Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Nutr., 27 May 2022
Sec. Nutrition and Food Science Technology
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.904812

Edible Insects in Latin America: A Sustainable Alternative for Our Food Security

  • Department of Chemical and Food Engineering, Grupo de Diseño de Productos y Procesos (GDPP), Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia

Nowadays, the food industry faces paramount challenges in different areas, since worldwide consumers are increasing every day, and at the same time, they are demanding new convenient products. Recent studies show that the current food production system is unsustainable over time and therefore is necessary to create new alternatives of production. New food trends are focused on the consumption of natural products, that have an eco-friendly production approach, and a beneficial nutritional profile for the consumer’s health. Hence, products are being created to not only have good organoleptic characteristics, but also to contain a wide variety of micro and macronutrients, and to be sustainable within their production. For this reason, the use of raw materials that satisfy the needs previously mentioned is being implemented. For instance, the use of insects as raw material, because they have a high protein content comparable to animal-based foods. Specifically, ants and crickets can contain between 9 and 77% protein of dry weight, while beef contains between 25 and 28%. On the other hand, insects present an ease and sustainable production system, compared to livestock farming, since some of them feed with food waste generated by humans. In addition, require less food for their upbringing; insects can convert 2 kg of feed into 1 kg of insect mass, while cattle use 8 kg of feed to produce 1 kg of body weight. On the other hand, there is evidence that insects produce fewer greenhouse gases during their production, for example, pigs produce between 10 and 100 times more greenhouse gases per kg of weight. United States, Mexico, Chile, Peru, and Argentina have begun to develop and consume these products; thus, promoting different and new ventures. Large-scale production of insect-based food products could help solve or even prevent the looming food problem and contribute to the sustainable development goals set by the United Nations. Thus, the aim of this review work was to compile and investigate the edible insect’s alternatives in Latin America, as well as the commercially available or potential derivative products. We discussed the nutritional value of edible insects, and how they could contribute to food security.

Introduction

The constant growth of the population results in an increase of food production and consumption; it is estimated that by the year 2050, there will be approximately 10,000 million people (1). Figure 1 shows the population growth estimated by the FAO until the year 2100. Feeding this future population is one of the greatest challenges for agrifood industries, since not only demographic and economic factors must be taken into account, but also those related to natural resources such as water and energy (2). In countries like China, much of this population growth has occurred, and an increase in meat consumption has been associated (3). It is expected that by 2035 the population in China will be almost 1.41 billion (4), this rise in meat consumption brings China to surpass the US as the world’s leader in meat consumption (5). In China, meat consumption increased from 8 million tons in 1978 to about 9 million in 2020 (6); it is estimated that the global consumption of animal protein by 2050 could increase by 60% (7). These trends are facing several challenges for food and agriculture industries because meat consumption tendencies are causing massive deforestation, water scarcity, soil depletion and high levels of greenhouse gas emissions that cannot offer or promote sustainable agriculture and food production (8). According to a FAO report, published in 2017, if climate change and the exploitation of natural resources continue to intensify in the same way, humanity is at risk of not being able to feed itself (7). Livestock (including cattle, pigs, and sheep) occupies 70% of agricultural land, which corresponds to 30% of the land area and additionally 77 million tons of protein are used, of which 58 are recovered for human consumption (9). Likewise, livestock is responsible for 18% of all greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of anthropic origin; the main sources and types of GHG from livestock systems are methane production from animals (25%), carbon dioxide (CO2) from land use and its changes (32%), and nitrous oxide (N2O) from manure and slurry management (31%). These gases are usually converted to units of CO2 equivalent (CO2 eq.) that have varying global warming potential (10).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Population growth estimated by de FAO until year 2100 (7).

This raises the question not only of whether it is possible to supply this growing demand, but also of the effects it would have on natural resources and the environment if this food production system is maintained (7). All these factors are presented as an obstacle to produce the food required by the population and animals (7). Therefore, it is necessary to search for alternatives that satisfy the future demand of food (11). Considering the above, in recent years, industries and some consumers are looking for alternatives to mitigate this effect. The demand for food is therefore changing toward new habits of production, sale, purchase, and consumption of food that are healthier, friendly to the environment and seek animal welfare (7). For this reason, innovative systems are needed to protect natural resources without reducing productivity. It becomes essential to make better use of resources where the production, conservation and packaging processes generate the least impact on the environment and ecosystems. Consequently, the models would be more sustainable over time and are going to be inspired by the circular economy (12).

Within this new system, the principle of efficiency is implemented, where the aim is to do more with less, that is, to develop functional foods, new ingredients and materials or energy from co-products, by-products, or waste (13). For example, waste such as bones, hooves, viscera, horns, skins, blood, feathers, bird carcasses, eggshells, among others, which have a significant content of protein, lipid compounds, fiber, etc., can be used as ingredients for food production or used in industry as natural additives (14). On the one hand, foods that are efficient in their production are also of interest because they require less space, water, and are less polluting. Likewise, the ingredients obtained from microalgae, bacteria, yeasts, fungi, or cultured animal cells are highlighted because they consume fewer natural resources (12). On the other hand, among the new foods in development is cultured meat or in vitro meat that is obtained from stem cells of animal muscles because it consumes 45% less energy, produces 96% fewer emissions and requires 99% less land (15). Similarly, insects have stood out in this group because they have high nutritional quality while generating environmental benefits (16). For these reasons, the breeding, production, distribution, and sale of insects, for animal and human consumption, started to be implemented a few years ago (17). Thus, the consumption of insects emerges as a possible solution for feeding an increasingly growing population and as an alternative to contribute to environmental sustainability.

In this way, the novelty of the present review was to identify and study the alternatives Latin America can offer regarding edible insects and how we could take advantage of them in order to develop products with the possibility to be commercialized. Taking into account the nutritional values these insects can provide us, we debated about its contribution to food security.

For this review article, databases such as ScienceDirect, Wiley, Web of science, Springer, and Researchgate, were used. To search for information related to the topic that the article is going to deal with, keywords such as food security, edible insects, Latin America, sustainability, entomophagy, insects nutrition value, food safety, insects breeding, products based on edible insects, food of the future, insects rearing, insectsconsumption, were implemented. Research was made not only of articles but also of web pages belonging to brands that work with edible insects, and books focused on the consumption of insects from the development of new products. It is important to mention that the period implemented when searching for articles, books, web pages, etc., was between 2000 and 2022.

Entomophagy and Environmental, Nutritional, and Social Benefits of Insect’s Consumption

The term entomophagy refers to the ingestion of insects and has been considered an alternative or additional source of animal protein, which is an important source of micro and macronutrients for humans (18). Edible insect are estimated to be part of the diet of at least two billion people around the world, with more than 2,100 species of insects currently used as food (19). However, possibly all species of insect are edible (20). The most consumed insects worldwide are beetles (31%), caterpillars (17%) and bees, wasps and ants (15%). In addition, grasshoppers, crickets, locusts (14%), cicadas, leafhoppers, mealybugs, bedbugs (11%), termites (3%), dragonflies, flies, and others (9%), etc. are also consumed (21). Insects can be consumed at all stages of their development, including eggs, larvae, nymphs, pupae, and adults (20). They are raised, traded and exported in different ways: canned, fried, in syrup, with chocolate, with garlic sauce, among other preparations (22). In 2022 it was reported that entomophagy is practiced mostly in countries such as Thailand, Ghana, Mexico, China, Brazil, Australia, Japan, and the Netherlands (23). For example, China has a lot of edible insects but the two most famous ones are the Antheraea pernyi and Bombyx mori worms, the former was evaluated as a highly potentially edible insect (24, 25) and the latter as the perfect mass production system reared (26). Figure 2 presents a geographical map indicating the registry of insect species that are consumed by country (17).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Recorded number of edible insect’s species, by country (16).

However, despite various environmental, nutritional, and social benefits of using insects in the human diet, in Western countries most of the population rejects the idea of consuming them, for cultural reasons and for considering them unpleasant and harmful (27). Other aspects that cast doubt on the use of insects to feed animals and humans is the legislative issue and whether they can really be produced on a large scale to meet the high demand (28). Nevertheless, entomophagy is a practice to which benefits are attributed in different fields such as the environment, consumption and social, as discussed below.

Environmental Benefits

Due to insect are cold-blooded species, food conversion becomes really efficient compared to other species. There is an evidence that insects emit less greenhouse gases and ammonia compared to conventional livestock (20, 29). Thanks of these benefits, insect farming has been suggested as a promising alternative to conventional livestock production, even in Western societies (30). Another environmental advantage of this feeding practice is the use of food waste as feed for insect farms (17). First, various insects feed on food waste that humans and traditional livestock cannot eat. Insects eat food waste and as a result, a bad disposition and incineration are avoided (17). Likewise, insects do not compete with humans for the same food, as cattle do in some cases, that is, insect farming does not take from the planet’s already limited resources, but rather helps reduce food waste (31, 32). In the same way, entomophagy is a practice that uses much less water than traditional cattle since there are insects such as mealworms that are more resistant to drought (17). Finally, insect are less dependent on the land than traditional livestock farming since their small size allows them to take more advantage of the ground space both horizontally and vertically (29).

