You are on page 1of 21

PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL

AIRLINES, PIA

STRATEGIC REPORT
VISION STATEMENT

‘’PIA aims to carve the utmost flying experiences consistently.’’


MISSION STATEMENT

‘’To set the standard of excellence for flying across the globe by
always striving hard to provide unmatched services to all our
prestige guests when it comes to safety, entertainment and
punctuality and the most state of the art airplanes gives us an extra
edge to meet our customer needs consistently and to grow more’’
COMPONENETS OF MISSION STATEMENT

CUSTOMERS .
• People who want their flying experience to be memorable each time.

SERVICES .
• Taking guests from one destination to another with safety, punctuality and entertainment.

TECHNOLOGY .
• State of the art airplanes.

PHILOSOPHY .
• organization believes in giving utmost flying experiences on consistent basis to the guests and by
reaching out an extra mile to meet their needs.

SELF CONCEPT .
• The determination to set excellence standards covers the self-concept aspect.

CONCERN FOR GROWTH .


• That part consistency shows that the organizations survival and profitability depends upon it, if we
lose we will lose it all.

PUBLIC IMAGE .
• That their needs will be met and for that the organization is willing to take an extra mile.

MARKET .
• Across the globe.
STRATEGY FORMULATION

• IFE
INPUT STAGE • EFE
• CPM

• SWOT
• SPACE
MATCHING STAGE • BCG
• IE
• GRAND STRATEGY

DECISION STAGE • QSPM MATRIX


INPUT STAGE
INTERNAL FACTOR EVALUATION MATRIX:
STRENGHTHS
Point to point frequency 0.07 3 0.21
Broader target market 0.08 3 0.24
First movers (experience advantage) 0.02 4 0.08
Brand Image 0.2 4 0.8
Huge destination coverage 0.04 4 0.16
State to the art fleet 0.07 4 0.28
Financial resources 0.08 4 0.32
Competitive staff 0.02 3 0.06
Monopoly 0.06 3 0.18
WEAKNESSES
Corruption 0.05 2 0.1
Dysfunctional structure 0.04 2 0.08
Strong domestic competition with airlines 0.04 1 0.04
Non professionalism 0.05 2 0.1
Strong union hold 0.04 2 0.08
Bad allocation of resources 0.05 1 0.05
Government influence 0.06 2 0.12
Over staffing 0.05 1 0.05
Low awards and appraisals 0.04 2 0.08
Debt 0.05 1 0.05

EXTERNAL FACTOR EVALUATION MATRIX:
OPPORTUNITIES WEIGHTS (W) SCORE (S) W*S
• Subsidy on oil prices 0.04 4 0.16
• Ability to have maximum fleet and route 0.03 3 0.09
• Increasing number of airports 0.05 4 0.04
• Air crashes of other airlines 0.2 4 0.08
• Changing customer trends 0.03 3 0.09
• Low cost barriers 0.07 3 0.21
• Industry recovery predicted 0.08 4 0.32
• Better recruitment policy 0.06 3 0.18
• Globalization of speed-ex 0.05 3 0.15
THREATS
• Increase in interest rates 0.05 2 0.1
• Increasing oil prices globally 0.04 3 0.12
• New entrants 0.04 2 0.08
• Inflation 0.05 2 0.1
• Privatization 0.06 3 0.18
• Terrorism threat 0.05 3 0.15
• Time consumed by embassy for the visa 0.04 2 0.08
• Devalue of currency 0.07 1 0.07
TOTAL 1 46 2.2

COMPETITIVE PROFILE MATRIX:
PIA Air Blue
FACTORS Weight Score W*S Weight Score W*S
(W) (S) (W) (S)
Advertising 0.05 2 0.1 0.05 1 0.05
Market Share 0.30 3 0.9 0.30 2 0.60
Safety 0.10 3 0.3 0.10 2 0.20
Punctuality 0.15 4 0.6 0.15 2 0.30
Fare charges 0.05 1 0.05 0.05 3 0.15
Customer Expectations 0.10 3 0.3 0.10 2 0.20
Management 0.05 2 0.1 0.05 1 0.05
Reliability 0.05 3 0.15 0.05 1 0.05
Resources 0.10 4 0.4 0.10 2 0.20
Technology 0.05 4 0.2 0.05 2 0.10
TOTAL 1 30 3.1 1 17 1.9
MATCHING STAGE

