studies have been published<br />

concerning the issue <strong>of</strong> tourism and people<br />

with disabilities (Burnett & Baker, 2001,<br />

Darcy, 1998, 2002). Some academics<br />

specialized on tourism were concern with<br />

this problems in the late 1980s and early<br />

1990s (Smith,1987; Muloin, 1992), Smith's<br />

work being one <strong>of</strong> the few works published<br />

in a major tourism publication. Since then,<br />

academics in the field <strong>of</strong> tourism have been<br />

silent on this subject. Also referring to the<br />

disabilities literature which is characterized<br />

by the lack <strong>of</strong> consideration <strong>of</strong> those issues,<br />

identify one or two studies. Various studies<br />

are as well illustrated by the Canadian<br />

Tourism Commission (1997), Nurnett and<br />

Baker's work (2001 ) in the U.S..<br />

The broad spectrum <strong>of</strong> disability problem<br />

has become a field <strong>of</strong> study since the early<br />

50.. Typically, these studies and debates<br />

related to persons with disabilities ,in orbit<br />

around the social model <strong>of</strong> disability,<br />

emerged in Britain in 1976 from the activity<br />

against segregation by the Physically Unfit<br />

Union .<br />

Disability is a generic term for diseases or<br />

disabilities, activity limitations and<br />

participation restrictions as defined in the<br />

international classification <strong>of</strong> functioning,<br />

and health disability adopted and approved<br />

202<br />

by the World Health Organization to show<br />

the negative aspect <strong>of</strong> individual context<br />

interaction (Law 448 / 6 December. 2006,<br />

Art. 5, pct.16).<br />

Researchers Hugh and Paterson (1997) say<br />

that the company creates an environment<br />

that does not take into account the needs <strong>of</strong><br />

those with disabilities. They tried to make a<br />

clear distinction between those with<br />

impaired and those with disabilities. Such<br />

disorders refer to the normal functioning <strong>of</strong><br />

the individual caused by mental or sensory<br />

dysfunctions and disability is the loss or<br />

limitation <strong>of</strong> opportunities to live normally<br />

in society on an equal level with others due<br />

to physical barriers. The fact is however that<br />

until nowadays a social model for people<br />

with disabilities wasn't treated in tourism<br />

literature.<br />

3. OBSTACLES IN ACCESS OF THE<br />

PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES<br />

As for the problems (barriers) that a person<br />

with disabilities may face when seeking to<br />

participate in the act <strong>of</strong> travel there were<br />

found numerous internal and external<br />

barriers in trying to participate in tourism<br />

activities . These barriers can be classified<br />

as:<br />

Internal barriers are obstacles that must be<br />

overcome before a person becomes active in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> tourism and that the individual has<br />

the greatest control over these barriers. In<br />

this way people with disabilities should be<br />

helped through institutionalization at the<br />

recovery units. For example in Romania this<br />

aid is extremely small as about 3.62% <strong>of</strong><br />

people benefit from institutionalization<br />

External barriers - which may inhibit their<br />

journey, they may limit the options or reduce<br />

satisfaction. This category includes:<br />

architectural barriers such as stairs, toilet<br />

accessibility, accommodation, and<br />

environmental barriers difficult paths, tree<br />

roots or other obstructions outside, means <strong>of</strong><br />

transport, especially the local variety <strong>of</strong><br />

means <strong>of</strong> transport, which includes cars,<br />

buses and taxis ; laws and regulations that


prohibit the people with disabilities to bring<br />

necessary equipment with them,<br />

communication difficulties both at home and<br />

at the receiving person, negative attitudes<br />

from service providers and incorrect<br />

information. Tourists with a disability must<br />

consider that foreign travel agencies must<br />

break down these barriers.<br />

In 2002, Darcy reveals that attitudes<br />

towards individuals with disabilities, and<br />

research undertaken on this market segment,<br />

in particular, have evolved significantly in<br />

the last 25 years. Originally attitudes,<br />

regarding disability were conceptualized in a<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> personal tragedy, concentrated<br />

on individual helplessness. The person was<br />

treated as an unfortunate victim. Since then,<br />

the emergence <strong>of</strong> political movements for<br />

the rights <strong>of</strong> persons with disabilities have<br />

changed the overall impression <strong>of</strong> personal<br />

tragedy, to disability as a form <strong>of</strong> social<br />

oppression.<br />

The way in which disability is<br />

conceptualized and natural attitudes have a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ound effect on society and people with<br />

disabilities. First <strong>of</strong> all, attitude influences<br />

individual behavior regarding people with<br />

disabilities Understanding disability as an"<br />

abnormality" <strong>of</strong> a person rather than a social<br />

failure, it outlines behaviors that lead to<br />

isolation and marginalization. In many cases,<br />

certain behaviors are not intentional but<br />

rather are rooted in social practices "nondisabled".<br />

Second, attitudes form public<br />

opinions, attitudes which influence social<br />

and public policies, resource allocation and<br />

access to education, transportation, jobs, etc..<br />

Finally, prevailing attitudes influence the<br />

perception <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities <strong>of</strong><br />

themselves .<br />

4. RESEARCH DIRECTIONS<br />

The study seeks to identify how normal<br />

people behave towards people with<br />

disabilities and aims to demonstrate the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> correlations between the<br />

responses <strong>of</strong> the interviewees, which would<br />

lead to the presentation as close to the truth<br />

203<br />

as possible <strong>of</strong> the results from the sample<br />

(section), transposed over the population<br />

from which the sample belongs and also lead<br />

to finding conclusions on which there could<br />

be made several proposals.<br />

Between the specific objectives we find:<br />

knowledge or the social prerequisites,<br />

psychological and cultural <strong>of</strong> the<br />

interviewees; discovering the causes that<br />

lead to negative feelings, on people with<br />

disabilities, eliminate the causes, proposed<br />

ways <strong>of</strong> intervention and trying to change the<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> the normal people.<br />

Knowing the psychological assumptions<br />

helps determine the way people act,<br />

understand the personal points view and also<br />

allows the identification <strong>of</strong> certain measures<br />

by which those with disabilities could be<br />

integrated and accepted in society.<br />

Discovering the causes which lead in<br />

forming an opinion regarding people with<br />

disabilities could be one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

important secondary objective, this objective<br />

is important because it may act directly on<br />

the case and not on the effect that results.<br />

Finally the directions <strong>of</strong> intervention in<br />

modifying behavior <strong>of</strong> the normal people<br />

towards people with disabilities should be<br />

materialized at the end <strong>of</strong> the present study.<br />

The modeling <strong>of</strong> the behavior occurs when<br />

the stimuli are identified, the basic<br />

behavioral processes are analyzed, the<br />

explanatory variables <strong>of</strong> behavior and<br />

behavioral response.<br />

5. RESULTS INTERPRETATION<br />

The research was conducted on the basis <strong>of</strong> a<br />

questionnaire. Sample size was 100 people<br />

chosen randomly. The sample was<br />

structured: 40% <strong>of</strong> them are under 24 years,<br />

20% <strong>of</strong> people are between 25-30 years old,<br />

8% <strong>of</strong> people between 31-35 years old , 14%<br />

between 36-45 years and the rest, 18% are<br />

people over 45 years. Of these 62% were<br />

women and 38% were male. Regarding the<br />

marital status <strong>of</strong> respondents 44% aren't<br />

married, 34% are married and the rest belong


to other categories (divorced, widowed or<br />

living with partner).<br />

The study was conducted by distributing<br />

questionnaires in urban areas, in Timisoara,<br />

and 62% <strong>of</strong> the respondents have completed<br />

either a college, a university or a postgraduate<br />

study, while 32% are high school<br />

graduates. We can say that the education<br />

level has a major influence in assessing the<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities, in the<br />

knowledge that education is directly<br />

proportional to the positive responses in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> acceptance, understanding and<br />

helping these people with disabilities. This<br />

can be observed from the study because the<br />

question <strong>of</strong> concerning "helping people with<br />

disabilities", 94% <strong>of</strong> the respondents would<br />

be willing to help such a person and 72% <strong>of</strong><br />

them, have done it already.<br />

Regarding the attitudes <strong>of</strong> normal people<br />

towards people with disabilities in society, it<br />

is found that the opinions <strong>of</strong> those people are<br />

divided. On a scale containing five possible<br />

answers: from compassion, mercy,<br />

acceptance, restraint, and indifference it is<br />

found that compared to the normal version <strong>of</strong><br />

acceptance chosen by 34% <strong>of</strong> respondents,<br />

there is a balance between compassion and<br />

restraint (16% <strong>of</strong> the responses for each<br />

question) and an imbalance between<br />

compassion and indifference, they have<br />

chosen 32% and 2% <strong>of</strong> respondents (an<br />

insignificant percentage). Because according<br />

to the glossary "compassion" is associated<br />

with a sense <strong>of</strong> understanding and sympathy<br />

to the suffering and misery concerning<br />

someone; positive feelings total overall 82%<br />

<strong>of</strong> responses , a sign that these people are<br />

understood and are given support from<br />

individuals.<br />

Regarding the people's situation in Romania,<br />

it is not a very good one because the<br />

perception to the human rights <strong>of</strong> persons<br />

with disabilities knows negative aspects. To<br />

analyze the situation <strong>of</strong> peoples with<br />

disabilities in Romania there were developed<br />

three questions:<br />

204<br />

1. "Do you think that there are<br />

respected the human rights <strong>of</strong><br />

people with disabilities in<br />

Romania?": 68% consider that the<br />

right are not respected, 22% said<br />

yes and 10% <strong>of</strong> them do not know or<br />

are not interested.<br />

2. "Do you consider that people with<br />

disabilities should receive certain<br />

gratuities?": 84%, have replied yes<br />

and 16% said that they do not.<br />

3. "Should programs against<br />

discrimination <strong>of</strong> the disabled, be<br />

introduced in schools?'': 62% said<br />

yes, 16% said no and 22% believe<br />

that these things must be learned at<br />

home.<br />

In conclusion, the Romanian society does<br />

not help people with disabilities in Romania<br />

and the fundamental rights are not respected.<br />

In principle these people would be helped by<br />

the state through the granting <strong>of</strong> gratuities<br />

and benefits. What is crucial is that programs<br />

against discrimination <strong>of</strong> the disabled should<br />

be introduced in schools, because it is known<br />

that the children's education must contain<br />

rules that causes them to act ethically and<br />

morally towards these people.<br />

When asked "What do you think the<br />

integration <strong>of</strong> disabled people in society", the<br />

answers "very important " and "Important"<br />

occupy the largest share <strong>of</strong> responses 54%<br />

and 28%. We can say that 82% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents believes that integration <strong>of</strong><br />

persons with disabilities in society is<br />

extremely important and agree with this<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view, and consider that such people<br />

should not be marginalized.<br />

Also on the problem in terms <strong>of</strong> employment<br />

chances <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities. In this<br />

sense 78% <strong>of</strong> people with normal capacity to<br />

work, inform that employers are reluctant in<br />

hiring these people. 80% <strong>of</strong> those surveyed<br />

said they have colleagues at work with<br />

disabilities and that there are no cooperation<br />

or social issues, but there exists a significant<br />

number <strong>of</strong> people who would not agree to<br />

collaborate at work with them, which is


concerning because 14% <strong>of</strong> them answered<br />

like this<br />

Regarding the participation <strong>of</strong> disabled<br />

people to the act <strong>of</strong> tourism, individuals<br />

answers were hopeful because even if, as the<br />

disabled are not accepted at work, the<br />

situation is different in a hotel, 92% <strong>of</strong><br />

respondents would not be disturbed by the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities in a hotel<br />

where they were individually penned.<br />

When asked "What do you think about<br />

tourism products for people with<br />

disabilities?" being an open question,<br />

respondents were able to freely choose their<br />

answers without being restricted by answers.<br />

The answers to the questions above are<br />

different and presented in a special way by<br />

each interviewee. The most frequent<br />

response was "I have not heard about such<br />

products for people with disabilities" Those<br />

who have heard and know these products are<br />

<strong>of</strong> the opinion that the number <strong>of</strong> products is<br />

very small compared to the number <strong>of</strong><br />

people with disabilities, and that these<br />

products are not known even by the<br />

recipients, and are difficult to obtain even if<br />

you belong in that category disabled. The<br />

most important thing about these products is<br />

that it gives people with disabilities the<br />

opportunity to socialize and integrate into<br />

the society.<br />

Another view <strong>of</strong> respondents: state<br />

organizations, regional and local ones do not<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer aid to the disabled.<br />

Regarding the promotion <strong>of</strong> these products,<br />

media channels do not consider this as an<br />

important fact and do not promote them<br />

because they do not obtain financial benefits.<br />

Existing channels that promote such<br />

products are local ones but <strong>of</strong> no national<br />

importance.<br />

Other opinions say that those people with<br />

disabilities should receive such products<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> destination, travel time or<br />

means <strong>of</strong> transport chosen, thus a social<br />

development <strong>of</strong> tourism and also building<br />

access roads and other facilities absolutely<br />

205<br />

necessary for each hotel , motel, resort,<br />

tourist destination.<br />

6. CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSALS<br />

Surrounded by negative attitudes, people<br />

with disabilities can internalize negative<br />

beliefs and attitudes. It is recognized that the<br />

nature and severity <strong>of</strong> disability can affect<br />

the scope <strong>of</strong> activities to which a person can<br />

participate, but may also influence how the<br />

tourist experience is formed.<br />

After analyzing the data we can say that<br />

people with disabilities are accepted in<br />

society by all other categories <strong>of</strong> people by<br />

supporting the integration process,<br />

respondents have the opinion that this<br />

process is <strong>of</strong> great importance and that it<br />

should exist in any modern society; besides<br />

the fact that the states must be required to<br />

provide the disabled and give certain<br />

financial gratuities and psychosocial help.<br />

Most people have the opinion that people<br />

with disabilities and people with disabilities<br />

face difficulties in finding jobs, qualified or<br />

unqualified. Their problems are accentuated<br />

and supported by the reluctance <strong>of</strong><br />

employers, higher health costs and other<br />

types <strong>of</strong> insurances. In addition to these<br />

serious problems, these people are refused at<br />

interviews because <strong>of</strong> their condition.<br />

Although 86% <strong>of</strong> respondents would not be<br />

''bothered'' to work with people with<br />

disabilities that is not reflected in obtaining a<br />

job, from the individuals concerned.<br />

Granting help to such a person is a fairly<br />

widespread phenomenon in Romania, as<br />

reflected by the number <strong>of</strong> responses, which<br />

shows a great solidarity among people<br />

belonging to all social categories and more<br />

than 10% <strong>of</strong> respondents have in their<br />

families people with disabilities and face<br />

with all the problems that such a person may<br />

have.<br />

The most important person's perspective<br />

refers to introducing these special programs<br />

against discrimination for people with<br />

disabilities in schools. These programs lead<br />

to changes in behavior and attitudes towards


people with disabilities and disabled.<br />

Through these programs there are removed<br />

barriers <strong>of</strong> communication, the emphasis is<br />

on socialization and integration, on giving<br />

unconditional aid and late but not least social<br />

acceptance <strong>of</strong> each people.<br />

The attitude <strong>of</strong> respondents should be<br />

improved and may even reach some<br />

collaborations, events, games and excursions<br />

for all people (including people with<br />

disabilities). These events have a crucial role<br />

in changing the negative aspects and<br />

strengthen the already existing ones.<br />

Facilities for disabled people, should be<br />

necessarily placed in any institution, means<br />

<strong>of</strong> transportation, hotels, resort, and other<br />

accommodations and tourist destinations,<br />

etc. These facilities could be regulated by<br />

laws, governmental decisions and a<br />

supervision is required.<br />

Tourism products for people with disabilities<br />

should be promoted on the channels known<br />

by the public, the number <strong>of</strong> products should<br />

cover as much <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong><br />

recipients. This can be done by organizing<br />

cyclical products or circuit ones so that in<br />

the course <strong>of</strong> two years all disabled people<br />

would enjoy a product <strong>of</strong> this kind.<br />

206<br />

Bibliography<br />

1. Buruiana, G., (2009), Macroeconomic<br />

Policies in tourism, Editura Uranus,<br />

Bucuresti<br />

2. Burnett, J., and H. Bender-Baker,<br />

(2001), Assessing the Travel-related<br />

Behaviors <strong>of</strong> the Mobility-disabled<br />

Consumer, Journal <strong>of</strong> Travel Research<br />

40:4–11.<br />

3. Darcy, S., (1998), Anxiety to Access:<br />

Tourism Patterns and Experiences <strong>of</strong><br />

Disabled New, South Wales People with<br />

a Physical Disability. Sydney: Tourism<br />

New South Wales.<br />

4. Darcy, S., (2002), Marginalised<br />

Participation: Physical Disability, High<br />

Support Needs and Tourism, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Hospitality and Tourism Management<br />

9:61–72.<br />

5. Matthew Kwai-sang Yau, Bob<br />

McKercher, Tanya L. Packer, (2004),<br />

Traveling with a Disability, More than<br />

an Access Issue, Annals <strong>of</strong> Tourism<br />

Research, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 946–960<br />

6. Muloin, S., (1992), Wilderness Access<br />

for Persons with a Disability. In<br />

Ecotourism, G. Harper and B. Weiler,<br />

eds., pp. 20–25.<br />

7. Smith, R., (1987), Leisure <strong>of</strong> Tourist<br />

with a Disability: Barriers to Travel.<br />

Annals <strong>of</strong> Tourism


START-UP FINANCING SOURCES: DOES GENDER MATTER? SOME<br />

EVIDENCE FOR EU AND ROMANIA<br />

Bădulescu Alina<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />

Abstract: Although financial resources are very important in SMEs in general, and for start-ups in<br />

particular, many entrepreneurs face numerous restrictions in finding sources for start-up financing.<br />

The present article aims to investigate the similarities or differences in start-up financing sources<br />

due to gender issues, otherwise to investigate if female entrepreneurs use (or have access) different<br />

financial sources in the early stage <strong>of</strong> their business.<br />

As reported by the literature, access to finance is one <strong>of</strong> the most important issues for SMEs and<br />

nascent entrepreneurs. Moreover, among the main financial issues, the first one is the access to<br />

start-up finance (Schwartz, 1976; Carter and Cannon, 1992; Johnson and Storey, 1993; Koper,<br />

1993; Van Auken et al, 1993; Carter and Rosa, 1998, FOBS survey 2005). In all sectors, women use<br />

for starting up businesses substantially less capital then men. Women encounter, more then men,<br />

credibility problems when dealing with bankers. This problem causes important effects concerning<br />

the performance, survival and growth <strong>of</strong> women-run businesses.<br />

The present research focuses on revealing how male and female entrepreneurs face and solve the<br />

problem <strong>of</strong> start-up financing sources. The methodology is based on using the dataset “Enterprises<br />

managed by the founder - broken down by gender <strong>of</strong> the entrepreneur”, available in EUROSTAT<br />

database. The data selected refers to the start-up financing sources available for European Union<br />

and Romania, regarding activities included in NACE: Industry and services excluding public<br />

administration and management activities <strong>of</strong> holding companies and 2005 as time <strong>of</strong> reference. The<br />

data were used to make some comparison between: male versus female entrepreneurs in EU; male<br />

versus female entrepreneurs in Romania; EU entrepreneurs versus Romanian entrepreneurs.<br />

The main findings reveal that there are no significant differences between men and women<br />

concerning the start-up financing sources. The main sources are the internal ones: own fund and<br />

savings (ranging from 82% to 92%), and financial assistance from family and friend (ranging from<br />

25% to 34%), both for male and female entrepreneurs, both for EU as an aggregate and Romania.<br />

Among the external sources, bank loans are the most important: they have been indicated by 17% <strong>of</strong><br />

the females (EU) and 19% <strong>of</strong> the males, about 10 times more than the other external sources<br />

together: capital contributions from other enterprises and venture capital. There are no significant<br />

gender differences in EU case, and also there are not in the case <strong>of</strong> Romania. Apparently, gender<br />

does not matter about sources used for start-up financing. The most significant difference concerns<br />

the financial support from public authorities as financial source. The number <strong>of</strong> female<br />

entrepreneurs indicating financial support from public authorities as a source for start-up financing<br />

represents 6.18% in EU, versus 0.17% in Romania (36 times less in Romania than the EU average),<br />

while for men the figures are 4.85% in EU versus 0.30% in Romania (16 times less in Romania).<br />

This gap brings again in front <strong>of</strong> policy responsible the imperative <strong>of</strong> financially supporting nascent<br />

entrepreneurs, as the key to sustainable economic growth.<br />

Keywords: entrepreneurship, women entrepreneurship, financial sources for business start-up<br />

JEL code: M13<br />

207


Introduction<br />

Entrepreneurship is widely considered as a<br />

driving force <strong>of</strong> economic growth, job<br />

creation and promoting innovations, and thus,<br />

an important focus <strong>of</strong> economic policies. As a<br />

result, the number and incidence <strong>of</strong> SMEs in<br />

the national economies are increasing<br />

constantly. Nevertheless, fostering<br />

entrepreneurship needs providing fair access<br />

to financing. Unfortunately, the access to<br />

finance is mentioned as one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

important barriers (Hughes and Storey, 1994)<br />

and in the case <strong>of</strong> female entrepreneurs, the<br />

situation is even worse.<br />

In this paper we are going to investigate the<br />

differences (if there are any) between female<br />

entrepreneurs and male entrepreneurs with<br />

respect to the sources <strong>of</strong> start-up financing,<br />

for EU and Romanian case. The paper is<br />

organised as follows: in the first part, we<br />

make a brief review <strong>of</strong> the literature; in the<br />

second part we present the methodology used,<br />

in the third part we emphasize the main<br />

results, and finally we conclude.<br />

1. A brief review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />

Start up financing is a major problem for the<br />

nascent entrepreneurs, as banks, the most<br />

important lending supplier, are reluctant to<br />

involve in SMEs financing, for reason related<br />

to asymmetrical information - adverse<br />

selection and moral hazard. The financial<br />

problem is a constant <strong>of</strong> the entire life-cycle<br />

<strong>of</strong> the SME, but researches showed that the<br />

first stage <strong>of</strong> existence (from idea to start up<br />

and then, first steps to development) is more<br />

affected by financial restriction then<br />

following stages. Especially in the so-called<br />

“valley <strong>of</strong> death” stage, the problems are very<br />

serious and most starting entrepreneurs use<br />

their own savings, family and business angels<br />

support (see Badulescu and Badulescu 2010).<br />

Theoretical explanations <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

the internal finance (personal savings or<br />

retained earnings) in the SMEs case are<br />

confirmed by recent European Barometer on<br />

Entrepreneurship (EC, 2009). According to<br />

this, across all EU Member States, a majority<br />

208<br />

<strong>of</strong> interviewees agreed that it was difficult to<br />

start one’s own business due to a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

available financial support. In Greece,<br />

Bulgaria, Latvia, Slovakia, Spain and<br />

Romania, 90% or more <strong>of</strong> the respondents<br />

agreed (strongly agreed and agreed) with that<br />

statement. At the bottom <strong>of</strong> the ranking,<br />

people in Finland, Austria and the<br />

Netherlands agreed with the statement on a<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> less than two-thirds (56%-<br />

63%).<br />

Female entrepreneurs, more than males, face<br />

start-up financial difficulties. Start up finance<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the most cited problems in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> women entrepreneurs. For example, the<br />

most important problems facing women<br />

entrepreneurs are – in the opinion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

specialist agencies cited by CEEDR 2000 – as<br />

follows:<br />

-Start up finance (indicated by more than<br />

25% as a major problem);<br />

-Finance for growth (indicated by more than<br />

20% as a major problem);<br />

-Discrimination by finance providers<br />

(indicated by more than 15% as a major<br />

problem). All <strong>of</strong> these are related to the<br />

access to finance.<br />

Among the four areas <strong>of</strong> finance identified as<br />

posing problems for women by Carter, S.<br />

(2000) and then Carter, Anderson and Shaw<br />

(2001), the first one is access to start-up<br />

finance (Schwartz, 1976; Carter and Cannon,<br />

1992; Johnson and Storey, 1993; Koper,<br />

1993; Van Auken et al, 1993; Carter and<br />

Rosa, 1998, FOBS survey 2005). Irrespective<br />

<strong>of</strong> sector and location, women start in<br />

business with only one-third the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

capital used by men. Women are more likely<br />

to encounter credibility problems when<br />

dealing with bankers. It is difficult to raise<br />

start-up finance. Some studies have shown<br />

links between low start-up capital and<br />

subsequent poor performance. Female<br />

entrepreneurs use substantially less capital at<br />

start-up than male owners, although intrasectoral<br />

similarities demonstrate that gender<br />

was only one <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> variables<br />

affecting the business financing process


(Carter S. and Rosa P. 1998). The majority <strong>of</strong><br />

women business owners have had to rely to a<br />

significant extent on self-generated finance<br />

during the start-up period <strong>of</strong> their business.<br />

Whilst many small businesses face<br />

difficulties in accessing the finance that they<br />

need (particularly at start-up), organizations<br />

specialising in providing support for female<br />

entrepreneurs clearly feel that this is one area<br />

where their clients face greater difficulties<br />

than their male counterparts. Shaw, Carter<br />

and Brierton (2001) have found research that<br />

suggests women face more difficulty when<br />

seeking finance to set up and grow their<br />

business. They note that women use only one<br />

third <strong>of</strong> the starting capital that men do,<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> sector; on-going growth<br />

finance may be less available for female<br />

owned firms than it is for male enterprises,<br />

largely due to women’s difficulty in<br />

penetrating informal financial networks.<br />

More women-owned businesses, for example,<br />

used family savings, household income,<br />

inheritance, grants and friends as sources <strong>of</strong><br />

business finance. ”In fact, Carter and<br />

Anderson (2001) found that women’s<br />

personal savings constitute between 80% and<br />

99% <strong>of</strong> initial capitalisation, compared to<br />

men where the figure is between 30% and<br />

59%. Although this may seem admirable it<br />

can <strong>of</strong>ten have a negative effect on the<br />

business (Sannikova 2007).<br />

Using a panel <strong>of</strong> 2000 Dutch start-ups<br />

(1994), Verheul and Thurik (2001, p. 14 )<br />

found out that „female entrepreneurs have a<br />

smaller amount <strong>of</strong> start-up capital than their<br />

male counterparts, but that they do not<br />

significantly differ with respect to the<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> financial capital”. Women<br />

starts up their business with less capital than<br />

men, and this can be attributed to a direct<br />

effect („gender effect”: men and women<br />

having the same characteristics but different<br />

with respect to the way <strong>of</strong> financing their<br />

businesses) and to an indirect effect („the<br />

female pr<strong>of</strong>ile”: differences related to<br />

business type, management and<br />

experience)(Verheul and Thurik, 2001).<br />

209<br />

Smaller financial resources to start up<br />

business leads unfortunately to less business<br />

performance and growth (Welter et al. 2006).<br />

2.Methodology<br />

Aiming to reveal the similarities or<br />

differences between female and male<br />

entrepreneurs’ start-up financing sources, in<br />

EU and Romania, we used the dataset<br />

“Enterprises managed by the founder -<br />

broken down by gender <strong>of</strong> the entrepreneur”,<br />

available in Eurostat database. We select<br />

from this database the data regarding the<br />

start-up financing source available for<br />

European Union (aggregate changing<br />

according to countries available) and<br />

Romania. Available data refers to NACE:<br />

Industry and services excluding public<br />

administration and management activities <strong>of</strong><br />

holding companies and to the year 2005.<br />

First, we select the data for the EU, broken by<br />

the gender <strong>of</strong> the founder and manager <strong>of</strong> the<br />

firm and search to arrange the sources for<br />

start-up financing starting with the most<br />

important, e.g. more nominated by the<br />

respondents. Second, we did the same thing<br />

for the data available for Romania, sorting<br />

them by relevance. Third, we tried to make<br />

some comparison between:<br />

-Male versus female entrepreneurs in EU<br />

-Male versus female entrepreneurs in<br />

Romania<br />

-EU entrepreneurs versus Romanian<br />

entrepreneurs.<br />

3.Discussion and results<br />

As the literature reported, and according to<br />

expectations, the main source for start-up<br />

financing used by women nascent<br />

entrepreneurs in EU are the own funds and<br />

savings. More than 4 out <strong>of</strong> 5 cited own funds<br />

and savings as a source for start-up financing,<br />

followed by the financial assistance from<br />

family and friends, reported by 3 out <strong>of</strong> ten<br />

women entrepreneurs. Far from these internal<br />

sources, the external sources are barely<br />

mentioned. Even we approach bank loans<br />

together - with and without collateral – they


are mentioned by only 1 out <strong>of</strong> 6 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents. If we approach separately bank<br />

loans without and with collateral, the third<br />

source appears to be The financial support<br />

from public authorities (mentioned by 6% <strong>of</strong><br />

Sources <strong>of</strong> financing - total<br />

Own funds or savings<br />

Financial assistance from family or friends<br />

Bank loan with collateral<br />

Financial support from public authorities<br />

Bank loan without collateral<br />

Capital contribution from other enterprises<br />

Venture capital<br />

210<br />

the respondents). Capital contributions from<br />

other enterprises and venture capital are<br />

nominated by only 1.34% <strong>of</strong> the women<br />

entrepreneurs. The complete picture is shown<br />

below:<br />

Chart 1. Sources for start-up financing, NACE industry and services, EU, males and<br />

females, 2005<br />

Source: based on Eurostat database<br />

Basically, the same ranking applies for men<br />

entrepreneurs. Own fund and savings, and<br />

financial assistance from family and friends<br />

are the first two sources for start-up<br />

financing. Own funds and savings are<br />

mentioned by 87% <strong>of</strong> the men (even more<br />

than the 82% in the case <strong>of</strong> women), while<br />

financial assistance from family and friends is<br />

mentioned by 25% <strong>of</strong> the men (less than the<br />

30% indicated by women). This little<br />

difference can be attributed to the fact that<br />

men may have (or may consider that!) more<br />

personal money than women, so essentially<br />

the same money are, for men, own fund, and<br />

for women, family’s money. It may be also<br />

an indication <strong>of</strong> the less effective networking<br />

in the case <strong>of</strong> women (explaining why<br />

financial assistance from friend is less<br />

important than in men’s case. And also, do<br />

not forget that women have more women<br />

friends (with less financial resources) and<br />

94971<br />

77853<br />

60821<br />

28928<br />

27698<br />

10354<br />

11785<br />

5867<br />

17597<br />

5452<br />

3374<br />

746<br />

2037<br />

520<br />

210799<br />

242951<br />

0 100000 200000 300000<br />

Males Females<br />

men have more men friends. Bank loans with<br />

collateral are the third financing source.<br />

Together, bank loans (without and with<br />

collateral) are indicated by 18.64% <strong>of</strong> men<br />

(versus 16.64% <strong>of</strong> women). Financial support<br />

from public authorities (mentioned by 4.85%)<br />

and capital contributions from other<br />

enterprises and venture capital (mentioned by<br />

2.23% <strong>of</strong> the respondents) are still marginal<br />

sources.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> Romanian entrepreneurs, the<br />

picture is mainly similar, as expected. The<br />

main source is, far from the others, own funds<br />

or savings, indicated as financing sources by<br />

90% <strong>of</strong> the female entrepreneurs and even<br />

more by male entrepreneurs. The second<br />

source is financial assistance from family and<br />

friends (indicated by 1 out <strong>of</strong> 3 entrepreneurs,<br />

males and females). Bank loans are indicated<br />

by 7% <strong>of</strong> the Romanian female entrepreneurs,<br />

and 9.24% <strong>of</strong> the Romanian male


entrepreneurs (for comparison, bank loans<br />

have been indicated by 17-19% in EU case).<br />

Capital contribution from other enterprises<br />

and venture capital are almost not used as<br />

start-up financial sources. Financial support<br />

Sources <strong>of</strong> financing - total<br />

Own funds or savings<br />

Financial assistance from family or friends<br />

Bank loan with collateral<br />

Bank loan without collateral<br />

Venture capital<br />

Capital contribution from other enterprises<br />

Financial support from public authorities<br />

211<br />

from public authorities is effectively nonexistent,<br />

with 0.17% <strong>of</strong> the females and<br />

0.30% <strong>of</strong> the male entrepreneurs indicating as<br />

a start-up financial source.<br />

Chart 2. Sources for start-up financing, NACE industry and services, Romania, males and<br />

females, 2005<br />

Source: based on Eurostat database<br />

4.Conclusions and further implications<br />

Main sources for start-up financing remain<br />

internal sources: own fund and savings, and<br />

financial assistance from family and friend,<br />

both for male and female entrepreneurs, both<br />

for EU as an aggregate and Romania, a new<br />

member state and still developing economy.<br />

Regarding the external sources, bank loans<br />

are the most important: they have been<br />

indicated by 17% <strong>of</strong> the females (EU) and<br />

19% <strong>of</strong> the males, about 10 times more than<br />

the other external sources together: capital<br />

17831<br />

16075<br />

11078<br />

5792<br />

1130<br />

648<br />

1529<br />

615<br />

82<br />

38<br />

304<br />

37<br />

96<br />

30<br />

29568<br />

32251<br />

0 10000 20000 30000 40000<br />

Males Females<br />

contributions from other enterprises and<br />

venture capital. There are no significant<br />

gender differences in EU case, and also there<br />

are not in the case <strong>of</strong> Romania. Apparently,<br />

gender does not matter about sources used for<br />

start-up financing. The access to external<br />

financial sources is restricted for<br />

entrepreneurs <strong>of</strong> both genders: only 1 <strong>of</strong> 6<br />

nascent entrepreneurs has access to them. The<br />

complete picture and comparison are shown<br />

in Table 1.


Table 1. Sources for start-up financing: males versus females, Romania versus EU (2005)<br />

Source for start-up financing Indicated<br />

by … %<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

females<br />

(EU)<br />

212<br />

Indicated<br />

by … %<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

females<br />

(RO)<br />

Indicated<br />

by … %<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

males<br />

(EU)<br />

Indicate<br />

d by …<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

the<br />

males<br />

(RO)<br />

Own funds or savings 81.98 90.15 86.77 91.68<br />

Financial assistance from family or<br />

friends<br />

30.46 32.48 25.03 34.35<br />

Bank loan without collateral 5.74 3.45 7.24 4.74<br />

Bank loan with collateral 10.9 3.63 11.4 3.50<br />

Capital contribution from other 0.79 0.21 1.39 0.94<br />

enterprises<br />

Venture capital 0.55 0.21 0.84 0.25<br />

Financial support from public authorities 6.18 0.17 4.85 0.30<br />

More than gender seems to matter the<br />

development stage and/or public involvement<br />

in policies and programmes fostering<br />

entrepreneurship. The most significant<br />

difference revealed by the data is related to<br />

the financial support from public authorities.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> female entrepreneurs<br />

indicating financial support from public<br />

authorities as a source for start-up financing<br />

represents 6.18% in EU, versus 0.17% in<br />

Romania (36 times less in Romania than the<br />

EU average), while for men the figures are<br />

4.85% in EU versus 0.30% in Romania (16<br />

times less in Romania). Probably the gap is<br />

even bigger now, after implementing<br />

numerous European programmes in fostering<br />

women entrepreneurship.<br />

After all, if gender does not matter, there<br />

other things that matters: entrepreneurship<br />

policies!<br />

Some further research can be carried out<br />

regarding other things that matter: economic<br />

sector can be one, so different NACE in the<br />

EU database are to be studied further. And<br />

further policies should be enforced to<br />

promote, foster and support (financially<br />

included!) entrepreneurship, as an important<br />

key to economic growing and social progress.<br />

References:<br />

1.Carter S. and Cannon T. 1992. Women as<br />

Entrepreneurs, London: Academic Press<br />

2.Carter S. and Rosa P. 1998.‘The financing<br />

<strong>of</strong> male- and female-owned businesses’, in:<br />

Entrepreneurship and Regional Development,<br />

10(3), 225-241<br />

3.Carter, S. 2000. “Gender and Enterprise”,<br />

in: Carter S. and Jones Evans D. (eds),<br />

Enterprise and Small Business: Principles,<br />

Practice and Policy, Addison Wesley<br />

4.Carter S and Anderson S.2001. On the<br />

move: Women and men business owners in<br />

the United Kingdom, Washington DC:<br />

NFWBO and IBM, p. 5<br />

5.European Commission 2000. Young<br />

Entrepreneurs, Women Entrepreneurs, Ethnic<br />

Minority Entrepreneurs and Co-ntrepreneurs<br />

in the European Union and Central and<br />

Eastern Europe, Final Report to the European<br />

Commission, Centre For Enterprise And<br />

Economic Development Research (CEEDR),<br />

Middlesex University Business School, UK,<br />

http://Ec.Europa.Eu/Enterprise/Policies/Sme/<br />

Files/Craft/Craft-<br />

Studies/Documents/Completereport_En.Pdf


6.European Commission 2009 . Flash<br />

Eurobarometer Entrepreneurship in the EU<br />

and beyond. A survey in the U, EFTA<br />

countries, Croatia, Turkey, the US, Japan,<br />

South Korea and China. Analytical report<br />

Fieldwork: December 2009, p. 76<br />

7.Hughes, A. and D. J. Storey. 1994, Finance<br />

and the Small Firm, London and New York:<br />

Routledge.<br />

8.Greene, Patricia G.; Hart, Myra M.;<br />

Gatewood, Elizabeth J.; Brush, Candida G.;<br />

Carter, Nancy M. 2003. Women<br />

Entrepreneurs: Moving Front and Center: An<br />

Overview <strong>of</strong> Research and Theory,<br />

http://usasbe.org/knowledge/whitepapers/gree<br />

ne2003.pdf<br />

213<br />

9.Sannikova, E. 2007. Regulatory<br />

Impediments to Enterprise Development:<br />

Mobilizing Women's Economic Potential,<br />

International Conference on Reducing<br />

Barriers to Entrepreneurship and Encouraging<br />

Enterprise Development: Policy Options, 18-<br />

19 June 2007<br />

10.Shaw, E., Carter, S. and Brierton, J. 2001.<br />

Unequal Entrepreneurs: Why female<br />

enterprise is an uphill business, The Industrial<br />

Society<br />

11.Verheul, I. and Thurok, R. 2001. “Start-<br />

Up Capital: Does Gender Matter?” Small<br />

Business Economics 16: 329–345<br />

12.Welter, F., D. Smallbone and N. Isakova.<br />

2006. Enterprising Women in Transition<br />

Economies, (eds), Aldershot, Ashgate


Sub-section: Economics


COMPETITIVENESS - GROWTH FACTOR. POINT OF VIEW ON THE<br />

SITUATION IN ROMANIA<br />

Cismaș Laura<br />

The West University <strong>of</strong> Timisoara, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />

Bucur Oana Nicoleta<br />

The West University <strong>of</strong> Timisoara, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />

Pitorac Ruxandra Ioana<br />

The West University <strong>of</strong> Timisoara, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />

Abstract: This paper considers the issue <strong>of</strong> competitiveness <strong>of</strong> national economy, making specific<br />

reference to the economic situation <strong>of</strong> Romania in the year 2010.<br />

The diversity <strong>of</strong> views on approaches to competitiveness in the literature requires consultation <strong>of</strong><br />

reports prepared by prestigious international forums and organizations, using relevant indicators<br />

and economic variables.<br />

Keywords: Competitiveness, economic growth, productivity, economic environment, economic<br />

efficiency.<br />

JEL Codes: F43, O47<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Competitiveness means the way in which<br />

nations and the economic environment given<br />

all powers to achieve its prosperity.<br />

Competitiveness study allows "the possibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> comparing the performance achieved, and<br />

future growth potential" (Spataru) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

company and the economic environment.<br />

Analyzing the structure and dynamics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

competitive system is also an element <strong>of</strong><br />

absolute completion <strong>of</strong> analysis and relevant<br />

government decisions targeting companies<br />

involved in production activity (Airoldi,<br />

Brunetti and Coda in 2005: 322), all aimed at<br />

raising environmental performance national<br />

economy.<br />

In economics, competitiveness is identified as<br />

the main active element in the procurement<br />

and delivery performance during the<br />

competition, the organization the role <strong>of</strong> 'the<br />

situation is in better position as compared to<br />

its competitor for the "defeat" for the<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> reporting gave a performance<br />

criterion and followed by all competitors<br />

(Voiculescu 2001: 6).<br />

217<br />

2. Defining the level <strong>of</strong> competitiveness<br />

based approach<br />

The concept can be approached at<br />

mondoeconomic, macroeconomic and<br />

microeconomic level. In that respect this<br />

industry experts opinions on the definition<br />

depending on the level <strong>of</strong> approach:<br />

- "Global competitiveness is a matter <strong>of</strong><br />

economics that analyzes the facts and policies<br />

that shape a nation's ability to create and<br />

maintain an environment conducive to<br />

supporting and achieving better value for<br />

their enterprises and prosperity <strong>of</strong> its<br />

people"(World Competitiveness Yearbook).<br />

- "Competitiveness is defined as that set <strong>of</strong><br />

factors, policies and institutions that<br />

determine the current level <strong>of</strong> productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

a country. Productivity determines both the<br />

welfare <strong>of</strong> an economy at a time, and its<br />

growth potential in the future. Empirical<br />

research has shown that developing a<br />

knowledge-based economy is one <strong>of</strong> the key<br />

factors enhancing the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> an<br />

economy"(Imbrescu and Băbăiţă).


- "The competitiveness <strong>of</strong> markets, refers to<br />

the degree to which individual firms have the<br />

power to influence market prices or terms on<br />

which their product is sold. The individual<br />

firm has less power to influence the market<br />

on selling their product, the more competitive<br />

is the market" (Lipsei and Chrystal 1999: 252<br />

).<br />

- “The level at which it generates is the<br />

microeconomic competitiveness. A country<br />

becomes competitive when you manage to<br />

build that environment that allows each<br />

company to become effective added value, to<br />

be able to survive or develop in any national<br />

economic environment, especially<br />

internationally. The level at which it<br />

maintains and strengthens the<br />

competitiveness <strong>of</strong> the macro. The country<br />

maintains or improves its pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />

internationally when it decides to apply the<br />

set <strong>of</strong> economic policies necessary to<br />

stimulate the achieving optimum expansion at<br />

the micro level”(Spataru).<br />

Creating a competitive system is an important<br />

issue and a policy <strong>of</strong> “Washington<br />

Consensus” for economic growth in<br />

developing states (Baumol, Litan and<br />

Schramm 2009: 52).<br />

Representation <strong>of</strong> the competitive system, the<br />

example <strong>of</strong> a competitive economic market<br />

can be achieved only by extensive<br />

competition model representation.<br />

Competitive system structure: the<br />

competition extended) is a necessary<br />

condition <strong>of</strong> existence and developing a real<br />

competitive.<br />

The four pillars <strong>of</strong> the macroeconomic level<br />

the competitive system are newcomers<br />

(especially entrepreneurs), customers<br />

(consumers), suppliers and manufacturers <strong>of</strong><br />

goods substitutable (those who have the<br />

ability to conduct marketing pressures).<br />

If new entrants can affect competition by<br />

larger volumes <strong>of</strong> production and reducing<br />

unit costs through a variety <strong>of</strong> products,<br />

manufacturers <strong>of</strong> substitutable products or<br />

services will be the source <strong>of</strong> uncertainty for<br />

new entrants if the price / benefit will be one<br />

218<br />

<strong>of</strong> those consumers’ expectations accordingly<br />

have propensities for such goods.<br />

Providers will become competitive in<br />

particular by focusing on service quality and<br />

price <strong>of</strong> services and clients, through<br />

negotiation and price elasticity will be the<br />

most important word to say.<br />

The competitiveness suggests safety,<br />

efficiency, quality, high productivity,<br />

adaptability, successful, modern<br />

management, superior products, low cost.<br />

In the battle for new markets, firms need to<br />

emphasize their strengths to gain the ground<br />

to competitors. Also they have to defend<br />

these benefits, known and recognized by<br />

constant efforts and also to know and accept<br />

that are the strengths <strong>of</strong> its competitors. At<br />

the same time, significantly increase the<br />

interest and effort to obtain business benefits<br />

both the domestic and international market.<br />

Competitive or competitive ability is just that<br />

part on which power and economic strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> the economic conditions <strong>of</strong> a market<br />

economy. Therefore, development <strong>of</strong><br />

competitiveness, acquiring and maintaining<br />

competitive advantage and effective use <strong>of</strong><br />

the factors influencing it, is the main goal<br />

toward which all economic agents.<br />

3. Implications <strong>of</strong> competitive markets in<br />

the growth states<br />

The contemporary world has undergone a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> connections between markets and<br />

increasing competitiveness <strong>of</strong> the country's<br />

economic performance in the economic<br />

environment runs its business. In this respect<br />

shows experts in the field: "To be effective,<br />

must include an economic and pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />

business based on competitive (...) the true<br />

economic substance produced by them, their<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability depends on economic strength<br />

and level to live the great country"(Verboncu<br />

and Zalman 2005:41).<br />

The competitiveness <strong>of</strong> a country is assessed<br />

by its capacity (Gavrila 2009: 131):<br />

- to export<br />

- to attract FDI


- to harness resources and increase real per<br />

capita GDP<br />

- prices were more positive than those <strong>of</strong><br />

competitors, the <strong>of</strong>fer is characterized by<br />

quality, diversity and timeliness<br />

A national economy is competitive in the<br />

long term, they ensure the sustainable<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> welfare and population dynamics<br />

due to the high overall productivity <strong>of</strong> factors<br />

<strong>of</strong> production.<br />

It is clear that the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> an<br />

economy depends decisively on the business<br />

environment, businesses are the engine <strong>of</strong><br />

economic growth. Improve business access to<br />

factors <strong>of</strong> their participation in the European<br />

Single Market, investment in optimizing their<br />

industrial base, while respecting the<br />

principles <strong>of</strong> sustainable development is a<br />

critical prerequisite for the operation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Romanian economy competitive.<br />

As described by Michael Porter in the latest<br />

edition (2008) <strong>of</strong> his famous works, ''About<br />

the competition, the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> a<br />

country do not relate primarily to<br />

macroeconomic stability, neither labor nor<br />

public policies, or practices management, but<br />

especially in productivity. A nation is<br />

competitive when it allows the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> the determinants <strong>of</strong> productivity and<br />

increasing productivity.<br />

219<br />

Depending on factors contributing to<br />

productivity, the report prepared by the<br />

World Economic Forum identified three<br />

stages in which the countries, namely:<br />

Stage I: The competitiveness <strong>of</strong> production<br />

due to factors - factor - driven (force <strong>of</strong><br />

unskilled or poorly qualified natural<br />

resources). The economy is particularly<br />

competitive because <strong>of</strong> lower prices, but the<br />

products are less complex. However,<br />

assuming the presence <strong>of</strong> certain basic<br />

conditions are essential (institutions,<br />

infrastructure, macroeconomics, health and<br />

primary education).<br />

Stage II: Competitiveness by factors <strong>of</strong><br />

efficiency - efficiency - driven (production<br />

more efficient, better quality products).<br />

Competitive conditions related to higher<br />

education and continuous training and ability<br />

to benefit from existing technologies.<br />

Stage III: The competitiveness based on<br />

innovation - innovation-driven (new products<br />

from innovative, complex production<br />

processes).<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> individual factors,<br />

expressed by weight in the total contribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> the three pillars <strong>of</strong> competitiveness<br />

depends on the stage in which the country<br />

concerned.<br />

Table 1 The pillars <strong>of</strong> competitiveness (on a scale from 1 a worst - 7 the most powerful)<br />

Basic requirements Score Romania<br />

Institutions 3,7<br />

Infrastructure 2,7<br />

Macroeconomic stability 4,6<br />

Health and primary education 5,5<br />

Effciency enhancers<br />

Higher education and training 4,3<br />

Goods market effciency 4,2<br />

Labor market effciency 4,3<br />

Financial market sophistication 4,4<br />

Technological readiness 3,8<br />

Market size 4,5<br />

Innovation and sophistication factors<br />

Business sophistication 3,8<br />

Innovation 3,1<br />

Source: World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010


4. Romania's place in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

competitiveness in 2010?<br />

According to the Romanian Institute for<br />

Social and Economic Research Polls -<br />

IRECSON, Romania is one <strong>of</strong> the last places<br />

among the 58 states, namely the 54th place,<br />

ahead <strong>of</strong> Argentina, Croatia, Ukraine and<br />

Venezuela. In front <strong>of</strong> us, at very short<br />

distance are Bulgaria (who score a 0.6%<br />

higher than the score <strong>of</strong> Romania) and<br />

Slovenia which has a spacing <strong>of</strong> 1.2 points<br />

from November. In the case <strong>of</strong> former<br />

communist countries until 1989 before we<br />

can see that under the current economic<br />

crisis, Hungary (42), Estonia (34) and Poland<br />

(32) have found solutions to increase<br />

competitiveness, Romania (54) and Czech<br />

Republic (29) retain their positions from 2009<br />

to 2010, while Bulgaria (53), Slovenia (52),<br />

Slovakia (49) and Lithuania (43) have<br />

recorded substantial decreases ranging from<br />

20 to 12 seats. For a better building on<br />

evolution, that the positions occupied in<br />

recent years, the Yearbook presents<br />

individual country specific contributory<br />

factors in terms <strong>of</strong> competitiveness and the<br />

disadvantaged.<br />

In 2010 Romania registered a decline in<br />

economic performance, ranked 32 in 2009,<br />

ranked 47 in 2010. Although this chapter we<br />

have seen a drop <strong>of</strong> 15 seats still remain<br />

before countries like Greece (48), Russia<br />

(49), Turkey (50), Estonia (52), Slovakia<br />

(54), Ukraine (55) Lithuania (57). Regarding<br />

the efficiency <strong>of</strong> government, I dropped one<br />

place from 2009, topped 50. Regarding<br />

infrastructure, I grew up 10 seats in 2010<br />

compared to 2009, peaking at number 43 in<br />

2010, and Chapter Efficiency business, grew<br />

13 seats, up from 56 in 2009 ranked the 49th<br />

place in 2010.<br />

Unfortunately, Romania has made significant<br />

gains in terms <strong>of</strong> business efficiency and<br />

infrastructure were not enough to increase<br />

competitiveness as a whole, but given that the<br />

economic performance and efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

government Chapter I declined, maintaining<br />

the position <strong>of</strong> Romania in 2010, to 2009<br />

220<br />

levels is due the first two factors. Credit<br />

business is beginning to strengthen in recent<br />

years and investment in telecommunications<br />

infrastructure and in research are beginning to<br />

become visible, helping them to contribute in<br />

2010 to maintain the competitiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania in 2009, the economic crisis.<br />

Strengths <strong>of</strong> the business concerns in<br />

particular the progress made by the Romanian<br />

companies in their concern for customer<br />

satisfaction for a proper wage service sector,<br />

and staff management positions, at a salary<br />

that is comparable to that in other EU<br />

countries.<br />

However, to further strengthen the business<br />

environment we need to improve some<br />

aspects which for 2010 is still the weak points<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> competitiveness, namely: the need<br />

for specialists in finance raised by the need to<br />

increase the capacity <strong>of</strong> Romanian companies'<br />

adaptability to market changes the need to<br />

increase transparency <strong>of</strong> financial institutions<br />

in Romania, the stock market decline, and<br />

finding solutions so enterprise debts not<br />

restrict their ability to be competitive.<br />

Negative aspects (aspects <strong>of</strong> which Romania<br />

is ranked the lowest in the context <strong>of</strong> global<br />

competitiveness) in terms <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

performance are related to direct investment<br />

abroad, investments in capital markets<br />

abroad, receipts from tourism and real GDP<br />

growth.<br />

Even though the Chapter Efficiency sit well<br />

in the government's total public debt and<br />

collect taxes on income, weaknesses in the<br />

system in terms <strong>of</strong> competitiveness in 2010<br />

relate mostly to the lack <strong>of</strong> public contracts<br />

open to all bidders, the black market<br />

economy that does not allow and competition<br />

law can not stop unfair competition.<br />

In conclusion, overall, we assess the<br />

competitiveness <strong>of</strong> Romanian economy as a<br />

"disappointing performance." In many ways<br />

they are signs <strong>of</strong> competitiveness,<br />

competitiveness appears other way to start,<br />

but in most economic indicators speak for<br />

lags, lack <strong>of</strong> competitiveness.


Heritage Foundation and Wall Street Journal<br />

<strong>Index</strong> <strong>of</strong> Economic Freedom determines (S),<br />

assuming that economic freedom is a<br />

221<br />

precondition for prosperity <strong>of</strong> individuals and<br />

in turn a key driver for competitiveness.<br />

Source: <strong>Index</strong> <strong>of</strong> Economic Freedom, Heritage Foundation, 2010<br />

Chart no. 1 Rating States <strong>of</strong> Europe according to ILE<br />

According to the results <strong>of</strong> this study, the<br />

2010 edition, Romania is the 63rd country<br />

in the world in terms <strong>of</strong> economic freedom,<br />

and ranked 28th in Europe.<br />

The Heritage analysis, Romania has<br />

achieved a 64.2 index points above the<br />

global average. After comparing the first<br />

countries in Europe, according to each<br />

indicator <strong>of</strong> economic freedom, Romania<br />

has high scores for: free trade, fiscal<br />

freedom, government spending, and<br />

significantly lower scores than the best<br />

countries in Europe obtained if : property<br />

rights and freedom from corruption, as<br />

these areas are necessary for developing<br />

solutions.<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the study conducted by the<br />

Heritage Foundation shows that Romania's<br />

economy is moving towards a greater<br />

economic freedom index.<br />

5. Conclusions<br />

For Romania, economic competitiveness is<br />

a major component <strong>of</strong> national<br />

development strategy for 2007-2013. For<br />

this purpose a special program was<br />

developed (Sectoral Operational<br />

Programme ‘Increasing <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />

Competitiveness ‘’SOP) in accordance<br />

with the Lisbon strategy on improving the<br />

economic competitiveness <strong>of</strong> the European<br />

Union.<br />

In full accordance with the conduct <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Commission’s proposals for<br />

Competitiveness and Innovation<br />

Framework 2007-2013, the priorities <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania’s competitiveness strategy, which<br />

take into account and take into account the<br />

guidelines proposed by the Commission for<br />

Cohesion Policy 2007 – 2013, are:<br />

- Improving access to emergency market,<br />

capital, technology businesses, especially<br />

small and medium enterprises;


- Developing knowledge-based economy:<br />

including the promotion <strong>of</strong> innovation and<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a competitive;<br />

- Improve energy efficiency and use<br />

renewable energy.<br />

Competitiveness, although <strong>of</strong>ten studied in<br />

recent decades even in Romania, remains a<br />

qualitative concept, draw conclusions on<br />

the competitive status is rather the depth <strong>of</strong><br />

analysis, the information behind it, the<br />

evaluator’s experience and, not least,<br />

points <strong>of</strong> view that makes analysis.<br />

Acknowledgements:<br />

1. This article is the result <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

POSDRU/88/1.5./S/55287 "Doctoral<br />

Programme in Economics at the European<br />

Standards Knowledge (DOESEC). This<br />

project is co-funded by the European<br />

Social Fund Through the Sectoral<br />

Operational Human Resources<br />

Development Programme for 2007-2013,<br />

coordinated by The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong><br />

Economic Studies in partnership with West<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Timisoara.<br />

2. "This work was partially funded by<br />

contract<br />

POSDRU/CPP107/DMI1.5/S/78421,<br />

strategic project ID 78 421 (2010), c<strong>of</strong>inanced<br />

by European Social Fund - Invest<br />

in People, by Human Resources<br />

Development Operational Programme<br />

2007-2013".<br />

222<br />

References<br />

1.Airoldi, G. Brunetti, G. Coda, V. Corso di<br />

economia aziendale. Bologna: il Mulino. 2005.<br />

2.Fung, K. V. Fung, K. W. Wond, Y.<br />

,Concurenţa într-o lume plată. Cum să<br />

construim o companie într-o lume fără graniţe.,<br />

Bucureşti: Editura Publică, 2009<br />

3.Gavrilă, I. Gavrilă, Tatiana. Competitivitate şi<br />

mediu concurenţial: Promovarea şi protejarea<br />

concurenţei în Uniunea Europeană. Bucureşti :<br />

Editura Economică, 2009<br />

4.Hamel, G. Prahalad, C. K. Competiţia pentru<br />

viitor. Bucureşti: Editura Meteor Press, 2008<br />

5.Kahn, S. Geopolitica Uniuni Europene.<br />

Bucureşti: Editura Cartier Istoric, 2008<br />

6.Lipsey, R. G. Chrystal, K. A. Economia<br />

pozitivă. Bucureşti : Editura Economică, 1999<br />

7.Porter, Michael, E. Despre concurenţă.<br />

Bucureşti: Editura Meteor Press, 2008<br />

8.Voiculescu, Dan. Mereuţă, Cezar. Analiza de<br />

competitivitate a economiei româneşti.<br />

Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Române, 1998<br />

9.Voiculescu, D. Competitivitatea – note de<br />

curs. Bucureşti: Editura Economică, 2000<br />

10.Voiculescu, Dan. Competiţie şi<br />

competitivitate. Bucureşti: Editura Economică,<br />

2001<br />

11.Cismaş, Laura. Stan, Laura-Melinda.<br />

Avantaj competitiv şi performanţă în contextul<br />

responsabilizării sociale a companiilor. The<br />

Romanian Economic Journal, Year XIII, nr. 35.<br />

2010<br />

12.Cismaş, Laura. Bucur Oana Realitatea<br />

romaneasca din perspectiva libertatii<br />

economice. Conferinta internationala Oameni,<br />

idei, experiente, Supliment al revistei Analele<br />

Universitatii „Eftimie Murgu” Resita, Fascicula<br />

II – Studii Economice, ISSN 1584 – 0972, 22-<br />

23 octombrie 2010<br />

13.Dăianu, Daniel. “Cursa pentru<br />

competitivitate”. Ziarul Jurnalul Naţional, 8<br />

martie 2006<br />

14.Spătaru, M. „Factorii competitivităţii<br />

naţionale”, Universitatea Petrol-Gaze, Ploieşti<br />

15.www.topbusiness.ro<br />

16.www.IRECSON.ro (Institutul Român de<br />

Cercetări Economice Sociale şi Sondaje)<br />

17.www.FMI.ro (Fondul Monetar Internaţional)<br />

18.www.WEFORUM.org (World Economic<br />

Forum)<br />

19.www.IMD.ch (Anuarul Competitivităţii<br />

Mondiale – World Competitiveness Yearbook)


DYNAMICS ECONOMIC DISPARITIES IN NORTH-WEST REGION OF<br />

ROMANIA<br />

Florea Adrian<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Abstract: Even though over the years has enjoyed wide media coverage, with highlighted aspects,<br />

discrepancies and inequalities <strong>of</strong> economic potential between different regions <strong>of</strong> the world, or even<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the same countries always remained topical. Difficulties arising from these differences were<br />

always felt, extremely painful by humans.<br />

Analyzing distinctly, participation <strong>of</strong> each county to the GDP <strong>of</strong> the Northwest Region and the<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> all indicators, we can identify significant discrepancies between counties, regions<br />

and municipalities. This is one <strong>of</strong> the reasons that led us trying to identify the causes that generated<br />

the current situation. From the perspective <strong>of</strong> the contribution <strong>of</strong> each county in the Northwest<br />

Region to Region's domestic product composition, the first place is taken by Cluj county 32.3%,<br />

followed by Bihor with 24.3%, Maramures, with 14.9% Satu-Mare, 12.1%, Bistrita-Nasaud, 9.1%<br />

and 7.2% Salaj. Consulting <strong>of</strong> the Regional Operational Programme 2007-2013 indicates that the<br />

poorest areas in the Northwest Region are in Maramures and Bistrita-Nasaud.<br />

An important part <strong>of</strong> the active population <strong>of</strong> North-West Region was employed in public<br />

enterprises and an increase <strong>of</strong> unemployment in the counties <strong>of</strong> Salaj, Satu Mare and Maramures<br />

became predictable, imminent amid restructuring <strong>of</strong> public enterprises with losses. Studies <strong>of</strong><br />

employed population by sectors <strong>of</strong> the economy, shows a high rate <strong>of</strong> population employed in<br />

services in the counties <strong>of</strong> Cluj and Bihor and high employment in agriculture on other four<br />

counties. In a modern market economy, services are most concentrated labors, and how the<br />

workforce is distributed in the Northwest region also shows an imbalance. How Northwest Region<br />

is participating in international economic cycle has major effects on the population's living<br />

standards. Relevant for the inter-district disparities analysis is the human and agents behavior<br />

analysis and the savings and loan relationships. How people behave in these ratios in each county<br />

tells us much about their economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

Attenuation <strong>of</strong> long distance gaps in the Northwest region remains a very complex problem,<br />

attempts to decrease it, is bringing into question, not infrequently contradictory<br />

strategies. Supporting the few remaining state-owned enterprises in the region could lead to a<br />

revival <strong>of</strong> activity, attracting attention <strong>of</strong> foreign investors can thus lead to recovery <strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong> the<br />

labor resources <strong>of</strong> the Region. Expansion and modernization <strong>of</strong> transport and distribution networks<br />

would provide a further chance to faster development <strong>of</strong> the North-West by exploiting the growing<br />

regional economic resources available, enhancing economic relations both intra and extra<br />

regional.<br />

But we can not fail to mention the part state should play in orchestrating these measures. Despite<br />

the independence <strong>of</strong> regions, they are subordinated to the central administration, and strategic<br />

investment policy depends to an overwhelming extent <strong>of</strong> it. Only by linking effective measures at<br />

national, regional and local level will alleviate the sustainable economic gaps.<br />

Keywords: disparities, restructuring, reforms, investments, consequences<br />

JEL: E01, E24, J11, R12, W24<br />

223


The issue <strong>of</strong> disparities and inequalities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economic potential existing between different<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> the world or even between regions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the same countries always remained valid,<br />

despite the fact that over time it has received<br />

wide media coverage. Difficulties arising<br />

from these differences were always felt<br />

particularly painful by humans.<br />

Currently, the economy is characterized by an<br />

increased mobility <strong>of</strong> all its components, and<br />

economic disparities have begun to worry<br />

more and more economic researchers. As a<br />

result, simply finding the economic<br />

disparities is not satisfying anyone anymore.<br />

Maybe that's why people who believe that it<br />

is necessary to identify the necessity to<br />

maintain and deepen the gaps identified cases<br />

depending on the particularities and<br />

specificities <strong>of</strong> each area. It must also<br />

decipher their consequences, because they are<br />

not limited to the current period, but<br />

designing, influencing economic relations on<br />

a longer period. In the spirit <strong>of</strong> the statement<br />

we want to present an analysis by<br />

geographical regions, North-West <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania. Among the envisaged objectives<br />

we include: identifying the causes <strong>of</strong><br />

economic disparities emphasis <strong>of</strong> inter-county<br />

geographic area North West <strong>of</strong> Romania,<br />

which are the economic effects <strong>of</strong> these interdistrict<br />

disparities<br />

According to information provided by the<br />

Regional Development North West Agency,<br />

the North-West region (northern<br />

Transylvania) is close to European markets,<br />

with good road access, rail and air has a<br />

strategic geographical position, being the<br />

gateway to Romania from the European<br />

Union and Ukraine. Even if the region is<br />

crossed by 7 European roads, has peripheral<br />

position over the European transport<br />

corridors, the connection with eminent poles<br />

in the neighborhood, with other regions is<br />

still difficult. According to the same sources,<br />

224<br />

the North-West <strong>of</strong> Romania has an area <strong>of</strong><br />

34,159 km ² representing 14.3% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

area <strong>of</strong> the country. Part <strong>of</strong> this region are the<br />

counties: Bihor, Bistrita-Nasaud, Cluj,<br />

Maramures, Satu Mare and Salaj having a<br />

population <strong>of</strong> 2,744,914 (14.32% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

population <strong>of</strong> the country) and has an average<br />

density <strong>of</strong> 80.1 inhabitants per square<br />

kilometer. For that is the number <strong>of</strong><br />

administrative-territorial units (421),<br />

distributed as follows: 42 cities including 15<br />

municipalities, 398 communes and 1823<br />

villages.<br />

Analyzing separately each county<br />

participating in the formation <strong>of</strong> regional<br />

GDP and the composition <strong>of</strong> the indicators,<br />

we can identify significant discrepancies<br />

between counties, regions and<br />

municipalities. This is one <strong>of</strong> the reasons that<br />

led us trying to identify the causes that<br />

generated the current situation.<br />

From the perspective <strong>of</strong> contribution each<br />

county has in North-West Region’s domestic<br />

product formation, first place is taken by Cluj<br />

county with 32.3%, followed by Bihar with<br />

24.3%, Maramures, with 14.9% Satu-Mare,<br />

12.1%, Bistrita-Nasaud, 9.1% and 7.2% Salaj.<br />

Consulting <strong>of</strong> the Regional Operational<br />

Programme 2007-2013 indicates that the<br />

poorest areas in the Northwest Region are in<br />

Maramures and Bistrita-Nasaud. Here were<br />

identified most areas <strong>of</strong> industrial<br />

decline. Intra-regional differences are closely<br />

related to the degree <strong>of</strong> industrialization, the<br />

counties most powerful and industrialized<br />

early - Cluj and Bihor - having a high<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> the employed population<br />

(44.5% and 45.7%), while less counties and<br />

later industrial - Satu Mare and Bistrita-<br />

Nasaud - have lower weights (39.6% and<br />

38.0%). Un-industrialization has led to a<br />

restricted job use in industry in counties <strong>of</strong><br />

North-west, but with large differences from<br />

one area to another.