Consumption Benefits

Insect are being cataloged as a food source of high nutritional value, compared to meat or fish, since some of them have a large amount of micro and macronutrients (33). This food especially contains proteins, amino acids and is rich in fiber and minerals such as copper, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, manganese, selenium, and zinc (34). Proteins represent the main component in the nutritional composition of insects and their content is variable. Beetles and larvae have a protein content between 20 and 71%, flies and mosquitoes between 36 and 70%, dragonflies between 37 and 68%, bees, bumblebees, wasps, and ants between 10 and 64%, caterpillars and moths between 13 and 64% and crickets and grasshoppers between 27 and 76% (20). Different kinds of insects have a high protein content that is comparable to foods derived from animals such as beef (25–28%), pork (20–37%), chicken (22.8%) (35, 36), and fish (14–63%) (22). Similarly, insects have good quality amino acids and are rich in essential amino acids. The main amino acids they contain are glutamic and aspartic acids, phenylalanine, alanine, proline, leucine, tyrosine, valine, and methionine (20). Likewise, edible insects have registered high digestibility values, although the species of insects and the technological processing can influence this parameter (17). It is worth noting that digestibility of insect proteins is between 78 and 98% (20).

As it can be seen, high protein content, which includes all essential amino acids, the presence of unsaturated fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals, make both insects and meat highly nutritious (33). Although there is still extensive research required on the nutrient composition of edible insects, it is undisputed that they represent an alternative sustainable source for animal-related protein for food and feed in general (37).

Social Benefits

In terms of benefits for the social environment, important livelihood diversification strategies can be achieved through the breeding and collection of insects. This is because they can be collected directly from the environment in a simple way and technical means or significant investments are not required to access basic breeding and collection equipment (38). On the other hand, catching, cultivation, processing and sale of insect are activities that can contribute to a direct improvement of the diet and income for society in general (39). Likewise, the breeding and collection of insects can generate business opportunities in developed economies. Lastly, these animals can be easily processed to serve as food for humans as some species can be consumed whole or can be made into paste or ground to make flour or extract their proteins (17). Considering these characteristics, the economic and social factors that make insect farming more desirable than animal husbandry are that insect harvesting and breeding require low technology and capital investment choices and that the cultivation of insects provides living opportunities to both the urban and the rural population (40, 41). Additionally, due to the high resource efficiency and good nutritional value of insects, insect rearing for entomophagy seems to fit perfectly with a modern food production system (30).

Types of Edible Insects Around the World and Latin-America

In many parts of the world, especially in the middle east, insect are commonly used as a source of food. As of 2012, over 1,900–2,100 species have been recorded as part of the diet in continents as Asia, Africa, Oceania, and North and South America (38). This is because of the high diversity of insects that are highly nutritious and a healthy food for people, but it is also because of the ability of many species to breed quickly. Additionally, insect are efficient in converting their food into protein, and some species can be reared on organic waste. As it was said, the orders of species of insects, that are most consumed are the ones shown in Figure 3. Coleoptera is the largest order as it has 350,000 species that are found in almost all habitats. Nowadays, Mexico, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, and Chile are Latin American countries that have more species belonging to this order according to Data Basin: a science-based mapping and analysis platform of environmental stewardship (42). Lepidoptera, the second largest order of insects, includes the moths, butterflies, and skippers, and there are approximately 180,000 species. In Latin America, Lepidopteras are more common in Mexico and Costa Rica (43). Hymenoptera includes such familiar groups as ants, wasps, and bees; these insect are consumed in many regions of the world because of the nutritional value they have (44). The countries in Latin America that have a lot of species belonging to this order are Mexico, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Ecuador, and Brazil (45). The Orthoptera group includes grasshoppers, locusts, katydids, and crickets; common edible insects worldwide, particularly in Japan and Thailand (38). The Isoptera group are insects that live in nests of diverse morphologies that receive the name of termite mounds. At last, Odonata and Diptera are the orders that mostly incorporate dragonflies and flies, respectively. Dragonfly nymphs are an accepted food in many regions of the world, with 29 edible species recorded. On the contrary, flies and cockroaches are not typical foods for people, although both types of insects were eaten in ancient times. Different species of flies that feed on organic matter can be used to convert organic wastes into fertilizers. Moreover, the bodies of insect are rich in protein and are therefore used as animal feed (46). In 2014, 735 species of insects were scientifically identified in Latin America. Table 1 shows the number of edible insect species in the different countries of Latin America (47). These countries consume more Coleoptera species, then Hymenoptera, then Lepidoptera and finally Isoptera. Likewise, it was identified that northern Mexico, Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and southern Brazil are the countries that consume and use the most insects for food. In Figure 4 can be observed that Mexico and Costa Rica have more of those groups of insects in Latin America compared to the other countries (45).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Orders of species of insects that are more consumed (46).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Number of edible insects in different countries of Latin America [modified from Medeiros (47)].

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Latin America’s insects. (A) Coleopteras in Latin America (42), (B) Hymenopteras in Latin America (45). (C) Lepidopteras in Latin America (43).

Nutritional Properties and Quality of Edible Insects

The nutritional values of insects can vary depending on their metamorphosis, origin, diet, and the preparation processes carried out before the consumption (48). In addition, the composition of insects is also different depending on the species to which the insect belongs (34). However, many of the edible insects provide enough energy and protein for the human diet and, furthermore, some are healthier than many of the meats that are consumed today. According to Payne et al. (49), crickets, palm weevil larvae and mealworm are significantly healthier than chicken and meat. Finally, it is important to mention that insects also contain enough energy, protein, amino acids necessary for the human diet, and have a high content of mono and polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamins (48). Nutritional data indicates that the content of good quality protein is high in insects, since it is approximately 50% of the total weight of the insect and, in addition, that they contain high contents of essential amino acids (46). In Table 2, the proximal composition of some orders is shown. Ortodopthera stands out for its high protein content (61.32 g/100 g db). Into the detail, Table 3 compares protein content between some edible insects and foods derived from animals. Also, it is important to mention that some insects store large amounts of fat; approximately between 10 and 60%. The insect that has the greatest fat content is the dragonfly, since it has between 8.6 and 15.2 g per 100 g of insect (48). In addition, generally they have high levels of unsaturated fatty acids. For example, termites, belonging to the Isoptera order, have a proportion of 74.19% unsaturated fatty acids, ants have 79.99% unsaturated fatty acids and grasshoppers a value of 77.5% unsaturated fatty acids (46). Regards to the fiber content, it is between 5.06% for Isoptera to 13.56% for Hemiptera. Species with a lower fiber content are part of the orders Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and Orthoptera; Aegiale hesperiaris, Apis mellifera, and Brachytrupes spp., respectively, since they contain between 0.12 and 11.61% of fiber (50). Similarly, insects have good quality amino acids and are rich in essential amino acids; the main amino acids they contain are glutamic and aspartic acids, phenylalanine, alanine, proline, leucine, tyrosine, valine, and methionine. In addition, glutamic acid, leucine, and alanine are also highlighted (20). The amino acid that orders contain the most is leucine; 74.2 mg/g protein for Coleoptera, 62.7 mg/g protein for Lepidoptera, 78.4 mg/g protein for Hymenoptera, 74.8 mg/g protein for Orthoptera, 49.8 mg/g protein for Hemiptera, 78.3 mg/g protein for Isoptera and 57.4 mg/g protein for Diptera (50).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Proximal composition of some orders [taken from Rumpold and Schlüter (50)].

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Protein content of edible insects and foods derivates from animals (50).

As it can be seen, protein, fat, mineral and vitamin, essential components to sustain life, contents in insects generally satisfy the requirements of healthy food, although there is considerable variation associated with insect species, collection site, processing method, insect life stage, rearing technology and insect feed (51, 52). In the same way, edible insects have the potential to benefit human health due to their nutritional characteristics (53). For instance, some insect-based food, like cricket powder, contain high quantities of bioactive peptides with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties (53). Also, the unsaturated fatty acid content of insects may help to reduce the risk of developing cardiovascular disease (54). Moreover, contents of essential micronutrients in crickets and other edible insects have the potential to prevent anemia and improve immune function, cognitive function, and gastrointestinal health in humans (53). The acquired knowledge indicates that edible insect are a valuable food product and that their widespread use in the human diet may help solve the problem of global malnutrition (33).