MATCHING STAGE

SPACE GRAND
BCG SWOT IE
MATRIX STRATEGY
MATRIX MATRIX MATRIX MATRIX
SPACE MATRIX

INTERNAL STRATEGIC EXTERNAL STRATEGIC POSITION


POSITION
Y- AXIS FINANCIAL POSITION (FP) STABILITY POSITION (SP)
ROI = +2 Barriers to entry = -1
ROE = +2 Inflation = -4
Liquidity ratio = +3 Technology Advancement = -3
Leverage ratio = +1 Competitive pressure = -6
Working Capital = +1 Poor law and order situation = -4

FP+SP = -1.8 Average = +1.8 Average = -3.6


X-AXIS COMPETITIVE POSITION (CP) INDUSTRY POSITION (IP)
Market share = -3 Growth potential = +3
Huge fleet = -1 Fuel price stability = +1
Service quality = -4 Government support = +5
Direct flight = -2 Entry-exit barriers = +5
Management Experience = -1 Financial stability = +2
Average = -2.2 Average = 3.2
CP+IP = +1

BCG MATRIX

DESTINATION INDUSTRY MARKET PROFIT % PROFIT


GROWTH SHARE
LHR-KHI 19% 1.00 50 50/100 =50%

LHR-ISB 10% 0.65 10 10/100 = 10%

KHI-DUBAI -9% 0.44 5 5/100 = 5%

ISB-USA 16% 0.75 35 35/100 = 35%

TOTAL 100

INTERNAL EXTERNAL (IE) MATRIX

The IE matrix is based on the following two criteria:

• Score from the EFE matrix is plotted on the y-axis i.e. 2.2
• Score from the IFE matrix is plotted on the x-axis i.e. 3.08

IE RESULT:
Having a look at the graph of IE MATRIX on the next page, PIA falls in the 4th cell which
suggests grow and build strategy for PIA so the strategies available for them are,
intensive integrative strategies and intensive market penetration, market development
and product development.

SWOT MATRIX
STRENGTHS-S WEAKNESSES-W
1. STRONG BRAND 1. HIGH MAINTENANCE COSTS
2. MONOPLY AT HAJ FLIGHTS 2. OVER STAFFING
3. GREATER ACCESS TO DESTINATIONS WORLD WIDE 3. CORRUPTION
4. FINANCE W.H.O GOVERNMENT 4. UNION HOLD
5. HUGE JET FLEET 5. LOW MOTIVATION OF EMPLOYEES

OPPORTUNITIES-O SO WO
1. USE OF ALTERNATIVE FUEL (S4, O3), Acquire Shaheen airways to get its share. (W1, W4, W5, O3), Merger could be a way to get rid of
2. INCREASED TRAVELLING IN ASIA aging crafts resulting in high maintenance costs, new
(S3, O5), Focus on the Asian market more to benefit from
3. MERGER AND ACQUSITIONS employees coming over would help the existing
increasing demand and wider access to worldwide
4. NEW DESTINATIONS employees in getting motivation and to weaken the
destinations.
5. GLOBALIZATION OF FED-X union hold.
(S4, S2, O1), Make the haj flights more profitable by saving
on fuel costs.

THREATS-T ST WT
1. FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK (S4, T3), the threat of poor security situation in our (W2, T5, T2), Introduce culture of merit in HR
2. WORLD WIDE WEAK ECONOMIC country can be overcome by adding advance practices.
CONDITIONS security systems and equipment.
3. TERRRORISM
4. INNTENSE COMPETITION (S1, T4), Marketing the strong brand name properly
5. POLITICAL INTERFERENCE can reduce the competition.
GRAND STRATEGY MATRIX

• With reference to BCG matrix the growth rate of the four destination routes are as
follows:
• DESTINATION GROWTH RATE
• LHR-KHI 19%
• LHR-ISB 10%
• ISB-USA 16%
• KHI-DUBAI -9%

• And the competitive position with reference to space matrix is -2.2

Rapid Market Growth

Quadrant 2 Quadrant 1
LHR-KHI 19%
LHR-ISB 10%
ISB-USA 16%

Strong
Weak Quadrant 3 -2.2 Quadrant 4 Competitive
Competitive
KHI-DUBAI -9% position
position

Slow Market Growth


THE END

QUESTIONS AND QUERIES

You might also like