Table 1 Unemployment in North-West<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Bihor 2,4 3 5,8 5,8<br />

Bistriţa 2,4 2,8 8,2 6,3<br />

Cluj 3 2,9 6,3 4,9<br />

Maramureş 3,4 3,7 6,4 6<br />

Satu Mare 2,6 3 6 6,3<br />

Sălaj 4,4 5,5 10,3 8,2<br />

Made by author based on information found on the website:<br />

http://www.insse.ro/cms/rw/pages/buletinStatJud.ro.do<br />

An important part <strong>of</strong> the active population <strong>of</strong><br />

North-West Region was employed in public<br />

enterprises and an increase <strong>of</strong> unemployment<br />

in the counties <strong>of</strong> Salaj, Satu Mare and<br />

Maramures became predictable, imminent<br />

amid restructuring <strong>of</strong> public enterprises with<br />

losses. Other areas in decline are: the Apuseni<br />

Mountains and the northern mountain area.<br />

Mining sector restructurations has affected<br />

this sector and led to massive lay<strong>of</strong>fs in the<br />

area <strong>of</strong> Baia Mare-Borsa-Viseu.<br />

A lower number <strong>of</strong> unemployed in Cluj and<br />

Bihor to the major foreign investment, which<br />

have diminished, even partially, the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

industry restructuring. North-West has<br />

attracted a relatively high number <strong>of</strong> firms<br />

with foreign participation, sometimes<br />

grouped in clusters (eg major foreign<br />

investors in Bihor County - primarily<br />

producers <strong>of</strong> technological equipment). But<br />

we can observe that they are generally SMEs,<br />

who <strong>of</strong>ten work as subcontractors or contract<br />

work or operate based on business ties,<br />

traditional Western Europe. It should be<br />

noted that SMEs present in the Northwest<br />

region <strong>of</strong> the country accounts for 15% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

national total. The existence <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />

investors to operate in the same field at the<br />

same time can create both advantages and<br />

disadvantages. On Bihor ‘s labor market<br />

multinationals had a visible contribution to<br />

the unemployment rate and the constant<br />

increase in demand for qualified manpower,<br />

services development.<br />

Studies <strong>of</strong> employed population by sectors <strong>of</strong><br />

the economy, shows a high rate <strong>of</strong> population<br />

225<br />

employed in services in counties <strong>of</strong> Cluj and<br />

Bihor and high employment in agriculture on<br />

other four counties. In a modern market<br />

economy, services are most concentrated<br />

labors, and how the workforce is distributed<br />

in the Northwest region also shows an<br />

imbalance. Counties in which the<br />

employment <strong>of</strong> labor resources is higher in<br />

services, like Cluj and Bihor, also raises the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> economic development compared to<br />

other counties.<br />

The presence, quite shy, <strong>of</strong> industrial parks in<br />

the Northwest Region counties, and also their<br />

unequal distribution in the Region, is<br />

supplying the gaps. We notice the early<br />

existence in Cluj County <strong>of</strong> three industrial<br />

parks: Tetarom1 Cluj-Napoca, Cluj Napoca<br />

Tetrarom2 , Dej ARC Park, which attracted<br />

investments <strong>of</strong> hundreds <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong><br />

euros. A significant impact on the local<br />

economy has the making <strong>of</strong> the industrial<br />

park <strong>of</strong> the Finnish giant Nokia (Tetrarom3),<br />

Nokia investment reaching half billion<br />

euros. Existence in Bihor county <strong>of</strong> those two<br />

industrial parks, one located in Oradea and<br />

one in the west <strong>of</strong> the county, between<br />

Oradea and the border with Hungary, has<br />

created a domino-type effect, attracting other<br />

foreign investors and companies. So Shin<br />

Heung Precision <strong>of</strong>Korea, U.S. Plexus that<br />

made investments <strong>of</strong> over EUR 20 million<br />

and a Canadian company that produces<br />

equipment (Celestica) made an investment <strong>of</strong><br />

over 84 million, those 3 assuring to employ<br />

over 3,000 people. In other county we could<br />

see 25 million euros invested by the French


company Michellin in a tire factory in Zalau,<br />

the Natuzzi Italian corporation in a furniture<br />

manufacturing facility in Baia-Mare in the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> 40 million euros in Satu Mare<br />

Schemmer German company has invested 10<br />

million euros in the production <strong>of</strong> tubes for<br />

cable protection, and in Bistrita-Nasaud a<br />

germany company Leoni Wyring System’s<br />

presence is noted, producing automotive<br />

wiring, but also companies with Italian<br />

capital such as Tesitura, Italtextil and Storia,<br />

active in textiles field. In all counties in the<br />

Table 2 Average monthly wage<br />

Salariaţi<br />

(raportat la totalul<br />

populaţiei) (%)<br />

226<br />

region, except Bistrita-Nasaud, industrial<br />

parks have been established.<br />

The top foreign investors in the county <strong>of</strong><br />

Cluj is the leader <strong>of</strong> the Region, and placing<br />

their capital where conditions exist for<br />

achieving higher returns. All these elements<br />

lead to the development <strong>of</strong> the labor market,<br />

bringing financial resources, significantly<br />

reducing the unemployment rate, while<br />

generating an increase in GDP per inhabitant<br />

(Table 2).<br />

Salariul<br />

mediu net<br />

lunar(euro)<br />

PIB<br />

(pe cap de locuitor)<br />

Bihor 27,3 249 5550<br />

Bistriţa 19,2 261 4712<br />

Cluj 28,5 345 7100<br />

Maramureş 17,8 235 4090<br />

Satu Mare 19,5 259 4459<br />

Sălaj 17,6 265 4337<br />

Source: National Commission for Prognosis http://www.cnp.ro/ro/prognoze<br />

In the Northwest Region, we noted important<br />

differences between the counties both in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> employees compared to<br />

the total population, the net average wage,<br />

and GDP per inhabitants. A cause <strong>of</strong> this<br />

situation may be the preference <strong>of</strong> investors<br />

to place capital in more developed counties,<br />

such as Cluj, at the expense <strong>of</strong> others.<br />

Another effect <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> gaps in the<br />

North West is population migration. If the<br />

external migration is already well known,<br />

became a phenomenon very carefully studied<br />

by the European institutions, migration<br />

between counties in the Region being<br />

seriously considered, to my knowledge, until<br />

now.<br />

Relevant inter-district disparities analysis is<br />

to analyze the behavior <strong>of</strong> the population and<br />

the savings and loan relationships.How<br />

people behave in these ratios in each county<br />

tells us much about their economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

The information presented in the table 3,<br />

allows us to identify different behaviors for<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the counties residents regarding loans<br />

and deposits. As expected, most <strong>of</strong> the loans<br />

(in absolute value) are in the county <strong>of</strong> Cluj,<br />

followed in order by Bihor, Maramures, Satu<br />

Mare and Bistrita-Nasaud. Perhaps more<br />

relevant is the percentage <strong>of</strong> outstanding<br />

loans, Cluj and Satu Mare, where only 9.8%<br />

and 9.1% <strong>of</strong> total loans, Bistrita-Nasaud most<br />

delicate position having 18.2% <strong>of</strong> total loans,<br />

while the values <strong>of</strong> Bihor and<br />

Maramures 13.2% and 11% standing in the<br />

middle somewhere.<br />

Following the structure <strong>of</strong> loans, it is noted<br />

that in the Maramures home credits do not<br />

exceed 31.7% <strong>of</strong> total loans to the public. The<br />

explanation could be given by the fact that a<br />

large number <strong>of</strong> Maramures people are<br />

working abroad, money they send being used<br />

primarily to create new residential areas, so<br />

the necessary credits for this area is


smaller. Cluj in turn, has the highest share <strong>of</strong><br />

housing credits in total loans, approximately<br />

42.44%, this being due to increased<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the area in recent years, the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> students who chose Cluj as the city<br />

<strong>of</strong> residence after graduation, relatively high<br />

price <strong>of</strong> real estate in this area compared to<br />

other areas as well as greater employment and<br />

income more consistent work performed by<br />

227<br />

residents in the area. Bistrita, Satu Mare and<br />

Bihor have comparative value <strong>of</strong> real estate<br />

loans in total loans ratio, with values ranging<br />

between 34% and 36%, remarkable being the<br />

fact that in absolute value Bihor is ranked<br />

second after Cluj with a double value total<br />

loans and real estate compared to the other<br />

counties.<br />

Table 3 Information on credit report in the Northwest Region (mil. RON)<br />

Total<br />

credite<br />

Lei şi<br />

valută<br />

Total<br />

restante<br />

Lei şi<br />

valută<br />

Total<br />

credite<br />

populatie<br />

Lei şi<br />

valută<br />

Total<br />

credite<br />

locuinte<br />

Lei şi<br />

valută<br />

Total<br />

depozite la<br />

termen lei şi<br />

valută<br />

Bihor 6071.9 1788.5 2575.8 645.3 2395.8<br />

Bistriţa 2135.5 809 1170.2 290.3 1026.7<br />

Cluj 9197.8 862.8 4694.9 1574.7 5583.6<br />

Maramureş 3107.9 264.5 1445.1 305 1524.9<br />

Satu Mare 2632.1 193.1 1099.4 266.5 1040.1<br />

Source: BNR – Territorial structure <strong>of</strong> non-bank loans and customer deposits<br />

http://www.bnr.ro/Indicatori-agregati-privind-institutiile-de-credit-3368.aspx<br />

Attenuation <strong>of</strong> long distance gaps in the<br />

Northwest region remains a very complex<br />

problem, attempts to decrease it, is bringing<br />

into question, not infrequently contradictory<br />

strategies. Supporting the few remaining<br />

state-owned enterprises in the region could<br />

lead to a revival <strong>of</strong> activity, attracting<br />

attention <strong>of</strong> foreign investors can thus lead to<br />

recovery <strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong> the labor resources <strong>of</strong><br />

the Region.The level <strong>of</strong> resource utilization<br />

services sector should also be carefully<br />

considered.<br />

Expansion and modernization <strong>of</strong> transport<br />

and distribution networks would provide a<br />

further chance to faster development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

North-West by exploiting the growing<br />

regional economic resources available,<br />

intensifying economic relations both intra and<br />

extra regional.<br />

But we can not fail to mention the part state<br />

should play in orchestrating these<br />

measures. Despite the independence <strong>of</strong><br />

regions, they are subordinated to the central<br />

administration, and strategic investment<br />

policy depends to an overwhelming extent <strong>of</strong><br />

it. Only by linking effective measures at<br />

national, regional and local level will<br />

alleviate the sustainable economic gaps.<br />

References:<br />

1. Dascălu, Maria Nicoleta and Cârstea,<br />

Gheorghe. Autonomie locală și dezvoltare<br />

regională. București: Economica, 2009<br />

2. Fometescu, Casiana and Coșea, Mircea .<br />

Dezvoltarea economică regională a României<br />

în condițiile integrării în Uniunea Europeană.<br />

București: Economica, 2008<br />

3. Idu, Pompilia and Bal, Ana. Politica de<br />

dezvoltare regionala a Uniunii Europene :<br />

Implicațiile aplicării ei in Romania.<br />

București: Economica, 2009<br />

4. Agenția de dezvoltare regională Nord-vest.<br />

Accessed May 1, 2011. www.nord-vest.ro<br />

5. Oficiul național al Registrului Comerțului.<br />

Accessed April 30, 2011. http://www.onrc.ro/<br />

6. Banca Națională a României. Accessed 22<br />

aprilie, 2011. www.bnr.ro


7. Bugetul anual al Județului Sălaj. Accessed<br />

April 29, 2011.<br />

http://www.zalausj.ro/ro/informatii/buget201<br />

1.pdf?PHPSESSID=1cjlcooc5mijip9eapnd3uf<br />

6j6<br />

8. Institutul Național de Statistică al<br />

României. Accessed April 29, 2011.<br />

http://www.insse.ro/cms/rw/pages/index.ro.d<br />

o<br />

9. Județul Satu-mare - centralizator investiții.<br />

Accessed April 29, 2011. http://www.satu-<br />

228<br />

mare.ro/fisiere/buget/2011/centraliz_2011_in<br />

vestitii.pdf<br />

10. Comisia Națională de Prognoză.<br />

Accessed April 30, 2011. http://www.cnp.ro/<br />

11. Situația investitorilor în Parcul Industrial<br />

Eurobussines. Accessed April, 12 2011.<br />

http://www.oradea.ro/parcul-industrialeurobusiness-oradea/situatia-investitorilor-inparcul-industrial


ABOUT OTHER KIND OF PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH (HOMO-SAPIENS<br />

TO HOMO-OECONOMICUS)<br />

Jivan Alexandru<br />

Universitatea de Vest din Timişoara Facultatea de Economie şi de Administrare a Afacerilor<br />

Abstract: Part <strong>of</strong> a larger research, this paper ranges among the matter <strong>of</strong> ideas confrontation<br />

concerning the causes <strong>of</strong> the economic crises and those keys to be passed. Paper aims at finding<br />

and praising the defining elements <strong>of</strong> our economy, in the purpose <strong>of</strong> better understanding the<br />

nowadays crisis, and at presenting certain conceptually different approaches. In this purpose,<br />

analytical presentations are focussed on the specific realities <strong>of</strong> the economic life that are in<br />

position in the last centuries, which are considered to be favouring the arriving to the critical states<br />

in the last years and to be promoting those maintaining, or which allow explaining certain effects<br />

and tendencies.<br />

The approach is made from the angle <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> the productivity that is had in view and<br />

highlighted in the market regulating mechanisms, and <strong>of</strong> the due growth. The paper is grounded on<br />

important analysis on the matter (including anterior researches <strong>of</strong> the author), but their dimensions<br />

does not allow their presentation in the abstract. Analysis starts from interpreting the very<br />

nowadays crisis, from different sites concerning the core (general) causes, by correlating with<br />

certain features <strong>of</strong> the industrialized consuming society. More recent references are made in the<br />

literature on the matter. Modern western economy is defined from the angle <strong>of</strong> focussing on<br />

material-quantitative productivity and growth. Analysis tries to explain certain effects concerning<br />

this kind <strong>of</strong> focus. Interesting effects and tendencies are noticed, that miss to the traditional<br />

approaches. Further on an opposed theoretic model is discussed. This is built and developed inside<br />

the service economy (on the case <strong>of</strong> two conceptually similar approaches, came from two different<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> economic thought in the field; original contributions <strong>of</strong> the author are involved).<br />

Adequately to the knowledge society, this last one is considered more favourable for homo sapiens,<br />

at least once the visible effects <strong>of</strong> the last two hundred years model are revealed, which are<br />

dominated by homo oeconomicus. This reference model being set up, a short foray is intuitively<br />

made in the perspectives <strong>of</strong> humanity on long run and on very long time, in the supposed maintain<br />

<strong>of</strong> the present economic model. In all those presentations and analyses, connections are made with<br />

other papers on the matter, in the purpose <strong>of</strong> more pr<strong>of</strong>ound study.<br />

The conclusions concern the practical possibility <strong>of</strong> the model opposed to the industrialist economic<br />

crisis. The details highlighted from the analysis <strong>of</strong> the conceptual comparison between models and<br />

prospections bring, in the final, at proposing solutions, grounded on fundamental requirements on<br />

the line <strong>of</strong> humanity’s values, with didactic addressing to the young generation. The elements <strong>of</strong><br />

contribution <strong>of</strong> the author are underlined in the presented matter.<br />

Keywords: productivity, modern growth, economic crisis, knowledge society, service economy<br />

JEL: A13, H49, I25<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The nowadays crisis looks like a systemic<br />

crisis <strong>of</strong> the whole life <strong>of</strong> humans that was<br />

(and still is) approached in the modern<br />

tidiness, just like in the times <strong>of</strong><br />

industrialization.<br />

229<br />

It looks like humanity arrived to the limits <strong>of</strong><br />

a way <strong>of</strong> living that proved itself to be<br />

destructive for the planet and for the living <strong>of</strong><br />

our own species on a very long time.<br />

That what is certain is that, for Romania, the<br />

crisis is total: Romanian scientific research<br />

rather does no more exists, that we are


integrated in Europe on positions <strong>of</strong> a<br />

marginal country, that Romanians are<br />

importing the most <strong>of</strong> the apples and potatoes<br />

they eat, that our country is in enormous debt<br />

to the foreign banks, that the Romanian<br />

education lost all its chances to come back to<br />

the performances it had two decades ago, that<br />

the health <strong>of</strong> the population is under the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> certain decisions <strong>of</strong> the same (and<br />

rather generalized) principle <strong>of</strong> elimination<br />

(and not <strong>of</strong> construction) etc.<br />

For the analysis <strong>of</strong> Romania’s economy can<br />

be invoked the exceptional book <strong>of</strong> Marius<br />

Băcescu and Dionysius Fota (Băcescu and<br />

Fota, 2009).<br />

In this paper we will bring the discussion<br />

mainly in the field <strong>of</strong> service economy: this<br />

was that what made possible the necessity <strong>of</strong><br />

approaching productivity, efficiency and<br />

growth in widened horizons to be seen. It<br />

happened in the postmodern epoch, when the<br />

traditional view was replaced, by taking into<br />

account certain social aspects and other, more<br />

than the monetary narrow economic. For a<br />

Short Literature Review, please also see the<br />

chapter no. 4.<br />

2. The crisis <strong>of</strong> the world as a capitalist<br />

extensity spread<br />

In opposition with the well-known growing<br />

intensity by industrial means, that is usual<br />

and preached in the theories concerning the<br />

modern world, the consuming society meant<br />

rather a simple spread <strong>of</strong> a model – the<br />

capitalist one – as Issac Johsua shown<br />

(Johsua, 2006). In the chapter 7 „« Nouvelle<br />

économie » ou l'utopie du capital”, the author<br />

we cited spokes about “over-accumulation”<br />

<strong>of</strong> capital, meaning accumulating it in a<br />

rhythm that the economy cannot support, on a<br />

long run, the pr<strong>of</strong>it ratio anticipated by those<br />

who supply the funds. The financial capital <strong>of</strong><br />

the world brought us in crisis, sais Issac<br />

Johsua. This research, published before the<br />

nowadays crisis, spokes about the generating<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> what followed – as we have all<br />

seen. “The crisis <strong>of</strong> «the new economy» was<br />

not surmounted, but only stocked in the<br />

230<br />

accumulated lack <strong>of</strong> equilibrium”, sais the<br />

author at pp. 240. The superficial character,<br />

from the economic point <strong>of</strong> view (founded on<br />

“moment solutions”, having beneficial results<br />

in the short run, but generating spread effects,<br />

including in the long run, aggravating effects)<br />

is exceptionally synthesised when Johsua<br />

shows that, in critical situations, “America<br />

rescued itself just as it lived: on credit. The<br />

pick up again was so realised, not by reducing<br />

certain anterior dysfunctions <strong>of</strong> the American<br />

economy, but contrary, starting from them, by<br />

increasing them.” (pp. 243).<br />

The central goal on the market (and the<br />

criterion <strong>of</strong> “selection” by “competition”) is<br />

the gain, found in computed productivity. The<br />

method consists in cheating models <strong>of</strong><br />

economy, by evading its genuine roles <strong>of</strong> tool<br />

for covering people’s needs; and, by this, the<br />

economy is preached like a goal by itself; the<br />

slogans <strong>of</strong> liberty and <strong>of</strong> “fair competition” in<br />

the economy, but the economy that is<br />

producing those which are really necessary<br />

(economy that was dominant two-three<br />

centuries ago) is let in the outside <strong>of</strong> the<br />

efficiency: there is else that the market<br />

acknowledge and admits as rewarding and<br />

moneymaking; i.e. the gains are from<br />

winning in the “fair” competition, including<br />

the intense exploitation <strong>of</strong> the natural<br />

reserves, speculation etc.<br />

A main result is that primary needs, as food,<br />

and flu and tuberculosis cure) are abandoned<br />

to the market laws, at a subsistence level:<br />

they are maintained in this way in the<br />

”poverty trap” (this matter is developed in our<br />

paper Jivan, 2008).<br />

The existence <strong>of</strong> mass poverty also annulates<br />

or maintains to a minimal level the qualitative<br />

improving trends – which should be<br />

correlated with the increase in the price. The<br />

price increases very much, for relatively low<br />

improvements, for strictly opulent<br />

improvements, for advertising and mostly for<br />

good indicators established by the rate<br />

agencies (which are private firms and have<br />

private interests too); quality decreases for


the low price levels – having as a unique<br />

alternative the total give-up to those supplies.<br />

Prices are judged not in function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

quantities, but according to percentages <strong>of</strong> the<br />

revenues allocated to those buys. So, the<br />

situation (the current, given situation), <strong>of</strong> the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> significant revenues above the<br />

fundamental needs (which can receive the<br />

most varied destinations, it is too little in the<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> improving or increasing<br />

alimentation) generates this marginal state <strong>of</strong><br />

agriculture in the capitals beholders’<br />

economic action options. The issue <strong>of</strong><br />

sponsoring agriculture is a mechanism which<br />

is external to the market, from outside the<br />

free competition, which tries to correct a<br />

situation (fair from the market logics point <strong>of</strong><br />

view), which risks leading to a dangerous<br />

diminishing <strong>of</strong> the agriculture weight in the<br />

entrepreneurs’ options.<br />

The suppliers remain attracted – according to<br />

the market criteria, as well – by the luxury<br />

consumptions segment. Disequilibrium at the<br />

individuals’ level results (Jivan, 2008). The<br />

optimizing system does no longer work, as<br />

well as the self-regulating mechanisms. A<br />

waste <strong>of</strong> values, <strong>of</strong> resources, <strong>of</strong> efforts result;<br />

this generates inflation.<br />

3. Usual perceptions, including in the<br />

periods <strong>of</strong> crisis<br />

It was shown (Jivan, 2010) how, in the<br />

traditional (classical) economic model, pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

and interest are usually seen as varying with<br />

capital amount, economic growth being<br />

generated by material investment, which is<br />

about quantitative growth <strong>of</strong> tools, machines,<br />

money and other forms <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

employment for production which generates<br />

quantitative growth <strong>of</strong> production. But the<br />

economic growth can be better generated by<br />

growing returns: productivity and the quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> being lucrative are given by innovation,<br />

information, knowledge, science, brains,<br />

including the results <strong>of</strong> human capital<br />

formation and education; growth is varying<br />

with inter-relational growth and with<br />

intellectual factor. (Jivan, 1995).<br />

231<br />

The usual angle <strong>of</strong> approach and level <strong>of</strong><br />

analysis is that <strong>of</strong> the accountants’ books, as<br />

well as the source <strong>of</strong> data; but in the<br />

accountancy books <strong>of</strong> business, the place <strong>of</strong><br />

such services may be less important than the<br />

place industry takes, even if the genuine<br />

essential generation <strong>of</strong> things has another<br />

logics (from Jivan, 2009). The understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> the economists must go above the<br />

businessmen’s reasoning.<br />

Such a wrong approach is also in certain<br />

government policies concerning education<br />

and scientific research. Unfortunately they let<br />

us see the state <strong>of</strong> our country.<br />

We discussed the materialist fallacy<br />

(classical, or Marxist); it is a big mistake to<br />

see mostly the expenditures in services (and<br />

blame them all as a whole), because <strong>of</strong> their<br />

immateriality – proving lack <strong>of</strong><br />

understanding. We have also seen the<br />

consumption fallacy (Keynesian). They are as<br />

fallacious as any other exaggerations, like any<br />

speculating production, aiming exclusively to<br />

gain, with no respect for its environment<br />

(Mother Nature, social, moral environment).<br />

Any activity can be destructive (Jivan, 2010).<br />

But at aggregate economy scale (national,<br />

world-wide), useful performances are mutual,<br />

mostly, one way or another, at least by the<br />

mediation <strong>of</strong> the generalized market (see here<br />

our synthesis on the market as global<br />

servicing, in Jivan 1996).<br />

Knowledge society implies an opened minded<br />

view and an interdisciplinary vision, which<br />

are superior to the narrow economic<br />

approach, including the care for the social<br />

problem, for the planetary environment and<br />

such like, among which moral-institutional<br />

aspects are also important. Even production<br />

and consume are replaced with “functioning”<br />

and with the creation <strong>of</strong> utility; and the place<br />

<strong>of</strong> immaterial activities is really central.<br />

The choice between ways should not be a<br />

dilemma: the best permanent answer is<br />

aureea mediocritas, the equilibrium and<br />

avoiding any extreme and narrow view.<br />

4. An opposite model


On the line <strong>of</strong> research opened by service<br />

economy, observations, critics and proposals<br />

were made at micro as well as macroeconomic<br />

levels. Between those many<br />

research, we mention here only these realized<br />

by Jean-Claude Delaunay, Jean Gadrey (like<br />

particularly Delaunay, Gadrey, 1987 and<br />

Gadrey, 1992 and others), Jacques de Bandt<br />

(De Bandt, 1991), Orio Giarini (particularly<br />

Giarini, Stahel, 1993 and Giarini and<br />

Lauberge, 1997), André Barcet, Joel<br />

Bonnamy and many other authors<br />

(particularly the papers in Revue d'Economie<br />

Industrielle - no. 43, 1988).<br />

Jean Gadrey (Gadrey, 2010) criticizes the<br />

industrialized economy, speaking (at pp. 88)<br />

about the “double dictatorship”, (i) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world markets (that are not regulated) and (ii)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the agricultural “liberal-productivist”<br />

politics. He requires a more complex analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the productivity <strong>of</strong> an industrialized<br />

production process: not just the growing<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> the modern tools and<br />

machines, but also the time <strong>of</strong> work<br />

consumed for their fabrication should<br />

supplementary be recorded as a cost; a cost<br />

that should not be ignored. He also proposes<br />

the deduction <strong>of</strong> the estimated value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

big damages involved by industrialized and<br />

chemical production (including in food) and<br />

long distances transport: those damages<br />

should diminish the pretended growth that<br />

modern industrialized productions pretend<br />

realize.<br />

Gadrey argues (pp 85-86) that the usual<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> growth and productivity is<br />

interested only by the quantitative aspects,<br />

making no difference between an output that<br />

is protective for Mother Nature, not-polluting,<br />

ecologic, on one hand, and an output based<br />

on big consumes and waste <strong>of</strong> energy and less<br />

healthy for humans or even worse.<br />

Gadrey spokes about the fact that an investing<br />

economic activity and a consuming one are<br />

considered to be „equivalent” in the<br />

numerical usual analyzes. There is a<br />

comparison made by quantitative criteria,<br />

232<br />

with no respect to the qualitative and more<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ound aspects.<br />

All those critics and recommendations are<br />

revealing critical aspects <strong>of</strong> the usual<br />

productivity and growth models. In contrast<br />

with the usual (growing, industrialist) model,<br />

he proposes, in his large-hearted approach, a<br />

new one, using a “new type” <strong>of</strong> progress, the<br />

true progress, pr<strong>of</strong>ound, not just superficially<br />

quantitative and not only on the short run.<br />

Another approach is that <strong>of</strong> servicity,<br />

proposed like an extension or even a rebuff to<br />

productivity, at The 9th Seminar on the<br />

Service Economy (PROGRES – Programme<br />

<strong>of</strong> Research in the Economics <strong>of</strong> Services,<br />

A.S.E.C) in Geneva, September, 6 th -7 th ,<br />

1993. Firstly included in a paper published in<br />

the review <strong>of</strong> Services World Forum (Jivan,<br />

1993), the concept was later developed in<br />

other papers and books. The concept <strong>of</strong><br />

servicity is grounded on the point <strong>of</strong> view in<br />

the modern marketing optics and on service<br />

economics.<br />

The concept we call servicity would mean<br />

exactly the effective intrinsic productivity,<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> human activity consisting in<br />

generating general and absolute plusses. It is<br />

in opposition with computed productivity,<br />

generating palpable concrete plus to the<br />

concerned individual, therefore relatively to a<br />

specific economic agent (with no concern<br />

with the rest <strong>of</strong> the world, with the ensemble)<br />

Such approaches prepared the conceptual<br />

field for the European requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge society and knowledge based<br />

economy, <strong>of</strong> more seriously taking into<br />

account the natural and social environment.<br />

Ulterior, the ideas were developed, and<br />

between the most recent exemplificative<br />

research we mention those on innovation,<br />

productivity and performance, <strong>of</strong> Faïz Gallouj<br />

(Gadrey and Gallouj, 2002, Gallouj and<br />

Djellal, 2010), Faridah Djellal (Djellal and<br />

Gallouj, 2008) and others.<br />

As concerns the matter <strong>of</strong> indicators, between<br />

the preoccupations in the field, we limit us to<br />

mention only about the important European<br />

project known (shortly) under the name <strong>of</strong>


Stiglitz – one <strong>of</strong> the two big Nobel Laureates<br />

economists who are mastering, together with<br />

Amartya Sen, those research, to what work<br />

numerous and other big specialists.<br />

5. Long term prospects <strong>of</strong> humanity<br />

Mankind should see that, in business practice,<br />

the narrow pursuing <strong>of</strong> the goals <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

(and calculated productivity growth) and the<br />

interest and gaining principles, brought us in<br />

the position <strong>of</strong> buying the water from stores<br />

(please see the developments <strong>of</strong> the matter in<br />

Jivan, 2011), and there already are first signs<br />

<strong>of</strong> buying also the air (another vital genuine<br />

resource) on the market in a foreseeable<br />

future. The bear conditions for life are<br />

sacrificed for gaining more money. In these<br />

conditions, mankind should apply another<br />

widening <strong>of</strong> horizons, like Marshall made<br />

(please also see our Jivan, 2011, where from<br />

is the presentation here): the impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> people on the environment, the<br />

impact on Mother Nature and, implicitly on<br />

its own future (on a longer time that market<br />

can appropriately manage) should be<br />

considered.<br />

Humans can already see that the most<br />

important must be the entire existent (the<br />

notions <strong>of</strong> Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen can<br />

be used or Gheorghe Popescu’s „the Joint<br />

Living Whole”, in Popescu, 2006), including<br />

the environment, and the utility and costs, for<br />

it, <strong>of</strong> the output, <strong>of</strong> the whole economic<br />

activity and <strong>of</strong> any human act. People should<br />

no more use only the individualist approach,<br />

and should take into account not only the<br />

economic actors (both buyer and seller), but<br />

also the others, directly involved and not<br />

involved, present and not present, the entire<br />

environment <strong>of</strong> the persons directly decisive<br />

in the trade, from the most comprehensive<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view: in the space as well as in the<br />

time dimensions. It includes the whole human<br />

society, Mother Nature, the Planet, the notyet-born<br />

generations. And it takes into<br />

account different means and fields <strong>of</strong> action<br />

in the human society.<br />

233<br />

Centuries <strong>of</strong> industrialism and market<br />

domination passed and the effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

market values (determined by short and<br />

medium interests and regulated on the long<br />

run only by mercantile criterion – costs, gain<br />

and pr<strong>of</strong>it) become to let be seen the planet<br />

destruction.<br />

In such a widened approach, firstly the<br />

economic science (and, by time, all humans)<br />

should take into account the costs and effects<br />

for all the parts <strong>of</strong> the reality that are affected,<br />

even if they are active or passive parts, even<br />

if they wanted or wanted not to participate to<br />

the processes <strong>of</strong> humans’ economy, even if<br />

they were not warned or they did not know at<br />

least that they are involved in the economic<br />

process and effects, even if they are present<br />

or not yet born.<br />

Furthering what Marshall made, we could<br />

surpassed the strictly economic angle <strong>of</strong><br />

perceiving reality, which proved already to be<br />

also too narrow: we should introduce a third<br />

category <strong>of</strong> time, for having a more complete<br />

comprehension <strong>of</strong> events, in space and also in<br />

the historic view. The short run and long run<br />

must be completed with the very long term,<br />

proving the historical capacity <strong>of</strong> perception<br />

<strong>of</strong> our human species. In the post-modern<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> realities, humans must<br />

already have the clear-sightedness to accept<br />

that if the same way <strong>of</strong> living is persistently<br />

pursued, no chance will remain.<br />

Georgescu-Roegen hardly tried to teach us<br />

about another kind <strong>of</strong> economics we should<br />

study, learn, teach and apply, but he was<br />

marginalized (Georgescu-Roegen, 2009) –<br />

may be precisely because <strong>of</strong> this attitude.


6. What can we, still, make?<br />

In despite <strong>of</strong> the usual principles <strong>of</strong><br />

competition (invocate also by the economic<br />

traditionalist approach – still dominant), the<br />

special human (superior to the strict<br />

economic and short run) principles are<br />

surviving, (even in poorness or in societies<br />

what are week from the economic point <strong>of</strong><br />

view), like also a big enough number <strong>of</strong> their<br />

bearers and preachers. Their extension and<br />

spreading is not an exception, but a tendency,<br />

mostly in the knowledge society: it is and<br />

should be consistent with it.<br />

The mercantile values represent just a tool<br />

and must remain a tool. In our times, homosapiens<br />

must now show his superior<br />

knowledge and thinking: superior and much<br />

more widen than the simple economic one.<br />

And must teach and widen the mind <strong>of</strong> homooeconomicus<br />

too. This is the fight <strong>of</strong> our<br />

times. The task is in the field <strong>of</strong> learning and<br />

<strong>of</strong> teaching the young generations, not in the<br />

spirit <strong>of</strong> private speculation, but in the team<br />

spirit <strong>of</strong> work, care and concern for the whole<br />

environment, as a common good for living. A<br />

superior rationality must be put in.<br />

The economic functioning can be oriented on<br />

realizing the general well-being and on<br />

attending the interests <strong>of</strong> the whole human<br />

society, exactly and just by a well-considered<br />

and well-settled legislation – which points out<br />

the optimizing valences <strong>of</strong> the market<br />

mechanisms. (Jivan, 2009).<br />

Science has the new task <strong>of</strong> knowing how and<br />

when the market mechanisms act in an<br />

improving direction: “how and when” means<br />

the legal conditions requested (that society<br />

should settle). A superior outlook upon the<br />

final (compensated) results <strong>of</strong> the efforts and<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> any human activities is necessary.<br />

Efficiency should not be no more narrowly<br />

limited by the economic criteria, but should<br />

concern the best for the person, for the<br />

society, for the world, balanced between the<br />

present and the future. Taking into account<br />

the disequilibrium we spoke about, we<br />

propose analytical studies concerning a<br />

certain criteria system in the matter.<br />

234<br />

Bibliography<br />

1.Băcescu Marius and Fota Dyonisus. The<br />

Economic Crisis in Romania’s 2009 (in<br />

Romanian). Bucharest: Universitară<br />

Publishing House, 2009.<br />

2.De Bandt, Jaques. Les services, productivité<br />

et prix. Paris: Economica Pulishing House,<br />

1991.<br />

3.Delaunay, Jean-Claude and Gadrey, Jean.<br />

Les enjeux de la societé de service. Paris:<br />

Presses de la Fondation Nationale des<br />

Sciences Politiques Publishing House, 1987.<br />

4.Garey, Jean. L'économie des services.Paris:<br />

La Decouverte Publishing House, 1992<br />

5.Djellal, Faridah and Gallouj, Faïz.<br />

Measuring and Improving Productivity in<br />

Services. Issues, Strategies and Challenges.,<br />

Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA:<br />

Edward Elgar, 2008.<br />

6.Gadrey, Jean. Adieu à la croissance. Bien<br />

vivre dans un monde solidaire. Paris: Les<br />

petits matins/Alternatives Économiques,<br />

2010.<br />

7.Gadrey, Jean and Gallouj, Faïz (Edited by).<br />

Productivity, Innovation and Knowledge in<br />

Services. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton,<br />

MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2002.<br />

8.Gallouj, Faïz and Djellal, Faridah (Edited<br />

by). The Handbook <strong>of</strong> Innovation and<br />

Services. A Multi-disciplinary Perspective.<br />

Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: ,<br />

Edward Elgar, 2010.<br />

9.Georgescu-Roegen, Nicolas. The Entropy<br />

Law and Economic Process. Bucharest:<br />

National Bank Publishing House, 2009.<br />

10.Giarini, Orio and Stahel, Walter R. The<br />

limits to Certainty, Facing Risks in the New<br />

Service Economy. International Studies in the<br />

Service Economy, 2nd Revised Edition,<br />

1993.<br />

11.Giarini, Orio and Loubergé, Henry. Les<br />

rendements décroissants de la technologie.<br />

Paris: Dunod, 1979.<br />

12.Jivan, Alexandru. “Completions to<br />

Marshallian Out-Look, Consistent with<br />

Knowledge Based Economy”. Timisoara<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics, no. 13(2011).


13.Jivan, Alexandru. „Do People (no longer)<br />

Need Food? A Few Reflections on the Market<br />

Mechanisms and Their Effects” (paper<br />

translated in English by Adina Popovici),<br />

Caiete de drept Internaţional, Anul VI<br />

(2008): 153-158.<br />

14.Jivan, Alexandru. “Two Fallacies in<br />

Approaching the Current Crisis”. REBS<br />

(Review <strong>of</strong> Economic & Business Studies),<br />

3(2009), Special Issue: 85-104.<br />

15.Jivan, Alexandru. “Major<br />

Misunderstandings in Economic Crises, in the<br />

Light <strong>of</strong> Knowledge Society”. In proceedings<br />

<strong>of</strong> International Conference “European<br />

Integration - New Challenges for the<br />

Romanian Economy” - 6th Edition,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Publishing House,<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, May 28-29, 2010: 633.<br />

235<br />

16.Jivan, Alexandru. Modern Services – a<br />

Challenge for the Economic Theory and<br />

Practice (in Romanian). Timisoara: Mirton<br />

Publishing House, 1996.<br />

17.Jivan, Alexandru. The Intellectual Tertiary<br />

Sector Economics (in Romanian). Timisoara:<br />

Mirton Publishing House, 1995.<br />

18.Jivan, Alexandru. “Services and<br />

Servicity”. SWF Bulletin, no. 3-4 (Jully-<br />

December 1993): 16-24.<br />

19.Johsua, Issac. Une trajectoire du capital:<br />

de la crise de 1929 à celle de la nouvelle<br />

économie, Paris: Syllapse Publishing House,<br />

2006.<br />

20.Popescu, Constantin. Rationality and<br />

Hope. The Paradigm <strong>of</strong> the Entire Living<br />

Whole (in Romanian), Bucharest:<br />

Renaissance Publishing House, 2006.<br />

21.Revue d'Economie Industrielle. 43(1988).


236


THE POTENTIAL OF FEMALE ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS A REGIONAL<br />

GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT ENGINE IN THE WESTERN ROMANIA<br />

Pop Cohuț Ioana<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />

Abstract: Starting from the objectives, activities, and the results <strong>of</strong> the empirical, quantitative, and<br />

qualitative research carried out in the AntrES project (AntrES - Project acronym "Entrepreneurship<br />

and Equal Opportunities. A new school for women entrepreneurship" – Antreprenoriatul şi<br />

egalitatea de şanse. Un nou model de şcoală antreprenorială pentru femei), during the two years <strong>of</strong><br />

implementation, in the Western Romania referring to the new businesses start up; business<br />

development; the motivation and difficulties <strong>of</strong> female entrepreneurs and potentially enterprising<br />

women; <strong>of</strong> their perceptions regarding the need for entrepreneurship education, the role <strong>of</strong> female<br />

entrepreneurship promotion and the impact <strong>of</strong> the successful models on new businesses start up –<br />

this paper presents directions <strong>of</strong> action meant to emphasize and support the potential <strong>of</strong> the female<br />

entrepreneurship in Romania, as a regional growth and development engine.<br />

Keywords: women entrepreneurship, new businesses start up, regional development<br />

JEL Codes: B54, H81, M13, M21, R11, R28, R53, R58<br />

REL Codes: 13C, 14D, 14 K, 16H , 18F, 18G, 20J<br />

The potential <strong>of</strong> female entrepreneurship –<br />

as a research subject<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the potential <strong>of</strong> female<br />

entrepreneurship in Romania starts from the<br />

premise that encouraging and supporting new<br />

businesses is one <strong>of</strong> the most important<br />

economic and social activities due to the<br />

impact on economic growth, innovation, job<br />

creation and the rise <strong>of</strong> living standards<br />

(Brush Candida et al., 2007). The literature in<br />

the field shows that women play an important<br />

role in the economic activity in many <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world’s economies (Minitti et al., 2005, apud<br />

Brush Candida et al., 2007). According to<br />

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM,<br />

Reynols et al., 2003), women represent 33%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the total <strong>of</strong> those initiating a business, with<br />

variations from a country to another<br />

according to cultural factors, natural and<br />

industrial resources together with the policies<br />

meant to stimulate the entrepreneurship and<br />

the attitude and faith in the female<br />

entrepreneurship. Although the number <strong>of</strong><br />

business women is increasing, the rate <strong>of</strong><br />

female self-employment is systematically<br />

237<br />

lower than that <strong>of</strong> men (Schimidt and Parker,<br />

2003, apud Brindley Clare, 2007).<br />

For Romania, studies show that for all the<br />

development regions, the most important<br />

problems in stimulating the spirit <strong>of</strong> female<br />

entrepreneurship are the low density <strong>of</strong><br />

SMEs, the limited entrepreneurial culture, the<br />

reduced entrepreneurial spirit, especially<br />

among women and mainly in the rural area,<br />

the lack <strong>of</strong> programmes promoting<br />

entrepreneurship, especially female<br />

entrepreneurship, the lack <strong>of</strong> programmes<br />

supporting self-employment initiatives.<br />

Taking into consideration these aspects, our<br />

research is trying to emphasise that through<br />

measures educating the entrepreneurial<br />

culture among women – as a determining<br />

factor <strong>of</strong> self-employment, the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

those setting up a business may increase<br />

significantly with a direct impact on the<br />

regional development. In our opinion, this<br />

aspect is significant, taking into account that<br />

we are referring to a single measure – that <strong>of</strong><br />

educating and motivating the female<br />

entrepreneurial spirit which can, correlated


with measures supporting the access to<br />

financing, improving the social assistance<br />

system and especially supporting children’s<br />

raise and education (Brindley Clare, 2007),<br />

lifelong learning (Drumond, 2004),<br />

supporting the development <strong>of</strong> the business<br />

(Brindley Clare, 2007), promoting the female<br />

entrepreneurship by successful business<br />

women, promoting good practices, determine<br />

the significant increase <strong>of</strong> this objective,<br />

underlying the still unexploited potential <strong>of</strong><br />

Romanian female entrepreneurship.<br />

Objectives and directions <strong>of</strong> action – aspects<br />

regarding the research methodology<br />

Taking into consideration these premises, our<br />

research was delineated on at least three<br />

directions, <strong>of</strong> those mentioned above, that is:<br />

- to ensure the female entrepreneurial<br />

education for the support <strong>of</strong> new business<br />

start up;<br />

- to support the development <strong>of</strong> already<br />

initiated businesses;<br />

- to promote and motivate the female<br />

entrepreneurship.<br />

Our three objectives could be materialised by<br />

implementing the project “Entrepreneurship<br />

and Equality <strong>of</strong> Chances. An Inter-regional<br />

Model <strong>of</strong> Entrepreneurial School for<br />

Women” (acronym AntrES), implemented in<br />

the North-Western and Western Regions <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania (counties Maramureş, Satu Mare,<br />

Bihor, Arad, Timiş, Caraş-Severin) 32 , which<br />

had as objectives, among others:<br />

- to provide training in order to acquire<br />

capabilities in the field <strong>of</strong> business start<br />

up; to provide training in the field <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneurial culture formation and<br />

promotion, in order to improve the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> knowledge regarding a<br />

successful business initiation,<br />

organization, and working;<br />

- to provide training for women in the<br />

field <strong>of</strong> business administration and<br />

development and to favour the<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> the entrepreneurial<br />

32 For more information, see www.antres.ro<br />

238<br />

spirit within the SMEs having women<br />

as managers or administrators;<br />

- to promote and stimulate the<br />

entrepreneurial spirit among women so<br />

that they can behave as active<br />

entrepreneurs; to promote active<br />

learning, lifelong learning, including<br />

the e-learning methods and techniques;<br />

to promote the competition spirit by<br />

organizing contests and awarding the<br />

best business plans.<br />

AntrES project addressed a number <strong>of</strong> 1800<br />

women <strong>of</strong> the six counties situated along the<br />

Romanian Western border, grouped into three<br />

target groups. The first target group is made<br />

up <strong>of</strong> 288 women, SME managers, wishing to<br />

develop their business, from the counties<br />

situated along the Romanian Western border<br />

(Maramureş, Satu-Mare, Bihor, Arad, Timiş,<br />

Caraş-Severin). It concerns, at the level <strong>of</strong><br />

each county, a number <strong>of</strong> 48 women<br />

managers who have been trained in the town<br />

where they work, as it follows: 24 at the<br />

territorial centre situated in the county capital<br />

city and 24 at the level <strong>of</strong> local centres (6 for<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the 4 local centres in each county),<br />

respectively a total <strong>of</strong> 288 women in all 6<br />

counties. For this target group the project had<br />

in view the improvement <strong>of</strong> the intra- and<br />

entrepreneurial managerial skills in order to<br />

develop the existing business, to optimally<br />

use the opportunities existing on the market,<br />

the success factors increasing competitivity,<br />

the management and marketing strategies etc.<br />

and the promotion <strong>of</strong> the adaptability, with<br />

effects on the performance, stability <strong>of</strong> SMEs<br />

and the employment level. The second target<br />

group is made up <strong>of</strong> 1440 women wishing to<br />

start up their own business, in the counties<br />

situated along the Western Romanian border<br />

(Maramureş, Satu-Mare, Bihor, Arad, Timiş,<br />

Caraş-Severin). It concerns, at the level <strong>of</strong><br />

each county, a number <strong>of</strong> 240 women, trained<br />

where they live, as it follows: 24 at the<br />

territorial centre situated in the county capital<br />

city and 72 at the level <strong>of</strong> local centres (18 for<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the 4 local centres in each county),<br />

144 at the level <strong>of</strong> rural centres (12 for each


<strong>of</strong> the 12 rural centres in each county),<br />

respectively a total <strong>of</strong> 1440 women from all<br />

the 6 counties. For this target group the<br />

project had in view the formation <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneurial culture, the increase <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ability to transform business ideas into actual<br />

actions, by providing the necessary<br />

information regarding the business<br />

environment and the local existing<br />

opportunities, the drawing up <strong>of</strong> a business<br />

plan, the organization and carry out <strong>of</strong> a<br />

successful business etc. and by services<br />

supporting the initiation <strong>of</strong> a business, having<br />

as effect the generation <strong>of</strong> an increased<br />

number <strong>of</strong> businesses, both in the urban and<br />

in the rural areas. The third target group is<br />

made up <strong>of</strong> 72 women, last year students in<br />

Economics who have been trained to become<br />

coordinators in the entrepreneurial field and<br />

who currently have a job as rural<br />

coordinators in the project. It concerns, at<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> each county, a number <strong>of</strong> 12<br />

women, selected from in the partner<br />

university centres, respectively a total <strong>of</strong> 72<br />

coordinators at the level <strong>of</strong> the 6 six counties.<br />

For this target group the project had in view<br />

the acquisition <strong>of</strong> the coordinator skills in the<br />

field <strong>of</strong> business start up, the increase <strong>of</strong> these<br />

people’s capacity to become promoters <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneurship, as well as the increase <strong>of</strong><br />

the awareness and promotion <strong>of</strong> the positive<br />

attitude to entrepreneurial culture and to <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

services supporting the start up <strong>of</strong> a business.<br />

Research study and results<br />

To reach the three objectives mentioned<br />

previously, the activities carried out in the six<br />

counties in the implementation area on three<br />

levels: territorial, local, and rural, were<br />

channelled on the following directions:<br />

1. The organization <strong>of</strong> courses in the<br />

Entrepreneurial school for women, Start<br />

up <strong>of</strong> Business – courses attended by a<br />

total number <strong>of</strong> 1512 women; the impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> these training activities in the<br />

entrepreneurial field on women wishing<br />

to start up their own business can be seen<br />

in the openness regarding the training<br />

239<br />

activities, the avowal <strong>of</strong> the need for<br />

entrepreneurial education and counselling<br />

“The courses <strong>of</strong> Entrepreneurial School<br />

have been for me the first encounter with<br />

economic theory... I have acquired a<br />

theoretical basis which, collocated with<br />

the already existing practice, form a solid<br />

basis for the business I want to start up.”<br />

(Meluţ Corina, Oradea, Bihor); “... this<br />

course represented an important<br />

opportunity being provided with all the<br />

latest necessary information in order to<br />

start up a business. The form <strong>of</strong><br />

presenting the information was clear,<br />

concise, and mostly accessible... the<br />

project team has had the highest<br />

contribution ... which provided the<br />

necessary counselling, during the entire<br />

learning process ... the knowledge<br />

acquired here will represent an<br />

important support in my future business.<br />

((Roiban Roxana, Timişoara, Timiş); “...<br />

to accumulate new knowledge, to deepen<br />

new concepts, to better assess the<br />

qualities a female entrepreneur needs<br />

and, with the help <strong>of</strong> the business plan, to<br />

evaluate the business we wish to start up<br />

... it has greatly facilitated the<br />

communication and interconnection<br />

among us...” (Vărguţa Marta, Arad,<br />

Arad); the opportunity <strong>of</strong> training<br />

activities for personal development “It<br />

has been an opportunity which helped us<br />

to make n important step for my<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional development. I have<br />

discovered managerial qualities that I<br />

did not know I had .... (Tanko Erika, Satu<br />

Mare, Maramureş).<br />

2. The organization <strong>of</strong> courses at the<br />

Entrepreneurial school for women,<br />

Business Development – courses attended<br />

by a total number <strong>of</strong> 288 women<br />

managers <strong>of</strong> the six counties. The impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> the training activities on the women<br />

managers is also significant: personal<br />

development: “.... it helped me rediscover<br />

myself and develop pr<strong>of</strong>essionally. These<br />

courses have taught me how to present


myself pr<strong>of</strong>essionally, my knowledge and<br />

experience acquired through practice”<br />

(Dăncescu Livia, Oradea, Bihor); the<br />

opportunity to meet successful women<br />

managers and to share the experience and<br />

difficulties <strong>of</strong> running a business “...the<br />

experts invited shared aspects from their<br />

own successful experience, which has<br />

been beneficial for me.” (Anton<br />

Maricica, Timişoara, Timiş); the desire<br />

to improve, motivation and reciprocal<br />

encouragement “....I have had the<br />

opportunity to learn new things, which<br />

are <strong>of</strong> real help to me both in running<br />

the business that I currently have and in<br />

assessing the business I want to set up.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> action learning method<br />

allowed us to discuss with the other<br />

business women about the achievements<br />

and hardships we had encountered when<br />

running our businesses, to share our<br />

common experiences to the women<br />

wishing to start up a business ....” (Taşcă<br />

Carmen, Arad, Arad); “...the theoretical<br />

part and the practical studies, too ... have<br />

helped me involve and motivate the<br />

partners through a positive control <strong>of</strong> the<br />

business, each trying to understand that<br />

that the performance <strong>of</strong> a firm is not only<br />

revenues but other factors such as<br />

financial control factors, employees and<br />

generally the performance <strong>of</strong> the entire<br />

activity”. (Azap Mihaela, Reşiţa, Caraş<br />

Severin); “... women were poorly<br />

represented in the business environment,<br />

stimulating and encouraging through this<br />

course the women’s initiative regarding<br />

the development and initiation <strong>of</strong> their<br />

own businesses in order to acquire<br />

financial independence and to bravely<br />

enter the business world ...” (Laza<br />

Doina, Satu Mare, Satu Mare).<br />

The integration <strong>of</strong> the Action Learning [1]<br />

method in the AntrES Entrepreneurial<br />

School, for both categories <strong>of</strong> courses –<br />

Business Start up and Business Development,<br />

had in view the achievement <strong>of</strong> the objectives<br />

proposed beyond the simple supply <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong><br />

240<br />

knowledge for the initiation, development or<br />

support <strong>of</strong> the business, by determining the<br />

change based on learning, in the real meaning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the word. The use <strong>of</strong> the action learning<br />

method “with and from the others”, by<br />

forming mixed sets (groups) – made up <strong>of</strong><br />

women <strong>of</strong> all the three target groups: women<br />

managers <strong>of</strong> their own business wishing to<br />

develop it, women wishing to start up their<br />

own business and last year students in<br />

Economics, who have been trained and have<br />

become coordinators in the field <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneurship; therefore, women with and<br />

without any entrepreneurial experience, in<br />

different stages <strong>of</strong> knowledge and<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship. Within<br />

these sets, women have been encouraged to<br />

discuss freely, based on the subjects<br />

suggested by the course book and<br />

applications, and also from the perspective <strong>of</strong><br />

their own experience, being stimulated to<br />

share their own problems and to mutually<br />

give advice to each other, to ask and answer,<br />

being an inspiration for the others, mutually<br />

motivating, learning from each other. In<br />

completing and stimulating the use <strong>of</strong> this<br />

method, an external expert, preferably a wellknown<br />

woman entrepreneur or a woman with<br />

well-known pr<strong>of</strong>essional capabilities was<br />

invited for the subject tackled, at the level <strong>of</strong><br />

that particular city or village, willing to share<br />

with the course participants her success story<br />

or her own experience in the field.<br />

3. The organization <strong>of</strong> the contest “My<br />

Business Plan”, where all the 1800<br />

trained women participated. The contest<br />

“My Business Plan!” was organized on<br />

three levels, in order to evaluate, select,<br />

emphasize, promote, and award the best<br />

Business plans made by the course<br />

attendants trained in the project. The<br />

contest was open to all the participants to<br />

the training activities from the target<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> the project, that is a total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> 1800 women. It took place in<br />

2010 in three phases, thus: 1st Phase –<br />

Levels: territorial – selection / interregional<br />

– prize award; 2nd Phase –


Levels: local – selection / territorial –<br />

prize award; 3rd Phase – Levels: rural –<br />

selection / territorial – prize award. Each<br />

<strong>of</strong> the phases <strong>of</strong> the contest “ My<br />

Business Plan!” had 2 stages:<br />

� Highlighting the business plans – a<br />

stage where all the business plans<br />

entered the competition, business<br />

plans made by the women selected in<br />

the target group in the<br />

Entrepreneurial school for women, a<br />

stage in which, after the Evaluation<br />

Commissions evaluated the business<br />

plans, 50% <strong>of</strong> the business plans<br />

from the urban areas were<br />

highlighted and 30% from the rural<br />

areas. The highlighting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

business plans was made by giving<br />

diplomas. The business plans have<br />

been promoted on the site <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project www.antres.ro in the section<br />

AntrES Winners – The Presentation<br />

Catalogue <strong>of</strong> the Winners, 1st, 2nd<br />

and 3rd Phase 33 , and through massmedia<br />

during the actions meant to<br />

ensure the visibility <strong>of</strong> the project,<br />

information and advertising<br />

regarding the project. As a result <strong>of</strong><br />

this stage, a total number <strong>of</strong> 724<br />

women from the three target groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> the project were highlighted and<br />

promoted, 387 from the urban area<br />

and 337 from the rural area, as well<br />

as the business plans made by them<br />

at the Entrepreneurial school for<br />

women.<br />

� Awarding the business plans, a stage<br />

where only the business plans<br />

recommended in the previous stage<br />

participated. After the contest at this<br />

level, out <strong>of</strong> the 724 business plans<br />

33 See www.antres.ro, Catalogue <strong>of</strong> AntrES Winners<br />

1st phase – territorial level selection / inter-regional<br />

level prize award; Catalogue <strong>of</strong> AntrES Winners 2nd<br />

phase – local level – selection / territorial level –<br />

prize award, Catalogue <strong>of</strong> AntrES Winners 3rd<br />

phase - rural level – selection / local level – prize<br />

award.<br />

241<br />

highlighted and promoted, a total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> 408 business plans were<br />

recommended to be awarded. These<br />

plans entered the 2nd phase <strong>of</strong><br />

evaluation, after which 111 women<br />

wishing to start up their own<br />

business were awarded, with<br />

minimum amounts necessary to<br />

initiate the business (amounts<br />

ranging between 1000 and 2000 lei).<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> organizing this contest and the<br />

activity to promote the female<br />

entrepreneurship have determined then<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> the motivation among women<br />

wishing to start up a business, which has<br />

determined the setting up <strong>of</strong> total number <strong>of</strong><br />

180 businesses in the six counties where the<br />

project was implemented.<br />

Taking into account the demonstrated impact<br />

on the female entrepreneurship <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneurial education, <strong>of</strong> the models, <strong>of</strong><br />

the learning from the other’s experience,<br />

success or mistakes, by using the Action<br />

Learning method , mainly characterised by<br />

Learning with and from the others, the<br />

AntrES Entrepreneurial School had in view –<br />

and we believe it succeeded – to help the<br />

women mangers to better understand their<br />

business, to develop it and to become real<br />

entrepreneurs, the women wishing to start up<br />

their own business to give them the necessary<br />

courage and force to attract and mobilize<br />

resources in order to become entrepreneurs,<br />

and the young coordinators in the field <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneurship to transform them into<br />

promoters <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship from<br />

conviction and not from necessity.<br />

This paper represents an attempt to contribute<br />

to the increase <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

entrepreneurial potential in the Western<br />

Romania and not only, the encouragement <strong>of</strong><br />

female entrepreneurship, an instrument to<br />

disseminate knowledge, information and<br />

practical experience resulted from this<br />

project.<br />

Acknowledgments:


This paper was made in the project<br />

“Entrepreneurship and the Equality <strong>of</strong><br />

Chances. An Inter-regional Model <strong>of</strong> Women<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Entrepreneurship” (acronym<br />

AntrES), a strategic project co-financed by<br />

the Social European Fund, Sectoral<br />

Operational Programme Human Resources<br />

Development 2007-2013, “Investing in<br />

people!”, Priority Axis 3 “Increasing<br />

adaptability <strong>of</strong> workers and enterprises”,<br />

Major Intervention Domain 3. 1 “Promoting<br />

entrepreneurial culture”, Contract:<br />

POSDRU/9I/3.1/S/5 (grant value<br />

12,500,104,00 lei), which took place between<br />

5.01.2009 - 5.01.2011 under the coordination<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Oradea, in partnership with: West University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Timişoara; “Aurel Vlaicu” University,<br />

Arad; North University <strong>of</strong> Baia-Mare;<br />

“Eftimie Murgu” University, Reşiţa;<br />

Commercial Academy <strong>of</strong> Satu Mare;<br />

Management Scientific Society <strong>of</strong> Romania<br />

and The National Agency for Equal<br />

Opportunities between Women and Men;<br />

website: www.antres.ro.<br />

242<br />

Notes:<br />

1. According to the Action Learning method<br />

(“Learning with and through action”), the<br />

difference between to know and to understand<br />

is the following: to know means to be capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> doing it; to understand means to be<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> changing the reality that you<br />

understood. Learning means Progress, which<br />

in its turn represents our capacity to produce<br />

the Change into better. The use <strong>of</strong> the Action<br />

Learning method starts from the premise,<br />

widely accepted in the literature, that<br />

entrepreneurship is learnt to a higher extent<br />

through informal or non-formal means than<br />

through the formal education system.<br />

Bibliography:<br />

1. Brindley Clare, Women and New Business<br />

Creation, Breaking Down the Risk Barriers,<br />

in Carter M. Nancy; Henry Colette; Cinneide<br />

O Barra; Johnston Kate (Eds.) - Female<br />

Entrepreneurship – Implication for<br />

education, training and policy, Routledge<br />

Taylor & Francis Group, London and New<br />

York, Routledge Advances in Management<br />

and Business Studies collection, New York,<br />

2007;<br />

2. Brush G. Candida; Carter Nancy;<br />

Gatewood Elizabeth, Green Patricia, Hart<br />

Myra, Enhancing women’s financial strategy<br />

for growth, in Carter M. Nancy; Henry<br />

Colette; Cinneide O Barra; Johnston Kate<br />

(Eds.) - Female Entrepreneurship –<br />

Implication for education, training and<br />

policy, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group,<br />

London and New York, Routledge Advances<br />

in Management and Business Studies<br />

collection, New York, 2007;<br />

3. Cantando Mary, Leading with Care, How<br />

women around the world are inspiring<br />

business, empowering communities, and<br />

creating opportunity, Jossey-Bass a Wiley<br />

Imprint, San Francisco, 2009;<br />

4. Carter M. Nancy; Henry Colette; Cinneide<br />

O Barra; Johnston Kate (Eds.) - Female<br />

Entrepreneurship – Implication for<br />

education, training and policy, Routledge<br />

Taylor & Francis Group, London and New


York, Routledge Advances in Management<br />

and Business Studies collection, New York,<br />

2007;<br />

5. Dodescu Anca, Pop Cohuţ Ioana (coord.),<br />

Premiantele AntrES. Studii de caz pentru<br />

analiza antreprenoriatului feminin în context<br />

regional şi local, Vol. I – Vol. II, ISBN: 978-<br />

606-10-0343-3, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />

Publishing House, 2010.<br />

6. Dodescu, A. (coord.), Barker, A., Brihan,<br />

A., Giurgiu A. (2004) Ghid practic Action<br />

Learning, Editura Universităţii din Oradea,<br />

Oradea;<br />

7. Dodescu, A. (coord.), Barker, A. , Giurgiu<br />

A. (2004) Un nou model de şcoală<br />

antreprenorială în domeniul resurselor<br />

umane (A New Model <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong><br />