Even though insect are not generally consumed due to lack of knowledge in taste and little familiarity, there are countries that have a remarkable market value for edible insects and consume them because of their high nutritional quality. For instance, Latin America, with a market value of $92.2 million in 2018, is the second largest market for edible insects in the world. Additionally, it is known that Mexico, Ecuador, Colombia, Brazil and Venezuela, consume the most insects as an alternative food source (55). It is important to know that the total production around the world of edible insects per year is 60,000–67,000 tons approximately of which 4,500–6,000 are produced in Latin America. In Mexico it is common to consume the following insects: “Chapulines” (grasshopper), “Chicatana” (ant), “Gusano blanco maguey” (maguey grub), “Escamol” (ant egg), and “Ahuahutles” (mosquito eggs). It should be noted that ants or “Chicatanas” are also consumed in countries such as Colombia and Brazil. The nutritional composition and essential amino acid content of these five species are shown in Table 4 (56). Likewise, it is important to mention that the beetle, belonging to the Coleoptera order, is in the ranking of the most consumed insects in Latin America (55). Specifically, the most famous beetle, which is widely produced in Latin American and Caribbean countries, is the Tenebrio molitor, commonly known as the mealworm or flour beetle (57). Optiprot, one of the many Mexican companies that work with this insect, produces 0.4 tons of this edible insect per month, and that is, 4.8 tons of mealworm per year (57, 58).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Nutritional composition of five edible insects from México (g/100 g dry basis) (56).

Insect Production Systems and their Derived Products

The rearing of insects has been practiced for 7,000 years with different purposes like sericulture (silk), apiculture (honey), biological control of pests and the production of medicinal products (59). It has deep roots in tropical areas of Asia, Africa, and Latin America, where insects represent an important component of local diet. However, the practice has progressively expanded to Western countries (60). For insects to be considered a viable micro livestock, it must be possible to produce them on a large scale in a sustainable, secure and qualified way (17). Until now, they have developed controlled and artificial conditions for mass rearing. However, there are still several hurdles preventing the scaling up of insect farming for human and animal consumption (60, 61). The most important barrier is that until now there is not known the ideal specie of insect that have high egg production, a short larval stage, high weights of larvae or pupae, a high productivity, low feed costs, low vulnerability to diseases, ability to live in high densities, and a high-quality protein content, among others (61). In the same way, optimal conditions of temperature, light, humidity, ventilation, feed composition and quality, etc., are not yet known (62). The efficiency of insect farms in terms of feed conversion depends on rearing conditions. Temperature and humidity must be ensured to optimize the insect growth; typically, temperatures range between 20 and 35°C and humidity levels from 55 to 75% are required (60, 63). For large-scale production, critical elements including research on insect biology, suitable rearing conditions, and diet formulas are required (64). Moreover, nowadays for insect farming it is necessary manual labor to complete tasks such as feeding, collection, cleaning and rehousing which has as a consequence that farm-reared insect are expensive, even when feed costs are low (61). This means that to achieve commercial mass production automation is needed for insects to be an attractive alternative and economically competitive to beef and poultry protein (61, 64). Rearing insects in mechanized facilities involves high designed equipment, mechanization, industrial intensive, varieties of production elements, computerizations and cost effectiveness (65). To produce insects, two units are needed: (i) a reproduction unit where adults can mate and lay their eggs and (ii) a production unit where the eggs are sown on substrate (66). In Figure 5 can be seen different types of breeding containers (17).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Types of breeding Containers for Crickets. (A) Concrete cylinder pen breeding container, (B) concrete block pen breeding container, (C) plywood boxes breeding container, and (D) plastic drawers breeding container (67).

Nowadays, there is no ideal insect production system for most kinds of insects (68). The industrial production scheme of insects is based on controlling the life cycle of the target species of production, being separated, like other livestock productions, by stages of reproduction, rearing and fattening (69). Dobermann et al. (61) proposed a general model for insect production with four different phases. First, it is important to consider the specific feeding, for the type of insect, and in this way begin the rearing process [larvae/nymph, pupae, adult (breeding colony), and finally eggs]. It is fundamental to highlight that at this stage, special care must be taken with the conditions for raising the insect and it is essential to monitor the quality and safety of the crop. Secondly, classification of the different stages of development of the insects will proceed and then the automated harvesting process. For instance, adults are kept in containers that are provided with feeding substrate and water (60, 70). In the same way, oviposition sites should be reduced to specific locations inside the breeding containers to allow easier egg collection. Small boxes sealed with moisture can be used where females can preferentially spawn. Decomposing grain saturated with water, peat moss, coconut husks and other organic matter can be also used depending on the insect species (60). In third place, the post-harvest process of insects is proposed, which includes the process that would ensure food safety and quality and the processing of the insect into an edible food (61). Finally, the last phase consists in the packing, storage, transportation and consumption of food or feed (61). Nonetheless, in some countries the mass farming of specific types of insects already exists. For example, crickets are grown in large boxes ranging from 36 to 60 cm deep filled with different materials, most commonly cardboard, such as egg cartons (Figure 5C) or packing dividers for shipping to increase surface spaces (Figure 5B) (71). Additionally, these insects should be reared in humid environments and for that reason they are traditionally raised in plastic bins that contain damp sponges (to maintain the humid environment) (72). Favorable conditions for crickets are warm temperature (29–35°C) and high relative humidity (50%) (73, 74). Additionally, on the bottom of the box they must have a layer of potting soil or something similar. On the other hand, a female cricket usually lays around 100 eggs, but it is possible that over the course of her life (8–10 weeks as an adult) she lays 3,000 eggs (72). The eggs hatch in about 6–14 days but this will depend with the temperature and cricket species. At temperatures of between 28 and 35°C, the eggs hatch between 1 and 2 weeks. At low temperature eggs take a longer period to hatch, 20–21 days at 25°C and 76 days at 15°C (75). Each harvesting cycle is between 28 and 35 days (76). In the United States, Canada, and Europe, crickets are typically fed a combination of vegetables, corn and soybeans (77). However, kales (Brassica oleracea var. ocephala), banana peels (Musa acuminate), sweet potato vines (Ipomoea batatas), and ugali are used as cricket feed (78). According to a United States industry consultant, crickets are slaughtered by different methods; by freezing, shredding or heating. Sometimes, they freeze-dried alive or dead to remove all water (72). On the other hand, unlike crickets, the first stage of mealworm farming is breeding darkling beetles (79). Female beetles lay approximately 500 eggs during her lifetime and they will take about 2–3 weeks to hatch (80). After eggs hatch, producers focus on growing the larvae as quickly as possible; they will take about 10–12 weeks to reach the right size (80). Mealworms usually use diets of cereal bran or flour and fresh vegetables (e.g., carrot, apple, potato, or cabbage) as a water source, or flour with water and a source of protein. Protein sources commonly used to complement the diet include beer yeast, casein and soy protein (81, 82). At this moment, they are separated from the colony and they are then slaughtered in a variety of methods; the most common methods are freezing or freeze-drying (72). Finally, mealworms can adapt to tolerate a wide range of temperatures, as they act and eat normally at 15–40°C, and can survive at 0–15°C and 40–45°C (83) and they must have 60–75% relative humidity (82). Black soldier flies originally came from Latin America, but are now established in most of the world, and are common in the United States and Europe (84). The rearing of these insects requires hot and humid conditions and typically, they are raised in netted. The best range of temperature for the larvae to pupate is from 25 to 30°C. For mating purposes, optimal temperature is around 28°C (85). According to Bullock et al. (86), black soldier fly larvae develop most rapidly at 70% humidity boxes. Usually, they are feed with cereal, fruits and vegetables that are positioned at the bottom of the box (72). Black soldier flies typically lay eggs in cracks and crevices and these eggs must be moved and maintained in a nursery bin with high temperature, up to 30°C; they hatch after up to 10 days (87). The females lay between 320 and 1,000 eggs, on a dry substrate in a humid environment (87). On the other hand, the larvae of this insect might be an especially cheap insect to farm because they are usually fed with cereals, fruits, vegetables, meat and animal waste. Finally, when black soldier fly larvae are fully grown, they crawl out of the substrate; in other words, they “self-harvest.” This insect is frequently shredded and freeze-dried to produce a powdered product (74).

Taking into account that the breeding and reproduction of insects varies depending on their class, it is evident that their processing to turn them into food for humans or animals will also be different (88). New technologies are currently being developed to transform insects into edible foods that meet safety regulations (89). Pre-processing technologies represents the first step of each edible insects processing route and mainly consist of insect harvesting/separation from the substrate residuals, insects’ inactivation, removal of wings/legs, and washing (50). First, there is blanching, which is used to reduce microbiological contamination and inactivate enzymes. It consists in a short boiling step followed by a rapid cooling in flowing cold water to reduce microbial counts and to inactivate the enzymes responsible for spoilage and food poisoning (90). It is usually performed prior to food processes such as drying, frying, canning, and freeze- drying (91). However, the most used technology to increase insect’s life is drying, since it reduces microbiological activity, degradation reactions and moisture content (92). It is important to highlight that when carrying out this process, alterations in the nutritional and physical profile of the insect can occur like alterations in protein content, lipid oxidation, and color variation (93). Other methods are often used to ensure a better ratio of macronutrients in the final insect feed, e.g., to reduce lipid or chitin contents, or to obtain derived products such as oil and protein powders and pellets.

These processes have allowed edible insects to be marketed in different ways today; for example, whole (dried, frozen, and pre-cooked), processed or in extracts (94). In Western countries, the practice of entomophagy is still not very common because insect are associated and classified as unpleasant, dirty, and dangerous (17). However, in Colombia the consumption of insects is common despite being a westernized country (95). The Santandereana ant known as the “Culona” ant and whose scientific name is Atta laevigata is common in the departments of Santander and Casanare in Colombia. They are used as food by the inhabitants, attributing aphrodisiac properties to them (96). In 2013, in the department of Santander, Granados et al. (96) carried out on toasting and the production of flour from Santanderean ants. That article describes the different stages of pre-treatment and treatment to obtain ant toasted flour. In the first place, to fry or roast the ants, they must be collected, which is done outside the anthills manually or with the help of equipment, such as a sucker. The collected ants are transported in sealed containers to the place where the selection and cleaning is done. The future queen ants are selected, their wings, legs and head are removed and the residues of sand, stones, earth, etc. are removed. This selection operation is done manually. Afterward, a blanching process is carried out for 2 min at a temperature of 89.85°C until the ants are sacrificed. Subsequently, the elaboration of the roasted product begins. Firstly, pre-roasting is done for 30 min at a temperature of 69.85°C and then for toasting a temperature of 89.85°C is used for 20 min. Then, grinding is carried out where the aim is to reduce the size of the particles. Having the crushed product and there being a greater contact surface with the medium, a more even drying is achieved for 1 h. The final moisture percentage should not exceed 5%. Then the unitary sieving operation is carried out with a sieve of 40 microns in diameter to obtain a final product with uniform granulation. Finally, they are placed in the transport and commercialization containers (96).

Finally, it is possible to conclude that in order to scale the production process of insects and products derived from them, the breeding and growth characteristics of the species of insects must be known (97). Additionally, a good post-processing of the insects must be guaranteed so that they can be transformed into edible food (38). So far, in Eastern countries, specific production systems have been developed for some insects, such as crickets and flies, since their characteristics are already known (70). In the same way, these production systems already have their regulation (98). On the contrary, in Western countries, the practice of entomophagy is new and therefore there is not enough information to allow the implementation of a definitive production process (99). However, processing systems such as that of the “Culona” ant are beginning to be studied few years ago (96). Nevertheless, it can be highlighted that production systems of edible insects worldwide are trying to implement good manufacturing practices not only to warrant the processing of the insects into an edible food but also to guarantee food safety and quality (61). In western countries, providing information about the nutritional and environmental benefits of entomophagy is a common intervention aimed to increase Westerners’ acceptance of edible insects (100).

Current Food Products that are Commercialized or With the Potential to Be Commercialized

There is a large number of ventures in the world, where the focus is insects as food for humans. In the last 10 years, around 133 companies from Europe, South Asia and North America have sold this type of food (20). For example, they sell different types of bread, pasta such as curry, salsa, candy for children, pate, energy bars, drinks with or without alcohol, cookies, corn tortillas, pasta, hamburgers, sausages, among others (20). Much content of these products is based on insect meal; amounts between 1 and 25%, with crickets being the most used in the first place, followed by fly larvae and mealworms (20). Some of the most recognized companies in the United States, Europe, and Mexico are: Exo Protein (United States), Entosense (United States), Brooklyn Bugs (United States), Entomo Farms (United States), Chapul (United States), Griyum (Mexico), BeCrickets (Mexico), Smart Bites (Mexico), Becrit (Spain), Crunchy Critters (United Kingdom), Entis Store (Finland) and Jimini’s (France). It is important to emphasize that each of these enterprises manages different products for different users. For example, “Exoprotein” manages cricket flour, energy and protein bars for athletes (101). “Becrickets” manages cricket flour as the only product and is also focused on people who practice sports due to the high amount of protein that this product has (102). On the other hand, “Becrit” is an enterprise that manages a single product, and this is known as an insect-based protein shake which has three different flavors: strawberries and white chocolate; vanilla, coconut, and cinnamon; and chocolate. It is a shake intended for those people who have an active physical activity but who specifically do crossfit (103).

One of the enterprises that manages the most products is “Crunchy Critters” since within its offer are buffalo worms, mealworms, crickets, and lobsters, with which they make all kinds of snacks or flours (104). On the other hand, “Entosense” is a venture that aims to bring insects closer to the American diet with the help of various products that adjust to their tastes, that is, salts, lollipops with insects inside, cookies, snacks, etc (105). A venture like “Entosense” is “Brooklyn Bugs,” however, the difference between these two is that “Brooklyn Bugs” does not sell products but rather conducts training or events where knowledge about their preparation is acquired.

It is necessary to highlight that there are ventures that point to the commitment to enhance the care of the environment. One of these enterprises is “Griyum” which distributes all kinds of products but from other companies and offers companies the opportunity to transform processed products in foods rich in nutrients (106). Another venture that has the same objective of improving the environmental situation is “Entomo Farms” which manages fertilizers, pet food, protein shakes, protein bars, snacks, cricket flour, among others (107). “Smart Bites,” “Chapul,” and “Jimini’s” are ventures that target people who care about their health through diet and exercise, are not afraid of eating insects and/or seek natural products over processed products (102).

On the other hand, several United States companies, as stated above, have become interested in the business of producing and selling insect food products. “Chirps Chips” make use of crickets from some North American farms and produce cricket “chips” that additionally contain corn, bean, and chia seeds, making them a product of nutritional interest (32). Similarly, other companies develop these kinds of products such as “All Things Bugs,” that produces and sells cricket powder; “Chapul,” which manufactures cricket protein bars (108); “Sens,” that produces cricket protein bars and cricket flour (109) and finally “Hotlix” that produces and sells candies based on insects such as ants, scorpions, crickets, and worms; one of its innovative products is the inclusion of foods such as chocolate covered crickets and scorpion lollipops (32).

Now, focusing more on food products based on insects made in countries from Latin America, it is important to highlight that most, or it could be said that almost all of them, do not have a regulatory framework that stables the breeding of insects for the production and marketing of their products (110). For example, Argentina does not have such a framework, however, progress has been made in the creation of one where the genuineness of insects and the establishment of criteria for their safety will be ensured (111). Companies such as “Ento Piruw” (Peru) and “Food for the future,” better known as “F4F,” (Chile) handle insect-based products but are aware that in their countries they are not regulations that establish the use of insects in human food (20). “Ento Piruw” is responsible for the production and marketing of energy bars made from the species Tenebrio molitor (mealworm) and its product is aimed at the sports sector (112). On the other hand, “F4F” is a Chilean company that will open a plant to produce insect meal and oil in order to help reduce the carbon and ecological footprint in salmon farming; they seek to ensure the food of the future (113).

In countries like Brazil, not many insect-based products are known since their consumption is undervalued due to the few studies that exist about entomophagy (114). However, studies indicate that most Brazilian indigenous groups do tend to consume them (114); it is important to mention that in Latin America, there are approximately 50 million indigenous people and that is, about 10% of the total population (115). Back to the topic, 39 Brazilian indigenous groups, consider that insect are one of the most fundamental food resources in their diet and they can consume grasshoppers, termites, cockroaches and even their own lice (114). Another of the Latin American countries that does not have a specific regulation to produce insects is Costa Rica, however, it is recognized for being a tropical country with great capacities to produce crickets. Costa Rica can produce a large amount of flour based on crickets (116). Statistics indicate that it is expected to produce and export an amount of 2 tons of cricket flour to countries such as Mexico, the United States and some European countries in the year 2024 (116). In Figure 6, can be seen some of the products mentioned above.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Food products derived from edible insects. (A) Demolitor’s protein bar ® (Ento Piruw), (B) edible insect lollipops ® (Crunchy Critters), (C) Cricket Snacks - Maca Canela ® (Smart Bites), (D) Cricket Proteína + Vegetable Chocolate Flavor ® (BeCrickets).

Returning to the topic, there are companies that have goals such as: perfecting insect-based products and expanding traditional gastronomic diversity. “Arthrofood,” is a Colombian company, which in addition to fulfilling the two aforementioned objectives, seeks to save the world from our table and have a future with sustainable food (117). It is a company that breeding two species of tropical crickets: G. assimilis and G. sigillatus; through mating, incubation of eggs, to finally produce flour from this insect; they implement a totally friendly alternative to the environment (118). At the same time, the consumption of insects in Colombia is given in greater proportion by the indigenous people belonging to the Amazon basin. For example, indigenous groups like Yagua, Bora, Iquitos, and Capicuna (119), consume in their daily diet, as a source of protein and fat, the larva of the beetle Rhynchophorus palmarum (120). Today not only the indigenous people consume it, but also restaurants use it as a raw material. For example, in Medellín Colombia, the restaurant inspired by Amazonian flavors: “La Chagra,” includes a dish whose recipe is focused on these larvae and is known as the “Pachamama” dish (118). In the department of Santander, another species of insect known as the “culonas ants” (Atta laevigata) are consumed, which have a very high commercial potential and are also very well received in the market to develop products based on it (119).