Entrepreneurship in the field <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Resources Development), University <strong>of</strong><br />

Oradea Publishing House, Oradea;<br />

243<br />

8. Drumond, H. (2004) “See You Next Week?<br />

A Study <strong>of</strong> Entrapment in a Small Business”,<br />

International Small Business Journal, 22, 5,<br />

487-502;<br />

9. Minitti, M; Arenius, P and Langowitz, N.,<br />

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2004<br />

Report and Women and Entrepreneurship,<br />

Babson Park, MA and London, Babson<br />

College and London Business School;<br />

10. Reynolds, P.D.; Bygrave, W.P., Autio, E.<br />

and others (2003), Global Entrepreneurship<br />

Monitor;<br />

11. Schmidt, R.A and Parker, C. (2003),<br />

Diversity in Independent Retailing Barriers<br />

and Benefits – the impact <strong>of</strong> Gender,<br />

International Journal <strong>of</strong> Retail and<br />

Distribution Management, 31, 8, 428-439;


244


TOURISM'S CHANGING FACE: NEW AGE TOURISM VERSUS OLD TOURISM<br />

Stănciulescu Gabriela Cecilia<br />

The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania<br />

Molnar Elisabeta<br />

The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania<br />

Bunghez Magdalena<br />

The Bucharest Academy <strong>of</strong> Economic Studies, Romania<br />

Abstract: Times are changing and so are the demands and expectations <strong>of</strong> the 'new' traveller, the<br />

search for different experiences, different adventures, different lifestyles has paved the way for this<br />

concept called the 'new tourism' Attention is being turned to exploring new frontiers or daring to go<br />

where traditional thought did not allow.<br />

"New" tourists however, are increasingly being seen to be environmentally sensitive, displaying<br />

respect for the culture <strong>of</strong> host nations and looking to experience and learn rather than merely stand<br />

back and gaze. "New" tourists are participators not spectators. Things that would never appear on<br />

the list <strong>of</strong> the "mass" tourist such as adventure, getting <strong>of</strong> the beaten track and mingling with the<br />

locals are now the foundations <strong>of</strong> the new tourist experiences.<br />

Responding to the shift in market dynamics towards a "New" style <strong>of</strong> tourist, a number <strong>of</strong> initiatives<br />

have or are likely to fuel the growth <strong>of</strong> experiential tourism, these include: network tourism<br />

initiatives; the development <strong>of</strong> interpretive highways; the explosion <strong>of</strong> interpretive centers;the latest<br />

trend towards regional base camps. A new era has arrived, and a new kind <strong>of</strong> tourism is<br />

emerging, sustainable, environmentally and socially responsible, and characterized by flexibility<br />

and choice. A new type <strong>of</strong> tourist is driving it: more educated, experienced, independent,<br />

conservation-minded, respectful <strong>of</strong> cultures, and insistent on value for money. Typically these<br />

tourists are turning away from travel and prefer to have a high level <strong>of</strong> involvement in the<br />

organisation <strong>of</strong> their trip.<br />

Key words: old tourism,new tourism, market, changes, strategies<br />

Introduction<br />

Until 19th century, travel for recreation was<br />

only undertaken by the elite. With the advent<br />

<strong>of</strong> rail, mass travel was available for the first<br />

time and destinations such as Brighton, UK<br />

and Coney Island, NY developed. Status was<br />

then defined by the mode <strong>of</strong> travel. In 20th<br />

century status was revealed by the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

the destinations. Travel and tourism has been<br />

going on since time immemorial, and for the<br />

'twentieth century tourist, the world has<br />

become one large department store <strong>of</strong><br />

countrysides and cities'. By 21st century,<br />

travel became a new economy - tourism -<br />

available to all with enough money.<br />

The focus in the tourism industry has shifted<br />

from air travel, overnights, meals and so on to<br />

total experiences or fantasy worlds associated<br />

245<br />

with specific. This new tourism phenomenon<br />

is not only influenced by economic factors<br />

but also by new cultures and a new<br />

generation <strong>of</strong> tourists. In tourism, the<br />

different destinations compete worldwide<br />

through globalisation. The paradigm shift<br />

from mass tourism (also known as Fordian<br />

Tourism), which was the norm for more than<br />

three decades, no longer suffices to achieve<br />

competitiveness in tourism enterprises and<br />

regions. A new paradigm, or new tourism, is<br />

gathering momentum owing to its ability to<br />

face prevailing circumstances.<br />

Modern information and communication<br />

technology development in symbiosis with<br />

the transformation <strong>of</strong> tourism demand gave<br />

rise to a new tourism. This paradigm shift is<br />

not easy to define but is indicative <strong>of</strong> a new


type <strong>of</strong> tourist who wants a new or different<br />

product. The new tourists are more<br />

experienced, more educated, more "green",<br />

more flexible, more independent, more<br />

quality-conscious and "harder to please" than<br />

ever before. Furthermore, they are well read<br />

and know what they want and where they<br />

want to go The different approach <strong>of</strong> the<br />

new tourist's creates a demand for new<br />

products. The small, medium and micro<br />

entrepreneurs within the tourism industry are<br />

dependent on major tourism developments. It<br />

is essential role <strong>of</strong> these small entrepreneurs<br />

be increased to deal with the changing<br />

demands <strong>of</strong> the new tourists. In Canada, 20%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the population is truly entrepreneurial<br />

while in South Africa the role <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneurs is still extremely small. Only<br />

about 4% <strong>of</strong> the South African population is<br />

truly entrepreneurial.<br />

What is New Tourism?<br />

New Tourism is characterised mainly by<br />

supersegmentation <strong>of</strong> demand, the need for<br />

flexibility <strong>of</strong> supply and distribution, and<br />

achieving pr<strong>of</strong>itability through diagonal<br />

integration and subsequent system economies<br />

and integrated values, instead <strong>of</strong> economies<br />

<strong>of</strong> scale. This paradigm permits the tourism<br />

industry to <strong>of</strong>fer products adapted to the<br />

increasingly complex and diverse needs <strong>of</strong><br />

demand, while being competitive with the old<br />

standardized products. These markets <strong>of</strong><br />

experience have become global, affecting the<br />

demand as well as the supply side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tourism industry. The tourism industry has<br />

undergone pr<strong>of</strong>ound changes, which have<br />

been categorized by Poon (1993) in the<br />

following groups: (a) new consumers, (b)<br />

new technologies, (c) new forms <strong>of</strong><br />

production, (d) new management styles, and<br />

(e) new prevailing circumstances. As result <strong>of</strong><br />

the super segmentation <strong>of</strong> demand there is a<br />

very strong need for in-depth knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

the market in order to identify the clusters <strong>of</strong><br />

consumer traits and needs. This knowledge<br />

will enable the tourism enterprises to develop<br />

those products that will give a greater<br />

246<br />

competitive edge, and to place them on the<br />

market using efficient methods <strong>of</strong><br />

communication and distribution. Flexibility is<br />

also a very relevant factor since it can assist<br />

the enterprise in adapting to the new demand<br />

requirements. This factor is relevant in<br />

several areas: flexibility in the organisation<br />

and in the production and distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

tourism products; flexibility in reservation,<br />

purchasing and payment systems; and<br />

flexibility in ways in which the tourism<br />

product is consumed. New technologies are<br />

fundamental in this respect and, in particular,<br />

in the expansion and development <strong>of</strong> new<br />

systems <strong>of</strong> tourism information. Diagonal<br />

integration is the final basic element.<br />

Compared with vertical and horizontal<br />

integration, which characterise the massstandardised<br />

production paradigm, this is a<br />

process by which the tourism enterprise can<br />

develop and compete not only in one activity,<br />

but also within a wider framework, seeking<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability on the basis <strong>of</strong> system<br />

economies, obtaining synergies between<br />

different products and <strong>of</strong>fering services well<br />

integrated in the value systems <strong>of</strong> consumers.<br />

Key shifts in global tourism market trends are<br />

as follows:<br />

In the long term, the average standard <strong>of</strong><br />

living in western developed countries will<br />

increase, as will the amount <strong>of</strong> discretionary<br />

money available for travel;<br />

Rising affluence will bring with it increases<br />

in the amount <strong>of</strong> free time available. Longer<br />

weekends and increased paid holidays have<br />

helped to stimulate expansion in attraction<br />

visitation;<br />

There is a shift in emphasis from passive fun<br />

to active learning;<br />

Activity or special interest holidays are likely<br />

to gain at the expense <strong>of</strong> conventional<br />

sightseeing, visiting and other passive<br />

experiences;<br />

There is growing concern about the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

modern industry, including tourism, on the<br />

physical and social environment;<br />

There is growing awareness <strong>of</strong> risks to<br />

personal health and safety;


Leisure time will be used more actively, for<br />

mental development as well as physical<br />

exercise;<br />

People aged 45 to 64 years <strong>of</strong> age will be<br />

growing significantly in number to the year<br />

2010. In the United States alone, this age<br />

group is forecasted to grow by 31% by the<br />

year 2000;<br />

The potential visitor <strong>of</strong> the future will be:<br />

older, more affluent; more demanding; more<br />

247<br />

thoughtful and discriminating; and more<br />

active physically and mentally;<br />

Timeframes for decision-making windows<br />

will be smaller. Hence, one-stop-shopping for<br />

all-inclusive packages will continue to be<br />

appealing; and<br />

Consumers will increasingly seek low impact<br />

tourism facilities, consistent with<br />

environmental values and the desire not to<br />

contribute to negative impacts.


The New Tourist<br />

The travelling consumer <strong>of</strong> today (let alone in<br />

the future) is very different from any other<br />

time in history. The most successful<br />

businesses in the travel industry are those that<br />

respond to the challenge through the use <strong>of</strong><br />

technology, innovative marketing programs,<br />

better training <strong>of</strong> staff and by developing a<br />

closeness and understanding <strong>of</strong> its<br />

customers/guests. The differences in travel<br />

patterns in the next century will be more<br />

related to what consumers are seeking in a<br />

travel experience than in how they travel.<br />

Today's traveller, the well-heeled or footloose<br />

back-packer, is usually informed, educated,<br />

and more <strong>of</strong>ten than not, fully aware <strong>of</strong> what<br />

he or she wants from their travels. For them<br />

the optimisation <strong>of</strong> time and money is the key<br />

and they prepare for their trip by researching<br />

their destination through the Web and the<br />

experiences <strong>of</strong> friends and fellow travellers.<br />

Mass media has responded to this shift and<br />

further fuelled the search for experiences<br />

through the promotion <strong>of</strong> a vast range <strong>of</strong><br />

lifestyle/adventure programs which have<br />

evolved more recently into experiential<br />

248<br />

voyeuristic docu-dramas referred to as reality<br />

programmes. Attention is being turned to<br />

exploring new frontiers or daring to go where<br />

traditional thought did not allow.<br />

In Tourism, Technology and Competitive<br />

Strategies, author Auliana Poon speaks about<br />

the changes in consumer behaviour and<br />

values which are the critical driving forces for<br />

the new tourism. The new tourist is<br />

experienced, more flexible, independent,<br />

quality conscious and harder to please.<br />

"New" tourists however, are increasingly<br />

being seen to be environmentally sensitive,<br />

displaying respect for the culture <strong>of</strong> host<br />

nations and looking to experience and learn<br />

rather than merely stand back and gaze.<br />

"New" tourists are participators not<br />

spectators. Things that would never appear on<br />

the list <strong>of</strong> the "mass" tourist such as<br />

adventure, getting <strong>of</strong> the beaten track and<br />

mingling with the locals are now the<br />

foundations <strong>of</strong> the new tourist experiences.<br />

Typically these tourists are turning away<br />

from travel and prefer to have a high level <strong>of</strong><br />

involvement in the organisation <strong>of</strong> their trip.<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> Old and New Tourists<br />

New Tourists<br />

Search for the sun => Experience something different<br />

Follow the masses => Want to be in charge<br />

Here today, gone tomorrow => See and enjoy but not destroy<br />

Just to show that you had been => Just for the fun <strong>of</strong> it<br />

Having => Being<br />

Superiority => Understanding<br />

Like attractions => Like sports<br />

Precautions => Adventurous<br />

Eat in hotel => Try local fare<br />

Homogeneous => Hybrid<br />

Source: Tourism, Technology and Competitive Strategies, Auliana Poon


Travel is no longer a novelty to the new<br />

tourist. Studies support what industry<br />

executives have been noticing for the last few<br />

years. People expect more out <strong>of</strong> their<br />

vacations than they used to and they are more<br />

adventuresome. Surveys done by the<br />

Canadian Tourism Research Institute indicate<br />

a high degree <strong>of</strong> interest in getaway<br />

vacations, ecotourism, cultural tourism and<br />

combining a business trip with a pleasure trip.<br />

Over the next ten years, tourism products and<br />

attractions will have to cater to visitors who<br />

are more demanding and discriminating, as<br />

well as more active and more purposeful in<br />

their choice <strong>of</strong> destination. There will be a<br />

shift in emphasis from passive fun to active<br />

learning, and the quality and genuineness <strong>of</strong><br />

visitor experiences will be crucial to future<br />

success in a competitive market. An Acronym<br />

that is relevant to describe the 'new' tourist is<br />

REAL, which stands for:Rewarding<br />

Enriching Adventuresome Learning<br />

Experience.<br />

A key underpinning concept for REAL<br />

tourism is authenticity <strong>of</strong> experience, which is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten related to the environment and culture<br />

and seen to be unaffected by "mass" tourism.<br />

The New Tourists prefer to be regarded as<br />

travellers and not tourists. Some specific<br />

points which need to be kept in mind while<br />

dealing with the New Tourist are:<br />

This type <strong>of</strong> traveller requires a completely<br />

different marketing approach.<br />

They avoid conventional glossy marketing<br />

mechanisms and prefer to use reliable sources<br />

such as word <strong>of</strong> mouth referrals, their own<br />

independent research and trusted<br />

publications;<br />

They desire experiences as opposed to<br />

products and services;<br />

They can be called experiential traveller s,<br />

they extend across all age groups and<br />

traditional market segments;<br />

249<br />

New Tourism for the New Tourist<br />

To enable new tourism attractions to stand the<br />

test <strong>of</strong> time and satisfy the demanding<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> the evolving 'new' tourist, the<br />

following criteria should be applied to<br />

existing and proposed attractions:<br />

- That the attraction <strong>of</strong>fers a distinct,<br />

unique experience that cannot easily<br />

be replicated by competitors;<br />

- That the attraction is value added<br />

through 'best practice' interpretation,<br />

which preferably utilises a 'human<br />

element' such as interpretive guides,<br />

seasoned veterans and/or local<br />

characters;<br />

- That, where possible, the experience<br />

is externalised within the<br />

natural/actual setting rather than<br />

internalised within a false/reproduced<br />

setting;<br />

- That the attraction <strong>of</strong>fers an exciting,<br />

authentic, interactive and educational<br />

experience;<br />

- That 'comfort' should not<br />

compromise the authenticity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experience;<br />

- That the attraction adheres to<br />

ecologically sustainable development<br />

principles;<br />

- That the attraction avoids the over<br />

reliance on technological interpretive<br />

devices that will become quickly<br />

outdated; and<br />

- That the attraction <strong>of</strong>fers a choice in<br />

the form <strong>of</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong>fered.<br />

Responding to the shift in market dynamics<br />

towards a "New" style <strong>of</strong> tourist, a number <strong>of</strong><br />

initiatives need to be taken so as to fuel the<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> experiential tourism these include:<br />

- Network tourism initiatives;<br />

- The development <strong>of</strong> interpretive<br />

highways;<br />

- The explosion <strong>of</strong> interpretive centers<br />

- The latest trend towards regional<br />

base camps.


Conclusion<br />

A new tourism is emerging, sustainable,<br />

environmentally and socially responsible, and<br />

characterised by flexibility and choice. A new<br />

type <strong>of</strong> tourist is driving it: more educated,<br />

experienced, independent, conservationminded,<br />

respectful <strong>of</strong> cultures, and insistent<br />

on value for money.<br />

Starting in the eighties and mid-eighties<br />

(depending on the tourism receiving region in<br />

question) a number <strong>of</strong> dramatic<br />

environmental changes occurred which<br />

moved the "tourism industry" much closer to<br />

the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the new economy. Used<br />

to more convenience, faster service and more<br />

options from his/her every-day-life the new<br />

tourist also insisted on more options, more<br />

entertainment and fun, more diversified<br />

sports facilities and cultural variety in his/her<br />

vacation. This new consumer (tourist) thereby<br />

has exercised pressure upon the tourism<br />

industry and tourism enterprises to develop<br />

new products, services and experiences.<br />

Information technology is opening up an<br />

astonishing array <strong>of</strong> travel and vacation<br />

options for this new tourist. To remain<br />

competitive, tourism destinations and<br />

industry players alike must adapt. For many,<br />

the challenge is to "reinvent" tourism. Market<br />

intelligence, innovation, and closeness to<br />

250<br />

customers have become the new imperatives.<br />

Thus, on the horizon <strong>of</strong> the postmodern<br />

landscape, a New Age <strong>of</strong> tourism is dawning:<br />

New Age tourism for New Age people.<br />

References<br />

1. POON, A. (1993), Tourism, technology<br />

and competitive strategies.<br />

2. VAN HOVE, N. 1996. Globalisation <strong>of</strong><br />

tourism demand: the underlying factors and<br />

the impact on marketing strategy<br />

3. SAMEULSON, R.J. 1997. Globalisation<br />

on the march.<br />

4. CHRISTOPFER, C. 2003. Classic reviews<br />

in tourism<br />

5. SMERAL, E. 1998. The impact <strong>of</strong><br />

globalisation on small and medium<br />

enterprises: new challenges for tourism<br />

policies in European countries<br />

6. KELLER, P. 1996. Globalisation and<br />

tourism: a facinating topic for research<br />

http://www.fasttrack.org/resources/news/opin<br />

ion_editorial/971015wp.html.<br />

http://www.law.indiana.edu.glsj/vol5/no1/pir<br />

ages.html (23.7.98)<br />

http://www.rgs.org/NR/rdonlyres/38EC0973-<br />

BC22-434B-B1A5-<br />

463C3B799208/0/Tourism.pdf<br />

http://www.ectaa.org/LinkClick.aspx?filetick<br />

et=y8qguk%2FjvyI%3D&tabid=103


YOUTH LABOUR MARKET. MOBILITY, CAREER DEVELOPMENT,<br />

INCOMES. CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES<br />

Vasile Valentina<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> National Economy-<br />

Romanian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences<br />

Vasile Liviu<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> National Economy-<br />

Romanian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences<br />

This paper presents the main characteristics <strong>of</strong> the youth labour market, with a special view on<br />

mobility, career development and incomes. The paper is substantiated by and continues the<br />

researches <strong>of</strong> the authors on the topic <strong>of</strong> labour force mobility and on the one <strong>of</strong> adaptability,<br />

respectively on youths’ beahviour on labour market (with particular consideration <strong>of</strong> young<br />

graduates) highlighting the factors that adjust choices regarding taking up a job, career<br />

advancement, labour motivation, pr<strong>of</strong>essional and personal satisfaction opportunities which are<br />

provided by the labour market at local level, in country and abroad. Quantitative and qualitative<br />

indicators are presented about Romanian youths’ labour market within the European context<br />

during the transition period. The impact <strong>of</strong> the crisis on youths’ labour market is analysed,<br />

highlighting the challenges and opportunities, the particularities <strong>of</strong> the newly created jobs and<br />

especially the knowledge, skills and competencies requirements (KSC). The authors propose both<br />

the improvement <strong>of</strong> the systems <strong>of</strong> indicators for defining the potential and presence <strong>of</strong> youth on the<br />

labour market, the economic and social impact <strong>of</strong> external mobility <strong>of</strong> young graduates and an<br />

integrated scheme <strong>of</strong> policy measures for promoting adaptability and performance integration on<br />

Romanian labour market <strong>of</strong> youth. Particular attention is paid to presenting policy instruments for<br />

halting/diminishing the brain drain and brain shopping phenomena by promoting an attractive<br />

(pr<strong>of</strong>essionally and monetary) supply for employment in Romania’s local economy. The authors<br />

succeed in highlighting the functional links between the education market (labour force supply) and<br />

labour market (employment demand <strong>of</strong> the business environment) underpinning the requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

integrated management <strong>of</strong> labour potential in the years preceding studies’ finalization and up to the<br />

post-insertion years by multi-criteria analysis models and graduate career tracking programmes.<br />

Correlative measures are suggested for policies, procedures and monitoring instruments <strong>of</strong> youths’<br />

adaptability on labour market, as alternative to external migration/mobility for labour.<br />

Keywords: labour market, education market, young graduate adaptability, labour mobility, career<br />

development<br />

JEL classification: J40, I20, J61, I25<br />

I. Introduction<br />

Youth employment is much more volatile<br />

than the one <strong>of</strong> mature labour force. Youth<br />

labour market is characterised by<br />

opportunities’ deficit for decent employment,<br />

diminishing jobs, employment precariousness<br />

(increases in the number <strong>of</strong> part-time jobs,<br />

temporary employment) and wages’<br />

reduction. Young people are faced also with<br />

increased difficulties on entering the labour<br />

251<br />

market, considering that also during the<br />

economic expansion period there were<br />

already issues related to the creation <strong>of</strong> new<br />

jobs for them. The lack <strong>of</strong> employment<br />

perspectives in a decent job on entering the<br />

labour market affects/compromises their path<br />

on labour market and career development.<br />

Additionally, unemployment among young<br />

individuals presents specific vulnerabilities –<br />

higher sensitivity to the variations <strong>of</strong>


economic activity, difficulties in creating new<br />

jobs for youth, longer duration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

unemployment period, and easier entry on the<br />

informal labour market, which turns into a<br />

true refuge, particularly for graduates.<br />

Experts’ estimations appreciate that an<br />

increase in total unemployment rate by 1 per<br />

cent is accompanied by an employment<br />

diminishment among youth <strong>of</strong> about 1.1 – 1.8<br />

per cents, and Romania is one <strong>of</strong> the EU<br />

Member States with the highest<br />

unemployment rate <strong>of</strong> youth and its increase<br />

is expected (about 3 times higher than the<br />

general unemployment rate). The crisis<br />

“generates” precarious jobs for youth, which<br />

are weakly remunerated very <strong>of</strong>ten under<br />

their skills’ level, triggering loss/depreciation<br />

<strong>of</strong> competencies, or long-term unemployment<br />

and discouragement, hence increased poverty<br />

incidence.<br />

Considerable numerical and structural gaps<br />

are present on labour market between supply<br />

(outcome <strong>of</strong> education for vocational<br />

training) and demand (job requirements on<br />

the national labour market), which are<br />

amplified in some fields by the free<br />

movement <strong>of</strong> labour force (attractiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

some better paid jobs, not necessarily in the<br />

same training field), so that a significant<br />

deficit emerges for skilled staff in fields such<br />

as constructions, industry, services, including<br />

here health care ones, while on the European<br />

labour market our citizens deliver<br />

preponderantly low/un-skilled labour.<br />

On the education market, the curriculum<br />

adjustment and the range <strong>of</strong> skills on<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essions and fields <strong>of</strong> sciences has low<br />

flexibility, remaining behind as considered<br />

from KSCs demanded on labour market, and<br />

the link between school and business<br />

environment is erratic, punctual, or inexistent<br />

in most field (lack <strong>of</strong> cooperation for practice,<br />

internship, etc. and the system <strong>of</strong> scholarships<br />

provided by the business environment among<br />

graduates is strongly unbalanced tending to<br />

being inexistent). The difference between the<br />

demand on labour market and the supply <strong>of</strong><br />

labour from among the graduates is strongly<br />

252<br />

imbalanced, in most cases a period <strong>of</strong> training<br />

is necessary for labour market insertion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

graduates (either on the job or by courses<br />

provided by authorised institutions for adult<br />

education on the LLL market, and by courses<br />

<strong>of</strong> the National Council for Adult Training -<br />

NCAT).<br />

In the current paper we intend to highlight the<br />

fault lines between the educational system<br />

and the labour market and to present an<br />

integrated system <strong>of</strong> instruments and support<br />

mechanisms for dynamic balancing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

labour demand and labour supply represented<br />

by the insertion <strong>of</strong> young graduates.<br />

II. Literature review<br />

Youth adaptability on labour market, their<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional insertion and the KSCs deficit<br />

are issues widely debated by experts,<br />

particularly as outcome <strong>of</strong> the propagated<br />

effects on long term which they generate.<br />

Young people enter the labour market<br />

unprepared, without practical skills, their<br />

theoretical knowledge is either outdated or<br />

incomplete, and their basic competencies –<br />

generic and specific – are weakly developed<br />

(Vasile,V., 2009). The transition from school<br />

to active life and labour integration <strong>of</strong> youth<br />

represents an essential issue with a strong<br />

economic and social impact as it is also an<br />

important measurement <strong>of</strong> the external<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> the educational system (Vasile,<br />

L., 2011). The concerns in order to promote<br />

(performance) employment <strong>of</strong> youth, and the<br />

efforts <strong>of</strong> integrating young people on the<br />

local labour market were intensified during<br />

the period <strong>of</strong> crisis, and at EU level were<br />

realised a series <strong>of</strong> studies and researches <strong>of</strong><br />

the various aspects regarding this issue (EU,<br />

2011). Additionally EU 2020, integrates in<br />

the development targets both young<br />

generation’s participation to education to a<br />

share <strong>of</strong> 40%, and a diminishment <strong>of</strong> early<br />

school leaving under 10%, which are<br />

performances difficult to reach by Romania<br />

(from 16 % in 2008 the intention is to<br />

increase to almost 27% in the case <strong>of</strong> the<br />

share <strong>of</strong> graduates <strong>of</strong> tertiary education aged


from 30-34 years and also from 15,9% in the<br />

same year to reduce to 11,3% the rate <strong>of</strong> early<br />

school leaving). At the same time, EC, by<br />

“Youth on the move” proposes in 2010 a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> 4 priorities for lowering youth<br />

unemployment: support for pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

insertion and career development; support for<br />

youth in risk situations; promoting a support<br />

social network and sustaining<br />

entrepreneurship and self-employment.<br />

Increased concerns are shown also at national<br />

level by supporting the absorption <strong>of</strong><br />

structural funds for priority objectives that<br />

support youth (adaptability to the labour<br />

market, post-doctoral studies, etc.), as well as<br />

by developing topical surveys (NIS, 2000,<br />

2009). We still can remind the topical studies<br />

realised by various other institutions, based<br />

on projects financed with domestic funds, or<br />

international ones, yet these provide only for<br />

a partial, fragmented image related to the<br />

issue <strong>of</strong> youths on labour market (Nicolescu,<br />

L 2002, Săpătoru D Caplanova A &<br />

Slantcheva S, 2002)<br />

As result, there is no relevant information<br />

source that would aid the education system to<br />

permanently adjust/adapt the educational<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile to the requirements <strong>of</strong> the business<br />

environment (<strong>of</strong> the graduate career tracking<br />

program at national level), and the market<br />

allows just for punctual regulation on shortterm<br />

by CVT courses especially, which does<br />

not solve the issue <strong>of</strong> the anticipative<br />

character <strong>of</strong> the educational system against<br />

the labour demand expressed by the real<br />

economy. The outcomes <strong>of</strong> the survey<br />

repeated in 2009, associated with the reform<br />

measures on both markets (education and<br />

labour) allow for formulating some<br />

conclusions/partial outcomes and may<br />

represent milestones for defining the<br />

framework for improving the communication<br />

relationships/channels between the two<br />

systems/markets. Moreover, there are<br />

neither systematic studies nor even a<br />

national databank for monitoring the<br />

socio-pr<strong>of</strong>essional insertion <strong>of</strong> graduates<br />

on labour market in the first years by<br />

253<br />

highlighting the dysfunctions in forecasting<br />

educational content, and an adequate<br />

system <strong>of</strong> indicators that would allow for<br />

evaluating the impact <strong>of</strong> the university<br />

system on the Romanian economy and<br />

society is non-existent, as well. Only<br />

fragmented studies are made at the level <strong>of</strong><br />

individual universities, without an attempt <strong>of</strong><br />

aggregating the outcomes. The requirement<br />

<strong>of</strong> such approaches and the first national<br />

initiatives were rendered concrete in<br />

developing a methodology and working<br />

instruments regarding monitoring studies <strong>of</strong><br />

insertion on labour market for higher<br />

education graduates from Romania (MECT,<br />

2008), which were applied for the first time<br />

by means <strong>of</strong> a pilot project initiated within<br />

SOPHRD (Damian, R.M., 2011). The<br />

questionnaire developed on this topic is<br />

applied to a restricted target-group<br />

represented by graduates <strong>of</strong> state- and private<br />

higher education institutions after one year,<br />

and then after five years since graduation, but<br />

only for the universities involved in the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the study.<br />

III. Youth labour market. Main<br />

characteristics and development<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> the economic transition<br />

process, the labour market from Romania was<br />

faced with important changes, shown in the<br />

diminishment <strong>of</strong> the active and employed<br />

population, in the increased unemployment<br />

among young individuals and growth <strong>of</strong> longterm<br />

unemployment, in the limited capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the economy to create new jobs and to<br />

ensure stimulative work remuneration in<br />

accordance with performance and importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> supplied work, by the lack <strong>of</strong> attractiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the jobs for young graduates, particularly<br />

for those finishing tertiary education. As<br />

result, labour mobility increased especially<br />

external mobility <strong>of</strong> workers, and the stock <strong>of</strong><br />

migrant population is estimated currently to<br />

total almost 4 million persons (in the<br />

registered and unregistered economy).<br />

Labour market reform and the changes in the<br />

human capital management model from


Romania have known a sinuous development,<br />

much delayed as compared with the demands<br />

<strong>of</strong> the economic and social environment. This<br />

issue was left on a secondary plane, as it was<br />

considered that the regulations on the other<br />

markets will generate the required changes to<br />

ensure labour market functionality. If we<br />

consider the requirements <strong>of</strong> an efficient<br />

labour market, as support for sustaining<br />

competitiveness, we may appreciate that the<br />

labour market after two decades <strong>of</strong><br />

reform/adjustment and a period <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> about 8 years: a) does not ensure<br />

an efficient allocation <strong>of</strong> human capital<br />

within the economy, nor its performance use;<br />

b) the remuneration system is rigid in relation<br />

to performance and work involvement, and<br />

does not stimulate to a sufficient extent the<br />

additional effort, in particular for the public<br />

sector; c) mobility on fields <strong>of</strong> activity is<br />

relatively low, even for common pr<strong>of</strong>essions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the national economy due on one hand to<br />

the rigid recruitment and selection systems <strong>of</strong><br />

the staff (the criterion <strong>of</strong> experience is<br />

defining in most cases), and on the other hand<br />

due to the high differences in the<br />

remuneration on branches and fields <strong>of</strong><br />

activity (especially with respect to the<br />

bonuses and advantages system (bonus for<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> the branch, stability bonus,<br />

etc.); d) opportunities’ equalities in career<br />

advancement and remuneration albeit<br />

stipulated in regulation documents and<br />

development strategies <strong>of</strong> human resources,<br />

the practice shows frequently derails there<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Hence, we cannot consider efficiency and<br />

flexibility on labour market as support factor<br />

<strong>of</strong> competitiveness (the seventh pillar “labour<br />

market efficiency”, Global Competitiveness<br />

Report 2009-2010), and as positive input to<br />

increasing economic growth and sustainable<br />

human development, to retaining young<br />

graduates on the national labour market and<br />

decreasing migration propensity.<br />

During the entire transition period is recorded<br />

a diminishment in the size <strong>of</strong> labour market<br />

associated with higher flexibility but on the<br />

background <strong>of</strong> increasingly stronger de-<br />

254<br />

correlation under the quantitative and<br />

qualitative aspect between labour demand and<br />

supply, especially on the labour market<br />

segment specific for young graduates. Low<br />

concerns exist for the efficient allocation <strong>of</strong><br />

labour force at local level, by stimulating<br />

through active measures internal mobility for<br />

labour. The concentration <strong>of</strong> investments in<br />

high-density population urban areas and the<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> instruments for supporting internal<br />

mobility for labour (living and/or transport<br />

conditions) triggered increasingly stronger<br />

decoupling under quantitative and qualitative<br />

aspect between demand and supply for labour<br />

at regional/local level. Temporary<br />

migration for labour is preferred by<br />

working-age household members,<br />

particularly the young individuals aged up<br />

to 35 years, instead <strong>of</strong> territorial mobility<br />

<strong>of</strong> the household or commuting. Very <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

deficits are encountered on some markets<br />

and labour force surplus on<br />

trades/pr<strong>of</strong>essions on others, the<br />

differences being covered rather by<br />

external migration flows (emigration <strong>of</strong><br />

Romanians to Western Europe, Israel or<br />

Canada, and immigration from the East on<br />

the local labour markets, especially the<br />

ones in Moldova and in the central region<br />

<strong>of</strong> the country). Unfortunately, to a large<br />

extent, such balances are made due to the<br />

informal market, the benefits being partial<br />

both for employees (wages but without social<br />

insurance), and employers (lower costs but<br />

without instruments for long-term incentives<br />

for performance and labour involvement),<br />

and also for the society (reduced<br />

contributions to social funds and unpaid<br />

taxes).<br />

The crisis period generates significant<br />

changes on labour market, in the opinion <strong>of</strong><br />

social partners, disruptions and atypical<br />

developments, non-performance and actual<br />

restrictions in the way <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

turnaround. The previous economic growth is<br />

proven as unsustainable and the Romanian<br />

economy drops by more than 7% in 2009 and<br />

yet another about 1.5% in 2010. The


constriction <strong>of</strong> economic activity triggers<br />

considerable unemployment in the private<br />

sector but also personnel reductions in the<br />

public sector, but on administrative criteria <strong>of</strong><br />

diminishing personnel expenditures<br />

(budgetary corrections are operated uniformly<br />

on ministries). The number <strong>of</strong> governmental<br />

agencies are reduced by half, yet ministerial<br />

structures increase, reductions are made in<br />

education, health care and research strictly on<br />

economic reasoning, without defining the<br />

medium- and long-term needs both for<br />

quality and efficient educational and health<br />

services, as well as for technological progress<br />

within the business environment, as solution<br />

for exiting the crisis and economic<br />

turnaround. The European principles <strong>of</strong><br />

supporting continuing learning and<br />

stimulating the generation <strong>of</strong> RDI outcomes<br />

applicable within economy are acknowledged<br />

as necessary, yet unsupported in practice,<br />

employment is practically blocked by the<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> demand from the business<br />

environment and administrative lay<strong>of</strong>fs<br />

within the public sector. Unemployment<br />

increases, the active measures on labour<br />

market are even more downsized (the level<br />

from the period <strong>of</strong> economic growth varying<br />

around 2% in total unemployment fund, for<br />

instance) and employees participation to CVT<br />

decreases dramatically (Romania was placed<br />

on the last position in the EU with a<br />

255<br />

participation to CVT courses <strong>of</strong> about 1,3%<br />

in the last 2 years.<br />

Unemployment among youngsters is higher<br />

than the average, about 2-3 times, and higher<br />

for men. Young people are predominant<br />

among unemployed who never worked and<br />

they represent a third <strong>of</strong> the long-term<br />

unemployed.<br />

The youth labour market is different as<br />

challenges and restrictions, being more<br />

vulnerable to migration “attractiveness”.<br />

Young individuals represent the most mobile<br />

segment <strong>of</strong> migrant population, especially for<br />

external migration. Aspirations about<br />

incomes and pr<strong>of</strong>essional career and the<br />

relative independence from family (single, or<br />

without children) make them be more open<br />

towards jobs at longer distances, if they<br />

satisfy expectations. On the other hand, the<br />

situation <strong>of</strong> youth on labour market is<br />

difficult as they are regarded a vulnerable<br />

group: they have more difficulties in finding a<br />

job due to lack <strong>of</strong> working experience (in<br />

Romania only a small share <strong>of</strong> the young are<br />

employed during their university studies and<br />

only few, by exception, during the period <strong>of</strong><br />

upper-secondary studies). In the last years, ejobs<br />

mobility and increasing part-time<br />

employment already during the period <strong>of</strong><br />

study have attenuated the pressure on<br />

insertion unemployment rate.


ILO unemployment rate in Romania and EU, total and for the age group 15-24 years<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Sursa: Eurostat (2009), http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal.<br />

The youths employment model is defined by<br />

the following characteristics: part-time jobs,<br />

contracts on determined periods <strong>of</strong> time, high<br />

mobility from one job to another in the first<br />

year after finalising studies, diminished<br />

wages towards the legal limit for the<br />

graduated level <strong>of</strong> studies, dual employment,<br />

or only within the informal economy, low<br />

perspectives <strong>of</strong> access to a career in the first<br />

years, practical competencies and skills<br />

deficits triggering inclusively employment in<br />

inferior jobs to the training received in<br />

school. All these aspects define a nonperformance<br />

and weakly stimulating model<br />

for stability, career advancement and personal<br />

development. At an employment rate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

working-age population (15 to 64 years) <strong>of</strong><br />

about 60% in Q3 2009, were employed 26%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the young individuals (15 to 24 years <strong>of</strong><br />

age). The highest employment level is among<br />

graduates <strong>of</strong> higher education (84,6%) for the<br />

same period and decreases to about 45% for<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

Youths activity and employment rate, 2002-2009<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

256<br />

EU15-ILO unemployment<br />

rate - total<br />

EU15- ILO unemployment<br />

rate, 15-24 years old<br />

RO- ILO unemployment<br />

rate- total<br />

RO- ILO unemployment<br />

rate, 15-24 years old<br />

those with the lowest training levels (NIS,<br />

2009). As fields, youngsters aged 15-24 years<br />

are employed preponderantly in<br />

constructions, trade, hotels and restaurants,<br />

and those from the age group 25-34 years <strong>of</strong><br />

age in real estate transactions and trade. Men<br />

are best represented within all sociopr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

categories, partially justified also<br />

by the fertile life span <strong>of</strong> women and hence<br />

the lower share <strong>of</strong> participation to labour<br />

market.<br />

The activity rate and the employment rate for<br />

youths aged 15-24 years is lower than the<br />

national average, due to: reduced population<br />

cohorts (as result <strong>of</strong> demographic decline), to<br />

extended education period, to poor<br />

employment attractiveness provided by the<br />

market and to the national employment model<br />

which does not promote youth employment<br />

during the period <strong>of</strong> studies, save by<br />

exception.<br />

Source: Labour force in Romania – employment and unemployment– Q 2, 2009, NIS<br />

Consequently, the two rates are placed about<br />

20 pp under the general average. At the same<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

Activity rate, 15-64 years<br />

old<br />

Activity rate, 15-24 years<br />

old<br />

Employment rate, 15-64<br />

years old


time, against the Lisbon objectives, the<br />

working-age population employment rate in<br />

2008 places Romania at a distance <strong>of</strong> 11 pp<br />

(70%), and for the women at a distance <strong>of</strong> 7,5<br />

pp (60% objective).<br />

Secondary education graduates have an<br />

employment rate varying on averages<br />

around the national values, the employment<br />

rate in the rural area being in reversed<br />

proportion to the education level in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> pre-university levels <strong>of</strong> study, and the<br />

opportunities provided by the rural area<br />

being in (paid or unpaid) activities<br />

developed in agriculture. Estimates<br />

(CEDEFOP, 2008) show that up to the year<br />

2015, approximately 30% <strong>of</strong> the jobs shall<br />

require higher education and almost 50% at<br />

least upper-secondary education with a<br />

significant decrease <strong>of</strong> the jobs requiring a<br />

low skill level. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional insertion <strong>of</strong> a<br />

graduate is strongly influenced by the<br />

attended school, the field <strong>of</strong> study, the<br />

economic development level <strong>of</strong> the region,<br />

the firms/companies in whom he/she<br />

effected internship or worked during<br />

studies, the recruitment firms where he/she<br />

sustained interviews, on the attended<br />

conferences and trainings, etc.<br />

Occupational guidance already during highschool<br />

<strong>of</strong> youngsters towards the<br />

40,00%<br />

20,00%<br />

0,00%<br />

Source: Eurostat on-line database<br />

257<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional pr<strong>of</strong>ile and choice <strong>of</strong><br />

university training in relationship to the<br />

intended trade/pr<strong>of</strong>ession for career<br />

development, correlated with gained<br />

aptitudes and competencies, but also with<br />

the demand on labour market trigger a<br />

higher employment rate <strong>of</strong> graduates and<br />

less time searching for a job<br />

“adequate/corresponding” to individual<br />

aspirations. From this perspective,<br />

employment opportunity is in reverse<br />

proportionality to the sum <strong>of</strong> self-imposed<br />

restrictions <strong>of</strong> the graduate. This is also the<br />

reason why for young individuals (15-24 de<br />

year) the long-term unemployment rate<br />

(unemployment <strong>of</strong> 6 months or over) was,<br />

for instance in Q3 2009 <strong>of</strong> 10,4% , and the<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> long-term unemployment<br />

among youths <strong>of</strong> 46,9% (at an average<br />

unemployment rate <strong>of</strong> 6,8% per total and <strong>of</strong><br />

22,3% among those aged between 15-24<br />

years). Women have an unemployment rate<br />

by approximately 30% lower as compared<br />

with men. However, they register an<br />

enrolment rate in high-school, respectively<br />

tertiary education significantly higher than<br />

the one <strong>of</strong> men, a situation which explains<br />

the lower employment rate which is<br />

specific to them (Vasile V., 2009).<br />

Share <strong>of</strong> the young unemployed at the half <strong>of</strong> the year 2009<br />

19,60% 18,30%<br />

România<br />

Media UE<br />

33,60%<br />

Spania<br />

28,20%<br />

Letonia<br />

24,90%<br />

Italia<br />

6,00%<br />

Olanda<br />

8,90% 9% 10,50%<br />

Danemarca<br />

Austria<br />

Germania<br />

18,20%<br />

Polonia


If we refer to action methods on the labour<br />

market, the youth is more incisive and resort<br />

to direct and modern methods in searching for<br />

a job, take more risks at an interview and the<br />

negotiation <strong>of</strong> working conditions and<br />

incomes. Between finishing school and taking<br />

up an activity at the first significant job,<br />

74.1% have searched a job using active<br />

methods (direct contacting <strong>of</strong> employers or <strong>of</strong><br />

the decision factors responsible with hiring<br />

37.9%). The insertion rate <strong>of</strong> tertiary<br />

education graduates is lower against the<br />

average situation per total youth who are<br />

hired and particularly in the first year after<br />

graduation, due to the fact that an university<br />

graduate will search longer and have higher<br />

expectations with respect to the workplace –<br />

under the aspect <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>essional pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />

the workplace and <strong>of</strong> the provided<br />

remuneration level (very <strong>of</strong>ten much lower<br />

than graduates’ expectations). Even though<br />

the state grants tax facilities on employing<br />

youths (for instance, the employer will<br />

receive for a 12 months period the minimum<br />

wage on economy) due to the complementary<br />

conditions (including the obligation to remain<br />

on the job for at least 2 years) and <strong>of</strong> the high<br />

mobility <strong>of</strong> youths in search for the right job<br />

corresponding to their pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

aspirations, the share <strong>of</strong> those resorting to<br />

these facilities is very low. On medium- and<br />

long-term, job security for youths with<br />

tertiary education is relatively higher, but also<br />

the opportunities for mobility based on<br />

employment advantages are more. In<br />

general, young graduates are considered on<br />

insertion on the labour market as having the<br />

disadvantage <strong>of</strong> lacking experience, yet the<br />

advantages are net superior: potentially high<br />

productivity, adaptability and acceptance <strong>of</strong><br />

novelty, theoretic knowledge, so as to be<br />

considered “relatively cheap”, as lack <strong>of</strong><br />

experience diminishes the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

insertion wage towards the minimum legal<br />

limits. The hampering lack <strong>of</strong> experience can<br />

be relatively easily dealt away with by<br />

training on the job, which depending on trade<br />

258<br />

and skills level attracts lower or higher<br />

continuing training costs. Yet, these costs are<br />

absorbed on medium-term by individual<br />

outcomes and performance, if there is<br />

employment motivation. Job motivation and<br />

satisfaction are very important components<br />

for graduates and youths in general, and<br />

therefore they turn easier into unemployed<br />

and search for a relatively longer period <strong>of</strong><br />

time an adequate workplace. Consequently,<br />

the unemployment rate for the age group 25-<br />

34 is closer to the average one, which leads to<br />

the idea that youths after graduation have a<br />

short period <strong>of</strong> feverishly searching a job,<br />

with frequent changes and alternating<br />

unemployment and employment periods, until<br />

succeeding to find a job or to migrate for<br />

employment outside the country.<br />

IV. Ways <strong>of</strong> diminishing discrepancies<br />

between demand and supply on youths’<br />

labour market. Milestones for an<br />

integrated balance model for insertion<br />

employment<br />

Youths on labour market remain a<br />

disadvantaged group, and as risk are<br />

considered: a) for the society as<br />

unemployment on local/national market and<br />

their migration as brain drain/brain shopping<br />

lead to waste <strong>of</strong> resources due to the nonvalued<br />

investment in education done in the<br />

country and loss on medium- and long-term<br />

average <strong>of</strong> GDP and diminishment <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

increase; b) for the labour market, in event<br />

they fail to get employment according to their<br />

training pr<strong>of</strong>ile and in a pr<strong>of</strong>essionally and<br />

financially attractive job. The pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the<br />

young worker is defined on a hand by<br />

education (knowledge and theoretic<br />

competencies, especially), occupational<br />

flexibility, availability for LLL and, on the<br />

other hand, the attitude (to work, job,<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional career, status on labour market:<br />

employed, self-employed, etc.); geographic<br />

mobility. The size and balance on labour<br />

market are defined by the medium- and longterm<br />

trends: demographic decline by delays


in family grounding and in the decision to<br />

have children, mobility for career and<br />

incomes – geographic or virtual –<br />

employment volatility, entrepreneurship<br />

development and self-employment, lower<br />

elasticity by unemployment, increase in the<br />

stock <strong>of</strong> incorporated education and<br />

permanent updating by LLL, gender<br />

convergence on trades, pr<strong>of</strong>essions,<br />

specialisation fields, including at managerial<br />

level and presence in the political life, the<br />

interest for developing a successful<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional career.<br />

An integrated model for ensuring mobile<br />

balance on labour market presupposes at<br />

least three components: education for labour<br />

market as integral part <strong>of</strong> LLL, defining the<br />

business environment demand by means <strong>of</strong><br />

KSCs and ensuring a social network <strong>of</strong><br />

stimulating employment on local/national<br />

market. For each component a number <strong>of</strong><br />

indicators for quantitative measurements can<br />

be defined and then weighted/adjusted with<br />

the qualitative variables resulting from<br />

dedicated surveys (graduated track survey<br />

and labour market for youth questionnaire).<br />

The selected variables were <strong>of</strong> 3 up to 6 for<br />

each component depending on the demanded<br />

training level for the job and scarcity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

specialists. In the case <strong>of</strong> a job for a tertiary<br />

education graduate, as minimum quantitative<br />

indicators were defined: a) for the education<br />

for labour market component were considered<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> graduates on specialties, the<br />

aggregated index <strong>of</strong> generic competencies<br />

and the KSCs index specific to the pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

and hierarchical level <strong>of</strong> the job; b) for<br />

defining the labour demand within the<br />

business environment was considered the<br />

specific demand <strong>of</strong> similar jobs, workplace<br />

stability and the substitution index <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional pr<strong>of</strong>ile; finally, for c) social<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> stimulation, at least at the<br />

comparative level <strong>of</strong> wages and additional<br />

wage packages can be considered the<br />

geographic indicator (defined by the<br />

rural/urban environment) and the local<br />

development level (GDP/area inhabitant or<br />

259<br />

the development lag against the national<br />

average). Balancing the values <strong>of</strong> aggregated<br />

indicators on each component indicate the<br />

compatibility state and attractiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

employment for youths, while the imbalance<br />

situations points out the migration risk – brain<br />

drain/brain shopping or the employment<br />

option by substitution (another pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile but for which minimum competencies<br />

are proven for taking up the job). The job<br />

experience variable non-specific to young<br />

graduates and the advantages <strong>of</strong> the employer<br />

from insertion employment are considered in<br />

operating selection <strong>of</strong> equivalent candidates<br />

(IEN, 2010). Albeit in the incipient stage <strong>of</strong><br />

developing and testing on youth market, this<br />

algorithm allows on one hand for guiding the<br />

educational system to curricula adjustment<br />

and focusing learning outcomes on KSCs<br />

demanded on labour market, and on the other<br />

hand in guiding employers towards<br />

recruitment from the local market or from the<br />

national/international market, as well as to the<br />

association with the development on variants<br />

<strong>of</strong> employment <strong>of</strong> the e-work type for some<br />

trades/pr<strong>of</strong>essions and, respectively jobs. The<br />

current developments and dysfunctions on the<br />

youth labour market, particularly during the<br />

period <strong>of</strong> crisis when the volatility elements<br />

were more prominent, support the need <strong>of</strong><br />

developing ex-ante and ex-post management<br />

mechanisms <strong>of</strong> potential (youth) labour force<br />

employment by combining counselling and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional guidance with internship periods<br />

and graduate tracking management,<br />

employer/alumni engagement strategies,<br />

industrial relations development and<br />

stimulative wage package, LLL, career<br />

development model, etc.


V. Brief conclusions<br />

The labour market, respectively the business<br />

environment is more exigent in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

the young labour force which enters labour<br />

market after graduation. Youths have more<br />

difficulty in finding a job corresponding both<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionally and monetary, the reason why<br />

both employment fluctuations from<br />

employment to unemployment and viceversa,<br />

and longer periods <strong>of</strong> unemployment<br />

are an important barometer <strong>of</strong> permanent<br />

education system’s reform in Romania.<br />

Moreover, information about vocational<br />

training programmes or for on the job<br />

adjustment may provide information about<br />

dysfunctions and correlations’ lack between<br />

the education system and demand on labour<br />

market, while the following might be<br />

considered as the most significant ones:<br />

- Youths entering on labour market after<br />

graduation <strong>of</strong> secondary or tertiary education<br />

live preponderantly in the urban area, and<br />

men are more numerous; accessibility <strong>of</strong><br />

higher education is better for those in the<br />

urban area, opportunities closer to the<br />

beneficiary and, very <strong>of</strong>ten, financial<br />

restrictions are the most important.<br />

- The shares <strong>of</strong> their employment and<br />

unemployment against the age group to<br />

which they belong has not underwent<br />

significant changes, just as the passage rate to<br />

higher education which improved but not to a<br />

significant share and, unfortunately, did not<br />

generate a proportional improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

graduates’ education quality, but to the<br />

contrary.<br />

- Still the diploma is more important than<br />

proven skills and knowledge, in particular for<br />

the public sector. The business environment<br />

becomes gradually increasingly rigid from<br />

this viewpoint and requires evidence on<br />

hiring <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional competencies’<br />

certification, and in their absence,<br />

employment is made on a job requiring<br />

inferior training and/or the knowledge deficit<br />

is compensated by CVT on the job.<br />

- The activity rate decreases, young<br />

individuals on one hand postpone entering the<br />

260<br />

labour market, and pursue several educational<br />

tertiary paths (<strong>of</strong>ten in completely different<br />

fields) or continue their studies for<br />

masters/doctorate or, on the other hand after<br />

graduation (or early leaving) are active on the<br />

black market, or migrate for employment in<br />

low skilled jobs, inferior to gained education.<br />

- The main reasons <strong>of</strong> early school leaving<br />

are still <strong>of</strong> current concern, respectively the<br />

high cost <strong>of</strong> schooling (especially for those<br />

from the rural area) and/or associated with the<br />

need <strong>of</strong> working for incomes (dependency on<br />

families with low incomes or other types <strong>of</strong><br />

difficulties). An important reason <strong>of</strong> failing to<br />

finalise studies is represented also by the<br />

inefficiency <strong>of</strong> the evaluation/certification<br />

systems on graduation which consider<br />

inflexible evaluation schemes and less<br />

adjusted to the practical finality <strong>of</strong> education<br />

– knowledge verification instead <strong>of</strong><br />

competencies certification, etc.<br />

- The lack <strong>of</strong> a flexible, coherent and<br />

accessible to all system for continuing<br />

training, including by<br />

certification/continuation/ and/or transition<br />

from the formal to the informal and nonformal<br />

system.<br />

- Another issue which is difficult to measure<br />

but is particularly relevant under the aspect <strong>of</strong><br />

compatibility between education market and<br />

labour market, between the chosen pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

and competencies for practicing this<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession in performance conditions is<br />

represented by the analysis “first significant<br />

job” – under the aspect <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

and search duration.<br />

- Finally, another important aspect <strong>of</strong><br />

individual performance during active life is<br />

represented by the informal education related<br />

to the behaviour on labour market and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional development. The example <strong>of</strong><br />

parents and extended family members may<br />

define to a significant share the labour market<br />

behaviour <strong>of</strong> young graduates and their<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional path.<br />

Failure to acknowledge such aspects in a<br />

systematic way and their analysis affect the<br />

feedback processes within the educational


process, maintaining dysfunctions and gaps<br />

between education market and labour market,<br />

rendered concrete, finally, by loss <strong>of</strong> human<br />

capital, <strong>of</strong> investments in education, loss <strong>of</strong><br />

potential value added as result <strong>of</strong> nonperformance<br />

work or giving up work after<br />

graduation. The relatively high level <strong>of</strong> this<br />

youths’ unemployment rate emphasises the<br />

necessity <strong>of</strong> a closer link between the<br />

educational and vocational system and the<br />

labour market. Finalising and applying<br />

methodologies <strong>of</strong> monitoring young<br />

graduates insertion for various educational<br />

forms (vocational, upper-secondary, tertiary)<br />

is a priority, just as the development <strong>of</strong> more<br />

flexible and efficient systems <strong>of</strong> organising<br />

internship for students. Last but not least, a<br />

more careful analysis is expected with respect<br />

to the competencies which Romanian<br />

employers regard as important for the success<br />

<strong>of</strong> their companies and the adjustment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

educational and vocational supply to them,<br />

periodical update <strong>of</strong> occupational and<br />

vocational training standards, and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

educational curriculum in close dependency<br />

to the change dynamics on labour market.<br />

Bibliography<br />

1. Damian, R.M., (2011) – University<br />

Graduates and Labour Market, Romanian<br />

Tracer Study, Strategic projects for Romanian<br />

Higher Education, FSE investing in People,<br />

UEFISCDI, prezentare la Conferinta Life<br />

after graduation: The Role <strong>of</strong> Graduate<br />

Employment and Tracking Systems for<br />

Continuous Curricula Development and<br />

Quality Enhancement in Higher Education<br />

UNESCO –CEPES si ULBS, mai 2011Sibiu<br />

2. Nicolescu, L (2002) Contribution <strong>of</strong><br />

Higher Education to the transition towards<br />

the market economy: The case <strong>of</strong> Romania In<br />

K Liuhto & J Jumpponen (Ed) Ten years <strong>of</strong><br />

Transition;<br />

3. Săpătoru D Caplanova A & Slantcheva S<br />

(2002) Estimating the value <strong>of</strong> public and<br />

private higher education in Central and<br />

Eastern Europe: Labour market outcomes and<br />

institutional forms in Bulgaria, Romania and<br />

261<br />

Slovakia (Report to PHARE ACE P98-1020-<br />

R project),<br />

4. Vasile, V coord, (2009) – Improving<br />

vocational competencies among graduates<br />

and youths: A chance for the future -Strategy<br />

and Policy Studies SPOS 2009, Study no. 4<br />

European Institute <strong>of</strong> Romania<br />

http://www.ier.ro/documente/spos_2009/Stud<br />

iul_4_EN_site.pdf<br />

5. Vasile L, (2011) – Particularitati si efecte<br />

economic-sociale ale migratiei fortei de<br />

munca in conditiile globalizarii.Repere<br />

strategice si politici in Romania, teza de<br />

doctorat, INCE-Academia Romana, 2011<br />

6. CEDEFOP (2008) – Future skills needs in<br />

Europe,<br />

www.lisboncouncil.net/component/download<br />

s/?id=212,<br />

http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/developing<br />

-lifelong-learning/index.aspx<br />

7. EC (2011) – Youth employment measures,<br />

European Employment Observatory Review,<br />

2010, Social Europe, Directorate General for<br />

Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion<br />

8. IEN (2010) – Studiu privind piata fortei de<br />

munca tinere in lucrarea “Efectele crizei<br />

asupra pietei muncii. Mecanisme si politici<br />

pentru cresterea ocuparii si performanta in<br />

munca” (coord Vasile V) in Programul<br />

Evaluarea Stării Economiei Naţionale - ESEN<br />

2009-2010 (PF-AR) INCE/Academia<br />

Română – in manuscris, pe CD<br />

9. INS (2000) - AMIGO, Ancheta<br />

complementară”Tranziţia de la şcoală la<br />

muncă”, trt III 2000,<br />

10. INS (2009) -Accesul tinerilor pe piata<br />

muncii, modul ad hoc la Ancheta AMIGO, tr<br />

II 2009 si comunicat de presa nr 237 din 3<br />

decembrie 2009 Accesul tinerilor pe piaţa<br />

forţei de muncă Modul ad hoc ataşat<br />

cercetării statistice asupra forţei de muncă în<br />

gospodării (AMIGO) în trimestrul II 2009 -<br />

adresat tinerilor în vârstă de 15-34 ani<br />

11. MECT, (2008) - Ordin nr.<br />

6012/21.11.2008 pentru aprobarea<br />

Metodologiei şi a instrumentelor de lucru<br />

privind studiile de monitorizare a inserţiei pe<br />

piaţa muncii a absolvenţilor de învăţământ


superior din România<br />

http://www.edu.ro/index.php/articles/11137.<br />

12. WEF (2009) - Global Competitiveness<br />

report 2009-2010,<br />

https://members.weforum.org/pdf/GCR09/G<br />

CR20092010fullreport.pdf, World Economic<br />

262<br />

Forum 2009.<br />

http://www.weforum.org/issues/globalcompetitiveness


263


Section Finance, Banking and Accounting<br />

Sub-section: Finances


THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE PUBLIC DEFICIT<br />

OF THE EU COUNTRIES<br />

Bǎtrâncea Ioan<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />

Bǎtrâncea Maria<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Bogdan Vodǎ University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania<br />

Nichita Ramona-Anca<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />

Abstract: In this paper, the authors make an analysis <strong>of</strong> the second wave <strong>of</strong> the actual World<br />

Financial Crisis. They present the consequences <strong>of</strong> the first wave <strong>of</strong> the World Financial Crisis,<br />

namely the Banking Crisis, on the EU countries public debts.<br />

Keywords: analysis, crisis, public debts, EU<br />

JEL Classification: G30<br />

1. European Bailout Plan<br />

The first wave <strong>of</strong> the global financial crisis<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> a deep crisis within the<br />

international banking system caused by<br />

mortgage contracts. The devastating effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> this first wave were only delayed - not<br />

eliminated - by states interventions through<br />

state bailouts given to banks in difficulty. To<br />

mitigate the effects <strong>of</strong> this crisis, the<br />

European Bailout Plan was passed in 2008<br />

within the EU Zone, which in summary<br />

provided the following:<br />

- Any financial support had to be given on<br />

time and it was temporary;<br />

- Taxpayers interests had to be protected;<br />

- Remaining shareholders had to deal with<br />

governmental interventions;<br />

- Governments were free to change<br />

companies management when necessary;<br />

- Governments were entitled to changing<br />

banking wage policies;<br />

- Stipulations relating to EU Bailout Plan had<br />

to be followed as stated;<br />

- No secondary effects on other UE members<br />

were allowed.<br />

267<br />

Besides the bailout amount <strong>of</strong> 1465 billion<br />

Euros, the EU Bailout Plan also stipulated<br />

that bailed banks could not give dividends to<br />

investors until the total amount received by<br />

them was returned to the governments.<br />

Moreover, governments had the right to be<br />

represented on the board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> bailed<br />

banks by special observers. As a consequence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the above stipulations, European stock<br />

markets fell the very next day this plan was<br />

approved.<br />

There were also some exceptions. Many<br />

French banks like Credit Agricole or BNP<br />

Parisbas refused governmental help because<br />

<strong>of</strong> its interfering role in bank management.<br />

Other banks accepted the bailout plan, as<br />

following: Barclay’s (UK): 1.62 billion £;<br />

Royal Bank <strong>of</strong> Scotland (UK): 5 billion £;<br />

Fortis (The Netherlands/Belgium): 11.2<br />

billion €; Dexia (France/Belgium): 6.4 billion<br />

€; Hypo Real Estate (Germany): 35 billion €.<br />

This bailout given to banks by EU states was<br />

misunderstood by them, for several reasons,<br />

among which the following:


- When banks know that the state will support<br />

them during crises, they can afford to take<br />

bigger risks.<br />

- Without more regulation, banks are driven<br />

to increase their returns by taking bigger<br />

risks.<br />

- When banks gain huge amounts <strong>of</strong> money,<br />

they keep the pr<strong>of</strong>its; when banks loose, it is<br />

the state that pays.<br />

Looking back, one can see that the European<br />

public has discovered an interesting fact: the<br />

2008-2009 fiscal stimulus programs, which<br />

were aimed at forestalling an even greater<br />

crisis, generated more debts than jobs. By<br />

analyzing this situation, one conclusion<br />

arises: cheap money (through cost and high<br />

liquidity levels) has deepened the crisis.<br />

2. It’s all in the history<br />

Recent past history showed, on one hand, the<br />

financial crisis deepened the problems <strong>of</strong><br />

several European countries because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

monetary and financial structures <strong>of</strong> the Euro<br />

zone. On the other hand, the crisis resulted in<br />

extreme shortage <strong>of</strong> liquidity for European<br />

banks. During 2007-2008, banks <strong>of</strong> core Euro<br />

zone countries (Germany, France, The<br />

Netherlands, Belgium) continued to lend to<br />

peripheral countries (Italy, Spain, Ireland,<br />

Greece, Portugal). Gross cross-border claims<br />

from core to periphery reached 1.5 trillion<br />

Euros in 2008, representing almost three<br />

times the capital <strong>of</strong> core banks.<br />

The European Central Bank (ECB)<br />

intervened, lending freely and making it<br />

possible for banks to start dealing with their<br />

weak position. Also, the ECB reaction was<br />

very different in 2009 when states were<br />

facing growing borrowing needs due to the<br />

crisis. The ECB watched as interest rates<br />

rose, financial institutions speculated against<br />

state debt, and state bankruptcy raised its<br />

head. In such a difficult financial<br />

environment, the Euro zone left each state to<br />

defend itself in the financial markets.<br />

When looking closer at the above mentioned<br />

time line, the following can be stated: The<br />

financial crisis has been followed by a wave<br />

268<br />

<strong>of</strong> governmental defaults on public debt<br />

obligations; The financial crisis has led to, or<br />

exacerbated, sharp economic downturns, low<br />

government revenues, widening government<br />

deficits, and high levels <strong>of</strong> debt, pushing<br />

many governments into default; As recovery<br />

from the global financial crisis begins, the<br />

global recession endures, at some point to the<br />

threat <strong>of</strong> a second wave <strong>of</strong> the crisis:<br />

sovereign debt crisis.<br />

3. Sovereign debt crises<br />

In a financial crisis, government spending<br />

increases dramatically in the attempt to<br />

stabilize the financial system and stimulate<br />

economic activity. Hence, tax revenues fall,<br />

fiscal surpluses turn into deficits and existing<br />

deficits increase. Because <strong>of</strong> the difficult<br />

financial situation, all sixteen members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

European Monetary Union (EMU) have<br />

violated treaty limits on allowable budget<br />

deficits (some more than four times).<br />

Moreover, the leading economies <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world have all seen their deficits shoot<br />

higher, some to record levels.<br />

Among all the obstacles, there is a certainty:<br />

when economies are contracting or even grow<br />

slowly, bringing these deficits back down to<br />

earth, the situation turns into an unenviable<br />

challenge. Governments have to survive by<br />

turning to the markets. Then those increased<br />

deficits turn into growing debt loads. When<br />

debt reaches 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the GDP threshold,<br />

the borrowing costs for governments start<br />

ticking higher and so does the market<br />

scrutiny. Related to this topic and in the<br />

attempt to warn financial markets, the IMF<br />

stated in 2010 that five <strong>of</strong> the top seven<br />

developed countries in the world would have<br />

debt levels exceeding 100 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

during the next four years.<br />

If deficits and debts rise and economic<br />

activity appears unlikely to solve fiscal<br />

problems, the creditworthiness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

government falls under intense scrutiny.<br />

That’s when downgrades appear. This is the<br />

situation many countries around the world<br />

had to face in 2009 and 2010, when the


sovereign debt crises burst. Greece’s<br />

sovereign debt rating has been downgraded to<br />

junk status. Spain has lost its AAA rating. UK<br />

could have lost its AAA status if its deficit<br />

would not have been addressed. Across the<br />

ocean, Japan’s outlook has been cut to<br />

negative and rating agencies have even<br />

warned the U.S.<br />

In such an environment, when investors see<br />

more risk, they require more return.<br />

Therefore, the borrowing costs for troubled<br />

countries rises. Then, it becomes harder to<br />

finance spending needs and harder to finance<br />

existing debt. That’s when defaults show up.<br />

Unless governments can demonstrate they’re<br />

willing to take tough steps to reign in debt,<br />

crisis can spread quickly.<br />

4. Public deficit, nowadays problem in the<br />

EU<br />

Regarding the issue <strong>of</strong> the EU public deficit,<br />

it must be stated that this economic<br />

phenomenon is accepted within the union<br />

until it exceeds values stated in documents<br />

like: Maastricht Treaty (1992); Stability and<br />

Growth Pact (1997).<br />

According to the Maastricht Treaty, countries<br />

have to meet several convergence criteria,<br />

among which the following:<br />

- An inflation rate no more than 1.5% higher<br />

than the average <strong>of</strong> the three lowest inflation<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> EU member states over the previous<br />

year;<br />

- Long-term interest rates must not exceed by<br />

more than 2% the lowest inflation rates <strong>of</strong> EU<br />

countries over the previous year;<br />

- The Member State is required to join the<br />

exchange-rate mechanism (ERM II) for two<br />

consecutive years before entering the Euro<br />

269<br />

zone and it should not have devalued its<br />

currency during the period;<br />

- A government budget deficit must not<br />

exceed 3% <strong>of</strong> each country’s GDP at the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> the preceding fiscal year;<br />

- A gross debt to GDP ratio must not exceed<br />

60% at the end <strong>of</strong> the preceding fiscal year.<br />

On the other hand, the Stability and Growth<br />

Pact (1997) provided:<br />

- mechanisms for multilateral surveillance<br />

and enforcement;<br />

- stated that budgetary positions should<br />

normally be “close to balance or in surplus”;<br />

- if requirements are broken, EU can apply a<br />

fine <strong>of</strong> 0.5 % <strong>of</strong> the GDP to its members.<br />

To comply with the provisions <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

treaties, EU members had to impose a strict<br />

budget discipline, because the budget<br />

positions <strong>of</strong> some countries pose a risk for the<br />

sustainability <strong>of</strong> the public finances <strong>of</strong> these<br />

countries and <strong>of</strong> the European Monetary<br />

Union (EMU) as a whole. Moreover, the<br />

national fiscal policies <strong>of</strong> EU members were<br />

strictly subordinated to the inflation target <strong>of</strong><br />

the European Central Bank. Also, the national<br />

governments were obliged to meet rigid<br />

parameters and could not use fiscal policies<br />

freely to increase growth and employment.<br />

Nevertheless, since the financial meltdown<br />

has begun, 20 EU countries (among which all<br />

16 <strong>of</strong> the EMU’s members) have been guilty<br />

<strong>of</strong> excessive spending. During all this period,<br />

European governments were and still are<br />

struggling to rein in deficits after the worst<br />

downturn since World War II. The table<br />

below presents some data concerning the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> deficits:


As it can be seen, twenty member countries<br />

are facing EU deadlines to get their budgets<br />

back in shape. They are all deemed crucial to<br />

economic stability and growth as the EU<br />

claws back from recession. A review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

situation in Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and<br />

Malta shows all four countries have taken<br />

adequate steps to narrow their deficits. There<br />

are requests that Malta and Lithuania are<br />

granted another 1 and 2 years to get back in<br />

shape.<br />

Most analysts stated that in 2010<br />

unemployment rate in the EU would reach the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> 10.25% and the public deficit would<br />

be 7.5% <strong>of</strong> EU GDP. In 2009 budget<br />

shortfalls <strong>of</strong> two or three times the EU limit<br />

would have been unthinkable in most<br />

countries. Because many countries have<br />

exceeding deficits, the EU Commission<br />

proposed deadlines to reduce gaps. Here are<br />

some examples:<br />

- Hungary met its 2009 deficit target <strong>of</strong> 3.9%<br />

<strong>of</strong> GDP. It has until 2011 to bring its deficit<br />

below 3%.<br />

Table no. 1 Budgetary Deficit/GDP<br />

COUNTRY 2007 2008 2009<br />

Ireland 0.1 -7.3 -14.3<br />

Greece -5.1 -7.7 -13.6<br />

United Kingdom -2.8 -4.9 -11.5<br />

Spain 1.9 -4.1 -11.2<br />

Portugal -2.6 -2.8 -9.4<br />

Iceland 5.4 -13.5 -9.1<br />

Latvia -0.3 -4.1 -9<br />

Lithuania -1 -3.3 -8.9<br />

Romania -2.5 -5.4 -8.3<br />

France -2.7 -3.3 -7.5<br />

Netherlands 0.2 0.7 -5.3<br />

Hungary -5 -3.8 -4<br />

Bulgaria 0.1 1.8 -3.9<br />

Malta -2.2 -4.5 -3.8<br />

Source: Eurostat data<br />

270<br />

- Latvia ended 2009 with a deficit projected<br />

at just below 10% <strong>of</strong> GDP, as recommended<br />

by the EU. The target for 2010 was 8.5%.<br />

- 13 countries were given 2-5 years to<br />

reinstate fiscal discipline: Italy, Belgium<br />

(until 2012); Germany, France, Spain,<br />

Austria, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic,<br />

Slovakia, Slovenia, Portugal (until 2013);<br />

Ireland (until 2014); UK (until 2014-2015).<br />

The significant indicator for any country is<br />

Gross Debt to GDP Ratio, which has<br />

deteriorated strongly due to recession,<br />

stimulus, capital injection in banks, and<br />

reached dangerous levels in 2010 for the<br />

balance <strong>of</strong> European economies, as it follows:<br />

Greece 115%; Italy 116%; Belgium 97.2%;<br />

UK 78.7%; Portugal 77.4%, France 76.1%;<br />

Germany 72.1%; Austria 69.1%; Ireland<br />

64%, Finland 41.3%. Many analysts think<br />

that the problem in today’s Europe is due to a<br />

natural evolution <strong>of</strong> things and that the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> the financial crisis follows this<br />

pattern: over indebtedness was shifted from<br />

home buyers on to banks, then transferred to<br />

governments (e.g. the recent sovereign debt


crisis in Greece is only a natural development<br />

<strong>of</strong> things).<br />

To prevent amplification <strong>of</strong> budgetary<br />

problems and their propagation in the EU, the<br />

27 EU states have to reduce public deficit and<br />

have received guidelines from the EU to<br />

achieve this goal within 2011-2014.<br />

5. The situation <strong>of</strong> Greece, “Achilles Heel<br />

<strong>of</strong> the EU”<br />

Greece has accumulated high levels <strong>of</strong> debt<br />

during the decade before the crisis, when<br />

capital markets were highly liquid. As the<br />

crisis has unfolded, and capital markets have<br />

become more illiquid, Greece may no longer<br />

be able to roll over its maturing debt<br />

obligations. Some analysts have discussed the<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> a Greek default. Greece has<br />

relied heavily on external financing for<br />

funding the budget. Between 2001, when it<br />

adopted the euro as its currency, and 2008,<br />

Greece’s reported budget deficits averaged<br />

5% per year, compared to a Euro-zone<br />

average <strong>of</strong> 2%. Its current account deficits<br />

averaged 9% per year, compared to a Eurozone<br />

average <strong>of</strong> 1%.<br />

The causes <strong>of</strong> financial crisis in Greece can<br />

be grouped into two categories, namely:<br />

- Domestic causes: high government spending<br />

<strong>of</strong> successive Greek governments; weak<br />

revenue collection; structural rigidities in<br />

Greece’s economy.<br />

- International causes: access to capital at<br />

low interest rates after adopting the Euro;<br />

weak enforcement <strong>of</strong> EU rules concerning<br />

debt and deficit ceilings facilitated Greece’s<br />

ability to accumulate high levels <strong>of</strong> external<br />

debt.<br />

To prevent the entry <strong>of</strong> Greece into collapse,<br />

Euro-zone countries and the International<br />

Monetary Fund, seeking to halt a widening<br />

European debt crisis that has threatened the<br />

stability <strong>of</strong> the Euro, agreed to extend Greece<br />

an unprecedented €110 billion ($147 billion)<br />

rescue in return for Draconian budget cuts.<br />

Germany, whose population has been deeply<br />

sceptical <strong>of</strong> a bailout, beared the largest share<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Euro-zone contribution, namely €22.3<br />

271<br />

billion <strong>of</strong> the total amount. The Euro-zone<br />

loans carry an interest rate <strong>of</strong> about 5%,<br />

compared to about 3% for the IMF<br />

contribution. Some €10 billion will be set<br />

aside as “bank stabilization” fund for use if<br />

the condition <strong>of</strong> Greek financial institutions<br />

worsens.<br />

The Greek government has promised to slash<br />

and then freeze public sector wages, raise sin<br />

taxes, increase value-added taxes, impose a<br />

new levy on businesses, cut pension<br />

payments and increase retirement ages for<br />

some public-sector workers. The steps are<br />

expected to save the state €30 billion through<br />

2013. Thus, the Greek government has<br />

adopted the following measures:<br />

- Public sector limit <strong>of</strong> €1,000 introduced to<br />

bi-annual bonus, abolished entirely for those<br />

earning over €3,000 a month;<br />

- An 8% cut on public sector allowances and<br />

a 3% pay cut for DEKO (public sector<br />

utilities) employees;<br />

- Limit <strong>of</strong> €800 per month to 13 th and 14 th<br />

monthly pension instalments; abolished for<br />

pensioners receiving over €2,500 a month;<br />

- Return <strong>of</strong> a special tax on high pensions;<br />

- Changes concerning laws governing lay-<strong>of</strong>fs<br />

and overtime payment;<br />

- Extraordinary taxes imposed on company<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>its;<br />

- Increases in VAT to 23%, 11% and 5.5%.<br />

- 10% rise in luxury taxes and taxes on<br />

alcohol, cigarettes, and fuel;<br />

- Equalization <strong>of</strong> men and women pension<br />

age limits;<br />

- General pension age has not been changed,<br />

but a mechanism has been introduced to scale<br />

them to life expectancy changes;<br />

- Average retirement age for public sector<br />

workers has increased from 61 to 65;<br />

- Public-owned companies to be reduced<br />

from 6,000 to 2,000.<br />

Only the nearest future will show whether<br />

these harsh methods have generated the<br />

appropriate results.<br />

6. Broader implications <strong>of</strong> Greece crisis:<br />

Spillover Effect


During the last two years, there were several<br />

concerns that Greece’s crisis could spill over<br />

to other European countries in difficult<br />

economic positions, including Portugal,<br />

Ireland, Italy, and Spain. European authorities<br />

warned that debt programs in Greece and<br />

other high deficit countries such as Spain,<br />

Portugal, Ireland and even Italy may affect<br />

stronger European countries. Greece’s foreign<br />

policy focus on the region and growing trade<br />

volumes between neighbour countries like<br />

Serbia, Albania, Macedonia, Romania,<br />

Bulgaria and Turkey could not remain<br />

indifferent to the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the crisis next<br />

door.<br />

All their concerns were entirely justifiable.<br />

PIIGS ZONE, that is Portugal, Ireland, Italy,<br />

Greece, Spain, borrowed heavily during the<br />

credit bubble. Some argued that the spillover<br />

effect could appear in Europe just as it<br />

appeared in Asia, where investors’ herding<br />

behaviour contributed to the spillover <strong>of</strong><br />

Asian financial crisis (1997-1998). Others<br />

argued the spillover hypothesis was unlikely<br />

to happen: the low levels <strong>of</strong> national savings<br />

in Greece and Portugal put these countries in<br />

the weakest financial position, at 7.2% <strong>of</strong><br />

GDP and 10.2% <strong>of</strong> GDP respectively,<br />

compared to an EU average <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />

20%. Spain and Ireland, by contrast, were<br />

closer to the EU average at 19% <strong>of</strong> GDP and<br />

17% <strong>of</strong> GDP, respectively, putting them in a<br />

stronger financial position.<br />

Two macroeconomic indicators were<br />

significant for the evolution <strong>of</strong> these<br />

countries, namely: government expenditure as<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> GDP and government consolidated<br />

gross debt as percent <strong>of</strong> GDP. The figures for<br />

each country were as following: Portugal:<br />

spending 51%; debt 77%; Ireland: spending<br />

48%; debt 64%; Italy: spending 52%; debt<br />

116%; Greece: spending 50%; debt 116%;<br />

Spain: spending 46%; debt 53%.<br />

7. Conclusions<br />

272<br />

All in all, when referring to the implications<br />

<strong>of</strong> the world financial crisis on the European<br />

public deficit, it can be stated that the bubble<br />

disease has spread to the whole financial<br />

system, making governments to bail banks<br />

and acquire liabilities. Although liabilities are<br />

necessary, borrowing more to satisfy previous<br />

debt obligation will only delay the problem,<br />

not solve it. Nowadays, it’s too early to<br />

measure the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the bailout plan<br />

for the Euro-zone. In our view, time is the<br />

best solution to the debt problem. Giving it 5-<br />

8 years, reducing spending and increasing<br />

saving to pay down the debts is the most<br />

pragmatic way <strong>of</strong> solving it.<br />

8. References<br />

Single-author books:<br />

1.Lamfalussy, Alexandre. Financial Crises in<br />

Emerging Economies. New Haven: Yale<br />

University Press, 2000.<br />

Articles in journals:<br />

2.Buti, Marco, Larch, Martin. The<br />

Commission propsals for stronger EU<br />

economic governance. VoxEU, 14 th <strong>of</strong><br />

October (2010).<br />

3.Dabrowski, Marek. Macroeconomic<br />

surveillance within the EU. CASE network Ebriefs,<br />

No. 13(2010).<br />

4.EFC. Lessons from the financial crisis for<br />

European financial stability arrangements,<br />

EFC High-Level Working Group on Cross-<br />

Border Financial Stability Arrangements. 18 th<br />

June(2009).<br />

5.European Council. Strengthening Economic<br />

Governance in the EU, Report <strong>of</strong> the Task<br />

Force to the European Council. Brussels, 21 st<br />

<strong>of</strong> October(2010).<br />

6.Monti, Mario. A new strategy for the single<br />

market. Report to the President <strong>of</strong> the<br />

European Commission. 9 th <strong>of</strong> May(2010).<br />

7.Wolf, Martin. The Challenges <strong>of</strong> Managing<br />

our Post-crisis World. Financial Times, 30 th<br />

<strong>of</strong> December(2009).


Subsection: Accounting


INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE IN THE ANNUAL<br />

REPORTS OF ROMANIAN MANUFACTURING LISTED COMPANIES –<br />

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK<br />

Bogdan Victoria<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Balint Platon Judit<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Farcaş Mariana<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Abstract: One <strong>of</strong> the most researched topic regarding financial reporting and disclosure <strong>of</strong> today is<br />

the way intellectual capital or knowledge assets contributes to the improving <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

information disclosed and create or add value to business performance. Also, it is acknowledged<br />

that a company has access to a variety <strong>of</strong> tools for disclosing information on intellectual capital. In<br />

our study we have decided to investigate the concept, the measurement models and the intellectual<br />

capital disclosure practices using as the source <strong>of</strong> our documentation books, articles, working<br />

papers and online publications. So, in the first part <strong>of</strong> our research we have presented several<br />

points <strong>of</strong> view in respect to the concept <strong>of</strong> knowledge assets or intellectual capital and in the second<br />

part we have reviewed the literature on the topic highlightening several scholars opinion on<br />

reporting and disclosure issues.<br />

Keywords: knowledge, intellectual capital, reporting practices, disclosure, annual reports<br />

JEL codes: M41, M10, G14, D83<br />

1. Introduction<br />

In knowledge based economy value is the<br />

result <strong>of</strong> knowledge and information.<br />

Moreover, business organizations can not<br />

generate pr<strong>of</strong>its without ideas, skills talent<br />

and intelligence <strong>of</strong> humans. As Depres and<br />

Chauvel (2000) observed beside it’s<br />

concentration on intangibles, knowledge<br />

economy is characterized by networked,<br />

digital, virtual and extremely fast moving<br />

businesses, better performing, the primary<br />

factor <strong>of</strong> production is knowledge. The three<br />

pillars <strong>of</strong> knowledge economy according to<br />

Stewart (2001) are:<br />

- knowledge as the most important factor <strong>of</strong><br />

production; creating value through<br />

knowledge economy is the process <strong>of</strong><br />

creating value from information;<br />

- knowledge assets; intellectual capital has<br />

become the most important knowledge assets<br />

embedded in talent, skills, know-how, know-<br />

275<br />

what, relationships and other human values<br />

that can be used to create value;<br />

- adaption to knowledge economy in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

adopting new business language, new<br />

management techniques, new corporate<br />

governance practices, new technologies and<br />

strategies and why not, new accounting.<br />

Studying the literature written on the topic we<br />

have found as Tseng and Goo (2005)<br />

underlined that there is a common lack <strong>of</strong> a<br />

clear definition that would appropriately<br />

describe the concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital.<br />

Also, regarding intellectual capital<br />

components we have found in the studied<br />

literature that intellectual capital is not<br />

detached. As Maditinos, Sevic and Tsaidiris<br />

(2009) pointed out several scholars grouped<br />

intellectual capital in four categories: human<br />

capital; structural capital; customer capital<br />

and innovation capital (Edvinsson and<br />

Malone, 1997; Ross et al., 1997; Stewart,


1997, Sveiby, 1997; Chen et al., 2004, Tseng<br />

and Goo, 2005).<br />

Our paper is organized as follows. The next<br />

section objective is to underline the<br />

differences between classical assets and<br />

knowledge based assets focusing on<br />

definition and recognition <strong>of</strong> intellectual<br />

capital. The literature review section is<br />

concentrated on intellectual capital<br />

measurement models and also reporting<br />

issues. In the last section we have drawn the<br />

conclusions and the limits <strong>of</strong> our study.<br />

2. From classical assets to knowledge based<br />

assets<br />

Companies, regardless <strong>of</strong> their size, in order<br />

to undertake their activity and create value,<br />

own both tangible and intangible assets.<br />

Buildings, work equipments and instalations,<br />

computers are, <strong>of</strong> course, tangible assets, and<br />

the ways in which these generate value for a<br />

company and affect performance have been<br />

the subject <strong>of</strong> theoretical and practical<br />

speculations in economic literature in past<br />

centuries. On the other hand, the considerable<br />

growth in the diversity <strong>of</strong> intangible assets<br />

has reoriented, in the last few decades, the<br />

focus <strong>of</strong> researchers from tangible to<br />

knowledge based assets. But, what are<br />

knowledge based assets? In contrast with<br />

tangible asssets, these are more dificult to<br />

identify, to clasify, to asses and highlight in<br />

the structures <strong>of</strong> financial situations. Yet, in a<br />

knowledge based economy, it is imperatively<br />

important to understand which activity<br />

generates real added value and to adapt<br />

contemporary financial reporting to this<br />

economic reality. Knowledge based assets or<br />

intangible assets have existed for a very long<br />

time. As Cohen (2008) so vividly remarked,<br />

the first caveman to light a fire knew that he<br />

held valuable information. This ability <strong>of</strong> his<br />

represented an intangible asset. Expanding on<br />

this reasoning, Cohen underscored the fact<br />

that the people who invented the alphabet or<br />

the ones who created the calendar or the<br />

numeral system were early inventors <strong>of</strong><br />

extremely important intangible assets. It’s a<br />

276<br />

pity they did not know how to patent their<br />

inventions or protect their works through<br />

copyright (Cohen, 2008:25). It is vital to keep<br />

in mind that the terms <strong>of</strong> knowledge,<br />

intangibles and intellectual capital are usually<br />

used interchangeably. As Mansour et al.<br />

(2008) emphasize the terms <strong>of</strong> intangibles in<br />

accounting literature, knowledge assets by<br />

economist and intellectual capital in the<br />

management and legal literature are refer<br />

essentially to the same thing: a nonphysical<br />

claim to future benefits. Unlike the physical<br />

or classical assets, the knowledge assets are<br />

characterized by increasing return on scale.<br />

Return is the outcome <strong>of</strong> value generated by<br />

innovation (discovery), unique organizational<br />

designs or human resources practice<br />

(Mansour et al., 2008).<br />

An interesting point <strong>of</strong> view is <strong>of</strong> Bontis<br />

(1998). He emphasized that intellectual<br />

capital has been considered by many, defined<br />

by some, understood by a select few and<br />

formally valued by practically no one. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the literature written on intellectual capital,<br />

according to Bontis (1998) makes a set <strong>of</strong><br />

claims that are related to the value and<br />

intangible nature <strong>of</strong> this resource. As Bontis<br />

(1998) noticed the concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual<br />

capital was first introduced by Kenneth<br />

Galbraith in 1969, who believed that<br />

intellectual capital was more than pure<br />

intellect but included “intellectual action”. It<br />

is the move from “having” knowledge and<br />

skills to “using” the knowledge and skills that<br />

is captured in a numerous way in the<br />

literature. The management literature shows<br />

two main streams that discuss knowledge<br />

assets, in opinion <strong>of</strong> Marr et al. (2004). One<br />

<strong>of</strong> them, taking an epistemological approach,<br />

interprets knowledge as an entity and<br />

discusses the differences between information<br />

and knowledge and the implications for<br />

knowledge management, whereas the other<br />

stream <strong>of</strong> literature discusses knowledge as<br />

an organizational asset that has to be<br />

managed in order to improve organizational<br />

performance. The later stream <strong>of</strong> research<br />

seeks to help managers in managing and


evaluating the company performance (Teece,<br />

2000; Roos et al, 1997; Stewart, 1997). In<br />

Marr et al. vision a major contribution<br />

provided by this research stream is the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital, which help<br />

managers to identify and classify the<br />

knowledge components <strong>of</strong> an organization.<br />

The authors also considered that intellectual<br />

capital contributed to a better understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge assets and was a first step<br />

towards a less abstract and more operative<br />

conceptualizing <strong>of</strong> knowledge.<br />

As Abeysekera (2007) noticed several authors<br />

have taken a long-term view in defining and<br />

analyzing the nature <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital,<br />

though their definitions have varied<br />

significantly (Edvinsson and Sullivan, 1996;<br />

Brooking, 1997; Edvinsson, 1997; Edvinsson<br />

and Malone, 1998; Klein, 1998; Knight,<br />

1999). Because in our paper we are analysing<br />

mainly intellectual capital reporting and<br />

disclosure, we are interested in the definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> Edvinsson and Sullivan (1996). In their<br />

opinion intellectual capital can be defined as<br />

knowledge that can be converted into value.<br />

Buck et al. (2001) consider that the<br />

expression “intellectual capital statement”<br />

refers to “capital”, emphasizing the<br />

accounting value. While some authors use the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital while referring<br />

to the knowledge <strong>of</strong> a social community, such<br />

as an organization or pr<strong>of</strong>essional practice<br />

groups (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998), other<br />

scholars interpret intellectual capital as a<br />

human resource (Boudreau and Ramstad,<br />

1997; Liebowitz and Wright, 1999) or<br />

associate it with information technology<br />

(Davenport and Prusak, 1998). Abeysekera<br />

and Guthrie (2002) consider there is<br />

considerable ambiguity as to what constitutes<br />

intellectual assets, some scholars including all<br />

intangibles (Ross et al., 1997; Knight, 1999)<br />

but others do not recognize intangibles in the<br />

financial statements (Caddy, 2000; Edvinsson<br />

and Sullivan, 1996). Abeysekera and Guthrie<br />

(2002) also point out the fact that most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

definitions <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital are based on<br />

recognizing knowledge or intellectual assets<br />

277<br />

only. They have ignored the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

existence <strong>of</strong> intellectual liabilities in the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital (Harvey and<br />

Lusch, 1999; Caddy 2000) and external<br />

intellectual liabilities (Dzinkowski, 2000).<br />

But Abeysekera (2001) suggests that if<br />

knowledge is well managed then value is<br />

added via intellectual capital and if it is badly<br />

managed, this may lead to intellectual<br />

liabilities. According to Tseng and Goo<br />

(2005) there is a common lack <strong>of</strong> a clear<br />

definition that would appropriately describe<br />

the concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital. However,<br />

they seem to adopt Stewart’s (1997)<br />

definition, also widely, recognized, that<br />

intellectual capital has been formalized,<br />

captured and enforced so as to generate an<br />

advanced value to the organization.<br />

Regarding intellectual capital components we<br />

have found in the studied literature that<br />

intellectual capital is not detached. As<br />

Maditinos, Sevic and Tsaidiris (2009) pointed<br />

out several scholars grouped intellectual<br />

capital in four categories: human capital;<br />

structural capital; customer capital and<br />

innovation capital (Edvinsson and Malone,<br />

1997; Ross et al., 1997; Stewart, 1997,<br />

Sveiby, 1997; Chen et al., 2004, Tseng and<br />

Goo, 2005).<br />

3. Literature review on intellectual capital<br />

measurement models<br />

As reflected in the various studies conducted<br />

by different scholars found in the literature,<br />

measuring intellectual capital is not a science<br />

as “exact” as mathemathics or accounting.<br />

According to CEN (2004) (1), there are many<br />

interdependencies with other activities and<br />

quite <strong>of</strong>ten the context in which value is<br />

created is not the same as the one in which<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the knowledge efforts take place.<br />

And as noted by Iske and Boekh<strong>of</strong>f (2001)<br />

value is not an “intrinsic” property <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge: the value <strong>of</strong> knowledge fully<br />

depends on how knowledge is being used.<br />

Some knowledge can have a lot <strong>of</strong> value in<br />

one situation but be worthless in another. As


we can see in the figure bellow, value can be added in five dimensions:<br />

Fig 1.<br />

Source: CEN (2004), European Guide to good Practice in Knowledge<br />

Management – Part 4: Guidelines for Measuring Knowledge Management, pg. 7<br />

Many approaches to the measurement <strong>of</strong><br />

intellectual capital can be identified in the<br />

literature. In Sveiby’s (2) view<br />

the measuring approaches for intangibles fall<br />

into at least four categories <strong>of</strong> measurement<br />

approaches.<br />

Direct Intellectual Capital methods (DIC)<br />

estimates the value <strong>of</strong> intangible assets by<br />

identifying its various components. Once<br />

these components are identified, they can be<br />

directly evaluated, either individually or as an<br />

aggregated coefficient. Market<br />

Capitalization Methods (MCM) calculates<br />

the difference between a company's market<br />

capitalization and its stockholders' equity as<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> its intellectual capital or<br />

intangible assets. Return on Assets methods<br />

(ROA) - average pre-tax earnings <strong>of</strong> a<br />

company for a period <strong>of</strong> time are divided by<br />

the average tangible assets <strong>of</strong> the company.<br />

The result is a company ROA that is then<br />

compared with its industry average. The<br />

278<br />

difference is multiplied by the company's<br />

average tangible assets to calculate the<br />

average annual earnings from the intangibles.<br />

Dividing the above-average earnings by the<br />

company's average cost <strong>of</strong> capital or an<br />

interest rate, one can derive an estimate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> its intangible assets or intellectual<br />

capital. Scorecard Methods (SC) - the<br />

various components <strong>of</strong> intangible assets or<br />

intellectual capital are identified and<br />

indicators and indices are generated and<br />

reported in scorecards or as graphs. SC<br />

methods are similar to DIC methods, expect<br />

that no estimate is made <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

intangible assets. A composite index may or<br />

may not be produced. The figure bellow<br />

highlights the four above mentioned well<br />

known measurement approaches and shows<br />

that one may consider various facets, such as<br />

financial valuation, or high levels <strong>of</strong><br />

evaluation that measure the effect <strong>of</strong> a<br />

knowledge management implementation in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> macroelements or at a lower level, that is at the organizational component level.


Fig. 2<br />

Sourse: Karl-Erik Sveiby , Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets, 2001, updated 27.04.2010<br />

As we have found in the studied literature<br />

Skandia is considered the first large<br />

company to have made a truly coherent effort<br />

at measuring knowledge assets (Bontis 1996;<br />

Huseman & Goodman, 1999). In 1985<br />

Skandia developed the first internally<br />

intellectual capital report and became the first<br />

company to issue an intellectual capital<br />

addendum accompanying its traditional<br />

financial report to shareholders in 1994. Leif<br />

Edvinsson, the chief architect behind<br />

Skandia’s initiatives, developed a dynamic<br />

and holistic intellectual capital reporting<br />

model called the Navigator with five areas <strong>of</strong><br />

focus: financial, customer, process, renewal<br />

and development and human capital (Bontis,<br />

2001). According to Edvinsson and Malone<br />

(1997) the new accounting taxonomy sought<br />

to identify the roots odf a company’s value by<br />

measuring hidden dynamic factors that<br />

underlie the visible company <strong>of</strong> buildings and<br />

products. As Bontis (2001) noticed Skandia’s<br />

value scheme contains both financial and<br />

non-financial building blocks that combine to<br />

estimate the company’s market value. This<br />

conceptualization achieved a balance for<br />

Skandia in trying to represent both financial<br />

and non-financial reporting, uncovering and<br />

279<br />

visualizing its intellectual capital, tying its<br />

strategic vision to the company’s core<br />

competencies reflecting knowledge sharing<br />

technology and knowledge assets beyond<br />

intellectual property and reflecting its market<br />

value better.<br />

The Intangible Assets Monitor (Sveiby,<br />

1997) is a method for measuring intellectual<br />

capital and a presentation format that displays<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> relevant indicators for measuring<br />

intellectual capital un a simple fashion. The<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> indicators depends on the<br />

organizational strategy. On the surface, the<br />

Intangible Assets Monitor looks similar to the<br />

Kaplan Norton Balanced Score Card,<br />

however there are significant differences. The<br />

Intangible Assets Monitor can be integrated<br />

into management information systems and it<br />

should be accompanied by a number <strong>of</strong><br />

comments. Only a few <strong>of</strong> the suggested<br />

indicators should be selected and designed<br />

the main purpose to achieve is to get a broad<br />

picture. So, essentially management selects<br />

indicators, based on the strategic objectives <strong>of</strong><br />

the firm, to measure four aspects <strong>of</strong> creating<br />

value from three classes <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital<br />

labeled: people’s competence, internal<br />

structure, external structure and value


creation ways are: growth, renewal,<br />

utilization/efficiency and risk<br />

reduction/stability.<br />

Intellectual Capital-<strong>Index</strong> is an example <strong>of</strong><br />

“second generation” practices that attempt to<br />

consolidate all the different individual<br />

indicators into a single index, and to correlate<br />

the changes in intellectual capital with<br />

changes in the market (Roos et al., 1997). The<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> an IC-<strong>Index</strong> was first advanced by<br />

Goran Roos and his colleagues at Intellectual<br />

Capital Services Ltd., and was first used by<br />

Skandia in its IC supplement to the annual<br />

report. According to Roos et al. (1997) the<br />

IC-<strong>Index</strong> has several distinct features: it is an<br />

idiosyncratic measure; it focuses on the<br />

monitoring <strong>of</strong> the dynamics <strong>of</strong> IC; it is<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> taken into account performance<br />

from prior periods; it shed light on a company<br />

different from an external view typically<br />

based on an examination <strong>of</strong> physical assets; it<br />

is a self-correcting index meaning that if<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> the IC-index does not reflect<br />

changes <strong>of</strong> the market value <strong>of</strong> the company,<br />

then the choice <strong>of</strong> capital forms, weights<br />

and/or indicators is flawed. Like most other<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> tangible assets, an IC-index does<br />

depend on value judgements, in the choice <strong>of</strong><br />

weights, indicators and even the assumption<br />

that intellectual capital is present and<br />

important in company operations. Also, Roos<br />

et al. (1997) argue that intellectual capital<br />

measurement and especially a consolidated<br />

measure such as the IC-index makes a larger<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the organization visible and open to<br />

valuation.<br />

According to Bontis et al. (1999), Economic<br />

Value Added (EVA) was introduce by Stern<br />

Stewart as a comprehensive performance<br />

measure that uses the variables <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

budgeting, financial planning, goal setting,<br />

performance measurement, shareholder<br />

communication and incentive compensation<br />

to account properly for all ways in which<br />

corporate value can be added or lost. While<br />

several scholars consider that economic value<br />

added is the net result <strong>of</strong> all managerial<br />

activities, Bontis et al (1999) described EVA<br />

280<br />

as providing a common language and<br />

benchmark for managers to discuss value<br />

creation and also can increase the legitimacy<br />

<strong>of</strong> a company in the eyes <strong>of</strong> financial markets.<br />

EVA is intended to <strong>of</strong>fer improvements to<br />

market value added calculation. Similar to<br />

EVA, MVA method derives from the Alfred<br />

Marshall concept <strong>of</strong> „economic pr<strong>of</strong>it”. MVA<br />

is the difference between actual market value<br />

<strong>of</strong> the company (invested capital) and the<br />

present value <strong>of</strong> invested capital. In other<br />

words MVA is the difference between cash<br />

out or what investors could get by selling at<br />

the present conditions <strong>of</strong> firm and market and<br />

cah in or what investors contributed over the<br />

years from the beginning <strong>of</strong> the firm.<br />

Tobin’s Q ratio named Q ratio or q, is the<br />

market value <strong>of</strong> invested capital relative to<br />

assets replacement cost (Tobin, 1969). The Q<br />

is the ratio <strong>of</strong> the stock market value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

firm divided by the replacement cost <strong>of</strong> its<br />

assets and changes in Q provide a proxy for<br />

measuring effective performance or not <strong>of</strong> a<br />

firm’s intellectual capital. Tobin developed<br />

the Q ratio as a measure to help predict<br />

investment decision independent on<br />

macroeconomic factors such as interest rate.<br />

In Stewart’s (1997) opinion Tobin’s Q ratio<br />

was not developed as a measure <strong>of</strong><br />

intellectual capital, but former Federal<br />

Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan has noted<br />

that high Q and market to book ratios reflect<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> investments in technology and<br />

human capital. Norton and Kaplan’s Balance<br />

Score Card was created to help managers to<br />

transform organization’s strategy into a<br />

reliable set <strong>of</strong> performances that will provide<br />

framework for a strategic measurement and<br />

management system (Anghel, 2008). A<br />

company’s performance is measured by<br />

indicators covering four major focus<br />

perspectives: financial perspective, customer<br />

perspective, internal process perspective and<br />

learning perspective (Kaplan and Norton,<br />

1996). Balance Score Card indicators are<br />

based on the strategic objectives <strong>of</strong> the firm.<br />

This measurement model <strong>of</strong> intangible assets<br />

was developed considering the ability <strong>of</strong> a


company to exploit and develop its intangible<br />

assets. The Value Added Intellectual<br />

Coefficienttm (VAIC tm ) methodology,<br />

developed by Ante Pulic (1998), is an<br />

analytical procedure designed to enable<br />

management, shareholders and other relevant<br />

stakeholders to effectively monitor and<br />

evaluate the efficiency <strong>of</strong> VA by a firm’s<br />

total resources and each major resource<br />

component. Pulic (1998) states the higher the<br />

VAIC tm coefficient, the better the efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> VA by a firm’s total resources. Formally,<br />

VAIC tm is a composite sum <strong>of</strong> three<br />

indicators: (1) Value Added Capital<br />

Coefficient (VACA) – indicator <strong>of</strong> VA<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> capital employed; Value Added<br />

Human Capital (VAHU) – indicator <strong>of</strong> VA<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> human capital; and (3)<br />

Structural Capital Value Added (STVA) –<br />

indicator <strong>of</strong> VA efficiency <strong>of</strong> structural<br />

capital.<br />

Baruch Lev’s model (1999), knowledge<br />

capital earnings, reveals a way to measure<br />

assets, intellectual eranings and knowledge<br />

earnings. As Lev’s describe his model in an<br />

interview taken by Alan Webber in 1999 (3),<br />

„it’s a computation that starts with what I<br />

call normalized earnings – a measure that’s<br />

based on past and future earnings...My<br />

approach looks at the past. Based on those<br />

forecast, I create an average and I call that<br />

average normalized earnings. From those<br />

normalized earnings, I then substract an<br />

average return on physical and financial<br />

assets, based on the theory that these are<br />

substitutable assets...when I substract from<br />

the total normalised earnings a reasonable<br />

return on the physical and financial assets I<br />

define what remains as the konwledge<br />

earnings”. Further on in the same interview<br />

Baruch Lev mention that technological<br />

capabilities index is based on measures <strong>of</strong><br />

inputs, such as investment in R&D,<br />

investment in product development,<br />

investment in information systems; on<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> intermediate outputs, such as<br />

patens and trademarks; on measures <strong>of</strong><br />

competitive position such as the number <strong>of</strong><br />

281<br />

people who access a particular web site and<br />

on measures based on the ultimate output –<br />

commercialization.<br />

These where some <strong>of</strong> the models that over the<br />

past years were developed to measure<br />

intellectual capital or in general intangible or<br />

knowledge assets.<br />

4. Literature review on intellectual capital<br />

reporting practices<br />

Several scholars have concentrated their<br />

efforts toward understanding and analyzing<br />

intellectual capital reporting practices. For<br />

instance, Abeysekera and Guthrie (2006)<br />

identify the following categories <strong>of</strong><br />

intellectual capital reporting: ratios and<br />

values; reporting intellectual capital via<br />

intellectual capital statements; theoretical<br />

models. Concerning reporting intellectual<br />

capital as ratios and values Roos et al. (1997)<br />

states that intellectual capital is by definition<br />

intangibles and therefore the only possible<br />

way to measure them is by proxy variables or<br />

indicators. Authors like Abeysekera and<br />

Guthrie (2006) considered that there<br />

techniques could be classified into two<br />

broader sub-categories: the firm macro level<br />

for inter-firm comparisons; and <strong>of</strong> measuring<br />

and reporting within firm level (micro) for<br />

interdivisional comparisons. In regard to<br />

reporting intellectual capital through<br />

intellectual capital statements, empirical<br />

models have been proposed to measure<br />

intellectual capital items (Leibowitz &<br />

Wright, 1999; Decker & Hoog, 2000). Some<br />

models used activity based costing to<br />

determinate cost and market value to<br />

determine revenue. In Abeysekera’s vision<br />

(2001) another conceptual approach is to<br />

report intellectual capital in relation to the<br />

“fair value” <strong>of</strong> the firm and to recognize<br />

intellectual revenue or intellectual expense as<br />

the difference <strong>of</strong> fair value between two<br />

periods within the traditional accounting<br />

system. Also, Abeysekera and Guthrie (2006)<br />

identified five major frameworks <strong>of</strong><br />

intellectual capital reporting: structures<br />

holding intellectual assets, developed by


Sveiby (1997), focused on intellectual assets;<br />

capital holding intellectual items, that<br />

analysis intellectual capital in relation to<br />

intellectual assets (Edvinsson, 1997;<br />

Edvinsson and Malone, 1998; Roos et al.,<br />

1997); assets representing intellectual capital,<br />

that focused on intellectual assets and was in<br />

Brooking (1999) interest; strategic and<br />

measurement root focused on the role <strong>of</strong><br />

intellectual capital, that was in attention <strong>of</strong><br />

Roos et al. (1997) research and a combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> assets and capital representing intellectual<br />

capital, developed by IFAC in 1998 and<br />

Dzinkowski (2000).<br />

As Abeysekera (2001) noted annual reports<br />

are an ideal research location for applying the<br />

intellectual capital framework because they<br />

provide a good proxy with which to measure<br />

the comparative positions and trends <strong>of</strong><br />

intellectual capital between firms, industries<br />

and countries. Several papers and studies that<br />

we have found in the literature concerning<br />

intellectual capital issues has used annual<br />

reports as source documents to discover the<br />

status <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital <strong>of</strong> companies<br />

(Abeysekera and Guthrie, 2005; Brennan,<br />

2001; Guthrie and Petty, 2000; Vergauwen<br />

and van Alem, 2005). The value-creation<br />

capabilities <strong>of</strong> different organizations and<br />

entities are studied in the last decade by<br />

several authors like Edvinsson (2002), Bontis<br />

(2004), Tallman et al. (2004), Bonfour and<br />

Edvinsson (2005), Schiuma et al. (2005).<br />

Also, several theoretical contributions have<br />

underlined the strategic importance <strong>of</strong><br />

intangible resources for the value creation<br />

capabilities, some <strong>of</strong> them tried to build<br />

approaches and tools more oriented towards<br />

project and management processes or<br />

analyzed the relationship between knowledge<br />

resources, value creation capabilities and<br />

competitiveness (Bontis, 2004; Bonfour and<br />

Edvinsson, 2005; Pulic, 2005). Lev and<br />

Sougiannis (1996) valued and calculated<br />

intangibles and then correlated those values<br />

with financial measures while Edvinsson<br />

(1997) identified the so called “hidden<br />

values” <strong>of</strong> a company and developed an<br />

282<br />

intellectual capital management model. Also,<br />

various prior studies have suggested that the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital disclosure in<br />

annual reports is relatively low.<br />

5. Conclusions and limits <strong>of</strong> the research<br />

As it can be understood from the above<br />

presented issues concerning the intellectual<br />

capital concept, measurement models and<br />

reporting practices we did not found in the<br />

studied literature on the topic much<br />

homogeneity and uniform views. Also, our<br />

work was a difficult one taking into account<br />

the very rich and diverse literature. However,<br />

we consider that we have synthesized the<br />

main or important aspects regarding the<br />

definition, the measurement and reporting <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge assets. But, there are a few aspects<br />

that were not discussed and this is surely one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the limits <strong>of</strong> our study. Another limit refers<br />

to the fact that we have not pointed out<br />

separately the contributions <strong>of</strong> domestic<br />

authors interested in this subject.<br />

Note<br />

(1) European Committee for Standardization<br />

(Comite Europeen de normalization),<br />

European Guide to good Practice in<br />

Knowledge Management – Part 4: Guidelines<br />

for Measuring Knowledge Management<br />

(2)<br />

http://www.sveiby.com/articles/IntangibleMe<br />

thods.htm/updated 07 April 2010<br />

(3)<br />

http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/31/lev.html?<br />

page=0%2C3/download on 10.01.2011<br />

References<br />

Books<br />

1. Bounfour A., Edvinsson L.. Intellectual<br />

Capital for Communities. Elsevier.<br />

Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005<br />

2. Cohen J.A.. Imobilizarile necorporale -<br />

Evaluare si Beneficii Economice. Bucuresti:<br />

Editura Irecson, 2008<br />

3. Davenport T.H., Prusak L.. Working<br />

Knowledge: How Organizations Manage


What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business<br />

School Press, 1998<br />

4. Edvinsson L..Corporate Longitude.<br />

London: Perason Education, 2002<br />

5. Edvinsson L.. Malone M.S.. Intellectual<br />

Capital.London: Judy Piatkus Publishers,<br />

1998<br />

6. Klein D.A.. The Strategic management <strong>of</strong><br />

Intellectual Capital. Butterworth-Heinemann,<br />

Woburn, M.A., 1998<br />

7. Pulic A.. Value Creation Efficiency at<br />

National and Regional Levels: Case Study -<br />

Croatia and the European Union, Chapter 12<br />

in Bonfour A., Edvinsson L., (eds).<br />

Intellectual Capital for Community - Nations,<br />

Regions and Cities. Elsevier Butterworth-<br />

Heinemann, 2005<br />

8. Schiuma G., Lerro A.. Carlucci D. An<br />

Interfirm Perspective on Intellectual Capital.<br />

pp. 155-169 in Marr B.(eds). Perspectives in<br />

Intellectual Capital, Elsevier Butterworth-<br />

Heinemann, 2005<br />

9. Sveiby K.E..The new organisational<br />

wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge<br />

based assets. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler,<br />

1997<br />

10. Roos J., Roos G., Dragonetti N.C.,<br />

Edvinsson L., Intellectual Capital:<br />

Navigating the New Business Landscape.<br />

London: Macmillan Press, 1997<br />

11. Stewart T.A., Intellectual Capital: The<br />

New Wealth <strong>of</strong> Organizations. New York:<br />

Doubleday/Currency 1997<br />

12. Teece D.J.. Managing Intellectual<br />

Capital: Organizational, Strategic and Policy<br />

Dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University<br />

Press, 2000<br />

Publications<br />

1. Anghel I. (2008) “Analiza şi evaluarea<br />

capitalului intelectual şi a activelor<br />

necorporale”, Revista de economie Teoretică<br />

şi Aplicată, nr. 3, pp. 80-83<br />

2. Abeysekera I., (2001) ”Intellectual capital<br />

and knowledge management: two sides <strong>of</strong> the<br />

same coin” Economic Review, Colombo,<br />

April/June, Feature, vol. 27 no.01-03, pp. 31-<br />

33<br />

283<br />

3. Abeysekera I., Guthrie J., (2002) "An<br />

update review <strong>of</strong> literature on intellectual<br />

capital reporting"", available online at<br />

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstra<br />

ct_id=1362158/ downloaded on 10.11.2010<br />

4. Abeysekera I., Guthrie J., (2005) "Annual<br />

reporting trends <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital in Sri<br />

Lanka", Critical Perspectives on Accounting,<br />

vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 151-163<br />

5. Abeysekera I.K., (2007) "Intellectual<br />

capital reporting between a developing and<br />

developed nation"", Journal <strong>of</strong> Intellectual<br />

Capital, vol. 8 no.2, pp. 329-345<br />

6. Bontis N., (1998) "Intellectual capital: an<br />

an exploratory study that develops measures<br />

and models", Management Decision, vol. 36,<br />

no.2, pp. 63-76<br />

7. Bontis N., (2004) "National Intellectual<br />

Capital <strong>Index</strong>", Journal <strong>of</strong> Intellectual<br />

Capital, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13-39<br />

8. Boudreau J.W., Ramstad P.M., (1997)<br />

"Measuring intellectual capital: learning form<br />

financial history", Human Resource<br />

Management, vol. 36, no. 3, pp 343-356<br />

9. Brennan N., (2001) "Reporting intellectual<br />

capital in annual reports: evidence from<br />

Ireland", Accounting, Auditing &<br />

Accountability Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, pp.<br />

423-436<br />

10. Brooking A., (1997) "The management <strong>of</strong><br />

intellectual capital", Long Range Planning,<br />

vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 364-365<br />

11. Bukh P.N.D., Larsen H.H., Mouritsen J.,<br />

(2001) "Constructing intellectual capital<br />

statements", Scandinavian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 87-108<br />

12. Caddy I., (2000) "Intellectual capital:<br />

recognizing both assets and liabilities",<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Intellectual Capital, vol. 1 no. 2,<br />

pp. 1469-1930<br />

13. Chen J.Z., Xie H.Y, (2004) "Measuring<br />

intellectual capital: a new model and<br />

empirical study", Journal <strong>of</strong> Intellectual<br />

Capital, 5(1), pp. 195-212<br />

14. Dekker R., Hoog R., (2000) "The<br />

monetary value <strong>of</strong> knowledge assets: a micro<br />

approach", Expert Systems with Applications,<br />

18(2), february, pp. 111-124


15. Dzinkowski R., (2000) "The measurement<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital: an<br />

introduction", Management Accounting,<br />

78(2), february, pp. 32-36<br />

16. Edvinsson L., (1997) "Developing<br />

intellectual capital at Skandia", Long Range<br />

Planning, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 366-373<br />

17. Edvinsson L., Sullivan P., (1996)<br />

"Developing a model for managing<br />

intellectual capital", European Management<br />

Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 356-364<br />

18. Guthrie J., Petty R., (2000) "Intellectual<br />

capital: Australian annual reporting<br />

practices", Journal <strong>of</strong> Intellectual Capital,<br />

vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 241-251<br />

19. Harvey M.G., Lusch R. F., (1999)<br />

"Balancing the intellectual capital books:<br />

intangible liabilities", European Management<br />

Journal, 17(1), february, pp. 85-92<br />

20. Iske P., Boekh<strong>of</strong>f T., (2001) "The Value<br />

<strong>of</strong> Knowledge Doesn't Exist"", KM<br />

Magazine, vol. 5, issue 2<br />

21. Knight D.J., (1999) "Performance<br />

measures for increasing intellectual capital",<br />

Planning Review, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 22-27<br />

22. Lev B., Sougiannis T., ( 1996) "The<br />

capitalization, amortization and value<br />

relevance <strong>of</strong> R&D", Journal <strong>of</strong> Accounting<br />

and Economics, vol. 21, pp. 107 - 138<br />

23. Liebowitz J., Wright K., (1999) "Does<br />

measuring knowledge make cents?", Expert<br />

Systems with Aplications, vol. 17, no. 5, pp.<br />

99-103<br />

24. Maditinos D., Sevic Z., Tsairidis C.,<br />

(2009)"Intellectual Capital and Business<br />

Performance: An Empirical Study for the<br />

Greek Listed Companies", 7th International<br />

Conference on Accounting and Finance in<br />

Transition, 23-25 July 2009, Greenwich,<br />

London<br />

25. Mansour E., Mohammad A., Missi F.,<br />

(2008) "Validity <strong>of</strong> Accounting Models in the<br />

Knowledge Era"", European and<br />

Mediterranean Conference on Information<br />

Systems, 2008<br />

26. Marr B., Schiuma G., Neely A., (2004)<br />

"Intellectual capital - defining key<br />

284<br />

performance indicators for organizational<br />

knowledge assets", Business Process<br />

Management Journal, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 551-<br />

569<br />

27. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S., (1998) "Social<br />

capital, intellectual capital and the<br />

organizational advantage", Academy <strong>of</strong><br />

Management Review, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 242-<br />

266<br />

28. Petty R.M., Cuganesan S., Finch N., Ford<br />

G., (2009) "Intellectual Capital and<br />

Valuation: Challenges in the Voluntary<br />

Disclosure <strong>of</strong> Value Drivers", Academic and<br />

Business Research Institute , Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Finance and Accountancy, August 2009,<br />

pp.1-7 available online at<br />

http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09177.pdf<br />

downloaded on 15.01.2011<br />

29. Sveiby K.E., (2001–2010) "Methods for<br />

Measuring Intangible assets", available online<br />

at<br />

http://www.sveiby.com/articles/IntangibleMe<br />

thods.htm<br />

30. Tallman S., Jenkins M., Henry N., Pinch<br />

S., (2004) "Knowledge, clusters and<br />

competitive advantage", Academy <strong>of</strong><br />

Management Review, vol. 29 no. 2 pp.258-<br />

271<br />

31. Tseng C.Y., Goo Y.J.J., ()"Intellectual<br />

capital and corporate value in an emerging<br />

economy: empirical study <strong>of</strong> Taiwanese<br />

manufacturers", R&D Management, 35(2),<br />

pp. 187-201<br />

32. Vergauwen P.G.M.C., van Alem F.J.C.,<br />

(2005) "Annual report IC disclosures in The<br />

Netherlands, France and Germany", Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Intellectual Capital, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 89-<br />

104<br />

33. European Committee for Standardization,<br />

(2004) "European Guide to Good practice in<br />

Knowledge management - Part 4: Guidelines<br />

for Measuring KM", available online at<br />

ftp://cenftp1.cenorm.be/PUBLIC/CWAs/e-<br />

Europe/KM/CWA14924-04-2004-Mar.pdf<br />

downloaded on 28.10.2010


Morar Ioan – Dan<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES ON FISCAL<br />

Abstract: Fiscal science advertise in most analytical situations, while the principles reiterated by<br />

specialists in the field in various specialized works<br />

The two components <strong>of</strong> taxation, the tax system relating to the theoretical and the practical<br />

procedures relating to tax are marked by frequent references and invocations <strong>of</strong> the underlying<br />

principles to tax.<br />

This paper attempts a return on equity fiscal general vision as a principle <strong>of</strong>ten invoked and used to<br />

justify tax policies, but so <strong>of</strong>ten violated the laws fiscality .<br />

Also want to emphasize the importance <strong>of</strong> devising procedures to ensure fiscal equitable treatment<br />

<strong>of</strong> taxpayers.<br />

Specific approach <strong>of</strong> this paper is based on the notion that tax equity is based on equality before tax<br />

and social policies <strong>of</strong> the executive that would be more effective than using the other tax<br />

instruments.<br />

I want to emphasize that if the scientific approach to justify the unequal treatment <strong>of</strong> the tax law is<br />

based on the various social problems <strong>of</strong> the taxpayers, then deviates from the issue <strong>of</strong> tax fairness<br />

justification explaining the need to promote social policies usually more attractive to taxpayers.<br />

Modern tax techniques are believed to be promoted especially in order to ensure an increasing level<br />

<strong>of</strong> high efficiency at the expense <strong>of</strong> the taxpayers obligations to ensure equality before the law tax.<br />

On the other hand, tax inequities reaction generates multiple recipients from the first budget plan,<br />

but finalities unfair measures can not quantify and no timeline for the reaction, usually not known.<br />

But while statistics show fluctuations in budgetary revenues and <strong>of</strong>ten find in literature reviews and<br />

analysis relevant to a connection between changes in government policies, budget execution and<br />

outcome.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> inequality on tax on tax procedures and budgetary revenues are difficult to quantify<br />

and is among others to this work.<br />

Providing tax equity without combining it with the principles <strong>of</strong> discrimination and neutrality in the<br />

tax to ensure an objective <strong>of</strong> fiscal policy.<br />

Keywords: fiscal science, the principles <strong>of</strong> taxation ,fiscal, tax, fiscal revenues, budget, crisis<br />

JEL Codes: H20<br />

Imposition <strong>of</strong> the theoretical principles <strong>of</strong><br />

science is tax procedures such as the practical<br />

form <strong>of</strong> taxation, the latter being comprised<br />

<strong>of</strong> specific operations taxation.<br />

The principles, generallly, there are rules,<br />

customs, descriptions or definitions accepted<br />

in time by repeating to their individualization<br />

as dedicated as such time.<br />

How the tax is an important part <strong>of</strong> social life,<br />

from ancient times it was a high regulatory<br />

component level in different periods in the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> society.<br />

285<br />

Feeding practices are emerging as national<br />

budgets techniques quite late, we can say that<br />

the great empires like the Roman Empire,<br />

Byzantine Empire or state organizations<br />

during the later Middle Ages and especially<br />

in modern times have used techniques that<br />

have evolved time, so to speak in<br />

contemporary modern tax procedures and<br />

techniques.<br />

Although ways to attract financial resources<br />

from state treasures states or organizations<br />

have the same economic content, however,<br />

different forms from country to country while


also differed. But the great thinkers and<br />

especially classical political economy, Adam<br />

Smith precursor fails to define the rules<br />

governing the taxation process more objective<br />

to be achieved, namely in the form <strong>of</strong><br />

imposing peaks.<br />

Maximums were imposed along the<br />

remaining time and raised in the special cases<br />

in the literature so far is talk <strong>of</strong> three groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> taxation, namely the<br />

principles <strong>of</strong> fiscal efficiency, fiscal equity<br />

principles and principles <strong>of</strong> economic policy<br />

and social.<br />

Principles <strong>of</strong> taxation yield based on the idea<br />

that taxes should be placed so that it brings<br />

maximum revenue with minimal state<br />

expenditure, in other words, is characterized<br />

by productivity. Productivity in turn is an<br />

indicator that expresses the efficiency, and in<br />

this case is also a feature <strong>of</strong> the tax cost.<br />

As an indication, in general, productivity<br />

expresses the ratio between results and effort,<br />

and if taxes this indicator is the ratio between<br />

tax revenues and state efforts to attract them,<br />

in fact, tax administration costs.<br />

These costs are quantified and the fiscal<br />

system can be determined, in fact, are the<br />

fiscal costs <strong>of</strong> maintenance. We know that if<br />

indirect taxes tax procedures involve a higher<br />

tax payers in the process starting with<br />

maintenance records purchases and sales,<br />

continuing with the calculation <strong>of</strong> taxes, their<br />

declaration and <strong>of</strong> course their pay.<br />

The participation <strong>of</strong> contributors to the tax<br />

administration requires an effort on their part<br />

and savings from the tax authority.<br />

It is interesting to determine the involvement<br />

<strong>of</strong> taxpayers in the administration <strong>of</strong> taxes<br />

and how constitutional law is the imposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> tax by taxpayers that they were required to<br />

maintain records on tax and other obligations,<br />

such as declarations on a particular type <strong>of</strong><br />

data carrier, or the obligation to submit and<br />

maintain certain records prior accounting and<br />

other information related to trim taxes<br />

otherwise.<br />

On the other hand in case <strong>of</strong> direct taxes is<br />

based on a fiscal apparatus restricted<br />

286<br />

participation <strong>of</strong> taxpayers, meaning that taxes<br />

on buildings, land, vehicles, tax on personal<br />

income from independent activities carried<br />

out by the retained the source <strong>of</strong> rents from<br />

agricultural activities and other with the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> regulation, the unit tax on the taxpayer<br />

prepares the tax statement, enforceable<br />

document, it will be followed to the<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> amounts assessed.<br />

If the pr<strong>of</strong>it tax, income microenterprises,<br />

dividends and others taxpayer tax return and<br />

calculate the actual tax. And if those indirect<br />

taxes and direct tax authority has the right<br />

and obligation to control activity for each tax<br />

separately .In this context we can say that<br />

indirect taxes are more pr<strong>of</strong>itable than direct<br />

taxes.<br />

Tax return is influenced by the level <strong>of</strong><br />

accuracy <strong>of</strong> tax law, if it allows or not or if<br />

you fraudulent tax evasion against the law<br />

even if it is located that you do not leave<br />

room for interpretation. If the tax is paid by<br />

all taxpayers who have taxable same table, it<br />

is characterized by universality, quality tax<br />

cost.<br />

So we know that in fact violated tax laws are<br />

fraudulent or are bypassed by the taxpayers,<br />

so that part <strong>of</strong> planned to collect tax revenues<br />

do not reach the collection. Level budget tax<br />

revenue is a function and device performance<br />

fiscal control, the device should be based on<br />

tax laws and procedures <strong>of</strong> tax control<br />

equivocal performance.<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> failures to receive is not equal to<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> tax evasion primarily because<br />

we do not know if the planned revenues are<br />

well grounded and if he can not evolve as<br />

macroeconomic indicators once assumed the<br />

public budget planning.<br />

The most important problem <strong>of</strong> collecting the<br />

fraudulent evasion <strong>of</strong> taxes is an important<br />

topic as complicated as it is.<br />

In the literature <strong>of</strong>ten talks about avoiding the<br />

tax law on an escapist phenomenon without<br />

breaking the law, called the fraudulent<br />

evasion.<br />

In this context I put my problem reporting<br />

escapist content phenomenon, if we refer to


tax law, if we refer to planned tax revenues or<br />

the principle <strong>of</strong> universality <strong>of</strong> taxation. In the<br />

first case the tax law is not broken, so in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> jurisdictional comparison is<br />

pointless.<br />

Reporting on planned tax revenue does not<br />

generate an eloquent comparison to the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> planning can be faulty and so the<br />

comparison suffering . Remains third<br />

comparison, the principle <strong>of</strong> imposing, this<br />

principle can be violated, in which, however,<br />

does not violate law rule than universally<br />

accepted.<br />

I personally, not breaking the law does not<br />

accept such employment, considering honest<br />

trader and indicates those interested in just<br />

talking about tax evasion, fraud phenomenon<br />

par excellence. Rinciples violation <strong>of</strong><br />

universality, a principle is violated<br />

continually bcare fact, primarily affecting<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability and return on any taxation can be<br />

no question <strong>of</strong> tax fairness.<br />

A tax and cost is characterized by stability, a<br />

tax that must be seen as two spots <strong>of</strong> view,<br />

namely, the stability <strong>of</strong> the tax law and tax<br />

revenue stability. Stability <strong>of</strong> resistance<br />

translates into tax law tax law in time, which<br />

means that the law would be well located and<br />

comprises all the details required in the tax<br />

case.<br />

Cash inflows fiscal stability means that when<br />

tax rates change and change proceeds in the<br />

same way. It is said that excise taxes are<br />

stable so that when tax rates rise and increase<br />

revenues.<br />

If these taxes are apparently betting heavily<br />

on the psychological factor <strong>of</strong> about certain<br />

flaws in the case <strong>of</strong> alcohol and tobacco, the<br />

habit if auto fuel.<br />

Another quality <strong>of</strong> taxes, namely the<br />

imposition <strong>of</strong> convenience, in fact one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

maxims <strong>of</strong> taxation, taxation with fairness,<br />

certainty <strong>of</strong> imposition <strong>of</strong> taxation and<br />

economic qualities, put forward by Adam<br />

Shmith, can be considered a necessary feature<br />

cost taxes, and contributing to increasing the<br />

collection tax revenue.<br />

287<br />

Fairness is a principle <strong>of</strong> taxation <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

invoked in literature, but it seems the most<br />

difficult fiscal respected in practice. Fair<br />

treatment for all taxpayers from the tax<br />

authorities is a goal difficult to achieve in<br />

practice in tax and general appropriateness<br />

societate.Totusi promotion, discrimination<br />

and neutrality to the tax authorities may result<br />

in equal treatment from the tax law.<br />

Equality before the treasury can be absolute<br />

when the taxpayer owes an equal amount <strong>of</strong><br />

Tax expressed in absolute terms, or may be<br />

relative when the taxpayer owes a relatively<br />

equal nsuma expressed in relative numbers, in<br />

percent, this is the proportional share.<br />

In time, when economic and social life to<br />

sophisticated and revenue obtained from<br />

various sources the question <strong>of</strong> contributory<br />

capacity taxpayers, taking into account their<br />

economic situation, their social, family, their<br />

health status and other variables to justify<br />

differential treatment to the tax authority, in<br />

other words one that can pay more to do.<br />

They rely so under the influence <strong>of</strong> leftist<br />

thought after the French Revolution to<br />

provide income tratamentulechitabil public<br />

increasingly larger.<br />

The literature talks about horizontal equity<br />

and vertical equity on, the evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> tax fairness.<br />