Although this alternative is not widely used in Colombia, there are studies focused on the possibility and formalization of new insect-based products that demonstrate the nutritional and sensory potential of entomophagy. For example, students from the Universidad de los Andes, developed the formulation of a hamburger meat based on cricket flour and subsequently studied the properties and microbiological quality of the product. This study proposed an experimental design in which the percentage of cricket flour and the type of binder used in the formulation were varied. As a result, they found that the best formulation to resemble their control sample: Pietran’s Veggie meat; was using 25% cricket flour and potato starch (121). On the other hand, there is a study, where a granola-type bar based on cricket flour was developed. This bar not only met attributes similar to those of an ideal bar, but was also known as good protein source since it provides 16.76% of the recommended daily value. Its percentage of total carbohydrates was lower than that of commercial bars and its percentage of moisture complied with the standard (95). There are also books that provide information and recipes for the development of products or dishes from insect-based ingredients. A specific case would be the book “Desde Cundinamarca. Harina de grillo: gastronomía y sostenibilidad para Colombia y el mundo,” which has a large number of recipes that allow the reader to discover different ways of implementing cricket flour and at the same time realize how it can contribute to the development of a healthy and sustainable diet (122).

How Can Insects Contribute to Food Security?

Food security is a problem in many developing and less developed countries due to increase in human population and decrease in crop productivity and food availability (40). Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life (89). The four pillars of food security are availability, access, utilization and stability; while the nutritional dimension is considered integral to the concept of food security (123). Nations worldwide are feeling increasing pressure to improve the food system and to overcome the food crisis. For that reason, companies and governmental agencies have implemented various methods to improve food supply by introducing new technologies that are more efficient, cost-effective, and yield better crops such as genetically modified foods (124). However, food insecurity is still a common problem among low-income households in developing countries (125, 126).

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aim to end all forms of hunger and malnutrition by 2030, making sure all people—especially children and the more vulnerable people—have access to sufficient and nutritious food throughout the year (127). The aim is to ensure that everyone everywhere has enough good-quality food to lead a healthy life. This involves promoting sustainable agricultural practices improving the livelihoods and capacities of small scale farmers, allowing equal access to land, technology and markets (128). It also requires international cooperation to ensure investment in infrastructure and technology to improve agricultural productivity (127). The data for Latin America indicate that 187 million people suffer from moderate or severe food insecurity. Of these, 53.7 million were in a situation of severe food insecurity during the same 3-year-period. Approximately two-thirds of that population was concentrated in South America, and the rest in Mesoamerica (129). In South America the prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity increased by 20.5% between 2014 and 2020, while in Mesoamerica there was an increase of 7.3% during the same period (130). The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations took an initiative to create a policy and proposed the program of feeding people with alternative sources which includes insects (38). The consumption of insects has been gaining popularity in many Western countries as an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional proteins such as chicken, beef and pork. There are already several companies producing insects for human consumption (131) due to the facility in their rearing, short life cycle, high intrinsic growth rate, the good nutritional properties and the benefits on the environment (132).

Apart from the reasons mentioned above, insects have been well-recognized worldwide as nutritious food since insects provide proteins (amino acids including methionine, cysteine, lysine, and threonine), carbohydrates, fats, some minerals and vitamins, and have energy value (133). In tropical countries most insect species are collected from nature. The reason that insect are predominantly eaten in tropical countries is that they are larger and often occur clumped, which facilitates harvesting. Also, in the absence of a winter season, insect species can be found during the whole year (123). However, consumer disgust remains one of the largest barriers to the adoption of insects as viable sources of protein in many Western countries.

It has been demonstrated the feasibility of the obscure incorporation and fortification of a major food staple, such as rice, by utilizing edible insect flour as a value-adding ingredient. By removing the original form of the insect and incorporating its flour into a food matrix that is widely consumed around the world, could provide an innovative solution for food insecurity and malnutrition, especially in developing countries. Furthermore, the hidden form of the edible insect is designed to reduce the “yuck” factor and increase the acceptance of entomophagy (134). Edible insects, with their high feed conversion efficiency and fecundity, as well as their minimal space for rearing, certainly represent as an advantageous solution for present and future food insecurity (134).

As a conclusion, it is evident that inefficiencies in the current food production system generate inconsistencies between the demand and supply of food resources. The animal protein is not evenly distributed across the globe, as the average person in a “developed” country consumes 40 g more protein a day than the average person in a “developing” country (9). The demand for affordable and sustainable protein is high, while animal protein is becoming more expensive and less accessible in some regions (70). Edible insects have been suggested to be capable of providing a valuable source of food in geographical regions with people suffering from malnutrition and food insecurity, since they can provide protein, vitamins and minerals needed for human health and wellbeing (38, 135). Additionally, entomophagy may be a viable solution to the problem of global food insecurity in terms of the quantity of food required to meet physiological needs. Not only do insects provide calories and nutrients, but they are also cost-effective, easily grown and can be environmentally sustainable when incorporated into a circular production system using organic side streams (136). The establishment of insect production sectors could therefore offer a policy solution to the problem of food insecurity (135). However, several challenges need to be addressed in employing the potential of edible insects to enhance food security. For instance, the nutritional value and health benefits of different insect species should be investigated in more detail to provide the basis for their promotion as a healthy food source (135). In the same way, it is necessary to develop a complete legal framework at the international level that allows the scale of the production process of insects and subsequently the production of derivative products (38).

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is clear that feeding the growing population is unsustainable over time due to the effects this has on society itself and on the environment. For this reason, today, in different parts of the world, it has been seen that there is a need to create and implement new production systems and new product foods. It has been shown that entomophagy is an alternative with good nutritional qualities, that generates benefits for the environment and people’s lives and that could be a solution to unsustainability. Now, talking about insects, it is concluded that they have a great amount of micro and macronutrients, and that breeding and collection of insects could carry out important livelihood diversification strategies for a social environment improvement and generate business opportunities in developed economies.

In Latin America countries consume most species of insects that belong to the orders Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and Isoptera. It has been proven that the two countries that have more species of insects in Latin America are Mexico and Costa Rica and that Mexico has more edible insects compared to the rest of the countries of south and central America.

To scale the production of insects and subsequently the production of derivative products, it is necessary to take into account the type of insect, the diet they require and the optimal conditions for breeding and processing. It was found that temperature and humidity are fundamental conditions to ensure good production and processing of insects. On the other hand, post-harvest process of insects is fundamental to be able to scale the production of these as this includes the operations that would ensure food safety and quality and the processing of the insect into an edible food. So far, blanching has been implemented, which is used to reduce microbiological contamination and inactivate enzymes. It is usually performed prior to food processes such as drying, frying, canning and freeze-drying. In some countries, the mass farming of specific types of insects, like crickets, mealworms and black soldier flies, already exists.

Some Latin America countries do not have a regulatory framework that stables the breeding of insects for the production and marketing of the products, such as Argentina. Countries like Chile, Peru, and Colombia have ventures related with the consumption of food products prepared with insects. Moreover, Brazil does not have ventures because of the lack of information they have about insects, but it is known that indigenous groups tend to consume them, as well as indigenous groups from Colombia. In Colombia, the indigenous people, belonging to the Amazon basin, have the greater proportion of consumption of insects and, even though the alternative of insect consumption is not widely used in this country, there are studies focused on the possibility and formalization of new insect-based products that demonstrate the nutritional and sensory potential of entomophagy.

Facing the current food crisis is a necessity for many countries and, for that reason, it has been proposed as one of the sustainable development goals, which seeks to end all forms of hunger and malnutrition by 2030. It is evident that entomophagy could be considered as a possible solution to this situation because it is less harmful to the environment and insect are nutritious, have high conversion rates and do not require as much space to grow and develop, which could contribute to more people having access to good quality food in all developing countries. Additionally, it would help the growing population to feed itself in the future.

Author Contributions

SA and MP: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, and writing—original draft. MH-C and AS-C: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, and supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2019. New York, NY: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019).

Google Scholar

2. Calicioglu O, Flammini A, Bracco S, Bellù L, Sims R. The future challenges of food and agriculture: an integrated analysis of trends and solutions. Sustainability. (2018) 11:222. doi: 10.3390/su11010222

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Al-Ali E, Shingler A, Huston A, Leung E. Meat: The Past, Present, and Future of Meat in China’s Diet. Waterloo: University of Waterloo (2018).

Google Scholar

4. Hofman B. China’s New Population Numbers Won’t Doom its Growth | East Asia Forum. (2022). Available online at: https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2021/06/06/chinas-new-population-numbers-wont-doom-its-growth/ (accessed April 8, 2022).

Google Scholar

5. Ghose B. Food security and food self- sufficiency in China: from past to 2050. Food Energy Secur. (2014) 3:86–95. doi: 10.1002/fes3.48

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. National Bureau of Statistics. Producción de Carne en 2020. Bauchi: National Bureau of Statistics (2020).

Google Scholar

7. FAO. The Future of Food and Agriculture – Trends and Challenges. Rome: FAO (2017). p. 11–6.

Google Scholar

8. Dagevos H, Voordouw J. Sustainability and Meat Consumption: Is Reduction Realistic?. Wageningen: Agricultural Economics Research Institute, LEI Wageningen University and Research Centre (2013). doi: 10.1080/15487733.2013.11908115

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Premalatha M, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA. Energy-efficient food production to reduce global warmind and ecodegradation: the use of edible insects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. (2011) 15:4357–60. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.115

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Moran D, Wall E. Livestock production and greenhouse gas emissions: defining the problem and specifying solutions. Anim Front. (2011) 1:19–25. doi: 10.2527/af.2011-0012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Henchion M, Hayes M, Mullen AM, Feneelon M, Tiwan B. Future protein supply and demand: strategies and factors influencing a sustainable equilibrium. Foods. (2017) 6:53. doi: 10.3390/foods6070053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Martinez-Alvarez O, Iriondo-DeHond A, Gómez-Estaca J, Del Castillo MD. Nuevas tendencias en la producción y consumo alimentario. Distrib Consum. (2021) 1:51–62.

Google Scholar

13. Nikmaram N, Rosentrater K. Overview of some recent advances in improving water and energy efficiencies in food processing factories. Front Nutr. (2019) 6:20. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Jayathilakan K, Sultana K, Radhakrishna K, Bawa AS. Utilization of byproducts and waste materials from meat, poultry and fish processing industries: a review. J Food Sci Technol. (2012) 49:278–93. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0290-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Stephens N, Di Silvio L, Dunsford I, Ellis M, Glencross A, Sexton A. Bringing cultured meat to market: Technical, socio-political, and regulatory challenges in cellular agriculture. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2018) 78:155–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Bernard T, Womeni HM. ‘Entomophagy: insects as food. In: Shields VD editor. Insect Physiology and Ecology. (London: IntechOpen) (2017).

Google Scholar

17. FAO. The Contribution of Insects to Food Security, the Means of Life and the Environment. Rome: FAO (2013).

Google Scholar

18. Evans J, Alemu MH, Flore R, Frost MB, Halloran A, Jensen AB, et al. ‘Entomophagy’: an evolving terminology in need of review. J Insects Food Feed. (2015) 1:293–305. doi: 10.3920/JIFF2015.0074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Toti E, Massaro L, Kais A, Aiello P, Palmery M, Peluso I. Entomophagy: a narrative review on nutritional value, safety, cultural acceptance and a focus on the role of food neophobia in Italy. Eur J Invest Health Psychol Educ. (2020) 10:628–43. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10020046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Avendaño C, Sánchez M, Valenzuela C. Insectos: son realmente una alternativa para la alimentación de animales y humanos. Rev Chil Nutr. (2020) 47:1029–37. doi: 10.4067/S0717-75182020000601029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. FAO. Looking at Edible Insects from a Food Safety Perspective. Challenges and Opportunities for the Sector. Rome: FAO (2021). doi: 10.4060/cb4094en

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Fleta-Zaragozano J. Entomofagia: >una alternativa a nuestra dieta tradicional? Sanidad Mil. (2018) 74:41–6.

Google Scholar

23. Deshmuhk R. Edible Insects Market Insect Type (Beetles, Cricket, Caterpillars, Grasshoppers, Bees, Ants, Others) Application (Food & Beverage, Bakery, Pet Food, Others) Product Type (Whole, Ingredient): Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2022-2029. (2022). Available online at: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/edible-insects-market-A11035 (accessed April 8, 2022).

Google Scholar

24. Ambühl D. Skyfood – Edible Insects – from the Wild to Cultivation. Unterterzen: Skyfood Publishing (2019). p. 246–9.

Google Scholar

25. Xiaoming C, Ying F, Hong Z, Zhiyong C. Review of the Nutritive Value of Edible Insects. Forest Insects as Food: Humans Bite Back. (2010). Available online at: http://www.doc-developpement-durable.org/file/Elevages/Insectes/edible%20forest%20insects.pdf#page=94 (accessed February 10, 2022).

Google Scholar

26. Li Z, You L, Zhang Q, Yu Y, Tan A. A targeted in-fusion expression system for recombinant protein production in Bombyx mori. Front Genet. (2022) 12:816075. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.816075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Van-Itterbeeck J. Entomophagy and The West. Barriers and Possibilities, Ecological Advantages, and Ethical Desirability. Master thesis. Wageningen: Wageningen University & Research (2008). p. 10–5.

Google Scholar

28. Pino M. Why we still do not eat insects: legal framework in the European Union. Rev Bioética Derecho. (2018) 42:311–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2015.06.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Quirce C, Filippini V, Micó E. La utilización de los insectos en la gastronomía, un taller nutritivo. Cuadernos Biodivers. (2013) 43:11–21. doi: 10.14198/cdbio.2013.43.02

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Jansson A, Hunter D, Berggren Å. Insects as Food– an Option for Sustainable Food Production?, SLU Future Food Reports. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Science (2019). p. 7–9.

Google Scholar

31. Doi H, Galecli R, Mulia RN. The Merits of Entomophagy in the Post COVID-19 World. Amsterdam: Elsevier (2021). p. 849–54. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Skrivervik E. Insects’ contribution to the bioeconomy and the reduction of food waste. Heliyon. (2020) 6:e03934. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03934

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Orkusz A. Edible insects versus meat—nutritional comparison: knowledge of their composition is the key to good health. Nutrients. (2021) 13:1207. doi: 10.3390/nu13041207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Oonincx DGAB, Finke MD. Nutritional value of insects and ways to manipulate their composition. J Insects Food Feed. (2020) 7:639–59. doi: 10.3920/JIFF2020.0050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Gallinger C I, Federico FJ, Pighin DG, Cazaux N, Trossero M, Marsó A, et al. Determinación de la composición nutricional de la carne de pollo argentina. Diaeta. (2016) 34:10–8.

Google Scholar

36. FAO. Composition of Meat. Rome: FAO (2015).

Google Scholar

37. Rumpold BA, Schlüler O. Insect-based protein sources and their potential for human consumption: nutritional composition and processing. Anim Front. (2015) 5:20–24.

Google Scholar

38. Van Huis A, Itterbeeck J, Klinder H, Meterns E, Halloran A, Muir G, et al. Edible Insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security. Wageningen: Wageningen University & Research (2013).

Google Scholar

39. Pinho R, Correia P, Coelho C, Amaro da Costa C. The role of edible insects to mitigate challenges for sustainability. Open Agric. (2021) 6:24–36. doi: 10.1515/opag-2020-0206

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Gahukar RT. Entomophagy and human food security. Int J Trop Insect Sci. (2011) 31:129–44. doi: 10.1017/S1742758411000257

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Papastavropoulou K, Koupa A, Kritikou E, Kostais M, Proestos C. Edible insects: benefits and potential risk for consumers and food industry. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. (2021) 12:5131–49. doi: 10.33263/BRIAC124.51315149

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Data Basin. Los insectos del Orden Coleóptera para Latinoamérica y el Caribe. (2017).

Google Scholar

43. Data Basin. Los Insectos del Orden Lepidóptera para Latinoamérica y el Caribe. (2022). Available online at: https://databasin.org/maps/new/#datasets=0fbdd2693fc0473ab29fb9db30eaa65c (accessed February 14, 2022).

Google Scholar

44. Zumbado MA, Azofeifa D. Insectos de Importancia agrícola. Guía básica de entomología. Heredia, Costa Rica. Program Nacional Agric Orgán. (2018): 60–80.

Google Scholar

45. Data Basin. Los Insectos del Orden Himenóptera para Latinoamérica y el Caribe. (2022). Available online at: https://databasin.org/maps/new/#datasets=7f4812b29f094088bda0810f195d5cc7 (accessed February 14, 2022).

Google Scholar

46. Feng Y, Chen X-M, Zhao M, He Z, Sun L, Wang C-Y, et al. Edible insects in China: utilization and prospects. Insect Sci. (2018) 25:184–98. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12449

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Medeiros E. Anthropo-entomophagy in Latin America: an overview of the importance of edible insects to local communities. J Insects Food Feed. (2014) 1:17–23. doi: 10.3920/JIFF2014.0015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Kouøimská L, Adámkováb A. Nutritional and sensory quality of edible insects. NFS J. (2016) 4:22–6. doi: 10.1016/j.nfs.2016.07.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Payne CLR, Scarborough P, Rayner M, Nonaka K. Are edible insects more or less ‘healthy’ than commonly consumed meats? A comparison using two nutrient profiling models developed to combat over– and undernutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2016) 70:285–91. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.149

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Rumpold BA, Schlüter OK. Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2013) 57:802–23. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201200735

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Venn BJ. Macronutrients and human health for the 21st century. Nutrients. (2020) 12:2363. doi: 10.3390/nu12082363

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Meyer-Rochow VB, Gahukar RT, Ghosh S, Jung C. Chemical composition, nutrient quality and acceptability of edible insect are affected by species, developmental stage, gender, diet, and processing method. Foods. (2021) 10:1036. doi: 10.3390/foods10051036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Nowakowski AC, Miller AC, Miller ME, Xiao H, Wu X. Potential health benefits of edible insects. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2021) 5 :1–10. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1867053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Makkar HP, Tran G, Heuzé V, Ankers P. State-of-the-art on use of insects as animal feed. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2014) 197:1–33. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Kiprot V. Data from: Top Regions in the Global Edible Insect Market. WorldAltas. (2018). Available online at: https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/top-regions-in-the-global-edible-insect-market.html (accessed February 20, 2022).