Treatment involves horizontal comparison<br />

income <strong>of</strong> two or more persons get equal pay<br />

but from different sources, and if vertical<br />

equity is to compare the incomes <strong>of</strong> two or<br />

more different persons who earn income from<br />

the same source, context in which Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />

Constantin Tulai in his” Public Finance and<br />

Taxation”highlights the risk <strong>of</strong> such<br />

comparisons, in fact beneficial to express<br />

report with the taxpayer, to transfer the<br />

emphasis on gender equality before tax<br />

through tax .<br />

Time evolution <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> tax equity<br />

reflects the intent to transfer treasury<br />

importance to gender equality through taxes<br />

or tax reports, obviously in financial<br />

purposes. Accepting equality through taxes,<br />

accept and practice invasive in terms <strong>of</strong> tax


authorities, tax policies are used exclusively<br />

for government.<br />

Of course many <strong>of</strong> our peers need<br />

government help because <strong>of</strong> illness, because<br />

<strong>of</strong> family and <strong>of</strong> course other reasons that<br />

they need help in different ways. In this<br />

context, however, we must ask ourselves<br />

whether such interventions for social<br />

purposes to be promoted through taxes or<br />

using other levers.<br />

It is obvious that if the executives involved in<br />

the tax account, the first result is that it<br />

distorts the acceptance address, that the<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial intention <strong>of</strong> the taxpayer and those<br />

who do not enjoy such tax benefits conferred<br />

will try to bypass the tax law.<br />

I think for social interventions can be<br />

promoted through other means, such as state<br />

social insurance systems, at other institutions<br />

<strong>of</strong> social protection for the taxpayer and not<br />

to confuse the proper push other adverse<br />

judgments propriety, and labor market<br />

competition capital and ultimately to tax<br />

evasion.<br />

On the other hand and tax procedures are<br />

hampered and will suffer in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

efficiency and their bureaucratic<br />

phenomenon, by appealing to all sorts <strong>of</strong><br />

supporting operations to access tax<br />

advantages or disadvantages for others put in<br />

the work <strong>of</strong> contributors.<br />

The third group <strong>of</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> taxation are<br />

those that concern economic and social<br />

policies. Taxes are the main source <strong>of</strong><br />

288<br />

revenue for the state, but a tool, an effective<br />

lever to influence consumatori.Principiile<br />

taxpayers in their capacity as neutral taxation,<br />

the tax discrimination, lack <strong>of</strong> arbitrariness,<br />

impersonality and the legitimacy <strong>of</strong> taxes.<br />

Use taxes in their capacity as leverage<br />

requires diversifying financial operations tax<br />

procedure.<br />

Bibliography<br />

1. Mihail C. Demetrescu, „Politici economice<br />

şi financiare de ieri şi de azi” („Middle Age<br />

Financial Sociology and Finances”)<br />

Tipografia Federatiei Nationale Cooperatiste,<br />

Bucharest,1946<br />

2. Morar Ioan Dan, „Sistemul fiscal<br />

românesc.Traditie si capacitate de adaptare”<br />

(„Romanian Taxation System. Tradition and<br />

Adaptation Capacity”), Ed.Dacia, Cluj-<br />

Napoca, 2000;<br />

3. Văcărel Iulian, „Politici economice şi<br />

financiare de ieri şi de azi” („Financial and<br />

Economic Policies – Old and New”), Ed.<br />

Economica, Bucuresti, 1996;<br />

4. Constantin Tulai, „Finantele publice si<br />

fiscalitatea” („Public Finances and Taxation<br />

System”) Casa Cartii de Stiinta, Cluj-<br />

Napoca,2003<br />

5. Radu Vasile,Intre echilibru si<br />

recesiune,Editura Economica 1998.(Balance<br />

between<br />

recession, Economics 1998) ;<br />

6. Codul Fiscal ,L 571/2003, republicata<br />

(Code, L 571/2003, republished)


IFRS COMPLIANCE REGARDING INFORMATION DISCLOSED BY<br />

COMPANIES IN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CASE STUDY<br />

ON IAS 23 BORROWING COSTS APPLICABILITY<br />

Tiron-Tudor Adriana<br />

Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences and Business Administration<br />

Fekete-Pali-Pista Szilveszter<br />

Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences and Business Administration<br />

Dragu Ioana-Maria<br />

Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences and Business Administration<br />

Abstract: This paper concentrates on information disclosure regarding IAS 23, being included in<br />

accounting research field. It comprises an empirical study on the correlation between information<br />

published by companies in consolidated financial statements with respect to borrowing cost policies<br />

and a series <strong>of</strong> variables that characterize a firm. The objectives <strong>of</strong> this paper involve estimating<br />

and establishing an econometric model in which is assumed that disclosure index for information<br />

required by IAS 23 depends on certain elements in the form <strong>of</strong> country <strong>of</strong> origin, sales, total assets,<br />

debt ratio, solvency, ROA and ROE. International accounting literature presents a series <strong>of</strong> studies<br />

on the subject <strong>of</strong> compliance with IAS disclosure requirements. Similar with this paper, various<br />

authors considered annual reports as starting point for data gathering in their reasearch on<br />

disclosure phenomena. The criteria used for data gathering, processing and analysing have been<br />

previously used in a successful manner by important scientists who published in accounting field.<br />

The methodology used involves Disclosure <strong>Index</strong> computation, as well as SPSS data processing,<br />

analysis and interpretation. Results show that the model is valid, meaning that there is correlation<br />

between information disclosure with respect to IAS 23 and the analyzed variables. According to our<br />

estimated econometric model, most <strong>of</strong> the variables maintain a certain influence on disclosure as we<br />

can observe a significant correlation level between the studied elements. This research contributes<br />

to the development <strong>of</strong> both accounting field and international accounting literature, by studying<br />

borrowing costs disclosed information in relation to certain elements that best characterize the<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> a company. Although an empirical paper, it concentrates also on accounting practices, as<br />

it uses real data extracted from annual reports and consolidated financial statements. The<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> this research relies in its originality approach, by studying the information disclosure<br />

for borrowing costs that represent one <strong>of</strong> the most important accounting fields.<br />

Keywords: information, disclosure, borrowing costs, annual reports, correlation<br />

JEL Codes: C51, C53, M41<br />

I. Introduction<br />

International accounting literature contains a<br />

serie <strong>of</strong> studies on disclosure. The most<br />

recent <strong>of</strong> them, involve the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

compliance with IAS requirements. Many<br />

scientists have started to consider annual<br />

reports in their reasearch on disclosure<br />

phenomena. In addition, this paper uses<br />

certain criteria in data gathering, processing<br />

and analysing that have been previously used<br />

in a successful manner by important scientists<br />

289<br />

who published in accounting field. Regarding<br />

the motivation for implementing this<br />

research, there is a need to establish the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> IFRS compliance, as both recognition and<br />

appliance <strong>of</strong> IAS is considered to be an<br />

essential element in the process <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />

development. Further on, by analysing<br />

information disclosure in financial reports,<br />

and defining its correlation to some key<br />

indicators that show the financial position and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> companies, IFRS requirements


egarding information made public could<br />

meet progress in compliance. This study<br />

contributes to a better understanding <strong>of</strong> IFRS<br />

compliance as well as <strong>of</strong> the factors that<br />

influence information disclosure.<br />

Furthermore, international organisms from<br />

accounting field should supervize IAS<br />

acceptance and thus the process <strong>of</strong> disclosure<br />

is one imporant part <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

II. Literature review<br />

Nowadays is becoming more and more<br />

difficult to make economic forecasts whithout<br />

having the necessary information. Decisions<br />

cannot be made in the absence <strong>of</strong> information<br />

disclosure. Further on, in all fields there is a<br />

need for published information, otherwise<br />

negative effects <strong>of</strong> non-disclosure can appear<br />

(Edmiston 2011:281-320). There is evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fact that a ’real-time reporting’ can be<br />

attained only through continuous evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

financial reporting, in order for accounting<br />

standards and policies addopted by<br />

companies in practice to reach a common<br />

point (Kueppers and Sullivan 2010:292).<br />

International accounting literature mentions<br />

the benefits <strong>of</strong> improved disclosure (Lang and<br />

Lundholm 1993), as firms increase intensity<br />

<strong>of</strong> disclosure efforts before <strong>of</strong>fering public<br />

debt and equity, and thus from compliance<br />

with international standards (Barry et al.<br />

1991). There have been many attempts to<br />

study the level <strong>of</strong> disclosure for mandatory<br />

and voluntary issues using disclosure index.<br />

Donna Street (Street 2001:27-35) made a<br />

research on factors that generate<br />

noncompliance, and uses regression analysis<br />

in order to estimate their correlation to<br />

information disclosure. By studying the<br />

information made public in annual reports,<br />

some sientists try in fact to underline the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> disclosure for accounting and<br />

for the economy, in general. According to<br />

them, the process <strong>of</strong> disclosure assumes three<br />

main aspects or characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

information to be disclosed (Hossain 2008:<br />

661): efficiency from economical point <strong>of</strong><br />

view <strong>of</strong> disclosed information, influence <strong>of</strong><br />

290<br />

published information on economic agents’<br />

behavior, background <strong>of</strong> disclosure decision.<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the study reveals that banks seldom<br />

choose to disclose voluntary elements; on the<br />

other hand, for mandatory issues, disclosure<br />

and transparency meets compliance. Hossain<br />

et al. (Hossain et al. 2009:664-667) made a<br />

study on corporate disclosure measurement<br />

for financial and non-financial companies.<br />

Their research is based on some analysis<br />

criteria, including: size <strong>of</strong> the firm given by<br />

turnover or sales, pr<strong>of</strong>itability (ROE, ROA),<br />

complexity <strong>of</strong> business- industry, activity<br />

field, country <strong>of</strong> origin, and assets. According<br />

to the authors, all these variables are<br />

supposed to influence information disclosure<br />

in financial reporting. In scoring <strong>of</strong> disclosure<br />

index, they used 0 for non disclosed and 1 for<br />

disclosed, which is known as the unweighted<br />

disclosure approach. Another research on<br />

disclosure concerns public listed companies<br />

in Malaysia (Lee 2010: 40-42) in which is<br />

studied the level <strong>of</strong> human resource<br />

information disclosed in correlation to a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> variables: size, industry and listing.<br />

The conceptual and relational SPSS analysis<br />

is based on information disclosed in<br />

companies’ annual reports. Some researchers<br />

intended to create models for borrowing<br />

costs, in order to facilitate decisions and<br />

secure debt (Booth 2006: 70-72). In addition,<br />

ROE and ROA ratio indicators are used in<br />

empirical research to perform comparative<br />

analysis for companies’ data in relation to<br />

borrowing costs (Bohusova and Nerudova<br />

2009: 35-39). Other studies on capitalization<br />

<strong>of</strong> borrowing costs and their disclosure<br />

(Chung et al. 1993: 886-893) investigate<br />

firms from oil and gas industry, the analysis<br />

revealing two types <strong>of</strong> companies: successful<br />

efforts that expense borrowing costs, and are<br />

expensed full costs which capitalize costs.


III. Research methodology<br />

The methodology used involves Disclosure<br />

<strong>Index</strong> computation, as well as SPSS data<br />

processing, analysis and interpretation <strong>of</strong><br />

results. Data gathering implies a selection <strong>of</strong><br />

companies and a detailed read through all<br />

their consolidated financial statements.<br />

Research development is being sustained by<br />

certain analysis criteria, such as: market<br />

capitalization, company pr<strong>of</strong>ile, headquarter,<br />

or time period. The number <strong>of</strong> firms involved<br />

in the study has been elected in accordance to<br />

the market capitalization level corresponding<br />

to each one <strong>of</strong> the ten countries implied in the<br />

research (France, Germany, Spain, Italy,<br />

Poland, Austria, Romania, Hungary, Ukraine<br />

and Bulgaria) and the period <strong>of</strong> study<br />

comprises a five years’ analysis (from year<br />

2005 to 2009). The elements determined for<br />

all the 92 participating companies include:<br />

disclosure index, sales, total assets, gearing-<br />

solvency and debt rate-, ROE, ROA.<br />

Regarding the information disclosed by firms<br />

in their consolidated financial statements, the<br />

paper investigates the compliance with<br />

Disclosure Checklists <strong>of</strong> borrowing costs that<br />

is disclosing the accounting policy adopted<br />

with respect to borrowing costs, amount <strong>of</strong><br />

capitalized borrowing costs and<br />

capitalization rate.<br />

291<br />

The function that best describes the<br />

econometric model can be presented as<br />

follows:<br />

DIt = ∂0 + ∂1 Sales + ∂2 TA + ∂3 DebtRatio +<br />

∂4 Solvency + ∂5 ROA + ∂6 ROE + ∂7<br />

Country (1)<br />

In the above function, t is the year <strong>of</strong> study<br />

and takes values from 2005 to 2009.<br />

Disclosure <strong>Index</strong> determination involved two<br />

stages. First <strong>of</strong> all, for each one <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

items to be disclosed, in the form <strong>of</strong><br />

borrowing costs policy adopted by company,<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> capitalysed borrowing costs and<br />

capitalization rate, were denoted with ’1’ in<br />

case information for that item has been<br />

disclosed in the annual report, and ’0’ for the<br />

firm that did not publish the rspective<br />

information. The second step involved<br />

summing up the result for the three elements,<br />

and then dividing by three- as this was the<br />

maximum probability for disclosure.<br />

DI = ∑(di effectively presented)/ ∑( di<br />

all the possible cases) (2)


IV. Interpretation <strong>of</strong> results<br />

Table no. 1. SPSS- Descriptive statistics: Correlations<br />

(Source: own computations)<br />

Year<br />

2005<br />

Year<br />

2006<br />

Variables<br />

Dependent<br />

DI<br />

Variables<br />

Dependent<br />

DI<br />

Independent<br />

Sales, Total<br />

Assets, Debt Rate,<br />

Solvency, ROA,<br />

ROE<br />

Independent<br />

Sales, Total<br />

Assets, Debt Rate,<br />

Solvency, ROA,<br />

ROE<br />

Table no. 2. Results<br />

Variable Alfa T (sign.) F (sign.) Adj.R²<br />

Sales 5,970 0,167 4,974 0,396<br />

T.A. 5,353 0,159<br />

Debt rate 0,039 0,291<br />

Solvency 0,032 0,238<br />

ROA 0,109 0,016<br />

ROE -0,0013 0,019<br />

Variable Alfa T (sign.) F (sign.) Adj.R²<br />

Sales 3,422 0,236 4,611 0,373<br />

Total Assets 9,253 0,188<br />

Debt rate -0,0057 0,039<br />

Solvency 0,058 0,037<br />

ROA -0,0023 0,411<br />

ROE 0,00423 0,481<br />

Disclosure <strong>Index</strong><br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

DI 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />

Sales 0,102 0,076 0,073 0,132 0,076<br />

Total Asset 0,105 0,093 0,051 0,091 0,070<br />

Debt ratio -0,058 -0,185 ** -0,214 ** 0,062 0,159 *<br />

Solvency 0,075 0,187 ** 0,211 ** -0.073 -0,181 **<br />

ROA 0,224 ** 0,024 0,115 0,003 -0,031<br />

ROE 0,216 ** -0,005 -0,027 0,009 -0,011<br />

Romania -0,545 *** -0,529 *** -0,564 *** -0,450 *** -0,432 ***<br />

Bulgaria 0,025 0,007 0,011 0,003 -0,034<br />

Hungary 0,255 * 0,305 ** 0,229 ** 0,170 * 0,147 *<br />

Poland 0,056 0,0015 0,024 0,006 -0,075<br />

Ukraine 0,031 0,008 0,013 0,003 0,130<br />

Spain 0,066 0,017 0,028 0,007 -0,089<br />

France 0,042 0,231 ** 0,263 * 0,097 0,079<br />

Italy -0,175 ** 0,127 0,129 -0,114 -0,080<br />

Germany 0,139 * 0,043 0,036 0,060 0,201<br />

Austria 0,052 0,014 0,022 0,139 0,092<br />

Significance *, for Sig ≤ 0,10 **, for Sig ≤ 0,05 ***, for Sig ≤ 0,01<br />

292


Year<br />

2007<br />

Year<br />

2008<br />

Year<br />

2009<br />

Variables<br />

Dependent<br />

DI<br />

Variables<br />

Dependent<br />

DI<br />

Variables<br />

Dependent<br />

DI<br />

Independent<br />

Independent<br />

Sales, Total<br />

Assets, Debt Rate,<br />

Solvency, ROA,<br />

ROE<br />

Independent<br />

Sales, Total<br />

Assets, Debt Rate,<br />

Solvency, ROA,<br />

ROE<br />

Sales, Total Assets, Debt Rate, Solvency,<br />

ROA, ROE<br />

Table no.1 presents the correlation between<br />

Disclosure <strong>Index</strong> and its corresponding<br />

variables (Sales, Total Assets, Debt ratio,<br />

Solvency, ROA, ROE). In analyzing the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> correlation coefficients for the 5<br />

years’ period (2005-2009), we consider three<br />

significance thresholds, <strong>of</strong> 10%, 5% and 1%.<br />

The results show that according to our<br />

estimated econometric model, most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

variables (Sales, Total Assets, ROE and<br />

ROA), maintain a strong influence on<br />

disclosure for year 2005, as we can observe a<br />

high correlation level between the studied<br />

elements. In addition, we can observe that in<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the case, Pearson Coefficient<br />

Variable Alfa T (sign.) F (sign.) Adj.R²<br />

Sales 3,0988 0,244 4,897 0,391<br />

Total Assets -0,017 0,315<br />

Debt rate -0,0085 0,020<br />

Solvency 0,060 0,022<br />

ROA -0,0014 0,137<br />

ROE 0,0037 0,399<br />

Variable Alfa T (sign.) F (sign.) Adj.R²<br />

Sales 3,982 0,105 2,683 0,217<br />

Total Assets -3,7 0,195<br />

Debt rate 0,235 0,278<br />

Solvency 0,331 0,244<br />

ROA 0,005 0,490<br />

ROE -0,0005 0,467<br />

(Source: own computations)<br />

293<br />

Variable Alfa T F Adj.R²<br />

(sign.) (sign.)<br />

Sales 1,1826 0,234 2,672 0,216<br />

Total<br />

Assets<br />

-0,861 0,253<br />

Debt rate -0,101 0,065<br />

Solvency -0,088 0,042<br />

ROA -0,443 0,385<br />

ROE 0,0949 0,459<br />

registers values that are above the<br />

significance levels (see Table no.1). One <strong>of</strong><br />

the variables that influences disclosure index<br />

with respect to borrowing costs is represented<br />

by sales. Pearson Coefficient for sales (0,102)<br />

shows that the more complex the company is,<br />

having a high turnover, the higher the level <strong>of</strong><br />

published information. This is also valid for<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> total asset. Its coefficient <strong>of</strong> 0,105<br />

demonstrates that as a firm increases its<br />

assets, it is also willing to publish a greater<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> information. On the other hand, for<br />

both debt ratio and solvency there is a low<br />

correlation level in their relation to disclosure<br />

index. For instance, debt rate has a negative


correlation with respect to DI, which means<br />

that is some <strong>of</strong> the cases (tough, few, as the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> -0,058 does not indicate a significant<br />

influence) when a company’s debt ratio<br />

increases, disclosure concerning borrowing<br />

costs has in contrast a tendency to decrease.<br />

Concerning ROA and ROE for year 2005,<br />

although they seem to be highly correlated<br />

with the indicator showing information<br />

published by firms in accordance with IAS<br />

23, the significance level is lower than 0,05<br />

(see Table no.2). For years 2006 and 2007 we<br />

can state that again debt ratio and solvency<br />

show high correlation, but similar with the<br />

previous year, the level <strong>of</strong> significance does<br />

not reach 5% (see Table no.2). The other<br />

variables do not register coefficients that<br />

should indicate a relevant influence for<br />

disclosed information regarding borrowing<br />

costs. However, there is the exception <strong>of</strong><br />

Pearson’s coefficient for ROA recorded in<br />

2007 (0,115), that stands for a strong<br />

correlation between disclosure index and<br />

ROA for the mentioned year. The last period<br />

<strong>of</strong> our analysis (2008-2009) is characterized<br />

by some evidence <strong>of</strong> correlation- sales from<br />

2008 (0,132), as well as debt ratio and<br />

solvency, in 2009 although for the last two<br />

items the significance level is under 10%,<br />

respectively 5% (see Table no.2). Regarding<br />

the assumption that the country in which a<br />

company has it’s headquarter and where it<br />

has been set up has an influence politics<br />

adopted concerning information made public,<br />

the findings suggest that Romanian<br />

companies have similar behaviors when it<br />

comes to publishing information regarding<br />

borrowing costs. In addition, the significance<br />

level is lower than 1%. Further on, Bulgaria<br />

registers a small influence on disclosure<br />

index for the entire period <strong>of</strong> 5 years’<br />

analysis, the maximum value being under<br />

0,03. Similar values for Pearson’s’<br />

Coefficients are recorded for Poland and<br />

Spain, that present a negative correlation in<br />

2009 (-0,075 and -0,089). Ukraine does not<br />

seem to have an important influence on<br />

disclosure with respect to borrowing costs,<br />

294<br />

excepting year 2009 (0,130). For France,<br />

there is evidence for high correlation in 2006<br />

and 2007, but the significance level is under<br />

5% and 10%. In case <strong>of</strong> Italy, it seems that<br />

there is both positive and negative strong<br />

correlation. For years 2006 and 2007 the<br />

recorded values (0,127 and 0,129), imply that<br />

this country influences the firms that have<br />

headquarters and were set up within its<br />

borders, in the matter <strong>of</strong> information<br />

disclosure policy for IAS 23 issues. In 2008,<br />

Austria recorded a high degree <strong>of</strong> influence<br />

on its companies with respect to borrowing<br />

costs, while in 2009 Germany seems to also<br />

have a great impact on the way its firms<br />

publish information <strong>of</strong> IAS 23 appliance.<br />

Finally, regarding the relevance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

econometric model, according the SPSS<br />

analysis, the dependent variable (disclosure<br />

index for borrowing costs information) is<br />

explained through the model in a percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> 39% in 2005 and 2007, 37% for 2006,<br />

while in 2008 and 2009 this amount decreases<br />

to 21%. In addition, the values for adjusted<br />

R² stand as evidence for the mentioned facts.<br />

V. Conclusions<br />

This paper is meant to study the consistency<br />

<strong>of</strong> information published by companies in<br />

their consolidated financial reports. The<br />

research objective relates to the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

international accounting standard IAS 23<br />

Borrowing Cost demands on companies’<br />

accounting policies. Further on, the study<br />

involves estimating and establishing an<br />

econometric model in which is assumed that<br />

disclosure index for information required by<br />

IAS 23 depends on certain elements in the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> country <strong>of</strong> origin, sales, total assets,<br />

debt ratio, ROA and ROE. The importance <strong>of</strong><br />

this research relies in its originality approach,<br />

by studying the information disclosure for<br />

borrowing costs for a 5 years’ period, starting<br />

with 2005, until 2009, and also by<br />

considering a large sample <strong>of</strong> companies<br />

being significantly chosen. On the whole, this<br />

paper is meant to bring a national and<br />

international contribution to the literature <strong>of</strong>


orrowing costs, as one <strong>of</strong> the most important<br />

accounting fields.<br />

Results show that the model is valid, meaning<br />

that there is correlation between information<br />

disclosure with respect to IAS 23 and the<br />

analyzed variables. According to our<br />

estimated econometric model, most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

variables maintain a certain influence on<br />

disclosure as we can observe a significant<br />

correlation level between the studied<br />

elements. Regarding the relevance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

econometric model, according the SPSS<br />

analysis, the dependent variable -disclosure<br />

index for borrowing costs information- is<br />

explained by the model, adjusted R² taking<br />

values between 21% and 39%. This research<br />

contributes to the development <strong>of</strong> both<br />

accounting field and international accounting<br />

literature, by studying borrowing costs<br />

disclosed information in relation to certain<br />

elements that best characterize the activity <strong>of</strong><br />

a company. Although an empirical paper, it<br />

concentrates also on accounting practices, as<br />

it uses real data extracted from annual reports<br />

and consolidated financial statements.<br />

295<br />

VI. References<br />

Bohusova Hana, Nerudova Danuse, “IFRS and<br />

US GAAP Convergence in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

Borrowing Costs”, International Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Business Research 9(2009): 35-39.<br />

Barry Marks, Benson, Earl D. and Raman K.K..<br />

“The Effect <strong>of</strong> Voluntary GAAP Compliance<br />

and Financial Disclosure on Governmental<br />

Borrowing Costs”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Accounting,<br />

Auditing, and Finance 6(1991): 303-319.<br />

Booth James R. and Booth Lena Chua. “Loan<br />

Collateral Decisions and Corporate Borrowing<br />

Costs”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Money, Credit and Banking<br />

38(2006): 70-72.<br />

Chung, Kwan-Hyun, Ghicas Dimitrios, Pastena<br />

Victor. “Lenders’ Use <strong>of</strong> Accounting<br />

Information in the Oil and Gas Industry”. The<br />

Accounting Review 68(1993): 885-895.<br />

Edmiston Stuart C.. “Secrets worth keeping:<br />

toward a principled basis for stigmatized<br />

property disclosure statutes”. UCLA Law<br />

Review. 58(2011): 282-300.<br />

Hossain, M.A., Akhtaruddin, M., Yao, Lee.<br />

“Corporate Governance and Voluntary<br />

Disclosure in Corporate Annual Reports <strong>of</strong><br />

Malaysian Listed Firms”. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied<br />

Management Accounting Research 7(2009): 1-<br />

20.<br />

Hossain, Mohammed. “The Extent <strong>of</strong><br />

Disclosure in Annual Reports <strong>of</strong> Banking<br />

Companies: The Case <strong>of</strong> India”. European<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Scientific Research 4 (2008): 660-<br />

681.<br />

Kueppers Robert J. and Sullivan Kristen B..<br />

“How and why an independent audit matters”.<br />

International Journal <strong>of</strong> disclosure and<br />

governance 7(2010): 286-293.<br />

Lang, M. and Lundholm, R., ”Cross-sectional<br />

determinants <strong>of</strong> analyst ratings <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

disclosures”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Accounting Research.<br />

31(1993): 246-271.<br />

Lee, M.H., 2010, Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Annual Reports<br />

on Human Resource Disclosure using content<br />

analysis. Unitar E-Journal. 6(2010).<br />

Street, Donna. “Observance <strong>of</strong> International<br />

Accounting Standards: Factors explaining noncompliance”.<br />

ACCA Research Report 74(2001):<br />

1-127.


Subsection: Banking


MODELING ROMANIAN EXCHANGE RATE EVOLUTION WITH GARCH,<br />

TGARCH, GARCH- IN MEAN MODELS<br />

Trenca Ioan<br />

Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />

Cociuba Mihail Ioan<br />

Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />

Abstract: In this paper we analyze the return <strong>of</strong> exchange rate in order to test and analyze the best<br />

models which are capable <strong>of</strong> forecasting accurately there evolution. We apply the GARCH family<br />

models on the exchange rate return in order to obtain the best models for there volatility. Financial<br />

time series <strong>of</strong>ten exhibit abnormal characteristics, such as: serial correlation, non-stationarity,<br />

heteroskedasticity, asymmetric and are leptokurtic. Due to these characteristics autoregressive<br />

models such as autoregressive (AR), moving average (MA) and autoregressive integrated movingaverage<br />

(ARIMA) are unable to capture the evolution <strong>of</strong> financial series, to represent the special<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> financial a hole new range <strong>of</strong> models where developed : generalized<br />

autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), which are taking into account the<br />

heteroskedasticity <strong>of</strong> the errors term. The GARCH model allows for lags in the autoregressive term<br />

and in the variance term incorporates lags <strong>of</strong> the previous variance and also for the errors. The<br />

GARCH family has expanded in the last years in order to incorporate for asymmetry (Threshold<br />

GARCH, TGARCH) and risk (GARCH -in Mean).<br />

We analyze the evolution <strong>of</strong> exchange rate for: Euro/RON, dollar/RON, yen/RON, British<br />

pound/RON, Swiss franc/RON for a period <strong>of</strong> five years from 2005 till 2011, we observe that in the<br />

analyzed period there are 2 sub-periods: 2005-2007 in which the RON appreciated constantly, and<br />

2007-2011 in which the trend is depreciation for RON in respect to all the five currencies and the<br />

volatility was sensible higher than in the previous period. We obtain the returns on exchange rate<br />

by using the following transformation r=log(curs_t)-log(curs_t-1); the five analyzed series display<br />

an leptokurtic and asymmetric behavioral. Using the GARCH, TGARCH and GARCH-in Mean<br />

models, we explicit the evolution <strong>of</strong> volatility throw this period, choosing the best model using the<br />

following : minimizing the value <strong>of</strong> the sum <strong>of</strong> squared errors, Akaike and Bayesian Information<br />

Criterion.<br />

Keywords: exchange rate, GARCH, TGARCH, AIC, BIC.<br />

JEL Classification: G01, G21<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The evolution <strong>of</strong> Romanian exchange rate<br />

represent an important factor for a hole range<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic actors: banks, governmental<br />

agencies, companies and households, so the<br />

fluctuations <strong>of</strong> exchange rate and the ability<br />

to forecast her evolution is very important.<br />

For banks which must comply to the<br />

recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Basel Committee and<br />

which are ,usually, having open position on<br />

different currencies it is vital that they can<br />

understand and prognoses the future<br />

299<br />

exchanges rates in order to minimize the risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> losses; for governmental agencies<br />

(especially the Romanian IRS) the evolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> Euro/Ron is important due to the fact that<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the taxes are expressed in Euro;<br />

exchange rate fluctuation can have a great on<br />

companies if there debts is in foreign<br />

currency or if the export/import; for<br />

households which in Romania are in debt<br />

especially in foreign currency the devaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ron can lead to bankruptcy. Over 60<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> loans are denominated in foreign


currency in Romania which makes our<br />

economy very sensitive to the fluctuations in<br />

exchange rates (especially Euro, dollar, yen,<br />

swiss franc). All <strong>of</strong> these reason makes<br />

important the study <strong>of</strong> exchange rates<br />

evolution.<br />

The evaluation or devaluation <strong>of</strong> currency is<br />

not a bad think per se, what raises difficulties<br />

is their volatility because in general financial<br />

time series, including exchange rate, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

exhibit abnormal characteristics, such as:<br />

serial correlation, non-stationarity,<br />

heteroskedasticity, asymmetric and are<br />

leptokurtic.<br />

2. Literature review<br />

The theory <strong>of</strong> purchasing power parity (PPP)<br />

was the first which managed to explain the<br />

fluctuations in exchange rate values in real<br />

terms , but there are limits <strong>of</strong> this theory<br />

[Guglielmo&Luis,2010] because it cannot<br />

explain the volatility, the main critics brought<br />

to this theory being given by the reduced<br />

relevance <strong>of</strong> the obtained methods and the<br />

necessity to use large amount <strong>of</strong> data series. If<br />

analyzing the exchange rate evolution from a<br />

nominal point there are problems for the<br />

researchers, for eg. the structure <strong>of</strong> the data<br />

series on the financial markets (because these<br />

are generally leptokurtic, the moment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

order 3 <strong>of</strong> the series is much bigger than in<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> normal distribution), leading to an<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> the probability <strong>of</strong> the appearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> extreme phenomena, also if the series are<br />

stationary or there is any evidence for<br />

structural breaks.<br />

The best models used for modeling the<br />

volatility are the ARCH models [Engel,<br />

yt= Β0 + et (1)<br />

et | It-1 ~ N(0, ht) (2)<br />

ht= ά0 + ά1* e 2 t-1 , ά0 > 0, 0 ≤ ά1 < 1 (3)<br />

300<br />

1982] and then the GARCH generalization<br />

[Bollerslev, 1986] which lead to the<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> some instruments advanced<br />

enough to model the financial series. The<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> the GARCH models lead to a<br />

better understanding and a modeling <strong>of</strong> the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> the financial series, these models<br />

developing both in univariate and<br />

multivariate models [Bauwens, 2006]. The<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> the Romanian exchange rate has<br />

been analyzed being used the GARCH<br />

modeling by Codirlasu [2001] on the series<br />

ROL/EURO and ROL/DOLAR for the period<br />

2000-2001, being remarked the fact that the<br />

series follow an asymmetric ARCH process.<br />

Using series available during the period<br />

1999-2003, Necula [2008] applies the<br />

GARCH and the Copula-GARCH modeling,<br />

concluding that the dynamic models <strong>of</strong> the<br />

type Copula-GARCH bring more information<br />

and stability concerning the obtained results.<br />

3. Data used and methodology<br />

The analyzed series are 5 currencies: Euro,<br />

dollar, British pound , Japanese yen and<br />

Swiss franc, the analyzed period is between<br />

January 3, 2005 and April 29, 2011, daily<br />

series; the date are obtained from Romanian<br />

National Bank <strong>of</strong>ficial site www.bnro.ro and<br />

the econometrics s<strong>of</strong>tware packaged used is<br />

GRETL, in order to obtain returns from the<br />

daily series we apply the following<br />

transformation:<br />

r = log (curst) – log (curst-1 ) .<br />

The ARCH models developed by<br />

Engel [1982] have the following<br />

equations:


The equation(1) expresses the series<br />

evolution, a following a normal distribution<br />

law <strong>of</strong> conditional equations (2) and (3).<br />

Equations 2 and 3 express the ARCH type<br />

models, autoregressive models with<br />

different time variance, residuals follow a<br />

normal law <strong>of</strong> 0 mean and ht variance. The<br />

value <strong>of</strong> ά0 and ά1 must be positive, and<br />

ά1 has a value between [0,1] in order to<br />

301<br />

avoid an explosive processes, also<br />

errors(residuals) follow a normal<br />

distribution law.<br />

ARCH models have been developed later in<br />

the GARCH (Generalized autoregressive<br />

conditional heteroskedasticity) by<br />

Bollerslev [1986], which bring the use <strong>of</strong><br />

lags as an innovation in equation variance,<br />

equations in the GARCH (1,1) case are:<br />

yt = β0 + et (4)<br />

et | It-1 ~ N(0, ht) (5)<br />

ht = ά0 +ά1 *e 2 t-1+ β1* ht-1 , ά0 > 0, 0 ≤ ά1< 1 (6)<br />

It have been observed that on the financial<br />

markets the assets prices are influenced by<br />

the news (also called innovation) , so that a<br />

bad news generates more volatility than a<br />

good news. A GARCH model which treats<br />

ht= ά0 +ά1 e 2 t-1+γ *dt-1* e 2 t-1+β1* ht-1 (7)<br />

where: dt = 1 if et 0 .<br />

Also in order to reflect the relation between<br />

risk and return another models where<br />

proposed in order to incorporate this<br />

differently the bad-good news was<br />

proposed by Zakoian [1993] – Threshold<br />

GARCH. It is an asymmetric model in<br />

which the conditional volatility is:<br />

characteristics [Engle,1987], GARCH in<br />

mean model have the following<br />

characteristic:<br />

yt = β0 + et + θ*ht (8)<br />

et | It-1 ~ N(0, ht) (9)<br />

ht = ά0 +ά1 *e 2 t-1+ β1* ht-1 , ά0 > 0, 0 ≤ ά1< 1 (10)<br />

In this model as the volatility rises the<br />

return are rising too, this models are useful<br />

in order to capture the risk <strong>of</strong> the assets.<br />

4. Exchange rate models: GARCH,<br />

TGARCH and GARCH in Mean<br />

Using the return<br />

r = log (curst) – log (curst-1),<br />

we obtain the following evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

series:


R_DOLAR R_EURO R_FRANC R_LIRA R_YEN<br />

Mean -0.003560 0.002223 0.013383 -0.012068 0.010834<br />

Median -0.048804 -0.017661 -0.020991 -0.038889 -0.091837<br />

Maximum 4.434815 3.385650 5.223699 4.018345 10.80639<br />

Minimum -4.968370 -5.106356 -5.027989 -4.838047 -7.547544<br />

Std. Dev. 0.874067 0.487860 0.702979 0.746555 1.133958<br />

Skewness 0.277802 0.050525 0.290114 0.072925 0.678837<br />

Kurtosis 6.729989 16.06188 9.472018 7.815664 11.90174<br />

Jarque-Bera 955.2118 11460.17 2836.024 1559.066 5446.158<br />

Probability 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000<br />

Sum -5.739149 3.582965 21.57408 -19.45334 17.46505<br />

Sum Sq.<br />

Dev. 1230.792 383.4293 796.1225 897.8817 2071.521<br />

Observations 1612 1612 1612 1612 1612<br />

The return <strong>of</strong> the series are different from<br />

zero for all the return, the highest return is<br />

obtain for the Swiss franc 1.33% and the<br />

lowest for the British pound – 1.20%; from<br />

the 5 currency two have negative return: the<br />

British pound -1.20% and the American<br />

dollar -0.3%. The standard deviation which<br />

measures the risk associated with these<br />

currency are the highest for Yen 1.13 and the<br />

lowest for EURO 0.48, also all the currency<br />

302<br />

are asymmetric and leptokurtic. All the series<br />

where tested for stationarity using the ADF<br />

test and also for the ARCH effect: the series<br />

are stationary and the ARCH effect is present.<br />

The evolution <strong>of</strong> the return (Fig.1) are having<br />

the characteristic <strong>of</strong> an GARCH model with<br />

periods <strong>of</strong> high volatility followed by periods<br />

<strong>of</strong> low volatility, also we can observe that the<br />

highest volatility is in 2008-2009 when the<br />

financial crisis hit the markets.


Fig.1. Evolution <strong>of</strong> return 2005 -2011<br />

We explicit the TARCH model for dollar as being:<br />

Table 1. TARCH Model dollar<br />

Dependent Variable: R_DOLAR<br />

Sample (adjusted): 1/07/2005 4/29/2011<br />

Included observations: 1609 after adjustments<br />

Variable Coefficient Std. Error z-Statistic Prob.<br />

R_DOLAR(-1) 0.048747 0.025227 1.932310 0.0533<br />

R_DOLAR(-2) -0.029834 0.027110 -1.100462 0.2711<br />

R_DOLAR(-3) -0.046187 0.025247 -1.829397 0.0673<br />

Variance Equation<br />

C 0.009057 0.002396 3.780163 0.0002<br />

RESID(-1)^2 0.071693 0.009958 7.199375 0.0000<br />

RESID(-1)^2*(RESID(-1)


We observe that the coefficient <strong>of</strong> the<br />

equation are representative at the population<br />

level with a 95% confidence except for the<br />

second lag <strong>of</strong> the return. The normality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

estimation is analyzed throw the Durbin-<br />

Table 2. GARCH in Mean for dollar<br />

304<br />

Watson test which is under the critical level<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2.<br />

Using the information criterion: Akaike,<br />

Schwarz we have selected this model for<br />

being the most performant from the<br />

TGACRH family models.<br />

Dependent Variable: R_DOLAR<br />

Date: 05/14/11 Time: 15:35<br />

Sample (adjusted): 1/07/2005 4/29/2011<br />

GARCH = C(5) + C(6)*RESID(-1)^2 + C(7)*GARCH(-1)<br />

Variable Coefficient Std. Error z-Statistic Prob.<br />

LOG(GARCH) 0.043134 0.020789 2.074855 0.0380<br />

R_DOLAR(-1) 0.045477 0.025094 1.812215 0.0700<br />

R_DOLAR(-2) -0.033026 0.027023 -1.222125 0.2217<br />

R_DOLAR(-3) -0.053874 0.025031 -2.152348 0.0314<br />

Variance Equation<br />

C 0.008319 0.002410 3.452184 0.0006<br />

RESID(-1)^2 0.061833 0.007541 8.199630 0.0000<br />

GARCH(-1) 0.926816 0.008588 107.9201 0.0000<br />

R-squared 0.014756 Mean dependent var -0.004295<br />

Adjusted R-squared 0.012914 S.D. dependent var 0.874680<br />

S.E. <strong>of</strong> regression 0.869013 Akaike info criterion 2.351012<br />

Sum squared resid 1212.071 Schwarz criterion 2.374433<br />

Log likelihood -1884.389 Durbin-Watson stat 1.918963<br />

For the GARCH in Mean model we used for quantifying the risk in the mean equations after<br />

testing the model with a variance that the best way to integrate risk is using the logarithm <strong>of</strong><br />

variance.


Fig.2 The evolution <strong>of</strong> conditional variance for dollar in a TGARC model<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> using TGARCH and<br />

GARCH in Mean models is to <strong>of</strong>fer a better<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the volatility which is found<br />

on financial markets, because financial assets<br />

have some abnormal characteristics, such as:<br />

serial correlation, non-stationarity,<br />

heteroskedasticity, asymmetric and are<br />

leptokurtic it is important to take into account<br />

them. GARCH asymmetric models , like<br />

TGARCH and GARCH in Mean, are <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

the possibility for better forecasting on these<br />

assets. In this models we postulated that the<br />

error term is following a normal distribution :<br />

et | It-1 ~ N(0, ht) but there are others<br />

possibilities: student, Generalized Error<br />

Distribution, student skewed and skewed<br />

Generalized Error Distribution. Another<br />

factor which we need to take into the<br />

consideration is the possibility <strong>of</strong> structural<br />

breaks in the series.<br />

References<br />

1. Adkins Lee, Using GRETL for Principles <strong>of</strong><br />

Econometrics, 2010, www.learneconometrics.com<br />

2. Bitca Robert et al, Pro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the endogeneity <strong>of</strong><br />

the optimum monetary zones, 2007,<br />

www.batca.files.wordpress.com.<br />

3. Bollerslev T., A conditionally heteroskedastic<br />

time series model for speculative prices and rates<br />

<strong>of</strong> return - The review <strong>of</strong> economics and statistics,<br />

1987 - JSTOR<br />

305<br />

4. Codirlasu Adrian, Analiza econometrica a<br />

volatilitatii cursului de schimb,<br />

http://www.d<strong>of</strong>in.ase.ro/acodirlasu/wp/d<strong>of</strong>in2001/<br />

arch.pdf<br />

5. COTTREL, Allin, LUCHETTI, Riccardi, Gretl<br />

User Guide, 2010, gretl.sourceforge.net<br />

6. Codirlasu Adrian & Nicolae Chidesciuc,<br />

Applied Econometrics using Eviews 5.1, Second<br />

Edition, 2008, http://www.d<strong>of</strong>in.ase.ro/acodirlasu/<br />

7. Engle, R.F., D.M. Lilien and R.P. Robbins,<br />

(1987), “Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in<br />

the Term Structure: The ARCH-M Model,”<br />

Econometrica, 55, 391-407.<br />

8. Engle, RF Autoregressive conditional<br />

heteroscedasticity with estimates <strong>of</strong> the variance <strong>of</strong><br />

United Kingdom inflation- Econometrica: Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Econometric Society,1982- JSTOR,<br />

9. Guglielmo&Luis, Long Memory and Volatility<br />

Dynamics in the US Dollar Exchange Rate,<br />

2010, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1596083<br />

10. Gujarati Damodar, Basic Econometrics, 4th<br />

Edition, pg.858, 2004, Editura McGraw-Hill<br />

11. Hill Carter, Principles <strong>of</strong> Econometrics, pg.<br />

364, 3rd Edition, 2008, Editura Wiley<br />

12.Mugur Isarescu, “Romania - passing to euro”<br />

BNR , 2007, May, www.bnro.ro<br />

13. Necula Ciprian, Modelarea si previzionarea<br />

cursului de schimb, 2008, www.d<strong>of</strong>in.ase.ro<br />

14. www.bnro.ro<br />

15. www.gretl.sourceforge.net/<br />

16. www.bnro.ro<br />

17. www.d<strong>of</strong>in.ase.ro/acodirlasu/lect/<br />

18. www.reuters.ro<br />

19.www.learneconometrics.com/gretl.html


306


MONEY: FROM STATISTICAL DEFINITION TO MONETARY POLICY FOR<br />

ADOPTING EURO.<br />

Zăpodeanu Daniela<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Abstract: The evolution <strong>of</strong> monetary aggregates is closely related to the economic cycle, especially<br />

the evolution <strong>of</strong> GDP. The study aims to analyse the primary monetary aggregates (M1), the<br />

secondary (M2) and the tertiary (M3) in three Central and Eastern European countries: Romania,<br />

Bulgaria and Poland. The countries were chosen as follows: Romania and Bulgaria on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

the economic and geographical closeness and Poland as a benchmark for the first group. The data<br />

used are money supply, monetary aggregates: primary, secondary and tertiary, in Romania, Poland<br />

and Bulgaria, for the period January 2004 - March 2011, the monthly series are obtained from<br />

central bank websites, Poland's Central Bank and Bulgarian National Statistical Institute. The<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> monetary aggregates <strong>of</strong> the three countries was compared with the Euro area and it<br />

was noticed a high degree <strong>of</strong> similarity between countries more developed economically as<br />

compared to less developed countries. From the viewpoint <strong>of</strong> optimum currency areas, it is<br />

necessary that the countries that adopt the Euro would respond symmetrically to external shocks<br />

and also have similar economic behaviour. Our study aims, in this respect, to analyse the<br />

components and the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the monetary aggregates, as well as the trends existing within<br />

them. The analysis <strong>of</strong> the correlation between monetary aggregates will show how the way in which<br />

the monetary mass and aggregates behave and which the sense <strong>of</strong> connection established between<br />

these countries is. We find that Romania and Bulgaria have a similar comportment, the correlation<br />

between these being the highest, we observe some differences between Romania and Bulgaria<br />

versus Poland.<br />

Keywords: Monetary Aggregate, Gross Domestic Product, Monetary policy, Euro Zone<br />

JEL Classification: E42, E52<br />

1. Introductory notions<br />

The evolution <strong>of</strong> monetary aggregates is<br />

closely related to the economic cycle,<br />

especially the evolution <strong>of</strong> GDP [Fagan,<br />

Henry, 1998]. The study aims to analyse the<br />

primary monetary aggregates (M1), the<br />

secondary (M2) and the tertiary (M3) in three<br />

Central and Eastern European countries:<br />

Romania, Bulgaria and Poland. The countries<br />

were chosen as follows: Romania and<br />

Bulgaria on the basis <strong>of</strong> the economic and<br />

geographical closeness, and Poland as a<br />

benchmark. The study aims to observe the<br />

similarities concerning money supply that<br />

exist between these countries and the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> monetary aggregates as an<br />

instrument <strong>of</strong> monetary policy in these<br />

countries. Following the EU accession, these<br />

countries will adopt the euro, the forecasts<br />

307<br />

being: Romania - 2015, Bulgaria - 2013,<br />

Poland 2012 (2013); The theory <strong>of</strong> optimal<br />

currency areas shows how important is the<br />

economic synchronization for countries with<br />

a single currency.<br />

Within the Economic Monetary Union, the<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> monetary aggregates is stated,<br />

since 2007, according to the methodology <strong>of</strong><br />

the European Central Bank (NBR Monthly<br />

Report, 2009):<br />

1. Narrow money supply (M1) includes<br />

currency in circulation (banknotes and coins)<br />

and deposits readily convertible into cash or<br />

used for payment by bank transfer called<br />

overnight deposits.<br />

2. Intermediate money supply (M2) includes<br />

narrow money (M1) plus time deposits with<br />

maturity <strong>of</strong> up to two years and adding<br />

deposits redeemable at a period <strong>of</strong> notice <strong>of</strong>


up to 3 months. The definition <strong>of</strong> M2 mirrors<br />

the interest in analyzing and monitoring a<br />

monetary aggregate which, apart from cash,<br />

includes deposits with a high degree <strong>of</strong><br />

liquidity.<br />

3. Broad money supply (M3) comprises<br />

intermediate money (M2), and marketable<br />

instruments issued by the monetary financial<br />

institutions sector; money market<br />

instruments, especially money market fund<br />

shares/units and repurchase agreements are<br />

included in the aggregate (a high degree <strong>of</strong><br />

liquidity makes these instruments close<br />

substitutes for deposits).<br />

The way <strong>of</strong> defining monetary aggregates in<br />

Romania and Bulgaria before the<br />

harmonization with the European Central<br />

Bank requirements was:<br />

- M1 - Narrow money supply, which<br />

comprises: currency outside the banking<br />

system, sight deposits (until December 1991<br />

time deposits <strong>of</strong> economic agents as well);<br />

- Quasi-money – which, together with M1,<br />

form M2 (broad money) and which<br />

comprises: household savings, term or<br />

restricted deposits in Lei, foreign currency<br />

deposits <strong>of</strong> residents.<br />

2. Literature Review<br />

The monetary union (or currency union) -<br />

means adopting the same currency in<br />

neighbouring countries or that <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

important commercial partner; we witness the<br />

dollarization in Latin America (Ecuador,<br />

Peru) and the euro area. For Romania an<br />

important significance has been given by the<br />

''euro zone''; now that our country is a EU<br />

member, it should focus on continuing the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> integration into European<br />

economic and monetary union and the next<br />

step is to adopt the euro. Establishing the euro<br />

area was a long process that had as its starting<br />

point the Delors report <strong>of</strong> 1989, which<br />

proposed a realization <strong>of</strong> monetary union in<br />

three steps. The benefits <strong>of</strong> achieving a<br />

monetary union are related to the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

an optimal currency areas, optimum currency<br />

area is defined as a geographical region in<br />

308<br />

which the member states must use fixed<br />

exchange rates or a single currency, while<br />

there are also criteria that a country must<br />

satisfy to be part <strong>of</strong> an optimal currency area<br />

(Mundell, 1961):<br />

-high degree <strong>of</strong> labour mobility;<br />

-diversified production;<br />

-degree <strong>of</strong> openness <strong>of</strong> the economy;<br />

-symmetry <strong>of</strong> external shocks.<br />

From this point <strong>of</strong> view, the European Union<br />

is not entirely an optimum currency area,<br />

there are differences in labour mobility (in<br />

particular because <strong>of</strong> language barriers).<br />

However, joining an economic union and<br />

then a monetary union, with the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> EU acquis and the<br />

liberalization <strong>of</strong> the movement <strong>of</strong> labour<br />

force showed that the level <strong>of</strong> integration in<br />

the euro area is increasing (Bîtcă et al, 2007),<br />

and also that the euro zone economies<br />

become integrated as a result <strong>of</strong> monetary<br />

union[Baldwin, 2006 ].<br />

A preliminary stage <strong>of</strong> adopting the euro is<br />

compliance with the provision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Maastricht Treaty (1992):<br />

- the average inflation rate should not<br />

exceed with more than 1.5 percentage<br />

points the average <strong>of</strong> the most performant<br />

three members<br />

- the long-term interest rates should not<br />

exceed with more than two percentage<br />

points the average <strong>of</strong> the top performing<br />

members<br />

- consolidated budget deficit should be<br />

less than 3% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

- public debt should be below 60% <strong>of</strong><br />

GDP<br />

- exchange rate fluctuations against the<br />

euro should fall within a corridor <strong>of</strong> + / -<br />

15% <strong>of</strong> the average level.<br />

Bulgaria: in 1997, as a result <strong>of</strong> excessive<br />

borrowing, Bulgaria became insolvent, the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> Monetary Council was<br />

decided in July 1997, the exchange rate level<br />

was fixed at 1000 leva for a German mark.<br />

The establishment <strong>of</strong> the Monetary Council<br />

has been beneficial in terms <strong>of</strong> controlling<br />

inflation, thus, from the peak <strong>of</strong> 1044% in


1997, the inflation was reduced to 18.7% in<br />

1998, 2.6% in 1999, 10.3% in 2000, 7.4% in<br />

2001, 5.8% in 2002 and in the EU preaccession<br />

period (2003-2007) it fluctuated<br />

between a minimum <strong>of</strong> 2.3% and a maximum<br />

309<br />

<strong>of</strong> 7.3%. Getting over the critical period,<br />

which was caused by entering into insolvency<br />

in 2000s, by structural reforms and by EU<br />

accession in 2007, made Bulgaria to fix its<br />

target <strong>of</strong> joining the euro zone as 2012.<br />

Fig.1 Eurozone and the use <strong>of</strong> European single currency<br />

(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro)<br />

Poland: After 2000, the Polish Central Bank<br />

will focus on inflation targeting, and is due to<br />

adopt the euro by 2014, which supposes<br />

compliance with ERM II requirements two<br />

years before acceding to the euro area. Poland<br />

is a success story, managing the performance<br />

to continue its growth even during the crisis.<br />

Romania: After accession to the EU,<br />

Romania must abide by the obligations <strong>of</strong> EU<br />

membership and will have to join the euro<br />

zone, the time horizon forecast is after 2015,<br />

with a period <strong>of</strong> at least two years preceding<br />

that, during which it will comply with the<br />

regulations <strong>of</strong> exchange mechanism <strong>of</strong> ERM<br />

II, which involves a controlled national<br />

currency fluctuations against the euro within<br />

a deviation band <strong>of</strong> +/- 15%. Romania meets<br />

only one <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Maastricht<br />

Treaty, namely the public debt and, on the<br />

edge, the exchange rate fluctuation. Through<br />

the reforms and agreements with International<br />

bodies, it is aimed at the reduction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

budget deficit below 3%, while the central<br />

bank aims to control inflation, although this<br />

year's inflation target will be exceeded.<br />

3. Data used and methodology<br />

The data used are money supply, monetary<br />

aggregates: primary, secondary and tertiary,<br />

in Romania, Poland and Bulgaria, for the<br />

period January 2004 - March 2011, the<br />

monthly series are obtained from central bank<br />

websites, Poland's Central Bank and<br />

Bulgarian National Statistical Institute.<br />

To analyse the evolution <strong>of</strong> money supply<br />

and monetary aggregates in the three<br />

countries, we shall calculate the correlation<br />

that exists between the evolution <strong>of</strong> M1, M2<br />

and M3, so the correlation is defined as:<br />

ρ = corr (x, y) = cov (x, y) / σx σy =<br />

E [(X-Xm)(YYM)]/ σx σy,<br />

- where XM,YM represent the mean <strong>of</strong><br />

X, respectively Y,<br />

- and σx, σy represent the mean<br />

squared deviation <strong>of</strong> X, respectively Y.


The analysis <strong>of</strong> the correlation between<br />

monetary aggregates will show how the way<br />

in which the monetary mass and aggregates<br />

behave and which the sense <strong>of</strong> connection<br />

established between these countries is.<br />

310<br />

4. The analysis <strong>of</strong> monetary aggregates<br />

(M1, M2, M3) in Romania, Bulgaria,<br />

Poland<br />

For these countries, the period analysed is<br />

related to two major events:<br />

- European Union adheration.<br />

- economic crisis.<br />

Fig.2 shows the evolution <strong>of</strong> money supply<br />

(M3) and primary aggregate (M1); the money<br />

supply in the period under analysis has a<br />

growth tendency, consistent with the<br />

economic growth witnessed by these<br />

countries in the pre-crisis period, except in<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria where from mid-2008 to<br />

2009 the money supply (M3) shrinks due to<br />

the decrease in GDP.<br />

Fig. 2. Evolution <strong>of</strong> M1, M3 in Romania, Bulgary, Poland 2004-2011<br />

The primary aggregate (M1) has a much more<br />

volatile evolution, this being also due to the<br />

fact that the assets constituting the aggregate<br />

are <strong>of</strong> the most liquid type, and thus,<br />

particularly sensitive to changes in economic<br />

climate; with Romania and Bulgaria, M1<br />

decreases, during 2008 for Bulgaria and the at<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> 2009 for Romania, while Poland<br />

is the only country in which M1 growth<br />

continues. The evolution <strong>of</strong> money supply,<br />

being closely related to GDP trend, the<br />

conclusions drawn show that in both<br />

Romania and Bulgaria the money supply<br />

growth rate has slowed down due to the<br />

downturn. However, the fact the trend is<br />

nevertheless positive raises questions about<br />

monetary policies in both countries because<br />

the excess <strong>of</strong> money can turn into inflation.


Fig. 3. Primary component <strong>of</strong> aggregate money supply M1 in total<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> the component <strong>of</strong> the money<br />

supply, it is seen in Fig.3 that, for both<br />

Romania and Bulgaria, the primary aggregate<br />

(most liquid) is below 45% for Romania and<br />

under 38% for Bulgaria, much less than in the<br />

pre-crisis period (over 50% for both<br />

countries) which shows that the economic<br />

crisis has manifested itself at the level <strong>of</strong> nonbank<br />

agents, as well, by lowering the amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> cash and the value <strong>of</strong> sight accounts. While<br />

with Romania and Bulgaria M1 is still<br />

decreasing, in Poland, after a period <strong>of</strong><br />

decline <strong>of</strong> a similar magnitude to that in the<br />

other countries analysed, it recovered to<br />

levels comparable to those in the pre-crisis<br />

period.<br />

The correlation between the monetary<br />

mass and the aggregates in Romania,<br />

Poland and Bulgaria<br />

To analyse the evolution <strong>of</strong> money supply<br />

and monetary aggregates in the three<br />

countries, we calculate the correlation that<br />

exists between the evolution <strong>of</strong> M1, M2 and<br />

M3; so the correlation is defined as:<br />

ρ = corr (x, y) = cov (x, y) / σx σy = E [(X-<br />

Xm)(YYM)]/ σx σy,<br />

- where XM,YM represent the mean <strong>of</strong> X,<br />

respectively Y,<br />

- and σx, σy represent the mean squared<br />

deviation <strong>of</strong> X, respectively Y.<br />

311<br />

Table 1. Correlation matrix <strong>of</strong> Monetary<br />

aggregates<br />

M1 Pl_M1 Ro_M1 M1<br />

0.88 0.97 Bg_M1<br />

1 0.93 Pl_M1<br />

M2 Pl_M2 Ro_M2 M2<br />

0.98 0.98 Bg_M2<br />

1 0.96 Pl_M2<br />

M3 Pl_M3 Ro_M3 M2<br />

0.98 0.99 Bg_M3<br />

1 0.99 Pl_M3<br />

Based on monetary value and monetary<br />

aggregates M1 and M2 between January 2004<br />

and March 2011, their correlation matrix was<br />

calculated. Statistically, the correlation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

results <strong>of</strong> the secondary aggregate (M2) and<br />

the tertiary one (M3) shows a close link<br />

between the developments in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania, Bulgaria and Poland. With the<br />

secondary aggregate, the highest correlation<br />

is between Romania and Bulgaria or,<br />

respectively, Romania and Poland, this<br />

showing that the evolution <strong>of</strong> money supply<br />

in our country, on one hand, presents the<br />

features <strong>of</strong> an underdeveloped economy (such<br />

as Bulgaria) and, on the other hand, is similar<br />

to Poland - a country with a large population.<br />

The most noticeable differences are found<br />

with the primary aggregate, the highest


correlation is observed for Romania and<br />

Bulgaria which shows that these countries<br />

have been equally affected by the economic<br />

crisis and the behaviour <strong>of</strong> non-bank agents in<br />

these countries was similar, namely a<br />

decrease in cash holdings and short-term<br />

deposits. The lowest level <strong>of</strong> correlation is<br />

remarked between Bulgaria and Poland which<br />

is due to the fact that after the first effects <strong>of</strong><br />

the economic crisis in Poland, the primary<br />

aggregate returned to levels comparable to<br />

the pre-crisis period, while in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

Bulgaria the decline <strong>of</strong> this aggregate<br />

continues.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Explaining money throw the statistical<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> money aggregates is ,obviously<br />

,more than presenting the static situation <strong>of</strong><br />

monetary aggregates because the level <strong>of</strong><br />

them is an important objective <strong>of</strong> the<br />

monetary policy, the main criteria which are<br />

followed in determining the main<br />

monetary aggregates are: the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

aggregates to be set as an intermediate target<br />

for the monetary policy, the controllability<br />

that can be exercise by the central bank<br />

authority on its growth, the possibility to<br />

allow the monetary authority to react quickly<br />

entitles us to say that pursuit <strong>of</strong> monetary<br />

aggregates is required for fulfilling the<br />

criteria for euro adoption.<br />

The tertiary aggregates are usually more<br />

difficult to calculated and also are to narrow<br />

to supervise by the central bank so in practice<br />

usually its used the secondary aggregate<br />

targeting<br />

The biggest differences are found within the<br />

primary aggregate, the highest correlation is<br />

observed between Romania and Bulgaria; this<br />

shows that these countries have been equally<br />

affected by the economic crisis and the<br />

behaviour <strong>of</strong> non-bank agents in these<br />

countries was similar, namely a decrease in<br />

cash holdings and short-term deposits. The<br />

lowest level <strong>of</strong> correlation is remarked<br />

312<br />

between Bulgaria and Poland which is due to<br />

the fact that after the first effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economic crisis in Poland, the primary<br />

aggregate returned to levels comparable to<br />

the pre-crisis period, while in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

Bulgaria the decline <strong>of</strong> this aggregate<br />

continues.<br />

Bibliography<br />

1. ADKINS, Lee, Using Gretl for Principles<br />

<strong>of</strong> Econometrics, 2009 ,<br />

learneconometrics.org<br />

2. Baldwin, Richard (2006). In or Out: Does<br />

it Matter? An Evidence-Based Analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Euro's Trade Effects , London: Centre for<br />

Economic Policy Research. ISBN<br />

189812891X.<br />

3. CERNA, Silviu, Economie monetară,<br />

Editura Universității de Vest, Timișoara,<br />

2009<br />

4. COTTREL, Allin, LUCHETTI,<br />

Riccardi, Gretl User Guide, 2010,<br />

gretl.sourceforge.net<br />

5. Damodar N. Gujarati, Basic<br />

Econometrics , Mcgraw-Hill; 4th edition<br />

(May 2002)<br />

6. Fagan, Gabriel, Henry, Jérôme, Long<br />

run money demand in the EU: Evidence for<br />

area-wide aggregates, Empirical Economics,<br />

1998, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01294419<br />

7. Mundell, RA - The American Economic<br />

Review, 1961, A theory <strong>of</strong> optimum currency<br />

Areas, 1961.<br />

8. Robert Bîtcă et al., Dovezi ale<br />

endogenităţii zonelor monetare optime,<br />

(Evidence <strong>of</strong> the endogeneity <strong>of</strong> optimum<br />

currency areas), 2007,<br />

www.batca.files.wordpress.com.<br />

9. ZĂPODEANU, Daniela, Politici<br />

Monetare, Ed. Dacia, Cluj-. Napoca, 2002<br />

10. www.gretl.sourceforge.net/<br />

11. www.bnro.ro<br />

12. http://www.nbp.pl<br />

13. http://www.bnb.bg/<br />

14. www.learneconometrics.com/gretl.html


Section Management and Marketing<br />

Sub-section: Economic Informatics


TOOLS USED IN DECISION MAKING<br />

Demian Horia<br />

Str. Universitatii nr 1, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania<br />

Bernabeu Elena Perez<br />

Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Spain<br />

Abrudan Maria Madela<br />

Str. Universitatii nr 1, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Romania<br />

Abstract: Decision making is one <strong>of</strong> the important tasks <strong>of</strong> every manager. The process <strong>of</strong> taking<br />

decisions has to be based on knowledge. For optimizing this process some s<strong>of</strong>tware solutions has<br />

been created. In this article we tried to summarize some <strong>of</strong> the features which exists in some<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware applications.<br />

Keywords: decision making, risk solver<br />

Introduction<br />

Knowledge is the main source <strong>of</strong> competitive<br />

advantage in the knowledge economy and<br />

innovation in organizations involved in the<br />

services sector.[1] It’s really about the<br />

transformation <strong>of</strong> information into useful data<br />

management process. We must keep in mind,<br />

however, that the speed with which<br />

information circulates, accessibility, search<br />

and how their storage are critical factors to be<br />

taken into account in streamlining decisionmaking.<br />

Taking into account the likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />

achieving results, several models are<br />

developed to optimize decisions, starting<br />

from the classification <strong>of</strong> decisions: decisions<br />

in conditions <strong>of</strong> certainty, risk and<br />

uncertainty. The elements that distinguish<br />

these types <strong>of</strong> decisions is very important for<br />

all - managers and s<strong>of</strong>tware developers.<br />

While the development <strong>of</strong> computer<br />

applications has raised no problems using<br />

established models in case <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

consequences known with certainty -<br />

ELECTRE, for example - the real challenge<br />

for s<strong>of</strong>tware developers is to optimize the<br />

decisions <strong>of</strong> category risk and uncertainty.<br />

In the service sector, as in any other field <strong>of</strong><br />

economics, all computer application are<br />

based on the distinction between definitions<br />

<strong>of</strong> risk and uncertainty:<br />

315<br />

-risk is present when future events<br />

occur with measurable probability<br />

-uncertainty is present when the<br />

likelihood <strong>of</strong> future events is<br />

indefinite or incalculable (Frank H.<br />

Knight, 1921)<br />

Between different algorithms used inside the<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware “Monte Carlo has become a<br />

standard tool <strong>of</strong> risk management” [PRO02]<br />

According to Michele Gambera, the accuracy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the results is limited by the number <strong>of</strong><br />

simulated histories. The process <strong>of</strong> simulation<br />

will be longer when we have more data. So,<br />

an important issue will be how fast a<br />

computer program can do all the calculations.<br />

New technologies which were developed will<br />

improve the speed <strong>of</strong> the calculations. Cloud<br />

computing is one <strong>of</strong> this technology. If we are<br />

taking into consideration cloud computing,<br />

we have to be aware that the algorithm has to<br />

be done in parallel and also if there are a<br />

mechanism <strong>of</strong> sending and receiving subsets<br />

<strong>of</strong> data between these processes. Monte Carlo<br />

algorithm is one which can be done in<br />

parallel computing.<br />

In Monte Carlo simulation an important fact<br />

is the distribution which we used for our<br />

model. There is a lot <strong>of</strong> distribution which<br />

can be used like normal distribution, uniform<br />

distribution, triangular distribution and so on.


According to an article <strong>of</strong> S. Savage, S.<br />

Scholtes, and D. Zweidler “simulations<br />

without acceptable input distributions are like<br />

light bulbs without electricity”, and they<br />

observe very well that “Only a few people<br />

within an organization have the expertise to<br />

estimate probability distributions, and even<br />

fewer have the managerial authority to get<br />

their estimates accepted on an enterprise-wide<br />

basis”. One <strong>of</strong> their ideas was to manage<br />

probability distributions centrally and to<br />

replace the classical probability distributions<br />

with stochastic libraries a pre-generated<br />

random trials that approximate” stochastic<br />

inputs or can be the results <strong>of</strong> simulation and<br />

optimization models.<br />

ProbabilityManagement.org has presented the<br />

DIST Distribution String which brings to<br />

Monte Carlo simulation, a data structure that<br />

contains thousands <strong>of</strong> Monte Carlo trials.<br />

These trials are compressed through XML, so<br />

that structure can be store in the single cell <strong>of</strong><br />

a spreadsheet or in a field <strong>of</strong> a data base. The<br />

main advantages <strong>of</strong> DIST is that it can be<br />

generated by experts, to represent virtually<br />

any type <strong>of</strong> probability distribution, and then<br />

Also a Model Pane which consists <strong>of</strong> four<br />

tabs will be displayed in the right part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

screen. Model tab is used for seeing the<br />

description for the current model which can<br />

be one <strong>of</strong> Optimization, Simulation or<br />

Decision tree. Platform tab is used for<br />

defining parameters for Optimization Model,<br />

parameters for Simulation Model or<br />

parameters for decision Tree Model.<br />

Engine tab is used for specifying engine<br />

which will be used in solving the problem.<br />

We can select from Standard GRG Nonlinear<br />

Engine, Standard LP/Quadratic Engine,<br />

316<br />

it can be distributed to others in a<br />

standardized format.<br />

Other important concept is to use interactive<br />

simulation in your model.<br />

Risk Solver Platform is developed by<br />

FrontlineSystems and is fully integrated with<br />

Micros<strong>of</strong>t Excel. This s<strong>of</strong>tware can be used<br />

for linear and non-linear model, for<br />

conventional optimization, for decision tree<br />

model, for risk analysis and Monte Carlo<br />

simulation.<br />

“This package was also the first, and as <strong>of</strong><br />

this date, the most powerful interactive Monte<br />

Carlo simulation package for Micros<strong>of</strong>t<br />

Excel. For simple simulations involving a few<br />

variables, it can perform 100,000 trials<br />

essentially instantly, as the user changes<br />

parameters in the model.”<br />

[http://probabilitymanagement.org/S<strong>of</strong>tware.h<br />

tm]<br />

Immediate after installation the menu <strong>of</strong><br />

Excel will be improved with a ribbon with<br />

specific option for optimization and<br />

simulation, like it can be seen in the<br />

following figure.<br />

Standard Evolutionary Engine, Standard<br />

Interval Global Engine, Standard SOCP<br />

Barrier Engine, Risk Solver Engine, or we<br />

can let it choose automatically which engine<br />

to use in solving the problem. Which engine<br />

should we use? Their recommendation is to<br />

try them all, and use the one that performs<br />

best on your model.[RISK01]<br />

For every <strong>of</strong> these engine we can define some<br />

parameters which will be used, like Monte<br />

Carlo number <strong>of</strong> trials, the algorithm used for<br />

random number generations, number <strong>of</strong><br />

iterations, Integer tolerance, Multi Start and


so on. Integer tolerance is used to stop finding<br />

a solution in Branch and Bound algorithm,<br />

when the relative difference between the best<br />

found solution and the best possible solution<br />

is less than this value. If this value is set to<br />

zero, the algorithm will be stopped with the<br />

true optimal integer solution.<br />

When Multistart option is set to true, methods<br />

for finding global solution to the problem will<br />

be used.<br />

Output tab is used for displaying the results.<br />

Nonlinear problems are more difficult to<br />

solve than linear problems. In risk solver<br />

platform an important advantage is that <strong>of</strong><br />

using (Analyze without solving) button,<br />

which will help us in finding the model. If the<br />

nonlinear problem is convex, the global<br />

optimal solution will be found.<br />

For using this platform we have to be familiar<br />

with Micros<strong>of</strong>t Excel. The platform came<br />

with a lot <strong>of</strong> useful examples for<br />

optimization, simulation and simulation &<br />

optimization like Simple Business Plan<br />

Forecast Model with Uncertainty, an example<br />

illustrating modeling an investment fund's<br />

growth given uncertain return rates, an<br />

example illustrating modeling multi-period<br />

317<br />

Inventory problems with uncertain demand,<br />

an example illustrating the use <strong>of</strong> Monte-<br />

Carlo Simulation to estimate workforce levels<br />

required to meet demand, an example<br />

illustrating use <strong>of</strong> Monte-Carlo Simulation in<br />

Airline Yield Management; this example also<br />

shows the use <strong>of</strong> a parameterized simulation<br />

model to arrive at good decision policies<br />

under uncertainty.<br />

It is very important to mention that a useful<br />

package named Risk Solver Engine can be<br />

used to develop and deploy application to<br />

users.<br />

Risk Solver Platform came with a set <strong>of</strong><br />

functions which can be used for defining<br />

optimization models and Monte Carlo<br />

simulation models. According to their<br />

documentation most <strong>of</strong> these functions will<br />

be used for Monte Carlo simulation models,<br />

or for the uncertain elements <strong>of</strong> stochastic<br />

optimization models.<br />

We have tried to solve a problem <strong>of</strong> making<br />

reservation to a hotel, in the following<br />

conditions. Our hotels have 50 rooms, and the<br />

price for a room is 39 EURO. In case a client<br />

will cancel the reservation, hotel will not<br />

refund the price <strong>of</strong> the first night <strong>of</strong><br />

accommodation. In case the tourist will show<br />

up and no room will be available a<br />

compensation <strong>of</strong> 25% <strong>of</strong> the price <strong>of</strong> a room<br />

will be paid by the hotel for tourist<br />

accommodation in another hotel.<br />

In less than 5 minutes we can create a model<br />

<strong>of</strong> our problem based on the model which is<br />

defined in YieldManagementModel2.XLS<br />

file. The distribution <strong>of</strong> cancelation will be a<br />

LogNormal distribution <strong>of</strong> 5% with a<br />

standard deviation <strong>of</strong> 2%. For this we used<br />

PSILogNormal function which generates<br />

random number <strong>of</strong> tourist cancelations. We<br />

prefer this model because we can see exactly<br />

the evolution <strong>of</strong> simulation for each particular<br />

case, and we can make an idea about the<br />

algoritm.


For number <strong>of</strong> booking we used<br />

=PsiSimParam(C19:BB19) which tell to<br />

Solver engine that a different simulation will<br />

be made for each value <strong>of</strong> a cell from the<br />

domain C19 to BB19. We also used<br />

=PsiMean($C$15,C18) do define the<br />

expected revenue in each case <strong>of</strong> simulations.<br />

We also set the number <strong>of</strong> trials per<br />

simulation to 10000 for more accuracy. In<br />

less than 3 seconds on our computer we<br />

To solve this problem solver was simulate all<br />

50 cases with 10000 <strong>of</strong> situations in 0.25<br />

seconds.<br />

318<br />

obtain the results to our problems which<br />

indicate us to use 53 rooms in the process <strong>of</strong><br />

making reservations.<br />

Another very useful thing is the displaying <strong>of</strong><br />

the results which can be viewed and analyzed<br />

in a different window like the above on. We<br />

can combine multiple simulations in our<br />

analyzing or we can see the results for only<br />

one.<br />

The same problem can be solved if we define<br />

a simulation &optimization model. For this<br />

model we used only PSILogNormal and


PSIMean functions as it can be seen in the following figure.<br />

We define an maximum objective <strong>of</strong> C16, we<br />

put a condition that number <strong>of</strong> booking has to<br />

be an integer (we cannot book 5.34 rooms),<br />

and we also set that C11 is a variable, like it<br />

can be seen in the model above in the<br />

optimization section. Another parameters <strong>of</strong><br />

the engine is 1 simulation and 1000 <strong>of</strong> trials<br />

per simulation. We start with button.<br />

Solver has found a solution in our case in 6.8<br />

seconds after informing us that our model<br />

contains uncertainity, and Risk solver<br />

Another interesting part <strong>of</strong> Risk Solver Platform are Decision Tree.<br />

319<br />

platform will analyze our formula to<br />

determine the best methods for solving it.<br />

Also it determine that our models is non<br />

linear in decision variables and cannot be<br />

solved by stochastic programming or robust<br />

optimization methods. At the end inform us<br />

that Branch &Bound algorithm has found the<br />

best <strong>of</strong> the locally optimal solutions. The<br />

results are 53 bookings like in the preceding<br />

solutions.


Conclusions<br />

1.Risk Solver platform can be used in solving<br />

different services optimization problems<br />

when we are working with uncertainty.<br />

2.SAS can be mention as a leader on risk<br />

management for banking.<br />

3.Using simulation & optimization it takes<br />

more time to Risk Solver Platform to solve<br />

our problem, but is more ease to define the<br />

model and to interpret the results.<br />

Bibliography:<br />

1.[SAV01] S. Savage, S. Scholtes, and D.<br />

Zweidler, 2006,“Probability Management,<br />

Part 2,” OR/MS Today, April 2006, Vol. 33,<br />

No. 2.<br />

[RISK01] Risk Solver Platform Reference<br />

guide- version 10.0<br />

[PRO01] ProbabilityManagement.org, 2011<br />

2.[PRO02]<br />

http://probabilitymanagement.org/Library/IW<br />

M11MarApr_MonteCarlo.pdf<br />

3.[BOY01] Stephen Boyd, Arpita Ghosh, and<br />

Alessandro Magnani- Brench and Bound<br />

methods – Stanford university 2003<br />

320<br />

4. Shradhanand, Amarjeet Kaur, and Dr.<br />

Satbir Jain. Use <strong>of</strong> fuzzy logic in s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

development. Issues in Information Systems.<br />

Volume VIII, No. 2, 2007<br />

5. Kahraman C, Fuzzy Multi-Criteria<br />

Decision Making.Theory and Applications<br />

with Recent Developments. Springer<br />

Science+Business Media 2008. ISBN 978-0-<br />

387-76812-0<br />

6. Gurevich G, Kliger D. and Levy O.<br />

Decision-making under uncertainty – A field<br />

study <strong>of</strong> cumulative prospect theory. Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Banking & Finance 33 (2009) 1221–1229<br />

7. Feng G and Mingzhe W. Route Choice<br />

Behavior Model with Guidance Information.<br />

J Transpn Sys Eng & IT, 2010, 10(6), 64−69.<br />

8.<br />

http://www.palisade.com/decisiontools_suite/<br />

9. http://www.solver.com/platform/risksolver-platform.htm<br />

10.<br />

http://www.oracle.com/us/products/middlewa<br />

re/bus-int/crystalball/index.html


Sub-section: Marketing


PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THE<br />

CASE OF ROMANIA. CONCEPT AND MANAGEMENT.<br />

Bibu Nicolae<br />

West University, Timisoara (Romania)<br />

Faculty Of Economics And Business Administration (FEAA)<br />

Lisetchi Mihai<br />

West University, Timisoara (Romania)<br />

Faculty Of Economics And Business Administration (FEAA)<br />

Abstract: The public administration has a major role in partnerships establishing and operating<br />

with different community actors aiming at solving specific community problems. In the process <strong>of</strong><br />

identifying and solving the community problems the actions <strong>of</strong> the non-governmental organisations<br />

are considered as “alternatives” to the solutions <strong>of</strong> the public administration.<br />

The advantages <strong>of</strong> an on-going collaboration between non-governmental organisations, as relevant<br />

agents in the social economy, and the public authorities aiming at solving the community problems<br />

were identified and aknowledged by both sides representatives. The access to complementary<br />

resources, and implicitly, an increase in the range <strong>of</strong> actions <strong>of</strong> the partners beyond mathematical<br />

calculus, an increase in the credibility and public image <strong>of</strong> the partners, as well as the social benefit<br />

corollary to positive models established within the community, are only a few <strong>of</strong> the arguments. The<br />

question raised is why this type <strong>of</strong> a more consistent approach is not used in the current practices <strong>of</strong><br />

solving the community issues in Romania. The following causes should be considered in response to<br />

this question: the lack <strong>of</strong> an associative culture at the level <strong>of</strong> all potential partners, the access to<br />

resources is by far too limited on behalf <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the two parts involved, a neutral, thus,<br />

unrestrictive legislative environment, but at the same time, unstimulating towards an associative<br />

action, i.e. limited management capacities on both sides.<br />

From this perspectives, this paper aims at clarifying the partnership concept (definition, typology),<br />

the public-private partnership role in solving community problems and the management issues<br />

related: partners identification, negociation <strong>of</strong> the cooperation protocol, decision making process<br />

and resource management, assesment, etc.<br />

Keywords: partnership, public administration, non-governmental organizations, public-private<br />

partnership, partnership management.<br />

JEL Classification codes: L33, L38<br />

I. Public Administration and Partnership<br />

Practice<br />

Bringing suplementary resources represents<br />

the aim <strong>of</strong> the openess <strong>of</strong> the public<br />

institutions to public-private partnership, as<br />

an instrument in community problems solving<br />

process. This openess is a must considering<br />

the genuine explosion <strong>of</strong> citizens’ public<br />

needs coroborated with the cronic lack <strong>of</strong><br />

resources any public institution has to face,<br />

regardless which part <strong>of</strong> the world it<br />

functions.<br />

323<br />

The Partnership Concept<br />

Assuming partnership as a governing<br />

principle represents, from a political point <strong>of</strong><br />

view, a democratic option and, thus, has the<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> a political message;<br />

meantime, it implies an great effort to ensure<br />

its institutional and procedural premises and,<br />

by consequance, has the significance <strong>of</strong> a<br />

institutional development program, situation<br />

which brings advantages and risks<br />

simultanously. Among its advantages for the<br />

public authorities are increased public support<br />

for their ongoing programs, atracting


suplementary resources compared with the<br />

ones commonly available to public authorities<br />

and an increased adaptation <strong>of</strong> the public<br />

services to the community needs (Bancila et<br />

al. 2002:42). Partnership is not a purpose in<br />

itself, but, from a methodological point <strong>of</strong><br />

view, it is a way to approach problems, while<br />

from a managerial point <strong>of</strong> view it is an<br />

instrument used in solving problems.<br />

Partnership is the way, formal or informal,<br />

through which two or more parties act<br />

together in order to achieve a joint goal or<br />

joint objectives, based on a joint plan <strong>of</strong><br />

action and joint dedicated resources and<br />

under a joint resources and activities<br />

management. The specific approach through<br />

which resources are jointly dedicated under a<br />

joint management makes the difference<br />

between partnership and cooperation concept<br />

while the differences between the two words<br />

are difficult to notice from a semantic point<br />

<strong>of</strong> view. In the same respect, joint<br />

management makes the difference between a<br />

partnership and a funding relation.<br />

As far as it concern the decision process, in<br />

partnership relation, the parties must not<br />

necessarly have equal shares, but is important<br />

that they are treated as sitting on equal<br />

grounds because partnership can not be build<br />

on a subordination relation. Consequantly, in<br />

a partnership, the decision power can be split<br />

between parties evenly or proportionally with<br />

their contribution (Bancila et al. 2002:40).<br />

The partnership types can be considered<br />

based on diverse criteria, acting<br />

simultanously or independently, which<br />

generate a relatively complex typology<br />

(Bancila et al. 2002:39). Thus, from a legal<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view, partnerships can be formal or<br />

informal. When the goal is specific enough<br />

and achiving it is not a problem, an informal<br />

partnership can be established if the parties<br />

are similar entities, knowing each other and,<br />

eventually, having a cooperation history<br />

together. In the case <strong>of</strong> a more complexe or<br />

long term or if parties are different type <strong>of</strong><br />

entities (NGOs and public authorities, or<br />

NGOs <strong>of</strong> different nationalities), partnership<br />

324<br />

tends to be formalised. Another criteria for<br />

partnerships classification is the type <strong>of</strong> the<br />

partnership goal. Thus, one can find<br />

representation partnerships like federations,<br />

unions, councils, aliances, coalitions, etc.<br />

together with operational partnerships which<br />

implies the existance <strong>of</strong> specific projects as a<br />

reason <strong>of</strong> the venture. Partneships can be<br />

established on a long or short term, with its<br />

own funding or attracted funding, etc.<br />

Meantime, it should be mentioned that<br />

public-private partnership, as a specific cas <strong>of</strong><br />

partnership [1], may define an public<br />

authorities’ initiative to solve community<br />

problems by involving a private partners,<br />

either from business sector, or nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

sector. This paper is focusing on the second<br />

category <strong>of</strong> potential private partners.<br />

NGOs as Public Policy Subjects in Romania<br />

Coagulation and development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

nonpr<strong>of</strong>it sector, as an alternative to the<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> the market and public institutions,<br />

creates the opportunity <strong>of</strong> an analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

public authorities-NGOs partnership<br />

management and, implicitly, the clarification<br />

<strong>of</strong> the nongovernmental organization concept.<br />

Comparing to the other categories <strong>of</strong><br />

institutions which operate in the community,<br />

nonpr<strong>of</strong>it nongovernmental organizations<br />

(commonly known as nongovernmental<br />

organizations - NGOs) ressamble to private<br />

commercial entities concerning the way they<br />

function, but their goals and objectives are<br />

focused on social needs approached through<br />

public interest activities, without a<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>it (if does exist) among<br />

the persons involved in the activities. This<br />

brings NGOs closer to the logic <strong>of</strong> the public<br />

institutions (Andersen et al. 2010:8). There<br />

are many definitions on the nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

nongovernmental organization concept.<br />

According to the structural-functional<br />

definition (Salomon 1992:6), NGOs should<br />

meet couple <strong>of</strong> criteria: to have an<br />

institutional structure, to be <strong>of</strong> private nature,<br />

to do not share pr<strong>of</strong>it, to be self governed, to<br />

be volunteer run.


Further, the discussion is focusing on only<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the NGOs, more precisely, in the<br />

meaning <strong>of</strong> this text, nongovernmental<br />

organizations or nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations are<br />

defined as an organizational category, formed<br />

by institutionalised entities, <strong>of</strong> private nature,<br />

dedicated to social needs, independent from<br />

public institutions and not interested in<br />

political power (i.e. political parties) or pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

(i.e. commercial private organizations).<br />

In some countries, the relations between<br />

NGOs and public authorities have a long and<br />

well grounded history. For other countries,<br />

Romania included, relations without an<br />

evident political character between NGOs and<br />

public authorities represent a new type <strong>of</strong><br />

public relations emerged in the beggining <strong>of</strong><br />

the ’90ties. They were possible only when<br />

democratic changes in former socialist<br />

countries started while previously their<br />

governments kept all private initiatives under<br />

strict surveillance and administrative control<br />

(ICNL 2000). All the governmental<br />

strategies issued in Romania after 1990<br />

included public authorities-NGOs<br />

partnerships as a constant objective for all<br />

governments. Periodically legislative and<br />

institutional initiatives aimed to facilitate<br />

public authorities-NGOs sectoral, national<br />

and local consultations were announced<br />

(Liseţchi and Olteanu 1998:3). While the<br />

governmental interest for NGOs has a history<br />

<strong>of</strong> over 20 years, a review <strong>of</strong> the public policy<br />

on NGOs main hallmarks shows that actual<br />

period is a transitional one and Romania is<br />

still in a phase <strong>of</strong> institutional set up (Lisetchi<br />

2006:1).<br />

NGOs’ Evaluation by Public Authorities<br />

In order to evaluate the NGOs’ potential to be<br />

associated in the public policies elaboration,<br />

implementation and evaluation process, and,<br />

also, to apply the Romanian legal norms<br />

(O.G. 26/2000), it is useful for the public<br />

authorities to elaborate an appropriate<br />

methodology. Public perception on NGOs is<br />

an important factor in assessing this potential<br />

(Bancila et al. 2002:45). NGOs shows an<br />

325<br />

higher level <strong>of</strong> public trust comparing to<br />

authorities (FDSC 2010). Citizens’<br />

appreciation for NGOs is as increased as<br />

they: facilitate the citizens’ participation,<br />

strengthen cohesion and solidarity, get<br />

involved in partnerships with the authorities<br />

and have strong local roots. NGOs seem to be<br />

less trustful if perceived as part <strong>of</strong> the public<br />

system, beneficiary and consumers <strong>of</strong> public<br />

resources, or if they are perceived as week or<br />

centred on their own goals, if these are<br />

different from those <strong>of</strong> the community<br />

(Bancila et al. 2002:45).<br />

Assessment Criteria <strong>of</strong> Public Policies on<br />

NGO<br />

In order to foster the possibility <strong>of</strong> evaluating<br />

the willingness <strong>of</strong> the public authorities to get<br />

involved with the non-governmental<br />

organizations it is necessary to employ some<br />

criteria to ensure a standardised assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

the associative behaviour <strong>of</strong> the public<br />

administration towards potential community<br />

partners. Such criteria (Bancila et al.<br />

2002:45-46) are as follows:<br />

a) existing institutionalised structures that<br />

link the public authorities to the<br />

associative sector;<br />

b) exiting solution grids, accurately and<br />

univocally defined, such as recurrent<br />

institutionalized processes;<br />

c) applying the principle <strong>of</strong> equal<br />

opportunities to any non-governmental<br />

organisations that request assistance;<br />

d) applying the principle <strong>of</strong> supply and<br />

demand in any public administration-<br />

NGO relation;<br />

e) employing accurate selection criteria <strong>of</strong><br />

the services <strong>of</strong>fered by the organizations;<br />

f) the access <strong>of</strong> organisations to public<br />

services contracting within equal terms as<br />

other economic agents;<br />

g) the registration <strong>of</strong> relevant information<br />

regarding the organisations that perform<br />

their activity within the covered<br />

geographical area;<br />

h) jointly designing a job description <strong>of</strong> the<br />

public clerk whose attributions should


entail the relationship with the nongovernmental<br />

organisations;<br />

i) showing interest in raising the awareness<br />

and the sense <strong>of</strong> responsibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

elected <strong>of</strong>ficials in relation to the<br />

electorate;<br />

II. The Partnership between Public<br />

Administration and Non-Governmental<br />

Organisations The Opportunity <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Partnership between Public Administration<br />

and NGOs<br />

The advantages <strong>of</strong> an on-going collaboration<br />

between non-governmental organisations, as<br />

relevant agents in the social economy, and the<br />

public authorities aiming at solving the<br />

community problems, are as follows: the<br />

access to complementary resources, and<br />

implicitly, an increase in the range <strong>of</strong> actions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the partners beyond mathematical calculus,<br />

an increase in the credibility and public image<br />

<strong>of</strong> the partners, as well as the social benefit<br />

corollary to positive models established<br />

within the community, etc.<br />

In the process <strong>of</strong> identifying and solving the<br />

community problems the actions <strong>of</strong> the nongovernmental<br />

organisations are considered as<br />

“alternatives” to the solutions <strong>of</strong> the public<br />

administration. In order to render perspicuous<br />

the choice <strong>of</strong> the word “alternative”, it is<br />

necessary to explain that communities do not<br />

have to choose between the development<br />

model brought forth by the public authorities<br />

and a model suggested by the organisations,<br />

for the very reason that organisations cannot<br />

launch such an <strong>of</strong>fer. Only in exceptional<br />

circumstances can NGOs entirely solve a<br />

community problem. At the same time, the<br />

way in which NGOs take action can represent<br />

a model <strong>of</strong> approaching a problematic matter,<br />

not the only way or the best way, however,<br />

most definitely efficient from the perspective<br />

<strong>of</strong> a cost/benefit analysis. This does not mean<br />

that non-governmental organisations are to<br />

replace the public administration or that they<br />

are to perform the duties <strong>of</strong> the latter. The<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> the non-governmental organisations<br />

does not represent an alternative per se to the<br />

326<br />

services <strong>of</strong>fered by the public institutions.<br />

NGOs represent an action method<br />

complementary to the activities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

administration, through which the community<br />

becomes responsible towards solving their<br />

own issues (Lisetchi 2006:1). In this context,<br />

the partnership can be considered a<br />

desirable principle <strong>of</strong> action which can be<br />

found, to a certain extant, in the<br />

organizational culture and the practice <strong>of</strong><br />

some public institutions.<br />

Management Approach <strong>of</strong> the Public<br />

Administration - NGOs Partnership<br />

In an atempt to optimize the public<br />

administration-NGOs partnership, some<br />

specific aspects are to be considered:<br />

a) different resources: the authorities have the<br />

possibility to allocate public funds, as well as<br />

the capacity to issue regulations, while the<br />

NGOs have the possibility <strong>of</strong> accessing<br />

private funds, respectively, the expertise to<br />

solve specific issues and the capacity to<br />

motivate/mobilise volunteers.<br />

b) working method: the operation capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

the authorities is limited by the attributions<br />

foreseen by their regulations, respectively, a<br />

slow reaction held back by bureaucracy and<br />

the propensity towards solving the general<br />

issues, while the NGOs are more flexible,<br />

faster in their reactions and the tendency to<br />

focus on specific problems.<br />

c) the organisational structure and culture:<br />

the authorities are larger organisations<br />

comprising complex structures, while NGOs<br />

are smaller organisations with simpler<br />

structures (Altman-Sauer et al. 2001:34).<br />

The differences can generate tension; the<br />

main obstacles that hinder an efficient<br />

relationship between the NGOs and the<br />

public authorities have been identified: (I)<br />

different perspectives <strong>of</strong> the two sides<br />

concerning the same matter, (II) the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

understanding the peculiarity <strong>of</strong> the activity<br />

carried into effect by the other, (III) the<br />

particular economic and cultural effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

community on the communication methods,<br />

on the spreading <strong>of</strong> the information and <strong>of</strong> the


decision-making and (IV) the power relations<br />

between the two parts involved (Altman-<br />

Sauer et al. 2001: 35-38). The common<br />

element that was identified by the two sides,<br />

i.e. the fact that it addresses the same group<br />

(members <strong>of</strong> the community sharing the same<br />

problems) and the capacity to find solutions<br />

for the above-mentioned obstacles, can lead<br />

to an advantageous cooperation between<br />

public administration and NGOs, that will,<br />

consequently, benefit the community.<br />

Cooperation within a public-private<br />

partnership is facilitated in the following<br />

circumstances: collaboration should focus on<br />

a single matter, the purposes are clearly<br />

stated, public participation in the process <strong>of</strong><br />

solving the community problems, each<br />

partner should devote time and resources to<br />

plan the cooperation, the intentions and<br />

coordinates <strong>of</strong> the partnership should be<br />

clearly established by the two parts, the<br />

necessary resources for a good cooperation<br />

within the partnership should be accurately<br />

identified, assessed and allocated,<br />

communication should be appropriate and<br />

efficient, the attributions, skills and<br />

responsibilities <strong>of</strong> each partner should be<br />

specified, a decision-making system based on<br />

the equal status <strong>of</strong> the partners should be<br />

designed (Altman-Sauer et al. 2001:34-35).<br />

Exercising the Public Administration-<br />

NGOs Partnership in Romania<br />

If at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the last decade nongovernmental<br />

organisations were perceived<br />

as being rather anti-governmental by the<br />

public authorities, partnerships between them<br />

being exceptional, currently things have<br />

changed considerably with the opportunities<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by the European financing<br />

programmes prior to Romania’s accession to<br />

the E.U. The fact that the European Union,<br />

according to the financing programme, either<br />

imposed on the public administration the<br />

partnership with the non-governmental<br />

organisations, respectively, imposing on the<br />

public institutions the partnership with<br />

NGOs, or it granted a higher score for such<br />

327<br />

collaborations, has lead to a spectacular<br />

proliferation <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> public-private<br />

partnerships in Romania. It is worth<br />

mentioning that, as a consequence, more<br />

funders took up this approach as part <strong>of</strong> their<br />

financing policies. Given this context,<br />

towards the end <strong>of</strong> the last decade,<br />

partnerships became a purpose themselves,<br />

being assessed inconsistently in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

management or the results <strong>of</strong> such a process.<br />

On the other hand, financing the projects <strong>of</strong><br />

the non-governmental organisations by the<br />

public authorities, as a recommended practice<br />

by the community development theory, has<br />

lead to an extensive employment <strong>of</strong> the term<br />

partnership in the marketing discourse.<br />

Nevertheless, such an interpretation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

financing relationship between the two types<br />

<strong>of</strong> institutions, even if valued on first sight, is<br />

abusive if compared to the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

partnership which entails a process <strong>of</strong> codecision<br />

in operating the tasks to be handled<br />

by the parts involved in the partnership.<br />

Regarding the above-mentioned issues, the<br />

problem raised is that the public-private<br />

partnership is deprived <strong>of</strong> its deep structure<br />

and meaning.<br />

To bring forth a general perspective regarding<br />

the practice <strong>of</strong> the public-private partnership,<br />

it is worth mentioning that, as in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania, the current legal framework allows<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> the relations between<br />

public authorities and the non-governmental<br />

organisations (OG 26/2000). The question<br />

raised is why this type <strong>of</strong> a more consistent<br />

approach is not used in the current practices<br />

<strong>of</strong> solving the community issues in Romania.<br />

The following causes should be considered in<br />

response to this question (Lisetchi 2006:20):<br />

the lack <strong>of</strong> an associative culture at the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> all potential partners, the access to<br />

resources is by far too limited on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />

any <strong>of</strong> the two parts involved, a neutral, thus,<br />

unrestrictive legislative environment, but at<br />

the same time, unstimulating towards an<br />

associative action, i.e. limited management<br />

capacities on both sides. Concerning the issue<br />

<strong>of</strong> the associative culture, the GLOBE


Romania research (Bibu et al. 2008) shows<br />

that in relation to the obtained score for the<br />

cultural dimension criterion, Institutional<br />

Collectivism (Collectivism I), Romania is<br />

situated on a scale from 1 to 7 at a relatively<br />

low level, 3.75, in comparison with the rest <strong>of</strong><br />

the world. This number outlines the degree to<br />

which institutional practices at the social and<br />

organisational level encourage and<br />

compensate for the collective distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

the resources and the collective action. A low<br />

number indicates less collectivism, thus, more<br />

individualism in relation to the general<br />

interest in society. Nonetheless, the score <strong>of</strong><br />

5.43 for the cultural dimension Group<br />

Collectivism (Collectivism II) is situated at<br />

a higher level on the world scale, which<br />

indicates that in Romania individual<br />

expressions <strong>of</strong> pride, loyalty and cohesion<br />

within smaller groups, such as the<br />

organisation, the family, are more recurrent.<br />

Romanian culture favours smaller groups and<br />

their interests and puts at a disadvantage the<br />

general interest in the society. Consequently,<br />

the associative factor is not favoured by the<br />

Romanian culture. The narrow interest <strong>of</strong> the<br />

group they belong to is the strongest.<br />

Perforce, it is necessary to clearly point out<br />

the common areas <strong>of</strong> the two partners in order<br />

to render the partnerships viable.<br />

In practice there are naturally more<br />

differences in approaching the way in which<br />

the authorities and NGOs relate to<br />

community problems. Public administration<br />

tends to unfold partnerships in especially in<br />

certain fields: unemployment, social care,<br />

local development, citizen-public<br />

administration relation, health, SMEs,<br />

environmental care, education, the non-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

associative sector, the protection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

disabled, tourism development, child care,<br />

regional development, culture (Bancila et al.<br />

2002:42).<br />

In establishing the partnership vocation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

NGOs, the representatives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

administration tend to employ, in this very<br />

same order, the following indicators: the<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> the organisation, the target-<br />

328<br />

group, the resources <strong>of</strong> the organisation, the<br />

impact, the level the public participation.<br />

There is a considerable difference between<br />

this evaluation grid and the one carried into<br />

effect by the financing foundations (for<br />

example, the small amount <strong>of</strong> importance<br />

given to the impact), which can be explained<br />

through the different experience in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> an organisation and its<br />

programmes.<br />

In Romania, according to the public<br />

administration representatives, the following<br />

major obstacles stand in the way <strong>of</strong> the<br />

administration-NGO partnership: deficiencies<br />

in the functioning <strong>of</strong> the authorities 29%,<br />

inadequate institutional and legislative<br />

environment 22%, authority resources 15%,<br />

disfunctions in the running <strong>of</strong> the NGO 15%,<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> information 10% (Bancila et al.<br />

2002:44). In effect, it was noticed that in the<br />

past few years in Romania, falling beyond an<br />

existing theory concept and favourable<br />

narrative discourse, there still exists an<br />

unequal involvement <strong>of</strong> the two potential<br />

partners in the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

collaboration. Naturally, there are also many<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> partnerships between nongovernmental<br />

organisations and public<br />

institutions, this fact being registered<br />

positively. The truth <strong>of</strong> the matter is that, on<br />

the background <strong>of</strong> the opening declarations <strong>of</strong><br />

the public authorities on the common actions,<br />

there is a passive attitude towards this type <strong>of</strong><br />

approach on behalf <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the institutions<br />

(Lisetchi 2006:21-22). The initiative<br />

regarding the common resolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

problems <strong>of</strong> public interest continues to be to<br />

a great extent in the hands <strong>of</strong> nongovernmental<br />

organisations. Needless to say,<br />

not all organisations can be included in our<br />

analysis, as well as not all public institutions<br />

are part <strong>of</strong> this discussion. Nuances <strong>of</strong> the<br />

discourse should be observed in the context<br />

<strong>of</strong> a reality in which not all non-governmental<br />

organisations should take a role in the public<br />

welfare, insomuch as the assertion above does<br />

not mean that all public institutions should<br />

collaborate with non-governmental


organisations in order to deal with<br />

community problems. NGOs are, in general,<br />

the ones who request the collaboration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

public authorities according to various<br />

conditions: individual priorities, willingness<br />

to work in a partnership, the public relations<br />

image <strong>of</strong> the organisation, etc. The public<br />

administration accepts or refuses to be<br />

involved in such actions. At a surface level,<br />

the normality <strong>of</strong> the situation described above<br />

cannot be refuted. The problem, though, that<br />

should be raised revolves around the attitude<br />

towards the responsibility <strong>of</strong> solving the<br />

community issues <strong>of</strong> the two potential<br />

partners. If, for the public administration, this<br />

type <strong>of</strong> responsibility is legally regulated,<br />

having a binding character, imposed, and,<br />

eventually, it represents the reason to be <strong>of</strong> a<br />

public institution, for the non-governmental<br />

organisations, as structures <strong>of</strong> private<br />

initiative, taking this kind <strong>of</strong> responsibility is<br />

the result <strong>of</strong> the individual willingness,<br />

motivated by the interest in the public welfare<br />

<strong>of</strong> a private group. (Lisetchi 2006:22).<br />

Recommendations Regarding the Public<br />

Administration-NGO Partnership<br />

The problem <strong>of</strong> the partnership between the<br />

public administration and the nongovernmental<br />

organisations represented an<br />

interest point for the Romanian<br />

nongovernmental sector even from the period<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first mandate <strong>of</strong> The Group for the<br />

Implementation <strong>of</strong> the Resolution <strong>of</strong> the NGO<br />

National Forum (GIR) formed in 1998. Thus,<br />

some general recommendations that make<br />

direct reference to the current discussion can<br />

be enlisted among the mentioned activities<br />

within the context <strong>of</strong> a GIR proposition<br />

regarding the future actions <strong>of</strong> the associative<br />

sector:<br />

a) The reinforcement <strong>of</strong> the local and central<br />

public administration capacities to work with<br />

the civil society, manifested through public<br />

authorities agreement procedures <strong>of</strong> the nongovernmental<br />

organisations as service<br />

providers and organisers <strong>of</strong> citizen consulting<br />

centres<br />

329<br />

b) Involving the citizen in the public<br />

decision-making on the basis <strong>of</strong> pre-arranged<br />

procedures<br />

Altman-Sauer, Henderson and Whitaker<br />

(2001:37-38) have a couple <strong>of</strong><br />

recommendations for the two parts involved<br />

in the promotion <strong>of</strong> the NGO-public<br />

administration partnership:<br />

What can the non-governmental organisations<br />

do?<br />

1. Inform the relevant authorities throughout<br />

the year about their progress, not only in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> the partnership launching or fund<br />

raising.<br />

2. Attach importance to the functioning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

entire community, not only to the<br />

organisation target group.<br />

3. They should be responsible and fair and<br />

bring pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> that to the public eye.<br />

4. To reinforce the trust <strong>of</strong> the public in the<br />

organisation by presenting a trustworthy and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional image.<br />

5. To help the community learn how to<br />

manage the problems that the organisation<br />

tries to solve and into which they have not<br />

gained an insight yet.<br />

What can the public authorities do?<br />

1. Diminish the frustrations, tensions and<br />

mistrust in the NGO.<br />

2. Ensure an overt management <strong>of</strong> the<br />

financial requests which come on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />

the NGOs.<br />

3. Tackle the problems and needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

community as being part <strong>of</strong> it, not only the<br />

ones <strong>of</strong> the NGOs.<br />

4. Recognise the potential <strong>of</strong> the NGO as a<br />

serious investment.<br />

What can the non-governmental organisations<br />

and the public authorities do together?<br />

1. Exchange information during their<br />

common work relations, as well as in general.<br />

2. To commonly use certain resources.<br />

3. To develop clear guidelines about each<br />

part’s expectations and work on this to reach<br />

a common balance ground.


4. To aknowledge the other part as the best<br />

support for dealing with the public sector<br />

priorities.<br />

Apart from the usefulness <strong>of</strong> these<br />

recommendations, it is foreseeable that<br />

carrying them into effect in the partnership<br />

between the public administration and the<br />

non-governmental organizations is done<br />

progressively, during a slow process<br />

conditioned by the common culture in<br />

Romania, both at an institutional and at an<br />

individual level. Nevertheless, their value is<br />

highlighted by the possibility <strong>of</strong> their use as a<br />

referential point towards which the<br />

organisational behaviour <strong>of</strong> the two types <strong>of</strong><br />

institutions should be oriented, as well as<br />

criteria for a post-factum evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

management and the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

partnerships.<br />

Note:<br />

1. It is worth mentioning that the partnership<br />

typology also comprises public-public or<br />

private-private partnerships, apart from the<br />

public-private one.<br />

References<br />

1. Altman-Sauer, Lydian, Henderson,<br />

Margaret and Whitaker, Gordon P.,<br />

Strengthening Relationships between Local<br />

Governments and Nonpr<strong>of</strong>its, Vol.66, No.2,<br />

Winter 2001, 2001, Accessed May 12, 2011.<br />

http://sogpubs.unc.edu/electronicversions/pg/<br />

pgwin01/article4.pdf<br />

2. Andersen et al., România 2010. Sectorul<br />

neguvernamental – pr<strong>of</strong>il, tendinţe,<br />

provocări, Bucuresti: Fundaţia pentru<br />

Dezvoltarea Societăţii Civile 2010<br />

330<br />

3. Bancila et al., Organizatii<br />

neguvernamentale, Ghid practic, Timişoara:<br />

editura Brumar, 2002<br />

4. Bibu, et al., Romanian Societal Culture: A<br />

culture towards Westernization?, 2008<br />

5. Fundatia pentru Dezvoltarea Societatii<br />

Civile (FDSC), Organizatiile<br />

neguvernamentale conteaza: bilantul a 20 de<br />

ani de existenta, text disponibil la:<br />

http://www.fdsc.ro/pagini/organizatiileneguvernamentale-conteaza.php,<br />

2010,<br />

accesat la 13 martie 2011<br />

6. International Center for Not-for-Pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

Law (ICNL), Comparative Assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

NGO/Government Partnership in Romania,<br />

2000, accessed May 12, 2011<br />

http://www.icnl.org/knowledge/ijnl/vol2iss3/<br />

p_1.htm<br />

7. Mihai, Liseţchi and Ion, Olteanu,<br />

“Organizaţiile neguvernamentale şi conceptul<br />

de parteneriat”, Carte alba la Forumul<br />

Naţional ONG 1998, 1998<br />

8. Liseţchi, Mihai “Parteneriatul administratie<br />

publica - organizatii neguvernamentale. De la<br />

declaratii de intentie la politici publice” Carte<br />

alba la Forumul Naţional ONG, 1999<br />

9. Lisetchi Mihai, Model participativ de<br />

elaborare a unei politici publice privind ONG<br />

in Romania, lucrare de dizertatie elaborata in<br />

cadrul Masteratului de Politici Publice si<br />

Advocacy, Facultatea de Stiinte Politice,<br />

Universitatea de Vest Timisoara, 2006<br />

10. Ordonanţa Guvernului nr. 26/2000,<br />

Capitolului VIII, cu modificarile introduse de<br />

L 246/2005.<br />

11. Salomon, Lester, America’s Nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

Sector: A Primer, New York: The Foundation<br />

Center, 1992


Sub-section: Management


ORGANIZATIONAL STRESS AND ITS IMPACT ON WORK PERFORMANCE<br />

Bucurean Mirela<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Costin Mădălina-Adriana<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Abstract: Nowadays, in times <strong>of</strong> economic crisis, most managers or entrepreneurs have to cope with<br />

a lot <strong>of</strong> new job challenges which can easily transform into stressors. Work related stress is <strong>of</strong><br />

growing concern because it has significant economic implications for the organization. Even if<br />

some stress is a normal part <strong>of</strong> life, excessive stress can influence one’s productivity, health and<br />

emotions and it has to be taken under control. When people lose confidence, they refuse to take<br />

responsibilities, they get quickly irritated, they are unsatisfied <strong>of</strong> their job, their performance will be<br />

very low and the organization will be in danger. Fortunately, most managers and entrepreneurs<br />

know which stress main symptoms are and have the necessary knowledge for managing and<br />

reducing it before it can affect employees’ daily work.<br />

Stress can have an impact both on the organizational welfare and on personal behavior <strong>of</strong><br />

supervisors or employees, that’s why, the ability <strong>of</strong> managing it can make the difference between<br />

job’s success or failure.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to study Romanian managers and entrepreneurs from Bihor County’s<br />

perception regarding the stress phenomenon, if they feel that they are affected by stress, if they<br />

promote some methods to reduce it and if they consider that stress can influence the organizational<br />

performance.<br />

As a research method we used an online questionnaire, applied to a number <strong>of</strong> 75 managers and<br />

entrepreneurs that represent the target group <strong>of</strong> the project "Flexibility and performance through<br />

management", project financed by the European Social Fund - "Invest in people". Each participant<br />

had to answer a number <strong>of</strong> 35 questions regarding stress and the results will be presented in this<br />

paper. The main conclusion is that, even if job itself is seen as a stressor, there are other important<br />

factors that can produce stress such as: family problems, personal problems or social problems.<br />

Keywords: organizational stress, impact, managers, entrepreneurs, work performance<br />

Cod JEL lucrare: M54<br />

1. Organizational stress<br />

Organizational stress can be defined as an<br />

emotional, cognitive, behavioral and<br />

physiological response to the aggressive and<br />

harmful aspects <strong>of</strong> work, work environment<br />

and organizational climate. It is a condition<br />

characterized by feelings <strong>of</strong> helplessness in<br />

solving tasks.<br />

In other words, work-related stress is people’s<br />

reaction when they have to face some<br />

demands or special tasks that are out <strong>of</strong> their<br />

abilities or knowledge.<br />

Types <strong>of</strong> organizational stress<br />

333<br />

The main types <strong>of</strong> organizational stress can<br />

be considered the following (1):<br />

Eustress represents a positive kind <strong>of</strong> stress<br />

and helps people to prepare their mind and<br />

body for whatever is about to occur in the<br />

future. Eustress can develop one’s energy,<br />

creativity or competitive spirit and can <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

the strength for achieving performance.<br />

Distress occurs when something affects one’s<br />

routine for a short period <strong>of</strong> time. It has a<br />

negative impact on people and it contains the<br />

following categories <strong>of</strong> stress: acute stress<br />

and chronic stress.


Acute stress appears when a change<br />

transforms one <strong>of</strong> the usual works that a<br />

person do. Although it seems to be an intense<br />

type <strong>of</strong> stress, it passes very quickly. The<br />

symptoms to that king <strong>of</strong> stress are:<br />

headaches, hypertensions, rapid heartbeat and<br />

stomach problems.<br />

Chronic stress is the most serious type <strong>of</strong><br />

stress and can be very harmful for people’s<br />

health. It occurs when something changes the<br />

routine for a long period <strong>of</strong> time, from weeks<br />

to years. This kind <strong>of</strong> stress appears when<br />

facing several work or personal failures.<br />

2. The effects <strong>of</strong> stress on the<br />

entrepreneurs/managers and stress<br />

management<br />

334<br />

Sources, symptoms and effects <strong>of</strong> stress for<br />

entrepreneurs/managers<br />

After analyzing the causes <strong>of</strong> organizational<br />

stress we can distinguish between those who<br />

act solely on entrepreneurs or managers.<br />

These causes can be the following:<br />

- the diversity and complexity <strong>of</strong> tasks;<br />

- high responsibilities that require<br />

management positions;<br />

- concern for the organization’s future;<br />

- aware <strong>of</strong> the potential effects <strong>of</strong> a poorly<br />

developed decision;<br />

- inappropriate management style;<br />

- excessive centralization <strong>of</strong> authority;<br />

- the existence <strong>of</strong> poorly pr<strong>of</strong>essional trained<br />

subordinates;<br />

- the extension <strong>of</strong> work program due to the<br />

emergence <strong>of</strong> some special situations.<br />

The relationship between stress sources, symptoms and diseases caused by stress for<br />

managers/entrepreneurs, can be graphically represented like this (Fig. no. 1):<br />

Figure no.1 The relationship between stress sources, symptoms and diseases caused by stress<br />

for managers/entrepreneurs (2)<br />

Adaptation by: Agrawal, Rita, Stress in life and at work, Response books, London, 2001, p. 146


Ways <strong>of</strong> managing individual stress<br />

There are a lot <strong>of</strong> actions that individuals can<br />

take in order to manage their stress level and<br />

to prevent them from developing into more<br />

serious problems. The main positive actions<br />

that people can take fall into three categories:<br />

- modification <strong>of</strong> behavior;<br />

- development <strong>of</strong> a healthy lifestyle;<br />

- alteration <strong>of</strong> mindset.<br />

When talking about behavior, the<br />

interventions that can be made are:<br />

- being more assertive: listen to others,<br />

respect others, tell others what you feel or<br />

need, negotiate, compromise, being selfconfidence.<br />

- improving time management: establish<br />

priorities, make a list <strong>of</strong> what must be done,<br />

eliminate time-wasting activities, focus on<br />

essentials, be able to delegate effectively,<br />

learn to say “no”, organize daily activities,<br />

make a list <strong>of</strong> targets.<br />

- avoid perfectionism<br />

- avoid getting angry over things that you<br />

cannot influence;<br />

- accept (sometimes) the errors <strong>of</strong> yourself<br />

and others;<br />

- smile and give affection;<br />

- practice being a good listener;<br />

- learn to relax;<br />

- learn to turn stressful life events into<br />

challenges for personal growth;<br />

- get used to take some “time out”.<br />

As far as healthy lifestyle is concerned, the<br />

main activities that people can follow are:<br />

- a healthy diet: alcohol taken with<br />

moderation, limited quantity <strong>of</strong> caffeine,<br />

avoid carbohydrates, eat fruits, vegetables<br />

and sufficient quantity <strong>of</strong> water;<br />

- regular exercise: reduce muscle tension,<br />

increase energy, maintains self-image,<br />

appearance and tends to control weight, helps<br />

to clear the mind <strong>of</strong> worrying thoughts;<br />

- relaxation: improve sleep patterns,<br />

ameliorate pain, reduces stress response,<br />

increase self-esteem;<br />

- increase leisure time and taking up hobbies.<br />

335<br />

The third area in which people can make<br />

interventions refers to the alteration <strong>of</strong><br />

mindset, including:<br />

- modification <strong>of</strong> perspectives;<br />

- self-talk;<br />

- positive thinking;<br />

Ways <strong>of</strong> managing organizational stress<br />

There are a lot <strong>of</strong> strategies that can be<br />

applied when talking about managing<br />

organizational stress, such as:<br />

- early prevention and elimination <strong>of</strong> workrelated<br />

problems that can produce stress;<br />

- change work demands;<br />

- ensure that employees have the necessary<br />

knowledge and abilities to perform<br />

effectively their jobs;<br />

- improve constantly the technique used at<br />

work;<br />

- apply a proper management style;<br />

- ensure a proper work environment;<br />

- <strong>of</strong>fer employees a stress management<br />

training in order to teach them ways <strong>of</strong><br />

overcoming stress;<br />

- increase the support needed by employees;<br />

- ensure a good level <strong>of</strong> cooperation within<br />

employees;<br />

- clearly define disciplinary procedures;<br />

- establish a supportive working culture in<br />

order that employees feel integral to the<br />

organization and are motivated to achieve its<br />

goals;<br />

- <strong>of</strong>fer employees the necessary support and<br />

information for developing their career;<br />

- encourage flexible work schedules;<br />

- try to manage the change process in a way<br />

that employees cannot become stressed due to<br />

it.<br />

3. Case study - aspects <strong>of</strong> stress perception <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneurs and managers from Bihor<br />

County<br />

The proposed research was conducted by<br />

using the database <strong>of</strong> the project "Flexibility<br />

and performance through management"<br />

developed in partnership by the Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics and Business Administration,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Craiova and the Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea as a


partner, no <strong>of</strong> contract<br />

POSDRU/81/3.2/S/57620, implementation<br />

period: 12/02/2010 to 01/31/2012 in the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong>: 2,137,229 lei.<br />

The project's general objective is to develop<br />

the pr<strong>of</strong>essional skills <strong>of</strong> general managers in<br />

order to prepare them to promote the<br />

adaptability and the introduction <strong>of</strong> new<br />

technologies. The specific objectives are: the<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional training <strong>of</strong> 180 entrepreneurs and<br />

SMEs managers from two development<br />

regions in order to promote new forms <strong>of</strong><br />

work organization and new technologies with<br />

reduced environmental impact; the increasing<br />

<strong>of</strong> informational level <strong>of</strong> the target group<br />

entrepreneurs and managers when talking<br />

about the necessity <strong>of</strong> introduction and the<br />

compliance <strong>of</strong> safety and health rules at work.<br />

Further the study will be referred to the target<br />

group <strong>of</strong> the NW - Bihor County.<br />

Research Methodology<br />

This research is a descriptive one and its aim<br />

is to provide an image at a certain time on the<br />

studied phenomenon - stress. For<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> this quantitative research<br />

was chosen as a research method - the survey.<br />

For this purpose, a structured questionnaire<br />

was developed in two parts with 35 questions.<br />

336<br />

The target population is the target group -<br />

Bihor County entrepreneurs and managers,<br />

participants in the course <strong>of</strong> the project -<br />

"Flexibility and performance through<br />

management", project financed by the<br />

European Social Fund - "Invest in people".<br />

The database <strong>of</strong> the target group -<br />

entrepreneurs and managers from Bihor<br />

County is based on online questionnaires.<br />

This database has a total <strong>of</strong> 75 entries.<br />

The respondent’s structure<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> affiliation to a business category<br />

entrepreneur/manager, 40% <strong>of</strong> respondents<br />

are entrepreneurs and 60% are managers at all<br />

levels within the SMEs.<br />

Gender structure. The share <strong>of</strong> women in the<br />

total number <strong>of</strong> respondents is 40%, 60% are<br />

men.<br />

Age. Taking into consideration the age in<br />

completed years, the situation is as follows:<br />

16%, 18 – 24 years, 73%, 25 – 45 years, 9%,<br />

45 – 54 years, 2%, 55 – 64 years.<br />

Regarding family status, most participants are<br />

married (62.8%), 34.8% are unmarried,<br />

0.04% being divorced.<br />

Stress and stress concerns<br />

45% <strong>of</strong> respondents work more than 48 hours<br />

per week. In these circumstances, it is not<br />

surprising that 70% <strong>of</strong> respondents believe<br />

they are affected by stress (Fig. no. 2).<br />

Figure no. 2 Working time/week in the case <strong>of</strong> managers<br />

and entrepreneurs from Bihor County


It follows therefore that a larger number <strong>of</strong> respondents believe they are affected by stress. 69%<br />

say they are concerned about stress, but only 21% say they have adopted measures to combat<br />

stress. Also a small number <strong>of</strong> managers (18%) say that the organization in which workers have<br />

been taken measures to combat stress. (Fig. no. 3))<br />

Figure no. 3 Managers, entrepreneurs and organization’s attitude towards stress<br />

To a large extent (85%) respondents considered that work is the main source <strong>of</strong> stress in their<br />

lives. (Fig. no. 4)<br />

Figure no. 4 The main stress factors<br />

337


Over 65% <strong>of</strong> questioned people said they<br />

would continue to work even if they did not<br />

have any financial need. Many managers,<br />

however, (60%) would prefer "to work<br />

elsewhere."<br />

A minority <strong>of</strong> respondents (16%) say that<br />

there are situations in which stress motivate<br />

them to act in order to achieve something - it<br />

is positive stress (eustress); but the most<br />

common is negative stress (distress), when<br />

body and / or mind begin to respond<br />

negatively to stress agents. Over 85% <strong>of</strong><br />

respondents considered that the stress level is<br />

much higher now as compared to five years<br />

ago.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

According to the conducted cross research the<br />

conclusions are the following:<br />

- entrepreneurs are more stressed than<br />

managers;<br />

- women entrepreneurs/managers are more<br />

stressed than men entrepreneurs/managers;<br />

- married entrepreneurs/managers are more<br />

stressed than unmarried<br />

entrepreneurs/managers;<br />

- the majority entrepreneurs/managers<br />

believes that stress level is much higher now<br />

as compared to five years ago;<br />

- the entrepreneurs and managers are<br />

concerned about stress;<br />

- on personal level, entrepreneurs/managers<br />

usually fail to take measures to combat stress;<br />

- within the organization are generally not<br />

taken measures to combat stress;<br />

- the situations in which stress motivate<br />

entrepreneurs/managers to act to achieve<br />

something are rare;<br />

338<br />

- entrepreneurs/managers believe that work is<br />

the main source <strong>of</strong> stress in their lives;<br />

- entrepreneurs/managers would continue to<br />

work even if they did not have any financial<br />

need;<br />

- most <strong>of</strong> managers would prefer "to work<br />

elsewhere".<br />

Concluding, although the work is considered<br />

the main source <strong>of</strong> stress, not the work itself<br />

is stressful, but the conditions and social<br />

environments in which it unfolds.<br />

Notes<br />

(1) “Types <strong>of</strong> stress – some good, some bad”,<br />

Accessed April 18, 2011.<br />

http://www.stressfocus.com/stress_focus_arti<br />

cle/types-<strong>of</strong>-stress.htm<br />

(2) Agrawal. Rita. Stress in life and at work.<br />

London, England: Response books Publishing<br />

House, 2001.<br />

Bibliography:<br />

1.Agrawal. Rita. Stress in life and at work.<br />

London, England: Response books Publishing<br />

House, 2001.<br />

2.Bucurean, Mirela. Antreprenoriatul si<br />

managementul micilor afaceri. Oradea:<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Oradea Publishing House,<br />

2009.<br />

3.Spiers, Carole. Tolley’s Managing Stress in<br />

the Workplace. London, England: LexisNexis<br />

Tolley Publishing House, 2003.<br />

4.*** “Causes and cures <strong>of</strong> stress in<br />

organizations”, Accessed April 21, 2011.<br />

5.http://statpac.org/walonick/organizationalstress.htm<br />

*** “Types <strong>of</strong> stress – some good, some<br />

bad”, Accessed April 18, 2011.<br />

6.http://www.stressfocus.com/stress_focus_ar<br />

ticle/types-<strong>of</strong>-stress.htm


ELEMENTS FOR A MODEL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL SCHOOL FOR WOMEN<br />

IN RURAL AREAS OF ROMANIA<br />

Botezat Elena<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />

Tarcza Teodora<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />

Abstract: Romanian mentality, especially in rural areas is deeply influenced by culture, literature<br />

and history <strong>of</strong> the Romanian people. This proves to be both adaptable and rooted in the old<br />

Romanian traditions and customs. In the last two decades, the transition from socialism to<br />

capitalism, modern society, the socio-economic development <strong>of</strong> the country has left strong<br />

impressions on the way <strong>of</strong> thought, expression and action <strong>of</strong> the Romanian people. Women in rural<br />

areas are no exception. As some groups <strong>of</strong> people interested in their development <strong>of</strong> socialeconomic<br />

scale, rural women are trying to adapt, to evolve, to overcome the barriers imposed at<br />

psychologically, socially and financially.<br />

The paper highlights the results <strong>of</strong> a survey on a sample <strong>of</strong> 979 women students in the project<br />

"Entrepreneurship and Equal Opportunities. An inter-regional model for women entrepreneurial<br />

school "(AntrES acronym), which certified mediators intention to initiate their own business.The<br />

results <strong>of</strong> questionnaires have provided important information about the character, ambition,<br />

motivation, courage, and moral support and financial support to women entrepreneurs based in<br />

Romania, including those in rural areas. The information obtained inetrmediul "I shattered" 7<br />

myths about starting a business in our country. Romanian entrepreneur spirit, women in rural areas<br />

in Romania is not only a manifestation <strong>of</strong> strong desire to improve living standards in financial<br />

terms, but rather an "effort" to improve and "beauty" <strong>of</strong> the individual, family, environment and<br />

society we belong!<br />

In developed countries, at its home, female entrepreneurship is trying to reform, to seek new<br />

solutions to rethink the principles, to exercise imagination, to learn. Here, in Romania standard<br />

behavior still predominates. Female entrepreneurs are doing what everyone else in the same<br />

category does. The future however belongs to those who will opt diversity, surprise, excitement,<br />

personalization. How could this happen in the Romanian rural environment and take place in a<br />

sustainable way?<br />

Keywords: antreprenoriat feminin, mentalitate românească, mediul rural, mituri, potenţial<br />