Google Scholar

56. Melo-Ruiz V, Garcia M, Sandoval H, Jimenez HD, Calvo C. Quality proteins from edible indigenous insect food of Latin America and Asia. J Food Agric. (2011) 23:283–9.

Google Scholar

57. Carreño D. La Historia de la Bióloga Que Vende Gusano de Harina Para Consumo Humano – Goula. (2022). Available onlie at: https://goula.lat/la-historia-de-la-biologa-que-fundo-su-empresa-y-vende-gusano-de-harina-para-consumo-humano/ (accessed April 9, 2022).

Google Scholar

58. OptiProt. OptiProt. Mealworm, Proteína Natural y Abono Orgánico. Cuernavaca: OptiProt (2022).

Google Scholar

59. Tang C, Yang D, Liao H, Sun H, Liu C, Wei L, et al. Edible insects as a food source: a review. Food Prod Process Nutr. (2019) 1:8. doi: 10.1186/s43014-019-0008-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Cadinu L, Barra P, Torre F, Delogu F, Madau F. Insect rearing: potential, challenges, and circularity. Sustainability. (2020) 12:4567. doi: 10.3390/su12114567

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Dobermann D, Swift JA, Field LM. Opportunities and hurdles of edible insects for food and feed. Nutr Bull. (2017) 42:293–308. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12291

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Coudron C, Spranghers T, Elliot D, Halstead J. Insect Breeding. (2019). Available online at: https://www.bioboosteurope.com/assets/files/Report-Insect-Breeding-.pdf (accessed February 18, 2022).

Google Scholar

63. Parra JRP, Coelho A Jr. Insect rearing techniques for biological control programs, a component of sustainable agriculture in Brazil. Insects. (2022) 13:105. doi: 10.3390/insects13010105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Gahukar RT. Chapter 4 – edible insects farming: efficiency and impact on family livelihood, food security, and environment compared with livestock and crops. In: Aaron T, Juan A, Morales-Ramos M editors. Guadalupe Rojas, Insects as Sustainable Food Ingredients. (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press) (2016). p. 85–111. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802856-8.00004-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Enwemiwe VN, Popoola KOK. Edible Insects: Rearing Methods and Incorporation Into Commercial Food Products-A Critical Review. Abraka: Delta State University (2018).

Google Scholar

66. Van Huis A. Prospects of insects as food and feed. Organ Agric. (2020) 11:301–8. doi: 10.1007/s13165-020-00290-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. FAO. Cricket Farming for Human Consumption. (2013). Available online at: https://www.fao.org/teca/pt/technologies/7927 (accessed April 27, 2022).

Google Scholar

68. Delvendahl N, Rumpold BA, Langen N. Edible insects as food–insect welfare and ethical aspects from a consumer perspective. Insects. (2022) 13:121. doi: 10.3390/insects13020121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Costa JM, Murta DM, Novais T. Manual de Boas Práticas na Produção, Processamento e Utilização de Insetos na Alimentação Animal. (2018). Available online at: https://www.entogreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/manual_boas_praticas.pdf (accessed February 18, 2022).

Google Scholar

70. Raheem D, Carrascosa C, Bolanle-Oluwole O, Nieuwland M, Saraiva A, Millán R, et al. Traditional consumption of and rearing edible insects in Africa, Asia and Europe. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2018) 59:2169–88. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1440191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Cortes JA, Ruiz AT, Morales-Ramos JA, Thomas M, Rojas MG, Tomberlin JK, et al. Insects as sustainable food ingredients. Insect Mass Prod Technol. (2016) 6:153–95. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802856-8.00006-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Rowe A. Insects Farmed for Food and Feed —Global Scale, Practices, and Policy. (2020). Available online at: https://rethinkpriorities.org/publications/insects-raised-for-food-and-feed (accessed March 1, 2022).

Google Scholar

73. Kemsawasd V, Inthachat W, Suttisansanee U, Temviriyanukul P. Road to the red carpet of edible crickets through integration into the human food chain with biofunctions and sustainability: a review. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:1801. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031801

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Miech P, Berggren Å, Lindberg JE, Chhay T, Khieu B, Jansson A. Growth and survival of reared Cambodian field crickets (Teleogryllus testaceus) fed weeds, agricultural and food industry by-products. J Insects Food Feed. (2016) 2:285–92. doi: 10.3920/JIFF2016.0028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Orienda MA, Oloo JA, Magara HJO, Ayieko MA, Ekesi S, Roos N. Cricket rearing handbook services for science and education kingdom. Serv Sci Educ Stockport. (2021) 1–3. doi: 10.14738/eb.86.2020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Magara HJO, Niassy S, Ayieko MA, Mukundamago M, Egonyu JP, Tanga CM, et al. Edible crickets (Orthoptera) around the world: distribution, nutritional value, and other benefits—a review. Front Nutr. (2021) 7:537915. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.537915

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Straub P, Tanga CM, Osuga I, Windish W, Subramanian S. Experimental feeding studies with crickets and locusts on the use of feed mixtures composed of storable feed materials commonly used in livestock production. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2019) 255:114215. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114215

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Oloo JA, Ayieko M, Nyongesah JM. Acheta domesticus (Cricket) feed resources among smallholder farmers in Lake Victoria region of Kenya. Food Sci Nutr. (2020) 8:69–78. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1242

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Sialis. Raising Mealworms: Everything you Always Wanted to Know. (2018). Available online at: https://scienceclass3000.weebly.com/uploads/5/4/5/9/5459088/raising_mealworms.pdf (accessed February 18, 2022).

Google Scholar

80. Azzolin A. Everything you Need to Know Before Setting up a Mealworm Farm. (2021). Available online at: https://francosrl.com/news/mealworm-breeding/ (accessed February 18, 2022).

Google Scholar

81. Liu C, Masri J, Perez V, Maya C, Zhao J. Growth performance and nutrient composition of mealworms (Tenebrio molitor) fed on fresh plant materials-supplemented diets. Foods. (2020) 9:151. doi: 10.3390/foods9020151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Garruncho N. Rearing Conditions and the Effect of Pesticides on its Performance. Master thesis. Coimbra: Politécnico de Coimbra Escola Superior Agrária (2017).

Google Scholar

83. Adámková A, Adámek M, Mlček J, Borkovcová M, Bednárová M, Kourimská L, et al. Welfare of the mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) breeding with regard to nutrition value and food safety. Potr S J Food Sci. (2017) 11:460–5. doi: 10.5219/779

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Wang Y, Shelomi M. Review of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) as animal feed and human food. Foods. (2017) 6:91. doi: 10.3390/foods6100091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Zhang J, Huang L, He J, Tomberlin JK, Li J, Lei C, et al. An artificial light source influences mating and oviposition of black soldier flies, Hermetia illucens. J Insect Sci. (2010) 10:202. doi: 10.1673/031.010.20201

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Bullock N, Chapin E, Evans A, Elder B, Givens M, Jeffay N, et al. The Black Soldier Fly How-to-Guide. St. Paul, MN: Institute for the environment (2013).

Google Scholar

87. Caruso D, Devic E, Subamia I, Talamond P, Baras E. Technical handbook of domestication and production of diptera Black Soldier Fly (BSF) Hermetia illucens, Stratiomyidae. Bogor: PT Penerbit IPB Press (2013).

Google Scholar

88. Kampmeier G, Irwisa M. Commercialization of Insects and Their Products. In: Resh VH, Carde R editors. Encyclopedia of Insects. (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press) (2009). p. 220–7. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374144-8.00068-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Grabowski N, Abdilmawjood A, Acheuk F, Barragán K, Chhay T, Madeiros E, et al. Review: insects—a source of safe and sustainable food?— “Jein” (yes and no). Front Sustain Food Syst. (2022) 5:701797. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.701797

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Fellows P. Principle and Practice. Food Science, Technology and Nutrition. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing (2009). p. 369–80.

Google Scholar

91. Xiao H, Pan Z, Deng L, El-Mashad H, Yang X, Mujumdar A, et al. Recent developments and trends in thermal blanching – a comprehensive review. Inf Process Agric. (2017) 4:101–27. doi: 10.1016/j.inpa.2017.02.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Ojha S, Bubler S, Rossi G, Schlüter OK. Edible insect processing pathways and implementation of emerging technologies. J Insects Food Feed. (2021) 7:877–900. doi: 10.3920/jiff2020.0121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Elhassan M, Wendin K, Olsson V, Langton M. Quality aspects of insects as food- nutritional, sensory, and related concepts. Foods. (2019) 8:95. doi: 10.3390/foods8030095

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. European Food Safety Authority [EFSA]. Risk profile related to production and consumption of insects as food and feed. EFSA J. (2015) 13:4257. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4257

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Blanco DA, Giraldo DF. Desarrollo de una Barra tipo Granola a Base de Harina de Grillo Acheta Domesticus Como Principal Fuente Proteica. Degree thesis. Bogotá: Universidad de la salle (2016).