Jel code: M12, M52<br />

1. Continuity and change in rural Romania<br />

"The main feature <strong>of</strong> Romanian people is its<br />

gregarism, a condition imposed by the<br />

circumstances and traditions, no<br />

entrepreneurs come out from within the rural<br />

population, however exists a tradition <strong>of</strong><br />

collective work, each aligning with what<br />

others do. From the perspective <strong>of</strong> the future,<br />

gregarism continued as such, can be fatal.<br />

Modern society requires individuality,<br />

consciousness <strong>of</strong> effort and personal<br />

sacrifice". (Radulescu-Motru in Maliţa C.<br />

M., 2010). Modernity entered the Romanian<br />

339<br />

society over 200 years, but has not<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>oundly changed economic and social life,<br />

especially in rural areas, the Romanian<br />

village. The continouos transition <strong>of</strong><br />

Romanian society and especially the latter,<br />

the last 20 years, gave bith to a mosaic, a<br />

modern "type patch" without a clear dominant<br />

form. It is a modern trend, ie a type <strong>of</strong><br />

modernity that affects only a certain part <strong>of</strong><br />

society and is beneficial only to certain<br />

groups concerned with their economic and<br />

social condition. (Schifirneţ, C., 2007, 2008).<br />

Romanian mentality is the result <strong>of</strong> survival


in a given area, seen as a drama in time -<br />

paraphrase by Patrick Geddes, who proposes<br />

the term "survey before action", ie the need<br />

for building action on a synergy between<br />

ecology, economics, politics and<br />

anthropology. Data collection should blend<br />

with the description, explanation, observation<br />

integrated into a systemic research, in which<br />

the mentality seems to occupy a central place<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> a unique spiritual model,<br />

specifically built over time, which determine<br />

the motivation for use <strong>of</strong> resources on a<br />

territory (area, central area, region).<br />

Romanian mentality, especially in rural areas<br />

shows a great capacity for adaptation and also<br />

versatility, a balance between idealism and<br />

fear, between the initiation <strong>of</strong> large projects<br />

and autoassertion <strong>of</strong> certain limits. In fact,<br />

Romanians have all the features, static<br />

distributed in the population, but what is<br />

evident is that they change according to<br />

circumstances, meaning they are adaptable<br />

(Maliţa, M., 2010; Draghicescu, D., 1995).<br />

Adaptability, as a intermediate soul structure<br />

between Western creative ability and Oriental<br />

passive resignation may mean evolution,<br />

intelligence, finesse, suppleness, as progress<br />

may mean cowardice, duplicity, cunning,<br />

superficial. (Ralea, in Maliţa M. M., 2010).<br />

There seems to be more obvious what Mihail<br />

Ralea says in his book in 1933, Romanian<br />

Phenomenon, that "progress towards<br />

modernity will never come from autochthon<br />

localism, but <strong>of</strong> Europeanization".<br />

"Romanianism, ie, what is particularly unique<br />

and Romanian, is not done, yet not<br />

coagulated, but with a bergsonian formula, is<br />

yet to be done. He's still that prospect that is<br />

questing, endeavouring itself "said Michael<br />

Ralea. This emerging trend is visible in many<br />

Romanian villages in western Romania, with<br />

new and modern homes, through various<br />

goods and crafts exposed along the road and<br />

especially by many rural firms who have<br />

found qualified and cheaper labour force,<br />

lower rents, lower taxes. In addition it seems<br />

to be some kind <strong>of</strong> reconciliation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

"house" with "work", after over 20 years,<br />

340<br />

during which millions <strong>of</strong> Romanian worked<br />

in Europe where they have adapted, were<br />

integrated and learned. Sometimes by bitter<br />

lessons, sometimes paying a price too high.<br />

Some have returned and are looking to do<br />

something, here at home, home being a state<br />

<strong>of</strong> mind rather than a specific location. Rural<br />

community, like all other social forms, is the<br />

result <strong>of</strong> six components: biological, moral,<br />

religious, aesthetic, economic and political<br />

(Braileanu, T., 2000). Migration <strong>of</strong><br />

Romanians abroad was primarily due to<br />

financial reasons, poverty. What we need to<br />

say at this point, however, is that it talks<br />

about three types <strong>of</strong> poverty: "Poverty <strong>of</strong><br />

goods and money (type I), moral poverty<br />

(mediocrity <strong>of</strong> social feelings, <strong>of</strong> the sense <strong>of</strong><br />

family, <strong>of</strong> the love <strong>of</strong> nation, love for God<br />

and neighbor), which is a poor type II and<br />

poverty type III, the one in<br />

knowledge"(Daniel Bell Badescu, I., 2005).<br />

"The dominant mentality is that <strong>of</strong> trade and<br />

finances, which have created, trained and<br />

handled a consumption society, in which the<br />

citizen identity has been replaced with the<br />

credit card. There is no falsification <strong>of</strong> the<br />

human essence more bitter than the<br />

representation <strong>of</strong> man as a seeker <strong>of</strong> silver<br />

pots. He looks, indeed, other treasures, which<br />

ensure a dignified life and by merit earned<br />

through effort and wise strategy ... The crisis<br />

revealed the weakness, which requires time<br />

for healing and normalization". (Maliţa, M.,<br />

2010).<br />

2.The research <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurial<br />

intentions <strong>of</strong> women in rural areas within<br />

the project AntrEs<br />

Between January 2009 and December 2010,<br />

was implemented by the University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences as coordinator,<br />

the project "Entrepreneurship and Equal<br />

Opportunities. An inter-regional<br />

entrepreneurial school model for women<br />

"(acronym AntrES) strategic project financed<br />

by the European Social Fund, the key area <strong>of</strong><br />

intervention "Promoting an entrepreneurial<br />

culture". The main objective <strong>of</strong> the project


was to promote equal opportunities for<br />

entrepreneurship by encouraging the<br />

involvement <strong>of</strong> women, in general, rural<br />

women, especially in the initiation and<br />

development <strong>of</strong> their business in the context<br />

<strong>of</strong> sustainable development <strong>of</strong> communities in<br />

the counties located along the western border<br />

<strong>of</strong> Romania (Bihor, Timis, Arad, Maramures,<br />

Caras-Severin, Satu-Mare). Among the<br />

specific objectives were enrolled: providing<br />

training to acquire expertise in business<br />

startup; active promotion <strong>of</strong> lifelong learning,<br />

promoting competitive spirit by awarding the<br />

best business plans, dissemination <strong>of</strong> best<br />

practices in entrepreneurship in order to<br />

develop sustainable communities in the<br />

counties located along the western border <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania.<br />

The study conducted between July 2010 and<br />

March 2011 followed the intentions <strong>of</strong> a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> 874 women - women business<br />

school graduates from rural areas <strong>of</strong> West<br />

Romania to start their own business.<br />

Data were collected through a survey at the<br />

beginning and end <strong>of</strong> the Module I course -<br />

Starting a business, conducted between July-<br />

September 2010 by non-directed interviews<br />

and by the study <strong>of</strong> documents prepared<br />

within the project mentioned above.<br />

The initial sample consisting <strong>of</strong> 979 women<br />

presented a series <strong>of</strong> characteristics retrieved<br />

synthetically as follows: average age is 35.47<br />

years, 74.6% are married, two-thirds live in<br />

households with one or two children, 66% are<br />

employed and 84% did not initiate any deal<br />

so far. 43% <strong>of</strong> the total have undergraduate<br />

and graduate studies, almost 60% work for<br />

the state (public administration or education)<br />

and intends to open a business in trade - 32,<br />

4% as expected in agriculture.<br />

According to the latest data, the number <strong>of</strong><br />

newly established businesses by the<br />

entrepreneurial business school graduates at<br />

the rural level is 88 (10% <strong>of</strong> graduates), as<br />

follows: Bihor – 18, Timis - 8, Arad - 12,<br />

Maramureş - 29, Caras-Severin - 9, Satu<br />

Mare - 12.<br />

341<br />

What factors have led these graduates to take<br />

action to overcome their fears and leave their<br />

habits? And especially what are the key<br />

elements on which an entrepreneurial school<br />

for rural Romanian women must be based to<br />

succeed?<br />

In an attempt to provide a consistent answer<br />

to these questions, we will start from the<br />

results <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire analysis,<br />

questionnaire applied in the 72 rural centers<br />

<strong>of</strong> business school for women, to a total <strong>of</strong><br />

979 respondents:<br />

- Question 1: What do you think are the<br />

chances to open a successful business? 12%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the respondents believe that the chances to<br />

open a successful business are high and 53%<br />

believe the chances are average;<br />

- Question 2: What are the qualities you think<br />

a woman needs to open a business? Choice<br />

number 1 was: confidence, courage, optimism<br />

- for 184 respondents (18.79%); intelligence,<br />

intellectual resources - 130 respondents<br />

(13.27%); will and ambition - 128<br />

respondents (13.07%);<br />

- Question 3: Which is the reason you are<br />

willing to start a business? Responses were:<br />

the need to earn more - 46%, the desire for<br />

fulfillment - 33%, desire to have a higher<br />

social and pr<strong>of</strong>essional status - 12%;<br />

- Question 4: What support elements do you<br />

think are needed to start a business? 66.49% -<br />

financial and material resources, emotional<br />

support (family, friends, close) - 10.72%;<br />

- Question 5: What do you think are the areas<br />

in which to start a successful business? Trade<br />

- 335 respondents (34.21%), tourism - 210<br />

respondents (21.45%), other services - 118<br />

respondents (12.05%);<br />

- Question 6: How should labour be seen to<br />

succeed in business? A pleasure - 79%, a<br />

necessity - 9%, a duty - 8% non answers -<br />

4%;<br />

- Question 7: What is the factor which<br />

depends primarily on success in business?<br />

Courage / audacity - 30%; intelligence -<br />

lucidity - 23%; exercise capacity - 15%;<br />

socio-economic context - 13%; chance - 11%;<br />

imagination - 4%; non answers - 4%


The review <strong>of</strong> the results is shown below.<br />

Seven myths dispelled<br />

The first myth: Second hand entrepreneurs do<br />

not take risks!<br />

Reality: The entrepreneur may seem to the<br />

uninformed spectator strait-laced and<br />

conservative, but that does not mean that he is<br />

not prepared to engage boldly assuming<br />

significant risks. Like when you prepare to<br />

climb a high mountain, you can be fearful,<br />

but such a challenge puts the blood in motion<br />

and can generate a momentum and a huge<br />

effort. And something more: "the Romanian<br />

is more difficult to move and easier to stop. It<br />

does not seek immediate spectacular results,<br />

but other more subtle and pr<strong>of</strong>ound ". (Maliţa,<br />

M., 2010). The society within us, a product <strong>of</strong><br />

the spirit <strong>of</strong> our times, puts his stamp on the<br />

limited, strait-laced <strong>of</strong> our thinking. "We all<br />

live in a very narrow cage, the spirit <strong>of</strong> our<br />

age in which we have very little freedom <strong>of</strong><br />

movement. If in different ages, people have<br />

thought in different ways, not because it was<br />

due to expanded cage, but for the fact he was<br />

moved from place". (Szent-Gyögyi, A.,<br />

1981).<br />

Second myth: With the ability <strong>of</strong> an<br />

entrepreneur you have to be born!<br />

Reality: Man is build, as a road as long as it is<br />

it starts with the first kilometer. In our<br />

opinion, even if someone does not seem to be<br />

an entrepreneur, he/she can become! There<br />

are no few recent examples populating the<br />

area <strong>of</strong> knowledge that we have access. "Life<br />

itself is what you want it to be” (Marcus<br />

Aurelius). To do this you first have to believe<br />

(strongly). "Transformation, real change<br />

always occurs from the inside out ... arising<br />

from work which toils at the roots, operating<br />

on our way <strong>of</strong> thinking, on the paradigms that<br />

define our character and create the lens<br />

through which we view the world (Stephen R.<br />

Covey)". Romania is trying to change the<br />

binding data and seeks to define objectives<br />

and methods that allow more suitable ways to<br />

promote the interests, <strong>of</strong> which the first is<br />

survival." (Maliţa, M., 2010).<br />

342<br />

The third myth: In business you enter to make<br />

money!<br />

Reality: A pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> production<br />

management for a long time explains to his<br />

students the importance <strong>of</strong> "a job well done",<br />

until he was interrupted by a (bored) student<br />

who said (determined) ”I do not want to make<br />

products, I want to make money ". The<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essor (calmly) asked:" And the money for<br />

what?". Contrary to popular saying, money<br />

brings happiness. A kind <strong>of</strong> happiness. One<br />

direct, material that is not rejected at all, or<br />

even a more subtle dependent on the holder<br />

person, most envied (the joy <strong>of</strong> giving).<br />

Poverty is far from being "a card" and has<br />

little to do with "honesty" (almost at all).<br />

Therefore we advocate for "wealthy and<br />

honest" and not for ”poor and honest ". At the<br />

same time, with more conviction, we believe<br />

that continuing to work hard in a business<br />

where money is no longer a problem is<br />

something to be appreciated (very much).<br />

What is worth saying at this point is that the<br />

path to "having" (sparingly!) has many other<br />

items, ie determination. Obsession to make<br />

money seems to be a fairly sure way not to<br />

get them!<br />

Fourth myth: In business you have no friends!<br />

Reality: Is it all true that "the spirit <strong>of</strong><br />

democratic capitalism, which led to<br />

development was to encourage individual,<br />

based on deep understanding that this is the<br />

main source <strong>of</strong> economic and social power<br />

(Novak, M. Ionescu Gh in Gh, 1997). But this<br />

is individualism? That crazy idea that "the<br />

world begins and ends with you", that you are<br />

enough? Not so, the existential model is quite<br />

different. Beyond having with what to live,<br />

you have to have something to live for. It is<br />

natural to pay special attention to our<br />

business, our goals, our ideas. But the result<br />

<strong>of</strong> an exclusive concentration on interests and<br />

selfish attitude <strong>of</strong> seeing the world as a whole<br />

and the people around us as tools used in our<br />

plans lead to counterproductive and<br />

disgraceful results. Key terms <strong>of</strong> today's<br />

economy, durability, in my view, female


entrepreneurship in rural areas <strong>of</strong> western<br />

Romania, refers primarily to the people!<br />

Fifth myth: A successful business requires a<br />

great idea!<br />

Reality: Setting up a business from such a<br />

conception may be a bad idea. Few<br />

businesses have been based on such an idea.<br />

In fact, some have been established simply<br />

based on an idea more simple, banal even<br />

while another group were raised from the<br />

ashes <strong>of</strong> failure. "the Romanian can not<br />

accept almost any event or program in a form<br />

which is given, or is required. The Romanian<br />

is realistic. He rates fiction, myths and<br />

legends he likes, but keeps his feet on the<br />

ground ". (Maliţa, M., 2010). We join the<br />

mathematician Grigore Moisil’s opinion, that<br />

the logic is rather a nuanced reasoning in<br />

which thinking is evolving in a direction that<br />

includes, besides true and false or dubious<br />

value as possible, with possible and<br />

necessary.<br />

The sixth myth: In business the most<br />

important thing is "to deal"!<br />

Reality: Our view is that the vital question for<br />

an entrepreneur is not : "How well am I<br />

doing?" Or "How can I cope?" Or even "How<br />

well we handle ourselves to cope<br />

competition?" but "How can we make things<br />

better tomorrow than we did today? ". The<br />

history <strong>of</strong> a business is written by its people<br />

and their work is the special "ingredient" in<br />

the "magic formula" that "is to grow". "The<br />

Romanian undertakes all the action, if it has a<br />

real motivation." (Maliţa, M., 2010).<br />

Motivation is an emotional drive type, but<br />

with rational arguments. More strings must<br />

vibrate: ambition, rewards, influence, social<br />

position, reputation. But beyond these events<br />

rather selfish comes a heavy argument: "you<br />

are what you know to do".<br />

The Seventh Myth: You have to be lucky to<br />

succeed in business!<br />

Reality: Reflecting on the essence <strong>of</strong> success,<br />

J. Willard Marriott, wrote in his diary:<br />

"Discipline is the most important thing in the<br />

world. Where there is no discipline, there is<br />

no character. And with no character, there is<br />

343<br />

no progress ... problems gives us the chance<br />

to grow. And usually, we get the thing for<br />

which we worked. If it encounters obstacles<br />

and overcome them, we anneal our character<br />

and qualities that bring success". "Long term<br />

success <strong>of</strong> a business organization, is<br />

determined by three main factors: 1. good<br />

planning <strong>of</strong> various activities / actions, 2. a<br />

better implementation <strong>of</strong> various plans /<br />

strategies, 3. luck or that non-chance in a<br />

given context. " (But the chance never comes<br />

to an unprepared mind – o. n.) (Harrington &<br />

Harrington, 2001).<br />

3.Preserving the essence and stimulate<br />

progress<br />

In our view, in rural areas, women have a real<br />

chance in the direction <strong>of</strong> setting up a<br />

business because "the village is the shrine<br />

where she took refuge and is kept living the<br />

manifestation <strong>of</strong> the Romanian people"<br />

(Dimitrie Gusti) including the preservation <strong>of</strong><br />

moral values and skills necessary to create a<br />

complete product, in other words knowledge.<br />

As Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Allen Wilson, a biologist at UC<br />

Berkeley who has studied closely the<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> birds, knowledge creation and<br />

dissemination <strong>of</strong> appropriate behaviour had to<br />

do with three basic elements: 1. mobility (the<br />

ability to move freely to learn and<br />

experience) 2. spread within the community<br />

(the ability to transfer from individual to<br />

community building communities <strong>of</strong> best<br />

practice), 3. innovation (the ability to develop<br />

new skills to take advantage <strong>of</strong> new<br />

knowledge in specific environmental<br />

conditions) (Hjelmervike Ove R., 2001). We<br />

have identified the existence <strong>of</strong> these<br />

elements in the rural areas <strong>of</strong> western<br />

Romania, including examples <strong>of</strong> adaptation<br />

between the most interesting. Adaptation,<br />

defining feature is based on the characteristic<br />

skills: knowledge, information, experience,<br />

which can be put into use to create wealth<br />

and remain the same in any social<br />

environment. Efficient use <strong>of</strong> knowledge,<br />

skills, abilities and cultural values <strong>of</strong> rural<br />

women towards encouraging female


entrepreneurship depends on public<br />

awareness that women, who prove to be more<br />

vulnerable, more exposed to "insolvency" are<br />

much more concerned than men on what she<br />

spends, what she earns for food, education<br />

and child and family health insurance<br />

(Brockhaus, R. & Horwitz, P., 1986 Miniti,<br />

M. & Naud, W. 2010). Despite many<br />

obstacles in the way <strong>of</strong> Romanian rural<br />

female entrepreneurship, we believe that it "is<br />

about to get done, although is still that<br />

prospect that is questing, endeavouring itself"<br />

(Michael Ralea).<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> this statement there are three<br />

important aspects:<br />

• the existence <strong>of</strong> a potential consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge, information and experience<br />

which can help achieve competitive products<br />

and services;<br />

• the ability <strong>of</strong> this potential to transform in a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> operational elements, creating<br />

value, to be integrated into final products;<br />

• grafting this potential <strong>of</strong> adaptation as a<br />

characteristic feature, which is a<br />

transformation, an adjustment, a location, a<br />

selection that you cannot do without having<br />

inside the affinity with what you choose. In<br />

our view, rural female entrepreneurship in<br />

Romania is not only something that is<br />

expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> improved incomes, the<br />

desire to avoid dependence on others or even<br />

better control <strong>of</strong> their lives but most <strong>of</strong> all, "a<br />

deed " that improves the person concerned<br />

and the world around them. It takes however<br />

a first generation <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurial skills to<br />

rehabilitate honest skill, science - and pride -<br />

to do what you do with virtue. Future will not<br />

mimic models but invent them!<br />

References<br />

Books<br />

1.Brăileanu, T., Teoria comunităţii morale,<br />

Bucureşti: Editura Albatros, 2000;<br />

2.Brockhaus, R. & Horwitz, P., Psychology <strong>of</strong><br />

the entrepreneur. In D. Sexton & R. Smilor<br />

(eds.), The Art & Science <strong>of</strong> Entrepreneurship,<br />

Cambridge: Ballinger, 25-48, 1986;<br />

344<br />

3.Chang, Ha-J., 23 de lucruri care nu ţi se<br />

spun despre capitalism, Iaşi: Editura Polirom,<br />

2011;<br />

4.Drăghicescu, D., Din psihologia poporului<br />

român – Introducere, Bucureşti: Editura<br />

Albatros, 1995;<br />

5.Dodescu Anca, Bădulescu Alina, Giurgiu<br />

Adriana, Pop Cohuţ Ioana, Antreprenoriatul<br />

feminin în Vestul României – încadrări<br />

tooretice şi provocări concrete, Bucureşti:<br />

Editura Economica, 289-301, 2010;<br />

6.Franklin B., The Autobiography and Other<br />

Things, New York: New American Library,<br />

1961;<br />

7.Gilder, G., Welth and Poverty, New York:<br />

Basic Books, 1981<br />

8.Handy, Ch., (1994), The Empty Raincoat,<br />

Londra: Hutchinson, 1994;<br />

9.Harrington H.J., Harrington J.S.,<br />

Management total, Bucureşti: Editura Teora,<br />

2001;<br />

10.Ionescu Gh., Gh., Cultura afacerilor.<br />

Modelul american, Bucureşti: Editura<br />

Economica, 1997;<br />

11.Maliţa, M., Cuminţenia pământului.<br />

Strategii de supravieţuire în istoria poporului<br />

român, Bucureşti: Editura Corint, 2010;<br />

12.Maslow, A. H. Motivaţie şi personalitate,<br />

Bucureşti: Editura Trei, 2008;<br />

13.Rădulescu-Motru, C., Psihologia<br />

poporului român, antologie de Constantin<br />

Schifirneţ, Bucureşti: Editura Albatros, 1999;<br />

14.Schifirneţ, C., From Romanian Indigenous<br />

Modernization <strong>of</strong> Europenization,<br />

Globalization and Policies <strong>of</strong> Development,<br />

Bucureşti: Ed. comunicare.ro 2007, pp.133-<br />

138;<br />

15.Schifirneţ, C., Tendentioous Modernity<br />

and Innovation, Education, Research and<br />

Innovation, Bucureşti, Ed. comunicare.ro,<br />

2008, pp.385-390;<br />

16.Szent-Gyögyi, A., Speech for Life,<br />

Bucharest: Politica Publishinghouse, 1981;<br />

17.Voicu, B., Penuria post-modernă a<br />

postcomunismului românesc, Iaşi: Editura<br />

Expert Projects, 2005;<br />

18.Zamfir, C., Incertitudinea – o perspectivă<br />

psihosociologică in Zamfir, C., Spre o


paradigmă a gândirii sociologice, Iaşi:<br />

Editura Cantes, 1999, pp. 327-364.<br />

Articles /On-line magazines articles<br />

1.Bădescu, I., Demopolitica în Occident, în<br />

Europa Centrală şi în Eurasia, în Revista de<br />

Geopolitică, nr. 1(5), an IV, (2005);<br />

2.Botezat, E., Women’s Business Potential<br />

from the Western Part <strong>of</strong> Romania, Paper at<br />

5 th WSEAS International Conference on<br />

Economy and Management Transformation<br />

(EMT’10), (2010), 597-604,<br />

http://www.wseas.us/conferences/2010/timiso<br />

ara2/emt/program.htm<br />

3.Botezat, E., Learning Women from<br />

Western Part <strong>of</strong> Romania Business. An<br />

Empirical Aproach, International Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Education and Information, Issue 2, Volume<br />

5, (2011), 258-261,<br />

http://www.naun.org/journals/educationinfor<br />

mation/19-782.pdf<br />

4.Carsrud, A., Olm, K. & Eddy, G.,<br />

Entrepreneurs-mentors, networks & successful<br />

345<br />

new venture development: an exploratory<br />

study. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Small Business,<br />

(1987) 12:13-18;<br />

5.Hjelmervike Ove R., Innovation in the<br />

knowledge-based economy. A process model<br />

for knowledge creation and sharing, Paper at<br />

OECD High-Level Forum on Knowledge<br />

Management, February 8-9, Copenhagen,<br />

(2001);<br />

6.Ionescu, Gh., Gh., Cultural Caryatides <strong>of</strong><br />

the Romanians Business Potential, The<br />

Romanian Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Ethics, Vol. 1,<br />

October, (2007);<br />

7.Ionescu, Gh., Gh., Women in Business, a<br />

Cross Cultural Approach, The Romanian<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Ethics, Vol. 2, April,<br />

(2008);<br />

8.Tsuya, N. &Mason K., Changing Gender<br />

Roles and Below-Replacement Fertility in<br />

Japan, Papaer at IUSSP Seminar on Gender<br />

and Family Change in Industrialized<br />

Contrries, Rome, Italy, (1992).


346


HOW FUTURE MANAGERS VIEW SOCIETAL CULTURE: A CROSS-<br />

COUNTRY COMPARISON<br />

Catana Gheorghe Alexandru<br />

Technical University <strong>of</strong> Cluj-Napoca<br />

Catana Doina<br />

Technical University <strong>of</strong> Cluj-Napoca<br />

Abstract: Our study aims at enriching the existing literature about the prospective managers view<br />

<strong>of</strong> an ideal societal value system and the existing cultural practices in their society. The findings<br />

about the students’ perception on cultural practices and their expectations about societal culture<br />

are helpful in imagining the societal culture in its dynamics. The research sample consists <strong>of</strong> 727<br />

students in business and engineering on undergraduate and graduate levels from Romania and<br />

Slovenia. The reason we have chosen to compare Romanian sample with the cultural pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the<br />

“average” future manager from Slovenia is the scientific curiosity <strong>of</strong> finding out if there are signs<br />

<strong>of</strong> cultural convergence <strong>of</strong> Romania with a previous communist country, and an older member <strong>of</strong><br />

European Union. In doing so, our study will hopefully broaden the body <strong>of</strong> knowledge about the<br />

cultural convergence (or divergence?) between the former socialist countries joining European<br />

Union. The theoretical and methodological foundation is rooted in GLOBE international research<br />

project. Our findings revealed that at practices level,Romanians perceive significant higher Power<br />

Distance and significant lower mean value for Uncertainty Avoidance. At the expectations level, the<br />

Romanians and Slovenians are very similar in the desire concerning their societies orientation<br />

toward In group/Family Collectivism, Assertiveness and Performance Orientation, and record<br />

significant differenced in all the other societal values. The fact that for all the cultural expectations<br />

the future managers assign different mean values than for the correspondent practices make us<br />

expect that they will act to change their cultural environments. Still, the cultural orientation <strong>of</strong><br />

Romanian future middle managers will differ in many regards from the Slovenian sample averages.<br />

Keywords: societal culture, cultural practice, cultural value, Romania, Slovenia<br />

JEL clasification: M14, M19<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Starting from GLOBE international research<br />

project dealing with top and middle<br />

managers, GLOBE STUDENT project was<br />

initiated (2008) 34 , aiming at targeting future<br />

managers, to be recruited mostly from today’s<br />

students in business and engineering. One <strong>of</strong><br />

its objectives is to determine the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />

future managers from their perceptions on<br />

and expectations about societal culture<br />

dimensions point <strong>of</strong> view. The main research<br />

question concerns the similarities and<br />

34 The project is co-ordinated by R. Lang from<br />

Chemnitz University <strong>of</strong> Technology. The data for<br />

Slovenia has been collected by D. Pucko and T.<br />

Cater (University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana)<br />

347<br />

differences between the Romanians with the<br />

average future manager in Slovenia. The<br />

reason we have chosen to compare Romanian<br />

sample with the cultural pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the<br />

“average” future manager from Slovenia is<br />

the scientific curiosity <strong>of</strong> finding out if there<br />

are signs <strong>of</strong> cultural convergence <strong>of</strong> Romania<br />

with a previous communist country, and an<br />

older member <strong>of</strong> European Union. In doing<br />

so, our study will hopefully broaden the body<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge about the cultural convergence<br />

(or divergence?) between the former socialist<br />

countries joining European Union.<br />

Specifically, we will try to answer the<br />

following research questions:<br />

1.Which are (if any) the significant<br />

differences between Romanian


students perceptions <strong>of</strong> current<br />

societal practices and those <strong>of</strong><br />

students from Slovenia?<br />

2.How do Romanian students’<br />

societal values (expectations) differ<br />

(if) from those <strong>of</strong> students from<br />

Slovenia?<br />

2. Theoretical background<br />

As known, there is no single generally<br />

accepted definition <strong>of</strong> societal culture<br />

(Chhokar et al, 2007:3). Our study shares the<br />

definition used by GLOBE international<br />

research project: “shared motives, values,<br />

beliefs, identities and events that result from<br />

common experiences <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong><br />

collectives and are transmitted across age<br />

generations” (House et al., 2002: 5). The<br />

GLOBE project distingwishes between<br />

practices (“as it is”) and values (“as it should<br />

be”). Values distinguishing a culture from the<br />

others are predictors for cultural practices, as<br />

well as for leadership features and behaviours<br />

in that culture (House et al. 2002). In all<br />

societies, the shared values become good<br />

predictors <strong>of</strong> future practices.<br />

GLOBE project operationalised culture in<br />

nine dimensions: 1) Uncertainty Avoidance;<br />

2) Future Orientation; 3) Power Distance; 4)<br />

Collectivism I (societal collectivism); 5)<br />

Humane Orientation; 6. Performance<br />

Orientation; 7) Collectivism II (in-group<br />

collectivism); 8) Gender Egalitarianism; 9)<br />

Assertiveness (House et al., 2002: 5-6). As<br />

the GLOBE researchers acknowledge (House<br />

et al., 2002: 6), the first six dimensions are<br />

rooted in cultural dimensions defined<br />

originally by H<strong>of</strong>stede (1980), Future<br />

Orientation and Humane Orientation from<br />

Kluckholn & Strodtbeck (1961), Putnam<br />

348<br />

(1993) and McClelland (1985), while<br />

Performance Orientation from McClelland<br />

(1985). Short definitions <strong>of</strong> these cultural<br />

dimensions are given in GLOBE related book<br />

(House et all, 2004:3).<br />

Our research compares the cultural<br />

foundations <strong>of</strong> prospective managers and<br />

leaders in Romania and Slovenia. The<br />

findings about the students’ expectations<br />

about societal culture are helpful in imagining<br />

the societal culture in its dynamics. Accepting<br />

that values “high in centrality, pervasive, and<br />

supported by powerful sanctions and high<br />

consensus and supporters <strong>of</strong> these values hold<br />

positions <strong>of</strong> high prestige and authority”<br />

(Williams 1979: 34) are resistant to change,<br />

we also are aware that they change especially<br />

when one generation succeeds another<br />

(Keating et al., 2002: 637).<br />

3. Methodology<br />

GLOBE student project uses the section 1 (as<br />

it is) and, respectively, section 3 (as should<br />

be) GLOBE research Beta questionnaires<br />

(House et al., 2004) with some modifications<br />

required by the subjects’ nature (students).<br />

Scales in section 1 ask the students to value<br />

“the way our society is” (practices), while<br />

scales in section 3 ask the students opinion<br />

about “the way our society should be”<br />

(values) using a seven points Likert scale.<br />

The surveys were carried out in either 2008<br />

or the first half <strong>of</strong> 2009. The respondents are<br />

enroled at the Technical University <strong>of</strong> Cluj-<br />

Napoca, Babes-Bolyai University (Cluj–<br />

Napoca) and Petru Maior University in<br />

Targu-Mures (Romania) and at University <strong>of</strong><br />

Ljubljana (Slovenia). Table 1 shows the joint<br />

sample structure <strong>of</strong> our respondents, which<br />

gave us usable data.<br />

Table 1: Sample structure<br />

What subject area/ study path do you study?<br />

Country <strong>of</strong> origin Business/ Economics Engineering Total<br />

Romania 166 261 427<br />

Slovenia 150 150 300<br />

TOTAL (valid answers) 316 411 727


Collected empirical data has been processed<br />

with SPSS 17. Descriptive statistical analysis<br />

was carried out separately for Romanian and<br />

Slovenian sample. In comparing Romanian<br />

sample with the Slovenian one, the<br />

independent samples t-test was used, with<br />

0.05 significance threshold.<br />

4. Findings<br />

The research findings concern: 1) differences<br />

between Romanian and Slovenian students’<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> current cultural practices; 2)<br />

differences between Romanian and Slovenian<br />

349<br />

students’ expectations concerning societal<br />

values.<br />

4.1. Differences in perceptions: Romanian<br />

vs. Slovenian students<br />

Table 2 displays the significant differences<br />

between Romanian and Slovenian sample<br />

with respect <strong>of</strong> perceptions <strong>of</strong> societal culture<br />

practices, while the differences between the<br />

mean values <strong>of</strong> perceptions on cultural<br />

practices in Romania and Slovenia are<br />

displayed in Figure 1<br />

Table 2. Significant differences in cultural practices: Romania vs. Slovenia<br />

Cultural practice<br />

(“society as it is”)<br />

Romania Slovenia Absolut<br />

differences<br />

t-test<br />

(sig 2-tailed)<br />

Uncertainty Avoidance 3.49 4.19 - 0.70 - 11.617 (0.000)<br />

Future Orientation 3.44 3.79 - 0.35 - 4.659** (0.000)<br />

Power Distance 5.81 5.03 0.78 12.306** (0.000)<br />

Collectivism I<br />

(Institutional)<br />

3.78 4.04 - 0.26 - 3.920 (0.000)<br />

Humane Orientation 3.83 3.97 - 0.14 - 2.204 (0.028)<br />

Performance Orientation 3.66 4.05 - 0.39 - 5.089 (0.000)<br />

Collectivism II (in 5.13 5.22 (0.175)<br />

group)<br />

Gender Egalitarianism 3.99 4.13 - 0.14 - 2.427** (0.016)<br />

Assertiveness 3.51 4.24 - 0.73 -<br />

10.587**(0.000)<br />

95% confidence; *two independent samples; ** equal variances not assumed<br />

Uncertainty Avoidance<br />

Assertiveness<br />

Gender Egalitarianism<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Future Orientation<br />

Power Distance<br />

Collectivism II<br />

Performance Orientation<br />

Collectivism I<br />

Humane Orientation<br />

Romania Slovenia<br />

Figure 1. Differences in perception <strong>of</strong> cultural practices: Romania vs. Slovenia (mean<br />

scores)


T-test <strong>of</strong> differences between the mean scores<br />

(two independent samples) shows that the<br />

Romanians perceive significant higher Power<br />

Distance (t = 12.306; sig = 0.000) than the<br />

Slovenians (equal variaces not assumed).<br />

Significant lower mean values are recorded<br />

by Romanians for (decreasing order):<br />

Uncertainty Avoidance (t = - 11.617; sig =<br />

0.000), Assertiveness (t = - 10.587; sig. =<br />

0.000), Performance Orientation (t = - 5.089;<br />

sig = 0.000), Future Orientation (t = - 4.659;<br />

sig = 0.000), Institutional Collectivism (t = -<br />

3.920; sig = 0.000), Gender Egalitarianism (t<br />

= - 2.427; sig = 0.016) and Humane<br />

Orientation (t = -2.204; sig = 0.028). The lack<br />

350<br />

<strong>of</strong> significant differences for Collectivism II<br />

(In group/Family) might be interpreted as a<br />

convergence in practicing tight relationships<br />

within membership group in both countries.<br />

4.2. Differences in expectations: Romanian<br />

vs. Slovenian students<br />

The data in Table 3 summarized the<br />

significant differences between the most<br />

appreciated cultural values by the future<br />

managers and leaders in the Romanian and<br />

Slovenia and the “spider” in Figure 2 reveals<br />

the differences between the average score <strong>of</strong><br />

cultural expectations (values) in Romania and<br />

Slovenia.<br />

Table 3. Significant differences in societal values: Romania vs. Slovenia (mean scores)*<br />

Cultural value<br />

Romania Slovenia Absolut differences t-test<br />

(“society as it should be”)<br />

(sig 2-tailed)<br />

Uncertainty Avoidance 5.10 4.55 0.55 9.427 (0.000)<br />

Future Orientation 5.23 4.74 0.49 6.781 (0.000)<br />

Power Distance 2.65 2.94 -0.29 - 3.737 (0.000)**<br />

Collectivism I (Institutional) 4.94 4.46 0.48 7.069 (0.000)**<br />

Humane Orientation 5.41 5.08 0.33 4.887 (0.000)**<br />

Performance Orientation 5.89 5.78 0.11 (0.068)<br />

Collectivism II (in group) 5.70 5.69 0.01 (0.824)<br />

Gender Egalitarianism 4.42 4.55 -0.13 - 2.384 (0.011)**<br />

Assertiveness 4.01 4.09 -0.08 (0.186)<br />

*two independent samples; ** equal variances not assumed<br />

Gender Egalitarianism<br />

Uncertainty Avoidance<br />

7<br />

Assertiveness<br />

Future Orientation<br />

5<br />

Collectivism II<br />

Performance Orientation<br />

3<br />

1<br />

Romania Slovenia<br />

Power Distance<br />

Collectivism I<br />

Humane Orientation<br />

Figure 2. Differences between average scores <strong>of</strong> cultural expectations: Romania vs. Slovenia


As seen, there is no (or very low) difference<br />

between the mean scores (p


embedded elements <strong>of</strong> management, seem to<br />

be more difficult to achieve (Lang/Steger<br />

2002), the fact that for all the cultural values<br />

the future managers assign different mean<br />

values than for the correspondent practices<br />

make us expect that they will act to change<br />

their cultural environments. Still, the cultural<br />

orientation <strong>of</strong> Romanian future middle<br />

managers will differ in many regards from the<br />

Slovenian sample averages.<br />

We are aware that our research findings have<br />

a few limitations, among which the<br />

assumption that business and engineering<br />

students will become a core part <strong>of</strong> the future<br />

population <strong>of</strong> managers. Beyond the<br />

limitations, we believe that our findings <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

certain insights into relevant issues for<br />

researchers, academics and consultants in<br />

management and leadership, as well as for<br />

today’s practitioners, especially related to<br />

culture dynamics in the region. The<br />

dissemination <strong>of</strong> our research findings among<br />

active managers, researchers, academic staff<br />

and management consultants may contribute<br />

to improving the management training <strong>of</strong><br />

students, as well as the management practices<br />

in Europe. Future research should focus on<br />

studying cultural practices and value systems<br />

in directions like possible differences in<br />

respondents’ relevant perceptions based on<br />

subjects demographic characteristics (age,<br />

gender, field <strong>of</strong> study, major subject etc.). In<br />

addition, comparisons could be making with<br />

other countries taking part to GLOBE student<br />

project.<br />

References<br />

1.Catana, Doina, Catana, Gheorghe A. “Societal<br />

culture dimensions: a comparison <strong>of</strong> future<br />

and present managers in Romania”, [2011] under<br />

review<br />

2.Chhokar, Jagdeep S., Brodbeck, Felix C.,<br />

House, Robert J (eds.), Culture and Leadership<br />

Across theWorld: The GLOBE book <strong>of</strong> in-depth<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> 25 societies, Lawrence Erlbaum<br />

Associates, Publishers, New York, [2007]<br />

352<br />

3.H<strong>of</strong>stede, Geert, Cultures consequences:<br />

International differences in work related values,<br />

Sage, London [1980]<br />

4.H<strong>of</strong>stede, Geert, Cultures consequences:<br />

comparing values, behaviors, institutions and<br />

organizations across nations, Sage, London<br />

[2001]<br />

5.House, Robert.J, Javidan, Mansour, Hanges,<br />

Paul W, Dorfman, Peter, “Understanding cultures<br />

and implicit leadership theories across the globe:<br />

an introduction to project GLOBE”, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

World Business, 37, [2002]: 3 – 10<br />

6.House, Robert J., Javidan, Mansour, Dorfman,<br />

Peter W., Gupta, Wipin P. (eds.), Culture,<br />

leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study<br />

<strong>of</strong> 62 societies, Thousand Oaks: Sage [2004]<br />

7.Keating, Mary A., Martin, Gillian, Szabo, Erna,<br />

“Do managers and students share the same<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> societal culture?” International<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Intercultural Relations, 26, [2002]: 633<br />

– 652<br />

8.Kluckhohn Rockwood Florence, Strodtbeck,<br />

Fred L., Variations in value orientations, New<br />

York: Harper Collins [1961]<br />

9.Lang, Rainhart, Steger, Thomas, “The odyssey<br />

<strong>of</strong> management knowledge to transforming<br />

societies: A critical review <strong>of</strong> a theoretical<br />

alternative”, Human Resource Development<br />

International, 5, [2002]: 279-294<br />

10.Luca, Adina, “Studiu despre valorile si<br />

comportamentul romanesc din perspectiva<br />

dimensiunilor culturale dupa metoda lui Geert<br />

H<strong>of</strong>stede” INTERACT [2005],<br />

http://anatolbasarab.files.wordpress.com<br />

/2010/05/studiu_h<strong>of</strong>stete5.pdf, accessed March 1,<br />

2011<br />

11.McClelland, David, C., Human motivation,<br />

Glenview, Il: Scott, Foresman, [1985]<br />

12.Putnam, Robert D., Leonardi, Robert, Nanetti,<br />

Raffaela Y, Making democracy work, Princeton,<br />

N.J., Princeton University Press [1993]<br />

13.Williams, Robin M.Jr, Change and stability in<br />

values and value systems: A sociological<br />

perspective. Understanding human values:<br />

Individual and societal (ed.) Rokeach, M. New<br />

York: Free Press [1979]<br />

*** itim International, Geert H<strong>of</strong>sted cultural<br />

dimensions, http://www.geert-h<strong>of</strong>stede.com,<br />

accessed March 10, 2011


EXPLANATORY ECONOMETRIC METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THE<br />

BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA - GUIDE FOR<br />

DEVELOPING THE PILOT STUDY<br />

Research coordinator:<br />

Roşca Constantin<br />

SSMAR<br />

Research team:<br />

Roşca Doina - University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Horticulture<br />

Manolescu Adriana -Agora University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />

Roşca Adrian - University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanics<br />

Dodescu Anca Otilia - University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />

Abrudan Maria Madela - University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />

Dănăiaţă Doina - West University <strong>of</strong> Timişoara<br />

Sîrbu Mirela -University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economical Sciences<br />

Negulescu Cristian - “Spiru Haret” University <strong>of</strong> Craiova<br />

Dragomir Laurenţiu - University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economical Sciences<br />

Judeu Viorina Maria - Agora University <strong>of</strong> Oradea<br />

Morariu Alunica - University “Ştefan cel Mare” Suceava<br />

Lukas Edit - University “Dunărea de Jos” Galaţi<br />

Cîrnu Doru - University ”Constantin Brâncuşi” Târgu Jiu<br />

Morăraşu Irina - Hight School “Carol I” Craiova<br />

Abstract: Our paper, entitled "Explanatory Econometric Method for the Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Behaviour<br />

Management in Organizations in Romania" reflects the wide opening <strong>of</strong> econometric modelling to<br />

quantify the Romanian management issues, representing a practical guidance on multiple recovery<br />

plans to fund the huge data collected as part COMOR project launched by the Scientific Society <strong>of</strong><br />

Management in Romania to characterize the behaviour <strong>of</strong> managers in the Romanian economic<br />

organizations. Construction <strong>of</strong> these models <strong>of</strong>fers possibilities for complex analysis, descriptive<br />

and factorial sequence <strong>of</strong> firms, counties, geographical areas, but comprehensive summary <strong>of</strong><br />

studies on the macroeconomic level. Scientific knowledge through a comprehensive assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

managerial behaviour in the most representative types <strong>of</strong> business organizations <strong>of</strong> all geographical<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> the country are, in the context <strong>of</strong> globalization, one way to prevent surprises market<br />

economy. Thus, the results <strong>of</strong> this exploratory research will provide economic environment, and not<br />

only strong argument for anticipating decisions in order to choose the best economic policies, with<br />

beneficial effects as conclusive and with as few undesirable implications. Research based on the<br />

opinions <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> respondents approved, processed through a variety <strong>of</strong> instruments subject<br />

<strong>of</strong> extensive econometric and interdisciplinary interpretation, psycho-socio-economic management,<br />

is a modest contribution to the affirmation <strong>of</strong> local scientific research that aim for theoretical and<br />

applied Romanian school <strong>of</strong> management by defining:<br />

- knowledge <strong>of</strong> behaviour management in all types <strong>of</strong> business organizations in Romania;<br />

- identifying the Romanian space dimensions <strong>of</strong> organizational culture as a reflection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

peculiarities <strong>of</strong> national culture and especially <strong>of</strong> the main ethnic-specific subcultures;<br />

- pr<strong>of</strong>ile defining effective manager and leader <strong>of</strong> excellence in terms <strong>of</strong> character traits and their<br />

behaviour.<br />

Keywords: econometrics, management, organizational culture, descriptive analysis, factorial<br />

analysis.<br />

Coduri JEL: M12<br />

353


1. Preamble<br />

Without proposes to develop the defining<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> econometrics, the specific<br />

features <strong>of</strong> this scientific field in relation to<br />

statistics, mathematical statistics or in the<br />

preamble <strong>of</strong> our approach using econometric<br />

method in an exploratory research on<br />

behaviour management in large scale<br />

economic organizations Romania, makes<br />

some-option argument on the use <strong>of</strong><br />

econometric indicators to quantify the value<br />

judgments <strong>of</strong> various socio-economic<br />

variables <strong>of</strong> our research.<br />

According to this, we refer to adopt the<br />

following key behaviours <strong>of</strong> econometrics,<br />

the study undertaken in this specific case,<br />

namely:<br />

- factual component that the specific area<br />

under investigation is a reality <strong>of</strong><br />

management processes in a well defined<br />

geographical area: economic organizations in<br />

Romania as the unit <strong>of</strong> observation, that<br />

respondents from these organizations as units<br />

<strong>of</strong> sampling;<br />

- conceptual component <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

management for the dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />

INPUTS<br />

Working levels<br />

- Economic<br />

variables<br />

- Social<br />

variables<br />

- variable<br />

value<br />

judgments<br />

Initial information<br />

354<br />

organizational culture, specific types <strong>of</strong><br />

managerial behaviour different subcultures <strong>of</strong><br />

the Romanian space and effective leader and<br />

the typology <strong>of</strong> excellence;<br />

- logical-formal component that we built<br />

quantitative models and rational behaviour on<br />

different sides <strong>of</strong> managerial and calling their<br />

methods inferential statistics (theory and<br />

theory tests estimate) that draw a general<br />

conclusion from the quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

several private facts I checked the<br />

assumptions made in terms <strong>of</strong> management<br />

theory in general and human resource<br />

management theory in particular.<br />

2. The construction <strong>of</strong> econometric models<br />

Depending on the scale and complexity <strong>of</strong><br />

research, but also the degree <strong>of</strong> deepening the<br />

analysis, econometric models used in<br />

research as set out above as shown in Fig. 1<br />

managerial explanatory models are composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> a more or less complex input variables, a<br />

process <strong>of</strong> transformation <strong>of</strong> probability<br />

distributions mathematically range <strong>of</strong> views<br />

expressed by the exponents, a set <strong>of</strong> variables<br />

leads to the result (the outputs).<br />

PROCESS OUTPUTS<br />

Psycho-social<br />

analysis tools<br />

- Central<br />

Tendency<br />

- Variation<br />

- Correlation<br />

- Tables<br />

- Charts<br />

Structures <strong>of</strong> the<br />

managerial<br />

variables<br />

Fig. 1 The systemic structure <strong>of</strong> the econometric model<br />

Conclusions<br />

- Cultural<br />

dimensions<br />

- Types <strong>of</strong><br />

behaviour<br />

- Leadership<br />

Consequences <strong>of</strong><br />

the basic<br />

assumptions


Building models based on the initial<br />

capitalization <strong>of</strong> knowledge in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

econometrics integrated knowledge<br />

management and organizational psycho<br />

specific limits <strong>of</strong> investigator.<br />

Assumptions that formed the basis for models<br />

reflect the volume and quality <strong>of</strong> information<br />

we had about the reality investigated using<br />

the following input variables:<br />

- economic variables <strong>of</strong> the statistical units <strong>of</strong><br />

observation <strong>of</strong> the firms: the field <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

according to CAEN code, size <strong>of</strong><br />

organization based on the number <strong>of</strong><br />

employees, ownership <strong>of</strong> equity;<br />

- social variables <strong>of</strong> the statistical unit<br />

surveyed (respondents): sex, age, marital<br />

status, level <strong>of</strong> schooling and education in<br />

management, the position in the<br />

organizational hierarchy (managers,<br />

performers);<br />

- variable value judgments, those measurable<br />

by designating entities beach views<br />

expressed, and which were assigned<br />

numerical values on the scale from highly<br />

positive (strongly agree) to highly negative<br />

(disagree).<br />

The information held in the observation data<br />

was processed using the managerial structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> the variables <strong>of</strong> a system <strong>of</strong> statistical and<br />

mathematical indicators consisting <strong>of</strong>:<br />

position indicators (weights), indicators <strong>of</strong><br />

central tendency (arithmetic mean, median,<br />

modulus and asymmetry); indicators <strong>of</strong><br />

change (amplitude variation, individual<br />

deviation, standard deviation, the dispersion,<br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation); indicators<br />

correlation (regression coefficient, correlation<br />

table, the correlation chart).<br />

The conclusions derived through econometric<br />

models are logical consequences <strong>of</strong><br />

assumptions underlying the inferential<br />

analysis process allowed the release <strong>of</strong> initial<br />

information content <strong>of</strong> their dormant state to<br />

highlight the following variables outcome<br />

(output):<br />

- dimensions <strong>of</strong> organizational culture: power<br />

distance, individualism-collectivism,<br />

355<br />

masculinity-femininity, uncertainty<br />

avoidance, future orientation (long-short);<br />

- types <strong>of</strong> managerial behaviour: management<br />

approach, work style, attitude toward change,<br />

policies and practices <strong>of</strong> motivation,<br />

organizational communication procedures<br />

and practices, and / or interpersonal, concern<br />

for performance;<br />

- behavioural pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> character and<br />

effective leader;<br />

- typology <strong>of</strong> excellence leader.<br />

3. The econometric method, basis for<br />

analysis<br />

Ultimately seeking a comprehensive and as<br />

accurate characterization <strong>of</strong> the different<br />

structures <strong>of</strong> management variables, we<br />

focused our approach on two lines <strong>of</strong><br />

analysis: a quantitative analysis focused on<br />

value judgments, on the one hand by the<br />

statistical units <strong>of</strong> observation (firms), and<br />

secondly by statistical sampling units<br />

(respondents) and the second direction<br />

oriented qualitative analysis with indicators<br />

<strong>of</strong> variation and correlation.<br />

The two types <strong>of</strong> correlation analysis<br />

(quantitative and qualitative) we decided to<br />

identify and characterize managerial<br />

behaviour in key areas <strong>of</strong> economic activity<br />

across different subcultures <strong>of</strong> the Romanian<br />

territory and into the major temperamental<br />

traits <strong>of</strong> different managers and executors<br />

geographical areas <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />

To meet this requirements-goal, we adopted a<br />

systemic approach, whereby we develop an<br />

analysis stratified by different levels <strong>of</strong><br />

aggregation (system elements) as follows:<br />

- for large enterprises at the microeconomic<br />

level (on request);<br />

- mezoeconomic level with aggregated<br />

counties, regions and macro-economic<br />

development;<br />

- at the macroeconomic level, with<br />

conclusions on the national economy.


3.1. Descriptive Analysis<br />

The quantitative analysis (descriptive) was<br />

used in structure relative sizes (weights)<br />

calculated as percentage ratio to the whole<br />

party, namely:<br />

part<br />

p % � �100<br />

whole<br />

With the help <strong>of</strong> weights, which are<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> position, it is argued:<br />

a) representativeness <strong>of</strong> the total economic<br />

organizations observed, reflecting the domain<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> economic activity (agriculture,<br />

mining, manufacturing, construction,<br />

transport, trade, etc.), by the degree <strong>of</strong> size<br />

(50-100 employees, 101-250 , 251-500, over<br />

500 employees), by type <strong>of</strong> capital ownership<br />

(public, private);<br />

b) the reliability <strong>of</strong> judgments <strong>of</strong> value (total<br />

agreement, partial agreement, indecision,<br />

partly disagree, strongly disagree) expressed<br />

by respondents in different social variables<br />

(gender, age, education, hierarchy within the<br />

organization) for each item (question ) that<br />

characterize a specific variable Managerial<br />

dimensions <strong>of</strong> organizational culture,<br />

managerial behaviour, characteristic traits <strong>of</strong><br />

leadership.<br />

3.2. Factorial Analysis<br />

Unlike the descriptive analysis, in which we<br />

used a single indicator, one that characterizes<br />

Likert Score<br />

5<br />

levels<br />

3 levels<br />

2<br />

levels<br />

356<br />

the position <strong>of</strong> a given quantitative variable<br />

(part) throughout the community studied, the<br />

factor analysis we made use <strong>of</strong> a true system<br />

<strong>of</strong> indicators with which we managed many<br />

sides to put out quality <strong>of</strong> managerial<br />

behaviour in its various aspects.<br />

Without abusing detail on the material we<br />

present a brief overview <strong>of</strong> these indicators,<br />

their relationships with computers and how to<br />

use the process to review the research,<br />

according to the valence <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

Thus, the system <strong>of</strong> indicators that I did not<br />

use the factor analysis, is composed <strong>of</strong>:<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> central tendency, simple<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> change, synthetic indicators <strong>of</strong><br />

variation, correlation indicators.<br />

3.2.1. Specification<br />

Before developing each indicator used in<br />

factor analysis, we make two methodological<br />

notes:<br />

1. Calculating each <strong>of</strong> the indicators that are<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the groups mentioned above, a process<br />

required to convert the numeric expression<br />

value judgments on a Likert-type scale. Thus,<br />

depending on the range <strong>of</strong> value judgments<br />

provided by the construction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

questionnaire respondents used the primary<br />

data collection, conversion was done on 5, 3<br />

or 2 levels, as in the models below:<br />

at ap i dp dt<br />

5 4 3 2 1<br />

a i d<br />

3 2 1<br />

yes no<br />

1 0<br />

Legend:<br />

at – total agreement i – indecision a – agree<br />

ap – partial agreement dp – partially disagree d - disagree<br />

dt – total disagree<br />

Fig. 2. Model <strong>of</strong> conversion <strong>of</strong> opinions to numerical expressions


2. To measure respondents' opinions on a<br />

particular variable studied, we started from<br />

the premise that people are honest in<br />

expressing their beliefs and opinions,<br />

however, to arrive at generalized conclusions,<br />

we have relied on a single question.<br />

Therefore, for each variable outcome<br />

(dimensions <strong>of</strong> organizational culture,<br />

behaviour management, effective leader or<br />

typology pr<strong>of</strong>ile leader <strong>of</strong> excellence), the<br />

questionnaire applied, we have formulated a<br />

set <strong>of</strong> questions that allow us to establish the<br />

position <strong>of</strong> respondents to a variable or<br />

another. For example, to measure the cultural<br />

dimension "individualism - collectivism"<br />

were formulated 16 questions, or to<br />

characterize the size <strong>of</strong> "masculinity -<br />

femininity" were used six questions etc.<br />

3.2.2. Indicators <strong>of</strong> central tendency<br />

From this group <strong>of</strong> indicators have appealed<br />

to the mean, median and dominant module.<br />

These indicators, allowed us to put out the<br />

essential trends <strong>of</strong> the variability <strong>of</strong> responses<br />

to the questions in the questionnaire. Thus,<br />

the mean value ( x ), as a synthetic<br />

expression levels <strong>of</strong> individual value<br />

judgments embodied in a single<br />

representative level, which highlights the<br />

average scores <strong>of</strong> opinions expressed by<br />

respondents to each question in questionnaire<br />

responses from the entire range <strong>of</strong> intensely<br />

positive the intensely negative, was<br />

calculated as a weighted arithmetic mean<br />

formula:<br />

n<br />

�<br />

i�<br />

x � m<br />

xi<br />

fi<br />

1 , where :<br />

f<br />

�<br />

i<br />

i�1<br />

x - means medium value;<br />

xi – Spectrum opinions expressed on the scale<br />

<strong>of</strong> values (i) from 1-5;<br />

fi – the number <strong>of</strong> respondents, m, varying<br />

according to the level <strong>of</strong> aggregation:<br />

business, county, region developing, country.<br />

357<br />

The median (Me) is the average score<br />

occupying the central place statistical series<br />

ordered in ascending or descending, so the<br />

average scores <strong>of</strong> the series number <strong>of</strong> values<br />

which divides into two equal parts. When the<br />

series has an odd number <strong>of</strong> terms, the<br />

median score is given by the rank n<br />

;<br />

n �1<br />

where the series has an even number <strong>of</strong> terms,<br />

the median is given by the central terms <strong>of</strong><br />

simple arithmetic.<br />

Statistics compiled for each question series<br />

that helps to characterize a variable result, has<br />

different meanings depending on the content<br />

and the level at which lies such analysis:<br />

- at the firm level, the series is comprised <strong>of</strong><br />

average score <strong>of</strong> the views expressed by each<br />

respondent;<br />

- at the county level, the average score is<br />

made up <strong>of</strong> the views expressed by the<br />

average sample firm in each county;<br />

- development in the region, the average<br />

mean score <strong>of</strong> opinions expressed by counties<br />

comprising the region's development.<br />

At any level <strong>of</strong> aggregation, median<br />

highlights the question that was most<br />

meaningful significance to characterize the<br />

result <strong>of</strong> research variable. It is important, in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> theory, construction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

questionnaire in future research.<br />

Module (Mo) or dominant frequency is the<br />

value that has score greater.<br />

Is determined using the statistical series as the<br />

median scores obtained by highlighting the<br />

tendency <strong>of</strong> respondents to a particular judge<br />

stated value <strong>of</strong> the spectrum: from highly<br />

positive to highly negative, and from total<br />

acceptance to total rejection.<br />

Asymmetry (As) is the indicator that allows<br />

us to know the degree <strong>of</strong> skew or non<br />

symmetry dimensional distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

symmetry, from the position and values <strong>of</strong> the<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> central tendency: mean, median<br />

and the module.<br />

Form distribution with left and right<br />

asymmetry can be analyzed either by using


graphical methods or calculating indicators <strong>of</strong><br />

asymmetry.<br />

Graphical representation <strong>of</strong> statistical series<br />

provides a suggestive picture <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong><br />

asymmetry using, on a case by case<br />

frequency polygon and histogram.<br />

Indicators <strong>of</strong> asymmetry are expressed both<br />

in absolute size and in relative sizes.<br />

Asymmetry is calculated absolute<br />

relationship:<br />

As � x � Mo<br />

To make comparisons between statistical<br />

series resort to indicators <strong>of</strong> asymmetry<br />

relative. Among them, we stopped at what is<br />

called the asymmetry coefficients authors:<br />

Pearson and Yule.<br />

Pearson coefficient <strong>of</strong> asymmetry (Cas) is<br />

calculated using the formula:<br />

x � Mo<br />

�<br />

C as<br />

This coefficient can take values between -1<br />

and +1, as the absolute value is less than the<br />

Pearson coefficient, the asymmetry is smaller.<br />

The value <strong>of</strong> this coefficient has the following<br />

meanings:<br />

Cas = 0 symmetry means the terms <strong>of</strong><br />

the series;<br />

Cas � 0 distinguish a left skewed<br />

distribution;<br />

Cas � 0 we deal with a distribution<br />

skewed to the right.<br />

Yule asymmetry coefficient (C'as) is<br />

calculated in cases where we determined the<br />

median statistical series (Me), using the<br />

formula:<br />

3( x � Me)<br />

C'as=<br />

Yule coefficient can take values between -3<br />

and + 3 and used when between three<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> central tendency relationship is<br />

verified:<br />

Module = Average - 3 (Average -<br />

Median)<br />

Coefficient will show a higher degree <strong>of</strong><br />

symmetry as will be closer to zero.<br />

�<br />

�<br />

358<br />

3.2.3. Indicators <strong>of</strong> change<br />

If our research, the value judgments<br />

expressed by different respondents, more or<br />

less with each other, may be more or less<br />

scattered close to the average score, regarded<br />

as the most representative value for the<br />

research unit (sample taken enrolment).<br />

These indicators allow us to characterize the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> homogeneity or opinions expressed<br />

in the scattering <strong>of</strong> a social group in general<br />

(at the company, county, geographic area,<br />

etc..), as well as some <strong>of</strong> its structures<br />

(gender, age, education, hierarchy).<br />

In this group <strong>of</strong> indicators <strong>of</strong> change there are<br />

two groups: simple indicators <strong>of</strong> change<br />

(amplitude variation, e.g. individual<br />

deviations) and synthetic indicators <strong>of</strong><br />

variation (standard deviation, the dispersion,<br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation).<br />

With these indicators we develop the analysis<br />

at different degrees <strong>of</strong> depth, allowing us to<br />

put some light on the qualitative side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

value judgments expressed by respondents.<br />

Amplitude variation (A) is the indicator by<br />

which, in-depth analysis, especially analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the company or the county, determine the<br />

differences between extreme values <strong>of</strong> the<br />

views expressed by respondents. The<br />

amplitude <strong>of</strong> variation is greater, the opinions<br />

are different, and vice versa. It is expressed in<br />

two forms: absolute amplitude (Aa) and<br />

relative amplitude (A %), relationships with<br />

the following calculation:<br />

� x � x<br />

A a<br />

max<br />

min<br />

Aa<br />

A%<br />

� �100<br />

x –<br />

x<br />

represents the opinions score; x – means<br />

value scores<br />

Individual deviations (di) are calculated as<br />

the difference between each variation<br />

recorded (score value judgments) and their<br />

arithmetic means (average score), using<br />

equations:


da i<br />

� x � x for individual absolute<br />

da<br />

deviations; d%<br />

� �100<br />

for individual<br />

x<br />

absolute deviations<br />

It is mainly used in the analysis at the firm<br />

level, and only exceptionally in the county.<br />

Standard deviation, standard deviation or<br />

standard deviation (�) is calculated as the<br />

average squared deviations <strong>of</strong> the score<br />

recorded for each item determined opinions<br />

characterizing variable outcome (dimensions<br />

<strong>of</strong> organizational culture, behaviour<br />

management, etc.) from their arithmetic mean<br />

. To this end we used the relationship:<br />

� �<br />

n<br />

�<br />

i�1<br />

( x � x)<br />

i<br />

�<br />

Thus, using this indicator consider how the<br />

respondents opinions vary on the scale <strong>of</strong><br />

value judgments (from at to dt) calculated<br />

from the average <strong>of</strong> each variable result.<br />

Example:<br />

Variable result sought: Behaviour managers<br />

in different situations.<br />

Faces situational managers:<br />

1. Attitude towards settling tensions/conflict<br />

in the workplace.<br />

2. Attitude towards the expression <strong>of</strong> the<br />

performers, opinions about their work<br />

address.<br />

3. Attitude towards mistakes by employees<br />

during the activities.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> statistical units <strong>of</strong><br />

observation in Suceava County = 15<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> statistical sampling units<br />

(respondents) = 222<br />

Based on data from Appendix 1, Table<br />

present standard deviations below the mean<br />

score calculated from the views expressed by<br />

respondents to characterize both the current<br />

state and considered to be normal in the<br />

organizations surveyed.<br />

f<br />

i<br />

2<br />

f<br />

i<br />

359<br />

Managers' behaviour in different situational<br />

Analysis Symbol Current Desired<br />

indicators<br />

practice practice<br />

1. Average<br />

value<br />

judgments<br />

x<br />

3,727 4,183<br />

2. Standard<br />

deviation<br />

� 0,258 0,279<br />

Summary interpretation <strong>of</strong> these indicators<br />

leads to the following conclusions:<br />

1. Almost ¾ <strong>of</strong> respondents say that current<br />

practice managers are interested in<br />

maintaining a spirit <strong>of</strong> understanding and<br />

cooperation between employees and are<br />

involved as mediators between the parties<br />

when there are situations <strong>of</strong> tension or<br />

conflict, are open to collaboration in the team<br />

encouraging employee participation in<br />

solving practical service problems and is also<br />

tolerant <strong>of</strong> the mistakes they inadvertently<br />

committed during the activities.<br />

2. Value judgments expressed by respondents<br />

is quite high values clustered around (partly<br />

agree to strongly agree).<br />

3. Despite the favourable findings about the<br />

behaviour <strong>of</strong> managers in the three situational<br />

instances, the number <strong>of</strong> respondents who<br />

believe it would be better place, is almost<br />

10% higher than the existing situation (83.7%<br />

vs. 74.5%).<br />

A hierarchy <strong>of</strong> employees who desire<br />

signifies a strong attachment to the goals <strong>of</strong><br />

the organization is working is as follows:<br />

- 86.3% (11.8% more than the current<br />

situation) believes that managers should make<br />

greater use <strong>of</strong> employee participation with<br />

solutions to solve the tasks;<br />

- 89% (8.1% more than the current situation)<br />

believes that managers should intervene more<br />

effectively and to ease tension or conflict<br />

between state employees;<br />

- 75.7% (7.4% more than the current<br />

situation) believes that managers should be<br />

more sympathetic to unintentional mistakes<br />

committed during the activities, especially by<br />

young people who need more support to their<br />

immediate bosses.