Google Scholar

96. Granados C, Acevedo D, Guzman LE. Tostado y harina de la hormiga santandereana “Atta laevigata”. Biotecnol Sector Agropecuario Agroind. (2013) 11:68–74.

Google Scholar

97. Halloran A, Roos N, Eilenberg J, Cerutti A, Bruun S. Life cycle assessment of edible insects for food protein: a review. Agron Sustain Dev. (2016) 36:57. doi: 10.1007/s13593-016-0392-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Lähteenmäki-utela A, Marimuthu SB, Meijer N. Regulations on insects as food and feed: a global comparison. J Insects Food Feed. (2021) 7:849–56. doi: 10.3920/jiff2020.0066

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Essid C. Entomophagy in the Western World: Promoting the Insurmountable. (2017). Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327822009_Entomophagy_in_the_Western_world_promoting_the_insurmountable (accessed April 9, 20220).

Google Scholar

100. Kröger T, Dupont J, Büsing L, Fiebelkorn F. Acceptance of insect-based food products in Western Societies: a systematic review. Front Nutr. (2022) 8:759885. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.759885

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. EXO. Sustainable Prebiotic Performance. (2022). Available online at: https://exoprotein.com/ (accessed December 15, 2021).

Google Scholar

102. Acevedo JA. Modelo de Negocios de un Emprendimiento a Base de Insectos. Degree thesis. Santiago de Chile: Universidad de Chile (2021).

Google Scholar

103. Becrit. Por qué Comer Insectos? (2022). Available online at: https://www.becrit.com/pages/beneficios-sostenibles-y-medioambientales (accessed December 15, 2021).

Google Scholar

104. Crunchycritters. The UK’s Leading Supplier of Varied and Exclusive Ready to Eat Edible Insect Products Since 2011. (2022). Available online at: https://www.crunchycritters.com/about-us/ (accessed December 15, 2021).

Google Scholar

105. Entosense. Entomophagy for a Healthy Future. Lewiston, ME: ENTOSENSE (2019).

Google Scholar

106. Griyum. Harina de Grillo. (2020). Available online at: https://www.griyum.com.mx/ (accessed December 15, 2021).

Google Scholar

107. Entomo Farms. Healthier For You & Our Planet. Norwood: ENTOMO FARMS (2021).

Google Scholar

108. Chapul Farms. Increasing Food Security With the Power of Insects. McMinnville, OR: CHAPUL FARMS (2018).

Google Scholar

109. Sens Foods Operations. Maximal Nutrition Minimal Harm. (accessed December 15, 2021).

Google Scholar

110. Espitia PA, Hernández LM, Burkar S, Palmer S, Cardoso JA. Forage-fed insects as food and feed source: opportunities and constraints of edible insects in the tropics. Front Sustain Food Syst. (2021) 5:724628. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.724628

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Gobierno de Argentina. Comida a Base de Insectos, el Alimento del Futuro Que ya Llegó a ARGENTINA. (2020). Available online at: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/noticias/comida-base-de-insectos-el-alimento-del-futuro-que-ya-llego-argentina-0 (accessed December 18, 2020).

Google Scholar

112. Economía verde. Ento Piruw. (2022). Available online at: https://economiaverde.pe/pymes/ento-piruw/ (accessed March 9, 2022).

Google Scholar

113. Food for the Future. EN F4F BUSCAMOS ASEGURAR LA ALIMENTACIÓN DEL FUTURO. (2020). Available online at: https://f4f.cl/nosotros/ (accessed December 12, 2021).

Google Scholar

114. Costa EM, Ramos-Elorduy J. Los insectos comestibles de Brasil: etnicidad, diversidad e importancia en la alimentación. Bol Soc Entomol Arag. (2006) 38:423–42.

Google Scholar

115. Costa-Neto EM. Edible insects in Latin America: old challenges, new opportunities. J Insects Food Feed. (2016) 2:1–2. doi: 10.3920/jiff2016.x001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Bermudez IM. Exploring the Production and Export Potential of Cricket Powder in Costa Rica. Master thesis. Leipzig: Leipzig University (2020).

Google Scholar

117. Guache. Arthrofood. (2019). Available online at: https://guachefoods.com/arthrofood/ (accessed December 15, 2021).

Google Scholar

118. Pulido VC, González CF, Tapia YM, Celis XM. Insectos: recursos del pasado que podrían ser una solución nutricional para el futuro. Avances Invest Agropecuaria. (2020) 24:81–100.

Google Scholar

119. Beltran JS. Caracterizacion Nutricional de las Especies de Hormiga Culona (Atta laevigata) el Gusano Mojojoy (Ancognatha scarabaeoides) y la de Grillo Común (Acheta domestica), en el Departamento de Santander, Para su Implementacion en Preparaciones Gastronómicas. (2019). Available online at: https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.12749/11816/2019_Tesis_Juan_Sebastian_Beltran_Rangel.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed February 8, 2022).

Google Scholar

120. Cartay R. Entre el Asombro y el Asco: el Consumo de Insectos en la Cuenca Amazónica. El Caso del Rhynchophorus Palmarum (Coleoptera Curculionidae). Portoviejo: Universidad San Gregorio de Portoviejo (2017). doi: 10.22380/2539472X.465

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Sánchez MJ, Castellanos N. Desarrollo de Carne de Hamburguesa a Base de Harina de Grillo. Tesis de Proyecto de Grado. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes (2021).

Google Scholar

122. Ambrosio A, Indira L, Deaza MP, Ramírez B. Desde Cundinamarca Harina de grillo Gastronomía y sostenibilidad Para Colombia y el Mundo. Cundinamarca: Universidad de La Sabana (2021).

Google Scholar

123. Van Huis A. Edible insects contributing to food security? Agric Food Secur. (2015) 4:20. doi: 10.1186/s40066-015-0041-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Michael C, Falk M, Chassy K, Harlander J, Hoban IV, Martina N, et al. Food biotechnology: benefits and concerns. J Nutr. (2002) 132:1384–90. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.6.1384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. FAO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World. Rome: FAO (2019).

Google Scholar

126. Imathiu S. Benefits and food safety concerns associated with consumption of edible insects. NFS J. (2020) 18:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.nfs.2019.11.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. United Nations Development Programme. Goal2: Zero Hunger. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme (2022).

Google Scholar

128. United Nations. Goal 2: End Hunger, Achieve Food Security and Improved Nutrition and Promote Sustainable Agriculture. New York, NY: United Nations (2022).

Google Scholar

129. FAO, PAHO, WFP, UNICEF. Regional Overview of Food Security and Nutrition in Latin America and the Caribean. Santiago: FAO, PAHO, WFP, UNICEF (2019). p. 135., doi: 10.4060/ca6979en

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. PAHO. New UN report: Hunger in Latin America and the Caribbean rose by 13.8 Million People in Just One Year. Washington, DC: PAHO (2021).

Google Scholar

131. Van Huis A, Oonincx DGAB. The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. (2017) 37:43. doi: 10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Oonincx DGAB, van Itterbeeck J, Heetkamp MJW, van den Brand H, van Loon JJA, van Huis A. An exploration on greenhouse gas and ammonia production. insect species suitable for animal or human consumption. PLoS One. (2010) 5:e14445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014445

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Durst P. Forest Insects as Food: Humans Bite Back. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. (2010). Available online at: http://www.doc-developpement-durable.org/file/Elevages/Insectes/edible%20forest%20insects.pdf (accessed February 22, 2022).

Google Scholar

134. Tao J, Olive Li Y. Edible insects as a means to address global malnutrition and food insecurity issues. Food Qual Saf. (2018) 2:17–26. doi: 10.1093/fqsafe/fyy001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Lange W, Nakamura Y. Edible insects as future food: chances and challenges. J Future Foods. (2021) 1:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jfutfo.2021.10.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Dickie F, Miyamoto M, Collins C. The potential of insect farming to increase food security. In: Mikkola H editor. Edible Insects. (London: IntechOpen) (2019). doi: 10.5772/intechopen.88106

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: food production, eco-friendly, beneficial nutrition, Latin America, insects, entomophagy

Citation: Abril S, Pinzón M, Hernández-Carrión M and Sánchez-Camargo AdP (2022) Edible Insects in Latin America: A Sustainable Alternative for Our Food Security. Front. Nutr. 9:904812. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.904812

Received: 25 March 2022; Accepted: 19 April 2022;
Published: 27 May 2022.

Edited by:

Zhaojun Wei, Hefei University of Technology, China

Reviewed by:

Jun Wang, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, China
Ronghai He, Jiangsu University, Chinao
Yan-Qun Liu, Shenyang Agricultural University, China

Copyright © 2022 Abril, Pinzón, Hernández-Carrión and Sánchez-Camargo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Andrea del Pilar Sánchez-Camargo, ad.sanchez@uniandes.edu.co

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Download