4. Even if the range <strong>of</strong> value judgments is<br />

somewhat higher in practice desired by<br />

respondents, (standard deviation 0.279 to<br />

0.258) shows that the average score is 12.2%<br />

higher than the current practice, which means<br />

that "total agreement", the whole scale <strong>of</strong><br />

assessment is crucial.<br />

Dispersion or variance � 2 a variable result is<br />

calculated with a simple arithmetic average <strong>of</strong><br />

the squared terms <strong>of</strong> statistical series which<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> questions score variable that is<br />

characterized by the relationship:<br />

n<br />

�<br />

�<br />

xi<br />

� x<br />

i<br />

�<br />

n<br />

1<br />

2<br />

( )<br />

2<br />

� , where n is the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> items that characterize each variable<br />

outcome (dimension <strong>of</strong> organizational<br />

culture, types <strong>of</strong> managerial behaviour etc.).<br />

The coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation (v) is the ratio<br />

between the average standard deviation and<br />

statistical series, and shows us the degree <strong>of</strong><br />

homogeneity <strong>of</strong> the collectivity <strong>of</strong> questions /<br />

answers that characterize a variable outcome,<br />

using the relation:<br />

�<br />

v� �100<br />

x<br />

The higher the coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation is close<br />

to zero, the variance is lower, so statistical<br />

collectivity is more homogeneous and the<br />

media has a higher level <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />

3.2.4. Indicators <strong>of</strong> correlation<br />

In our research we are dealing with direct<br />

factorial correlations, simple linear type,<br />

which led us to make use <strong>of</strong> the following<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> intensity commensurate factorial<br />

causal links between variables symbolized by<br />

x1, x2 , ...., xn and the variable outcome or<br />

effect variable y symbolized: the correlation<br />

table, the graphic method and the regression<br />

coefficient.<br />

With the correlation table identifies issues<br />

such as: the existence and meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

correlation, the shape and intensity <strong>of</strong> causal<br />

links. Thus, we use the correlation table<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> causal links between traits <strong>of</strong><br />

360<br />

character which designates the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the<br />

effective leader, the variables x and types <strong>of</strong><br />

managerial behaviour, the variable result. So,<br />

for example, may reveal the correlation<br />

between some features <strong>of</strong> the leader, such as<br />

courage, self-confidence, will, its rigor on the<br />

one hand, his attitude toward change, on the<br />

other side.<br />

Corelograma as a graphic expression <strong>of</strong> the<br />

correlation, is constructed as follows: the<br />

abscissa scale is going to represent the values<br />

<strong>of</strong> variable x factorial, and the ordinate y pass<br />

variable values result by uniting intersection<br />

points <strong>of</strong> coordinates x, y, is obtained<br />

expressing corelograma suggestive<br />

correlation that we want to highlight in<br />

particular.<br />

Regression coefficient. As a method <strong>of</strong><br />

econometrics, regression helps to determine<br />

the contribution <strong>of</strong> the factors underlying<br />

(causative) effect <strong>of</strong> variability phenomena.<br />

Since in our research are linear causal links,<br />

to measure the strength <strong>of</strong> correlation using<br />

linear function <strong>of</strong> the form:<br />

Yx = a +bx, where<br />

Yx - are theoretical variables;a - y result<br />

variable values are determined outside the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> variable x factorial;<br />

b - is the regression coefficient;<br />

x - represents the values <strong>of</strong> x1, x2 , ...., xn<br />

factorial <strong>of</strong> variable x.<br />

The coefficients a and b is determined using<br />

ordinary least squares method, using<br />

relations:<br />

a y � � � represents the<br />

� u(x<br />

) , where: u(x<br />

)<br />

first order cantered factor for variable x. It<br />

has zero value.<br />

� xy<br />

b � , where: x - xi variants are<br />

2<br />

n�<br />

X<br />

deviations from their average<br />

y - yi variants are deviations from their<br />

average<br />

In our research we measure the linear<br />

correlation between the intensity <strong>of</strong><br />

respondents‘social variables (gender, age,<br />

marital status, education level, the position in


the organizational hierarchy), as variable<br />

factors and value judgments, as a floating<br />

effect. Thus, we build correlation coefficients<br />

entering the following notation for the<br />

variable factor x:<br />

Sex: male x1, female x2<br />

Age: 30 years x1, 30 - 44 years x2,<br />

between 45 - 60 years x3, x4 over 60 years<br />

Education: elementary x1, x2<br />

environments, beyond x3<br />

Hierarchy: top managers x1, x2<br />

middle managers, managers <strong>of</strong> basic x3, x4<br />

performers.<br />

Similarly, we introduce the following<br />

notation for the variable y result (value<br />

judgments about the dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />

organizational culture, types <strong>of</strong> managerial<br />

behaviour, effective leader pr<strong>of</strong>ile, types <strong>of</strong><br />

Excellence leader):<br />

Total agreement<br />

y1<br />

Partial agreement<br />

y2<br />

Indecision y3<br />

Partial disagree y4<br />

Total disagree y5<br />

or<br />

agreement y1<br />

indecision y2<br />

disagree y3<br />

Conclusions<br />

The models described in this paper is the set<br />

<strong>of</strong> indicators is based on an econometric<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> descriptive and factor analysis,<br />

structural and managerial behaviour in<br />

comparative economic organizations in<br />

Romania. Among them were:<br />

- to characterize the dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />

organizational culture at all levels <strong>of</strong><br />

361<br />

aggregation: the big companies, counties,<br />

regions, macro, national economy;<br />

- characterization <strong>of</strong> managerial behaviour in<br />

all types <strong>of</strong> business organizations by field <strong>of</strong><br />

activity according to CAEN code, by type <strong>of</strong><br />

ownership <strong>of</strong> capital, depending on their size<br />

as number <strong>of</strong> employees;<br />

- description <strong>of</strong> character and behavioural<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the effective manager;<br />

- characterization <strong>of</strong> the leader <strong>of</strong> excellence;<br />

- according to various categories <strong>of</strong><br />

respondents (by sex, age, education,<br />

hierarchy) on the various elements listed<br />

above characterization etc.<br />

These econometric models, with minimal<br />

possibilities for the interpretation <strong>of</strong> measured<br />

results are used in the study phase <strong>of</strong> the pilot<br />

- the example <strong>of</strong> Suceava county, to develop<br />

national analysis by established analytical<br />

team in Bucharest, Craiova, Oradea, Suceava,<br />

Targu Mures, Galati, Resita, Braşov most<br />

competent scholars with interests in<br />

management, sociology and organizational<br />

psychology, computer science, econometrics.<br />

Bibliography<br />

1. Chelcea S., Metodologia cercetării<br />

sociologice. Metode cantitative şi calitative<br />

(ediţia a III-a, revăzută şi adăugită), Editura<br />

Economică, Bucureşti, 2007<br />

1.1. Georgescu V., Econometrie, Editura<br />

Universitaria, Craiova, 1997<br />

1.2. Pecican E. S., Econometrie, Editura<br />

ALL, Bucureşti, 1994<br />

1.3. Tövissi L., Pecican E. S., Curs de calcul<br />

economic. Metode şi tehnici<br />

econometrice ale calculului economic,<br />

Lito ASE, Bucureşti, 1974


Item Score<br />

Elements <strong>of</strong> synthetic indicators <strong>of</strong> change,<br />

based on scores from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)<br />

xi<br />

Respondents<br />

fi<br />

xi fi xi - x (xi - x ) 2<br />

362<br />

Annex 1<br />

Actual practice<br />

(xi - x ) 2 fi<br />

51 4,045 222 897,95 0,318 0,101124 22,4495<br />

53 3,725 222 826,95 -0,02 0,004 0,0888<br />

64 3.412 222 757,46 -0,315 0,0992 22,0224<br />

Total x<br />

3,727<br />

Item Score<br />

xi<br />

*<br />

( � )<br />

� � xi x<br />

n<br />

�<br />

x<br />

i fi<br />

2482,36<br />

2<br />

2<br />

� ;<br />

� �<br />

�<br />

( x � x)<br />

i<br />

�<br />

f<br />

i<br />

2<br />

f<br />

0,<br />

200724<br />

� � 0,<br />

0669<br />

3<br />

i<br />

�<br />

*<br />

44,<br />

5607<br />

�<br />

666<br />

0,<br />

258<br />

0,<br />

258<br />

v � �100<br />

� �100<br />

� 6,<br />

9%<br />

x 3,<br />

727<br />

�<br />

Respondents<br />

fi<br />

∑(x - x ) 2<br />

0,200724<br />

xi fi xi - x (xi - x ) 2<br />

∑(xi - x ) 2 fi<br />

44,5607<br />

Desired practice<br />

(xi - x ) 2 fi<br />

51 4, 450 222 987,90 0,267 0,071289 15,8262<br />

53 4,315 222 957,93 0,132<br />

0,002299<br />

0,5106<br />

64 3,784 222 840,05 -0,399<br />

0,159201<br />

35,3426<br />

Total X<br />

4,183 * � xi<br />

fi<br />

2785,88<br />

*<br />

∑(x - x ) 2<br />

0,232789<br />

( � )<br />

� � xi x<br />

n<br />

0,<br />

232789<br />

� � 0,<br />

0776<br />

3<br />

( x � x)<br />

∑(xi - x ) 2 fi<br />

51,6794<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

i<br />

i 51,<br />

6794<br />

� ; � �<br />

� � 0,<br />

279<br />

�<br />

0,<br />

279<br />

v � �100<br />

� �100<br />

�<br />

x 4,<br />

183<br />

�<br />

Annex 2<br />

�<br />

f<br />

i<br />

6,<br />

67%<br />

f<br />

666


Q51<br />

Q53<br />

Q64<br />

Content questions to characterize the behaviour <strong>of</strong> managers in different situations<br />

If a state <strong>of</strong> tension or<br />

conflict, managers<br />

To impose their<br />

views in solving<br />

work tasks,<br />

employees<br />

Compared mistakes<br />

during their work,<br />

managers<br />

Pa work for reconciliation through<br />

Pd<br />

dialogue with those involved<br />

should work for reconciliation through<br />

dialogue<br />

Pa by managers are encouraged to respect<br />

the opinions <strong>of</strong> others<br />

Pd should be encouraged by managers to<br />

respect the opinions <strong>of</strong> others<br />

363<br />

Opinion score<br />

x<br />

4,045<br />

4,450<br />

Opinion<br />

score<br />

x<br />

3,725<br />

4,315<br />

Opinion score<br />

x<br />

Pa are sympathetic (tolerant) 3,412<br />

Pd Should be sympathetic (tolerant) 3,784


364


THE NEED FOR PUBLIC DEBT MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF<br />

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION<br />

Marcu Nicu<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />

Meghișan Mădălina Georgeta<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Craiova, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business Administration<br />

Public debt is created when the necessary resources for the socio-economic development <strong>of</strong> a state<br />

are greater than the opportunities that exist at that time. The destination <strong>of</strong> the necessary resources<br />

acquired from foreign markets can be either consumption by raising the standard <strong>of</strong> living (on short<br />

term) or investments in order to reduce the discrepancies in relation to the European Union through<br />

investments in infrastructure, jobs, human and technical capital development.<br />

The scientific research aims to clarify several key objectives, namely: the theoretical concept and its<br />

belonging in the governance politics; the dynamics <strong>of</strong> public debt in Romania and the identification<br />

<strong>of</strong> specific features <strong>of</strong> the indebtedness decision, the influence <strong>of</strong> the current global economic crisis<br />

on the Romanian economy, the analysis <strong>of</strong> Romania's public debt sustainability integrated in the<br />

European structures, and proposals for action in order to return as soon as possible to a positive<br />

economic dynamics with direct impact on people's standard <strong>of</strong> living.<br />

The theme <strong>of</strong> this research is contemporary in the context <strong>of</strong> the financial and economical global<br />

crisis and the difficulties in overcoming this period. The need to coordination the fiscal and<br />

budgetary policies in Romania, the awareness that the accumulation <strong>of</strong> a large public debt presents<br />

a threat to future generations, the increase <strong>of</strong> the tax pressure over a market that trends towards<br />

globalization and the impact that the aging <strong>of</strong> the population will have on the public finances<br />

sparked public controversy, both in the academic environment and in the media. To continuously<br />

borrow resources and maintain a stable level for them requires a sustainable public debt, an<br />

important objective <strong>of</strong> any state’s tax policy. A sustainable public debt is the result <strong>of</strong> the market<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the fiscal and budgetary policy decisions.<br />

Although the sustainability <strong>of</strong> public finances and implicitly <strong>of</strong> public debt has been an issue<br />

extensively debated for over a century, they currently remain vague concepts. Although, intuitively,<br />

it is natural to consider that a fiscal policy is sustainable if it avoids financial collapse, there is no<br />

generally accepted definition in terms <strong>of</strong> sustainable public debt, respectively a sustainable level <strong>of</strong><br />

public debt. The methodology <strong>of</strong> this research is stressed by the large number <strong>of</strong> statistical data on<br />

public debt dynamics used in the analysis, relevant in this regard are the national and international<br />

databases: the National Bank <strong>of</strong> Romania, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Public Finances, World Bank, Euro stat, the<br />

statistical database <strong>of</strong> the European Commission, the database <strong>of</strong> the International Monetary Fund,<br />

the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the normative documents consulted<br />

in order to ensure the terminological accuracy <strong>of</strong> the concepts, the numerous theoretical and<br />

empirical studies <strong>of</strong> Romanian and foreign specialists, the views and arguments <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />

researchers with high experience in the field.<br />

The personal contribution to the researched field is present throughout this work. Thus, I aimed to<br />

clarify some theoretical aspects <strong>of</strong> the issues addressed, <strong>of</strong> some concepts and economic notions to<br />

elucidate the studied phenomenon by using a large number <strong>of</strong> statistical data in order to analyses<br />

the dynamics <strong>of</strong> public debt in Romania, in comparison with other former communist countries and<br />

to formulate proposals for a long-term sustained recovery and a sustainable economic growth.<br />

Keywords: public debt, budget deficit, external financing, public debt management, degree <strong>of</strong><br />

indebtedness, public debt service<br />

JEL Codes: H63 - Debt, Debt Management, Sovereign Debt<br />

365


I. Introduction:<br />

"The need for public debt management in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> sustainable development within the<br />

European Union” presents the main<br />

theoretical issues related to public debt<br />

management and its importance in the<br />

effective management <strong>of</strong> public debt, over the<br />

objectives and risks associated with public<br />

debt management. Moreover, the main<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> public debt management is to<br />

ensure that the government’s need <strong>of</strong> funding<br />

and its payment obligations are met at the<br />

lowest possible cost, on medium and long<br />

term, consistent with a prudent degree <strong>of</strong> risk<br />

. The issues <strong>of</strong> public debt management <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

start from the lack <strong>of</strong> attention <strong>of</strong> decisionmakers<br />

regarding the benefits <strong>of</strong> a cautious<br />

debt management strategy and the costs <strong>of</strong> a<br />

weak macroeconomic management <strong>of</strong><br />

excessive levels <strong>of</strong> public debt. In the first<br />

case, public authorities should pay attention<br />

to the beneficiaries resulting from the use <strong>of</strong> a<br />

prudent public debt management strategy and<br />

<strong>of</strong> public policies that are coordinated in a<br />

complete macroeconomic framework. In the<br />

second case, fiscal-budgetary policies,<br />

monetary policies and exchange rate policies<br />

that are inappropriate to the economic<br />

situation generate uncertainty in the financial<br />

markets regarding the future returns <strong>of</strong><br />

investment expressed in local currency,<br />

which will lead investors to request higher<br />

risk premiums. Particularly in emerging or<br />

developed markets, debtors and creditors<br />

alike, applying long-term commitments can<br />

suffocate the development <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

markets and they can severely impede public<br />

debt managers’ efforts to protect the<br />

government from refinancing and currency<br />

exchange risks.<br />

Moreover, poorly structured public debt in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> maturity, currency or the<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> the interest rate to which<br />

unfunded big liabilities are added, were<br />

important factors in the induction and<br />

propagation <strong>of</strong> the debt crisis in many<br />

countries over time.<br />

366<br />

The process <strong>of</strong> managing public debt<br />

portfolio is a priority for every government in<br />

order to reduce medium and long term<br />

exposure to risks.<br />

The main objective in process <strong>of</strong> public debt<br />

management is represented by providing for<br />

the governmental financing needs in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

minimizing long term costs and limiting the<br />

risks involved. In our country, during the<br />

period proposed for analysis, a series <strong>of</strong><br />

measures for the permanent improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

the legal and institutional framework for<br />

public debt management were taken. These<br />

measures corresponded to a positive<br />

macroeconomic context; Romania obtained<br />

the best results at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transition period. Analyzing the<br />

macroeconomic and policies - fiscal,<br />

budgetary, monetary, <strong>of</strong> exchange rate – one<br />

can see their continuous orientation towards<br />

public debt and budgetary deficit. The<br />

financing strategy for the budget deficit and<br />

the refinancing strategy for public debt will<br />

focus on contracting domestic loans by<br />

launching the issuance <strong>of</strong> public securities.<br />

Domestic public debt represents the total <strong>of</strong><br />

loans contracted directly by the state or<br />

guaranteed by it, from the internal market, in<br />

order to cover fiscal deficits, by financing and<br />

refinancing them. Also, domestic public debt<br />

represents the state’s takeover <strong>of</strong> debts based<br />

on special laws, due to losses registered by<br />

some companies and state-owned banks. A<br />

series <strong>of</strong> public spending, financed in order to<br />

achieve objectives <strong>of</strong> national interest can<br />

also be seen as domestic public debt. The<br />

annual growth <strong>of</strong> external public debt (direct<br />

and guaranteed) was based on a rigorous<br />

foundation regarding the contract criteria,<br />

within limits that did not exceed the country's<br />

capacity to assure the service, respectively the<br />

reimbursement <strong>of</strong> capital rates, interests and<br />

related fees without a strict policy regarding<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> borrowed resources.<br />

An incorrect structured debt by maturity date<br />

is an important factor in triggering the<br />

economic crisis. Short and medium term<br />

contracted loans with variable interest rates


may expose the state budget to a high risk if<br />

the international capital markets have<br />

changed the conditions regarding the<br />

refinancement <strong>of</strong> these loans. International<br />

financial organizations, the IMF and the<br />

World Bank, make suggestions on<br />

contracting loans for the purposes <strong>of</strong> directing<br />

those loans towards those on long term, thus<br />

avoiding countries’ indebtedness on short and<br />

medium term. Also, an analysis <strong>of</strong> internal<br />

and external public debt service is presented.<br />

II. Literature review<br />

Foreign loans allow a country to invest and<br />

consume beyond its domestic production<br />

capacity and therefore, to finance the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> capital not only by<br />

mobilizing domestic savings, but also by<br />

drawing resources from countries with capital<br />

surplus. In order to define external public<br />

debt will start from the definition <strong>of</strong> external<br />

debt as the due amount in currency, at some<br />

point, by one country(s) to other countries<br />

and / or international financial institution on<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> the credits received by the state<br />

(government), by private companies with the<br />

state’s guarantee and also by companies or<br />

individuals, that remains to be paid in a<br />

period longer than one year 35 .<br />

The internationally accepted definition <strong>of</strong><br />

external debt that results from the research<br />

conducted by international organizations,<br />

which have as the main field <strong>of</strong> activity<br />

crediting those countries that face problems<br />

in providing for their financial needs, presents<br />

gross external debt at one point as "the total<br />

<strong>of</strong> contractual liabilities used and unpaid by<br />

residents to nonresidents and the residents'<br />

obligation to reimburse capital rates, with or<br />

without interest, or to pay interest with or<br />

without capital rates 36 ."<br />

35 Ceauşu, Iulian. Enciclopedic Managerial<br />

Dictionary, Vol. I. Bucharest: Academic<br />

Management Publishing, 2000;, p. 264.<br />

36 Klein, Thomas M., External Debt Management –<br />

An Introduction, World Bank Technical Paper<br />

Number 245, Washington, D.C., p. 56.<br />

367<br />

In Romania, the Law <strong>of</strong> Public Debt No.<br />

313/2004 defines the external governmental<br />

public debt as "the part <strong>of</strong> the governmental<br />

public debt representing all financial<br />

obligations <strong>of</strong> the state that derive from loans<br />

contracted directly or guaranteed by the state<br />

from nonresidents individuals or legal entities<br />

in Romania"<br />

External public debt is a key parameter to<br />

assess the state <strong>of</strong> public finances; it can be<br />

defined as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the following<br />

macro economical issues 37 :<br />

� low production capacity in relation to<br />

consumption, investments and public<br />

expenditures;<br />

� insufficient domestic saving, in relation<br />

to investments and the budgetary deficit,<br />

� a overly high current account deficit,<br />

compared with net inflows <strong>of</strong> funds (debt<br />

is exempted);<br />

� Excessive capital outflows in the form <strong>of</strong><br />

direct investment or "capital leaks"<br />

abroad.<br />

Consequently, the role <strong>of</strong> external public debt<br />

can be seen through the following<br />

implications 38 :<br />

a) external loans allow the contracting<br />

country to invest and consume beyond<br />

its current internal possibilities and, in<br />

fact, to finance capital development not<br />

only by mobilizing domestic savings,<br />

but also by using the savings <strong>of</strong><br />

countries with capital surplus;<br />

b) External loans may lead to a faster<br />

economic growth, enabling the financing<br />

<strong>of</strong> a greater volume <strong>of</strong> investments and<br />

the mobilization <strong>of</strong> the country’s<br />

available resources, giving them a more<br />

cautious but a more effective usage.<br />

c) External loans can also serve to finance<br />

temporary deficits <strong>of</strong> the balance <strong>of</strong><br />

payments and can provide the authorities<br />

with the solution to avoid to taking<br />

37 Gaftoniuc, Simona. International Finances.<br />

Bucharest: Economic Publishing, 2000, p. 403.<br />

38 Klein, Thomas M., External Debt Management –<br />

An Introduction, World Bank Technical Paper<br />

Number 245, Washington, D.C., p. 2.


actions that could jeopardize the<br />

country's development program.<br />

III. Research Methodology.<br />

In order to assess the level <strong>of</strong> external public<br />

debt and to correlate it with the situation <strong>of</strong><br />

other macroeconomic variables (these ratios<br />

are more conclusive than the absolute size <strong>of</strong><br />

debt), a series <strong>of</strong> indicators are being used:<br />

- external public debt in the year<br />

(DPE):<br />

DPE � DPE � DPE ,<br />

- d g<br />

- where:<br />

- DPEd is the external public debt <strong>of</strong><br />

the state;<br />

- DPEg is the external public debt<br />

guaranteed by the state.<br />

- External public debt service (SDPE),<br />

which represents the payments due in<br />

order to reimburse external public<br />

debt, representing the mature rates in<br />

a period <strong>of</strong> one year (RDPE), the<br />

interests and the related fees as well<br />

as the costs <strong>of</strong> issuance and<br />

placement <strong>of</strong> securities (DobDPE) 3940 :<br />

Dob R SDPE � � ; (1)<br />

- DPE DPE<br />

- the share <strong>of</strong> external public debt in GDP:<br />

DPE<br />

- DPE/ PIB � �100<br />

; (2)<br />

PIB<br />

- the share <strong>of</strong> external public debt in the<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> exports <strong>of</strong> goods and services<br />

(E)<br />

DPE<br />

- DPE/ E � �100<br />

; (3)<br />

E<br />

- the share <strong>of</strong> interests <strong>of</strong> the existing<br />

external debt in GDP<br />

DobDPE<br />

- DobDPE<br />

� �100<br />

/ PIB<br />

; (4)<br />

PIB<br />

39 Moşteanu, Tatiana (coord.) şi colectiv, Finanţe<br />

publice: note de curs şi aplicaţii pentru seminar,<br />

Editura Universitară, Bucureşti, 2005, p. 264<br />

368<br />

- the share <strong>of</strong> the external public debt<br />

service in GDP:<br />

SDPE<br />

- SDPE / PIB � �100<br />

; (5)<br />

PIB<br />

- the share <strong>of</strong> external public debt service<br />

in the volume <strong>of</strong> exports <strong>of</strong> goods and<br />

services:<br />

SDPE<br />

- SDPE / E � �100<br />

; (6)<br />

E<br />

- external public debt service in the state’s<br />

budget expenditures (ChBS):<br />

SDPE<br />

SDPE / Ch � �100<br />

. (7)<br />

BS Ch<br />

IV. Results <strong>of</strong> the research<br />

The period 2007-2010 was characterized by<br />

the expression <strong>of</strong> the global financial and<br />

economical crisis. Although all European<br />

countries have been marked by different<br />

bubbles (the most frequent being the real<br />

estate bubbles), the crisis manifested<br />

unevenly, depending on specific conditions<br />

and governmental policies from each country<br />

and especially depending on the anti-crisis<br />

measures taken as a response to the crisis.<br />

In Romania, in comparison with developed<br />

countries, external public debt has been and<br />

continues to be the main component <strong>of</strong> public<br />

debt. Throughout the period, the actual public<br />

debt was fueled substantially by external<br />

loans and only to a lesser extent on the<br />

domestic loans, this structure being specific<br />

to developing countries which lack their own<br />

capital market capable <strong>of</strong> meeting the needs<br />

<strong>of</strong> the private and the public sector. The funds<br />

attracted were from international<br />

organizations (IMF, IEB) with compliance to<br />

the conditions imposed and in the cases<br />

where the government could not meet those<br />

conditions, it turned to private banks that<br />

granted loans but with a higher interest rate.<br />

Under the pressure <strong>of</strong> external financing <strong>of</strong><br />

budgetary deficit, the authorities have<br />

promoted macroeconomic austerity measures,<br />

aimed to restrict governmental spending,<br />

reorganize the system <strong>of</strong> pensions paid from<br />

BS


public funds, the system <strong>of</strong> social benefits<br />

and health insurances, which had short-term<br />

constriction effects.<br />

The painful budgetary adjustments, especially<br />

in the field <strong>of</strong> social benefits have been<br />

politically legitimated by the "state reform"<br />

slogan and the construction <strong>of</strong> a neoliberal<br />

minimal state.<br />

In reality, this approach was not accompanied<br />

by an appropriate and encouraging fiscal<br />

recovery, especially in the field <strong>of</strong> labor<br />

taxation nor by a real liberalization <strong>of</strong> some<br />

services or the entrustment <strong>of</strong> infrastructure<br />

works to the market.<br />

An extremely important issue for fiscal and<br />

budgetary sustainability on long-term remains<br />

the reduced capacity to collect public<br />

revenues, which causes an additional tax<br />

burden on taxpayers and keeps the premises<br />

for structural budget deficits. In this respect,<br />

the areas that require special attention should<br />

aim to modernize the rural economy, adjust<br />

the tax level <strong>of</strong> properties, the taxed labor<br />

shortages, tax evasion and the numerous<br />

exceptions to the general tax regime. The<br />

reduced ability to collect or to generate<br />

additional budgetary revenues imposes on<br />

Romania a redefinition <strong>of</strong> the fields <strong>of</strong> state<br />

intervention.<br />

In the long term, macroeconomic policies<br />

should aim to achieve general economic<br />

balance, a medium and long-term sustainable<br />

economic growth with the purpose to achieve<br />

real convergence, whether it will be<br />

expressed by growth <strong>of</strong> GDP per capita, by<br />

reducing labor costs, by the relocation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

share <strong>of</strong> national economy branches in the<br />

generation <strong>of</strong> GDP or by the degree <strong>of</strong><br />

openness <strong>of</strong> the Romanian economy.<br />

The draining budgetary measures taken in<br />

2010 have been misinterpreted as an actual<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> the Romanian state’s<br />

intervention in the economy; they rather<br />

represent the only solution to reduce the<br />

budget deficit because <strong>of</strong> its funding<br />

difficulties.<br />

369<br />

V. Conclusions<br />

For the recovery <strong>of</strong> the Central and Eastern<br />

European economies several groups <strong>of</strong><br />

countries can be distinguished. Some<br />

countries have managed to contradict the<br />

experts forecasts, obtaining better results<br />

(Poland, Czech Republic), others have met<br />

their forecasts, those being the countries with<br />

the strongest economies in the EU (France,<br />

Germany), while others faced the collapse <strong>of</strong><br />

their national economies (Greece, Spain).<br />

To help cushion the impact on their citizens,<br />

governments have implemented a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

initiatives. There are three important reasons<br />

why the analyzed countries were affected by<br />

the crisis. Firstly, the dependence on the<br />

foreign capital inflows (the ability to attract<br />

foreign investments meant to develop the<br />

national economy) and the money sent home<br />

by those working abroad to support<br />

consumption and hence the national budget.<br />

For example, in Romania and Bulgaria in<br />

2009, the money sent home dropped by 30% -<br />

50% compared to 2008 levels. Secondly, a<br />

large part <strong>of</strong> their exports were for countries<br />

in the region and the euro zone, so that the<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> transactions fell dramatically.<br />

Thirdly, several <strong>of</strong> the analyzed countries had<br />

their national currency dependent on the Euro<br />

and the weakened economies had been<br />

strongly influenced by Euros fluctuations<br />

which have <strong>of</strong>ten suffocated the exports.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> Poland, the government used<br />

quickly and effectively all the European<br />

funds at its disposal in order to cover the<br />

capital withdrawals amid the international<br />

crisis, the current account deficit became<br />

stable and zloty’s fall was stopped by the<br />

central bank <strong>of</strong> Warsaw with the help <strong>of</strong><br />

BCE, avoiding mortgage debtors’ entry into<br />

payment incapacity on mortgage loans<br />

denominated in foreign currencies.<br />

Although the government has contracted a<br />

loan through the new "flexible credit<br />

arrangement" <strong>of</strong> the IMF, in very favorable<br />

conditions, the National Bank <strong>of</strong> Poland was<br />

not forced to resort to these reserves.<br />

Although it had to postpone its accession to


the European exchange rate mechanism<br />

(ERM II), the Polish government initiated an<br />

extensive privatization program to reduce the<br />

budget deficit and maintain public debt below<br />

50% <strong>of</strong> GDP. Thus, Poland regained the<br />

investors’ confidence that began to return to<br />

their country. Because <strong>of</strong> the fact that this<br />

economic crisis was much longer than<br />

expected, the 50% threshold was exceeded<br />

due to the financing needs <strong>of</strong> the budget<br />

deficit which has increased 5 times in the<br />

period under review. The goal <strong>of</strong> the deficit<br />

was the need for co-financing the projects<br />

with EU grants and also the investments in<br />

infrastructure that is why the output from this<br />

EU recession will find Poland with a healthy<br />

economy based on sustainable development.<br />

Before the crisis started, Romania faced a<br />

high budget deficit, an overly indebted<br />

private sector, a real estate bubble and an<br />

over heated economy, Romania called on the<br />

help <strong>of</strong> the IMF in order to flatten the<br />

adjustment <strong>of</strong> internal and external<br />

imbalances set in motion by the global<br />

economic crisis.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the delay <strong>of</strong> the Government in<br />

adopting tough structural reform measures<br />

and reduce public spending, eventually to<br />

channel the funds at its disposal to the<br />

economic sectors that would really help the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a sustainable economic<br />

development, Romania was looked at and<br />

cataloged by the analysts as being without an<br />

economic horizon. Even though the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> the public debt in the GDP is a<br />

reduced one (30.8% in 2010) it is alarming<br />

that this public debt has risen with 300% in<br />

the analyzed period, from the borrowed sums<br />

being financed the social budgets deficits, the<br />

Government being content with a relative<br />

quietness <strong>of</strong> the social strata and waiting for<br />

the passing <strong>of</strong> this period without major<br />

interventions. The measure to reduce<br />

budgetary spending by cutting 25% in the<br />

public sector did not have a macroeconomic<br />

result because <strong>of</strong> the useless spending made<br />

from the same amount. In the analyzed<br />

370<br />

period, Romania was the only country that<br />

had registered a decrease in productivity.<br />

An aspect that probably did not get enough<br />

attention is that the financing <strong>of</strong> the excessive<br />

budgetary deficits, whether is done internally<br />

or internationally, is not a costless action. On<br />

the contrary, the level <strong>of</strong> the interest rate at<br />

which the debt has been contracted, as well as<br />

its schedule are extremely important aspects<br />

and can become an extreme burden, as<br />

situations exist in which the principal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

debt can be compared with the interest.<br />

Confronted with the lack <strong>of</strong> immediate low<br />

cost financing, some states have even<br />

advanced the unorthodox solution that the<br />

government securities be repurchased by the<br />

central bank. This option can not even be<br />

taken into consideration, as the conditions <strong>of</strong><br />

the Romania’s accession to the Monetary<br />

Union targets too also other dimensions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

nominal convergence, beside the stability <strong>of</strong><br />

the public finances, as would be: inflation, the<br />

stability <strong>of</strong> the exchange rate, interest rates,<br />

which would strongly affected by such a<br />

decision.


Bibliography<br />

1. Albu, Lucian-Liviu, Pelinescu,<br />

Elena. Suteinability <strong>of</strong> public debt,.<br />

Bucharest: Romanian Centre for<br />

Economic Policies, 2002;<br />

2. Beleanu, Pavel and Anghelache,<br />

Gabriela. Romania’s Public Fiances.<br />

Bucharest: Economic Publishing,<br />

2005;<br />

3. Burada, Mihaela Alina. “ The ration<br />

between internal and external public<br />

debt“ “ Economic Tribune”<br />

Publishing no. 19/2004;<br />

4. Ceauşu, Iulian. Enciclopedic<br />

Managerial Dictionary, Vol. I.<br />

Bucharest: Academic Management<br />

Publishing, 2000;<br />

5. Gaftoniuc, Simona. International<br />

Finances. Bucharest: Economic<br />

Publishing, 2000;<br />

371<br />

6. Klein, Thomas M.. External Debt<br />

Management – An Introduction.<br />

World Bank Technical Paper<br />

Number 245, Washington, D.C.;<br />

7. Moşteanu, Tatiana. Public finances:<br />

notes and applications. Bucharest:<br />

University Publishing, 2005;<br />

8. *** The strategy for managing<br />

guvernmental public debt 2011-<br />

2013;<br />

9. *** Public debt law no. 313/2004;<br />

10. *** Anual reports <strong>of</strong> BNR during<br />

2001-2010;<br />

11. *** Anual reports <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Public Finances regarding<br />

Romania’s external public debt<br />

during 2000-2010;<br />

12. *** Anual reports <strong>of</strong> the IMF from:<br />

1997, 2000, 2002 si 2009<br />

13. *** Data series regarding the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> Romania’s external<br />

public debt during 1990-2010 given<br />

by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Public Finances


372


IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES IN THE LESS FAVOURED AREAS<br />

OF ROMANIA<br />

Tileagă Cosmin<br />

“Lucian Blaga” University <strong>of</strong> Sibiu<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />

Cosmescu Ioan<br />

“Lucian Blaga” University <strong>of</strong> Sibiu<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Sciences<br />

Abstract: This paper deals with finding solutions for improving the economic activities in<br />

Romania’s undeveloped areas, which still represent a major problem for this country’s economy.<br />

During 1999 and 2009, these areas were considered tax havens, due to some facilities accorded by<br />

the Government and the EU (headage compensatory allowances*, tax deductions, non-refundable<br />

funds). Many had the opportunity to invest in those regions, but no positive effect was to be seen.<br />

Tulcea County (Danube Delta area), coal mine regions, rural areas and the North-East area<br />

(Suceava and Botoşani county) are considered to be Romania’s less favoured areas.<br />

Keywords: less favoured areas, non-refundable funds, tax havens, economic growth, economic<br />

activities<br />

JEL clasification: E60<br />

Introduction<br />

Nowadays, every less favoured area from<br />

Romania represents a major problem for<br />

regional development, having a negative<br />

impact on Romania’s economy. It is proven<br />

that long-term growth strategies for lessfavoured<br />

areas require especially the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> infrastructure and national<br />

institutions, which kept those areas<br />

backwards. Since 1999, open trade between<br />

countries has been considered to stimulate the<br />

economic growth, both at national and<br />

regional level. This growth was <strong>of</strong>ten suppose<br />

to trickle down to less favoured areas. In<br />

other words, this was considered a process<br />

whereby the economic gains from economic<br />

growth would pass down throughout the<br />

entire society, eventually giving rise to<br />

development.<br />

* The objective <strong>of</strong> these schemes is to provide a<br />

reasonable level <strong>of</strong> income for farmers where natural<br />

production conditions are least favourable so as to<br />

conserve the countryside by the prevention <strong>of</strong> further<br />

depopulation <strong>of</strong> rural areas. Compensatory<br />

allowances are payable to farmers for the keeping <strong>of</strong><br />

cattle, sheep and goats. (www.europa.eu)<br />

373<br />

People living in less-favoured areas represent<br />

around the globe 40% <strong>of</strong> the rural population,<br />

suffering from chronic poverty. In what<br />

Romania is concerned, a study from 2010<br />

reveals that closely 33% <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania is living with less than 200 Euros a<br />

month.<br />

Less-favoured areas are defined as „remote<br />

regions with limited natural resource base,<br />

where problemes <strong>of</strong> chronic poverty and<br />

resource degradation tend to be the same. In<br />

the same time these areas have a limited<br />

agriculture potential, with poor infrastructure<br />

and service suport”.<br />

However, it is necessary to distinguish the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> less-favoured area with<br />

development potential. This area would be an<br />

ideal place where investment especially in<br />

infrastructure and tourism can be productive<br />

and sustainable.<br />

A large number <strong>of</strong> implementing directives<br />

comprise the current classification <strong>of</strong> the LFA<br />

<strong>of</strong> each European Member State into three<br />

types:<br />

-Mountain areas (rural areas around the<br />

Carpathian Mountains) where altitude,<br />

climate and slopes, reduce the chance <strong>of</strong>


investments. The major problem for this areas<br />

still represents the process <strong>of</strong> deforestation,<br />

the lack <strong>of</strong> mountain resorts, and the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

infrastructure.<br />

-LFAs which are marked by poor soil<br />

conditions (especially low agricultural<br />

productivity), low population densities or<br />

even depopulation tendencies. In Romania<br />

Tulcea county (Danube Delta area) could be<br />

considered an area with a low rate <strong>of</strong><br />

investments, low soil productivity mainly<br />

because the Danube.<br />

-LFAs which are related to small areas with<br />

specific handicaps relating to the<br />

environment, landscape development, low<br />

agricultural activity, low tourism<br />

development. This area in Romania may be<br />

found in the North-East <strong>of</strong> the territory,<br />

including Botoşani and Suceava county. This<br />

area represents a major undeveloped region<br />

<strong>of</strong> Romania, mainly due to migration to other<br />

countries or even in more developed areas <strong>of</strong><br />

Romania.<br />

To find solutions in order to develop the less<br />

favoured areas, some objectives must be<br />

established: finding an economic balance<br />

between regions, finding new ways to attract<br />

new investors, developing agriculture,<br />

industry and especially tourism to enhance<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> the local resources, inforce the<br />

cooperation between the regional areas.<br />

Two important elements always play an<br />

important role for less-favoured areas:<br />

defected political institutions and poor<br />

infrastructure (poor infrastructure <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

implies a long transport duration or difficult<br />

communication between a LFA and other<br />

regions). These two elements are especially<br />

revelevant because <strong>of</strong> their link to the effects<br />

on the economic growth. Moreover, the<br />

political environment has a strong impact on<br />

the economic growth <strong>of</strong> the less-favoured<br />

area, meaning that in Romania the funds<br />

accorded by the Government to regions are<br />

not equally distributed.<br />

374<br />

Less-favoured mountain areas, and rural<br />

areas<br />

The less-favoured mountain areas, which<br />

represent aproximately 29,93% <strong>of</strong> Romania’s<br />

territory are the homeplace for 2.400.000<br />

romanians. The economic activities from<br />

these areas are mainly those related to the<br />

wood and furniture industry, agriculture and<br />

animal breeding. In the areas surrouding the<br />

Carpathian Mountains, due to the numerous<br />

protected areas, tourism is not welldeveloped,<br />

excepting the winter season when<br />

the winter resorts are full <strong>of</strong> tourists<br />

practising the winter sports.<br />

A major problem for this area represents the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> deforestation, which causes<br />

numerous landslips and floods. It is well<br />

know that there is a lack <strong>of</strong> modern woodland<br />

planting that affects negatively the imagine <strong>of</strong><br />

this area. Once a tree is being planted, it<br />

needs around 40 or 50 years to grow to<br />

maturity.<br />

The forests <strong>of</strong>fer important resources for the<br />

economy <strong>of</strong> this less-favoured area.<br />

Excepting wood, mushrooms, seeds, forest<br />

fruits, firtrees, mineral waters represent<br />

significant resources.<br />

On a short term, tourism and especially<br />

mountains resorts should be considered<br />

strong points for developing the local<br />

economy, especially during the winter. In<br />

addition, due to the speed <strong>of</strong> falling waters<br />

coming from the mountains, hydro-electric<br />

power plants could <strong>of</strong>fer to this area a new<br />

opportunity to attract new investors,<br />

becoming an area stong enough to generate<br />

new workplaces and greater amount <strong>of</strong><br />

„green-energy”.<br />

The less-favoured areas from the mountains<br />

(mainly the rural areas) in Romania are<br />

characterised by a scattered population and<br />

very low quality infrastructure – for example,<br />

only 33% <strong>of</strong> rural residents are connected to a<br />

water supply network and only 10% to a<br />

sewerage system, while only 10% <strong>of</strong> rural<br />

roads are considered <strong>of</strong> „adequate standard”<br />

with asphalt cover. The basic social<br />

infrastructure (health and education systems,


finance) is much less developed than in urban<br />

areas. These factors have a negative impact<br />

on the quality <strong>of</strong> life in the rural areas,<br />

increase migration, create environment<br />

problems, hamper economic development and<br />

exacerbate health.<br />

In what rural tourism is concerned, this<br />

represents a significant potential which is not<br />

sufficient valorised. The tourism sector in<br />

2009 in the rural areas, showed an increase in<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> accomodation structures and<br />

accomodation capacity. The development <strong>of</strong><br />

rural tourism in rural areas depends on the<br />

specific <strong>of</strong> each region, agricultural products,<br />

ethnographic regions and folklore. It also<br />

depends very much on the existence and<br />

especially the quality <strong>of</strong> the tourist pension,<br />

different types <strong>of</strong> recreation activities,<br />

practising agriculture and in some areas<br />

winegrowing and animal breeding. For<br />

example the specific tourism for Bucovina<br />

(North East less favoured area) is religious<br />

tourism, in Maramureş it is the architecture<br />

and folklore, while in Transylvania the<br />

spotlight is the reacreational and cultural<br />

tourism, food and wine. The mountain and<br />

forestry areas in Romania ensure the<br />

opportunities for practising tourism, in<br />

particular the so called eco-tourism which<br />

could be an alternative income, generating in<br />

this way different activities that could <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

potential development, due to the unique<br />

landscapes, native hospitability, wellconserved<br />

traditions and food.<br />

Noteworthy modernization, development and<br />

innovation are mandatory for Romania’s<br />

tourism, together with creating modern and<br />

competitive tourism products. The main<br />

reasons why tourism is not that well<br />

developed in these areas are that there is a<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> organisation, promotion, information<br />

as well as qualitatively low tourism<br />

infrastructure.<br />

The mountain and rural areas are affected by<br />

the significant lack <strong>of</strong> infrastructure which<br />

retrains both the economic development and<br />

the most important: the quality <strong>of</strong> life. The<br />

roads are the most important transportation<br />

375<br />

routes, but the quality and development <strong>of</strong><br />

rural road and traffic is a long way behind the<br />

European standard. The undevelopment <strong>of</strong><br />

the road blocks the economic growth, and<br />

interferes with other difficulties concerning<br />

the medical and educational servicies. The<br />

road represents the key element for the<br />

economic development among the fields <strong>of</strong><br />

human, social and economic develpment.<br />

Watter supply is another key for the quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> life, as well as in a direct relation to the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> economic activities in rural<br />

areas. As an interesting fact in the less<br />

favoured areas <strong>of</strong> Romania only 33% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rural inhabitans have access to the public<br />

water network.<br />

As opportunities for development it is<br />

important the exploitation <strong>of</strong> wood, not<br />

exceedind the annual operating capacity,<br />

exploiting accessory products (berries, herbs,<br />

mushrooms, pine cones), extend forestry<br />

product processing industry taking into<br />

account regional sustainable development,<br />

increasing mechanization <strong>of</strong> forestry products<br />

and create a system to record the number <strong>of</strong><br />

the cutten trees.<br />

Attracting investors requires a modern<br />

infrastructure, forest road development,<br />

execution <strong>of</strong> simple pathways for wood<br />

processing machinery. In addition, the<br />

mechanization <strong>of</strong> woodworking would be a<br />

step forward in what development <strong>of</strong><br />

mountain areas is concerned.<br />

North-East less favoured area<br />

The underdevelopment <strong>of</strong> this area appears to<br />

be correlated with rising unemployment, the<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> rural activities and failure to<br />

attract foreign investors. The North-East area<br />

is marked by the dependence on agriculture,<br />

and especially its proximity to other<br />

disadvantaged regions (Ukraine and<br />

Moldavia). It is the only region in the country<br />

with positive natural growth, the share <strong>of</strong><br />

young population is high, and as positive<br />

aspects there is an effective education system<br />

in the large cities and skilled labor.<br />

As weakness points, the rate <strong>of</strong> poverty is


high along with the rate <strong>of</strong> migration to the<br />

outside region, there is a lack <strong>of</strong> openness to<br />

change and especially modernization, the<br />

crime rate is higher that in the developed<br />

regions. To these are added the aging<br />

population <strong>of</strong> the region, undeveloped spirit<br />

<strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship, poor business support<br />

infrastructure, poor implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

product quality assurance system, the low<br />

level <strong>of</strong> industrialization <strong>of</strong> wood, insufficient<br />

promotion <strong>of</strong> the region's investment<br />

potential, lack <strong>of</strong> cooperation between<br />

universities and the poor quality <strong>of</strong> public<br />

servicies, the lack <strong>of</strong> specific knowledge in<br />

business development, namely the creation <strong>of</strong><br />

new jobs.<br />

From an economic perspective, there is<br />

already a development <strong>of</strong> the activities related<br />

to the exploitation and wood processing, good<br />

financial banking and insurance<br />

infrastructure, and a large numer <strong>of</strong><br />

specialists in forestry, trade and public<br />

servicies. The industrial structure is fragile<br />

mainly due to the usage <strong>of</strong> outdated<br />

technology, having a negative impact on<br />

productivity and economic efficiency.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> tourism there is a high share <strong>of</strong><br />

private ownership in the tourism sector, the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> spa and national cultural centers,<br />

along with the existence <strong>of</strong> developing the<br />

religious tourism (the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

monasteries), mountain sports (hinking,<br />

skiing, paragliding), and the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

traditional folklore events <strong>of</strong> the region.<br />

The road infrastructure is poorly developed<br />

between East-West areas <strong>of</strong> the region, there<br />

is also a low percentage <strong>of</strong> upgraded roads,<br />

together with the density <strong>of</strong> railway lines<br />

being unequal in accordance with the<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> the electrified railways.<br />

Furthermore, the small numer <strong>of</strong> cities with<br />

natural gas distribution systems,<br />

underdeveloped telephone network in rural<br />

areas, poor infrastructure development for<br />

leisure activities and outdated water treatment<br />

and waste management systems, are the main<br />

things to be changed for developing this<br />

deprived area.<br />

376<br />

As geographical influence, the winter<br />

contributes to disadvantage the area as many<br />

investors fear the harshness <strong>of</strong> the winter cold<br />

weather (in transport, industry).<br />

The North-East region may become a major<br />

area <strong>of</strong> concern for investors, EU supporting<br />

less favoured areas. There is a legislative<br />

framework regarding the development <strong>of</strong> this<br />

area, providing many facilities to investors,<br />

including potential experienced staff for<br />

research.<br />

As opportunity, it should be taken into<br />

account the privatization and restructuring <strong>of</strong><br />

state-owned companies, the legal framework<br />

<strong>of</strong> local government involvement in regional<br />

development is being favorable to this region.<br />

Aceelerating the economic recovery and<br />

sustainable development represents the key<br />

objectives to ensure the overpassing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

actual life condition. Development involves<br />

creating the necessary infrastructure to<br />

promote the business environment,<br />

supporting SME 41 s, developing<br />

entrepreneurship, rural development.<br />

In connection with development, the<br />

industrial potential should be reevaluated in<br />

order to promote existing and new branches<br />

<strong>of</strong> industry. Building up a business<br />

infrastructure should help the development <strong>of</strong><br />

the pr<strong>of</strong>itable activities for the less-favoured<br />

areas, having a positive impact on the<br />

deprived area only with a strict control <strong>of</strong> the<br />

local authorities (in the occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

phantom companies without creating new<br />

jobs, or poorly paid) and support for access to<br />

new technologies, efficient and clean.<br />

Therefore, to ensure the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

region, it is required effective cooperative<br />

ventures to develop effective managerial<br />

skills and support technology development.<br />

Although, being a less-favoured area with<br />

limited natural resources, human resource is<br />

considered a valuable treasure <strong>of</strong> this region.<br />

Investing in human resources is a priority <strong>of</strong><br />

any regional development strategy. Just by<br />

raising the educational standards and human<br />

41 Small and Medium Enterprises.


esource training system, economic recovery<br />

could be achived, raising the standard <strong>of</strong><br />

living.<br />

Priority strategic directions in the upcoming<br />

years should focus on upgrading old roads,<br />

upgrading rural telecommunications<br />

infrastructure, modernization <strong>of</strong> water<br />

systems, municipal waste by attracting<br />

European funding grants. economic growth is<br />

the most important indicator <strong>of</strong> the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a region. In this way creating<br />

a competitive economy is a decisive factor in<br />

the evolvment <strong>of</strong> an area or industrial<br />

enterprise.<br />

There are assumptions that can form the basis<br />

for economic recovery, namely:<br />

-existence <strong>of</strong> an industrial infrastructure in<br />

almost all sub-branches (machine building,<br />

chemical, petrochemical, food, textiles,<br />

medicines, wood, etc.);<br />

-existence <strong>of</strong> a well-trained personnel.<br />

-existence <strong>of</strong> companies in the industry,<br />

which benefited from consistent and fresh<br />

capital.<br />

-dynamics <strong>of</strong> small and medium enterprises.<br />

Tourism development in the NE<br />

disadvantaged<br />

Tourism is a priority, and by the enhancement<br />

<strong>of</strong> existing targets, improving the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

tourism services, responding to the actual<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> customers, the image <strong>of</strong><br />

tourism could be improved by creating a<br />

positive image <strong>of</strong> tourism in the area.<br />

The region presents many opportunities for<br />

various and complex recreational activities:<br />

religious-tourism, supported by the existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> an impressive number <strong>of</strong> churches and<br />

monasteries, historical monuments<br />

throughout the region; cultural-historical<br />

tourism, the existing museums, famous<br />

castles and a great cultural heritage and<br />

folklore <strong>of</strong> the region.<br />

For the economic progress, namely tourism,<br />

following investment in tourism, agrotourism<br />

support, upgrading roads in<br />

mountainous areas can sketch some results:<br />

-Increase the number <strong>of</strong> visitors to the North-<br />

377<br />

East region, and investing money in<br />

upgrading areas.<br />

-Increase the volume <strong>of</strong> private investment in<br />

tourism.<br />

-Increase the volume <strong>of</strong> requests for<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> vacation homes that bring<br />

additional revenue to local budgets.<br />

-Creating a positive image that <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

prospects for large-scale business and<br />

investment.<br />

-Working with the media, advertising that<br />

will help promote the area.<br />

-Improving the financial situation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

disadvantaged population.<br />

-Scale applications for sponsorship grants for<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> new technologies in the health<br />

system.<br />

Financial facilities given to the lessfavoured<br />

areas.<br />

To assist disadvantaged areas, the Romanian<br />

government has proposed that by 2013, these<br />

areas should be given various grants and tax<br />

breaks to help economic development.<br />

For new investments made in a deprived area,<br />

investors can benefit from one or more <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following features:<br />

-full refund <strong>of</strong> customs duties for machinery,<br />

equipment, equipment, vehicles (excluding<br />

cars), other depreciable assets which are<br />

imported to carry and operate investments in<br />

the area, as well as raw materials, spare parts<br />

and / or imported components necessary to<br />

achieve performance in the area<br />

-exemption from pr<strong>of</strong>it tax during the lifetime<br />

<strong>of</strong> the deprived area<br />

-financing special programs, approved by<br />

Government Decision<br />

-finance companies investment projects,<br />

through co-participation <strong>of</strong> the state to the<br />

social capital<br />

-discounted rates for car transport, inland<br />

waterways and rail<br />

-reducing income tax by up to 50%.<br />

These measures taken by the Government,<br />

aim at equalizing currently considered<br />

disadvantaged areas, with already developed<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> Romania.


CASE STUDY: THE IMPACT OF STATE<br />

AID TO ROMANIA LESS-FAVOURED<br />

AREAS -ROMANIAN GOVERNMENT<br />

AND COMPETITION COUNCIL<br />

2000-2009<br />

TOTAL:<br />

Tax Incentives<br />

584<br />

Nonrefundable<br />

2.<br />

funds<br />

300.000<br />

250.000<br />

200.000<br />

150.000<br />

100.000<br />

50.000<br />

0<br />

378<br />

Regional development policy is an essential<br />

component <strong>of</strong> the reform process in Romania,<br />

mainly aimed at reducing economic and<br />

social imbalances accumulated, preventing<br />

the emergence <strong>of</strong> new imbalances and<br />

support the overall sustainable development<br />

<strong>of</strong> all regions <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> regional aid in Romania during 2000-2009 (RON)<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

66. 384<br />

63. 800<br />

252. 017<br />

230. 957<br />

21. 060<br />

237. 110<br />

207. 568<br />

29. 152<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

194. 155<br />

179. 476<br />

13. 719<br />

TOTAL:<br />

Tax Incentives<br />

Non-refundable funds<br />

The general trend <strong>of</strong> decrease in the volume <strong>of</strong> such aid by 2008 is because the vast majority <strong>of</strong><br />

aid was granted as tax incentives. Since 2007, new schemes have been initiated with the<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> regional state aid, in full compliance with EU rules.<br />

Also while checking operators in June 2010 (a total <strong>of</strong> 109 from disadvantaged areas), a study<br />

was conducted on two questions:<br />

249. 353<br />

245. 957<br />

2. 098<br />

99. 644<br />

77. 391<br />

20. 944<br />

100. 948<br />

84. 162<br />

16. 655<br />

67. 582<br />

29. 080<br />

38. 502<br />

154. 226<br />

13. 206<br />

141. 020<br />

179. 376<br />

7. 130<br />

172. 246


1. "What are the problems faced by the society?”<br />

2%<br />

2% 5%<br />

3% 3%<br />

8%<br />

So it may be noted that the majority consider that there is a low demand due to the current<br />

crisis, followed by those who believe that there is a huge financial jam and the high prices <strong>of</strong><br />

utilities.<br />

2. "What measures do you think the state should take in order to raise the social-economic level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the disadvantaged area? "<br />

5%<br />

8%<br />

13%<br />

14%<br />

15%<br />

55%<br />

Conclusion<br />

Disadvantaged areas in Romania were<br />

considered tax havens, the ghost business<br />

having prospered without bringing any<br />

positive aspects to the less-favoured region. A<br />

2010 study, conducted by Pro TV campaign,<br />

showed that 33% <strong>of</strong> Romanians live with a<br />

wage <strong>of</strong> about 200 euros per month. Between<br />

1998 and 2010 there were approximately 160<br />

cities declared disadvantaged, where many<br />

companies tried to move its headquarters to<br />

Problems <strong>of</strong> the Society<br />

56%<br />

379<br />

Low demand and high<br />

taxation<br />

Financial Jam<br />

High prices <strong>of</strong> utilities and<br />

raw materials<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> qualified labor<br />

Developing the less-favoured areas<br />

4% 4% 3%<br />

Further tax incentives<br />

Adequate infrastructure<br />

Support for jobs and training<br />

Simplified procedure for<br />

accessing funds<br />

the enjoyment <strong>of</strong> the exemptions (about 6<br />

billion RON). Companies wishing to relocate<br />

their headquarters in these areas had no such<br />

development project, creating a monopoly on<br />

the labor market, taking advantage prodiving<br />

extremly low wages for people who were<br />

wiling to work.<br />

Moreover, a investor from a deprived area is<br />

required to engage minimum 2 employees<br />

residing in that area, which would lead to<br />

lower unemployment in the disadvantaged


egion. State aid to disadvantaged areas led<br />

the companies to develop diversified<br />

economic activity, the population has become<br />

more responsive to the conversion process.<br />

Most companies have relied exclusively on<br />

these grants from the government instead <strong>of</strong><br />

continuing research and finding its own<br />

funds, tax incentives were an additional cost<br />

for Ministry <strong>of</strong> Public Finance, who had to<br />

make numerous tax inspection. For the best<br />

possible structural funds for the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> disadvantaged areas is recommended to<br />

promote information campaigns in both<br />

economic agents and local authorities. The<br />

authorities also need to simplify legislation<br />

for obtaining grants. Attracting investors<br />

outside the LFA can be achieved by creating<br />

industrial parks along with investment in<br />

local infrastructure.<br />

Linked to the yield, most traders have noticed<br />

a decline in pr<strong>of</strong>it in 2005, the period during<br />

which state aid stopped, increases recorded in<br />

2006 and 2007, followed by a period <strong>of</strong><br />

declining pr<strong>of</strong>its, because <strong>of</strong> the decreased<br />

number funds granted. Migration factor (or<br />

even interregional migration in other<br />

European countries) resulted in a decrease <strong>of</strong><br />

GDP especially the North-East region.<br />

However, there are positive signs, as<br />

investors obtained licenses in less-favoured<br />

areas, have created an estimated 44,300 new<br />

jobs (Source: The Competition Council in the<br />

year 2009), representing about 5.3% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total unemployment number.<br />

Less-favoured areas in Romania could easily<br />

disappear if the political factor would not<br />

have direct impact on the funds granted, only<br />

changing legislation and eliminating regional<br />

bureaucracy, would lead to an improvement<br />

in the economic situation <strong>of</strong> each region.<br />

380<br />

References<br />

Oskam,A. J., Komen, MHC., Wobst, P.,<br />

Yalew, A, Trade Policies and development <strong>of</strong><br />

Less-Favoured Areas:Evidence from<br />

Literature, 2006<br />

Kuyenvenhoven, A., Ruben, R., Pender, J.,<br />

Sustainable Poverty Reduction in Lessfavoured<br />

Areas:Problems, Options and<br />

Strategies, 2007<br />

Kuyenvenhoven, A., Ruben, R., Pender, J.,<br />

Development Strategies for Less-favoured<br />

Areas, 2003<br />

Kuyenvenhoven, A., Ruben, R., Pender, J.,<br />

Investing in poor people in less-favoured<br />

areas:Institutions, Technologies and Policies<br />

for poverty alleviation and sustainable<br />

resource use, 2003<br />

Pender, J., Hazell, P., Promoting sustainable<br />

development in Less-favoured Areas, 2000<br />

National Rural Development Programme<br />

2007-2013, Romania<br />

http://ec. europa.<br />

eu/agriculture/consultations/lfa/index_en. htm<br />

www. adrnordest. ro<br />

www. adr. ro<br />

www. antreprenortanar. ro<br />

www. fonduri-structurale-europene. ro/<br />

www. consiliulconcurentei. ro<br />

http://eur-lex. europa. eu/en/index. htm<br />

www. apia. org. ro/dir_iacs/ppt. pdf<br />

http://www. mdrl. ro/index. php?p=159<br />

http://www. ier.<br />

ro/documente/formare/Politica_regionala. pdf<br />

Această lucrare/articol a beneficiat de suport<br />

financiar prin proiectul,,Studii Post-<br />

Doctorale în Economie: program de formare<br />

continuă a cercetătorilor de elită – SPODE”,<br />

contract de finanţare nr.<br />

POSDRU/89/1.5/S/61755, proiect finanţat din<br />

Fondul Social European prin Programul<br />

Operaţional Sectorial Dezvoltarea Resurselor<br />

Umane 2007-2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!